Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Right
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, it is eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one Sean if you want to join us. Linda,
Speaker 1: how many years have you worked for me? How many
Speaker 1: total years have you been on the show?
Speaker 2: Twenty one?
Speaker 1: How many times can you think of in the course
Speaker 1: of me being on the air between all of the
Speaker 1: travel we do, all of the shows that we do radio, TV,
Speaker 1: extra broadcasts, speeches, book signings, events, all that. How many
Speaker 1: times freedom concerts back in the day? How many times
Speaker 1: have I lost my voice that you can recall or
Speaker 1: the best guesstimate you can give.
Speaker 2: Me, Oh my god, so many?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: Many a lot and twenty five fifty?
Speaker 1: And how often when I'm losing my voice or lost it?
Speaker 1: Have you told me don't go on the air?
Speaker 2: Well, no, that's not true. I don't tell you not
Speaker 2: to go on the air.
Speaker 1: I tell you to take you try to persuade me
Speaker 1: to take a day off.
Speaker 2: I tell I tell you you could use a little rest,
Speaker 2: just a.
Speaker 1: Little By the way, that is so fake news in
Speaker 1: terms of the spirit and attitude. No, I still I
Speaker 1: will I will push her. I mean, so I have
Speaker 1: I've had laryngitis. It's diagnosed laryngitis, and you know, at
Speaker 1: times sometimes the vocal cords kind of shut down a
Speaker 1: little bit. He's having a stroke. I'm like, I've had
Speaker 1: this my whole career, and I appreciate the kind words
Speaker 1: people have been sending my way, except for he's strogging out.
Speaker 1: But it's happened so often. It's like, why, all of
Speaker 1: a sudden does this take on a life of its own.
Speaker 2: Well, I have to tell you. I have to tell you.
Speaker 1: I don't want to take a minute.
Speaker 2: What are you talking about? The whole story. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: give you something nice. You're gonna like this.
Speaker 1: Okay, wait a minute.
Speaker 2: There was a woman that emailed me, a very nice woman.
Speaker 2: She didn't want anything, shouldn't ask for anything. All she
Speaker 2: said was, I have a five hundred person prayer group.
Speaker 2: We're doing a prayer chain for Sean. We hope he's okay.
Speaker 2: It was very nice. That's the kind of people you
Speaker 2: have in your audience.
Speaker 1: You know what. I just think it's beautiful. But you know,
Speaker 1: at different times, like for me to come on the
Speaker 1: air just now right here to start this show. Before
Speaker 1: I came on the air, I opened up my voice.
Speaker 1: And the other night when I was with JD we
Speaker 1: did a podcast. We finished about five minutes until the
Speaker 1: live show at nine, and then in the process the interim,
Speaker 1: my throat closes up, which is kind of normal based
Speaker 1: on my history how this thing works with me. I
Speaker 1: didn't open my voice up, and it took me until
Speaker 1: I got to the conversation part to be able to talk,
Speaker 1: and so it is not unusual. But I mean, I
Speaker 1: guess I should be happy that people are so kind
Speaker 1: and nice and loving and concerned. Then of course you
Speaker 1: have the people that wish me dead. But I can't
Speaker 1: really help that too much. Good thing, I don't read
Speaker 1: all these social media coming so I think sweet Baby
Speaker 1: James said, Neah, I don't think i'd read that. I
Speaker 1: don't think that's a good idea anyway, Thank you for
Speaker 1: your kind words, everybody. Yeah, I'm you know, I'm still
Speaker 1: struggling with it. I don't really want to go on
Speaker 1: all the medicines that are available to reduce the inflemmation
Speaker 1: in the vocal cords, because it's like the worst medicine
Speaker 1: in the world. So, you know, just kind of powering
Speaker 1: through and try and get through day by day. And
Speaker 1: I appreciate people tolerating if it's not you know, at
Speaker 1: times if it's a little rough, But no, I'm in
Speaker 1: perfect health. I'm in actually the best health I've ever
Speaker 1: been in my life, with doctor's approval and check up
Speaker 1: and everything in between. I want to get to this
Speaker 1: whole issue, and I'm going to give you a different perspective.
Speaker 1: I think, and having spoken with all of the people
Speaker 1: involved in this as it relates to this Iranian deal
Speaker 1: and where I cut to the chase and other people
Speaker 1: don't cut to the chase. And I have, for example,
Speaker 1: had a long conversation with Steve Woodcoff and a long
Speaker 1: conversation and it went into great specificity and detail, way
Speaker 1: beyond this memorandum of understanding. If you've done a business
Speaker 1: deal in your life, they put together usually what is
Speaker 1: called the term sheet. Some people might call it a
Speaker 1: memorandum of understanding. It's all pretty much the same thing,
Speaker 1: and all it is is like the basis that I
Speaker 1: was starting on these points, and you sign it, and
Speaker 1: it just means you agree to begin discussions. What the
Speaker 1: discussions are about. They actually I learned and I don't
Speaker 1: think he'd mind me sharing this with you, so I will.
Speaker 1: He didn't tell me it was off the record, that
Speaker 1: it is so much deeper than that term sheet. It is,
Speaker 1: it is so so different. And then there's other pressure.
Speaker 3: JD.
Speaker 1: Vance was on some show saying that you know that
Speaker 1: there was a lot of pressure just to get something
Speaker 1: on paper, so that all these discussions, they didn't want
Speaker 1: to have it out in public because there still are
Speaker 1: factions that are competing for power within the Iranian regime.
Speaker 1: Meaning you have the more the hardliners, the IRGC some
Speaker 1: of these people, and then the more political side, and
Speaker 1: there is a group of people that desperately want out
Speaker 1: of this situation because they see what's happening to their country.
Speaker 1: The most effective move besides the bombing obviously Midnight Hammer
Speaker 1: epic fury were historic in so many different ways, and
Speaker 1: obviously that has had a massive impact on Iran. The
Speaker 1: blockade is the single most other effective thing that the
Speaker 1: president put in place. Their entire economy, ninety percent of
Speaker 1: it is an energy, oil based economy. After the president
Speaker 1: resumed those two big bombings last week, it got the
Speaker 1: Iranian's attention and when he said the next night is
Speaker 1: going to be harder than the previous two nights, and
Speaker 1: he's probably taken carg Island then all by behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: I am told that all held brokelues and that all
Speaker 1: the Iranians and JD confirmed this to me. I have
Speaker 1: no reason to doubt them that for the first time
Speaker 1: in forty seven years, there is direct communication with the
Speaker 1: Iranian leadership and that had apparently never happened before. And
Speaker 1: they were begging to sign a sheet and get their
Speaker 1: signature on a piece of paper, and that was that
Speaker 1: quote was the memorandum of understanding. I don't even think
Speaker 1: they're going to have a ceremony and signing this stupid
Speaker 1: thing because it's meaningless anyway, because that's not what the
Speaker 1: deal is going to be. And that's what Wikoff went into,
Speaker 1: That's what JD was saying on the TV show two
Speaker 1: nights ago, et cetera, et cetera. Now let me let
Speaker 1: me predicate all of this by saying, I will never
Speaker 1: trust the Iranians. I do believe that these hardliners are hardcore.
Speaker 1: We cannot forget that a little over a week ago
Speaker 1: they fired a missile a drone shot at an Apache helicopter,
Speaker 1: and I would even argue if those pilots had died
Speaker 1: in that incident, we'd be having a very very different
Speaker 1: discussion on the air today. Thank god they're alive. Thank
Speaker 1: God god they're recovered. But it really doesn't matter, because
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, if you know, as
Speaker 1: somebody knows Donald Trump and has known him for thirty years,
Speaker 1: and the guy that wrote the art of the deal,
Speaker 1: maybe it's me, and you can say that I have
Speaker 1: a bias, I don't care, but I tend to listen
Speaker 1: to what he says, because it really doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: other people say. It matters what Donald Trump says. And
Speaker 1: for example, the President said, now at least I think
Speaker 1: we counted ten twelve times, set it again today that
Speaker 1: the Memorandum of Understanding is said, not the deal, and
Speaker 1: warned that the US would revert to dropping bombs if
Speaker 1: he doesn't like the deal. Now I'll take it a
Speaker 1: step further. I spoke to the President while he's at
Speaker 1: the G seven, and the President said to me, I
Speaker 1: have no problem going right back and taking carg Island
Speaker 1: in two seconds. This is more their opportunity than ours,
Speaker 1: and I figured I would give it a shot. And
Speaker 1: he said, if if I don't like the deal, we'll
Speaker 1: go back to shooting all of them, dropping bombs on
Speaker 1: their heads. If they don't behave, we'll go right back
Speaker 1: to dropping bombs right in the middle of their head.
Speaker 1: And you know, here's one cut of the many times
Speaker 1: he said it. If it is the actually the agreement
Speaker 1: now final or are you still no? It's not final.
Speaker 3: It's a memorandum of understanding. And if I don't like it,
Speaker 3: we'll go back to shooting at him, dropping bombs on
Speaker 3: the head the word. If I don't like it, if
Speaker 3: they don't behave, we'll go right back to dropping bombs
Speaker 3: right smack in the middle of their head. Okay, because
Speaker 3: they misbehaved for forty seven years, all right, But nobody
Speaker 3: could have made this deal. I mean the JCPOA done
Speaker 3: by Obama. He handed him a billion seven in cash,
Speaker 3: gave him hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of gave
Speaker 3: him billions and billions of dollars. But he gave them
Speaker 3: one point seven billion dollars in cash, green cash from
Speaker 3: banks into a Boeing seven fifty seven and flew it
Speaker 3: into Iran and they.
Speaker 1: Stood at the plane.
Speaker 3: I have pictures of it, like Oh my, look at
Speaker 3: this money he's giving us. He tried to bribe his
Speaker 3: way out in and do that. Nobody mentions that one
Speaker 3: point seven billion and hundreds of millions of dollars. They
Speaker 3: tried to bribe their way out of it. And you
Speaker 3: know what the Iranians did. They laughed at Obama and
Speaker 3: they said he's a stupid son of a b.
Speaker 1: And that's the president in his own words. So listen.
Speaker 1: I have always been and Reagan coined the term trust
Speaker 1: but verify, and I am very untrusting of a regime
Speaker 1: that has been responsible the number one state sponsor of terror,
Speaker 1: run by people that chant death to Israel, death to America,
Speaker 1: that have expressed in a desire for worldwide caliphate. That
Speaker 1: is a death cult that kills its own people, that
Speaker 1: funds all of these proxies. Yes, they have been degraded.
Speaker 1: The Navy's gone, their ships are gone, missile defenses are
Speaker 1: mostly dead, their air defense systems are nonexistent. We could
Speaker 1: fly and bomb any part of Iran we want, any
Speaker 1: second of any day that we want. So do I
Speaker 1: have and does the president? Did I get a sense
Speaker 1: from the President that he has a healthy dose of
Speaker 1: skis epticism. Yes he does. But he has a resolve
Speaker 1: that I know to be true, and that is that
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, if if this is
Speaker 1: not going to shape up into what they are saying
Speaker 1: and we're saying that they want, I don't think it's
Speaker 1: going to last very long, and I think we'll be
Speaker 1: back where we are, and probably I would say he'll
Speaker 1: hit him even harder. Now. That is so I'm not
Speaker 1: wringing my hands like everybody else. And maybe it's because
Speaker 1: of what we have seen of President Trump and his
Speaker 1: actions leading up to this point and what the Trump
Speaker 1: doctrine really is. Some people say, well, why don't we
Speaker 1: just finish off this leadership. That's never been a stated
Speaker 1: goal of President Trump. The President has said the Trump
Speaker 1: doctrine is he doesn't believe in forever wars. He doesn't
Speaker 1: want boots on the ground. The President is very clear,
Speaker 1: we are not giving one taxpayer dollar to them. I
Speaker 1: think he does understand the need for a carrot and
Speaker 1: a stick meaning of golf countries for the sake of
Speaker 1: helping them transform their ideology into economy, into prospering for
Speaker 1: themselves and the people in their country. I mean, right now,
Speaker 1: the value of their currency zero half the adult workforces
Speaker 1: out of work. Their economy is energy based. They have
Speaker 1: no economy so to speak of. Right now. We've been sneaking.
Speaker 1: Even yesterday I heard we got you know, eight million
Speaker 1: barrels of oil out of that southern open lane in
Speaker 1: the straight o horn moves. We've been taking out oil left,
Speaker 1: right and sideways. You know, oil has been trading at
Speaker 1: seventy six dollars a barrel. It was as high as
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty six dollars a barrel. And is
Speaker 1: this just an opportunity, Yes, it's an opportunity. Do I
Speaker 1: treat what would I say? The odds are high that
Speaker 1: the Iranians blow it up and are incapable of getting
Speaker 1: their act together. Probably yeah. Do I think the President
Speaker 1: means what he says, that he'll go back to bombing them,
Speaker 1: I absolutely believe it. So anyway, report out that this
Speaker 1: deal may be signed remotely without any signing ceremony, I
Speaker 1: don't really see the need for it anyway, because I
Speaker 1: think it's fairly meaningless. I think what's in Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: head is what matters. The White House says, by the way,
Speaker 1: that there's been all these false reports out there circulating
Speaker 1: in multiple mainstream media outlets about a text or a
Speaker 1: series of texts and some of the drafts of the
Speaker 1: memorandum of understanding, and the White House is saying these
Speaker 1: lead texts of the Iran agreement published by CNN and
Speaker 1: others are not accurate. The President is pushing back hard
Speaker 1: on reports that the US or Gulf allies or bank
Speaker 1: rolling Tehran. They don't get a penny, only based on
Speaker 1: specific things actions that they take that shows good faith
Speaker 1: on their part. So the Reconstruction Fund language is they're
Speaker 1: not we're not investing ten cents and other countries can't
Speaker 1: invest until such time as the Iranians take concrete actions.
Speaker 1: I think that's a big part of this as well.
Speaker 1: And so with all of that said, I think you
Speaker 1: should be a trust but verify audience. I think we
Speaker 1: have to watch it with clear eyes. I think that
Speaker 1: we have to know what we're dealing with. We're dealing
Speaker 1: with an Islamo fascist death cult regime. With that said,
Speaker 1: they have been defeated on every level militarily, and you
Speaker 1: have a president that is saying publicly that he's very
Speaker 1: committed to going back militarily in two seconds, and I
Speaker 1: think that the president's actions, he's kind of earned our
Speaker 1: trust in the sense that he's proven with Solomani beating
Speaker 1: the Caliphate bag Daddy Midnight Hammer at BIC Fury that
Speaker 1: he really doesn't have any compunctions doing it. So I
Speaker 1: guess I have a little bit more comfort knowing that
Speaker 1: he'll flip on a dime if he has to. That's
Speaker 1: my take, and as not spin, I think that could happen.
Speaker 1: This could happen by the weekend. For crying out loud,
Speaker 1: it's crazy. I understand everybody wants to take the memorandum
Speaker 1: of understanding and turn it into the deal. I have
Speaker 1: been assured and reassured and reassured and reassured. So either
Speaker 1: I'm being pollyannish and naive and this is what it's
Speaker 1: going to come into. Or the guy that I've known
Speaker 1: for thirty years that keeps saying this has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with any final deal, they don't even care about it,
Speaker 1: and it was just to get the process started. I
Speaker 1: think it's all going to play out in the end.
Speaker 1: What I've been told was discussed behind the scenes, and
Speaker 1: what they're agreeing to behind the scenes is very different
Speaker 1: than what is being reported. However, do I trust them?
Speaker 1: Of course not. Why would you trust the Iranians number
Speaker 1: one state sponsor a terror Look at the havoc that
Speaker 1: they have caused worldwide, look at the danger. Let me
Speaker 1: go back, Let me step back here for a second,
Speaker 1: because and I have told this audience over and over
Speaker 1: again that every source I had leading up to Epic Fury,
Speaker 1: after the devastation of fourteen bunk or buster bombs and
Speaker 1: Midnight Hammer, a president that's not an isolationist, even though
Speaker 1: some people the new woke right claim that he is
Speaker 1: or should be. That was not Donald Trump in the
Speaker 1: first term, taking out the Caliphate of Isis and Solomani
Speaker 1: and Bagdaddy and dropping the mother of all bombs on Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Midnight Hammer is basically Donald Trump two point
Speaker 1: zero and very consistent with the Trump doctrine. I don't
Speaker 1: think his doctrine has changed, and I guess maybe it's
Speaker 1: the intimate knowledge of knowing him, watching him, observing him.
Speaker 1: He will listen to everybody, and at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, there's going to be one person that will
Speaker 1: make the ultimate decision on whether any deal goes forward
Speaker 1: with Iran or any other country for that matter, and
Speaker 1: that is going to be Donald Trump. And when Donald
Speaker 1: Trump says over and over and over and over again,
Speaker 1: like he says here, all hell will rain down on
Speaker 1: Iran if they pursue a nuclear weapon, do you believe
Speaker 1: that he means it. That's a very important component to me. Listen,
Speaker 1: Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 3: And it says it loud and clear. They're not going
Speaker 3: to develop it, they're not going to buy it, they're
Speaker 3: not going to do anything with it, and if they do,
Speaker 3: they suffer unbelievable consequences, not just a little bit like.
Speaker 1: I won't even tell.
Speaker 3: You the consequences, but the consequences are the ultimate consequences.
Speaker 3: And with that being said, we have a very good relationship.
Speaker 3: But the biggest thing is they will not have a
Speaker 3: nuclear weapon, so we have they will not develop, a
Speaker 3: purchase by or any other thing. They're not going to
Speaker 3: acquire a nuclear weapon. If they do, all hell will
Speaker 3: rain down on them. And they're not going to do that.
Speaker 1: You know, he doesn't think they're going to do it,
Speaker 1: but if they do, the message has been sent clear.
Speaker 1: You know what's frustrating is the people that did not
Speaker 1: want epic fury and feel like Donald Trump betrayed them
Speaker 1: by doing exactly what he did in his first term
Speaker 1: and exactly what he said he would do since even
Speaker 1: before he ran for president that Donald Trump said Iran
Speaker 1: can never have a nuclear weapon. He's been consistent now. Well,
Speaker 1: when Steve Whitkoff, I think that the definitive interviews, they
Speaker 1: acknowledge they have this sixty percent enriched uranium in twelve
Speaker 1: days that can be enriched up to weapons grade uranium
Speaker 1: ninety percent, which would have given them four hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty kilograms about one thousand pounds as many as eleven
Speaker 1: or twelve nuclear weapons. They could do that if they
Speaker 1: could get back up any enrichment capability, that could be
Speaker 1: less than twelve days, and they would have enough weapons
Speaker 1: grade material for that amount of bombs. We learned in
Speaker 1: this process their ballistic missile range was much further than
Speaker 1: we had once thought. We now know their ballistic missiles
Speaker 1: can hit Europe cities like Paris and cities like London.
Speaker 1: The President in many ways will never get credit for it,
Speaker 1: but he's making the world a safer place. If if
Speaker 1: you don't trust him, then don't I mean, let's verify it,
Speaker 1: because I I think We're going to know very quickly
Speaker 1: whether or not this has any teeth to it or not,
Speaker 1: and if they start to balk or back up what
Speaker 1: they've been telling our negotiators privately and what has been
Speaker 1: communicated to me. Member Steve Wikoff told us about the
Speaker 1: enriched uranium which made this a necessity. And then every
Speaker 1: other source that I had spoken to, in other words,
Speaker 1: people that would really know. There are people it's called
Speaker 1: being read into the presidential daily briefing. Usually there's maybe
Speaker 1: five six seven people daily that get to see that
Speaker 1: threat assessment, and that was what the intelligence was showing. Now.
Speaker 1: Dan Bongino at the time, was the deputy FBI director
Speaker 1: under Cash Betel, and I had him on the podcast
Speaker 1: We went deep part in the paint, and he gave
Speaker 1: an explanation, and I said to him, every person, every
Speaker 1: source that know, every one of them said to me
Speaker 1: the same thing is the president had no choice. That's
Speaker 1: what they were telling me, meaning that we had to
Speaker 1: act with epic fury. Let's play.
Speaker 4: Dan Bongino, I'm limited in what I can say, but
Speaker 4: I'll tell you this, it's not just the nuclear threat
Speaker 4: that was exigent. It's the cyber threat. The Iranians were
Speaker 4: engaged in. It's the lethal plotting, the assassination attempts. And
Speaker 4: I want you to remember this, everyone in the listening audience,
Speaker 4: they don't have they don't subscribe to this mutually assured destruction.
Speaker 4: They don't act in any way with any logic or
Speaker 4: reason whatsoever, Like say, even the Russians don't even however,
Speaker 4: crazy Putin is he does not want a nuclear weapon
Speaker 4: hitting Moscow.
Speaker 1: He does it.
Speaker 4: He's crazy, but he's not on The Iranians don't care.
Speaker 4: It is a bloodthirsty theocracy. You give them the ability
Speaker 4: to kill us, you give them the gun, They're gonna
Speaker 4: shoot it. It's not a matter of if forget. And
Speaker 4: the question was only the when. And I think President
Speaker 4: Trump said, I'm tired of dealing with this kicking down
Speaker 4: the kicking the can down the road, the when question,
Speaker 4: and we're just gonna do it. The politics be dan,
Speaker 4: I mean, you think the politics are helping him. If
Speaker 4: he cared about the politics, he wouldn't have done. You
Speaker 4: know what he cares about. He doesn't want a freaking
Speaker 4: mushroom cloud over Washington, DC or New York. That's called leadership,
Speaker 4: making really hard decisions that are really difficult to explain
Speaker 4: to people who may not understand them because they don't
Speaker 4: have the information set you have. That's okay, you know,
Speaker 4: we're free to question it here. It's a republic, and
Speaker 4: I'm telling you I will go to the grave telling
Speaker 4: you he made one hundred percent the right call. I'm
Speaker 4: absolutely sure of it.
Speaker 1: Now. Dan is one of the people, the few people
Speaker 1: like Cash Ptel and other top national secret I'm sure
Speaker 1: the CIA director Ratcliffe and on, and of course our
Speaker 1: top generals were read into that information that I would
Speaker 1: never have access to. And Dan is just giving us
Speaker 1: a glimpse of what every other person that is read
Speaker 1: in tells me. It's my job to pass that information
Speaker 1: on to you. Here's a question, based on the history
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump a national security and national defense and
Speaker 1: his deal making acumen, how many of you have a
Speaker 1: pretty relatively on the without getting into specific have a
Speaker 1: high degree of confidence that he won't sign a bad deal.
Speaker 1: That's kind of where my head's at. And the fact
Speaker 1: that he's so casual in saying, wow, I'll just take
Speaker 1: him out and I'll just you know, bomb them into oblivion,
Speaker 1: and that's it. I know others may not have it.
Speaker 1: We have an update, Linda. You've been following the chilling
Speaker 1: details of this plot tied to the UFC event on
Speaker 1: Sunday night, the UFC two fifty at the White House.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely insane.
Speaker 1: Now new details about the five suspects accused of plotting
Speaker 1: this mass casualty event. I mean, it's pretty scary. It's
Speaker 1: prosecutors alleged that the group that were arrested in June,
Speaker 1: as we told you yesterday, a multi state sweep, coordinated
Speaker 1: and ambush involving explosive Leyden drones intended to strike the
Speaker 1: north side of the White House, which would cause, they thought,
Speaker 1: a panic, and then they would sit in wait to
Speaker 1: basically slaughter everybody coming out. Officials said the group planned
Speaker 1: to target multiple high profile officials through this coordinated ambush.
Speaker 1: According to court documents, the suspects intended to launch the
Speaker 1: explosive laden drones over the UFC arena, detonate them above
Speaker 1: the crowd, forcing panicked attendees and high value targets to
Speaker 1: flee to a southern evacuation point. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: look at three assassination attempts against the President, and you
Speaker 1: look at Charlie Kirk and then you put it together
Speaker 1: with the incendiary and rhetoric of the left today, when
Speaker 1: you dehumanize and devalue people to the extent that they do,
Speaker 1: and it's Nazi, fascist, racist, Gstapo, At what point do
Speaker 1: you bear some responsibility that you are you are You're
Speaker 1: causing people to believe they're doing God's will. And if
Speaker 1: you look at for example, investigators allege that, you know,
Speaker 1: they had targets and their encrypted group chat you know,
Speaker 1: one for Trump, two for JD. Vans and for Israeli
Speaker 1: Prime Minister Netan Yahoo Musk for Elon Musk, and the
Speaker 1: plows to rob a military ammunition plant and steel, military
Speaker 1: you know, equipment. They had safe houses, bunkers, jail break ins,
Speaker 1: they were planning. I mean it just this, this is
Speaker 1: the world we're living in. But think about Schipes.
Speaker 5: It was somebody's mom that stepped in there. Imagine being
Speaker 5: that mother and getting like the sense like this is serious,
Speaker 5: like I think this may actually happen, and that my
Speaker 5: child is involved in this and I need to call
Speaker 5: the FBI.
Speaker 1: And she did well. According to the complaint, the biggest
Speaker 1: warning sign came from the mother of the nineteen year
Speaker 1: old from Ohio charged in connection with this God. By
Speaker 1: the way, God bless her and if you see something,
Speaker 1: say something right. It's a cliche, but it works. She
Speaker 1: observed him researching locations near DC and receiving maps and
Speaker 1: images through text messages, and when she confronted him, apparently
Speaker 1: said that the group planned to conduct a recon and
Speaker 1: hit and run missions. Then she went to investigators and
Speaker 1: she interpreted that as planned shootings, and the complaint that
Speaker 1: they released shows that this mother, God bless her contacted
Speaker 1: authorities on June tenth, after becoming concerned about her son's
Speaker 1: recent firearm purchases and communications with these people that he
Speaker 1: was having online. The father told officers his son had
Speaker 1: recently met people online and planning recons with them, and
Speaker 1: he told investigators that his son apparently recently acquired all
Speaker 1: the firearms, body armor, ammunition, tactical gear, etc. With three
Speaker 1: thousand dollars of his graduation money. Dana White of the
Speaker 1: USC revealed late on Tuesday that there were multiple threats
Speaker 1: made against Freedom two fifty. He told TMZ Sports that
Speaker 1: he was in the loop on all of what was
Speaker 1: happening in real time over the threats to the event.
Speaker 1: He said there was more than the alarming alleged plot
Speaker 1: to use drones and snipers to take out as many
Speaker 1: people as possible. He said, I mean, these guys are
Speaker 1: so good at what they do. Here's the reality. There
Speaker 1: was no safer place in America to be on Sunday
Speaker 1: night than there freedom to fifty wires attack by the way,
Speaker 1: you know, posted wild anti Trump, anti Semitic, you know,
Speaker 1: TikTok craziness like you know this is now people like
Speaker 1: clinging to mana like Luigi Mangioni syndrome. If somebody is insane,
Speaker 1: they just want to, you know, cling to it. Anyway,
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four one SEAN is a number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program.