WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: Anonymity

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works in a love all things tech, and

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to another classic episode of tech Stuff. In this episode,

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the concept of anonymity. Anonymity is one

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of those things that the Internet was kind of built

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>off of, and there's been sort of a love hate

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>relationship between anonymity and the need to have some form

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of accountability on the Internet. This episode originally published on

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>August two thousand eleven. It's one of the true classics

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. Chris Palette and I have this conversation.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoy this discussion about anonymity. So we're

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk today about anonymity and the web and its

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>relationship with one another and how things have been changing

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>over time. And this also ties a lot into a

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>privacy in the web. In fact, the two are these

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>topics are all very closely related. But um it's it's

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>been in the news a lot recently, and by recently

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean the summer of of two thousand eleven because

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of different things. First of all, a

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago you had um or it was

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>only a year ago, but you had Mark Zuckerberg say

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>that the the whole notion of privacy was falling out

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of social norms, meaning that people today don't value privacy

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or don't think of privacy is something that's important the

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>way that generations earlier had, uh you know, thought of

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the subject. So uh, that was that actually kind of

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>explains a lot about certain things that Facebook has done

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>over the past, where you know, it's all about sharing information,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly information about yourself and the things you like to

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>do in the places you like to go. And then

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the argument I think someone at Facebook

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>would make is that the more you share, the more

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get out of that service. So if

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you do not share a lot, you won't really benefit

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>from the service the way you do if you are

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>someone who shares lots of stuff. Although even that, you know,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we could anyone could tell you if they have a

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>friend who shares absolutely everything that that can get old too. Yes. Sorry, Look,

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a particularly interesting bowl of oatmeal,

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so I shared it. Well, it's always nice to share otmeal.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but all right, anyway, we're getting off

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>track because I mean I just go back to the

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Oatmeal party where Josh Clark did that well anyway, So

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so Facebook's approach is saying that anonymity and privacy are

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>really kind of those are old ideas that we're slowly

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing phase out. And then the other thing that kind

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of brought this into attention was a Google launching Google Plus,

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and we did that episode on Google Plus, that epic

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus episode. One thing we didn't really talk about

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that much was that Google Plus. You know, in order

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to have a Google Plus profile, you have to have

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a Google profile. In order to have a Google profile,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a Google profile that's public because

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they eliminated all private Google profiles, And you had to

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have a name associated with that profile. And it didn't

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>have to necessarily be your legal name, but it did

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be the name that you go by the

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>most frequently. And so you would, you know, I have

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to put a first name in a last name and

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>make it make it a legitimate name if it were

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>something that was clearly a handle or a nickname or

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>just unusual had some odd characters in it, like not

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Alex from Clockwork Orange odd characters, but

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>like symbols like at symbols or hashtags or things like that.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Um that Google would flag it and then Google would

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>suspend your Google Plus account. It is a darn good

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that Prince decided to go back to being prince. Yeah,

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>well he the web's over compared if yes, Prince, So

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's immaterial for this discussion. Point yea irregardless um supposedly supposedly,

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, anyway, if you if you put these these

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>symbols into your name, or you had some other weird

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>name going in there, Google might flag your account and

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>suspend it. Uh. They then later on kind of adjusted

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit where they would give you a

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>warning saying you need to go into your Google profile

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and put in your actual name, and you could add

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in nicknames and stuff and another field called other names,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>but that the name associated with your profile would be

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>your real name. Now, that brought up some some questions

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>among a lot of users, and it ranges through the

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>whole spectrum. You've got the spectrum that includes people who

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>are know that their argument is that hey, I have

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>made a a name for myself under this persona. It's

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like a brand. Yeah, a brand exactly. It's like a brand.

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.559
<v Speaker 1>So um The example I used in my blog post

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>was Dr Kiki of Dr Kki Science. Yeah, she's she's

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a scientist, um uh. And she is known as Dr Keiki.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Her first name is I believe Kirsten. But but you know,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>she that's not what everyone knows her as. So she

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>created a Google profile using Dr Kiki and um uh, yes,

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Sandford. That's her name, Dr Kirsten Sandford. So she

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>went she goes as everyone knows her is Dr Kiki,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>So that's what she created a Google profile as. But

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>she her Google Plus profile was suspended because it did

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>it violated the rules that Google had set up. And

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Google's argument was that he wanted to create a social

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>network that would let people connect with folks they know

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and folks they know of easily, and that that if

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you start putting in handles and things and you're cloaking

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>your identity, that's kind of antithetical to what Google meant

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus two be. The problem is that's not the

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>way people use the web. You know, people use the

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.799
<v Speaker 1>web in all sorts of different ways. There are people

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>who will use their own names as their handles. For example,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those people. I use my own name

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as my handle pretty much everywhere, and uh, the reason

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for that is so that I keep myself accountable for

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the things I say. It's a personal choice. I don't

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>judge anyone else who goes by a handle. I totally

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>understand that, and I think anonymity is an interesting and

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>important issue. I just, for myself choose to use my

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>own name because one, uh, that's kind of my brand.

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's my name at this point. If I had gone

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>by some other weird, wacky name, I'd probably be using

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that everywhere. But to you know, it's just again, it

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just keeps me responsible for the things I say. I'm

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>less likely to say something really offensive or outrageous or

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>just pigheaded because it's attached to my name, and I'm

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna go onto some forum and and tell off

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the person who posted above me that they're a complete

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>jerk and an idiot. And you know, I'm I'm less

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to do that. I still do it, I just

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do it as frequently as I would if I had.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, hamster Man seventy three was my handle,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and no one knew that that was me. But we

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all know now, well I don't post under that handle anymore.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>You won't find those YouTube comments coming from me anymore. Buster. Yeah,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>well it's funny. Um you need to it's weird to

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>put this in perspective, so you know, to some degree,

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think online Mark Zuckerberg has a point. We've gotten

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we're interested in social networking. Um.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We have business profiles on link den dot com. We've

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>got uh, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus and all the others

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for our social fun you know, our our informal networking,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in some case business networking too. Um and And it's hard.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's when you've gotten used to the idea of the

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>right to privacy, which, um, you know here in the

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>United States we have a certain expectation of personal privacy,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>um and not that's not necessarily true everywhere else in

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. But when you've established all these accounts and

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, no, I just want to be online and

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>have my uh my ten family members and sixty friends,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. That's all I want on my account.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want everyone else to read my posts. Why

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are you making them available? Um? The thing is, Mark

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>has a point because if you, you do have that

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>right to privacy. But when you join Facebook, the point

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is to be social, and I, you know, I don't

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>want I'm one of those people that would prefer to

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>socialize with people I know in real life and not

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody online that I that I really don't

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>know that well. But at the same time, you know,

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>if if I joined Facebook and I don't have, you know,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to play the rules, by the rules of Facebook,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and if Facebook says on Facebook, you don't have the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 1>right to privacy. And to the same extent, I mean,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're everyone can see you. Now. You don't have

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to publish your stuff so that the world can read

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>every single post you write, but everybody's going to be

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>able to see that you have a profile. And that's

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just the way it is on Facebook. And um, you know,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I I see the annoyance, but I don't see why

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people get so very angry simply because you've you're you're

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to the terms of service for joining those accounts.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the reasons I wasn't anxious to

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>uh join Google Plus right away. It was because I

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>realized that I was gonna have to make my profile

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>public and everybody was going to be able to see

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it was me, And um, you're not allowed to use

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>your nickname because I mean, not only is that against

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules, but it also shows up against your account.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So if I wanted to be Larry the Wonder Beagle,

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>then all my email on Gmail comes from Larry the

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Wonder Beagle, and I don't want to do that because

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I keep in touch with you. You would essentially have

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to create a second Gmail account just for your Google

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Plus profile in that case, which you could theoretically do,

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>although you're again kind of skirting the rules there. Yeah. Yeah, so,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's and it would be annoying because you

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>always have to log out of one account and log

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>into the other whenever you wanted to check your quote

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote real email. Yeah, exactly. It's a it's a pain

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the neck. But the thing is, and again, this

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the actual law. This has

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with the terms of service of the website

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you're using, and it is it is frustrating. Hey guys,

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Jonathan back in two thousand and eighteen. I just

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to interrupt here to say we need to have

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a quick break to thank our sponsor. I think there

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are some people who who agree, like, all right, I

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>get it. If I want to be on blah blah blah,

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I have to play by their roles. I think the

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>fear is that the approach to eliminating anonymity entirely, they're

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they're worried about that being more of a broad approach

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to the web in general. Yeah, and I worry about

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that too. Yeah, that's something that I'm not interested because

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because that would be let's let's say that Twitter made

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that same same decision that your Twitter handle had to

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be your first and last name. Now for me, it

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>happens to be that, but the shortened version of my

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>first name because Jonathan Strickland does not fit as a

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>full Twitter handle. Um, so you know, Johnny cakes, that's me. No,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not, It's not really me anyway, so the cake

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>cake I prefer pie anyway. If Twitter did that, then

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you think about that there there, We've seen

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter being used in things like a political revolutions, you know,

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>political unrest, turmoil, riots, that kind of thing, protests, uh,

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>situations where the people who are organizing it definitely would

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>not want their their identity shared with the general public

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because it would put themselves in danger, literal physical danger,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and it would it would help prevent them from doing

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the the political activist work they were trying to do.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Like if they were to post something and it was

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>traced back to their identity, they could be you know,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>theoretically by by an oppressive government brought in and then

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>not only do you have a person brought in by

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the same government they were trying to protest, but whatever

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>activities they were trying to organize have been, um, you know,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>have been somewhat well sidetracked, have been have been sabotaged

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly because you no longer have that anonymity. And so

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a definite place for anonymity on the web.

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So you here here, Like, let's talk about some of

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the different arguments that people make for and against anonymity. Okay,

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so we've already covered one of them, which is that,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to be able to connect

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with people, you need to be able to know who

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to look for. And it's kind of hard to look

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>for someone if everyone's using up fake names everywhere. So

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's one argument against anonymity. Um another is another argument

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>against anonymity is that, uh, making someone use their own

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>name kind of the way I was explained my own

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>personal approach, uh, keep some somewhat accountable for their words

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and actions. So, in other words, the idea is that

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>if you make sure that people cannot be anonymous, you

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>really cut back on trolling. That's that's ultimately what we

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>get down to. So can you imagine what a place

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>YouTube would be if everyone had to use their real

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>names and like there was a way of really linking

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>an account to an actual person as opposed to just

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a handle, because I mean, you look at some of

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the quotes on YouTube, and they are some of the meanest, nastiest,

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>mean spirited stuff I've ever read anywhere, and just on

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the typical video even you know something that a video

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that has no objectionable material in it, it's just silly,

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>or it's or it's even you know, even if it's boring.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you kill the nastiest responses. And so the argument

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is that, well, if you made sure that people could

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not be anonymous, couldn't hide behind a pseudonym or a handle,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that they would be nicer. And that's probably true for

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>most people, they would probably be nicer. I don't think

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that it would magically make the web a shiny, happy

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>place and no one would ever disagree with anyone, and

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you would never have anyone call anyone else a hurtful

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>name or anything that's naive. That would still happen, but

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it would cut down quite a bit on

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the trollish behavior. But I don't know that the trade

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>off is worth that, you know, So anyway, those are

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>those are two arguments against anonymity. But one that we've

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned already is what if you want to be able

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to protest something or to bring attention to an issue

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that could get yourself in trouble, um, just because of

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>your circumstances. That's true, um. And then there's a difference

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, we could take, uh, we could take

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically the the example of Google itself. So on the

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you've got Google Plus, which is a social

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>networking service that is optional for you to join you

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if you if you want to join the service. Currently

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as of the time we're recording this, you have to

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>use your real name and that's up to you. You

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>do not have to join Google Plus. Then you have

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Google street View. On the other hand, and this again

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>long term listeners will know that We've talked about this

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>before on the on previous podcasts. So Google street View

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea of being that Google is sending cars on

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>driving around neighborhoods, driving on city streets, um, and basically

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they take pana ramic photos of the street so you

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>can see I personally find it really helpful when I'm

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for a business that I've never seen before. I'm

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to get there and you can go look it

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>up online and see a picture of what it looks like. Oh,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the green building, and you can pan around and

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>see what the surrounding buildings are and you can you

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>get an idea for the landmarks. Yes, it's it's it's

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>really a neat idea, a concept on the table right

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a neat idea, especially when you apply to

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>things like I want to take a virtual tour of

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a city I've never been in, and you could literally

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do that if you have a fast enough connection to

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and a good processor, then yeah you can.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You can you know, navigate through street View and go

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>down streets in cities just as if you were there,

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>um without the like, you know, you can stroll down

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>New York City at night without worrying about getting bugged.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it'd be at night. Well, no,

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but it would. It would be kind of hard to see.

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But um, and there are there are many funny stories

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>about Google street View, the cameras getting knocked off by

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>low bridges and people doing crazy things. People hearing that

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>street view was coming through, so they arrange for some

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of bizarre demonstration or or sword fire mooning, you know,

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff. But the thing is to people

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>complain that they're taking photos of their houses without any permission.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>It's an invasion of privacy, as the argument. Yes, um,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and so there you go. You you you know, suddenly

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>your house is there and you can't opt out of it. Yeah. Yeah,

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know. Plus there are many many phone directories

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with with information in there. Uh they scrape phone books

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and you know their of course legitimate phone books as

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>well phone directories online. So if you put two and

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>two together, you can figure out where somebody lives and

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 1>what their house looks like. Yeah. Now, if you've, if

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you've managed to stay unlisted and everything, then there may

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not be a connection between you the person and your

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>wherever you call home. So but for the majority of people.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, you know, with a little snooping, you

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>could easily figure out where someone lives, and then through

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>street view you can see you can actually see their

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>their house, which I mean, you know, you can argue,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>well that let's let's let's potential thieves case the joint

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>without ever leaving, um, leaving wherever they are. You know

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they can they can look it up and then get

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>a real good view at least to the front of

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the house, maybe even the back of the house, depending

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on how your neighborhoods laid out. And you could use

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the satellite view in in one of the mapping services

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or in Google Earth to get an idea of the

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>lay of the lands. So it's you know, it's one

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of those arguments where you make well, this this can

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>make us less safe and and there that is a

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good argument for anonymity, saying that, well, I understand that

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>there are uses for this technology and that um that

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it can come in handy and it's a fun technology,

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but there are also some serious consequences or there can

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>be serious consequences to enabling this technology and immediately opting

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone in. It's not like you had a choice as

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>far as street view is concerned. I mean, there are

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>some very famous cases of towns that the essentially told

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Google to go uh google themselves and get the heck

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>out of Dodge, although Dodge was not one of those towns.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and some gated communities places like that. In course,

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in in Europe, there have been many cases, um, in

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>different countries in Europe where uh, you know, they they've

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>taken Google to court and said, you do not have

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the authority to do this, um, you know, because it

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>violates our country's privacy laws. So um, you know, it's

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's difficult, you know, on on, but it's there

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>is a definite difference in um, you know, things like

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>being signing up to be unlisted from your phone company

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and deciding to opt out of social networking services versus um,

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, what other people post about you online. And

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing too. You you can't control what other

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people do, um not yet, but I'm working on it.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>That's why I brought a crown in today. Yeah he did,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>sitting right on the table right between us right now. Um.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, you know, I've had pictures tagged

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, um, and you know, with my name on them,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm kind of the point where I try to

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>avoid having that done, and I go and remove the

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>tags simply because I'm less comfortable being public than other

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 1>people there. But I can that I think there's this, well,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure actually that Facebook has in its privacy

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>settings a setting where you can go in and make

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>sure that if someone wants to tag you in a

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>photo that it has that requests your permission before the

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tag goes public. So you can actually tweak that setting,

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>although like all Facebook privacy settings, it's not the easiest

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>thing to find. You have to kind of do a

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>little digging. Um. Google Plus is is kind of the

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>same way in a sense, it's a lot easier to

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>control who sees your information when you use Google Plus

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>because you can just at every stage you can determine

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>which bits of information are visible to others and which

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ones aren't and uh, and you can specify you know,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>which users can see it, like a circle or just

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a specific user. But even so, it's it's still a

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff to wade through. Hey, guys, Jonathan two

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand eighteen, present day, looking back on the past. Before

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we conclude this discussion about anonymity, let's take another quick

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. Another thing about well, another

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>argument you can make against anonymity. We we've already touched

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>on this about the trolling, but if you really want

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to see and I don't recommend you do this, but

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>if you if you want to see what the power

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of anonymity, you can go to a uh community like

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>community like four chan. Yes, now, four chan is we've

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about before. It's a it's a message board that

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>allows you to post things anonymously. You don't have to

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>create an account. You can create a handle and you

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can either use the same handle or you can use

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a different handle every time you log in if you

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>want to. Um, Actually, that would probably make you less

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>likely to be traced because you're using a different one.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>You're not creating an identity for yourself. Is there a

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>spout too, or just a handle? It's just a handle.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It's actually two handles. I'm a sugar dish um. So

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the the idea here, but four chann is that you

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>can share stuff without ever having to to link it

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>back to yourself personally. And they actually have a couple

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of chann and not everything on four chan is is

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>of objectionable material. Right. Uh, there's a lot of stuff

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on Fortune that's all about uh, you know, a lot

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of its Japanese pop culture stuff, especially um manga and anime.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>But there are some channels in four chan, the random

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>channel being the most famous channel where anything goes and

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>people are using um anonymous handles in or or to

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>post stuff, usually in order to get a reaction out

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of other people, um, either to make them laugh or

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to shock them, or to discuss them or whatever. But

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of about it's about as close to

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>chaos as I can think of really. Um, not that

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not interesting or entertaining at times, but it's often

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>very uh disturbing to look at. So you look at

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that and you say, well, if if maintaining anonymity on

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the web means getting this kind of reaction where you

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>get the sort of of people trying to do whatever

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>they can to get a reaction of other folks, that's

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>an easy thing to point out and say, well, this

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is why we don't want anonymity, right. I think it's

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's misleading because it's it's stating that just

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because you want to be anonymous, you want to cause trouble,

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's you know, I don't think you

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>can draw that conclusion, but I think that that's something

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people who argue against anonymity, um,

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they will they will point their finger at places like

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or or sites like four chan and say, well, that's why.

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's shortsighted. I mean, I I just

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>point to the political unrest in places like Egypt or

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>uh Libya or Iran or Iraq, where you know, we've

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>seen social networking come into play and help people, and say, well,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this is where anonymity is really important. And without it, uh,

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that these people would have suffered more. It's

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>possible that the world would have remained ignorant of what

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>was going on for the most part, because we would

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just get mainstream media coverage of whatever those events were.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And either, you know, you can be cynical. You could

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say that mainstream media just doesn't do a good job

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of covering that kind of information, and you know, that's

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's an argument for a different podcast. Or you could

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>say that mainstream media does an okay job, we just

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>have become very good at ignoring it, cynical in a

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>different away, or it could be a combination of the two. Um,

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing any of those things, of just saying

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that without that, you know, if we had had the

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>social media, without the social media, we all we'd have

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>is the mainstream media approach. With the social media, it

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tends to put up even when it's anonymous, it puts

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a personal spin on these stories that tend to hook

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>us as human beings into them. Yeah. And and I

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>think it's also important for us to touch on enforcement. Yeah,

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, although Facebook and Google Plus are are

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>currently requiring people to use, you know, a real name

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least the name they go by. Um, no,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody's requiring a birth certificate. And even then, you know,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a birth certificate could be faked. Um, let's not get

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>into that. But I mean, yeah, I mean you could.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You could doctor a document and send it into Facebook

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and say hey, so, nopsie, that's right, you real name. Um,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.479
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there there nobody's actually doing that. And

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I know people who don't use their real names on Facebook.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And for a while there they were removing people. I

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>assume they probably still are, but I remember it being

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a big thing a while back, a few months ago,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a year ago and I thought, oh, well, you know,

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>my friend is going to have his profile removed. It

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>never happened when it's clearly, you know, he goes by

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>a band name, you know, the name of a character

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>creative for the for a band that he's in, and

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like, uh, like the remote stage person it's a

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stage persona and it's clearly not a name. Well, which

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you could clearly you could do that for a fan

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>page without any issue at all, but for a personal

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>page that does tend to get a little like if

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:44.679
<v Speaker 1>people notice, they get or if people if if the

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>company that is providing the service notices, you might have

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>some issues. But some people with particularly unusual names I've

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>been reading about Google Plus have had their profiles removed

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and actually it's their real name. Yea, let's happened. I

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>mean there are some there's some fun names out there.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of my my my sister's vet Dr Stacy Stacy. Seriously, yeah,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Stacy. Interesting. Yeah, she says everything twice twice. Check

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the papers, check the papers. Um she's at any rate. Yeah,

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>there there are issues where we see people who are

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 1>legitimately following the rules, who being punished for not following

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the rules just because they happen to have an unusual name. Um,

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna fall find that pretty much in any kind

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of environment where they are requiring people to use real names.

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Just because you know, we're human beings, we come up

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with some interesting combinations for names. Sometimes we marry into them.

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we just luck out in our born into them.

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes our parents have a cruel since humor Moxi crime

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Fighter being a good one, Pen Gilette's daughter Moxi crime

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Fighter Gilette. That's true. I'm not making that. I don't

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any doubts since I don't remember some

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of the countries around the web Moon Unit Moon Units that.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I meant. Um, yeah, they Yeah, they were.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing legislation in several countries where people were

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.679
<v Speaker 1>trying to name their kids things like Superman. Wow. Really

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>um but but yeah, I mean, and it's very difficult

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to enforce that without requiring any kind of proof, and

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're sort of going through and going, well, I'm

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem like a real name, so you can

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>go ahead a lot of guesswork. So yeah, yeah, I'm

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>sure that Google plus I Google seems like one of

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>those companies that's really eager to please, and I think

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there are cases like this. Is This is

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>also an issue Google Plus runs in too, when it

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>opens up a private beta and the there's a disproportionate

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>number of people in the private beta who are public personas,

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in the tech world, because you have people who

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>are known by their brand. So Google Plus kind of

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>brought it in on themselves in this case. But at

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>least they're learning this lesson very early on before it

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast. They haven't gone open, they

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't opened up the social network yet, so hopefully this

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff will get ironed out so that UM, if you

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>do want to use a nickname or a brand or

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>something as your persona, you should be able to UM.

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>There's been discussion at Google about finding ways of making

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that happen, although it may not. It may mean that

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to create a sort of profile that's not

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the same as a personal profile, kind of like on Facebook,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where you have fan pages or group pages, and then

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have your personal pages. UM, I think picture pages.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the concern really I have is not um

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:37.959
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you could be anonymous on Google Plus,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or on Facebook or whatever. My concern is that you

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>start to see the generation of movers and shakers in

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the web space, like the Mark Zuckerberg's of the web,

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>who say that they think that privacy is no longer

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a social norm. That concerns me. And the reason that

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>concerns me is because that means that if that, if

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that attitude becomes prevalent throughout the web, then and then

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it will become a thing of the past in all

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but the smallest niche communities. So that's really where I'm concerned,

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not so much in the specific cases of Google and Facebook,

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but in a more general web wide case. And will

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we see anonymity get stamped out? I don't. I don't

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think that will ever happen across the board, but I

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>can certainly see privacy and anonymity taking kind of a

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>uh diminished role in the future. Well I, um, you know,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I personally like to retain a great deal of my privacy. Um.

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I do think that anonymity

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can breed a sense of um recklessness when when people

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>are willing to say whatever they feel like they can

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>get away with well without any kinds of repercussion and

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't particularly approve of that. Um. But

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the same time too, I think, uh,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea that we have all given up

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.959
<v Speaker 1>our privacy and this is just the way things are

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be also encourages people to share too much information.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hey, I'm going out of town for two weeks.

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Look at this. Here, here are pictures of my trip.

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, and then two posts later, Oh,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the police just called. Someone broke into my house. Yeah,

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean if if if you go, well,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all public anyway, who cares? Then you know,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you're I I think I don't think there's as much

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to discourage you from over sharing things that you shouldn't share. Well, yeah,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And and the Internet has made it so easy to

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>share things as soon as you think of them that uh,

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's also an issue. Like the Google Plus setting

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for your phone that instantly uploads any photo you take. Yes,

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have to have those shared publicly. You

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. But if you don't, yes, um yeah,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the yes is getting easier and easier for you to

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to upload your thoughts immediately to the Internet without filtering

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>them first, which is why whenever I make my social network,

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a little window pup ups, do you

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>really want to post that? And when you click yes,

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>do you really really want to post that? And then

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 1>when you click yes it it posts. And then at

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the very end it says if this is stupid, it's

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>not because I didn't tell him. So well, that's that's

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>why I started my own anti social network and I

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>am I am the only member, right uh, and that

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to change, right, It's just it's just it's

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just me. It's just a black web page. You go

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to the web page, there's nothing on it. It's just

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just black. Well, it saves me a lot of

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>time because they don't have to check it very often. Yeah,

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. There is at the very bomb, if you

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>scroll all the way down and it's long, there's an

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>under construction boom shovel digging with the hard hat because

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna bring geo cities back one web page at

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a time. And that is the classic episode of tech

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff about anonymity. I hope you guys enjoyed it big

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks to my original co host, Chris Poulette, who I

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>always enjoyed having conversations with on or off the microphone.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have any suggestions for future episodes of

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, let me know send me an email. The

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>address for the show is tech Stuff at how stuff

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>works dot com, or drop me a line on Facebook

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter. The handle there is text stuff H s W.

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget. You can follow us on Instagram and I'll

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, is it how stuff works

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com.