WEBVTT - Do Dogs Use Facial Expressions to Communicate with Us?

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff from How Stuff Works. Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogelbaum. Here. If you're like me, you love dogs,

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>possibly more than people. Some days, their warm eyes and

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>doggie grins have me wrapped around their fluffy pupper tails,

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and according to new research from the University of Portsmouth's

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Dog Cognition Center, dogs deliberately make more facial expressions when

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're watching them, and it could be their way to

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>communicate with us. The study was led by Dr Julienne

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Kaminsky and published in a twenty seventeen issue of Scientific Reports.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Kaminski and her research team came to their conclusion after

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>watching twenty four different dogs, all family pets of varying

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>breeds and ages. Each dog was filmed individually in a

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>room with a person who went through various scenarios, including

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at the dog, looking away from the dog, and

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>giving the dog food. The scientists then studied the dog's

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>facial expressions using the Dog Facial Action Coding System or

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Dog FACTS, which is a scientific tool for coding canines

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>facial movements. It was adapted from the FACTS system created

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>for humans back in night. Kaminsky and her team discovered

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that each dog made animated faces when the person in

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the room was looking at it, including raising its eyebrows

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and sticking out its tongue a much more than when

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the person's back was turned. In a press statement, Dr

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Kaminsky said the findings appear to support evidence that dogs

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are sensitive to humans attention and that expressions are potentially

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>active attempts to communicate, not simple emotional displays. Most surprisingly

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is that even the presence of food didn't influence the

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>dogs as much as human affection. Kaminski said, we knew

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>domestic dogs paid attention to how attentive a human is.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>In a previous study, we found, for example, the dogs

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>stole food more often when the human's eyes were closed

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>or when they had their back turned. In another study,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we found dogs follow the gaze of a human if

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the human first establishes eye contact with the dog, so

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the dog knows that the gaze shift is erected at them.

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Kabinski says it's possible that the expressions of dogs have

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>changed as they've become more domesticated, but the study does

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have its limits. Twenty four canines makes for a small

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>study sample, so it's likely that more dogs should be

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>studied to confirm these findings, which sounds like an excellent

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>research session to me. Today's episode was written by Sarah

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Glime and produced by Tyler Clang. For more on this

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and lots of other tail wagging topics, visit our home planet,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot com