WEBVTT - Full Episode - Trump’s Most Consequential Scandal Wasn’t Clickable Enough + What Teddy Roosevelt Can Teach Us About Trump’s America

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteisonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>nutrients any oxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>The Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>their variety box, they have a gluten free box, a

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>vegan box, and a new protein box. I will tell

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you I have done the gluten free box. I have

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>done it a second time. I have also used the

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 1>code the todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at checkout you get thirty dollars off. I've already used

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it as a gift to somebody else who loves this bread.

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It is hard to find good gluten free bread. It

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic. They give you step by step instructions. I

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>really dig this. There is nothing like having an artesion

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bakery in your freezer to chase away the winter chill.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Now is the best time to stay in and enjoy

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some comforting homemade meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It is worth giving Wildgrain a try. Right now, Wildgrain

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first box

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>plus free croyissants for life. Come on when you go

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>That's thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 1>or simply use the promo code podcast at check out.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. Hello,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>They're happy Wednesday and welcome to another episode of the

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Podcast. Let me give you a quick little rundown

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of what to expect in today's full episode. I will

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have an answer to the question that I get more

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>often than any other will the midterms happen? But I

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>want to explain it in such a way that kind

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of builds off of what we talked about on Monday.

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I will get to that in a minute. My interview

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>today is with author David S. Brown. He's got a

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>great it's a new ish Teddy Roosevelt book out there.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's called In the Arena, came out last year. Many

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, I'm obsessed with the sort of this

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty year period between eighteen eighty and nineteen thirty in

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>America because it really feels like we are, you know,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>that fifty year period that basically nineteen ninety through where

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we are today, that we're kind of living a similar

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>time frame. That was a transition from an agrarian economy

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to an industrial economy. We had income inequality growing by

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>leaps in back, and the democracy did something about it,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and Teddy Roosevelt sort of captured the anxiety of those

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>moments and he became the sort of the lead figure there.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I also find fascinating about Teddy is is

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>how often and how much similarities there are, at least

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to his personality that are similar to Donald Trump. So

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we get into that, and we get into all things Teddy,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>both the era, how much the current era we live

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in and the era of sort of Teddy from you know,

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundred to nineteen twenty. Is you know that we're

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we're in a moment that feels like we need a

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, who's going to be the Teddy Roosevelt, right,

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to be the one that says, you know what,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>this is out of hand tech Titans. We've got to

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rein you in, so we make a So that's the interview.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll also going to have my top five list, and

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this one has to do with thought I'm calling Project

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two for the Democratic Party. I'll just leave

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that little tease at that, and you'll get an idea

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of where I'm going to go with my top five

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>list on that, and of course we'll take some questions

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and go from there. All right, So let's go back

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to the to this exercise I want to do, and

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it wants to I want to build on the story

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked about on Monday, but try to explain why

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>why it's disappearing, and I'm going to lament why it's

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>disappearing because I don't think it should be disappearing, and

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of help you discern which one of

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>these alarming stories. How much do you worry about Trump's

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>alarming rhetoric versus his alarming deeds. So look, if you

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to Monday's episode. You know, I spent a good

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>chunk of time slowing things down, walking through a story

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that I think is easy to miss in this current

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>information ecosystem. I knew that this didn't have easy visuals

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to show bells and whistles. But what I really believe

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is that this is the worst sort of This is

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst corruption scandal we've ever had involving an American president.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It's bigger than teapot doma bigger than Watergate. And I know,

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.559
<v Speaker 1>because we're so numb to Trump's transactionalism, we just don't

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>see it right. But that's why I wanted to walk

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>through the details very deliberately, because it's incredibly important and

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it was. Of course, I'm referring to the Wall Street

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Journal story, the report about how Sovereign Wealth Fund of

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>UAE investments into a crypto company that really wasn't going

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>anywhere for Trump that suddenly became relevant. It led to

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a change in America in the United States of America's

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>policy on AI and chips, and of course led to

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a pardon of a very controversial figure in the crypto world.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And all of it happening while Trump was receiving hundreds

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of millions of dollars in cash Trump and his family. Now,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the story didn't have to metic visuals, and it wasn't

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>easy to villainize somebody in a moment. It was a

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>dense it was It's a story that requires some patience

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>in some ways. As I said, right, you need a

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to either the whiteboard on a beautiful mind

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or clar Danes and Homeland to sort of see how

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>everything is connected. And I really believe that it was

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the most important story of the weekend and really something

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that that should be seen. You know that every congressional

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter should be asking every member of Congress about it. Right,

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that type of story to sort of get Congress off

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>its ass and start worrying about whether presidents are following

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the constitution. But then the rest of the then the

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>rest of Monday happened. Right, You had the Dan Bongino

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast that the President did where he mused about federalizing elections, which,

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>of course that quick comment coupled with the video footage

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the bizarre Telsea Gabbard leven FBI rate of Fulton

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>County in Atlanta with the twenty twenty ballots and boom, Right,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you instantly had a bit viral of a feeding frenzy

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on a specific story. You know, by Tuesday morning, you

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>wake up and it's Kennedy Senator has been Kennedy Center.

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>He's just canceled it, shutting it down for two years. Again,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a shiny metal object story became the lead of the day.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And oh, by the way, the government was shut down,

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>so we had to reopen that and all of it,

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>shoving what is the perhaps the biggest scandal in American

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>history further and further and further down the information ecosystem ladder.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course, the sudden burst of rhetorical crazy from

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump involving the midterms led to a whole bunch of

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>questions that I regularly get from both listeners, viewers and

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>friends and family starting to panic, you know, is going

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to is he going to cancel the midterms? And it

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>always leads to this, because how anxious should we all

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>be right now? And you know you can and I

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>get it right. Are things collapsing? Is this different? Is

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump actually serious this time? What guardrails are left that

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>could stop him on this? So here's what I want

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to do. I don't want to hype your anxiety and

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dismiss it either. What I want

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to try to do is organize it, because one of

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the biggest mistakes we make in moments like this is

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>confusing volume with importance and mistaking what feels scariest for

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what's actually doing the most damage. Right. It goes to

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the original trope with Trump. You know, right, you know

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, do you take him literally or

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>seriously or both? Right? And in this case, what I

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>would say is should you worry about what he's saying

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.679
<v Speaker 1>or should you worry about what he's doing? Now, of

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>course I would argue the answer is yes to everything.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's what going to get to. So let's start

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with the story that everyone understands. Immediately, Donald Trump goes

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast muses again about federalizing elections, which, of course,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, reminds people of him musing about just I

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>wish I could cancel the midterms, and almost simultaneously, right

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when you play that, you have your file footage, right,

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So if you see this on video, you could just

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>show the weird Tulsea Gabbert thing and the striking images

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>out of Georgia of federal agents executing a raid connected

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to election materials from twenty twenty. You know, we're at

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly six years later. We've had multiple elections in Fulton

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>County ever since. I mean, I sort of look at

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing is laughable. I think it's silly, but

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:44.959
<v Speaker 1>it's also very serious. Right, we know he's desperate to

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>continue to sell this lie that he somehow was illegitimately

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>thrown out of office in twenty twenty. So Trump talks

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about overriding elections and then all of a sudden, you

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>see federal agents seizing ballots. Right, the great fear that

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>so many people have. So you don't need a constitutional

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>law degree to fill your stomach drop. That is scary.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Rhetoric plus visuals, threat plus spectacle. It's an easy story

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell. It fits in a tweet, it fits in

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a cairn, and it fits in your nervous system, and

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it rides the algorithm. Now, let me be very clear,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric is not harmless. This isn't normal, and it

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be normalized. Election interference talk is as damaging as

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>election interference itself, and using federal power to intimidate state

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>workers matters a great deal. So I don't want to

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to minimize what he has said or

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>what he has done. But here's what I want, I

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>want you to understand, and I want to make this

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>clear because it's essential. What feels existential is not always

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what's most consequential. So these two events, the rhetoric and

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the raid, landed together. They functioned together, They were consumed

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>as one narrative event. It almost doesn't matter which technically

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>came first, right, the raid itself or is rhetoric To Bongino,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the meaning formed through proximity and imaging. Right, that's how

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>political narratives work now, thanks to these algorithms, thanks to

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>these big tech companies that control the flow of information

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that you and I get to see. Isn't done through

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>chronology or nuanced but through what shows up next on

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>your screen. And that's why this story dominates. It feels

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like democracy itself is on the line, and it animates

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. But feeling existential isn't the same

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>thing as actually being the thing that does the most

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>lasting damage. Now, let me talk about the Kennedy Center here.

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.439
<v Speaker 1>First glance Trump's move to effectively just shut down the

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy Center unilaterally under the guise of renovations. I see

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>why some see it as cultural authoritarianism. And symbolically, sure,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty ugly, and if fits a broader pattern of

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>treating institutions as enemies and loyalty tests. But then the

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>context of all this matters, right, and I think it

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tells us something pretty important about how Trump actually operates.

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So why did he shut this down? This wasn't a

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>first strike, This was a reaction. He was being humiliated right.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Artists were pulling out, performers were canceling, events were unraveling

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>quietly but visibly. The reputational damage was happening big time

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. Right the minute Trump touched the Kennedy Center

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>got involved. Everybody wanted out. The opera wanted out. People,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>every classical, anybody with any level of integrity wanted in.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>The art community wanted out. And it was humiliating the

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy Center. It was humiliating Trump. Right. So Trump wasn't

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dominating the story. He was losing control of it. So

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what does he do? This is a classic Trump. He

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>flips the script. Instead of having to deal with they're

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>rejecting me, which is what they are doing, it becomes

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I shut it down and instead of absorbing a thousand

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>small acts of descent, he creates one big spectacle. Instead

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of reputational damage accumulating quietly, he centralizes the conflict and

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>reframes it as Trump versus the culture. Right, it's just

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>simple spin. Right, And notice what happens when he does that, right?

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The story becomes about Trump's power, Trump's move, Trump's dominance.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Can he do it? Is it legal? The stories of

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the cancelations fade, the accountability dissipates, and the noise replaces

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the consequence. This matters because it's the same dynamic we're

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing everywhere else, which brings me back to Monday. Right.

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>While George and the Kennedy Center sucked all the oxygen

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the room early part of this week, the

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>story I walked through earlier in the week is already fading.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And that should worry us more because that story, the

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that Donald Trump has turned America into a kleptocracy

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for his personal enrichment, that's the story that ought to

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>be alarming everybody, because he's already doing it, and he's

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>already done it. He has taken these payments, he has

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>enriched himself. This isn't he might he's thinking about he's doing.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>This is stuff he's done, okay, Foreign sovereign wealth flowing

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>into Trump linked enterprises, policy decisions especially around AI chips

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and crypto, suddenly aligning with the private financial financial upside, pardons, permissions,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and access, all moving in parallel. And as I said,

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the journal never says it was a quid pro quo.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But all you have to do is look right. The

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>modern corruption doesn't look like a brown paper bag anymore.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It looks like timing, proximity and mutual benefit. Each step

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>defensible on its own and technically legal in some sort

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of byzantine way of looking at it, but it is

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>damning when taken together. And it is illegal when you

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>realize it's being done by the President of the United States,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and violation of the Constitution. And here's the moment that

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>really sort of crystallized all this for me. So on

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday morning, I was scanning my usual mountain of newsletters

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>right by us. You know, lots of good ones out there,

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>lots of mediocre ones, but I read a lot of

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>them good faith actors, smart people, outlets that are deeply

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on democratic norms. And the foreign policy story was

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>gone from a couple of them that I was shocked

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to see it gone from. But the election rhetoric that

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was everywhere, the midterm anxiety that was dominant. I mean,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my friend Bill Crystal, who does the Morning Shots newsletter

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for The Bulwark on Tuesday, not a single mention of

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this Wall Street Journal story anymore. Look, they did a

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>lot on Monday, but they were obsessed with the midterm

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>issue with playbook. Had nothing on that had a slew

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>on the midterm issue. We all know how how this

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff right, Some stuff travels more, some stuff rides the

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>algorithm right, And the way the independent media landscape works,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of editorial folks examine what's getting attention what isn't,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and they may lean more heavily on the stories that

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are getting more traction, even if there are other stories

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that are arguably more important. And I'm not calling it.

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's bad faith. I don't think it's corruption.

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is sort of how our information ecosystem is

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of doing exactly what it's designed to do. It

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rewards stories that are visually immediate and emotionally legible, and

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>quietly pushes aside stories that are technical, slow and complicated.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It and might not be as gripping to as large

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>enough of an audience. And that's exactly why the story

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of the of the creation of the American leptocracy is

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>much more dangerous. So it brings me back to the

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>anxiety question and something I want to be very clear about.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>As alarmed as we all are by some of Trump's

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric and by the sense that there are no guardrails left,

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the truth is a bit more complicated because what's interesting

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>is every time we lament this idea that there are

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>no guardrails, you start to see that some of them

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>do work, not all of them, not consistently, but some

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of them some of the time. And it's interesting for

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>us to realize when they do work and when they

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 1>don't work. And understanding which ones work and why is

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the difference, I think, between whether you should panic and

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>whether you should view it as some sort of strategy.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So let me give you two examples. First, there's Minneapolis

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>after the killing of two Americans, and let's just say

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it took two American deaths for Trump to do this.

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump did something almost never does rhetorically. He back down,

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>He sat down Senate Democrats, he negotiated, he accepted the

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 1>premise that they were going to shut down the government

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't negotiate constraints on ice, and he said, okay, right,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>here's a guy that his critics consistently say, you know,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't listen to anything, there's no and he did on

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>this one. So why was it because of norms? No,

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we know he doesn't care about norms. Was it because

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>someone made a better constitutional argument to him? Sorry? Or

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>was it because the political costs suddenly became undeniable even

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>for Trump? Right? Public opinion has shifted dramatically on this issue.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Republicans got nervous. The backlash wasn't abstract anymore, and it

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just coming from Democrats that owned the Libs. It

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was measurable. And Trump does respond to measurable pain, at

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>least political pain in Poland look at the Fed. We

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>heard all the noise, the threats, the posturing, and then

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the choice came down to picked Kevin Walsh, a conventional,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>even market reassuring pick. He didn't pick a sickaphan, a

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>guy like Kevin Hassett, who might have been somebody who

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>would have just yes, you know, been a yes man

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>for whatever Trump wanted on interest rates. So why did

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he do that? Well, one guardrail. He does seem to

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>care about our markets, right, and he cares about what

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>some donors think, his donors, and he certainly cares about

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>what the elites that he interacts with think. So the

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>guardrail wasn't the idea of FED independence. It was the

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>risk of immediate, tangible financial consequences for him and his friends.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's an interesting pattern that you've watched over. It's like,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>every once in a while he responds to a guardrail,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's never that for the reason you want him

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to respond to a guardrail. It's for usually some sort

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of personal cost and personal nervousness. So it does seem

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>as if Trump accepts push back when when three conditions

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>are met. First, the cost is immediate, it's not theoretical,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not long term, it's immediate. Second, the backlash is

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>something he sees poll numbers, market drops, donor anger, maybe

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>even a ratings issue. Right, It's not an editorial, it's

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not a whole bunch of statements, right. And if the

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pressure is across the board, right, lots of people and

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of different parts of his life going hey, are

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you sure about this? Are you sure? About this. Are

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you sure about this? Right? It was. It's why he

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>seemed to back down a bit on Minneapolis. And I

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>know some of you are going to say he hasn't

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>back down that much, But for Trump, he's back down.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Right what happened? You had Republicans saying, oh whoa, well

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this went too far. The same with the FED. But

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>all those reasons are also explained why it's so hard

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for the foreign policy monitoration story to get legs. Because

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it fails those three tests, the costs are delayed. We

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>won't see the impact of selling out American form policy,

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>creating loopholes for China to catch up. We won't know

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>this until after it's too late. The consequences are on

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a spreadsheet, and none of us like to read spreadsheets.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And of course the backlash is a bit fragmented. There's

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>no market crash, there's no single dramatic moment, there's no

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>image on cable news. Just a slow monetization of power.

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>And we see it almost every week when he signs,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>when he releases the list of people he's pardoned, and

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you start to go through it and you realize most

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of them were represented by friends of Trump, and he

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>just was monetizing, helping them win fees from these rich crooks.

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And it also explains why I'm less worried about Trump's

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>election rhetoric than I am about what he's doing in

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the form. Elections in the United States are decentralized by design.

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>States run them, counties administer them. The diffusion isn't a weakness.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a firewall. Right. Trump doesn't control it. Republicans

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 1>quietly know he can't override it without detonating their own power.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They can't do it. They'd have to pass Acts of Congress.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>There's so many different ways in order to make this happen.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It's for it to happen, the Republican Republic would essentially

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>have to collapse. We'd have to suspend the Constitution, and

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not. And he doesn't have that kind of power.

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And now, ironically, I think politically, every time Trump muses

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about interfering with elections, he doesn't suppress turnout, which I

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>know is of fear some people have. He fuels it.

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>He energizes opposition voters, he repels swing voters who just

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>want to get rid of the chaos, and he deepened

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cynicism among his own bank so if you were trying

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to design the dumbest possible strategy heading into the midterm election,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you'd be hard pressed to beat the one Trump is

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>doing right now, talk about if you're on the Democratic

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>side of the isle, you should want him talking about this.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>All it does is make it saved you money on

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>get out the vote. Donald Trump is going to get

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>your base out to vote, and then he's sending a

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>message that he thinks the whole thing is rigged anyway,

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's sending a message to his own base that,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe he's sort of winking and nodding, don't worry,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll rig it, so it doesn't matter.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 2>They're not going to show up.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So, yes, the rhetoric's extraordinarily dangerous, and I don't want

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to dismiss it, but it is institutionally constrained and politically

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly self defeating. That's not the case with this foreign

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>policy story. Congress is supposed to be the check here.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>The voters are never going to be the check on

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this story. It's going to take him a while to

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get it. This Congress has shown no interest in investigating

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the leader of their own party, so that story is

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep going he's going to keep selling

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy decisions to the highest bidder. Sometimes he'll do

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it right out in the open. Sometimes they'll do it quietly.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean times it feels like Venezuela and the oil

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is he's just doing it right out in the open.

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Most of this he'll do out of view. So the

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>point is this, No, I don't think the country's collapsing tomorrow,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and no, I don't think elections are going to get

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>canceled twenty twenty six. But I do think we're watching

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>something more subtle and more corrosive. Democracies don't usually fall

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from who's they actually erode. They look more like what happened,

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Turkey, what's happening in Hungary. They erode

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>when corruption becomes complicated, normalized, and easier to ignore than

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the latest outrage, cultural outrage. You know, bad bunny. You know,

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to bad Bunny, but don't pay attention to

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the selling out of American foreign policy. So what Trump

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>does say threatens democracy symbolically, but what Trump does corrodes

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it materially, and our information ecosystem, whether it intends to

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>or not, keep steering us towards the loudest, scariest stories,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>while the most consequential ones fade in the background. That's

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the real danger. It's not the panic, it's not the calm.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>It's miss placed attention and mist placed concern. There used

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a publication out there that once reminded us

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>democracy dies in darkness, but sometimes that darkness is also noisy,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and the democracy can die in a lot of distraction

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and noise. All right, on that uplifting note, let's sneak

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in a break and when we come back, we're going

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little Teddy Roosevelt with David S. Brown.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers? We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro dose to their newest

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern mindful alternative to a

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHC and c ABD products all

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>designed to boost your mood and simply help you unwind.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>So if you.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Struggle to switch off at night, so also as a

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>variety of products specifically designed to just simply help you

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>get a better night's sleep, including their top selling sleepy gummies.

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep. So bring

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>on the good vibes and treat yourself to Soul today.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>your entire order. So go to get sold dot com

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget that code. That's

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>getsold dot com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off. Well,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you have heard me talk to da that history is rhyming,

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that there's a familiarity in our recent history early twentieth

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>century with what the current situation is. We're in a

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>we're in a we've got these big tech titans. We

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>had the big robber barons. And you've probably heard myself

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>another say that, you know, boy, the country really needs

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a Teddy Roosevelt. And what's fascinating about Teddy Roosevelt is

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that he's a rorschach Test. If you're a liberal, you

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>love certain parts of him. If you're a conservative, you

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>love other parts of him. He is somebody. He is

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>like Lincoln in Washington and maybe to a lesser extent, Eisenhower,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>where it's the rare biography you can write, where there

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are interested people on the left and the right, and

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>there are people that are devoted to say, no, he's

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>really a progressive. No, he's really a conservative. He's a disruptor,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's this, and Teddy is definitely one of those. And

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>let's just say I devour every Teddy Roosevelt book. I

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>think I've only read more Lincoln books than Teddy Roosevelt books.

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>He is clearly one of the most fascinating Americans we've

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>ever had. My guest today is David Brown. He's got

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the more recent additions in the Teddy Roosevelt Library,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will, is called in the arena, which of

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>course is a homage to his man in the Arena

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>speech back in the day. And this is a it

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>is it is not just the Teddy of the Roosevelt

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>presidency or the Roosevelt this it really is as much

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to capture the zeitgeist and the culture that

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was Teddy, that inspired Teddy, and the culture that he

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>helped try to create and build. So that's my intro.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>David hod I do mysell in your book pretty well?

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful?

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he's a magnet for historians like yourself, right, like

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Teddy is just there's in the only challenge I imagine

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you had was writing something unique that that others hadn't attempted.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're right, here's a magnet. Not because not

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>just because it's an incredible life. Yeah, really an incredible life,

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 2>but that life it tells us so much about America.

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think what I think, what an a story

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and can bring to it, you know, five years from now,

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty five years from now is the perspective of the culture.

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And so as you note, you know, there's something of

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the times in this book. You know, it's a life,

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 2>but it's also at times and historians also bring, you know,

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>additional perspective. They've seen additional presidents, they've seen people use

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and the used roseults reputation. We might read Roosevelt's actions

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>differently in say nineteen fifty or twenty twenty five, then

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>we would have in nineteen ten in the moment. So

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in that sense, I think that there's almost always something,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>something fresh, something interesting perspective that the storying can bring

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>to a topic.

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>How did you tackle this? I mean, there's, like I said,

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>there is so much incredible scholarship on Teddy. You know,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>did you go how much core sort of you know,

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back to letters and all of that sort of the

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ground zero type research. How much did you either devour

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>or avoid other takes on him? What was your balance? Yeah?

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I read the major biographies, but made notes selectively because

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't want too much of the perspective to sink in,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>And I focused most of my research on Roosevelt's writings, letters,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>journals at the Journal when he was younger, and as

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 2>many many books. He was a voluminous writer.

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He wrote.

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 2>He wrote many books and also the private papers, some

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 2>of the newspapers, the culturea milliear the people who knew him,

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the people who loved him, the people who didn't love him,

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Because I wanted to get a broad sense of the

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>man and the times, because I think that the two

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>go hand in hand.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm always curious of why an author chooses their subjects,

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, when they choose their subjects. Is there

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>something that was happening in the moment that made you

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>turn there and you realize I want to unpack this,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>tell me walk me through. You've done a few other books,

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and so what drew you to Roosevelt? And when did

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you decide you wanted to tackle Teddy?

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 2>So about twenty or thirteen years ago I started an

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a biography of Henry Adams and Henry Adams from the

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Great Adams family. It was a neighbor of Roosevelt's in Washington.

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt was, of course living in a White House, then

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Henry Adams was living well what is now the Hay

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Adams Hotel.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Right across the street, although I think it's technically the

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>building was across the street from the across the bed. Anyway,

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some yeah, there's some origin story of the hotel itself,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but yes, basically right there, Walkable's lists so.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>They knew each other. And Henry Adams was generation older,

0:32:55.040 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 2>old money, likes her dry wit, somewhat acerbic, and he

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 2>saw not unlike Mark Twain, he saw Roosevelt as something

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of a big boy. Mark Twain said route to someone

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>said basically, this is this is, this is Tom Sawyer.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 2>We have Tom Sawear in the White House. And I

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 2>just found roosevelts excuse me. Adams's take on Roosevelt's so interesting,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>so pungent, so provocative, and it kind of drew me in.

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 2>And also I think writing that biography of Henry Adams,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 2>it drew me to the late nineteenth century. So I

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 2>was starting my graduate work. I tend to focus on

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 2>America in the early Republic seventeen nineties, eighteen twenty, eighteen thirties,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and there was a lot there in the late nineteenth century.

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Early wasn't aware of cultural history, intellectual history. So I

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 2>do Henry Adams. I'm thinking there's a lot there about

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 2>intellectual life at that time. Now I'm interested in the politics,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>so i'd obviously read something. You know, some things about

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt before, but never systematic, never in depth, And so

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I started to read just my own curiosity and the

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 2>deeper I got into it, the more I said to myself,

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 2>you know what I really want to write on this guy.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to write a biography. So it was deep

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in COVID back in twenty twenty, and that's when I

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>started the project.

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>What makes Roosevelt so intriguing to me is, like Lincoln

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and Washington, he's a president. And like I said to

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a lesser Eisenhower that anybody running for president, far left

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or far right, moderate, centrist, you name it, would love

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to be compared favorably to said president. Right, And I have,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I've been having an uncomfortable intellectual exercise which that I've

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and i'm and I'm gonna I'm this is with trepidation

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that I and that I tiptoe on this, which is

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and Teddy Roosevelt and the shocking amount of

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>similarities that there are. There are some important differences, and

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fan of Teddy and not a fan

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of Trump, you probably recoil at this. But you know,

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there is something about Teddy in the time

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that he served of narcissism, right, I mean the original

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>great quote the bride at every wedding, and the and

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the corpse at every funeral was about him, right, you

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>know it was it was said of him by his daughter. Right.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it? And how much? How

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>much do you see of it? And how did you

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>avoid it? How did you write about it?

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Sure know?

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>How did it? How did it influence you?

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Sure I make some notes of this late in the book,

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 2>last all pages. The narcissism was there. The question is

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 2>how do you deal with the narcissism? And uh and

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt's it was.

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>All about Roosevelt.

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 2>But there was this sort of generosity underlying Roosevelt, and

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that generosity I think really drew people to him. Of course,

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Trump has a wide appeal as well. Some of the

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 2>similarities are a tremendous charisma on the part of both men.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 2>The loyalists, they've really been loyalists for both men. Roosevelt

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 2>had a broader reach. Roosewolt got I think like fifty

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 2>six percent of the popular vote in two thousand. Excuse

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 2>me the nineteen oh four.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>As an important point you made that I didn't fully

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that it was the It was actually the most

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>dominant vote total we'd had really in the with the

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>country that big at the time.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right. So he was really popular. He

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>could really cross over. Trump doesn't have the crossover appeal,

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 2>but to the loyalists, they could do no wrong. Roosevelt's

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 2>was seen by party regulars in the GUP as being

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 2>a threat. He was never supposed to be presidents. He

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 2>was a war hero, and they made him a veep,

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and of course McKinley wasn't supposed to get shot and killed.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>But then Rosald becomes presidents and he's so popular that

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 2>they can't do anything with him until Roosevelt decides that

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 2>he's going to leave after a couple of terms and

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 2>then once the crown back, and at that time, for

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 2>GOP regulars, this sort of gave currency to their concerns

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 2>for the last few years that Roosevelt was a maverick,

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>he was a loose cannon. He could not be trusted

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 2>for party regularity, and they opposed him, and they were

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>able to essentially keep them from getting the nomination in

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen twelve, and in Roosevelt said that this was stolen,

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that the people wanted him, and of course he then

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 2>broke away from the party, which is said that Trump

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 2>had talked about doing in twenty sixty if the GOP

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>at that time had kept the nomination from him.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't we credit Teddy with primaries? Essentially that that that

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of It was right after that that

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we I think Oregon had the first presidential primary.

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 2>There were there were, there were, there were a few,

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're about thirteen. But in raise what actually got

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 2>more votes and delegates in these thirteen primaries? Right the

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>sitting president did. And there's a number of reasons why

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 2>these these these these primaries would expand, but one was

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 2>that it was seen that that perhaps that people need

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to have more say and we would look back to,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>for example, nineteen twelve and say so, clearly the party

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 2>wanted Taft to get the nomination, but clearly most garden

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 2>variety Republican voters wanted Roosevelt.

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously the era that I think makes this an

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>extra magnet for me right now. And there's always been

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>something about Teddy. Did it take a rich guy to

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>go after rich guys? Did it? Meaning you know that

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the progressive populist politics of that era only gets traction

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>when a rich guy turned on rich guys. That's too simplistic.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily, he was a different kind of rich guy

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 2>like Henry Adams.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>He was old money and inherited inherited well, which is

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>always important. I always find it fascinating. I track, I

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>love to see right now where billionaires go right, new

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>billionaires support Trump. Inherited billionaires support the left right now.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just an interesting era that we're in.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is. Yeah. So Roosevelt did not like new money.

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt thought that that new money was essentially, you know,

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 2>building factories and whatnot, which he recognized the country needed

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 2>if it was going to be strong. But and his

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 2>notion of the string of his life sitting in office

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 2>all day just making money, there was nothing romantic, There

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 2>was nothing important about that. It's going to lead to

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the country becoming soft and not sharp any longer. So

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 2>he did feel I think, when he called, for example,

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan into the White House, that there was a

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 2>sense of superiority on his side in reading, in culture

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and background. And if Morgan had a bit more money,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 2>which of course he did, that was okay because Roosevelt

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 2>had had some money too. But more important, I think

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Roosevelt thought that he Roosevelt understood how money

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 2>should be used, and people like this new rich They

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 2>liked imagination. They didn't know what was best for the country.

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 2>They only understood what was best for themselves.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think he had this this sense because

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it because he went on his travels

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>or you know, he did seem to at least understand

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't concentrate this much power in the in in

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in with these the titans of that era. But was

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>his motivation because he didn't want them stronger than the government,

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or was his motivation because the little guy was getting hurt?

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I use all those things.

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 2>He never called himself a populous and there was a

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 2>populist party at that time, is a gram farmers, and

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 2>he thought that they were just radical and vaguely ridiculous.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 2>But there was a populistic bone in Roosevelt. He wrote

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>to John Hey, the Secretary of State, after he Roosevelt

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.720
<v Speaker 2>had toured the country, and he said, you know, seeing

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 2>these these common people out there who were standing in

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, by a train stession for two hours in

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the wintertime, you know, waiting to and we talk. Uh,

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 2>they're so sincere. There's so they're such hard workers. You know,

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 2>we we we need to we need to do right

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 2>by these people. He did believe that, he did believe

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 2>that he that the presidency, that the government had a

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>responsibility the people. So there was something also, I think

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of old money about that, the sense

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of paternalism where they're they're social work economic betters so called,

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 2>and we need to take care of them. That's our obligation.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Also though when when he's thinking about obtaining the trusts.

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>But I think I think there's something about Roosevelt that

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:41.080
<v Speaker 2>is vaguely consulted, that that these that these titans, that

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 2>they should have so much just because they invented something

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>or they have a factory, and why should they have

0:42:49.440 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 2>so much say in our politics? Why should why should

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 2>they be able to put politicians in their pockets through

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 2>through through lobbying. So I think he sincerely saw them

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 2>something of a potential thread to the Republic in a

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 2>different way, but not unlike say Jefferson with the First

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 2>National Bank and Jackson with the Second National Bank, looking

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 2>at money congealing together and saying, if this continues, this

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 2>could be a real problem for the Republic moving forward.

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's let let's do this intellectual exercise. What would

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Teddy be doing right now with the aim like with

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the with the with with the AI technology that we're

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to build, the infrastructure and the concentration of wealth

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're experiencing at the moment.

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I think if it was President's with AI, he would

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 2>want to harness AI. He would he would want to

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 2>use it to make you know, as America as powerful

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 2>as possible. That would also tie him with the second

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 2>part of your question, because so these people who have

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 2>this this this this resource, some of the billionaires, I

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 2>suspect that he would look upon them not unlike he

0:44:07.840 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 2>looked upon the rich class of his own day, which

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is they have a purpose. The purpose is to continue

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 2>to be patriotic and contribute to the growing wealth of America.

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 2>And they could have their nice houses and and and

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and and whatnot. But but I think he would draw

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a real line at the kind of influence that these

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:35.879
<v Speaker 2>people would have. So I wouldn't see him inviting billionaires

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to be in his official cabinet family.

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And yet he's super transactional, particularly in foreign affairs.

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yes, he's he's savvy. He looks to get things done.

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 2>He wants to build a canal, not not in Panama

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 2>because there's no country in Panama, but there's a province

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 2>in Colombia.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And when the Colombian Senate sort of bulks a little

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 2>bit on what was supposed to be a done deal,

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 2>then he will essentially, you know, support the independence movement,

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>which which would not have succeeded without just.

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's just be let you're being a little gentle here.

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He manufactures this movement in this separatist region called Panama

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. There were certainly some independence people that

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>were but it you know, it's it was a pretext, right.

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>He samships and he sends men, and they will support

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and in a sense, it's it's what John F. Kennedy

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:43.799
<v Speaker 2>tried and failed to do with.

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the uh, the Cubans they the quote unquote lead it.

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:51.799
<v Speaker 2>But but but there was American support, but there wasn't

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 2>enough American support. Rose, I'm sure that there was that

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 2>there was more than enough American support. So you're right,

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.759
<v Speaker 2>this is this is trans is actual here. He's very

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 2>happy to play both with Columbia. When Columbia wouldn't play

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 2>ball with him any longer, he gave him what the boy.

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Having good life insurance is incredibly important I know from

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the best shape. My mother single mother, now widow, myself

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 1>one life insurance policy that we found wasn't a lot,

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.879
<v Speaker 1>but it was important at the time, and it's why

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I was able to go to college. Little did he

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know how important that would be in that moment. Well

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>guess what. That's why I am here to tell you

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>about Etho's life. They can provide you with peace of

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mind knowing your family is protected even if the worst

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to pass. Ethos is an online platform that makes

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:59.320
<v Speaker 1>getting life insurance fast and easy, all designed to protect

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 1>your family's few. You're in minutes, not months. There's no

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>complicated process, and it's one hundred percent online. There's no

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>medical exam require you just answer a few health questions online.

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You can get a quote in as little as ten minutes,

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can get same day coverage without ever leaving

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>your home. You can get up to three million dollars

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in coverage, and some policies start as low as two

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day that would be billed monthly. As of

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>March twenty twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one no medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your family with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:38.359
<v Speaker 1>quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. So again that's

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me,

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 1>life insurance is something you should really think about it,

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 1>especially if you've got a growing family. This is where

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you look deeper at rule Roosevelt's sort

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 1>of point of view and actions in the Western hemisphere,

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the actually pale in comparisons to Trump's beltic.

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, it was a different time, and so it's

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 2>a period when that type of American imperialism, the so

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 2>called Banana Republic era, is just beginning to take off.

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 2>We had this early phase of American form policy, you know,

0:48:30.560 --> 0:48:34.839
<v Speaker 2>Ceptain American Revolution, we're very Atlantic facing. And then you know,

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 2>by the time you get to the eighteen twenties, thirties

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 2>and forties and you're talking about bringing Florida and Texas

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 2>into the Union. Then we become a golf golf of Mexico,

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 2>golf of America, depends on who you talk to these days.

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 2>That becomes the focus of our foreign policy, and then

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 2>American it becomes this beginning of a global power in

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 2>the late nineteenth century with with with the acquisition Philippines

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>and whatnot. So the Central in South America had always

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>been sort of an abstraction. There was the Mono doctrine,

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 2>but America didn't really have much power to police that.

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>There were there were there were various individual filibuster attempts

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 2>by American citizens with armies and whatnot private, although some

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 2>were sort of okay by congressman senators to cut out

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:37.240
<v Speaker 2>parts of Central and South America. It's really not until

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 2>about nineteen hundred. It's all through the nineteenth century.

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, there's a whole part in the Grant

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Presidency where there's where a bunch of Republicans want Canada

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>as reparations for the UK's for Britain's role in the

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Civil War. Sure too. I mean like it

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like we had all sorts of ambitions to grab

0:49:59.520 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Western hemisphere in the nineteenth century, right.

0:50:02.480 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I got about one third of Mexico. So

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 2>with with Roosevelt, and I'd also extend this to look

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 2>at Woodrow Wilson. There then is is I think, I

0:50:15.360 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 2>think more over not simply using filibusters or threads, but

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 2>actually you know, going into countries and and and putting

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 2>putting some teeth into the Monroe doctrine.

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that was the thing I mean he almost

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to I mean, it was interesting you used a phrase.

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he viewed it as a police you know,

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to police the governments in the Western hemisphere,

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, know what was going on, right, And it

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was almost the first use of the idea that we're

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be the global police force. Yeah, you know.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 2>So I think that there Bracklin Roosevelt related distantly, sort

0:50:55.320 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of gets the credit for the American century and for

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 2>this notion of when the Second World Wars over, re

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 2>going to the four policemen, you know, sort of take

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 2>care of the world. And I think a lot of

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 2>these ideas, including the social welfare state with the progressive

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:14.480
<v Speaker 2>here under ro results. I think actually the antecedents are

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 2>there around nineteen five, nineteen ten, and it's a result,

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's with the different Roosevelt. And so certainly you

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>know Roosevelt have been the top cop in New York

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 2>when he was a commissioner, and he took policing very seriously.

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 2>He applies the concept not just to you know, a

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.359
<v Speaker 2>city or a state, but to an entire country. If

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:40.439
<v Speaker 2>countries will not live up to the obligations, he said,

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the name must be they must be policed. Of course,

0:51:45.920 --> 0:51:48.200
<v Speaker 2>what we know is happening here also is that there's

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a game that's being played by European countries as well,

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>which is to get some of these Latin American countries

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 2>into debt and then it would be made to pay

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 2>by for example, leasing a ports, we're opening up markets.

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 2>And Roosevelt was very very quick to ensure that, for

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 2>example Great Britain and in Germany, we're not going to

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 2>be effective doing that, violating the minour doctrine. But it

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>was also tactic, as you suggested, that he from time

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to time employed as well.

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to his days in New

0:52:25.560 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>York politics, because that was a very machine heavy wing

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican Party in the eighteen eighties, in the

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>eighteen nineties, was he seen as a good party Man

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen eighties and nineties because of because he

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was connected to wealthy patrons of Manhattan, or was he

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>already being identified as a bit of a disruptor inside

0:52:55.120 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the party.

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.799
<v Speaker 2>It was always a bit of a disruptor. He was

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.320
<v Speaker 2>connected to wealthy people in New York. But many of

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 2>these wealthy people, including much of the people in his

0:53:03.680 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 2>graduating class at Harvard, thought he was nuts for getting

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 2>involved in politics, at least politics at the local level.

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 2>If somebody wants to bring you into their cabinet and

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 2>make you Secretary of States, well then what kind of

0:53:19.280 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 2>a service. But Rosewock came in at the low end,

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 2>and he was questioned about this some of his friends,

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.719
<v Speaker 2>and he said, you know, either either I'm going to

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 2>be part of the willing class or I'm not, and

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I aim to be part of the ruling class. In

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 2>other words, the ruling class had been losing its share

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:42.279
<v Speaker 2>ever since whenever eighteen under eighteen twenty, eighteen thirty, the

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Patricius right, and so Roosevelt is going to, in effect

0:53:48.160 --> 0:53:54.240
<v Speaker 2>try to reassert that no bless oblige. So in democratic age,

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 2>well you've got to get involved. He gets involved, but

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.879
<v Speaker 2>he was not he was not a great party man.

0:54:04.040 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 2>There's a maverick. There was a lot of talk in

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 2>eighteen eighty four about the Republican Party's presidential candidate, James G. Blaine,

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 2>as someone had the continental liar from the state of Maine,

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 2>very controversial, reputed to be the dirty politician, had taken bribes,

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 2>and so Roosevelt fought very hard as a young man

0:54:27.360 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 2>to try to stop that nomination, and of course he

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 2>couldn't at that time, but there was a real question

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 2>would you stay with the party or would you bolt?

0:54:36.560 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 2>And Rooselt understood that if you bolt it, if he

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:43.720
<v Speaker 2>was not regular, then he would have really no chance.

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 2>There was no way he was going to become a

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.439
<v Speaker 2>Democrat at that time. The Democrat Party in the North

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 2>was associated with the immigrants, with Irish, in the South

0:54:52.160 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 2>was associated with secession. And so he swallowed real hard

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 2>and he became a regular politician in eighteen eighty four,

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 2>and he gave campaign speeches on behalf of Blaine. But

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that was of the moment that was opportunistic, and he

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.480
<v Speaker 2>was always free. He thought to go his own way,

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes he did.

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is the fault of some of the educators.

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I have, But I've always tied William Jennings Bryan and

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt oddly more together than separate. And yet they were

0:55:27.120 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on opposing tickets, Right, What did you think of William

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Jennings Bryan.

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 2>So he was not a big Brian fan, probably for

0:55:36.080 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a few reasons. Some would be political. He just didn't

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:44.799
<v Speaker 2>like Brian's politics. Brian was a populist. He was also

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat. Brian was concerned with, for example, enlarging the

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:54.720
<v Speaker 2>country's money supply with free silver. Roosevelt's on the East coast.

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 2>It's the gold standard all the way. And so Brian

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 2>represents to conservatives. And we were talking earlier about you know,

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 2>sometimes Rooselt's progressive and sometimes he's a conservative. He was

0:56:05.680 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 2>earing a conservative on Brian, who he thought was just

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, this kind of you know, was going to

0:56:12.640 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 2>make the French Revolution happen in America, was going to

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 2>attack the money supply, and and representing a group, you know,

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 2>American farmers who Roosevelt respected but did not really take

0:56:25.280 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 2>seriously as as being a part of part of the

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:32.560
<v Speaker 2>ruling class. They had their place, they should vote, and

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:37.400
<v Speaker 2>they should have like like Roosevelt. I wonder if Roosevelt. Also,

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, we think of Roosevelt being so young, the

0:56:40.440 --> 0:56:44.360
<v Speaker 2>youngest American president, Brian was actually just a little bit younger.

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 2>He was the boy orator. I always wondering if there

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>was a part of Roosevelt it was vaguely jealous that

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Roosevelt didn't have a great speaking voice, could get a

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:58.280
<v Speaker 2>good speech, great speaking voice, and here's Brian, just wonderful.

0:56:58.320 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 2>He would have been on radio time or television and

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 2>really give a speech. If we know, blind's because this

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 2>cross of gold speech you gave. There wasn't a little

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:11.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of jealousy that here was this younger man who

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 2>had these qualities that he aspired to have himself.

0:57:14.360 --> 0:57:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, by the way, I'm really taken with the

0:57:17.240 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>cover of your book because of the it feels like

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an authentic photo. I'm assuming it's not in that it's colorized.

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It is colorist, right, but it has this just wonderful right.

0:57:30.800 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And you just brought up something that I think is

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things I like to say

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is you know about certain people that run for president

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the modern era, boy, they'd have made a great

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century president, meaning when you didn't need this sort

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of public oratory or the public charisma, And here's Teddy

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt thought of it as this incredibly charismatic president, larger

0:57:52.440 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>than life figure. Would he have been a nobody in

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the TV? The TV era?

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you know, it's hard to answer because I'm not

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 2>sure how the charisma translates.

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Again, didn't have a great projecting voice, the pond's neck glasses,

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure about that. Wasn't a particularly tall man.

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes you kind of look back at those photographs

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:28.800
<v Speaker 2>and you see him as a forty year old officer

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in the Spanish American War, and he just doesn't maybe

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:36.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe look like, I don't know, Douglas MacArthur, you know, with.

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 1>No, he doesn't that right, Yeah, the square job.

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:41.640
<v Speaker 2>So so it is. It is a real question.

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:58:42.800 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 2>And I guess to answer your question, I don't know

0:58:45.840 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 2>if that, if all that would have translated particularly well.

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 2>He was very well read, He was a thoughtful man.

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:54.000
<v Speaker 2>He was an intellectual one. Is America ever been in

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:57.840
<v Speaker 2>love with people who have demonstrated intellectual qualities? Uh, that's

0:58:57.880 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty tough to come up with. It's possible though, that

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 2>his argumented the skills and debates would have caught people's eye.

0:59:08.160 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 2>It's also possible that because people who went to see

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 2>him live they said, wow, you know, there's.

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Good always really good reactions. Right, Yeah, there were, there

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>were good reactions there.

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I wouldn't I wouldn't count him out.

0:59:21.960 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the other points you make that I thought, frankly,

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it was one of those I'm my boy, there's a

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>whole book in here. Was the how Roosevelt's presidency was

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of the first one. You know, Lincoln challenged the

0:59:36.320 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 1>supremacy of Congress for obvious reasons during the Civil War,

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but the but the sort of the strong presidency versus

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the strong legislative branch. You know, the last time there

0:59:48.120 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was big fights like that was you had to go

0:59:49.920 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 1>back to Andrew Jackson, and you were sort of painting

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a picture that Roosevelt in many ways was, you know,

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of certainly in the twentieth century, and now in hindsight,

0:59:59.720 --> 1:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like he laid the groundwork for a strong the

1:00:02.680 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>strong executive that we're now used to today. And in

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>many ways he epitomized this.

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go ahead, Yeah, it was semi cael an imperial presidency, and.

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>It was the big the what realistically really kind of,

1:00:18.160 --> 1:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in hindsight, now the first of its kind, right, And.

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I think I think what makes it unique is that

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:28.959
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned you mentioned Andrew Jackson back in the day,

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and even Lincoln a little bit later. Nobody really had

1:00:32.760 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the kind of force and power that Roosevelt had. The

1:00:38.880 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>country had obviously grown great development, including industrial development, and

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>so Jackson and Lincoln were primarily presidents of groaring republics,

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>and Roosevelt was a president of a country that was

1:00:56.440 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>industrializing and that was urbanizing. We just become an overseas

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>imperial power. And that means that how the presidency is

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 2>also going to increase. There's more resources, there's a bigger military,

1:01:12.840 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 2>there's more money available, and this can give someone who's

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>interested and not necessarily expand the part of the presidency

1:01:22.960 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>just to do it or to challenge the constitution, but

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 2>to project, say his vision about what America should look like,

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>or the fruition of America. If you don't have a

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>real strong congress or court system, then with those advantages,

1:01:37.120 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 2>that president can really push things. And it doesn't come

1:01:42.720 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>just with the times. The individual is also important, because

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>we don't talk about McKinley that way. We don't talk

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 2>about William Howard Taff that way, and if talk about

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Wilson that way. Wilson came from a southern state troits tradition.

1:01:55.040 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>What allows Wilson to and somebody's expand the power of

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the presidency. Not unlike Lincoln, he was involved in a

1:02:01.360 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>great war.

1:02:02.480 --> 1:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Right. You point out something and I remember this being

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading something about Bill Clinton feeling this way

1:02:09.800 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>after nine to eleven that he lamented that his presidency

1:02:13.520 --> 1:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>was too peaceful and too prosperous. Right, Like, he didn't

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have a moment where he could have made

1:02:20.320 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>history right. You know, there's always the debate, right, do

1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the men make the history or just the history make

1:02:25.240 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the men right? Type of thing. And you write something

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>similar about Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt that there was

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a jealousy of sorts that Wilson, you know that he

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a chance to lead. But here's the thing,

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Like he ran for president in nineteen twelve. You know

1:02:44.000 --> 1:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>he could get elected in nineteen twelve and in theory

1:02:46.400 --> 1:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have been president during World War one. Give you know,

1:02:49.880 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of alternative histories. That's a that's

1:02:52.640 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a sliding door. That's not unrealistic. Teddy Roosevelt as president

1:02:57.400 --> 1:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at the start of the Great War, there's a America

1:03:00.560 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>get in sooner or later? Or is it just different

1:03:04.160 --> 1:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric but same same basic result.

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that he begins to arm the country a

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>percadials campaign, I would guess pretty much right away, like

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 2>in late nineteen fourteen, whereas the Wilson administration waited until

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>hunting right and I think unless the Germans had sort

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 2>of pulled back on unrestricted some warfare, I mean they did,

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>but then by nineteen seventeen they they put it back

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>in play. I think Roosevelt I could see a Roosevelt

1:03:43.440 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 2>administration going to war in nineteen fifteen unless the German

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:52.200
<v Speaker 2>government recognized this guy's real serious, this guy will do it,

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>and then completely, you know, leave the Americans alone. And

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>then I wonder in that context if Roosevelt would have

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>found ways too, For example, aid the Allies even at

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the United States wasn't part of the Daly cause of

1:04:07.720 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>course you could do so saying we're neutral country and

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>we can trade with who we want to. In that sense,

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>it would not have been much different than what occurred

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>under Wilson's presidency, which is that billions went to the

1:04:19.960 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Allies and millions went to the Germans. But I think

1:04:25.120 --> 1:04:26.560
<v Speaker 2>we would have been in the war earlier.

1:04:27.640 --> 1:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>That's my initial instinct when even asking you the question,

1:04:31.640 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was I assume he gets us in earlier? Is it?

1:04:36.920 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You know? Do you know does the groundwork for the

1:04:40.680 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>United Nations get laid if there's a Roosevelt presidency in

1:04:44.080 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the teens rather than a Wilson presidency.

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's possible, because Roosevelt really came to loathe Wilson,

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and so anything that Wilson proposed, Roosevelt was going to

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>argue against it.

1:04:56.960 --> 1:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't alone among conservatives both of that era and

1:04:59.640 --> 1:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of today when it comes to Wilson, I guess.

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:07.280
<v Speaker 2>And and so when when Wilson proposes the League of Nations,

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>t R really attacks it. Of course, but one can

1:05:12.920 --> 1:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>imagine that that Roosevelt would have loved to have had

1:05:17.240 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>the world stage, and if he had been in power,

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>one could easily imagine that he would have made some

1:05:23.960 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>proposal for this great, huge crusade which is world peace. Well, actually,

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:32.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's sort of what Wilson was asking for

1:05:32.520 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the war to end all wars. One can imagine Roosevelt's

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>sort of adopting like rhetoric and the like mission. I

1:05:41.640 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 2>can't remember who it was, but the research one of

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:49.480
<v Speaker 2>contemporaries said the other thing that really bothered Roosevelt was

1:05:49.520 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that Wilson was doing things that that Rooselt would have

1:05:53.560 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>loved to have done, including including, uh, go to Congress

1:05:58.520 --> 1:06:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and and give the you know, the State the Union Address,

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>which which was just like habitually just sort of like

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>delivered this this this big long paper. And now here's

1:06:06.960 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Wilson going to Congress and delivering it. And of course,

1:06:11.200 --> 1:06:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you know from now once a year that's what we do.

1:06:13.400 --> 1:06:15.959
<v Speaker 2>We sit around our TVs and whatnot, and we've watched

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 2>rallies depending on this, and I think, uh not unlike

1:06:23.240 --> 1:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Roosealt's relationship to Brian, there was a little bit of

1:06:26.400 --> 1:06:31.440
<v Speaker 2>jealousy in Roosevelt's reaction, it seems criticism to Wilson.

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason I think the presidency had a

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>chance to sort of dominate Congress, as Congress was pretty

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>evenly divided. That was another mark of similarity between the

1:06:49.320 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>era we live in now in the air then, is

1:06:51.680 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that we were in the middle of a political realignment

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>back then. We just didn't fully realize that. You know,

1:06:56.680 --> 1:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of historians like yourself, right, you can oh, well,

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the middle of a political realignment. Well at

1:07:02.720 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment, people didn't realize it, right. I always say

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that about the moment we're living in. Like, you know,

1:07:07.440 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we think every election is this permanent you know picture

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of a coalition. I mean I watched these people going

1:07:14.520 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump coalition. It's like, Okay, on one day, Trump

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>had these voters and there's a whole bunch of people

1:07:19.480 --> 1:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that literally the next day might not have voted that way.

1:07:21.560 --> 1:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Like a This is a more fluid situation than we

1:07:25.000 --> 1:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>give it credit for. But as you went through and

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>writing this book, you know, how much did it echo

1:07:32.640 --> 1:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>with the current era? In your mind as you were writing.

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think back to nineteen hundred nineteen five,

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:47.560
<v Speaker 2>anxiety about where the country's moving, anxiety about form policy.

1:07:48.640 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>We were just entering a phase where we're going to

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>become an imperial power, which seems to contradict our history, right.

1:07:57.600 --> 1:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the United States was born in a great

1:08:00.200 --> 1:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>anti colonial rebellion. We identified ourselves as the world's leader

1:08:04.120 --> 1:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>against colonization. And now with the war against Spain. You know,

1:08:07.840 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>there's Hawaii, there's the Philippines.

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>There's suddenly acquiring territory. And this was quite a This

1:08:13.280 --> 1:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>was a something we hadn't really done since Mexico, I

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>guess exactly.

1:08:18.840 --> 1:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, I'm thinking, you know, we're industrializing,

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>there's monopolies, there's a need for reform. This would become

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the progressive era. There's the Populist Party. These farmers in

1:08:29.360 --> 1:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the frontier, hitherto the bone and sinew, the backbone of

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the country. The here's the textbooks, the agrarians. If you

1:08:37.320 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 2>were a president back in their own republic and you

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>were listing what you did for a living, you would

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>check I was a farmer. Of course, farmers are the

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:49.320
<v Speaker 2>best people. So the American identity is undergoing a great change.

1:08:49.640 --> 1:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Some people would argue of last twenty five years or

1:08:52.080 --> 1:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>so from policy AI dot com billionaires, the American identity

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>is undergoing a great change, and so in times of uncertainty,

1:09:04.080 --> 1:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>one might rebel against the existing structure. In nineteen you know,

1:09:09.320 --> 1:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>term the century. It wasn't that that people dumped the

1:09:12.280 --> 1:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party, but in a sense and latched under Roosevelt.

1:09:16.920 --> 1:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>They latched onto a maverick within the party who was

1:09:20.960 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 2>never within the good graces of the party's old guard.

1:09:24.760 --> 1:09:30.360
<v Speaker 2>One could say that Trump is a transactional Republican and

1:09:30.640 --> 1:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>was quite willing to go his own way. So he

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>said that maybe in twenty sixteen and run a third

1:09:35.400 --> 1:09:38.519
<v Speaker 2>party candidcy, which is what Roosevelt did, And so the

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>party sort of, you know, went with him whenever he

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:46.519
<v Speaker 2>was in power. And when Roosevelt was in power, the

1:09:46.560 --> 1:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>old guard went with him too. But when Roosevelt left,

1:09:49.760 --> 1:09:51.679
<v Speaker 2>they quickly moved on to Taft.

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>So what's the lesson there, because that's fascinating to me too,

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like the McKinley wing of the party

1:09:58.200 --> 1:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>took back control of the party by nineteen twenty, right

1:10:01.600 --> 1:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and Harding and Coolidge, we're really more Republicans in the

1:10:05.760 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>in the style of your of your McKinley's or or

1:10:09.160 --> 1:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>your Tafts less so Roosevelt. Is that is that foreshadowing

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>what we should expect inside this Republican party as they

1:10:19.240 --> 1:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>move forward post Rum.

1:10:20.360 --> 1:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to say, because on one hand, there's just

1:10:23.080 --> 1:10:26.400
<v Speaker 2>there's just politics, right sure, and so and so, even

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>even if I'm the old guard, you know, and we

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:32.519
<v Speaker 2>look like we've got control this year, there's there's there's

1:10:32.560 --> 1:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>elections coming, and if you want to stand power, you

1:10:35.000 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>have to win elections. And so on one hand, it

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>would be easy to say, yeah, I can imagine that.

1:10:42.240 --> 1:10:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Uh you know when when when frum scone the cult

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 2>of Chrisma that's there, that the Republican Party is going

1:10:49.479 --> 1:10:53.519
<v Speaker 2>to look quite a bit different. Maybe so perhaps, But

1:10:53.640 --> 1:10:56.679
<v Speaker 2>another hand, you have to win elections, and so what

1:10:56.800 --> 1:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>are the voters pushing for? What are the voters demanding?

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And in nineteen twenties, you know, even though farmers had

1:11:05.040 --> 1:11:08.320
<v Speaker 2>are difficult, there was a booming stock market, the standard

1:11:08.360 --> 1:11:12.000
<v Speaker 2>living kept increasing, and so they were Republicans who might,

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:14.519
<v Speaker 2>you know, in their library have a couple of books

1:11:14.520 --> 1:11:18.679
<v Speaker 2>by Roselant, say Roosevelt's Great, Roosevelt's My Hero, and I'm

1:11:18.720 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>supporting the results because I'm voting for Republicans. But really

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 2>they might be supporting a Republican party that was antithetical

1:11:25.120 --> 1:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to Roosevelt. They can't necessarily see the difference because it's

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>party labels. They're voting the pocketbook. They feel good.

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>About this.

1:11:33.080 --> 1:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>With us, It's not exactly clear where some of these

1:11:36.760 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Republican voters might go after Trump, and that depends upon

1:11:41.360 --> 1:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of things, the future of the economy, the

1:11:45.960 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 2>future of how the things that been happening the last year.

1:11:48.640 --> 1:11:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So I'll jacked in play out this year we have

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>elections and in you know, three years and moving forward.

1:11:56.520 --> 1:11:59.719
<v Speaker 2>So wow, it's a steal. It's a hard question.

1:11:59.760 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Man. Well, I'd like to actually spend the next five

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>or so minutes here as we wrap up, talking about

1:12:05.880 --> 1:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>another book you wrote, which has to do with moderates.

1:12:11.640 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Vital Center of American Politics from the

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Founding to Today. And I look at these two books, right,

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you wrote about Teddy and you wrote that book, and

1:12:20.080 --> 1:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it tells me you sort of which is why, frankly,

1:12:23.360 --> 1:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I was why I wanted you on, because I sort

1:12:26.040 --> 1:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of I always say I'm not a liberal or conservative.

1:12:29.040 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm an incrementalist, and that I'm a believer that ultimately,

1:12:33.240 --> 1:12:37.639
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we have you know, whenever we incrementally move,

1:12:38.680 --> 1:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it's on solid footing. It takes you know, and it's incremental, right.

1:12:43.200 --> 1:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>SOID security is the best example of incrementalism that over

1:12:46.560 --> 1:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>time takes root and then it becomes something something more permanent.

1:12:51.080 --> 1:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>To many people. When you view the center of American politics,

1:12:58.439 --> 1:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>do you view it in terms of the middle ground

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:03.519
<v Speaker 1>between left and right or do you view it more

1:13:03.560 --> 1:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how I describe, which is it's not

1:13:06.400 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>whether I have some views. I'm very progressive, some views

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm very conservative, but ultimately I come down as an incrementalist.

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:16.519
<v Speaker 1>Some might call that a pragmatist. However you want to

1:13:16.600 --> 1:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>view it, What do you view as the center of

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>American politics? Is it ideological or is it really more

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about how you practice politics?

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I do you tell you practice politics? You could be

1:13:30.200 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, you know, to be a Democrat

1:13:33.360 --> 1:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen thirty five, it's much different than to be

1:13:38.200 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat in twenty twenty five. And the party's origins

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 2>are actually I think the protection institution, slavery, or these

1:13:47.479 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>forms in the seventeen nineties, principally by the efforts of

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson and Madison. For parties to be successful, they have

1:13:54.800 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to attract coalitions and people, and so that's where I

1:13:59.160 --> 1:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>think of moderate, That's where I think of connecting with voters.

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:06.720
<v Speaker 2>And if you're too far on the right, I think

1:14:06.720 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 2>if you're too far on the left, you're not gonna

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:10.920
<v Speaker 2>be able to do that effectively. You'll have your hardcore,

1:14:11.439 --> 1:14:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, enough to lose elections respectively. But that's not

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the name of the game. And so, you know, when

1:14:18.200 --> 1:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think of the two major parties and I look

1:14:20.960 --> 1:14:26.840
<v Speaker 2>at some of the rhetoric, I can usually find some

1:14:27.680 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>appeal at a center, and sometimes it's a big appeal,

1:14:33.520 --> 1:14:37.080
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes maybe not. For example, it's not such a

1:14:37.080 --> 1:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>big appeal. And when I don't see the appeal to

1:14:40.680 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 2>the center, that gives them suggestion that that party may

1:14:44.479 --> 1:14:48.160
<v Speaker 2>not be very successful in the next selection.

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:51.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, I answer this question people are I had

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 1>a student in a class I teach currently was asking

1:14:55.520 --> 1:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>me why the Democrats come across as lashier than the Republicans,

1:15:00.040 --> 1:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And to me, it's a matt I always say, well,

1:15:01.800 --> 1:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>there's your answer is a mathic problem, meaning there are

1:15:05.720 --> 1:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>more base Republicans and based Democrats, and so the path

1:15:10.320 --> 1:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to fifty percent plus one for a Republican allows them

1:15:14.000 --> 1:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more conservative than the path to fifty percent

1:15:17.000 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>plus one. And this is generically you know, in certain

1:15:19.160 --> 1:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>places it's blue or and you can you can do this,

1:15:21.640 --> 1:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but the Democrats need more of these moderates to get

1:15:25.400 --> 1:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to fifty percent plus one. By the way, this was

1:15:27.680 --> 1:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>reversed right when you and I were growing up in

1:15:29.920 --> 1:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the sixty seventies and eighties. You could argue it the

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>other way. The Republicans right where they considered more of

1:15:35.439 --> 1:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the centrist party, well they didn't. They had a smaller base.

1:15:39.240 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats had the larger base, so the Democrats didn't

1:15:42.080 --> 1:15:44.479
<v Speaker 1>have to you know, it always I always was trying

1:15:44.479 --> 1:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell the student, Look, it's just a numbers game.

1:15:46.680 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You know. Parties aren't centrists because they want to be

1:15:48.960 --> 1:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Parties reach out to the center out of necessity, right,

1:15:52.960 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not out of so in looking at that, there's clearly

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum, right, there is a We always say there's

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>this vast middle of America, and some of us want

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to believe it's between the thirty yard Lindes. Is it

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:14.559
<v Speaker 1>is that correct? Or how should we describe the vast

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>moderate center of the American electorate?

1:16:17.840 --> 1:16:20.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that's one of the great narratives

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:23.439
<v Speaker 2>that's been out there for at least the last half century.

1:16:23.600 --> 1:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I think back, for example, to Richard Nixon, the Forgotten American.

1:16:28.920 --> 1:16:34.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's it's it's about recognizing you can't reach

1:16:34.439 --> 1:16:38.640
<v Speaker 2>these people unless you recognize that they're there, that that

1:16:38.680 --> 1:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to automatically vote for you, automatically not

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>vote for you. And so I I, you know, I

1:16:45.160 --> 1:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>look at the hardcore voters on both sides, and what

1:16:49.160 --> 1:16:52.599
<v Speaker 2>always interests me though, is that who's available, who is

1:16:52.640 --> 1:16:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in play, And it seems to me that that's that's

1:16:56.080 --> 1:16:59.720
<v Speaker 2>who you need to go after. That that, to me,

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the art of politics, which is which is

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>building coalitions, big tents. And you obviously have to do

1:17:07.040 --> 1:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>this because if you if you're in a country our

1:17:08.840 --> 1:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>size and you only have two major parties, well.

1:17:11.800 --> 1:17:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the flaw in our system right there,

1:17:13.640 --> 1:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we're trying. Can you imagine going to a

1:17:17.360 --> 1:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>clothing store and they're only being small and extra large,

1:17:23.040 --> 1:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we've done to you know. And you know,

1:17:26.800 --> 1:17:29.599
<v Speaker 1>I think people sit there and say, yeah, I'm registered

1:17:29.600 --> 1:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as a Republican, but the Republicans don't represent everything I believe.

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Or I'm registered as a Democrat, but the Democrats don't

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>represent everything I believe. That if we had, you know,

1:17:39.160 --> 1:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if we had more parties and no majority and no

1:17:42.400 --> 1:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>party had to get a majority to get power, but

1:17:44.240 --> 1:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you had to form a coalition. I mean, in some ways,

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I always say both parties are coalitions, are not parties,

1:17:49.920 --> 1:17:53.439
<v Speaker 1>They're coalitions of multiple sub parties. Right, there's a there's

1:17:53.439 --> 1:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a Christian Conservative Party, there's a business party, right all

1:17:57.000 --> 1:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on the right, there's a progressive you know, you could

1:17:59.120 --> 1:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>put together your for pieces of each you know, basically

1:18:03.479 --> 1:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>multiple political parties within this umbrella group called the left

1:18:07.040 --> 1:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and the right. You know, look, I will I will admit, well,

1:18:12.040 --> 1:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want us to be a parliamentary system. I

1:18:14.880 --> 1:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do wish we had a system that allowed for parties

1:18:19.320 --> 1:18:21.559
<v Speaker 1>to be more representative of where people wanted to be.

1:18:21.640 --> 1:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>But you but you had sort of top four, right,

1:18:24.160 --> 1:18:26.559
<v Speaker 1>we had four major were really I think we're really

1:18:26.600 --> 1:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>four major political parties stuffed into two.

1:18:29.640 --> 1:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Yeah, well it's it's obviously it's a very diverse country.

1:18:34.560 --> 1:18:38.479
<v Speaker 2>And I think some of the difficulty in going after

1:18:38.479 --> 1:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the center is you don't want to alienate certain coalitions

1:18:44.960 --> 1:18:50.920
<v Speaker 2>within your coach right, and and obviously if you do that,

1:18:51.439 --> 1:18:56.439
<v Speaker 2>there's there's there's the fear of alienation. But you know,

1:18:56.600 --> 1:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>there's also the question of do you want to government

1:18:59.040 --> 1:19:00.880
<v Speaker 2>from fear? Do you want to do you want to

1:19:01.080 --> 1:19:03.080
<v Speaker 2>try to gain things all the time. So if I

1:19:03.080 --> 1:19:05.479
<v Speaker 2>could do in one more result reference and this guy

1:19:05.520 --> 1:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>really was a romantic and he wasn't thinking about, you know,

1:19:09.000 --> 1:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of electoral votes, and he wasn't counting. He was

1:19:12.400 --> 1:19:15.679
<v Speaker 2>really leading from his heart. And maybe this is romantic

1:19:15.760 --> 1:19:17.519
<v Speaker 2>thing to say, but I think if we had more

1:19:17.600 --> 1:19:21.240
<v Speaker 2>of that, I think voters would really resonate to someone

1:19:21.280 --> 1:19:25.559
<v Speaker 2>who they thought was speaking directly to them, was mostly

1:19:25.640 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>sincere and believed that we all had something in stake together.

1:19:32.479 --> 1:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't just reading spreadsheets.

1:19:37.040 --> 1:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>As a historian, who's a president, we don't have enough

1:19:40.520 --> 1:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>scholarship on that. You wish people would spend more time

1:19:43.400 --> 1:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>getting to know deserves the better biography treatment. You know,

1:19:47.600 --> 1:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I used to say I felt like Eisenhower was under scholarship.

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Then that's changed, I would argain in the last twenty years,

1:19:52.960 --> 1:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten the proper what I think is a proper

1:19:56.240 --> 1:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of historians tackling him in different ways, which feel

1:20:02.400 --> 1:20:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there's some people that are overwritten about, like Kennedy, and

1:20:04.960 --> 1:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I say this with no disrespect, they just you know,

1:20:07.040 --> 1:20:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I get, I get why what what does it? Because

1:20:10.160 --> 1:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of the circumstances of his death. But I'm curious because

1:20:14.240 --> 1:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I still actually think there are more things to learn

1:20:15.880 --> 1:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>about Teddy. So I'm not saying this to say, hey,

1:20:17.960 --> 1:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we've written. You know, we've had too much on Teddy.

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree. I think not enough sometimes still there.

1:20:24.160 --> 1:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But who's somebody that he thinks a bit under represented

1:20:27.520 --> 1:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in your ranks of the historians? Now you like to

1:20:30.680 --> 1:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>see tackled?

1:20:31.880 --> 1:20:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I sure have to see some aspects of James

1:20:36.920 --> 1:20:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Monroe's presidency looked at more carefully. So this is kind

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:43.600
<v Speaker 2>of going way back. But you know, he was the

1:20:43.640 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 2>last president to heurre knee britches, and so we're really

1:20:46.400 --> 1:20:47.360
<v Speaker 2>moving from you.

1:20:47.400 --> 1:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Use that phrase, and can I make a confession. When

1:20:50.280 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you use the phrase the first time, I'm like, what

1:20:52.000 --> 1:20:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the hell are knee britches? So I literally the old

1:20:54.680 --> 1:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't done this in a while. Where I did

1:20:56.080 --> 1:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the old? Okay, I gotta I gotta go look up

1:20:57.960 --> 1:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what that is. You know, you know when as a kid,

1:21:00.240 --> 1:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know you're reading books that are a little ahead

1:21:01.840 --> 1:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of your time, you're constantly doing that. I had done that.

1:21:03.960 --> 1:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, neighbor, oh, neighbridges, got it? Okay?

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, so very eighteenth century. Yes, it is Monroe as

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:16.559
<v Speaker 2>this transitional figure, right, I mean he was a founder,

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>was he was neighbors.

1:21:19.000 --> 1:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>He was the last founder president, right, I would.

1:21:21.280 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Say so, yeah, John Quincy Adams follows him. But John

1:21:25.280 --> 1:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Quincy Adams was bored in the revolution, right, And we're

1:21:28.120 --> 1:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>moving into what would be called machine politics, and Monroe

1:21:33.760 --> 1:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of resisted that. Monroe wanted to push what he

1:21:37.160 --> 1:21:40.559
<v Speaker 2>once called amalgamation politics, which is we need to go

1:21:40.680 --> 1:21:43.839
<v Speaker 2>back to where there are no parties. There's just essentially,

1:21:44.320 --> 1:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, Americans in governments and we're not fiderlists and

1:21:47.280 --> 1:21:50.200
<v Speaker 2>we're not we're not republicans. We're just all in this together,

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>which which looks so antiquated by that time, it's just

1:21:54.160 --> 1:21:57.679
<v Speaker 2>blown out the waters in eighteen twenties. But I'm interested

1:21:57.760 --> 1:22:01.439
<v Speaker 2>in the intellectual history that's there, his readings of you know,

1:22:01.680 --> 1:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I Thinkian democracy and the Roman Republic, and you know,

1:22:05.920 --> 1:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>he was the last chief executive to essentially run you know,

1:22:09.800 --> 1:22:11.960
<v Speaker 2>all by himself. There was there was no one opposed him.

1:22:12.280 --> 1:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>So there really was that moment of what do you

1:22:15.320 --> 1:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>call it moderation or the center or consensus that we

1:22:18.760 --> 1:22:20.679
<v Speaker 2>could we could, we could as a country say, yeah,

1:22:20.760 --> 1:22:24.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're essentially behind this person. It doesn't last.

1:22:25.720 --> 1:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, you know Lincoln has that now, but he

1:22:27.760 --> 1:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>never had it in practice. Right, what's that meaning that

1:22:31.680 --> 1:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>what you just described that Monroe had this sort of Hey,

1:22:34.240 --> 1:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>he's representative of all of us. Well, that's right. In hindsight,

1:22:37.800 --> 1:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we've decided Lincoln is is an avatar for the for

1:22:41.520 --> 1:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>who we want America to have been in the nineteenth century,

1:22:44.120 --> 1:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't what America was, but he's the avatar

1:22:46.160 --> 1:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of what we could be. Right, he's America. I think

1:22:49.479 --> 1:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>FDR is pretty close to achieving that status. Eisenhower, I

1:22:52.640 --> 1:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>think has that status. But there's not many presidents that

1:22:56.240 --> 1:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have that status.

1:22:57.880 --> 1:23:02.120
<v Speaker 2>No, there isn't. Oftentimes it's it's chief executives who are

1:23:02.160 --> 1:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>associated in some way, shape or form with wars, with

1:23:06.479 --> 1:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>America's more popular wars, more necessary wars, and and so

1:23:12.360 --> 1:23:13.080
<v Speaker 2>that blups off.

1:23:13.600 --> 1:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>You made a great case for James Monroe America at

1:23:16.360 --> 1:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>two fifty. How should the average citizens celebrate.

1:23:22.760 --> 1:23:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm part of their country, cognizance of are our successes,

1:23:31.600 --> 1:23:36.200
<v Speaker 2>cognizance of our failures, and to love and respect our

1:23:36.240 --> 1:23:40.160
<v Speaker 2>country enough to look at it wholly and clearly as

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>as best we can and to do what we can

1:23:44.680 --> 1:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to be good, productive, honest, deliberate, considerate citizens.

1:23:53.760 --> 1:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, David, I enjoyed it. Uh, you know, look, I'm

1:23:57.200 --> 1:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>an easy mark. I enjoyed Teddy Roosevelt books. But look,

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you the best history books to read are the ones

1:24:06.439 --> 1:24:08.559
<v Speaker 1>that make you feel like they echo in the moment

1:24:08.600 --> 1:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>we're currently living in. And I would say that you've

1:24:11.479 --> 1:24:13.479
<v Speaker 1>you've you've done a good job of trying to capture

1:24:14.000 --> 1:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think that's a plus side of a

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>history book, right is when it can also it's writing

1:24:19.080 --> 1:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about the past, but it's writing about the present. Well.

1:24:21.240 --> 1:24:25.479
<v Speaker 2>Thanks, You know, the historian is objective as objective can be. Us.

1:24:25.560 --> 1:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>This sources you're you're going to get, You're going to

1:24:28.160 --> 1:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>get influenced by the times you're living in. It's just inevitable,

1:24:31.280 --> 1:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>right exactly.

1:24:32.439 --> 1:24:35.479
<v Speaker 2>The history is living is living through the times.

1:24:36.960 --> 1:24:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, we need a lot more historians as journalists these days.

1:24:39.920 --> 1:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like context and nuances uh falls off too much.

1:24:44.439 --> 1:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad to surface this and uh, well done.

1:24:51.600 --> 1:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>It's great to get to know you, David.

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks check.

1:25:04.120 --> 1:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite historical debates over the next few

1:25:07.040 --> 1:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>decades is going to be tr and Donald Trump. It

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is sort of where there are similarities and where there

1:25:17.439 --> 1:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>are differences. And I know my tr lovers are horrified

1:25:21.439 --> 1:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>that the comparisons get made, but on some of these

1:25:25.600 --> 1:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>character issues and some of these narcissistic issues, it's hard

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>not to see to see some comparisons there. So for

1:25:34.080 --> 1:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>my top five lists this week, I'm going to the

1:25:40.200 --> 1:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Census and a little bit of a riff as there's

1:25:44.000 --> 1:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>some new census updates went around and there there was

1:25:46.240 --> 1:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a new round of panic among Democrats and liberals about

1:25:50.160 --> 1:25:56.719
<v Speaker 1>how the electoral college map in twenty thirty two after

1:25:56.760 --> 1:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thirty census is going to become a disaster

1:26:00.080 --> 1:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats because the power shift essentially, you know,

1:26:04.760 --> 1:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. You know, had Kamala Harris simply carried Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,

1:26:12.200 --> 1:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan in addition all the other states she carried,

1:26:15.400 --> 1:26:17.519
<v Speaker 1>she'd have been right at two hundred and seventy By

1:26:17.600 --> 1:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty two, the same configuration of states would have

1:26:21.920 --> 1:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>only gotten heard to two hundred and fifty nine electoral votes.

1:26:24.680 --> 1:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So basically Democrats in the next census are going to

1:26:27.640 --> 1:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>lose a dozen base electoral votes, which means the Republican

1:26:31.920 --> 1:26:34.479
<v Speaker 1>floor is going to go up about a dozen votes.

1:26:35.439 --> 1:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Just to give you some technical numbers, Essentially, you've got

1:26:40.160 --> 1:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Republican states Florida, Texas, Idaho, Utah that collectively are going

1:26:46.280 --> 1:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to net anywhere from say ten to twelve congressional districts,

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>which means electoral votes. And then you will have a

1:26:56.120 --> 1:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of losses in the blue based states. Right, California

1:26:59.800 --> 1:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in your collectively are going to lose eight to nine.

1:27:02.960 --> 1:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Throw in Illinois's going to lose another two, and then

1:27:05.120 --> 1:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to lose one each from Oregon and Minnesota.

1:27:08.080 --> 1:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Never mind some of the swing states that you're going

1:27:09.760 --> 1:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to see someromp shifts in right, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin each

1:27:12.760 --> 1:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>lose one, but North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia will each

1:27:15.680 --> 1:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>gain one. So in that sense, the swing states, the

1:27:19.160 --> 1:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>numbers are going to be the same, but it is

1:27:22.479 --> 1:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>going to mean that the Blue wall is not going

1:27:24.840 --> 1:27:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to be the important thing. It's the Sunbelt purple wall

1:27:27.600 --> 1:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to matter more. Of Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona

1:27:31.200 --> 1:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to be at least as important, if not

1:27:34.840 --> 1:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more important than the trio of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin in Michigan.

1:27:42.200 --> 1:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's just if you're sitting there, assuming the map

1:27:45.439 --> 1:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is what it is. Right, Political parties are supposed to

1:27:49.600 --> 1:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>be dynamic organizations, and they, based on investments, can can

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>try to take a base state from the other party

1:27:58.880 --> 1:28:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and turn it into a swing state. Take a swing

1:28:00.800 --> 1:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>state and try to turn it into a base state. Right.

1:28:03.200 --> 1:28:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Virginia and Colorado Democrats successfully took what were swing states

1:28:06.720 --> 1:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and turn them into base states. Arguably, Republicans Florida and

1:28:10.040 --> 1:28:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Ohio took what was swing states and turned them into

1:28:13.640 --> 1:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>base states. Right, So political parties, right, you've got right. Now,

1:28:19.800 --> 1:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Republicans would love to take a swing state like Minnesota

1:28:22.320 --> 1:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and see or a lean blue state like Minnesota and

1:28:24.800 --> 1:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>see if they can turn it into a swing state.

1:28:26.880 --> 1:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have been amusing about the idea of taking Texas

1:28:30.920 --> 1:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and making it a swing state. But now the project

1:28:37.000 --> 1:28:39.719
<v Speaker 1>is more acute than ever for the Democrats. Now, look,

1:28:40.360 --> 1:28:43.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make one tangent real quick because those

1:28:43.479 --> 1:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of you that read me closely and listen to me closely, No,

1:28:46.760 --> 1:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm obsessed that the easiest way to fix this electoral

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:51.439
<v Speaker 1>You know that one of the ways we need to

1:28:51.479 --> 1:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>fix the electoral college unfairness is to not have a

1:28:56.080 --> 1:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>constitutional amendment but simply expand the House to the size

1:28:59.240 --> 1:29:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that the founders and tended it to be. Right, it

1:29:01.520 --> 1:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is no longer a representative democracy we have now. We

1:29:04.439 --> 1:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>now have every congressional districts the size of a major

1:29:07.080 --> 1:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>city with about eight hundred thousand. They're too big. They

1:29:10.400 --> 1:29:14.519
<v Speaker 1>don't they are not representative of communities of interest anymore.

1:29:14.720 --> 1:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They're simply dominated by the most powerful faction within each

1:29:20.200 --> 1:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of these congressional districts, and so they're not doing what

1:29:22.880 --> 1:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the founders intended. The House of Representatives was supposed to

1:29:27.760 --> 1:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>expand with the population of the country, and they did

1:29:31.040 --> 1:29:34.479
<v Speaker 1>this every decade until nineteen twenty when there was a

1:29:34.520 --> 1:29:36.519
<v Speaker 1>dispute between the two parties, and then they locked it

1:29:36.520 --> 1:29:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in at four hundred and thirty five. That is now

1:29:39.680 --> 1:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>why you feel like you live in a congressional district

1:29:43.240 --> 1:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>likely where you feel like your a member of Congress

1:29:44.960 --> 1:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really represent the district. They either represent to liberal

1:29:48.880 --> 1:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the district over they sort of overrepresent the

1:29:52.720 --> 1:29:57.559
<v Speaker 1>liberal part or overrepresent the conservative part. But it doesn't

1:29:57.560 --> 1:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like anybody represents right the district as a whole.

1:30:03.200 --> 1:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So I want to set that tangent aside. So if

1:30:06.439 --> 1:30:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you're the DNC and you have leadership that is thinking

1:30:09.880 --> 1:30:12.759
<v Speaker 1>beyond tomorrow, and I don't know if that's the case,

1:30:12.800 --> 1:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I say it. I'm not trying to be snarky, but

1:30:15.439 --> 1:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, leaders of political parties are like general managers

1:30:20.920 --> 1:30:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for sports teams. The fan base expects immediate results. They

1:30:25.640 --> 1:30:28.599
<v Speaker 1>are not interested in you building a foundation that pays

1:30:28.640 --> 1:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>dividends in eight years, because that general manager won't even

1:30:31.880 --> 1:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be there in eight years, just like that political party

1:30:34.800 --> 1:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>leader won't be there in eight years. So it is

1:30:37.200 --> 1:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the incentive structures are messed up. But that doesn't mean

1:30:41.280 --> 1:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>there aren't other outside entities that should be thinking about

1:30:45.280 --> 1:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the following, which is, if the Democrats are suddenly have

1:30:49.400 --> 1:30:53.599
<v Speaker 1>an electoral college majority problem, then they need to design

1:30:53.640 --> 1:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>what I call a Project twenty to thirty two and

1:30:56.479 --> 1:31:00.439
<v Speaker 1>decide they've got to put eight to ten They've got

1:31:00.479 --> 1:31:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to invest in eight to ten states, and about half

1:31:04.479 --> 1:31:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of them are swing states that they've got to attempt

1:31:06.680 --> 1:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to make more reliably blue and or red states that

1:31:11.360 --> 1:31:14.599
<v Speaker 1>they can put into the competitive category. They have got

1:31:14.600 --> 1:31:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to expand the map even though it doesn't look obvious

1:31:18.240 --> 1:31:22.479
<v Speaker 1>that they can expand the map, so that long wind

1:31:22.560 --> 1:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>up is designed. So if project with twenty thirty two's

1:31:27.040 --> 1:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>presidential election in mind, with the new map that we'll have,

1:31:30.640 --> 1:31:34.919
<v Speaker 1>then I give you the top five list of states

1:31:35.000 --> 1:31:38.839
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats should be targeting now in an effort

1:31:40.320 --> 1:31:46.559
<v Speaker 1>to keep them competitive on in the electoral college going forward,

1:31:46.840 --> 1:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>top top top, because the political power that California and

1:31:56.920 --> 1:32:00.519
<v Speaker 1>New York, that sort of floor of support at times

1:32:00.960 --> 1:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>made it seem like the electoral college, and this is

1:32:02.920 --> 1:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>something that always is cyclical. At times it looks like

1:32:05.280 --> 1:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>there's an advantage to the Democrats, at times looks like

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's advantage to Republicans. Really it usually is who's winning

1:32:12.400 --> 1:32:16.479
<v Speaker 1>the middle more often, right is and who's got the

1:32:16.600 --> 1:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>larger base, And right now Republicans have a slightly larger

1:32:19.000 --> 1:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>base than the Democrats. So with that in mind, I'm

1:32:23.960 --> 1:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going to give you my top five lists of states

1:32:27.120 --> 1:32:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats have to invest in, either because they

1:32:31.640 --> 1:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>need to try to make that state more reliably competitive,

1:32:36.720 --> 1:32:38.599
<v Speaker 1>or they need to try to take a state and

1:32:38.680 --> 1:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>make it competitive in the first place. So number one

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>on the list is North Carolina. North Carolina by twenty

1:32:43.960 --> 1:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two is likely to be up to seventeen electoral votes.

1:32:48.400 --> 1:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It's arguably should you know, it is trending the way

1:32:52.200 --> 1:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with Georgia trending. It is younger, it's a

1:32:55.439 --> 1:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more diverse, but it hadn't quite tipped yet. Right,

1:32:58.920 --> 1:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But it is one of the highest education to growth

1:33:02.439 --> 1:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>ratios in the state. Right, it's seven percent higher education

1:33:06.560 --> 1:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>than some of its neighbors. So you know, here they've

1:33:10.360 --> 1:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got Virginia as a light blue state. Georgia is

1:33:14.360 --> 1:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a model here. But North Carolina they have multiple markets. Charlotte, Raleigh,

1:33:18.760 --> 1:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Ashville can serve as anchors there. But the bottom line

1:33:23.200 --> 1:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is they've they've acted while they are while they're competitive

1:33:26.360 --> 1:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina, they usually come up short. Right, It's

1:33:29.439 --> 1:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of what Minnesota has been to the Republicans. And yes,

1:33:33.800 --> 1:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama carried North Carolina once and in that one

1:33:37.400 --> 1:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>year they won a Senate seat, and occasionally they win

1:33:39.320 --> 1:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Senate seats just like Republicans occasionally win statewide. In Minnesota,

1:33:42.800 --> 1:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be a hard cap of about forty

1:33:45.360 --> 1:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eight percent in most federal elections. DIDO in Minnesota for

1:33:49.240 --> 1:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans did oh for that in North Carolina. They've

1:33:52.160 --> 1:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>got to change that. And North Carolina has been a

1:33:54.640 --> 1:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>state that they you know, it's always like, was on

1:33:57.160 --> 1:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the periphery of targeting in the swing states. Yeah, we're

1:33:59.800 --> 1:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna to target North Carolina the same way they would say, yeah,

1:34:02.160 --> 1:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we might target Florida back in twenty twelve and twenty sixteen,

1:34:05.439 --> 1:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they didn't. Sometimes they didn't. Now they've got

1:34:08.080 --> 1:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to treat North Carolina the same way they treat Wisconsin

1:34:10.520 --> 1:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan. It's got to be that that sort of

1:34:14.240 --> 1:34:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's got to be treated on another level.

1:34:17.479 --> 1:34:20.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's number one North Carolina. In some ways, I

1:34:20.600 --> 1:34:23.479
<v Speaker 1>don't know if a Democrat's going to get elected president

1:34:23.640 --> 1:34:26.760
<v Speaker 1>without carrying North Carolina and Georgia. At the end of

1:34:26.760 --> 1:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the day, you know, when you start to look at

1:34:29.720 --> 1:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this in the way trend's going in the demographic makeup

1:34:32.960 --> 1:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party versus what we're seeing in the

1:34:35.439 --> 1:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party aging in smaller populations, I suspect over time, Pennsylvania,

1:34:40.240 --> 1:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin's going to start drifting right, which means Democrats have

1:34:45.240 --> 1:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to turn Georgia, Arizona and North

1:34:49.160 --> 1:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Carolina collectively into the new Trio into their You know

1:34:53.720 --> 1:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the new wall, right, It's either

1:34:55.800 --> 1:34:58.439
<v Speaker 1>a red wall for the Republicans that Democrats can't penetrate,

1:34:58.800 --> 1:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or becomes the building blocks of a Sunbelt blue wall.

1:35:04.360 --> 1:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But either way, the anchor of it is likely North

1:35:07.400 --> 1:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolina number two on that list, I think of targeting

1:35:12.520 --> 1:35:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a reach state, but it's Texas

1:35:16.240 --> 1:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas more than Florida right now. It's I think the

1:35:19.960 --> 1:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>trend lines in Florida for some demographic reasons with the

1:35:23.120 --> 1:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Latino population. In some ways, I think Hispanics are more

1:35:26.160 --> 1:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>gettable for Democrats in Texas than Hispanics are in Florida.

1:35:32.439 --> 1:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>They're more swing voter, swingy swing votery in Texas than

1:35:37.000 --> 1:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they are in South Florida. So I think that when

1:35:39.320 --> 1:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>you start to just look at the numbers, they're there.

1:35:41.960 --> 1:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas is just getting a lot of new residents and

1:35:44.360 --> 1:35:48.599
<v Speaker 1>any just like how Florida transitioned in the nineties from

1:35:48.720 --> 1:35:52.559
<v Speaker 1>being a fairly reliable Republican state to becoming a swing state.

1:35:53.200 --> 1:35:55.760
<v Speaker 1>First Clinton carried it in ninety six, and then of

1:35:55.800 --> 1:35:58.360
<v Speaker 1>course it became the single most important state in two

1:35:58.400 --> 1:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand thousand and four. That's the sort of reasoning and

1:36:03.800 --> 1:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>rationale why Texas has to be a focal point. And

1:36:05.880 --> 1:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, rhetorically, the Democrats have talked about Texas

1:36:09.000 --> 1:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. They've never actually put their money

1:36:11.320 --> 1:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>where their mouth is. Maybe this year's Senate race, if

1:36:14.760 --> 1:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it's indeed competitive, if Ken Paxton is the Republican nominee,

1:36:18.520 --> 1:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that jump starts interest in it. But I would argue regardless,

1:36:23.240 --> 1:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to treat Texas like a swing state even

1:36:26.240 --> 1:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>when it's not, in order to get that state comfortable

1:36:30.960 --> 1:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>supporting a Democrat by twenty thirty two. It's not going

1:36:33.760 --> 1:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen overnight. And that's why it's sort of like

1:36:36.479 --> 1:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>again I go back, I have. You know, it is

1:36:38.920 --> 1:36:41.519
<v Speaker 1>hard to get political parties to think more than a

1:36:41.640 --> 1:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>luncheon cycle ahead. That's not how the incentives work. But

1:36:46.000 --> 1:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>when thinking this far in advance, that's why Texas arguably

1:36:50.960 --> 1:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>is number two, because it's going to be very expensive,

1:36:52.840 --> 1:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be and you just got to

1:36:54.680 --> 1:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>plot along. Number three on my list is the state

1:36:57.240 --> 1:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that I talk about all the time that it's a

1:37:00.680 --> 1:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>head scratcher to me that Democrats really don't focus on it,

1:37:04.720 --> 1:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's Kansas. It is. We've seen this now two

1:37:10.920 --> 1:37:15.720
<v Speaker 1>different Democrat, two term Democratic governors over the last you know,

1:37:15.880 --> 1:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>sixteen of the last twenty four years have had Democratic governors,

1:37:19.560 --> 1:37:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and they've won due to Republican overreach, but they've also

1:37:22.760 --> 1:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>won because you've seen you know, you have a growing

1:37:26.040 --> 1:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. Look, the biggest sort of deno way to

1:37:30.200 --> 1:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>find out if a state leans will inherently lean red

1:37:34.280 --> 1:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or blue is you know the number of college grads. Well,

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Kansas is one that in Kansas and Missouri are kind

1:37:40.560 --> 1:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of going in the opposite directions. You've got the growing

1:37:44.200 --> 1:37:48.519
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of Kansas City in Kansas that have taken have

1:37:48.720 --> 1:37:51.559
<v Speaker 1>basically taken what used to be a lean red district

1:37:51.600 --> 1:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and turned it into a lean blue district. Both with

1:37:55.160 --> 1:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Chaitan Tipeaka are growing. You've got two big state schools

1:37:58.800 --> 1:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in Lauren and in Manhattan, Kansas and Kansas State. And

1:38:04.000 --> 1:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so when you look at the sort of formula that

1:38:06.360 --> 1:38:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have used to succeed in places like Wisconsin or Michigan,

1:38:12.240 --> 1:38:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or let's see smaller states or like Nevada, I could

1:38:18.680 --> 1:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I could argue that Kansas looks more like that. Look

1:38:23.080 --> 1:38:27.599
<v Speaker 1>there I get the sort of the historical trends of Kansas,

1:38:29.439 --> 1:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>but Kansas is not as you know, Yes, there's MAGA

1:38:32.880 --> 1:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas, but there's sort of this Kansas Republican that

1:38:38.040 --> 1:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>is different than the MAGA makeup as well. Where Missouri.

1:38:43.200 --> 1:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny, Missouri feels more like a southern

1:38:47.000 --> 1:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>state and Kansas feels more like a Midwestern state. And Democrats,

1:38:50.560 --> 1:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think right now have a better shot, particularly among

1:38:53.439 --> 1:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>white voters in the Kansas winning those folks over than

1:38:57.040 --> 1:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they do winning the white voters of number four on

1:39:01.720 --> 1:39:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the list. Very similar argument to North Carolina. It's Georgia.

1:39:05.479 --> 1:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Georgia is a state that you know, we're going to

1:39:07.000 --> 1:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>find out in twenty twenty six just how strong the

1:39:10.200 --> 1:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party is. Is this a state that just is

1:39:14.840 --> 1:39:17.599
<v Speaker 1>competitive only when they have Rafael Warnock on the ballot,

1:39:18.200 --> 1:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or is this a state that is going to be

1:39:19.840 --> 1:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>competitive now no matter what. And asof winning reelection would

1:39:25.120 --> 1:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>send one signal, Democrats winning the governor's mansion would send

1:39:28.200 --> 1:39:30.280
<v Speaker 1>another signal. So I think we're going to learn a

1:39:30.360 --> 1:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>lot about just sort of the health of the Democratic brand.

1:39:33.360 --> 1:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>How much is this the marginal success Democrats have had

1:39:38.320 --> 1:39:41.439
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia been just because of backlaster Trump or is

1:39:41.520 --> 1:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>there is this starting to become durable. I think we're

1:39:44.160 --> 1:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going to learn, but no matter what, again, because of

1:39:46.320 --> 1:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the math issue, right Georgia. When you think about how

1:39:51.120 --> 1:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>much money and resources over the decades have gone into Michigan, Wisconsin,

1:39:55.400 --> 1:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina and number five of my

1:39:58.680 --> 1:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>list Arizona, three the they have to become just core states.

1:40:04.479 --> 1:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Arguably now they're as important, if not more important, than

1:40:09.360 --> 1:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the blue Wall of the Midwest. It's going to be

1:40:12.320 --> 1:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a red wall, a purple wall, or a blue sun

1:40:15.240 --> 1:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>butt wall either way. So there's that. So three states

1:40:19.000 --> 1:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make my list that I think deserve some

1:40:22.520 --> 1:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>investment in when you're looking at Project thirty two, Iowa, Indiana,

1:40:28.080 --> 1:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, I think all of them. It's one of

1:40:31.080 --> 1:40:35.720
<v Speaker 1>those where you want to get into a position where

1:40:35.760 --> 1:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you're competitive in those states where you have enough because

1:40:40.760 --> 1:40:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you need some buffers. You can't always have to draw this.

1:40:43.600 --> 1:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>You know the perfect inside straight and you know if

1:40:47.160 --> 1:40:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to expand the map for Senate seats, and

1:40:49.280 --> 1:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to expand the map for more governor's mansions,

1:40:51.800 --> 1:40:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you've got to give yourself buffers and Indiana, Iowa, and Florida,

1:40:57.000 --> 1:41:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in theory, all have enough combiny of metro areas and

1:41:01.400 --> 1:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>suburban populations in some allergies to MAGA policies that collectively,

1:41:10.000 --> 1:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in theory, should give the Democrats opportunity. Now, you know,

1:41:13.439 --> 1:41:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting the Democrats in this in what should be

1:41:18.680 --> 1:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a focal point here Project twenty thirty two. And I'm

1:41:21.080 --> 1:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at some point waiting for there to be an organization

1:41:23.200 --> 1:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that's spun off just called this, right, you know that

1:41:26.160 --> 1:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>some big donor decides to fund and just focused on

1:41:30.080 --> 1:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>voter registration programs things like that is when the Democrats

1:41:34.439 --> 1:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>decide what the early calendar looks like. And they just

1:41:37.040 --> 1:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last week greenlit twelve states that plan to

1:41:43.360 --> 1:41:46.879
<v Speaker 1>petition to be in the early primary window for presidential politics.

1:41:48.240 --> 1:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If the Democrats are thinking long term, they should be

1:41:52.200 --> 1:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about these four states as this decision as an

1:41:57.280 --> 1:42:01.639
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to invest in Project twenty thirty two for them

1:42:02.160 --> 1:42:06.240
<v Speaker 1>how to strengthen their ability to get more a few

1:42:06.320 --> 1:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>more states in play, expand the map. Right, So I

1:42:10.200 --> 1:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to look at their twelve states and see where

1:42:12.240 --> 1:42:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they overlapped with states that perhaps they need to strengthen

1:42:17.840 --> 1:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in in order to give keep themselves competitive and a

1:42:20.280 --> 1:42:23.240
<v Speaker 1>presidential by twenty thirty two. So the twelve states they

1:42:23.280 --> 1:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>put in out of the east, it was Delaware, New Hampshire.

1:42:25.560 --> 1:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Out of the midwest, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan. Out of the south, Georgia,

1:42:29.160 --> 1:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and out of the

1:42:31.920 --> 1:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>west Nevada and New Mexico. So North Caro and the

1:42:37.240 --> 1:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>top five lists Georgia and North Carolina overlaps. You know,

1:42:41.840 --> 1:42:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I think on the you know, I've said this before

1:42:44.520 --> 1:42:47.519
<v Speaker 1>in the early state stuff, the bigger the state, the

1:42:47.640 --> 1:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>more ineffective that state can be at being sort of

1:42:51.280 --> 1:42:54.639
<v Speaker 1>a fair fairness because with the bigger states then rewards

1:42:54.680 --> 1:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those with big money. And both Georgia and North Carolina

1:42:57.439 --> 1:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are expensive states. So while I think you could argue

1:43:00.240 --> 1:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this would this in theory them as early states, having

1:43:04.320 --> 1:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>more Democrats campaign in them all the time could serve

1:43:07.040 --> 1:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to overtime invest them, I don't know if they're the

1:43:09.680 --> 1:43:13.519
<v Speaker 1>best states to create a level playing field for those

1:43:13.640 --> 1:43:15.880
<v Speaker 1>candidates with big money and those candidates that don't have

1:43:16.000 --> 1:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>big money at the beginning. That would be the two

1:43:18.479 --> 1:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>negatives right, just very expensive states to advertise in, but

1:43:23.680 --> 1:43:26.559
<v Speaker 1>having them as early states where Democrats are just always

1:43:26.640 --> 1:43:30.479
<v Speaker 1>traveling to those to Georgia or North Carolina. Certainly, I

1:43:30.680 --> 1:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think that is why Iowa state in the battle round,

1:43:33.680 --> 1:43:36.240
<v Speaker 1>even though demographically Iowa looks like a state that should

1:43:36.240 --> 1:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be darker red than it is. Iowa. Obviously, I think

1:43:42.200 --> 1:43:44.519
<v Speaker 1>this is a way on the smaller state scale. I

1:43:44.680 --> 1:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was disappointed to see that either Kansas didn't apply or

1:43:47.800 --> 1:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>there was no interest. I saw that Nebraska didn't do

1:43:50.520 --> 1:43:52.519
<v Speaker 1>this either. So when you look at it, the only

1:43:53.080 --> 1:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>viable small states that applied for the early state window

1:43:58.920 --> 1:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Democratic president primaries with Iowa right. The other

1:44:02.040 --> 1:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>two in the Midwest or Illinois Michigan again too big,

1:44:05.040 --> 1:44:08.519
<v Speaker 1>too expensive, will only be there to help the big

1:44:08.640 --> 1:44:12.479
<v Speaker 1>name candidates. It doesn't really doesn't really work as a

1:44:12.520 --> 1:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>good early test where Iowa you have to campaign in

1:44:17.200 --> 1:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rural parts of the state in order to win. Versus

1:44:19.400 --> 1:44:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Ellinois Michigan, you don't have to campaign in the rural

1:44:21.560 --> 1:44:24.760
<v Speaker 1>parts of the state in order to win. The most

1:44:24.880 --> 1:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting state that's on there that's got advanced for consideration

1:44:28.640 --> 1:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to be in the early state window is Tennessee and

1:44:32.240 --> 1:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to close with Tennessee because Tennessee is a

1:44:34.280 --> 1:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>state that has been a head scratcher to me. Twenty

1:44:38.200 --> 1:44:41.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I thought Tennessee was going to go was

1:44:41.720 --> 1:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a part of Georgia North Carolina. Right.

1:44:45.200 --> 1:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You always said Florida was the first state in the

1:44:46.840 --> 1:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sun Belt that became competitive, and then the question was, okay,

1:44:50.600 --> 1:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>which ones are going to go next? And if you

1:44:52.320 --> 1:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>went by sort of socioeconomics, where we were seeing more

1:44:59.520 --> 1:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>people move to write Georgia North Carolina on the list,

1:45:02.960 --> 1:45:06.519
<v Speaker 1>but so is Tennessee and Tennessee is is actually moved

1:45:07.600 --> 1:45:10.599
<v Speaker 1>become more Republican, not less Republican over the last twenty years.

1:45:13.280 --> 1:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to continue? Does the growth of Nashville

1:45:19.760 --> 1:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>does that sort of the bigger it grows, the more

1:45:23.080 --> 1:45:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it becomes sort of Austin meets Las Vegas, which then

1:45:26.880 --> 1:45:30.519
<v Speaker 1>creates your sort of suburban and you just get more

1:45:30.680 --> 1:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>non sort of cultural Southerners in your in your electorate.

1:45:36.360 --> 1:45:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly something that I think a lot a lot

1:45:39.400 --> 1:45:41.519
<v Speaker 1>of US election observers have been waiting to see, and

1:45:41.560 --> 1:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>there's been very little evidence of it. I mean, you know,

1:45:44.320 --> 1:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if this were happening, that Tennessee special in December would

1:45:47.920 --> 1:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>have would have seen a flip, while we didn't see

1:45:49.880 --> 1:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a flip. Right, it was a little bit more competitive,

1:45:52.160 --> 1:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't necessarily a flip. So, you know, part

1:45:55.000 --> 1:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of it is, you could say the election lines. I

1:45:56.680 --> 1:45:59.760
<v Speaker 1>do think Democrats have a Memphis problem in the state.

1:45:59.840 --> 1:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Memphis is just it's just it's a city that is

1:46:04.080 --> 1:46:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not as it's not what it was thirty years ago.

1:46:08.640 --> 1:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It feels as if and there's this whether it's fair

1:46:12.120 --> 1:46:14.599
<v Speaker 1>or not, this perception, well, it's a Democrat run city

1:46:14.680 --> 1:46:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's poorly run and et cetera, et cetera. And

1:46:18.479 --> 1:46:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have weaponized sort of Memphis a long time to

1:46:21.920 --> 1:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>win elections. It's been sort of something they've done, been

1:46:25.240 --> 1:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know, Memphis has been used as

1:46:27.960 --> 1:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of a code word for race. But when you

1:46:33.040 --> 1:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the elector in Tennessee, you know the I

1:46:37.960 --> 1:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>know that if I if I were a strategist over

1:46:41.000 --> 1:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at the DNC, I'd be thinking, you know, yeah, Tennessee's

1:46:44.120 --> 1:46:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a reach state, but here's the state that that is

1:46:47.800 --> 1:46:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that's got something in common with Virginia, something in common

1:46:50.320 --> 1:46:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with North Carolina. You know, maybe more resources into the

1:46:55.160 --> 1:47:01.760
<v Speaker 1>state opened some doors here. I found of all the

1:47:02.120 --> 1:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of all the states that made it through in the

1:47:03.720 --> 1:47:06.280
<v Speaker 1>top twelve, the one that you know, which one of

1:47:06.360 --> 1:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>these is not like the other, It was Tennessee. But

1:47:09.840 --> 1:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you if you if you went back thirty years,

1:47:12.439 --> 1:47:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of US election forecasters would have said Tennessee

1:47:15.840 --> 1:47:17.639
<v Speaker 1>was one of the states that we expected to start

1:47:18.320 --> 1:47:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to sort of I think a lot of people saw

1:47:20.520 --> 1:47:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the South sort of splitting into sort of you know,

1:47:22.600 --> 1:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the South more Cosmopolitans south of quote New South, right,

1:47:26.320 --> 1:47:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of old South, deep South, however you

1:47:28.800 --> 1:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>want to describe it. And there was a you know,

1:47:31.120 --> 1:47:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you had sort of your your Tennessee, your North Carolina,

1:47:33.920 --> 1:47:37.200
<v Speaker 1>your Georgia, You're Virginia in one area, Florida in one area,

1:47:37.280 --> 1:47:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you're Alabama, your Mississippi, You're Louisiana, South Carolina

1:47:44.680 --> 1:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in another area. So it is mostly broken along those lines,

1:47:49.520 --> 1:47:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but not totally. In Tennessee has been interesting. I know,

1:47:53.880 --> 1:47:55.599
<v Speaker 1>my friend Brad Todd has a lot of theories there.

1:47:55.600 --> 1:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>He thinks that that Tennessee Republicans have benefited from a

1:48:00.160 --> 1:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of Midwestern refugees, if you will, sort of Midwestern

1:48:04.240 --> 1:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>conservatives who have left the higher tax states of Ohio, Illinois,

1:48:10.360 --> 1:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Michigan and have not moved all the way south, but

1:48:13.320 --> 1:48:17.599
<v Speaker 1>moved to Tennessee, a low income tax state. So he says,

1:48:17.640 --> 1:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways you notice it is if you

1:48:18.920 --> 1:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>go in the suburbs some of these suburban communities in

1:48:21.000 --> 1:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Nashville on a fall Saturday, you don't see Tennessee flex.

1:48:25.520 --> 1:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He goes, you see a lot of Ohio, State, Michigan, Purdue,

1:48:29.800 --> 1:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Indiana flex. So that's been It's an interesting anecdote. I

1:48:36.439 --> 1:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's one worth processing. But the reality is this

1:48:40.640 --> 1:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have a major problem on their hands come twenty

1:48:44.479 --> 1:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, and if they start worrying about it in

1:48:47.080 --> 1:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty one, it's going to be too late. So

1:48:49.160 --> 1:48:51.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to launch Project twenty thirty two, now,

1:48:52.439 --> 1:48:54.120
<v Speaker 1>let me go through it again. The five states. They

1:48:54.160 --> 1:48:58.639
<v Speaker 1>should be focusing on North Carolina, basically the sun Belt,

1:48:59.240 --> 1:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Purple Wall of North Carolina, Arizona, and Georgia, and then

1:49:03.439 --> 1:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>i'd throw in Texas and Kansas. They've got to expand

1:49:05.800 --> 1:49:10.400
<v Speaker 1>their map, and then maybe you dabble in Indiana, Iowa,

1:49:10.600 --> 1:49:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Florida. And then of course we'll see what they

1:49:13.840 --> 1:49:18.519
<v Speaker 1>do about Tennessee. But if the party doesn't start thinking

1:49:18.640 --> 1:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that way, they could get locked out of the presidency

1:49:22.280 --> 1:49:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for a generation. That's how dire this population shift is

1:49:27.160 --> 1:49:38.599
<v Speaker 1>from California, New York to Florida and Texas. Ask Chuck,

1:49:41.400 --> 1:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's do a little last chuck before we

1:49:43.200 --> 1:49:44.720
<v Speaker 1>get out of here. I think I'm going to try

1:49:44.760 --> 1:49:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to do six of them today, so let's keep me honest.

1:49:49.040 --> 1:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Number one. This came from Brian from New England. He says, Hey,

1:49:52.400 --> 1:49:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been about a year since you announced your departure

1:49:54.280 --> 1:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>from NBC. Yes, it is feels like it feels like

1:49:59.680 --> 1:50:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a de but anyway, I imagine you're happy with the move.

1:50:02.800 --> 1:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Was there a moment that made you realize going independent

1:50:04.880 --> 1:50:06.599
<v Speaker 1>was the right call? Or had you just done everything

1:50:06.600 --> 1:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you set up to? Two in a broadcast? Any regrets

1:50:08.800 --> 1:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or roles you wish you'd tried, like foreign correspondent or

1:50:10.880 --> 1:50:13.559
<v Speaker 1>local politics, and any future plans you can tease, maybe

1:50:13.600 --> 1:50:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a check sports cast. Thanks Brian from New England. Well,

1:50:17.439 --> 1:50:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there is a fun little sports project I'm working on.

1:50:19.400 --> 1:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll have more details soon ish. Partnering with somebody that

1:50:23.960 --> 1:50:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is probably very familiar to many of you in the

1:50:26.439 --> 1:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>sports space. I'm looking forward to it, but it sort

1:50:28.920 --> 1:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of combines my love for sports in history. So I

1:50:32.400 --> 1:50:34.559
<v Speaker 1>will throw that out there and leave that out there

1:50:34.560 --> 1:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as a tease for you, but it's something that should

1:50:37.080 --> 1:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be come into fruition in the next four to six weeks.

1:50:40.160 --> 1:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>On that front, Look, I have, I have no regrets.

1:50:47.160 --> 1:50:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Miss I missed the collaboration. I miss some of my

1:50:50.000 --> 1:50:55.320
<v Speaker 1>friends in colleagues. I ache currently for my longtime friend

1:50:55.360 --> 1:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Savannah got three, who's going through just the worst, the

1:51:01.080 --> 1:51:02.280
<v Speaker 1>worst experience imaginable.

1:51:03.600 --> 1:51:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:51:04.160 --> 1:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, something happens to your parents and your kids

1:51:05.960 --> 1:51:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're just there's there's no there's no consoling that,

1:51:14.760 --> 1:51:18.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's just heartbreaking. I know Savannah's mother a little bit.

1:51:18.920 --> 1:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Nancy. She's just terrific. I hope by the

1:51:24.000 --> 1:51:28.720
<v Speaker 1>time you hear this, she's home safe. So moments like this,

1:51:29.360 --> 1:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I miss, I miss just miss being able

1:51:34.439 --> 1:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a be a friend on that. But I

1:51:36.640 --> 1:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>can always be a friend. I don't have to be

1:51:37.840 --> 1:51:40.639
<v Speaker 1>an NBC to do that. But I'm just in pain

1:51:40.800 --> 1:51:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for that, you know I have. When you go on

1:51:45.680 --> 1:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the regret front, you know, some of my regrets. I

1:51:50.000 --> 1:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I it's not really regrets. It's sort of like, I, uh,

1:52:01.479 --> 1:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I leaned in, I should have jumped into certain to

1:52:04.200 --> 1:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>certain things, right. But I honestly, I'm pretty proud of

1:52:08.840 --> 1:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>my work. I think it's aging. I think it's aging

1:52:11.120 --> 1:52:14.760
<v Speaker 1>very well, so in that sense, And frankly, I feel

1:52:14.800 --> 1:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>like I got out at the time, just before everybody

1:52:17.439 --> 1:52:20.760
<v Speaker 1>else was being shoved out because of what's happening with

1:52:20.880 --> 1:52:24.920
<v Speaker 1>corporate ownership of media. So in some ways I feel

1:52:24.960 --> 1:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>lucky to be in the independent space before it was cool.

1:52:29.720 --> 1:52:34.559
<v Speaker 1>I feel lucky to get this opportunity to help really

1:52:34.680 --> 1:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>talented friends and former colleagues jump into these waters. As

1:52:38.880 --> 1:52:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I say, it's a big cliff dive, but I promise

1:52:40.720 --> 1:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you there's water there. And you know, I you know,

1:52:51.920 --> 1:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>when you look back and realize this moment that we're

1:52:54.400 --> 1:52:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in with corporate owned media, I don't know. I think

1:52:58.640 --> 1:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I was able to maximize everything that was

1:53:00.760 --> 1:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>possible under that situation. And you know, that was as

1:53:04.840 --> 1:53:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with an old friend yesterday. Actually we

1:53:07.680 --> 1:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>were doing a little catching up and reminiscing and lamenting

1:53:11.680 --> 1:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening to our friend's mom, And you know,

1:53:16.520 --> 1:53:19.280
<v Speaker 1>He put it as like, you know, it's so different

1:53:19.439 --> 1:53:25.000
<v Speaker 1>now that it's it's not even the same thing I worked.

1:53:25.360 --> 1:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't recognize this network. I say, it is. No.

1:53:30.280 --> 1:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>This not me dissing them. It's just totally different, right,

1:53:33.240 --> 1:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the separation from the there's no cable channel anymore. They basically,

1:53:37.400 --> 1:53:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, just reimagined. Right, there's a real shrinkage of

1:53:42.640 --> 1:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>what NBC News is. And you know, I don't I

1:53:45.880 --> 1:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>know this. I wouldn't be happy under this circumstance, but

1:53:52.040 --> 1:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wore the jersey, so I still root

1:53:55.000 --> 1:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for him. I root for the individuals there because there's

1:53:58.880 --> 1:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some good people. I'm still there doing some good reporting.

1:54:03.000 --> 1:54:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I just hope they're given the opportunity to do it all. Right,

1:54:06.760 --> 1:54:09.000
<v Speaker 1>next one, let's see, He says, Hey, I rarely miss

1:54:09.000 --> 1:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>an episode and really appreciate how you approach issues with

1:54:11.000 --> 1:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>balance and thoughtfulness. You give me hope multiple times a week.

1:54:15.080 --> 1:54:16.479
<v Speaker 1>My wife tells me this all the time. You have

1:54:16.560 --> 1:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to get people help, don't depress them too much. So

1:54:18.920 --> 1:54:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you saying that. I sensed a bit of

1:54:20.840 --> 1:54:23.160
<v Speaker 1>fatigue in your one twenty six episode, which is understandable

1:54:23.200 --> 1:54:25.920
<v Speaker 1>given the repetitive nature of our political chaos. Just wanted

1:54:25.920 --> 1:54:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, your perspective is helping thousands of us see

1:54:28.240 --> 1:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the bigger picture and hold on to hope. Keep it up. Well,

1:54:31.200 --> 1:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can I confess your You know, I worried that I

1:54:34.080 --> 1:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>let my fatigue show that night. I just was tired.

1:54:37.000 --> 1:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd been traveling and doing all this, So I you know,

1:54:40.680 --> 1:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>my goal is to never let you see me tired.

1:54:43.640 --> 1:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Trust me, I always have a cup of coffee going

1:54:47.120 --> 1:54:50.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't you know, I appreciate the sentiment, but

1:54:50.560 --> 1:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't catch that. But you were correct. You caught

1:54:53.600 --> 1:54:57.720
<v Speaker 1>me a little tired. Next question comes from Eric R.

1:54:57.880 --> 1:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>North Oaks, Minnesota with parentheses. Want to be Canadian Chuck?

1:55:02.240 --> 1:55:04.280
<v Speaker 1>First time? Long time? Why isn't there more discussion about

1:55:04.280 --> 1:55:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the contrast between Trump wanting to send US troops into

1:55:06.920 --> 1:55:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Iran to protect protesters while abeying protesters in Minneapolis as

1:55:10.240 --> 1:55:13.240
<v Speaker 1>domestic terrorists. Imagine if Canada crossed our border to defend

1:55:13.360 --> 1:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>US protesters, how would MAGA respond? The inconsistency is baffling, Eric,

1:55:18.120 --> 1:55:21.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a terrific observation. I you know, I want to

1:55:21.320 --> 1:55:23.120
<v Speaker 1>sit here and say, oh, well, you know this is

1:55:23.160 --> 1:55:26.840
<v Speaker 1>apples and pairs and you know, no, it's a terrific observation.

1:55:28.800 --> 1:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the second part, what if Canada sent in

1:55:31.080 --> 1:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>troops to protect protesters. It's you know, if you recall

1:55:35.280 --> 1:55:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Wallas was asked about bringing in the National Guard

1:55:37.800 --> 1:55:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and he seemed to think he was concerned that you

1:55:40.080 --> 1:55:46.040
<v Speaker 1>know that maybe the military confrontation is is is the

1:55:46.280 --> 1:55:48.960
<v Speaker 1>pretext that that Trump might be looking for and all that.

1:55:49.240 --> 1:55:57.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's I, you know, I don't have I don't

1:55:57.520 --> 1:56:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have a lot to add to your comparison. It is now,

1:56:01.000 --> 1:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>can I just say something on Iran? Donald Trump is

1:56:06.200 --> 1:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>playing with America's credibility again, these Iranian protesters. It's just

1:56:11.600 --> 1:56:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like he is messing with these Venezuelan Venezuelan dissidents. You

1:56:15.360 --> 1:56:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, the Venezuelan dissidents want, the democracy. You know what,

1:56:18.320 --> 1:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is not delivering a democracy. He is keeping

1:56:22.680 --> 1:56:26.720
<v Speaker 1>right Maduro's number two in power because she is simply

1:56:26.800 --> 1:56:29.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy time and is playing the transactional game.

1:56:30.640 --> 1:56:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And Trump, as long as he gets what he wants

1:56:32.760 --> 1:56:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in regards to control and oil, he doesn't care about democracy.

1:56:37.080 --> 1:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So I do think Donald Trump is telling us something

1:56:39.920 --> 1:56:46.040
<v Speaker 1>about what he thinks of democracy by what he's not

1:56:46.200 --> 1:56:51.240
<v Speaker 1>doing in Venezuela. The fact that this is not a priority. Well,

1:56:51.480 --> 1:56:53.720
<v Speaker 1>if democracy is not a priority when you have an

1:56:53.720 --> 1:56:58.080
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to make it a priority in another country, it's

1:56:58.160 --> 1:57:01.920
<v Speaker 1>clearly not a priority for him here. So that's the

1:57:02.000 --> 1:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate takeaway. Now, speaking of American credibility with the Iranian

1:57:05.240 --> 1:57:13.360
<v Speaker 1>hostage of the Iranian protesters, you know, every time we

1:57:13.520 --> 1:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>make a promise and don't follow through overseas, a potential terrorist,

1:57:18.840 --> 1:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>future terrorist attacking the United States or a US entity

1:57:24.240 --> 1:57:32.280
<v Speaker 1>only increases. Right, somebody who's fifteen protesting in Iran will

1:57:32.320 --> 1:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>see their parent killed and wondering how come the Americans

1:57:35.840 --> 1:57:38.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't come. They said they would come, but they didn't

1:57:38.560 --> 1:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>follow through. Their word means nothing. The impression that leads

1:57:43.040 --> 1:57:47.200
<v Speaker 1>each time, right is it is to make a promise

1:57:47.280 --> 1:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and then abandon is in some ways worse than not

1:57:53.360 --> 1:57:55.800
<v Speaker 1>doing anything. But at least you didn't promise that you would.

1:57:57.200 --> 1:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So look, it's a fair picture you're painting about, you know,

1:58:02.120 --> 1:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the sort of protesters. But I think if we're really

1:58:05.120 --> 1:58:08.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand does he care about democracy or not?

1:58:09.800 --> 1:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the actions in Venezuela say it all and

1:58:13.800 --> 1:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the lack of prioritization of making this a democracy. There

1:58:17.000 --> 1:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is a democratic elected government already ready to go, and

1:58:22.680 --> 1:58:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the inability to acknowledge that is because for whatever reason,

1:58:26.880 --> 1:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't financially paid whatever price. I guess it needs

1:58:31.320 --> 1:58:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to be paid to become to get this, to get

1:58:36.400 --> 1:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the support of the United States for what the will

1:58:40.480 --> 1:58:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the people want it. But I also worry about

1:58:47.360 --> 1:58:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's used a lot of hot rhetoric with

1:58:49.600 --> 1:58:52.920
<v Speaker 1>these Iranian protesters, and we can debate whether American firepower

1:58:52.960 --> 1:58:55.320
<v Speaker 1>should be used to protect these protesters or not. You know,

1:58:55.720 --> 1:58:58.800
<v Speaker 1>why in Iran but not in me? And mar right

1:58:58.960 --> 1:59:01.680
<v Speaker 1>why in you know? Picking and choosing when we step

1:59:01.760 --> 1:59:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in is always comes with that comes with a lot

1:59:05.040 --> 1:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of problems long term. But making a promise and not

1:59:08.960 --> 1:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>keeping it is in some ways the worst possible outcome.

1:59:16.000 --> 1:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Darryl He says, longtime listener and

1:59:19.160 --> 1:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>fellow alum of Miami Killian and the University of Miami

1:59:21.360 --> 1:59:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at class in ninety seven. Hey, what you take on

1:59:23.240 --> 1:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the current state of NILAN college football, specifically Yum's approach

1:59:25.880 --> 1:59:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to bringing established quarterbacks rather than developing talent from within.

1:59:29.360 --> 1:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I worry this could push promising recruits like Darien Coleman

1:59:32.440 --> 1:59:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to transfer and thrive elsewhere. Thanks and keep up the

1:59:34.520 --> 1:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>great podcasting, Darryl. You're not the only person worried about this.

1:59:38.560 --> 1:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And I saw that the Hurricane. You know, I'd say

1:59:40.680 --> 1:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the Hurricane fanatics like yourself and myself were pretty divided,

1:59:47.280 --> 1:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>right Like I was, I was weirdly not confident that

1:59:52.160 --> 1:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we'd be okay if we didn't get a top notch

1:59:55.360 --> 1:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>portal quarterback. But that but that, I'm like, all right,

2:00:00.440 --> 2:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll find a Ken Dorsey. We'll find it

2:00:02.800 --> 2:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Steve Walsh. And what do I mean by that? Both

2:00:05.440 --> 2:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Steve Walsh and Ken Dorsey did get a couple of

2:00:07.400 --> 2:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>cups of coffee in the NFL. Ken Dorsey became a coach,

2:00:10.320 --> 2:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>really and he's a really good coach. Steve Walsh, I

2:00:14.440 --> 2:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>think does some coaching in Minnesota. But neither one. We're

2:00:19.080 --> 2:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of highly touted NFL quarterbacks. But they had great

2:00:23.560 --> 2:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive lines, they had great running backs and receivers, and

2:00:27.680 --> 2:00:30.839
<v Speaker 1>they were I don't want to call them game managers,

2:00:31.040 --> 2:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a negative. They were better than that. They

2:00:34.400 --> 2:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>were cerebral, they understood the offense and all that so

2:00:39.440 --> 2:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think that the way Miami has built this

2:00:42.520 --> 2:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>brother the way Mario wants to build, which is, you

2:00:47.040 --> 2:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>get as deep of an offensive line and defensive line

2:00:49.400 --> 2:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as you can, you get as many playmakers as you can,

2:00:54.000 --> 2:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you know on receivers, and then you make

2:00:57.440 --> 2:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it where it is hard for an average to above

2:01:01.040 --> 2:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>average to a great quarterback to fail no matter what

2:01:03.360 --> 2:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>level they're in. And so as long as we're building

2:01:08.240 --> 2:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>these powerful offensive lines, I'm not concerned about this, and

2:01:12.480 --> 2:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that this quarterback. I mean, here's the thing.

2:01:17.240 --> 2:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the top, look at all of

2:01:20.320 --> 2:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the top top ten. Let's just go through the top

2:01:24.200 --> 2:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>ten programs real quick. Ohio State last year won a

2:01:26.880 --> 2:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>national title with a portal quarterback. In the end of

2:01:29.280 --> 2:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this year went to a national lade with a portal quarterback.

2:01:32.240 --> 2:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame was in the finals, lost the finals with

2:01:34.960 --> 2:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a portal quarterback. Miami lost the finals with a portal quarterback.

2:01:40.720 --> 2:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It is it is not you can do both. One

2:01:46.000 --> 2:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>could argue Georgia hasn't won a title because they stuck

2:01:49.400 --> 2:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with Gunner Stockton when maybe they should have shopped for

2:01:52.600 --> 2:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a portal quarterback. Is that what happened? To Alabama, right

2:01:58.480 --> 2:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is you see LSU has had some success with portal quarterbacks,

2:02:03.280 --> 2:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Texas has arch Manning. I don't even think that counts

2:02:05.520 --> 2:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>right on that front. But I think that, you know,

2:02:13.280 --> 2:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you're assuming this is in Miami's control. I think until

2:02:18.080 --> 2:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we get some sort of parameters around transfers and how

2:02:21.360 --> 2:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this all works, the quarterbacks themselves are going to keep

2:02:25.160 --> 2:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>shopping because the paydays are there. Because you know, there's

2:02:29.560 --> 2:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>always one program that thinks they're a quarterback away from

2:02:33.480 --> 2:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>relevancy if some form or another, and will overpay. So

2:02:37.040 --> 2:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get more of these quarterbacks to get

2:02:39.080 --> 2:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the portal and go in. And so do

2:02:41.840 --> 2:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I do? I you know, think, well, my guess is

2:02:45.360 --> 2:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of Miami starting quarterback until the system is

2:02:48.200 --> 2:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of changed. If this is the system, that a

2:02:50.760 --> 2:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>majority of our starters will be portal quarterbacks. But if

2:02:54.920 --> 2:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, we'll find out, you know, what happens

2:02:58.720 --> 2:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to how we recruited for we get a major injury, right,

2:03:02.080 --> 2:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's also unforeseen issues that could pop up

2:03:08.360 --> 2:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that could end up forcing our hand, and we'll find

2:03:12.560 --> 2:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>out just how good our high school recruiting has been

2:03:15.280 --> 2:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and our quarterback development has been But I think as

2:03:22.480 --> 2:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>long as we're building an offensive line and whether it's

2:03:26.680 --> 2:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>making sure we have the best freshman and the best

2:03:29.000 --> 2:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>portal right like that is you know, then I do

2:03:32.960 --> 2:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think you can plug and play quarterback. It's probably the

2:03:36.040 --> 2:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>only position I'm comfortable plugging in playing like that. But

2:03:39.280 --> 2:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you can. Next question comes from Heather from Decatur,

2:03:46.200 --> 2:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>longtime listener. I'm curious Illinois or Alabama. Heather, long time listener,

2:03:50.760 --> 2:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the clear, nonpartisan analysis that helps me stay grounded

2:03:54.720 --> 2:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in two day's political climate. Well, thank you for saying that, Heather,

2:03:57.720 --> 2:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as a Georgia native, I'm curious about your recent confident

2:04:00.080 --> 2:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that's in John Ossoff holding the Senate seat beyond the

2:04:02.680 --> 2:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>two flipped PSC races. Do you have other insights? I

2:04:05.040 --> 2:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>were those results might be skewed since many Republican areas

2:04:07.800 --> 2:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>had fewer races on the ballot compared to Democratic strongholds.

2:04:10.160 --> 2:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks and war Eagle. Obviously it's de cater Alabama. What

2:04:13.600 --> 2:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you take on Auburn's new head coach. I love Auburn's

2:04:16.240 --> 2:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>new head coach, Alex Grolls. I think he's got a

2:04:19.000 --> 2:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>great story. I don't know if you know it. I

2:04:20.640 --> 2:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think he was, if I'm not mistaken. He was born

2:04:23.240 --> 2:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in Moscow in nineteen eighty four. Parents brought him over

2:04:26.520 --> 2:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to the United States at the age of seven, became

2:04:28.560 --> 2:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a football crazed, got into it, all that stuff, and

2:04:32.800 --> 2:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>he's bringing over a great quarterback and Byron Brown. So

2:04:35.040 --> 2:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I you know, look, I've got Auburn fans in my

2:04:38.320 --> 2:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>in my family and two our closest friends, and some

2:04:42.760 --> 2:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of my closest relatives big Auburn fans. So I'm I'm

2:04:46.680 --> 2:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>an Auburn apologist in general. I've become I'm learning to

2:04:50.240 --> 2:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>become one. They still didn't deserve a shot at the

2:04:55.640 --> 2:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>national title over Miami in nineteen eighty three, Stephen, and

2:04:58.200 --> 2:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll just leave it at that. But I'm bullish on him.

2:05:03.240 --> 2:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I uh, you know, I just hope the Auburn powers

2:05:08.480 --> 2:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that be have patience, right, They're so impatience nobody ever

2:05:13.880 --> 2:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to get a chance to build a program. But

2:05:17.680 --> 2:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I like that they they're trying this, you know,

2:05:23.480 --> 2:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of like trying the searching for Bobby, you know,

2:05:26.640 --> 2:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in the obsessions with Bobby Petrino or throwing cash at

2:05:29.960 --> 2:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin or doing something like that, right, seeing if

2:05:33.000 --> 2:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they can get a guy from the level below, find

2:05:35.800 --> 2:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>their own Urban Meyer, right, who came at the time

2:05:38.800 --> 2:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>from the mid majors and then turned you know, came

2:05:42.400 --> 2:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in and helped make Florida power. So I would I'm

2:05:48.400 --> 2:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I am more bullish on him, and I'd like I'd

2:05:51.800 --> 2:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>like to see the South Florida guy do good on

2:05:54.480 --> 2:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that front. Now, as for the other part of your question,

2:06:00.800 --> 2:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>John Assoff, what gives me this confidence? It's the weak

2:06:03.840 --> 2:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary field as well. Right, So you throw a

2:06:07.320 --> 2:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of things. Number one, you know, Asofsun and Coombent

2:06:10.480 --> 2:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>has an enormous financial advantage. Number Two, the only can

2:06:15.680 --> 2:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the I would argue, there were two candidates he had

2:06:18.000 --> 2:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to fear, Brian Camp and Brad Rathensberger. Neither one of

2:06:21.760 --> 2:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>them are running. Three, you have the national climate and

2:06:27.240 --> 2:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Georgia clearly being a swing state now seems to move

2:06:30.080 --> 2:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. I agree with you, I I it

2:06:33.280 --> 2:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is not the margins. It is the result of the

2:06:35.800 --> 2:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>PSC races, not necessarily even the margins. That impressed me

2:06:40.480 --> 2:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>because you're right, you know, you had you had to

2:06:42.720 --> 2:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>turn out differential that was huge. But the fact that

2:06:45.320 --> 2:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you still got those huge margins, says something, but it

2:06:48.480 --> 2:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>mostly goes this is a weak field. I think the

2:06:52.080 --> 2:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>strongest candidate will be Derek Dooley, but it looks like

2:06:54.520 --> 2:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the likely opponent's going to be somebody with the first

2:06:56.960 --> 2:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>name of Congressman, which I think is an absolute gift

2:07:01.040 --> 2:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because his biggest competitive you know, in theory, being a

2:07:04.720 --> 2:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the Washington Swamp is not good. But if

2:07:06.680 --> 2:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a House Republican people, people don't like Congress. I

2:07:09.920 --> 2:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think they hate the House more than the Senate, just generically, right,

2:07:12.880 --> 2:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So I just think you throw all that together, open

2:07:16.520 --> 2:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>governor's seat. No Brian camp leading the ticket either, right,

2:07:20.480 --> 2:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>his his political machine. Just yes, it's helping Derek Dooley

2:07:23.920 --> 2:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in that Senate primary. But I think when you throw

2:07:25.800 --> 2:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all that together, and I was, you know, look, I

2:07:29.560 --> 2:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>thought as Off was the accidental senator when you know,

2:07:33.080 --> 2:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of writing the coattails of Raphaeld Warnock back in

2:07:36.200 --> 2:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>during those runoffs. You know, he's got a formidable he's

2:07:41.240 --> 2:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>always been formidable on raising money, and he works his

2:07:45.800 --> 2:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, off, he works his as Off Off.

2:07:49.520 --> 2:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's a to to try to create a

2:07:52.920 --> 2:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Dad humor pun there. So, yeah, that's I think this

2:07:56.480 --> 2:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is I'm I'm inclined to right now. It's in lean

2:08:00.680 --> 2:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>deed to me. Until you show me proof that one

2:08:03.960 --> 2:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of these Republicans can get the fifty percent plus one

2:08:06.400 --> 2:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, I don't see it all right. Final question

2:08:09.480 --> 2:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the day comes from Colonel Stephen Mitchell, the United

2:08:13.920 --> 2:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>States Air Force retired, and he writes this good day check.

2:08:16.400 --> 2:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed your January twenty ninth podcast, especially in

2:08:19.080 --> 2:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the segment on Trump's pull numbers. It seems he's losing

2:08:21.240 --> 2:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>support from voters who backed him for economic reasons, but

2:08:23.760 --> 2:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm unsure if the same is true for those focused

2:08:25.600 --> 2:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on the border. Given your polling expertise, what you take

2:08:28.640 --> 2:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and aside from the economy, what do you think will

2:08:31.960 --> 2:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>be the top issue on voters minds? Thank you very much. Look,

2:08:34.880 --> 2:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously you're gonna have economy one. I think

2:08:38.920 --> 2:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's the question I have is is there a do

2:08:43.320 --> 2:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we create a bucket called sort of chaos or tumult right,

2:08:48.840 --> 2:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Because ultimately, I think the reason why Trump won in

2:08:51.920 --> 2:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four is because the perceived chaos Biden created

2:08:55.000 --> 2:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at the border. In addition to sourness about the economy,

2:08:59.400 --> 2:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like you need it, you needed sort of both things.

2:09:02.400 --> 2:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I think sourness in the economy, plus you know, is

2:09:05.920 --> 2:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>he intentionally dividing the country with ice? Right, it's not

2:09:08.920 --> 2:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that the it's not that what he did on the

2:09:11.080 --> 2:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>borders unpopular. In fact, that's an important distinction, which I

2:09:14.680 --> 2:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>which you're I think indicating that you understand about how

2:09:20.760 --> 2:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. The danger for Republicans now is that the

2:09:24.600 --> 2:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>voters are pretty sophisticated in how they are processing the

2:09:28.040 --> 2:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>immigration issue. When you ask them about border security, they're

2:09:32.320 --> 2:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>impressed with the Trump administration. They're mostly approving. When you

2:09:36.200 --> 2:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ask them about immigration, they see that through the prism

2:09:38.960 --> 2:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of ice, not security anymore, and they don't like what

2:09:42.400 --> 2:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing. So I think the fact that that's been

2:09:46.760 --> 2:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>split right where it's an opening if a nimble Democrat

2:09:52.680 --> 2:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>knows how to take it, which is look, Biden was

2:09:55.840 --> 2:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>terrible on border security. I'm not going to let that

2:09:58.440 --> 2:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>happen again. And I'm glad to see what the Trump

2:10:00.560 --> 2:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>administration has done at the border, but what they're doing

2:10:03.400 --> 2:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in our communities across the country is outrageous, etc. Etc. Right.

2:10:06.920 --> 2:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So the point is that I think what it does

2:10:08.960 --> 2:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>provide is the Democrats an opening to look like, hey,

2:10:12.520 --> 2:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm no Biden on the border, but I'm no Trump

2:10:16.840 --> 2:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in harassing Americans either. Right, It's a way to differentiate

2:10:21.400 --> 2:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>yourself from the Democratic brand on a negative aspect of

2:10:24.640 --> 2:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the border and at the same time being able to

2:10:27.480 --> 2:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>differentiate yourself and show empathy and compassionate about what's happening

2:10:30.880 --> 2:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in places like Minneapolis. So that's where I think that

2:10:34.360 --> 2:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a real problem now for Republicans on this issue,

2:10:37.560 --> 2:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and why so many of them are starting to whisper

2:10:41.880 --> 2:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>loudly that Stephen Miller's a problem, that he is creating

2:10:46.240 --> 2:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a narrative, creating a perception about Republicans. It's going to

2:10:50.600 --> 2:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>be hard to overcome in many of these places. You know,

2:10:53.600 --> 2:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the base is happy, but that is it on

2:10:57.560 --> 2:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. But when you're asking about other issues, look,

2:11:01.480 --> 2:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think obviously economy, anything that's you know, So do

2:11:05.840 --> 2:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you consider healthcare and economy issue? I kind of do, right,

2:11:09.280 --> 2:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's there. If Democrats let me do this,

2:11:16.200 --> 2:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>let me flip the question here. If Democrats have a

2:11:20.280 --> 2:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>huge night, it isn't going to be because they only

2:11:24.600 --> 2:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>want on the economy. If Democrats have a huge night,

2:11:28.520 --> 2:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it means they got the corruption issue into the mind

2:11:33.280 --> 2:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the swing voter, that they found a way into it.

2:11:36.120 --> 2:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they did it via exhaustion, you know, the Trump

2:11:40.040 --> 2:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>chaos idea, look what he does at the White House,

2:11:42.720 --> 2:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy Centers selling foreign policy, like lumping it all in together.

2:11:46.960 --> 2:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the difference between Democrats having

2:11:53.360 --> 2:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a good night in November and having an incredible night

2:11:57.160 --> 2:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in November is their ability to take these various gross, corruptive,

2:12:08.160 --> 2:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable stories and figuring out how to package it as one. Right.

2:12:12.760 --> 2:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID helped paint a picture of, you know, all the

2:12:17.120 --> 2:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump chaos and it led to this right, and so

2:12:19.800 --> 2:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that's why that messaging was was pretty easy to get

2:12:23.440 --> 2:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>him out of there. If you know, it's sort of

2:12:31.080 --> 2:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll be curious to see how they do it and

2:12:32.760 --> 2:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if they can do it. But my point is is

2:12:34.800 --> 2:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's one of those if I'm in a coma,

2:12:38.080 --> 2:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>If I go in to coma to my and I

2:12:40.040 --> 2:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>don't wake up till day after election and you tell

2:12:42.320 --> 2:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>me they won six Senate seats and thirty House seats,

2:12:45.080 --> 2:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh wow, the corruption issue must have played

2:12:49.160 --> 2:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that would be my initial instinct. So I don't know

2:12:52.920 --> 2:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to play, but I think this is

2:12:58.400 --> 2:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those for them to go from good to great,

2:13:02.080 --> 2:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they need to figure out how to get the corruption

2:13:03.880 --> 2:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>issue to be easy to digest and something the quote

2:13:09.920 --> 2:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>check on Trump, right, the check on his power, you

2:13:13.240 --> 2:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>know it is. It is the path for them to

2:13:15.440 --> 2:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>get to that messaging. But you need to make the

2:13:19.440 --> 2:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>case that he's corrupt and that this corruption is happening

2:13:22.560 --> 2:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to do it. And we'll see if they're

2:13:25.400 --> 2:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>able to pull that off. All right, there you go.

2:13:29.160 --> 2:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That does it for me. On a Wednesday, man, I

2:13:34.840 --> 2:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>got to this is a political junkies, junkies episode trying

2:13:37.840 --> 2:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to explain this is like the old hotline for me,

2:13:40.560 --> 2:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>little media narrative explanation, a little historical comparison with Eddie Roosevelt,

2:13:45.560 --> 2:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a little electoral scoreboard in college strategizing for twenty thirty two,

2:13:50.400 --> 2:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>plus this, and somebody's asking me whether you know what

2:13:54.280 --> 2:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>do I miss about NBC at this point? Nothing? This,

2:13:58.920 --> 2:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the broadcast, the type of broadcast

2:14:02.600 --> 2:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I've always wanted to do. So I appreciate you listening,

2:14:04.920 --> 2:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your support. I can subscribe, don't forget to use

2:14:08.520 --> 2:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all the codes from our advertisers, and with that, I'll

2:14:12.640 --> 2:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>see you in twenty four hours.