Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much Happy new Year everyone,
Speaker 1: the free state of Florida. During lockdown, the Electoral College
Speaker 1: objections loom Georgia sent it run off tomorrow, and a
Speaker 1: New York bill to detain public health risks. This is
Speaker 1: the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake America great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins.
Speaker 1: CIA analysts He's a great guy. No welcome, everybody, great
Speaker 1: to be here. Look, I was in Florida and it
Speaker 1: was amazing, It really was. It was like an advertisement
Speaker 1: for what can happen when your state is not run
Speaker 1: by people who are completely beholden the Democrat Party, when
Speaker 1: your state is not overtaken by those who either seek
Speaker 1: to control you or are too terrified, too anxious to
Speaker 1: make reasonable decisions to come to fair minded conclusions about
Speaker 1: the kind of trade offs involved in dealing with a
Speaker 1: pandemic like we're seeing right now. I was in Florida
Speaker 1: for a week, and what did I see? People going
Speaker 1: about their lives, going to businesses, going to restaurants. I
Speaker 1: went out to eat night after night, restaurants, open businesses, stores,
Speaker 1: imagine this. I realized that I needed something. I had
Speaker 1: to go buy something, and I didn't even have to
Speaker 1: call ahead and say, hey, are you no. I went
Speaker 1: to a bookstore in Florida. It was almost like a
Speaker 1: time orp. And you might say, well, hold on a
Speaker 1: second puck. They must be engaged in an experiment at
Speaker 1: human sacrifice. There must be a tremendous amount of loss
Speaker 1: as a result of their reckless policies in the Sunshine State.
Speaker 1: And it turns out that's not true at all. In fact,
Speaker 1: Florida is, by the numbers, by fatalities, by hospitalizations, better off,
Speaker 1: has been throughout the course of the pandemic, and continues
Speaker 1: to be better off than it's two nearest states for comparison,
Speaker 1: New York and California. Florida is better off. Now, let's
Speaker 1: understand this. I've seen all these objections that will be raised.
Speaker 1: I've seen all the people that say, oh no, look
Speaker 1: at the number of cases and they pick some arbitrary
Speaker 1: Look at the cases in Florida from December eighteenth to
Speaker 1: December twenty first, see, it's not better off. It's pathetic,
Speaker 1: it's desperate. We can all tell what's going on here.
Speaker 1: Let's understand this. For lockdowns to be even remotely worth it,
Speaker 1: for lockdowns to be intelligent public policy, there should be
Speaker 1: no debate when you see the numbers between cases, hospitalizations,
Speaker 1: and deaths in states with the most stringent lockdowns versus
Speaker 1: those that have taken a more open approach. We should
Speaker 1: be having a conversation about how Florida has two or
Speaker 1: three times the COVID cases, two or three times the
Speaker 1: death not that it actually has less then states that
Speaker 1: have been going through continuous lockdowns for months and months.
Speaker 1: It should be absolutely obvious, it should be clear, and
Speaker 1: yet it isn't. You don't even have to get into
Speaker 1: a debate about whether is better than New York when
Speaker 1: it comes to how it has handled COVID, whether Florida
Speaker 1: is better than California. And yes, we're talking about a
Speaker 1: large Republican governed state versus two very large Democrat Democrat
Speaker 1: governed states. This is about politics now because political parties
Speaker 1: have made it so, because people that believe that Fauci
Speaker 1: is some kind of a saint have convinced themselves than
Speaker 1: anyone who doubts the wisdom of these catastrophic, irrational policies
Speaker 1: is a bad person, as a person who doesn't care
Speaker 1: about human debt, doesn't care how many people lose their lives. Well,
Speaker 1: as it turns out those people were wrong, they were wrong,
Speaker 1: and we can see it, and we all need to
Speaker 1: understand this. You need to be secure in the knowledge
Speaker 1: that you have from seeing what's going on around you
Speaker 1: with country right now. You need to know that the
Speaker 1: experts are not going to come over to your side,
Speaker 1: because this has become the experts and the elites unified
Speaker 1: against those who believe that freedom and the Constitution and
Speaker 1: the right to ask questions aren't supposed to be suspended
Speaker 1: the moment there's an emergency. If Florida, I was at restaurants,
Speaker 1: I was out, I was seeing people living their lives.
Speaker 1: I was down there with brothers, my two brothers, and
Speaker 1: my girlfriend and seeing various friends, some of whom you'd
Speaker 1: even know from this show and from conservative media, people
Speaker 1: who either have moved down there and they were showing
Speaker 1: another way. You know, the states in our system are
Speaker 1: supposed to be experiments in a sense. There's the essence
Speaker 1: of the states as laboratories for different policies, and the
Speaker 1: Democrat obsession with the most stringent lockdowns possible the Democrat
Speaker 1: obsession with making this as horrific and economic and emotional
Speaker 1: and psychological cost as possible from this pandemic. It's not
Speaker 1: going to stop. We have to stop them. We have
Speaker 1: to win the argument. They don't even see the results
Speaker 1: that we see and come to the same conclusion. They
Speaker 1: don't turn around and say, you know what, you're right,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't have done this, This was a bad idea. No,
Speaker 1: they turn around, they say, we need more of it,
Speaker 1: We need more double down, triple down. Why hasn't it
Speaker 1: worked because we haven't done it well enough? They ignore.
Speaker 1: They always talked about the data in the early days
Speaker 1: of this, and Fauci and the others would talk about
Speaker 1: their adherence to the data. Well, when you point out
Speaker 1: that compliance when it comes to masking, compliance when it
Speaker 1: comes to these draconian policies is higher than it has
Speaker 1: ever been, and particularly in places like New York and California.
Speaker 1: And I'm just most familiar with the numbers in those states.
Speaker 1: That are others you could put in there as well.
Speaker 1: But they said that they figured it out, they knew
Speaker 1: what to do, they had the facts, you see, and
Speaker 1: so they told tens of millions of people Cancel Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: cancel Christmas, don't see your loved ones live in fear.
Speaker 1: Watch your business be shut down, watch your bank account,
Speaker 1: watch your life savings evaporate, because it's the only way
Speaker 1: you'll be safe. And now what you see is that
Speaker 1: we had to do all that. We had no choice.
Speaker 1: They made us. They use the force of the state,
Speaker 1: and we're not safe. The numbers are off the charts,
Speaker 1: cases rising, as though this stuff we're doing doesn't really
Speaker 1: stop it at all. That's where we are. Observe it.
Speaker 1: See it for yourself. I came back from Florida. I
Speaker 1: was on the plane. I get to New York and
Speaker 1: sure enough, there's members the National Guard taking data because
Speaker 1: they insist, they insist that we fill out all this
Speaker 1: information about ourselves so that we can be tested and
Speaker 1: test and traced. What is that going to do. By
Speaker 1: the time they contact me, a week will have passed.
Speaker 1: I'll already be beyond the quarantine phase. They've got hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands, now a million New Yorkers say that they've
Speaker 1: tested positive for COVID. A million. That's the latest number
Speaker 1: you see. And the claim is what they're going to
Speaker 1: be able to call every contact, every person. You see,
Speaker 1: this was idiotic from the start. You cannot test and
Speaker 1: trace a million people, never mind the actual millions of
Speaker 1: people beyond that that you have no idea whether they
Speaker 1: have this or not. New York COVID hospitalizations are up
Speaker 1: eighty percent in four weeks. A million residents have tested positive.
Speaker 1: And what is Governor Cuomo doing. He's saying that they'll
Speaker 1: find people a million dollars. Now, any practitioner who gives
Speaker 1: a COVID vaccine to somebody who's not considered at the
Speaker 1: high priority, will we find a million dollars? Oh, that's right.
Speaker 1: Make it so that now there are enormous penalties attached
Speaker 1: to giving someone a vaccine that could save their life
Speaker 1: if it's not in the order that a bunch of
Speaker 1: feckless bureaucrats decide that's going to make the vaccine get
Speaker 1: distributed faster, that's going to help. No, they haven't helped
Speaker 1: at all. They've been catastrophic failures. In fact, the chief
Speaker 1: among them has been the governor of New York, although
Speaker 1: the governor of California is right behind him. And now
Speaker 1: we have this incoming Biden administration that has learned none
Speaker 1: of the actual lessons based on the data, and they're
Speaker 1: going to do exactly what has been done all along,
Speaker 1: and that has failed all along. And if we don't
Speaker 1: stop them, if we don't win the argument and back
Speaker 1: and noncomply, everyone will eventually see this as one of
Speaker 1: the greatest periods of national folly of the last hundred years.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is insane what we're doing. You can
Speaker 1: see it for yourself. I saw it. People are going
Speaker 1: about their lives in Florida. Yes there are cases there. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's a very serious disease. It's very dangerous to the elderly.
Speaker 1: And yet you can still allow life to continue while
Speaker 1: trying to take reasonable steps to protect yourself, reasonable precautions.
Speaker 1: What you see in these Democrat enclaves, and what you
Speaker 1: will see from the federal level from Biden Harris is unreasonable.
Speaker 1: You'll see unreasonable steps, not just continued, enhanced, expanded, They'll
Speaker 1: go even further into this, which is just the height
Speaker 1: of stupidity. We can have our freedom back, or at
Speaker 1: least much more of it than we've had. We can
Speaker 1: have our constitutional rights back. Freedom is our fight. This
Speaker 1: year twenty twenty one, I'm telling you right now is
Speaker 1: going to be all about the fight for liberty on
Speaker 1: an individual basis and for a free society. You have
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, you have the tech censors. You have a
Speaker 1: Democrat party that increasingly just bears its authoritarian things without
Speaker 1: any sense whatsoever of fair play and good faith toward
Speaker 1: the other side, because they haven't had it for years,
Speaker 1: because Trump defeating Trump in their minds, justified absolutely anything.
Speaker 1: This year is going to be about the fight for freedom.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake about it. I don't care who the
Speaker 1: president ends up being. I don't care who ends up
Speaker 1: winning the next two seats in this Georgia runoff. It's
Speaker 1: going to be about taking back our freedom from those
Speaker 1: who have taken it away from us and who are ultimately,
Speaker 1: I think terrified about what would happen if the American
Speaker 1: people came to the realization that this was all for.
Speaker 1: What exactly? The masked mania, the lockdowns, the constant lectures
Speaker 1: who are welly, and propaganda everywhere about hand washing and
Speaker 1: social distancing, What exactly did that save us from? Where
Speaker 1: are the results? Where's the upside of any of that?
Speaker 1: As a policy? If you say that, they'll just yell
Speaker 1: at you that you don't believe in science, and then
Speaker 1: they'll tell you that there are more than two genders.
Speaker 1: That's the world we live in now, in this country,
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast, twenty four hours away, give or take from
Speaker 1: I guess what would call it G Day or Georgia
Speaker 1: not quite D Day, but it's a big day. Tomorrow.
Speaker 1: We have two Senate seats hanging in the ballots, and
Speaker 1: with those two seats control of the Senate. And if
Speaker 1: the Democrats were to manage to take this and if
Speaker 1: the current path which will have a Biden Harris presidency continues,
Speaker 1: which I think we all have to assume it will.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean we give up the fight, but it
Speaker 1: means that we have to prepare for this reality. And
Speaker 1: that's what I've been telling you for weeks and I
Speaker 1: think now if we all look back at that, in fairness,
Speaker 1: that was the correct approach fight. But prepare right. This
Speaker 1: is that this means you, you know, you keep throwing,
Speaker 1: you keep throwing the ball, you keep running up the middle.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if you're down two touchdowns, but you
Speaker 1: know you also got to be ready for the possibility
Speaker 1: that you're not going to the super Bowl. But in Georgia.
Speaker 1: What we see are two Democrat candidates who are really
Speaker 1: particularly well suited to show you what the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has has become in this moment, and notably this this
Speaker 1: ass Off character, who is it's almost like a a
Speaker 1: elitist Democrat created in a lab. I mean this guy,
Speaker 1: nothing about him, nothing about him speaks to strength or
Speaker 1: wisdom or a good judgment. He's just he's just a
Speaker 1: little little rich boy who wants to be important and powerful.
Speaker 1: And so he figures if he says, if he mouths
Speaker 1: the right slogans, if he says the right things, ass
Speaker 1: Off will get to be a senator. And look, there
Speaker 1: are plenty of clownish politicians on both sides, and there
Speaker 1: are people who, yeah, they've got a lot of access
Speaker 1: to money, maybe from their family, whatever it may be,
Speaker 1: and they're not particularly impressive either. But this ass Off guy,
Speaker 1: I gotta say, not not somebody that you'd wanted your foxhole,
Speaker 1: that is for sure. Kelly Leffler, I was surprised if
Speaker 1: this one, Kelly Leffler, able able to throw throw some elbows,
Speaker 1: wouldn't necessary here she is play one Georgian knows that
Speaker 1: John Assoff is a pathological liar. He's a trust fund
Speaker 1: socialist whose only job has been working for the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party in recent years. And look, here's the deal.
Speaker 1: If we're going to tell lies about my campaign, let's
Speaker 1: tell the truth about who he's campaigning with. This is
Speaker 1: the truth. Radical liberal Raphael Warnock has been involved in
Speaker 1: child abuse, domestic abuse. He's someone who has praised Fidel Castro,
Speaker 1: Louis Ferricon, Carl Marx, James Cone. These are radicals. He
Speaker 1: has attacked our military, our police, our small businesses, and
Speaker 1: every Georgian who wants to live the American dream. So
Speaker 1: I'm not going to be lectured by some thirty three
Speaker 1: year old trust fund socialist who's a pathological liar. Let
Speaker 1: her rip, Kelly, let her rip. I like it. I
Speaker 1: like how she gets right to it and decides that
Speaker 1: she's not going to hold back on this guy who
Speaker 1: really does remind me very much of that Obama eramme
Speaker 1: of Pajama Boy, the guy picking his if you remember
Speaker 1: he was picking his Obamacare plan and his pajamas drinking tea.
Speaker 1: He kind of even looks a little bit like USA,
Speaker 1: but not that that matters. It's kind of funny though,
Speaker 1: so Georgia matters a whole lot, because if we lose Georgia,
Speaker 1: well then we all recognize that if we lose Georgia,
Speaker 1: if we lose both of these Senate seats, the Democrats
Speaker 1: are almost certain to have unified control. And really, let's
Speaker 1: be honest, folks, it's ninety nine percent that that's what's
Speaker 1: going to happen. If they take those Senate seats, they
Speaker 1: will have unified control the government. Nancy Pelosi was just
Speaker 1: voted in as Speaker of the House. You know, my
Speaker 1: favorite thing about that is talking about a chardonnay socialist.
Speaker 1: I mean, Nancy is should we call her Pino Nancy
Speaker 1: or Chardonnay Nancy. She's among the most outrageous hypocrites and
Speaker 1: frauds you could find in the Democrat Party, which is
Speaker 1: saying a lot. I mean, that's quite impressive to pull
Speaker 1: off that feed. But Chardonnaye Nancy as is now the
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House and the next as the next
Speaker 1: Congress now is going about their business. And she also
Speaker 1: required the votes of some members of Congress who had
Speaker 1: recently tested positive for COVID. But we're told to fly
Speaker 1: in and vote anyway. I saw this. I just it's amazing,
Speaker 1: isn't it. You can't say it's unbelievable, because of course
Speaker 1: you believe it, Because of course COVID is so dangerous
Speaker 1: and so horrible that you can't be in the same
Speaker 1: home over the holidays as loved ones, including loved ones
Speaker 1: who just by nature of father time don't have much
Speaker 1: time left. You can't see them. But if a Democrat
Speaker 1: who's important is going to have a funeral, well then
Speaker 1: the COVID rules get waived. If a Democrat needs votes
Speaker 1: on the floor of the Congress, then the COVID rules
Speaker 1: get waived. Almost like the virus has a political affiliation,
Speaker 1: you know, the virus will back off. And you saw
Speaker 1: this even over the over the last summer when suddenly
Speaker 1: mass gatherings were safe during COVID outbreaks because it was
Speaker 1: necessary for public health for BLM to burn down stores,
Speaker 1: loot buildings, and attack strangers for no reason. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: the kind Those are the kind of public health experts
Speaker 1: that we've been listening to. No one to get me
Speaker 1: started on doctor Fauci. That guy is one of the
Speaker 1: biggest catastrophes to befall America. Fauci belongs in the history
Speaker 1: books alongside generals in World War One who sent thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands of men directly into the machine guns hoping
Speaker 1: the other side would run out of AMMO. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. But while we are on the subject
Speaker 1: of socialism for the rich, which Republican friends have suddenly
Speaker 1: become very concerned about, let me talk about the Trump
Speaker 1: tax proposal that was pushed very hard by Senator McConnell
Speaker 1: and the Republican leadership and where I think every Republican
Speaker 1: voted for it. You want to talk about socialism for
Speaker 1: the rich, it is not the bill that puts two
Speaker 1: thousand dollars into working class hands all over this country.
Speaker 1: That ain't socialism for the rich. This is socialism for
Speaker 1: the rich in that bill. Amazon. Oh, by the way,
Speaker 1: I must say this, if I may, We are quoting
Speaker 1: the liberal Washington Post owned by Jeff Bezos, the wealthiest
Speaker 1: guy in the world. So here is Jeff Bezos's company Amazon,
Speaker 1: and they received a tax rebate. They paid nothing in
Speaker 1: two and eighteen in federal taxes. That's a corrupt tax
Speaker 1: system to begin with, but then on top of that,
Speaker 1: they received a hundred and twenty nine million dollars as
Speaker 1: a Act three late. That senator throne is what socialism
Speaker 1: for the rich. If there's one thing that Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: knows that socialism, that's for sure. He's not necessarily honest
Speaker 1: about socialism, but he certainly is quite familiar with it.
Speaker 1: Is it's his ideology. I mean, it's this guy's reason
Speaker 1: for being. It's why he is a senator. It's why
Speaker 1: he was almost the Democrat candidate for the presidency, and
Speaker 1: I wish he had been, because at least with Sanders,
Speaker 1: you get some honesty about what the Democrat Party is.
Speaker 1: At least with Sanders, they're more upfront about it. Notice
Speaker 1: how he goes after corporations and this is just all
Speaker 1: for show. It's almost like a Bernie Sanders candidacy. It's
Speaker 1: to make it seem it's to make it seem like
Speaker 1: there's an openness about the radical aims of the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party to get the base all on board. But they're
Speaker 1: not going to let them really run the show because
Speaker 1: they don't understand the bargain. The radicals, the squad the
Speaker 1: people in the Democrat Party on the far left. They're
Speaker 1: there to make noises about these things, but they're not
Speaker 1: the ones that are really going to run things. AOC
Speaker 1: just voted for Nancy Pelosi to be Speaker of the House.
Speaker 1: That happened. I think the whole squad actually voted for
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi. Now is what do we learn from all
Speaker 1: of this. The radical left, the activist class with the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, they're there to pretend that all they care
Speaker 1: about is social justice, advancing minorities interests and advancing socialism
Speaker 1: for the poor, for the working class, and for the poor,
Speaker 1: but really for the poor, actually for the non working class,
Speaker 1: and for the elites. On the other side, you have
Speaker 1: Democrats like Pelosi who this is the whole game. Who
Speaker 1: benefits from the Democrat Party the most. It's the people
Speaker 1: that are the most dependent on government and the people
Speaker 1: who benefit the most from government. And that does include
Speaker 1: very powerful corporate test. That does include libs who run
Speaker 1: the tech monopolies. It includes the leftists who are in
Speaker 1: charge of places like Amazon and Google and others. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. They like the government because it can be
Speaker 1: an anti competitive edge for them. It can prevent them
Speaker 1: from having to really deal on in a free and
Speaker 1: fair marketplace with opposition. Right, the more regulations you have,
Speaker 1: the more carve outs in the tax code, the more
Speaker 1: legal hurdles, and all the different individuals back office that
Speaker 1: you have to have to comply with, the different dictates
Speaker 1: from DC. Well, if you're already a megacorporation, you're making
Speaker 1: a ton of money, You're good to go. Big business
Speaker 1: loves big government. Don't ever forget that, especially big business
Speaker 1: that can continue to find ways to benefit from things
Speaker 1: like the tax code. So Bernie Sanders railing on about
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars to America. This is where Trump and
Speaker 1: Bernie agree, and there is something because of the populous
Speaker 1: nature of some of Trump's ideas and some of Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders ideas, there is something too the crossover. And there
Speaker 1: has been on trade. There has been on America first
Speaker 1: and the workers in this country getting the benefits of
Speaker 1: being Americans over foreigners and having jobs outsourced and all
Speaker 1: the rest of it. Now, that work is far from done,
Speaker 1: and as we know, there are a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of continued battles we have to deal with from
Speaker 1: the Trump from the Trump first term. But I'm just
Speaker 1: telling you right now. I don't know why Republicans. It's
Speaker 1: almost like they're trying to lose these two Georgia Senate seats.
Speaker 1: It's almost like they don't want to be back in
Speaker 1: the mix. I don't know what to say now. There's
Speaker 1: there are two elements here. There are the Lynnwood I'm
Speaker 1: crazy going to say insane things about the election, which
Speaker 1: is so damaging because it undermines the very real questions
Speaker 1: and concerns about the election, about the integrity of the election,
Speaker 1: the fraud, all of that. Right, What's what's a great
Speaker 1: way to undermine real objections. It starts to feel like
Speaker 1: this guy lynn Wood is either crazy or he's a
Speaker 1: trojan horse for the left, because the best way to
Speaker 1: undermine the real objections is to constantly spout nonsense. And
Speaker 1: if you look at this guy's Twitter feed, I'm not
Speaker 1: even gonna get into it, but the guy's just gibberish.
Speaker 1: It's just crazy stuff that he's saying now. And there
Speaker 1: was a time when I know many Trump supporters were
Speaker 1: looking to him because he was saying, Oh, no, we're
Speaker 1: gonna it's all a fraud. We're gonna prove it. And
Speaker 1: I'm saying, okay, great, show me that proof. I think
Speaker 1: it was a fraud too, Where's where's the proof? And
Speaker 1: other people are looking at this and talking about double voting,
Speaker 1: and they're talking about dead people voting, and those are
Speaker 1: the those the real considerations of concerns. What do you
Speaker 1: have when you look at the lynn Woods of the world,
Speaker 1: What are they telling you? What are they saying? I
Speaker 1: can't even it's too silly to even repeat. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's talking about people being tried for treason and just
Speaker 1: crazy stuff. So remember that there are those who pretend
Speaker 1: to be in this fight and they're actually helping the
Speaker 1: other side. There are those who are holding themselves up
Speaker 1: as the great champions of MAGA, and they are actively assisting.
Speaker 1: They are aiding and abetting the pelosite left and the Democrats,
Speaker 1: the socialists, and they're doing so either because they're too
Speaker 1: stupid to know otherwise, they're more likely they're frauds. They're frauds,
Speaker 1: and they understand exactly what they're doing. Actually, Dennerson, exactly
Speaker 1: what's going on here now. There was this phone call
Speaker 1: over the weekend that was released by this Georgia Secretary
Speaker 1: of State Raffensburger and this guy again, he's a little
Speaker 1: rich boy, okay, and you know that's just the truth.
Speaker 1: So Raffensburger is a rich guy who wanted to be
Speaker 1: important in Georgia, so he becomes Secretary of State. Really
Speaker 1: has no experience or knowledge, that's but okay, look, you
Speaker 1: know he's got the role. So we got to deal
Speaker 1: with this. And Trump called him, and I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say this, there are certain things an honorable person doesn't
Speaker 1: do unless there are extenuating, you know, extreme circumstances to it,
Speaker 1: and then you'd have to explain what those are. But
Speaker 1: you don't have a you don't have a phone call
Speaker 1: with the President of the United States that you surreptitiously
Speaker 1: tape and then publicly release. You know, if anyone, and
Speaker 1: I know, if anyone who worked for me or with
Speaker 1: me or around me did this, I would be right
Speaker 1: rightly outraged, just because it's a dishone, honorable loser thing
Speaker 1: to do. And that is what Raffensberger did. And you
Speaker 1: have to wonder what does he think, what purpose does
Speaker 1: this serve? I think it's because his own ego. He
Speaker 1: was worried that Trump was going to say things that
Speaker 1: he didn't like. So if he taped it, he'd have
Speaker 1: that as back up. But even still, if you're going
Speaker 1: to do that, tell the president that says, mister president,
Speaker 1: I would like to record this call. That's the honorable
Speaker 1: thing to do, you know, that would be the way
Speaker 1: to Now. I think Georgia has a one party consent,
Speaker 1: but I do believe it was across state lines. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I don't know. The recording laws are a bit complicated.
Speaker 1: They're definitely variable, and they're a little bit complicated. Here
Speaker 1: is some of this phone call though, play clip twenty one.
Speaker 1: I just want to find eleven seven votes, which is
Speaker 1: one more that we have because we won the say so,
Speaker 1: so tell me bred what are we going to do?
Speaker 1: We won the election and it's not fair to take
Speaker 1: it away from much like this. Now, what's the media
Speaker 1: is saying about this? How are they taking this? Well,
Speaker 1: they're claiming that Trump is trying to Trump is trying
Speaker 1: to cheat, He's trying to push and steal an election
Speaker 1: that Trump is trying to That's what they're doing. Now
Speaker 1: what is Trump really saying here? His belief and I'm
Speaker 1: I would I would bet any amount of money that
Speaker 1: you want that Trump does think this does believe this,
Speaker 1: although I don't like to bet so I'll take that away,
Speaker 1: but you know what I'm saying, I bet you I'll
Speaker 1: just say it that way. I bet you that Trump
Speaker 1: really does believe that he won this election, that he
Speaker 1: won the election, and he thinks he won a Georgia.
Speaker 1: So all he's saying, and Trump's mind is, come on, man,
Speaker 1: you've got to get me the real answers here. There's
Speaker 1: no way, there's no way that the rate of absentee
Speaker 1: ballot rejection or mail in ballot rejection was so much
Speaker 1: lower this time around, with so many more ballots. It's
Speaker 1: not possible. So find out what happened here, And all
Speaker 1: you have to do is show me twelve thousand roughly.
Speaker 1: I mean, we said eleven thousand something twelve thousand ballots
Speaker 1: that are invalidated from their side because they were illegal ballots.
Speaker 1: And I win. That's what he's That's what Trump is saying.
Speaker 1: But I know that the way that that this is
Speaker 1: reported on is Trump is pressuring. I mean, I mean
Speaker 1: he's really going to pressure. He would make some kind
Speaker 1: of a threat. You would assume, right he would do
Speaker 1: something beyond this. But now they're now they're at they're
Speaker 1: at Defcon Defcon one against Trump. Now it's it's the
Speaker 1: the usual panic. And you know, here's Senator Van hollend Oh,
Speaker 1: it's a criminal act play seven. Well, I do think
Speaker 1: this has the elements of a criminal act, and there's
Speaker 1: been a lot of discussion about that. I think the
Speaker 1: authorities in Georgia and a future Justice Department need to
Speaker 1: look into that and make a determination about whether or
Speaker 1: not to bring charges. Obviously, this president is facing a
Speaker 1: lot of other potential civil and criminal liability when he
Speaker 1: leaves office for other acts he's committed, and this is
Speaker 1: going to be part of that review by future administration.
Speaker 1: But I think or the authorities in Georgia, now, there's
Speaker 1: no criminal act here. This is just bullcrap from a clown.
Speaker 1: But what he's telling you is important to remember, and
Speaker 1: I want all of you to remember this. They will
Speaker 1: not be satisfied when Trump leaves office. They will not
Speaker 1: be satisfied with that it's not going to happen. They
Speaker 1: want him to be prosecuted. That is what the Democrats
Speaker 1: actually want to happen. They want to see him dragged
Speaker 1: into court, criminally prosecuted, and ruined because in the back
Speaker 1: of their minds. A lot of them must know. I mean,
Speaker 1: this has already come out. They recognize that what's gone
Speaker 1: on here look shady to tens of millions of Americans,
Speaker 1: and beyond that, the Trump movement is going to continue.
Speaker 1: The Trump movement doesn't stop just because Trump isn't the president.
Speaker 1: And what really we need to start thinking about what
Speaker 1: are we going to call it? What is this conservative populism?
Speaker 1: Is a constitutional populism? When to come up with award?
Speaker 1: Is it just you know, maga or what are we
Speaker 1: going to say about this? Because it's not stopping. It's
Speaker 1: more than even just a set of policies. It's an
Speaker 1: approach to politics that's not going away. So they want
Speaker 1: Trump to be prosecuted because they feel like that's the
Speaker 1: only way that they'll get to a point where all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, all of a sudden, it will all stop.
Speaker 1: It will be over, it'll be done, the nightmare of
Speaker 1: having to deal with this guy. Come to conclusion. I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna tell you this right now. This is the rubicon,
Speaker 1: my friends. If Democrats bring a criminal charge against Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and if you don't think they're capable of it, I
Speaker 1: got news for you. I think they are at the
Speaker 1: state level. They'll bring some kind of rinky dink mickey
Speaker 1: mouse criminal charge against President Trump and he leaves office.
Speaker 1: We need to be prepared for that because notice how
Speaker 1: quickly it shifted from unity unity, which just meant shut
Speaker 1: up and do what you're told to. Well, now we're
Speaker 1: going to have to actually go after Trump criminally and
Speaker 1: go after his family members. They didn't miss a beat,
Speaker 1: no issue with a no problem with it whatsoever, and
Speaker 1: they're serious about it. While our side has got Paul
Speaker 1: Ryan and other people going around telling all of us,
Speaker 1: you know, the gentlemanly way to act the Trump. Rather
Speaker 1: the Democrats side is saying that Trump needs to be
Speaker 1: criminally prosecuted. The Democrat side is saying that Trump is
Speaker 1: a huge, a huge target for retribution, and that's what
Speaker 1: they're looking to do. It's just a question when they
Speaker 1: get the opening. You're in the freedom This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. If I were the House Democrats,
Speaker 1: there's nothing stopping it right now from convening the Oversidergiciary Committee.
Speaker 1: Play the audio in full for an hour straight, make
Speaker 1: every members sit there and listen to it, and then
Speaker 1: vote on impeachment right there, because there has to be
Speaker 1: a cost for these things. And even if he won't
Speaker 1: be removed and indicted by the Senate, President Trump deserves
Speaker 1: the historical stain, the permanent stain of impeachment. There's a
Speaker 1: reason why these processes exist in the first place. It's
Speaker 1: to have some measure of accountability, even not in real time,
Speaker 1: but for the future. And for that context, it has
Speaker 1: to be made very clear by a coequal branch of
Speaker 1: government that what Donald Trump is caught on tape doing
Speaker 1: is illegal, it's wrong, it's undemocratic. They want to impeach
Speaker 1: him again, just just in case you're ordering it is
Speaker 1: buck going too far. They really want to product well,
Speaker 1: they want to impeach him again. We've got what three weeks,
Speaker 1: less than three weeks before there's a transition, and I know, Look,
Speaker 1: I understand there's going to be an objection to the
Speaker 1: certification of the results. There should be more investigation. I
Speaker 1: agree with that. I agree that we should have more information,
Speaker 1: we should look into this, we should look for accountability.
Speaker 1: I agree with all that. But I'm telling you the truth.
Speaker 1: A lot of other people are going to pander. I
Speaker 1: don't pander. The objections that these eleven senators are considering,
Speaker 1: are not considering, are not going to stop anything. They're
Speaker 1: not unconstitutional, it's not a crisis. It's fine, it's the
Speaker 1: right thing to do, but it's not going to stop anything.
Speaker 1: But they still, even with all of this, Democrats are
Speaker 1: out there talking about how they want to they want
Speaker 1: to impeach this guy. You know, well, how many people
Speaker 1: were talking about impeaching and esecuting Obama? And when I
Speaker 1: say people, I'm not talking about you know, your random
Speaker 1: buddy Phil who lives down the street from you and
Speaker 1: mutters to himself a lot, I'm talking about actual elected
Speaker 1: Democrats in office. How many of them we're talking, I'm sorry, Republicans.
Speaker 1: How many elected Republicans were actually talking about doing this. None.
Speaker 1: We're all happy that Trump had won in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and we're thinking about the future. Well, not every Republican
Speaker 1: was happy, but a lot of us were. Now here
Speaker 1: we are now. What we see continues continues to play
Speaker 1: out and exactly the way that we should have expected along,
Speaker 1: which is that their hope is that they can get
Speaker 1: retribution against Donald Trump. Not enough to beat him. They
Speaker 1: want to get him and not just him people who
Speaker 1: supported him, people around him, maybe people who even say
Speaker 1: too many nice things about him on radio. You know,
Speaker 1: just just telling you right now, wait for it. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you what it happens. I RS all of a
Speaker 1: sudden's gonna come knocking on the Busters door. Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: nice radio show. You got. There be a shame. It's
Speaker 1: something happened to it Trump's supporter. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Busson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Big
Speaker 1: week in politics, How are we looking, my fellow conservatives?
Speaker 1: What are we dealing with now? My friend Sean Parnell
Speaker 1: joins us. He is a former Army ranger, author of
Speaker 1: Outlaw Platoon as well as other great books. He is
Speaker 1: a candidate for a congressional seat out there in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: That fight continues on, but Sean joins us. Now, Sean,
Speaker 1: great to have you, Hey Buck, good to be back.
Speaker 1: I hope you had a great holiday season, my friend.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about Georgia first. I mean, you you just
Speaker 1: ran in this last election for Congress, and you're very
Speaker 1: plugged into what's happening, and you certainly know in real
Speaker 1: detail the ways that this election was funky. I guess
Speaker 1: that's a way we could describe it, that there are
Speaker 1: problems here, there was clear fraud. But explain this to me,
Speaker 1: how do you how do you think we're shaping up
Speaker 1: right now in Georgia. I'm I've been worried for weeks
Speaker 1: about the apathy effect mixed in with some of the
Speaker 1: the lack of focus that I'm seeing from the GOP
Speaker 1: nationally and in Georgia. Yeah, I agree, I am very
Speaker 1: very concerned for Georgia. I mean, you know, because a
Speaker 1: clear signal that the Supreme Court and other courts, federal
Speaker 1: courts and state courts, has set a precedent that really
Speaker 1: the Constitution doesn't matter. Laws election laws don't matter. When
Speaker 1: we saw laws as specifically here in the state of
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania buck that were violated, whether you know Act seventy
Speaker 1: seven itself, our mail in ballot law was unconstitutional to
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State in Pennsylvania changing unilaterally changing election
Speaker 1: law to remove the postmark for mail in ballots and
Speaker 1: signature verification. All of these things are required by the
Speaker 1: legislature to change, but Pennsylvania changed them, and then you
Speaker 1: have this mark Zuckerberg money. This Facebook money poured into
Speaker 1: the state of Pennsylvania and PA seventeen in Allegheny County
Speaker 1: alone got two point two million dollars, which basically paid
Speaker 1: judges of elections, boosted their salaries, paid for ballot drop
Speaker 1: boxes and satellite remote voting facilities. All of this stuff
Speaker 1: was changed on the flybock, all of it. And we're
Speaker 1: seeing the same things happen in Georgia. And indeed, what
Speaker 1: happened in the general election in Georgia there there were
Speaker 1: ballot drop boxes, There, there were remote satellite voting facilities.
Speaker 1: There poll watchers were denied meaningful access. And I mean
Speaker 1: when you think about the concept of a ballot drop box,
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, anybody with an ounce of common
Speaker 1: sense can tell you that they cannot be supervised twenty
Speaker 1: four hours a day, seven days a week. What prevents
Speaker 1: any democratic activists from stuffing one hundred ballots in there
Speaker 1: every single day for a week. And in Georgia they
Speaker 1: didn't scale back on any of this stuff. Buck the
Speaker 1: Secretary of State in Georgia plussed up on ballot drop boxes.
Speaker 1: So now there are more, and so you add to
Speaker 1: all of these unconstitutional last minute voting changes, right, you
Speaker 1: add to that the level of what you said, the
Speaker 1: apathy that I feel like Trump voters are feeling like
Speaker 1: many And by the way, I think it's very important
Speaker 1: there's a clear distinction between a Trump voter and a
Speaker 1: traditional Republican voter, and first success, for there to be
Speaker 1: any level of success achieved in Georgia, both traditional GOP
Speaker 1: and Trump voters need to turn out in force and
Speaker 1: the base, the Republican base, the Trump base feels I
Speaker 1: will tell you they feel a sense of apathy because
Speaker 1: they feel like they were left behind by the courts
Speaker 1: and perhaps even some members in the Senate and the
Speaker 1: House who aren't fighting as as passionately as I I
Speaker 1: think they need to be to make sure that people
Speaker 1: have a sense of clarity with the selection. So I'm
Speaker 1: very worried about Georgia. Hopefully when the President goes down
Speaker 1: there today, he'll stir up the base in Northern Georgia,
Speaker 1: because in Northern Georgia, those Republicans need to turn out
Speaker 1: and force. But I'm worried because, man, I feel like
Speaker 1: we are staring, We are staring into the abyss here Man,
Speaker 1: this country stands on a thin line between hope and
Speaker 1: darkness and if we lose, if we lose both races
Speaker 1: in Georgia, I mean, the Democrats have not made a
Speaker 1: secret about the fact that they will do everything that
Speaker 1: they can to fundamentally change America for generations. What do
Speaker 1: you think, Shawn about this plan? So we got we
Speaker 1: got Georgia tomorrow, and then you know, it's a big week.
Speaker 1: A lot going on here with Georgia tomorrow, and then
Speaker 1: you have the certification January sixth, right, the Electoral College
Speaker 1: results certification in Congress, you got eleven senators who are
Speaker 1: saying that they will reject the electors from disputed states
Speaker 1: has not regularly given and lawfully certified unless a ten
Speaker 1: day audit is completed. You've got Senator's Cruz, Johnson, Langford,
Speaker 1: Danes Kennedy, Marsha Blackburne, Mike Braun, Cynthia Loomis, Roger Marshall,
Speaker 1: Bill Haggerty, and Tommy Tuberville. They've all said they're going
Speaker 1: to vote against accepting election results unless there is a
Speaker 1: ten day audit. They want to extend this thing out.
Speaker 1: Just first off, what do you think about this? At
Speaker 1: the macro level? Is this the right move? And do
Speaker 1: you think it can do anything. Well, look, I agree
Speaker 1: with it. I do think it's the right move. I
Speaker 1: don't know if a ten day commission is going to
Speaker 1: have the time necessary to get the information required to
Speaker 1: do anything with it. I Senator Cruz, I think is
Speaker 1: right to push back on this issue because I'll tell
Speaker 1: you look, and this is just from my personal experience
Speaker 1: on the ground in Pennsylvania, Buck, I have no idea
Speaker 1: how any person Democrat Republican, and I mean this can
Speaker 1: certify the race in Pennsylvania. I mean everything that I
Speaker 1: just mentioned about unconstitutional changes to election system, to our
Speaker 1: electoral process here last minute on the go, and add
Speaker 1: to that, like we're putting together an audit of the
Speaker 1: vote numbers using Pennsylvania's own reported numbers at a precinct
Speaker 1: by precinct level and across the state of Pennsylvania, there's
Speaker 1: a one hundred and twenty thousand vote deficit. And what
Speaker 1: that means is there are one hundred and twenty thousand
Speaker 1: more votes than voters statewide, right, than people who cast
Speaker 1: ballots in my district alone, throughout more votes than people
Speaker 1: who vote on election day. And this is data that
Speaker 1: can be taken from the short system in Pennsylvania. The
Speaker 1: SHORT System is our official voter database and registry by
Speaker 1: the law Buck by law, the state of Pennsylvania cannot
Speaker 1: be certified until the numbers are reconciled in the SHORT system.
Speaker 1: And we just swore in the one hundred and seventeen
Speaker 1: Congress yesterday and those numbers have yet to be rectified.
Speaker 1: And Alleghany County hasn't updated the SHORT system since November
Speaker 1: twenty four, So this is clearly illegal and I don't
Speaker 1: know how anyone can certify the state of Pennsylvania. This
Speaker 1: election was just a disaster, and every day that goes by,
Speaker 1: we found out more information. It makes me less comfortable
Speaker 1: with the way that the election is conducted here in Pennsylvania. Sean,
Speaker 1: we're speaking with Sean Parnell. He was a candidate for
Speaker 1: congressional seat in Pennsylvania seventeenth district. Is a former Army ranger,
Speaker 1: bestselling author. And as all of you listen to the show,
Speaker 1: note buddy of mine and Sean, I need to ask
Speaker 1: you this. Why is it so you know you tell
Speaker 1: me these numbers? For example, you mentioned Pennsylvania over one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand more votes than voters. What is the explanation
Speaker 1: of this, because I feel like there's you know, one
Speaker 1: of the one of the problems is that there are
Speaker 1: these real objections and real fraud let's call them indicators
Speaker 1: that have been all mixed in with the you know,
Speaker 1: all the krack in is coming and there's a you know,
Speaker 1: Hugo Chavez was hang out with Poul Pod and they
Speaker 1: hacked into machines and they flew them to Mars, and
Speaker 1: you know, there's all this nonsense out there too, and
Speaker 1: it is nonsense, and then there's the real stuff, and
Speaker 1: the nonsense is making it harder to get answers on
Speaker 1: the real stuff. So to do that, we have to
Speaker 1: ask the question, well, what would the other side say
Speaker 1: about this? I mean, it seems like it couldn't be
Speaker 1: any more clear. You have over one hundred thousand more
Speaker 1: votes than voters in just the state of Pennsylvania. What
Speaker 1: is the explanation for that or do they just say
Speaker 1: the data is wrong? Well, so they could. So we
Speaker 1: asked for a response from the PA Secretary of State
Speaker 1: and she basically said exactly what you just said. Ah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you guys are wrong, but we're not wrong. We used
Speaker 1: kind Pensylvania's own numbers that precincts reported in the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania, and we use the source system, which is
Speaker 1: again Pennsylvania's official voter registry, so our numbers are airtight.
Speaker 1: We are absolutely correct. What the Secretary of State in
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania would likely say is, you know, Alleghany County hasn't
Speaker 1: officially reported all their numbers yet. You know, there's air pandemic,
Speaker 1: more mail in ballots than they were used to dealing with.
Speaker 1: It takes time. But here's the deal. It's been what
Speaker 1: over two and a half months since the election has done.
Speaker 1: Allegany County hasn't updated the short system in the state
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania since November, and it is against the law
Speaker 1: to certify a race until those until those numbers are reconciled.
Speaker 1: So why then, did the Pennsylvania Secretary of State along
Speaker 1: with Governor Will certify the race so November. How could
Speaker 1: they certify the race without reconciling those numbers they have.
Speaker 1: There is simply no explanation that they could have that
Speaker 1: would be sufficient for the amount of misconduct. And I
Speaker 1: would go so far as to say corruption that we're
Speaker 1: seeing here in the state of Pennsylvania. It's systemic, and Buck,
Speaker 1: what I just told you about the voter deficits. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of this will come out in the report that
Speaker 1: we're releasing tomorrow. But Buck, this is just a tip
Speaker 1: of the iceberg. It looks like, and again we can
Speaker 1: substantiate this, but the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania, Secretary
Speaker 1: Bookbar allowed certain left wing groups to have access administrative
Speaker 1: access to the shore system again, the official voter registry
Speaker 1: of the State of Pennsylvania, and granted them Madman access
Speaker 1: to give sub access to other left wing groups. That's unprecedented.
Speaker 1: That's unprecedented, and so I don't know how anyone can
Speaker 1: certify the race in Pennsylvania unild many of these questions
Speaker 1: are answered. And so to circle back to your initial question,
Speaker 1: if Senator Cruz, if Josh Holly, if these eleven senators
Speaker 1: and this ten day audit can somehow make that happen
Speaker 1: and help us answer those questions, well, I think it
Speaker 1: will do a lot of good for this country because,
Speaker 1: believe me, a lot of people feel right now like
Speaker 1: their votes did not matter, like their votes were canceled
Speaker 1: out by illegal votes, Like elections moving forward won't matter.
Speaker 1: And man, we got to get answers to this stuff now,
Speaker 1: because if if you think that that the radical left
Speaker 1: was good at manipulating the system, the further their own
Speaker 1: goals in twenty twenty, they'll get better in twenty twenty two,
Speaker 1: and they'll be even better in twenty twenty four. So
Speaker 1: we've got it. Like, at the end of the day, Buck,
Speaker 1: the Constitution either matters or it doesn't. Laws and statutes
Speaker 1: either matter or they don't. And all I'm trying to say,
Speaker 1: I mean, the left would say, oh, you're trying to
Speaker 1: overturn an election. That's absolutely not true. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to defend the election. I'm trying to make sure that
Speaker 1: laws were followed, and it looks like in Alleghany County
Speaker 1: they weren't. There's so much misconduct in this race in Pennsylvania, Buck,
Speaker 1: I don't even know where to start. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't even think ten minutes is enough in an interview
Speaker 1: to even talk about it. And that's unfortunate. But you know,
Speaker 1: hopefully that the debate and the House and the Senate
Speaker 1: will give us some answers and some clarity moving forward,
Speaker 1: because I think that people deserve it, give us give
Speaker 1: us some sense of what when you say that you're
Speaker 1: releasing a report tomorrow, so people are getting a little
Speaker 1: preview of it here on this show. How did you
Speaker 1: bring together this report? What is it looking at? And
Speaker 1: then just just give us the you know, the the
Speaker 1: executive summary, top line findings that you can as of now. Well,
Speaker 1: we commissioned a former intelligence analyst. Um This person wants
Speaker 1: to remain anonymous because they have a small business and
Speaker 1: they don't want they don't want to be targeted by
Speaker 1: the left and harassed. But all of the information that
Speaker 1: we have in this report will be sourced with links
Speaker 1: from people. If people don't trust me, and you know what, fine,
Speaker 1: don't trust me, I want you to go and think
Speaker 1: critically and get this information on your on your own.
Speaker 1: All of that, all of our source material will be
Speaker 1: in the report so people can go see with their
Speaker 1: own two eyes. It will show you the voter deficits,
Speaker 1: and a voter deficit just mean more votes than actual
Speaker 1: voters who showed up or voted on election day. It
Speaker 1: will show you left wing access in twenty sixteen to
Speaker 1: the shore system, and in twenty twenty, we've had multiple
Speaker 1: requests for information to the Secretary of State in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: They've all fallen on death hears silence crickets from the
Speaker 1: state of Pennsylvania, so we don't do. The truth is,
Speaker 1: we don't know what left wing organizations had access to
Speaker 1: the shore system in twenty twenty, but I bet you
Speaker 1: it's worse than twenty sixteen. And another thing that we
Speaker 1: found was incredibly concerning was that Alleghany County was removed
Speaker 1: from the election database in the short system, which is
Speaker 1: supposed to be publicly available at all times. In fact,
Speaker 1: a couple of counties were removed from that database. We
Speaker 1: believe that they were removed to prevent further scrutiny from
Speaker 1: whatever audit that might come down the pipe. But the
Speaker 1: two counties that are removed, and again I can send
Speaker 1: you the information on this and you'll see it in
Speaker 1: the report, Alleghany County in Philadelphia County. Those are the
Speaker 1: only two counties in the state of Pennsylvania, I think
Speaker 1: right now where you can't go and pull up the
Speaker 1: election map to see how many mail and ballots were cast,
Speaker 1: how many provisionals were cast, how many how many in
Speaker 1: person votes were cast, and that information is critical that
Speaker 1: with regards to how they're going to reconcile this one
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty thousand votes statewide, in sixty three thousand
Speaker 1: votes in my district and part of Alleghany County alone.
Speaker 1: Fuck forty eight percent of the voter deficit in the
Speaker 1: state of Pennsylvania happen in Alleghany County. And without Alleghany
Speaker 1: County available publicly on the election map, which again by
Speaker 1: PA statute, is supposed to be available to the public
Speaker 1: twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. It's
Speaker 1: not there. It's not there right now. You can go
Speaker 1: to the own you can go to the website and look,
Speaker 1: Alleghany County General election is not there. And without that
Speaker 1: information there, how can how can there be any transparency
Speaker 1: or accountability on how they reconcile these numbers? There can't be.
Speaker 1: So there, there cannot be. Well, Sean, we appreciate you
Speaker 1: continuing to stay in the right. Let us know, and
Speaker 1: I know you've got this report. Tomorrow, release it. I'll
Speaker 1: be sharing it with people and we'll have you back
Speaker 1: on to talk about where this goes. Sean Parnell, everybody,
Speaker 1: thanks so much, my friend. Thanks Bud, You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom money. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast.
Speaker 1: Be asking in the name of the monotheistic God and
Speaker 1: God known by many names by many different faiths. Amen
Speaker 1: and a woman, a woman, woman Whoamen. For those of
Speaker 1: you who are fans of so I married an axe murder,
Speaker 1: you'll get that. Everybody else will think that I'm having
Speaker 1: some kind of an episode. But Amen and a woman.
Speaker 1: Now this is what this is what it's come to
Speaker 1: in Congress. Now, folks gotta be gotta be super gender inclusive.
Speaker 1: So you can't say amen, you gotta say a woman.
Speaker 1: I mean this, this is now bring into reality some
Speaker 1: of the nineties PC culture jokes about how it couldn't
Speaker 1: be women in gender's studies, for example, on college campuses
Speaker 1: had to be wo, m y n. Why because can't
Speaker 1: have men in the women's name. I mean, it's that
Speaker 1: level of absurdity. And I'm sure you may have seen
Speaker 1: this already. But Amen or amen comes from biblical Hebrew
Speaker 1: and it means so be it or it is so,
Speaker 1: and that's all. It's just an affirmation. And yet because
Speaker 1: it sounds like something that has to do with gender
Speaker 1: or men or the patriarchy, now there's a women. Now
Speaker 1: you know this is this is going to become a
Speaker 1: part of our daily lives, even more so over the
Speaker 1: next four years. Get ready for it. Democrats culturally have
Speaker 1: adopted wokeness now in a way that they won't be
Speaker 1: able to shake off. I mean, the Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: the party of the woke, and there's no degree of
Speaker 1: woke absurdity that is too much for them, or whatever
Speaker 1: they think they can get away with, they will. And
Speaker 1: you're going to see this talk to your children in school.
Speaker 1: You're going to see this represented in the boardrooms of
Speaker 1: major corporations. Government training. Oh my gosh, the stuff that's
Speaker 1: going to be told the government employees. Now. I can't
Speaker 1: even imagine how much the brainwashing and re education seminars
Speaker 1: in diversity and inclusion. I can't even imagine how crazy
Speaker 1: they're going to be, because whatever you think it is,
Speaker 1: it's going to be worse than that. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: worse than that. But now now we're at that point.
Speaker 1: Now now they're going to say, oh, this is just
Speaker 1: a guy, one guy member of Congress making this comment,
Speaker 1: But no, we see the trend. We see that this
Speaker 1: is the direction they're going in. And I want you
Speaker 1: to remember this while we are going to make fun
Speaker 1: of it. Because they hate mockery, and mockery is an
Speaker 1: important weapon in political political fights discourse, and they hate
Speaker 1: being mocked, I mean, the left app So that's why
Speaker 1: they try to shut down humor, because humor is such
Speaker 1: an effective weapon against their absurdity. But remember this too,
Speaker 1: they need to be mocked, they deserve to be mocked.
Speaker 1: But there's also a totalitarian impulse behind all of this,
Speaker 1: all this PC stuff and the patriarchy and everything else.
Speaker 1: There's a reason they're doing this, and it's disastrous for
Speaker 1: this country over the long term. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple
Speaker 1: podcasts at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Could and likely will get worse in the next couple
Speaker 1: of weeks, or at least maintain this very terribly high
Speaker 1: level of infections and deaths that we're seeing. And the
Speaker 1: reason is that, you know, we're in that situation that
Speaker 1: we've predicted a few weeks ago. As you get into
Speaker 1: the holiday season and people have done a considerable amount
Speaker 1: of traveling, there's been congregate settings where people innocently and
Speaker 1: understandably we're gathering for social and family get togethers, against
Speaker 1: the advice of public health officials like myself, even though
Speaker 1: it's very difficult to do that when you have a
Speaker 1: family oriented season and then you have the cold weather
Speaker 1: people doing things indoors much more than outdoors, and this
Speaker 1: is what happens. It's terrible, it's unfortunate, but it was
Speaker 1: predictable that we were going to see the number of
Speaker 1: cases that we're seeing now. My concern is that it
Speaker 1: could get worse over the next couple of weeks as
Speaker 1: we see the lag that happens when an event occurs
Speaker 1: like the Christmas and New Year's holiday, Fauci takes out.
Speaker 1: It's just two more weeks, We'll see two more weeks
Speaker 1: where we are crystal ball. This guy has been wrong
Speaker 1: so much that I just I have to wonder at
Speaker 1: this point, I'm sort of curious, when do we all
Speaker 1: agree that there's no reason to listen into this moron anymore?
Speaker 1: When at what stage? At what point do we understand
Speaker 1: that everything that he tells us is either unnecessary because
Speaker 1: we already know it because it's so obvious, or just incorrect.
Speaker 1: His predictions all along have been wrong. Did he tell
Speaker 1: us that if we just mask mitigate social distance, that
Speaker 1: we would set all time records. Somehow, Let's be very
Speaker 1: clear about this. Somehow the disease was in the United
Speaker 1: States at least at the end of twenty nineteen, and
Speaker 1: yet we got into March and April where there was
Speaker 1: almost no mitigation to speak of. In February, right over
Speaker 1: the wintertime. We go into March and April and they're
Speaker 1: telling us, don't mask and then there was a little
Speaker 1: bit of masking and that, you know, then we got
Speaker 1: into the first round of lockdowns. It's worse now by
Speaker 1: cases and by hospitalizations in a lot of places. Then
Speaker 1: it was then and Fauci what he heat saw this coming?
Speaker 1: What was the point of all the measures? What was
Speaker 1: the point of all the lockdowns? Trump was somehow blamed
Speaker 1: for all this, as you remember, coronavirus was entirely Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's fault. That's what we're told. Coronavirus was something that
Speaker 1: he didn't take seriously in a lot about That's where
Speaker 1: they were telling us. What about the UK? What about Germany?
Speaker 1: What about France? What about all these other countries where
Speaker 1: they're having very similar scale problems to us. Do you
Speaker 1: know that they're about two hundred thousand people who have
Speaker 1: died of COVID nineteen in Brazil, for example. You see
Speaker 1: that headline anywhere, No, you don't. Is that Donald Trump's fault?
Speaker 1: Is it because people don't social distance that don't mask
Speaker 1: up or is it something else? How is it that
Speaker 1: this is a policy? We're told that this is working
Speaker 1: when there's no metric you can show me that proves
Speaker 1: that any of this stuff actually works as a government policy.
Speaker 1: That's not the same thing as saying that theoretically some
Speaker 1: of these things would not prevent an individual from getting
Speaker 1: the virus, but on a massive scale with government mandates.
Speaker 1: How is this exactly functioning the way we're supposed to
Speaker 1: compared to what They don't have any answers, but they
Speaker 1: just tell us you have to listen. They tell you
Speaker 1: that if you don't listen, you're a bad person, against
Speaker 1: the science, you're a problem. In fact, it's your fault,
Speaker 1: don't you see? All you have to do is listen
Speaker 1: to Saint Fauci and everything's going to get better. Here
Speaker 1: he is the usual Saint Fauci coming back to us.
Speaker 1: Play eight. I hope we don't have to do the
Speaker 1: lockdown because we all know, Chuck, how much COVID nineteenth fatigue.
Speaker 1: There is of people just really being worn down with this.
Speaker 1: But we certainly need to enhance and make more uniform
Speaker 1: our public health measure. President elect Biden has called for
Speaker 1: a hundred days of every body wearing a mask uniformly
Speaker 1: throughout the country. That's really a good start. The idea
Speaker 1: about locking down is something that you might have to do,
Speaker 1: but you want to avoid in certain areas of the country,
Speaker 1: such as in California, which is really being stressed with
Speaker 1: regard to the hospital beds and the personnel who are
Speaker 1: really getting exhausted with the number of cases that are
Speaker 1: coming in. You may have to have and they already
Speaker 1: have decided on some form of lockdown in specific areas
Speaker 1: of the state or specific regions of the country, So
Speaker 1: that's not out of the question. We hope we don't
Speaker 1: have to do with countrywide because we feel that if
Speaker 1: you adhere to the public health measures, you can turn
Speaker 1: things around. National Fauchiism. That's what we're heading toward, national
Speaker 1: Fauchiite mandates and regulations, that's what he wants. Now, let's
Speaker 1: be very clear about this. You and I are sitting here,
Speaker 1: and the normal human reaction all this would be they've
Speaker 1: got to see that this stuff doesn't do anything right.
Speaker 1: They've got to see it. I mean, they've got to know.
Speaker 1: When I say this stuff, I'm not saying that a
Speaker 1: mask properly fitted, an N ninety five mask can't work.
Speaker 1: Of course this can out of course it can stop
Speaker 1: some degree of particles, some degree of spread under certain circumstances.
Speaker 1: But the government mandates the way they're implementing these rules absurd.
Speaker 1: I was on a plane coming back from Florida. Every
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes there's a make sure your mask is up
Speaker 1: and over your nose, you know, very very important, very important.
Speaker 1: I look around. Everyone's sitting there watching the TV screen
Speaker 1: in the back of the seat in front of them,
Speaker 1: you know, muncheon on chips or whatever, masks down. Oh okay, Well,
Speaker 1: I'm so glad that when they're entering the plane they
Speaker 1: have the mask on and then they sit there for
Speaker 1: an hour without their mask. But I'm not I was
Speaker 1: one of them. I was sitting there drinking, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: these are the rules. It nullifies the rest of the rules.
Speaker 1: And that's what they don't understand, or they just pretend
Speaker 1: they don't understand. No intelligent person can see what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Can see all these mandates and regulations in place and say,
Speaker 1: you know what, this really makes sense. This is good.
Speaker 1: And yet what is Fauci saying. He's telling you that
Speaker 1: if we adhere to these measures, we can turn things around.
Speaker 1: That's not true. He's wrong. We keep seeing him be wrong.
Speaker 1: And yeah, this is a guy who really does I think,
Speaker 1: enjoy his spotlight and history right now. I think he
Speaker 1: is a person who's gotten a little too in love
Speaker 1: with the whole country turning to him like he's the
Speaker 1: great godfather of our salvation during this virus. And it's
Speaker 1: not true, really stunning, it's it's upsetting. It's upsetting. At
Speaker 1: this point, I think everybody should see this for what
Speaker 1: it really is. We are in a period of mass
Speaker 1: delusion here. I mean, I can't tell you how many
Speaker 1: times outside in Florida, for example, and I can compare
Speaker 1: it to New York. So I've now I'm now in
Speaker 1: a very lockdown. Said, no restaurants open, No restaurants open.
Speaker 1: And you know, I want to take the snow Princess
Speaker 1: out to a dinner tonight. Can't. I can't, can't, can't
Speaker 1: take her to the restaurants. Her birthday, Happy Birthday, snow
Speaker 1: Princess can't take her out because there's no restaurants open here.
Speaker 1: Restaurants are open in Florida, indoor dine, not even just
Speaker 1: outdoor indoor dining, crowded, booked. I had to go drive
Speaker 1: thirty minutes because I had a last minute change of
Speaker 1: plans on New Year's Eve, I had to go thirty
Speaker 1: minutes to go to a good restaurant because everything was
Speaker 1: booked up indoors and outdoors. Everyone's doing this, So shouldn't Florida,
Speaker 1: given that that's a regulation, a mannate that we have,
Speaker 1: shouldn't Florida be much worse? I mean, just overflowing er
Speaker 1: can handle a cannon little case, is much worse than
Speaker 1: New York. That's not true, it's not What about California?
Speaker 1: They were all about masking there, They were all about
Speaker 1: these lockdowns. They got rid of outdoor dining now now,
Speaker 1: and this is real, this is really important, and I
Speaker 1: want to be clear about this one too. You have
Speaker 1: to remember, if there were limited measures here, if there
Speaker 1: were limited measures that were reasonable, it's much more likely
Speaker 1: that we would actually, you know, limited and reasonable restrictions.
Speaker 1: We would say okay, and I would complain about this
Speaker 1: a lot less. I'm not opposed to all restrictions. I
Speaker 1: don't think if you're sick you should quarantine. If you're sick,
Speaker 1: you should stay away from people, And if you think
Speaker 1: you're you're sick or you've been exposed to somebody, you
Speaker 1: should also quarantine. I'm not I'm not crazy, okay, But
Speaker 1: limited and reasonable restrictions versus unlimited and unreasonable ones. That's
Speaker 1: what we're dealing with right now, unlimited restrictions that are unreasonable.
Speaker 1: And one of the best examples of this is why
Speaker 1: won't FOUCHI say you don't have to wear a mask
Speaker 1: outside if they were telling me, even with the absurdity
Speaker 1: of mask up indoors, unless you're eating on a plane,
Speaker 1: unless you're eating at the restaurant. But I'd be more
Speaker 1: willing to when I say, deal with it, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I would agree with it, but I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be as as furious because I'm furious about this stuff,
Speaker 1: and you should be too, because millions of your fellow Americans,
Speaker 1: and many of you listen to show right now, are
Speaker 1: suffering more than you should be by a lot because
Speaker 1: of jackasses like Fauci. But if he was just willing
Speaker 1: to say every school should be open full stop, they're safe.
Speaker 1: Mask wearing outdoors is entirely unnecessary. If you want to
Speaker 1: do it, that's up to you. But do not impose
Speaker 1: rules and impose even social pressure on others to mask outside.
Speaker 1: I would say, Okay, at least there's a willingness here
Speaker 1: to look at what's clearly true. But they won't even
Speaker 1: do that. So I mean I would. I would see
Speaker 1: people that were out, you know, laying out by the
Speaker 1: pool of Florida. We had great weather, it's beautiful. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was like an advertisement for why everybody should move
Speaker 1: to Florida from New York and California, which is what's happening.
Speaker 1: But you see people outside. They're laying on side in
Speaker 1: the sun for two hours, and then they would walk
Speaker 1: through the lot, you know, they'd walk into the lobby
Speaker 1: of the hotel. They put their mask on to walk
Speaker 1: into the lobby, and then they'd sit in the lobby,
Speaker 1: order a drink from the hotel bar, take their mask off. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm so glad they're wearing a mask for about thirty
Speaker 1: seconds of let's say a three hour period and the
Speaker 1: thirty seconds, they're not even near anybody. But this is
Speaker 1: the way that it's done, and this is from the
Speaker 1: hotels demanding it. Understand that this is not a request,
Speaker 1: story a suggestion from your peers. They're demanding this kind
Speaker 1: of behavior. It's absurd and I don't know what we
Speaker 1: can do about this other than just keep fighting back
Speaker 1: and telling everybody the truth about it, even though the
Speaker 1: social media companies want to lock us down and prevent
Speaker 1: us from having conversations about it, even though there's a
Speaker 1: fundamental lack of honesty around what we've been told and
Speaker 1: what is true when it comes to lockdowns. And then
Speaker 1: you have the virus and the vaccine. You know, we
Speaker 1: we have this vaccine. We are already into January here.
Speaker 1: The vaccine has been approved for almost a month. Now,
Speaker 1: why are there all these slowdowns? Well, there's a there's
Speaker 1: a reason for that, my friends, let's get into it.
Speaker 1: You're in this is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. This
Speaker 1: virus actually mutate as part of its normal behavior, and
Speaker 1: therefore it is normal to expect that there will be variants.
Speaker 1: What's very important is to study those variants and understand
Speaker 1: how infectious they are, whether they have more impact in
Speaker 1: terms of morbidity or mortality, and critically now that they
Speaker 1: are still sensitive to the vaccines that have been developed
Speaker 1: and on those three counts, based on the information shared
Speaker 1: with us by the UK scientists and early data that
Speaker 1: we have here, we think that these viruses, these virus
Speaker 1: variants should be under control with this vaccine. Fortunately, they
Speaker 1: are not more deadly to the population. They are more
Speaker 1: infectious and therefore they will further exacerbate the search that
Speaker 1: we are having. So the vaccine should help with the
Speaker 1: new strains. But understand this, the new strains. We're going
Speaker 1: to keep hearing about new strains, and it's going to
Speaker 1: be used to justify the continued extreme lockdown policies, because
Speaker 1: how can you really know, How can you really know,
Speaker 1: even based on the numbers that you see in any
Speaker 1: given month, if everything's going to be okay, when any
Speaker 1: moment you could have an outbreak of a new strain
Speaker 1: of this virus, and then everything would just be back
Speaker 1: to the nightmare we've been going through. Look, twenty twenty
Speaker 1: one is gonna be a better year than twenty twenty friends,
Speaker 1: at least when it comes to the virus. That's a given.
Speaker 1: But how quickly we get there and how little we
Speaker 1: suffer before we get there is still very much an
Speaker 1: open question. And that's why when you see these slowdowns
Speaker 1: with the vaccination, I mean the way that this should
Speaker 1: be done in my opinion, I mean the government they
Speaker 1: should set up mass vaccination areas. I mean, if they
Speaker 1: could bring, you know, hospital ships to New York City
Speaker 1: as they did to military hospital ships here and set
Speaker 1: up field tents in Central Park, you know, and this
Speaker 1: should just be we should be getting people, you know,
Speaker 1: every we should be going straight to the nursing homes,
Speaker 1: which they've been doing somewhat, and then we should have
Speaker 1: individuals who are above a certain age. Yeah, you can
Speaker 1: make an appointment with your doctor and all this, but
Speaker 1: there should also just be you just show up, you
Speaker 1: show up, and you get it. Because a lot of
Speaker 1: people aren't getting it. A lot of people are waiting,
Speaker 1: and they're waiting and they don't have time to wait.
Speaker 1: So the distribution of this is problematic. But you also
Speaker 1: see some of the people in the healthcare field who
Speaker 1: are younger and healthier, who they don't even want to
Speaker 1: get this virus. I'm sorry, this a vaccine. Of course,
Speaker 1: they don't want to get the virus. They don't want
Speaker 1: to get the vaccine. And now there's a question about
Speaker 1: whether they should just give first doses to people without
Speaker 1: even having a second dose ready, because the first dose
Speaker 1: barrenly gives a fair amount of protection based upon the
Speaker 1: clinical data they've already run. We need to get creative,
Speaker 1: and what you're seeing is that unfortunately government and bureaucracy
Speaker 1: hate they're they're allergic to creativity. They hate it. Everyone
Speaker 1: just wants to do exactly what they're supposed to do
Speaker 1: at exactly the speed they're forced to do it, and
Speaker 1: that's it. They have no interest in innovating. Has to
Speaker 1: be forced down their throats from up on high and no,
Speaker 1: they have no interest in moving faster than whatever the
Speaker 1: standard operating procedure declared by those in charge may be.
Speaker 1: So we need to get better about getting this vaccine
Speaker 1: out to people. I'm not happy with the progress on
Speaker 1: that at all. Man. We need to see some real
Speaker 1: creativity and incentive in all of this, because you got
Speaker 1: these cases so high. You know, people are going to
Speaker 1: lose their lives who should have been vaccinated but have
Speaker 1: not been vaccinated, who are in the high risk groups.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're over sixty five. There should be
Speaker 1: places where you can just go in every state in
Speaker 1: the country right now, and you know you're gonna get
Speaker 1: a vaccine right there. It should be this. I mean,
Speaker 1: I keep talking to people saying, how will we even
Speaker 1: get this? And oh, I don't know. I'm really sure.
Speaker 1: You know, there's all this a lot of questions circulating
Speaker 1: around this. How is it that they can have here's
Speaker 1: where your feet go, wash your hands, stay six feet
Speaker 1: away from people's signs in every bathroom stall and in
Speaker 1: on every elevator door and every lamp post in America.
Speaker 1: It feels like, but it's not obvious to everybody. When
Speaker 1: you're getting the vaccine, how you're getting the vaccine, what
Speaker 1: you do you want to talk about an important The
Speaker 1: vaccine is going to help all this other stuff. Well,
Speaker 1: you can decide for yourself how well handwashing has really
Speaker 1: saved us. But this is a failure at many levels
Speaker 1: of government, And of course the Democrats are going to
Speaker 1: just blame everything on Trump because that's all they ever do,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately it's been a very effective, if deeply disingenuous
Speaker 1: policy for them. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show. Podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. We're at an extraordinary time
Speaker 1: in our country's history. We went into this election with
Speaker 1: the country deeply divided, deeply polarized, and we've seen in
Speaker 1: the last two months unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, and
Speaker 1: that's produced a deep, deep distrust of our democratic process
Speaker 1: across the country. I think when Congress have an obligation
Speaker 1: to do something about that, we have an obligation to
Speaker 1: protect the integrity of the democratic system. And so this
Speaker 1: past week I spent writing out a position and assembling
Speaker 1: a group that ultimately of eleven Senators that we put
Speaker 1: out yesterday that we will together object to certification in
Speaker 1: order to force the appointment of an emergency electoral Commission
Speaker 1: to perform an emergency audit of the election results to
Speaker 1: assess these claims of frauds. I think we can do that.
Speaker 1: We can do it promptly, we can do it in
Speaker 1: ten days before the inauguration. But I think we have
Speaker 1: an obligation to the voters, and we have an obligation
Speaker 1: to the Constitution to ensure that this election was lawful
Speaker 1: seems entirely reasonable, doesn't it certainly constitutional, certainly lawful. So
Speaker 1: what's the big problem? Friends? You have to remember the
Speaker 1: people that are now pretending, the people who are Democrats
Speaker 1: of course, who are pretending that they care so much
Speaker 1: about the rule of law and they care so much
Speaker 1: about the sanctity of our democracy and all this other
Speaker 1: stuff that you're hearing. They don't give a crap about
Speaker 1: any of those things. They care about power, they care
Speaker 1: about being in sure, they care about their side winning.
Speaker 1: And this brings me back to the concept that I've
Speaker 1: been trying to forward here on the show for the
Speaker 1: last whatever. It is a couple of months of operation reciprocity,
Speaker 1: barring from a clear and present danger. I guess we'll
Speaker 1: just call it that, right, operation reciprocity. Now you know
Speaker 1: it comes from Clear and Present Danger, which is a
Speaker 1: pretty good film with Harrison Ford, and it's straightforward. We
Speaker 1: should take the approach to the Democrats in power that
Speaker 1: the Democrats took to Donald Trump in power, and that
Speaker 1: means that every legal, lawful process that we have, everything
Speaker 1: that we can do to slow them down, thwart their policies,
Speaker 1: jam them up, as long as it's lawful as long
Speaker 1: as we are not actively breaking the law or violating
Speaker 1: our own moral principles, because we still have those, unlike
Speaker 1: the Democrat left, we should do. And if that means
Speaker 1: they don't get to have a big victory celebration, parade
Speaker 1: and all the rest of it without people asking some questions,
Speaker 1: too bad. That means that Democrats get all upset and
Speaker 1: throw hissy fits on TV because we're all supposed to
Speaker 1: think it's gonna be so much better. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: so much better with Joe Biden as president. Oh, we'll
Speaker 1: see about that. CNN is gonna be a fascinating channel
Speaker 1: in the months ahead, not that it's ever actually interesting content,
Speaker 1: but I mean they'll be fascining to watch the way
Speaker 1: that they really believe they think, because this is their
Speaker 1: mindset and they're delusional that they can go back now
Speaker 1: to being kind of palsy oh so serious journals but
Speaker 1: who are very close and friendly with the White House,
Speaker 1: and that people who are in intelligent and who are
Speaker 1: observant are going to treat them like they're actually journalists
Speaker 1: now when they're they're activists. They are effectively operatives of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. They were for the four years of Trump.
Speaker 1: They were before Trump. They've just been more open about it.
Speaker 1: They've just been more obvious about it in the Trump
Speaker 1: era than they were before. Here's CNN's John Berman, for example,
Speaker 1: being a journalist, play seventeen. We know Donald Trump lost
Speaker 1: the election this morning, it's fair to ask whether he
Speaker 1: lost his mind. So if you think that's harsh, it's
Speaker 1: actually the most charitable explanation for the astonishing new evidence
Speaker 1: that has come to light. Audio first obtained by The
Speaker 1: Washington Post reveals the president trying to bully George's Republican
Speaker 1: secretary of State and to quote finding votes to overturn
Speaker 1: President elect Biden's win. There the audio includes what might
Speaker 1: be construed as the threat of criminal prosecution. Either the
Speaker 1: president has just completely lost his grip on reality and
Speaker 1: there is much any hour long recording to suggest this,
Speaker 1: or he got cough committing an act that you will
Speaker 1: hear legal expert's sake, is at a minimum morally repugnant
Speaker 1: and at a maximum a conspiracy to violate election law. Oh,
Speaker 1: he's a he's a criminal. There's a criminal. What are
Speaker 1: they even gonna say when Trump is at president anymore? Well,
Speaker 1: what are they going to do? To entertain themselves. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know that they're gonna sit there and they're just
Speaker 1: going to try to act like we all believe that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is some kind of genius, that Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: a great leader, that he's a great president, that he's
Speaker 1: which is which is on its face, I mean, it's absurd.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden doesn't even stand for anything other than not
Speaker 1: being Trump and being a Democrat who will do the
Speaker 1: left bidding. That's it, that's all there's. This guy doesn't
Speaker 1: stand for anything, really stands for being in office. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's a joke. I don't care that the guy is
Speaker 1: on track to be then expressidented states. I don't care.
Speaker 1: He's still a joke. It always will be. But they're
Speaker 1: gonna have to do the usual, you know, the Libs,
Speaker 1: the media, they're going to be usual. Look at Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and he's so great, it's fantastic. We're loving it. He's amazing,
Speaker 1: and it's just gonna be boring. It's just going to
Speaker 1: be boring. And this is why I think that you're
Speaker 1: going to see very early on so much focus on Kamala.
Speaker 1: The media loves Kamala. They want. They always wanted Kamala.
Speaker 1: In fact, that was her main constituency, was the editorial
Speaker 1: board of the New York Times, in the LA Times
Speaker 1: and the Washington Post. That that was the Kamala base.
Speaker 1: And now you're going to see that Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: not gonna make it through two terms. I don't even
Speaker 1: think one term as president without stepping down. He's going
Speaker 1: to step down. People keep I get all these questions
Speaker 1: thrown at me. Do you think that they're gonna make
Speaker 1: him still? No? Why would they have to make him?
Speaker 1: He's president for a little while, and then he gets
Speaker 1: to say that he was president and he gets to
Speaker 1: hand it off to Combola. And the guy's too old
Speaker 1: for this. He's not up for this too. He's doesn't
Speaker 1: have the vitality and the energy to do this job.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but we can all see it. I don't
Speaker 1: care that he can spout off some talking points and
Speaker 1: walk around with his mask on all the time, doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: But eventually what we're gonna see is is that what's
Speaker 1: best for Joe Biden is to go back on the
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a speech circuit and
Speaker 1: pass it off to Kamala and and create the Biden
Speaker 1: political dynasty and the Biden you know, presidential library and
Speaker 1: all this stuff. It's not gonna be through his accomplishments.
Speaker 1: He's serving his purpose here, and his purpose is just
Speaker 1: to be a placeholder until the Democrat left can actually
Speaker 1: get someone they want in that role. That's what's gonna
Speaker 1: end up happening. So that's it's gonna be boring from
Speaker 1: the perspective of what the media is going to say
Speaker 1: on Biden's side, it's gonna be a very very predictable,
Speaker 1: but get ready for it. Oh, speaking of commonly, here
Speaker 1: she is on Trump's call to Raffensburger play twenty. Have
Speaker 1: y'all heard about that recorded conversation. Well, it was, yes,
Speaker 1: certainly the voice of desperation, most certainly that and it
Speaker 1: was a ball ball faced, bold abuse of power by
Speaker 1: the President of the United States, an abuse of power.
Speaker 1: You know, we would listen to this more, We would
Speaker 1: listen this more. Perhaps, I mean I probably wouldn't, but
Speaker 1: maybe people listen a little bit more if we didn't
Speaker 1: know the following the Democrats. Let's do a little review
Speaker 1: here as they're talking about all the threat to our
Speaker 1: Republican impeach Trump and all the stuff the Democrats brought
Speaker 1: an actual impeachment, the impeached Donald Trump. That happened. They
Speaker 1: didn't remove him if they impeached him. They impeached him
Speaker 1: because he had a phone call where he asked about
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden corruption. And now we know beyond any reasonable
Speaker 1: doubt that Hunter Biden was engaged in certainly eyebrow raising,
Speaker 1: if not outright corrupt and perhaps even illegal schemes to
Speaker 1: enrich himself by selling access to his father while his
Speaker 1: dad was vice president. We know this. This has proven.
Speaker 1: The media can try to pretend the laptop doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: They can try to pretend that we don't have the
Speaker 1: proof that we do. We know all this, and yet
Speaker 1: they think that we don't remember. They think that we
Speaker 1: don't know that they impeached Donald Trump over a phone
Speaker 1: call that was not only was it not an issue
Speaker 1: of corruption and something that we should be so concerned about,
Speaker 1: but it turned out Trump was right. He was he
Speaker 1: was right to ask the questions that he did. He
Speaker 1: was right about the Hunter Biden schemes that did influence
Speaker 1: his father and US policy. Whether they say so or not,
Speaker 1: we can all tell that's the whole idea, right, and
Speaker 1: this is why there was the fire of the prosecutor.
Speaker 1: This is why the whole establishment all rallied to Biden's
Speaker 1: side because they knew that this was their o this
Speaker 1: was their only shot to defeat Donald Trump, and so
Speaker 1: they would say and do absolutely anything. But now here
Speaker 1: were there. Here we are again another time. Oh his
Speaker 1: phone call. He should be impeached. These people, they never stopped.
Speaker 1: We should learn something here from the Democrats. We should
Speaker 1: learn from the way that they harnessed their insanity and
Speaker 1: their ferocious political hatred of Trump. While it's while it's unfair,
Speaker 1: it's wrong, it's grotesque, it is useful for them. They
Speaker 1: don't get tired of this. They don't get tired of
Speaker 1: the lies. They don't decide all of a sudden, you
Speaker 1: know what, maybe we should be more reasonable. No, no,
Speaker 1: they're always always up for this. Right. They're they're deranged,
Speaker 1: but they they used like a Viking berserkers. They kind
Speaker 1: of use their derangement to their advantage and they run
Speaker 1: into battle, you know, oiled up and stark naked, so
Speaker 1: to speak. That's what the Vikings used to do when
Speaker 1: they are during berserker rages, which I gotta tell you
Speaker 1: that must have been quite a site back in the day.
Speaker 1: So this is the way they approach things. We're going
Speaker 1: to be told a lot in the weeks ahead. We're
Speaker 1: already seeing it now. You're already seeing some of the
Speaker 1: big names of the the Republican Party who are there to,
Speaker 1: you know, make really compelling spreadsheet arguments about how we
Speaker 1: could cut you know, maybe we cut public spending a
Speaker 1: little bit here, a little tiny bit there, and as
Speaker 1: if that's going to restore American greatness, as if that's
Speaker 1: some kind of a pathway for power on the conservative
Speaker 1: side of things. I remember, we want power hour so
Speaker 1: we can ensure prosperity, peace and individual liberty in the
Speaker 1: Constitution for people. I don't want the Conservatives. I don't
Speaker 1: want the GOP to gain power so they can dramatically
Speaker 1: remake America and turn it into some other place. That's
Speaker 1: what the Democrats are doing. We are ultimately trying to
Speaker 1: preserve what is foundational and what is essential for this republic.
Speaker 1: And we are the last and only hope that's it.
Speaker 1: If the left gets its way, if the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is able to enact its will, America will be a
Speaker 1: very very different country. You know it, and I know it.
Speaker 1: And so that's what's at stake here as we continue
Speaker 1: to go through and have this process play out where
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is going to be sworn in it a
Speaker 1: matter of weeks here as president of United States, and
Speaker 1: we've got this Georgia, these Georgia Senate races that are
Speaker 1: so close at hand, and yet I feel like the
Speaker 1: Republican Party is asleep at the wheel on this one.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of people that feel like, well,
Speaker 1: Trump didn't win, so they're not going to go forward
Speaker 1: and be a part of this. A lot of people
Speaker 1: are taking that approach, and there are a lot of
Speaker 1: people who are pretending to be fighters here who are
Speaker 1: damaging our side. So when you start to add all
Speaker 1: this together, we have quite a challenge ahead of us
Speaker 1: here and we all need to be in this together.
Speaker 1: I mean, I was thinking a lot about twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1: During my week, I had a week off which was
Speaker 1: I'll tell you, the first three days it was just detox,
Speaker 1: and then the next couple of days it was you know,
Speaker 1: it was nice and I was relaxed. But then by
Speaker 1: the time I got four or five days out, of
Speaker 1: doing this show. Let's be honest with you, I wanted
Speaker 1: to get back in the fight. So I'm so glad
Speaker 1: to be back in the mix here, which is just
Speaker 1: also a testament to how important I think this work
Speaker 1: is and how grateful I am to have all of
Speaker 1: you listening. It's very humbling and kind support of that.
Speaker 1: We have the audience that we do that continues to
Speaker 1: listen to the show all across the country. And this
Speaker 1: will be our This will be our biggest year ever
Speaker 1: of the show. I mean, we keep we grow every year.
Speaker 1: We get bigger every year, more listeners, more people downloading,
Speaker 1: and that's largely because of all of you. The word
Speaker 1: of mouth is I don't have a million dollar budget
Speaker 1: to advertise us on Facebook. Other people do that. Other
Speaker 1: people have huge budgets, they put it all over the
Speaker 1: internet and everything else. I don't have a budget to
Speaker 1: do any of that stuff. I have you telling people
Speaker 1: about the show. That's that's how this has actually grown,
Speaker 1: you telling your friends about the show. But I didn't
Speaker 1: miss doing it. And part of that was also the
Speaker 1: recognition that, you know, we had great years under Trump.
Speaker 1: The first three years under Trump were fantastic, and yeah,
Speaker 1: we had fights over Russia collusion that we had to
Speaker 1: we had to wage, and there were things that certainly
Speaker 1: demanded our attention, and we weren't complacent at all, but
Speaker 1: we were we were winning. We weren't tired of winning,
Speaker 1: but we were winning. Now we're on defense, and this
Speaker 1: is gonna be a very different, a very different feeling
Speaker 1: where it's going to take some time to get used
Speaker 1: to it. But if we are in this together, my
Speaker 1: fellow patriots, if if we stand together on principle and
Speaker 1: understand what is ahead of us and why it's so
Speaker 1: necessary to continue the fight, it will be worth it
Speaker 1: no matter the outcome. And that attitude also makes it
Speaker 1: more likely that we will win. So I understand that
Speaker 1: though there's a few steps there and throwing a lot
Speaker 1: at you here on our first day back, but this
Speaker 1: is where we are heading into, into a challenging time
Speaker 1: here where there are some very powerful forces that are
Speaker 1: all united in a raid against us, that are really
Speaker 1: seeking to undo the Trump Trump policies, but even beyond that,
Speaker 1: that are very much seeking to destroy once and for
Speaker 1: all the GOP approach that we've seen under Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: and it's up to us to keep it going. You're
Speaker 1: in this is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Donny
Speaker 1: is freaking gone, So he flushed it down the toilet.
Speaker 1: I definitely ecle mess that it was. This is a
Speaker 1: little half I like saying that. Letricity m I'm glad
Speaker 1: I brought two bottles of this. Oh my god, yeah, alright, alright,
Speaker 1: oh my god. Like that's how I felt when I
Speaker 1: saw Mayor Deblasio dancing. Just now, what do you I
Speaker 1: just don't need to see that. At the beginning of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one. Do something with this city, honestly, get
Speaker 1: it together. Andy Cohen, who's a Bravo host, having some
Speaker 1: fun there and speaking some some inebriated truths about New
Speaker 1: York City, specifically, I mean the the Deblasio awkwardly dancing
Speaker 1: in the time squad that was essentially blocked off or
Speaker 1: shut down for everybody else. But this is it, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is he. It was his nero fiddling while Rome
Speaker 1: burns moment. But in this case, it's New York City.
Speaker 1: He's destroying this place. I know a lot of you
Speaker 1: don't live here. We probably I don't know, I'd guess one,
Speaker 1: maybe a twentieth of the audience. Maybe we got five
Speaker 1: percent of our listeners in New York something like that,
Speaker 1: So I know a lot of you don't live here,
Speaker 1: but it's indicative of what's happening in a lot of
Speaker 1: other places across the country too. California is the other
Speaker 1: great example of this, but there are other states as well.
Speaker 1: I think people are increasingly gonna be leaving Illinois. I
Speaker 1: think people are gonna realize if Democrat control becomes more
Speaker 1: more locked in in Georgia, that's going to make Georgia
Speaker 1: a much less attractive place to be for a whole
Speaker 1: lot of reasons. But the Blue states are hemorrhaging people,
Speaker 1: and so what's gonna happen now You're gonna see a
Speaker 1: swinging of the pendulum toward You're going to see a
Speaker 1: swing of the pendulum toward federal control in a lot
Speaker 1: of ways, so that the federal government is going to
Speaker 1: want to tax people more and then funnel money back
Speaker 1: to these blue states right there. They don't want to
Speaker 1: let you escape bad Democrat policies. You know, New York
Speaker 1: and California are states that are failing, as they're not
Speaker 1: failed states in the sort of nation state term. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I'm not pretending that you know New York or California,
Speaker 1: Are you know Syria or Somalia in the midst of
Speaker 1: a collapse. But they are failing as US states, and
Speaker 1: the policies behind them are clearly the reason for all this.
Speaker 1: And yet what you're going to see is the federal
Speaker 1: government's going to come in and try to try to
Speaker 1: patch all that up by saying, Okay, you can leave
Speaker 1: New York for Florida, but you're gonna pay so much
Speaker 1: in federal taxes and we're gonna give that money back
Speaker 1: to New York. Anyway, Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: show past. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the
Speaker 1: I heard radio app before wherever you get your podcasts
Speaker 1: like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some
Speaker 1: freedom coast to coast. It's time for Roll Call. Roll
Speaker 1: Call everybody, Facebook, dot Com, Slashbucks, Exton, Team Bucket, iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot Com producer Mark Buddy you all. You all refreshed
Speaker 1: and good to go and ready here I am. I'm refreshed.
Speaker 1: I'm not as tired and grumpy as I was a
Speaker 1: couple of weeks ago. Very nice as good, very nice.
Speaker 1: How long do you think this is the last I
Speaker 1: don't know, a couple of days. Hopefully by next week.
Speaker 1: I'll be back tomorrow. Anything anything notable for you and
Speaker 1: missus Mark. Over the holiday, we had a couple of
Speaker 1: people over for New Years for her birthday. That was fun.
Speaker 1: Watch a lot of TV. That's basically what we did
Speaker 1: the whole time. Okay, well, what are some of the
Speaker 1: best things you saw on watch? Uh? Definitely the top
Speaker 1: show I'd say was The Flight Attendant. It's an HBO
Speaker 1: Max exclusive. You know who Kaylee Kuoko is do the
Speaker 1: blonde girl from The Big Bang Theory. Okay, she's in this.
Speaker 1: It's a murder mystery miniseries. Fantastic that's on HBO Max.
Speaker 1: We actual watch the Challenger documentary. Those were the two
Speaker 1: two ones that I enjoyed the most least. Okay, I
Speaker 1: think I need to watch the Challenger document It was
Speaker 1: very especially for me who had no idea this had
Speaker 1: happened because I wasn't born yet. It was very interesting
Speaker 1: and informative. I'll have to check this out. I'll have
Speaker 1: to check this out for sure. I was in Florida's
Speaker 1: you know, so I was really just trying to get
Speaker 1: sunshine and fresh air, which I did get a lot
Speaker 1: of and man, it is tough coming back to this gray,
Speaker 1: depressing ice box of the Try State right now. Yeah,
Speaker 1: some sun sounds absolutely amazing right now. Mark, it was
Speaker 1: eighty degrees when I left yesterday. I arrived in New
Speaker 1: York City, it was raining and thirty something. It was
Speaker 1: quite quite a shock to the system. That's always the
Speaker 1: worst when you come back from a tropical vacation, especially
Speaker 1: if you come back to a cold weather environment. Well,
Speaker 1: I hope everybody listening had tod If you were able
Speaker 1: to get some holiday time, you had a great one,
Speaker 1: a RESTful, relaxing one. I was doing. I did a
Speaker 1: lot of reading about the Punic Wars, and I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna do a Shield High Hannibal podcast. I got
Speaker 1: to finish the we're just gonna start releasing them. We're
Speaker 1: kind of holding them, Mark, where we're gonna start releasing
Speaker 1: them now, because it looks like that's just gonna be
Speaker 1: the best way. So we've got a multipart one already done.
Speaker 1: I'm going to record part too soon. Then we've got
Speaker 1: the Punic Wars podcast. I got a lot of plans,
Speaker 1: so reading about some history on the beach with the
Speaker 1: snow princess and producer Mark. Guess who's now thirty nine
Speaker 1: years young, mister Sexton. I'm guessing this guy, this guy,
Speaker 1: mister Sexton, thirty nine years young. It's crazy, I know,
Speaker 1: just one year until the big Buck Sexton birthday bash.
Speaker 1: Forty Man, what do you do at forty? That's just whoa?
Speaker 1: That's that's you're You're definitely an adult at forty, you
Speaker 1: know you're you're a fully. I think you're definitely an
Speaker 1: adult at thirty. That's probably true. You're definitely not at
Speaker 1: like twenty two, twenty two, you're like an overgrown kid.
Speaker 1: You know, twenty two you're not really quite in full
Speaker 1: adults stay. I don't care what the law says. You're
Speaker 1: not in full adult status as a person. But you
Speaker 1: get to be forty and you're like, WHOA, that's yeah,
Speaker 1: you know you're you're there, buddy, So what are you again?
Speaker 1: How old are you? I'm about to be twenty eight
Speaker 1: in April? Look at producer Mark is a young and liz.
Speaker 1: This guy, this guy's a decade younger than be folks.
Speaker 1: Why he knows all the all the hip tunes and
Speaker 1: all the cool stuff. I don't though, like I'll put
Speaker 1: on a Today's Hits playlist and I have no idea
Speaker 1: any of the songs. I really am turning into a
Speaker 1: grumpy old get off my long guy because all the
Speaker 1: music that's it all sounds kind of the same to me.
Speaker 1: They all have these sort of beat tracks now that
Speaker 1: it's all just it all sounds the same to me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's like I can't even whatever happened
Speaker 1: to rock and roll, whatever whatever happened to music that
Speaker 1: you hear and you're like, ah, this is so creative
Speaker 1: and it speaks to me. It's just it's all overproduced.
Speaker 1: I know, people get so mad at me, but it's true.
Speaker 1: It's all overproduced nonsense. So I mean, I know I'm
Speaker 1: out of touch when I'm watching a show with my
Speaker 1: wife and I go, who is that? Is that a
Speaker 1: famous actress? And she goes, that's Reese Witherspoon. Oh wow, Yeah,
Speaker 1: So I'm definitely out of touch. I also watched some
Speaker 1: of Cobra Kai season three, which has started out now,
Speaker 1: and I've really been a Cobra Kai fan, but I'm
Speaker 1: a little worried that it's kind of go. You know,
Speaker 1: Mandalorian season two, I didn't think was as good as
Speaker 1: it needed to be. Cobra Kai season three. I'm sort of,
Speaker 1: you know, people aren't really executing it. At a time
Speaker 1: when we're all sort of locked at home, I just
Speaker 1: feel like, come on, you know, I'm beginning to think
Speaker 1: it's you. What do you mean? Because I've seen everywhere
Speaker 1: everyone raving about Cobra Christ season three, and then Buck
Speaker 1: goes it's terrible. Well, I know, I didn't say it's terrible.
Speaker 1: That's not see that's not fair. It's just not as
Speaker 1: good as the other ones. He's definitely going downhill. That's
Speaker 1: why I think it's you. I think people just get
Speaker 1: excited about these things. I also, are you gonna watch
Speaker 1: The Wonder Woman nineteen eighty four? I already did? What
Speaker 1: do you think? It wasn't as the first one was
Speaker 1: much better? This one was? He was ah right, Well,
Speaker 1: obviously gonna say producer Mark likes his his comic book movies,
Speaker 1: So if he's saying it's a he's being charitable, all right,
Speaker 1: because I've seen people say that it's like the most
Speaker 1: boring thing they've ever seen. So, I mean, there were
Speaker 1: some very boring moments. There were some fine moments. But
Speaker 1: I just expected a lot more from a sequel to
Speaker 1: a movie that I held to a higher standard because
Speaker 1: the first one was so good. The first one was good.
Speaker 1: I even I liked the first one. I thought the
Speaker 1: first one was very watchable. For him, you don't like anything,
Speaker 1: and I don't like anything, so I gotta say that
Speaker 1: was that was that? And uh, all right, So you
Speaker 1: know it's down in Florida, Bruce Mark, I will say,
Speaker 1: you know, the Freedom of Hunt, the Freedom Hut, Florida
Speaker 1: is getting closer all the time. It's getting closer all
Speaker 1: the time. Dude. We just got to figure out whe's
Speaker 1: where's it gonna be. You're gonna go to Panhandle, you know,
Speaker 1: with with more of my people, or are we gonna
Speaker 1: go down to Miami and where all the libs are?
Speaker 1: But it's very beautiful. I mean, it's it's great down there.
Speaker 1: So if it's up to my grandparents in law, it'll
Speaker 1: be the South Florida area. Yeah, yeah, I'll tell you this,
Speaker 1: the the South Beach. So I stayed in South Beach
Speaker 1: the whole week, right on the beach in South Beach,
Speaker 1: and I saw Stool Presidente by the way at my hotel.
Speaker 1: Did you meet him, No, because he's dude. I'm cool.
Speaker 1: He's on vacation. I'm on vacation. I'm with my girlfriend.
Speaker 1: We're being cool, you know what I mean. But I
Speaker 1: didn't want to say anything. I didn't I didn't bother.
Speaker 1: But he was definitely there. It's funny because you know,
Speaker 1: I saw him like, I think that's him. Then I
Speaker 1: heard his voice that, Oh that's definitely you know when
Speaker 1: you when you see when you have something like that.
Speaker 1: I don't know him, I just know his work. So
Speaker 1: when you see something like that, and especially for me,
Speaker 1: it's actually the voice is the real, the real giveaway.
Speaker 1: Oh and and I'm One night we had dinner at
Speaker 1: this uh, this Greek place outdoors in South Beach and
Speaker 1: it was like this very sort of classic Greek family
Speaker 1: restaurant where you know, it's just they're playing the loud
Speaker 1: Greek music and they got kind of an outdoor area
Speaker 1: as a fun place and bringing oh like IV, you know,
Speaker 1: we bring you m mousaka, we bring you the lamb chop,
Speaker 1: we bring you you know, they bring all these things up.
Speaker 1: And and I'm looking at my brother. I was there.
Speaker 1: My two brothers were also down there separately for me celebrated.
Speaker 1: They helped celebrate my birthday and my girlfriend Snow Princess
Speaker 1: down there and today is the Snow Princess's birthday, So
Speaker 1: happy birthday, snow Princess. You're a fantastic girlfriend. And uh,
Speaker 1: you know, her name is actually Deborah for those who
Speaker 1: have been wondering this whole time, So she's a real
Speaker 1: person with a real name. A few people from the
Speaker 1: media world got to meet her because they were down there,
Speaker 1: so there's now further proof that she exists. But anyway,
Speaker 1: we were We're down there at this Greek restaurant and
Speaker 1: my brother sees a guy and he goes, do you
Speaker 1: know who that is sitting at the bar? And I,
Speaker 1: I know, I have no idea that it is. And
Speaker 1: he goes, that is the guy who plays Johnny Tapia,
Speaker 1: the bad guy in Bad Boys Too, And U Snow
Speaker 1: Princess said to him, we really like your work, or
Speaker 1: really think you do a great job, because he was exit,
Speaker 1: have you seen Bad Boys Too? Yeah? Of course, yeah
Speaker 1: he's Johnny Tapia. You don't tell you another guy? Yeah yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: kind of long hair. You know. He's also in the
Speaker 1: movie Blow with super famous pirates. The Caribbean guy with
Speaker 1: Johnny Depp. He's in Blow with Johnny Depp. He's his partner.
Speaker 1: I don't remember the guy's name even, but we know
Speaker 1: him from this. We told him and he was very nice.
Speaker 1: He said thank you, thank you very much. You know,
Speaker 1: he's a very sort of squave guy. His name is
Speaker 1: Jordy Mola. Yeah. Yeah, he was very but he was cool.
Speaker 1: Apparently he hangs out this Greek restaurant. It's like in
Speaker 1: his day. He hangs out like all the time. It's
Speaker 1: like his spot and uh, and he's very cool. I
Speaker 1: always appreciate this. He's cool with people that's saying you know,
Speaker 1: oh man, I like your stuff or whatever. So we
Speaker 1: did say you know the he's but I felt like
Speaker 1: with him, I do not even know the guy's name.
Speaker 1: He would appreciate it, whereas I feel like stool presidente.
Speaker 1: The guy's on Vaca. You know what I'm saying. He's
Speaker 1: on Vaca. I'm not he's on the beach. I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna be like going, Oh. I think we followed each
Speaker 1: other on Twitter or I don't even know if I
Speaker 1: follow if he follows me on Twitter, but I think
Speaker 1: I follow him on Twitter and oh, I think we followed.
Speaker 1: You know what, you don't wanna be that guy, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. I mean you could have tried
Speaker 1: to get on his podcast, you know, just saying well
Speaker 1: show promotion. That would have been a good idea. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's why you call me in these situations. Yeah, good call.
Speaker 1: All right, your thoughts now, roll call coming up. You're in.
Speaker 1: This is the Bucket Show podcast, all right. Kicking us
Speaker 1: off with the first roll call of the new year,
Speaker 1: we get t J. Buck Let's talk about how the
Speaker 1: House Republicans acqu asced to another Pelosi speakership. They could
Speaker 1: have really coordinated something that would have blown up her chances,
Speaker 1: but apparently they did not have the motivation or the
Speaker 1: fortitwo to capitalize either way. I'm afraid their inability to
Speaker 1: fight on this front maybe a premonition of what's to
Speaker 1: come in the next two to four years. If their
Speaker 1: pushback against the Dems is just good old fashioned partisan
Speaker 1: rancor with little to offer an actual policy advancement and
Speaker 1: are not willing to think outside of the box to
Speaker 1: make things happen, that I don't think we're going to
Speaker 1: see the House flipped in twenty twenty two. TJ. There
Speaker 1: is going to be a lot of people pretending that
Speaker 1: they're holding the line when really they're just looking for
Speaker 1: sound bites and want to go on Fox News, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. Members of Congress that are doing that.
Speaker 1: There's gonna be a lot of that. Be ready for that,
Speaker 1: be prepared for that. That's a reality. That's said. We're
Speaker 1: also on the precipice of being out of power in
Speaker 1: the House, the Senate, and the presidency. Now. I hope
Speaker 1: we win these Georgia Center races, don't get me wrong,
Speaker 1: and it's very possible we'll get at least one, if
Speaker 1: not both of them. But if we get, if we
Speaker 1: get shut out, there's going to be a lot of
Speaker 1: just trying to make the case to the American people.
Speaker 1: There's not that many procedural blocks. There's not that much
Speaker 1: we can do to stop the machinery of the Democrats
Speaker 1: from kind of rolling over us. We might get steamrolled
Speaker 1: on some of this stuff. So that's why making the case,
Speaker 1: making the argument, appealing to principle that is still shared
Speaker 1: by enough Americans, and fortunately not enough Democrats, but enough
Speaker 1: Americans that we can find some common ground even outside
Speaker 1: of Trump and Trump supporters. Chris, hey Buck, I'm sure
Speaker 1: you've talked about it, but the real tragedy about the
Speaker 1: whole COVID pandemic is the negative effect that's having on
Speaker 1: all of our personal relationships. I've in masks shamed plenty
Speaker 1: of times while outdoors that it never bothers me, but
Speaker 1: to get it from our friends and families that we
Speaker 1: care and love about is something else. They've now pitted
Speaker 1: us all against each other, in some cases to the
Speaker 1: point of no return, and it really is a sad
Speaker 1: thing to watch and do experience. What's even more frustrating
Speaker 1: is when those same people aren't even willing or wanting
Speaker 1: to understand, read, or research the things that we've been
Speaker 1: seeing for ourselves and also learning from you. Chris, I
Speaker 1: hear you, and and I know that is very that's
Speaker 1: very real, and these are these are challenges that we
Speaker 1: all face right now. I mean, I can tell you
Speaker 1: I was down in Florida with some friends and one
Speaker 1: female friend was, you know, made some comment about how
Speaker 1: she gets yelled at by her family members when or
Speaker 1: by by her family members when she's on zoom with
Speaker 1: them not wearing a mask, and I kind of laughed,
Speaker 1: and I said, why would you be on why would
Speaker 1: you wear a mask over zoom? That's electronic, that's this
Speaker 1: can't you know you're not? Let's well, but they they
Speaker 1: feel like, wherever I am, I probably should be masked
Speaker 1: up anyway because it'll make me safer. And I kind
Speaker 1: of laugh, and then she said, well, you're wearing a
Speaker 1: mask because we were in a inside of an elevator
Speaker 1: in a building in Miami, and I look at it.
Speaker 1: I didn't want to get up, but I want to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think this is ridiculous. I can't walk into this
Speaker 1: building without one on. They will go up to me
Speaker 1: and say you're not welcome here. Go ah, so what
Speaker 1: am I gonna do? But you see, that's that's the
Speaker 1: way it is. They mandate compliance, and then when you
Speaker 1: try to say, it's like we're all guilty. We're all
Speaker 1: a part of this madness, even if we don't want
Speaker 1: to be, because they mandate your compliance. And then they say, well,
Speaker 1: you're wearing a mask because well, look let me walk it.
Speaker 1: If they would let me walk into stores in New
Speaker 1: York City right now, and I need to do things
Speaker 1: like buy food, I need to go to my office
Speaker 1: and do my TV show if they would let me
Speaker 1: do that without wearing a mask. If it was up
Speaker 1: to my choice, I would not wear a mask at
Speaker 1: any of these places, full stop, Nope, no mask wearing.
Speaker 1: But I don't have that option, and they have the
Speaker 1: force of government on their side. So what's the point.
Speaker 1: This is where we are. And I was a non
Speaker 1: comply in my own building, except it got to the
Speaker 1: point where everyone was complaining about hundreds of people live
Speaker 1: in my building. Me one other guy. Only two people
Speaker 1: in my very large apartment building, not a large apartment unfortunately,
Speaker 1: but large apartment building in New York City. Only only
Speaker 1: two people that were and this was over the summer.
Speaker 1: There is basically no real COVID risk in New York
Speaker 1: City to speak of, to reasonably, you know, healthy people,
Speaker 1: A very few COVID cases of the city over the
Speaker 1: summer in the city. And yet I was getting complaints
Speaker 1: lodged regularly with management. I mean, I don't want to
Speaker 1: be evicted. I don't want to be kicked out of
Speaker 1: my home. But that's what you face, So yes, it is.
Speaker 1: It is pitting us against each other. And also say,
Speaker 1: you know, I sat down at a brunch place in
Speaker 1: Miami and I try to be patient with people around
Speaker 1: me and everything else. But I sat down. I'm not kidding.
Speaker 1: I sit down and there's a a guy who's there
Speaker 1: with his with his maybe ten year old son and
Speaker 1: his wife. And look, I you always show respect in
Speaker 1: front of another person's family, and you never, you know,
Speaker 1: I know, you never go to you never tell a
Speaker 1: kid who's not your kid to do something like be
Speaker 1: quiet or whatever. Right you never used to be adults
Speaker 1: speak to adults and your play. So I said, excuse me, sir,
Speaker 1: could you could you? Could you ask him to stop?
Speaker 1: He had his son sitting there at a table and
Speaker 1: just his ten year old son perfectly, you know, normal
Speaker 1: ten year old son that just blowing into a whistle
Speaker 1: like a coach on a football team, just sitting there
Speaker 1: at at this is at a at a lunch at
Speaker 1: a restaurant. Okay, he's sitting at a table, screeching into
Speaker 1: his whistle, just whoooooop poop. And I said, excuse me, sir,
Speaker 1: could you ask your son to just for you know,
Speaker 1: while I'm sitting here with you, and the guy, you know,
Speaker 1: made a big thing of it and everything, and now
Speaker 1: you know, he escalated to the point where I'm like, buddy,
Speaker 1: you know, this is not this is not good. You know,
Speaker 1: I had to raise the voice a little bit. Everything
Speaker 1: else I didn't want to raise a voice. I did
Speaker 1: not curse. I would not curse in front of children.
Speaker 1: I do not obviously, I would never uh, you know,
Speaker 1: escalate on any kind of that way. But you know,
Speaker 1: people can't act like savages. And I'm I know we're
Speaker 1: all under a lot of stress into rest right now
Speaker 1: from COVID and everything else, but this is there's still
Speaker 1: basic consideration for your fellow human beings in public accommodations
Speaker 1: that should that should be maintained. And you know, I
Speaker 1: asked politely. I asked the adult. I asked the you know,
Speaker 1: the guy man to man, I did not raise my voice,
Speaker 1: and he wanted to call you know, his whole thing
Speaker 1: was that he was going to tell him to stop.
Speaker 1: It wasn't necessary for me to ask him to tell
Speaker 1: the kid to stop. And I'm like, well, no, I'm
Speaker 1: not going to sit here for ten more minutes while
Speaker 1: you decide when when I've had enough whistling. Remember not
Speaker 1: mouth whistling through an actual metal whistle, as if this
Speaker 1: is like a toy that should anyway. You know this
Speaker 1: is but but it was really a reminder to me
Speaker 1: that people are frayed right now, there's ten but we
Speaker 1: all have to be responsible. You don't get to act
Speaker 1: like a savage. You can't be a barbarian and undermined
Speaker 1: civilization because we're all under tension. We're honored together anyway.
Speaker 1: That guy was a jerky, was wrong. That's it for today.
Speaker 1: Honored to be back with your team, shields high.