WEBVTT - Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Talks Inflation; US Economy

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>We welcome our TV audience and radio listeners here in Virginia.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting down with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Thank you

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>so much, Madam Secretary, for joining Bloomberg.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to the invitation.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.760
<v Speaker 2>We're in Stafford County. This is a county that Trump

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 2>won in twenty sixteen but flipped to Biden in twenty twenty,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and you're here to talk about the fiscal agenda that

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 2>we've seen out of this administration, bringing highlighting. You're going

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>to highlight there's millions of dollars to broadband in rural

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>areas like Virginia. Yet when you look at consumer sentiment

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>recent on Friday the Michigan Serve, and you look at

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>recent polls, inflation remains.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Top of vine for American voters.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 2>How do you get them to potentially look at the

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>way you look at how the economy is working well.

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>The cost of living in many areas is very high,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and it is a concern to Americans, and it is

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>President Biden's top priceority to do all he can to

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>bring down the cost of living. Why I'm here in

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Stafford County though, is it really illustrates one way in

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 3>which that's going to occur. I'm looking at an area

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>that has been deprived, has had really no access to

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 3>the Internet at all, sufficiently remote part of Virginia, and

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 3>President Biden has made a commitment that every American household

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 3>and business should have access to the Internet, and funds

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>that were included in the American Rescue Plan that was

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>passed in twenty twenty one and then later the bipart

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 3>is an Infrastructure Bill provided substantial funding to make sure

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that the Internet is available everywhere and that it's also affordable.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 3>And what we saw during the pandemic is that access

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>to the Internet is critical to education, to jobs, to healthcare,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's really a critical tool that every family needs

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 3>to have access to. And so making that available and

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>making sure it's affordable, which is what I'm going to

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 3>be seeing here today. Project that has succeeded in reaching

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 3>about seven hundred households in this area. This is one

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>way in which President Biden's working to lower the cost

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of living, but there are many other areas as well.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Prescription drugs brought down the cost of insulin to thirty

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 3>five dollars a month, working very hard to bring down

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the cost of energy. At the same time, we're protecting

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:13.119
<v Speaker 3>the environment and bolstering the finances of households by extending

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 3>the child tax credit and an income tax credit.

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>If inflation, though, is still top of mind of American

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Americans today, why then tomorrow, or it's likely expected the

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 2>bid administration is going to lift the walls even higher

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to Chinese goods, why then raised tariffs?

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>The President believes that it's critically important for the United

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 3>States to have a role and a presence in strategic

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>industries like semiconductors and like clean energy that are going

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>to be the foundation of good jobs and national security

0:03:55.960 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 3>in the decades ahead. He believes it's receptible, as I do,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to be completely dependent on China in these areas, and

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>he wants to make sure, given that China is really

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>not playing by the rules in the sense they have

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 3>enormous subsidies in critical areas of advanced manufacturing has resulted

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 3>in over capacity, he wants to make sure that the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 3>stimulus that's being provided through the Inflation Reduction Act to

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 3>support these industries. And these are industries that are creating

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 3>good manufacturing jobs in parts of the country that have

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 3>been overlooked or have suffered from de industrialization in the past.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>The President wants to make sure that he protects these investments.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to get ahead of the three

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 3>to zero one review on tariffs, but this is a

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 3>commitment that UH President Biden has made and I agree

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>with that. I was in China just a couple of

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago and made clear that we would not allow

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Chinese over capacity to harm our emerging industries.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Does the US want a trade war though with China?

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>We w We believe that we should have a deep

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and productive and that we do in most areas UH

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>trade and investment relationship. We're working to stabilize our economic relationship.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 3>We do not wish to disengage from China economically, but

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>we do think that the playing field should be fair,

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>and China engages in unfair practices like massive subsidies of

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>industries they have decided are critical, and those are cases

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>where we will act to protect ourselves.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 2>We've seen Beijing in the past as though respond and

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>it's become tit for tat.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you expecting a response?

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Could they go after Tesla or maybe American farm products?

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Well? President Biden believes that anything we do should be

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 3>targeted to our concerns and not broad based. And hopefully

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 3>we will not see a significant Chinese response, but that's

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 3>always a possibility.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>China is big focus going into the election.

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 2>We hear the former president also talk about he wants

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to put a sixty percent import tariff potential and all

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Chinese goods. He also over the weekend was talking about

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the Trump era tax cuts that are set to expire

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>next year. Trump over the weekend said, Biden will give

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you a tax hike. If it was up to Trump,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>it would be a cut on upper middle, lower and

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the business class. Are you envisioning these tax cuts to

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 2>be extended.

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, what President Biden has said, and I certainly strongly

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 3>agree with it, is that we want to make sure

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 3>that working families earning under four hundred thousand dollars are

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>not faced with the tax hike, but all of the

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 3>wealthy individuals and corporations that benefited from the Tax Cut

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and Jobs Act, where there are provisions that are going

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 3>to expire. The President, for the sake of working families

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and tax fairness, believes that the rich incorporation should pay

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>their fair share. And I would say that CBO. The

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that extending all of the

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 3>provisions of TCJA would cost five trillion dollars over the

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>next decade. And we really do need to be on

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 3>a fiscally sustainable path. The President has already signed and

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>put into effect a trillion dollars of deficit reduction over

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 3>the next decade, and he's proposed in his twenty twenty

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>five budget in additional three trillion dollars worth of deficit reduction.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>It really is critical that we are in a fiscally

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>sustainable path. So TCJA, the bulk of the benefits went

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>to the wealthy and to corporations. It blew away the deficit.

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 3>It caused huge increase in the deficit. It promised an

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 3>investment boom, and we didn't see it.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 2>So should tax revenues be used to lower the deficit? Yes,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.599
<v Speaker 2>that one for Biden or where they go to social programs?

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 3>President Biden believes it's important to invest in areas of

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 3>the economy that will help us grow and create good jobs,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>and his budget is won that proposes helping working families

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and undertaking investments that are critical to our future, but

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>also raising taxes on wealthy individuals who he believes they

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 3>are not paying their fair share, and raising taxes on

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 3>corporations that are doing extremely well, and he would both

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>invest in America and help working families and lower the deficit.

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>The US at the moment is spending just as much

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>every year at this point on paying off our debt

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>as it is funding our military. Just the usd lower

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>interest rates in order to balance the budget.

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have to take the interest rate path that

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 3>prevails in the economy as given. The President's budget incorporates

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the assumption that interest rates will be in line with

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 3>the projections of private sector forecasters. So there has been

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>an increase in the interest rate path that's assumed, and

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>it's necessary to make sure that we're in a fiscally

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>sustainable path. Of course, the higher interest rate path makes

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>that more difficult, but the president's budget would hold I

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>see the key metric that summarizes the burden of deficits

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>as being its interest cost, and the President's plan would

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>hold interest costs at historical levels and not allow them

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>to rise above that.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>The federal deficit, though now, is at a level we

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>really don't see outside of recessions. Is anyone in Washington

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>seriously concerned about this, real conversations about bringing debt back

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to a sustainable path.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, as I said, the interest cost of the debt

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 3>is a good way to measure its burden. Generally, interest

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 3>rates have been lower in spite of recent increases, they

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>have been lower than they were in past decades. And

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>that means that metrics like the ratio of debt to GDP,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 3>we can probably manage and have a fiscally sustainable path

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>with somewhat higher ratio of debt to GDP. But it's

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 3>important to make sure that the real interest burden of

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the debt, which is a measure of the burden it's

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 3>placing our economy, we have to make sure that that

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 3>stays in historically normal level.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>This isn't just a complain of fiscal hawks either. This

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 2>is a complaint. I heard a lot at the IMF

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 2>World Bank meetings. A lot of countries are lining up

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 2>learned about the path that the US is on and

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>what also that means for the US dollar. I hurt

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people reminiscent of the Nixon times say

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the US it's our currency, but it's your problem, is

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 2>it right? In that context, then that other countries should

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 2>be intervening well.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Our position is that major countries like those in the

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 3>G seven, and this has been agreed in the G seven,

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 3>should have market determined exchange rates, and if intervention occurs,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 3>it should be rare, well communicated, and largely to address

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>excessive fluctuations in currencies. That's the system that we essentially

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 3>have in place, and I think it's worked well. And

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>of course differences in the stance of monetary policy across

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 3>countries is a factor that influences the value of exchange rates.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure this is going to come up on your

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 2>next trip. You're going to be meeting with your G

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>seven partners in Italy. There have been reports that Japan

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 2>has intervened twice. You've said it should be communicated, it

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>should be rare, but they actually haven't worked.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So why does it matter.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I'm not going to comment on a situation

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 3>in a specific country. I just want to leave it

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 3>as when there is excessive volatility, it's possible for countries

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to intervene. It doesn't always work without more fundamental changes

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>in policy, but we believe that should happen very rarely

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 3>and be communicated to trade partners. If it does.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 2>Just on a final point and in this FX world,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna get your G seven partners.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a currency pair that you watch the most?

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Watch certainly the value of the dollar visa V major

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 3>currencies like the Euro, the en, the remnant b but

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>what your currency developments generally.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, Treasure Secretary Janet Yellen, We thank you so much

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>for your time. That was, of course US Treasury Secretary

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Janet Yellen in Virginia talking about and highlighting the millions

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>of dollars that have come out of the fiscal agenda

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>of the Biden administration, and today during this Infrastructure Week,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>it is about expanding broadband in royal areas.