WEBVTT - RNC Co-Chair Lara Trump Talks 2024 Presidential Election

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 2>I am Kaylee Liones here on Balance of Power on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV and Radio, where we brought you the news

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>earlier this week from the Harris campaign about a milestone

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>crossed half a billion dollars fundraised since Joe Biden left

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the race five weeks ago, five hundred and forty million

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 2>to be exact, of which eighty two million, the campaign

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 2>says was raised at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>last week. Now I will note here for full disclosure,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael Bloomberg Michael R. Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg LP, has contributed nineteen million dollars to Future Forward,

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>which is a flagship super pac supporting Harris. I say

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 2>that as we aim here to provide you with all

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 2>of the facts, and the facts are right now there

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>is a fundraising gap between Trump and the RNC and Harris,

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 2>and the DNC filing show that the Biden to Harris

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>campaign has raised more than a billion dollars this cycle,

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>while Trump and the RNC has raised a little north

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>of six hundred and thirty five million dollars. And it

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>is to the RNC and co chair we go. Now,

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Laura Trump, I'm pleased to say, is joining me here

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg.

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>TV and Radio.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>She, of course, is the co chair of the Republican

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 2>National Committee. Great to have you, Laura, Welcome back to Bloomberg.

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Is we considered this fundraising gap, how do you aim

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to close it? Who do you go to?

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, listen, I don't think we ever keep pace

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>with Democrats traditionally as Republicans. Look, you look back at

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton,

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and she far outraised us, and we know the outcome

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of that election. Now. Of course, money is important. It

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>affords us the ability to buy TV ads, to do

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>digital advertising, to have a great ground game, and we're

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>really proud of the number that we've raised so far.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I think our most proud number may be our small

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar digital online fundraising. We are approaching our fiftieth day

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of over a million dollars raised in small dollar donations.

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>These are donations under like forty dollars on average, And

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what that says is that you have the

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>support of the American people behind Donald Trump right now.

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So we always aim to raise more money. We always

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>try to encourage people to donate, and even in this

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>bad economy that really is hurting so many people, we

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are still seeing very big fundraising numbers for Donald Trump.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, as you talk about the small dollar donors specifically,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 2>is that where you think more of the money you

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 2>can raise will come from from the grassroots or there

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 2>are other big ticket donors that you think you can

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 2>pull in who may not have yet contributed to the campaign.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we do. We do have our eye on some

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>donors who we're bringing back into the fold, or maybe

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>some new door't I won't give any names today, but

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>some new donors as well. Look, you've seen Donald Trump

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really resonate with Silicon Valley over the past six months

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>or so, and I think he's really shaken a lot

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of people awake, and a lot of people are now

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>realizing how much better off their life, their businesses, and

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the trajectory of this country were when he was in office.

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you're seeing a lot of new donors and

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>first time donors as well come in in a very

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>big way. I do a lot of fundraising calls, I

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>go to a lot of fundraising events, and oftentimes there

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are people coming up to me saying I have never

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>been to any political fundraiser in my life. I'm here

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>maxing out to the RNC and the Trump campaign because

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they want Donald Trump back in office.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, ma'am, of course, it's one thing to raise money.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 2>It's another to consider how to spend it, and what

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the strategy should be and how it should change. Now

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that it's Kamala Harris at the top of the Democratic

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>ticket instead of Joe Biden, polling is consistently showing us

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that it does seem the map may be wider for

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>her than it was for Biden in terms of states

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 2>she could win. She of course is spending time in

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Georgia today. There's indications she's pulling better in North Carolina.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you have to rethink your allocation to some of

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>those states, like in the Sun Belt now that it

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>is the Harris campaign not the Biden one.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, listen, of course you have a different candidate.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You do have to change your tactic to an extent.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And we certainly are doing certain things in very specific states,

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking at all the same polling as well,

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're making sure that where we need to kind

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of firm things up, we're going to allocate a little

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more money there, We're going to put more boots

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in those areas. So yeah, it's a

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>different game. But look, I think that apparently we're going

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to hear from Kamala Harris herself in her first television

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>interview alongside her running mate tomorrow night. We'll see how

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>that goes. And I think that after the September tenth debate,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see another shift in numbers.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think people are going to very clearly see who

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris is. She's got a lot of questions to answer.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>She seems to have avoided the media very well to

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this point, and we really don't know where she stands

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of issues. And so I believe once

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the American people are not only reminded that she's been

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in office for three and a half years, that life

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>is harder because she has been vice president as well

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for three and a half years, and she's got to

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sell the American people on four more years of this.

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe we're going to see polling shift again. And

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>we feel very confident all across the country that we

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have our eye and exactly what we need to focus on,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and that indeed, Donald Trump will be reelected on November fifth.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, will wait and see what further detail we get

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 2>from Kamala Harrison that interview tomorrow. But if I could

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>just get some more detail from you, Laura, you are

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about identifying potentially areas in which you will now

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>need to shift strategy and invest more resources. Could you

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>illustrate for us where some of those areas are. Is

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>it North Carolina? Is it Georgia? Where exactly are you

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 2>now targeting to a greater degree?

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, listen, North Carolina is definitely a state where

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen some movement. It looked very positive for Donald

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Trump in whenever he was going against Joe Biden. It

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>still shows Donald Trump up on Kamala Harris. But we

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that we increase that lead, so

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we certainly are prepared to put more money into that state.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It is my home state, and it's one that I

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of course want to win, and I think Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is a must win state. I think that you know,

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>every election cycle we have seen consistently how important that

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>state has become. I think the margins have tightened quite

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit there. You're going to see Donald Trump in

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin coming up today, and so you know, we're making

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>sure that everywhere that we felt very good prior to

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris being the nominee for the Democrats, we want

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to feel just as good on the other side of things.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're prepared to invest wherever we need.

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, as you look at your home state, are you

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 2>worried that the gubernatorial candidate there, Mark Robinson could actually

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 2>create a drag on Donald Trump's own chances to see

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.559
<v Speaker 2>a problematic candidate for the Republican Party.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, listen, I don't think you've ever seen that sort

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of movement for Donald Trump. In fact, I would say

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the opposite. I think that Donald Trump typically helps

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>out the candidates in these various races, down ballot races,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's within the state or for the House or

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, and so that's not a concern at all.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think you're going to look to races

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the race in Montana, the Senate race there,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>You're going to look at Ohio and Pennsylvanian. I think

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see that Donald Trump is going to

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>be a huge boost for a lot of the down

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ballot candidates and the races within those various states, So

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not a concern for us at all.

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, of course, you know Donald Trump better than most

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>people ever. Will You are not just the CoA chair

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of the r and C, you are also his daughter

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>in law. And what we have heard from Donald Trump

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty consistently in recent weeks on the campaign trail is

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 2>that he is hearing from people close to him, his advisors,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>that they want him to focus on policy less so

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>on personal attacks. But it does seem, and he has

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>said as much that he'd like to keep going with

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the personal attacks. Do you have his ear on that, Laura,

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>as his daughter in law as RNC co chair, do

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you think he should be focusing more on policy?

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, I certainly have his ear, and he certainly asked

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>my opinion about a variety of different things. And listen,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that people have been very quick to criticize

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump for the way he operates, and he definitely

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>does not operate, Keyley, like a typical politician. He's still,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>even though he was president for four years, doesn't like

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to consider himself a politician. And I actually think you

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>look back at the twenty sixteen election, for example, Donald

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump was such a great brander of people that it

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>really gave him an edge during the primary with sixteen

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>other candidates, all of whom could have been great presidents

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>or great presidential nominees for the Republican ticket. And you

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the way that he branded Hillary Clinton. You

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the way that even in the early primaries

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four, you saw him do the same

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>thing with people like Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley. It's

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump who was left standing at the end. So

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people don't agree with the way he operates in

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, but I actually think that people down the

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>line start to realize maybe he had the right idea

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to begin with.

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, something else that many may disagree with Donald Trump

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>about is whether or not he should be willing to

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>say now, I will accept the results of the election,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>whatever they are. Instead, what we have heard from him

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 2>as suggestions that as long as he thinks it was

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 2>free and fair, that's when he will decide. Some have

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>read that is if he wins, he'll accept those results,

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>especially considering that at the RNC, Laura, you are not

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.479
<v Speaker 2>just charged with getting a Republican elected to the presidency.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>It's about the Republican Party as a whole in the

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 2>balance of power in Washington, or you can that kind

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of rhetoric around election integrity may actually harm the Senate

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 2>and congressional candidates who are trying to keep hold of

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the House and turn the Senate blue. What if they're

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 2>able to do that and your father in law does

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 2>not win, is he still going to claim that this

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 2>election was not valid.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think that what you've heard from Donald Trump

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is if this is a fair election, which is something

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that I'm working on day and night at the RNC.

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the number one focus of the RNC right now.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>We have a huge election integrity operation because, let's be honest,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>half the country had a lot of questions, maybe more

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>about twenty twenty. Those questions were never answered. People are

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>just supposed to forget about him. And it's paramount that

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States of America we trust our electoral process.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>This is integral to who we are as a country,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and so we are trying to re establish that trust.

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Every day. We're doing everything we possibly can making sure

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that people are confident that no matter if you're voting

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for a Republican, a Democrat, or a third party candidate

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>in this country, your vote matters in your vote counts,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately, we've gotten a lot of pushback from Democrat

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>run states, and it's been very challenging to get transparency

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in an issue where we really need transparency. But I

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>believe that what we are doing right now at the

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>RNC is going to further the notion that we do

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>indeed have free, fair and transparent elections. And so I

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think Donald Trump saying if this is a free election

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and a fair election and there's no funny business here,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>is a perfectly legitimate thing to say, because again, you

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>go ask half the country, they don't feel like everything

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was completely fair in twenty twenty.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, Laura Trump, appreciate you joining us here on

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg TV and radio. The co chair of the rn C,

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. And of course, for those that

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 2>do still have questions about the results of twenty twenty,

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden did win the election, and no court found

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>that there was anything actually wrong with the democratic process.