WEBVTT - OpenAI Is A Systemic Risk To The Tech Industry 

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media. Try spinning. That's a good trick. I'm at Zetron.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Better Offline and this is the second episode

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of my two part series where I explain how open

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>ai has become a systemic risk to the tech industry,

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>even with its massive forty billion dollar funding round and

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>bird brain benefactor in the form of soft Bank, the

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 1>world's foremost authority in losing money. Now, before I continue,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>shameless request, Better Offline has been nominated for a Webbie

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and I want to win this thing. I've linked to

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it in my Twitter and my Blue Sky and if

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>you could vote for me, well, it will be in

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the episode notes two. Moving on back at it. Okay,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>all right, open ai now has forty billion dollars somehow,

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>right great? Right, Well, Dolgier horses. As part of its

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with soft Bank, open Ai must also convert its

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>bizarre nonprofit structure into a for profit entity by December

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, or it will lose ten billion dollars

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>from that forty billion dollars and of funding. And just

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, by the way, they've only really got

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars of that so far. The rest is

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year. Furthermore, and the event

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that open ai fails to convert into a for profit

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>company by October twenty twenty six, investors in its previous

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>six point six billion dollar funding route can claw back

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>their investment with a converting into a loan with an

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>attached interest rate. Naturally, this represents a night mess scenario

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for the company, as it will increase both its costs

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and its outgoings. This is a complex situation that almost

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>warrants its own podcast, But the long and short of

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it is that open ai would have to effectively dissolve itself,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>start the process of reforming an entirely new entity, and

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>distribute its assets to other nonprofits or seller license them

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to a for profit company at fair market rates which

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they would not set. It would also require valuing open

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ai as assets, which in and of itself would be

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a difficult task, as well as getting past the necessary

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>state regulators, the IRA state revenue agencies, and the upcoming

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>trial with Elon Musk Well, that only adds further problems.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I've simplified things here, and that's because, as I've said,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is a little complex and pretty boring. Suffice

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, this isn't as simple as liquidating a company

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and starting a fresh or submitting a couple of legal filings.

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a long, fraught process and one that will be

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>as as has been subject to legal challenges, both from

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>open AI's business rivals as well as from civil society

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>organizations in California. You may have heard the lost monologue.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Based on discussions with experts in the field of my

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>own research, I simply do not know how open ai

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>pulls off this by October twenty twenty six, and honestly,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how they do it by the end

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of this year. It's insane. It's a it's a really

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I just every time I read this stuff and I

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>write out, I'm like, how is nobody else reading this

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and going, what the fuck is going on? You See,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a big problem, this nonprofit thing, because open

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>eye really has become a systemic risk to the tech industry,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>and anything that increases that is bad news for everybody.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai, they've become a kind of load bearing company

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>for this industry, both as a narrative, as I've discussed

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple times as chat GPT is the only large language

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>model company with any meaningful use base, and also as

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a financial entity. Its ability to meet its obligations and

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>its future expansion plans are critical to the future health

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>or in some cases survival of multiple large companies. And

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's before the after effects that will affect its customers

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>as a result of any kind of financial collapse. The

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>parallels to the two thousand and seven the two thousand

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and eight financial crisis are starting to become a little worrying.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Layman Brothers wasn't the largest investment bank in the world,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>although it was pretty big, just like open Ai isn't

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the largest tech company, though again it's certainly large in

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>terms of alleged valuation and expenditures. Layman Brothers collapse sparked

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a contagient that would later spread throughout the entire global

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>financial services industry and consequently the global economy. Now I

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>can see open AI's failure not having as big an effect,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but I can imagine a systemic effect. Still, you have

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to realize that the whole AI trade, the narrative, the bubble,

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's holding up the economy. I think like thirty thirty

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the US stock market is in the

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Magnificent seven, and all of their bullshit numbers right now

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are held up by this nonsense. And like the financial crisis,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the impact in this case won't be limited to just

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bankers and insurers. It will bleed into everything else. This

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be a bit grim. I'm not

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>going to lie. I want to lay out the direct

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>result of any kind of financial crisis at open Ai,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think anybody is taking this seriously. Let's

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>start with Oracle, who will lose at least a billion

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars if open ai doesn't fulfill its obligations per the Information. Oracle,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which has taken responsibility for organizing the construction of the

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>stargate data centers with unproven data center build a Cruso

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and I quote the Information here, may need to raise

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>more capital to fund its data center ambitions. Oracle has

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>signed a fifteen year lease with Crusoe, and to quote

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the Information is on the hook for one billion dollars

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>in payments to that firm. To further quote information. While

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the standard deal length, the unprecedented size of the

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>facility Oracle is building for just one customerment makes its

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>riskier than the standard cloud data center used by lots

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of interchangeable customers with much more predictable needs. According to

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen people familiar with these types of deals.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>In simpler terms, Oracle is building a giant data center

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>for one customer, open Ai, and has taken on the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>financial burden associated with them. If open Ai fails to

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>expand or lacks the capital to actually pay for its

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>share of the Stargate data center project, Oracle is on

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the hook for at least a billion dollars, and based

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Information's reporting, it's also on the hooked by

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the GPUs for the site. This is me quoting them again.

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Even before the Stargate announcement, Oracle and open Ai had

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>agreed to expand their Abelene deal from two to eight

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>data center buildings, which can hold four hundred thousand and

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>VIDIA Blackwell GPUs, adding tens of billions of dollars to

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the facility. In reality, this development will

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>likely cost tens of billions of dollars, nineteen billion dollars

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of which is due from open Ai, which does not

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>have the money until it receives its second tranche of

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>funding in December twenty twenty five from SoftBank, and this

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is contingent partially on their ability to convert into a

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>for profit entity, which has mentioned is extremely difficult and

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>extremely unlikely. It's unclear how many of the Blackwell GPUs

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the Oracle has had to purchase in advance, but in

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the event of any kind of financial collapse, open Ai

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Oracle will likely have to toss at least a billion dollars,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>if not several billion dollars, and then we get the

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>core with a companies. So a company whose expansion is

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 1>likely driven entirely by open Ai now and cannot survive

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>without open Ai flilling its obligations if it doesn't die.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>O Anyway, Now, I've written and spoken a lot about

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded AI compute firm Core Weave, and it would

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>give me the greatest pleasure in my life. Never think

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or talk about them ever again. Nevertheless, I have to.

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.559
<v Speaker 1>This is my curse. This is my curse. Core Weave

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>has become my curse every time I think about this.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Fuck Okay. The Financial Times revealed a few weeks ago

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that core Weave's debt payments could balloon to over two

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollars a year by the end of

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, far outstripping its cash reserves, and the

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Information reported that its cash burn would increase to fifteen

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in twenty twenty five, as Bird's IBO filing.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Sixty two percent of core weaves twenty twenty four revenue

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a little under two billion, with losses amounting to eight

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty three million was Microsoft Compute, and based

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the conversations I've had with sources, a good amount

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of this was Microsoft running compute for open Ai. Starting

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>October twenty twenty five, open Ai will start paying core

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Weave as part of its five year long, twelve billion

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar contract, picking up the option that Microsoft declined. This

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is not great timing, or maybe it's perfect timing, because

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this is also when core Weave will have to start

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>making payments on their massive, stupid, multi billion dollar d

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>DTL two point zero loan mentioned in previous episodes. But really,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a newsletter if you want to you hear me,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>go mad, You want to read me go mad? You

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>read my read my core with piece because it really

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 1>drove me insane. Nevertheless, these core Weave payments, the ones

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from open Ai to core Weave that October, they're pretty

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>much critical to Corewave's future. This deal also suggests that

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>open ai will become core Weave's life just customer. Microsoft

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>had previously committed to spending ten billion dollars on core

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Weave services by the end of the decade, but CEO

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>satchly Adella added a few months later on a podcast

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that its relationship with core Weave was a one time thing. Man,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>man a really like really fucking around there, such a

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't love core Weave. Assuming Microsoft keeps spending it its

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>previous rate, So about one point like sixty six percent

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of two billion dollars whatever those I have something that

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>isn't guaranteed. By the way, it would still only be

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>half of open AI's potential revenue to core Weave. Core

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Weave's expansion at this point is entirely driven by open Ai.

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Seventy seven percent of its twenty twenty four revenue came

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from two customers, Microsoft being the largest and yes, I

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>just fucked up a number at sixty two percent and

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>using core weaves auxiliary compute for open Ai. As a result,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the future expansion efforts the theoretical one point three gigawatts

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>have contracted, and by the way, that means it doesn't exist.

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Compute at core Weaver are largely, if not entirely, for

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of open Ai. In the event that open

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Ai cannot fulfill its obligations, core weave will collapse. It's

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that fucking simple, and then the shock waves will ripple further.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>In Video relies on corewey for more than six percent

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of its revenue and corwy's future credit worthiness to continue

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>receiving said revenue. Well, much of that is dependent on

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>open ai continuing to buy services from core Weave now

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and basically this in a comment I received from the

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>legendary Gil Luria, Managing director and head of Technology research

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at Analyst DA Davison and Co, I quote him, since

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 1>cor We've bought two hundred thousand GPUs last year, and

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>those systems are around forty thousand dollars. We believe cor

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>We've spent eight billion dollars on in Vidia last year.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That represents more than six percent of Nvidia's revenue in

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, he said last year, but I've just

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make it sound better. Core We've receives preferential

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>access to Nvidia's GPUs, though Nvidia kind of denies that

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and makes up billions of dollars of Nvidia's revenue. Corweave

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>then takes those GPUs and then they raise debt using

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the GPU's as collateral as well as customer contracts. Then

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they use the money they've raised to buy more GPUs

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>from Nvidia. You may think that doesn't sound right. I

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>am being complete, like this is factual information. At this

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>point in video was the anchor for Corwave's IPO, and

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO Michael and Trader said that the IPO would not

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have closed without Invidia buying two hundred and fifty million

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of their shares. Nvidia also invested one hundred

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in the early days of core weaves, and

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>for reasons I cannot understand, also agreed to spend one

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars over four years two and I

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>quote the information rent its own chips from core weave

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>fum fact. I can't find a single fucking mention of

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>core weave in any of Nvidia's filings. Now buried in

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that core weaves s one the document every company publishes

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>before going public was a warning about counterparty credit risk,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>which is when one party provides services or goods to

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>another with specific repayment terms and the other party doesn't

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>meet their side of the deal. While this was written

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as a theoretical as it could, in theoretically speaking, come

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>from any company to which core Weave acts as a creditor.

0:10:55.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It only named one open Ai now has discussed previously.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Core Weaver is saying that should a customer, any customer,

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but really they mean open Ai failed to pay its

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>bills for infrastructure built on their behalf or services rendered,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it can have a material risk of the company. Now.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>As an aside, the information reported that Google and someone's

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 1>going to email me there, so I just want to

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of it. The core Weave is apparently in

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>advanced talks with Google to nd GPUs it Also, it

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>also added another thing in this story, just so that

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to hear from any of you. The

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Google's potential deal with core Weaves significantly smaller than their

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>commitments with Microsoft as according to one of the people

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>briefed on it, but could potentially expand in future years.

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Do not come to me and claim that Google's going

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to save core Weeve. I'll be so mad anyway. Even

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>with Google and open AI's money, Carew's continued the ability

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to do business hinges heavily on its ability to raise

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>further debt, which I have previously called into question a

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>newsletter that gave me madness, and its ability to raise

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>future debt is to quote the financial times secured against

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's more than two hundred and fifty thousand n vida

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>GPUs and its contracts with customers such as Microsoft. Now,

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>any future debt that core Weave raises will be based

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>off of its contract with open Ai. You know, the

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>counterparty credit risk threat that represents a disproportionate sharef it's

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>revenue I just mentioned, and also whatever GPUs they still

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 1>have left that they can get debt on. As a result,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a chunk of a video's future revenue is dependent on

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>open AI's ability to fulfill its obligations the core Weave

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>both in its ability to pay them, and they're timing

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>less in doing so. If open ai fails, then core

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Weave fails, then that hurts and video Jensen's going to

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have to go. He's going to have to go to

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a cheaper leather jacketarium and it gets worse. Open AI's

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>expansion is dependent on two unproven startups, one of them

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned, who are also dependent on open ai

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to live with Microsoft's data center pullback and open AI's

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>intend to become independent from redmen. Future data center expansion

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is based on two partners supporting coll Weave I know

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>will get there and Oracle. Now I'm referring, of course

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to Core Scientific, which is the data center developer for

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>core Weave, and of course Crusos, the data center develer

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>four Oracle. Now, if you were wondering, I can't hint

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it about this earlier how many data center how many

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.599
<v Speaker 1>DIIDENTA centers do you think Cruso's ever built, and the

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>answer is none, And of course Scientific, how many do

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you think they've built and the answer is also none.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>These are the fucking companies underpending the AI boom. I

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>also really must explain how difficult it is to build

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a data center, and how said difficult he increases when

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you're building an AI focused one. For example, in Video

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>had to delay the launch of its Blackwell GPUs because

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.079
<v Speaker 1>of how finnicky the associated infrastructure, so the servers and

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the cooling and such is for customers. This was for

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>customers that had already been using GPUs and therefore likely

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>knew how to manage the temperatures created by them. Also

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>is another reminder open eyes on the hook for nineteen

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of funding behind Stargate, and neither of them

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have that money. I just want to remind you of that,

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>because it costs so much money to build a fucking

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>data center. And imagine if you didn't have any experience

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>and effectively had to learn from scratch, how do you

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>think it would be building these data centers? Let's find out.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>So let's start in Abilene, Texas with Crusoe and the

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Stargate Data Center project. Now. Cruso is a former cryptocurrency

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>mining company that has now raised hundreds of millions of

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars to build data centers for AI companies, starting with

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a three point four billion dollar data center financing deal

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>with asset manager Blue Owl Capital. This yet to be

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>completed data center has now been leased by Oracle, which

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>will allegedly fill it full of GPUs for open AI.

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Despite calling itself and I quote the industry's first vertically

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>integrated AI infrastructure provider, with the company using flared gas

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as a waste by product of oil production to power

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I infrastructure, Cruso does not appear to have built a

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>single AI data center and is now being tasked with

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>building one point two Gigawatt's had a data center capacity

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for open Ai. It's just so fucking Cruso is the

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>sole developer and operator of the Abilene site, meaning, according

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to the information that it is in charge of contracting

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>with construction contractors and data center customers as well as

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>running the data center after it is built. Oracle, it seems,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>will be responsible for filling said data center with GPUs

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as mentioned. Nevertheless, the project also appears to be behind schedule.

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The Information reported in October twenty twenty four that Abilene

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was meant to have fifty thousand of Nvidia's Blackwell AI

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>chips in the first quarter of twenty twenty five, and

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>also suggested that the site was projected to have a

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>whopping one hundred thousand of them by the end of

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. Now you can join me back here

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in reality, because a report from Bloomberg in March twenty

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five said the Open AI and Oracle we're expected

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to have sixteen thousand available by the summer of twenty

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, with and a quote open Ai and Oracle

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>expecting to deploy sixty four thousand then video GB two

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>hundreds at the Stargate Data center by the end of

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. That's that's very delayed. That's really delayed. Again.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>How I run a PR firm in that I record

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, I've write a newsletter, I have a book.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm right in. I got all this shit on and

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm the asshole who notices this anyway, has discussed previously.

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Open ai needs this capacity very bad. According to the information,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>open ai expect stargate to handle three quarters of its

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>compute by twenty thirty and these delays call into question,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>at the very least whether this schedule is reasonable, or

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>logical or even possible. And I actually really question whether

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Stargate itself is possible at this point. But it can

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>get dumber because we're about to talk about Core Scientific,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and they are core Weave's friends. They're the people building

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>data centers for core Wave in Denton, Texas. Now, as

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you can probably tell, I've written a great deal about

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>core Wave in the past. That got a monologue, got

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a newsletter, and I got a therapy bill for it.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And specifically I've written about their build out partner, Core Scientific,

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a cryptocurrency mining company, yes, another one that has exactly

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>one customer for its AI data centers, and you'll never

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>guess who it is. It's Core Wave. Now here's a

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>few fun facts about Core Scientific. Core Scientific was bankrupt

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>lotat year. Course Scientific has never built an AI data center,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and its cryptocurrency mining operations were built around a six

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>specialist computers for mining bitcoin, which led to an analyst

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell CNBC that said data centers would and I

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>quote need to be buildozed and built from the ground

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>up to accommodate AI compute. That's the stuff. Course Scientific

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>also does not appear to have any meaningful AI compute

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. It's AI slash HPC, which is high

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>performance computing. Revenue represents a teeny tiny, teeny little percentage

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of overall revenue, which mostly comes from mining crypto, both

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for itself and other parties. Now, hearing all of this,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>would you give this company your your compute? Would you

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think these are the people that I am going to

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>call to build my data centers. If you said no,

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you are smarter than Corewave, who has given their entire

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>one point three gigabat build out to Core Scientific. Course Scientific. Also,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>it seems they seem to be taking on like one

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>point one four billion dollars of capital expenditures to build

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>these data centers, which, by the way, is not enough money.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But nevertheless, Corwave has promised to reimburse them at eight

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety nine point three million of these costs.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>This is all from public filings. By the way, it's

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as one clear house course Scientific actually intends to do

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>any of this shit. While they've taken on a good

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>amount of debt in the past five hundred and fifty

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in the convertible note towards the end of

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, this would be more debt than they've ever

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>taken on. It Also, as with Crusoe, does not appear

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to have any experienced building AI data centers, a point

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I keep repeating because it's very important. These are other

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>companies behind the growth for open AI, except unlike Crusoe,

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Core Scientific is a barely functioning, recently bankrupted bitcoin minor

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be a data center company. Crusoe, on the

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>other hand, is possibly also doing the same thing, but

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>less egregious about it. Now, how important do you think

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>core Weave is to open ai? Exactly? Well, that's our semaphore.

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Core Weaver has been one of our earliest and largest

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>compute partners, open ai chief Sam Allman said in Corwave's

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>roadshow video, adding that Corwave's compute power led to the

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>creation of some of the models that were best known

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for Core. We figured out how to innovate on hardware,

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to innovate on data center construction, and to delve for results,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>very very quickly did it. But even if it did,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>will it survive long term? Going back to the point

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the contagion. If open ai fails and core we fails,

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>so too does course Scientific And I don't really fancy

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Crusoe's chances either. But let's take a step back for

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a moment. We've been going so hard, haven't we. I've

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>got a genuine question, just for the fact finders out there.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a Microsoft book. Open AI's computer's revenue now. Up

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>until fairly recently, Microsoft has been the entire infrastructure backing

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>open ai, but recently to free open ai up to

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>work with Oracle and see other people, released it from

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>its exclusive cloud compute deal. Nevertheless, put the information, open

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>ai still intends to spend thirteen billion dollars on compute

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on Microsoft as there this year. What's confusing, however, is

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>whether any of this is booked as revenue for Microsoft.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft claimed earlier in the year that it surpassed thirteen

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in annual recurring revenue, by which it means

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's last month multiplied by twelve by the way, and

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they said it was from ai. Open AI's compute costs

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four or five billion dollars, and that's

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>at are discounted as your rate, which on an anualized

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>basis will be about four hundred and sixteen million dollars

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in revenue a month for Microsoft. It isn't, however, clear

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>whether Microsoft counts open ai is computer's money, which is

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>really fucking weird. You'd think with all this money they're

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>making from this company, they'd be saying there was money

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 1>coming in. It's peculiar. I've yet to find a real answer. Now.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft sernings do not include an artificial intelligence section. No,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They're made up of three separate segments, Productivity and Business Processes,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>which includes things like LinkedIn, Microsoft three sixty five and

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so on. More Personal Computing, which includes Windows and gaming products,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and then Intelligent Cloud including server products and cloud services

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like A zero, which is likely where open AI's computers included,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and where Microsoft book the revenue from selling access to

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 1>open AI's models but not open AI's compute question. As

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a result, it's hard to say specifically where open AI's

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue might sit. Even guessing intelligent Cloud might not be right,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>but based on an analysis of Microsoft's Intelligent Cloud segment

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from financial year twenty twenty three Q one through its

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>most recent earnings, and there was a spike in revenue

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from twenty three Q one to twenty four Q one.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>In financial year Q one, which ended on September thirtieth,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, a month before Chat GPT's launch, the

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>segment made twenty point three billion dollars. The following year,

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in FY twenty four Q one, it made twenty four

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars, a nineteen point seven percent year

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of a year growth, or roughly four billion dollars. This

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>could represent the massive increase in training and inference costs

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>associate with hosting Chat GPT, and they peaked at twenty

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>eight point five billion dollars in revenue in the financial

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>year twenty four Q four, before dropping dramatically to twenty

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>four point one billion dollars in financial year twenty five

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Q one, and raising a little twenty five point five

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in financial year twenty five Q two. I'm

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so sorry none of this is easy to read. This

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is a plausible explanation. Open ai spent twenty twenty three

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>training its GPT four to Roho model before transitioning to

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>its massive, expensive iryme model, which would eventually become GPT

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>four point five, as well as its video generating model sourer.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>According to the Wall Street Journal, training GPT four point

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>five involved at least one training run, costing around half

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in compute costs alone. These are huge sums,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's worth noting a couple of things. First, Microsoft

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>licenses open AI's models the third parties, so some of

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>this revenue could be from other companies using GPT on Azure.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We've seen lots of companies launch Ai products, and not

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>all of them are based on l lambs mrieing things. Further,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft provides open ai access to a zerr cloud services

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>at a discounted rate, as I've mentioned in the past,

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a giant question mark over open AI's

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>actual contribution to the various spikes in revenue for Microsoft's

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent cloud segment, or whether other third parties played a

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>significant role. Furthermore, Microsoft's investment in open Ai isn't entirely

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>cold hard cash. Rather, it's provided the company with credits

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to be redeemed on in see your services, kind of

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>like Chucky cheese tokens. I'm not entirely sure how this

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would be represented in accounting terms, and if anyone can

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>shed any light on this, please get in touch. Would

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it be noted as revenue or something else? Open Ai

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't paying Microsoft or are they? Are they doing the

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tech equivalent of redeeming air miles or have they spent

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a gift card of us? You're it really isn't obvious,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft is doing some accounting bullshit here and not

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>suggesting impropriety, not suggesting anything illegal. I'm just saying it's

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>insane that they have this company spending billions of dollars

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>theoretically on their services and it's just nowhere. Additionally, while

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>equity is often treated as income for tax purposes, as

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is the case when an employee receives RSUs as part

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of their compensation package, under the existing open Ai structure,

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft isn't actually a shareholder, but rather the owner of

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>profit sharing units. This is a distinction worth noting. These

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>profit sharing units are treated as analogous to equity, or

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>at least in terms of open AI's ability to raise capital,

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>but in practice they aren't the same thing. They don't

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>represent ownership in a company as directly as, for example,

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a normal share would. They lack the liquidity of a

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>share in the upside they provide, namely dividends is purely theoretical.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Another key difference. When a company goes bankrupt and enters liquidation,

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>shareholders can potentially receive a share of the proceeds after creditors, employees,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and so on are paid. Well, that often doesn't happen

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as is, as in the liabilities generally, they can exceed

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the assets of the company. In many cases it's at

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>least theoretically possible, given that profit sharing units aren't actual

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>salaries or shares. Where does that leave Microsoft? This stuff

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is confusing, and I'm not ashamed to say that I

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>just fucked up a word and that complicated accounting questions

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>like these are far beyond my understanding. If anyone can

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>shed some light, drop me an email, buzz me on

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or blue sky, hit me up on clerk or

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>gorp or post on the better offline subware. Someone might

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>take your wallet though. Anyway, back on track, I think

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's worth understanding the scale of the open air vortex

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and how it's distorting the tech investment market and why,

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>even without having failed, it represents the systemic risk. Without

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>open ai, and American startup investment is flat, and even

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with it, less startups are receiving investment. Crunch based News

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reported in early April the North American startup investments spiked

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in Q one due to open Ai, hitting eighty two

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Great, right, sounds great? This statement sadly has

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a darker undertone. American star up investment was actually like

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>forty two billion in Q one twenty twenty five when

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you remove the deal, which is appropriate because none of

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the money is actually received by open Ai yet and

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at best only ten billion dollars if it will be

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>received before Sember twenty twenty five. This quarter also included

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a three point five billion dollar investment in Wormlight competitors

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Aroundthropic run by Warrio Amma Day, making the appropriate number

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of paltry thirty nine point five billion dollars. Now, this

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is still an improvement, though a marginal one over the

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven point five billion dollars raised in Q one

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. Nevertheless, crunch based news also has a far,

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>far darker story. Your volume women in American startups has

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>begun to collapse, trending downward almost every quarter or deal

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>volume isn't the direct result of open AI's financial condition.

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 1>The so called revolution created by open ai and other

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>generative AI companies technology appears to be petering out, and

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the contagion is starting to impact the wider tech sector.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's important to understand how bleak things are the future

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of generative AI, wrest and open ai, and open AI's

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>future rests on near and possible financial requirements. I've done

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>my best to make this argument is in as objective

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a tone as possible, regardless of my feelings about the

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>bubble and its associated boosters open Ai. As I've said

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>before and argued countless times in interviews and podcasts and newsletters,

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it's effectively the entire generative AI industry, with its nearest

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>competitor being less than five percent of its five hundred

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>million weekly active users Anthropic, Google, Microsoft XAI. They're all

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>rounding errors in the grand scheme of things. But open

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>AI's future is dependent and this is not an opinion.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>This is an objective fact on effectively infinite resources in

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>many forms. Let's start with the financial resources. If open

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ai required forty billion dollars to continue operations this year,

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonable to believe it will need at least another

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>forty billion dollars next year, and based on its internal projections,

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>will need at least forty billion dollars every single year

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>until twenty thirty, when it claims somehow it will be profitable.

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>And I quote the information with the completion of the

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Stargate Data Center project, you may be wondering, how's that possible? Ed?

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>How you think the information wrote that down? Fuck no,

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just go Lesson's too busy humiliating people. She let go

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>by name on Twitter, Ess Golesson. I like the information.

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you're a fucking asshole for how you treated

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>your people. Say it on my podcast, I say it

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Anyway. Let's keep talking about some of these

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>resources that open ai is dealing with, specifically the compute

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>resources and expansion. Open ai requires more compute resources than

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>anyone has ever needed, and will continue to do so

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>in perpetuity. Building these resources is now dependent on two partners,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Course Scientific and Crusoe. Though I've never built a data center,

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as Microsoft has materially pulled back on data center development

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and has as aforementioned, pulled back on two gigawads of

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>data centers, slowed or paused. Of course, some of its

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>early stage center products too, with TD Cohen's recent analyst

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>reports saying that data center pullbacks were and I quote

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>them March twenty six, twenty twenty five, data center channel

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>checks letter because it's so good, driven by the decision

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to not support incremental open Ai training workloads, that's the stuff.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>In simpler terms, open ai needs more computer at a

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>time when it's lead backer, which has the most GPUs

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world, has specifically walked away from building it.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Even in my most optimistic frame of mind, it isn't

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>realistic to believe that Cruso or Core Scientific can build

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the data centers necessary for open AI's expansion, even if

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank and open Ai had the money to invest

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in Stargate today, which they do not. Dollars do not

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>change the fabric of reality. Data Centers take time to build,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>requiring concrete would steal in other materials to be manufactured

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and placed, and that's after the permitting required to get

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>these deals done. Even if that succeeds, getting the power

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>necessary is a challenge unto itself, to the point that

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>even Oracle, an established and storied cloud compute company run

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>by a very evil man at one point to quote

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Information, has less experience than its larger arrivals in

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the utilities, to secure power and working with

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>powerful and demanding cloud customers whose plans change frequently. A

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>partner like Cruso will Core Scientific simply doesn't have the muscle, memory,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>or domainer expertise that Microsoft has when it comes to

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>building and operating data centers. As a result, it's hard

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to imagine, even in the best case scenario, that they

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>are able to match the hunger for compute the open

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Ai has now. I want to be clear, I believe

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>open ai will still continue to use Microsoft's compute and

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>even expand further into whatever remaining compute Microsoft may have. However,

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>there is now a hard limit on how much of

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be, both literally and what's physically available,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and in what Microsoft itself will actually allow open ai

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to use, especially given how unprofitable GPU compute seems to

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be based on how every single company that isn't in

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>vidio lose his money running them. But really, and we're

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>coming to the end of this, which leads to a question,

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>how does all of this end? Last week, a truly

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive piece of fan fiction framed as a report called

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>AI twenty twenty seven went viral, garnering press with the

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Duiskesh podcast and gormles childlike wonder from Dope New York

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Times reporter Kevin Rus and reporter I think is a

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>fucking stretch. Its predictions vaguely suggest a theoretical company called

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>open Brain will invent a self teaching agent of some sort.

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's total bullshit, but it captured the handsome minds of

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>AI boosters and other people without object permanence because it

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>vaguely suggests that somehow, large language models and their associated

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>technology will become something entirely different. Like making predictions like

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>these because the future, especially in our current political climate,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is utter chaos. But I will say that I do

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not see, and I say this with complete objectivity, how

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>any of this bullshit continues. I want to be extremely

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>blunt with the following points, as I feel like both

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>members of the media and tech analysts have categorically failed

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to express how ridiculous things have become. I will be

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>repeating myself, but it's fucking necessary, as I need you

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to understand how untenable things are. Soft Bank is putting

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>itself in dire straits simply to fund open Ai once

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this deal threatens its credit rating, with soft Bank having

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to take on what will be multiple loans to fund

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this forty billion dollar round, and open Ai will need

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at least another forty billion dollars a year later. This

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is before you consider the other nineteen billion dollars that

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>soft Bank has agreed to contribute to the data center

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>project with Stargate money it does not currently have available. Now.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai has promised nineteen billion dollars to the Stargate

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Data Center project two and again they do not have it,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and they need soft Bank to give it to them.

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And again I've said it, and I'll say it again.

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Neither of these companies have the money. The money is

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not there, and open Ai needs Stargate to get built

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to grow much further. I see no way in which

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>open ai can continue to raise money at this rate,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>even if open Ai somehow actually receives the forty billion

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars it's been promised, which will require it to become

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a for profit entity, which I don't think it can

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fucking do. While it could theoretically stretch that forty billion

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars to the last multiple years, projections say it will

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>burn three hundred and twenty billion dollars in the next

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>five years, or more likely, I can't see a realistic

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>way in which open ai gets the resources it needs

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to survive. It will need this insane streak of good fortune,

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of which you only really hear about in

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Greek poems or JoJo's Bizarre Adventure. You know, the more

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>cultured choice, but let's go through them. Somehow soft Bank

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>gets the resources and loses the constraints required to bankroll

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this company forever. The world's wealthiest entities, those sovereign wealth

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>funds mentioned in the last episode, sounds and so on,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.239
<v Speaker 1>they pick up the slack until open Ai receive they

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>reach profitability, which is a huge assumption. It's also assuming

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that open ai will have enough of these megawealthy benefactors

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to provide it with the three hundred and twenty billion

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars they need to reach profitability, which it won't. There'll

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>also need Cruso and Core Scientific to turn out to

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be really good at building AI infrastructure, which they've never

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>done before, which is that's very possible, I'm sure. And

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>then Microsoft will then walk back its walk back on

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>building UAI infrastructure and recommit to tens of billions of

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars of CAPEX, specifically on AI data centers, and also

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>will give it to open Ai. And then, of course

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Stargate's construction happens faster than expected and there are no

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues in terms of labor, building materials, GPUs

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Now I don't know, I haven't checked

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the news in the last three weeks, but is there

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>anything going on that might increase the costs of materials?

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Anyway, if those things happen, I'll eat quo.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not particularly worried. In the present conditions. Open ai

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is on course to run out of money or run

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.439
<v Speaker 1>out of compute capacity, and it's unclear which will happen first.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But what is clear is it's time to wake up.

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Even in a hysterical bubble where everybody is agreeing that

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the future, open ai is currently requiring more

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>money in more compute than is reasonable to acquire. Nobody nowhere, ever, anywhere,

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>has ever raised as much money as open ai needs to.

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And based on the sheer amount of difficulty that soft

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank is having raising the funds to meet the lower tranche,

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the ten billion dollar one of its commitment, it may

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not actually be possible for this company to continue, even

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>with the extremely preferential payment terms months long deferred payments

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for example that open ai probably has. At some point

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>someone will need a dollar. I'll give Sam Ortman some

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fucking credit. He's found many partners the shoulder the burden

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of the rock economics of open Ai. With Microsoft, Oracle,

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Crusoe and Core We've handling the upfront costs of building

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure, and SoftBank finding the investors for its monstrous

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>stupid round, and the tech media mostly handling marketing for him,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>which is really nice, great job everybody. He is. However, overleveraged.

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai has never been forced to stand on its

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>own two feet or focus on efficiency, and I believe

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the constant enabling of this ugly nonsensical burn rate has

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.240
<v Speaker 1>doomed this company. Open Ai has acted like it'll always

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>have more money. In compute, And that's kind of because

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone's acted as that would be the case. No one's

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>really called sam Altman out on his bullshit. There are

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>some people, but really no one in the mainstream media

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>has bothered. Really, Sam Altman has been enabled. Open Ai,

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, cannot just make things cheaper at this point,

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because the money has always been there to make things

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, as has the compute to make larger and

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>larger language models that burn billions of dollars a year.

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This company is not built to reduce its footprint in

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>any way, nor is it built for a future in

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which it wouldn't have access to infinite resources. Worse still,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>investors in the media have run cover for the fact

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that these models don't really do much more than they

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>did a year ago, and for the overall diminishing returns

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of large language models writ large. Now, I've had many

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>people attack my work about open ai, but none of them,

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not one of them. Nobody has provided me any real

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>counterpoint to the underlying economic argument I've made since July

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of last year, the open ai is unsustainable. Now this

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>is likely because there really isn't one other than open

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ai will continue to raise more money than anybody has

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>ever raised in history imperpetuity and will somehow turn the

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>least profitable company of all time into a profitable company.

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>This is not a rational argument. It's a religious one.

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a call for faith. And it's disgusting to see

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>well paid reporters with one hundred and fifty thousand subscribers

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>to the newsletters and a really shitty podcast with a

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>major news outlet constantly just ignore them share and I

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>see no greater payal horse of the apocalypse than Microsoft's

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>material pullback on data centers. Well, the argument might be

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft wants open ai to have an independent future.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's fucking laughable when you consider Microsoft's deeply monopolistic tendencies,

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and for that matter, it owns a massive proportion of

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.240
<v Speaker 1>open AI's pseudoequity. At one point, Microsoft's portion was valued

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at forty nine percent, and while additional fundraising has likely

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>diluted Microsoft's steak, it still owns a massive portion of

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>what is, at the very least, if you believe any

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of this nonsense, the most valuable private startup of all time.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And we're supposed to believe that Microsoft's pullback, which limits

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>open AI's access to infrastructure it needs to train its

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and run its models, and thus is mentioned represents an

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to the company. You meant to believe that

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this is because of some sort of paternal desire to

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>see open ai leave childhood behind to spread its wings

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and enter the real world. Are you fucking stupid? Sorry?

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be calling people stupid. I shouldn't. I really shouldn't.

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But I am more likely Microsoft got would have needed

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>out of open Ai, which has reached the limit of

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the models that can develop, and which Microsoft, by the way,

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>already owns the ip of due to their twenty nineteen

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>funning round. There's probably no reason for Microsoft to make

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>any further significant investments other than just kind of throwing

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a little cash in there, and then I imagine some

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of tax dodge. I'm just guessing. It's also important

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to note that absolutely nobody other than Nvidia is making

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>any money from generative AI. Core Weave loses billions of dollars,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>open Ai loses billions of dollars, Anthropic loses billions of dollars.

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And I can't find a single fucking company providing generative

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>AI powered software that's actually making a profit. The only

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>company is even close to doing so Are Consultancy is

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>providing services to drain and create data for models like

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Churing and Scale AI, and Scale isn't even fucking profitable now.

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The knock on effects of open AI's collapse will be

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>wide ranging. Neither core Weave nor Crusoe will have tenants

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for their massive, unsustainable operations. An oracle will have nobody

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to sell compute to because they've leased that thing for

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen fucking years, or one customer who else is going

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>to take that anyway. Cor we will likely collapse under

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the weight of its abominable debt anyway, which will lead

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to a six seven percent or more revenue drop for

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in video or a time when revenue growth has already

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>begun to slow. On a philosophical level, too, open AI's

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 1>health is what keeps this industry alive. Open ai has

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>truly the only meaningful user base in generative AI, and

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this entire hype cycle has been driven by its success.

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Meaning any deterioration or collapse of open ai will tell

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the market what I've been saying for over a year.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The generative AI is not the next hype of growth

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>market and it's underlying economics do not make sense. But look,

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying this to be a hater. I'm not

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>saying this to be right. This stuff has driven me insane,

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not doing it to be a pundit, to

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be a skeptic, to be a cynic, to be someone

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that hates because I want to hate. And I hate

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>them not because I think people like me because I

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>hate them. I hate them because I have brainworms. I

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.959
<v Speaker 1>have something wrong with me inside my brain that tells

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to be like this, and I have to

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>look at these things and I have to try and

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>find what's going on, otherwise I will be driven mad,

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.080
<v Speaker 1>which is why I'll say if something changes, if I'm

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong somehow, I promise you I will tell you exactly how,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly why, and what mistakes I made to come to

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the conclusions I have in this episode and the episodes before.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>But I don't believe that my peers in the media

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>will do the same when this collapses. But I promise

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you that they will be held accountable because all of

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this abominable waste could have been avoided. Large language models

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are not on their own the problem. The tools capable

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of some outcomes, doing some things, But the problem, ultimately

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are the extrapolations made about their abilities and the unnecessary

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>drive to make them larger, even if said largeness never

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really amounted to much. Everything that I'm describing is the

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>result of a tech industry, including media and analysts, that

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>refuses to do business with reality, trafficking in the ideas

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and ideolo, celebrating victories that have yet to take place,

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>applauding those who have yet to create the things that

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about, cheering on men lying about what's possible

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>so that they can continue to burn billions of dollars

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and increase their wealth and influence for barely any fucking reason.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I understand why others might not have said what I've said.

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>What I am describing is a systemic failure, one at

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a scale here too unseen, one that has involved so

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>many rich and powerful and influential people agreeing to ignore reality,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and that'll have crushing impacts for the wider tech ecosystem

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>when it happens. Don't say I didn't warn you. Thank

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>check out more of his music and audio projects at

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Mattasowski dot com m A T. T O S O

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>w Ski dot com. You can email me at easy

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>at better offline dot com or visit better offline dot

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>com to find more podcast links and of course, my newsletter.

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I also really recommend you go to chat dot where'soead

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>dot at to visit the discord, and go to our

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 1>slash Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media, visit

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>our website cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us out

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts.