WEBVTT - A legally binding treaty to fight the plastic problem

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to zero. I'm Akshatrati this week a plan for

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>plastic pollution. Climate change is a pollution problem. We spew

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>too much greenhouse gases into the air and it heats

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>up the planet. The trouble is greenhouse gases are invisible,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and that can make it very hard to describe the

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>scale of the problem. The same is not true of

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>plastic pollution, which is everywhere. Plastic that is littered on

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the land, washes into the oceans, slowly breaks down into microplastics,

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>and then travels to the furthest corners of the globe.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty two, a study was published showing that

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>microplastics had been found in antarctics. Now it's also been

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>found in every organ of the body, including the brain.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Sick is abundant and very cheap, and on current trends,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the amount we produce is set to triple by twenty

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty from four hundred and thirty million tons a year

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>today to one point two billion tons, according to the OECD.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And if that plastic is not managed, we'll see much

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>more of it polluting our lands, oceans and bodies. It's

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>also not just about human health. There's an impact on

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.639
<v Speaker 1>climate One point two billion tons of plastic would produce

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as much as four billion tons of greenhouse gases, so

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be a fix.

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>The deal has to ensure that we reduce the avoidable

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>and the eliminatable, if there is such a word. But

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>this cannot be and some parties would like it to

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>be just a recycling treaty.

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Inger Anderson, head of the United Nations Environment Program,

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the last eighteen months she has been working

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on a new global treaty to reduce plastic pollution. At

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year, the first version of the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>agreement was sent to negotiators. It's called the Zero Draft,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and it calls for a reduction of plastic pollution from

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>start to finish, not just increased recycling, but reduced production

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>by eliminating unnecessary single use plastics. It all goes to plan.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The legally binding treaty is due to come into action

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty five. I caught up with Inger at

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>COP twenty eight to hear about how negotiations are going,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>why big companies are dropping out of their plastic promises,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and why a lack of cash is as pervasive a

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>problem as plastic pollution.

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Inger, Welcome to the show.

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you for having me.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Now we talk about pollution. There is a lot of

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>invisible pollution, some we have to deal with in the atmosphere,

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 3>but plastic pollution is very visible and it's been growing

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 3>and becoming a menace all around the world. So over

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the past eight months, you are trying to figure out

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a way in which governments around the world can come

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 3>together and finally have a legally binding way to address

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>plastic pollution.

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Correct, how is it going. Well, We've had three rounds

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>of negotiations. The last one happened in Nairobi just a

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks back. There's a zero draft text out

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 2>of the treaty text in the UN speak, it will

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>be a treaty, but it may have other names, the

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>instrument as we refer to it, until it's baptized.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>If you know what I mean when you say zero draft,

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean?

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So that means you know. The first two sessions the

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Intergovernmental Negotiation Committee i NC one and i n C two.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>The first one was spent on organizational issues and to

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to member states and other parties on their views.

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Second one ditto, and it got really bogged down in

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>silliness of procedural issues. I shouldn't say silliness, but there

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 2>was quite a lot of frustration that the procedural issues

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>took so long. But sometimes that's the case. When you

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 2>have one hundred and ninety three be your best friends negotiating,

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it takes time. But in the meantime, of course, we

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>had an open submission from all governments and partners and

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 2>other interested parties where they sort of submitted in response

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to what was called an options paper. These submissions were received,

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>hundreds of submissions based upon which a draft tree D

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>text was drafted. That's a zero drafted from A to Z.

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's an actual you can it's on the

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>website unit website and it was issued in September, so

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 2>that when parties gathered in Nairobia a couple of weeks ago,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>they had that text to refer to.

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 3>And the goal is there'll be i INC four and

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 3>five over the next year, and by twenty twenty five

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>there will be a legally binding treaty to add.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>That's certainly what enabled resolution as it's called back the

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>United Nations Environment Assembly, which is sort of the Environment

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 2>General Assembly. If you know happens every two years. It's

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 2>under unip's auspices. It happens always in Nairobi, which is

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>where our headquarters is. And in the junea United Nations

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Environment Assembly that happened in twenty two that was a

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 2>decision to negotiate a legally binding instrument to end plastic

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>pollution COMMA, including in the marine environment. So it's from

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 2>the entire production line, if you like, from beginning to end,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>not just cleaning up the oceans, not just recycling, but

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the entire production chain, life cycle approach. And that's what

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this zero draft text reflected at the last I INC

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 2>three in Nairobi. So there was a lot of comments

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>from different interests, I have to say, and based upon

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>which now the next round will be the true negotiation.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 2>The idea, as you rightly say, is to finish this

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>by the end of twenty twenty four.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>You said one hundred and ninety three best friends. Well,

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.679
<v Speaker 3>right now, given where multilateral negotiations are going, generally, take

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>the climate negotiations that happen at COPP, they don't really

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 3>act like best friends. So why do you think there

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 3>is more agreement among parties among these hundred and ninety

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 3>three countries on plastic pollution than there is on carbon pollution.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not saying that they're in agreement. I

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>am saying that I have one hundred and ninety three

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 2>bosses whom I'm trying to enable, for whom I'm trying

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 2>to enable this negotiation. We can look upon it like that. However,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>there are also many other stakeholders who are inside the

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>negotiating room. They're activists, there, indigenous people the waste because

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>they're scientists. There's private sector, et cetera. Why will this

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 2>be more successful? I would like to believe. I think

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a popular demand for this. You know, so every

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>child saw what was it ten years ago? The straw

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and the turtle snows. Every child has seen and now

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they're a little bit older, but the belly of the

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>bird full of plastic, the whale full of fishing gear.

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Every person, especially who lives in the global South, where

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>sanitation collection of municipal solid waste is largely absent, knows

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 2>that it is the poorer people who live with waste.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Knows that it is the drains that are supposed to

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>carry the rain water out to sea that gets full

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of garbage and therefore blocks and courses inundation understands that

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 2>if they burn it, their children gets asthma and other

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>diseases from burning plastic, which contains thousands of chemicals, many

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of which are highly toxic. So this understanding is very real.

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I think what we are seeing is very interesting from

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>all sides, including sort of left and right, both aisles

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of proverbial aisles in politics, that there is a desire

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to find a solution. The on ramp for the solutions

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 2>are slightly different because some would rather focus on a

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 2>recycling side and some would rather focus on a let's

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>find a way of reducing overall production. But there is

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a desire to find solutions.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>How would you roughly structure what is inside the zero

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>draft and why that document as it exists, and it

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>will of course be modified, but at least is a

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>good start for addressing the problem of plastic pollution.

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I think first of all, what we would say is

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that the deal has to ensure that we reduce the

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 2>avoidable and the eliminatable, if there is such a word,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 2>and that we need to think about the redesign, that

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>we need to think about the switch to non plastic substitutes,

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that we need to strengthen the systems for reuse, refill,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 2>repair and recycle. But this cannot be and some parties

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 2>would like it to be just a recycling treaty. As

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>I say, we didn't need a treaty for having a

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>fire brigade, we don't need a treaty for having a

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>recycling system. It's obvious and it's something that we just

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>need to do. The zero draft has to target primary polymers.

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 2>It has to target chemicals of concern because we will

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>end up having to recycle and the recycling. Therefore, we

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>need to know what's in the stuff that we are recycling.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 2>But we also have to ensure that there's a degree

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 2>of justice. There are twenty million wastepickers today who make

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>their living being the global workforce of sanitation. As hopefully

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 2>we will switch to a different type of waste management.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>The wastepickers, when I speak to them, their aspiration is

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to not work on the dump but to do house

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to house collection. If today I'm collecting metal, tomorrow I'm

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>collecting plastic. You understand what I'm saying. So that it

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>becomes separated at sauce to the extent that you can

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 2>get willingness to separate in their households. That's something that

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>we need to think about. And on the funding, there

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>has to be a funding mechanism. Finally, I will say

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>extended producer responsibility is something that is in the treaty.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>That means that there's some sort of obligation of the

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 2>brand owners to have a take back scheme. Brand owners,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>most of them are very interested in this, but they

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 2>want any equal level playing field. There can't be that

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>in one market it's not and in one market it is,

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>because then it becomes unequal. We will also need to

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>ensure that we can move stuff across boundaries that today

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 2>is considered hazardous and tomorrow week it becomes wealth as

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>we move into recycling. Then, finally, if I may legacy

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 2>pollution as what we refer to what is already out

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>there in our oceans, our rivers, our waterways. A small

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>island state Tuvalu, Fiji, et cetera that lives off of tourism.

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Just as an example, who is responsible for that beach cleanup?

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>If I met the minister from the Saeychelles and he

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>told me the costs of the beach cleanup just to

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 2>enable tourism, these are extraordinary amounts, so there has to

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 2>be some justice around this in the treaty as well.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 3>One of the features of global negotiations on environmental issues

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 3>in general is that they've become the place where the

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>divide between the global North and global South is most apparent.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>And if you want those solutions to apply everywhere, Global

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 3>South countries typically require financing to be able to get

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>those solutions going. Now, a new report from the OECD

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 3>says that to be able to deal with just prevention

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of plastic from leaking into the environment would require more

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 3>than a trillion dollars of investment in non OECD countries

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 3>in the zero draft and in the work that you

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 3>do and end up with this treaty, how is finance

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 3>fitting into trying to get these solutions? Is going in

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>all the places it must?

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think we need to be careful because of

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>course I live on the African continent. I'm privileged enough

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>to live there. And it is correct that infrastructure solid

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>waste infrastructure is largely absent from many many African countries

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 2>as an example, as well as in South Asia, et cetera.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>And the costs of an engineered landfill with lead chased

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 2>channels with salting conveyor bills. All of that, and with

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>transfer stations and the collection vehicles and all that is considerable.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 2>But don't put that burden on the Plastic Treaty. You know,

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>the Plastic Treaty can't carry that. But the Plastic Treaty

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in its draft text now speaks to the imperative of

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 2>investments in solid waste. Their countries will have to think

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that once you have the investment of

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the infrastructure piece and the trucks and what have you,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 2>someone has to pay the bills to pay an I wouldn't.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't if you live in Islam, you would dump

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 2>because you have very little money and your priority is

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to feed your kids and necessities. And the luxury paying

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for your garbage to be taken away is too high.

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So you need to find some degree of cross subsidies

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>for that which people are willing to pay for. But

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>on the plastic itself, the reduction itself, and the alternatives itself, no,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>there we are not talking these extraordinary costs. What we

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>need to think about because the poor people who may

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>not be able to afford to buy a big container

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, will buy whatever they need in a sachet.

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 2>So that's where we've seen some really neat innovation, for

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 2>example El Grammo in Chile, where you own a bottle

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>with your little microchip and you go to the store

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>and you buy a grammo the grams that you can afford.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>If you can afford twenty grams, you press the button,

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>you get the twenty of whatever. So whatever it is

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that you need, and you are done and at bottle

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 2>as yours forever. It's this kind of innovation that we

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 2>need to leapfrog into so that we can get rid

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>of the plastic I'm not denying the OCD study, but

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>we need to think of them. And that's why I'm

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>speaking to all the ifi's development banks, et cetera. They

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 2>really need to lean in on the solid waste management.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>After the break, how to get companies to do the

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>work on cutting plastic pollution.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, the science of climate change has been clear for

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a long time, and it's only become more and more certain.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's not allowed for progress to happen at pace.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 3>That is not to say progress can't happen under the

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 3>UN system. We had the Montreal Protocol back in nineteen

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven, another Unit convention, indeed, very clear mandates to

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>try and reduce there a set of gases that were

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>causing the ozone layer to break apart and all kinds

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 3>of problems that follow from that. We've seen the result

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>of that show over the next thirty years. The osen

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>hole is currently filling up and filling up quickly. So

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>these things can work. But the same group of countries

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 3>that have caused a problem on the climate sphere are

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>also the group of countries that are trying to cause

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 3>a problem on the plastics treat And one of the

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 3>ways in which they do it is they say energy

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>is needed for development. They were able to insert that

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 3>phrase in the Zero draft that was published earlier this year,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>where they said, yes we lend plastic pollution as long

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 3>as it supports sustainable development. How are you going to

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 3>deal with those forces?

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So, first of all, there are many pieces to what

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you said. Obviously, the producers of plastic plastic comes from

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>virgin raw polymer. Obviously, hydrocarbons ie oil and gas are

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the foundational element to produce new virgin raw polymer, which

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 2>often is delivered in small nodules and can be then

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>made into anything from airplanes to your toothbrush or whatever.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 2>The point is that many, many, many countries, way beyond

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the producers, have a plastics industry. Frankly, I was looking up.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to find a country that does not have

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 2>a plastics industry, even if it's not very big. But

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>these are jobs, and so some of the countries are

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>concerned about Okay, yes, this is fine, but what happens

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>as we shift to alternatives? Will they only be made

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>in the global north? Where's the R and D? Is

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 2>there going to be justice? Will we have access to

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the new I mean, these are real issues that are

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>concerning on the issue of new raw polymers. Obviously, yes,

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the countries that produce the polymer could be argued that

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>they have an interest to keep producing. On the other hand,

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>there is an understanding even amongst their populations that recycling

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and recycle content is critical. They too live on oceans,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 2>they too experience this. They too have a population that

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 2>objects to plastic in the waste stream. And what the

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>zero draft speaks to elimination of the single use the

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 2>single use packaging. We can do a lot, and yes,

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 2>obviously they're commercial interest, but I think the other force

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 2>is quite strong, and you rightly pointed out the Montreal protocol.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And if I could just go back and remind listeners

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that in their seventies, when the theory that fluorinated gases

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 2>were in fact what depleted the ozone layer, it was

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>highly disputed by very large American companies. There was hearings

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 2>in the Senate where extraordinary things were said about how

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 2>this would be impossible to face out, face down, face whatever.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 2>This wasn't a word at the time, but you know,

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>eliminate from the production. At the time, the world was told,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 2>your food will spoil, your vaccines will go off, and

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 2>you will be very hot because they're not going to

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>be any cooling. And yet the industry was able to

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>step in. There are many many alternatives, and some are

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 2>with us, but we're just not using them fast enough,

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 2>and others we need to invent. And what's very interesting

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 2>is that we are seeing many of the brand owners

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 2>actually it's detracting from their shareholder value and from their

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 2>company employee pride, and obviously from their brand. When their

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>packaging is bobbing around in the water or lying on

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the side of the street. It is not a good

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>thing nowadays. And so I think brand owners, many of

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 2>whom I speak to at the CEO levels. I also

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>seek to lean in. I say to those countries that

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>are holding on to plastic in the places where it's replaceable.

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>We still need it for planes, trains, cars, appliances, electrical

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. But that kind of plastic doesn't

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>end up in the environment. It's a packaging that does.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I say to those brand owners. Look at the solar

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 2>industry PV. The early bird got the worm. Those who

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>started investing and now controlling that market, step in and

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 2>lead in this way so that you can be part

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of that innovation way, because it will come like it

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 2>came on cooling, like it came on photovol takes.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>It's clear that there are solutions and that there are

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 3>places where these solutions have started to work. One solution

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 3>that has popular and has scaled up is the plastic

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 3>bottle fee, where you pay a little bit when you

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 3>buy the bottle and if when you return it to

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the right place, you get some money back. These solutions exist,

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 3>they need to be scaled up. But if you just

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 3>look at companies. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation listed one hundred

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and fifty companies in twenty eighteen that said they would

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>report on and reduce their plastic pollution by twenty twenty five.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>But five years on twenty companies have dropped out many

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 3>major brands and they are unwilling to either meet the

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 3>criteria or even take part in what was an obligation

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>that seemed pretty reasonable. Why do you think a treaty

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 3>which is being talked about by governments will actually get

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>companies to do so.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 2>I grew up in Denmark. We always had a collect scheme.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>When I was a kid. It was glass and if

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>you found a glass bottle as a little five year old,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>you would pick it up. It would be like fifty cents,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and you could go and get a lollipop

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 2>for that or whatever. So and now it's also plastic

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and you put them into a machine either by way

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to buy individual code, and out pops a little thing

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>that you then used to pay for your groceries. I

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 2>could never walk past a can or a bottle in denmarket.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like walking past money lying on the ground. And

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>so what these individual companies did. They put up their

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>hands and we're willing to do this, but if there

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 2>is no system by which I take it all to

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the grocery shop or the supermarket, and everything, whether it's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 2>pepsi or Coca Cola or Procter and Gamble or it

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 2>has to go through the same system. Honestly, it's hard

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 2>for people to this one goes here, that one goes there.

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit like when you stand with your

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 2>ice cream wrapping in front of the recycling and joy, okay,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 2>is this here or is it there? And where does

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 2>it go? The system has to be one that has

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>been enabled across a jurisdiction, normally a country or a

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>group of countries. If that is in place by legislation,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the national level logic follows. It's just how it works.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Are there countries in the world where there has been

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>legislation put in place to deal with plastic pollution that

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 3>you think are good case studies to follow? You mentioned Denmark,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Well are examples. Perhaps I would look.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 2>At Rwanda and Kenya as the I mean Rwanda came

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 2>first and Kenya on its heels, and now a number

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of countries on the continent of Africa. Rwanda banned plastic bags.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>You're going to have to double check, but like two

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven and Kenya is shortly thereafter, and significant

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 2>finds follow. If you're caught with a plastic bag significant

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 2>in terms of and or jail time. The National Environmental

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Management Authority of Kenya, for example, it's sort of similar

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>to drug busts, except it's illegal plastic bag production busts,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 2>and the criminals are lined up and on Twitter and

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you see them all and shamefaced and so and so forth.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 2>You cannot when you land in Nairobi, the air announcement

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>will come. If you have a plastic bag, you got

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.479
<v Speaker 2>to leave it on the plane, do not take it

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>into the country. That's how it is. And it's phenomenal,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm telling you. And so you know it's only bags, yes,

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 2>but it's a very very good beginning and people are

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>very aware of it. And we don't have like you

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 2>have in other poor countries where solid waste is absent,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 2>plastic bank trees, you know, where they have blown onto trees,

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>not at all.

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 3>It just does not exist.

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>And so that's I mean, the beautification, the absence of

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the drainage clogging and so on. Not to say Kenya

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have plastic pollution, because it does because of the

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>packaging for cleaning products and so on. But this is

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the next step. Kenya, for example, it's just rolling out

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 2>an EPR legislation on this exact thing. Rwanda similarly and

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 2>other countries do. So, yes, it's not just the North

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and that's what I will probably finish with if we're

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 2>coming up towards the end. That's what I would like

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to really stras that this is not a North South story.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It was Peru and Rwanda that sponsored the resolution at

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the United Nations Environment Assembly, and then they got others

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to jump in the Nordic see, some of the Europeans obviously,

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 2>the Pacific Islands and more and more to support that resolution.

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So it is not just a North South story. It

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>is really a story lit by the global south where

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 2>the global nrcessor Yeah, we can get with this, and

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that's quite exciting too.

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Well. I wish you much luck for coming up with

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 3>a global treaty in short order, and I hope we

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 3>can catch up once it's done.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 2>It will be my pleasure.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me, Thank you for listening to zero.

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>If you liked this episode, please take a moment to

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>rate or review the show on Apple Podcasts and Spotify,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Share this episode with a friend or with your local

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>flight dipper. You can get in touch at zero Pod

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot Net. Zero's producer is Oscar Boyd and

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>senior producer is Christine Riskell. Our theme music is composed

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>by Wonderly Special thanks to Kira Binrim, Leslie Kaufman, and

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Tiffany Joy him ma Akshatrati back next week