WEBVTT - Ford’s CEO Sees Auto Prices Dropping

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news the Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebek from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>It is for Capital Markets Day Today and Dearborn and

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>having some fun and a I believe Coney Dog in

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>downtown Detroit is her own Matt Miller radio and TV anchor,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>my co host at times, lever of all things, four wheels,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>two wheels and more that first of all, nice to

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>have you here with justin myself. Where the heck are you?

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 2>You look like you fit in.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 3>There, Coney.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Anyone who's been to Detroit knows that the local food

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 4>is a Coney Dog, right, which is basically a hot

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 4>dog with chili on it. And there are really only

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 4>two places to get those, the classic Coney's National Chili

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 4>and then there's another chain that I won't mention while

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm in here. Nice, but yes, whenever I go to Detroit,

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I stop here first get my fix of Cony's, and

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 4>then I go on and do whatever business I came

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 4>here to do.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to tell you and get them at

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>my kitchen too, because that's how my husband likes his

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>hot dogs with chili on it. Okay, so tell us

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>what you were in I mean, we know why you

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>were in Detroit. You had some interesting conversations.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 4>I had an interview with the CEO of Ford today

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 4>and the reason that you know he invited me, along

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>with the rest of his executive board and a ton

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 4>of Wall Street analysts, is that Ford is trying to

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 4>convince the Street that they can meet their goal of

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 4>producing two million evs in twenty twenty six, and probably

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 4>a lot more importantly, that they can actually make money

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 4>on those evs, right, because they're slated to sell about

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 4>three billion dollars worth of electric vehicles this year and

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 4>they're slated to lose about three billion dollars on their sales.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>So currently their margin is like negative one hundred percent,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 4>but they say they are going to be able to

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 4>boost it to eight percent on EV's by twenty twenty six,

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 4>and that's what they want to convince analysts.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>I think I was curious about matt Is. I mean,

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>we didn't get forwards earnings earlier this month, and they

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>beat on first quarter profit, but they obviously warned on

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>their outlook for this year. I'm kind of wondering how

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>does the EV sort of fit into that dynamic and

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 3>how much growth could that potentially When you're hearing and

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>talking to the CEO for does he think that that

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 3>could potentially help things moving forward?

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 4>So the EV, you know, last year they only sold

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 4>sixty one thousand evs in the US, and of course

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 4>they sell millions of cars, so it's hardly anything, but

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>hopefully that share is going to increase. Still, it's not

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 4>the you know, the cold steel that they sell off

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 4>dealership lots that makes them money. You know, they're hoping

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 4>to get, like I said, margins back to eight percent

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 4>and their traditional ic business they're hoping to be around

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 4>ten percent, which is where they are right now. They

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 4>make a ton of money on the f one fifty

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 4>trucks that they sell with gas engines, but the real growth,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 4>according to Farley, is going to come from software and services.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 4>They have, for example, a business unit for pro that

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 4>works with you know, contractors, plumbers, electricians, et cetera, and

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 4>they make a ton of money, like big Fat Margins,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 4>selling software that can tell you, you know, if your

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 4>engine has got a problem. If your door needs fixed.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 4>They even can tell that your windshield wiper is moving

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 4>in a way that that means it's about to break.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 4>So that's where they see the growth coming and that's

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 4>what they're hoping to see in the future.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So Zach, it's not only the year of efficiencies at Meta,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it's also at Ford Motor Company, and Matt did catch

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>up with Ford CEO Jim Farley to talk about the

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>efficiencies that it could put together, all of them in

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 2>many different forms. Listen up, everybody, We're making progress.

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 6>It needs to go faster. But a new culture setting

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 6>in in the company. We have, you know a lot

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 6>of other competitors that made a lot of personnel reductions.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 6>We see that as kind of more of an in

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 6>our journey on cost and quality, more of an output metric.

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 6>So we want to reduce is more like the bill

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 6>material cost, the industrial cost, and the plants a lot

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 6>of extra inventory we want to get out as well

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 6>as our negotiated cost with the supplier. So our cost

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 6>we want to get out is actually in the heart

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 6>of our industrial system.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 5>It's not like just people.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 7>You have said in the past, you have twenty five

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 7>percent more engineers working on the same output as your competitors.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 7>Does that mean you're going to reduce that twenty five percent?

