WEBVTT - The Supply Chain, Semiconductors, And Real Estate

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's get right to

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Sad Path Soda Ryan, chief revenue officer

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>from Verizon, joins a sad Path. Thanks so much for

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>joining us here, huge global company, Verizon Business Consumer. How

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>has your business changed in the last two years? Hey,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>good morning everyone. Look, it's been a good time for us.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, as networks become even more important as people

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.319
<v Speaker 1>work from home, remote work is more prevalent networks and

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what we offer becomes really important. And for us, it's

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>also where we are launching five G you know, we

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>are right now at the cusp of a second phase

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the five G era where we turn on our

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ce band network in a few weeks times. So it's

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just a great time to be in this business.

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So you are the chief revenue officer. I don't know

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how deep into the tech you are, but you have

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to have some um view on the safety of five G.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, for the first time last week,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing that it's capable of messing with airplanes altitude

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>sensors and maybe you would make landing dangerous. To me,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty binary. Either it's dangerous or it's not. What's

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the deal, It's not dangerous. Look, safeties are most important

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to us, and it's kind of number one in what

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we do. All we that are forty countries around the

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>world that have five G networks in the same CE

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>band that we operate in. Planes takeoff, planes land there

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>really well, one of the countries is France. You know,

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>American planes go in and get out there. What we

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are proposing is a kind of a similar approach to

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>what's there in France, where we kind of have an

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>exclusionary zone just outside the airports where we have lower

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>power levels so there's no interference that way. You know.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We give the f A and the FCC six months

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to work this out, but we feel very confident and

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>we just can't wait to launch the network. I mean,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>even if you didn't have that sand path, what if

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you had the strongest, most powerful five G signals right

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>up the tower. Um, would it interfere with I mean,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't the bandwidths different? Isn't Isn't there someone who made

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that this is a different part of the frequency

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>before they sold you, um, this bundle? Yeah, exactly. Look,

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you know we spent fifty three billion dollars for it. Uh.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And the laws of physics are the same either in

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the United States or in France or any of the

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>other countries. In fact, in the US, the guard band

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are kind of the protection band between the spectrum we

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>use and then the spectrum the airlines use. Is one

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of the largest in the world, so there are two

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>different spectrums. We have a very large guard band, and

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>with us, you know, lowering power levels and other technical

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>things around airports, we see absolutely no risk. So Sampath

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gives a sense advertising again a huge company. Um, how

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the are you know, managing through the pandemic? How

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>has Verizon done? How has Verizon adapted? A couple of things,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, One, we have to balance out four of

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>our stakeholders, you know, whether it's employees, customers, shareholders, and

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>broader society. So just having that balance has been a

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>good framework for us to get through. The second is

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that personal safety is important for our teams. But we

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>also realized that the service we operate networks is kind

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the backbone of the global economy today. It's the

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>rails on which most of the economy runs on. So

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for us, it's been a careful balance of the four

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>stakeholders as well as ensuring that our networks up and

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>running at the same time. Now it's also the same

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>time we decided to deploy five G. More broadly, Actually,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been a little faster than what we had planned

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because our construction has not stopped. We've moved applied faster.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a little bit of good and bad,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but overall is just a great time to be here.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I've noticed, um from the consumer side,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>people have been using more data than ever on a

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>level that they probably wouldn't have imagined. Not just consuming um,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh media content like television shows and movies,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're doing all of their banking online, and they're

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>starting their cars with their phones and controlling their home

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>HVAC systems with their phones. And you know, this was

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what was forecast to happen, but I don't think anyone

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>expected it to boom all of a sudden happening side

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of the period of one year. Um, how is that

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for you? Are you still offering unlimited data packages or

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>people using fort sixty gigs a month? Yeah, people are

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>using a lot of data. As you said, they use

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it for everything. I wish I could say everything is

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for great to you with my kids use it for

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more gaming than they need to. But yes,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely a lot of data consumption that's gone, which is

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>why the five G network is critical because one of

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest advantages of five G if you get more

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>throughput and more speed. So we're literally adding a ton

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and a ton of a technical term, a ton of

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>capacity in the network. All right, Sam Path, thank you

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your thoughts there,

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Path, so many on a Ryan, chief revenue officer

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for Verizon. I was just typing out a letter to

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the producers upstairs at the Quick Take at

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Take, a little pitch for them because I said,

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you should have me on more I can talk about cars,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and they were like, yeah, all you want to talk

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>about is cars, But I said, look, it's at the

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>center of the economy, probably more so UM that any

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>time since Henry Ford started his production line, because these

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>vehicles use more and more chips, especially as they produce

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>UM more hybrids and e vs than they ever have before.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It's it's connected to the labor story, it's connected to

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>UH consumer spending, and it's just amazing. Let's let's focus

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in on the chips part of it, because we have

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>not Cool Dougal Uh. He is a senior VP and

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>General manager of Automotive UH for qual Calm right now,

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and they are I'm gonna get the biggest not Cool

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>correct me if if I'm wrong, the biggest automotive chip

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>maker in the world. I would like to see the

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>fastest going. Good morning, gentlemen, the fastest growing all right.

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I just know because UM I was at the Munich

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto Show. I spent a lot of time at car shows,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and UM I noticed so many products there, UM, from

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the trucks to the cars to Ducati motorcycles are packing

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>qual Calm chips UM, and you can't make them fast enough. Right,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Are you still at a point where your order books

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>are completely full and you just can't ship them quickly enough.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>To the customer. You know, that's right. We've been able

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to stay ahead of the challenges that the industry has

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>had because we prioritize automotive over our other businesses, just

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>because of the complexity of the auto industry. But we

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>consider ourselves MATH bought in a very fortunate position because

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we uh, I would say, human as far

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>back as a decade ago, made the call that automotive

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was a very important adjacency forkcom to start to focus

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on and invest in as this market goes through a

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>significant amount of transformation, and we are seeing a lot

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the dividends of the investments we've made back then

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pay out as we look ahead. Now, cool, maybe you

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>can settle an argument. Matt and I were just having

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>literally here in the studio about you know, I was questioning,

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>why are we still having such a pronounced chip shortage

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>on a global scale. Matt says, it was, you know,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just unprecedented increase in demand across a range of products.

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I said, no, no, no, I think it's got to

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>come from the supply side. That maybe plant closures in Asia,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and so that really came on the supply side, but

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>so long ago, I know, But I'm just thinking, these

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>chip guys have got to figure this thing out, so

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>settle this debate for us. I think there are there

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are a few different things going on, and I think

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, electrification is creating the need for new

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>architectures for vehicles. So there is a lot of focus

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as you look at the next generation modern cars to

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>move towards an architecture that relies on semiconductors much more

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>heavily as it has. As you know, the the car

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>industry is moving more towards the mobility business, which means

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to have a tremendous amount

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of software and semiconductors that power that software. UH. What

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>compounds become flexity is as we went through COVID UH,

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the automotive architecture has relied on a variety of different

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>vintages of semiconductors. As architectures and automotive haven't evolved for

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time, there is a dependency on

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:20.719
<v Speaker 1>older architectures that use semiconductors in lagging process notes. That's

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>when most of the complexity is where you've been developing

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors on older notes for a long period of time

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that that have a lot more complexity to modernize. The

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>complexity is much less when you talk about the next

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>generation notes. So what we are starting to see is

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a significant transition towards newer notes. You can't completely get

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>yourself out of the depends on older notes, but a

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>significant faster transition to newer nodes, which obviously places to

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>our advantage. I've noticed some some carmakers are just dropping

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>functions completely because they don't have the chips to power them.

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>For example, about ten years ago, a lot of the

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>carmakers started offering the style start technology where your motor

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>switches off at a stoplight. UM. Car guys hate it

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>right and always try and disable it. Now I've noticed

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>some car makers like GM, I'm building a truck on

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>their website and they say, uh, no stops to feature anymore.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So you get fifty dollars back. Are you are you

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going to see more of that you think the cool

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or less of that? Are Are we at a point

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>where this is getting better or we're or still worse?

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an excellent question. I think that's an

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>example of the dependency on a small micro controller that

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is in short supply and it's going to be harder

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to get around. The transition we are seeing pollen mat

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is that those steps of functions are moving to software,

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so where you have much harder performance application processors that

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the auto industry is now embracing, and a function like

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>stop start can actually be integrated as a software function

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>into the higher end processor as opposed to rely on

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a simple discrete micro controller. So you will start to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>see examples like this play out, and that functionality gets

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>subsumed into larger application processors that then manage that functionality

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to software. All right, Nicole, here's the money question. When

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is this chip shortage going to be addressed? Here? When

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>are we making back to more normalized supply demand. Well,

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's a complex question because it

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is a bit different for each automaker. Everybody has a

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly different type of challenge too. Smaller automakers are going

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to get around it faster, especially if

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they move to newer architectures. The larger ones that have

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more complexity, lot more diversity across their uh

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio, have a lot more dependency on the complexity

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of the semiconductor crisis. But I would imagine, you know,

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in the I think we are. I think towards the

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty two we should certainly start to see

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry come out of a lot of this complexity

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>on the whole. From our perspective, we have actually been

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>able to stay ahead of this challenge, but clearly we

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>supply a portion of the overall semiconductor portfolio within a

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicle n cool what's the smartest car out there? What's

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the what's the coolest, high highest tech vehicle that you

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>could buy right now? Yeah? I think, you know, there

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>are several because we have so many different partners and

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>customers that we work with. But you know, one thing

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that we are very proud of is the fact that

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the strategy that we've laid out over the last five

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>years has now culminated into working called the Snap Drag

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and Digital Chassis, which is basically enabling automakers with the

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>newest tech, the latest semiconductors in software, connected to highly

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>complex ecosystems, whether it's in the autonomous space or in

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the digital cockpit experience or five connectivity, and bringing that

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>together to help automakers make a much larger step up

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of modernization. We've been working with General Motors

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years, but over twenty years. And

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Mary Burton announced the partnership with us UH can see

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>yes a few days ago. We are very part of

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Altar Cruise work that we've been doing with them,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a level three door to door autonomous service.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>We made an announcement with the bub back in November

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on Ada. Wal Boy has been working with us. Difficult

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to pick one of my favorite customers, all right, Nicole

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Naldgal, Senior VP and General Manager Automotive for Qualcom.

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. They need to get more chips out

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>into the marketplace. That's what their customers are demanding. We'll

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>see how long that plays out. We talked about that

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll Take two again buying who are they buying? Other things?

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Premium twelve billion? Large? That size. I didn't know there

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was that arm for words with friends. It's not even scrabble,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it's an also ran. All right, let's check in with

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>an expert here on this deal. I mean Ben Sad

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>he is t MT analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. I mean,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking a time here. Is this

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a good deal for Take two? Their stock is trading down? Yeah?

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean thanks for having me and and I think this

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is a very good deal for for Take two, especially

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>as when you look at the numbers in this deal.

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it looks like this is the largest

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>video game deal ever from a mini stand point. And

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>second of all, Take two previously they had almost ten

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of theirselves from mobile, and this deal is gonna,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next few years is gonna push that

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to over fifty serves of going to mobile. And that's

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>important because mobile is that first is growing. Uh you

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>know gaming, Uh certainly, I just I find that so

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to believe because I don't know what you can

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do with mobile. I I love video games I have

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ever since, not Pong, but you know, Galactica and all

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the way through, um Super Mario Brothers with Nintendo three

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and none of the Daga up through. You know. Now

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing Xbox all the time, Call of Duty and

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>even Red Dead unfortunately I hate it, but I play it. Um,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what can you do on mobile? There's like, aside from

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Angry Birds, right, how can it can't even get complex enough?

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, First, I would say you actually impressed me

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>earlier when you mentioned Collegual Vision, which is, you know,

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the oldest came in conforts even before Autari,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>so that was gooding knowledge knowledge there I didn't you

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can know about that. But from gaming, you know, mobile

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>has been very successful because we don't target gamers. They

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>target uh segment in the population called hyper hyper casual gamers. Right,

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody just plays can division a little bit, plays some

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>puzzles or something, or farm reels or world with friends,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's why this segment has imploded in the last

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>few years, and especially in Asia it has been doing

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really really well. So really, if to focus on the

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hyper casual quote unquote gamers, that's why there is a

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>huge success in this platform. I also wonder about the

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of gamers. Are we worried that, you know, the

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>world just isn't producing enough young people. We're gonna actually

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>read a book, We're gonna, we're gonna we're gonna have

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>enough video games for sure, But are there enough consumers

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>for all this content? Yes? Absolutely, I think overall globally,

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>if you include the hyper casual gamers, there's over three

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>billion gamers right now. So it's not going to be

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the lack of gamers, especially with this new generation there

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are basically born in gaming. If you think about Fortnight

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and other games like that. Gaming has become much more

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>mainstream than news to be back then, and now it's

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>all one handed, any billion dollar global industry. So the

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>industry is growing, the user basis growing, so it's not

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be lack of gamers. I think to your point,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the lack of contact. And especially during the pandemic.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>All the major video game makers were impacted by the pandemics,

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but they have lower content that they expected. Uh, and

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about this deal here quickly, Uh, Take two kept

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>delaying news about g t A six content of for six,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the major games being awaited in

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this industry. And this is why this deal kind of

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to uh, you know, to remove some of

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the headaches in the top line that this company with

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you facing, all right, I mean, thanks so much for

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>bringing us up to date on this big deal in

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the gaming space. I mean, Ben sad tmt Annalys, Bloomberg Intelligence, Matt,

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I got, I guess, I gotta. I mean, if you're

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>still there, are you a gamer too? Yes? Three years

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>gaming I started actually on the Commodore sixty four playing

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>space Taxi and Mule, and I've noticed a lot of

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>these games are coming back now you can get them

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>on your phone. That to me is an interesting thing

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that these um vent games are coming back. Oh yes, look,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>especially the indie companies. They are smaller ones. They make

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>games like that because the cord of love of resources.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you see Netflix, even Netflix getting into that. So, yes,

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>those are coming back because they have a lot of

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting stolis there. Very cool. Okay, Paul, you're not a gamer,

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of course not. I'm an adult. Okay, I bet you

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would like Mule. I'm gonna show you Mule during the

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>break and then we'll see if, um, if you can

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>get into it. It's really it's a market. Okay. I

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>aged out after Atari. How about that? The Goldman sacks

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that I grew up with and I competed against was

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>investment banking and investment banking, and that was basically and

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>bankers and traders, bankers and traders. But since the Great

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was running it then so John Whitehead, uh, it might

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>even been like yeah, probably Core designed for a while there.

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going back in the day. Um but they've always

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>been the big bank, the big trading desk. But really

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>since Great Financial Crisis, they've been really branching out into

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>more consumer businesses. And I saw them some news there

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Goldman adds GM credit cards to its Marcus consumer business.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I just shook my head. But what happened to my

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>old Goldman sex? All right? Shanani Basket, Wall Street reporter

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. She joins the shore. She follows the

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street beat closely. Goldman's continuing to expand out its

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer business, right, yeah, listen, this is the second big

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>partnership that Goldman is announcing here with General Motors. Of course,

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we know they had that big relationship with Apple before.

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>What you're seeing here is Goldman start to branch into

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>new places, so card business. To what extent do they

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have their ambition to launch their own credit card without

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the co brand? And also what does General Motors give them?

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>General Motors already has billions of customers in their own

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>credit card business, so now by partner with Goldman, the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>hope is they could really expand on the millions of

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>customers they've been able to amass with Apple. To your point,

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>General Motors was previews a slee An investment banking client,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>which they then converted now into what you're what do

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you not buy? It, Matt, is that you know what,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>grass grows faster than Goldman Sacks business. This has been

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>years in the making, and they seem to have done

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>very little with Apple. I mean, they could take over

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>your life if they wanted to. Apple and Goldman Sacks

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>together you could do everything one stop shop, um from

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>savings to checking to investment, credit card, I mean, you

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>name it. They're just not doing it. Marcus has taken

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>forever to get off the ground. Forever and ever and

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>ever and ever we've been talking about it. You were

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in high school to that that's not true. I mean,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years they have and remember

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>these are very highly regulated businesses. To your point, Goldman

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>makes a couple hundred million a quarter on their consumer

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>business Revolute and and twenty six they came out of

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the gates running, ready to win, picking up customers by

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the millions. And where are they based in Europe exactly.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a lot harder in the US for

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the big banks to really get their technology in line,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which is what makes these partnerships and these efforts so interesting.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>They just need to buy the technology. They already run

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the government, right, so they don't need to worry about regulations.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>The government buys them. Let's the idea of the government

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing Goldman Sacks to buy like a Stripe, for example,

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>which is a lot more back end infrastructure. The biggest

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>payments companies in the US, Matt, the biggest tech companies

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>are all back end financial, back of credit cards. They're

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not consumer facing businesses. All Right, we're gonna have the

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl this year where so Fi Stadium in Los Angeles.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>So far as a brand, I know, so it's a

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>brand that Goldman Sacks knows. So to Matt's point, I'm

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>almost at the point by a former set Goldman Sacks banker.

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a dollar say it's only ten billion dollar company,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>so you buy that with a couple of partners pocket change.

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But at least that gets you a brand awareness, because

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the MAT's point, one of the things that

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised about is the brand value. The brand awareness

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of Marcus, I think is still obscure to what you

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>can get from it. They just launched investing products. They

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>have had that savings product. This is the year that

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they're probably going to open a checking account. Once they

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>open that checking account is when they can be a

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>real full scale bank for consumers in a bigger way.

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, they are not that yet by

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>any means. I mean, remember when we all got so

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>excited about the Apple card before it came out. Oh

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>my god, Apple is going to release a credit card.

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna change finance forever. I gotta get one.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an Apple card? Do you have an

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Card? No? Neither. When I use Apple Pay, neither

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do I. Of course we all use Apple Pay. But look,

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they could just do so much. The first site that

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I made the Apple page paying my subway. Listen there.

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>The car business is a harder one too, because you

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have a Chase Sapphire, or you have City Group, the

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest card tossure in the world, your Barclays. You're competing,

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and they both offer better rewards programs than Apple and

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sax. Why not, because it's hard to think of

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>offering a good rewards program. The numbers are there, all

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is beat the numbers, and they

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>make a ton on interest rates already. They don't need

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the padding they have that well. Actually,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates are not making anything off of right

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.959
<v Speaker 1>now because people are paying back their cards. But this

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is this is why this is now into this year

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a big deal because people are starting to borrow again

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at a much bigger scale than they're taking out any

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>other type of loan. And so to get into it

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>now is a good time. But yes, it is an

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily hard time to get in the card business because

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>people want rewards. They want them and all forms, shapes

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and sizes for different products. They want them in crypto sometimes.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you can't give your client everything, then can

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you compete in the space is a perfectly legitimate question.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>All right. I think we're saying basically, this isn't a

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>typical Goldman business because it hasn't just got that that

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>traction that you would expect, uh, this Goldman effort to do.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see how they continue to invest in it,

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see how it continues to grow into the business.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Shanelli Bassek, thanks for joining us Wall Street reporter for

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Joining us here in a Bloomberg interactive Brooker Studio.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller, I'm on Twitter

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. Put on false Sweeney. I'm on

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney Before the podcast. You can always

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio