WEBVTT - Elon Becomes the First Friend

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Worst case scenario if our planet falls apart, we can

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 2>all go to Mars with the other man that we

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>love and trust.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk, You are right, check it out, Doc Mega.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but seriously, I run the country now, and it's

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 4>gonna be like one of my rockheads. You know, that's

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 4>super cool and super fun. But this slideshads a good

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 4>blow up and everybody dies.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Ha ha, I'm Doc Mega. See in the White House,

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>US say, us say, well.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 3>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:55.320 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 3>controlled by one man. Well, he's a legitimate, super genius, legitimate.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 5>He says.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be different.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 6>He'll vote Republican.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 5>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 5>on him.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>I think anything he does, he's fascinating the people.

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 6>Welcome to Elon Inc. Bloomberg's weekly podcast about Elon Musk.

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 6>That was from Saturday Night Live, sending up Elon Musk's

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 6>big week in politics. Today is Tuesday, November twelve. I'm

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 6>your host, Max Chafkin, standing in for David Papadopoulos. It's

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 6>hard to believe that the election was only a week ago.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 6>It feels to me anyway like Elon Musk has been

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 6>vice president for years, which is only slightly a joke,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 6>because Musk's role in this election has been staggering. Today,

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 6>we're going to break that down in multiple ways. We

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 6>are joined by our regulars, Sarah fryar head a Big

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 6>Tech coverage Hello, Sarah, Hello, Dana Hull are one and

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 6>only Elon Musk reporter, Hey, Dana.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Elon belongs to all of us, Hey, Hey.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 6>And then later on we'll be joined by a new guest,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 6>Tom Maloney, a member of Bloomberg's wealth team, who will

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 6>come and talk to us about Musk's money before we

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 6>get there. Just to catch people up if you weren't

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 6>following this on Twitter or on the news or wherever else.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 6>Elon has basically been camped out in mar A Lago

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 6>for the week. He went there for the victory party

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 6>and Dan I think he actually did leave briefly to

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 6>go to Texas, but more or less, he's with Trump

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 6>now right. He's at the right hand of the soon

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 6>to be president of the United States.

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think he briefly went home to Austin, but

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>then he went back and there's all these photographs of him,

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like sitting around with Trump at the golf course and

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with the whole extended Trump clan, and he

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>posted something about how like it was a great first

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>day of the transition team, Like he is totally camped

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>out there and like talking to foreign leaders.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 6>Sarah, what is going on with this aspect of kind

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 6>of like the Elon Musk transition era or whatever, Like

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 6>these family photos. There was a family photo on election night,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 6>I believe, posted by Kai Trump, who's Trump's granddaughter, where

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 6>like all the Trump's are there, but there's no Millenia

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 6>and no JD Vance And then there's Elon Musk.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Is Elon trying to what do we take away from this?

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 7>He's getting his money's worth. I mean, I think we've

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 7>always known that Donald Trump is a bit of a

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 7>favor operated president, and Elon Musk just gave him the

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 7>biggest favor of all, helping him score the presidency and

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 7>giving him the full support of a media organization in

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 7>x And that is loyalty that Trump recognizes, and it

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 7>is going to be very powerful. It's going to make

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 7>that whole forty four billion Twitter acquisition worth it if

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 7>he can maintain the relationship. So now it's really important

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 7>that Musk, I guess, continued to show up for Trump

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 7>and continue to stay on his side because there's a

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 7>lot at stake. There's the government contracts, there's influence over

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 7>over future policy, there's influence over foreign policy. He may

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 7>have a hand in picking the Senate majority leader. This

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 7>is this is a key moment for Elon Muskin and

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 7>honestly for Donald Trump.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 6>Elon's foreign policy, as far as I could tell ahead

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 6>of the election, is sort of twofold. He's he's a peacenick,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 6>I guess like he's He has made comments about not

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 6>wanting to have too many wars happen, and he's also

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 6>very much in favor of maximizing the contracts that are

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 6>given to his companies. Dana, were you surprised by this

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 6>call with Zelenski, the president of Ukraine, especially given Musk's

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 6>all separate relationship with Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Not really, I mean the sense that I got was that,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like Trump and Elon were probably just like hanging out

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and world leaders recalling and like, so Trump put them

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on speaker and sort of let them know that Elon

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was there in the room. That could be wrong, but

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that's like, that's my assumption, And no, I think it's

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like very very normal Elon. I mean, Elon is like

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a transnational actor, right, he has relationships with foreign governments

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on his own, independent of our State Department, and he

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>talks to foreign leaders all the time. So like these

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are people that Musk also knows. I think it's just

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>where it's unprecedented for government to sort of operate this way.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've never had a corporate CEO or a

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>billionaire like literally right there like side by side with

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the President elect, helping to shape the transition team and

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>like taking all these calls with foreign leaders in such

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a stark way before. So that's what's really striking. But

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't surprise me that the Trump patched Elon in

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>or that Elon.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 6>Is doing this. Yeah, I believe we've also seen reports

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 6>of calls with the leader of Turkey as well as

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 6>I think, Dana, you sent me a news story this

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 6>morning about a Serbia right kind of a near East portfolio,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 6>I guess for now, Sarah. You mentioned also domestic politics,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Elon sort of created a poll, I guess, to see

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 6>who should be the Senate majority leader.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about a man who sees no boundaries between

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 7>his companies. He mix and matches talent where he needs

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 7>it to go, whether that's a SpaceX or boring or X.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 7>He has certain people that he really trusts, and certain

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 7>people who are as allies and certain people who are

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 7>as enemies, and he doesn't really see the silos of like,

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 7>this is the team for boring companies. So I'm you know,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 7>cannibalizing that if I take them to neuralink, whatever thing

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 7>is on fire, he turns his attention to. And so

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 7>this is a moment for him to just go into

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 7>launch mode really with the US government.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so in the next couple of months, there's going

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 6>to be this jockeying among all these people who who

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 6>want to have influence in the White House, and I

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 6>feel like we're maybe already seeing a little bit of that.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 5>Jocking.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Howard Lutnik went on CNN and he described Musk's role

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 6>in the you know, in the new administration in what

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 6>I would say are kind of narrow terms. He said, Oh,

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 6>he's going to write some software and then give us

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 6>that software. He's gonna he's not going to be part

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 6>of the government. He's not going to be making decisions.

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 6>What do you make of that? Like, and do you

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 6>think is that how Elon understands it? Is that actually

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 6>what he's going to do what's happening right now?

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 7>Also, it just is so imagine you could just write

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 7>software and give it to the government and say here

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 7>you go, Now your government's fixed. Like, that's just not

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 7>how the government works, and that's not how Elon works.

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 7>What I imagine might happen is We've talked about this before,

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 7>but the Department of Government Efficiency, the DOGE leadership type

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 7>of job that Trump is thinking of giving Musk would

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 7>really allow him to be in charge of slash and

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 7>burn the way he was at X. I imagine him

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 7>going into these agencies and saying, who are your most

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 7>productive people? Who can you afford to lose? Send me

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 7>a list of your accomplishments this week and every week.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, how many lines of code have you written?

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 7>Like that sort of thing that he did it X

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 7>and replicating it for the US government to the extent

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 7>that the law allows him to.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one question I have is just about the

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>epics of it all. Like today, John Paulson, who a

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people had been floating to be Treasury Secretary,

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>basically came out and he said, like, I'm ecstatic that

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump is in office, but my complex financial obligations would

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>prevent me from holding an official position and President Trump's

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>administration at this time. So Paulson is basically a no

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for Treasury secretary.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 6>So I love that. Imagine having such complex financial arrangements.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>No one has more complex financial arrangements than Elon Musk.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>He runs six companies. SpaceX is an annoy ormous government contractor,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla is a huge beneficiary of the Inflation Reduction Act.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 1>So like, that's my big question, Like is this doge

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>thing just an advisory role that allows him to keep

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>all of his companies, And in that sense, if it's

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>only advisory, like what is the actual remit or does

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he actually have like a job job in the government,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And in which case does he have to abide by

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>ethical rules or are those ethical rules about to go

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>out the window.

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, my take is that he's definitely not going

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 6>to join the administration. I feel like Trump has said it.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Lutnick said it the other day. You know, Trump has

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 6>said repeatedly on the on the stump during the campaign,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 6>like he doesn't have enough time to do this. And

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you're right, Dan, and like it's not just

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>because it would be complicated in the John Paulson sense,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 6>although who knows what's behind that complication. It's that Elon

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Musk doesn't want to right the whole point. And I

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 6>think he's made as clear of like joining the administration

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 6>or taking on an advisory role is so it can

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 6>help his companies. It's not like he doesn't want to

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 6>give that the That's the whole point of this is

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 6>my reading. But I do think it makes you wonder

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 6>how long could this last? And like should we already

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 6>be on Like, you know, Elon Musk Trump feud watch.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see some real tests of Musk's

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>power this week, right, Like who is the Senate majority

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>leader going to be? Like Musk has thrown his weight

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>behind Scott, who's like not particularly popular among the Senate.

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So like is the non Maga wing of the Republican

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Party going to try to be like a check and

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>balance to that and similarly, like a least stephonic right,

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like Musk was saying, Oh, she's great, but she should

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really stay in the house, But she's not staying in

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the house, like she's just been nominated to be the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>delegate to the un So like Musk isn't getting everything

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that he wants, even though he's being very public about

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what he wants. And so it'll just be interesting to see,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>like behind the scenes within the Republican Party, like what

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>efforts are ma to kind of be a check on

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>what seems to be his unbridled power right now.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 7>It would be hard if you're a politician and you

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 7>have to be feeling the whiplash of Trump's leadership already,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 7>right he changes his mind based on who he talked

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 7>to last, he tweets about it or posts about it,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 7>and then the whole government has to shift to be

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 7>loyal to something like that and then simultaneously be loyal

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 7>to Elon Musk, who has similar behavioral characteristics of you know,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 7>being very strong minded about what he thinks is the

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 7>best way to do things that seems very difficult. And

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 7>also the idea that Musk is is very much in

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 7>the spotlight you know, on stage pictured with Trump. For

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 7>how long is Trump going to be able to seed

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 7>the spotlight to Elon Musk?

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So huge week for Elon in politics and there's

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 6>gonna be lots for us to talk about in the

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 6>weeks to come.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 5>But it was.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 6>Also a huge week for Elon's bank account. And to

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 6>break that down, we have the perfect guest, Tom Maloney,

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 6>a member of Bloomberg's wealth team who has been crunching

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 6>the numbers on Elon Musk's wealth and is coming to

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 6>talk about it.

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Tom, Thanks for being on Eloni. Thanks bys Tom. How

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 5>wealthy is Elon Musk?

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>He's worth more than three hundred and thirty billion, so

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>he's very near he's wealthiest ever, which was about three

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty billion. About two thirds of that comes

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>from Tesla stock and options, and then a big chunk

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>of that comes from SpaceX that's valued about two hundred

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and ten billion earns forty two percent of that then XII, Twitter,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Neuralink boring company kind of around the rest of that album.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 6>So were you on the well team, were you guys

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 6>like preparing for what happened last week? I mean, and

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 6>if people don't know the Tesla stock went up like crazy.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 6>I think was around forty up to forty percent as

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 6>of yesterday, I believe as a Monday, and that sent

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Musk's wealth up, I don't know, from the election night

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 6>to now, what's the game been.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>More than seventy billion. And just to put that in context,

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>seventy billion is the net worth of Charles Koch, who's

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the twenty second richest person on the planet, and Musk

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 2>has out of that in a week.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I found this really interesting just because, like before

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 6>the election, and you know, we've been telling this story

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 6>over several years of all the problems at Twitter. He's

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 6>possibly lost I don't know, twenty or thirty billion dollars

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 6>Sarah right on on the acquisition of Twitter. But it's

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 6>like he made it all back in three days.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 7>It's wild And this is what we were talking about

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 7>when he acquired Twitter, right, Like, this is really not

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 7>about the money now.

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 7>If you look at Twitter and you look at what

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 7>it makes and what it does and how big it

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 7>is and how it's shrinking, there's no way that's worth

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 7>forty four billion, And that's exactly what financial analysts looking

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 7>at as But you know, our colleague Kurt Wagner how

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 7>to call him this week, forty four billion looks cheap

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 7>if you're Elon Musk and you have as much money

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 7>as he does to gain this level of influence over

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 7>the US government and the future of policy.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think we need to start. I mean, and

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 6>I feel like if you've been listening to this podcast

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 6>for a year, you are not going to be surprised.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 6>But like, there aren't like what six companies, and I

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 6>guess now a seventh company with America Pack. There's like

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 6>one Elon Musk conglomerate. And Twitter is the media arm

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 6>of the Elon Musk conglomerate, right, Dana.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, absolutely, one hundred percent. And like we need

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to stop kind of thinking of it as like this

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>failing business that has alienated advertisers and is losing users

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>left and right. Like it has served it is serving

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>its purpose as a megaphone for Musk his politics for

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>now the Trump administration, I mean, for every you know,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>journalists and epidemiologists and climate scientists who's like leaving X

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to go join Blue Sky. A lot of Republicans are

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>now using it because it really it is like the

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>media arm of the Republican Party, and it's kind of

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>become what truth Social set out to be a while ago.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, I think your framing is totally right.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 6>Max.

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the media wing of ELIN Inc.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 6>Tom, have you started thinking about or is it worth

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 6>starting to think about an exit for Twitter? And when

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 6>you guys are thinking about valuation of Twitter, like, how

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 6>much is it worth if Tesla's valuation goes up forty

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 6>percent just based on kind of like the magic of

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 6>having President elec Donald Trump, Like, what does that do

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 6>to Twitter's valuation?

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 5>How does that affect his net worth? Yeah?

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Look, that's a good question. Could he tenant into a mainstalk?

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean you look at Trump media and technology, right,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 2>It's got truth Social, which is made like a million

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars lost quota. It's financially it's terrible, and yet it's

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>valued at something like seven or eight billion dollars. So Twitter,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>by that comparison should be with multiple multiple times of that.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 6>One of the things that Elon said right up right

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 6>before the election, and he reiterated it in a tweet

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 6>this morning was the idea that America pack is going

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 6>to continue putting money into politics. And I think part

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 6>of why he's doing that is because it's a way

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 6>to you know, create some leverage over what's happening in

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 6>the White House right now. Tom, Like, can he just

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 6>spend a couple hundred million dollars every couple of years

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 6>without without incident or like, at what point do those

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 6>liquidity problems that we've talked about with Elon Musk, the

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 6>fact that like most of his net worth is in

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 6>Tesla stock and options, when does that start to become

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 6>a problem.

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Like, I think a couple hundred million is pretty easy

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 2>for him to come up with. I mean, he ran

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 2>into problems when he bought Twitter, and that's when he

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>had to sell a bunch of Tesla shes. There were

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 2>margin calls, there were problems with his margin loan that

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 2>was you know, forty four billion dollars and that was

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 2>a big purchase, right and that was a struggle for him.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 2>But coming up with half a billion dollars a year

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>at this point, that's that's pretty straightforward. We don't know

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>much about liquidity at this point. He's margin loan with

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Tesla stock has come down a lot. They limited that

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>to three and a half billion after the Twitter fiasco.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>He could probably borrow against SpaceX. That's a private company,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 2>so it's a little bit trickier in terms of liquidity,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>but for private companies, it's probably the most liquid one

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>in the world, or at least right up there. So

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>he has ways of raising money, and certainly coming up

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>with that sort of money I think is very easy

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>for him.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 6>How do you think about what SpaceX is worth and

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 6>how much what this stuff that we've heard about and

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 6>talked about and that Dana and I on the on

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 6>the Citizen Elon podcast which is all about the election

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 6>that we've talked about, like, how do you figure out

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 6>how that's going to be how much that's going to

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 6>be worth to Elon?

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, from a perspective evaluation, we only care about

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>what it's worth now. But if you're asking what is

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>going to drive his wealth in the future, I mean

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you've got to think SpaceX and XAI is where the

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>most potential is, especially with Tesla. But it's worth versus

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>you know what its revenue is and how many cars

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 2>it's selling. It's it's hard to imagine the trajectory it's

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 2>on now kind of continuing indefinitely, and it's come down

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot in the past. I mean, Mosca is the

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>only person in the world who's lost more than two

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion at some point as well. So he's always

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 2>had a volatile fortune and that's because of Tesla SpaceX though,

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's a company that is a huge amount of

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 2>potential and XAI, even if that was worth as much

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>as open Ai, then that would boost his fortune by multiples,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, he would add another one hundred billion or

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 2>something to his fortune.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Did SpaceX's value also go up overnight when Trump got elected?

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>No, well we don't. We look at when it was

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 2>last valued, So that was back in June when it

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 2>did a fundraising at two hundred and ten billion. Do

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 2>I think it's worth that now, No, I think it's

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 2>probably worth substing.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 6>But in terms of the Bloomberg model, which is what

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 6>you're citing exactly, the big appreciation is just.

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.479
<v Speaker 5>In his Tesla shares.

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm guessing most of it he's added about the seventy

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 2>bills that he's added in the last week comes from

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>his Tesla sches. This year he's added about one hundred billion,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think the rest of that comes from XII

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and SPICEX.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Sarah, just stepping back a minute from Elon Musk and

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 6>just looking at the world of Silicon Valley, how do

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 6>you think this is going to be processed by like

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 6>the other you know, want to be oligarchs in the

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 6>tech industry, the people who you know, there are a

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 6>lot of people who really look up to Elon, Like

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 6>are people just seeing this as like, oh my god,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 6>this his bet paid off, Like now I need to

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 6>somehow either get close to Trump or get get into politics,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 6>or like how is this playing kind of in the

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 6>wider world of Silicon Valley.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 7>I think there's sort of two camps that I see.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 7>There's the the people who are now going very silent

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 7>because they don't want to ruffle Elon's feathers or Truan's

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 7>feathers or you know, try to make any waves and

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 7>they want to stay in good graces just for being technologists.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 7>And then then there are people that are clearly trying

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 7>to angle to to have to think about like how

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 7>Elon got what he got, and I'm sure that we'll

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:12.719
<v Speaker 7>see a lot more trying to replicate that success for

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 7>their businesses. I do think that there might be a

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 7>backlash to all this culturally, Like I think that there

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 7>was already you know, and I think you and I

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 7>were talking about this yesterday, Max, like the era of

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 7>like tech optimism about growth and designing the future, and

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 7>we were just seeing a lot of like cultural backlash

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 7>to the idea of Musks so close to the government

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 7>and like what that might mean for all of us.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 7>And then there are people that hope that his proximity

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.959
<v Speaker 7>to Trump means that Trump's climate policies won't be as

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 7>much of a disaster.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I love the theory that like Musk isn't actually right

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>wing Mega, He's just like pretending to be right wing

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>magass so he can sort of trojan horse it and

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like get into the government and then can vince Musk

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>that they's trojanhorsing it and is going to convince Trump

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that electric vehicles are great, windmills aren't so bad, solar

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>energy is the future, and I mean, if that came

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to pass, that would be remarkable. I don't believe in

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that theory personally, but that is a theory.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah. I mean, I feel like it's totally runs counter

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 6>to almost everything he said and Trump said over the

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 6>last year. Right, all right, Dana, we are going to

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 6>let you go and get back to the important business

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 6>of reporting on on the crazy things that are happening.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 5>I'll see you soon. Thanks for being here.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Take care.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 6>So Sarah brought up this idea of a tech lash,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 6>and I think we actually got a preview this week

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 6>and we're going to talk about it for our semi

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 6>regular feud segment few to the week, and this one

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 6>stars cultural icon Olivia Rodrigo against I guess guys who

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 6>want to go to space?

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Let's give a listen the guests my vig.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 8>Okay, this is a very odd specific question that I

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 8>ask guys on first dates. I always ask them if

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 8>they think that they would want to go to space,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 8>and if they say yes, I don't date. I just

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 8>think if you want to go to space, you're a

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 8>little too full of yourself. I think it's just weird.

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 6>Uh, Sarah, she's talking about Elon Musk, right, Oh?

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely. I mean I think that this is a theme

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 7>I've also seen in it is. It's really not just

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 7>Elon Musk. It's this idea of like men who are

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 7>so disconnected from human connection and how to actually develop

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 7>human connection. They're so deeply invested in this Musk world

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 7>and like the Manisphere. I've seen other kind of tech

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:50.119
<v Speaker 7>lash cultural tweets like this and memes where people are like, oh,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 7>if you suggest that I use chat GBT to solve

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 7>a problem on the first date, Like, I'm you know,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 7>you're not going to get a second date.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 5>I think this is really bad for Elon Musk.

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I know this is not obviously you know,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 6>this isn't a ROBOTAXI you know, crashing or something. This

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 6>isn't this isn't a rocket failing to launch. But this

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 6>seems like the canary in the coal mine that could

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 6>pretend what Sarah is talking about tom a you know,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 6>monumental tech lash, a tech lash where basically all the

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 6>cool people decide that like Elon Musk and anybody like

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 6>him doesn't belong in their community.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what do you make of this?

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 6>How are you incorporating this into the Bloomberg billionaires model?

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Musk has always wanted to be cool

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 2>but has always been on the outside, and this is

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 2>just kind of more of the same. Right, So is

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>this really going to change his trajectory in any way?

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so.

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just one more blow and he's going

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to just continue with his quest to go to space

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and hopefully he'll make more like minded people on Moss.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 6>So Sarah, again, I don't want to make too much

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 6>of this, but in a more in a more serious sense,

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 6>like do you think that this could like slow things

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 6>down culturally? I mean, I think we probably need to

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 6>get ready for some version of, you know, resistance to

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 6>point zero, and maybe a resistance that's more directed at

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 6>tech guys than the last one was.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, just look at the reasons that people voted

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 7>for Trump on a macro scale, Like people are unsatisfied

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 7>with how expensive everything is, how difficult life is, how

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 7>much childcare costs.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 5>You know, when people are.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 7>Dissatisfied with the state of their lives and their spending

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 7>power and their futures, they vote for the alternative. And

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 7>in a moment like that, saying well, let's just go

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 7>to space, is it's like, well, let's just forget about

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 7>fixing the stuff that is broken on Earth and stop

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 7>trying to do anything about it and instead invest in

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 7>some future that is very expensive and who knows if

0:24:58.600 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 7>it'll work.

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Fine words, Tom, No, but I gotta say I've always

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of wanted to go to space. So I feel

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit hurt by Rigo's comments.

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Sarah, what do you think is going to space a

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 5>a red flag?

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 6>No? I don't.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I don't think so.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean like I'm a tech reporter, right, Like I

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 7>think innovation is cool, but I also think that there

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 7>are other problems that people on Earth probably want to

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 7>be solved first or in conjunction with that.

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 6>Let's leave it there. We'll be paying attention to those

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 6>problems in the Weisa come, Sarah, Tom.

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for being on Elon Inc.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 6>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Anna Maserakas is

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 6>our editor and Rayhan Harmanci our senior editor. The idea

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 6>for this show also came from Rayhan Blake Maple's Handles

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 6>Engineering and Emma Sanchez fact checks. Our supervising producer is

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 6>Magnus Henrickson. The Elin is written and performed by Taka

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Yazuzawa and Alex Sigierra. Brendan Francis Newnham is our executive producer,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 6>and Sage Bauman is the head.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 5>Of Bloomberg Podcast.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 6>A big thanks to our supporters Joel Weber and Brad Stone.

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm Max Chafkin. If you have a minute rate and

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 6>review our show. It'll help other listeners find us, and

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 6>we will see you next week.