WEBVTT - May Jobs Report, Crypto, and a Look at M&A

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Let's talk about the monthly

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Jost Report, talking about Yes exactly, U S employers hiring

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at a robust clip in the month of May, wage

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>gains holding firms suggesting the economy continues to power forward

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>as a FED raises interest rates at a steep pace

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to tame red hot inflation. Is Mike McKee said, good report.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>FED should be happy. Susan Arthur is the chief executive

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>officer of Career Builder. Susan joins us on the phone

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>from Philadelphia. Good to have you with us, Susan, do

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you agree with our own International Economics and Policy correspondent.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>There's almost nothing in this report that that would make

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the FED unhappy. Hey, thanks for having me on getting Yes,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I would agree, there's not too much to be unhappy about. Um,

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>we are pacing about eight hundred thousand jobs under pretty pandemic,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so obviously the continued growth here is is restoring us

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to almost to pre pandemic levels. All Right, you sound

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of worn out. Is it just the flow of news?

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it that things are rough out there? Like? How

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>how would you assess the job market kind of compared

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to pre pandemic compared to the I mean it's listen,

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, I'm exhausted, and we've got an alcohol

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>guest at the end of the show and they're not

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sharing any alcoholic us. So I'm pretty pretty ticked off

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's almost like this is like, actually true, Carol,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you're, you're. She's showing all our cards

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and being very real. Susan, I really am no, But

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, tell us give us an assessment because

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the job market is so important to what happened, especially

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>when we have so many big banks. Uh CEO is

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about recession, not session. How do you see it, Yeah,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say so. So under the numbers, the big

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>movers are what we've been hearing, right, We're moving from

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>consumer goods to services, with the biggest gainers being leisure, hospitality,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>professional and business services. What we see in our data

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and the pulling we do with job seekers UM is

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>there's still an incredible number of employed people in an

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>active search process. So while you know, lots of people

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are employed, and we like the unemployment rate level and

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the progress would participation rate, more fifty five year olds

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>came back to work this month, there are still a

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people looking to make a change. So that's

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a good thing, right, That's a good and and and

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's interesting to because your your point about

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>being exhausted. The other thing we got our most recent

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 1>pulling data is UM two thirds of people would choose

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>money versus an additional week off. That did surprise me

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>considering sort of some of the burnout going on, right, UM.

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But of the people looking for work, the younger generations

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or to make moves, the younger generations are looking at

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>twice the rate of the older generations, literally twice the rate. UM.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Lots of people prioritizing money first, followed by a flexible

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>schedule and remote work. So those trends are holding and gaining. Um.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So when we think about what's going to change over

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this period, who's going to make moves? Where are they

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go? Where? Associate with growth in sectors? I

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>would expect a lot more movement of the younger generations,

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and that it isn't about culture or purpose, it is

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>money and flexibility will help us connect to this to

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>what it says about the economy and what happens in

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>an economy where workers feel like they have that choice,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>they have that ability to move, doesn't that manifest itself

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in higher wages and a higher quit rate? I would

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>expect the higher quit rate to hold, whether or not

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the wage growth. I mean, I think that's by point

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent um the months, uh is you know, obviously

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to take down a little bit from last last year,

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>but I mean from last months. But obviously there are

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>outliers in that. If you look at leisure and hospitality

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>significantly about pre pandemic levels. So I think you know,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 1>people are still going to jump. It isn't always going

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to be for money, but there's gonna be competitive pressure

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on the employer employers for sure, Susan, I think what

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you were saying is so fascinating about this whole idea

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of people prioritizing money first. I had a fascinating conversation

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>with an Uber driver yesterday and trying to buy a home,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about mortgage rates, talking about costs um talking about

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>what it costs to fill up his tank over a

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars, and just being like this is really rough,

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>searching for baby formula like this is real. This is

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>America talking and saying how difficult it is, and when

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to it, you want to make sure

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you have enough money to to you know, put a home,

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a roof over your family and feed them agreed in Like,

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we went back pre pandemic, I would

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>expect our trending in the younger generation. Job secret to

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lead with purpose, to lead with advancement, to a lead

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 1>with alignment to company culture. Those things are moving further

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>down and folks are focused on you know, food and

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>water here um followed by flexibility because that is there's

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people doing gig work. There's a lot

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of people in their side hustle, so flexibility thing isn't

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>just that people like remote work, It's that they're needing

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to optimize their time and the economics of their time.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>If you had to assess the outlook for the rest

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year, recession, no recession. You know, I hope

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we have solid indicators here that mean we're going to land. Okay. Um,

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>But to be determined is that a is that a

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just intense seconds a cynical to be determined pessimistic? Now

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>not pessimistic. I mean, I just think there is incredible

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>growth out here and a lot of good work and

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>innovation going on. So, you know, not pessimistic or syncle

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>at all. Hopeful. I guess that I love it. You're real.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a real mega get real mood uh and

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>mode today. So Susan, thank you so much. Have a

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>good and safe weekend. Be well. Susan Arthur, She's chief

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>executive officer Career Builder understand sees what's going on in

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the job market firsthand. Hurting us on the phone from Philadelphia.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hey, Um, certainly.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the big business stories of one was that

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>record round of M and A deals last year, and

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>at the end of last year, bankers were telling Bloomberg

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there were no signs of slowing, and then of course

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two happened, bringing in it with it lots of financial

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>market volatility and different macro values and outlooks, and yet

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we are still seeing deals getting announced and getting done.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>To him, let's get into it with Chris bloom he's

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the head of leveraged finance at a BNP. Perrybody joins

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Massachusetts. Chris, how are you.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, Thanks, how are you? We're doing well. So

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly a month ago, the three of us were at

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Milk and Institute Global Conference. You've participated in the

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>panel on global M and A about chasing records. A

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>lot has changed in the markets just in the last month.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Give us an update from an M and A perspective

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and what you're seeing. Yeah, No, that's a great it's

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a great topic. And I think that the panel that

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we had out there was actually, you know, very very

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting in terms of the outlook for the rest of

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty two. I think we talked about that.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had quite a bit of agreement that

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the we thought the market might rebound as we headed

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into the back half of the year. We have seen

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>transactions still getting announced, and really I think the big

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that we need to look at is volatility. You know,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, in order to to

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>actually agree on valuations for assets, you need to see

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>volatility mitigate. You need to see the credit markets then

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>stabilized so that the cost of capital you know, becomes

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>known as as companies looked to be on assets or

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sponsors looked to been on assets. So I think that

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as we see volatility continuing to be relatively high in

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets and the debt markets, it makes it harder.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But we are still we are seeing deals, you know,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>begin begin to be announced again, you know, albeit you know,

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely definitely not at the base probably thought are they

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>different types of deals? Though? You know from the perspective

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that everybody says to keep an eye on, you know,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our our own M and A reporters here say keep

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>an eye on private equity right now, because that's where

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be seeing a lot of deals. Are

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you seeing a different type of deal in this environment.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We are we are and again the core part of

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>my my job is running our our financial sponsor business

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>and our leverage finance business. So we have we have seen.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, private equity investors love downturns in the equity

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>markets because it creates opportunity from evaluation perspective. And while

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the cost of capital has gone up quite a bit

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when you see interest rates rising like this, you know,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, especially if you're looking

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>at sectors like tech or healthcare, you know, while those

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>valuations have gone down, when you're treating at fifteen twenty times,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, finance at six to seven, you know, maybe

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's six times now versus was seven times before because

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of that higher pricing on the debt. That's not necessarily

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>making that investment decision. So the downtake evaluations does create

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for pH shops in order to take businesses private.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're seeing a little bit more of that. So, okay,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>are we on track for another record here or that's

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not likely? Definitely not gonna I don't think it's gonna

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be another record here. I mean, you are seeing some

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, large cap M and A being announced. You

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>saw a broad coom announced a very large transaction recently. However,

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the just the volatility in the markets. I

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>would say it's continued, you know. I think we all

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking, you know, exactly a month ago, beginning of May.

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That's continued. We're in the in early June. You know,

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>volumes are down in both that and equity. So I think,

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would say a record dear, No, you know,

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>will the year round out, you know, with with a

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>solid back half, that is definitely still possible. How do

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you watch the VIX, Chris, because you know, we have

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>some of our reports and even the New York Stock

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Exchange President referring to certain levels of the VIX as

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a point when you'll see M and A R I

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>p O S. Yeah, No, it's a great question. So

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're over thirty, it's very difficult to

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>see any type of financing actions in the financing markets,

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as any type of settling out in in

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>UM in M and A. When you're below twenty, I

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>think that makes things, you know, feasible. Right now. We

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>were over thirty for for you know, during the period

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we had very heavy equity market polatility a week and

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a half ago. You were over thirty for a few days.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're now sitting at six for the last

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>few days. If you see a dip back below twenty,

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of things become more possible. We've

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>seen the high O bond market open up just this week.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a four point seven billion dollar

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>day on Wednesday. There was there was was just five

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>billion printed the entire month of May. Yeah, it's very different,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>very different. Hey, one thing I want to ask, so,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>are you not busy on the weekends? Are you and

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>your team not busy on the weekends? Can? We are

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely busy on the weekends, you know it just in

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of Look, we've all got risk portfolios that we're managing,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and there are deals in the pipeline. There were there

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>were you know, I saw an article today talking about

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, we've got roughly thirty billion

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, sort of death financings in the

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in the lb O market that needs to come in

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months. So, you know, we're always

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at the positions that we have on and the

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>commitments that we have on and if if we need

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>uh and if we need anything else. We've got always

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>got the elon musk to send something out that all

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>running around there. It is um. Having said that, if

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you had to pick an area where you think we

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>will see a more active area of deal flow, is

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it some of those beaten down sector? Is it health?

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it? What? Just quickly, I think it's Look, I

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>think I think you're going to seek health. Healthcare and

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>tech continue to be areas of opportunity because you can

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>get outside returns as a private equity firm because of

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the growth in those sectors. You know, with by putting

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to work a very large amount of equity, so you know,

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the equity checks and those deals are usually a high

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the capitalization, and so you can put put

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to work there. I think that

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll you'll see industrials will become more and more interesting

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>because you know, at the end of the day, you know,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses with good hard assets, and when you see sort

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of the high high sort of valued assets kind of

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>treading down, you know, businesses with good hard assets could

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>be attractive. Got it, We get energy, We gotta run. Chris,

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend. Chris bloom over at BnB, Parry

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Bot joining us right here on Bloomberg Radio. You're listening

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well in our weekly

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto segment. An investor and content creator in the space

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>back with us has been Armstrong. He has founder a

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bit boy Crypto and the YouTube channel that goes by

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the same name. A self proclaimed crypto millionaire. I think

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how we described him last night. He joins us

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in Atlanta. Ben, It's good to have

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. How are you. I'm doing great today.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys doing well? I look Bitcoin really seeming

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>rage bound right now. It's under thirty thousand dollars according

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to the latest on the Bloomberg terminal. Uh. When do

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you think we'll see a bottom here? That is a

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>great question. I think we're looking at one of two scenarios. Uh,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a scenario that exists to where you know,

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we call it the false top theory that basically November,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of sixty nine thousand was actually a false top.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It was really kind of an over exaggerated deadcap bounce.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>We really look back at April is really actually being

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the true top. Uh, there's a lot of indicators to

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of point to that. Obviously, retail sentiment was the

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>highest at that point. If that's the case, then we

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>could expect to see a bottom for a bitcoin in

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the next month, you know, maybe maybe even over the

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>next ten days, as things look very bad in the

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>markets right now. Um, but most likely what we've seen

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>traditionally in with bitcoin is a bottom in November after

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the mid term elections. So we're really targeting, you know,

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of the end of November beginning of December, and

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that will kind of line up with a

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of the larger kind of macroeconomic problems that we're

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>having right now that don't really seem to be slowing down.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But and here's my problem with the cryptocurrency where all

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this I don't know what fundamentals to measure it against,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Like if you give me a hard asset or could

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you say fundamentals When it comes to crypto, we don't

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>do fundamentals. Yeah, I don't know if you know this, Carol,

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But there there's no earnings for a bitcoin and flows.

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Hence my confusion and problem with So how do I,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like you say, Okay, could you know midterms? We could

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bottom at like, how do you say that, because what

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>are you basing it on? Well? What when I said that?

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at two separate kind of issues here. Uh.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Number one, we do have fundamentals for bitcoin. They're they're

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>what we call on chained metrics. So you can kind

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of look at the hash rate of bitcoins. Traditionally up

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>until about the last year, you know, generally, when the

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>hash rate has been at the highest, the bitcoin price

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>has been at the highest. We have seen that change

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit recently. You can also look at you know,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>things we call the os the s O p R,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which is like kind of how over the long term

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>people are holding onto bitcoins. We've got a lot of

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>different measurements that have to do with addresses and wallet

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and ales and transactional activity that you can kind of measure,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can look and see connections between price and

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>those generally, but also when are they reliable indicators? Are

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>they going to create long term cyclical historical cycles that

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I can kind of analyze in ten years that are

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>going to make sense or is it like so many

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>people who come out of air who say, listen, this

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is like the Internet in the really early days. So

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get ready for some craziness, of course, and I mean

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really that's that's what we're seeing, is that the hash

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>rate has traditionally been an indicator, but it isn't working

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I think we really have got to

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more time under our belt to be

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>able to connect those on chain metrics to the price.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But what we do have is the history of the

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin price and how it follows what we call the

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>having cycle. Every four years, we've seen bitcoin do almost

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same thing, hit all time highs every four years,

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>hit all time or hit new bottoms of bear markets

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>every four years. And this is based of the having

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>which last one occurred in next one occurred in four years.

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Why is it four years, Well, it's it's about three

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>years eleven months technically, because it's two hundred and ten

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand blocks for bitcoin is actually the distance between the havings,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's so far it's worked out to approximately every

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>four years um. So it's coated into bitcoin to cut

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the production in half every four years, or every two

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten thousand blocks. So but of course the

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>average person making conceptualize, you know, two hundred and ten

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand blocks for bitcoin, so it's just easier to say

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>every four years. It's kind of a layman's term that

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that we use. So Bitcoin is pretty much always followed

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that same path, and if it follows that same path

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>again throughout the rest of this bear market, like it

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>has the previous two bear markets, then that would probably

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>indicate a bottom sometime around November. Okay, I want to

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>move past this. Carol's still making sense of it, so

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>am I? Are you satisfied? Carol? No, but you go ahead.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I consider you the expert in until Let's not get

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead of ourselves here. And Armstrong is the expert founder

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>of Biboy Crypto. That's why we have him on the phone. Uh, Ben,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk crypto winter here because we're just

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a host of bad news we're hearing from. Uh

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>What the latest is? Among the latest, of course, is

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>coin based pausing hiring and then also resending some offers

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>coming after Robin and layoffs and layoffs at coins the fundamental.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I understand that there's a fundamental and the Gemini yesterday

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>announcing layoffs. Um, are we in a crypto winter? Oh?

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>We are certainly in a crypto winner. I mean, I

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's any any debate about that. Uh. And

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.239
<v Speaker 1>like I said before, it's predictable crypto winner. I mean

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>last year, even we were having high prices, we were

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>predicting this year we were going to go through this.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And every four years you see the same thing where

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>people say it's going to be different this time, it's

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 1>too much adoption, there's it's two mainstream, and yet we

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>always continue to see the same bear bear winter play out.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're looking at them cutting jobs, I'm

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>not sure this is as connected to crypto is it

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is just connected the overall job market and the general economy.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we look at Tesla, they said they were

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be laying off ten percent of their employees a

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>salaried you should say salaried. We later learned say that

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>again salaried employees, not just not contractors. So it changes

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the equation a little bit, just a little bit, but

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still ten percent of those contractor workers. So they

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>are showing a pullback. So I think connecting necessarily the

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>layoffs at Jim and I to UH in the hiring

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>freezer coin based the crypto, it isn't as relevant and

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's to the larger, you know market, I would say

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in general. You know, we've got the jobs report today.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks very strong, and that's actually bad for the economy.

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Is you know that means uh, you know, inflation still

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>running rampant. It's not really pulling back yet. You know,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>don't expect any of the tightenings to ease up anytime soon.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one gonna get worse. And I think

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this is having effec on all businesses. We gotta run. Hey,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>good to check in with you. Ben now, I'm strong.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>He's found her a bit boy crypto on the phone

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from Atlanta. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. I still

0:18:54.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>don't understand this is Bloompark Journal. Yeah, but you let

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no, all right, please,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the brivels I want to drive. It's a

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>good question. This is the drive to the clothes don

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on Bluebird Radio. All right, we've got just about ten

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes left in today's trading session, folks.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>We're getting ready to wrap up what's been a shortened

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>trading weekle though you're not already, I know, but it

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>feels like kind of a month of trading. I don't

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>know how you all are feeling. Um, so let's get

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah. Jonathan Waite is fund manager and senior

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>equity analyst. He co manages the Frost Growth Equity Fund

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>at Frost Investment Advisers. He joins us on the phone

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>from San Antonio, Texas. Jonathan, how are you good? How

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? We're good, We're good. We're trying to

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>make sense of everything that's happening. On the one hand,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you got Elon Musk and Jamie Diamond and Jane Fraser

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in the list of sense there's a problem companies, companies

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>warning us. Then we get this, you know, hotter than

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>expected jobs report earlier today. That's kind of saying, wait

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a second, hiring, still firing on all cylinders. Help us

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>make sense of it? Well, I think at the end

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>of the day, when you know, everybody's thrown around the

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>R word recession, that, um, it's important to note that

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a psychological, you know, element to it. That

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a thought that you know, if if somebody else

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>has stopped hiring or freezing, you know, or laying off people,

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that I got to do it too, and so there

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a little bit of a group think that

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>could be detrimental to the economy. But for the time being,

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, most of the numbers we've seen have been,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, fairly healthy, but maybe a few yellow flags

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of signs of things slowing a bit. So whether or

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not that you know, it becomes worse or some full

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>blown recession remains to be seen. You know what's interesting too,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is when everybody starts to freak out a little bit,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is is that our Gina Martin Adams Jonathan reminds us

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're not seeing an earnings recession. It's a moderation

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of expectations. Earning still growing, the pace of that growth

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is slowing, and yes, things have the tone has certainly moderated, um,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>but she said, margins are still rising, but analysts are

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>reducing their expectations. That's kind of where we are. And

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question is do things moderate to the

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>point where there is no growth and we're recession and

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot more painful. How do you see

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and how do you make investment decisions based on that outlook? Yeah? Well, okay,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so let's start with the first quarter. We're going to

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>see a negative g D. We already saw a negative

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>GDP print. You know, the second quarter estimates keep moving down.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The question though from here is what about the second

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>half and of investors, I think that the recession hits

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>at least by the end of next year. So it's

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>very much consensus already that we're going to have a

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>recession somewhere in there. So, um, you know where where

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>where we shake out? As we look at you know,

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at a typical recession, you're going to see excesses, right,

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what are the excesses we're seeing this time. Well, it's

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>monetary stimulus, it's fiscal stimulus, and both of those they're

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 1>taking the punch bowl away at the same time just

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>as things are starting to slow down. So you know,

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we're we're a little cautious there. We think there could

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be it will be a rough go trying to get

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to that soft landing. It's not impossible, but it could

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>be a little rough time to get there. Um. You know,

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're we are seeing a bit slowing down on the

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we did see a good job number, but

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing the tech companies um freezing hirings and

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>job cuts. Um, you know, seeing credit spreads move up

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a bit, and you know, had a very brief um

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>yield curve and version consumer confidence going down a bit.

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So with some yellow flags that we're watching, I want

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to tomp in because you actually co manage the Frost

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Growth Equity Fund, which you're today's down UM. But we

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know everything's been are largely be eaten up here five years.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You are on average annually more than a game, putting

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you in the seventy seven percentile according to Bloomberg Data.

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So you've done, you know, well, the names in your fund, though,

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>we'd like a who's who? I feel like I've Corporate America, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, MasterCard, Visa,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Home depot Um. Do you regret some of those holdings?

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you hold onto them? Because how do you think

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about some of these names? Now, well, let's put it

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the context. Right, You've had several years of those

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>leading the crew, you know, the entire market up, and

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so it was inevitable that value stocks would have their

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>day again, right, And so we've seen that shift to

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>UM out of a lot of those growth names. This year,

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>we've seen move towards defensive names, especially in the second quarter.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I said, the market zigs and zags. There

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there will be a time that you know, Amazon will

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>come back in favor, UM that you know Google and

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>digit advertising will come back. So we we feel like

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.239
<v Speaker 1>we have good names to own through the cycle. You know,

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we're long term investors and we like to own these

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>names through UM. You know, as long as we feel

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>like that there's that they have secular growth and strength,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we're fine holding it through cyclical swings. So you haven't

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>gotten rid of any of them, paired back or anything.

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>We will trade around some of those names, but by

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and large, we've we've stuck with. How are you thinking

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about Tesla? It's your seventeenth biggest holding, just under two

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the portfolio. It's been all over the place lately. Yeah,

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of under wait versus the bench and versus

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the peers. We own it. Probably don't like

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it as much as some of those, but but we

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>do like UM the E v UM, that market. We

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>do like where the mix of new autos is moving. UM.

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It's he's a very controversial figure. I'm not going to

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>argue with that. UM got that right, and he's got

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot on his plate right now. You're talking, Yeah, Okay,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just making sure who else are you talking about? Who

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about? No, I'm just making you know

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't say the name. So, um, if you have

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>new money to commit, where do you put it and

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>how patient do you have to be for it to

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>show some kind of significant performance? You put it in

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the growth stocks. Baby, Hey, wait a minute, I don't know.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You can't say that growth stocks. You put it in

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the growth so so well, look, I think there's a

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a time in which the growth stocks will will

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>come back. And growth has you know, through various recessions

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>done well and sell downs where you get typical cyclical

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>stocks will get will sell down even more in a

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>draw down. So so there will be a scarcity of

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>growth when you get GDP slowing down, and so you

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>will eventually have people gravitating back to names that have

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a like I said, a long term secular growth story,

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and those are the names that we like to invest in.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Ten seconds, when do you think those come back? Look

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>back half of the back half of this year. Like

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's going to be the Fed holds the keys.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be path depending on what they do. We

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>think that at some point in time they're going to

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have to back off. And I think that once, um,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>once we get a clearer picture of what they're going

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to do, um and frankly, once we get a little

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of bottom out of some of the frogginess and

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>these high valuation stocks, and I think that's a great

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>time to get back in the girl stop. All right,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run, Jonathan, Thanks so much. Jonathan Waite, he

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>senior equity analys and Frost Investment Advisors, joining us on

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the phone from San Antonio. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News