WEBVTT - How Mindsets Shape Reality w/ Dr. Alia Crum

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that what meditation does, what mindfulness does, is

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it helps you realize that you have mindsets, that the world,

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>your beliefs aren't just sort of a reflection of reality

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as it is, that like could be this way or

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>could be that way, and you kind of like sit

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>back and you sort of see the kind of absurdity

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of it all. So that's part of it. But then

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what right, then you need to go live your life,

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like then you need to get back in the game.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And so it's you know, it's stepping back in and

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>say now I'm going to live my life and I'm

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>going to choose to view stress as enhancing.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to the Psychology Podcast, where we explore

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 2>the depths of human potential. I'm your host, doctor Scott

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Barry Kaufman, a cognitive scientist and Columbia professor. On this episode,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 2>we have my dear friend, doctor Ali Crumb, whose research

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>focuses on how changes in subjective mindsets, the lenses through

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>which information is perceived, organized, and interpreted, can alter objective

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>reality through behavioral, psychological, and physiological mechanisms. Her work is

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>in part inspired by research on the placebo effect, a

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>remarkable and consistent demonstration of the ability of the mindset

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to elicit healing properties in the body. She is interested

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 2>in understanding how mindsets affect important outcomes outside the realm

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>of medicine, in the debates of behavioral health and organizational behavior.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 2>More specifically, she aims to understand how mindsets can be

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>consciously and deliberately changed through intervention to affect organizational and

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>individual performance, physiological and psychological well being, and interpersonal effectiveness.

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 2>This chat was very sentimental to me personally. I met

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>doctor Crumb in graduate school at Yale, and we connected immediately.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I remember fondly our deep chats, and I'm so proud

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>to see her become such a superstar in the field.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I hope you find this chat just as informative as

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I did. So, without further ado, I bring you doctor

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Ali Crumb. Oh my god, Allie, how do you look

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same?

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look exactly the same. It's so good

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to see you.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 2>So good to see you too. I mean like you're

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 2>exactly like you know Yale dance. What was some party, jon,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I think it must be something.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 2>The memory have of you in my mind is like

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same. Anyway. Congratulations on keeping your health and

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>vitality in youth, and for your amazing, amazing ascendency in

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the field of psychology, successes and research and everything. It's

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>been such a delight and honor to watch you sore.

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh. Well I feel the same about you,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott at like seeing you brings me right back to

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>New Haven. You know, I remember going to your dissertation.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember meeting your mom right outside of the Hall

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of Graduate Studies, and you know, just to we were

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just you know, we were so such kids then, but

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you know, I think both of us.

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I was drawn to you because I got a sense

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that this was your passion, right, this was your calling,

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and you weren't doing it to get some credentials. You

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>were doing it because you knew it mattered. So it's

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>been fun to watch from afar and listen to all

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>your work.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And likewise, thanks, thanks. Well let's let's let's back up

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.279
<v Speaker 2>before we even met. Let's back up to your undergraduate

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard Hall. You were a TA for a very

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>special and popular course and happiness by Tall. Is that correct?

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Tall Ben Shahar changed my life.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell me a little bit about that? Experience

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and uh, and then how it like influenced you for

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the research you've continued to do for sure.

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think in order to understand the effect

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that that class had on me, it's important to share

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about my childhood. So I grew up

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in a household. My father was a teacher of transcendental meditation.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>He was a master of the art of aiketo. He

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>started a foundation called Windstar Foundation with John Denver, the

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>singer songwriter, where they would host speakers retreats where people

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>would come basically to study in the mind body arts.

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>And so I grew up going to all these retreats.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, my summers were filled going to meditation and

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>aiketo seminars and retreats. And so when I got to Harvard,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I realized, you know, fairly quickly, that that was not

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a normal upbringing, that that wasn't the status quo for

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the other students there. And you know, for a while

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I was a little bit lost. I was feeling, you know,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sense of imposter syndrome, a sense of like, you know,

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>I've learned a lot, but I haven't learned all they know.

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And terms of you know, the academics but it wasn't

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>until I met Tall, Benjahar, Ellen Langer, and Harrington that

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I realized that, you know, even though my childhood was unique,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it was it was actually being researched at the time

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>from a neuroscientific standpoint. You know, the rise of positive

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>psychology was happening. The nerve excuse me, the neuroscience of

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>meditation was just beginning, and people were starting to take

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this work really seriously from a scientific standpoint. So that class,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it didn't necessarily like open my mind to

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>things that I hadn't learned or heard of before, but

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it made me feel at home. It made me feel

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like I belong.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 2>So you did some you contributed to some seminal research

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 2>even as an undergrad in Harvard with I think UH

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 2>paved the way for a career on mindsets and stress.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 2>So can you talk about some of that seminal research.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the original research that I did. You know, I

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned I had sort of been I had experienced the

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>power of the mind to affect the body, both through

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>watching my dad teach meditation, teach aikito, and the martial arts.

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Also as an athlete, I was an elite gymnast for

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a number of years and then I was a Division

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one athlete at Harvard. I was an ice hockey player,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I was taking a class actually with Ellen Langer

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and she said, you know, you know,

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I came back all sweaty from a practice

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to lab or class or something, and she was like, ah,

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, exercise, that's just a placebo And I was

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, wait, what, you know, what are you

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about? And you know, but I caught my attention,

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think at the time, I was

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>really struggling with this sense, this question of like what

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is enough exercise? Like I was training two to three

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hours a day, and then I would like go work

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>out after practice even further. And it kind of got

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>my attention. I was like, what if it's all in

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>my head the benefits of what I'm doing? So I

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>started researching placebo effects. Actually, sequentially, Anne Harrington was teaching

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a class on the history of medicine and she made

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a comment one day in class that said, she said,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you know something like, you know, in many ways, studying

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the history of medicine is like studying the history of

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the placebo effect. And so these two things kind of

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>got in my head. Wow, you know, what is the

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>placebo effect? How strong is it? And I did a

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of research looking into that. And then the study

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen and I did was looking at hotel housekeepers.

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>We found that they were getting a lot of exercise

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but weren't aware of it. And what we found was

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if we could make them aware of that helped them

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to see not only are they getting above and beyond

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the Surgeon General's requirements, they are you know, they're probably

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>getting more exercise than most people in the United States.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>That that shift in mindset didn't just change how they felt,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but also had measurable changes on their blood pressure, their

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>body fat, their weight, and so forth. So that really

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>kicked it off for me.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's pretty revolutionary research, pretty revolutionary foundation.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Yeah. I think what it did was it

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it brought two fields together that hadn't been integrated before.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>There was all this work on behavioral health being you know,

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the modern medicine, right, we need to eat well, we

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>need to exercise, we need to stop stressing, we need

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to stop smoking, and it brought the research on placebo

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>response into that and said well, yeah, we do need

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to do all those things, but also we need to

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to our beliefs, to our mindsets, to how

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about these things.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And then when you got to Yale,

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>you worked on you continued this research. You published this

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 2>paper in twenty eleven called mind over Milkshakes, a classic

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>classic in the field. Mind over milkshakes not just nutrients

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>determine grellin? Is that? He said? Response, So can you

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 2>just tell you what is grelin? You know, and I

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>know it's related to hunger, but give me a little

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 2>more technical description, and you know, how does our mindset

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>affect that?

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, first of all, do you remember I think

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I asked you to read a draft of this paper

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>back in New Haven. Maybe it hadn't made it such

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>an impact yet, but.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>I remember two thousand and nine.

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Something like that. We were sitting at a restaurant somewhere

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in New Haven and I've given it to you to

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>read because I was struggling with how to frame it.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But you were really helpful.

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, isn't that funny?

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>It is funny. It's awful circle. But yeah, so this study,

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, this is my favorite study I've ever done.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It mostly because of how profoundly it changed my life

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as a result. So Grellin is a hunger hunger hormone.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Her medical experts call it the hunger hormone. It helps

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>regulate hunger and metabolism. So, you know, I don't know

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>what time it is. I think you're in New York,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so maybe you've already eaten lunch, but I haven't yet.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So my grellin levels are slowly rising, and the purpose

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of that is to send signals to my brain and

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>body that I need to seek out food. So rising

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>levels of grellin signal hunger. It also rising grellin slows metabolism,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just in case we don't get the food that we need.

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And then, theoretically, or at least you know, prior to

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the study, it had been assumed that in proportion to

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of salaries you consume, Grellen levels will drop.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So say I go out after we chat and I

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>have a giant hamburger and a milkshake, then my grell

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and levels will plummet. Step telling my brain, okay, you

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>can stop feeling hungry, stop searching out food, and I'm

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>going to rev up the metabolism to consume the food

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that you just ingested. So you know, actually, these these

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>gut peptides, these hunger hormones hadn't really been fully discovered

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>until the late nineteen nineties, and we're still just now

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what they do and how they work in concert.

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>But what we were interested in in this study was

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>does our body's physiological response, and in particular, our bodies

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>grell in response. Does that differ? Might that differ if

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we have different beliefs about the food that we're eating.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>So in that study, we worked with the Yale New

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Haven Hospital and we gave people well the exact same milkshake,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so it was about a three hundred and fifty calorie milkshake,

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and we either told them that it was six hundred

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and twenty calories high fat, high sugar, or one hundred

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and twenty calories one hundred and forty calories low fat,

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of sensible diet shake, and we had them hooked

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>up to an IV we were measuring grillen levels through

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>their bloodstream. And what we found was that even though

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the shakes were exactly the same, when people thought they

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>were consuming an indulgent shake, their body responded as if

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they had had more food. So the drop in grellin

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was about three times as great compared to when they

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they were consuming a sensible kind of low fat

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>diet shake.

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like a big effect statistically, can you like

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>subjectively describe what that difference is if that makes sense totally?

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>So well, First of all, the findings were signific get

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>important in the sense that no one had ever documented

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just any physiological change based on the belief, So that

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was one thing that was important. But the second reason

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>why this study was important was realizing actually the direction

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in which the belief had an effect. So I went

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>into this, remember like thinking, okay, placebo effects are basically,

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you think you're going to be healthy,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll have a healthy response. So I assumed that the

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>sensible shake, if you know, if it made any difference

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at all, that would be the better mindset to be in.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And what we found was exactly the exact opposite, right,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>assuming you want to maintain or lose weight. When if

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you're consuming something in the mindset that you're eating sensibly healthy,

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it conveys to the brain a sense of uh scarcity

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>or restraint, this sense of like I didn't eat enough.

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And what that does is it perpetuates grell In perpetuates

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the hunger signals, slows metabolism and so forth. So the

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>mindset of sensibility or restraint or scarcity actually counteracts the

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hard work that you might be doing, actually reducing your

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>colort intake. Does that make sense?

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>It does? But the effect you found of three times

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>less is that the equivalent of literally going from signaling

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>that it's time to eat versus like I don't feel

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>any hunger at all, or is it like just not

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 2>as strong or I guess I'm trying to like quant

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>qualify qualify it, not quantify it.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know. It was threefold greater compared to

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the sense.

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Definitely an important effect. It's definitely port effect.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But how much did that affect their subjective sense? And honestly,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I the subjective sense is less important than the physiological

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>sense important in this case. And I think everybody's different.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, I've since that time wanted

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to do my sort of dream study is you know,

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because I was just they were sitting in there for

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>two hours, right, we're measuring their response to the shake.

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, okay, how much does this really matter?

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know what if we could take somebody over

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the course of a month, right, and not only change

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>their diet, but change their beliefs about what they're eating.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they're starting a low carb diet or low

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>fat diet or whatever it is. But if they believe

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's enough, will that actually change weight, change their

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>body composition and so forth. But we haven't been able

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that because, as you can imagine, it's hard

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to deceive people for a long period of time, and

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't want to deceive them for a long period

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of time.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Hill, I want to take a moment to make a

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 2>few important announcements that I'm really excited about. As you

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 2>all know, I'm committed to helping people self actualize. In

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the service of that, I just had a new book

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>comount called Rise Above. Overcome a victim mindset, empower yourself

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>and realize your full potential. In this book, I offer

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a science backed toolkit to help you overcome your living

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 2>beliefs and take control of your life. Are you tired

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>of feeling helpless? This book will offer you hope, not

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>by identifying with the worst things that have happened to you,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 2>but by empowering you to tap into the best that

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>is within you. Rise Above is available wherever you get

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>your books. Are you a personal coach looking to take

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>your coaching to the next level. I'm also excited to

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>tell you there are Foundations of Self Actualization Coaching. Three

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>day immersive experience for coaches is back by popular demand.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Foundations of Self Actualization Coaching is a course offered to

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 2>enhance your coaching practice by offering you evidence based tools

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 2>and insights to equip you to more effectively help your

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>clients and walk their unique creative potential. You can learn

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 2>more about the course and register by going to Center

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 2>for Human Potential dot Com slash SAC. That's Center for

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Humanpotential dot Com slash s a C. Okay, now back

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 2>to the show. No, that's cool. That's really cool. Well,

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>you've done some really great extensions of this work. In

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirteen, you teamed up with Peter Salve, who was

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>he head of the Yale Graduate School at that time.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, he was I think Deane when we

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>started to work working together, and then provost when I left.

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Great, And this guy called Sean Aker was a

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 2>call author in this paper as well. But you're the

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 2>lead author. I want to state for the record, you're amazing,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Ali Crum, And this paper is rethinking stress the role

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 2>of mindsets in deterring the stress response. And so what

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about on this paper is you

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 2>developed a measure called the stressed mind the stress mindset measure.

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Can you give me I'd hate to put you on

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 2>the spot, but can you give me? Give me one

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 2>or two items like, how do I know if I

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>score high on this measure?

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course you love you love self report.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>I love psychometrics.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I do too, so we have that in common. So this, uh,

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the Stress Mindset Measure. The s MM asks questions like

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>experiencing stress enhances my performance and productivity. So do you

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>strongly you know? Do you disagree with that? Agree with that?

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Strongly agree with that experiencing stress depletes my health and vitality.

0:18:54.440 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That one is reverse scored experiencing stress. Yes, I think

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>we had a health and performance vitality. Oh, it enhances

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>my learning and growth. So we wanted to cover these

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of three dimensions health and vitality, learning and growth,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>performance and productivity.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And for the record, these items are you know if

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 2>you score high in this it's not the majority of

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>participants who tend to think this way, correct. I mean,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>most of us don't think when I say stress to

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 2>every person on the street, they don't think, oh, that's

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be improve my performance. So what percent what

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 2>were percentages and things?

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think our you know, we've studied this now

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in many different populations, It's been translated in many different languages,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and the average score is always almost always below the midpoint.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, categorically you would put that into the

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>belief that stress is debilitating. The only group at least

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that I've sampled in my life so far that is

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on average in the enhancing side of the scale over

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the midpoint are Navy seals. So and it makes sense, right,

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, these these are people who are literally choosing

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to go into some of the most stressful experiences you

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>could dream up, in part because they know they can

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>handle it and they know they'll they'll thrive under That

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>makes sense.

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm sure that like the whole West Point Cadet,

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, vibe is that you know when they come in.

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 2>And so you found this is so cool. You found

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that those who show higher on the scale showed moderate

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>cortisol reactivity and high desire for feedback under stress. Now

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not this is not normal, This is not the norm.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So explain, explain the really important implications of this kind

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 2>of these changes to cortisol and your desire for feedback

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>under stress.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, well, first of all, it's important to kind

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of take step back and understand what this measure is. Right. So,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the truth about stress is that it is

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a paradox. Right, There's lots of research showing that stress

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>can have damaging effects on our health, on our learning,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>on our growth, on our well being, and so forth.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you actually dive deeper into the literature, you

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>realize that you know, it's not all bad. And in fact,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the body's stress response was not designed to kill us, like,

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it was not designed to hold us back. It was

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>designed to help us rise to the occasion, to meet

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the demands we're faced with. In fact, Hanselier, who sort

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of you know, humorously called the father of stress, when

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>he first wrote about stress, he wrote about the stress

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>responses non specific, right, it's just the body's reaction to

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that it faces. And he also talked about

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just stress as only bad, but stress

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>as being both distress when it causes negative effects and

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>use stress when it actually helps the brain, body system, grow, learn, perform.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So we want to distinguish between kind of what is

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the true nature of stress, which is, like most things

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in life, a paradox, many types of outcomes are possible,

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and what we're interested in, which is our belief or mindset,

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the core assumption that we have about the nature of stress. Now,

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>if you probe somebody further, they might say, well, I

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>get that it could be good here, and da da dah.

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>They can get all nuanced in their thinking. But you know,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we when we operate, when we act in the world,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we are acting based on these default assumptions. Our first

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>inclination is going to be based on where on that

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>scale did we stake our claim on average, And so

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>there's variability in that. Even though on average most people

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are on the stress of debilitating side, there's variability in

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people's beliefs. And what we find is that that variability matters.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So people who believe hold the mindset that stress can

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be enhancing, they show more adaptive cortisal response and I'll

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about that in a second, and they also show

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>more willingness for feedback. And it makes sense, right if

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you think that stress is bad for you, and then

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>you're faced with something stressful in your life, how do

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you feel right now? Not only are you stressed because

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 1>something just happened, but now you're stressed about the stress,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're upset that you're stressed, and you're a little

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>depressed that you have to deal with the stress, and

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you're worried about, you know, the cardiovascular ramifications of this stress.

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So the mindset itself just made the stress worse. So

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>emotionally it changes. Motivationally, we also are influenced by our mindset.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you believe that stress is debilitating, that it's

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bad for you, that it's going to kill you, what

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are you motivated to do? You're motivated to either yeah,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to like get the hell out of there, like either

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pretend that this problem isn't there, you know that your

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend or girlfriend didn't just give you negative feedback, or

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to overcompensate, to overreact to like make sure this problem

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>goes away. So those two responses, either hyperactivity around the

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stress or you know, avoid and hypoactivity show up physiologically,

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>so either people freak out or they check out. And

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what we found is people who believe that stress can

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be enhancing. There's somewhere in the middle. They're like, Okay,

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to be dealing with this stress, but

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it's here, and the stress response is designed to serve me.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So what do I have to learn from this? How

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can I engage with this in an appropriate, thoughtful, useful way.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>What feedback do I actually need to hear? And that

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>shows up physiologically in you know, moderate levels of cortisol,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>which is important because most people get this wrong. They

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think cortisol is all bad, but actually, you know, cortisol

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is linked with attention, focus, engagement, right, So you want

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere in the middle with respect to cortisol.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a there's an old saying that goes,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>when you worry, you suffer twice, and you have to

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>be thinking that it's you know, you have the stress,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 2>but the whole avoidance and we should use the word fear,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>is that enhances. Yes, these reactions and these and these

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>these physiological responses that cause damage to your body quite frankly,

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and your mind. So in some ways it's like a

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 2>double whammy. You know, it's you have the stress itself

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>and then you also have the avoidance response. So it

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>just seems like the more you can have this stress,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 2>it's enhancing mindset, the more you're kind of like avoiding

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a double whammy. Does that make any sense totally?

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You know? And some of the work that I did

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>with Peter Salave and he coined the term emotional intelligence

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>back before Dan Goldman, yes, yeah, and David Caruso. But

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I remember Peter talking about, and

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>later Mark Brackett and others is this idea of dirty discomfort.

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So you have clean discomfort, which is like the stress

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or the fear or the sadness, and then you have

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>dirty discomfort, which are your judge ment and concerns about

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the discomfort, like I can't believe I'm feeling this way.

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be feeling this way. This is going to

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>be harmful for me and so forth, and so you know,

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it's nuanced, right. The goal is not to you know,

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>get rid of all negative feelings, right, It's to feel them,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but not make them doubly damaging, as you say, not

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>make them worse. Right, There's enough to learn from them,

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's important, I think, you know, to say with

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:35.239
<v Speaker 1>respect to this stress is enhancing mindset, is you know,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes people misunderstand that. They think, oh, that means that,

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you should seek out more stress in your life,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, no, like, if you care about

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>anything in life, you're going to experience stress surrounding it.

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know, the definition of stress, at least

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that I use is stress is the experience or anticipation

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of encountering challenges in your goal related efforts. That's super jargony,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, for all intensive purposes, what matters

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is that you only experience stress in domains that you

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>care about. Right, if I told you that Johnny was

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>failing school, you wouldn't really be stressed about that unless

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>you were Johnny or your son was Johnny, or you

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.880
<v Speaker 1>cared about the Johnnys of the world school. So we're

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna have stress in our life. You don't need to

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seek it out. A stress is enhancing mindset. Also doesn't

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that the stressor is a good thing. And I

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think you know you know this with all your work

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on trauma and your great book that you just wrote recently,

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, when you say you can rise above

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>right trauma, it doesn't mean that like the trauma was

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, like stress, the stressor is not a

0:28:55.440 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good thing, but going through it can lead to enhancing outcomes,

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and that mindset makes those outcomes more likely.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seems like a bedfellow of a cow Dlex

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>growth mindset, but applied to a different demean exactly.

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, Carol's work has been very inspirational. I think

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>her use of the term mindset to kind of define

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a core belief that we have about the nature of

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligence as fixed or malleable is just so profound and important.

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And what we're doing here is we're trying to you know,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>expand that. But it's different right now. The topic is

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>stress and the modifiers are you know, is stress enhancing

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or debilitating, not necessarily growth or fixed? Right, So it's

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we have mindsets about all sorts of things, and they

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>turns out they matter, They.

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Do matter, and we can, you know, get even nerdier.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 2>You proposed a metacognitive approach to mindset change. Just when

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 2>you thought it didn't get nerd enough, you create your

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 2>stress mindset scale. What is the metacognitive approach that you

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>published in twenty twenty three where you evaluate your rethink

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>stress of mindset intervention from twenty thirteen. Yeah, anyway, I'm good.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad we get to nerd out together, Scott.

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 2>It's been too long.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>We need a better term for this, but it's so crucial, right, So,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the truth of stress is a paradox our mindsets matter.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>If we know the goal is to get people to

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>adopt more of a stress is enhancing mindset because we

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>know that's useful for them, how do we do that?

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So one approach could be to just try to convince

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>them that that's the true mindset, right, Like, that's the

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>right way to think about stress. And in fact, we

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>did that in that early study with Peter Salave and

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Sean Aker. We worked with ubs bankers who were going

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>through layoffs after the two thousand and eight financial recession,

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And what we did was we gave them three minute

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>video clips that shared the science science of stress, anecdotes, etc.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But they were oriented towards one or the other of

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>these truths. So, you know, one group in the study

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>saw all the information that kind of reaffirmed how bad

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>stress is for you, and the other group saw all

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the information that showed that stress, you know, actually wasn't

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>designed to be that way. It was designed to support

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>your immune system. And narrow your your attention and ways

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that can support you. We found is over the course

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the week, just watching those videos did change their

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>mindset and it did have effects on their health and performance.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But I left that study feeling like, you know, that

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really ideal because it's not fully true, right, Like

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not lying to people. Everything that we put in

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>those films were you know, was based on evidence or

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a true anecdote, but it wasn't the full picture, right.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So then I was left with this question of how

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do we get people into the mindset that stress can

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be enhancing, not by kind of you know, you know,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to teach them or getting them to see that

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the true nature of stress, but by getting them

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to see that that mindset is useful. And so what

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we decided to do was to create an intervention where

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>people learned the true nature of stress. They learned all

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the whole messy story of stress. It can be the

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>worst thing for you, right, and some people really thrive

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and grow from stress. All of these things are true,

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and your mindset about it matters. It can shape your attention,

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it can shape your feelings, it can shape your motivation,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it can even change your body. So you choose, right, like,

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you want to choose to view stress? Right,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>do you want to view it as debilitating or do

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to view it as enhancing? So by meta mindset,

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what we mean by that is we inspire people to

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>adopt the mindset a particular mindset, such as the mindset

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that stress can be enhancing, not because they're manipulated into it,

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but because they choose consciously that that mindset is a

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>more useful one to have.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, so it's just like a flexible stress mindset, Yeah,

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 2>strategically flexible.

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's sort of like you know, I think that

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>what meditation does, what mindfulness does, is it helps you

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>realize that you have mindsets, that the world, your beliefs

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't just sort of a reflection of reality as it is,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that like could be this way or could be that way,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of like sit back and you sort

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>of see the kind of absurdity of it all. So

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. But then what, right, then you

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>need to go live your life, Like then you need

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to get back in the game. And so it's you know,

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it's stepping back in and say now I'm going to

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>live my life, and I'm going to choose to view

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>stress as enhancing.

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 3>It's mine. Okay, your piano, I don't know, but I

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 3>can beatbox.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>No. So I mean this is this, there's a whole

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 2>there's some extensions, so many offshoots of this. I mean,

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 2>there's some fascinating stuff found that you can change cancer mindsets.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, a brief mindset focused digital intervention was effective

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 2>at improving physical, social, emotional, and functional h r QO

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 2>L Okay, what does that mean?

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You gotta love jargon. Yeah, so you know, we did

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the stress mindset stuff that stuffs still ongoing so important

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>as you know. Sadly, well, we can come back to this.

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But I thought, you know, we would do this research

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and then everybody would learn about it, and then everybody

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>would have a stresses enhancing mindset.

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, sadly, you need to write that book.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm working on it. Yeah, But sadly, I feel like

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>our culture has even taken a step back in you know,

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 1>having this belief that stress is bad, all stress should

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be avoided, we should protect everyone from stress and so forth.

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But we can talk about that. The cancer work is

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really near and dear to my heart, this is work

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that I've done with Shan Zion, former grad student in

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the lab, Lydia Shapira, and others. Jonathan Barrack and we

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to understand what are mindsets that people have about cancer.

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, what we learned is that, you know,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like stress, there's you know, cancer is complicated. It doesn't

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>just have one effect on people's lives, but people have

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>mindsets about it. Three of the mindsets that we know

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 1>people hold are you know, either you view it as

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of an unmitigated catastrophe. My life as I knew

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it was over, Nothing will ever be the same. Why me,

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>poor me? You know, Yeah, the cancer is a catastrophe.

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But people can also view it more as something that's manageable. Right.

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>They have a mindset that, yeah, I'm diagnosed with cancer.

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>This is not what I would have hoped for. It's

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 1>not what I wanted, but I can manage this. I

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>can handle this. And there's a third mindset that we

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:21.439
<v Speaker 1>see actually quite frequently in people with cancer, and that

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>is that cancer can be an opportunity. So again, that

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you wanted it doesn't mean it's a good

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>thing in and of itself.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>Growth potential for postmatic.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Growth exactly the experience of going through cancer. Can yeah,

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>help you reorganize your priorities, help you, you know, deepen

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>your values, help your self actualize, help deepen your relationships,

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, unlike stress actually in the normal population,

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>when you look at people with cancer, this is actually

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong, right, And I think when you're really faced

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>with tough things, you kind of are forced to see

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the light, to see the silver linings. But here again

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of variability. And what we find is that interestingly,

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>these mindsets aren't correlated with the severity of cancer. So

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>you have people who have stage four metastasized cancer who

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>believe it's an opportunity, feel like it's manageable, and you

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>have people with stage one, you know, no big deal

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of cancers that feel like their whole life's over.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And here again these mindsets matter in shaping how people feel,

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>how they're motivated to engage with treatment, how their bodies

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>are responding physiologically, and what they pay attention to in

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the treatment. And the intervention that we designed is also

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a metacognitive strategy to changing people's mindsets. So you can imagine,

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't want to go in and say, hey,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you who just was diagnosed with cancer, you should think

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this way or this is the right We don't do that.

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>What we do is we showcase stories from former, you know,

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>people who have been formally diagnosed their cancer survivors talk

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 1>about the role of their mindsets in the cancer journey.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And they're not just the people who had great mindsets

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>for the start. They're people who initially felt like this

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was a catastrophe and then realize the impact of their mindsets,

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>chose more useful mindsets and reaped the benefit of doing that.

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So the intervention is watching others talk about their mindset,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and what we show in that study is that, you know,

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that intervention, which is a total of about an hour

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>long of documentary style films, changes mindset and that confers

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the benefit on health related quality of life. So health

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>related quality of life is, you know, basically, how well

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are you functioning? Are you getting up and doing the

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>things that you want to do? Are you you know,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about your relationships. Are you physiologically in

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of symptom sort of managing Okay, that's cool.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 2>There's another category of people that you might want to

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 2>consider in your further studies on the topic. There was

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>a woman who got a lot of press for the

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 2>way she handled this her cancer diagnosis. She was told

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.319
<v Speaker 2>that she had stage four cancer and maybe had two

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>years left to live, and she decided she was going

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 2>to completely surrender to it. Actually not. She said, I'm

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>not going to fight. I'm not going to fight a

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 2>battle with cancer. I'm going to enjoy my life for

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 2>two years and accept it. Except that I only have

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 2>two years left. And I just don't like you. You don't

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 2>hear that about that option often enough, you you find

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 2>like you're almost like feeling pressure to fight it to

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, oh yeah, what are you doing to fight it?

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing to you know, fight the battle

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>with cancer? Cancer? She's like, I don't want to fight

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the battle with cancer. I want to enjoy my life.

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 2>And uh, and so that's just it might be an

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 2>interesting if there's you can get word enough sample of

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 2>people like that.

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. I'm so glad you brought that up,

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's going from a place another place

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>where people mis interpret the work. You know, and you know,

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>having the mindset that cancer is an opportunity, your cancer

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is manageable, doesn't mean you're kind of happy about cancer.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It also doesn't mean you're sort of denying it. It

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't mean you're a hundred percent going to beat it, right,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just to get there. The first step is really

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>to acknowledge and accept the reality of your diagnosis. Yes,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's only when you do that that then you

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>can choose how you're going to handle that, how you're

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.359
<v Speaker 1>going to approach it. And that might mean going all

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in and getting the treat every single you know, treatment

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that you can, or it might mean you know, I

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that. I want to live out

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of my days, you know, doing something else.

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But you can only get there through acknowledging it and

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>through having a mindset that is useful.

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I want to shift a little bit to what

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 2>happens when you get information about yourself and how that

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>changes those actual things without you trying to change them.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 2>So that's a long witted way of talking about a

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 2>study that you were a co author on with Turnwald

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 2>at colleagues in twenty nineteen. Learning one's genetic risk changes

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:38.360
<v Speaker 2>physiologic physiology independent of actual genetic risk. I mean that's mindful.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's just so mind blowing to me. Okay,

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 2>because so many of us are able with twenty three

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 2>and meters, right, we're able to find out all this

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 2>information about our genetic risk estimates for this and that, Alzheimer's, cancer, obesity,

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of diseases. What did this study find about

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 2>just merely learning about that?

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this was such an interesting and fun study to run.

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>We got people into the study. Under the study guys

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were looking at how you know, personalized medicine,

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>how we could create sort of personalized fitness plans, and

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this was very believable. In the Stanford area, lots of

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff on genome mapping and personalized medicine were happening at

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the time, and we in particular were interested in one

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 1>gene called the CREB one gene, and that gene had

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>been linked with obesity and weight through exercise capacity pathways.

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>So people with the risk aalele of the CREB one

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>gene were essentially associated with less cardiovascular efficiency when they exercise,

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So you would run, you feel like not very good it,

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's sort of painful to run. And the

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>theory was that was linked with part of the reason

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 1>why these people had higher rates of obesity. What we

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>were interested in in the study was what do do

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>your beliefs about your genetic risk influence the physiological effects

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of that gene? Right, So not just you know, well,

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:30.959
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you know, twenty three meters was big,

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>lots of this genetic you know, genotyping was getting more

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and more you know common. And the theory was, I

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>think that if you got information about your risk for

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>certain things, that that would motivate you to you know,

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>compensate and engage in behaviors that would make you healthy.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And a meta analysis had been done to show basically

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that that just wasn't true at all, Like people would

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>being told they at risk for all these things and

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't motivate them to be any healthier. So

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting. But what we were interested in was

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>even more kind of fundamental, which was, if you believe

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that your genes make you bad at exercise, will that

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>actually will that just the belief.

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Will change the genes?

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Change, yeah, change the express the genes. Yeah. And so

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what we did was we this was also within subjects

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>study like the milkshake studies, so it was the same

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>people did the same VO two max test. It was

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a cardiovascular efficiency test. This was done at the Human

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Performance Lab run under Scott Delt and so we hooked

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>them up. We were literally measuring the amount of oxygen

0:45:50.440 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>they were intaking and how efficiently they were able to

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>convert it to carbon dioxide through their lungs. And we

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>did one exercise test, very stringent. It's sort of like

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a stress test, if you know, if you've ever done one,

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 1>or a VO two max test. And then we had

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 1>them do the exact same test one week later, but

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>before they did it, we gave them their genetic result.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>So we gave that on this very official looking pamphlet

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:24.839
<v Speaker 1>and we said, you know, we just want to give

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you some important information that we got from your genotype.

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And they looked at it and half were told they

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>were they had the risk allele, that they were the

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>people who were likely to have lower exercise efficiency, or

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they were told they had the protective allele, that they

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>had the good gene. Right like this, they had the

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>type of gene that made them good at exercise basically,

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we had them run again the exact same test.

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Now what was interesting about this is we had their

0:46:56.320 --> 0:47:01.759
<v Speaker 1>actual genotype too, and so we had their actual genotype,

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we randomized them to getting the information, so

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the information they got was randomly determined. So therefore we

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>can separate the effect of the actual gene on the

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>outcome and the perceived genetic risk on the outcome. And

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:23.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially what we found was the perceived genetic risk mattered.

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>When people thought they had the risk aaliele. They converted

0:47:27.080 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 1>oxygen into CO two in a far less efficient rate.

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:37.160
<v Speaker 1>They also, you know, felt hotter, more pain less, motivation,

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, all a lot of other effects as well.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But the physiological results were really interesting, and it was

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>fully shaped by belief, not their genetic risk.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Just to quarify some I'm understanding this methodology correctly, they

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 2>were given accurate information about their genetic risk, right. You

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 2>didn't have a condition where people were given because I'd

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 2>be interesting too, a condition where people were given them

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 2>opposite of.

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sorry, I didn't explain that, so people, yeah, no,

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.479
<v Speaker 1>this is good. So we had their actual genetic risk,

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>which is actually three types. You're either the risk allele,

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the protective allele, or the heterozygo, which is sort of

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle. And what we did was we

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>took each of those two three groups and we randomized

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 1>them to getting to being told they're either protected or

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at risk.

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 2>So it was actually accurate for everyone.

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Some were right, So people who were actually protected. Half

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>were being told they were protected and half are being

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>told exact opposite.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so then we can kind of we can

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 1>look at if you just compare the people who were

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 1>told they were at risk versus told they were protected,

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what their actual genetic risk was. Just that

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>information changed their exchange rate of carbon dioxide and oxygen

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and carbon dioxide.

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Changed it in a direction consistent with what they were told.

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that the idea exactly.

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the belief, the belief that you are you know,

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>your genes make you less efficient when you exercise protect

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>created that reality.

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 2>That's I mean, that's I just can't express enough how

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 2>my mind was when I read when I when I

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 2>read that paper. Yeah, it's amazing, and it's time to

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 2>be thinking of studies that I want to conduct, you know,

0:49:51.080 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 2>because there's the g WOSS approach is now starting to

0:49:56.400 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 2>show not great predictability, but that there's something there with

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>like predicting IQ for instance, and an academic achievement potential,

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, and it's you're statistically significant effects.

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 2>It's explaining maybe what like two to fifteen percent of

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the variants of the outcome. It's I mean, that's something.

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And so it makes me wonder, what if you start,

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 2>what if you tell people their risk for like IQ,

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 2>for instance, like high er will IQ? Does that actually

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:32.360
<v Speaker 2>alter the expression of the genes that the GOS studies

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 2>are starting to show are relevant. I just think that

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 2>would be such an interesting study and potentially controversial, I understand,

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:41.280
<v Speaker 2>but I'm just very curious.

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I love that idea and how far does

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it go? Right? Again, this was another one of those

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>studies where our effects were very temporary, right, in part

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was an experimental manipulation. We were deceiving them,

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>some of many of them about their genetics risk and

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that was important to do for the science, right, we

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't know otherwise. But you know, if you want to

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>do sort of a long term study of like, oh,

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>how does learning that you're you know, you're all the

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.760
<v Speaker 1>aggregate of your genes lead you to have high IQ

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and how might that affect you over decades? Right, that

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be really interesting, But we got to be careful

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 1>in how how we you know, glean that information as

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, these messages matter.

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 2>That's why I would want to do the studies. Is

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the way my mind was thinking about it is that

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 2>can help show I mean, in a way, this is a

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 2>modern day version of the Pygmalion effect. You know, this

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 2>is like a modern day fancy genetics update on that.

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, is is it a self fulfilling prophecy our

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 2>genetic is our genetic expression the way we think a

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 2>self fulfilling prophecy on our genetic expression. But you know

0:51:58.239 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 2>it's to me, it's still on the similar wi, you

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:02.240
<v Speaker 2>know totally.

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I had that same thought as you were sharing your ideas,

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, some of the reviewers on

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>our paper had a similar question, which is like, you know,

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>how important is it that this is genetic information? Like

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>if you know, what if it was just like family

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>history or you know, in the Pygmalion study it was

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the Harvard Aptitude test, like you know, at that time

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>that was really important information that you believed. And in

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the day of age we're living in, or at least

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were. I think we're changing slowly, but

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>genes are like every you know, there's something that's like, oh,

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just hardwired. Right. If your genes, you know, predispose

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you to something that's meaningful, that's real. But at the

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, that's just information, just like some

0:52:54.760 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>test or you know, your family history or otherwise.

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. Is that great? I want to end

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 2>this interview by discussing a very fruitful collaboration you've you've

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 2>got going with Jared Clifton at University of Pennsylvania. You

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 2>guys are quite the duo, him looking at beliefs about

0:53:17.160 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the world at large and you obviously having a very

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 2>illustrious career looking at beliefs and how it can affect physiology.

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mind meld look like? I saw

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 2>that you recently published a paper in the American Psychologists.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that right? Greece this year?

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That's right?

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's like a dream for psychologists to

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 2>publish in the American Psychologists. So congratulate. It's probably not

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 2>he's probably not.

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Your first international psychologist, but.

0:53:45.400 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. That was very American centric of

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 2>me to say that. Thank you for putting that out.

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 2>But have you have you been in the American Psychologists before?

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And tell me about this paper a little bit.

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, No, that was the first time. Yeah, and thank

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you for that. I do you know, I remember reading

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know the American Psychologists. It has like

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the picture of the psychologists. I remember reading articles from

0:54:07.920 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>some of my heroes and that. But yeah, I'm really

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about the partnership that I've started with Jared Clifton.

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I know you know him from Penn bok Hair similar

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Pen Roots. Jare is doing really critical work, I think,

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:30.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the beliefs that we hold, the mindsets we

0:54:30.480 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hold about the nature of the world as one big place.

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as just as I've extended Carol Dweck's

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>work from looking at your core beliefs about intelligence to

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at our core beliefs about other domains like stress

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or cancer, or exercise or diet or our genes. Right,

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>what Jar's doing is looking at what are our core

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:59.359
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about the world? Right, Like do you believe the

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:04.760
<v Speaker 1>world is dangerous or safe? Do you believe the world

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is abundant or scarce? Do you believe the world needs you?

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Scott Barry Kaufman or could it just live without you? Right?

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>These are again neither true or false, Right, or wrong.

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.919
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of evidence to support either side of these spectrums.

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Spectrum, but there's a lot of evidence that.

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The world needs you, Scott.

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 2>You say there's evidence for the world.

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, the world. I believe the world needs you.

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe the world needs me, right.

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I believe that's actually objectively true. Though that's where I'm

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 2>disagreeing with you, my men.

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>A mindset knows that it's not objectively true, but it

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is a mindset that serves me and keeps me motivated

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to do what I can to actually have that be true.

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, we did we got off on tangent there.

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, so Jare's work is was really methodologically

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 1>advanced because instead of just like coming up with, you know,

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the beliefs that he thought mattered about the world, he'd

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:17.200
<v Speaker 1>decided to take a systematic approach to uncovering what are

0:56:17.239 --> 0:56:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all the possible beliefs that people could hold about the

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>nature of the world. He looked at you know, many

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand tweets, He looked at all the great religious text

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:32.280
<v Speaker 1>philosophical texts, you know, surveys in different countries and so forth.

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:36.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think my contribution to that work

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 1>has been to kind of help define the type of

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 1>belief we're talking about here. So these aren't you know,

0:56:47.560 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>nuanced kind of you know, takes on the world that

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:56.480
<v Speaker 1>could could be falsified, like the world is flat or

0:56:57.120 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the world was made by God. Right, These

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:07.239
<v Speaker 1>are simple adjectival and evaluative beliefs about the nature of

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they tend to have these modifiers like

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fixed or malleable, it's enhancing or debilitating, it's abundant

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or scarce, these adjectives that characterize the essence of what

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the world is. And in that paper what was fun

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to write about with Jair is, you know, when it

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to the world, our beliefs are omnipresent, right, Why

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because we never leave the world, at least you and

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I haven't yet left the world. And so personality psychologists

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and social psychologists used to get in these epic debates

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>about like is it the person like is it their

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>personality that's shaping their behavior or is it the situation? Right,

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And obviously like the situation matters. You know, your level

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of introversion and quietness is going to differ if you're

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>in a movie theater or a party. But on the whole.

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether you're more extroverted, it's going to shape

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:10.520
<v Speaker 1>how talkative you are. But what jar and I talk

0:58:10.560 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>about in this paper is that personality as defined as

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is who you are on average across many different situations,

0:58:22.680 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is not. It's here too, also about a belief about

0:58:26.120 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a situation, right, it's in this case, it's a belief

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:33.720
<v Speaker 1>about the situation of the world, this place that you

0:58:33.840 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 1>never leave. So that's a little philosophical, but we're doing

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>lots of fun work kind of trying to codify what

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>are these beliefs, how do they matter, Like, what are

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the mechanisms and what's the role that they play in

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 1>shaping not just you know, our health and performance, which

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>has been my focus, but who we are, how we

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>show up in the world.

0:58:56.880 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Such deep, deep, profound and important work. Ali and I

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 2>started off saying, I'm so proud of seeing your your journey.

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I just want to conclude by reiterating that, and I

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.800
<v Speaker 2>really view you as, you know, one of the brightest

0:59:10.840 --> 0:59:14.680
<v Speaker 2>lights in our field, in this generation, at this time

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:18.080
<v Speaker 2>in human history. And I'm honored to be in the world,

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 2>in the world with you.

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, Scott, and I really you know, when

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I look back at my days in grad school, which

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 1>were stressful and uncertain, and you know, in many ways,

0:59:33.480 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>research was research. I started the stress research during that time.

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I you know, having people like you in my life

0:59:45.680 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 1>made it possible, made it doable, made it fun, and

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, people like you reminded me of why we're

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>doing this right, We're not doing it for ourselves. We

0:59:56.920 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>are doing it for the world. So thank you for

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the work that you do and all the sincerity and

1:00:03.920 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, really just the kind of joy that

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you bring to it.

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Thanks for letting having me remind myself about

1:00:12.360 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>all that as well is really important as well. So boy,

1:00:16.720 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much and yeah, talk soon to be continued.