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 7>Are you letting it happen through attrition? How's it working?

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 6>You know, we're very intentional about this, Matt. I think

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 6>you're going to see from Ford over many years, a

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 6>natural reduction, not through attrition, but skill mismatch, intentional transition

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 6>of our teams, moving some of the engineering to lower

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 6>cost labor sources. So it'll be a combination of things.

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 6>But you know, it's obvious that we have we have

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 6>to be more efficient uncompetitive advertising and marketing spend is

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 6>also something that you've called out. Actually, I would say

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 6>on our blue business we've underinvested in advertising. We want

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 6>on our E business really not to do a lot

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 6>of broadcast advertising.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 5>We want to practice speak for itself.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 6>And really the investment in the marketing there is really

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 6>the ownership model, so people kind of come back and

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 6>high loyalty.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Same with pro on the blue business.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 6>You know, we are starting to see inventories grow for

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 6>the whole industry. We're in a great space. We have

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 6>a really fresh lineup of vehicles, but that merchandising capability,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 6>I would assume We're going to have to spend more

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 6>this year and prices will come down, thankfully for the

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 6>customer after all these years of tight supply.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 7>How much do you think prices are going to come

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 7>down and what's going to drive.

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 6>That we're assuming in our plan this year and next year,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, five plus percent reduction. It's kind of in

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 6>between where we were maybe in nineteen and where we've been.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 6>I don't think we see what we'ren't going to go

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 6>back to the days a couple of years of one

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 6>hundred day supply, so most people are in the fifty

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 6>day supply range. You know, I think the natural discounting

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 6>for someone who has an older product is going to

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 6>be in the thousands. You're starting to see now low

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 6>aprs from a lot of brands who have older product.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 5>What's unique of before.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 6>It is we're basically we have an all new lineup,

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 6>soh you know, we're a bit of a unicorn. But

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the background pricing will be more difficult.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 7>You said in the past, or people have asked, you know,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 7>how do you get from eight percent on your ev

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 7>business you want to do ten percent overall to like

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 7>the seventeen percent that Tesla has Do you get up

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 7>there or do they you think eventually see margin pressure.

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 5>It's a good question. Both both are going to happen.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 6>We're seeing you know, look at what's happening in China

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 6>with BYD.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 5>It looks what's happening with Tesla.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 6>They reduce their prices on model why their main product,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, five seven thousand dollars. It goes up, it

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 6>goes down, but it's it's pretty far down. I think,

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 6>you know that they've had the market to themselves at

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 6>a big head star kind of like what we do

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 6>on pro and now they're seeing a lot more pressure. Obviously,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 6>I think we're going to definitely see that, especially in

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 6>the two row crossover.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 5>We think there'll be like fifty to one.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 6>Hundred new models, so you know, and a lot of

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 6>people want to grow, so there's going to be it's

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 6>gonna be a great time to buy a two row

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 6>electric EV for customers like Makey where we compete really

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 6>in EV you know, pickup trucks, three row crossovers that

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 6>we're going to show people today and the commercial vehicle

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 6>EV commercial vehicles, we don't see as much price you know,

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 6>competition because there's not as many vehicles choices there all.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, That, of course is the Ford CEO Ji of

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Farley talking there with Matt. Matt, you know, I'm trying

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to understand if they're going to be cutting prices, they're

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>projecting what billions of dollars of losses for their EV

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>unit this year. I mean, how is it that they

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 2>ultimately get to that eight percent return on EV's It's

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>not going to be easy. I get the efficiencies, but

0:07:58.120 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be tough.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not going to be easy. But they're taking

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 4>out two and a half billion dollars of costs this year,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>and they think that they have six to seven billion

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 4>dollars of structural cost disadvantages compared to competitors that they

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 4>want to take out by the middle of the decade.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 4>So you add that to the software and services revenue

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 4>that they hope to really start generating, especially from the

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 4>ED cars. And remember they're cutting prices on just like

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Tesla right on the cheaper vehicles. The more expensive vehicles

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>are not getting cut. In fact, those prices are rising.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 4>So if you want you know, an F one to

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 4>fifty lightning Er, if you want a Raptor R, or

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 4>if you want a Bronco Wild Track. You're not getting

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 4>a price cut on those. You're not getting a price

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 4>cut on any of the Halo cars, just the cheaper stuff.

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>You know what I really want? I want a Cony dog.

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you bring one back?

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Uh?

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'll get you a Coney to go.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 2>That'll be pretty ugly by the time it gets here.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm loving that leather jacket.

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Math.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 2>He wears it, well, he wears it with you.

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 4>Mike McKee didn't like this. Apparently he doesn't like the look.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>It is an authentic nineteen forty three pilot's check.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, we'll get Mike in and you the two

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 2>if you can kind of debate it out, all right,

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 2>My Matt safe travels back home, of course, our Matt

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Miller there in Detroit.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:45.679
<v Speaker 2>No business theres on our radar today. Nowhere to hide,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>because folks, we are tracking it. Because it does feel

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 2>like from day to day there is news on the

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>semi space, mostly because of Micron technology, certainly in today's

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>trade stock under pressure after China cyberspace regulator said that

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 2>its products failed to pass a cybersecurity review in the country.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>And this comes on the heels of a Bloomberg exclusive

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 2>last week of Micron said to be getting one and

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a half billion from the Japanese government to make next

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 2>gen memory chips in Japan. So let's get to what

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>it all means, because it's certainly an important sector. I mean,

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>we all know chips go into so much and how

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>it really fits in, especially the Micron news into the

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>overall semi space. So let's get to it. Paula pencal

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Is with US Bloomberg Intelligence Semiconductor's analyst in our Bloomberg

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Brokers studio. Also with us is I and King

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News, US semiconductor networking reporter on the phone in

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco and Ian. You were part of the team

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>that put together that exclusive last week about the investment

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 2>in Micron. Let's start with you. A lot of news,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on with Micron. You always remind me

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>not every semiconductor is the same. Tell us about the

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>news around Micron and why it's important to follow what's

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>going on.

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean this is being seen as an escalation

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 8>of the ongoing trade dispute, trade war, call it what

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 8>you want, between the US, which is theest creator of semiconductors,

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 8>and China, which is the largest market for semiconductors. And

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 8>what's going on here really is that Micron is being

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 8>told by the Chinese government we don't like your products,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 8>we don't think they're safe, and we're going to ban

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 8>them from critical infrastructure. A lot of lack of clarity

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 8>around what that actually means and what that impact is

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 8>going to have, but obviously as a headline, it's not

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 8>a pretty one.

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 3>And Paul I want to bring you into this conversation.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 3>So as an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, what's your sort

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of big takeaway in the development and all this.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, first of all, we don't really know what the

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:40.239
<v Speaker 9>impact is, as Ian had pointed out. Mark Murphy, the CFO,

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 9>commented today at JP Morgan's conference, that the impact could

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 9>be anywhere from single digit percent impact to top line revenue,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 9>or it could be low single digit up to high

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 9>single digit. But then he went on to say, we

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 9>really don't have a lot of clarity, China was light

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 9>on what exactly it meant by this security risk. The

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 9>one thing I would point out is it's clearly it

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 9>does appear to be a political posturing because typically memory

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 9>chips are not targeted by hackers just because they tend

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 9>to have storage. They don't have a lot of like

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 9>specific software that runs on it or code. So that

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 9>sort of supports the fact that this is definitely likely

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 9>a political move.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, right, you know, I mean it's a

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>little wacky, right if you again you remind us that

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>not all chips are the same Paul the same thing,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 2>But I mean it's a little weird. And I do

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>wonder as you follow this space, is it just a

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 2>case until this political football kind of calms down a

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit? I mean, is that the expectation? I mean,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the rhetoric, especially when it comes to

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 2>semis and high tech, just continues to get tougher and

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>tough between the US and China.

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 10>No.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 8>I think you're absolutely right. The general direction is towards escalation.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 8>And you know, the concern that overarching is of so

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 8>called pea coupling, that these two markets will just learn

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 8>to live without each other. But in the interim now

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 8>cause an awful lot of pain. And the way to

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 8>look at the Micron action, according to what some people think,

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 8>is like China has not responded to a lot of

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 8>what the US has done over the last couple of

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 8>years because it couldn't because it didn't have anything to

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 8>really fight back with. The Micron thing is the one

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 8>thing that it could fight back with. They don't need Micron.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 8>They can get exactly the same chips from Samsung, exactly

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 8>the same chips from Heinex, and therefore this isn't going

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 8>to hurt them. They're not shooting themselves in the foot

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 8>by taking action against Micron, and if perhaps for the

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 8>political audience back in Beijing, this looks like they are

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 8>doing something and it looks like they're being.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Strong Paula, I'm curious as far as do we have

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 3>any sort of scoop as far as how this could

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 3>end up impacting Micron's financials.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, again, they are unclear. The company has communicated to

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 9>investors they are unclear as to the exact impact, but

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 9>it could be anywhere from low single digits to high

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 9>single digits, but they really don't know. I would say

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 9>though that just to follow up on what you was saying.

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 9>It is a little bit of a slippery slope for

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 9>China though, because even though they don't need these memory

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 9>chips because they can source them elsewhere, you know, there

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 9>are other chips that they do need from the US.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 9>So it really is a battle between the two and

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 9>Microns sort of stuck in the middle.

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, there was some great reporting. I think this might

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>have been by Debi Wu, or maybe it was by

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you Ian. You know that Micron and I'm reading from

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 2>the story Micron is still depend on the global electronic

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>supply chains that often run through Chinese factories. I mean,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>this is the tricky stuff, right when we talk about globalization.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 2>That train has left the station, and when you look

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>at some like semiconductors, right, it's a global supply chain.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 2>So how do we how do you look at something

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 2>like that and ultimately where Micron lands, you know, with

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>or without China.

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. No, to back up what Paula said and go

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 8>back to what the CFO himself said, He's like, we

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 8>don't know. First of all, yeah, we don't know, But

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 8>guess what as much as a quarter of Micron sales

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 8>somehow go through China, Whether it's Hong Kong headquartered companies.

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 8>Whether it's through the distribution channel, we don't know, right,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 8>Because China the world is the world's device manufacturing center,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 8>so you really need to be there, you need to

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 8>have those relationships. So anything that breaks up that chain

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 8>that we've seen, you know, develop over the last thirty years, this,

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, interdependency is not good.

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So and go to the story that you and a

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>colleague out of Asia broke last week about Micron getting

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 2>one and a half billion from the Japanese government for

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 2>next gen hip. So roll that into this story and

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>in the reporting.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's I think that's a that's a good way

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 8>to perhaps segue into that because everybody in the world,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, with the US, the Europeans, the Japanese, and

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 8>the Koreans are like, look, we want chip independence too, right,

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 8>we need to build our own factories. Japan's a little

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 8>bit late to the game. But guess what, hey, Micron,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 8>come and build here. How does that look if you're China.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 8>Some song has a chip factory in China. Heinez has

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 8>a chip factory in China. Micron doesn't, Right, How did

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 8>I look? Yeah?

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? Paul come in on that Yeah, I would just say.

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 9>I mean there's an element of Yeah, Micron's sort of

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 9>like covering their bases just in case. And you know,

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 9>I think like a couple of years ago they had

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 9>planned to build in Japan and then you know, at

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 9>their Hiroshima plan extend their capability there, but they backed out.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the market went south and so on and

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 9>so forth. But here they are back to the table.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 9>Everybody's sort of coming forth with their own equivalent to the.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>US Chips Act.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 9>Japan is you know, Singapore is even China is I'm

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 9>hearing like one hundred and forty nine billion going to

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 9>subsidize the sector. So Japan's taking advantage of this opportunity

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 9>now to sort of establish itself and hopefully emerge as

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 9>a new manufacturing hub within Asia.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.719
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder too, though, Ian like, how ultimately does

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>this work then if everybody's kind of developing their domestic

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>JIP industry, yay, great, I guess right, it's in your backyard.

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>But at some point, I mean, is it going to

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>be problematic and require almost government support at some point

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 2>because it's cyclical, right, I Mean, we always talk about this,

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>and I do wonder is it going to ultimately end

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>up in a glut of chips in a lot of markets.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, Sanda Jah, the CEO of Micron, told me off

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 8>saying that my thinking was too mid in the past,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 8>but that thinking is very much that this is a

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 8>viciously cyclic industry. We've seen loads and loads of plans

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 8>in the past about building factories here, there and everywhere.

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 8>And guess what, when things get tight, those factories get

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 8>built and they never get equipment put in them. Those

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 8>factories get built and they end up doing something else.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 8>So believe that when you see the chips rolling off

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 8>these lines would be my caution. But also, you know,

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 8>take Sanjay Jar's word for it. Apparently my thinking is

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 8>mired in the past.

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Well mine's apparently mired in the past too, because it

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 2>just kind of makes sense to me. Any last final thoughts,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Paula just got about twenty thirty seconds here.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 9>Now, I would just say that it's an ongoing process

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 9>that we have to keep close eye on, and no

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 9>one really knows what the final outcome is going to

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 9>be on this front. And in terms of the impact, we.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Can just hope that there's like the metaverse and AI

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 2>everywhere and like we just need a million chips everywhere.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's it's a very interesting time that

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>we're living in. Paula, thank you so much. Paula Pancal.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 2>She's Semiconductor's analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Here in Studio Interactive

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Brokers Studio. I king our thanks oas our go to

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to all things global techs chips, usmconductor

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and networking reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App and YouTube. You can also listen

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 2>So the aviation sector really set to thrive in twenty

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty three. You're just back from a trash.

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 3>Just back from Maruba. Did not check bags because I'm

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 3>always afraid I'm going to lose my.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Bad You're helping setting a set up the next segment,

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>so let's get to it with Sherry Stein. She's Chief

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 2>Technology Officer of the America's at SITA. They are the

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 2>IT provider for global aviation. They work at airports, on

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 2>board planes at borders. They operate more than two hundred countries,

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 2>which may explain why we find her on this Monday

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>on zoom in Spain. Sherry, nice to have you here

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg. Talk to us a little bit about this organization,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the history. It's been around for a long time, so

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 2>just talk a little bit about the mission if you will.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 10>Sure, that's right, hey, Carole, just too nice to be

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 10>here with you. Yeah. So CITA was formed in nineteen

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 10>forty nine really to help bring the communications together between airlines,

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 10>aircraft and the airports, so that you know, they could

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 10>easily know when an aircraft was leaving one airport and

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 10>when it was expected to arrive at the next, and

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 10>so to help facilitate that air to ground communications. So

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 10>we were formed on that basis and have been operating

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 10>ever since.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>So we serve more than Yeah, that's what I was

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna say. Your members are like global correct nowadays?

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 10>That's right. Yeah, we're a cooperative organization with about four

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 10>hundred and fifty different members. Airlines airports around the world,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 10>So any airport that you're go into, about ninety five

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 10>percent of the world's airports. Just look for that powered

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 10>by seat a sticker on any of the computer equipment

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 10>or kiosks or boarding gates or any of the devices

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 10>that you see there. And then of course, you know,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 10>the network behind the scenes that you won't see is

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 10>part of what helps keep that all working.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 3>So, Sherry, talk to us about these different innovative solutions

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 3>that y'all are trying to rule out here that are

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 3>already basically at a number of different airports that basically

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>try to help travelers.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so big focus is on digitization and how to

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 10>help eliminate the manual and paper laden processes that have

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 10>plagued not only our industry but other industries. Right is

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 10>how to move to a more seamless or frictionless process.

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 10>So we done a lot of work around you know,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 10>biometrics for document validation, and then certainly the subject that

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 10>you were talking about earlier, just with your flight to Aruba,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 10>includes not only work with biometrics and digital identity, but

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 10>also around bag tracking and bag management and helping to

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 10>make that whole process more seamless and easier for people

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 10>to give that confidence to check their bags.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Now I have to say I'm putting a little Apple

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>tags in my luggage so that I can kind of

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 2>track it. But I'm also noticing that more and more

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>airlines are saying, hey, you check your bags, here's where

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 2>they are, and they're giving you some information. I'm assuming

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you are involved in that.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 10>That's right exactly. So our platform suite as World Tracer

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 10>is the brand name. Passengers might not know it because

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 10>we're more of a B to B We provide services

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 10>to the airlines and to the airports behind the scenes,

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 10>but anything to do with the bag messaging. When you

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 10>get the notification that your bag has been checked in,

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 10>that your bag has been put onto the plane, that

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 10>your bag is arriving at carousel three at your destination,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 10>that's all messaging powered by our platform. So it helps

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 10>really help boost that confidence and provide the digitization for

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 10>the automation of those processes to help you keep passengers

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 10>informed and reduce some of the stress levels and anxiety,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 10>because nobody wants that when they travel.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>You want Actually, since we're being asked to do more

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and more at the plate, you know, like in check

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 2>it and stuff, there's a lot that's being kind of

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 2>put on us, like conversy, did you do did you

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>check in yourself? Did you take the bag over?

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I did everything? Yeah, I did everything. That's why I

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 3>was just I was worried. I've had lost baggage in

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 3>the past, and I just didn't want to go again.

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 10>I was curious.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I know that you did a baggage It Insights study,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 3>and not surprisingly you had on there. The number of

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>mishandled baggage nearly doubled from twenty twenty one to twenty

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty two. I mean as far as other things when

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 3>it comes to delayed baggage or other forms that you're

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 3>able to help people that are working through this. Is

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 3>it just for lost baggage or what else can you

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 3>do here as far as trying to help travelers kind

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 3>of ease their travel burdens.

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 10>So really, when you look at kind of the end

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 10>to end process, I suppose right there are more than

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 10>forty organizations involved in helping to fulfill a trip. So

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 10>everything that we can do to provide more information, more data,

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 10>more tools to help give the passenger more information. Feeling control,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 10>because I think the biggest thing about travel is maybe

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 10>feeling you know that you don't have control, you don't

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 10>have access to information, you don't have always accurate information,

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 10>So everything that we can do to help make that

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 10>possible is really core to our mission. So, you know,

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 10>the bag tracking details, certainly being able to provide accurate

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 10>flight information and making sure that you get that single

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 10>source of truth so you have consistent information regardless of

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, whether you're looking at the screen in the airport,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 10>the app on your phone, or you know, calling the

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 10>reservation center that everybody has the same information about that

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 10>flight or about your bag. Can I send all of

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 10>those things?

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Are this ability to track your bag?

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 2>If there's a delay? I mean, how is it kind

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 2>of helping to make sure that Indeed, like if you're

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 2>sitting on the plane and then you realize, okay, my

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 2>bag didn't get there, that's going to distress the hecatomy

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 2>rather than not knowing until I get to the carousel.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 2>So I do wonder. I guess ultimately it's not just

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>about like telling you information but hoping that it isn't delayed,

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 2>it isn't lost. So I'm curious how it's all of

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 2>this digitization and the work that you guys are doing

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>with airports and airlines. How is it improving so log

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 2>bags aren't delayed, aren't lost, aren't damaged.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so a couple of cases, I suppose, Like with

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 10>the Luftanza, we've been working on this auto reflight system

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 10>where if a bag happens to miss a connection because

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 10>maybe it's a tight timeline or you know, flight was

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 10>delayed for some reason, we have an auto reflight now,

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 10>so it puts the bag automatically onto the next flight

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 10>and then just without having to retag the bag, without

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 10>having to require manual intervention. And so that's bringing fantastic

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 10>savings for TANZA and so leading to the rollout of

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 10>that system on a wider basis beyond the proof of concept.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 10>And then airlines like Latam are seeing like a forty

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 10>percent increase in customer satisfaction through the implementation of self

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 10>bag drop and the systems that they're doing there, because

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 10>now they reduce the burden of the manual tagging processes

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 10>and they can automate all of that as well. So

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 10>a lot of things in that type of approach that

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 10>give the passenger control again and help to make it

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 10>more automated.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll find to check in with you, certainly something we

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 2>can all relate to, and it's interesting to kind of

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 2>go behind the scenes and understand how it's all working.

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Sherry Stein is Chief Technology Officer of the America is

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>at SITA, joining us on Zoom from Spain. I do

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 2>have to say that when I see the app, tell me, hey,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 2>your bag has made it. I mean, I'll follow it. Yeah, Like.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 3>It's such a relief.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 2>It is totally all right, everybody you're listening to watching

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Weekend. This is Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 8>Brother Marc.

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 7>A journal how about you let me drive?

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll do the riding gravels.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's mate, I want to try it.

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 10>It's a good question time.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes dot Com for me.

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 5>I think we'll buy around.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>You don on Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody just read eighteen minutes just under eighteen

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>minutes left in today's trading session. Carol Master Along and

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Jests met in live in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg YouTube, or i should say, on YouTube and

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Blomberg Originals as well our streaming service. You heard Charlie

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about the market's Jess bouncing around. I mean, I said,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like over the last week or said, we've

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of met trading days. It felt like

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 2>we did break out a little bit yet last week

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 2>an optimism of maybe a deal getting done out of DC.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But it just does feel like we're marking time a

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit until this gets done.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, And obviously we've talked about the technicals there with

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 3>the S and P five hundred as well as the

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>NASAK one hundred. So especially after a gangbuster year, you know,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense to some of my sources that we'd see.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 2>A little bit of a pullback from here. All right,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it with our drive to the closed. Guest.

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Max Wasserman is back with us, founder and senior portfolio

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 2>manager at the independent investment advisory for a Mira mar Capital.

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 2>He's joining us so once again on zoom from Northbrook, Illinois. Max,

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 2>nice to have you here. Top of mind for you

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on this Monday.

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, thank you for having me. I think the biggest

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 11>thing that I would focus on is disparity within the

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 11>market itself. Really, five technology companies are accounting for eighty

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 11>percent of the S and p's total return. It's Navidia's Amsen, Google, Microsoft, Apple,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 11>and if you look at it, From that perspective, it's

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 11>really the nasdack that's carrying in the whole market. The

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.479
<v Speaker 11>equal weighted part of the market's actually up only one

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 11>to two percent, So if you look at the market,

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 11>it's really a Nasdaq retracement of what they lost last year,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 11>and it's concentrated in five stocks, which we think is

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 11>not that healthy for the market.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 3>So if it's not that healthy for the market, how

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 3>are you positioning in the stock market at this.

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 11>Point, Well, we're staying we're diving in growth investors, so

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 11>we're looking for valuations that make reasonable sense paces good yield.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 11>While we do have investments in some of the large

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 11>cap techts, we're looking in cyclicals. We're looking in healthcare

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 11>energy companies that we think have reasonable valuations. Right now,

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 11>if you look at the top five stocks, they have

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 11>a forward pe of thirty one times, So with the

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 11>NASAK being up twenty percent, we don't think the risk

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 11>reward is really favorable from this level in that area

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 11>of the market. But there's other area the markets and

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 11>the cyclicals, the energies, the healthcare. They're trading it, you know,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 11>mid teams, which is less than the S and P itself.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, what I find interesting is that we have

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>had this if you go back maybe years ago or

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 2>so or I don't know, I'd have to look at

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>my calendar to really denote the exact timeframes. But Max,

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 2>we've had these conversations before that the overall gains of

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the market are really fueled by a handful of names,

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 2>those big tech names, only for folks to say, yep,

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>stepping back from them don't make sense, overdone, overdone, and

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>then we just see more money go into it and

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>we see them pop to the upside. Because so much

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of our economy is really a lot of what these

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>companies are doing. So how do you kind of factor

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that in fundamentally, Well.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 11>If we look at you take a step back. If

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 11>you look last year, for example, when the Nasdaq was

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 11>down thirty two percent, right then the SMP was down

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 11>around twenty. Equal weighted and dividend oriented stocks were down

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 11>in the high single digits. So if you look at

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 11>a company like Apple, which we have an investment in,

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 11>it's back to where it was in August of twenty two.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 11>So the stock just made a complete retrenchment. If you

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 11>look back into Navidio and some of these texts all

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 11>these companies just made a retrenchment to where they were

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 11>trading a year ago. So it's not like these are

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 11>making ultimate new highs by tremendous amount. Making some new

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 11>highs like Microsoft, but it's not by a significant amount.

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 11>So what we're saying to people for new money, be

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 11>cautious jumping into the nas deck. The S and P

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 11>five hundred has become the ETFs if you will have

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 11>become a mini Nasdaq one hundred. If you think about it,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 11>Apple and Microsoft account for almost fourteen percent of the

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 11>waiting in the S ANDP. So as technology goes, so

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 11>goes the general market. But there's a lot of other

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 11>areas which have a better asymmetrical return. And if we

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 11>look at somebody long term, if you bought the nas

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 11>deck a year ago, all you're doing is barely breaking

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 11>even now where it. Had you been a little bit

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 11>more conservative and not chased into these stocks at highs,

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 11>you wouldn't be hurt as much. But yeah, now you're todate.

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 11>Everybody likes tech because it's up twenty percent. But if

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 11>you take a longer perspective, they're just giving you back.

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 11>They're just coming back to where they were a year ago.

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Have you made any sort of shorter term changes just

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 3>based on what's happening with the debt ceiling, because when

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I've spoken with my sources, a lot of them feel

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 3>like it's more of a bond story right now rather

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 3>than a stock story.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 11>We look at the debt failing is more of a

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 11>political issue than anything. The issues that we see is

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 11>if you get a failed they failed to ratify the

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 11>debt ceiling, you could get a five to ten percent pullback,

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 11>But we think that's political and we would use it

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 11>as a buying opportunity. We haven't changed anything based on

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 11>the debt ceiling because it's day to day and it's

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 11>not a strategy. It's just trying the whims of the politics,

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 11>which you have to look at. Though that has affected

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 11>people strategy. It's what's happening in the banking area. You know,

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 11>regional banks are having a harder time. Large money center

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 11>banks are had a hard time given the fact that

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 11>the interest rate risk they took didn't pay off. So

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 11>from that perspective, we deemphasized financials and we have been

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 11>underwinting financials for some time. But we make the regional

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 11>banks and we do have an investment in one. We

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 11>still think there's some it's going to be languishing for

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 11>a while until they fix the balance sheets a little

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 11>bit better.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>How does what the Fed do and I don't want

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 2>to get into what the Fed will do because we

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 2>could go back and forth from day to day or

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>week to week. But how does what the Fed ALTI

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>mentally does and where it lands and for how long

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>impact your strategy right now?

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, how it impacts is liquidity. So if the Fed,

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, we look as the Fed maybe maybe one

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 11>or two more rises and interest rates and that's about it.

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 11>We think the Fed's gonna be tightening and the economy

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 11>is going to slow down. You think increases possibly, I do.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 5>I do now.

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 11>They may pause it for a little bit, but inflation

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 11>is still embedded in the economy. Wagers are still going high,

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 11>Unemployment is still very low. So you could see an

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 11>area where you get something called stagflation. So they may

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 11>try to prevent that, and that's you know, that's a possibility.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 11>But they may pause next time just to try to

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 11>digest everything that's going on. But I could still see

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 11>another twenty five to fifty basis points by year end,

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 11>which is contrary to what everybody's thinking the Fed's going

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 11>to cut. I think people are hoping the Fed's going

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 11>to cut to justify this enthusiasm in the NASDAK. And

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 11>it's also the market's trying to talk the Fed into

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 11>doing something. I mean, right now, the Fed gave so

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 11>much liquidity for so many years. To take it back,

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 11>they have to get rid of the embedded and and

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 11>that's a bigger risk. So to us, the thing that

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 11>we would change if we thought the Fed was going

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 11>to shift policy and going to cut interest rates, then

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 11>we probably moved to a little bit more higher beta

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 11>type stocks, if you will, because they'll do better and

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 11>lower interest rates. But right now we see no reason

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 11>to change, especially with valuations. Technology is not offering it

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 11>to us, and again we have investments in there. We

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 11>just don't think the risk reward. But also if they

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.919
<v Speaker 11>cut interest rates or they slow it down, we think

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 11>everything's going to be a fourth quarter story reflecting twenty

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 11>twenty four, and there we see the market much stronger

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 11>and we think the market will start reflecting that. So

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 11>we think the Fed's not as big of an issue

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 11>right now. It's just really digesting everything it's done all.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, We're going to leave it, I think. On that note, listen,

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much some really thoughtful advice for us

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>on this Monday. Max Wasserman. He's foundering senior portfolio manager

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and you're More Capital registered independent, registered investment advisory firm.

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Joining us on zoom from Northbrook, Illinois.

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Jermal