WEBVTT - To Absurdity and Beyond!

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, So Security you paid for your whole life, Medicare,

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Medicaid not a joke. Really, ask yourself, how are you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>going to sleep at night knowing that every five years,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise and the other ultramgat Republicans are going to

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>vote on whether you'll have Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. It's

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.799
<v Speaker 1>unlikely they'll be able to wipe it out, but any

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one of you doubt for a second they'll find ways

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to cut benefits and programs in order to keep anything going.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what this is about. They've always wanted to cut

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Social Security, They've always wanted to cut Medicare, They've always

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to cut Medicaid. This episode, A Verdict with Ted

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Cruise is brought to you by American Hartford Goal. Now,

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the new inflation numbers are out, and I think we

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can all agree they are incredibly depressing. The price of

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gas is way up, the price of housing is up,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the US national debt is way way way up. And unfortunately,

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>given the way that our current administration prints money and

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>spends money, experts don't see this going away, this inflation

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>going away anytime soon. So how do you protect your money,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>your savings, your retirement from inflation. Well, when times are turbulent,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Americans like you turn to physical gold and silver, and

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>American Hartford Gold can show you how to headge your

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hard earned savings against inflation by diversifying a portion of

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio into physical gold and silver. It's really easy

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>to get started. All it takes is a short phone

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>call and they will have physical gold and silver delivered

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>right to your door. Or if you prefer inside your

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K or your IRA, they make it easy.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>If you call them right now, then they will give

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you up to fifteen hundred dollars of free silver on

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>your first order. So don't wait, call them right now.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Call eight five five seven six eight one eight eight three.

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Or if you prefer texting, you can text the word

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>cactus to six five five three two. Again, the phone

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>number is eight five five seven, six eight one eight

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>eight three, or text the word tactus to sixty five

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>five three two. Today's episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is brought to you by ip Vanish. Did you know

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that browsing online using incognito mode doesn't actually protect your privacy?

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Without added security, you might as well give all your

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>private data way to hackers, advertisers, your Internet service provider,

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and who knows who else. Ip Vanish helps you securely

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and privately browse the Internet by encrypting one hundred percent

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>of your data. This means that your private messages, passwords, emails,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>browsing history, and other information will be completely protected from

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>falling into the wrong hands. Ip Vanish makes you virtually

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>invisible online. It's that simple. Just for Verdict listeners, ip

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>vanish is offering an insane seventy percent off their annual plan.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That's like getting nine months for free. You have to

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go directly to ip vanish dot com slash tactus to

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get this seventy percent off discount. Ip vanish is super

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to use. Just tap one button and you're instantly protected.

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You won't even know it's on. You can use ip

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>vanish on your computers, tablets, and phones, whether you're at

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>home or in public. Don't go online without use ip vanish.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget. Verdict listeners get seventy percent off the ip

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>vanish annual plan. Just go to ip vanished dot com

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>slash cactus to claim your discount and secure your online life.

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>That's ip va nish dot com slash Cactus. This episode,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>A Verdict with Ted Cruz is brought to you by

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Jennia Cell. How old does your mirror say you are?

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You can delay this question by five, ten, even fifteen years.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>With Jenny Cell's new ultra retinal cerum. You can you know,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>see it sitting right here on the desk. Here's a

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>testimonial from Marina. Marina lives in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. She says,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>great product, My skin loves it. I have spent more money,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>she says, on creams over the years, enough to pay

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>off my house. Just kidding, but it feels like that

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this product has changed my life like no other. Now

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Marina is flying high with Jennia Cell's new ultra retinal

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>serum with hyaluronic acid. This works to hydrate your skin

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at the cellular level. It builds on this deep moisture

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>with incredible anti wrinkle effects. And gentlemen, you know that

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we ladies, we wives use your razors in the bathroom

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>when you are not looking likewise, we know that you

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>use our face products, our skincare products, and it's fun.

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>All's fair in love and war. Now, if you go

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to my uurl that is genu cell dot com slash Cactus.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to fifty percent off geniu Cell's

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>new Ultra Retinals serum. That is fifty percent off if

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>you go to genueell dot com slash Cactus. It's spelled

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>g e n u cel dot com slash cactus, genu

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>cell dot com slash Tactus. Welcome back to Verdict with

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles no longer able to sleep

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at night because the co host of this show is

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>going to take away everybody's social security, so says the

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>leader of the formerly free World. Senator What say you? Well,

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, I will say the White House this week

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>noted and designated it as Elder Abuse Day, and I

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>guess I do have to apologize because apparently I'm interfering

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Biden's naptime. You know, it really is amazing

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that the kind of fearmongering that the White House does.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>You remember years ago the Democrats ran ads of Paul

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Ryan literally pushing Granny off the cliff. So now he's

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>standing at the aflcio saying Cruise wants to end the

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>social security I mean, look, let's be honest. Who has

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hurt seniors more in the past twenty years than Joseph

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Robinette Biden Junior. You got nine percent inflation, food prices skyrocketing,

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare skyrocketing, electricity skyrocketing, gas skyrocketing. Seniors are getting screwed.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>The only one who can compete with Joe Biden for

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>screwing seniors is Jimmy Carter. And so what does he do?

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.679
<v Speaker 1>He fearmongers, He suggests, Look, so security is a bedrock

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>of our country. Ain't nobody messing with it? He knows that,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but he can't run on his record, so he's got

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to scare people. And I'm sorry that that that that

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is finding it hard to sleep at night.

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Someone once told me in politics many years ago that

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the only thing worse than being talked about is not

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>being talked about. And I assume that principle is in

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>play here. It's interesting that Biden, while he's making this

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>desperate plea in what seems to be a very unfavorable

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>year for Democrats, he's going after you. Yeah, I will say,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm kind of flattered that that. Apparently I'm

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not just maga, I am ultraumaga like and just to

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>say that's a point of clarification, your Senator, you worked

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>very well with Donald Trump. Obviously, you guys worked very

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>well together during the administration. But I seem to recall

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that you were the man's chief primary rival. If I've

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>already going to describe someone as ultraumaga, doesn't that seem

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit strange to describe the guy's primary rival

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that way. So look, Biden gets confused sometimes, and I'm

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>not sure he knows what any of these words mean.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Biden literally he was elected to the Senate

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy two. When Joe Biden was first elected

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Senate, I was one and a half years old. Yeah,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so I understand how he remembers back to the false

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>campaigns Democrats of ron way back when you know what

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden said, Ronald Reagan was going to take away so Security.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Biden has been saying that line for a

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>long time, for literally the entirety of my life and

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for about double the entirety of years. That's a good,

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>good point, actually, and Reagan had two terms didn't take

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.119
<v Speaker 1>away social Security. It did strike me when he said

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that as just a kind of tired old line. Maybe

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it would have worked in twenty ten or twenty twelve.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, even his talking points they seemed to

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be a little dated at this point, but it wasn't

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just a Biden senator. You know I do not speak Spanish.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You know this. You have spoken Spanish to me. I

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have responded by asking you where the library is. That

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is the extent of my Spanish. But from what I

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>could make out, it sounds as though the President of Mexico,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>mister Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, does not like you very much.

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a senior endo game insist la protejo qua nicaraguezuela

0:08:48.760 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>restaurants amarco no lo covin us for Florida Republican and

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>see peror no solos. His sister senior Roo view Albertido Republican,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it ta Cruz Chamberti Republican t curus, while the Crusado

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>solo protejo dictadas see Okay permidi an arcotrafico que Domina

0:09:49.720 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>territorial de Mexicogo senior the Cruz Marco MBI. Also, I

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>could make out about one phrase their senator. The phrase

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>was ted Cruz. Ted Cruz kept coming coming up, So

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if you wouldn't mind I know you're a little more

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>fluent than I am. What did the president of Mexico

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>say about you? And why is he so angry with you?

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So I will say that that is one of the

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>most bizarre press conferences I've ever seen, because you've got

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a Mexican reporter who asked him a question about Marco

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Rubio and and am Low says, I'm sorry, who is

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this Rubio guy? I don't know who he is and

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and and the reporter says, oh, he's the senator from Florida.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And he goes, yeah, yeah, yeah, they're three of them,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>three of the Cubans but ted Cruz. And it's the

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>most bizarre thing because the reporter asked about Rubio, and

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>am Low responds by attacking me, and I mean, going

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>off on a screed, attacking me. And it's really bizarre.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So the reason am Loo is is so worked up

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is that a a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, I

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that Mexico has had a horrific record under

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>AMLO's presidency of allowing journalists to be murdered, and we're

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing historic levels of the drug cartels murdering journalists. If

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a journalist darres Cover the drug cartels and cover their

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>murdering and murder and extortion and crimes. They're killing them

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and AMLO's turning a blind eye. And what's fascinating about

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>this exchange. So Rubio had tweeted about AMLO's support for Cuba,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Nicaragua and Venezuela and dictators, and actually Amlo doesn't mind that.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>He's like, yeah, yeah, forget about the dictators. Cruz is

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm turning a blind eye to the drug cartels.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 1>And what he says there is show me the proof.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And he actually goes on later in that press conference

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to say I have the proof. I have the proof

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that Cruise is on the take from the supporters of

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gun rights. And so he goes on this whole thing about,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Cruz refuses to ban guns. You know what,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>am low damned straight, I refuse to ban guns. We

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>have this thing in the United States called the Second Amendment,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the right to keep in bear arms. You don't want

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>your citizens to be able to defend themselves from the

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>drug cartels that that are terrorizing innocent Mexican citizens. And

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 1>instead of responding to the substance, instead of having a

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>government that actually takes steps to protect freedom of the press,

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to protect journalists, to stand up to the criminals. Instead,

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amlow seems very very dismayed it uh, you know,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to quote Shakespeare mean thinks she doth protest too much.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I just love that he has that nickname am Low.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of like j Low with the Andreas Manuel

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Lopez overdo. That's very impressive. And when you've got two

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>world leaders, both in North America attacking you. You've got

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden going after you and then the speckless guy down

0:12:56.320 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico, I suppose that means you're probably doing something right. Look,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm just waiting for Justin Trudeau. I want the trifecta.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Come on, man, the Canadian truckers were right. Let's see

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>if Trudeau rises to the occasion. Now, Justin Trudeau knows

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a thing or two about Cuba and Cubans, according to rumors,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>but who knows. Maybe we can discuss that on a

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>future podcast. I do have to talk about one of Michael.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to ask you who's your daddy. That's true,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as Telemachus says, it's a wise man knows his own father,

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that's true. Up in America's hat as well.

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But closer to home, there is another group that's going

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>after you. That would be, of course, the media and

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Congressional Democrats. And really, I suppose I'm repeating myself

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in the January sixth committee because you have been such

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a target of this whole thing. What is your take

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>on the January sixth hearings? You know, Pelosi really gave

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>up the game when the committee was being four And

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>typically in a committee you have a roughly equal number

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats and Republicans. The majority party typically has one

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or two more, but it's about equal, and the majority

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>party doesn't get to pick the other parties members that

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>are on it. And so Kevin McCarthy selected several people,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>including Jim Jordan and Nancy Pelosi said no, no, we

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want real Republicans, we don't want actually people who

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>will ask questions. Instead, she picked she picked Liz Cheney

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Kinzinger because they both decided they're not Republicans

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>anymore and their agenda is the same, which is to

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>attack all the Republicans just like Pelosi's is right, and

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I gotta say so as you walk down

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the hall, this is the only question that reporters want

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to ask, and they're they're asking it constantly, and I

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just laughed. They're like, are you going to watch it?

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, why would I watch this? I don't watch

0:14:55.520 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic National Conventions convention every four years. That is

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a multi day political campaign ad. It is designed to

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>be propaganda, and I get it. They can have their

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>campaign ads, but it's not actual factual inquiry. And if

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it were, look if you want to ascertain what's going on,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at congressional hearings that go somewhere, you

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have cross examination, you have scrutiny. You have if a

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>particular witness comes in and makes a charge, there's all

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>these allegations that are made. You actually have someone challenge

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of the witness. Press on engage. Cross examination

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is a powerful tool for ferreting out truth. But for example,

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this kangaroo chord has zero interest in Nancy Pelosi's culpability

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>on January sixth with stopping a sufficient law enforcement presence,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stopping a sufficient effort to stop the riot that happened

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because she said, in her words, was bad optics. They

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to talk about that because that's inconsistent with

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>their political narrative. I think it makes a lot of

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>reporters really excited, but but I don't think it's going

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to change any voters mind anywhere in America. And by

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, the New York Times, there's an old line

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that a gaff is when someone in Washington accidentally tells

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the truth. All right, The New York Times let the

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>cat out of the bag when they ran as a

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>headline January sixth Committee hearings present opportunity for Democrats to

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>change the mid term narrative. Well, that's obviously what they

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>want to do. I think it has failed badly so far,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's going to continue to fail. Do

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you think Pelosi made a mistake kicking Jordan and Banks

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and the real Republicans off the committee? That is, if

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you do think, because if they were on the committee,

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>presumably the Republicans would be more engaged, you'd have the relling,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there would be a reason to tune in. I think

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it was stupid to kick off the real Republicans. It

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>look even from a perspective of of TV. Let's say

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>you let's say you're a Nancy Pelosi and you're not

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>interested in truth you are interested in nyeballs and frankly,

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the clash of seeing Jordan R. Banks go at it

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with with with the witnesses makes good TV. That conflict

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>would cause some people possibly to give a flip about

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. This is right now, a bunch of

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Democrats talking to a bunch of Democrats. It's it's MSNBC.

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>This is like a panel of MSNBC talking heads sitting

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>down and going Trump is terrible. Yes, Trump is terrible,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>though I agree, Oh definitely, uh huh, and like that's

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>boring and not news, like we know you think that.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>It was not lost on us that you don't have

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the Donald Trump swimsuit calendar up on your wall. We

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>got that. I think it was a bad strategic and

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tactical mistake for Pelosi to throw the Republicans selected by

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans off the committee because, just like The New

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>York Times, it said the quiet part out loud. It

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>made it obvious we are telling a story complete with

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>our Hollywood producer, and we don't want anyone telling any

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>different stories than the story we want to tell. And

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just look at the coverage. I think the Times example

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is a great, great point here. The New York Times

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is covering the coverage. The New York Times is covering

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the way they want to shift the narrative. But there's

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no actual news happening, and so it just doesn't

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>seem politically urgent. Well, and Michael, an easy way to

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>understand how ludicrous it is what the Democrats are doing

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>is just to flip the premise. Imagine if Donald Trump

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>held an inquiry onto what happened on January sixth, and

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it was just Trump. To be honest, would the press

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>give it any credibility? Of course not, But to be honest,

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to have something, you would want to

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>have both parties. You would want to have free speech,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you would want to have conflict, you would want to

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have debate. That's the method for ascertaining truth. Nobody in

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the press would give any credibility to a purely republican

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>assessment of January sixth or anything else. I mean, I mean,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever you talk about. A purely republican assessment gets no credibility.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's not crazy because we have a partisan system.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Both parties want to advance their narrative. And if you're

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent voter, look as a consumer of news. I

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>don't just read right wing news right I read left

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wing news too, and I try to figure out the

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>truth somewhere in the middle. When the Democrats and the

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate media are only spewing their propaganda. You know, it's

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>transparent to everyone. Now, speaking of Nancy Pelosi's missteps and

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>transparency and other trans issues, Nancy Pelosi made a claim

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this past week on a television show that I will

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>admit I don't regularly watch. She gave her theory on

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what America is all about. I'll give it to you

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in her own words. Please give a warm drag race.

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome Nancy Pelosi, Welcome back, my honor to be here.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Your freedom of expression of yourselves in drag is what

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>America is all about. Senator, I'm not a graduate of

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Law School. I've never clerked for the Supreme Court.

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a member of the United States Senate. In

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>your estimation, is transvestiism what America is all about? You know,

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think Nancy may have missed some days

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>in American history, Like, look, you you got a right

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to dress up anyway you want. That's great to knock

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>yourself out, but the idea, yeah, the last pod we did,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the drag show for kids in Dallas. Yeah,

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this is another example of the Democratic Party going so extreme. Like, look,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>if people want to dress in drag, that's fine. I'm

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>quite libertarian about do what you want to do. But

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to claim that's what America is all about. I look,

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it. The founding fathers did wear wigs, so

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>she does have a point there they were wearing wigs.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But but I'm not sure that's what Washington and Jefferson

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>were doing. But but it's it is such the dominant

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the the left wing culture war is the Democrat Party.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a It's just it is who

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they are and what they're driven by, and they keep going.

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not accurate to say that's what America is all about,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but it is accurate to say that's what today's Democrat

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Party is all about. I at least understand that the

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are making this philosophical claim that this is at

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>least what the country should be all about. What I

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>don't understand is how can Pelosi with a straight face

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>make the historical claim that transvestiism, which was illegal, by

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, in lots of America throughout parts of the

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century in San Francisco, of all places, which has

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>not exactly been promoted. I don't think it was part

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Shining City on a Hill speech. I don't

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>think Governor Bradford was writing about his you know, great

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>passion for cross dressing. How do you make the historic

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>claim that actually, America, it's not about apple pie or

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>freedom or going west young man. No, No, it's about

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>dressing up like a lady. Well, and there's a richer irony.

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>So she did. She has a tiny leg to stand

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on in that she starts off by saying freedom of expression.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And you can make an argument that freedom of expression

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is what America is all about. But the irony is

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi doesn't believe in freedom of expression, like today's

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Party has abandoned free speech. So she literally means

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>only if you want to dress up as a woman,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>he's what America is all about. But if you want

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to make a movie asking what is a woman? That

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is not what America is all about. So so she

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it is quite amazing. You know, Nancy Pelosi leads a

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Democrat party that wants big tech to censor that that

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that wants views that they disagree with. Silence that's wants

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to ban conservative speakers from campus. So I'm glad she's

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging freedom of expression is important. But you know, I

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 1>wish there were Democrats in Congress that still believe that. Oh,

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, because when Pelosi uses the phrase freedom of expression,

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and really it's it's true of democrats broadly. All they

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really seem to mean is replacing our taboos with their taboos,

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and replacing our standards with their standards. There's this major

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court case of a high school football coach who

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>just said a prayer on his knee by himself alone

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on the football field after the games, and the school

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>fired him for it. They were they were so angry

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>at this individual act of expression. So I don't think

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi is defending that. But but to your point, they're

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>only defending this sort of thing. And actually it ties

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>right in with the big story out of Hollywood, which

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is that there's a new movie. It's a new toy

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 1>story movie about Buzz light Year, and for some reason,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Disney felt it was very very important to include lesbian

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>toys kissing in the Buzz Lightyear movie. Meanwhile, they fire

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Tim Allen, who originated the role of buzz Lightyear. They

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>replace him with Frankly, probably a more expensive actor. What

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>is going on? Do our kids? Is it so important

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>that our kids see lesbian toys? Smooch? Well, I gotta say, Michael,

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it is remarkable that the Verdict podcast seems

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to be driving Hollywood's agenda. Um. You and I sat

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Alabama for our live campus tour

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and we were talking about woke Disney, and I observed,

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, these these lunatics. They want to see

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Mickey and Pluto going at it and and and the

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>press lost their mind. And then what do they do?

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Boom the next movie they come out buzz Lightyear. What

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do we need? We need lesbian toys? Now? Never mind

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that the last time I checked, most toys are kind

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of androgynous. They're usually without genitalia unless little shopping in

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah. Yeah, like it's just but it is the

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>commitment to culture, it is. And you know, this movie

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>has now been banned I think in fourteen countries. The

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>UAE has banned it, their countries in the Middle East,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>their countries in Asia. There's significant discussion that China is

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 1>not going to allow the movie in because of this scene.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And I got to say, it's it's it's a wild

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>twist where Hollywood has been willing to grovel to China,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to let China censor its movies, to embrace anti Americanism,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to avoid any criticism of China because they want to

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>get access to the Chinese Chinese movie market. But when

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to their culture agenda, apparently now suddenly they've discovered,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>all right, give up the money because lesbian toys are

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more important. And I must say it brings a whole

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>new meaning to the phrase to infinity and beyond. Yeah,

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that's that's sort of like the slippery slope, Senator. You know,

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems that we never get to the bottom of

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the slippery slope. Maybe that's because the slippery slope goes

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to infinity and beyond. Why do toys have to go

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at it like like like it just you could do without.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to see. It's the sexualization of kids

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that Hollywood embraces, and it is a political agenda that

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that is all consuming. And look, they fired Tim Allen,

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they replace him with Chris Evans Captain America. So so

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is American icons driving an agenda that that,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>astonishingly enough for the first time, matters more to Hollywood

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>than money. Oh. I think that this is why it's

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>important that Allen's getting dropped for Chris Evans. Is you

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>might say, well, maybe Tim Allen was just asking for

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>too much money, and so it's they're moving on to

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper actor. I suspect Chris Evans is demanding a

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>higher contract right now than Tim Allen is. He's a major,

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>major movie star, young and write in the prime of

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>his career, and so the only explanation I can think

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of is that Tim Allen is an outspoken conservative. Chris

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Evans is a huge lib from everything that I can tell,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and so even more to your point that the studios

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are willing to lose money if it advances their cultural agenda.

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of people losing money, Senator, it's not just

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood losing money. You and I and all the rest

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of America is losing money right now because inflation is

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>through the roof and our president is blaming Republicans. You know,

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the White House has one talking point, I didn't do it,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>not my fault, it's Republicans fault. It's Putin's fault. It's

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>anybody's fault, but Joe Biden. There's a reason Biden's approval

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>rating is in the thirties because people recognize that that's

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just that's just not credible to watch this White House

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>try to blame everything. You know, watching Biden's energy secretary

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>go on TV and saying, you know, Biden's trying to

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>do everything he can to lower gas prices. Won't yeah,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>except allow people to drill for oil and gas like

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like Other than that, I mean, you'd literally have had

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for a year and a half an unrelenting war on

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas production in the United States. They keep

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>doubling down, they keep Bizarrely, Biden is going to be

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>flying to Saudi Arabia to kiss Saudi Arabia is behind,

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>after he's been attacking Saudi Arabia for a year and

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a half and alienating them because he wants the Saudis

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to produce more oil. He wants Venezuela to produce more oil,

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants it Ran to produce more oil. He wants

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone to produce more oil except Americans. Yeah, and it is.

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>He believes that he can just convince the American people

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's everybody else's fault. It seems like they're deflecting a

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit, Senator, And it's actually a type of deflection

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that you first called my attention to right in the

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>earliest days of this podcast when we were in the

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>middle of the night and the bunker in the middle

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, DC, which is the Democrats line here is

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation is not entirely Joe Biden's fault, which, of course,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation is not entirely Joe Biden's fault, but that doesn't

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that it's not at all his fault, or even

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>largely his fault. And you can point to the reasons

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's driving inflation the ones that you've named. One.

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not allowing us to produce energy too. He in

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>many ways caused the war in Ukraine, at least according

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to President Zelenski's take on things three. He's continued to

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>lock down the economy in many ways that I don't

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think is very conducive to economic growth. You know, the

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>list goes, he keeps spending a crap ton of money,

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>like in the end of the day, trillions and trillions

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. You're right, it's not entirely Joe Biden's fault.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>It's also Nancy Pelosi's and Chuck Schumer's and every damn

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat that votes for a trillion here and a trillion

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there and spends and spends and spends and spends. And actually,

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, so one form of inflation they call shrinkflation.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You notice you go in and like packages are all

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>smaller in the stores, so you know, you buy de

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Ritos and you have five fewer chips in the bag.

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe CNN was right because they might start selling

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gas by the court, but we're not far away from

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>two dollars a court for gasoline, and so so you know,

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it just it's it's a smaller unit. Like a good

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>question to ask if you're watching a CNN broadcast. I

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>pick on CNN in particular because they actually used to

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be something of journalists. They were bad journalists, but they

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>were trying to be journalists. Now they're just shameless shills.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But a question that's worth asking if you watch a

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>news broadcast is would a word of this have been

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>different if the Biden White House had written the script?

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And if the answer is no, it's not journalism, right.

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This is not a complicated concept, but CNN and MSNBC

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>seemed very confused at the concept well, speaking of perhaps

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>unethical ways to make money, like just having the government

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>print to endless amounts of cash. There was a mail

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bag question that came in. I mentioned it to you

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier because I didn't know anything about it,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but I would love your take on it, if you

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have formed one. This is from Chris. I believe Chris

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is or I'm sorry that the question is from Jonathan,

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's about someone who is one of your constituents.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Question is the twitch streamer Asmond Gold said, he reached

0:32:56.080 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>out to Senator Cruz's office about regulating lootboxes in video games.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Where does the Senator stand on lootboxes? I know that

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>those are all words, and I understand they have been

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>strung together in an English sentence, but I don't really

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>understand what it means semantically together. Look, I'm happy to

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>engage in a conversation with him. I'm happy to see

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what he has to say on it, as I understand

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if the concern he's raising is a concern about gambling

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and kids. And I will say it is certainly true

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that that social media online environments, including video games, are

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>designed to be addictive. Now I'm I'm something of a gamer.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a gamer like like hardcore twitch streamers, and

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't don't do the massive multiplayer games, not yet, Senator.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'll tell you, I bet you never thought that

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you were going to be a top podcaster. So who knows.

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>We may have to launch the Verdict twitch stream and

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>start playing pac Man or whatever the kids are playing

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>these days. That that that that could well be. And

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you remember when you and I did Dave Rubens podcast,

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>We did a twitch stream on playing I think it

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was a Nintendo that he had, and we did that

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and if I remember right, I beat his ass. I'm

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that's right, And if not, that's the story

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with. But look, they're different components of it.

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>In games, I'll tell you I don't like it when

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>you can buy in game items and sort of make

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>your character stronger or get advantages. Now, I'll confess, when

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I play some games, I'll sometimes buy it because it

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is more fun. If suddenly your character has a lot

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>more great stuff that would take you six months or

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a year to build up. So sometimes I'll okay, I'll

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>spend twenty bucks and buy a you know, a treasure

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>chest full of coins, because then I can spend him

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to get cool things in the game. You know, I

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think it is a greater concern when you're dealing with kids,

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>when you're dealing with miners who have a potential number

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one to spend a whole lot of money. And you know,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>with some of the loot boxes, there's there's a fair

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of randomness that you could get a lot of

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>great stuff or some lousy stuff. And so I guess

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the argument that it's gambling. I'll confess I haven't.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm open to hearing arguments on this, but I approach

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the issue with a pretty strong libertarian bent. So I'd

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like to not see kids exploited and harmed, and so

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I'd be interested in his views. But at the same time,

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that the federal government really has a

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>dog in the fight that if people want to in

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>a video game spend money on stuff in the game,

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think my instincts are probably that that may not

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be a great choice if you're spending massive amounts of

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>money in games, But I'm not sure the federal government

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>has a role preventing you from doing that. Well, we'll

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have to look into loot boxes more. Maybe I'll brush

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>up on my Donkey Kong or you know whatever's really

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hip right now. Um, and I hope that we can

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>figure out maybe maybe we'll have to be quite confident

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not Donkey Kong, is it not? Okay, I'm a

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>little behind the curve, but uh, there were there were

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>no lootboxes in Donkey Kong too, So we'll maybe we'll

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear from Osman Gold and you know, I will note.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>So I actually just watched last week watched again Ready

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Player one. Did you ever see this this movie? No?

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I heard it was great, but I didn't catch it.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it several times, but I just happen to

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have rewatched it last week, and it's it's a really

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>good movie about virtual reality and people going into the

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>game and a whole alternative world in the game. But

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>people amass money in virtual reality and it ends up

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>for many people subsuming the world. And look, there are

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>hard challenges. We're we're not we're not yet to the

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>dystopic world of Ready Player one, but we might be.

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We're on a path towards that, and you know, escapism,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there are times when escapism can be valuable, but it

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>also is going to raise all sorts of challenges and

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>challenges that can spill over from the virtual world to

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the real world. And how those intersections happen, We're going

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to have to learn more about them, and specifically on

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this issue of the loot boxes and gaming, a lot

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the question involves the role of parents and parental

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>rights is a big topic these days, and I believe

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>parental rights is the topic of your conversation on the

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Cloakroom with Liz Wheeler. Is that right, Liz, Yeah, this

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is a great question, right, It's it's a question I

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of conservatives are asking our parental rights absolute.

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Ten parents actually be bad parents and take their kids

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>to a dreg show or ten that? Or should that

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be illegal? We're going to break this down on the

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>cloak Room. You can join us for this conversation Adverdict

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>with Ted crew dot com slash Plus. If you use

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>my promo code, which intuitively you know this is cloak Room,

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get your first month free on your annual subscription.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That's Verdict with Ted Cruz dot com slash Plus. But

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>before I tossed this back to you, I I want

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Tim Allen thing that you guys

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking about before the New Disney movie. The buzz

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>liked your movie. There was actually a member on our

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Verdict plus community today that was asking whether you, Senator,

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are ever going to star in a movie or even

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>make a cameo in a movie. I think they said,

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna be a high powered lawyer in one

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of these one of these crime movies? And I laughed

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>when I saw that. I thought to myself, what could

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>possibly trigger the libs more than conservative Tim Allen being

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in a movie? And Senator, I think the answer is you.

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you right now. I'm not fighting Sylvester Stallone

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and Schwartzenegger would break me in half. So but but

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 1>but I'm game. And and listen, if if Star Trek

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>could have Stacy Abrams as the President of Earth, which

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>which really was Look, I I'm something of a treky.

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a hardcore treky, but I like Star Trek

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and it really is just sad for them to be

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to be yet another woke mouthpiece. It's one thing to

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>take on issues, it's another thing to be just silly.

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of me, you know, Michael Jordan. Republicans

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>buy sneakers too, you know, Republicans watch Star Trek too,

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you start putting Stacy Abrams there, and suddenly I'm

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to find something else to watch. I'll go back,

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back to original Star trek Um. James T. Kirk,

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was the best captain any ever anyway,

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So so that and you've never seen the Internet get

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>more upset when than when I said that James T.

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Kirk as a Republican and Admiral Picard was a Democrat.

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And and apparently lefties don't like it when you comment

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on their art. They believe they own it well. And now, Senator,

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not only will you be criticized by the President of

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States, not only will you be criticized by

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the President of Mexico, but you will be criticized by

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the president of the world on Star Trek. I have

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>no doubt much more to be covered on the Cloakroom.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>So do not go anywhere. I will go somewhere though,

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>because that is it for Verdict. I'm Michael Knowles. This

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode of Verdict with

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to supporting

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In twenty

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans to donate

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Party across the nation.