WEBVTT - Cruzing on Air Force One

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot of people traveling these days, especially by air,

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:07.119
<v Speaker 1>and when you do travel by air, it's not particularly comfortable.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>That is, unless you were on a private seven forty

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>seven with the President of the United States. That's an

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>experience that my co host just had. We will get

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>into what the senator spoke about with the President. This

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdicts with

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles, Senator. You know I often

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>express envy and hurt that I'm not invited to your

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republican lunches, and I got to tell you the

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ride aboard Air Force One sounds like, well, I don't know, someday,

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I assume my invitation was lost in the mail. Please.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you had a crazy day yesterday. Take

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>us through it. Well, we did, as you and I

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to film Verdict yesterday together in DC, and

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm embarrassed to admit that I canceled on you. I

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>stood you up because, well, the President was coming to

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas and so he asked if I wanted to come

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>along as he was heading to Midland and was highlighting

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>energy production and America's energy independence and that's an issue

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I cared deeply about, and I'll pretty much always come

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>along if someone's going to Texas. And so it was

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting day though. So the way it started, I

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>had to be at the White House about seven am yesterday,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And for anyone that comes in contact with the President,

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they do a COVID test, so that's obligatory. Before you

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>can get on, you go get tested. So I went

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>into the White House, got tested yesterday morning. The folks

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>here in the studio will be glad to know as

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday morning, I confirmed negative WET and got in

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the van to head to Andrews Air Force Base. And

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>there were a couple of Texas members of Congress that

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we're flying with us. And suddenly we're sitting there and

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we hear, well, Louie Gomer's not coming. What do you mean,

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Louie Gomer's not coming. He was going to join us,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He was going to be on the flight. Louie is hysterical,

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, like anytime you spend time with Louie

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you will be holding your ribs laughing. So we're all like, well,

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>why isn't Louie coming. Well, he was at the White

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>House and he tested positive. So that's how the morning

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>started with Louie had to turn around and leave and

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>was not allowed on the plane because he just tested positive.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>So we take the van, we go jump on Air

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Force one. The President joins us, we take off while

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we're in the air, so we're headed to Midland, Texas.

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>A whole bunch of Republican candidates for Congress who were

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>running in various seats. They're not incumbents, they're running against Democrats,

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are in open seats. They were all meeting us in Midland,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and the plan was that those Republican candidates they were

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>going to invite on the plane and meet the President

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and do a photo op and they're all excited. Well,

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we find out mid air that one of those Republican

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>candidates got named Wesley Hunt, who's running here in Houston

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in my home district. Great guy, he tested positive for COVID.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So he was literally heading to meet Air Force one

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and he tests positive for COVID, and as a result,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, okay, all of you candidates, none of

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you can go in and see the president now because

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of that. So it was a fairly surreal beginning to

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the day. And listen, it's an underscoring that this remains

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous disease and we need to continue to take

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>serious steps to limit its spread. Right, if for no

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>other reason, then you might miss your chance to go

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>on Air Force One. So you got to make sure

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you behave responsibly and don't catch it well. It's one

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest reasons actually that you joined the president

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on a trip and I've done at this point a

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>number of trips on Air Force One with the President

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is that you spend a lot of time with him,

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and so if there are issues going on, it is

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the most concentrated, intense time, and it's a

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>stark difference. First four years I was in the Senate,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama was president that entire time. I went on

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Air Force One once. If you remember when when five

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Dallas police officers were murdered and there was a funeral

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for those police officers, Obama came down to speak at

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it and he invited me to come along. Actually, I

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sat next to Nancy Pelosi on Air Force One. We

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>had it may have been the first time I had

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>met Nancy. We had a very pleasant conversation, mostly about

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>her grandkids, not about anything remotely related to politics. And

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about Obama's he wouldn't hang out with us.

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>He briefly came back and talked with There were several

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>folks that were coming down and that had been invited

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to guests, and he came back briefly and kind of said, Hi,

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>how you doing okay? Great, and then went off went

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>off to his office and we didn't see him the

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>rest of the flight. Trump is totally different. Like Trump

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>hangs out, he wants to like the office on Air

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Force One. It's it's exact actually like the movie. It's

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a cool desk with the seal and it's so there

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>were the Texas House members and look or there Texas

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>members of the US House who were there who were

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty excited, and so I was taking pictures of all

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of them. All right, go stand by the president, give

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>me your phone, I'll take a picture. So I was

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the designated photograph, the photographer. But it's it's actually really

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>valuable because you're sitting down with the president for significant

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>time talking and right now there is a lot to

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>talk about. So we had probably seven hours of he

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and I discussing, in particular the economic challenges in the

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>country and the legislation moving moving through the Senate right now,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it was it was a propitious time to

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>be there with him. Well, without you know, asking you

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to violate any confidences or tell any tales at a school,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I would like to know something about perhaps what you

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>spoke about or what you're thinking about this economic relief

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>bill that seems to be coming down the pike in

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the midst of all this kind of bad economic news. Well,

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>let's take it in a couple of pieces, and I'll

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I think. I'm not going to share

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what the President said, and that's usually the line I

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>try to follow, is what I said, I'm happy to relay.

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave it to others to share what they said.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But but let me just get in my views, the

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi three trillion dollar bill that they passed a

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago is an absolute monstrosity. It is

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>three trillion dollars, even in government speak, is a crap

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of money. And it's a bill. Look, Pelosi wasn't

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>intending to pass that in the law. It's it's a

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>bill that is just a Democratic wish list. And she

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk to any Republican, she didn't talk to the Senate.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a campaign document. They passed it so that

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrats could campaign on it in November. That's all it's about.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Then we get to the Senate. Unfortunately, in the Senate

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this week, the Republican leader Mitch McConnell rolled out his

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>own plan, and the so called Republican Leadership Plan is

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it's cheaper than the Democrats plans. Instead of three trillions,

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's only one trillion. But it's it's fundamentally flawed, and

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>so I have been very outspoken against it, very outspoken

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>at our lunches that we do every day in the

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican Conference that you and I have talked about before,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>but I've been very outspoken publicly, and I was very

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>clear with the President what I thought yesterday when we

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>were together. I seem to recall, if some people haven't

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been following you your takes on this, you said that

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>as the legislation currently stands, you're not just to know

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a hell no, yep, that that is exactly right

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on a couple of levels. First of all, let's talk

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount, like the one trillion, which is a ton

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of money, is clearly just an opening bid, and nobody's

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hiding the fact, Okay, we'll start at a trillion, but

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the plan is to get negotiate up to one and

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a half or two or two and a half, and

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have it. There's no magic money tree in Washington.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's some secret vault hidden in the

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Capitol nobody knows about. This is all money that we're

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>either printing or borrowing from China, but it doesn't exist.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We've already spent over three trillion dollars and so the

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>amount is a problem. But actually my concern, Michael, is

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>much bigger than the amount, and this is that this

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was the center of what I was arguing to the

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>President yesterday. The focus of the bill, the objective of

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the bill is wrong. The objective of the bill is

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>just shoveling cash. It's just spending trillions of dollars shoveling

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it into the economy, but none of it creates jobs.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And so what I've been arguing to the other Republicans,

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>what I've been arguing to President, our focus on this

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bill should be one thing. In particular, it should be

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>creating jobs. We've got now fifty one million Americans who've

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lost their jobs because of this catastrophe that's hit this country.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got to get them back to work. That is

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly the priorities. Get people back to work. And you know,

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at these first bills, the bills that we

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>passed several months ago, in the height of the crisis.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Those were overwhelmingly bipartisan. The big one, the Cares Act,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety six to nothing. Every Democrat, every Republican voted yes.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I voted yes. Bertie Sanders voted yes. That was not

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a stimulus bill. It wasn't designed to stimulate the economy.

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>The press calls it a stimulus bill, but that's not

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>what it was. It was a relief bill. It was

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>designed to give emergency loans, short term loans to people

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at the very height of the crisis. Now our focus

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has got to be different. It's got to be getting

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>people back to work. We need a recovery bill. Now,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>what does the recovery bill do? Our entire focus, I

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>think should be cutting taxes and reducing regulations that are

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>killing jobs, making it easier for small businesses to open.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue. And by the way, the entire election

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in November turns on it. So the Democrats, what does

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi want. She wants all fifty one million people

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>who've lost their jobs to stay unemployed, to stay at home,

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>to not be working, to not have their kids in school,

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>because she is gambling on that fifty one million people

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>who are broken, unemployed and out of a job and

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>pissed off are going to go in and vote to

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>throw the bums out, and she's most interested in defeating

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. Well, the case I made to the President

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and to the other Republicans is we shouldn't be complicit

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in that objective. If the President wants to win in November,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we need people going back to work, We need people

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>earning a paycheck, We need people providing for their families again.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And simply spending trillions for Nancy Pelosi's buddies ain't going

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the job done. You know, I remember early

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on when when there were those debates over the initial

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>relief bill, you in particular pointed out that this language

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats added in on the question of unemployment

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>insurance was going to disincentivize people going back to work.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And it now seems that your prediction turned out to

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 1>be true. There's a Cato Institute survey of this. It

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>showed that two thirds of people who went on unemployment

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for the COVID lockdowns are making more money than they

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>would have made had they remained at their jobs. And

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>one third of people actually made two times or you know,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>two x their salary, which you know, wonderful for them.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we begrudge anybody money, but that is

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a recipe to keep people out of work that would

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to have a political objective in an election year. Well,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>incentives matter, and the dumbest part of what Congress did

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>already in this crisis was creating massive disincentives to work.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>And in particular, what Congress did is added six hundred

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars a week to the already existing unemployment conversation. So, look,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we had an unemployment system. If you lost your job,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you could file file for unemployment. That's designed to be

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to help you meet basic necessities, but it's designed to

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be substantially less than your job was. Because you want

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>people who've lost their job to have strong incentives to

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>go back to work. The best thing if someone's out

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of work has helped them get back to work. Adding

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>six hundred dollars to unemployment, let me give you some

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>math and I apologize to everyone in the podcast. There

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be no math. They told me I

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't sign up for this. Let me give you just

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. So. It used to be the maximum

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>weekly unemployment check in Texas was five hundred and twenty

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>one dollars a week. When Congress added six hundred dollars

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to that, that took it to eleven hundred and twenty

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one dollars a week, more than doubled it. That works

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>out to about fifty eight thousand dollars a year, or

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about twenty eight dollars an hour. Now, think about it

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for a second. If you're if you're working waiting tables,

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're working in an hourly job, you ain't making

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight bucks an hour. And if suddenly the government

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>pays you more to stay home than to go back

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to work, well naturally you're not going to go back

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to work. I mean, if you're paid more to do

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>something else, you're going to follow the incentives. But that's

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>terrible for you, and it's terrible for the economy, and

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's why Nancy Pelosi wants to keep doing it, and

0:13:53.760 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are falling in this trap that sixty eight

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>percent of people nationally right now because of what Congress did,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are receiving more ununemployment than their previous salary twenty percent,

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or receiving double their previous salary. If you're getting paid

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>twice as much not to work as to work, what

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do? I mean, that ain't complicated, and

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's why Nancy Pelosi is all in on wanting to

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>keep that going right until November third, right until the election.

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But Republicans shouldn't be complicit in that. And I talk

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to small business owners every single day that they're trying

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to reopen their businesses and they can't rehire their employees.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>They're calling their employees saying come back, and they're saying, understandably,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>why would we come back. We're getting paid more not

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to That is disastrous for getting the economy moving again

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and getting people back on their feet. Right. It's a

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty deceitful tactic. It would see them. I understand the

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>political objectives the Democrats have, but you know, you're you're

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not getting what they seem to be proposing. You know,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this has this underhanded aspect. I think that ties in

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty well with another underhanded display we saw from Democrats

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill this week, which was the billbar testimony. Yeah,

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and let me actually stop you there and go back

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to the prior topic for a second, which is, let

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>me tell you right now, what is pretty good in

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the Republican bill, okay, and what could be

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>good in the Republican bill. So there are two elements

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that are mildly good in the Republican bill. Number one,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it includes actually legislation that I've introduced that is for

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>school choice, that creates federal tax credits for contributions to

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>scholarship granting organizations for K through twelve education. That's really good,

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's really important, and it's really substantive, and it's transformational.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, I'm passionate about school choice. Now.

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the Democrats are passionately opposed because the

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>teachers unions opposed choice. And my concern is the Republican

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>negotiators will give that up at the table that it's

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in there, but it's not going to stay in there.

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That it's in there to be a bargaining chip to

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>be given up. The second good elements right now is

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>some liability protection. And there's no doubt it's a real

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>problem right now for any small business, for any school,

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for any university that opens, they're going to be sued.

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>All of them are going to be sued. Trial lawyers

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to descend upon them. Yeah, because if any

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>customer gets sick, if any employee gets sick, immediately they're

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>getting sued. So I very much agree with the objective

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of providing some reasonable liability protection so that people could open.

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not their faulty. It's not like the small businesses.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not like the movie theater created this this coronavirus

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from Wuhan, China, and and it doesn't make sense for

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars of damage judgments to make a bunch

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of plantiffs lawyers rich suing everybody. But the problem is

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>those same plantiffs lawyers are, along with the teachers unions,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest owners to the Democrats. So they're going to

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>fight to water that provision down. So those two provisions

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are right now pretty good, but my concern is they

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>will be gutted. Here's what we ought to be doing instead.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>We ought to be engaged in pro growth policy. So,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, instead of just shoveling cash out the door,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 1>one thing we could do is between now and the

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, suspend the payroll tax. That results

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in for you and for everyone, basically an immediate pay

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>raise in your job because the payroll tax you pay

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>out of your pocket. Suddenly your take home pay is higher.

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's an incentive for work. Suddenly your employer apportion

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>payroll chat tax your employer pays. Suddenly the cost of

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>employees of bringing back an employee has gone down for

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>your employer. That is a pro growth incentive. That is

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a pro jobs incentive. That is all about helping encourage

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>people to go back to work and work more. That's

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a very worthwhile thing to do. Another example of a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>very good thing to do. I've got legislation on health

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>savings accounts. So health savings accounts are accounts where you

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>can save in a tax advantage way for healthcare needs.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The problem is, current law prohibits most people from having

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a health savings account. The only instance in which you're

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have a health savings account is if you

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have a high deductible health insurance plan, which most people

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have. I have legislation that says everyone can have

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a health savings plan. That just lets everyone have one.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>That is really important healthcare reform right now in terms

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of changing the system, driving down the cost of healthcare,

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>making healthcare more affordable. And we're in the middle of

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. People are understandably concerned with healthcare costs. This

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>would be really meaningful reform. So this is something I

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>urged the President, and I said, by the way, for

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans that want to shovel cash, look, we've got

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the checks of twelve hundred dollars sent out to everyone.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>My parents both received twelve hundred dollar checks. They don't

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>need a twelve hundred dollar check. But Congress set on

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>one the proposals to do it again. I said, listen,

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if you are really intent on throwing money out of

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>a helicopter, how about taking the twelve hundred dollars and

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>populating it in a health savings account for everyone, so

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that everyone can suddenly have a health savings account to

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>meet healthcare costs. If you must spend the money, actually

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>spend it in a way that does some positive, if good.

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Right next week, I'm going to introduce a bill that

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling the Recovery Act that is going to be

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole series of pro jobs, pro growth steps that

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to take our focus should be getting

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>people back to work. And right now, the current so

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>called Republican bill that is going to lose a lot

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of Republican votes if and when we vote on it

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is not focused on jobs. Pelosi wants jobs to go away.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>And right now, basically the Republican bill took the Nancy

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi bill, divided all the numbers by three, and proposed

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the same damn thing. We should have different ideas, ideas

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that work. And a final political point, So are there's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>some Republicans who are really scared. We got to do this.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>We just got to do it. It's an election. You

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>got to spend money. Look in the battle to be

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Santa Clause, Republicans will always lose. If suddenly we pony

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>up three trillion dollars, they'll go to four like like

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no limit. And frankly, show me the voter out

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there that's really looking for a bunch of cash that's

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actually going to vote for the president because of it.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want someone to bankrupt the country and bankrupt

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>your kids and grandkids in order to get more cash,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, you're going to vote Democrats. Yeah, I think

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a null set. We should be the party of

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>jobs and growth and prosperity and higher wages. Look at

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>other proposal. I told the President, all right, at five,

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to spend money, waive the federal income tax

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for the next six months up to a certain amount.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>That again puts real money in people's pockets now, and

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>unlike what's being proposed, it doesn't kill jobs. We should

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>be creating jobs, not killing jobs. Well, I love this

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>point you're making. You're you're never going to out democrat

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the democrats. You're never going to outliberal the liberals. There's

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a famous conservative book from many decades ago called a Choice,

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>not an echo. You want you want to actually have

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a choice in your politicians when you go to the

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>ballot box. And I got to tell you, as somebody

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>who has an HSA, who uses an HSA, I love

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>HSA's I think it is it's brilliant. It's shocking to

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>me that they have not been more popular, they haven't

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>been more encouraged over time. And I think a lot

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of that is a law prohibited. The reason they're not

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more popular is Congress. Unless you have a high deductible

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>health insurance plan, it's legal for you to have an HSA.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>The poet I'm trying to make to the other Republicans, like,

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is there anything we want to accomplish that actually would

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>be good and fix the problem. We shouldn't rush out

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like chicken little and say we must do something to

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do something. Let's do something that would work and help

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>people get back to work. That's right. There a lot

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of perverse incentives I noticed going on on

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the left side of the aisle on Capitol Hill. And

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think nowhere was this clearer than when our former

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>verdict guest, the Attorney General William Barr, was invited to

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>testify on Capitol Hill. He was actually he accepted the

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>invitation on the very day that you and I sat

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>down with him at the Department of Justice. And so

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he finally goes to sit down for this hearing, and

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>then it turned out that the Democrats and a House

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives didn't really want to hear a single word

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. It really was studying. When you

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and I were interviewing Bill Barr, you recall we nicknamed

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>him Honey Badger, which wasn't planned that that was off

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the cuff. But if anyone didn't believe that nickname. You

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>just had to watch the you know, the Liliputians trying

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to tie him down. I mean it was small and

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>petty democrats relentlessly attacking him. And I love that Bar

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is completely not concerned. I don't know that I've ever

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>seen anyone drink coffee in a more dismissive way. There's

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>something about the coffee cup that just said you are

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>an utter buffoon. And the part that was really ridiculous

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is you'd have a Democrat go given a histrionic speech

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and then they'd declare, I reclaim my time. You reclaim

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>my time, which basically means shut up. I'm scared of

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>your answer. I don't want you to answer me, and

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll look really dumb if you do. And they did

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it over and over again, reclaiming their time, reclaiming their time,

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and it ultimately was an expression of fear. And I'll

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you, Michael, I actually had a conversation about House

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>democrats reclaiming their time a couple of days before Bill

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>bar testified. And let me tell you why. So next

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>week I'm chairing a hearing in the Senate on riots,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on violence, on antifa, on the organized terrorists who are

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>burning and attacking our cities. And first witness we're going

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to have is Ken Cuccinelli. Ken is the Deputy Secretary

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of Homeland Security. Ken is the former Attorney General of Virginia.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a rock rib conservative. Ken is a good

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>friend and right now Ken is leading the efforts to

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>secure the border, but he's also fighting for the federal

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officers of the Democrats are you know, Nancy

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi's calling them Nazi stormtroopers, which is grotesque. So when

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Ken and I are talking on the phone and I'm

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>telling them, Hey, Ken, I really want you to come

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>to this hearing we're chairing, he said, listen. One thing

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that he said I really don't like when I testify

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>at the house is they'll attack you. And then the

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will say, I reclaim my time. So they attack

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you and they don't give you a chance to respond.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>And this is before the bar hearing, by the way.

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And I laughed and I said, I said, well, Ken,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you this. In any hearing I chair,

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are going to attack you. That's that's for sure.

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>They're going to come after your hard because they've decided

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to demogogue every police officer in America. But I can

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>promise you, if I'm chairing the hearing, You're damn well

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get a full chance to respond each and

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>every attack headed your way. We have that conversation kenn

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Is coming to the hearing, and then like a day

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or two later, Bill bar goes through this this ridiculous

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>charade where they are terrified of his answers and quote

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>reclaim their time. If the words I reclaim my time

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ever come out of my mouth other than quoting them,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>throw something at me, Michael that they simply will. I

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>ain't going to say that, Senator, You've been spending too

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>much time with the Democrats. You must get come back

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to yourself. You know, I don't think I had read

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>anywhere that Ken Cuccinelli is going to be testifying. Is

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that this is that is that is breaking news where

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we were going to announce that next week, but I

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just announced it with you, terrific. I very much look

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>forward to hearing that because obviously I think this issue

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the mobs, the organized violence, ANTIFA has been at

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the top of a lot of people's minds. Yeah, so

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to seeing that, and I look forward

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>also to not having just echoes of reclaim my time,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>take up all the time that we could actually be

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hearing from someone who has so much to say on this.

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>One last question before we let you go, Senator, This

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>is from Kira. I think a lot of people are

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>wondering this these days, if they're living in urban centers

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in America. Is there any hope for sane people in

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>New York City? Or should we flee? What about New

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>York in general? What is what is the future? Not

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just maybe of New York, but of all the cities.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we all have to flee down to Texas? All right?

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So let me take New York. Actually listen. I'm an

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>optimist by nature. I believe in America. I believe in freedom.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>I even believe in New York. And I'll point I

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>often point to history as foreshadowing of the future. I'll

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>confess I think things are going to get worse in

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>New York in the short term. I think the malignant

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>politics there. I think radicals like de Blasio when they're

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>proposing cutting a billion dollars from the NYPD and AOC

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is saying not enough, basically burn it to the ground.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not quite what she said, but she said, defunded

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and abolish it, which is the same thing. In the

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>short term, New York is going to head to some dark,

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>dark days and it's but New York went through this

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties and seven, and we saw rampant crime

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in New York. New York was facing bankruptcy. I mean,

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the policies of the far left, they don't work, and

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>every time they're implemented, particularly in the extreme, they are

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. So what's the good news is that when

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people see the disaster, they often open up their eyes

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, this doesn't make any sense, let's change it.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And New York had a renaissance. Why do they have

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a renaissance? Remember Rudy Giuliani when he was elected and

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>not Rudy. Rudy today is a very different person than

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Rudy was when he was first elected. But New

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yorkers were sick and tired. They were sick and tired

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of the crime, they were sick and tired of the violence,

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>they were sick and tired of the shambles the city

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>had had gone through. And Rudy got elected. Remember the

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>broken windows theory, which is, let's let's when you go

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>into a neighborhood and you see shattered windows, you see graffiti,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and you see row. That makes all of the rest

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of violent crime more likely. And so go repair the windows,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Go clean up the graffiti, Go stop the squeegee guys

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.239
<v Speaker 1>who used to just dump crap on your car in

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the streets, and it actually stops the rest of violent

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>crime too. So de Blasio and the radicals have forgotten

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>those lessons. I think they will go through a dark period,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and many of our cities may go through a dark period.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But when the failures of radical left policies become evident,

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think people will turn back to them and say, hey,

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we want a New York City where you can walk

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in Central Park again and be safe. We want a

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>New York city where you can open a business and survive.

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>There are many things about New York that are extraordinary,

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that are wonderful that it has been. The statue of

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>liberty invites the whole world. We've seen immigrants from across

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the globe come to New York to make it. But

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the policies of the socialists can destroy all of that.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But we'll come out of it. That's why I think

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the moving trucks are heading down to

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>your state, Senator, and you know I'm a New Yorker

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I live in Los Angeles. Both my cities have

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>me wanting to fly straight down to where you are.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably not a board Air Force one. I haven't gotten

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that invitation yet, but maybe I'll fly commercial and see

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you there. Hey, Southwest one, you can sit in NYC.

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>That's true. That's I got some drink tickets too. We

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>will have to pause it there until next time. Thank you, Senator.

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political action

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress

0:31:57.080 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and help the Republican Party across the nation.