1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:06,760 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 2: We welcome our TV audience and radio listeners here in Virginia. 3 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 2: I'm sitting down with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Thank you 4 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:16,400 Speaker 2: so much, Madam Secretary, for joining Bloomberg. 5 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:17,079 Speaker 1: Thanks to the invitation. 6 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:20,760 Speaker 2: We're in Stafford County. This is a county that Trump 7 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:23,960 Speaker 2: won in twenty sixteen but flipped to Biden in twenty twenty, 8 00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 2: and you're here to talk about the fiscal agenda that 9 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:30,159 Speaker 2: we've seen out of this administration, bringing highlighting. You're going 10 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:32,920 Speaker 2: to highlight there's millions of dollars to broadband in rural 11 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:37,120 Speaker 2: areas like Virginia. Yet when you look at consumer sentiment 12 00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:39,720 Speaker 2: recent on Friday the Michigan Serve, and you look at 13 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 2: recent polls, inflation remains. 14 00:00:41,680 --> 00:00:43,280 Speaker 1: Top of vine for American voters. 15 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:45,839 Speaker 2: How do you get them to potentially look at the 16 00:00:45,840 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 2: way you look at how the economy is working well. 17 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 3: The cost of living in many areas is very high, 18 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 3: and it is a concern to Americans, and it is 19 00:00:57,800 --> 00:01:02,640 Speaker 3: President Biden's top priceority to do all he can to 20 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 3: bring down the cost of living. Why I'm here in 21 00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:12,080 Speaker 3: Stafford County though, is it really illustrates one way in 22 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:19,759 Speaker 3: which that's going to occur. I'm looking at an area 23 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 3: that has been deprived, has had really no access to 24 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:31,839 Speaker 3: the Internet at all, sufficiently remote part of Virginia, and 25 00:01:32,160 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 3: President Biden has made a commitment that every American household 26 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:43,759 Speaker 3: and business should have access to the Internet, and funds 27 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:47,480 Speaker 3: that were included in the American Rescue Plan that was 28 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:52,000 Speaker 3: passed in twenty twenty one and then later the bipart 29 00:01:52,120 --> 00:01:57,760 Speaker 3: is an Infrastructure Bill provided substantial funding to make sure 30 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:04,960 Speaker 3: that the Internet is available everywhere and that it's also affordable. 31 00:02:05,400 --> 00:02:09,840 Speaker 3: And what we saw during the pandemic is that access 32 00:02:09,880 --> 00:02:17,880 Speaker 3: to the Internet is critical to education, to jobs, to healthcare, 33 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:23,160 Speaker 3: and it's really a critical tool that every family needs 34 00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:27,639 Speaker 3: to have access to. And so making that available and 35 00:02:27,680 --> 00:02:30,720 Speaker 3: making sure it's affordable, which is what I'm going to 36 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 3: be seeing here today. Project that has succeeded in reaching 37 00:02:37,320 --> 00:02:42,639 Speaker 3: about seven hundred households in this area. This is one 38 00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:46,720 Speaker 3: way in which President Biden's working to lower the cost 39 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:50,120 Speaker 3: of living, but there are many other areas as well. 40 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:56,560 Speaker 3: Prescription drugs brought down the cost of insulin to thirty 41 00:02:56,600 --> 00:03:01,800 Speaker 3: five dollars a month, working very hard to bring down 42 00:03:01,880 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 3: the cost of energy. At the same time, we're protecting 43 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:13,119 Speaker 3: the environment and bolstering the finances of households by extending 44 00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:16,959 Speaker 3: the child tax credit and an income tax credit. 45 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,920 Speaker 2: If inflation, though, is still top of mind of American 46 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:25,520 Speaker 2: Americans today, why then tomorrow, or it's likely expected the 47 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:27,920 Speaker 2: bid administration is going to lift the walls even higher 48 00:03:27,960 --> 00:03:33,480 Speaker 2: when it comes to Chinese goods, why then raised tariffs? 49 00:03:33,520 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 3: The President believes that it's critically important for the United 50 00:03:40,160 --> 00:03:44,160 Speaker 3: States to have a role and a presence in strategic 51 00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:49,800 Speaker 3: industries like semiconductors and like clean energy that are going 52 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:55,840 Speaker 3: to be the foundation of good jobs and national security 53 00:03:55,960 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 3: in the decades ahead. He believes it's receptible, as I do, 54 00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 3: to be completely dependent on China in these areas, and 55 00:04:08,040 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 3: he wants to make sure, given that China is really 56 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,279 Speaker 3: not playing by the rules in the sense they have 57 00:04:16,520 --> 00:04:22,880 Speaker 3: enormous subsidies in critical areas of advanced manufacturing has resulted 58 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:27,640 Speaker 3: in over capacity, he wants to make sure that the 59 00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 3: stimulus that's being provided through the Inflation Reduction Act to 60 00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:37,320 Speaker 3: support these industries. And these are industries that are creating 61 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:43,760 Speaker 3: good manufacturing jobs in parts of the country that have 62 00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:49,400 Speaker 3: been overlooked or have suffered from de industrialization in the past. 63 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:54,120 Speaker 3: The President wants to make sure that he protects these investments. 64 00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 3: And I don't want to get ahead of the three 65 00:04:56,920 --> 00:05:00,560 Speaker 3: to zero one review on tariffs, but this is a 66 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,840 Speaker 3: commitment that UH President Biden has made and I agree 67 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 3: with that. I was in China just a couple of 68 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:11,000 Speaker 3: weeks ago and made clear that we would not allow 69 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:17,160 Speaker 3: Chinese over capacity to harm our emerging industries. 70 00:05:17,279 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 2: Does the US want a trade war though with China? 71 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:23,800 Speaker 3: We w We believe that we should have a deep 72 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:27,920 Speaker 3: and productive and that we do in most areas UH 73 00:05:27,960 --> 00:05:34,040 Speaker 3: trade and investment relationship. We're working to stabilize our economic relationship. 74 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:40,120 Speaker 3: We do not wish to disengage from China economically, but 75 00:05:40,240 --> 00:05:43,039 Speaker 3: we do think that the playing field should be fair, 76 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 3: and China engages in unfair practices like massive subsidies of 77 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:56,120 Speaker 3: industries they have decided are critical, and those are cases 78 00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:58,760 Speaker 3: where we will act to protect ourselves. 79 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,279 Speaker 2: We've seen Beijing in the past as though respond and 80 00:06:01,320 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 2: it's become tit for tat. 81 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:03,960 Speaker 1: Are you expecting a response? 82 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 2: Could they go after Tesla or maybe American farm products? 83 00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 3: Well? President Biden believes that anything we do should be 84 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:19,360 Speaker 3: targeted to our concerns and not broad based. And hopefully 85 00:06:19,480 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 3: we will not see a significant Chinese response, but that's 86 00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:24,920 Speaker 3: always a possibility. 87 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:27,240 Speaker 1: China is big focus going into the election. 88 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:29,719 Speaker 2: We hear the former president also talk about he wants 89 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:33,440 Speaker 2: to put a sixty percent import tariff potential and all 90 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 2: Chinese goods. He also over the weekend was talking about 91 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:39,720 Speaker 2: the Trump era tax cuts that are set to expire 92 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:43,240 Speaker 2: next year. Trump over the weekend said, Biden will give 93 00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:45,320 Speaker 2: you a tax hike. If it was up to Trump, 94 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 2: it would be a cut on upper middle, lower and 95 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:52,240 Speaker 2: the business class. Are you envisioning these tax cuts to 96 00:06:52,279 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 2: be extended. 97 00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:57,640 Speaker 3: Well, what President Biden has said, and I certainly strongly 98 00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:00,719 Speaker 3: agree with it, is that we want to make sure 99 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:05,839 Speaker 3: that working families earning under four hundred thousand dollars are 100 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:10,240 Speaker 3: not faced with the tax hike, but all of the 101 00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 3: wealthy individuals and corporations that benefited from the Tax Cut 102 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:19,160 Speaker 3: and Jobs Act, where there are provisions that are going 103 00:07:19,240 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 3: to expire. The President, for the sake of working families 104 00:07:25,800 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 3: and tax fairness, believes that the rich incorporation should pay 105 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 3: their fair share. And I would say that CBO. The 106 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:42,200 Speaker 3: Congressional Budget Office recently estimated that extending all of the 107 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:47,720 Speaker 3: provisions of TCJA would cost five trillion dollars over the 108 00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:52,280 Speaker 3: next decade. And we really do need to be on 109 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:57,760 Speaker 3: a fiscally sustainable path. The President has already signed and 110 00:07:57,840 --> 00:08:02,480 Speaker 3: put into effect a trillion dollars of deficit reduction over 111 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 3: the next decade, and he's proposed in his twenty twenty 112 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 3: five budget in additional three trillion dollars worth of deficit reduction. 113 00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:17,040 Speaker 3: It really is critical that we are in a fiscally 114 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:23,520 Speaker 3: sustainable path. So TCJA, the bulk of the benefits went 115 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 3: to the wealthy and to corporations. It blew away the deficit. 116 00:08:30,440 --> 00:08:34,839 Speaker 3: It caused huge increase in the deficit. It promised an 117 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:36,720 Speaker 3: investment boom, and we didn't see it. 118 00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 2: So should tax revenues be used to lower the deficit? Yes, 119 00:08:43,040 --> 00:08:45,599 Speaker 2: that one for Biden or where they go to social programs? 120 00:08:46,160 --> 00:08:46,400 Speaker 1: Well. 121 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:52,280 Speaker 3: President Biden believes it's important to invest in areas of 122 00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:57,080 Speaker 3: the economy that will help us grow and create good jobs, 123 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 3: and his budget is won that proposes helping working families 124 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 3: and undertaking investments that are critical to our future, but 125 00:09:09,040 --> 00:09:14,600 Speaker 3: also raising taxes on wealthy individuals who he believes they 126 00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:20,800 Speaker 3: are not paying their fair share, and raising taxes on 127 00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 3: corporations that are doing extremely well, and he would both 128 00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:31,720 Speaker 3: invest in America and help working families and lower the deficit. 129 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 2: The US at the moment is spending just as much 130 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,840 Speaker 2: every year at this point on paying off our debt 131 00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 2: as it is funding our military. Just the usd lower 132 00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:43,520 Speaker 2: interest rates in order to balance the budget. 133 00:09:43,640 --> 00:09:47,679 Speaker 3: Well, we have to take the interest rate path that 134 00:09:48,400 --> 00:09:54,680 Speaker 3: prevails in the economy as given. The President's budget incorporates 135 00:09:54,760 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 3: the assumption that interest rates will be in line with 136 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:05,320 Speaker 3: the projections of private sector forecasters. So there has been 137 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:11,080 Speaker 3: an increase in the interest rate path that's assumed, and 138 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:15,040 Speaker 3: it's necessary to make sure that we're in a fiscally 139 00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 3: sustainable path. Of course, the higher interest rate path makes 140 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:26,400 Speaker 3: that more difficult, but the president's budget would hold I 141 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 3: see the key metric that summarizes the burden of deficits 142 00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:38,280 Speaker 3: as being its interest cost, and the President's plan would 143 00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:44,920 Speaker 3: hold interest costs at historical levels and not allow them 144 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:46,400 Speaker 3: to rise above that. 145 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:49,040 Speaker 2: The federal deficit, though now, is at a level we 146 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:52,480 Speaker 2: really don't see outside of recessions. Is anyone in Washington 147 00:10:52,640 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 2: seriously concerned about this, real conversations about bringing debt back 148 00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:59,440 Speaker 2: to a sustainable path. 149 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:04,680 Speaker 3: Well, as I said, the interest cost of the debt 150 00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:09,160 Speaker 3: is a good way to measure its burden. Generally, interest 151 00:11:09,200 --> 00:11:13,079 Speaker 3: rates have been lower in spite of recent increases, they 152 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:16,640 Speaker 3: have been lower than they were in past decades. And 153 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:22,679 Speaker 3: that means that metrics like the ratio of debt to GDP, 154 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:31,040 Speaker 3: we can probably manage and have a fiscally sustainable path 155 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 3: with somewhat higher ratio of debt to GDP. But it's 156 00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:39,760 Speaker 3: important to make sure that the real interest burden of 157 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:44,800 Speaker 3: the debt, which is a measure of the burden it's 158 00:11:44,880 --> 00:11:48,559 Speaker 3: placing our economy, we have to make sure that that 159 00:11:48,679 --> 00:11:52,319 Speaker 3: stays in historically normal level. 160 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 2: This isn't just a complain of fiscal hawks either. This 161 00:11:55,480 --> 00:11:57,439 Speaker 2: is a complaint. I heard a lot at the IMF 162 00:11:57,520 --> 00:11:59,600 Speaker 2: World Bank meetings. A lot of countries are lining up 163 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 2: learned about the path that the US is on and 164 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:04,679 Speaker 2: what also that means for the US dollar. I hurt 165 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 2: a lot of people reminiscent of the Nixon times say 166 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,600 Speaker 2: the US it's our currency, but it's your problem, is 167 00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,679 Speaker 2: it right? In that context, then that other countries should 168 00:12:14,679 --> 00:12:16,880 Speaker 2: be intervening well. 169 00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:25,600 Speaker 3: Our position is that major countries like those in the 170 00:12:25,679 --> 00:12:29,040 Speaker 3: G seven, and this has been agreed in the G seven, 171 00:12:29,559 --> 00:12:36,720 Speaker 3: should have market determined exchange rates, and if intervention occurs, 172 00:12:37,160 --> 00:12:42,199 Speaker 3: it should be rare, well communicated, and largely to address 173 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 3: excessive fluctuations in currencies. That's the system that we essentially 174 00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:53,400 Speaker 3: have in place, and I think it's worked well. And 175 00:12:53,480 --> 00:12:58,320 Speaker 3: of course differences in the stance of monetary policy across 176 00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:03,080 Speaker 3: countries is a factor that influences the value of exchange rates. 177 00:13:03,200 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 2: I'm sure this is going to come up on your 178 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 2: next trip. You're going to be meeting with your G 179 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:10,800 Speaker 2: seven partners in Italy. There have been reports that Japan 180 00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:14,440 Speaker 2: has intervened twice. You've said it should be communicated, it 181 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:16,840 Speaker 2: should be rare, but they actually haven't worked. 182 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: So why does it matter. 183 00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:23,600 Speaker 3: Well, look, I'm not going to comment on a situation 184 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:26,880 Speaker 3: in a specific country. I just want to leave it 185 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:36,839 Speaker 3: as when there is excessive volatility, it's possible for countries 186 00:13:36,880 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 3: to intervene. It doesn't always work without more fundamental changes 187 00:13:42,520 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 3: in policy, but we believe that should happen very rarely 188 00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:51,160 Speaker 3: and be communicated to trade partners. If it does. 189 00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:54,199 Speaker 2: Just on a final point and in this FX world, 190 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:55,640 Speaker 2: you're gonna get your G seven partners. 191 00:13:55,840 --> 00:13:58,120 Speaker 1: Do you have a currency pair that you watch the most? 192 00:14:00,080 --> 00:14:06,080 Speaker 3: Watch certainly the value of the dollar visa V major 193 00:14:06,160 --> 00:14:10,920 Speaker 3: currencies like the Euro, the en, the remnant b but 194 00:14:11,520 --> 00:14:13,720 Speaker 3: what your currency developments generally. 195 00:14:14,400 --> 00:14:17,199 Speaker 2: Excellent, Treasure Secretary Janet Yellen, We thank you so much 196 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 2: for your time. That was, of course US Treasury Secretary 197 00:14:20,120 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 2: Janet Yellen in Virginia talking about and highlighting the millions 198 00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:26,920 Speaker 2: of dollars that have come out of the fiscal agenda 199 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:30,400 Speaker 2: of the Biden administration, and today during this Infrastructure Week, 200 00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 2: it is about expanding broadband in royal areas.