WEBVTT - Tech Megacaps Drag US Stocks

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play or Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Checking with Jay Hatho.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 3>He's the CEO CIO Infrastructure Capital Management.

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Jay, how do you think about twenty twenty six year?

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Because we're coming out of twenty twenty five, I mean

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>great equity returns, really solid returns in the fix, the

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>come space off hearing commodities, gold, silver, platinum plated bore.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 3>You're looking good there. How do you think about twenty

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty six?

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Good morning, Paul Alexis. Hey, I'm happy to hear. Well.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, we remain bullish. We are bullish this year still.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 5>We have a seven thousand target, which, by the way,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 5>you should sell targets now just buy them. So it's

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 5>okay if we fade a little bit before seven thousand.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 5>So we use the same methodology that we did this year,

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty three times twenty seven earnings consensus and we get

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 5>to an eight thousand target. So that's almost fifteen percent

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 5>from here. So we're bullish and this is normal the

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 5>rally and metals as well as normal when you come

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 5>out of a FED tidening cycle.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 6>And I'm going to ask you what I've been asking

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 6>all of our guests today, and that is leadership in

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 6>this market in the new year. We know that we've

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 6>seen a rotation into value. Is that going to continue

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 6>to the extent that it becomes the new leader for

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 6>this market and tech maybe takes a bit of a backseat.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Ali So we have what we call GARP models of

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 5>the magate, so includes Broadcom and last time when we

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 5>had sixty nine, the upside of those eight companies is

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 5>only two percent, so they're fully valued, even assuming they're

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 5>pretty high growth rates. And if we look, we have

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 5>dividend funds, so we have every sector and a lot

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 5>of those companies are super cheap, pay great dividends, have

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 5>good growth, and trade a really low market pay ratios.

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 4>So that's normal.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Same thing normal when you have a FED loosening cycle,

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 5>there's rotation into other sectors, including small caps. So we

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 5>do think that'll continue, and we're happy about it. Benefits

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 5>our funds because we have small allocations towards tech and

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 5>our income funds.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Jay, we came into twenty twenty five with a new

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>administration here thinking that financials would be an area that

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>would really benefit from, if nothing else, a lighter regulatory

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 3>touch here. Talk to us about financials, how you look

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 3>at that sector.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 5>We had a little bit different take on it in

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 5>that you know, I used to be an investment.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Banker, so I can kind of that's too best since when.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 5>Heat up and so we were super bold up about

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 5>the big investment banks early in the Trump administration, and

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 5>that was a great call. The regular banks have lagged

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 5>because the FED is lagged. So we think this year

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 5>there'll be a rotation. Not the investment banks won't do

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 5>well because they're blowing out their earnings, but they're very

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 5>fully valued. But we're recommending investors rotating into what I

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 5>call boring banks or standard banks like CFG. We hold

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 5>that in my cap our dividend fund. And we're even

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 5>more bulled up about the private equity firms because they've

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 5>been unfairly punished by this irrational fear about private credit.

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 5>So we would recommend rotating from the investment banks into

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 5>standard banks and into private equity.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 6>And I want to bring up we started this conversation

0:03:54.880 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 6>talking about commodities, Copper topping thirteen thousand, got silver and

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 6>gold add on near all time highs. What do you

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 6>do with the commodities trade next year?

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think I have to be a little bit

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 5>costious because if you look at charts, they're pretty far

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 5>away from their moving averages, and gold did break down

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 5>when it blew out well above its moving averages. I

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 5>think a bigger question is really oil. Oil has been horrible,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 5>which is great for inflation. By the way, you know,

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 5>the seventies inflation was really eighty percent caused by oil,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 5>So if super bolish for inflation, we're modestly constructive on

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 5>oil fifty five to sixty five this year. We think

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 5>that ope's not going to increase production as much as

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 5>it did last year, so we're more constructive on oil.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 5>There will continue to be rallied, particularly silver and copper.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 5>You know, have an AI electricity play, but just be

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 5>a little bit costious because it has a momentum element

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 5>to it as well, whereas oil has negative momentum.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Jay, you mentioned dividends here.

