WEBVTT - Sam Bankman-Fried Speaks Publicly, and TikTok's Tragedies

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde the Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I Mad Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up this hour. Sam bankmun Freed is taking

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>live questions in the wake of the f t X

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>contagion for bringing the headlines as we get them and

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the tragedies of TikTok. Bloomberg's Big Take investigates how trending

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>challenges on the platform are turning out to be deadly

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for some children. We discussed why the world's most popular

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>app isn't doing more to protect them. Meanwhile, the CEOs

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of Earn Your Leisure are here to explain how their

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.319
<v Speaker 1>financial literacy media platform is selling out venues from m

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>s G to the Royal Albert Hall. The first black

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Rock chief executive, Larry Fink, saying earlier today the most

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto companies will probably fold in the wake of f

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>t X is collapsed. This, of course, during the interview

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times Deal Brooks Summit. This is

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of course now we see that s Bankwin Freed has

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>taken to the virtual stage, appearing at the event as

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we speak, and passation. Ai Usk is here with all

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the latest some headlines coming from that event, some brkminfreed

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>saying he, to his knowledge, f t x u u

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>S platform is solvent, and overall that he made a

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of mistakes as the CEO of f t X.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>You have him first answering your question, or early in

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the program answering question by Andrew Ross Sorkin about gentleman

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a letter. He was reading a letter from a gentleman

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>who lost his life savings, and then he asked Sam

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Bankman free to answer to that letter. And that's when

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Caroline he had said that f t x U S

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he to his knowledge, was solvent and you could withdraw

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>today if they allowed for it. Now he's starting to

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about f t X the international business.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We know he also had that interview with Axios over

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours or so where he talked

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about getting those licenses around the world very quickly and

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the issues that have resulted from those international licenses that

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>have been accumulated so quickly. I would also say that,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he started off with some of the things

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that he has said before. He is deeply sorry that

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>he had wished he had done certain things differently, but

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it was only a month ago when he was excited

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about the prospects for f t X. So the tone

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>he's been taking here is a pretty solemn, pretty somber

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and apologetic, I would say, is the first way he's

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>coming off the bat. Yeah, there's certainly a level of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>contrition from Sam Bankman Freed right as you know. He

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>says that he has mistakes that if he wish you

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>could go back, he could change really early exchanges. Snali

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue to bring the headlines as they crossed. But

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the key questions that we want answered by

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>SPF On stage, Andrew Starkin had acknowledged that the money here,

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollars where everything had gone. They might get into

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:53.119
<v Speaker 1>here the details of all of those transactions. Let's see

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>how deep they get, but certainly they're starting with a

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue at play here. Will we get those answers

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>about where the money went, particularly only the eight billion

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar hall in their reality. Shana Essek will keep us

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>appressed of what's happening in that particular interview. Meanwhile, though,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we just want to turn our attention to a huge

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>story here on Bloomberg News today. A security concerns of

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a different type TikTok. They keep growing, and South Dakota

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is acting on it, banning TikTok on its government employee

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>devices after the governor so that the social media apps

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ownership by a Chinese company poses a national security threat.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>This comes as today's Big Take is out too, and

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on different kinds of security concerns, this time surrounding children's

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>safety on the platform. It was the front cover of

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>this week's Business Week and was a real deep dive

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>into some particularly heart wrenching stories, and I must warn

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you involve the death of some children. Greenberg's Olivia carvill

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is with the story and joins us now Olivia. It

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was a devastating read for anyone with any emotion. But

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure also of exact tives that need a business

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>such as TikTok, then in many ways get singled out

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>because of certain trends that occur on the platform that

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>children who are too young consume and then are in

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>some ways affected by. Just talk to us about how

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you came across the story and the reporting out of it. Yeah,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've been seeing cases of children who are

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>too young to be able to access social media platforms

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>having devastating consequences. Last year we saw Francis Hagen testifying

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>in Congress about Meta and Facebook and Instagram and the

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>mental health harms that it's been causing teenagers, particularly young girls.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I also noticed that we were seeing a number of

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>children dying participating in trending challenges on platforms, and I

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get a sense of what happens inside some

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of these companies when the worst case scenario occurs. So

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when an eight or nine year old child dies participating

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in an online deer or a trending challenge, how does

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the company respond? And as social media to blame in

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>any of these cases, I think that question of liability

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or responsibility over these deaths is a really big one,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen lawsuits filed in the US recently trying

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to raise that question in the courts. Oliver, you outline

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>two specific cases of children who died carrying out something

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>or emulating something they saw on the TikTok platform. Um

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I would encourage our global audience to go and read

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that story. But you also report on the response from

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>within TikTok sources that the company explained to you what

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>executives did next. Could you talk us through some of that,

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I was connected with more than two dozen individuals who

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>worked on TikTok's trust and safety team to really try

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and get a sense of how TikTok internally handles these situations.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>The company has a trust and safety team, you know,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>thousands strong. They have about forty thou content moderators looking

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 1>at the videos that are posted on TikTok on a

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, taking down anything problematic or potentially harmful. They

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have strict policies and guidelines set up to protect children,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and so the platform has created a number of safety

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms to try and keep kids safe. But children are

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>smart and they know how to side set those safety restrictions.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of the videos I was seeing more

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>recently that have been linked back to the blackout challenge,

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>kids have started to misspell the words or come up

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with different hashtags or different code names in order to

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>avoid those safety restrictions and keep this challenge trending. We're

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>interestingly went to our own audience via Twitter and asked them, look,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>how can social platforms such as a TikTok become safer? Interestingly,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the majority of it's only forts called for more regulation,

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>age verification, came in at just twenty four point five.

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>What's notable as the statistics in your story, more than

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>us children have a cell phone by the age of twelve.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Half of all kids from eight to eleven in the

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>UK of viewing TikTok content daily. Is there a technological

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>manner in which these sorts of platforms such as TikTok

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>can make sure that someone who's claiming to be thirteen

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is actually thirteen. Yeah, and that's a really important point

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to remember that children who are thirteen and younger, or

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>children who are under thirteen and not supposed to be

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on these platforms. Legally, there's laws set up to prevent

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>kids from being on platforms like TikTok, But unfortunately it's

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>very hard to figure out how old a user is.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you tell the difference between a fourteen and

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen year old. It's hard for humans to do that,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>let alone to train artificial intelligence to do it. So

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there have been companies that have recently been set up

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to tackle this particular issue, the issue of age verification,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which is something that all social media platforms are facing,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and these third party providers are offering software that can

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>actually tell when it's a child or when it's a teenager,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're relatively accurate. So I was talking to a

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>number of these providers trying to get a sense of

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>how does the software work, what can you actually do?

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And unlike facial recognition technology, which is trying to identify

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the individual in the photo, this software is just looking

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at that face and guessing an age. I sent them

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 1>a video of a nine year old girl who died

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>participating in one of these challenges on TikTok, and it

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>took that software three seconds to detect her age said

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>she was ten years old, and she died three months

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>before her tenth birthday. All right, Bloomberg's Olivia Carvill just

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>just excellent reporting. I encourage the audience to read that

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the Terminal and in Business Week.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Just great detail. What's happening with the TikTok platform. Apple

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO Tim Cook is doing the rounds in Washington, meeting

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with top Republican lawmakers as the company seems to forge

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 1>ties with the GOP ahead of the party's takeover of

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the House early next year. Now, this is all according

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to people familiar with the visit. Interesting timing given the

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>recent tirade from one Elon Musk about Apple's dominance for

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>its app store, and all the more intriguing is Elon

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Musk suggested he was actually at Apple headquarters today with

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook. Our very own Mark German is here with

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the latest intriguing Indeed, just talk to us Mark about well,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost the visit itself from Tim Cook. Yeah,

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly Cook is having a very busy week. He's scheduled

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to meet with some top DC lawmakers. Obviously, he has

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk in Cupertino at the Apple Park headquarters earlier

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>today around lunchtime. They went through a walk through the campus.

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we all know what they talked about. I'm curious

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>to know if Musk asked for special pricing on the

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>app store. But in terms of this DC meeting, he's

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to meet with Jim Jordan's. He scheduled to meet

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>with darryl Issa and some of these lawmakers cities that

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is meeting with. They're going to be at the top

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>right of the GOP when they take back the House

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>next year, so it's important for Cook to rebuild these

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>relationships given the changeover happening in Congress. Obviously Apple is

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.359
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be under a lot of scrutiny

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>right whether it's the Twitter situation, free speech, content moderation,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>whether that has to do with the app store and

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the fees that you know some developers aren't happy with

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously at the Epic Games trial UH several months ago,

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but that still remains ongoing. Privacy and security, the environment.

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Clearly many different issues that both Apple and Congress are

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>overlapping with and are probably going to continue to discuss

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for years ahead. Obviously there's the efforts to sort of

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>rein in on tech giants overall, so it's important for

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Cook to get in there and have these relationships with

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the top lawmakers. We should point out we ofst Apple,

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>if Ela Mosque was telling the truth or or whether

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he was in Apple HQ or not. My understanding his

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple didn't respond to that request. Maybe you can clarify.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The other big story, of course is China and what's

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>happening in Jong Joe. Give us the latest around iPhone

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen pro production there. Yeah, regarding Musk and his visit

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>to Apple today, I have no reason to believe that

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that visit didn't happen. I mean, I think it's accurate.

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Tim there and from what I've heard, uh,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Musk is there or was there earlier today.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I know Musk likes to prank a lot on Twitter,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, tweet things that made maybe the public

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily believe or if not entirely accurate. But I

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think this one was inaccurate at all, to say

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the least. In terms of the iPhone fourteen, we're hearing

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a unit declined from the

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>original ninety million to something north of eighty million. That's

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a combination of the riots and the COVID impact on

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone fourteen Pro factory, but also people not buying

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular iphon fourteen and iPhone fourteen plus the Pro

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>models in quantities that Apple maybe initially anticipated. But I

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think things are starting to turn around. I actually ordered

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone fourteen Pro from a carrier, Verizon, earlier this week,

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and that scheduled to arrive in mid December. So depending

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on where you're buying from, I think things are they're

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>going to improve the next few weeks. Alright, Bloomberg's Mark German,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. Let's stick with Apple dig into

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>it all with Shannon cross I, t hardware analyst at

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Credit Sweets who covers Apple, among other things. She joins

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>us from the Credit Swiss anual Technology conference. Shannon, I

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was reading your research and you point out that if

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you had tried to buy an iPhone thirteen at the

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>same time last year, you'd get it much more quickly

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>then if you try to buy an iPhone fourteen Pro

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>model right now Christmas period two. What's going on for Apple? Well,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, clearly there are issues with with production, and

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody's seen the videos and and what's going

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on in China right now. I think Apple is working

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as they can to help box Con and

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Hanhai basically Reese Art production. UM. I would say they

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>have people on the ground that are they're trying to

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>help the employees and and and fix some of the issues. UM.

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Apple did put out a press release

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>UM a few weeks ago basically saying there was gonna

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be some some challenges with supply, and you know, I

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think what we're looking at basically is a situation where

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>right now, if you order an Apple dot com, you're

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get your phone before the end of the year.

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm watching to see when that actually shifts into January,

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and at that point, then that revenue is not going

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually hit in the December quarter and it'll actually

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>shift over into the March quarter. You know, I think

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think at this point we really seem to

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>demand destruction. I think that the bigger issue that you're

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now is just a supply issue. You have

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an outperform rating on the stock hunt eighty four dollar

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>price target that's well above the hundred forty eight where

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>we are now at the moment, Shannon, just talk to

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>us about the risks to the outside of the downside here?

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it more likely? Are you worried not only about

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain headaches but sort of the pr hit

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that a company such as Apple has by having so

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>much a supply chain in China and indeed the sort

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of human cost of that, or is that ultimately not

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a key concern for you? Well, look, I think it's

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's always been a risk for app for Apple. I mean,

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple has a very good relationship with governments around the world.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>They employ an awful lot of people, and there's like

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a billion seven people are a billion that would be

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot millions of people that are employed around the

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>factory area. And it's not just the factory, right, It's

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the shop down the street that makes the widget

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that goes on the phone, and then the one that

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>makes the glue. And you know, they have a really

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>strong ecosystem of production. And and it is a risk

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>because whenever you have something in one area, you know

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you're gonna be it's susceptible to issues. But you know,

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Apple has shown during the pandemic um that

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they were able to come in with their partners and manufacture.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of partners that help them with

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing. They are shifting some manufacturing to India, although

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that will take a long time. I mean the way

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been described as you know, it's spent. They've spent

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years building a supply chain in um in China,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can't just you know, rip and replace that overnight.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they would want to. I mean,

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>China is an important market for them as well, so

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the standpoint of the Chinese government, it's important.

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And then to keep people employed, and then from an

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>output perspective, you know, obviously they're they're pretty reliant at

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>this point. Shannon, We've been excited to have you on

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>because you cover the world of hardware, but that encompasses

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>many companies. A name that's jumped out in me is

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>HP Inc. And up to six thousand jobs cut over

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the next three years. What's your assessment of job cuts

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the world you cover, and and and also just

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>financial discipline in response to kind of a slow down

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the end markets. You know, it's essentially we're having

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is the credit sweez Um. It's our twenty

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>six annual conference that we're holding out here. We have

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred employees or employees attendees and actually um I interviewed

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the PO of HP today. So you know, I think

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>HP is in a in an interesting situation. You've come

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the pandemic where uh PCs were elevated and

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody went out. You know, you had a hybrid work

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and so people needed a PC, they needed a printer.

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And now we're in a bit of a situation where

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they're digesting things. But the other thing to keep in

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mind with HP is that they have certain pillars of

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>growth that they're looking at. And you know, one of

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that is is peripherals. They bought Polly Polly It closed

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>UM a few weeks ago. You've also got three D

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>printing UM. They're they're focused on a number of different

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>areas and one of the things that they are doing

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with this restructuring is really trying to position all the

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>systems and their sales strategy and manufacturing such too that

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>they're able to support where they see growth coming from

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future, because you know, I think they are

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>cognizant of and and frankly investors are cognizant of the

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that printers are in a secular decline. I mean,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they can manage the secular decline and they may be

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a share gainer there over time, but you know, you've

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>got that. And then PCs are kind of they're going

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in a cycle. We had a big up

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>cycle during the pandemic and now we're in a digestion phase.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think mature tech companies, which I

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to cover a lot of, are constantly trying to

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>reduce costs, optimize and manage to the future, because again,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>when you don't grow very much or you start to

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>decline a bit, you know, the way to drive incremental

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>cash flow and incremental earnings is basically through you know,

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>cost reductions and optimization of your infrastructure. Talked to us

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>among these companies, Apple, Dell, Pure Storage, A lot of

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>these companies you cover we talk a lot about on

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the show, the geopolitics, and of course Apple has been

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>swelled in that when it comes to China. Just talked

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to us and steady seconds about the app Store. How

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.239
<v Speaker 1>are all you about the revenues from that? Well, you know,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the the App Store, there's one of the

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>reasons why it outperformed during the pandemic was because people

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>were home and people are playing games, and and that's

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a good way that they generate revenue. You know, we're

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>no longer home playing games. I mean this this UM

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>conference that I'm at, it's it's packed with people. People

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are roaming around, we're you know, interacting, we're traveling, we're

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>doing other things. The other thing, you know, on an

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>off sort of an um offset to what's going on

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in China right now, is that you do have a

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>situation where if people are at home and they're you know,

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>because of COVID restrictions, we may see a little bit

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of an upside there, so you know, I think, Jane,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry to cut you off. Shannon. We we

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we will have you back very soon. But we've got

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a head off, Shannon Cross, I T hardware analysts at

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Credit Suite. Thank you coming up. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>says she misspoke when she downplayed the possibility of probing

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the Musque Twitter deal. More on that next, This is

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg time for talking tech. Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 1>could be subject to a government review after all. Treasury

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Janet Yellen says she misspoke earlier this month when

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you told CBS she saw no basis for scrutiny. On Wednesday,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Yellen told an audience at the New York Times event

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that if there are risks with the deal in general,

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>actually quote, it would be appropriate for SCIFIUS to take

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a look sifious. That's a reference to the Committee on

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Investment in the US, which Yellen leads. The panel

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of government officials reviews investments in American businesses by foreign

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 1>buyers and decides if there's a national security risks. Now,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>foreign investors did back masks deal to take Twitter private,

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and a potential action by Cifius emerge due to concerns

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>over how masks many business interests overlap with US national

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.199
<v Speaker 1>security priorities. Yellen also stated by the way she couldn't

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>comment on specific reviews or what was specifically being looked at.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to even meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>New York alongside Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. Now, Damelio

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>family of TikTok fame is announced their first investments from

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>their families Venture capital fund. It's a twenty five million

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund recently invested so far in four startups backing

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>mid stage, high growth tech businesses, but they're primarily started

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>by women and minority founders. Doug rennet is with us

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is co founding partner of four four four Capital and

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>talk us through this is about what you have said

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>combating systemic inequities and technology and business world by funding

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the next generation of female and minority entrepreneurs. Talked to

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>us about the brands that you've picked, the companies you picked,

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and why they stood out for you. Yeah, that's right, Caroline. Um.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>We actually have backed six startups to date. We launched

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a little over two quarters ago and we and we

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just announced those six startups, and four of them were

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>backed by women founders. When we teamed up myself and

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>my co founding partner Jeff Beacher with the Damelio Family,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we really felt it was important to use our collective

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>platform to boost both women and minority founders. They've had

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a tougher time and have been underrepresented for years um

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's what we've set out to do. It

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>was great to see that of the four women back

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>companies that we uh, women founded companies that we backed,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>all four of them had founders picked recently on Income

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Magazine's Top one female founder lists, So that was great

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 1>validation that we're picking remarkable women founders. Doug, I want

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to point out that four four four Capital runs the

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>investment operations right for Damelio Family Funds. To kind of

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>explain your role in this, I find this really interesting, Caroline,

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>at this stage, mid stage, high growth, and we think

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about the news cycle right now, layoffs across tech, the

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>higher rate environment. What kind of conversations are you having

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with those mid stage, high growth companies. Yeah, great, question ed. So,

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>first of all, to clarify, we teamed up with the

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Damilo family to invest our own capital plus third party

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>capital into these high growth, midstage tech companies. So we're

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>backing third party founders again mostly women and minority founders

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as they build their companies. When we look at these

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>types of companies right now, we're pretty focused on making

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>sure their streamline and that there's a clear path to profitability.

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of high burn businesses right now are not in favor, uh,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of keep that in mind when we

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>look at these businesses. We want to make sure they

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have strong barriers to entry for competitors and already proven

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>brand with a growing audience. And the idea is once

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 1>we get involved and Damilos get behind it, we can

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of pour fuel on the fire and hopefully even

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>help that help them accelerate that growth further. We will

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>focus areas be too, be two CE platforms direct to

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 1>concede in a retail at Tech of fintech talk to

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about fintech carreas we look across

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the world of cryptocurrencies that is taking such a hit

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Have you made investments there are you

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>looking to in any way in the future. Yeah, So,

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>first off, we're betting on tech companies with large audiences,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>large user groups. If you think about the reach and

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the brand power of the Demilio's and eventually other celebrities

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>like them, that's we think where we can have the

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>most impact again helping those companies get their products in

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the and services in the hands of even more people. Uh.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>In terms of fintech, we're looking pretty broadly at that.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll do investment platforms of all sorts, finance platforms. We

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>have done one blockchain related investment, which was in the

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>company Gemini. It hasn't been a specific focus of ours,

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but again, if we see a strong, fast growing business

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>where we think we can help, will certainly give it, uh,

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, serious thought. I think we're pretty happy actually

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't been overexposed in crypto and Gemini. Jemini

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is quite a big player right in the crypto space.

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you had concerns about that investment? They are a

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>big player. Uh, it's it's a strong company. They've got

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a uh you know, strong balance sheet, a lot of cash.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We were the first outside money. We came into the

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>first outside round, so I think we're in pretty good position.

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>But it's like a lot of other companies in the

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>space has certainly taken a hit for the time being

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on valuation. We've been focused all day on the Federal Reserve,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>j PAL, the outlook for rates, the macro economic headwinds

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that are hitting a lot of tech. What is your

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>venture capital view of the world right now going into

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. Yeah, well, we take a pretty concervative outlook

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at that kind of repect to what I referred to earlier.

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>We want to make sure that the companies were investing

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in our streamlined and ready to uh survive and even

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.880
<v Speaker 1>thrive through what could be you know, a tough set

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of quarters coming up here. Um, we don't really try

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate what's going to happen, you know, at any

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>point in or. We just wanted back companies that when

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the dust settles, they're going to be on top and

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll have great investments on our hands. Okay, four four

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or four capital co founding partner Doug Rennet, thank you now.

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Door Dash is laying off about one thousand, two d

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and fifty people in an effort to cut costs. That's

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>according to an internal memo seen by Bloomberg. The cuts

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>will effect about six percent of the food delivery services workforce.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Door Dash saw its business boom during the pandemic, but

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it's still unprofitable and more tech companies layoff employees. The

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>US government is taking advantage, though, of the growing pool

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of talent executives from the US Veteran Affairs Office or

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on an ambitious mission to recruit top designers and engineers

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for the agency, but enticing enough workers to jump ship

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>from the private sector to close the gaping government will

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be a daunting task. Historically, the US government has long

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>trailed the private sectors pay, driving much of the staffing shortfalls,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and crypto firm Kraken is reducing its workforce by people

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>or thirty percent. That's part of its plan to adapt

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to current market conditions. According to a statement on its blog,

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Kracken says macroeconomic and geopolitical factors have resulted in lower

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes and fewer clients sign ups. We'll see a

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of contagion, and whenever one big goes down,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they are going there is going to be

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>more fallout. I think we have one more big leg

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>down in crypt I think overall the industry is fine.

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is coming out of this smelling like a rose.

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin funder me fundamentals are intact. We see the same

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>confidence and the full confidence. The biggest lesson here is

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that the value is in bitcoin and self custody and

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not crypto. I think we're going to see some selling

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.719
<v Speaker 1>off in bitcoin. I think we're going to recover pretty quickly.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>We see less volatility than we did in the last

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sarer market. Sometimes you need to battle tests, you need

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to go through crises. Many big names talking about crypto

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a more specifically bitcoin of it there, But let's talk

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about Sam Banglin Freed himself, the f t X founder

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>co founder, an interview being conducted now with The New

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>York Times. No Notionani Bassa has been monitoring key headlines

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary the fact that basically he undermest died, underestimated the

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>scale of the potential crash. He says a rule, he

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was not nearly cautious enough on marking to market some

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tokens on the various platforms. He thinks the

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>US team took some assets offline, and he says there

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>was improper access to f t X post I roll.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>What really stood out for you? There are a few

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>things here. I want to talk about the timeline of

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>events because that is something that Andrew ros Sorkin is

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>drilling in on very deeply. If you all remember, there

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was a series of tweets. There was a tweet November

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seven that he had deleted about the assets being fine. Now,

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he did say that on November six he started to

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>become nervous that f t l X t X would

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>not be able to fill customer withdrawals. Uh. These timelines

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are really important here, Caroline, because at the end of

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the day, and Sorkin also asked, this is his lawyers, Okay,

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with him being up there speaking about this, this will

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>all be cataloged and looked at the end of the

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>day when you look at what happened here at ft X,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>both in November as well as the full year. Now

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the full year as far as what he had to say,

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he's really been trying to draw a very big distance

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>between himself and his role at f t X and

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>alamda uh. And it's you know, really apologizing for not

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>knowing and saying maybe he should have known. But Sorkin

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is also drilling in here very much so on why

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they're seemingly was a joint roles when it came to

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>assets that they both seemed to have some exposure to.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>When I say they both, I mean both Alametera as

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>well as Sam bing Bean Freed, who was a large

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>owner of Ala meter As we now, so a lot

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of questions here, muddy answers, but a lot of questions

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>still to be worked through. This interview is not over yet.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give any away any of sort

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the magic of television. But when Caroline and I

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>were waitings come on air, there's this question of is

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he going to turn up? And if he did turn

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>up virtually but as you said, you know, he was

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>asked what do your lawyers think about this? And he said, oh,

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I probably shouldn't say anything. He is saying a lot

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of things, and one of the things he's talking about

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is a term I haven't heard in a long time,

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>commingling the relationship basically between ft X and Alameda and

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the crossover of client funds. What was his response on that.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>This is a very important response, and I'm reading of

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the sentence I didn't knowingly commingle funds. Why is that

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>an important statement, because at the end of the day,

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't trying to come and go funds, he said,

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I did not ever try to commit fraud on anybody.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to be looking at a series of

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>events as things go on, as well as intent there.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So that is something that he had said that day.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You were asking about the Bahamas as well. He this

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. He was asked about why certain Alameda employees

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>had worked together. He had said he had not been

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>living there recently. We don't know how long he has

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or has not been living there. He had also said

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.719
<v Speaker 1>that he would not be surprised if sometime I am

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>up there talking about what happened with our representatives, our

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 1>representatives meaning US representatives. In that statement, he said he

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>has been in the Bahamas for the last year, as

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we know, though before this crisis had happened, he had

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>been between the Bahamas and the US. He had been

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in the DC a lot. I was in d C

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to him just weeks ago, really before this implosion

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>had happened, and he said he'd been running between ft

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>X and the Bahamas, running from FTX in the Bahamas.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>But he does say that he was asked about his

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>concern about criminal liability here. He's that he had a

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>bad month. But what matters here is millions of customers.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>He did not really give a straight answer about whether

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the criminal liability is whether why the reason why he

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>is not coming to the United States in person. Yeah,

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>he says he thinks he could travel to the US

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and staying silent won't accomplish any good. I mean, I

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have to say I've almost vaguely had a little chuckle

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>about co mingling because it came straight after a headline

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that a few of them lived altogether,

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and I couldn't work out whether which bit was commingling.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But overall, Shali, do you think it ends up being

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a wise decision on Sam Batmanfried's part to take a

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>part in this conversation. Overall is saying f t X

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>did unimpactful things to bolster his own image. I have

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions here again about some of the

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>things he's saying, because on one hand, here you can

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely see him trying to distance himself from the Lameter

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>roles to the ft X roles, which is where the

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>commingle and question really comes in. There are a lot

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of questions here about Block five and the collateral between

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Block FI and f t X. He again block Fire's

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>role lationship was both with Alameda and f t x

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>so what he knew and didn't know there are certain

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>things he should have known as the CEO of f

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>t x UM there He's also speaking about the relationship

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with Genesis as they tried to pull funds as well.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of unanswered questions here to your point

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about you know when you look back at this and

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is he going to be glad if he spoke publicly.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, he's distancing himself and trying to give

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>his version of the series of events here in real

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>time as the bankruptcy is going on in the United States. Uh.

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>One really interesting part of this also is Andrew Starkin

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>asked very specifically about whether he worked with the Bahamas

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.959
<v Speaker 1>as well when it came to any transfers, and he

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>said he wouldn't answer any specifics of that, but he

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>did point to the fact that Bahamas were a key

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>regulator for them and as well as the Joint Provisional

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Liquidators here. So a lot of questions also not just

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about Samming and Freedom his roll up both of these places,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but also about his relationship with You West regulators as

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.719
<v Speaker 1>well as the Bohemian one style bloom Bog scenari bastic,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you extraordinary that SPF talking about how he didn't

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>see the extreme scenarios that played out in markets coming Carrow,

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>which yeah, I don't think any of us really saw

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this coming, did we either way? Coming up, the ceo

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>s of Earn Your Leisure talk about their media platform

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and the podcast that's selling out venues like m s G.

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. So most people head to Madison Square

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Garden for a game from music concert, but now they're

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>buying tickets to financial literacy podcasts. Market Mondays, a podcast

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>from the financial literacy brand Earn Your Leisure, recently sold

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>out MSG as well as the rural Albert Hall in

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the UK and Your Leisure or Leisure as you might say,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>it has more than two million followers on social media,

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>as the creators interviewed some of the biggest names in

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>finance and entertainment joining us now. I'm very pleased to

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>welcome the CEOs of any Leisure, I said, with our

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Troy Millings and it's great to have some time with

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you both. Welcome and thank you. Thank you for having

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from from our own David Rubinstein, who have you interviewed

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>about building his wealth to talking about people how to

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>make I ra s and wrath sexy and getting involved

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>your children to invest in them already. Overall, Troy, what

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing at the moment in terms of interest

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in financial literacy at a time where the markets have

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>basically been selling off. Yeah, we're seeing a peaking it.

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what happened during COVID was everybody was home

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people were losing jobs and they wanted information,

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and we just kept in to be at the right

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>place at the right time with the information to provide

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to them. Um So people were investing at record numbers,

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>people were making money at record numbers, and to stay

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with them, and that's one of the things we you know,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>we've probably put on the forefront is like we're here

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>for the long term, right, We don't want to just

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>be short term traders. We want to give you information

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>that you can change your life, and now only yours,

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but your families as well. And I think that you're pairing,

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, coming together in ten. You from an education background,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you from a financial background. Already you're an independent financial

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>advisor and been here to Bloomberg in a previous life.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Rush talk to us about how much the education is working.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>How much people are willing to remain invested in, committed

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>for the long term and not be worried by a

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>looming recession, not be worried about the valuations and some

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of the structs they hold now for life. Yeah, I

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>mean we always leave with long term perspective. We always

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>leave with you know, balance and not get rich quick

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>scheme type of mentality. So I think that the people

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that listen to us are more um calm during this

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this time of turbulence, and they're actually excited because we

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know that you know, as an investor, you want to

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>buy low and so high. So most people do the

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite it. They buy high and so low because

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of emotions. But when you take emotions out of it,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have to use intelligence. So I think that

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the people that listen to us have a high intelligence

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to investing, and they're seeing this time

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as an opportunity. Troy, I want to come to you

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because you guys are content creators, right, Let's be honest,

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>your content creators. It's just that like Caroline and are

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you nerd out on finance, on tech, on markets, on

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>long term? How did you guys come up with this idea, like,

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>where does this come from? Yes, so it was originated

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom. You know, we started teaching young adults

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about financial literacy. We were used to doing a summer

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>program and at the end of it, they were going

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to make money, right, We're gonna pay them, and so

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we've kind kind of felt inclined to teach them about

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>money if we're gonna pay them. That led to us

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>creating Obviously social media content was led to earn your

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>leisure um and so it's always been to to teach

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the youth, but at the same time, to you, we

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>realized that adults needed the education, and so that's one

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of the things we've learned over the course of time

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is that financial doesn't really have an age, Right, somebody

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at eleven years old can know something that somebody at

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty years old doesn't know, and somebody at forty years

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know. So we're trying to make sure that it

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>feels encompassent for all ages because everybody can learn. I'm

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>not sure people like to consumerlate of different ways. I

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>like to listen to you on a podcast, people like

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to view on YouTube. You'd like to have real live

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>events and as you're doing MSG, you're doing at Royal

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Abbot Hole, your own invest Fest, which is over in Atlanta,

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of like music festival meets financial literacy.

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>From that point, like where does your media platform go,

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>where does your brand go? From here? How do you

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 1>build it? I think we are building a global media

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>empire and we're looking to produce more content even outside

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of the realm of financial literacy. So a cooking show,

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a show about no children, and I think that people

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>now they trust us, and that's one of the hardest

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>things to do is to build trust for the audience.

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So now I think we have the credibility to spread

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the message of not only financial literacy, but a variety

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of different things. And on a global perspective, As you said,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we just came back from London a few weeks ago,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing the need for financial literacy and business

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>education all over the world, whether it's in Lagos, Nigeria,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in Kingston, Jamaica, whether it's in London. So

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we're very exciting about, you know,

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>carrying the flag of financial literacy to everybody that was

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>left out of the conversation globally. Russian I know you're

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of social media guy for the duo, but Troy, like,

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to me a little bit about the numbers. Are

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you monetizing in the way that you expected, How are

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the algorithms working for you? What do you think about

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the way in which you can build on social media

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at this moment? Yeah, I mean it's very important. If

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't have social media presence, you really don't have

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a brand UM. And so that's something we knew very

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>very early on, and and knowing that, it was like, Okay,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how do we build how do we get more people involved?

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we wanted to make sure that the content

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>was relevant. A lot of times when we read articles

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, all right, this is kind of flunk.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know what's being told, but we made

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that was suggestible. It was something

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that was spoken in the language that people can understand

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>for people who were overlooked UM. And so that was

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much our format, and it's led to us have

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>at one point two million subscribers UH, one point to

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>million UH followers on Instagram, over a million subscribers on YouTube,

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>We're about to hit a quarter million on TikTok, so

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>all these avenues of resources that we're using to reach

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>an audience, a global audience, have paid off. Troy mentioned

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the platforms there. I guess my question Rush

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>had is what's the biggest surprise. What have you learned

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about how consumers are going to get content in this area? Well,

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>one thing that you know is ironic is that the

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.959
<v Speaker 1>financial literacy space actually booms during recession times. You would

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think that that would be the exact opposite, but during

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 1>times of financial hardship is when people take their education

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more serious, when people invest in their education, and we

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>saw that happened during COVID. I also saw it happened

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight when I came in as

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a financial advisor. I came in at the worst economic

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>times since the Great Depression, and that was actually a

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>good time to start my career because it was easy

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:51.919
<v Speaker 1>for me to talk about investment because investments were so low.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So we see opportunity in every crisis, and um, right now,

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>in this economic downturn that we're in right now, I

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think there is an opportunity to educate, to double down

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on content, and to spread the message because people need

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>it more now. Another all right, earn your leisures CEOs

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Rashabilau and Troy Millings thank you. The only other better

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>double A carrows you and I. That does it? Maybe

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>it's equivalent. There ain't no bad, sure does it? These

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are in different ways? That does it? All of us.

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>For this edition of Bloomberg Technology Thursday, we have Visas

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>CFO to share his outlook for three spending and do

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not forget to check out our own podcast. If you're

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>busy looking at and listening to earn your leisure, come

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>look at us as well. We're talking all things technology,

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of course where they are online, on Apple, Spotify and

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>on my heart. So much more to be debating. Go

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>check out the latest from Sam Bagma Freed. Of course,

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the interview continues and at the moment he's saying, you

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>went through a congressional hearing and public comment and still

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get to a point of offering futures in the US.

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating conversation. Yes, so much more to come. This is

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>flame back Wick Wick Wi A Pip Pip Pip