WEBVTT - China's Recovery Lacks Consumer Demand: China Beige Book

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, A, market pros, and

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news kind of

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts, and on Bloomberg dot com. So there's a

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of trepidation about what would happened with China GDP data,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, China being one of the test cases for

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens to an economy when it's going through COVID.

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>So we got the third quarter GDP data over the

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>weekend and year over year it was up four point

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>nine percent, which was quite the miss from what economists

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>were looking for, which was how ive and a half percent.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It was, however, better than the previous quarter three point

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>two percent. But really with China, you have to take

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a step back and talk to somebody who knows how

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all of this is put together, and no one better

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to do that than Leland Miller, China Beige Book International founder.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So Leland four point nine percent doesn't sound like a

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bad rate of growth for an economy that's been hit

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely ours by this coronavirus. Explained to us why this

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is a shocker, Well, you know, this is a really

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>important number, but it's a really important number for political

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons more than economic reasons. So you have China saying

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to the world, look at our response, look at how

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>well we've done. We're back to year on year growth.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And look at everybody else they haven't done done as well.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're someone to look up to. Now the

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>difference between four point nine and five point five. I

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>understand that the street is is agitating over over the

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>mis here, but this number is very realistic to start with.

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you look down at what our data

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are showing, you're not You're still not seeing that year

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and year improvement. You're seeing tremendous month on month, quarter

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and quarter improvement. Things are certainly getting better, but it's

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>very important for them to have a year and year

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>number uh and and improve improvement and uh and So

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're that's what they're currently announcing, right and

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>now we also got retail sales. For example, you're over

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe three point but still you know, down seven in

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>September in terms of year, today's year over years so

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mixed data. So give us your impression

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of how the Chinese economy is doing. So as you say,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, all the data is pretty managed. But at

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time China does seem to be growing. Is

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that the case consumers do seem to be spending. China

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be getting over the hit from the coronavirus. Sure,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>things are getting better, you know, it's still a supply

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>side recovery. If you look at what's happening on the

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>output side that has been with driving GDP. You know,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a better September figure for for for retail sales.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at retail sales UH from the

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year to now and compare it to

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, it's it is like you said, down over seven.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is not a consumption driven economy. This is

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not a demand recovery. This is the Chinese government deciding

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that they need to get their numbers up, and so

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they're making factories work harder and produce more stuff. There's

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>something to be said for getting the growth number up

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, but I think the idea that people

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>are really worried about whether this is four percent or

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.119
<v Speaker 1>three per center five percent. It's not a terribly healthy recovery.

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just a much more healthy, dynamic and recovery than

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in the rest of the world. So Leland's

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how much of that sort of unhealthiness that you're talking

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about is related to coronavirus and how much was coming anyway,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>because it was always a question mark about how much

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the trade war had impact to China's economy and just

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the flow of goods and services between China and the US.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Right Well, I think what what the coronavirus did is

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it put China in a box uh and forced it

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to use tools like property like heavy infrastructure stimulus to

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get the growth number back up, which was something that

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it didn't want to do and it hadn't been doing

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for the past several years. When you look at our

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>data and you look at official data, you see that

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>since seen when they were very worried about growth metrics

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the run up to the Party Congress, things that

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>actually slowed down over time, and yet the government did

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not go back to this let's juice, let's build bridges

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to nowhere, Let's let's build all these infrastructure developments. No

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>one wants to be in they had basically pushed away

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>from that because they are legitimately worried about debt. What

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think coronavirus did is pushed them into such a

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>corner that they said, look, we're gonna have to do,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to do and we're gonna have this

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>growth number up. So it is unhealthy levels of debt

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that are building us up. It's he's the same dynamic

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>scene and much of the rest of the world, but

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, China has a much bigger problem this historically. So, uh,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>there is a recovery, that's good, but yes, the way

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>we're getting there is not healthy at all. You have

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>said the China made some major colandestine changes to its

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>economic data reporting over the weekend. What were these clandestine changes?

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>It all sounds very token dagger. Yeah, we've been we've

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been having a field day on on our Twitter feed, uh,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. But look, you know, if you look

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>at fixed asset investment, which is the proxy that the

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese used for for for investment, you see that, uh,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty there was a number for the first three quarters,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you see a number for the first three

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>quarters of the number in nine was three trillion yuan

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>higher than in but when the when Beijing put out

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>their data last night, they said that things were up

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, So we were parsing through the how was

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this a typo? Why would they possibly do it? What

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we found is that essentially the Chinese government has reserved

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the right to no longer report figures regularly. What they're

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna do is they're going to rejigger the figures as

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>new inputs come in. But they're not gonna announce what

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>those new inputs are. They're not going to announce what

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the changing metrics are. They're not gonna announce what the

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>components of this sort of index their building is. They're

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>simply going to report a number and that number will

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be new based on the needed changes every year. So

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have, you know, you have basically three trillion

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>yuan they made go away in their fixed asset investment data.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>To report a year on your increase, it doesn't make

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>any sense at all, but they've reserved the right to

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>do this. Going forward, Leland, what will you be looking

0:05:58.000 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for next out of China? In order to give us

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>an indication of you know, not just the health of

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy, but what that would mean for the

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 1>health of the US economy at this point. Well, you know,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think on the Chinese side, you've got to look

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>at the retail and how it's recovering over time, and

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not just not just for for one or two months.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>But look, China's recovery is going to be based on

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the rest of the world. If the

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world does not get coronavirus contained, we

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>dipped down into a second wave. That China's data are

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be hurt. Its recovery is going to be

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hurt because it's not divorced from the rest of the

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>world no matter what's doing back home. Leland, thank you

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>so much, as always love to get you on because

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you do all of your research as well, and you

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>know you you gather the data just like many economists do.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But on the ground, Leland mill or China Beige Book

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Duncan donuts. Remember like to make the claim that America

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>runs on Duncan, and I'm sure it was true a

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time. Well, here is the man who

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Duncan run on. Robert Olsenberg is the former CEO of

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what is now Duncan Brand's used to be dunkn Donuts

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and author of Around the Corner to Around the World,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>A Dozen Lessons I learned running Duncan Donuts. Robert looking

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>at Duncan Donuts, now, how does it resemble the company

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you first took over? Were very different? But I when

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I joined the company as CEO is twenty five years old,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a cocky kid, freshwood and n b A. And we

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>had something on the order of a hundred stores. I

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think now today we have something on the order nearing

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand in forty one countries. It's been transformational, pretty phenomenal. Well,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a good leader is needed in order to scale that

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of business, particularly you know, something that you could

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.559
<v Speaker 1>call a generic enough business. I mean, I know Duncan

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Donuts are very very different from other types of donuts

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out there, but there are a lot of donat chains.

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>So how did you do that? What kind of leadership

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>skills does it take to scale a business like that?

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>A great team, a clear strategy. When we got it right,

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we were very successful. When I got it wrong, we

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>suffered the consequences. Luckily, in the thirty five years we

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>got more years right than we did get wrong. Uh,

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and a great product and that commitment I think basically

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to do and to create a set of services and

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>goods better than the competition, and that was always kept

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>us agile and kept us creative and growing and changing.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>As the time change, consumers and competition are constantly changing,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and companies have to change as well. But those are

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients I think that made for superior performance for us. Obviously,

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a different set of challenges every year, every month,

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>every day in business, right, but a pandemic is something

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't come along too often. If you were running

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Duncan now and you saw what was happening all sorts

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of restaurant owners not being able to save their businesses,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, big businesses depending on PPP funds in order

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to to continue, what would you do? I mean, how

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>do you survive something that's just completely all encompassing like that.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I never had to face anything quite like an worldwide pandemic,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 1>but did have to face certain cataclysmucker existential threats the

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>very survival of the business. I think. Uh. I'd comment

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic as I see it, and its impact

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on the restaurant industry, really is a tale of two

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>different stories. On the one hand, the first story is

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of devastating. It. Basically, the National Restaurant Association says

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that they expect something on the order of fift all

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>restaurants open, and six fifty restaurants may be permanently closed

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when the dust clears. That's painful. There may be a

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>million and a half or more people out of work.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>That's also disastrous and painful. On the other hand, the

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>second tale is a lot more optimistic. Those firms that

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>invested early, which is one of the elements of facing

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a crisis of pre preparation, that invested in convenience and

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>delivering on all plat forms. However, consumers wanted to access

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the product drive through windows, home delivery, online ordering, understanding

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the application of the social network that exists in social media.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Those companies that invested, in my view, will not only

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>survive the pandemic, but will thrive. Companies like Duncan that

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>have invested and those kinds of um new developments, pre

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>preparing continually looking to delight their customers better than the competition,

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>will be the ones on the other side. Unfortunately, it's

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be some pain left by the independence and

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people out of work. Hopefully, those chains

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that survive will be able to absorb those, but it

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>only will be over time. Fore warrant is were armed.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>These days, there's a lot of quote unquote business heroes

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley that you know, people look to some

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>unlikely characters for inspiration. Who inspires you in management these days?

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert Well, he's no longer actively engaged in the management

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of his business. He now runs a major philanthropic activity.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But the person I'm most inspired by Bill and Melinda Gates.

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I find them to be extraordinary citizens, extraordinary people, and

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I marvel at their brilliance and at their commitment to mankind.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And all those CEOs that are currently in the CEO

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>chair and in the boardroom chair, who do you admire? Well,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>admire the people that I'm closest to and the ones

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that I had the privilege of being able to serve

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>with day in and day out. So I was on

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the board of Sonic, and I find Cliff Hudson, who

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was a longtime twenty years CEO of Sonic Restaurants, an

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>outstanding leader. I also found Um Goodness. His name escaves

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>me for the moment. How Patrick Doyle from Dominoes was

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary leader and ranked among the best leaders by

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO magazine for years. Both both of them were extraordinary leaders, agile, kind, smart,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and just thoughtful people. Robert, I'll have to ask you

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>about what your thoughts are as we approach the election,

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and you know, very very divided country. Um, you know,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>many issues plaguing the country, and it just seems to

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be sometimes just difficult to even talk about it because

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, finding middle ground or finding sort of anybody

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>willing to engage is just a little bit difficult. Well,

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the first priority that the next president, whether it's

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump or a Biden administration, what's what should be

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the first priority in running this country? Thoughtful planning and

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>setting a moral tone for the country and bring us

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>back together. I think that our country can only take

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>so much chaos at any one point in time. So

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a good leader has to be very clear and crisp

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>about both the strategy, what the country wants to be,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>what it wants to have, and the four or five

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>specific leavers that are most important for all in order

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to bridge scarce resources. So whether it's

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a company of family or a country, and that's a

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>critical element. And the second element is to thround yourself

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>for the best people, complementary set of skills that will

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>help you accomplish that, and then you have to communicate

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>all the constituencies to mobilize them behind it. That works

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on a company, and it works on a country, and

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we need a leader who's got those abilities. And you know,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it certainly sounds pretty easy when you say it, Roberts.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So I hope that whoever starts to run the country

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>next reads your book. It's just out and it's a

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fantastic read. It's called Around the Corner to Around the World.

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>A dozen lessons I learned running Duncan Donuts and you

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can have a donut with every lesson there for for

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>your dozen lessons. Robert Rosen very former CEO of Duncan

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Brands and of course Duncan Donuts as it was. Then,

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us. Just a wonderful conversation. Let's

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>bring in our J Gallo. He's senior portfolio manage your

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>head of the Municipal Bond group and delighted to have

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>him are J. I have to ask you how much

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>time have you given to the competing tax bands? Um.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously we're looking at more of a likelihood

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a President Biden and the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration at the moment. But it's not fully you know,

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure, but he's definitely ahead by a long shot.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And some of the polls and you have to have

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>done a little bit of work on it, what have

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you decided, Well that the tax plans of the two

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>candidates are are vastly different. Um. You know, I don't

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that though that the polls make

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it pretty likely that President Biden is coming as opposed

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to being vice President Biden, And I would just suggest

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's just not based in the cake yet. I

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think that this election is going to be closer than

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the polls suggest. Remember it does come

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>down to state by state, and I think there are

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a number of toss up states where President Trump UM

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>may have some of his voters being under sampled and

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not showing up in the traditional polls. I know that's

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a of a partisan view, but I'm just

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>saying objectively, that's what happened in We saw a lot

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of Trump support that was not accurately assessed by the

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>polls leading up to it, and the shy Trump supporter too. Well.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Given that, then on the fact that your head of

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the ministal bond group, are there states for your sort

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of you know, making making that better or loading up

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the boat a little bit, well, I would say this.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say I think that the greatest impact on

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>muni's from the election outcome would be in the event

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of a blue blue wave. So Biden wins Capitol hialth, House,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Senate are completely in Democratic hands. That would open the

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>door for UH for an increase back to thirty nine

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>point six for the top marginal tax rate, which is

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>where I was before the Trump tax cuts. I would

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>also impose a minimum thirty nine point six on all

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>investment income for people who make more than a million

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars UH. That on average would increase demand for municipal bonds. Also,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>banks who shed munis in droves after their corporate tax

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>rate went to from thirty five, they would be facing

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a tax right under the Biden tax plan. Also Polish communis,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think munis would would fare relatively well compared

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to other fixed income in a blue wave undeniably UM

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And you'd also probably get a bigger stimulus plan. So

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the bigger stimulus plan will help all state and local governments.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Which ones would move the most, the cheapest ones? Uh?

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You know? So so states of like New Jersey in

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Illinois where spreads are wide, you think their bonds might

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>actually fare pretty well in a relative sense in a

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Biden victory. So it does seem like there's at least,

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, some kind of chance of a nice little

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pay day here. How are you hedging for that? Even

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if you don't believe that that's what's going to happen,

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or you're you know, you're more you're more than convinced

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>either way, there must be some hedging trades that you've

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>been putting on. You know. I think that markets are

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad with binary risks. Um, you know, zero one

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>outcome is just not easy to perfectly price in and

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>being of the election. Uh So in terms of just

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>adding duration or reducing duration, or adding munis or reducing communis,

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, you you you need to have a

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>little more confidence than than fifty fifty. So it makes

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>it tough. Since I think the chances of this election

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>being indeterminate come election day and maybe in fact being contested,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's greater than the markets are currently pricing.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you're really going to try to hedge, you know,

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to your question, I think you would need to go

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>into options markets. Okay, there's not a lot of options

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on munis, makes it really challenging. I think, uh, one

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>important fact here, if we have a contested election, market

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>risk access don't like it, treasure gilds probably go down. Ultimately,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>regardless of outcome, that event will fade and we will

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>know who the winner is. Biden would be probably more

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bullish for munis. Trump would be somewhat less bullish formmunities.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But on average, we're no matter what happens, we're going

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a stimulus plan. The question of sizing in

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>time is still open. In fact, we're still talking about

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it before the election. I just doubt that that's going

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And how much states and local governments get

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, of course, absolutely extraordinarily different. Um r J.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>How are you trading the coronavirus in the various states?

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Wisconsin is just in trouble right now. We had

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Icago's marriage coming out and saying that you know, she

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to avoid lockdowns, but it's getting to that tipping

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>point and she absolutely will if necessary. Are you doing

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>any kind of municipal or you know, trades related to

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus across the States. Well, the coronavirus has had

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge impact on municipal fixed income across states, locals

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and revenue bond sector. I would say we, as our

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>investment group, our MUNI effort, we have been pretty cautious

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on g os UM for the one primary reason gios

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't blow out that much relative to the overall triple

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>A MUNI scale during the onset of the COVID crisis. Meanwhile,

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>revenue on like airports bonds backed by hotel taxes areas

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that were very heavily impacted by the COVID shock due

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to travel plummeting for example. That's where we've looked for

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunities because that's where the risk premiums blew out and

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>bonds became very cheap. As far as the o's are concerned, UM,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we haven't been playing coronavirus regionally all that much. We

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>have been playing the coronavirus recovery in our in our

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue bond sectors. So we've added to airports for example.

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We've also we have some overweight positions in senior care

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>living centers which have been heavily impacted by this. But

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of good survivors in there, and if

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we can pick them, we get a nice wind. So

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I think every MUNI investor worth worth their salt is

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot of time on coronavirus, not only geographically,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but from a sector standpoint. And on the latter we've

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>been much more active than playing the geographies. So interesting,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Or j thank you for that insight into how your

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers are looking at all of this. Or Gallo

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is senior portfolio manager and head of the Municipal Bomb.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The group manages almost twelve billion dollars, but the whole

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>UH company has nearly six billion dollars in assets under management,

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so a loss to a lot to look through there,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But then there's a lot of municipal bonds out there

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's time now to talk deals. It has

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>been quite the year in many many different ways. Let's

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bring in Rob Brown, CEO of Lincoln International. So, Rob,

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had so many deals this year. I mean today

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's an early ten billion dollar old stock deal

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in the shale field, but talk to us generally about

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the appetite for companies getting together this year. Well, the

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>appetite right now is incredibly strong. Um. We obviously went

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>through a period earlier this year when the economy shut

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>down and you saw a huge fall off in deals,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And what we've seen coming out of that is companies

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that have a good COVID story to tell, meaning they

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>either performed well during the economic slowdown or they've bounced

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>back or their viewed as a sector that is going

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to maybe even more favorable post COVID. Those companies are

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>out for sale. And what we're seeing is as investors,

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>both strategic and financial, are aggressively putting money into those businesses,

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and in many cases, we're seeing valuations of those businesses

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>at the same or even better than pre COVID levels.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's an interesting, you know, part of the discussion

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>for me. Why are prices holding up? I mean, you know,

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>prices for almost everything are you know, are not holding

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>up the way they were pre COVID. And and and

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>yet it seems that for companies there isn't that much

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of a discount of COVID discount being built into these prices.

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>What am I missing? So? I think it's two things. One,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's classic supply and demand. So much capital

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 1>was raised over the last five years, particularly in the

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>private equity world, but but also corporations. Going into the downturn,

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you had stockpiles of cash, so you had capital that

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be put to work in acquiring companies that

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for a period of time during this past year, it

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was unable to be put to work. So you have

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the demand to put capital to work, and then you

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>have kind of a natural selection. The companies that are

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to market right now are the best companies. As

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, they're the ones that showed growth during the downturn.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that are in resilience sectors that were

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>proven to be essential. So I think as a result

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>of that, you still have more money that wants to

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be put to work in buying companies than there are

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>high quality companies to buy, and that supplying demand has

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>kept prices very elevated. What about people trying to negotiate

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>stock for deals. I mean, we definitely saw that that

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>set off back in March. Obviously we've recovered a loss

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of ground, but at the same time, is it more

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for companies to try and do an old stock

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>deal or a major portion of the deal in stock.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very companies specific. I think to the

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>extent companies field stock is still a little undervalued, they

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>tend to not want to use stock. I think to

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the extent companies feel like, hey, my stock is fairly valued. Uh,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they want to use it. So we are seeing it

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>be used, but we're not seeing it being used in

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a materially different way than it was pre COVID election.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So there is a very strong possibility that both the

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>White House and Congress turn blue on November three and

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that tax policy will change, including the capital gains tax policy.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing people actually come to market with their

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>business because they don't want to have to face paying

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what they might have to pay pay in tax if

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they wait until there is a potential Biden presidency to

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>sell their business. Yes, we are definitely seeing that an Interestingly,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it's become a very hot m and

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a market. And I think what's happening is the fear

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of cap gains rates going from you or you know,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the TRUP administration would like to lower in the fifteen

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that fear is actually pouring gasolene on what already is

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a hot market. So not only are we seeing um

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in particularly for private sellers. Uh. But not only are

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>we seeing companies come to market, we are in the

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>market with some things where the sellers are saying listen.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I know initially I said, hey, if this closes in

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Q one, that's fine. I'm not in a hurry. What

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing is, I'd really like to get this done

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. I don't want to take that risk, even

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>though traditionally when Congress makes tax increases, they make them

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>effective the next year. When they make tax decreases, they

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 1>have on occasion made those effective at the beginning of

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. But but legally and legislatively they can do

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want. And so we are seeing sellers feel

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like the odds of the blue wave are probably better

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>than they felt they were a couple of months ago,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and they just don't want to take the risk of

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>having to pay doubled in taxes if they sell their business. Well,

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask about sparks. They blew up this year.

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there were a couple of big ones and

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly almost everything you know related to deal making

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to be you know, a spack being raised. It's

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the new private equity or something at what happened to

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>have this explosion of special purpose acquisition vehicles. Well, that's

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting because we are seeing SPACs have more interest in

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>our deals that we're selling than we ever had in

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the past. And I think part of it is UH. Spacts,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>where you were historically viewed as the capital of last resort.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>They were very dilutive to sellers and they may be

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>weren't raised by the most reputable investors. That's changed. I

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>think people are feeling like, hey, SPACs are a way

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to access public markets without having to go through UM,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the typical road show and I p O.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>So they still can be more dilutive in a sale.

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>But I think part of it is UM. Again, it

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>gets back to the ability to raise capital, and so

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of SPACs were raised pre COVID UH that

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>needed to put money to work. They're raised by sophisticated

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>investors with good reputations, and you know, I think as

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the public markets have held up, UM, becoming public is

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>still for the right company. It's a way to go

0:26:08.000 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>public UH in a in a quicker, in sometimes cheaper way.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So we are seeing more SPACs than we've ever seen. UH.

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>They're not the right outcome for everybody, but we are

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing them participate more in the companies we have for sale.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, Rob, but thank you for that updates. Always

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to speak with Rob Brown, CEO of Lincoln International

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>on the deal landscape. Once again. A major deal today

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the shale space, Consho being bought by Conago from

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>nine point seven billion. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio