WEBVTT - Google Shakes Up Corporate Renewable Energy Purchasing

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Hi, This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switch

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It on the BNAF podcast. Today, we're going to talk

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about corporate energy procurement and how renewable energy power purchase

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>agreements or PPAs for short, have been able to help

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>companies meet their sustainability targets. But we're also going to

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>discuss their limitations. How about the fact that even under

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the best of circumstances, wind and solar are not able

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to fully decarbonize the company's scope two emissions when we

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think about it as around the clock and everywhere in

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the world at a specific place. So what will it

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>take for twenty four seven carbon free energy? Well, that's

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what Google's goal is by twenty thirty, So it's time

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to get creative. And here to talk about Google's journey

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>with PPAs and how they plan to innovate with the

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>help of their energy suppliers is Caroline Golin. She's the

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>global head of Energy Market Development and Policy at Google.

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Caroline was interviewed by Kyle Harrison, and he is head

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of sustainability research here at bf NOW. As a reminder,

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>B and EF does not provide investment or strategy advice,

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and we have a more complete disclaimer that's at the

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>very end of the show. But now let's listened to

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Caroline and Kyle's conversation. Caroline, thanks for joining us today. Oh,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. I'm really excited for the

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation som and actually, I feel like in many ways,

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>I've been an unofficial member of Google's energy procurement team.

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So I've been covering corporate procurement at BNF for many

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>years now, and I remember when companies like Google and

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon we're signing the first corporate ppa's five, six,

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>seven years ago, and it's really cool to see kind

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of how far this space has evolved over time. So

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe my first question for you, and starting from the top,

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>can you walk us through Google's history of clean energy

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>buying kind of how does that fit into the broader

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sustainability strategy of Google as a whole. Yeah, I'd be

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>happy to And well, then I'm glad we're having a

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a team reunion here with this podcast,

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, i'd start out with saying that sustainability

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>has really always been at the heart of Google's operations.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It's led by the employees. I mean, it's a very

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>important aspect to our employee culture. That's led by our customers.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a very important aspect to our customers, and it

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>has led you by our leadership. It is important across

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the board, and at the center of that sustainability initiative

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>has really been a commitment to cleaning our operations. And

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this has been something that I would say we're two

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>decades really in the making here. So in two thousand

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and seven, we had sort of set the goal for

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>our operations to be carbon neutral, and we really met

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 1>that goal largely by the use of offsets, which is

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>where many companies are today. As we evolved, we recognize

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that we had a role to play in the energy

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>market and in the communities that we operated in, and

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>those communities that we operate in as usually where our

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>data centers are. So when we're talking about our operations,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about our data centers or our office buildings,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and those are global, right, I like to say, we

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>serve communities from Singapore to South Carolina. And so we

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>made the commitment then to run all of our operations

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on one hundred percent renewable energy, and we did that

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>largely through an approach which is very common today of

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>global matching. So it's a bit of an accounting exercise,

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but we took all of our electricity consumption across all

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of our data centers and across all of our large

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>office buildings. We aggregated that up and then we said,

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this is how much renewable energy we need to go

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>out and purchase in the market globally. And we did that,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and we were the first corporate to do that. Actually,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we take a lot of pride in

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's something we've been doing year after year after

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>year after year. And what that meant really was that

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>where there were markets where we could go out and

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>sign PPAs for solar and win, we went out and

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>did that. Right, So you have markets in the United

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>States like MYSO and ERCOT where we could sign large

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred megawatt two hundred megawatt wind and solar deals and

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we aggregated all that up and that was equal to

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>our total electricity demand for all our data centers and

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 1>large office buildings across the globe. Huge, huge deal. The

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest impact I think was that it sort of standardized

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the corporate PPA and drove down the cost of wind

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and solar globally. And we did this along with many

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of our peers. You'll see this along many of the

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>tech company piers, Walmart, Microsoft like. In that sort of process,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we learned a lot right. The first thing we learned was, Wow,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there are only a few markets in the world where

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>we can really execute at this scale. That's a problem.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>When I joined Google a little over four years ago,

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>we only had a handful of data centers in each

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>area of the world. As we grow, as the digital

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>economy grows, we're going to have data centers and office

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 1>buildings all over the world. Does it makes sense to

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to only purchase in the markets that are available.

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>The other thing we realized was that by operating in

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of global annual match paradigm, there were many

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>hours of the day and in some cases complete data

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>centers that weren't actually running on any renewable energy at all,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and that a lot of the time we were still

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>very much reliant on fossil fuel. From a philosophical perspective,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the goal was to drive renewable energy to get off

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel, but that wasn't actually happening. So we had

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to take a step back and really assess, well, what

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are we trying to do here with our capital, with

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>our influence, with sort of our collective action, and we

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>settled on what we're really trying to do is decarbonize

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the electricity grid. We want to decarbonize the electricity grid

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>because that is the lifeblood of our economy. That means

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>that our society can evolve in a clean way. It's

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a stewardship towards our own operations, but it's also a

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>stewart ship to the communities that we operate in. So

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>how do we actually decarbonize the electricity system? Can we

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>do that with just this global matching approach? We came

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>to the opinion that we cannot do that with just

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.239
<v Speaker 1>this global matching approach, and so we set the goal

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of twenty four seven carbon free energy, And twenty four

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seven carbon free energy is really the goal that we

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>will operate all of our operations, and again that's data

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>centers in large office buildings on completely carbon free energy

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>every hour of every day by twenty thirty. And the

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>other caveat there is that all the energy that we

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>will procure to meet that goal has to be generated

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on the grids where we operate, right, so there is

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>no more buying in Iowa to match our needs in Singapore,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>or buying in the Netherlands to match our needs in

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Right, we have to now source all the

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.719
<v Speaker 1>clean energy that is going to meet our operational needs

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>where we are, and it has to be every hour

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of every day has to be met with carbon free energy.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>And that is a huge, huge shift, and that's the

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>path we're on now. We like to call it our

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>moonshot goal. It's the most aggressive corporate goal out there.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are many other companies that are seeing this

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and also joining in and making similar goals because we

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>all sort of have collectively realize what's the most impact

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we can drive, and the most impact we can actually

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>drive is the fold carbonization of the grid. So let's

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>put our focus there. Yeah, I think you know that

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>keyword of impact is really important here, right, You hit

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of really important points. There's talking about

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Google strategy obviously creating that blueprint and trailblazing with that

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>power purchase agreement model and beingf we're tracking power purchase

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement volumes globally and you saw our record thirty one

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gigawatts of these deals signed last year alone and this

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>year it's going to be a nail writer, but we

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>could see another record year. But you're absolutely right when

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at the kind of the geographic dispersion of

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>those deals, a lot of this activity is occurring where

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>clean energy is the cheapest. So you see a huge

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>glot of corporate power purchase agreements being signed in markets

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like Texas right or markets like SPP like you mentioned,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>where the wind blows a lot and wind powers is

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>very cheap. But if you actually look at the renewable

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>development queue in the mix of energy generation and some

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of these markets, they already have a lot of renewables,

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it's thinking a lot more about where can

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you buy clean energy that makes the biggest impact. And

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, there are a lot of markets around

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Asia and parts of Eastern Europe in Sub Saharan Africa

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>that have a much heavier fossil fuel mix and clean

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>energy buying today is much less accessible for a corporate buyer.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you're totally right that this twenty four seven

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>carbon free strategy that you just outlined really is going

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to open the door for a lot more companies to

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>start thinking this way. Maybe another question for you, would

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you consider this an evolution of Google's clean energy strategy

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or would you consider it more of a pivot away

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>from kind of that traditional PPA model. I think it's

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>an evolution. Just with any evolution, you have to sort

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of learn from where you started and learn as you go.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when we sign the first corporate renewable PPA,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>or when we set up the first solar program with

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the utility in the United States, we did so with

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the same goals that we have now, which is that

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we want to drive impact, we want to decarbonize the grid.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But it was only really through that learning process of going, oh,

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're not going to retire that coal plant even

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>though we added one hundred and fifty megawatts of wind. Okay, wait,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're actually going to bring on natural gas to firm

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that solar. Okay, that's not computing in our head, So

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>why is that not computing? And I think the crux

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>or sort of the inherent beauty I like to say

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of our twenty four seventh goal is it means we

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>actually have to roll up our sleeves and start reforming

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the regulations, the market structures, and the policies that have

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:03.359
<v Speaker 1>guided our elect city system for the past hundred plus years.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>This is something we didn't necessarily have to do in

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent are global matching space, because as you said,

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>where we could go to market, we went to market.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And we have a phenomenal procurement team, you know, and

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>they have worked their butts off for years signing all

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>these deals. But if we say no, no, no, you can't,

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do that anymore, then we have

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to say we're going to have to change the markets

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>everywhere we operate. And market reform means regulatory reform, it

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>means policy reform. It means working with suppliers, It means

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>working with utilities and developers to become more creative, to

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be more innovative, to say, okay, the structures that have

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>guided us for the past hundred years are insufficient for

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the future, and so what are we going to do

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to go faster, to be smarter, to get to that

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>clean energy transition. That's a much bigger undertaking. And so

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>why I think it's an evolution, it's because we've learned

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've just grown in the way we think about things.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>We still are meeting our one hundred percent renewable goal,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and all of that renewable energy that we're signing is

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>being counted and used towards our twenty four seven goal,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but now we're having to work on top of it,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and how do we meet that gap? So even if

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we're at one hundred percent renewable, which is when we

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>started this goal, even when we were at one hundred

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 1>percent renewable, we were still only around sixty six percent

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>carbon free on an hourly basis. So what are we

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>doing about that other thirty to forty percent everywhere we are?

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's where it's that evolution in thinking, and that

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>evolution in thinking is really fundamentally changing all the market structures. Right,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll still use ppa's for wind and solar, but we've

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>got to do more than that. And you mentioned that

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there are other companies that are starting to do this

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right, How sticky is this kind of carbon

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>free strategy? Are you seeing this catch on with a

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies? Because, like you mentioned, right, Google was

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the first company to achieve one renewable electricity matching on

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>an anual basis, and we of course have seen more

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>companies go out and do that. And the R one

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred is growing. I think it has close to four

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred members now, But a lot of these companies are

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not at one percent renewable yet, So how many of

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>those companies are ready for this evolution as you called it.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to take the conversation a little broader and

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>not just talk about companies, because the way that I

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>look at this is twenty four seven is the end goal,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's also sort of the paradigm and the framework

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>by which we all collectively work. So whether or not

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you've set a twenty four seven goal for your company,

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really about are we using our collective action to

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>put in place the market structures, the products, the technologies

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that we all know we're going to need for a

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>decarbonized grid. So last year I had the pleasure and

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>was really humbled to work with the UN to launch

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty four seven Carbon Free Energy Compact. And this

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is compact that invites every single player in the energy

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem to work together towards the full decarbonization of the grid.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The one thing about twenty four to seven is that

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>it is inclusive of other technologies. You know, if you

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>set a one hundred percent our goal right now or

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>any other goal, you are de facto excluding the next

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 1>generation technologies that everyone knows we're going to need to

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>fully roll off fossil fuel. This makes the tent a

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>lot bigger, and we need the tent bigger. And the

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>compact right now is populated with governments, companies, advocacy organizations, suppliers,

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>other large scale thought leaders on this. We have Iceland

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in Scotland and a g as Microsoft New Core. I mean,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a number of signatories here. They're all there

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily because they've set a twenty four seven goal,

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but because they believe that we need to change the

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>structure to get to a decarbonized it, and so that's

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're committed to do. So one thing that I

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>love about twenty four seven is it is more inclusive.

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I think for other companies or other organizations

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that have other goals, that's part of their evolutionary process, right,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and as they work, they need to be cognizant and

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>work towards the baseline structures that we're all going to need.

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that we get sometimes in a place where

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we say, oh, this corporate goal versus that corporate goal,

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or this corporate goal towards that corporate goal. As corporates,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a responsibility to the economy, to the communities

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>where we operate in to drive scaled impact so that

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not just our businesses, but every single household has the

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to run on clean energy. And if we do

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that collectively, then we are moving towards the right trajectory.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And because this transition to clean energy, it's bigger than

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>any of us often talk about, like me, the economic

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>future of our generation or my children's generation. This is

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>how we are going to evolve as a society, and

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.239
<v Speaker 1>so we need to really be collectively focused on society,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the public good. That's why I love being in

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the policy space, That's why I love being in the

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>market design space, because it's really about driving the public good.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I hesitate to say this corporate goal versus that corporate goal.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really about how are we working together to drive

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that collective action so that everyone behind us and everyone

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to the side of us also gets to realize a

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>clean future. I think that's a really smart way of

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it, and you're absolutely right that benefits many

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more parties than just corporate buyers. And I think something

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>else that you hit on there that was super interesting, right.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned flexible technologies You've mentioned policy, You've mentioned suppliers,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So I want to dive a little bit deeper now

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>into kind of the different factors that are really important

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in executing a twenty four seven carbon strategy twenty carbon free.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>And I know you said to kind of expand this

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>beyond the corporate buyer, but I did want to specifically

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about corporate buyers and make an analogy here. And

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been workshopping us for a little while, and what

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>better time to kind of unveil this analogy than a podcast.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Of course, to me, I think of clean energy buying,

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>especially from the corporate space, that the evolution of clean

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>energy buying, it reminds me a lot of the evolution

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that you would see in a sport like baseball. And

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got two Americans on the podcast here, so maybe

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll pick up on some of this, but I'm happy

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to kind of explain it more for a broader audience.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at the history of baseball, a

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people know that the most famous baseball player

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>ever his name is Babe Ruth. What made Babe Ruth

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so famous was he would go out and he would

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs. So he would hit the baseball outside

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the park, and it would get him and anyone

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>else that was on base a run, and that changed

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the way the sport of baseball was played. Before Babe

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Ruth came into the league, players intentionally wouldn't hit for power,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and they would intentionally hit it within the field. They

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't hit home runs, and it was a much more

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of strategic way of playing the game. And then

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>when Babe Bruth came in and started shattering all these

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>records around home runs, the sport of baseball changed fundamentally,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and all of the interests and all a wow factor

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>was going into hitting home runs. And to me, that

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of the corporate energy space a couple of

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It was all about volume, right who could

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sign the most power purchase agreements. But if you look

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>today kind of at in revising history and you look

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at who were the greatest baseball players of all time,

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll still get a lot of people that will say

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Babe Ruth. Babe Ruth was a fantastic player all around.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot more focused now on what we

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>call a five tool baseball player. So it's not just

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>about hitting for power. It's not just about hitting home runs.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's about getting on base more, it's about running the

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>basis faster, it's about fielding better, right, it's about a

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>better all around baseball player. And what that's doing is

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it's shining a light on all these other players that

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe used to not get as much attention as Babe

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Ruth and now they are. And to me, it's very

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>similar to twenty four seven carbon free, right, And you

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>can kind of equate each of those tools to a

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>specific important factor that goes into a twenty four seven

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>carbon free strategy. So you can think about base running

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as flexible generation, you can think about that supply side,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>working with utilities as something like being a better fielder.

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>But then of course you do have something like hitting

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>for power, which is still a very important part of

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the game, and buying clean energy, which is still a

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>very important part of a twenty four seven carbon free strategy.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>So maybe kind of going through each of these five

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tools one by one, one of the things that you

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned and you've mentioned a few times on the

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast today is the procurement of flexible technologies, and that's

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously going to be a very important part of a

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four seven carbon free strategy. So it's buying geothermal,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it's buying nuclear that more closely resembled base load power,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's also looking at things like energy storage. Can

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you tell me a little bit more about what Google's

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>doing here? Yes? Happy too, And you're right. I like

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>your baseball analogy. I was a little nervous. I wouldn't

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>get it at first, to be honest, but it is

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>pointing it right. Yes, it makes sense to me. So

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I go back to what I was saying before. Right,

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So we set this goal. We're one hundred percent renewable

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on our balance sheet in terms of if you add

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the left side and the right side of the equation up.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>It worked. When we dug a little deeper we got

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>to the hourly level, we realized only sixty six percent

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of the time, really we were running on clean energy.

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>That's unfortunate. All right, how do we actually think about

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>getting to one hundred percent running on clean energy? Will

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.479
<v Speaker 1>solar and wind do it? Then? Answer is no, solar

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and wind is not going to do it. Every single

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>research paper I've seen said solar and wind can get

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>us about seventy eighty percent of the goal of a

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>completely clean grid, and that sort of subject to what

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we do on transmission, which if we get a chance

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, I'd love to talk about. But what

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen is that we are in a

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>state where we don't have that last piece of the

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>pie figured out. So if we actually want to get

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that last piece of the pie figured out, we're going

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to need to start investing now. So that means that

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>we have to think bigger than wind and solar, and

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what we've been doing for the past coup beers,

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and we have a phenomenal team led by my colleague Mode,

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who is looking across the globe to say, what are

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the technologies that we need to invest in now, And

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we tend to look at sort that kilowat to megawat

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>space that have already shown their proof of concept at

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the kilowat space and we've said, okay, we're going to

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>now try to scale you beyond that. What are the

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>technologies that we're going to need to fill those firm hours,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, those firm baseload hours. And so we've

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>been investing across the globe in this One of the

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>most recent investments that we made was in Nevada where

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we invested with a company called Fervo Energy, and this

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>was the first partnership for what we're calling always on

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>clean Energy for geothermal, and so if this is successful,

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we will see the fruits of those labors to be

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>able to scale geothermal not only for us, but for

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>other customers. We've also taken this approach in PGM, where

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we've invested in battery storage with the same idea where

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we're actually looked to do it as a model not

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>just for us, but for others, and we did what

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>we called a clean Energy manager model there. And so

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at this, We're looking at hydrogen, we're looking

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>at next generation advanced nuclear, we're looking at everything that's

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>on the board. The other thing that we're looking at

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is how do we just not have to purchase a

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>kilowatt hour in the first place, So demand response, energy efficiency,

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>all of these become tools in your toolkit when you

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are in a twenty four seven world. To me, it's

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more creative and you get to sort of be the

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>wind behind the sales of the next technologies that we're

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>all going to need. And that's been really, really, really exciting,

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and Mode's team has done an amazing job leading this,

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and the goal is to get this to a point

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>where we can now get the markets and the policies

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to be supportive of these next generation technologies and figure

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>out how to best utilize them in a world where

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>within ten years we're going to have zero price signals

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in a renewable space. So it's an exciting time and

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that key component of investing in these next generation technologies.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, like, if we don't use our capital now

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it, they will not be available when we

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>get to these higher penetrations of renewable energy, and we

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in a very very, very overbuilt

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and over expensive system as a result. It's a very

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good point. And speaking of that availability, in those markets

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>where those flexibil technologies are not necessarily available, there's obviously

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the element where you can tap a utility or retailer

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>work with one of those companies to offer you more

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>reliable electricity as well. And I know Google and other

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>tech companies in the past have signed what we call

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>green tariffs with regulated utilities in the US, but of

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>course there's a slew of other retailers and utilities around

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the world that offer sleeved programs where they will buy

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>an intermittent source of renewable energy, they'll firm it up

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>with either their portfolio or buying power from the wholesale market,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and they'll deliver that and firmed up blocks to Google

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. So where do utilities fit into this? Retailers

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>how important are they to a twenty four seven carbon

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>free strategy? Oh? Well, utilities and retailers are incredibly important.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we can set the demand, but at the

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, we are looking for our partners

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other side to drive the creativity and the

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>innovation and deliver and we need to work together in

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>every situation. So from a utilities perspective, and I think

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to be honest, especially in the United States.

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 1>And this is different obviously in Europe, but in the

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>United States, most utilities have been governed by a regulatory

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>process that hasn't changed substantially in the past sixty plus years.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And while we were really proud of the inaugural green

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tariff program and large scale solar programs for corporate buyers,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it is something that exists on the margin. We are

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.239
<v Speaker 1>initiating these programs really with the idea that we're going

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to continue to take a portion of whatever is the

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>projected generation mix for that utility, and then we're just

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>going to add solar or at best add solar and

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>wind on and sort of make the math work, as

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>opposed to taking it from a different posture, which is

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to say the goal is to commoditize clean energy. The

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>goal is to roll off fossil fuels completely, which means

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we have to have a very different approach to capacity valuation,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to ancillary service valuation, to reactive powerflow valuation, and to

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>energy valuation. And so that means deconstructing the regulatory paradigms

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that have put power on our system and turn the

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lights on in our homes for decades. And so it's

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that deconstruction which is critical right now, and so Google

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is playing a part in that and working with our

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>utilities and in multiple parts of the country right now,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we are in partnership with utilities to try to get

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to that next level, that next generation tariff where you're

0:24:54.840 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>actually fully creating a power stack of clean energy, not

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>a power stack that is fossil fuel that is netted

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>out by an addition of renewable energy, but a full

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>power stack from capacity energy, ancillary and reserve that is

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>all clean, that's never been done before, and for a

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>utility to be able to do that and take on

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that role and create tariffs around it will be a

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 1>game changer for customers because a tariff is something that

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>all customers can buy into, right whether or not you

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>have a procurement team like Google does. A tariff is

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>something that everyone can take on the supply side. It's

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>very similar. Our entire market and our entire system has

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>been based on a single source PPA structure. So corporate

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>goes out, they sign a large PPA for solar, they

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>sign a large PPA for wind, and then they add

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>them up together. Wonderful. That is really inefficient and also

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I think derivative of what we actually want to do

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. What we need to get to a point

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with is where a customer, big or small, can go

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>out to the market and say, I want an eighty

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>percent carbon free energy score, I want a ninety percent

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon free energy score. I want one hundred percent carbon

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>free energy score. I want you to go out to

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the market, very innovative supplier, and figure out the technologies

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that need to stack up to deliver that to me.

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's my hourly footprint. You go figure it out. It

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>puts the innovation on the supplier to do that. It

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>a challenge is the market, and I think that's a

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>good posture. We need to be pushing each other and

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And we just did this actually with AS

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, we did this exact same thing. We said,

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>here is our carbon free energy score today. We want

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you to get it. Here. You go out and figure

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out the technologies and how they're going to stack, and

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>we're going to work. And it was a back and

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>forth process, but at the end of the day, it

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was much more efficient as a blueprint for how the

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>market really should work. So it's about innovation, it's about

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>working together, and it's about having that shared goal which

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>is not just to lay a renewable energy onto an

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>existence system, but to fundamentally change the way we stack

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>power so that we get to a clean system. Yeah,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing that you have companies like on

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>g an As, like you mentioned as part of this

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four seven carbon hub or carbon free Hub, right,

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're you know, you're actively workshopping with them on

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 1>these types of strategies. Maybe let's move on to the

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>third tool here and again another one that You've brought

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>up a bunch of times today which is policy, and

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I should say, right, you mentioned before that Google historically

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was only signing PPAs where PPAs were available, and I

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>do want to give credit to companies like Google and

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other tech companies. There's a lot more

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>countries that offer a corporate power purchase agreement model than

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple of years ago. You've seen big

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 1>developments of course in markets like Taiwan and markets like

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Japan and South Korea as well, where signing a power

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>purchase agreement or just buying clean energy in general as

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a corporate buyer is much more accessible than it was

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. But maybe let's open this discussion

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit further. Of course, like you mentioned,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>policy for twenty four seven, carbon free is is a

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more elaborate and a lot more expansive. So can

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about some of the work that Google's

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>been doing there? Yes, I'd love to. This is my wheelhouse,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this is where I sit most days. I said this before,

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'll say it again, but one of the inherent

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>commitments in a twenty four seven goal is a commitment

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentally change the markets and the policies and the

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>regulations which guide our electricity system. That's because there isn't

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a market out there today that is built for a

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>carbon free electricity grit. There isn't one. The truth is

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that our electricity systems globally are built because of and

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in service of fossil fuels a namely natural gas. But

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where we have come from and that's where we

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to be, and I think we all need to

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>recognize that the commodity by which our electricity system runs

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is natural gas. If we want our electricity system to

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>run on clean energy in full force, we have to

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>commoditize clean energy. The reason why we have commoditized natural

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gas is because we created policies and regulations and infrastructure

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to support that commodity. So if we want to run

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>on carbon for energy, we have to create the policies,

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the regulations, and the infrastructures to commoditize clean energy. And

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that is a fundamental difference from where we've been and

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a refocus for everyone. Lee. In April of this year,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we released our first policy roadmap for twenty four seven

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon free energy. And if my colleague Devon is listening,

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say thank you again for your blood,

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sweat and tears on this paper. And this was a

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>paper that we released because we wanted to put this

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>out there. We wanted to put the call to arms

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>out there, which is saying, if you really care about

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>decarbonizing the grid, it's not just about signing PPAs. It's

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>about getting involved in the policies that we need now

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to need in the future so that

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone can realize this goal. And we really lumped these

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>policies into three big buckets. The first one is market reform.

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>All of our price signals right now, you know this

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>better than anyone is run or correlated on the price

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of natural gas, which is a fuel cost. What are

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we going to do in a world where we have

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent penetrations of renewable energy has zero marginal costs,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the market structure is today don't support it. Okay, so

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the existing market structures don't support it. But then in

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple areas of the world, and especially in the United States,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't even have markets where customers can access clean energy.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So we need to reform existing wholesale markets so that

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.239
<v Speaker 1>they're actually supportive of the commodity of clean energy, and

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then we need to expand them so that customers can

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>reap the benefits of wholesale markets, which is to drive innovation,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>drive down costs, and integrate at scale clean energy resources.

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The second big bucket we have is investment in next

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>generation technology. We're putting our capital there. I just talked

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about that with Fervo, but we need policies that support that,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and very encouraged recently by what we've seen in Europe

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>with fit for fifty five and what we've seen in

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the US with the IRA And actually I would argue

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that the capital game for renewables is there. It's been

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there for quite some time now. We have a capital

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>game for next generation technologies, so we all need to

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>get on that train, right, We all need to be

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 1>investing there. And then the last bucket we really see

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>here is consumer empowerment. And so this gets at the

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>heart of a lot of what we're doing, which is

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that at the end of the day, we want every corporate,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>every customer, every buyer to be making the most informed

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>decision on where to deploy their capital that will have

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the greatest amount of impact. You cannot do that if

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't know where something is generating, when it's generating,

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and what it's generating, and you cannot know that unless

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you know the carbon footprint of your load. So to

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>empower consumers, we need policies that inform them. So we

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>need much more transparency in our regulations. We need to

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be using things like teaks across the board that give

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>buyers the right price signals so that we actually invest

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>where we need clean energy, and we need transparency. I've

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>used this joke so many times, but I don't think

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>people realize that one of the most informative pieces of

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>paper on how utilities operate and utilities footprint in the

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>US is still uploaded in a PDF and sent to FIRTH.

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to actually download it and get

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>anything out of it, you need to spend lots and

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of money on that type of data.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>But that data needs to be open so that we

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>can empower customers so that they are all rowing in

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the same direction. So those are three big buckets, and

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>building on that, we've been building coalitions globally. We've built

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of coalitions in the US. We've built the

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Carbon for Energy Compact. We just launched a recent partnership

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>with C forty, which is a major network of cities

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to see these work on launching pilot programs to see

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four seven grow. This year we saw Paris in

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 1>London and Copenhagen as our inaugural pilot cities. You know,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it's not just about corporates, but it's

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>about everyone who's at the left and right of us,

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in front, back of us to get this going. Yeah,

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, it does seem like policy is kind

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of the central component of this twenty four seven carbon

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>free strategy, and I think that point about transparency is

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>actually a really good segue into the next kind of

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tool in a twenty four seven carbon free strategy. So

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we've obviously seen a lot of really exciting developments, especially

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the EU, happening when it comes to the certification

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of energy generation. Right, So you have the Guarantees of

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Origin system in the EU, which is your renewable energy

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>certificate equivalent in Europe. But of course now there's proposals

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's policy in place to expand that to every

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>type of generation technology. And so I wanted to talk

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more just about what do we need

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on the technology side to enable a twenty four seven

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>carbon free strategy. Part of this is obviously adapting on

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the demand side. Google has done some really cool work

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>using Internet of Things and other technologies to change data

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>center activities so that they're using more energy intensive processes

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at times when renewables are generating. And then of course

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you have all these companies now that are trade are

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>creating sorry ourly renewable energy certificates. How important is this

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology development area in this broader overall strategy.

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hugely important, and I'm really glad we're

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about it. So let's take it from

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>both sides. You mentioned teaks our time stamping of geos

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in the EU, and this is something that's really important

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for us right now and that you and really should

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>be important for anyone who's driving towards a decarbonized grid,

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>which we have an opportunity right now with the Renewable

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Energy Directive drafts to really get time stamped geos in there.

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And the importance of this is that when you attach

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a location and a fuel source to

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>your geos, you start creating the price signals that investors

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>need to put their capital where the grid needs it,

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and really the goal is to move every one towards

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>focusing on what the grid needs wear to accelerate decarbonization.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of why these types of registries, a teak registry,

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a timestamp geo registry, they're really, really, really important because

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't have those market signals right now and rex

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are insufficient for creating the impact that we need, and

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>so we need to go farther. And so I think

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if we get teaks deployed across the board, that will

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of be a game changer and the way we

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think about capital deployment because then you're sitting from a

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>financial perspective and you actually can see the value of

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your investment not only for your footprint, but for the

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>overall grid, and that should have a larger value sign

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 1>with it. Right if you are decarbonizing in the hours

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that are really hard to decarbonize in, that creates more value,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That creates more long term capital assurance for these next

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>generation technologies, in the same way that a long term

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>ppa for solar and wind created the capital assurance for

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>the developer market to go out and to finance these

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.479
<v Speaker 1>new projects. And what we need to do is create

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the revenue certainty for the hours that we're not creating

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>clean energy for. So how do we do that? We

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have to create those price signals, So that's why teaks

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are so important. On the other side you asked about really,

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>which was like the demand side. You know, what are

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we doing from our load? This is something that is

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting that I think Google is doing and I

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting for data centers, but I think it's

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>actually more interesting for what it could mean for the

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>broader industrial economy. So we have a carbon compute system

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and a clean compute system, which it basically is a

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>system that says we are going to pilot matching our load,

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>matching our demand with the carbon intensity of the grid,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and where we can shift load, we are going to

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>shift load so that our footprint is following along with

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the footprint of the carbon intensity of the grid. Everyone

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>knows that demand response right now is based on the

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>price of the grid. If you're in Europe right now,

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing this day in and day out, and we've

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>seen this in the US, which is that the signal

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that customers are given is based on the marginal cost

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of electricity generation. The signal moving forward, if we're going

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to get to an eighty percent penetration of renewable system

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>where there is no marginal cost because there's no fuel

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>cost is going to have to change. So do we

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>scrap marginal cost altogether? No, I don't think we scrap

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>marginal costs altogether. We redefine marginal costs. So what is

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>marginal costs in a frankly zero fuel cost system. Marginal

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>cost means carbon intensity. Marginal cost means reserve, it means answllery,

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it means transmission costs, it means all these other things.

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.359
<v Speaker 1>But largely, what it's going to mean for buyers that

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have and the industrial sector that have these huge goals

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is when can I shift to make my load more clean?

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea of the software that we've been

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 1>piloting is not only to make data centers follow along

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>with the carbon intensity of the grid, but to get

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it out there across the entire industrial economy. The interesting

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>thing about data centers is that we don't have very

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>variable load. We're kind of always on. But I think

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about general manufacturing that has that ability to shift up,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>we would be able to get to a point where

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the industrial policy sector merge with demand response

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is really focused on creating a

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>CFEE per megawat score for your demand response signal as

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a cost of gas per megawat score for

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>your demand response signal. And I think that builds innovation

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 1>around energy efficiency in the industrial sector, It builds innovation

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>around building structures about how we build our manufacturing, how

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we design our parts, how we design transmission and industrial

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>parks in general. So it could really change the way

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>we think about this because you're getting out of just

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this price signal to something much more impactful, this carbon signal. Absolutely,

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think what that also does is it takes

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the burden off of some of these other

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>areas that we've talked about today, right around flexible generation

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and about the collaboration and the work that you do

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 1>with utilities. All right, So moving on now, I wanted

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to just really quickly highlight that that fifth tool, right,

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and of course in baseball, hitting home runs is still

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>very important. Aaron Judge on the New York Yankees just

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 1>set the record for home runs this past season, and

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he just signed a massive new contract yesterday as a

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, to show how much, you know, people

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>still care about hitting home runs, and it's the same

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in clean energy buying. Right. Of course, signing corporate PPAs

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>is still a very important part of the market, and

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure we gave it a little

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of love on today's podcast. Where does a traditional

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate PPA fit into Google strategy moving forward? Will you

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 1>still be signing them? We are still signing them today,

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 1>but we are signing them much faster and much more

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>simply than we were signing them before. The truth is

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it's completely inefficient for a company like Google to spend

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>six months going back and forth on the terms of

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a traditional PPA. We need to be able as an

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 1>industry to agree on a certain number of terms and

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>move forward and move quickly. And we are piloting and

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at that right now. So I think traditional PPAs

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>will be there, and it will be there. As we

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>said in the beginning, how the market evolves. If we're

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>not in a very evolved market and the best we

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>can do today is a traditional corporate PPA, we will

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>do that, of course, but we are going to be

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>pushing everywhere we can to at the market to evolve.

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>We would be happy to do a traditional corporate PPA.

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to you know, as you say,

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pooh pooh that model. We're using it where it is

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the best and brightest that it's available, but we're always

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>pushing it to be better. And I think that this

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is where we as an industry can really work together

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and knowledge share because we have a lot of collective

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>experience around this and it's time to evolve. Yeah, I

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a very good point, and you're totally right

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at all the companies that are going

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>out and setting net zero targets or making one hundred

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>pledges for all those companies to go out and sign

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 1>bilateral over the counterpower purchase agreements that can, like you say,

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>take six months or a year to negotiate. It's not

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>sustainable and candidly, there's not enough bodies to go ahead

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and do that for every company in the world. And

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's a very smart way of looking

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>at it is just continuing to sign corporate PPAs, but

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>evolving how we go out and procure those contracts. So

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I know we're running out of time here, Caroline, So

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kind of move on to the final

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one or two questions that I have for you today.

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>How does the investor community interpret a twenty four seven

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>carbon free strategy. I know you that you mentioned that,

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>of course it benefits the broader grid, and it could

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>change the way that we think about the energy system

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in general and how companies, of course buy energy as well.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But how are investors baking this into their strategies today?

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Are they starting to consider these things? And maybe it's

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is it from that risk angle where they're really focusing today. Yeah,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, I would say, and I mean

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I've said this before, which is that the clean energy

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:39.399
<v Speaker 1>revolution is not necessarily a capital issue. I think we've

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>all lived in a world where politically, maybe we have

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>said that there isn't enough capital out there. There isn't

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>enough capital appetite to deploy renewable energy to finance next

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>generation technologies at the scale we would need them to be.

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just too expensive. I think probably anyone who listens

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to your podcast knows that is true in some areas

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of our globe. But in the United States and in

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe and increasingly in South America and even parts of Asia,

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. The capital is there. What the

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>capital is there for is, as you've said, is for

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>tried and true contracts that makes sense on their ballot sheet.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>So I think Wall Street has been lining up for

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time based on the tax incentives and the

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>tax structures that we've deployed in this country and in

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>others to get a guaranteed return. It's a good one,

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and let's be thankful for that, right, Let's all take

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a moment and say we're really glad that happened, and

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be thankful for the tax incentives and the tax equity

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've been able to monetize over the past decade

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to really to make that capital market firm. And so

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>your question is really about, well, how do we evolve

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this if we know it's not just wind and solar.

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So one thing I'll say is that it's been really

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>encouraging to see where the EU and the US is

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this, and we can see there's a lot

0:43:59.360 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of public money right now going towards the deployment

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of next generation technologies. There's a lot of money right

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>now in hydrogen right there's a lot of money right

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>now in battery storage, long duration storage. And thinking about

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this where I would take your questions slightly differently, if

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll give me the allowance is that is that there's

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of money thinking about the infrastructure that

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we are going to need to deploy all of this.

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think the capital market knows how to finance

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 1>a big piece of steel in the ground. It's done

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it for a long time. Honestly. If that piece of

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>steel is generating solar electrons or wind electrons or geothermal electrons,

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the structure is largely there. I'm not saying it's cut

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and paste. It's not cut and paste. And obviously you're

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going to need companies like Google and other companies and

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>utilities to be those firm off takers. But the structure

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is largely there. What the structure is not there for

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is investing in monetary rising and securing off take for

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure we need in infrastructure a transmission and substations

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and long HDVC lines and piping offshore wind from Ireland

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the UK, and wheeling solar in

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Arizona to New England. And if I was to say

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.879
<v Speaker 1>anything to the capital market right now, it's that there's

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of energy going on. Sorry pun intended, I guess, yeah,

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of energy right now going on about

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.279
<v Speaker 1>getting clean energy onto the grid. And then there's a

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy right now the regulatory bodies, whether it

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:42.240
<v Speaker 1>be in the US or in Europe, around grid planning,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>transmission planning, Q reform, interconnection reform. We have a lot

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of capital going in into wind and solar in the US.

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Even in PJM that just did this watershed docket, we're

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to get anything interconnected before twenty twenty seven

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that we signed today. That's the quickest something's going to happen.

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:03.359
<v Speaker 1>So there's this huge backlog on the grid. And while

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we have all these planning docks, and we have all

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>these process docks, which are great, I'm very excited for them.

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.879
<v Speaker 1>We've lent our comments, we've intervened. We want to see

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>transmission planning, we want to see Q reform, we want

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>to see interconnection reform. We fundamentally need that if we're

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>going to get a single electron on the grid anytime

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 1>soon in this country. But if we don't figure out

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:27.760
<v Speaker 1>how we're financing our infrastructure, and if we don't change

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>cost allocation of our infrastructure in this country and in Europe,

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this capital behind clean energy really doesn't mean

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>much because it's going to have nowhere to go. We're

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just going to continue to build these loops of transmission

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:46.760
<v Speaker 1>lines in multiple areas of our country countries, as opposed

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>to actually investing in the broad backbone of a transmission

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>system that we're going to need to commoditize clean energy

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the way that gas pipelines and rail systems commoditized

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>coal natural gas. If that's not there, and if the

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:07.280
<v Speaker 1>capital market doesn't get invested in that another pun, then

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is just going to stall. So

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I would sort of take your question and say, if

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>we're really thinking about decarbonizing the grid, we have to

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think about that infrastructure backbone. And that's where I'd like

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to see the capital markets get more involved and work

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>with policymakers to figure out what's the best cost allocation here,

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.959
<v Speaker 1>what's the best investment strategy because this is a public good,

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we need it, we fundamentally need it. Or everything we

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just talked about before is you're sort of going to

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sit on a shelf. Yeah, of course, No, that's a

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>very interesting spin. And then honestly, when I asked the question,

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not the angle that I was thinking of it from.

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.879
<v Speaker 1>And it's a fascinating perspective and maybe just to close

0:47:45.920 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>things out here, I think a lot of this, of

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>course comes down to spreading the word and you know,

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of course these messages and talking about the importance of

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.400
<v Speaker 1>transmission and getting that in front of as you mentioned,

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>investors and policymakers. That makes a world of difference. And

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of course Google has done a great job and being

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>public and communicating publicly about its twenty four seven carbon

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>free strategy. And what we hope with this podcast is

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that we can further spread the word about all the

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.839
<v Speaker 1>good work you guys are doing. So maybe let's wrap

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it up there, And just to say, Caroline, thanks so

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today. Fascinating to hear as always

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>what Google's been doing when it comes to clean energy procurement,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and I look forward to hearing about many interesting developments

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in the future around the strategy. Oh well, thank you

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for having me. This was a wonderful way to spend

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>my morning. Today's episode of Switched On was edited by

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Gray Stoke Media. Bloomberg anyf is a service provided by

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute,

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>nor should it be construed as investment advice. Investment recommendations,

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>or a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg anyf should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:48:56.560 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance nor

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this recording, and any liability as a result of this

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>recording is expressly disclaimed.