WEBVTT - Week 14 ULTIMATE PREVIEW PART 1

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Do dinnit ye now? As welcome by your host by

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Bay from Marian your co host, five times sake, Bret

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Brick Stepfa BADR co host and five eleven from nor

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Why young ladies and tell them in your with that

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>we will have you inside up Studio thirty four. This

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is the BFFs His Frank Stamford, I am Greg Susman.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That Isy y Eric Young Frank. What's happening Bunny? Happy

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Thursday to your buddy. Week fourteen is here. The fantasy

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>football playoffs for most are here. If you playing a

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ten team league, you might start next week, but most

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>people are starting. You're an idiot, say week seventeen. You

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>can that too. You should play in ten team leagues.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>You should find two more friends. It's not that hard.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll help you find friends. We are best friends. And

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>don't play Week seventeen. Don't don't play weeks. Just just

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>don't do. You know, I'm not doing very well. I

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>just sleep last night, buddy, I slept, really, I was

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I was so tired last night, you know,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was. We're working really hard last night

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>writing all those things, right, like writing, we're writing all

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>these bios. You're not kidding, and there's a lot of

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>like energy that goes into that, obviously, right. So I

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get home. I watched Washman, which is awesome. Eui, you

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>watched I think that you could watch a Watchman. I

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>watched the first episode. It's I don't really know what

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it is or what it's about yet, but I'm I'm

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>into it. You should, you would like as you man.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome. So I watched I have about ten shows

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on the on the queue waiting waiting to go. I

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>watched the I watched the Terps. Was a great win.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>It was awesome. Let's go. And then after writing all

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>those bios that we had to write, like thirty of them.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>How did the terriers do last night? Judy's like, you

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta write some thank you notes? Like, oh god? So

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>I sat and wrote some thing, you know, man, and

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>then I was just like and I'm watering headache after it,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and She's just like, are you dying after these? Ted?

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I am so tired. I was also working

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>with the guys up here to like eleven thirty last night.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I am exhausted, went's mad, well up felt refreshing. Here

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we are, baby, let's go here we are, let's go

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys versus Bears tonight. It all starts week fourteen, getting

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>kicked off Thursday Night football. E y, how are you doing, buddy?

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>How did you sleep last night? I feel like I

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>never asked you how you sleep? And he's gone, and

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>he's gone a great, great shot at ey, we know

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what showed to take it from? Oh man, I was

0:03:39.040 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>about to grab my phone and just take a selfie

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with him, like right here with the remots over there,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>so I can't even turn it off. And this is great,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>This is great. I mean, look, if we didn't bring

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it up, nobody would know that he's frozen. It's awesome. Um,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>what dr Manhattan over here and there it is now

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>now he's really gone. Now we've got nothing. This is

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>live skype action here and look we have professional producers downstairs.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Split screen shot. Awesome, good shot, guys. I'm proud of everybody.

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud of everybody. But Ey is actually gone forever. Yeah,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>he's gone forever. Um, you know, I'm an Illinois at

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>two things. One, I forgot to text you what went

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>down in his lead that people came to blows. I've

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>met to text them about that. I gotta do it today.

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We will do it today, Okay. The second thing is

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>people see like people are, especially the split shot that

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>we have right now. You guys, it's like really nice,

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>like dress shirt on the frank really dresses. I got

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>my sweater and T shirt on, which is what I

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to wear for what we're doing later. He's

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in his pajamas. But anyway, people are gonna say, but

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're supposed to wear, right, You're not wrong,

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so wearing it? And then I so I asked Alex,

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>now I gotta sweater a black fry. What do you

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>think it is? I like it? Yeah, I mean a

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that stairs. Don't seem to like your

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>wardrobe lately into it. But yeah, you know, I just

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>not digging the winter wardrobe. I bought a few shirts

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>last week. I don't know what to wear anymore because

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, one production is telling me to wear this,

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the other production telling me to wear that. So you

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>know what, Greg, I'm just gonna wear a button down shirt.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We go over to M sgu later, I'll throw on

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a little jacket. We'll be all good, buddy, alright, we'll

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>be all good. All right, So let's I know what

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the games are you in the Thursday

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>night football and no Virginia Zaka she tore her a

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>c L. How a the irony in that she tore

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>her a c L from inside injuries? Uh, it seems

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that she has quite the injury herself playing soccer. Yeah,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that she was. Yeah, so that is

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 1>very unfortunate. We will not have her this week. Hopefully

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>she'll be she'll be good to go in in the

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>coming weeks after she has surgery. But yeah, we we

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>asked her what her optimal recovery time was. I don't

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think she liked those shown game. We then gave her

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>optimal recovery time. She didn't like that one either. There's

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>no response. In fact, she just might never join us again, Greig,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>at this point, it would be the first girl you

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>shoot away. What does that mean? You know what it means?

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. What it means? All right, that's

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of some breaking news. Before he hit the break,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>James Conner. Oh, this Sunday for the Bittsburgh Steelers. He

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>will not return at Arizona. Are you comfortably e y

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>going back to bank Snell? Yeah? I think so. I mean,

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you have Benny Snell, or

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you were carrying Benny Snell and replace of Connor, Like,

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>what choice do you have? It's not like, uh, you

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would have a bunch of other running backs that you

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>could get. I mean Snell looked okay. Uh So, I

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>mean comfortable. I don't think would be the word to

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>describe it. I think I would I'd feel forced to

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>play him. I don't know if force is the right

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>word either. You're right, y, Like, I wouldn't feel comfortable

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>with it. I think I would just feel fine, Like

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the word. That I would say about Benny Snell

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>as a as a low end RB two, a high

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>end RB three flex option. You know he's not gonna

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>do anything in the past game. He got up to

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a real slow start last week, Greg and I was

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>worried we're using channel and Samuel's early on in that game,

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and Kreth White was getting his uh his five carries

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of that game as well. But ultimately,

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>when when it came push the show, Benny Snell ended

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>up being the guy. He scored a touchdown. He tried

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>his best to do a goal gold dunk. It was

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more like a layup and he snelled more of a

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>well you're not allowed to duncan anymore. Yeah, he's he's

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a he's a heavier fellow anymore. So I don't think

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that he has the the ups to to get up

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>there to the goal post. But he did try his best.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>He scored a touchdown. The workload has been there for

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>him against Arizona, I think it should be a competitive game.

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually really liked the Steelers in that game. Um So,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a solid flex option, a high end

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>flex option. Would you're the start? James M Many Snell

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>or the Niners guys Matt Breeder, he most are Devin Coleman.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's basically where I'm up to in my ranking.

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So I ranked my top twenty four and then it's

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just black, it's everything else, it's Benny Snell, it's the

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners running back. So I'm currently working on that,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but as of now, based on the news that we

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>got from James Conner being out, I would prefer Benny

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Snell over the forty Niners. Are I probably agree too

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>much a question when comes to Niners, you know we're

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>gon get his fifteen, especially against Arizona. All Right, we'll

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>take a break. We got Thursday football to preview. That

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>will be fun between the Bears and the Cowboys. So

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>let's get into that over some my headlines as well

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and start our Sunday previews. Not the new to be

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>up as NFL season is now upon us and you

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>can become the eighth person away one million dollars in

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a Fandueler DraftKings tournament. My setting their lineups using the

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Com you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>better results into promo code action for as ten percent discount.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's promo code action for its ten percent discount.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Dailor order dot com where millionaires are made. EI, what

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is versus relish? But your your ke shirts is gents

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>versus relish. I gotta look like I don't know. I

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>just I just woke up wearing. Yeah, I don't know.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a violent gentleman T shirt. Hockey you guys wouldn't understand.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So I saw it during the break and I actually

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>said to Greg, what the hell is e Y wearing?

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks like an eight bit hockey fight. Yeah it is.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what it is. It's an eight bit hockey

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>fight like Nintendo old Nintendo video game cover shirt. It's

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>super cool. But I never really looked at it that closely.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>If I'm because I never read the shirt. I feel

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>like I'm obligated to say this for producer Alex downt

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Let's go isles, baby. Yeah you know, I don't know

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what that means. A big island. You gotta love the

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>blue and orange good year to be an Islanders fan.

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>There you go, I got I got it right, Greg.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of talk this week that Jerry

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones and the kind of owner that he is. He's

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a good owner, he's a bad owners and badn't too

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>much to say a team together, and I'm like it

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 1>does it seems silly? Like why are we doing this?

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems too far. It's because Jerry Jones speaks after

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>every game like you know what Jerry is right, Like

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that Jerry Jones is who he is for

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>better or worse. Tonight, Jerry Jones leads his team into

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>actually in Chicago against the Bears. Bears are a three

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half I believe maybe down to three now

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>point dog tonight at home against Chicago freaky. What do

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you expect for the Dallas Cowboys and the Chicago Bears tonight? Well,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's do or die basically for both teams here in

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this game. You know, Chicago Bears are technically still alive,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but they play in one of the tougher divisions this

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of record, with the Green Bay Packers

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota vikings ahead of them. As of now. I

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>know that they are still obviously gonna try to to

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>make a run for it. Here saw comments from clil

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Mac after their Thanksgiving win against the Lions. But man,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I do like the Dallas Cowboys here in the spot.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't know that I would lay the three. I think,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>just to be safe, I would probably just go with

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys moneyline overall here, Greg, and from a

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, I think it is a tough spot for

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott and a Mari Cooper. So I put out

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the poll before the show, Greg regarding a Marii Cooper

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and how people feel about you know, ranking him tonight,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and I said, is he a must start wide receiver?

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Is he a low end wide receiver, too high and

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three? Or is the matchup just too tough

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>where you just ben Shamari Cooper and right now say

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that he is still a must start regardless of matchup.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually think he's more of a low and wide

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver two in this matchup. You know, Look, the outside

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>corners for the Bears have been very good. I know

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that Prince of Mukamara is banged up, but Fuller is

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>still there and he is one of the better ones

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in the league. So for me. I think a Maori

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is more of a low end wide receiver too.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Jason Witten is in a good

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>spot here, Greg I mentioned him as a waiver wire pickup.

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You can attack the Bears with tight ends. I think

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that Randall Cobb is a sneaky play if you play

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in DFS. Probably not gonna use him in my season

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>long playoffs, but I like his prop as well. I

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think the Cowboys get it done tonight, Greig, I like

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys tonight as well. I like them at their number. Um,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just three point favorites, I think. But it is

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting right that you like the Cowboys but you don't

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like their top weapon, Mark Cooper, which means you probably

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>don't like their other weapon on the outside, as like

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks are good in Mike in Michael Gallup, are you

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in love the equality tonight is? I think it's equity.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's going to have a big game. I still have

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>him ranked as a top three running back this week.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off a game where he just had ten

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>targets seven receptions, so they're starting to use him more

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. I do worry a little bit

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>about Dak from from a fantasy perspective, I think that

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll be able to do enough from a real life

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL perspective to help the Cowboys get a victory tonight.

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's no denying that he has been much better

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>at home this year than he has been on the road.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging seven and a half fewer fantasy points on

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the road this season and seventy fewer passing yards per

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>game on the road this season. Obviously, going into Soldier

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Field and playing against the Chicago Bears is not going

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to be an easy task. I think he is more

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of a low end QB one, high end QB two.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I can give you a few quarterbacks that I have

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>ranked ahead of him. I got a question about Dak

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>Prescott actually the shirt. So the question was Dak Prescott

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>or Jamis Winston. I would use Jameis Winston, That's what

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I said. Yeah, so I have Jameis Winston eight. I

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have Tannehill ninth. Of course my boy, E wise boy,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as Sam Darnald QB tan. I'm going back

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to that well, and then I have Dak Prescott QB eleven,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know I'm gonna put on my rankings later

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on Rhodo experts, I might drop him even lower than this.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about doing that. Okay, e y, where are

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you on Dak Prescott? Tonight? Frank made a good poll

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>question today regards to with Marik Cooper. What do you

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's back? He's back and he's gone? What is

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>going on? All right? Well? Anyway, so to me go

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>back to your Mark Cooper question for a moment, I

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think Mark Cooper is probably the low end too high,

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>and think maybe a high end to um, but not

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the rocks alid high end wide receiver. One tonight, we've

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.679
<v Speaker 1>seen him in mad matches, We've seen underperformed. Where did

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you have Gallop? Right? He's he's a solid wide receiver

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>three solid to low end. Wait, he's the top thirty

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>six wide receiver. I just I don't feel great about

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Mukamara being out. Someone's going to benefit from that.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Between Mari Cooper and Michael Gallup, I don't know you

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>know which one exactly. I think that obviously they'd probably

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>send more defensive attention a Mari Cooper's way. But ultimately

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think this is a big Zeke game. I

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think Witten gets it done. And I think Randall Cobb

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will be solid as well. So I'm I'm just not

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>feel really feeling great about a Marie Cooper gallup. I

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>have him as a you know, high end tight end two,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>which is like where the streaming tight ends normally are.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I brought this up earlier in the week. The Bears

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>allow the seventh most fantasy points to opposing tight ends.

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>They allow the fourth most receptions. One of my favorite

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>prop bets tonight, greg is Jason Witten over three and

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a half receptions and over twenty I believe it's twenty

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>four and a half receiving yards. It's just a low

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>number for Jason Witten, who has routinely gone over that. Yeah,

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>his number is twenty five and a half. So over

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>three and a half receptions over twenty five and a

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>half receiving yards for Jason Witten tonight, I think he's

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in play as a streaming tendan. All right, we'll leave

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>get to you Bears in a second, but leta get

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to you eui. When it comes to Dallas, Frank brought

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>up how he doesn't love a mari how he doesn't

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>love a mare Cooper. Tonight, Michael Gal kind of is

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>what he is. Where are you on all of these

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys scoop position players tonight? Yeah, I think I got

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>uh going along with what Frank says. I think that

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel It is going to show up and show up

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and in a big way because the Dallas Cowboys need him. Uh,

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they were rotten last week. Um, Chicago has been approved.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Most importantly, Mitchell to Risky has been improved. So I

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like Dallas is going to have to move the ball.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And they're the Chicago Bears. Outside corners are really good.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to a kind of slow Marie Cooper

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>slow down gallop. It could be a sneaky good game

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for Randall. Cop Uh is someone that I would be

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>interested in. Um maybe maybe tonight, but I mean for

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sure I would be going with Ezekiel Elliott starting him

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>without worry. Greg Graham Barfield of NFL Fantasy tweeted out

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this chart of based on receiver alignment, where defenses have

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>been allowing the most Fantasy points over the last eight weeks.

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you give m a follow on Twitter. He

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>puts out great stuff. So over the past eight weeks,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Chicago is allowing the ninth their ninth against outside wide receivers,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>so pretty good. Obviously in the top half of the league.

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>They are seventeen against slot receivers, so that has been

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the way to attack the Chicago Bears over the past

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks. We did see, you know, Kenny Gollady had

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the long touchdown last week, Marvin Jonan scored a touchdown.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not telling people to Benjamari Cooper obviously, I'm just

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>saying he's not the slam dun play that he has

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>been all season long. So just keep your expectations realistic

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Amari Cooper. I think most people

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that have him, you're gonna have to play him, obviously,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>but I do think that there are some other peripheral

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pieces that can have a good game for the Dallas Cowboys.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Me over to the other side, that is the Chicago

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Barre's a lot of people, yourself included. I've talked to

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller here this week. Where's Anthony Miller in your rankings?

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'm basically in the same predicament where I am

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>with with my running back rank He's where I've ranked

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the top twenty four. Anthony Miller is not gonna be

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a top twenty four wide receiver. But he's gonna make

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it in as a as a top thirty six wide receiver. Three.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I am very bullish on Anthony Miller. I've been saying

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that all week long. I mean, his usage has been great,

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>at least nine targets in three straight games. Here the

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>monster game against the Lions on Thanksgiving last week. And

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll go back to this chart, Greggy. The Dallas Cowboys

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past eight weeks allowing the fifth most Fantasy

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing slot receivers, and they are at the

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>same time they are sixth best against outside wide receivers.

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So again, like similar situation to Amari Cooper. I like

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Miller a lot tonight, Craig. I am not gonna

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get away from using Allen Robinson, but you have to

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>be you know, realist, stick with what you expect in

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this game. But ultimately I do like Anthony Miller. His

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>usage has been there. No Taylor Gabriel, Uh, It's basically

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>just him and Allen Robinson, who we're seeing the targets.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Not worried about Javon Wims and you know, whatever third

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 1>string tight end they're throwing out there. I think the

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>targets are condensed to Allen Robinson, Anthony Miller, and Tarik

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Cohen uh and then David Montgomery is more of a

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>low end RB two because of his usage in the

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>red zone. All right, so there you have it. That's

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a Frankie season, Bears and the Cowboys breaking down. We're

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop there, We're gonna continue want we had a

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>lot on Sunday and chat about so stick around, pull

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more coming your ways. Your BFFs, Frank, Greg

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 1>and e Y on sports screen. NFL season is now

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>upon us and you can become the eighth person away

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>one million dollars in a fan Noel Draft Kings tournament.

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>My sitting there lineups using the Daily Roder dot Com

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>DFS a lot of optimizer. If you were playing Dailly

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy's four Words and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up down for the NFL

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>results into promo code action for a ten percent discount.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that's promo code action for a ten percent discount.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Tailor order dot com where millionaires are made back with

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you BFFs. Right snaffle, Eric Young and Greg's US we're

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>hanging out here on sports Grid. There's a football light

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and Bears. What are you gonna watch? Key mirrors

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>from it? I'm gonna stick home. I've got to I've

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>got a prep for everything tomorrow too. I still have

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to take some notes for the rest of the games.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I've basically taken about ten games worth of notes, so

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I gotta finish that up. I've gotta get my my

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>betting notes ready to go for the weekend as well.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>So uh yeah, basically just gonna be doing some research

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>while watching the game, creaking some beers like you mentioned.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I did just want to give out a few other

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>props that I like for tonight. I've I've moved more

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>into the props recently. Unless there's like something I really

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like in the game, I lean with the under tonight.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I like the Dallas money line. I can see this

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>game being, you know, decided by a late game field goal,

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so I don't want to take the I don't want

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to lay the three with the Cowboys. I would take

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the money line, but Witten over three and a half,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Witten over twenty five and a half, Randall cob over

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half, Anthony Miller over fifty and

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a half receiving yards. Those are my favorite props to

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the night, all right, the favorite props tonight Thursday night football.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>It should be a fun one in the Windy City tonight. Now,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>let me move on a Sunday, Fay. I want to

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to it's playoffs, and our thought was with

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Virginia out with her torn a c L, he wanted

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend enough time on all these games today and

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow we can answer more questions tomorrow. We're not rushing

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>through every game because there's no more buys, right, So, like,

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>there's literally sixteen games this weekend, and we got to

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure we hit them all. So I wanted to

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>start it hits from of them today, and I want

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to start in a weird spot, like this is the

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>game that we would wind up not hitting tomorrow. Right,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's like the Bengals in the Browns where it's love.

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the a f C. North. It's two crumby teams

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>from Ohio, and I like the way you use crummy

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the way that e Y uses rotten. These are two

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>rotten teams. They are It's exactly what they are, not wrong,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just like the usage of the word people really like

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>any Dalton this week with the Bengals. What people, what true?

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Jim people from Cincinnati. Jim Sonnis of fan Nuel likes

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton this week. Well, from a DFS perspective, I'm

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that his salary is really low and that has

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with Cleveland has allowed multiple poven

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has allowed multiple touchdown passes in eight of twelve games,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're eight and half point dogs, So that'll be

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>in come back with game. I can see it from

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>a DFS perspective. But if my if my season one

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>playoffs are on the line outside of a super flex

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not even then probably staying away from Andy Dalton.

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton not on your radar, but this Tyler Boyd

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on your radar here this week. Frank So, I do

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 1>like the usage from last week. Obviously right the ten

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>targets with Andy Dalton bag he scored a touchdown. John

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Ross is expected to be back for this game. I

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he's gonna play a full compliment of snaps.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I was actually reading up about John Ross last night.

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Apparently he was like an inch away from something puncturing

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and artery on him. You know his injury potentially being fatal,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>so shout out to John Ross. I'm happy that he's

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. But ultimately, the Cleveland Browns over the past

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks, I'm gonna keep referencing this chart because I

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thought it was I thought it was pretty awesome work.

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Over the past eight weeks, they're allowing the eighth fewest

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points to slot receivers. So I think it's a

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>tougher spot here for Tyler Boyd, But based on the

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>usage from last week, he is still in that high

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver three low end wide receiver to territory.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Why what say you? Yeah, I'm not super interested in

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in anybody. The only person that I think that that

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>could have an okay game is Mixing. I feel like, uh,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>they're they're starting to use him more and use him

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more properly because he should be catching the ball, running

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball, get getting heavy usage. So Mixing is a

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>guy that I trust them the Bengals. And if you

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if I mean, if you have boy You're probably gonna

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>start him. You're not scared of the Cleveland secondary at all.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So and there's obviously a connection between him and Andy Dalton.

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>What did you see my tweet last night about Joe Mixon,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is that why you brought him up? You wore no

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I like Joe Maxon. I'd liked him all year. Um,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I have him on a bunch of my teams. But

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the sad truth is is he just wasn't getting used

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like like he he should have been. But I feel

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that has been turning the last couple of weeks. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I tweeted out, Greg, drink for everybody

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>at home. Over the last five games for Joe Mixon,

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging nineteen point eight carries per game, seventy seven

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>point eight rushing yards, he has three total touchdowns, and

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>he has at least three targets in four of those

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>five games. During that span, Greg, he is the RB

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ten in Fantasy points per games. So the workload has

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>been there for Joe Mixon. Starting to score more touchdown

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>targets are up for him as well. And Cleveland is

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and run defense TV away, so Joe makes

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it for me high n RB two On the other

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>side to Cleveland Browns Beckham talking about today, he doesn't

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>nowhere he'll be next year. You have a contract. Think

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he'll just go off on an excursion. Who knows, we'll

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>find out a lot of players that just don't play

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>out their contracts nowadays. Does he want to be there?

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Does he not want to be there? He does? You

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>know what, I'm not gonna answer that question. Maybe he'll

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>be posing for g somewhere. Why is it always receivers?

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>What is it about wide receivers? And they're all lunatics?

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And why is that? I got another way? It doesn't

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>make any sense, all right, sorry, e y. Maybe it's concussions. Yeah,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not a real thing. Set you right up for that.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Um for Odell Beckham, I had a question today is

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>why bringing Odell Beckham part up? Start? Three of these guys? Ready,

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ye Vante Parker beck Um? I think I got the

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>same question Alan Robinson and Kenny Gallina. Yeah, so I

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>got the same question, and I told this gentleman to

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bench Kenny Golladay as did I. Yeah, and I don't

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>feel great about it because you can throw against the Vikings,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you can actually attack them with wide receivers. The last

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>time the Lions face the Vikings, Marvin Jones had four

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>receiving touchdowns. So you know that you can actually take

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage of the Vikings in that way, but you still

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have some pause when it comes to David Blow Blow

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>however you want to say his name as the quarterback

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>here for the Detroit Lions, Alan Robinson, The targets have

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>been consistent. We spoke about that earlier on Odell Beckham. Look, ultimately,

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you just trust Baker Mayfield in this spot more than

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you do. You know, a third string quarterback of the

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions going up against the Cincinnati Bengals, Like, it's

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a good match up here as well, right, so you

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>would expect Odell Beckham to take advantage of this. You

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>like the quarterback play more so. I think it's close.

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But I would choose to bench Kenny Golladay. What about you, Eway, Yeah,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I would feel probably the same way as how I

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>would end up answering that question. But man, I don't know.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I got Galada looked pretty good last week. Um him

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and Blow or blow or however you say his name

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>like you guys are saying. I mean, they seemed to

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of a connection. I think Golladay that

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>may have been his best game all year. I'm not

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a hunter person shirt on that, but I think it

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is Um and Beckham has just been so such a

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>disappointment for where he was drafted. Um, but I think

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I would still sit Galladay out of those just because

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>of the matchup for Beckham. Yeah, I agree, man, But

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're on the fence there, like you want

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to use and the thing is with the the thing

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was blow is why Eileen is just bench Golliday against Minnesota.

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>You're right, they could be beaten through the air. It's

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>still like a ferocious pass rush, like you only had

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>five targets to that thing. You like. Obviously all of

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>his production, most of his production came on that one

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yard play and it was a broken play.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It was obviously a misassignment for the Chicago Bears, and

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that was great, Like if you ended up starting Kenny Golladay.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually had to tweet out on Thanksgiving. I apologize

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to all the people that I told to bench Kenny Golladay,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>cause you know, I felt terrible. You know, the the

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>guy first play of the game ends up scoring a

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yard touchdown, but you know it's a broken play.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Those things are gonna happen in the NFL at times.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think here, just you know, the targets have

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>still been there for Odell Beckham. He's wide receiver twenty

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>six on the season. Yes, he's been a disappointment, but

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, again the targets are there. You can take

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage of Cincinnati. Actually, you know, while we're talking about

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>this game, I love Jarvis Landry to Greg. I mean,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he's wide receiver fourteen on the season. He has double

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>digit targets in five of his last six. You can uh,

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's actually easier to target the slot receiver against the

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals than anything else. So I like both of

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Obviously, Jarvis Landry is a legit, you know,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>high end wide receiver two at this point, Absolutely, Jervis Landry,

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as I said in the last couple of weeks, right,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the top receiver for Baker Mayfield and the Cleveland Browns.

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>And it has been that way for a little while now, right,

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>would you use Baker Mayfield over Dak Prescott. Baker Mayfield

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen plus fantasy points in four of his last five games.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati's defense has been playing better as of late. You know,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>the Jets came in hot last week and they they

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>shut that down real quick. Has been a lot better

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as a late Actually, would I use him over Dock

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because I saw this question on Twitter earlier and said

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I would not Baker easily. I would not. I think

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's that easy. I would not use him over there

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half point favorites. You can run on

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this team, right Like, if the Browns get up in

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>this game, you know we're gonna see a lot of Chubb.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see a lot of Kareem Hunt. I have

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb is a top three running back this week

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>going up against this Cincinnati Bengals defense, and then Kareem

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Hunt actually out snapped Nick Chubb for the first time

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>last week. That's because they were playing from behind. But

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he has at least five targets in three of four

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>games that he's been active for with the Browns, Cincinnati

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>allowing four point six seven yards for carry of running

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>backs the eighth most fantasy points. I think Kareem Haunt

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is a low one RB two. I think Nick Chubb

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is a top five running back this week. Nick Chubbs

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>got to get freaking carries though, man Like, it's very,

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating, and he doesn't play any third downs anymore.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>They's essentially splitting snaps. So he's all like Derk Henry. Now,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it's very frustrating. So Nick Chubb, I guess a lot

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of it does depending on what Kareem Hunt next year.

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But Creme Huns back on this team next year, what

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do you do about Nick Chubb in your draft? I

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>still think that Chubb is going to be a first

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>round pick next year because he has seen a lot

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of volume. Even with Kareem Hunt being there. You look

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at his game log, he's still getting twenty carries what

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like every single week. The targets have been down,

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but they still use him in the red zone. He

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>gets to the goal line, work um and the talent

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is obviously there with Nick Chubb. So I think heading

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.479
<v Speaker 1>into next year, you know whether Kareem Hunt is there

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or not. If Kareem Hunt is there, Nick Chubb is

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>probably a like a back end first round pick. And

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think if Kareem Hunt is gone, Nick chop is

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>probably a top five Pickni. I completely, I'm on the

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>same page with you. We had about a minute ago

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>before the breaks, let me sneak in one more game here,

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and that is a game between Detroit Minnesota. We were

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about this with Kenny Golladay anyway. Right, So let's

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of dive in full throttle here what you

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do about these pieces? And you've talked a lot of

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I owned most Garborough about out. You don't want to

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>start Bo Scarborough. This week, I've looked into this a

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. Greg, I'm sorry, buddy. I look Wednesdays

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are my big research to night, Greg, Bo Scarbro. The

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.719
<v Speaker 1>usage the past three weeks fourteen, eighteen and twenty one

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>carries Minnesota just got ran all over by Seattle. You

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>traded him away to Creg. It's I didn't trade away.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota had allowed the eighth most fantasy points of running

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>backs over the last I've been trying to tell you that.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>He said, Oh, despite what they did on one Monday night,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like they I still don't want to start about. But

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they are thirteen point at thirteen point dogs. So I'm

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>now in the same predicament. Frank, all right, what is

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>your question? Greg? I will try to try to make

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this about me, and he just turned it about me. Well,

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to help you out. I need the help man.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's Bow, it's Patrick Laird, it's Alexander Madison. Oh

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel like yesterday, I probably ranked Boscarborough last of

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those you did. We're going with boy, Why what about

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you Bow, Patrick Laird, Alexander Madison, Yeah, I probably go

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>bow as well. The came out today that Dalvin Cook

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to play Sunday for for certain So so

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that the three of us believe we're back, baby.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now upon us, and you can become

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person away one million dollars in a Fandueler

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings tournament by setting their lineups using the Daily Order

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL Access

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better results.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a promo code action for its ten percent discount.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's promo code action for its ten percent discount.

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com where millionaires are made. Right, what

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>did you do these Thursday games? I realized yan Sunday

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>games something you can Sorry, um, I realized as we're

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about believing like you probably could actually get us

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Bouw Dallas if we if we if

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we wanted. He believes with us. Yeah, we we probably could.

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I am Bo uh not much of a fantasy guy

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the b team, that's uh more. Joe Henning, big,

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>big fantasy guy. Uh yeah, bos good dude, it was

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a good all right, nice? So we all both leave together.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Were believing in Boscar pros this week. I can't believe

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we're doing this again. We should buy Bo Dallas a

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>bow scarbro jersey from the BFS. All right, we can

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, do that, and then he'll have to become

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a Detroit like it's on a different team next year.

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>End stink. So we just wasted their money. No, no, no,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no no no, I don't know what start over. My

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>man doesn't seem like a good financial decision. Doesn't know

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a good financial decision. Alright, we could buy Joe. Maybe

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we should buy Joe Henning. That way, why we froze

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>when we want to tell you this, I gotta text

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you after the show and found out about what happened

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in the next team league. I am still dying to that.

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, right, all right, we'll dive back into Minnesota,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>um and Detroit. Frank, you like bow more than you

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>realize now you like you don't hate Alexander Madison either,

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think that he is in the RB

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>three territory are the flex conversation as well. Uh, Detroit

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is still allowing a lot of receiving touchdowns to running

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>backs recently, but they actually have been stronger against the

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.239
<v Speaker 1>position than they were earlier on in the season. They

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't allowed more than seventy five rushing yards to an

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>RB over their last four games. I did mention to

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you yesterday, Greg what Dalvin Cook did against the Lions

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>last time he faced them, over a hundred yards and

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. They've been a little bit better recently, but

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think if they get up in this game, when

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they get up in this game the Minnesota Vikings, they

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>probably put Dalvin Cook on ice. And I think Alexander

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Madison probably gets his you know, ten to twelve touches,

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe fourteen touches something like that, and against this defense,

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that should be enough for him to give you flexworthy

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>for auction. So UM, I think that he is in

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. What's Adam feeling status for Sunday? He still

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is not practicing, so we assume he's out again. We

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>assume that we assumed that he reaggravated his injury last

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>last week. Last Monday, he reaggravated this injury and he's

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out again. Last week we were trying to figure out

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>not nothing be though he was playing, but no one's

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>really taking advantage outside of Kyle Rudolph. We talked before

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>UM about some of the tight ends out there. Is

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolf, We mentioned Jason Winn's Kyle Rudolph somebody that

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we can go back to be scored. Obviously a bunch

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns recently. There's no Adam feeling he comfortable going

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>with Kylar Rudolph. I think that he is in that

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>same conversation as Jason Witten. So I have Kyle Rudolf

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>as my tight end fifteen. I have Jason Witten as

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 1>my tight end sixteen. So they are you know, once

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you get past the the Mark Andrews Hunter Henry's everyone

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is basically a streamer. It's just who has the best matchup.

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So I have Tyler Higbie ranks very high this week.

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like ever it's going to be good

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to go again than Dallas Goddard, vance McDonald against the Cardinals,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you start to get into the rest of

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys. But Kyler Rolf six touchdowns over his last

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>six games. One of those games was against the Lions,

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>where he once again scored a touchdown. So I think

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that ky Rolf is in that mix. And the same

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>thing with Stefon Diggs. I mean, he had nine targets

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, couldn't really do much with those targets, but

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the last time he faced de seven receptions four a

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty three yards. I think he isn't play

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>as a wide receiver. To know, Adam Feeling, who else

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are they gonna throw? Totally agree. We've been saying that

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>all year long. Um e y, I I asked you

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>about bow I'll go ask you about Alexander Madison. I

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>know you said, hey, down Cook is probably gonna play.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been adamant he's playing Sunday. But from a fantasy perspective,

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous about it. I haven't nervous about it. Can

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you start Madison? I mean, I feel like, if you're

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>altered desperate, I have him in a league, um where

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I could play him. I'm not going to play him.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't need him. It was more of a pickup

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>just in case if Dalvin Cook goes back down. Obviously

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>he's a good running back UH in a great screen

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 1>scheme for the running backs in a team that wants

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball a lot um. But I think

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>if Dalvin Cook is adamant on playing UH, he's clear

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to play UH and he's gonna play. So I mean,

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, I wouldn't start Madison unless you absolutely had

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to start him. And I actually hope that the Lions

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of keep this game close, Greg because if they can,

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins should be in play for another great game.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Remember earlier on in the season, Adam Feeling called out

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback after that game against the Bears where they

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 1>just look dreadful. Since then, he is a QB seven

0:36:33.000 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in Fantasy points per game, and that's exactly where I

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have him ranked this week. He is my QB seven.

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Last time he faced this Detroit Lion secondary through for

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>three d over three hundred yards and four touchdowns. So

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a good matchup. You just need the game to

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>remain competitive or else they're just gonna turn it over

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to Dalvin Cook and Alexander Madison. Absolutely Kirk Cousins in

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that spot against Detroit should be a good one. A

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of Stefon Diggs we expect. Let me go to

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>my quarterback, Frank, that's my man, Matt Ryan. He's with

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons. Taken on Carol lineup? What nothing? Continue? What?

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>What was that? I don't know what was that? I'm

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>just I'm not a Matt Ryan guy. I know you're

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>not a matter. Where is he and your rankings this week?

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But let's let's pull it up for you. You're not

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna like this, Craig. That would be QB nineteen. I

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>am very serious. Why are you doing? I am completely serious? Craig.

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:19.800
<v Speaker 1>How about this? I have a nice little stat for

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you please. Matt Ryan has played four games since returning

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>from his ankle injury. He has four touchdowns and four interceptions.

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>During that span. He has the QB twenty five and

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points for game. What is what is your justification

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for wanting to play Matt Ryan at this point? Caroline

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>is also a very good matchup to run the football, Greg, Like,

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there's that's not good? This is uh, this is the

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 1>old switch roof for you. I just I don't think

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is healthy right now. Yes, if he gets

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>back Julio Jones. He should be all right, he should

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>be serviceable. I just I can't rank him higher than

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the other quarterbacks that I have ahead of him right now.

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>It's just I like those other guys more. I mean

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees at home, Yes, tough mat to up against

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, but he plays so well at home. Jacobe

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Burcette going up against the Tampa Bay Bucks secondary, I

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really like that matchup for him. You know, maybe Kyler

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Murray is one that I can move even lower because

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh has a really good pass rush and they're gonna

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get after Kyler Murray. But then Ryan Fitzpatrick. I love

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick in this game against the Jets. He did really

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>well against him last time he played. So I think

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that teams can just run, run, run all over the

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers, that they don't have to throw that much.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think DeVonta Freeman has a big game, and you know,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe Matt Ryan puts up something just pedestrian, like to

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty and one, or you know, like something around there

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to fifty and two. I just don't think that there's

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a big upside in this game, right No upside in

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this one for Matt Ryan says, E y, I assume

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you're on my side, right, yeah? Oh, I don't know.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>If I would say I'm on on either of your side,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I would probably I don't. I don't do rakings, but

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I would put him somewhere in the middle. Matt Ryan,

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as you guys know, someone I was super high on

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. Um, that hasn't come to fruition

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>every week. He's had ups and downs. Um, but I

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>do feel like, uh like they're they're they're gonna push

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 1>getting Hooper back for him. If that happens, will be

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. And obviously having Julio Jones available, we'll

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>make our break one way or the other. If there

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is no Hooper, a new no Julio Jones, then who

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I might be looking for a different quarterback, buddy. It

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like Austin Hooper is going to play here and

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>who and who singful. Julio has been limited, but I

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think he will be able to play this week. That

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously helps Matt Ryan. I just I like the spots

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for some of these other quarterbacks this week, the matchups

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that they have. Uh So I'm I'm out on Matt Ryan.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>I think Devantay Freeman has a big game. As I mentioned,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we just saw Darius Guys and Adrian Peterson combined for

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>two eight rushing yards and three touchdowns against this Panthers defense.

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>They've just been gashed by running backs all season long.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>In DeVonta Freeman's first game back, he played sixties seven

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snaps. I think he is a solid

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>RB two this week, Craig a solid ORBS two in

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the mixes. Hudges have been there for Davante Freeman. The

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>end zone has not been there for Demante Freeman. I

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>agree the solid army two we'll see even get there.

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess a bad Carolina rush defense here this week.

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, the questions I've gotten are all

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>about Curtis Samuel and where he stacks off in the

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers this week. He's obviously a deep deep target

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.479
<v Speaker 1>for Kyle allen Um, but he's someone that you should

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be relying on your fantasy playoffs for Curtis Samuel. Yes,

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Curtis Samuel is a wide receiver three. I

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that's what he has been. I think that's what

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he will continue to be. Obviously, you can still throw

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>against this Atlanta Falcon secondary. And you know, while d

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>J Moore is getting all of the attention, and rightfully so,

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore has just elevated himself into wide receiver

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one status. Curtis Samuel has at least six targets in

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>ten of twelve games, so the you know, the opportunity,

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the target share has actually been there for him. And uh,

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>we just saw, you know, Atlanta give up some big

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>games too wide receivers. Recently, Chris Godwin had one eighty

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>four and two. I know it wasn't last week, but

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it was the last time they played the Saints. Michael

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas had thirteen for one fifty two. So this Falcon

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary is still sketchy. I think Curtis Samuel is a

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three. D J more bona fide wide receiver one.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>DJ More absolutely a wide receiver one here against the

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons. I agree with you, Samuel as the wide

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver three. And we hit another game. Frank, let me

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>get to argue me the game of the weekend, not

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>the game of the weekend, but definitely your top one

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>o'clock game between Baltimore and Buffalo. This game, uh is

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo. Josh Allen against the Ravens. And I've asked

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you in regards to the quarterback, what do you do

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about Josh Allen's a really tough schedule. Uh. He Beforward

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>last week in Dallas. This week he's at home against

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>a tough Baltimore defense. Do you feel comfortable actually go

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>toy to start e y, Do you feel comfortable playing

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>your boy Josh Allen this week at home against Baltimore.

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>He's been good and he's been good all year. Um,

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>playing against the Baltimore Ravens, um is a is a

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>weird place to be. Their defense has been pretty good. Um,

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the team is amazing, one of my favorite teams I watched.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just a completely different style of Paul and I

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>believe Lamar Jackson is going to score and that's going

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to forest Allan. This is gonna be uh like I

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>feel a real feather game for him, like where you

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>know he can say like I held my own against them.

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I I I I beat possibly Lamar Jackson straight up.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So this is a big game. Yeah, big game for

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for for Josh Allen, and I would wouldn't feel comfortable

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>starting him, but I think if he's her quarterback, you

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta just start him and hope that he produces like

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>he has been. Baltimore is going up the fourth fewest

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points the quarterbacks this season. Frank. Yeah, and since

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Peters has joined the team, no QB has multiple

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes against him. That includes Russell Wilson, Tom Brady,

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson, Jared Golf and Jimmy Garoppolo. So some pretty

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>potent offenses there that this secondary has held down. But

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm right there with you, y. I said this last

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>week about Josh Allen going into that Thanksgiving game against

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. I think he's matchup proof. He has seven

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 1>or more fantasy points in eleven of twelve games this season.

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't throw for a tont of yards. Only he

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have it was against New England at home at

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of September and he got knocked out of

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that game where Matt Barkley came in and he had

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>concussion symptoms, so he didn't get to finish that. Yeah. Look,

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that's when you know the Patriots defense was still clicking

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on all cylinders. But ultimately, Josh Allen doesn't throw for

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards. He doesn't throw for a lot

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns, but he has a safe floor in fantasy

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because of what he can do with his legs. He's

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>almost like a Lamar Jackson very much. Obviously he doesn't,

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not a running back in a quarterback's

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>body like Lamar Jackson is. You know, he doesn't move

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way, but he does take off and he

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.760
<v Speaker 1>does run, and he has a safe floor in fantasy

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>because of that. So he is the QB five on

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the season. He is my QB twelve. He is a

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>low and QB one for me, I would stream Tannehill

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Donald over him. Those are the only like

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>streaming type quarter I would not use Fitzpatrick over Josh

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Allen this week. I think that the floor is still

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower for Fitzpatrick. But I trust Josh

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen at this point. Right, You're trusting Allen here even

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in a very very tough matchup. What about the weapons

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that Josh Allen has. What about Devon Singletary and what

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>about Frank Gordon, what about John Brown, Cole Beasley? You

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>meagined you mentioned the numbers of cold Basily Yesterday's got

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.959
<v Speaker 1>more Fantasy points. Is either Odell Beckham has those guys.

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think that Cole Beasley is maybe just outside

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver three territory, but he has been very good.

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean his usage recently at least seventy four yards

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown in six of his last seven games. Uh.

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is third and past defense dv Away. Obviously we

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>highlighted how good their secondary has been. I think it's

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>easier to throw against the slot against the Baltimore Ravens.

0:44:37.280 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't allow a lot of big plays, which makes

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 1>John Brown more of a low end wide receiver two

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>high end wide receiver three. I mean, the targets have

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just been there all year for John Brown. I don't

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think that you can get away from It's a revenge

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>game for John Brown as well. I think Cole Beasley

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is more of a low end wide receiver three in

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues. Devin Singletary, the workload has been there, the

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>snaps have been there, um starting all your bills you

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get away for and Raheem most are just ran

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>wild against the Ravens. So for me, Devin singles Arry

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is a very solid RB two right, So you're going

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>still with your bills while going to you with the

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Ravens. Obviously we know about marketing. You know about

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Do you start Hollywood Brown this week? That's

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the question we gotta answer. Yeah, I think you do,

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>because I think that the Buffalo Bills are going to

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>score as well, and this game is going to be

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. I'll be watching it for sure. Uh, Buffalo Bills,

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>saying fan from birth, Titans is my team of choice,

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but a piece of my soul will always be with

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills. Mark Andrews against the best tight end

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>events in the league, to spot for Andrews, for e

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Y and Frank, I'm Greg. We'll do it all go tomorrow.

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>We hope NFL season is now upon us so you

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>can be going to the eighth person away one million

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a Fandel Draft Kings tournament. My sittinger lineups

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.960
<v Speaker 1>using the Daily Order dot Com DFS a lot of optimizer.

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>If you were playing Dailey Fantasy Sports and not using

0:45:57.840 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Daily Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. It's not.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer, smarter

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>DFS projections, and better results into promo code action for

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>its head percent discount. That's promo code Action for its

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>head percent discount Taylor dot com, where millionaires are made.

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 1>What did happen? What did Here's what you missed on

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the bf aps. You know, one production is telling me

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to wear this, the other production is telling me to

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>wear that. So you know what, Greg, I'm just gonna

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 1>wear a button down shirt. We go over to MSG later,

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw on a little jacket. We'll be all good, buddy, alright,

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll be all good. All right, So let's I know

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>when the end of the games. Are you in the

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night football and no Virginia Zaka she tore her

0:46:40.760 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a c L. How ab the irony in that she

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>tore her a c L from inside injuries? Uh, it

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>seems that she has quite the injury herself playing soccer. Yeah,

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that she was. Yeah, so that is

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>very unfortunate. We will not have her this week. Hopefully

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>she'll be she'll be good to go in in the

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>coming weeks after she has surgery. But yeah, we we

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>asked her what her optimal recovery time was. I don't

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think she liked those shown. Game Wen gave her optable

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:07.640
<v Speaker 1>recovery time. She didn't like that one either it's no response. Um.

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you just might never join us again, Craig,

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point, it would be the first girl you

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.919
<v Speaker 1>shoot away. What does that mean? You know what it means?

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're talking about. I don't know

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. What it means? All right, that's

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of some breaking news before we hit the break.

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>James Conner, Oh, this Sunday for the Bittsburgh Steelers. He

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>will not return at Arizona. Are you comfortably e y

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going back to bank Snell? Yeah? I think so. I mean,

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you have Benny Snell, or

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, you were carrying Benny Snell in replace of Connor, Like,

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what choice do you have? It's not like, uh, you

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would have a bunch of other running backs that you

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>could get. I mean snow looked, okay? Uh So I

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>mean comfortable. I don't think would be the word to

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>describe it. I think I would I'd feel forced to

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>play him. I don't know if force is the right

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 1>word either. You're right, you like I wouldn't feel comfortable

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.719
<v Speaker 1>with it. I think I would just feel fine. Like

0:47:57.840 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the word that I would say about Benny Snell

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>as a as a low end RB two, a high

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>end RB three flex option. You know he's not gonna

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 1>do anything in the past game. He got up to

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a real slow start last week, Greg and I was

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>worried we're using Janellen Samuel's early on in that game,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and kath White was getting his U his five carries

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of that game as well. But ultimately,

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>when when it came pushed, the show of Benny Snell

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>ended up being the guy. He scored a touchdown. He

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>tried his best to do a goal gold dunk. It

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>was more like a layup and he snelled more of

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a well you're not allowed to Duncan anymore. Yeah, he's

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a he's a heavier fellow, so I don't think

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that he has the the ups to to get up

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there to the goal post. But he did try his best.

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>He scored a touchdown. The workload has been there for

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>him against Arizona. I think it should be a competitive game.

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually really liked the Steelers in that game. Um So,

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a solid flex option, a high end

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>flex option. Greate woud you're the star, James M. Benny

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Snell or the Niners guys Matt Reeder. He mostarred Devin Coleman.

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 1>So that's basically where I'm up to in my ranking.

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So I've ranked my top twenty four and then it's

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just black. Everything else. It's Benny Snell, it's the forty

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Niners running back. So I'm currently working on that, but

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>as of now, based on the news that we got

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 1>from James Conner being out, I would prefer Benny Snell

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 1>over the forty Niners. Are you? I probably agree there's

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:12.279
<v Speaker 1>too much a question when comes to Niners, at least

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>by Snell. You know, we were again, especially gains Arizona