WEBVTT - Do You Need A Permit To Construct Your Whiteness?

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center.

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty, I know

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 2>he Armstrong and Yetty. So we've got a former al

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>kaieda guy in charge. Now, what does he have planned

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>for the new Syria. I'm assuming it's some taliban asque

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>brutal fundamentalists to dystopia.

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>There must be legal framework that protects and ensures the

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>rights of all, not a system that serves only one sect.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 4>I asked God Almighty that this be a conquest free

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 4>of revenge, but a conquest entirely of mercy and love.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Conquest of mercy and love. I think that's how Taylor

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>ended the aerostour.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Wait that.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The new leader of Siria's is swifty.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>How many terror groups is that guy in?

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That will be so interesting to watch develop. Is it

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>going to become a multi sectarian blood bath Islamist nightmare

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for the next seventy five years?

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Or this?

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Does this guy mean what he says? You know, I

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get back into that, or I could do

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this later.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll get into that later. The idea of what

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>should happen next in Syria, but I wanted to get

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to this. This is I'm going to take you on

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a multi point journey here. Start over here, we're gonna

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>end be over there briefly, but then over there is

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna lead us over there, and we're gonna end up

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>over there.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>You'll enjoy it, trust me. So I love this.

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura Powell, who's an attorney, tweeted this the other day.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't from the you can't make this up, this

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff up file. A misinformation expert at Stanford one, Jeff Hancock,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>build the State of Minnesota six hundred dollars an hour

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to prepare an expert declaration on the dangers of AI

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>generated content. Six hundred dollars an hour the dangers of

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>AI generated content. He swore, under penalty of perjury, that

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>everything staateent in the declaration was true and correct, but

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>after it was discovered that the declaration indeed contained fabricated sources,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he was forced to admit that he had relied on

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 1>AI to write the declaration. Six hundred dollars an hour

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the dangers of AI generated content, and

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he shows up with a screen written by AI that's

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>almost you know what, it's almost so funny it's worth

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>him doing that. But as she points out, and I

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>agree completely, if there is a moniker a title that

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>leads you to immediately conclude that the person's a fraud,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it's either fact checker or misinformation expert. Somebody calls himself

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a misinformation expert. I know they're there to sell me something,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to offer some sort of dishonest snow job. Speaking of AI,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>I found this amusing. Beckett Adams was writing in the

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>National Review about how for normal, healthy people they go

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>through stages of grief, and his premises for the people

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>stupid enough to have trusted a midwin career bureaucrats on

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and scrupulous as Joe Biden, there's a sixth stage just

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>before acceptance, delusion, and he gets into the really.

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Odd theories of why.

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>That Biden could have served for one thing, and how

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>people are shocked that he hunted that he I'm sorry

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that he pardoned Hunter, even though he was completely consistent

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with his entire career. He's been dishonest, a hack, a backslapper,

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, with no real principles, and that was utterly,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>utterly predictable. But here's the part that kind of tie

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was so funny having to do with Ai.

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And he goes into the fact that so much of

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the media, and we played you these clips, was just

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>just crowing about the fact that Joe Biden said he

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>would not pardon Hunter and that showed him to be

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>such an incredibly honorable man, a paragon of justice and

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>an American decency and blah blah blah.

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>And then he turned around and he was lying the

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>whole time. But so enter the delusion.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>CBS's view co host and supposed political insighter and commentator

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Anna Navarro attempted to defend the pardon last week by

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>arguing that many presidents, including America's twenty eighth commander in chief,

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>have issued such edicts. Woodrow Wilson pardoned his brother in law,

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Hunter debuts, she remarked on social media, but tell me again,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>how Joe Biden is setting precedent. We actually got an

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>adamant email from a listener about this, mentioning that Woodrow

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Wilson pardoned his brother in law. Hunter debts, Well, if

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you've never heard of this incident, it's because it never happened.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>There is no Hunter debuts, Wilson never pardoned his brother

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in law.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>It's pure fabrication.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>In a fevered scramble to exonerate Biden for his objectively

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 1>slazy dealings, Navarro had asked chat GPT for exculpatory historical

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>examples of similar presidential pardons, and the AI tool then

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hallucinated a non existent event, which it does, and that's

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's such a head scratcher of a phenomenon too.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Isn't it.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It just invents stuff anyway, and Navarro uncritically shared the

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>results on social media because she wanted so badly for

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden to be at the very least in line with

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>historical president but she didn't like look it up or anything.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>To get any sort of verification.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And then then she she later blamed uh, chat GPT, Hey,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Twitter sleuths, thanks for taking the time to provide context.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Avide context.

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You claim something utterly fanciful to defend the indefensible.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>But the great part of this is and.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm quoting who, and I say this is beck At Adams.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The funny thing isn't that a robot hallucinated a presidential

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>pardon from and with a name like Hunter debts. But

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>none of this sounded out of place. To a woman

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>who's paid handsomely to explain the news in US politics

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to television audiences. One can't help but wonder whether even

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the names huge ass or Amanda hugging kiss would have

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>set off alarms in Navarro's head. Oh, that's beautiful, And

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>then then he points out huge ass.

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>A classic.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Points out that Esquire political columnist Charles Pierce the absolute

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>dimmest burnout in the commentary business. Here I did something

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>arguably more embarrassing when he wrote an entire article promoting

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a similar pardon fantasy. The article has since been completely

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>retracted from Esquire.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>The one thousand.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus words story originally titled a president shouldn't pardon his son? Hello,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody remember Neil Bush? Claimed that and we got an

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>email on this too, claimed that former President George H. W.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Bush pardoned his son over the savings and loan scandal.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Article sub had read, nobody defines Poppy Bush's presidents by

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact that presidency by the fact that he pardoned

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>his progeny the moral shut the f up about Hunter Biden, Please,

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>except hw never pardoned his son Neil. So immediately after

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a number of readers pointed out Esquire, he didn't. Esquire

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>article went through significant changes in revisions, including to the headline,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which was changed to Hunter Biden isn't the first presidential

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>son caught up in controversy? Anybody remember Neil Bush. But

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>eventually Esquire attracted the piece altogether because there was no

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>longer any point to the article even with the edits

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and revisions, they put up a note this column has

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>been removed due to an error anyway, So that all

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>leads us through various tales of AI dishonesty intersecting with

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>politics to the politics endpoint I wanted to get to.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know dissecting the election is so last month,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>but I thought this was absolutely extraordinary about lefty voters.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So who did this study? Well, there it is. Hello,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I got a computer glitch. No, I don't

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>want to sign up. They did a big poll slash

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>study of voters explaining what happened with the election or

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>giving their perception their explanation of what happened with the election,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and the most common, of course, now the website is

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>locked up, the most common explanation from Harris voters for

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>why she lost was misogyny, sexism. That was number one,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>not the economy or the economy under Trump, not inflation,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not the border, although those things did burble up in

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the word cloud thing they had. But the number one explanation,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>again was that it was sexism misogyny that people would

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not vote for Harris. And if you as a party

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>come from that election having come to that conclusion, you

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a chance the next go around. I mean,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you have no ability to perceive what went wrong with

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>your game, which is really the only thing you can control.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>And I just find that absolutely extraordinary. And I agree

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>with Jack when he said, I think America would love

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to elect a woman president just so we wouldn't have

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear about it anymore. And like virtually every conservative

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in America, hey, if she was smart and tough, had

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>great policies, loved America, believed in her robust defense, you know,

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>try to reduce the size of the government, reduce the debt.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Whatever.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Hell, I don't care if she's a woman or non

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>binary or a lesbian or whatever else.

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Nobody cares.

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's the number one explanation of why our side lost. Wow,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is that delusional? Speaking of that sort of thing? Brad

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Penny acquitted in New York. Thank goodness, some great commentary

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on that case and what it means and what it

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean. Plus activists calling for violence in the wake

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of that case. Just unbelievable. And of course how little

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>attention that's getting.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot to squeeze in. Hope you can stay with us.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 2>Heh y, how you doing? Thanks for being here.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking of picking up an A and G sweatshirt

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or hat or something for a loved one for Christmas?

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably want to order it today Armstrong and Getty dot com. Yeah,

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>premium sweatshirts flying off the shelves. Ran this clip yesterday,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>where'd go the Oh, it's under the the Penny Daniel

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Penny acquittal stuff, give us forty six. This is the

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>head of New York's Black Lives Matter, After or just

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>during the trial, he was talking on the street corner,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we need something black visionies. That's right.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 2>People want to jump up and choke us. Hey, kill

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 2>us for being loud.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 3>How about we do the same when they attempt to

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>oppress us.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm tired tie it. Yeah.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>He went on to say, Daniel Penny, you're not safe

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on the streets in New York.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna hunt you down.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, and I got no coverage threatening violence against a man.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>People in general because they didn't like the verdict ought

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a giant story in America. It's ignored by

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the utterly dishonest to mainstream media because the idea that

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, people of color can be racist is so unpopular.

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>See if or just it's unspeakable to the media. See

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>if this strikes you as a little bit racist, This

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is honorary Kleinsman, race, hustler, fraud, merchant. Ebram X Kendy

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on leashing your screen the screed the other day.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 3>White people worldwide have really reckoned with how much their

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 3>own personal identity is shaped by constructions of whiteness, and

0:12:51.480 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 3>how much that construction of whiteness prevents uh, white people

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>from connecting to humanity in other words, uh, recognizing that

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 3>when you when you recognize that you are part and

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 3>parcel of humanity, in other words, you're not over humanity, right. Uh.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 3>It allows you to.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Really be able to connect to people who don't look

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 4>like you, who have kinky hair, who have dark skin, uh,

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and to see yourself in them.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 3>And it's whiteness that prevents that. Right, And when and

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 3>when you're not able to see yourself, uh in other

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 3>human beings. That creates all sorts of problems, but not

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>just societal.

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Problems and personal problems.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh that that I think hopefully this, this, this film

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and this work will will liberate those. So I think

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it's this liberat it's liberating all the way around, right it.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it will liberate you know, really

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>all of us, because you know, we've all been told

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 3>a lie about ourselves and other people.

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, what a delusional crime.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Liberating you from your inability to pay your bills, I know,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>because you've gotten rich. And I congratulate John cooking up

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a scam that's so effective with soft headed, guilt.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Ridden white people.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But what a load of Do you need a constructor

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>do you need a permit to construct your whiteness? Because

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're constructing your whiteness every day without a permit,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna get a fine. Just absolutely cuckoo nuts.

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The idea that white people can't connect themselves to the

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of humanity because their hair looks different.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever spoken to any.

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>White people ebra I mean and lecturing them and taking

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand dollars an hour for one of your

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>racist screens doesn't doesn't count as talking to people. But

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was so interesting.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 2>There was a big who this poll. It was a

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 2>big pole echelon insights blah blah blah.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>More white progressives think that racism is built into our

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>society than black or Hispanic Americans, and white progressives are

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>much less likely to agree to the America is the

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>greatest country in the world than black or Hispanic Americans.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>This over educated, like the healthcare shooter lunatic dude with

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this view that the great white hope would save the

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>darker people even though the darker people. For instance, racism

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is built into our society. White progressives seventy seven percent

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>say that's correct, with blacks as sixty one percent.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 2>That's still too many and that's a.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Shame, But I mean their number is dwarfed by white progressives.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Hispanics is like thirty eight percent, and white conservatives is

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like twenty four percent. I believe racism is built in

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>our society. America is the greatest country in the world.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Ninety percent of white conservatives believe that, seventy six percent

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of Hispanics believe it. Fifty nine percent of blacks believe it.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>White progressives thirty percent, by far the lowest number. Most

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>people can make it if they work hard. You ask

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a black person that forty percent believe it. That's way

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>too low, way too low.

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 2>They have been.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely brainwashed into the cult of dependence, and I think

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a damn shame. About fifty nine percent of Hispanic

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>people believe most people can make it if they work hard.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>White conservatives eighty four percent believe it, White progressives twenty

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>three percent, twenty three percent government should increase border security

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and enforcement. About or about fifty percent of Hispanics and

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>blacks believe that white progressives it's about sixteen percent.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that crazy?

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>What a weird little cult white progressivism is. People need

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be studied at the university level, well, except the

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>universities are completely captured by them.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I got a couple of emails we might drop in

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>during the rest of the show today, including this one.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>We were talking yesterday about how difficult it is, apparently

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to predict revolutions like the one that just happened Syria, revolution, coup, overthrow,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it, and Sean reminded us

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of a famous economics saying he's paraphrasing it. I've predicted

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>twelve of the last three revolutions. It usually applies to

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>recessions or whatever. Bull markets, I've predicted twelve of the

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>last three recessions. Meaning people predict stuff all the time.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem. I'm sure there were predictions that Asad

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>was about to fall out there, but they were mixed

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in with a bunch of predictions of the opposite, or

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>something halfway in between or whatever. It's just everybody's guessing

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time. But you think they would see I

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, sweeping across the landscape and Toyota pickup trucks

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>and notice it.

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Totally different topic. Thought this was so good.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lee, who is the Senator from Utah and is

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite people in government, don't agree with

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>them one hundred percent of the time. But the list

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of people I agree with one hundred percent of the

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>time is very very short. In fact, I'm not sure

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody I change my mind, so I don't agree

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with myself one.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Hundred percent at the time. Anyway, Mike Lee unleashed this

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the other day.

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a Twitter threat it's adopted from something he wrote,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>adapted rather from something he wrote that I thought was

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just terrific and so interesting and.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 2>A little annoying, troubling and raging. But he begins.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Of all the deceptive sales techniques the US government is

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>used on the American people, one of them, the Social

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Security Act, gets far too little attention. Buckle up, because

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a wild ride. In nineteen thirty five, the

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>American people were sold a bill of goods. They were told,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pay into this system and it'll be your money for retirement.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And he has some of the actual verbiage of these

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Social Security Act. Sounds great, right, But here's where it

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>gets juicy in a really ugly way. Two years later,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>when the Supreme Court was considering the constitutionality of the

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Social Security Act, the government did a complete one point

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>eighty The government, through Assistant Attorney General Robert Jackson, this

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is under FDR. Are you in essence? Oh no, no, no,

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this isn't your money at all. This is a tax

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and we can do whatever we want with it. Classic

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>bait and switch. And let's not forget the ruling in

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Hellverring v. Davis, where the Supreme Court upheld the Social

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Security Act by embracing the government's argument slash admission just

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>skipped ahead that what people pay into Social Security is

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue available to be used as Congress may direct,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and not at all money belonging to those who paid it. So,

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to summarize, the proponents of the Social Security Act told

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>American workers that what they paid in the system would

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 1>remain their money, not the governments, to get Congress to

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>pass it, and then told the courts the exact opposite

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>when defending the Act's.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Use of money.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So, now let's talk about what happens to your money

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>once it's in the government's hands. Wright, senatorly spoiler alert,

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not managed like your or four one K and

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of you know this, but it's

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>worth repeating, indoor, filling in some of the details, end

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>or bringing people along.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 2>We had no idea this.

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the money that goes its taxed out

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of your hands into Social Security does not sit in

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a nice individual account with your name on it. No,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it goes into a huge account called the Social Security

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Trust Fund. But here's the kicker. The government routinely raids

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this fund. Yes you heard that right, They take your

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>money and use it for whatever the current Congress deems necessary,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>including stuff that is completely one hundred percent not related

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to Social Security or benefits for old people or whatever.

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>There's talking Congress about saving Social Security. I've introduced and

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.239
<v Speaker 1>co sponsored a number of measures over the years that

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>would fix it, but most in Congress show little desire

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to fix it and are instead constantly looking for ways

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to borrow from it quote unquote, with no plan to

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>put it back. And the returns, forget about compound to

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 1>interest or stock market gains. Your investment in Social Security

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>can give you a lower return than inflation. If you

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>had put the same amount into literally anything else, a

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund, real estate, even a savings account, you'd be

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 1>better off by the time you reach retirement age, even if.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>The government kept some of it. Do the math with

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Social Security.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at a return that's pathetic compared to market

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>market averages. It's not even an investment, it's a tax.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And let's talk about how this system is set up

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to fail. The democraphic shift, more retirees, fewer workers. It's

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>almost fair to compare it to a Ponzi scheme that's

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>running out of new investors and every dollar you pay

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>into Social Security only to see it gobbled up by

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the government itself is a dollar you cannot invest in

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>your own future. It's government dependency at its worst. Remember

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just about retirement, it's about independence, about controlling

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>your own destiny. With social Security, you control nothing. The

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>government promises you security but gives you dependency. It promises ownership,

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but it gives you a tax receipt. And don't get

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>me started on the management. The Social Security administration is

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a bureaucratic biemuth, not exactly known for its efficiency or innovation.

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.239
<v Speaker 1>If you think your money is safe there, you're in

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for a rude awakening. The mismanagement, the waste, the deception,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all on display. And I'm going to pause now

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>and depart from Michaele's text to point out for the

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>millionth time the utter incompetence, bias, and stupidity of the

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media. This is a story so massive and so important.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>To all of us.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>It affects all of us directly financially. You'd think you

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>would hear about this all the time, and not just

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>from quote unquote conservative commentators.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>And I honestly don't know.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>What's conservative or not conservative about this discussion. Unless you

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just want everything controlled by the government, you're that sort

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of progressive.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>So Mike Lee, right, So what's the solution. We need real,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>genuine reform within the Social Security administ system. Americans should

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>be able to invest in their own future and not

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be shackled by the worst parts of this outdated, mismanaged

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>system again, which was cooked up going on one hundred

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's time we acknowledge the truth. Social Security

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as it now exists is not a retirement plan. It's

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a tax plan with retirement benefits as an afterthought. We

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>were sold to dream but received a nightmare. It's time

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for a wake up call. We need real reform. It's

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>time for Americans to know the true history of Social

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Security Act. The more people learn the truth, the more

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll start demanding answers, options, and real reform from Congress.

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Please help spread the word.

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The history of the Social Security Act, which sadly must

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>include the deceptive manner in which it was sold to

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the American people, is yet another reason why America's century

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>long era of progressive government must be brought to a close.

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Please follow if you'd like to read more posts.

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Like this one.

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I retweeted it, of course. But what's interesting about this

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is human beings. I think the vast majority of us

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>are fundamentally conservative, not in a political way, but and

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this is super, super frustrating to me when you look

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>at whether Social Security, which is indefensible as a system,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just dumb, or the tax code, which

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about many, many times. If you were to

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>propose it as it is, not only would you be rejected,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you would be hooted out of the country for proposing

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>something so ludicrous and wasteful and complex.

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, seriously, people would laugh at you.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't even bother rejecting your idea to implement what

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we have right now because it's so clearly idiotic. And yet,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and this gets back to my point about people being

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally in a way conservative. If you suggest changing these things,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>reforming them, it's practically effortless to get people to reject

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that idea because they don't know what they want, but

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>they want what they know. They're so afraid to mess

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>with anything or experiment. Maybe that's a scary word, I

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, to innovate, to just take a look, are

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>we doing this the right way that you just can't

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere with it politically speak. And most politicians have

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>accepted this long ago. If you you know, fed them

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>truth serum or just got them one on one and said, hey,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>all of this is off the record, how's Social Security

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>looking or what do you think of it as a system,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they would most of them say, oh, it's a nightmare,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>total nightmare.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>But you just can't.

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Get the voters to a place of understanding adequate to

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>then explaining why you've got to change it and in

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what way it's a real failing of democracy or something.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just trying.

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about this even as I'm talking. I mean,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at the size of the entitlements,

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the share of the federal budget that is the entitlement programs,

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and how they're obviously screaming toward a cliff and the

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>system is indefensible at its birth, it was utterly dishonest

0:26:58.760 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the moment it was.

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 2>It's like Obamacare.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It's discouraging that we can't get any momentum behind fixing

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And I really like Mike Lee. Maybe he's

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a tilter at windmills. But these are

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>windmills that are going to ruin the country, so I

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate his awe his efforts anyway.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, with compound interest.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>If you just bought a CD, remember those, not ali

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like a music CD, a certificate of deposit like automatically

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>renewed at some very modest nineteen nineties level interest rate

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, you would have many, multiple, many

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>multiples of your Social Security benefits. Anyway, It's frustrating. Elections

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have consequences. I guess vote for people who are willing

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to be honest about this stuff. Ah, this is apropos

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing but gets again to the topic of government action

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in action. This is el capon El capon from Portland,

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a hell of a funny screen name. A

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>capon is like a neutered chicken, right, it's a gelding.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I know that.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's to make them like fatter and yummier

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to eat. I don't know why cutting off their nards

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>does that, but it does. Ask a chicken farmer, why

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you're you asking me? Got this note? I recently attempted

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to help my ninety year old wheelchair bound mother in

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>law to get her attempting to help her get her

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>real ID, which will be required to board US airplanes

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>after May the twenty seventh of twenty twenty five. This

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>was a nine to eleven thing, right, and it's got

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>delayed year after year after year after year, to the

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>point of absurdity. Nine to eleven will have been twenty

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>four years prior to the actual implementation of this if

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 1>it actually happens anyway, Getting back to L. K. Pond's note,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to get his nine year old wheelchair bound

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>mother in law her real ID. We provided her birth certificate,

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>current California ID, her last marriage certificate, and several utility

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>bills to prove her address. She was born in the USA. Unfortunately,

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>although she never committed a crime, has never been a

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>member of any subversive group, she was denied a real ID.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Why well, her first marriage as a teenager this is

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy plus years ago, was an elopement and we were

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>unable to provide a valid marriage certificate from that. What

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>would that be nineteen forties marriage? Even though we all

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>had the aforementioned proof of her identity and citizenship. When

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I asked the Santa Monica DMV agent if it would

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be easier to get a real IDEA if I wheeled

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>her up through the southern border.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 2>The woman just glared at me.

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, though what I asked about is likely true, as

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, US citizenship is not required for a

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>real ID. In other words, illegal aliens who have no

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>American certified proof of identity can get one. WTF What

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly is the purpose of the real ID and the

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>idea that a ninety plus year old American citizen can't

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>get one because of some paperwork problem with a marriage

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that took place when Truman was striding the halls of

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House. It's just incredibly frustrating. But it reminds

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>me of the Social Security discussion and the bullet train,

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the bullspit train in California and other things. What is

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as he signs off? What exactly is the purpose of

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the real ID? To that, I would answer, go ask

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, Go ask the year twenty oh two,

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Go ask Dick Cheney. But it got started and we

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>decided we needed it, and no government program ever gets ended.

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So your poor nine year old granny is gonna what

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I have to take amtrack. Oh faye, eh,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sorry to bring you down. I have to laugh to

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>keep from crying. We'll finish strong next day.

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 2>With Katie Michael. Have you heard about Scrim the Dog?

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I have not. Do you know Scrim the Dog? Scrim?

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I find this story charming in a way, just because

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's huge in New Orleans and nobody else knows about

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it or is talking about it really, And I'm you know,

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I miss your big box America makes me insane. You

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>go to every town in America. Every town looks the

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>same now. It didn't used to be that way. Every

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>town had its own department store and convenience stores and

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and holes in the wall and the rest of it.

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Now it's just this ugly corporate mess. So I don't

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>suggest you shoot a healthcare executive over it. Maybe just

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to get a canoe and enjoy vacation in the woods.

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, this is so uniquely American. This is a

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeen pound mutt, a funky looking dog too, not like

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>an ugly dog contest winner, but funky looking thing. A

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>couple adopts it from a shelter. Two hours later it

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>escapes jeez, and so they put up posters, help us

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>find our dog, Scream the dog. The Thing's been captured

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and escaped many times since, dozens of failed captures, hundreds

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of sightings, thousands of dollars in rescue efforts, a widely

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>broadcast detainment, and then a more recent escape out of

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a second story window. Every Neworlean Indian has an opinion

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>about Scrim. It's become a craze. This dog.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hang on back he jumped out of a second

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>story window. Yes, yes, I see in the video.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so this funky looking dog who is admittedly kind

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of in a comeete way, very photogenic. Now, every half

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of New Orleans is like, hell bent, it's become their

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>great cause. Oh my god, there is flying out of

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the window and smacking in the lawn, then runs away.

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Half of New Orleans is like, we've got to do

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever it takes to find Scrim. There's there's these women

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>primarily who are donating like thousands of dollars in all

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of their free time to try to rescue Scrim. And

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of New Orleans is like, there's so

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>many f and straight dogs on the street.

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>What are you people doing?

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Kill the thing or ignor it, or let it run away,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just forget it.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't kill Scram.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>He's cute.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I see a picture of him.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think anybody's actively trying to kill the thing,

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But there are other women who are saying, instead of

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>spending so many resources on this one dog, we should

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>probably be funding the public animals shelters.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>If we care about dogs this much. Well, now we've

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 2>got to find Scrim.

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Help Scrim, save Scrim.

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, people are stray. Look for the barcessities, a simple

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 2>bare necessities like final thoughts to and anther show.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean the bairncessities on the Mother Nature's recipes, like

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>final thoughts from our hosts Jack and Joe. Here's a

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>woman who spent about ten thousand dollars from her own

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pocket and other fundraisers on rescue efforts.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 2>And gear for one dog. Yeah.

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>cruise left to wrap things up for the day. There

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 1>he is our technical director, Michaelangelo. Michael, what's your final thought?

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, Jack really does make his life hard.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>He was telling me that he has two full pies

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and a full cheesecake at home.

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Just sitting there. I'm thinking that is torture.

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, well I would know what to do with that.

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It started, Katie Green are esteemedn't use woman. As a

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>final thought, Katie.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to nose dive into this Scrim thing. I'm

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:07.959
<v Speaker 2>seeing scrim t shirts, scraw bugs. It's a crazy.

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That gall who spent ten thousand dollars on rescuing Scrim,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>educated herself in, tranquilized her dark, shooting and trained and

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that.

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Says I'm a Cajun, so I'm a good shot.

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Evidently, one of our volunteers shot out the windshield of

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a rescue van, so maybe they're not such a great shot.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>But now the story of Scrim will be following it

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for you. Armstrung and Gedddy wrapping up another grueling for

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>our workday. Go to armstrong geddy dot com. Pick up sweatshirt,

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>order it for Christmas. God bless America.

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm strong and gette.

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>They're way better at words, Oh my words.

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>It is time for us to do what we have

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 2>been doing in that time as every day pre cool

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 2>matter of fact. But it's also a bob. It's a

0:35:55.000 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 2>bobcat is the thing. It's thank you.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 4>All and it's always everybody else.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I love you all that high note. Thanks all very much,

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty