WEBVTT - Elon Musk's Fraud Trial and Ryan Cohen Best on Alibaba

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde at Broomberg's world headquarters in New York

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and them D Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Technology coming up the funding secured fraud trial. You know,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Mask could lose billions in court over his infamous tweet.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Jury selection is underway over an investor lawsuit after Musk

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>claimed he had funding to take Tesla private all that

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. And Ryan Cohen's latest bet on Ali

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Barber risks a clash with Beijing. We look into his

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>requests and investor activism in China, plus tenure and Hinge

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think users are willing to cough up big bucks. We're

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>talking up to five dollars per month for an elite

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>membership subscription on dating apps. Or we're going to have

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>fun with that one, as you did on social media

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when we took a poll of your thoughts on it.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>But first and form, as Elon Musk said to me,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>what star witness and a jury trial that started tuesday

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco Federal court as he mentioned, and it's

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>over his infamous tweets just all that time ago, four

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half years ago. To be is precise about

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a plan staying eavy maker private with quote funding secured,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who makes Peter Blumberg joins us to get us up

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to speed with basically who's likely to win here, Peter,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because they're gonna be going out to it, and we

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know Elon Musk quite likes a bit of a fight. Well,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he does, and it's it's really unusual for a case

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>like this securities fraud trial brought by UH private investors

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>as a class action too, it's unlikely to sort to

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>go to trial in the first place. Usually they settle

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much money at stake, and in this

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>case there there's billions of dollars on the line. But

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>as you say, Musk is always up for a fight,

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and in this case he's had a really unusual disadvantage

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>because the judge ruled months ago that the tweets were false,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and the judge is going to tell that to the

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>jury at the get go. There's still other things that

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the jury has to decide, and it could still be

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>resolved in Musk's favor, but it's definitely a disadvantage for

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>him going into this. I think let's talk about mechanics.

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I As you know, Pec, you've been my editor on

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>more than one occasion covering these kind of blow by

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>blow trials. But the jury's key here and so are

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics. So we're going through jury selection right now,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and not a surprise, some of the potential jurors had

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>issues of Elon Musk. Remember Elon must tried to move

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this trial away from San Francisco because he argued there

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was bias among the jury pool. But this isn't going

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to happen quickly, and Elon Musk is going to be

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a star witness to walk us through what happens from here.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Right Well, they're they're getting close to selecting a jury,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've been very carefully questioning the jurors about their

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>views and whether they can commit to being fair and impartial.

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course the lawyers on both sides uh get

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to uh speak up and dismiss jurors

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that they don't feel comfortable with. But there's a feeling

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to reach a consensus before the end

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of the day and pick a jury. And then we've

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>got about a two and a half week trial where

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we will hear from a variety of witnesses beyond Musk himself,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>including some of the high finance people who were involved

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in some of the behind the scenes talks about funding

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>this transaction, as well as UH some professor types expert

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>witnesses who are gonna talk to the jury about their

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>theories of how the tweets may have influenced UH investors

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to make trades and also to talk about UH what

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of damage this did too, and bardsters and how

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>much money they should collect. Page thank you for getting

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>us up to feed. It's going to run for a

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>little while. Let's think at least until every first. Meanwhile, Apple,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it just rolled out it's new products. Have you spotted

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that ed has a new Apple products on them today?

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, but we digress from various broken phones and

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>we go back to the high end MacBook Pro, the

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>laptops as well as the Mac Mini desks that they've

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just been announced today. Let's see what all the fuss

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is all about, bing legs, Mark gam and they haven't announced,

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but they've gone on sale. Right, Mom, What do we

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>know about these products that you hadn't already broken in

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the past. Yes, So, the new MacBook Pro and the

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>new Mac Minie those were introduced today. They're available for

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>pre order on Apple's website and they start shipping on January,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>so just in about a week from now. Now these

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are marginal upgrades. They look identical to the previous models.

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>The Mac Minie last rolled out in the first Mac

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to get the M one chip part of the transition

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>away from Intel. The Mac Pro less updated at the

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>end of one Now why are these so significant, Well,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they introduced the new generation of Apple's chips. So the

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Mac Minie gets the same M two chip launched in

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the mat Book Air and the low end thirteen inch

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Maco Pro last year, but it also gets the first

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>M two Pro chip that adds a little bit more

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>horsepower on both the CPU and the GPU side. So

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>the CPUs the chip that is for the main performance,

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the overall speed of the computer, while the GPU handles

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>graphics and video editing and stuff of that nature. Now,

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the MacBook Pro also gets that same M two pro

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>chip in the Mac Mini, but also a more advanced

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>chip called the M to max, which essentially doubles the

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of horsepower you get on the graphics side. So

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that's really a high end machine for video editors, programmers,

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>engineers and such that really need the most horse power

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get in a laptop. What Caroline was alluding

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to Mark is this weekend, I dropped my phone and

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it smashed, and now I face a choice of whether

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade or Wait. You and I talk about this

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>behind closed doors all the time. Anyway, we digress. What

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook alluded to in a tweet was Apple silicon right,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you're just talking about it there that the emphasis Apples

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>had not just on supply chain but controlling its I

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>P controlling its technology. What I'm confused about is I

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that this latest gen of Mac was supposed to

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>come out last year. Was there a delay? What happened?

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So there was a delay. So the M two line

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>first started rolling out in last year. It started to

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>launch actually at the end of July. There was a

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>delay back then because of the manufacturing facilities in China.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>They all got shut down for about a month. That

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>delayed the rollout of the MacBook Air In the MacBook probe, that,

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>in addition to other factors regarding the chip shortage and

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the overall needs to allocate more manufacturing to more pressing

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>products like the iPhones and the iPads last year and

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the Apple watches, meant that something had to give in

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what gave was this was this new map book Pro

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Mac Mini Those were originally supposed to roll

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>out this past October. Alright, Bloomberg's Mark German always bringing

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>us the latest headlines and gadgets from the world of Apple.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Now Microsoft plans to cut jobs and a number of

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>engineering divisions as early as Wednesday. That, according to a

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg source, is unclear how many of the two hundred

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand workers will be affected, and it is the third

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs since July of last year. Microsoft, which

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>declined to comment, has also eliminated open positions and paused

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>hirings in many departments chat GPT, and it is still

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in the headlines, and this time because Microsoft's putting the

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>tool to use right this after the tech John we

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>already know reportedly as mulling an additional ten billion dollar

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>investment in chatch epts creator open Ai. But just get

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>us up to speed with what Microsoft's overall plans are. Yeah,

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this was an interesting and curiously times blog post from

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the company, partly because Davos is going on and you

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>know how things work over in Davos, but also because

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of how fresh that reporting was around them boosting their

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>funding into open Ai. Right, they've already invested a billion

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nineteen. But simply they're going to take

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>open aies tools and bring them into the Azure Cloud platform. Actually,

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>if we flip up the boards, we can get some

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>detail on that in some limited capacity. He Since Microsoft

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>has often offered a very small group of its Azure

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>clients the ability to use open ai tools if they

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have their own tools hosted in Asual Cloud, that all

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds very niche, but frankly so we put if you're

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a company that hosts your own tools on the Asual

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Cloud platform, you have now access to use GPT three

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>point five dally for example. And now they're making that

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>more accessible. They're opening it up to a wide wider

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>range of customers. Why do we care? When we were

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>asking when that news came around about the ten billion

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.719
<v Speaker 1>dollar potential investment, what's in it? For Microsoft? There is

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emphasis on being their search engine, right,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>how could chat GPT in particularly improve that platform? But

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>read Dina Basses reporting on the Bloomberg Tunel Bloomberg dot com,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>there are other use cases as well about how the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>language models and the underlying artificial intelligence could improve office

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, and teams might stuff teams as well. So

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting development that are now being a

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more open about, although there was still a

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>lot that they did not say in that blog post. Yeah,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more questions and answers is always the way, but let's

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>put more questions to one. Michael Dancy now his managing

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>partner over at Compound, has a number of investments actually

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>an AI and machine learning startups and two around million

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets and the management. Michael, great to catch

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>up with you and give us the iteration, the scale,

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the applications you're most excited about for something like chat

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>GPT or generative AI. Yeah, I think for chat GPT specifically,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>search is probably the thing that gets everyone really excited

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on a first order. You can think about how existential

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that is to Google and how they are kind of

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>economic model works. I think as you start to see

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>more and more of these use cases has become more

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>emergent and more professional already in areas that start off

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>as needing kind of inspiration and move towards needing n

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>percent perfection and eventually make their way all the way

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of plus. You can think of like legal

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>as an exam ample, um. And then in those middle

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>areas you can think of areas like biology, material discovery,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>things like that, as well as a bunch of other

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>enterprise software use cases. So we really think this is

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>something that's interesting across a bunch of different industries and

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to cut into a bunch of different companies

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of supposed modes over time. A lot of hype

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and actually a lot of handwringing around some of the

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ethics around it all. Michael, is that developing simultaneously with

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the innovation you worried about basically the rules of regulations,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the steering of the road not being formed quickly enough. Um.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>I think with all emergent technologies, especially when they get

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the type of adoption that's been rampant for chat GPT,

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you'd see this concern around can we roll this out properly,

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>which is ironic as Opening Eye was originally built around

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this idea of deploying AI in a kind of safe manner. UM.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't worry about it as much. I think there's

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of open questions around kind of artists attribution,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>around kind of fair right usage of different types of data,

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>where if you're pulling from a different sources, a bunch

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of different sources. Should you need to cite those sources,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but in general, I think that the value continually outstrips

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the the downsides, and we really should focus

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>on the the optimistic version of these technologies. What are

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>you surprised as somebody tracking the space between the time

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that reports came out, Microsoft was thinking about boosting its

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>investment in open ai and then last night when a

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>blog post comes out talking about how they're going to

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>incorporate the underlying technology into their own platforms. Is somebody

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that knows how these deals work and also what the

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>utility is. What's your read on the news announcements. I

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's just a continual um you know. I just

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>continually am impressed by Microsoft over years now, and I

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think they see the strategic asset that having these kind

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of foundation models and large language models implemented into their

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>products can be and also we can allow them to

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially leap frog competitors. And I think what you're going

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to see is um as we all know a lot

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of other large companies that are figuring out what are

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>they going to do? Google is the most notable one

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>sideline I think they have bigger regulatory headwinds and so

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they are being very very careful about this. But I

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>think all of us knew the scale of people there

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that care about these problems that are could have very

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>interested in figuring out, you know, what are the ways

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in which we can disrupt ourselves and or disrupt our

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest competitors. And for Microsoft, it's always been about disrupting

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>competitors and specifically doing it from the enterprise layer. And

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're going to see is that Microsoft's

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>ambitions are going to continue to expand far outside of

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>just enterprise software, and I think that's where people should

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>be maybe less surprised over the next twenty four months. Michael,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming there are some parallels between the experience you're

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>having at the moment, particularly in your inbox and mining

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Carolines that since this story took off, you know, lots

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of emails come across about startops were king in the

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>field of AI. It's hard to discern and distinguish the

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of those players that have genuine promise, those that

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have something unique about them, that have a you know,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a strong underlying technology or i P. Is that your

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>experience so you're getting pitches, you people seeking investment from you,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying, God, I don't know what is real

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world of AI and what's not. Yeah, someone

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who has spent you know, the better part of the

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>eight years and AI and also in similar time, my

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>time in crypto from I'm used to these kind of

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hype cycles and people adding burbiage, whether it's Web three

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or now AI to their UM, you know, to their pitch.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that you have to kind of understand what

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>are the core special skills or special sources of these

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>founders and entrepreneurs. Are they products centric? Are they technology centric?

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Are they distribution centric? And I think really most of

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>these teams are not technology centric and kind of you're

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not at the bleeding edge of machine learning artificial intelligence.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not there, then you have to be

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>elite on the product side. And so I think what

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see is both a lot of people that

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>pitch AI and never even get there, but also much

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>people that integrate you know, Opening Eye, a p I

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>S or other types of companies APIs and build products

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that UM take up quite quickly, but are kind of

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>suffering from death by a thousand cuts are suffering by

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>having no real modes in these businesses. I think, is

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you brought up Google and I think back to a

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>UK startup, deep Mind, that it first purchased, and the

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>focus that the UK had in artificial intelligence. Where in

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the world are these companies getting built at the moment,

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Because we seem to be very US centric about it

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at this moment in time, I actually think the UK

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most interesting places in the world

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>for artificial intelligence today. I think it's the U S.

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's Canada and Toronto Waterloo and the UK um and

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Europe has a few other disparate areas, but the concentration

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of talent in those places is pretty obvious. And I

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think the best part really for the UK specifically, were

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>investors in a company called wave Ai, which is a

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>self driving company using a very advanced type of machine

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>learning to get their cards to drive themselves. What we're

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing now, how is a kind of renaissance of news

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>machine learning researchers no longer wanting to be in research

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or academic settings, and so I think a lot of

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>people in Europe, specifically in London specifically, we're in deep

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Mind kind of really enjoying publishing these amazing paper as,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>whether as Alpha Fold or a bunch of others. And

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>now they're seeing chat GPT hit five million people on

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days, and we're saying, you know, it's

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been cool sitting around and working on technology for years,

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's time to go and build alright. Michael Densi,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>managing partner Compound, trying to discern what has promised what

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>does not in the world of AI. Now coming up,

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the energy crisis in Europe, the potential recession in the US.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there still some light at the end of the tunnel?

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Ib and Vice chairman Gary Cone seems to think so.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>More in that next, this is Bloomberg over in Davos,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where the World Economic Forum is on the way. Some

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>tech leaders are actually optimistic about the economy. IBM's vice

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>chairman Gary Cone, for example, suppose to Bloomberg's David Weston

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about that and the energy crisis over in Europe, have

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a listen. I thought that the risk to Germany was

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>really the energy situation going into the winter, to the

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>extent that we had a very cold winter and they

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>had to start rationing energy and they had to cut

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>back industrial Germany to keep people warm. I felt that

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a really tough situation. Potentially, we're now deep

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>enough into the winter and we sort of know where

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>we are, we know what's in reserve and storage. I

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think Germany is going to get through the winter very

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>fairly easily with energy and I think they're going to

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to power through this. So I'm in agreement with

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chancellor. The biggest economy in Europe. Does I say

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>about Europe in general? Every recession in Europe, Well, I

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think Europe is going to model through this. The UK

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not as clear, but it's it's it's it's not gonna

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be easy. You know, We've still got pretty pretty high

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation in Europe. It's it's it's a difficult situation. You know,

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, when we raise interest rates and

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we can all handle it that the interest rate picture

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, the leaguard has to deal with this is

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different. You know, Germany can handle higher

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates as you start raising interest rates, Southern Europe

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>has a lot more difficulty with the reality of what's

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>going on. You're director of the National Economic Council, so

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you followed the US aunty pretty closely, But about the

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>United States, what are the chances of hercession? I talked

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>earlier today with Jane Fraser City she thinks second half,

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's quite possible. You know, it's interesting. We've been around

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Davos and everyone here is negative. So the first of

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>all that that tells me we should be positive. But

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it a dinner last night with a

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>lot a lot of CEOs, global CEOs, and you know,

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>most of them raised their hands. They're pretty negative about

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Then when they talked about their business, they

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>were all pretty positive about their business. So I think

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks everyone else has a problem. My my opinion

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is I'm pretty optimistic. That doesn't mean we're having a

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>bullish economy. What I'm optimistic about is I think we

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>can muddle through where we are. I think the Feds

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>getting to the end of their tightening cycle. We may

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have a couple more twenty five basis point increases from

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. We top out around five percent in FED

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>funds here. But I think we've all factored that factor

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that into the situation, and I feel like we're in

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a relatively good situation. The consumer is okay, they're not great,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>We're starting to see a few cracks. Um, the economy

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>is slowing down. But I think we're going to model

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>through modeling through the IBMS Vice chair Gary Cone over

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there in Davos. Meanwhile, let's talk about crypto for a moment,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>because shares of the bank silver Gate, they spike today

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as an outline steps like shutting assets to whether the

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ft X collapse. That's off the posting in one million

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>loss earlier this month. Remember look, Silvergate is a lending

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on digital asset industry what large, and it's trying

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to navigate the fallout from f t X, which pronto

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>clients to draw down more than seven billion dollars in deposits.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>The company has said it's got four point six billion

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in cash on hand. Welcome back to blom Bow Technology.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hyde in New York and I'm Ed Ludlow

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco now. And it's a pretty air case

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>actually of an activist targeting if I'm in a Chinese company. Now,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>his mean stock investor who actually means stock royalty, Ryan Cohen,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>He's taking a state get this in Ali Baba, and

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 1>he wants the e commerce giant to buy back more

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>shares Funnily enough, if I could put Cohen maybe even

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>at allders with China's own president, Sheinping, whose administration has

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of wiped out growth at Ali Baba and other

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies. But it's a returning of the guard.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Promose Yuhuan Chan is with us who's been reporting on this,

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and and actually first and foremost we know his power

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>over game Stop, over bed Bath and beyond, but he

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hasn't had much power over the share price movement of

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba on the day. Yeah, it's interesting because if

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you'll look at the share at the store market reaction,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba is actually down around one point six percent

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>alongways all the Chinese A d R stocks during the

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>U S session. It only managed to go up slightly

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>overnight in Hong Kong when the news initial accoun out.

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's very different from the huge rally we saw

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the mean stock rail where he cuts on. So

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it appoints to something about the bigger questions

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing from invester. Is there question is because this

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is a Chinese company, and ask for an activist, how

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>much real impact and the influence he could have on

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the board, because you know, First, his steak is pretty

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>small thinking about Olive blah blah as this huge tech

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>giant of more than three hundred billion market cab in

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 1>his stake his positions like hundreds of millions. So that's

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>limited power, right. And also I think what's tricky and

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>more interesting is Beijing's perspective is Beijing is taking off

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this so called golden shears. So it's a minority stake,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>but well allowed the Chinese government um to you know,

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>have the rights or the control over or influence on

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the board or sway in important decisions. So from that perspective,

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the activists voice could ultimately be undermined, you know,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>if they are at odds right. And so I think

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that also points to the overall background is vary. We're

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in China, you see a real activists to push just

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Asian investor is also not much for Lola with that

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>concept or you know, is that kind of compare. Yeah,

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it was only last Thursday that the reports came out

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that that Chinese government entities we're taking so called golden

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>shares not just value Barba, but ten cent as well.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And activism is more rare, right when it comes to

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>China tech mainland Chinese companies. I guess my question is

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you strip out all the noise and his demands, what

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>is the outlook for Ali Barber. You know there was

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit more optimism at the end of two because

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a pullback on COVID zero, a bit more

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>supportive of e commerce stocks. Yeah, that's right, and so

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>one hour the agree is right now it's actually for

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the activists or as an investor, uh, it's a pretty

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>good entrying point because many would argument now we are

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>at an inflection point for China equities, right, like you mentioned,

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the lots of the China reopening trades

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is raising hope and also on the regulator reference, we

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>are seeing more and war science space during is finally

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>easing away from the regular crackdown and that's like the

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 1>initial trigger that caused the brutal cell off in Ali Baba. Right,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>So now you know people are more conveyced the wars

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is behind, the hewing is over, and hopefully with this

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>influential investors engagement it well lived the sentiments or you know,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>bring more attention from the retail traders um in the US.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 1>And right, what about Ali Baba buying Pakistan stock. I mean,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>given them still about six and the discounted versus the

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>highs of twenty dwying with Ali Baba's management with without

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Ko and think it's not a bad idea. Yeah,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And actually Ali Baba has already started to

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>do so from last year and has expanded shareholder share

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>buy back program, So it's underway. I think, just romant

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to see if like they will speed up the or

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>ramp up their effort. But it's something like already on

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the table. If you're Ryan Cohen and you're trying to

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>convince Ali Barber's board or the Chinese government of change,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>which demand do you think is most likely? That's a

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult question, you shim, But which demand is he pushing foremost?

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I what sink here? Share buy back is probably the

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>right aspect, just given that years she was sitting on

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>piles of cash and how to better use that part

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of capital is a you know, a like strategy. I

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think the board needs to be considered, um, you know,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thoroughly fascinating. I mean what Ali Baba is about fifty

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>times the size the game stops, so it's quite a

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>different ballpart that he's playing in now. You should Chen.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We thank you sir so much for saying a top

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the news. We might we've had a little bit of

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>news in the world of autos. Yeah, it was an

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting early start talking to GM because Chevrolet just unveiled

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the first ever electrified corvette. Okay, electrified kind of seventy

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>years after the first corvette concept was unveiled in New

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>York City. Actually, this is a hybrid zero to sixty

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and two point five seconds, not a plug in hybrid though,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I caught up with GM's president Mark Royce about

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>why they put a battery of sorts in their sports

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>car and what this fits in with GM's transition to electric.

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen, the car itself is is so different, um,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and it really is something that takes advantage of the

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>whole mill engine architecture in getting power to the front

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and rear wheels and makes it really an all weather machine.

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're very proud of it. It's an interestant engineering

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Marvel and uh, you know, today is a big day

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for the whole team. This is the fastest ever production corvette.

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>The electric or electrified propulsion system is a big part

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, right In going back to basics, this is

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>not a plug in hybrid. There are two separate propulsion

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>systems that that work in conjunction with one another. My question,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess Mark, is is this a sign that the

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Corvette customer is not ready to go full electric, to

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>go full battery electric. That's a great question. Um, I

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>think you know, the Corvette customer is ever changing, and

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>so is the car, and so i'd say, you know,

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>this is the next step in the evolution of getting Um,

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred sixty horse power in the front

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and four on a ninety horse power in the rear,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>all to the ground, and so you know, it's a

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>little faster, a little quicker, I should say, than there's

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>zero six at two and a half seconds, But um,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you know it's it's very different. And so when you

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>drive the car from a vehicle dynamic standpoint, it's at

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>home on the track, it's at home, you know, um,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>every day, as Corvettes usually are on on all streets.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is the next step. And you know, as

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, the Corvette buyer is a were changing and

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this is a pretty exciting time for us.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's a question of whether someone's

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>ready or not. You know, I think people are when

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 1>they look at the car and they discover, um, the

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>integration of the power as you mentioned that, and then

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know how we're doing it, and the sophistication and

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the integration of things like stealth mode and the launch itself. Uh,

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and then the like I said, the vehicle dynamics on

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the track when you actually have you know, um, the

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>front wheels actually pulling and and doing things that you know,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular sate doesn't do. So I think it's just

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the national evolution in propulsion performance, vehicle dynamics and sophistication. Mark,

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>let's get an update on on the electrification plan more broadly,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, there's a lot of excitement and

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>quite clearly a book of demand for the Lyric and

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the hummery V. But you know from bloom Bags reporting

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>that the output still seems quite low for those two vehicles.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>What what's the situation there? Well, you know, we we've

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been off a lot in terms of having

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>um lower volume vehicles until our cell plants, our own

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>cell plants, our ultium cell plants are brought online. So

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we just brought our first plant online, you know, for

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the cells of all those vehicles in Largetown, Ohio. The

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>next one on a volume basis comes from spring Hill,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>which is built just adjacent to the Lyrics. So, um,

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we also you know this is these are all new

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle platforms. They're not retrofit architectures with batteries. So

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>some of our competitors have done so, um, we are

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this right. We're doing it for the next twenty years.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing it for the next two years. And

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see those cell plants come online

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and high volume, which are is happening right now, and

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see the output of the first Ultium vehicles

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>increased quite dramatically over the next year. GM President up early.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll around like great conversation. And meanwhile, more news in

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the auto world for you. Uber and Hurts they're joining

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>forces for expansion plans across Europe and Hurts it's going

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to be making as many as twenty five thousand electric

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>vehicles available to Uber drivers in European capital cities. By

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty thousand Uber drivers have rented a Tesla through

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Hurt since those two companies partner in last October. So

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Uber hurts expansion. It's gonna begin in London this month. Yeah,

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>fascinating talking about demand, asking where they're going to get

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>all those evs from anyway, coming up a new bill

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK could put tech executives behind bars. This

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg meta Platforms President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>says the company is in a period of transition, but

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>also in the very very early stages of that transition

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to the metaverse. That says, growing legislation and scrutiny is

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>placed on social media apps around the world. Clerk spoke

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg tv is David Weston in Davos about the

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>transition and the threat of other tech giants like TikTok

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>owner bike Dance take a lesson. HM. So, I think

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you see this huge pendulum swing from the kind of

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>tech euphoria of the past where tech could do no wrong.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that the era of the Arab Spring, where

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>all things bright and beautiful were held to be produced

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>by tech, and now, of course the pendulum has swung

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty kind of pretty dramatically the opposite direction, and everything

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that is bad, whether it's an election or a referendum

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>outcome that people don't like or individual distresses is ascribed

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to social media, and I think part of part of

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of finding a resting place for that pendulum, because

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>extreme optimism and extreme pessimism of both as foolish as

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he is each other, of course, involves regulation. There are

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>issues like data privacy, content rules, data portability, the rules

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of of of how social media platform should operate during

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a lection and time and so on. All of those

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>are rules that should be set not by technologists, not

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>by engineers on the West Coast, but by but by legislature,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>by legislators elected by voters. And I think that's the

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>process you're seeing. It's most advanced in Europe, but you're

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing that you're seeing that debate in DC as well.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not producing legislation as much as as as occurs,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>but also in Brussels, in London, in in in Australia.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing this move towards regulation. I suspect some of

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it won't work very well and won't stand the test

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of time, and other bits of regulation will will make

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sense and will stand the test of time. I suspect

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons you have your important position in

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>meta is you have been on both sides I mean,

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you have been elected to parliament, you have been Deputy

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister in the United Kingdom, so you've seen the

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>government side of it, and now you're seeing the private

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sector side of as well. I'm not saying there's any

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>right answer. I'm not asking for what the regulation is,

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but give some principles from your experience on both sides

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. What is the basic principles you think that

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>should be followed? Well, I think I think the secret

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is in that name, the sort of the best recipes,

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's in that word principles. I think where things

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>go wrong is when legislators who are not engineers, they're

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not technologists. They don't know how algorithms work, or how

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>AI works and so on and so forth. And given

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that technology evolves so rapidly, I think where things go

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong is where legislators try and impose some sort of

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>static condition on on technology that moves very fast. I

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>think where where legislation and regulation makes more senses when

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's based on some principles which are sort of evergreen

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>principles that can that can apply to different technology, and too,

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>technologies that evolve over time, so to you know, look

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>at these big companies like Metal, like Google, like Twitter,

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like Apple, and so on, look at their systems, hold

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>their systems to account, but don't try and kind of

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>micromanage every bit of content or every change in in

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in you know, every every change in the code that

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is used to produce the product. I think that's the

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the fundamental lesson that I've certainly kind of observed

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>so far as we sit here in domagistrates with one

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of the big issues not just endeavors, but for the

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>globe right now, is some differences and systems. Yeah, I

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>mean there are difference between Europe and the United States

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and regularly learning tech for example, but fundamentally the systems

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are saying. China is quite different. They have a different

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>approach to social media, including other things. Can we have

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a world in which those are integrated or do they

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 1>have to essentially bifurkate. Do's China have to go it's

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>away in social media and the West goat it's way.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they already have bifurcated. We don't have a

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a global internet. People keep talking about

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the global Internet. It doesn't exist. You have a Chinese Internet,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which by its own on its own terms is highly successful.

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's walled off from the rest of the world.

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's subject to a great deal of internal surveillance.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't it doesn't welcome. You know, for instance,

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is not allowed to operate in China, whilst of

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>calls Chinese social media companies are allowed to operate in

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the States, tik Tak Taxica. How big a risk is

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that a national security risk? Because many in Washington think

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it really is. Look, I'll leave that to the national

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>security experts. What I would observe though, to your earlier question,

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>which is you know that there isn't a level playing field.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese social media companies are able to operate in both

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in China and in Europe and America. We're able to

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>operate in American Europe, but not in China. So you know,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>at the moment there's an imbalance imbalance there, which doesn't

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think in the long run make a make a

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of sense. And they and it's partly because

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the the approach to data, the approach to privacy is

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just very very different culturally and legally and politically in

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>China than it is elsewhere. And then there are slightly

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>more subtle, narrower differences between the EU and the US

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I think one of the interesting dynamics

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you have is that you have the European Union now

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>leading on new rules, need leading on new regulation, but

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>not leading technologically or commercially. You don't have in all

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the big tech giants are either in the United States

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or China. And yet it's Europe that doesn't have the

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>big tech giants that is inventing the rules for them.

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very interesting jigsaw where I would I

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would actually add a fourth element. I think India. I

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>think you have Europe, America, China and India. Those are

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the four great, big sort of jigsaw pieces that make

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>up how the the Internet operates in the modern world.

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Meta Platforms President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg. They're having

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a very global and a very legislation focused conversation there.

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about global legislation. Let's talk about the UK,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, where Nick Clegg used to be our deputy

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister, because it could be on the verge of

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>passing legislation. Social media bosses behind bars if they break

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>certain rules. Now Prime Minister is she soonak intends to

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>sign the Online Safety Bill with criminal sanctions for tech

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>executives that the bill aims to protect anyone under eighteen

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>from harmful content. That means, if regulators find that a

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>platform has been pushing teams to see content and citing violence, harassment,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>misinformation for example, some executives could face up to two

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>years behind bars. The Online Safety Bill is expected to

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be signed. It's early as spring head, and this is

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>after what was a big backlash from his own Conservative

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Party members, the backbenches as they're known, wanting to take

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>out a certain amendment that would remove any criminal liability.

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>And what's so interesting is basically taking a leaf out

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of Ireland's book, right because they've already sort of got

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this precedent set. You know, all social media players have

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about this issue for years, and I think

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>metas are really interesting example in like of what the

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>UK is doing, because go back to two thousand nineteen

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg's op ed in the Washington Post, we need new

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>rules for the Internet meta. Then Facebook shouldn't be the

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ones to form those rules. Then you have the Meta

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Oversight Board, an independent body brought in. It's always been

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that someone else should act. Well, now they are acting

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is actually a pretty sort of severe course

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of action the UK appears to be taking. It's interesting.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the Irish legislation, for example, it does have

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 1>checks before that isn't suddenly you're deemed legally culpable and

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>you're put behind MARS. I mean you get apparently a

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>series of checks, including if they do not comply with

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>warning notices from the country as Online Safety Commissioner. And

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact these rules are already applied to certain industries

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. Think of builders for example, the construction companies.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Banks even do have a layer of accountability up to

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the highest executives. It's just going to be interesting how

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of navigated, both legally and in practice. Yeah,

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and social media is just as societally important of those

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>things that you just mentioned, so it will be slow moving.

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Can you put a price on love well

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>hinge the dating a phone by match? I think so

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be offering a new subscription level at

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty to sixty a month. The idea go after gen

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>z app users who are quote highly motivated datas and

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>in return offer them enhanced features that boosts their profile

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and their chances of finding a match. But it's quite

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>a jump from Hinges existing thirty five dollar a month

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>offering now match teas the new Hinged here in their

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>latest earnings reports, saying it would be targeted it quote

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the most intention users who have a higher quote propensity

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay fifty to sixty dollars a month? Can you

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>predifice some love? Can you? Did you? I mean, I

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 1>know that you're a man who's well, many have found

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>love right through for certain dating applications, And would you,

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, spend six thousand a year? But it is

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of an amazing way to be amplifying your margin

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>at this particular moment. Right, but these are two different products, right,

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have Hinge sixty dollars a month palatable, You've

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 1>then got Tinder thinking about five hundred dollars a month. Well,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we asked the audience, right, what do they think? I

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>think the results are pretty well they speak for themselves. Caroline.

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean we threw in sort of are you sitting

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on the sense on the fence or do you think

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this is all ridiculous? And it seems as though it's

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>all ridiculous. Romance is dead? And think that seven percent

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 1>said yes, sign me up. I feel as though this

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is trying to take on those sort of elitist, elite

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>dating apps where you do pay an round, but you

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get perhaps a little bit more of a specific targeted audience.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you at least right full disclosure? I met my

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>wife on Hinge all those years ago. Had I known

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>them what I know now, cough up the cash. Probably

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do it? They work, That does it. For this edition

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology Wednesday, we're going to be talking all

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>things crypto and Bitcoin's bullish run and d y d

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>x he d Yeah, don't forget. There's so much recap

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast on the terminal Apple. I heart Spotify. This

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg