WEBVTT - (Radio)

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. That shows the hand of the program.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be getting more insight into the move. The

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>FED is in. I'm John Tucker in New York. I'm

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>dou Krisner will have great decisions in the coming week

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Bank of Korea and the Reserve Bank of Australia.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling head get him in London where we're looking

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>at the controversial cutter footballing World Cup. I maybe Morris

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. After the midterms. What comes next for the

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>GOP and Donald Trump. That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg eleven three on New York, Bloomberg one,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington d C, Bloomberg one oh six one, Boston, Bloomberg

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>nine sixties, San Francisco d A B Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM one nine ten, and around the world on

0:00:54.120 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio dot Com and via the Bloomberg Business App. Hi,

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody on John Tucker. Let's start today's program with the

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>FED and becoming fed minutes headed our way, joining me

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Bloomberg Global Economics and Policy editor

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee. You know, we had what Bloomberg is calling

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a deafening chorus of Fed hawks speaking this week, including St.

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Louis FED President Jim Bullard. Here's how he put it.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Even under these generous assumptions, the policy rates still isn't

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>at a zone that might be considered sufficiently restrictive. To

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>get to this sufficiently restrictive level of policy will need

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>to increase the policy rate further. Bullard presenting those charts

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at an event in Kentucky Hosted by the Greater Louisville, Inc.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>He showed a restrictive zone of somewhere between five and

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>seven percent. So, um, how draconian is between five and

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>seven that's encompasses the range from about as expected to

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>draconian we have. Uh. Bullards go on to clarify that

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking five to five and a quarter percent for

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a terminal rate that's not outside the right can back

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up for people who don't follow this minute by minute

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like you, to the terminal rate is where the Fed's

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop and stop. What the rate is going to

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>be when the Fed stops raising rates? And he thinks

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>five to five at a quarter percent, where is it

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>right now? Right now it's at four percent is the

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the range. Uh, it trades a little bit

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>below that. So if you get to five and a

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>quarter percent, you'd probably be trading around five to five

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>point one percent something like that. So, uh, that's not

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>outside the range of what other FED officials have been saying.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>There's sort of a feeling that they got to get

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to four and three quarters too, in the neighborhood of

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>five maybe something a little bit over that seven percent.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>That would indicate that inflation is much stickier than they anticipated,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and the economy is uh in need of much more restraint,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and they had anticipated. What he did was used the

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>tailor rule, which you've heard of, which is a way

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of plugging in economic indicators and it spits out what

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the optimal policy would be. Uh. It's really designed to

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>look backward at what had happened, but some people use

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it looking forward. And he wanted to make the case

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is not done. No matter what happens,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED is not done right now racing interest rate,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you also got to consider the source. Jim Bullard is

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a hawk, right Well, he's been a hawk.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been all over the map in his career, but

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>lately been a hawk. The reason people pay attention to

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>him is he's usually the first one to raise an

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that may then get into the mainstream. He was

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the first one to suggest that the Fed might do

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a seventy five basis point move this year, and now

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they've done four in a row. So when he says

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>five to seven percent, obviously Wall Street sets up and

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>takes note. When we get clues that maybe inflation, the

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>rate of inflation has peaked, that the rate of inflation

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>might be slowing, it's off to the races for the

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>equity markets that we've seen with the latest CPI report.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Um is the that's the c p I, that's inflation,

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the prices that we pay at the market. But in

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the employment report that still doesn't seem to have been

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>impacted by any Fed policy. Am I right in saying that?

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And do they have to torpedo employment? That's a big

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>argument out there. Historically that's what happens. The FED raisers

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, and so companies in particular, but people as well,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>with their auto loans and home loans stop borrowing money,

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and that means less economic activity, and then companies look

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>at who they have on staff and they don't need

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as many people if they're not going to be doing

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as much work, and so you see the unemployment rate

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>go up. Now in this case, uh, this is a

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>very unusual situation because everybody lost their jobs at once

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people didn't come back when the

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>job's reopened. So you're during the pandemic. So you're seeing

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown now in the pace of job growth each month.

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But is that because companies don't need to hire as

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>many people because they finally got people back, or is

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it because they see bad business conditions ahead. We don't know.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at the unemployment rate and it went up

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>from three and a half to three point seven percent,

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but it did that in August as well, and went

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>back to three point five in September. So the Fed

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>FED officials are saying, you know, as far as employment

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, we don't know yet what the actual trend is.

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>They think unemployment has to go up to around four

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent or so, but it's not. I've

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>been moving very quickly in that direction. So they're gonna

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see more and I'm sure that was a

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion at the meeting that will show up in the minutes.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Can I utter the most dangerous words in investing? This

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>time things are different? Uh, this time things are different.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was the first thing they taught you

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in economics graduate school is this time things are never different,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>except that they are because we haven't had a pandemic,

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>global pandemic like this since nineteen eighteen, and we didn't

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>have good economic data at that point. So yeah, this

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.119
<v Speaker 1>time things are different. In the FED and Wall Street

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's trying to model what's going to happen. They're

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>doing their best, but there's not a lot of historical

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>data to put into those models, so they can't be sure.

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mike, as always, we appreciate it. Michael McKee,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and just a hand on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend. Big decisions

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>looming for the Bank of Korea and New Zealand's Central

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Bank as well. I'm John Summer. This is Bloomberg. This

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look ahead at the

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm John

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Sucker in New York. Of Later in the program, the

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>world copy and Cutter is upon US and the event

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and politics surrounded getting a lot of attention. But first

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>central banker is in Asia steering down inflation and for more,

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia host Doug Krisner John.

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>As you know, inflation has been at historic levels in

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>many countries across the globe, and the respective central banks

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have been fighting to bring those prices down. Well. In

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the week ahead, we have monetary policy decisions from the

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Korea and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Now it's going to be particularly delicate for the b

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>OK since South Korea has been dealing with a credit

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>crunch in the last week. On day Break Asia, we

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ask Rajeev de Mello, global macro portfolio manager at Gamma

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management, for his take. The Bank of Create is

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhat more dubbish than central banks in in Latin America

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>or the US for many domestic reasons as well. But

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation has not only gone up for domestic reasons, but

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the one has been weak until most recently, and that's

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 1>also not been very good for the Bank of Korea.

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Will high rates we expect to twenty five basis points hike.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That's Rajiv Demelo of Gamma Asset Management. So let's take

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a preview of the b OKA meeting with Bloomberg's Global

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Policy editor Kathleen Hayes. So, this is the

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>last rate decision that the b OK will have for

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a rate hike. I think, Kathleen, seems to be a

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>foregone conclusion. If there's a debate right now in markets

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>or fifty basis points, is that fair? It's completely fair

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>because they did a fifty basis point rate hike when

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they had signaled twenty five basis points at the last meeting,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and they got a bit of pushback after that. That's

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I think some economists has

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>been saying, uh that even with inflation still high, but

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with a property market under pressure and a credit market

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's has been gone through some major gyrations in the

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>last month or so, it would be prudent to go

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the twenty five basis point hike for now,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the consensus. It will be quite

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a surprise if they do the fifty and the wand

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>wanting to keep its stable might be a reason for

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>them to do that, because going into the previous meeting

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons why they're expected to step

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more to put a floor into

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the currency. There seems to be this view in markets

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that the risk of corporate default is greater now and

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in particular concentrated in some segments of the business community

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>within South Korea. Leverage we know is a problem in

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>household activity, but I didn't realize that it was so

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>critical on the corporate side. First step one, so setting

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing up, was the global bond route. That's

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what pressured bond markets around the world. But then the

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>funniest thing happened on September, UH, the developer of the

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Lego Land Korea theme park in Gangwong Province, missed its

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>payments on its commercial paper repackaging loans. There these project

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>financing asset bait commercial papers what they're called. But the

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is um It's the biggest shareholders is Ganguan.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>There was there's a kind of a government side of this.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>There was the previous mayor that I would say the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>local government that was backing the developer. They wanted to

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>bring in this. It has finished. It's the second largest

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>UH Lego Land park in the world and then with

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a new president taking over, change of political power, the

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>next administration didn't want to back the developer anymore. Anyway,

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a long story, but that default just just shot

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>through the corporate bond market, yields on five year corporate

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>debt rising more than a hundred fifty basis points at

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one point, uh liquidity drying up. And then there was

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>an insurance company that didn't call its perpetual bonds bottom line,

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they were going to just pull back their refinancing of

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the bonds, and that was another bang to the corporate

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>bond market, and that's created a big loss of confidence.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>It has Koreans worried about investors continuing to want to

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in their bond market. And it's not entirely settled yet,

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>but it also doesn't in a in a way at

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>harkins to what we saw in the UK, where suddenly

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>a market that's been stable doesn't seem to be a problem.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of different things happened. Of course, it was

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the the ill timed and ill designed package budget package

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that Liz Trust had for a while. Anyway, I digress

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but it's that kind of a thing for

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>create seems to stable for now. But talking about the

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Korea, it's another big reason to say, hey,

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not time for a fifty basis point high.

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's the corporate story. Then on the household side,

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we know that debt levels are pretty high and viewed

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>as being maybe a little vulnerable, although I think Fitch

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Ratings this week had a note said that that vulnerability

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>can be managed. Rising interest rates and the way that

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that correlates to mortgage rates in a different way than

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it does in the States puts even greater pressure on

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the households. In Korea, well, about eight of crean households

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>have adjustable rate debt, so I believe it was one

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the b Okay of ischials who said, so a

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis point hike by the Bank of Korea is

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>more like a seventy five basis point hike by someone

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like the Federal Reserve. Remember most most Americans, or at

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>least many Americans, have thirty yor fixed rate mortgages, so

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a big difference when your central bank starts raising rates.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So be okay. This week we also have the rb

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>n Z, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. Right now,

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the consensus is that we're going to

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>see a much weaker economy in New Zealand in three uh.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>It's really been struggling as many economies across the world

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have been to come back to some degree of normalcy

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>after the pandemic. What do we know about the outlook

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>for rate policy in New Zealand, Well, we know that

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>their inflation rates very high. It's continued to rise. It's

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>up to seven point two percent year over year. We

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>know that Adrian or, the Governor of the Reserve Bank

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of New Zealand, is not afraid to do aggressive, bold

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>moves because remember at the very beginning of the downturn globally,

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>when the pandemics started, they suddenly went from one percent

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>on their key rate seventy basis point down to zero

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>point to five. Who else was They were out front,

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were out front on the way back up.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think now they're there. Rad hikes, they're they're

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressive tightening have been very effective in hitting the housing market.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>There are high prices, the market was overheated, but and

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't stopped them yet. And there are other parallels too,

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the tightness of the labor market

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in the face of higher interest rates. In the States,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is pretty pretty tight. Same is true

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, even though the r b A has been

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>tightening the labor market. We just had in the last

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>week a shockingly strong employment number, double what the market

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was forecasting. And in New Zealand, labor market conditions are

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>very tight. Although I think the expectation now is that

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>things will begin to loosen in the new year. Yes,

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but is loosening enough. That's the thing. I think It's

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>all relative, isn't it. And that's another reason why Um,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these uh particually. I think developed nation central

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>banks or in this position where they can maybe slowed

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>down the pace of rate hikes, the size of rate

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>hikes for various reasons be okay, their corporate bond markets

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>still being in turmoil, still being tight. Um. The RBN said,

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe figuring that the what the impact that they've had

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on housing is is pretty what I want to say, significant.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, the economies are holding up

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and their inflation rates are still higher, well above target,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so the doors open to more hikes at this point,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just like the FED. The question isn't do they stop

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>yet or anything like that. It's just how big. The

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Global Economics and Policy Editor Kathleen Hayes. I'm Doug Krisner.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You can join us for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia beginning at

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>seven am in Hong Kong, six pm on Wall Street.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>John Doug, thanks a lot, and just to have the

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>world cough a N. Cutter. I'm John Tucker is Bloomberg

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting live from the Bloomberg Getteractive Broker Studio in New York.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three oh to Washington, d C, Bloomberg to Boston,

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to the country Sirius XM Channel one nineteen to London

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>d A B Digital Radio, and around the globe the

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business apt in Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break Weekend. I'm John Tucker in New York

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with your global look ahead of the top stories for

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>investors in the coming week. Big weekend for Cutter and

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for soccer fans with the World Cup for more. Let's

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>send to London and bring in Bloomberg day Break. Euro

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Banker Caroline Hempger, John the Cutter World Cup is becoming

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the most controversial sporting events in history. Cut

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a country of three million people, won the vote to

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>host the tournament back in despite its scorching climate and

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lack of footballing history. It's faced enormous critics is um

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for its lack of freedom's mistreatment of migrant workers a

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>country where homosexuality is illegal. But Cutter has defended itself

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>against the sports washing accusations and the event could deliver

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>record revenue for organizers FIFA and a diplomatic dividend. Now.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>FIFA's president Gianni Infantino says that the tournament and cut

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Are can be used as a force for good. Football

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and the World Cup are offering you and the world

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a unique platform of unity and these all over the world.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's take this opportunity to where everything we can

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to start something. An end to all conflicts, okay, an

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>enter all conflicts. So in Fantino also did as a

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ceasefire in Ukraine for the month long World Cup. Well

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for more. Joining me now is Bienberg, Simon and Foxman

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in Doha and here in the London studio, David Hellier.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to both of you to discuss I mean, what

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is a huge event in the footballing in the global

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sporting calendar. David, can I ask you first? I mean

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Cutter wanted a global platform through football. It really has one.

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>What do you think this World Cup is going to

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be like? Well, I mean, obviously the jury is out

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on this, um. I mean the build up has been

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>unremitting lye uh you know negative in terms of criticisms

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of of of the country and it's it's sort of

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>treatment the migrant workers and uh LGBT rights, um, all

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Um. But on the from on

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the on on the other side, you know, a number

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>of stadiums have been built that look amazing. Uh. There

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>would have been a you know, a great rebuilding the

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of guitar. So from that point of view, it

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>leaves a useful legacy for the country. Um. But we

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really I don't think we've really seen anything quite like

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>this before. The clash of cultures and it really, you know,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it really will depend on how uh you know, how

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>they mix, um, And so we wait and see. I

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah, and I know of course, because hey, you

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are a huge football fan. Also you write a great

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>deal about the business of sports and you're going to

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be in Cutter to actually see some of the footballing

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>action and simone in Doha. I mean, this is this

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:39.479
<v Speaker 1>is it isn't it? It's Western footballing countries kind of

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>outrage that cut off for all the reasons that I mentioned,

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is actually hosting the event. What are the Qataris see?

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>How do they see it? You know, I think there's

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a degree of surprise that some of the criticism has

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>gone on for so long. Mind you, it's not just

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about human rights where or migrant rights, or the rights

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of minorities, including LGBT people, but it's also remember think

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>back to um the early twenty tens when there were

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>all these swirling controversies around corruption. You know, Cutter is

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thought to have won this bid to host the World Cup,

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>um maybe for unsavory reasons, as well as Russia eighteen.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think particularly in the UK, you know, fans

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't really forgotten about that. Here on the ground, though,

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the attitude has changed a little bit. I

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think there was some openness to labor reforms. Certainly the

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>expose as that came out painted a very dire picture

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of what life is like for the lowest income workers.

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>But this campaign has been unrelenting, and recently Mohammad Athani,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the ruling emir, talked about this as an unprecedented campaign

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>against the country for reasons that may not be um.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm just may not be so justified. And

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>so we've sort of seen that kind of evolved a

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more resistance. Okay, so football, but also much beyond

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>football as we look ahead to the World Cup two.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being with me, blom Big

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Simone Foxman in Doha and David Helliot in London. Of

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>course they'll be at some of the matches in cutter

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm callin Heger here in London. You can catch

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.719
<v Speaker 1>me every weekday morning for bloom Bag Daybreak. That's beginning

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at six am in London, one am on Wall Street,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>John Caroline, thanks alone just to hear on Bloomberg Daybreak

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>weekend the battle lines already being drawn for the four

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>presidential race. I'm John Tucker. Emptis Bloomberg. This agains Bloomberg

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Weekend, our global look ahead of the top stories

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for investors in the coming week. I'm John Tucker in

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>New York. A lot of uncertain among Republicans and some

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>level of uncertain among Democrats as well as we start

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to set up now for the presidential race. More. Let's

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>into our Bloomberg ninety one one newsroom in Washington and

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Amy Morris Amy, all right, thank you, John. One of

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question marks hanging over the GOP right now

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>after the midterms. What comes next for the GOP and

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump? Who want to take a deeper look at

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this with Bloomberg editor Megan Crane. Megan, thank you for

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>taking the time with us today. Oh, thanks for having me. Now,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump announced his own plans to run for president

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>again from his Moral Lago estate in Florida, in order

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to make America grated glorious again. I am tonight announcing

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>my candidacy for president of the United States. Now. He

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>seemed a bit muted during that announcement compared to the

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>last time he ran Megan, what's your thoughts? Um. You

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people have said that the announcement

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>sounded more uh muted is the right word, yeah, sort

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of a less energetic. Um. He did say that he's

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>hoping to recapture the underdog spirit of UM a smaller,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>scrappier campaign apparatus than he had in Um. You know,

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to make an announcement in front of a

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>room full of your friends at Mara Lego than it

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is in front of a crowd of supporters, you know,

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of out in the country somewhere. But you know,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it sort of remains to be seen whether he's able

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to recapture that energy. Now Here's what fellow Republican New

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire Governor Chris Sunew had to say, Uh, the same time,

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at the night that the former president was announcing, the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>political atmosphere today will be a hundred eighty degrees different

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>six months from now, eighty degrees six months after that,

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll get to June of twenty four and

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll see where we are there. It's gonna go

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>up and down and in and out. We are so

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>far away from all of it. So that's why I

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>say it's going to be kind of an up and

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>down wild right. Enjoy the show because we are so

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>far whatever whatever announcements may or may not be happening tonight,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh right, that nobody is going to care. That was

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>New Hampshire Governor Christannu Knew speaking there at the Republican

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Governor's Conference. And I guess what I want to know

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, Megan, is are we starting to see a

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shift or a rift? Are we starting to see a

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>split within the Republican Party or is the party going

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>back to the more conservative, traditional type Republican Party that

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we we may have grown up with in the seventies

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and eighties. Where are we seeing? Sure, Well, that's a

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really good question, and I think a lot of people

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>in Washington would love to know the answer. Um. You know,

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Josh Holly, Senator Josh Holly's said that the mid terms

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>had been a funeral for the Republican Party as we've

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>seen it in the recent you know, in recent years.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So a funeral for the Trump Republican Party. Yeah, I

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>suppose you know, yeah, that would be what he meant

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. Sure, but the traditional Republicans weren't supporting supportive

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 1>of Trump in sixteen either, So, uh, you know that

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>riff isn't really new, Um, and we've seen this show before.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump is a force to be reckoned with, and I

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know that they can just turn the page on

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>him so quickly. But it's not just the politicals, right,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's also those wealthy conservatives who are starting to turn

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their backs on him. You actually have been reporting on

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that on the Bloomberg terminal. Um Ken Griffin, founder and

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO at the hedge fund Citadel, actually put it this way.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>He lost, We lost Georgia because of his behavior in

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senate race. In that's a second loss. And then

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this year the Republicans lost the Senate because the Trump

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>back candidates in the Senate races were rejected by American voters.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a three time loser. And I'd like to think

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Republican Party is ready to move on from

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's been for this party a three time loser.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>It's important to note here that Griffin is also very

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>heavily invested in Florida. He's openly supporting a possible run

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>for president by Governor De Santis in Florida, but also

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>calling the former president a loser. I would think, really stings.

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>That is a word that for Donald Trump is a

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>naughty word. Yeah, it's like the ultimate insults. Isn't Trump right? Um?

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>A three time loser? He's not alone in saying that

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>he won't support Trump going forward. Uh. Stephen Schwartzman came

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>out with a statement saying he would not be supporting

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump's run and then he was really looking to a

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>new generation. He did not specifically speak to de Santis,

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>but that's sort of, you know, somewhat coded that we

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about de Santis when we talked about a new

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>generation of Republicans. Um importantly, though, those big or i'm sorry,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>deep pocketed Republicans didn't give to Trump before either, and

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they didn't support him early on in his candidacy,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and he ran without that kind of money in so, uh,

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's impossible to know whether he's able to

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>move on without him. Some people think that these big

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>donors moving away from Trump is actually good for him

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>because he it reinvigorates his image as sort of working

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for the working class and the working man as opposed

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to sort of being you know, tied to big business

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and big money and rich people. You know, that's an

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>excellent point because it occurs to me he probably doesn't

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>need the money. He hasn't need the money, has quite

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the war chest he does. He has you know, lots

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of money on hand that he can spend it. It

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 1>gets more complicated how he can spend it now that

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he's announced. But you know, he does have access to funds.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the um the signal from people like Griffith

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and um Swordsman is basically it opens a lane for

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>other people. If you're Rhonda Santis, you're Glenn yuncan it

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of lets it be known that there's money out

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>there for them. It's not as important that they're worth

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>holding from Trump, that they're making it available to other people.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Right that That exactly what I was going to ask

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you about next. If it opens up that lane, and

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if it also opens a lane for other big ticket donors,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>big heavy donors, to sort of be empowered or be

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>emboldened to say, oh, you know what, we're gonna throw

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>our money behind this other candidate as well. For sure.

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean these aren't necessarily people who you would say

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>follow the leader so much, but it is a little

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of that. Right. You know, when the tide turns,

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>people people don't like throwing good money after bad, so

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know they'll be sort of looking to see who

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>people are supporting, where the money is going, and where

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that's often where they'll put their dollars. Did it surprise

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you when the president's daughter, Ivanka Trump stood up and

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>said I'm not going to be a part of this

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>one and enjoy good luck. But I'm out right, Um,

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>did it surprise me? Is not really? She's been signaling

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>for a while that she was pretty done with politics.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It maybe wasn't as fun as she had expected fun.

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not that glamorous. Policy work is actually

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>harder than sometimes people maybe expect. I think that she

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and her husband took a lot of criticism for taking

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the White House, Um, and that maybe so

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've been there and done that. Maybe you know,

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's time for their family to move on. So then

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the next step for Donald Trump? You know, I

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>think that Trump doesn't want his legacy to be ending

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on a loss, right, and so he has one way

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to change that, which is to try again. And he'll

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>do that if he can. You know, what sort of

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen whether he can marshal the energy

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that he needs personally and also among his supporters. But

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he is the leading candidate for the Republican

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>nomination by a lot. Like people are talking about Rhonda Santis,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>but those poles showed to Santis, you know, sort of

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>like early who would you prefer to be the Republican nominee.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Poles showed to Santis behind by like fifty percentage points.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not you know, it's not like running neck and neck.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It was like, you know, Trump a whole bunch of

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 1>space and then a few other people. So de Santis rises,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>he won by a lot. You know, he's very popular

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. But also that's a very dangerous play to

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be Politics is a law as it's kind of dirty,

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>long business. And the Washington Post had a story this

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>week about how the air of inevitability is sort of

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a death sentence in politics. Um, I'm not certainly saying

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Rhonda Santis is not doing well and writing a wave

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, but two years out, we've often talked about

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of frontrunners who are not who never became president.

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot can happen, Yeah, Bush, you know it was inevitable.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>John Edwards was you know, had inevitability. So you know,

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we can go way back to when you know that's

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of a dangerous position to be in. It puts

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of targets on your back as well. And

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.239
<v Speaker 1>we are talking with Bloomberg editor Megan Crane about what

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.719
<v Speaker 1>comes next for the Republican Party and for Donald Trump.

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But let's also talk about Democrats to the mid terms

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge win for President Biden in a way. The

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>results are mixed though, but not as bad as they thought.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So a moral victory. I'm not sure how they would

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>describe it. Certainly the Senate numbers are evidence of that. Um,

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some questions about you know, Biden's age. There are

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>other questions that persist. But is there a way that

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats can take advantage of this? Yeah? So you know,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden turns eighty on Sunday. Um, he is already

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the oldest president and you know he would be eighty

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>two if he were reelected. That definitely. There's a lot

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of talk about generational change in the Democratic Party right now. Um,

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the House is led by three people in their eighties

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>right now? Is that just the Democrats? I mean the

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on both sides of the political aisle, you see a

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who are in their seventies and EIGHTI yes,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Donald Trump is seventy six. You know, there's definitely, UM,

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be a tied turning. Generational change is

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of what you keep hearing people talk about. There

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are lots of UM, Democrats, you know, who are decades

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>younger than the president, who are looking looking to the future,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>looking to be the future of the party. Um Weather,

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, right now Biden is the president, which

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is of course an incredibly powerful place to be. It's

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a you know, um, it's a he would be a

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>natural front runner. Bloomberg Editor Megan Crane, thank you very

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>much for taking the time with us. And that is

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what is going on in the nation's capital. For more

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of our political news coverage, tune into Balance of Power

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston weekdays at noon Wall Street Time, and

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Sound On with Joe Matthew week days at five pm

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time. Here on Bloomberg Radio, I'm Amy Morris

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg John. Amy Morris reporting from our

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in Washington. Thanks a lot, Amy, and that does

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it for this additional Bloomberg day Break weekend. Join us

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>again Monday morning at five again Wall Street Time, for

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the latest on markets overseas, at the news you need

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to start your day. I'm John Tucker and this is

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg