WEBVTT - Sam Bankman-Fried Guilty and Apple Takes a Hit

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline heindet Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York and.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>I met Lovelow in San Francisco. This his Bloomberg Technology

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>coming up.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>The FTX founder Sam Macmnfried is found guilty in his

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>full trial, now facing decades in prison. We'll break down

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the decision to discuss what it means for the broader

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 2>crypto industry.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus Apple shares taking a hit after the world's most

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 3>valuable company warns of a sluggish holiday quarter and some

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 3>weakness in China.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>We have full coverage ahead.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And we'll have an exclusive interview with the CEO of

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Zieman's as the company invests half a billion dollars in

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>new US manufacturing.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 5>Let's check out these markets.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>It is a macro picture one of a calling jobs market,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 2>which means maybe we're in Goldilock scenario. People buy on

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 2>the fact that maybe the Federal Reserve can indeed rest

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>on their laurels for a little bit. Now we're seeing

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the anaunsdak currently at one point one percent. I mean

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 2>having an absolute phenomenal week, best week of the entire year.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 5>So two is the S and P five hundred.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 2>In fact, the thirty year yield dips down some some

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>basis points on the day.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Last three days we've seen the thirty year.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Yield plunge the most since back in the pandemic, so

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 2>notable moves in the bond market and the stock market.

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 5>We're looking at the.

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Dollar index off by almost a four percentage point down

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>against every major currency that we currently see because we

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>start to anticipate a less hawkish FED.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 5>Let's look at what means for.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 2>The world of crypto, which were gonna be digging into

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 2>much more this entire hour head And actually we saw

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a pop over the last well

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>they are training first and second and November, but in

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>general we're range band once again below that thirty five

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars level. It's notable that we're actually climbed just

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>slightly over the last five days, but.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Really we do seem to have seen a peek in

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 5>the buying. Maybe we now need.

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>To die what the ramifications of Sam Magmin Freed's guilty

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>verdict means for broader crypto at large.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Ed what are you watching.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, the other big story, which is Apple.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, this was the one we were waiting for,

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and largely we got what we expected, the fourth straight

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 3>quarter of overall sales to climb for Apple. We have

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>to go back two decades, two thousand and one to

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the last time Apple had a slump like that. In

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the show, We're going to go deep on China in particular,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 3>they had very clear explanation for what Apple thinks is

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>happening in China, but basically they missed estimates, saying iPhone

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>was actually strong, a record revenue quarter for iPhone, but

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 3>weakness in iPad and Max. So much to discuss, and

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of strange because there's so much news. Thursday

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 3>night was wild in the world of technology, right. Apple

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 3>was a big story in the moment, and then it

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>quickly became a clipse. But we will bring you that

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 3>analysis throughout the hour.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 2>We will. Meanwhile, though, let's get back to the discoy

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>STUFFTX found the Sam Magman freed. He's been found guilty

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>of seven counts of fraud and conspiracy following a month

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 2>long trial that pitted the testimony of the former crypto

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>king against those of some of his closest friends joining

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>us now someone who is in that courtroom when we

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>saw very swiftly this verdict decidedly most uti Yang, Just

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 2>what was it like.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 5>To be getting that sort of response that quickly.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 6>It was a complete surprise. Nobody expected the result will

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 6>come out so quickly. The verdict with the deliberation started

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 6>shortly after three pm on Thursday, and some people just

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 6>left the courthouse and went home because usually for cases

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 6>of this skill, jury will take sometimes or even days

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 6>to deliberate it. But it turns out regard the verdict

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 6>shortly before a pm. So the jury really took a

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 6>quick turnaround turnaround on this and we find out that

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Sam was convicted on all counts.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Very few people ultimately able to be there to witness that.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Momently.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you just tell us sort of what the realc

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>action was of someone said himself of his own lawyers, for.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 6>Example, Yeah, I will start by saying that earlier in

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 6>the night, there's actually some lighthearted moments. The first jury

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 6>note came out and the judge said there are only

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 6>three words written on it, which is we want cars,

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 6>and that's what the jury was asking for. They wanted

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 6>to get transportation provided for them when they go home

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 6>after finishing the night, and when the judge announced that,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 6>the entire quruom just burst into laughter. Nobody expected that

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 6>to be the first jury note, and even sent himself

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 6>he was laughing. It was probably the biggest laugh of

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 6>seeing him throughout this trial. But then I would say

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 6>that the mood really darkened later into the night and

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 6>when we find out that there's gonna be a verdict,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 6>the entire quurum was just quiet.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 5>You could just.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 6>Feel the sense of suspense, the sense of nervousness among people.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 6>And eventually the judge was the one reading out the verdict.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 5>Sam rose up.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 6>As he listened to the verdict, he was clapping his

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 6>hands in front of him, standing very uptight, didn't really

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 6>have much facial expression on his face, and as he

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.559
<v Speaker 6>listened to the verdict guilty, guilty for every single count,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 6>he just kind of had this uh serious look on

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 6>his face. And that meanwhile, his parents were just you

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 6>could tell they were devastated. The dad, Joe Bankman, he

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 6>kind of doubled down and looked down. And after the

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 6>verdict was announced, the parents, at the end of this proceeding,

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 6>they tried to approach sent back free from the back,

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 6>but they really couldn't get to him because there is

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 6>a barricade that kind of separated the courthouse quom between

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 6>the gallery and where the lawyers are.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 7>And Sam was.

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Immediately escorted out by US Marshals and on his way out,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 6>he took a brief glance back at his parents, and

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 6>there's a slight nod and acknowledgement at his parents, and

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 6>then he was gone.

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomboth Utu Yang incredible reporting of the events that took

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>place in that New York courtroom on Thursday evening, and

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 3>later in the show we will get more reaction from

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the crypto industry for what this symbolizes, much more broadly

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>than the events of Thursday. The other top story that

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>we have to get back to here on Bloombow Technology

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 3>is Apple's earnings. We're going to bring in Forester Research

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 3>principal analyst juliasc who I'm delighted to say is with

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>us here in San Francisco. You heard me at the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 3>top of the show. We kind of got what we

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>thought was coming, four straight quarter of overall sales decline.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 3>But then you dig down by product and number and

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 3>it's much more complicated.

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 4>We start with China. What was your takeaway there?

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So, I said, I listened to most of the comments

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>from Tim Cook, and I understand the elements about the smartphone.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>What I thought was interesting about and interesting about his

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>announcements is Apple had growth in some of the largest

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>economies in the world, right places they haven't traditionally been

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>strong or had a lot of sales. And you heard

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>him talk about China with record growth and smartphones. You

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>heard him talk about India. You talk and talk about

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia and three of the largest you know economies, well

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not economies but country you know, popular markets markets in

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I thought that was encouraging that they're

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for growth beyond their existing customer base and outside

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Americas, which have to really been their strength.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So in Greater China sales fell two percent year

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>on year, but Apple said that on a constant currency basis,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>they would have grown. What they said was that in

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Greater China, iPhone had a record quarter and the drag

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 3>in sales was principally in mac an iPad, where in

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>that quarter there have been no refresh.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 4>On the product.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 3>What's the conclusion we draw, We just take it at

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 3>face value that actually iPhone's doing fine.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>There, So not being a financial analyst, I would have

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to take it at face value. But I think there's

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things in place. Like one of them

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is is this the upgrade cycles are slower. If we

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think back to when we first had phones or smartphones,

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we were upgrading those every eighteen to twenty four months,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and that upgrade cycle is probably closer to three to

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>four years now. The second thing I take into account

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>when we think about, you know, the markets, is this

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't their biggest quarter. You know, we're coming into holiday season,

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which is by far the biggest quarter for Apple and

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for every retailer that's there. And when we look at

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>our data, we have twenty four percent of US online

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>consumers saying they're going to spend more forty percent at

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>least the same as last year. And we've got almost

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of ansumers saying they're going to spend

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that money on consumer electronics. So I think also as

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>we look forward, there's some optimism at least for this

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>holiday season.

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 5>And yet the guidance wasn't one of optimism.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 2>And to that extent, do you think this is just

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Apple being typically cautious in this respect.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's probably Apple being typically cautious. I think Apple

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in some ways also they hold their what do they

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>call it, They hold their cards close to their chest.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean Apple is play playing a long game here.

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>When Tim Cook talked about the ecosystem of hardware, software

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and services, they had a new chipset come out about

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a week, maybe it was just

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, right, Their products get better with each generation

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of chips that come out. You look at more than

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one billion active subscribers and two billion active devices. Those

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>folks are spending a lot of money with Apple, and

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>those are just the services we pay for, right. But

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's payments, it's healthcare, it's maps, it's email, it's everything

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we do one hundred or two hundred times a day.

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.199
<v Speaker 1>And I do believe that they're playing a long game here.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That make it suddenly you know they're chasing acquisition. But

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>also the switching costs off of Apple are very high

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>these days for anyone who has bought into the Apple ecosystem,

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a real place of strength for Apple.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Ultimately, this becomes there for a global narrative and one

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 2>of which we are will worried about China, will worried

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>about the implications long a term. But do you think

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 2>that competition from the android sphere is getting more real,

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>more ferocious, more clear, and the nationalism playing into this respect.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think I don't follow in the Chinese market

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as closely, but I think certainly that's an element in

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a market, you know, like China or India. You know,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>when we think about Apple and smartphones, they're certainly chasing

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the top end of the market. It's a very profitable

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>device for them. And not every company that's selling smartphones

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is always selling is you know.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 4>The goals and problem.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, some companies make money in other ways. You know,

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>it could be the telecom providers, it's advertising, And there's

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different business models in China and Indian

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and some of these other countries that are less prevalent

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States that make the sale of

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone you know, I would say less important in

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those markets in terms of total revenue.

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Judy, it's always.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Great to get your expertise and thank you for it

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 2>for us, A research principal analyst, Judy Ask. Meanwhile, we're

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 2>going to stick in the Apple verse. Fox Con is

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>best known of course I building iPhones, but now it's

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>putting big on gifts, what electric vehicles. We spoke exclusively

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>with a fox Con chairman, NC young new about his

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>belief in an electric future.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 5>Take a listen.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 8>After four years, we're becoming more and more excited because

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 8>the more we learned about this new industry, the more

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 8>we believe this is the right industry for FASCA to

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 8>go into because with fastcas experience and its scale, and

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 8>it creates big enough entry barriers for our competitors in

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 8>the ICT industry to go into.

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 9>How big is the opportunity for fox Cone in terms

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 9>of the market size and also for the company's capabilities.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 8>For the market size, We did a study when we

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 8>started about three or four years ago. At that time,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 8>the market at twenty twenty five was estimated at six

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion US dollars big, So this is big enough.

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 8>If we can and get you know, like ten percent

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 8>of it, it will be sixty billion and fast kind

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 8>of running it about two hundred seventy ash you know

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 8>that kind of market, that kind of revenue. So with

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 8>sixty billion, it's about two points some twenty five percent

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 8>around that figure.

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 9>You're building a factory from the ground up in Thailand.

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 9>You bought a factory for this project in Ohio. First

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 9>of all, what did you think when you visited the

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 9>facility in Lordstown, Ohio.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's huge facilities, with a lot of histories and

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 8>a lot of capabilities. We think we can do a

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 8>lot by converting that factory to a EV factory. And

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 8>also because the surrounding environment they used to do I

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 8>would say five hundred thousand cars a year at that

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 8>kind of capacities, Definitely, you have to have enough supply

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 8>chain in the area in order to support that kind

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 8>of production. And with the supply chain almost there, with

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 8>the location with the space that is big enough, so

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 8>we think it will be very good now for the

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 8>EV production there.

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Fox CON's chairman and CEO Young Lewin's a pretty incredible

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 3>exclusive coming out of Asia from Loombog's reed Stevenson Semen's

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>announcing more than five hundred million US dollars in manufacturing

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>investments in the US to support rapidly growing industries like

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>data centers, semiconductor, and battery manufacturing. And that includes a

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 3>new one hundred and fifty million manufacturing plant in the

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Dallas Fort Worth area in Texas. Semen's global CEO Roland

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Bush joins us now from Dallas. Big News, Doctor Bush,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>thank you for your time on Bloomberg technology. How much

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of this is being pushed by the IRA and the

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 3>incentives that were on offer to establish a supply chain

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>here in this country.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean our five hundred million investment program the

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 10>United States has two reasons. Of course, it's attractive environment

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 10>on the one side, but it's also our market. It's

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 10>our customers which we're asking for our technology. So you

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 10>know that. Earlier the year we announced on a twenty

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 10>million investment in North Carolina and Lexington. This is our

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 10>brand new rolling stock manufacturing plant and this is definitely

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 10>pulled by our customer. I mean, our customers are really

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 10>buying rolling stock trains for locomotives from US. And now

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 10>today we announced on a fifty million investment in Dallas

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 10>for Worth and this is about electric products. We are

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 10>basically supporting the data center industry and large language models

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 10>data centers with electrical products and that's a reason for investing.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 10>And of course an attractive market environment is an add

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 10>on too.

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a clear line of sight to the

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>funding that is available from the IRI. One of the

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 3>things I've heard from CEOs all over the world is

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>that on paper it's fantastic, but getting hold of the

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 3>funds and getting going on the project actually has some

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>latency to it.

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, you know, the point is number one is

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 10>the funds. But for me, the most important point is

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 10>really people. When you talk about a manufacturing site, you

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 10>talk really about a fully automated and digitalized manufacturing site.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 10>So you really have to get the right people on

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 10>the shop floor. We are training and educating people at

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 10>the same time, so will little of people in a

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 10>market which is fully scars of labor is one of

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 10>the biggest advantages. This is what we find here. And

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 10>if you're doubling down basically on our investment, which you

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 10>have already in Grand Prairie. Team did a great job

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 10>in really bring our business within three years on electoral

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 10>products and a strong customer demount comes together. So that

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 10>is a nice fit for investing in the United States

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 10>and particularly here in Texas.

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's talk about Texas. You join us from Dallas,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the Dallas Fort Worth area. What was it about that

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>location that made it an attractive place? For you to

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>set up your supply chain there.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, as I said before, it's a very attractive

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 10>environment from the government, what kind of support they provide.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 10>Number two, it's forty miles away from Grand Prairie, where

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 10>we have already a full fledged manufacturing site for electoral equipment.

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 10>We have the people there, we have the supply base there,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 10>we have the management, so it's easy to double down

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 10>our investment on already a very great team performance. And

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 10>then we found a nice place here, a very good place.

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 10>It's an existing site which was used for a warehouse

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 10>convert We are going to convert it now for manufacturing.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 10>So it all comes together. And again this is a

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 10>very business frontier environment that you find here in Texas.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>You talk about Delta Bush, your focus on an end user,

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the client demand coming from the United States. Compare and

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 2>contrast that to Europe at the moment.

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 5>How much are.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>You seeing clients having to dial back some of their

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 2>demand because of the macroeconomic environment.

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 10>What we do see is, let me start with the

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 10>energy intensive industries. They are really looking into the United

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 10>States because you have very low energy crisis, and that's

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 10>a big advantage on top cons your Inflation Reduction Act,

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 10>which is really supporting investment in the United States. So

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 10>this is where our customers. I mean, it's a chemic industry,

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 10>batrem factual data centers, but any kind of energy intensive

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 10>industry is moving to the United States. They're looking into

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 10>that market. And it's a market too, it's a big

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.640
<v Speaker 10>market too, and we are in many many cases you're

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 10>following our customers to these markets and investing there. So

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 10>this is a very very positive environment. And you see

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 10>also semiconductors of following so all the energy intensive critical

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure of businesses, they are coming to United States. This

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 10>is a clear trend. We do know that also Europe

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 10>is putting some support in subsidies for companies. This will

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 10>also get some investment. But the competitive edge on low

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 10>energy prices is a clear advantage for the United States.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Talked a bitch.

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to discuss that competitive edge. Your home nation,

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Germany and its economy is being debated by the technology

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>industry and at the same time, the EUS kind of

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>response to the Inflation Reduction Act as a place to

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>do business and incentivize investment. Talk to us about the

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 3>equation for you of Germany versus the United States.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 10>I think you have to differentiate what kind of sectors

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 10>you're looking into. As I said, energy intensive industries, it's

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 10>very hard to defend. At the same time, we have

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 10>a very strong ecosystems, and Germany in particular, it's not

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 10>only the big companies, but it's all the whole ecosystem

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 10>of small and medium sized enterprises in machine tools, machine manufacturing,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 10>but also for example, the medical industry, car industry, but

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 10>also to some extent from acehutical chemical. If you look

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 10>forward in the way how you can deploy new technologies

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 10>in these markets, that gives you an idea which kind

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 10>of industries you are able to defend or even expand.

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 10>It's all about technology. I mean, Germany is an export

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 10>countries and in the innovative countries, in the industrials country,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 10>and this is the strength that we have to play

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 10>and we have to strength. And there's a reason why

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 10>I very much support also the subsidies which we're giving

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 10>into for Intel for example, but also for all Speed

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 10>and TSMC to invest in semiconductors industry in Germany because

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 10>we do have the right environment, the right people, educated people,

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 10>a good environment to really also go for this kind

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 10>of industry. So you have to look in a differentiated way,

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 10>and there's still industries which I believe have a great future,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 10>but we have to build our strengths, produce ecosystems and technology.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Zemian's global CEO Rolandish, thank you for your time here

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 3>on blue Bed Technology.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Caroline.

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, let's talk a little bit more about some of

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the companies that are out performing on the day, Yelp

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 2>being one of them. We're going to be speaking with

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the CFO next on the company's earnings and they're managing

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to post double digit growth and revenue. This is Blombag Technology.

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.199
<v Speaker 5>Time now for talking tech. First up, Jeff Bezos says, well,

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 5>he's moving to the East coast.

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>The Amazon founder is relocating from Seattle to the Miami

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 2>region in order to be close to his parents. The

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Blue Origin operations of course as well in Cape Canafron. Meanwhile,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Xai will finally introduce this first AI model this weekend

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to select group of people and the billionaire Elon Musk

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 2>started the bench over the summer. This comes million a

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>day after Mask reiterated that AI post is an existential

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 2>threat to humanity. That was over in the UK at

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the AI Safety summit, plus a new bipartisan bill would

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>put the National Students Standards and Technology in chatter deploying

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>AI safety standards. The bill, proposed by two US senators

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 2>would direct this to provide federal agencies with safeguards for AI,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of which they would be required to adapt. Similar bill

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 2>is expected to be introduced in the House.

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 3>Ed all Right earnings Yelp shares popping after the company

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>reported earnings, boosting its net revenue and adjusted EBITDA forecast

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 3>for the full year. Joining US now delighted today CFO

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>David Schwartzbark David. Analysts are basically saying.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 4>You're a juggernaut.

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Tenth straight quarter of double digit revenue growth. I think

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 3>what's missing is the answer and what keeps that going.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 12>Ed, It's good to be here. Is the tenth straight

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 12>quarterer of double digit growth for US. That's been against

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 12>the backdrop of what has certainly been a challenging environment

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 12>for digital advertising.

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 7>How have we done it well? It certainly starts with consumers.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 12>Tens of millions of consumers come to Yelp every month

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 12>for our trusted reviews. We're obviously a household brand. When

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 12>they're making those critical decisions like going out on a

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 12>first date.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 7>They want to go to the right restaurant.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 12>But if you're spending a lot on remodeling your kitchen,

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 12>you really want to choose someone who's going to do

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 12>a great job for you. And around services in particular,

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 12>we've really leaned in. Fourteen percent growth in the third

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 12>quarter for service is twenty percent in home services. We

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 12>think we're taking market share and we're doing that while

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 12>driving Adjusted at EBITDA is a record quarter for us

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 12>at twenty eight percent adjusted EBITDA, and we think our

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 12>product led strategy is really working very well for us.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 12>We think it's the best quarter in the company's history,

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 12>and we think that we're set up to have the

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 12>post here in the company's history.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 4>David, We love the numbers.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I love digging deep into the financials, but with Yelp,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 3>I just always want to know what the story is

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 3>right in this economy, with the priorities that consumers have,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 3>what is the the psychology or driver that makes them

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 3>go on Yelp. What is it that the consumer is

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 3>doing that helps your business grow.

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 12>Well Against the backdrop of high inflation where things are

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 12>more expensive, it means people can't go out as often,

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 12>they can't do as many home projects, so they really

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 12>want to make sure they're making a good decision. And

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 12>what we found actually is that consumers are doing even

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 12>more research than ever before making those purchase decisions. And

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 12>the folks who are coming to you help, they're high intent.

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 12>They're actually ready to purchase their affluent. They are the

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 12>majority of folks have gone to college, they have advanced degrees,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 12>and so they want to do that research before they

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 12>make that purchase decision.

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested in these being record sets of numbers. You say,

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 2>perhaps the best quarter in history, yet your market capitalization

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>is half of where its best was back in twenty fourteen.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 2>How can you can convince an investor base that you

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 2>are worth more, that the value of what you're bringing

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>is more to an investor right now?

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 12>Well, we really have transformed the company over the past

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 12>five years, and we moved from what was a sales

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 12>headcount driven growth model to a product led growth model,

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 12>and that product led growth model is paying off. We

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 12>obviously saw very strong adjustedy ebit don margin in the

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 12>third quarter, but over the long term, we think that

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 12>that product led model enables us to continue to deliver

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 12>profitable growth for the long term. You know, we're just

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 12>going through our planning process for twenty fourteen twenty four

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 12>and we're very excited about what we can achieve next

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 12>year that will enable us.

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 7>To deliver these types of consistent results.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>How about globally speaking, David Hay, why can you pull

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 2>on leavers in terms of growth? We were just speaking

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>with a European based company, Zeeman's, which of course is

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>having a harder macro picture in Europe than it is

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 2>in the US. How do you see your ability to

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 2>continue to ride a wave of US outperformance?

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 12>US economy certainly has held in there and we've been

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 12>and very relevant to consumers that they made those decisions

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 12>as I was saying around inflation. But fundamentally, what we

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 12>want to be able to do is to really leverage

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 12>technology to continue to deliver value to consumers and to advertisers.

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 12>At the end of the day, we have to give

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 12>them value and they have to find us relevant.

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 7>We obviously generate that content through these user reviews.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 12>We think it's really important for those to be trusted.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 12>We want to be that trusted brand for folks, but

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 12>we also want to be the best possible place for

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 12>consumers to go to make purchase decisions, particularly around services,

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 12>so we're continuing to invest there. We're continuing to differentiate

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 12>the experience. We grew home services about twenty percent in

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 12>the third quarter. We think we're taking market share and

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 12>we think that that sets us up very well.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 7>For the future.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 5>David, great to have some time with you.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 2>YEPCFO David shots back, really giving a really great macro

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>picture there for us.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 13>Ed to you.

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Yep.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 3>It's Friday, which means for the final time this week

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 3>that's going to check in on those European markets. The

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 3>stock six hundred Europe it's the gauge we've been checking

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>in all week long because it's kind of cross. European

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 3>has had its best week since March, really rebounding. A

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>big part of that is the central banks story all

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 3>over the world, but also some European earnings feeding into it.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Kind of countering that. On the other side is the

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical risk story and the Israel Hamas war has been

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 3>impacting Brent crude, which is kind of the global benchmark

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 3>for oil separate from WTI. We're down four percent on

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 3>the week. We've seen yields come down a little as well,

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.200
<v Speaker 3>the German tenure burned two point six three percent, off

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty basis points over the course of the week, and

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>euro dollar the euroeup one point six percent against the dollar.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>It's been a fun week. We've been showing you European

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 3>markets because of the time difference at this time of year, but.

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 2>That's it, and those European markets end, as fun as

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 2>they are, have been dictated in large part by macroeconomic

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>policymaking over here in the United States, and of course

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that's to do.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 5>With a FED yesterday, well on Wednesday, indeed, but.

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Also what's happening in terms of the data, the rich

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>data we're getting, and the cooling that we're getting in

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the macroeconomy here in the USTAM of jobs perspective. Goldielock

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 2>scenario is on the stocks they rise. Here in technology,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>we're up NAZAK one hundred and one point three percent,

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 2>basically best week for the big benchmarks since last year.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 5>So clearly a.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Desire to be getting back into some of these stocks

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 2>that have been sold off. I'm looking at a two

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>year yield as you'll see currently dipping down. In fact,

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 2>across the board, we've seen bonds rallying, yields falling.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 5>As we anticipate a less hawkish FED.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm also looking at what's happening in the world a

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin and actually, interestingly, even though we've got a week

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 2>of dollar, significantly week of dollar, we're still seeing bitcoin

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 2>just to the downside. That seems to be a read

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 2>across more and what's happening in the world of court

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 2>decisions around Sam Bankman freed and FTX the guilty verdict dead.

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that is the biggest story of the day,

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest stories of the year, and we'll

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>get back to it. Sam Bankman freed, convicted of a

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>massive fraud that led to the collapse of the FTX

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 3>exchange follows a month long trial where we heard from

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Sam Banker and freed himself from some of his closest

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 3>friends and confidence. We want to go back and look

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 3>at how the trial played out. With Christine Adams, partner

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>at Adams, Dirk and Stein, who was over twenty five

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 3>years of experience as a former federal prosecutor specializing in

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 3>sec investigation and white collar crimes. Our reporter earlier in

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the program painted the picture she was in the courtroom

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the moment that the verdict was read out. Was the

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>verdict and the seven guilty counts that came a surprise.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 14>To you, Honestly, No, I was a bit surprised that

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 14>the verdict came so rapidly, But I think everyone who

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 14>was watching this trial with some background and expertise saw this.

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 15>Ship sinking rapidly.

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 14>It was clear that Sam Bankman Bridge's testimony was going

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 14>to be what it ended up being, a hail Mary

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 14>passed that was not successful. There really wasn't a question

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 14>when the government kept being so simple and just simply

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 14>showed that Sam Bakeman Freed said one thing and did

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 14>entirely another, and that his image was basically a ruse

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 14>as part of this whole cryptocurrency.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 4>Fraud, Christine.

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 3>The lead headline of Bloomberg this morning is SBF faces

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 3>decades in prison after swift guilty verdict. The facing decades

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 3>in prison part help our audience understand how that sentencing

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 3>process will work from this point.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 14>So there is a set of guideline factors out there,

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 14>the US sentencing guidelines, but.

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 15>Those are entirely discretionary.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 14>So the core is required to consider those various factors

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 14>and then make a determination in his own discretion how

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 14>those factors will apply to mister Bateman Freed's sentence. What's

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 14>driving the sentence that everyone's describing as possibly life is

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 14>the loss involved here.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 15>Obviously there's millions, if not billions of.

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 14>Dollars lost here, So that's one main consideration. Another consideration

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 14>will be his leadership in the organization.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 15>So what will happen is mister.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 14>Bateman Freed will be subjected to an interview by pre

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 14>Child Service, by the Probation Office, and they'll prepare what's

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 14>called a pre sentence report and make a recommendation based

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 14>on his personal background, information and the factors around these

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 14>crimes that the defense and the government can then respond

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 14>to and the court will take all of that into

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 14>consideration in sentencing mister Bateman Freed.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 2>His own legal team, of course, showed their disappointment regarding

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the verdict.

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 5>Will they appeal and what sort of grounds might they use?

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 2>For example, I've seen lots that there was concern around

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>lack of well ability to access certain medicines for example.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 14>Yes, for apps, I'm certain that they will appeal and

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 14>that will likely be one of the grounds. Another ground

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 14>will possibly be the fact that the court limited his

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 14>defense that he relied on the advice of lawyers as

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 14>evidence in his case.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 15>I understand that the defense was.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 14>Objected to specifiously by the government during the defensive cross

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 14>examination of the cooperating witnesses, and that those objections were

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 14>sustained by the government.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 15>That might be another grounds for appeal as well.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>And what about those that gave evidence, those that in

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>many ways predd guilty themselves. How do we anticipate that

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 2>they too will will face punishment, potentially prison time.

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 15>They will this again will be in the court's discretion.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 14>They will be sentenced after mister Bankman Freed is sentenced,

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 14>and the court will take into.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 15>Consideration the cooperation in this case.

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 14>The court will also take into consideration the fact that

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 14>they were all leaders in this organization as well.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 15>One was a head of engineering, one was a co founder,

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 15>one was the CEO at FTX.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 14>The court will also take into consideration the value of

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 14>their testimony. You know, it's very difficult oftentimes to prove

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 14>someone's intent. There was obviously a lot of creating evidence

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 14>in contemporaneous text messages and documents, but certainly having the

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 14>people that were in the room talking about what mister

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 14>Bankmanfreed was saying, is very valuable. The CORP will also

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 14>take into consideration that they cooperated.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 15>Essentially after the fact. No one took a risk in

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 15>war or wire while this was happening.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 14>So these are all things that CORP will take into

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 14>consideration in sentencing the cooperating witnesses.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Christine Adams, really great to get your expertise. We thank

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 2>you partner on Adams, Dirk and Cammernstein decades in that

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>expertise as a prosecutor. Meanwhile, let's continue the conversation what

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the ramifications are for.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 5>The rest of the industry, the crypto industry.

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Nick Carter, founding partner at Castleleilen and Adventures, pleased to say,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>is with us VC firm focused on public blockchains?

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 5>And Nick, I mean, is this good news?

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Is this like a sigh of relief for the industry

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 2>that this has sort of been done and dusted, or

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>does it still have a spillover effect that well, crime

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 2>could have been committed within this industry group.

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 11>No, it's a moment of relief. And I saw a

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 11>lot of self clebration jubilation on crypto Twitter last night.

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 11>Practically everyone in the industry was harmed by SBF by FTX,

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 11>no one escaped unscathed, And of course there's a secondary

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 11>effect where the collapse of FTX gave regulators air cover

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 11>to go after the industry really harshly, which we've seen

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 11>in the last year. So I think virtually everybody is

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 11>pleased at the guilty verdict here and grateful that this

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 11>is over and we can put this sortid episode behind us.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Nick, Good morning from San Francisco. Good afternoon where you are. Look,

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 3>we are careful to draw a causal link right over

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the trading of crypto markets this week and the trial,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 3>but that's what we're writing about in Bloomberg this morning,

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 3>the headline red hot crypto rebound calls as bankman Freed

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 3>is found guilty. Did you see that, you know, the

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 3>tension of the trial play out in the markets that

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you're focused on.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 11>I don't necessarily see a strong connection between the outcome

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 11>of the t and price action. I mean, ultimately, virtually

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 11>everyone thought this would be the outcome. I think it

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 11>was very clear over the prior few months that Sam

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 11>didn't have much of a defense, and frankly, it was

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 11>very obvious if you'd followed any of the books written

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 11>about FTX that he didn't have much of a case here.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 11>I mean, his defense that he'd mounted in the initial

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:29.479
<v Speaker 11>weeks after the insolvency after the bankruptcy was pretty weak.

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 11>I mean, they siphoned the funds, and the margin trading

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 11>excuse didn't really make any sense. So I can tell

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 11>it seems like everyone kind of expected this outcome. I

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 11>thought some people thought there might have been a hung

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 11>jury or small likelihood that he wheaseled his way out

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 11>of it, but ultimately it was pretty forecastable.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Now you mentioned how basically no one was left unscathed

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>in the industry, and I bring up a post coming

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>from Alfred.

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 5>Lynn, of course, a sequoia, and he had said.

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I think after the results that today's swift and unanimous

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 2>verdict confirms what we already knew that SBF misled and

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>deceived so many, from customers and employees to business partners, investors,

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 2>including myself, a sequoia. In fact, he said, basically, they

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>did their own eighteen month working relationship, they evaluated that,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 2>and they concluded them been deliberately misled and lied to.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 5>What are the learnings from this?

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.760
<v Speaker 2>The positive's got to be how things change due diligence,

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of course, being one of them. But ultimately how people

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>investigate founders and indeed what's being built in the ecosystem.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 11>Have things changed, Yeah, I mean I don't know precisely

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 11>what Sequoia's diligence processes, but it is the job of

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 11>a venture capitalist to ascertain whether you are being lied to.

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we passed on FTX. We felt that the

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 11>risks the juice wasn't worth the squeeze there. It was

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 11>an unregistered offshore exchange. We passed on it twice. Many

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 11>of us were skeptical of SPF throughout his whole history

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 11>in the crypto space. I'm not saying we knew there

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 11>was a fraud going on, but the signs were certainly

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 11>there us. And the take from it is, you can't

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 11>be taken in by these wonder cans that become the

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 11>main character in crypto, and don't be taken in by

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 11>outrageous growth. And you know, things like boards and governance

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 11>really matter, alignment really matters. So there certainly was a

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 11>way as a venture capitalist to decide that the opportunity

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 11>wasn't worth it.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Nick Carter, founding partner of Cast Island Ventures, giving his

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 3>perspective on his interactions with FTX and the outcome of

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 3>this trial. Thank you very much for your time here

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Technology. Now, It's not the only crypto situation

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that's under Washington's scrutiny. Yesterday, the FTC released a less

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 3>redacted version of its anti trust complaint against Amazon, alleging

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the big tech giant doubled the number of junk ads

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 3>to boost profits and deleted internal communications to thought a

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 3>federal anti trust pro. FTC Share chair Lena Khan spoke

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg's Emily Chang at a tech and anti trust

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 3>event in San Francisco.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Have a listen.

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 16>I mean, what's really interesting is how be it in

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 16>this case or a whole bunch of other cases relating

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 16>to platforms. We see like a monopoly playbook, and so

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 16>in the early years, the firms are chasing gross and share,

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 16>and so they'll actually compete to make their products good

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 16>for people. But we've seen how in digital markets, once

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 16>the market tips and these firms start enjoying monopoly power

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 16>and able to start protecting that power, we see that

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 16>they start becoming too big to care in a basic

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 16>way where they can kind of make their product worse,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 16>they can make it more expensive. Corey doctor Rowe has

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 16>written about this really effectively, about the kind of life

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 16>cycle that we see where at the kind of end

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 16>stage of the monopoly cycle, these firms are just in

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 16>extraction mode where they're really not having to compete or

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 16>make their products better. And sometimes it can be hard

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 16>to kind of imagine what the counterfactual would be, right, like,

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 16>what would have happened if we'd had more competition. But

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 16>what's so interesting that we were able to find through

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 16>our investigation was that, you know, you don't have to

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 16>They weren't being subtle about it, right. These were tactics

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 16>that very overtly had the effect of overcharging people by

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 16>upwards of a billion dollars, actively degrading their services in

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 16>ways that they recognized was making the product worse. And

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 16>at various points, you know, there were folks at Amazon saying, hey, like,

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 16>we think these practices are actually bad for people, let's

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 16>not do it. And at each juncture they were overturned

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.839
<v Speaker 16>by the executive. So it's you know, all laid out

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 16>in our lawsuit, and you know, we think we have

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:36.280
<v Speaker 16>a strong case.

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 8>So in your view, Amazon is a monopoly.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's what our lawsuit a legislate FTC chat Lena Kam.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, look, the sea of TikTok will visit Brussels next

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 2>week to discuss data protection and disinformation with representatives from

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 2>the European Commission, and the meeting will be the first

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 2>since the EU and a number of countries there fans

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 2>government officials from using TikTok on their work.

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Phones and.

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up on the show, it's the race

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 3>for memory in the LLM space. We're going to break

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 3>all things memory chip down with Urrogit Raye Choldry of

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Georgia Tech. This is going to be a deep, nerdy,

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 3>but important conversation.

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 4>This has blimbo technology.

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 3>So it's been a big week for the technology that's

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 3>powering AI. AMD Earning showed significant demand for its MI

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>three hundred AI accelerator, which is set to take on

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 3>in Video's h one hundred. We also heard startups who

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 3>need the chips to build large language models, raising money

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 3>or in some cases failing on a near daily basis

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 3>a technical challenge for all of those memory. As AI

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 3>workloads increase, there's an intense demand and need for high

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>capacity memory Chips presenting a technical challenge known as the

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 3>memory war, joining us to discuss Professor Arrojet Ray Choudry

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 3>at the score of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of Tech and an expert in all things memory ships.

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 4>So let's start with the memory war, Professor, what is it?

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 13>So if you look at the performance of a processor

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 13>and that of a memory, So the processor performances increase

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 13>or keeps on increasing every year at much faster than

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 13>the performance of a memory increases. So that creates a

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 13>sort of a wall that we call the memory wall,

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 13>which is the gap between the processor performance and the

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 13>memory performance. When a top of the memory performance, it's

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 13>a couple of things. One is the capacity that you

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 13>mentioned of the total memory that you need to perform

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 13>that work, as well as the as the rate the

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 13>bandwide that which you can read and write from the memory.

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 13>So at the moment, what's happening with these large eye models,

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 13>particularly these larger language models or elelems, is that the

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 13>amount of memory that you need in order to store

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 13>all the models, the activations, and all the intermediate data,

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 13>as well as the rate at which you need to

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 13>access all the data are both becoming a huge bottleneck

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.399
<v Speaker 13>in the entire workload or the computing spectrum. So that's

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 13>kind of the memory world, the difference in logic performance

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 13>and the memory capacity and bandwidth that you need in

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 13>order to keep on feeding the logic.

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Er j this is your error expertsise.

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 3>This week, a MD talked up them I three hundred

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 3>x is having sort of superior high bandwidth memory, but

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the g H two hundred, the Gracehopper is coming from Nvidia.

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 3>What is your assessment of those two GPUs.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 13>I personally think they would be very comparable. So if

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 13>you look at age one hundreds now compared to the

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.439
<v Speaker 13>AMD offering that we have. Of course, the HPM three

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:43.360
<v Speaker 13>that AMD has has more capacity, has more bandwid But

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 13>at the same time, if you look at the announcement

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 13>from Nvidia, which happened a few months back, the Gracehoppers,

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 13>the super chip that's going to come out, which is

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 13>a CPUGP pair that's kind of that will have the

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 13>same kind of HBM three with you with as much

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 13>memory capacity and higher bandwidth. So I think it's kind

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 13>of a race between the multiple companies at the moment,

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 13>which are all kind of gearing towards more bandwidth, more memory,

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.399
<v Speaker 13>more capacity, denser memory. So I think we are in

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 13>some exciting.

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Times, Professor, you've argued in your research.

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 3>So what we need is denser, more energy efficient, higher

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 3>capacity memory.

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 4>What's the solution? How do we find that it's there?

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 13>So the solution can be at multiple layers of the stack.

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 13>So there's a lot of war going on in new technology,

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 13>which is essentially going beyond. Let's a charge to look

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 13>at other kinds of material properties that can be used

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 13>as memory. The next is, of course circuits. How do

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 13>you addage those bit cells or just memory elements so

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 13>that you can read, write, and access them with the

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 13>lowest amount of energy the highest performance. Then, of course

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 13>the architecture like how do you put the whole thing together?

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 13>And that also includes today more advanced packaging solutions. The

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 13>idea would be to keep on bringing the memory closer

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.760
<v Speaker 13>and closer to the GPU or the logic as possible.

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 13>So HPM three is an example where you essentially would

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 13>use something like what we call the two and A

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 13>have integration technique to bring the logic the GPU or

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 13>the CPU close to the memory. Going beyond, you know,

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 13>people are looking at researching three D solutions where you

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 13>stack the memory on top of the logic or even

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 13>bring a little bit of the logic into the memory

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 13>so that you can do what is called in memory

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 13>compute or processing in memory. So there are multiple research

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 13>avenues that are being explored, both in academy and in

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 13>the industry, and one or multiple of these will become

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 13>the solution of the future. But I think the mantra

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 13>is have more memory, denser memory, more energy efficient memory,

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 13>higher capacity, and at the same time you need this

0:43:33.560 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 13>memory to be as close to logic as possible.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Professor, We've been showing images of d d R five

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 3>from Samsung, HMB three E from Micron. You take an

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.439
<v Speaker 3>academic perspective, but there's work in the private sector around

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 3>the world on this.

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 4>What excites you most? Who is doing the cutting edge

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 4>of memory?

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 13>I think different companies are doing different things, and you know,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 13>innovations are happening all the layers of the stacked. Micron

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 13>has some very interesting solutions. You know, we have one

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.919
<v Speaker 13>of the large conferences in the device technology world, which

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 13>is called the International Electron Device Meeting, happens in San

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:12.480
<v Speaker 13>Francisco every December. So there are some there are some

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 13>announcements that Micron is going to make on some you know,

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 13>some very interesting exciting memory technologies which are post kind

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 13>of based on three D integration. Looking at Eskhaynix, looking

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 13>at Samsung amazing solutions for flash as well as for

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 13>d M, so at multiple layers of abstraction. You know,

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 13>from the technology, from the circuits and architecture, we see

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 13>a lot of exciting things happening in the memory. And

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 13>as I mentioned, you know, it's not just the memory

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 13>and isolation, but the packaging, the integration, the coupling with logic.

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 4>That's that's you know, that's kind of making the entire

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 4>space more more vibrant.

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Professor rach Awdry of Georgia Institute Tech, thank you so

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 3>much for your time.

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Shares of Apple still lower by about eight tens of

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 2>send after of course earnings last night. Let's get to

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Ana rag Ran on Blueberg Intelligence to really well articulate

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that this is a China problem. It feels like, first

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and foremost.

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, you see bag MAC sales, iPad sales not that good.

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 17>So the China number really was the biggest surprise on

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 17>the negative side, and you know that remains the concern.

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:21.360
<v Speaker 17>And I think that's going to be the most important

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 17>factor when we go into the next earning season also

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 17>because that, in our view, is going to dictate how

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 17>Apple's next twenty twenty four shapes up.

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Sure, sweet to the point, always looking forward to the

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 2>next set of earnings, even while we still seem to be.

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 5>Recovering from this set.

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Anna rag Rana, we thank you so much of BLUEBG

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence really with well the push forward there on Apple,

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 2>and of course it does it for this edition of

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Bluebog Technology.

0:45:44.880 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:47.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's been an incredible week.

0:45:47.480 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 3>We've covered European markets, We've had earnings, we've had the

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 3>trial of Sam Bankman freed, and don't forget you can

0:45:52.760 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 3>recap every episode on our podcast wherever you get your podcasts.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 3>We have all of them on the Bloomberg platforms, but

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:01.880
<v Speaker 3>also Apple Spotify. As you can see that over Caroline's

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 3>shoulder in New York City and over here in San Francisco,

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Happy Friday. This is Bloomberg Technology.