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 3>We don't talk that much about dividends because it's all

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>about big tech and most of the tech players don't

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 3>pay dividends here, what's your dividend strategy? How do you

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 3>think investors should think about dividends.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think, particularly for more conservative investors, it's good

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 5>to have a substantial amount of dividends that can cover

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 5>a significant portion of your cash needs, and then the

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 5>rest of it your portfolio can have a higher higher

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 5>volatility companies. So we love preferred stocks pffas our flagship fond,

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 5>has a great yield, has a good total return. We

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 5>do like highyal bonds if we're right about the market

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 5>going to eight thousand, and you want to be in

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>the riskier part of bonds. And as I briefly alluded to,

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 5>there's a ton of really high quality companies like Philip Morris,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 5>next Era. They're not overvalued, have strong dividends, good dividend growth.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 4>So we do think that you'll actually get paid for that.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 5>It's usually kind of a thankless proposition that you'll get

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 5>paid for that, because when there is a rotation, those

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 5>stocks tend to do better because when you get money

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 5>flowing in, they're looking for bargains versus just looking for

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 5>the latest AI trade.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 6>So well, small cap stocks continue to get some love

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 6>next year, because I was looking at the Russell two

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 6>thousand up about thirteen and a half percent year to date.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 6>There aren't They're sort of not the sexy index, right,

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 6>the Russell two thousand. But do you see there? Do

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 6>you see support for it next year?

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 4>We do.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 5>We have a small cap fund, Desk Cap, and I

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 5>would urge investors, whether you do yourself or hire people

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 5>like ourselves, focus on the money making companies because that's

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 5>where you stop gambling and you start investing. So if

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 5>you invest in profitable companies, they retain earnings, grow earnings.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 4>So small caps are.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 5>Attracted if you if you curate them for being profitable.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 5>And what's the biggest trade you're making there is it

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 5>is a notch and that's so the value part of

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 5>it's on about ten percent tech, So it's really part

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 5>of that whole trade. It's not that small caps borrow

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 5>way more much more money or have superig amount.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Of floating rate.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 5>It's just the normal rotation out of tech into other sectors.

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 5>And although the small cap sectors are do have slightly

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 5>lower valuations and do have upside like Digital Bridge you

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 5>know you mentioned earlier, right, it is smaller cap stock.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>So that you do benefit from M and A as well.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 5>So we do think it's going to be a good

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>place to be next year, you know, and it has

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 5>been since the FED became more dubbish.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 4>It's worked this year as well.

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Jay, thanks so much for joining us. Always appreciate getting

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 3>a few minutes of your time. Jay Haffield, CEO CIO

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Infrastructure Capital Advisors also reformed investment Banker did substance of

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Stanley, CIBC, Oppenheimer, all those haunts down there in

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the city.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 6>You know, Paul, when you look at it, we're heading

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 6>into the new year with a lot of the same

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 6>old problems and concerns. Right, We've got Tariff's inflation debt,

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 6>we still have global wars going on. Yep, the vix

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 6>is pretty low compared to all that. So our next

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 6>guest is that might mean the market a little complacent,

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 6>maybe we're ignoring the risks. Joy Yang, head of index

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 6>product management at market Vector Index's, joins us in studio. Joy,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 6>good morning, Good to have you.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 7>Here, mining thanks for having me.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 6>Is this market getting a little too comfortable and are

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 6>we ignoring the risks?

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a good time for us to just

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 7>step back and look at what's happening.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 7>So we're looking at another twenty percent year in the markets,

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 7>and I think we've just gotten used to twenty percent

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 7>because we saw it last year, we saw it the

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 7>year before. But we now have over one hundred years

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 7>of data on the markets, and do you know how

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 7>many times that we see the markets deliver over twenty

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 7>percent three years in a row.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 6>It's got to be pretty low.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 7>It's very low. We've only seen it twice and the

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 7>last time was the lead up to the dot com bubble,

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 7>So that was three years of positive twenty percent returns

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 7>followed by three years of negative returns. So I think

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 7>we investors have to be careful because on average we

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 7>only see the markets deliver about eleven percent returns per year.

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 7>But we never see eleven. Sometimes we'll see twenty, which

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 7>means next year we'll see maybe negative ten, but on

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 7>average you get eleven, twelve, thirteen percent returns. So what's

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:57.479
<v Speaker 7>unusual is we've seen twenty percent returns this year, low volatility,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 7>everything else, rising gold copy, silver, even value, as you

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 7>mentioned before. So this has got to be a little

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 7>bit kind of you know, uncomfortable. And yet you know,

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 7>people are euphoric about AI. And again, where did we

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 7>come off At the beginning of the year. We had

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 7>tariff uncertainty, we had fed policy uncertainty, we had high

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 7>government debt, we had AI is it you know, is

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 7>it a bubb all? And we had geopolitical tensions. We

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 7>have all those things right now exactly nothing has changed.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 7>And yet you know, the market still seems to be

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 7>going up. You know, you get market returns for taking

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 7>on risk, and the risks are still out there. But

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 7>that said, does that mean people should get out?

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 4>You know? Right?

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, time diversifying?

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 3>How about diversifying? Maybe we saw even a little bit

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>earlier in twenty twenty five people diversifying outside of the US,

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe going to European equities, and we weren't sure whether

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>that was is a short term trade maybe a longer

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 3>term rotation. How do you look at diversification outside the US.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 7>So I think price still matters, and then US earlier,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, everything seems expensive. Well, I say, look outside

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 7>of the US, because I think we tend to think

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 7>of you know, just US markets. You know, markets outside

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>of the US still look like they have good valuation.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 7>So international markets, emerging markets this year, they already had

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 7>a strong rally, but that's on the back of being

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 7>under allocated and undernoticed. You know, in the previous years.

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 6>You mentioned we didn't have a lot of volatility. This

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 6>past year is twenty twenty sixth the year that comes back.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 6>And why well, something's got to give.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.479
<v Speaker 7>You can't have high returns low volatility, So either returns

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 7>have to come down or volatility has to go up.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 7>And I think one thing that's interesting about the VICS

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 7>is because it doesn't seem like it's telling us the

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 7>fear of you know, what investors are really feeling, because

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 7>if you ask anybody, they are thinking about is this

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 7>above all? But it's not reflected in the you know VIX.

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 7>So I think we tend to look at crypto markets

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 7>and bitcoin. We have the crypto heat Index, which is

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 7>telling us fear is high. You know, we saw bitcoin crash,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 7>and you know, it's still hanging around that fear indicators.

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 7>So it feels like the VIX is just holding its breadth,

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 7>whereas you know, crypto markets are really measuring the pulse

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 7>of investors.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Looking at bitcoin here for tom Keen, just under eighty

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>seven thousand dollars per token. We've been anywhere from seventy

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 3>thousand to one hundred and twenty seven thousand this year

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 3>on topic.

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Volatility exactly right.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but that's also interesting because you know Bitcoin is

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 7>negative this year, but for you know, bitcoin holders and ETFs,

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 7>you know, it started back in January twenty twenty four,

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 7>it's up, it's delivered still one hundred percent returns for investors.

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely absolutely, Alternatives, private equity, private credit, you know, I

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 3>don't know hedge funds. How do you guys think about

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>all these days?

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 7>I think it's interesting because we're seeing this, you know,

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 7>the launch of the number of ETSS indexes that are

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 7>trying to measure this space for kind of daily flows

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 7>into an area that's meant to be a long term

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 7>buy and hold strategy. So what's the right price? You know,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 7>you can't look at it every single day and it's

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 7>meant to be a diversified holding for investors. So I

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 7>think investors should allocate to alternative.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 3>What percentage do you think. I've talked to registered investment

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>advisors and I would have thought either they're not really

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 3>in all they are, and I would have thought maybe

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 3>the allocation would five percent. They're talking much higher than that.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>How do you guys think about it?

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think with everything you should really it's really

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 7>based on your own risk allocation. You know, people say

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 7>even twenty percent gold. Now you know, but that seems

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 7>quite a hot and that seems like nobody's up there

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 7>at twenty percent. It should never be a core portion

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 7>of your holdings. And if you have twenty percent cent

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 7>to gold, five percent to private equity, you know, it

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 7>builds up. You know, what does that leave your core holdings?

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to put you on the spot, Joy and

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 6>ask where are we going to see leadership in twenty

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 6>twenty six? Make place your bat.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 7>Okay, that is on this spot, and I would say,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 7>still look at a diversified global allocation to all assets,

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 7>but adjust it to you know, their weight in the markets,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 7>which is still have a you know, solid portion in

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 7>equities and bonds, but also think about your allocation to

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 7>whether it's gold, bigcoin, private equity, so you know, be

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 7>be strategic and long term about it rather than what's

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>driving next year.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>How about just just in terms of leadership in the

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 3>equity markets. Boy, it's been AI has been really the

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 3>story for I don't know three years now, is that

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>still me?

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Hang your hat on that big cap tech trade?

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 8>Do you think?

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 7>I think AI is a disruptive innovation, but you know,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 7>can it come from a five trillion dollar company? You know,

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 7>people have been People haven't noticed the leadership that's building

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 7>up in Asia. You know, China's coming up with really innovative,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 7>disruptive companies, and I think people should be more diversified

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 7>in their AI holdings.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Joy, thanks so much for joining us.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Really appreciated.

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Joey Yang.

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>She's a head of index product management at market Vector Indexes.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Well you go out to side, you go to over

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>to Europe. The eurostock index justin for currencies up thirty

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>three percent?

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 4>How about that?

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Asian indexes up, you know, mid twenties returns. Everybody's making

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>money in the equity markets here, what do we do

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty six? Chris camp pitsis joins us here.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>He's a managing partner Barnum Financial Group. Chris, you know,

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>investors had a really good three year run in equities.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>They made a lot of money in the bond market

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty five. What's the conversations you're having with

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 3>your clients is to expectations for twenty six.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 9>And expectations I think as we look to go forward

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 9>into the new year.

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, the.

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 9>Reality is if we look at how the last time

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 9>we had four double digit up years in a row,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 9>that didn't end so well, right, that ended with the

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 9>dot com bubble burst. And so if we're going to

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 9>see another double digit, high momentum, high growth kind of year,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 9>we're going to need some kind of goldilocks economic and

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 9>stock performance in order to do that. So what has

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 9>to happen for that to be the case. Well, First,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 9>we need to see those accommodative interest rate cuts from

0:16:55.640 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 9>the FED to unemployment. Obviously can't get two out of control.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 4>And third, we.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 9>Can't have any AI bubble bursts, and that means we

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 9>need technology companies to really show and prove when earning

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 9>season comes along. The market didn't react too positively to

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 9>the last couple earning seasons, even though these big tech

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 9>companies delivered great results, and so that leaves us a

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 9>little cautious headed into the new year.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 6>So if you're cautious and you talked about tech, Chris,

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 6>if you're widening out, I see in your note you

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 6>like utilities, which makes a lot of sense because in

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 6>an environment of lower rates, but also all the electricity,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 6>all the data centers right that are being built to support.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 9>AI exactly right, So we think of that as almost

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 9>an AI adjacent play, if you will, what are the sectors,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 9>what are the industries? What are the companies that are

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 9>going to benefit from artificial intelligence but aren't necessarily the

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 9>semiconductor of companies themselves and thematically, if we can see

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 9>real companies start to increase their profit margins and their

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 9>earnings as a result of actually implementing artificial intelligence into

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 9>their businesses. Well, that's going to change the conversation from

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 9>is this a bubble? To how high can we go?

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 9>You know, in a positive and healthy manner.

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Chris, talk to us about how you think about investing

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>in the US versus non US, and maybe that's developing

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>markets and merging markets.

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about that?

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 9>So, you know, if you look at the typical investors

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 9>US based investors portfolio, it's extremely S and P five

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 9>hundred centric S and P five hundred almost has a

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 9>monopoly on the average investor's portfolio. And twenty twenty five

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 9>was a year in which the international markets, you know,

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 9>waved their hands and said, hey, take a look at me,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 9>because we're here too. And meanwhile, you have governments who

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 9>are evaluating their trading partners, right. We saw that with

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 9>Liberation Day and the tariffs and the tariff negotiations that

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 9>have taken place since then. So as countries are looking

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 9>to really re establish their trading relationships, and then companies

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 9>are looking to similarly diversify their supply chains. And then

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 9>on top of that you have this weakening dollar. It

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 9>begs investors to start to take a look at other economies.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 9>And other markets as complements to their US portfolio.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 6>Where I'm curious where you're looking in the world. I mean,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 6>I know, we say Europe, we say emerging markets, but

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 6>when you sort of drill down.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 9>Sure, So one country that we find very attractive right

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 9>now is Japan. In general, companies in Japan have very

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 9>cash rich balance sheets. There's been a renewed focus in

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Japan about delivering shareholder value. You're seeing a big increase

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 9>in buybacks, You're seeing a big increase in dividend hikes,

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 9>and then you have a much more accommodative fiscal policy

0:19:55.600 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 9>the last couple of years. And what's interesting about Japan is,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, the knock on them for a long time

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 9>has been an aging population. But an aging population also

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 9>lends itself to automation and technology enhancements. So we think

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 9>it's a perfect opportunity for Japanese equities. And then, of course,

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 9>with the strengthening yen weakening dollar for US dollar based returns,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 9>that's a real positive for the US consumer and investor.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 3>We haven't talked about Japan for thirty years, but it's

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 3>back in vogue here. I mean, is this something that's

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 3>a longer term trend, and my son's about to do

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>a semester brought in Japan, and he's all in on Japan.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm like, all right, that was in nineteen eighty

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that would have been a good call.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 2>But maybe it's coming back here. I don't know.

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 9>I think it is because ultimately, well, we have the

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 9>volatility of what's happening with AI and a little bit

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 9>of political uncertainty in the US and of course conflict

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 9>and tensions with China. People are looking for a consistent

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 9>story and Japan looks to deliver that here and they've

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 9>got a lot of characteristics of what could present a

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 9>big opportunity. That started in twenty five, and I think

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 9>the momentum will continue into twenty twenty six.

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 3>Just crossing the tape here in the Bloomberg terminal, red

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 3>headlines SoftBank to buy Digital Bridge for sixteen.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Dollars per share in cash.

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 6>So they still speaking about Monday Bank h exactly even

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 6>on a holiday weeks. Back to the US for a minute,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 6>Chris and we talked about we ticked some boxes, talking

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 6>about utilities, talking about tech, what about consumer staples, what's

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 6>the outlook the prognosis for them in twenty twenty six.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 9>I love that question because what happens is technology has

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 9>been driving the market, both in the short term and

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 9>long term. I think most people would agree AI has

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 9>a tremendous long term.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Thesis, right.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 9>But as we see these valuations reach these highs, we

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.239
<v Speaker 9>want to start to look to take some profits off

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 9>of the table. And then the question becomes where am

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 9>I putting that portion of my portfolio if I'm trimming

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 9>slightly from my technology and my growth story. And so

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 9>consumer staples provides a tremendous contrarian almost allocation, one that

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 9>is inflation friendly, one that provides a consistent dividend in

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 9>a lowering interest rate environment, that in essence pays us

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 9>to wait. And we saw this in April, right when

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 9>the tariff craziness took place and the market reacted. SMP

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 9>was negative fifteen percent for the year at one point.

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 9>Sectors like consumer staples really really were a bright spot

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 9>in a stormy stock market. And I think consumer staples

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 9>will perform exceptionally well going into the new year should

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 9>we see the pullback in technology.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing in Chris?

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>In the bond market here, we had some nice high

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 3>single digit returns in twenty twenty five, and if you

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 3>took some credit risk, you know, doing pretty well rewarded there.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>How about in twenty six.

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 9>If I'm going to take on risk to get that

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 9>risk through dividends rather through yield at the moment, especially

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 9>because the biggest risk to twenty twenty six is stock

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 9>market volatility and a worsening economy. Right, those are the

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 9>traditional concerns around what could the end of a bull

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 9>market be as we potentially go into theoretically a recession. Right,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 9>So I don't want to own the types of bonds

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 9>that are going to act like stocks if the stock

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 9>market's going down. So if I'm going to own bonds,

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 9>I want quality. I want a little bit of a

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 9>duration in a lowering interest rate environment. So I would

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 9>favor obviously sovereign debt, and I would favor cash and

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 9>dividend stocks.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Very good, Chris, thanks so much, appreciate it.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 3>Chris Campittsis He's a managing partner for Barnum Financial Group of.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast live weekday afternoons

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern listen on Applecarplay and

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or watch us

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>live on YouTube.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 6>I want to talk a little more fixed income because

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 6>what a year it was for fixed income and can

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty six continue that run. Vanessa McMichael, head of

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Corporate and Public Entity Strategy at Wells Fargo. Vanessa, I'm

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 6>going to jump right in here with something you call

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 6>cash segmentation because we are expecting, or at least the

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 6>markets expecting two interest rate cuts from the Fed next year.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 6>And you said in that scenario, cash segmentation is important

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 6>and will be back in style.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 8>What do you mean by that, Well, thank you for

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 8>having me this morning. Yes, So, for the clients that

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 8>I cover are corporate and public entity investors, they're using

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 8>fixed income markets to enhance their cash management process overall,

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 8>and so they're typically not chasing yield. They're more interested

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 8>in liquidity and safety above all else. And why am

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 8>I kind of rambling about this at the beginning of

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 8>Manchester in the conversation is because for the past couple

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 8>of years, it's been really easy to do very little

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 8>and generate really nice income for your organization. If you've

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 8>been camped out in cash instruments, and so prior to

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 8>this inverted yield environment that we've been living for at

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 8>least if you'r a front end investor organizations, they would

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 8>bucket their cash. Right, do you have your operating cash,

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 8>you have some strategic cash, maybe you have some cash

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 8>set aside for a specific project, and then you're using

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 8>fixed income markets to invest that cash until you need it.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 8>But again, because of the yield curve, because of the

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 8>way last year or this year, we're still in twenty

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 8>twenty five, I'm already trying to get into twenty twenty six.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 8>The way this year started, liquidity was the number one

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 8>conversation we were having with clients, and how do you

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 8>satisfy that liquidity golob Well, you camp out in a

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 8>cash instrument. So it's just time for organizations to reframe

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 8>how we're thinking about using fixed income markets and in

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 8>this cat in their case, managing process. Because we're in

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 8>an environment where the front end of the curve should

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 8>no longer be inverted if expectations come to fruition by

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 8>the end of this year, and so we do need

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 8>to think about segmenting and putting cash on different parts

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 8>of the curve.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 4>So that's what I mean.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>By that, Vanessa, I mean if your job now, I

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 3>know you went to Chicago Business School, which means you

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 3>like math. So right right off the beat, I got

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 3>a problem here. How about it to your treasury? I

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 3>mean three and a half percent isn't your job kind

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of done? You could say, put yourself in to your

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 3>treasuries for three and a half percent. That seems like

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 3>a nice return.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, and you bring up a really good point because

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 8>we're still in an environment and we're going to be,

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 8>at least for the foreseeable future for this particular investor

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 8>base that I cover that invests so short on a

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 8>yield curve where you don't have to take a lot

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 8>of credit risk to continue to enhance your yield and

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 8>stabilize some income generation. So we are in our seats.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 8>We are encouraging those clients that can and invest out

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 8>on the belly of the curve because of their investment policy.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 8>Then because they can, they have the cash that they

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 8>may not need immediately right for the foreseeable future. To

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 8>look at that part of the curve, because a three

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 8>and a half percent yield over a couple of years

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 8>is still really decent income particularly for this investor base.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 6>What's going on with money market fund assets, Vanessa? Because

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 6>they reached record highs, there was all this talk about

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 6>we're going to see a bunch of outflows that never

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 6>really came to fruition. So what's your outlook for MMF

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 6>asset growth?

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 8>We think they're going to continue to grow. I mean,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 8>this year we kind of hit two new records seven

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 8>trillion excuse me, and then eight trillion. We think growth

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 8>going forward may be a bit more incremental. Our clients,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 8>our corporate public entity clients are using money market funds

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 8>as a substitute for bank deposits, and so they're going

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 8>to continue to do that. And I think even if

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 8>the FED does execute two cuts, so we're fifty basis

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 8>points lower on the front end at some point fifty

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 8>basis points lower and money market funds, that still puts

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 8>us at about a three percent yield, and that's still

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 8>really attractive for these clients. Remember just a few years ago,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 8>and I'm saying a few maybe it was four where

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 8>rates for zero and we were only earning call it

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 8>one of two basis points and these sort of funds,

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 8>So to earn three percent, to be honest, is still

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 8>really decent guild, and it's going to generate decent income,

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 8>and so we expect to continue to see clients heavily

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 8>utilize those instruments going forward.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Hi, Vanessa, thank you so much for joining us. Really

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 3>appreciate it. Vanessa Michael. She is head of Corporate and

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Public Entity Strategy at Wells Fargo, advising her public clients

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 3>on the fixed income market and word to allocate capital there.

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal