WEBVTT - The Circle: Oppression Is an Endless Loop | Dissident Cinema

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.645 --> 0:00:27.565
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.845
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.284
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.445 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:45.845 --> 0:00:48.325
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:48.445 --> 0:00:50.804
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in armed now? So look, we're going

0:00:50.885 --> 0:00:55.405
<v Speaker 1>to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation. Hey,

0:00:55.405 --> 0:00:59.444
<v Speaker 1>film spotters, Adam and Josh. Here. The sixth and final

0:00:59.444 --> 0:01:03.605
<v Speaker 1>film in our Dissident Cinema Marathon is Jafar Panahi's chronicle

0:01:03.725 --> 0:01:06.685
<v Speaker 1>of contemporary Ron Circle the late nineties.

0:01:06.885 --> 0:01:07.445
<v Speaker 3>The Circle.

0:01:08.125 --> 0:01:11.444
<v Speaker 2>The Dissident Cinema Marathon is dedicated to films that depict

0:01:11.525 --> 0:01:15.565
<v Speaker 2>or openly confront fascism of various kinds. We have discussed

0:01:15.605 --> 0:01:18.605
<v Speaker 2>six films in all, or we will have once we

0:01:18.725 --> 0:01:21.005
<v Speaker 2>get through this conversation about the Circle. You can find

0:01:21.164 --> 0:01:25.164
<v Speaker 2>the full lineup at filmspotting dot net. Slash marathons. You

0:01:25.205 --> 0:01:29.725
<v Speaker 2>can also find there our entire history of marathons. We

0:01:29.765 --> 0:01:32.885
<v Speaker 2>have done over fifty of these over the years. What

0:01:33.045 --> 0:01:36.845
<v Speaker 2>are these well? Marathon is the word we use to

0:01:36.884 --> 0:01:40.165
<v Speaker 2>describe these series where we try to eliminate our cinematic

0:01:40.244 --> 0:01:44.485
<v Speaker 2>blind spots. They are often devoted to directors or actors

0:01:44.604 --> 0:01:49.044
<v Speaker 2>or genres, sometimes even regions of world cinema. I had

0:01:49.045 --> 0:01:52.565
<v Speaker 2>to look up, Josh where this film placed exactly in

0:01:52.645 --> 0:01:55.565
<v Speaker 2>Panahi's filmography has been a favorite of mine, certainly over

0:01:55.565 --> 0:01:58.925
<v Speaker 2>the years of doing this show, as I've gotten to

0:01:59.125 --> 0:02:03.124
<v Speaker 2>discover his work. It's his third feature after The White

0:02:03.165 --> 0:02:07.365
<v Speaker 2>Balloon in nineteen ninety five, and then my beloved The Mirror,

0:02:07.445 --> 0:02:11.725
<v Speaker 2>a movie that became beloved for me after watching it

0:02:11.765 --> 0:02:14.725
<v Speaker 2>as part of a marathon here on Film Spotting that

0:02:14.765 --> 0:02:18.205
<v Speaker 2>came out in nineteen ninety seven. This movie closing out

0:02:18.205 --> 0:02:21.325
<v Speaker 2>our marathon is a little bit of an outlier due

0:02:21.325 --> 0:02:24.045
<v Speaker 2>to the time of its release. I did bring up

0:02:24.045 --> 0:02:26.485
<v Speaker 2>whether or not it belonged in this marathon or we

0:02:26.485 --> 0:02:29.445
<v Speaker 2>should just conclude after five movies. Because we had a

0:02:29.565 --> 0:02:33.204
<v Speaker 2>run of what nineteen forty to basically nineteen sixty nine,

0:02:33.204 --> 0:02:38.005
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of compact about three decades, and most

0:02:38.005 --> 0:02:41.605
<v Speaker 2>of what we were recovering was really dealing with World

0:02:41.685 --> 0:02:44.325
<v Speaker 2>War two. It seemed really nice and tidy, and then

0:02:44.365 --> 0:02:46.405
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden we were jumping ahead to the

0:02:46.445 --> 0:02:49.044
<v Speaker 2>year two thousand and also in terms of subject matter,

0:02:49.805 --> 0:02:55.445
<v Speaker 2>not so much dealing with fascism per se, but definitely

0:02:55.484 --> 0:02:59.605
<v Speaker 2>an oppressive state, as this film is confronting Iran's treatment

0:02:59.845 --> 0:03:03.965
<v Speaker 2>of women in terms of quality, because if I remember correctly,

0:03:04.165 --> 0:03:07.005
<v Speaker 2>we have been fans of every film, both of us,

0:03:07.085 --> 0:03:09.605
<v Speaker 2>every film in this marathon. Yeah, was The Circle an

0:03:09.644 --> 0:03:13.445
<v Speaker 2>outlier or is it an appropriate conclusion to the marathon?

0:03:14.405 --> 0:03:18.565
<v Speaker 1>I think it's appropriate on many terms, including its quality.

0:03:18.885 --> 0:03:22.205
<v Speaker 1>I think it holds up alongside of these classics we've

0:03:22.245 --> 0:03:26.325
<v Speaker 1>been we've been visiting. And I also think, you know,

0:03:26.365 --> 0:03:29.525
<v Speaker 1>we have been tossing around fascism a lot. It's probably

0:03:29.565 --> 0:03:32.725
<v Speaker 1>been the go to phrase for this Dissonan cinema marathon,

0:03:33.325 --> 0:03:37.645
<v Speaker 1>But honestly, in thinking about it in larger terms, we

0:03:37.645 --> 0:03:45.525
<v Speaker 1>were discussing oppressive regimes, authoritarianism, any system of that sort

0:03:45.805 --> 0:03:51.445
<v Speaker 1>that is really limiting human freedom in systematic ways, and

0:03:51.645 --> 0:03:55.605
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely what we see here. And I do think,

0:03:55.885 --> 0:03:59.805
<v Speaker 1>you know, also there's some unfortunate relevance in the fact

0:03:59.885 --> 0:04:05.805
<v Speaker 1>that we have this pretty blatantly illegal war launched against

0:04:05.925 --> 0:04:09.685
<v Speaker 1>Iran on the part of the United States right now,

0:04:09.925 --> 0:04:14.205
<v Speaker 1>and any chance to get to know an area that

0:04:14.325 --> 0:04:17.445
<v Speaker 1>is being besieged in this way, I think is the

0:04:17.485 --> 0:04:22.045
<v Speaker 1>movies just offer you a really helpful way to get

0:04:22.045 --> 0:04:25.565
<v Speaker 1>your mind around that, beyond news reports and other sources

0:04:25.565 --> 0:04:29.405
<v Speaker 1>of information. You know, I was grateful to our contemporary

0:04:29.405 --> 0:04:32.565
<v Speaker 1>Iranian Cinema marathon when we first did it, for helping

0:04:32.605 --> 0:04:34.965
<v Speaker 1>to educate and enlighten about that part of the world.

0:04:35.645 --> 0:04:40.724
<v Speaker 1>And you know, those questions are anew with the conflict

0:04:40.725 --> 0:04:43.685
<v Speaker 1>going on right now, and so I do think it

0:04:43.765 --> 0:04:47.445
<v Speaker 1>was nice to see again set decades ago now but

0:04:47.565 --> 0:04:53.245
<v Speaker 1>still to learn about movements and people's experiences of the

0:04:53.284 --> 0:04:57.684
<v Speaker 1>regimes in Iran even now. So yeah, I think I'm

0:04:57.765 --> 0:05:00.965
<v Speaker 1>glad we're here. Glad is a strange word. This hasn't

0:05:01.005 --> 0:05:03.604
<v Speaker 1>been the cheeriest of marathons, but I do think it's

0:05:04.205 --> 0:05:07.445
<v Speaker 1>it's fitting. Yeah, curious to hear what you think along

0:05:07.485 --> 0:05:10.045
<v Speaker 1>those lines, and absolutely want to dig into that quality

0:05:10.125 --> 0:05:11.405
<v Speaker 1>question you asked.

0:05:12.005 --> 0:05:15.005
<v Speaker 2>I had a similar reaction as you. I'm certainly glad

0:05:15.605 --> 0:05:18.445
<v Speaker 2>that we watched it. It's befitting in terms of its

0:05:18.445 --> 0:05:24.045
<v Speaker 2>subject matter and befitting in terms of of quality. Trust

0:05:24.045 --> 0:05:27.325
<v Speaker 2>Panahe to find the perfect I'm going to dig in,

0:05:27.365 --> 0:05:32.005
<v Speaker 2>trust Panahi to find the perfect formal conceit to convey

0:05:32.445 --> 0:05:36.765
<v Speaker 2>this portrait of systemic oppression. Right, this is what he

0:05:36.885 --> 0:05:40.205
<v Speaker 2>has become so known for over the years. I have

0:05:40.284 --> 0:05:43.125
<v Speaker 2>not seen The White Balloon, but I wondered if, even

0:05:43.165 --> 0:05:49.125
<v Speaker 2>from the very beginning he was trying cinematic techniques like this,

0:05:49.245 --> 0:05:51.645
<v Speaker 2>And from what I could understand, I didn't want to

0:05:51.725 --> 0:05:54.205
<v Speaker 2>learn too much about it. It seems like that movie

0:05:54.245 --> 0:05:59.724
<v Speaker 2>is relatively straightforward. It did win the Camera Door for

0:05:59.805 --> 0:06:03.245
<v Speaker 2>Best First Feature at the can Film Festival in ninety five.

0:06:03.325 --> 0:06:05.685
<v Speaker 2>The Guardian listed it as one of the fifty best

0:06:05.725 --> 0:06:10.205
<v Speaker 2>family films. Ever, Bfi said that it's one of fifty

0:06:10.205 --> 0:06:12.325
<v Speaker 2>films you should see by the age of fourteen. So

0:06:12.645 --> 0:06:14.525
<v Speaker 2>this is a movie we should probably reckon with. At

0:06:14.525 --> 0:06:17.445
<v Speaker 2>some point. We should see The White Balloons. But in

0:06:17.525 --> 0:06:22.485
<v Speaker 2>terms of its narrative journey and how the craft and

0:06:22.605 --> 0:06:27.924
<v Speaker 2>content meat pretty traditional. The Mirror next is where he

0:06:28.005 --> 0:06:31.484
<v Speaker 2>starts playing the disruptor in terms of technique, and there's

0:06:32.165 --> 0:06:37.445
<v Speaker 2>the Blue Heron esque rupturing of reality. Since then, he

0:06:37.725 --> 0:06:40.805
<v Speaker 2>has almost always I'll say almost always because I didn't

0:06:40.805 --> 0:06:42.844
<v Speaker 2>go back and look at every single film and every

0:06:42.844 --> 0:06:47.085
<v Speaker 2>film that I know. He's almost always had a concept

0:06:47.725 --> 0:06:53.445
<v Speaker 2>and an elegant one, and you catch on, or at

0:06:53.485 --> 0:06:56.125
<v Speaker 2>least I thought I was catching on. Without knowing where

0:06:56.125 --> 0:06:59.164
<v Speaker 2>this movie was going to go. I thought I might

0:06:59.205 --> 0:07:02.805
<v Speaker 2>be catching on to the concept here when we get

0:07:02.805 --> 0:07:06.484
<v Speaker 2>this incredible prelude the opening of this film. This opening scene,

0:07:06.485 --> 0:07:09.125
<v Speaker 2>which is a relatively brief scene in terms of meeting

0:07:09.165 --> 0:07:13.125
<v Speaker 2>this character, the grandmother character that the camera is focusing on.

0:07:13.645 --> 0:07:18.645
<v Speaker 2>She is outside the door this whatever you want to

0:07:18.685 --> 0:07:21.205
<v Speaker 2>call it, the food door or the peep holes. It

0:07:21.205 --> 0:07:24.005
<v Speaker 2>looks like in a jail cell. You'll understand if you've

0:07:24.005 --> 0:07:26.485
<v Speaker 2>seen the movie. Why I'm saying that. But this is

0:07:26.525 --> 0:07:29.085
<v Speaker 2>a This is a hospital, and she's outside the door

0:07:29.525 --> 0:07:33.005
<v Speaker 2>basically of a of a maternity room. Her daughter is

0:07:33.045 --> 0:07:36.365
<v Speaker 2>giving birth, and at the beginning of this film, she's

0:07:36.405 --> 0:07:40.645
<v Speaker 2>awaiting the good news that her daughter has given birth

0:07:40.685 --> 0:07:43.685
<v Speaker 2>to a son. This is especially important to this family.

0:07:43.725 --> 0:07:49.165
<v Speaker 2>It turns out, because the daughter's husband's family was told

0:07:49.205 --> 0:07:52.125
<v Speaker 2>it would be a boy. The ultrasounds said it would

0:07:52.125 --> 0:07:55.645
<v Speaker 2>be a boy. They want a boy, they're expecting a boy,

0:07:56.725 --> 0:08:04.205
<v Speaker 2>and now she's just been told, congratulations, it's a girl.

0:08:17.445 --> 0:08:19.685
<v Speaker 2>We don't even see the grandmother for a long time.

0:08:19.725 --> 0:08:22.005
<v Speaker 2>We're just looking at the back of her head, but

0:08:22.085 --> 0:08:25.925
<v Speaker 2>we can still understand, just from the way the camera

0:08:25.965 --> 0:08:30.245
<v Speaker 2>is positioned behind her, per lack of movement, per lack

0:08:30.285 --> 0:08:33.485
<v Speaker 2>of excitement, that something is off. And then we understand

0:08:33.525 --> 0:08:37.765
<v Speaker 2>from her dialogue, where she essentially is saying some version

0:08:37.765 --> 0:08:41.444
<v Speaker 2>of check again, that that can't be right. She's like, no,

0:08:41.805 --> 0:08:45.205
<v Speaker 2>she doesn't believe it, and she doesn't more importantly, she

0:08:45.245 --> 0:08:49.485
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want to believe it. But as as the camera then,

0:08:49.565 --> 0:08:52.405
<v Speaker 2>and the camera, if I'm remembering correctly, I didn't go

0:08:52.485 --> 0:08:54.365
<v Speaker 2>back just to be one hundred percent sure, But I

0:08:54.445 --> 0:08:58.285
<v Speaker 2>think that entire opening is one long take, a continuous

0:08:58.325 --> 0:09:00.525
<v Speaker 2>take where we follow her. I don't know if there

0:09:00.525 --> 0:09:03.845
<v Speaker 2>are any cuts. We follow her past a couple of

0:09:03.845 --> 0:09:07.885
<v Speaker 2>other characters, including another daughter, and then when she ends

0:09:07.965 --> 0:09:10.725
<v Speaker 2>up out on the street, the baton, if you will,

0:09:10.765 --> 0:09:12.965
<v Speaker 2>sort of gets passed to another character.

0:09:13.045 --> 0:09:14.885
<v Speaker 3>And you you, and it's.

0:09:14.684 --> 0:09:16.925
<v Speaker 2>In real time, and the fact that it's in real time,

0:09:17.005 --> 0:09:21.325
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that then the grandmother disappears, you say, oh, okay,

0:09:21.925 --> 0:09:24.005
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if then this is what's going to happen

0:09:24.045 --> 0:09:27.285
<v Speaker 2>in this film is that we're going to be passed

0:09:27.845 --> 0:09:31.844
<v Speaker 2>along different women and their stories, and that, indeed is

0:09:32.485 --> 0:09:35.645
<v Speaker 2>the circle. That's just part of the circle metaphor of

0:09:35.684 --> 0:09:38.045
<v Speaker 2>the title. That is indeed what happens, isn't it? And

0:09:38.125 --> 0:09:41.444
<v Speaker 2>it is the It is the perfect metaphor. And I

0:09:42.205 --> 0:09:46.325
<v Speaker 2>did not have a sense of just how perfect it

0:09:46.325 --> 0:09:51.245
<v Speaker 2>would be and how devastating it would be until Panahi

0:09:51.645 --> 0:09:53.405
<v Speaker 2>hits us with the stomach punch at the end.

0:09:54.605 --> 0:09:57.525
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the ending. I mean we should discuss in detail

0:09:57.564 --> 0:09:59.525
<v Speaker 1>and give a little spoiler before we do that for

0:09:59.564 --> 0:10:01.525
<v Speaker 1>folks who are encouraged to watch this for the first time,

0:10:01.564 --> 0:10:04.485
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't know that's what was going to happen.

0:10:04.684 --> 0:10:07.725
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it is the it is the

0:10:07.765 --> 0:10:10.365
<v Speaker 1>triumph of the film is bringing us around to that point.

0:10:11.085 --> 0:10:13.125
<v Speaker 1>You're right, but Tom, that's how I was thinking about

0:10:13.125 --> 0:10:15.645
<v Speaker 1>this too. We essentially have a relay race here, because

0:10:15.684 --> 0:10:19.485
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that first handoff. We go through I

0:10:19.525 --> 0:10:23.525
<v Speaker 1>think three, possibly four or other women or groups of

0:10:23.564 --> 0:10:27.564
<v Speaker 1>women we meet that the movie introduces us to. We

0:10:27.645 --> 0:10:30.725
<v Speaker 1>run along with them for a short while. Some sort

0:10:30.725 --> 0:10:34.365
<v Speaker 1>of resolution kind of comes in some segments, but yeah,

0:10:34.405 --> 0:10:39.285
<v Speaker 1>not airways, and not fully. You know, the women's lives

0:10:39.405 --> 0:10:44.445
<v Speaker 1>move ahead, certainly, but really do they get anywhere? I

0:10:44.485 --> 0:10:47.685
<v Speaker 1>think we see that in most cases not. And you know,

0:10:47.725 --> 0:10:51.964
<v Speaker 1>there's something also. There's a couple of ways this is

0:10:52.005 --> 0:10:56.485
<v Speaker 1>so effective. And the one is we've talked about looking

0:10:56.485 --> 0:10:59.405
<v Speaker 1>at these movies and their depictions of oppressive societies, and

0:10:59.885 --> 0:11:02.085
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the movies we considered have

0:11:02.165 --> 0:11:05.245
<v Speaker 1>a fairly broad canvas, you know, but still there are

0:11:05.285 --> 0:11:07.925
<v Speaker 1>main characters in a lot of cases, or two or

0:11:07.925 --> 0:11:11.885
<v Speaker 1>three main characters, and so we can get the sense of, well,

0:11:11.925 --> 0:11:15.325
<v Speaker 1>this time and this oppression was experienced by this person,

0:11:15.885 --> 0:11:20.485
<v Speaker 1>maybe this neighborhood. But by doing this, by expanding the

0:11:20.564 --> 0:11:24.205
<v Speaker 1>canvas so wide in what is you know, probably the

0:11:24.205 --> 0:11:28.965
<v Speaker 1>shortest film of the marathon, but certainly among them, in

0:11:29.445 --> 0:11:32.565
<v Speaker 1>expanding things this wide, we really do get a sense

0:11:32.725 --> 0:11:37.804
<v Speaker 1>of the societal reality that this isn't just a you know,

0:11:38.205 --> 0:11:41.725
<v Speaker 1>a woman or two women in unfortunate situations, that this

0:11:41.885 --> 0:11:45.885
<v Speaker 1>is a top down issue. So it does that, and

0:11:45.965 --> 0:11:49.165
<v Speaker 1>it also does Adam, this is something you know, if

0:11:49.205 --> 0:11:51.085
<v Speaker 1>you had told me the structure, I could have said, yeah,

0:11:51.085 --> 0:11:53.445
<v Speaker 1>that's probably why he chose it, right, But it is

0:11:53.525 --> 0:11:58.245
<v Speaker 1>only experiencing the structure that I think we realize. Going

0:11:58.245 --> 0:12:02.245
<v Speaker 1>back to another quality you talked about devastating, I think

0:12:02.245 --> 0:12:08.885
<v Speaker 1>there's a helplessness to not having these women's stories resolved

0:12:09.205 --> 0:12:13.204
<v Speaker 1>or improved in most cases and anyway, and us as

0:12:13.285 --> 0:12:18.685
<v Speaker 1>viewers moving on, you just feel so helpless, not obviously

0:12:19.125 --> 0:12:21.805
<v Speaker 1>as a viewer that you could do so something for them,

0:12:22.125 --> 0:12:26.045
<v Speaker 1>but I think there's a form of empathy going on.

0:12:26.085 --> 0:12:29.125
<v Speaker 1>There's a contract between viewer and subject in a movie

0:12:29.845 --> 0:12:33.845
<v Speaker 1>where we sort of feel like we're helping by watching

0:12:34.564 --> 0:12:40.045
<v Speaker 1>something about our viewing, our attending, our witnessing, not practically

0:12:40.965 --> 0:12:43.645
<v Speaker 1>but just in our movie going experience. We feel like

0:12:43.684 --> 0:12:46.965
<v Speaker 1>we're there with them. And when that baton gets passed

0:12:47.085 --> 0:12:49.445
<v Speaker 1>from one of them, still in a state of distress,

0:12:49.965 --> 0:12:53.165
<v Speaker 1>and we pick up with someone else and we know

0:12:53.205 --> 0:12:55.765
<v Speaker 1>we're likely not going to get back to the other person,

0:12:55.925 --> 0:12:59.045
<v Speaker 1>there is an extra helplessness that I think feeds into

0:12:59.045 --> 0:13:03.925
<v Speaker 1>that devastation you're describing that really makes this a wrenching,

0:13:04.405 --> 0:13:07.725
<v Speaker 1>a wrenching experience. And let me go back just quickly

0:13:07.765 --> 0:13:10.205
<v Speaker 1>to that, because you were laying it out in such

0:13:10.245 --> 0:13:13.285
<v Speaker 1>detail that opening sequence. There's one thing I want to

0:13:13.325 --> 0:13:16.485
<v Speaker 1>point out about the first baton pass as well, because

0:13:16.725 --> 0:13:20.885
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to your point about Panahi's really incisive use

0:13:20.925 --> 0:13:24.485
<v Speaker 1>of his locations and putting us in the moment, if

0:13:24.525 --> 0:13:28.485
<v Speaker 1>not always precisely long, single takes, certainly longer takes that

0:13:28.605 --> 0:13:31.845
<v Speaker 1>have that feeling. So we follow that grandmother out onto

0:13:31.885 --> 0:13:34.845
<v Speaker 1>the street, and this is where we pick up three

0:13:34.925 --> 0:13:39.405
<v Speaker 1>new women, Arazoo Nargs and then another woman who I

0:13:39.405 --> 0:13:42.725
<v Speaker 1>don't think is named, and this is all on the

0:13:42.765 --> 0:13:48.285
<v Speaker 1>block that the hospital is on. Basically, they separate. We're

0:13:48.285 --> 0:13:51.805
<v Speaker 1>introduced to three women and they separate Nares. The youngest

0:13:51.845 --> 0:13:54.485
<v Speaker 1>stays in the middle where the camera met them, and

0:13:54.564 --> 0:13:56.605
<v Speaker 1>then one of them goes to one far end of

0:13:56.605 --> 0:13:58.645
<v Speaker 1>the block and the other goes to the other far

0:13:58.765 --> 0:14:01.685
<v Speaker 1>end of the block. And the camera looks back and forth,

0:14:01.804 --> 0:14:05.245
<v Speaker 1>and what we're witnessing is that the woman, I think

0:14:05.325 --> 0:14:09.485
<v Speaker 1>it's Arizoo, who goes to the one end to chase

0:14:09.525 --> 0:14:11.925
<v Speaker 1>down a guy who just said something rude to them. Right,

0:14:12.804 --> 0:14:15.285
<v Speaker 1>the other friend goes to the under end of the block.

0:14:15.525 --> 0:14:17.325
<v Speaker 1>I think she's going to a newspaper stand, and the

0:14:17.365 --> 0:14:20.525
<v Speaker 1>camera sees that she's beginning to have a confrontation with

0:14:20.605 --> 0:14:24.445
<v Speaker 1>police and by going back and forth. By looking back

0:14:24.485 --> 0:14:27.805
<v Speaker 1>and forth, we realize that in the course of a

0:14:27.805 --> 0:14:32.005
<v Speaker 1>single block, this is what these three women are experiencing.

0:14:32.125 --> 0:14:34.885
<v Speaker 1>In the middle now, Jess is in this just frightened

0:14:34.925 --> 0:14:38.165
<v Speaker 1>state of not knowing where to move. And again it's

0:14:38.365 --> 0:14:40.645
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably spend more time on this, but Panahi's use

0:14:40.725 --> 0:14:46.045
<v Speaker 1>of the street settings, it just shows you that all

0:14:46.085 --> 0:14:49.045
<v Speaker 1>of this can take place within the course of you know,

0:14:49.125 --> 0:14:51.045
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, one hundred feet or whatever it is.

0:14:51.245 --> 0:14:55.205
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred feet and a normal day, a fairly

0:14:55.245 --> 0:14:58.485
<v Speaker 2>normal experience, and that is what we get over the

0:14:58.525 --> 0:15:02.685
<v Speaker 2>course of this movie. Helplessness is the right word, because

0:15:02.725 --> 0:15:08.245
<v Speaker 2>the only problem with us using the terminology baton or

0:15:08.285 --> 0:15:10.325
<v Speaker 2>talking about it like it's a race is if it

0:15:10.365 --> 0:15:13.005
<v Speaker 2>was really a race and they were going around the oval,

0:15:13.845 --> 0:15:16.565
<v Speaker 2>is there's a finish line.

0:15:16.685 --> 0:15:18.485
<v Speaker 3>But there's no finish line here.

0:15:18.645 --> 0:15:24.445
<v Speaker 2>That's the entire point is this just continues and continues

0:15:25.485 --> 0:15:30.365
<v Speaker 2>and there is no resolution. There's certainly no neat resolution

0:15:30.885 --> 0:15:36.605
<v Speaker 2>to any of this, and sometimes we get that brought

0:15:36.645 --> 0:15:40.525
<v Speaker 2>to life with the camera. Did you notice how often

0:15:40.845 --> 0:15:46.365
<v Speaker 2>in spaces, whether it's at for example, the bus station,

0:15:47.005 --> 0:15:51.085
<v Speaker 2>we see these women often going around in circles. There

0:15:51.125 --> 0:15:54.645
<v Speaker 2>are parts of these locations where it feels like they

0:15:54.725 --> 0:15:58.325
<v Speaker 2>are they are walking in a loop, or they're they're

0:15:58.405 --> 0:16:00.405
<v Speaker 2>retracing their steps.

0:16:00.125 --> 0:16:01.645
<v Speaker 3>That's one of this too.

0:16:02.005 --> 0:16:07.525
<v Speaker 2>But often it's just a matter of their confinement. And

0:16:07.685 --> 0:16:11.325
<v Speaker 2>that's that's what that's what he shows is that no

0:16:11.365 --> 0:16:16.365
<v Speaker 2>matter where they are, no matter if they're in open spaces,

0:16:17.045 --> 0:16:23.525
<v Speaker 2>they are somehow still trapped. They are trapped by this system.

0:16:23.725 --> 0:16:28.885
<v Speaker 2>They are trapped by this this condition, the condition of

0:16:28.925 --> 0:16:34.845
<v Speaker 2>this state that demands that men get to make all

0:16:34.885 --> 0:16:37.085
<v Speaker 2>the decisions for them. Think about how many times you

0:16:37.165 --> 0:16:39.645
<v Speaker 2>hear people say I mean Perry is one of the

0:16:40.045 --> 0:16:43.325
<v Speaker 2>or Pari is one of the characters who she's she's

0:16:43.405 --> 0:16:47.005
<v Speaker 2>four months pregnant, she has no identification, she doesn't have

0:16:47.045 --> 0:16:51.485
<v Speaker 2>a father who can take responsibility for her, she doesn't

0:16:51.485 --> 0:16:53.965
<v Speaker 2>have a husband, and she just says at one point

0:16:53.965 --> 0:16:55.965
<v Speaker 2>to the one person she thinks can help her, I

0:16:56.005 --> 0:16:58.525
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to do. I don't know where to go.

0:16:59.325 --> 0:17:04.484
<v Speaker 2>And that's true. She she is completely helpless. The woman

0:17:04.565 --> 0:17:07.605
<v Speaker 2>we see at the very end, Josh, who is on

0:17:07.725 --> 0:17:11.325
<v Speaker 2>a bus and even the way that bus is shot,

0:17:11.845 --> 0:17:14.845
<v Speaker 2>she's sitting there and and how is it how is

0:17:14.885 --> 0:17:18.405
<v Speaker 2>it portrayed. There's like four other men and and they're

0:17:18.485 --> 0:17:21.565
<v Speaker 2>they're all angled around her so that there's just there's

0:17:21.605 --> 0:17:24.805
<v Speaker 2>just no escape there, there's no escape. And the bus,

0:17:24.845 --> 0:17:29.005
<v Speaker 2>the ticket person, the taxi driver, they have to beg

0:17:29.165 --> 0:17:32.445
<v Speaker 2>people to do them favors. They have to beg men

0:17:33.005 --> 0:17:36.525
<v Speaker 2>to do them favors, simply to do basic things like

0:17:36.925 --> 0:17:39.525
<v Speaker 2>I want to buy I want to buy a bus ticket.

0:17:40.005 --> 0:17:43.645
<v Speaker 2>That's the Yeah, that's the those conditions that they're living under.

0:17:44.005 --> 0:17:46.285
<v Speaker 1>To go back to the woman on that prison bus

0:17:46.325 --> 0:17:50.405
<v Speaker 1>at the very end, and men making the decisions and

0:17:50.445 --> 0:17:53.245
<v Speaker 1>making the rules even in the moment can't smell talk

0:17:53.245 --> 0:17:57.525
<v Speaker 1>about talk about the payoff to the repeated motif from

0:17:57.525 --> 0:18:02.445
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning about these women failing to light a cigarette,

0:18:02.565 --> 0:18:06.045
<v Speaker 1>wanting to have a cigarette, and how many sequences, Adam,

0:18:06.445 --> 0:18:09.365
<v Speaker 1>do they start to light one for some reason or

0:18:09.405 --> 0:18:11.245
<v Speaker 1>ask for one and it's it's failed.

0:18:11.445 --> 0:18:13.045
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they no matches whatever.

0:18:13.125 --> 0:18:15.285
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't think anyone gets to have

0:18:15.325 --> 0:18:18.605
<v Speaker 1>a cigarette in the point until this sequence where this

0:18:18.645 --> 0:18:21.365
<v Speaker 1>woman who has been picked up. We understand she was

0:18:21.525 --> 0:18:23.805
<v Speaker 1>on the street and a man picked her up, that

0:18:23.885 --> 0:18:27.325
<v Speaker 1>she's a sex worker, and the man is let go.

0:18:27.805 --> 0:18:30.725
<v Speaker 1>She gets arrested. She's on this prison bus with, as

0:18:30.725 --> 0:18:34.605
<v Speaker 1>you said, a couple other men, and she tries to

0:18:34.725 --> 0:18:37.045
<v Speaker 1>light a cigarette and is told no smoking on here.

0:18:37.645 --> 0:18:41.645
<v Speaker 1>What happens later a little bit later, the one or

0:18:41.645 --> 0:18:44.565
<v Speaker 1>two of the other men on the bus they light

0:18:45.325 --> 0:18:49.205
<v Speaker 1>their cigarette, and so suddenly they're smoking, and we cut

0:18:49.285 --> 0:18:52.565
<v Speaker 1>back to this woman and she looks and I forget

0:18:52.565 --> 0:18:55.005
<v Speaker 1>exactly how it happens, but basically the point is she

0:18:55.045 --> 0:18:58.365
<v Speaker 1>either lights her own again. She tries again and figures, well,

0:18:58.405 --> 0:19:00.165
<v Speaker 1>if they're doing it now, I can do it. And

0:19:00.205 --> 0:19:02.925
<v Speaker 1>she's allowed to. But it's the first cigarette in the

0:19:02.925 --> 0:19:06.485
<v Speaker 1>film that's actually lit, is not until the men have

0:19:06.645 --> 0:19:09.685
<v Speaker 1>done it first for themselves, which just speaks to your

0:19:09.685 --> 0:19:13.845
<v Speaker 1>point about, you know, decisions being completely out of your control,

0:19:14.045 --> 0:19:19.405
<v Speaker 1>even something as personal as that is that they all.

0:19:34.885 --> 0:19:37.565
<v Speaker 2>Do. We go ahead and talk about the end, acknowledging

0:19:37.605 --> 0:19:40.205
<v Speaker 2>that we have to we have to say that this

0:19:40.285 --> 0:19:42.165
<v Speaker 2>is heavy spoilers or are there other things you want to

0:19:42.205 --> 0:19:42.645
<v Speaker 2>talk about.

0:19:42.885 --> 0:19:46.805
<v Speaker 1>I do want to build on your note about imprisonment

0:19:47.125 --> 0:19:52.645
<v Speaker 1>and the visual nature of this, because I noticed fairly

0:19:52.685 --> 0:19:57.325
<v Speaker 1>early on that there is so much jail imagery or

0:19:57.365 --> 0:20:00.285
<v Speaker 1>just bars on the screen, and you were already touching

0:20:00.285 --> 0:20:03.405
<v Speaker 1>on one when you talked about narjest circling at the

0:20:03.405 --> 0:20:06.485
<v Speaker 1>bus station, and she does. It's that lower level, so

0:20:06.525 --> 0:20:09.525
<v Speaker 1>they're floor to ceiling windows, but each pane of window

0:20:09.565 --> 0:20:13.685
<v Speaker 1>is separated by a vertical black bar, and as she's circling,

0:20:14.085 --> 0:20:18.765
<v Speaker 1>which you described, the movement makes those they almost come

0:20:18.845 --> 0:20:21.765
<v Speaker 1>quicker than they would if she was just walking looking slowly,

0:20:21.885 --> 0:20:25.645
<v Speaker 1>and they definitely to me had the feeling of jail bars.

0:20:26.125 --> 0:20:29.925
<v Speaker 1>You can see there's another just shot again Panaki using

0:20:29.965 --> 0:20:33.005
<v Speaker 1>the streets so well, of Nargetes crouching against a wall,

0:20:33.565 --> 0:20:36.405
<v Speaker 1>and the wall is next to a gated door, and

0:20:36.445 --> 0:20:38.965
<v Speaker 1>of course there are bars on that, but just maybe

0:20:39.005 --> 0:20:42.205
<v Speaker 1>they waited for the light to be right. But the

0:20:42.285 --> 0:20:45.245
<v Speaker 1>bars are also casting a shadow onto the ground in

0:20:45.285 --> 0:20:48.085
<v Speaker 1>front of her, reminding her as we learn that her

0:20:48.085 --> 0:20:50.245
<v Speaker 1>and the other two women she's with they snuck out

0:20:50.285 --> 0:20:54.445
<v Speaker 1>of prison that morning, and so it's still haunting her

0:20:54.765 --> 0:20:57.805
<v Speaker 1>even though she's escaped. And then just one more I

0:20:57.845 --> 0:21:01.125
<v Speaker 1>really liked. Pari goes to talk to a friend who

0:21:01.165 --> 0:21:03.885
<v Speaker 1>works at a movie theater in the ticket booth and

0:21:04.165 --> 0:21:08.285
<v Speaker 1>she's allowed inside. Panahi keeps the camera outside the ticket booth,

0:21:08.565 --> 0:21:10.965
<v Speaker 1>frames their faces in the window where you pay for

0:21:11.005 --> 0:21:13.885
<v Speaker 1>your tickets, which of course has bars as well, so

0:21:13.925 --> 0:21:19.885
<v Speaker 1>that idea of imprisonment is also very much built into

0:21:19.885 --> 0:21:20.605
<v Speaker 1>the composition.

0:21:21.325 --> 0:21:26.605
<v Speaker 2>Choices of locales imprisonment or barriers to entry, right, they're

0:21:26.645 --> 0:21:29.565
<v Speaker 2>either stuck or they can't get in. That is the

0:21:29.565 --> 0:21:34.845
<v Speaker 2>point that is just the accepted or well it is unfortunately,

0:21:34.845 --> 0:21:38.645
<v Speaker 2>it's the accepted part of existence. They really have no

0:21:38.845 --> 0:21:41.565
<v Speaker 2>choice in this case, these women.

0:21:41.685 --> 0:21:42.325
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately.

0:21:42.925 --> 0:21:47.925
<v Speaker 2>That is something that Panahi really very vividly depicts in

0:21:47.965 --> 0:21:52.565
<v Speaker 2>this film. People listening who may be thinking, Okay, I

0:21:52.605 --> 0:21:56.805
<v Speaker 2>want to see this movie before especially they spoil the

0:21:57.325 --> 0:22:02.165
<v Speaker 2>ending of the film. There there isn't with this movie

0:22:02.325 --> 0:22:04.925
<v Speaker 2>exactly a case where we could spoil the plot of

0:22:04.965 --> 0:22:07.765
<v Speaker 2>the movie or a big reveal. But as we're talking

0:22:07.845 --> 0:22:12.605
<v Speaker 2>about the formal conceit and how important it is, I didn't,

0:22:12.645 --> 0:22:16.125
<v Speaker 2>as I alluded to expect that it would have the

0:22:16.965 --> 0:22:19.925
<v Speaker 2>total payoff that it does at the end, the devastating

0:22:19.965 --> 0:22:23.885
<v Speaker 2>payoff that it does. So if you want it shouldn't

0:22:23.925 --> 0:22:26.525
<v Speaker 2>be surprising because it's Panahi, and especially after something like

0:22:26.565 --> 0:22:28.605
<v Speaker 2>the ending of it was just an accident A.

0:22:28.565 --> 0:22:29.285
<v Speaker 3>Year or two ago.

0:22:30.285 --> 0:22:32.005
<v Speaker 2>Of course he would give us something like this, but

0:22:32.325 --> 0:22:34.565
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't anticipating it. If you don't want to hear

0:22:34.645 --> 0:22:36.925
<v Speaker 2>us talk about it, you do want to watch this movie.

0:22:37.045 --> 0:22:39.405
<v Speaker 2>This was the one movie. Another reason why we considered

0:22:39.445 --> 0:22:42.125
<v Speaker 2>not putting it in the marathon was that we couldn't

0:22:42.165 --> 0:22:45.165
<v Speaker 2>find it. It didn't seem to be available on DVD,

0:22:45.645 --> 0:22:49.005
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get it at the at the library, no streaming

0:22:49.045 --> 0:22:51.765
<v Speaker 2>or VOD platforms had it. And a listener wrote in,

0:22:51.885 --> 0:22:53.845
<v Speaker 2>and maybe as we're talking I can look it up

0:22:53.925 --> 0:22:56.325
<v Speaker 2>just to make sure we give him credit and said, well,

0:22:56.685 --> 0:23:00.085
<v Speaker 2>you know, the whole thing is legal or illegal. The

0:23:00.125 --> 0:23:04.405
<v Speaker 2>whole thing is English subtitled on YouTube, and it is.

0:23:04.645 --> 0:23:07.165
<v Speaker 2>And if you go to our marathons page, we have

0:23:07.205 --> 0:23:08.805
<v Speaker 2>a link to it, or you can just go to

0:23:08.925 --> 0:23:11.845
<v Speaker 2>YouTube and type in the circle Panahi and it will

0:23:11.845 --> 0:23:14.245
<v Speaker 2>come up, and it's ninety minutes long. And we're obviously

0:23:14.365 --> 0:23:17.405
<v Speaker 2>encouraging you to watch it. So have we done our

0:23:17.485 --> 0:23:20.965
<v Speaker 2>due diligence, Josh and setting up the ending and spoil

0:23:21.325 --> 0:23:25.405
<v Speaker 2>as we talk about it. Could you have ever anticipated

0:23:26.285 --> 0:23:28.165
<v Speaker 2>the gut punch that we get at the end of

0:23:28.205 --> 0:23:28.965
<v Speaker 2>this film?

0:23:29.485 --> 0:23:31.685
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if we if I tried to

0:23:31.725 --> 0:23:34.645
<v Speaker 1>plot it out and realize the structure he'd been using

0:23:34.845 --> 0:23:38.205
<v Speaker 1>and thought more deeply about the title, I might you

0:23:38.245 --> 0:23:40.965
<v Speaker 1>can see how we get there, right, but it still

0:23:40.965 --> 0:23:43.725
<v Speaker 1>did take me by surprise. There is a reference at

0:23:43.765 --> 0:23:46.885
<v Speaker 1>one point to one of the women to take me

0:23:46.965 --> 0:23:49.765
<v Speaker 1>to the circle in the taxi car. So so I

0:23:49.765 --> 0:23:52.685
<v Speaker 1>had already understood, like this must be, you know, a

0:23:52.765 --> 0:23:56.325
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood or maybe a traffic area that she's referring to.

0:23:56.725 --> 0:24:01.085
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's all the title is pulling from. But yeah,

0:24:01.205 --> 0:24:05.725
<v Speaker 1>to bring us again following that arrested sex worker played

0:24:05.725 --> 0:24:10.885
<v Speaker 1>by Emojgan Faramarzi, who brings a very refreshing attitude like

0:24:10.965 --> 0:24:13.725
<v Speaker 1>she's she's the one who who kind of pushes back

0:24:14.965 --> 0:24:18.005
<v Speaker 1>the most. I think, well, that's not true. Actually, I

0:24:18.005 --> 0:24:22.165
<v Speaker 1>would say one of the one goes to chase down

0:24:22.165 --> 0:24:26.125
<v Speaker 1>the men who are being rude. She also Pari. I

0:24:26.125 --> 0:24:29.965
<v Speaker 1>think it's Pari. Yeah, she also has some things to say,

0:24:30.005 --> 0:24:33.365
<v Speaker 1>but at any rate, to know that we're going to

0:24:33.565 --> 0:24:39.765
<v Speaker 1>follow her after being arrested into a holding cell where

0:24:39.765 --> 0:24:44.245
<v Speaker 1>we're going to meet again, reacquaint some of the other

0:24:44.285 --> 0:24:47.645
<v Speaker 1>women we've already met and see contradicting what we were

0:24:47.685 --> 0:24:49.765
<v Speaker 1>saying earlier what I was saying earlier about we don't

0:24:49.765 --> 0:24:51.925
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen to them. Now we do

0:24:52.125 --> 0:24:54.885
<v Speaker 1>see what is happening to a couple of them, and

0:24:54.925 --> 0:24:58.484
<v Speaker 1>it's it's as bad as we could have feared, and

0:24:58.525 --> 0:25:01.005
<v Speaker 1>it's possibly even worse. I want to ask you a

0:25:01.085 --> 0:25:06.805
<v Speaker 1>question about a tiny detail in this ending, but first, yes,

0:25:07.365 --> 0:25:09.925
<v Speaker 1>say it, how it affected you and what you made

0:25:09.925 --> 0:25:10.205
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:25:11.685 --> 0:25:17.565
<v Speaker 2>Well, we get the visual motif of the circle with

0:25:17.725 --> 0:25:21.405
<v Speaker 2>the camera right that is now going around the room.

0:25:21.525 --> 0:25:26.005
<v Speaker 2>It's identifying that we're seeing the women and that they

0:25:26.405 --> 0:25:28.725
<v Speaker 2>the previous women that we have followed, and that they

0:25:28.765 --> 0:25:33.165
<v Speaker 2>have ended up here. But to then on top of

0:25:33.445 --> 0:25:37.165
<v Speaker 2>that that, honestly, Josh, you know, this is where I

0:25:37.205 --> 0:25:38.845
<v Speaker 2>go back to something like it was just an accident.

0:25:38.885 --> 0:25:39.285
<v Speaker 3>I believe.

0:25:39.325 --> 0:25:42.965
<v Speaker 2>I even said the ending we got was already more

0:25:43.045 --> 0:25:47.205
<v Speaker 2>than sufficient, and then he gives us something after it

0:25:47.005 --> 0:25:51.565
<v Speaker 2>that just makes it even more special. And this is

0:25:51.725 --> 0:25:55.605
<v Speaker 2>even more, especially heart wrenching. But in this case, the

0:25:55.725 --> 0:26:02.765
<v Speaker 2>ending is great. And then the added element here is

0:26:02.845 --> 0:26:09.325
<v Speaker 2>to have the symmetry of opening the film. We've come

0:26:09.805 --> 0:26:13.525
<v Speaker 2>full circle. Of course, the film has come full circle.

0:26:14.005 --> 0:26:17.765
<v Speaker 2>To have the visual symmetry of the movie opening on

0:26:19.085 --> 0:26:25.725
<v Speaker 2>the opening of that food door, or I'm calling it

0:26:25.765 --> 0:26:27.445
<v Speaker 2>again the food door, because that's what it is in

0:26:27.485 --> 0:26:30.645
<v Speaker 2>a jail cell. But that sliding, that sliding little door

0:26:31.045 --> 0:26:35.765
<v Speaker 2>within the hospital door. Now we're opening it. Same shot,

0:26:36.045 --> 0:26:39.005
<v Speaker 2>same type of door, same type of little window. It

0:26:39.125 --> 0:26:44.085
<v Speaker 2>was in a hospital door, now it's in the jail cell. There,

0:26:44.605 --> 0:26:50.245
<v Speaker 2>that's enough symmetry. We've come full circle. And then to

0:26:50.365 --> 0:26:55.085
<v Speaker 2>find out that the name that's being called for is

0:26:55.165 --> 0:26:59.165
<v Speaker 2>the name of the woman giving birth at the beginning,

0:26:59.405 --> 0:27:04.925
<v Speaker 2>the woman who gave birth to the girl who failed Josh,

0:27:05.005 --> 0:27:08.805
<v Speaker 2>who failed to properly give birth to a boy as

0:27:08.845 --> 0:27:12.365
<v Speaker 2>she promised that she was going to at the beginning

0:27:12.365 --> 0:27:16.965
<v Speaker 2>of the film, the implication being I don't know what

0:27:17.045 --> 0:27:21.805
<v Speaker 2>else to read into it other than something obviously has

0:27:21.885 --> 0:27:27.365
<v Speaker 2>so spiraled sense that moment, as as we understand it

0:27:27.565 --> 0:27:32.045
<v Speaker 2>likely will based on how the grandmother responds, based on

0:27:32.085 --> 0:27:35.885
<v Speaker 2>how the grandmother. There's a moment Josh, the first person,

0:27:35.925 --> 0:27:39.365
<v Speaker 2>the grandmother, it's so hard to watch. I want to

0:27:39.405 --> 0:27:42.285
<v Speaker 2>say I love it because it's something so stunning, but

0:27:42.325 --> 0:27:44.965
<v Speaker 2>it's so hard to watch. The first person the grandmother

0:27:45.045 --> 0:27:48.245
<v Speaker 2>runs into whoever it is she knows the reality.

0:27:48.405 --> 0:27:48.925
<v Speaker 3>She knows it.

0:27:49.045 --> 0:27:51.485
<v Speaker 2>She's trying to process it, and I don't think she's

0:27:51.485 --> 0:27:55.085
<v Speaker 2>in denial, like she knows it, but it's almost like

0:27:55.125 --> 0:27:57.765
<v Speaker 2>she just doesn't want to face it. So when she

0:27:57.845 --> 0:28:00.605
<v Speaker 2>meets the first person and they're like, oh, so, what's

0:28:00.685 --> 0:28:04.205
<v Speaker 2>the news, and she goes, uh, no, nothing's happened yet,

0:28:04.525 --> 0:28:08.885
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, she just maybe it's a little hazy

0:28:08.925 --> 0:28:11.725
<v Speaker 2>on who exactly. Maybe that was the other I think

0:28:11.765 --> 0:28:14.885
<v Speaker 2>that's the in law's family, and so she doesn't want

0:28:14.885 --> 0:28:16.965
<v Speaker 2>to be the one to tell them.

0:28:17.245 --> 0:28:18.205
<v Speaker 3>That it's not a boy.

0:28:18.445 --> 0:28:21.845
<v Speaker 2>So she's just like, yeah, no news yet, and moves

0:28:21.965 --> 0:28:24.965
<v Speaker 2>and moves along it. That's that's a very hard thing

0:28:25.085 --> 0:28:28.645
<v Speaker 2>to watch. So to know that this is such terrible

0:28:28.725 --> 0:28:32.205
<v Speaker 2>news that they have, that that family has given birth

0:28:32.245 --> 0:28:36.045
<v Speaker 2>to a girl, that now that mother has somehow ended

0:28:36.125 --> 0:28:40.885
<v Speaker 2>up in such a such a state that she's now imprisoned.

0:28:42.125 --> 0:28:46.685
<v Speaker 2>That I mean that the entire movie, Josh, we could

0:28:46.725 --> 0:28:49.245
<v Speaker 2>make an entire movie just about that woman's story.

0:28:49.565 --> 0:28:54.165
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Oh, any of these women, Yeah, absolutely, which I

0:28:54.205 --> 0:28:57.365
<v Speaker 1>think speaks to the richness of the of the storylines

0:28:57.365 --> 0:29:00.165
<v Speaker 1>and the characterizations and the performances that any of these

0:29:00.205 --> 0:29:04.445
<v Speaker 1>women could support there on movie. I think you're That

0:29:04.605 --> 0:29:07.805
<v Speaker 1>was my first impression too, that the name it is

0:29:07.845 --> 0:29:10.485
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same. I went back check the subtitles at

0:29:10.485 --> 0:29:13.205
<v Speaker 1>the beginning against the name they call at the end.

0:29:13.285 --> 0:29:17.845
<v Speaker 1>It's the same, very likely the same woman, like you said,

0:29:17.965 --> 0:29:20.845
<v Speaker 1>spiraled to some point. It wouldn't take much we've learned.

0:29:21.045 --> 0:29:24.085
<v Speaker 1>As you said, I think there's also a possibility that

0:29:24.125 --> 0:29:28.205
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of symbolic coincidence that Panahi is offering.

0:29:28.285 --> 0:29:31.205
<v Speaker 1>You know, it could be a different woman who has

0:29:31.285 --> 0:29:34.605
<v Speaker 1>the same name, But the point is the same to

0:29:34.685 --> 0:29:37.765
<v Speaker 1>your observation about the door, the window that slides open.

0:29:38.525 --> 0:29:40.965
<v Speaker 1>It's even if it's a different woman but who has

0:29:41.005 --> 0:29:43.285
<v Speaker 1>the same name. The movie is making the same point

0:29:43.365 --> 0:29:46.645
<v Speaker 1>by having the same window in a maternity ward and

0:29:46.645 --> 0:29:47.285
<v Speaker 1>a prison cell.

0:29:47.445 --> 0:29:49.925
<v Speaker 2>There are other hundred There are a hundred of these

0:29:49.965 --> 0:29:52.085
<v Speaker 2>women in a similar position.

0:29:52.245 --> 0:29:55.085
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, it goes back to, you know, my

0:29:55.245 --> 0:29:58.285
<v Speaker 1>notion of the importance of having these be multiple stories.

0:29:58.565 --> 0:29:58.765
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:58.805 --> 0:30:01.285
<v Speaker 1>The production design choice here too, though, Adam. It's not

0:30:01.365 --> 0:30:05.205
<v Speaker 1>just that the window is about the same size and

0:30:05.245 --> 0:30:08.925
<v Speaker 1>shape and functions the same way. The walls themselves are

0:30:09.125 --> 0:30:11.965
<v Speaker 1>different colors. The maternity ward is like a hospital, white

0:30:12.325 --> 0:30:17.805
<v Speaker 1>but blank, like faceless. Nothing really distinguishes the window, the

0:30:17.885 --> 0:30:22.565
<v Speaker 1>door that slides except it's purpose. It's all painted the same.

0:30:23.045 --> 0:30:26.685
<v Speaker 1>The jail is the same way. It's green, kind of

0:30:26.725 --> 0:30:29.165
<v Speaker 1>like a dark green, it seemed to me. But again

0:30:29.445 --> 0:30:33.165
<v Speaker 1>all you know, like monochrome essentially, where it's the only

0:30:33.245 --> 0:30:36.885
<v Speaker 1>color on that door, and there's just sort of a

0:30:37.645 --> 0:30:43.045
<v Speaker 1>facelessness to that, you know, painting choice. There's there's an

0:30:43.085 --> 0:30:49.045
<v Speaker 1>inhumanity to it that both places have because for women,

0:30:49.445 --> 0:30:53.725
<v Speaker 1>they're experiencing the same thing essentially in both places. So

0:30:53.765 --> 0:30:56.085
<v Speaker 1>the question I had for you, also in addition to

0:30:56.125 --> 0:30:58.205
<v Speaker 1>the use of the name, is about the women there.

0:30:58.245 --> 0:31:04.805
<v Speaker 1>I know we see nigas An Arizo, who we saw

0:31:04.885 --> 0:31:06.925
<v Speaker 1>there the second to take the baton out on the

0:31:06.965 --> 0:31:09.605
<v Speaker 1>block as I described, and Arizo is actually the one

0:31:09.645 --> 0:31:12.405
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking of. Who's Who's kind of talks back

0:31:12.485 --> 0:31:16.205
<v Speaker 1>to the men played by Mariam Parvin Almani. She has

0:31:16.245 --> 0:31:19.765
<v Speaker 1>she has a real spark to her performance. Do we

0:31:19.805 --> 0:31:22.645
<v Speaker 1>see the third woman who is with them on that block?

0:31:23.645 --> 0:31:25.365
<v Speaker 3>And do we I don't remember for sure.

0:31:25.885 --> 0:31:28.245
<v Speaker 1>I rewatched a couple of times. It's very dark in

0:31:28.285 --> 0:31:31.965
<v Speaker 1>the cell. There are other women but the only faces

0:31:32.005 --> 0:31:34.485
<v Speaker 1>you see clearly are Narjessa and Arizela, and so it

0:31:34.525 --> 0:31:39.085
<v Speaker 1>made me wonder, is Pari there? Who is the woman

0:31:39.085 --> 0:31:41.925
<v Speaker 1>who's pregnant and looking for help with that. We also

0:31:41.925 --> 0:31:44.005
<v Speaker 1>spend time with a character we haven't mentioned yet, the

0:31:44.045 --> 0:31:47.405
<v Speaker 1>mother of a young girl who we don't exactly get

0:31:47.405 --> 0:31:50.205
<v Speaker 1>the details, but is in such a desperate situation. She's

0:31:50.245 --> 0:31:55.085
<v Speaker 1>out on the street trying to essentially abandon her young daughter,

0:31:55.605 --> 0:31:58.645
<v Speaker 1>hoping she'll be picked up by a wealthy family that

0:31:58.685 --> 0:32:01.445
<v Speaker 1>can take care of her. I wonder if that woman

0:32:01.685 --> 0:32:05.725
<v Speaker 1>is possibly in the cell as well. We can't. It's

0:32:05.765 --> 0:32:07.685
<v Speaker 1>not hard to see you if there are some of

0:32:07.725 --> 0:32:10.005
<v Speaker 1>them there. For sure, there are some of them, and

0:32:10.045 --> 0:32:12.045
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I guess is my larger If not,

0:32:12.925 --> 0:32:15.565
<v Speaker 1>I like that because if it is all of them,

0:32:15.725 --> 0:32:17.405
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it would be heavy handed if the

0:32:17.445 --> 0:32:21.645
<v Speaker 1>camera lingered on each face for twenty second. But there's

0:32:22.005 --> 0:32:27.085
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit of naturalism against this again, this gorilla

0:32:27.125 --> 0:32:30.045
<v Speaker 1>filmmaking on the street, sensibility fly on the wall that

0:32:30.085 --> 0:32:34.885
<v Speaker 1>Panahi brings to the entire film. There's a naturalism there

0:32:34.965 --> 0:32:37.605
<v Speaker 1>even within this Jyall cell that I think is important

0:32:38.365 --> 0:32:40.845
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to deciding there to linger on their faces too.

0:32:41.565 --> 0:32:46.285
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this film The Circle. We would love to hear

0:32:46.605 --> 0:32:50.365
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts about it. You can email us feedback at

0:32:50.405 --> 0:32:56.205
<v Speaker 2>film spotting dot net. Also, Josh, we need to officially

0:32:56.405 --> 0:33:01.765
<v Speaker 2>conclude our business of this marathon like we always do,

0:33:01.965 --> 0:33:06.325
<v Speaker 2>which is with our awards. We will plan to record

0:33:06.365 --> 0:33:10.645
<v Speaker 2>that conversation where we give out our marathon awards, including

0:33:10.685 --> 0:33:15.085
<v Speaker 2>things like best Actor or Actress, Best Supporting Actor or Actress,

0:33:15.285 --> 0:33:20.645
<v Speaker 2>Best Picture. That'll be tough next week. But the first

0:33:20.725 --> 0:33:22.805
<v Speaker 2>order businesses that we have to decide on what we're

0:33:22.845 --> 0:33:24.845
<v Speaker 2>going to call the awards, and we also have to

0:33:24.845 --> 0:33:28.765
<v Speaker 2>decide what that special topic is. What's that award that

0:33:28.925 --> 0:33:33.365
<v Speaker 2>is unique to this marathon that only the Dissident Cinema

0:33:34.605 --> 0:33:39.205
<v Speaker 2>Marathon could could evoke? Is it? Is it the best

0:33:39.685 --> 0:33:43.045
<v Speaker 2>moment of activism, the best pushback something?

0:33:43.085 --> 0:33:45.925
<v Speaker 1>That's where Yeah, that's where my mind went. I don't

0:33:45.925 --> 0:33:49.485
<v Speaker 1>have something right now for a title for the awards,

0:33:49.485 --> 0:33:51.845
<v Speaker 1>and listeners always have better ones anyway, So get those

0:33:51.845 --> 0:33:53.605
<v Speaker 1>to us quickly, please do, because I think we're going

0:33:53.685 --> 0:33:56.085
<v Speaker 1>to be doing this within a week or so. Yeah.

0:33:56.085 --> 0:33:59.565
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking along the lines of dissident gesture, something

0:33:59.645 --> 0:34:03.765
<v Speaker 1>that's cinematic, you know, so it it not a line

0:34:03.765 --> 0:34:07.645
<v Speaker 1>of dialogue necessarily, and maybe I would probably look for

0:34:07.725 --> 0:34:14.964
<v Speaker 1>something that involves the filmmaking in a especially clever, unique way.

0:34:15.765 --> 0:34:17.885
<v Speaker 1>As we've been discussing the whole structure of the circle,

0:34:18.005 --> 0:34:20.805
<v Speaker 1>you know, just something in the filmmaking that surprises us

0:34:20.805 --> 0:34:23.765
<v Speaker 1>that can count as a dissonant gesture. All of these

0:34:23.805 --> 0:34:26.605
<v Speaker 1>movies are as a whole, taken as a whole, but

0:34:26.725 --> 0:34:29.245
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's like just a little moment or a touch

0:34:29.525 --> 0:34:35.685
<v Speaker 1>or a filmmaking choice that feels particularly like it's trying

0:34:35.725 --> 0:34:39.045
<v Speaker 1>to push back against these forces that the movies are depicting.

0:34:39.405 --> 0:34:42.205
<v Speaker 2>I'm on board if you have a pick for dissident gesture,

0:34:42.205 --> 0:34:44.085
<v Speaker 2>if you've been doing your homework and playing along as

0:34:44.125 --> 0:34:46.285
<v Speaker 2>part of this marathon, or if you have an alternate suggestion,

0:34:46.685 --> 0:34:50.005
<v Speaker 2>if you have a suggestion for a name for these awards,

0:34:50.085 --> 0:34:52.525
<v Speaker 2>or if you have any comments at all about our

0:34:52.565 --> 0:34:55.405
<v Speaker 2>conversation regarding the circle. We'd love to hear all of

0:34:55.445 --> 0:34:57.325
<v Speaker 2>it feedback at filmspotting dot net.

0:34:58.525 --> 0:35:00.485
<v Speaker 1>We're about to start another week here, Adam, so we

0:35:00.525 --> 0:35:03.364
<v Speaker 1>want to remind folks about what's coming up in the

0:35:03.365 --> 0:35:07.005
<v Speaker 1>film Spotting feed Monday, we will have another episode of

0:35:07.045 --> 0:35:10.685
<v Speaker 1>the Movie Racket with Michael Phillips his guest this time.

0:35:10.845 --> 0:35:13.965
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be so great. At least Dana Stevens,

0:35:14.365 --> 0:35:18.885
<v Speaker 1>regular guest on Film Spotting regular live guests. She's done,

0:35:19.045 --> 0:35:20.685
<v Speaker 1>you know, a number of live shows. I think my

0:35:20.725 --> 0:35:25.005
<v Speaker 1>first live show I ever did was with Dana and

0:35:25.045 --> 0:35:27.125
<v Speaker 1>Michael and you. Yes, So this will be really cool

0:35:27.165 --> 0:35:30.485
<v Speaker 1>to hear them together on the Movie Racket that is Monday.

0:35:30.525 --> 0:35:34.485
<v Speaker 1>On Tuesday, Film Spotting SVU will have some Spider Man

0:35:34.565 --> 0:35:38.925
<v Speaker 1>Brand New Day related streaming recommendations, of course, along with

0:35:38.965 --> 0:35:42.085
<v Speaker 1>some thoughts on the new film. You know you want

0:35:42.125 --> 0:35:47.525
<v Speaker 1>those thoughts from Matt Singer, your friendly neighborhood Spider Man expert. Thursday,

0:35:47.565 --> 0:35:49.925
<v Speaker 1>the Next Picture Show, they have part one of a

0:35:50.005 --> 0:35:55.445
<v Speaker 1>new pairing, the Anthony Bourdain biopic Tony and Pixar's Ratitudey.

0:35:55.645 --> 0:35:59.525
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, you gotta listen to that. See

0:35:59.525 --> 0:36:03.205
<v Speaker 1>what they make of the new film, which is which

0:36:03.245 --> 0:36:06.005
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good, I'll say, and Ratitude is pretty great.

0:36:06.085 --> 0:36:09.285
<v Speaker 1>So they'll dig into some fascinating connections. On the Next

0:36:09.285 --> 0:36:12.165
<v Speaker 1>Picture Show Friday, we're back Adam with one of our

0:36:12.325 --> 0:36:16.404
<v Speaker 1>most anticipated movies of the year, Jane Shoon Bruns teenage

0:36:16.445 --> 0:36:20.085
<v Speaker 1>sex and death at Camp Miasma, and also some thoughts

0:36:20.125 --> 0:36:22.885
<v Speaker 1>on the Cold War drama The Brink of War for

0:36:23.005 --> 0:36:25.005
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting, I'm Josh Larson.

0:36:24.685 --> 0:36:27.765
<v Speaker 2>And I met him Kempinar. Thanks for listening. This conversation

0:36:27.925 --> 0:36:29.805
<v Speaker 2>can serve no purpose anymore.

0:36:30.645 --> 0:36:33.245
<v Speaker 3>Good Bye,