WEBVTT - 8/30/24: Breakdown: CNN's First Interview With Kamala

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, So the much anticipated Kamala Harris plus Timwall's

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>interview on CNN happened last night, So we thought we'd

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>do a whole like streamer style breakdown and react to

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the entire interview. Ryan, of course here with me Hi Ryan,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>good morning, how you doing.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>You can tell that they waited way too long to

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 2>do an interview by the fact that, like The New

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>York Times last night had a live blog about we

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>are reacting to it. Yeah, in real time. Trump did

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>like three interviews like during her interview and like whatever.

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they were with like who were they with? Random? Yeah,

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.319
<v Speaker 1>he's into this the podcast world. I know he's doing

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Lex Friedman. That'll be kind of interesting.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 2>And there was one that he did with this Florida

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 2>reporter who asked him, how are you going to vote

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 2>on the constitutional amendment on abortion?

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, yeaheah, the abortion stuff, I guess for abortion rights.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that ballot initiative, the pro choice side

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is now going to get like ninety percent of the

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>book because it was already about sixty percent, and what

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it has to get sixty percent to pass, right?

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And so I think now with a Trump backing it. Man,

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>he threw those pro lifers right under the bus, didn't he.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And he's saying he's going to do IVF for all

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I guess maybe the path ryan to

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>medicare for all is will just go body part by

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>body part, procedure by procedure and peacemeal it until we've

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>got entire coverage for you know, for the entire body.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, I'm sure we'll get covering all of that

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>next week. I actually want to set up I've been

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>trying for breaking points to set up a abortion debate.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Is Sager and I had this debate, but we're both

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>pro choice, So it'd be nice to have two people

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>who are actually pro life debating, you know, the Trump

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>campaign strategy and whether it's worth sacrificing the Yeah, like

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Lila Rose isn't her name, who's been going very forcefully

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on the pro life side, like this is outrageous. We

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>need to hold him to account it As lefties, I

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>feel a lot of compassion for their position because I

0:01:57.880 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're in the same spot with regard to

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>issues like Gaza and Palestine in there. Yeah, in any case,

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get to the interview now, but before we do, Ryan,

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys have a new story that you just broke

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on drop site News, which you guys should all, by

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, go and subscribe and support Ryan and Jeremy

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>over there because you're doing phenomenal work. So what do

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you got?

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, So last night we published this piece about Ecuador.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 2>This time from two thousand and seven to twenty seventeen,

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Ecuador had a social democratic government.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 3>They were called the Quarta.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Yastas run by Rafael Korea. In twenty seventeen. It's very

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 2>complicated but at a US right wing turn.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>It was a bit of a coup, bizarre situation.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But what we have and the next four or five

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 2>years were spent prosecuting Korea and his allies, and what

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>we have uncovered through a series of text messages that

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutor general, like the Attorney General Diana Salazar, sent

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to a judge and also to a member of Parliament

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that we've obtained and reviewed, show that she was very

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 2>specifically targeting her prosecutions at the left and delaying prosecutions

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 2>of the right in order to hurt the left in

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>election campaigns with in coordination and in constant contact with

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the US ambassador Wow in Ecuador. So a lot of

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 2>the times the US is not carrying out the kind

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 2>of old military coups that we're used to seeing from

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen seventies and eighties, though we still, you know,

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 2>once in a while might dip back into that playbook.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 2>But in general, it's more what they call law fair

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and using the public's hostility towards all politicians. The public

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>is fed up with corruption, so then you have social

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>democratic reformers coming in and the way to combat them

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 2>is that it's just dropped charges of corruption on them,

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and then the public's like, ah, they're all the same.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Says like what was done Lula in Brazil, for example.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Can't trust anybody exactly and then and then a strong

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>man comes in instead. It's exactly what they did with Lula,

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>threw him in jail for corruption until those were exposed

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>by Intercept Brazil Glenn Greenwald for being politically motivated, and

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>we partnered with Intercept Brazil on these.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 3>On this story as well.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 2>So fantastic new elections coming up at the beginning of

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>next year in Ecuador. So and already the story's you know,

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>picking up a lot of steam there, so we'll see.

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>So this is the sort of thing that was likely suspected,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>both the targeting of the left but also the US involvement.

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But you were able to actually get the goods.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly so people could check it out.

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Like the last point on this, she was setting the

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>messages using an app called Confide, which is popular in

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Latin America, which as soon as you read the message,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 2>it disappears.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>But what I was doing a deal.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>He was filming as he would read her messages with

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>a second phone, and so we were able to he

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 2>got a forensic analysis.

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>To prove that, like these are theologies is authentic.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 2>So we have like fifteen hundred videos of messages that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>we had to look through and then translate.

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's unbelievable.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 3>You can see the result over it drops on views

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to checking that out. I'm also looking

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>forward to checking out your next exchange with Matthew Miller

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>or whoever. The State Department.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 3>They haven't had a briefing in many weeks.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>But have they really not?

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think probably not even allowed, you.

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Know, I mean that anyway.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 3>They need it. They need a vacation from their hypocrisy,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 3>just like they.

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Can't take it either. Okay, all right, let's go ahead

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and get to comrade Kamala here, Coconut Kamala and her

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>very first inn This is it is kind of a

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>stunt first interview post Biden dropout, which happened back on

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what July twenty first, So we're like, you know, a

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>month and a week post Biden drop out, and we're

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>finally getting her first interview of very strategically time before

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Day weekend. I might add, let me go

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead and pull this up and we can just start

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>playing it and react.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Here we go Part one. All right, here it is

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>President Governor. Well, thank you so much for sitting down

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 4>with me and bringing the bus. Bus Star is well

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 4>underway here in Georgia. You have less time to make

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.679
<v Speaker 4>your case to voters than any candidate in modern American history.

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 4>The voters are really eager to hear what your plans

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 4>are if you are elected. What would you do on

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 4>day one in the White House.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, there are a number of things I will tell you.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 6>First and foremost, one of my highest priorities is to

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 6>do what we can to support and strengthen the middle class.

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 6>When I look at the aspirations, the goals, the ambitions

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 6>of the American people. I think that people are ready

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 6>for a new way forward in a way that generations

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 6>of Americans have been fueled by hope and by optimism.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 6>I think, sadly, in the last decade we have had

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 6>in the former president someone who has really been pushing

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 6>an agenda and an environment that is about diminishing the

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 6>character and the strength of who we are as Americans,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 6>really dividing our nation. And I think people are ready

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 6>to turn the page on that.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 7>So what would you do? Day one?

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So out of the gate, it's a very I mean,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious question was your day one agenda? Very

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>vague initial answer here, Ryan, how do you.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Get blindsided by the question what do you plan to

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 2>do as president?

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me someone who I mean, I'm sure she's

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be president for quite a lot of years now,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 3>It reminded me a lot of Ted.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>You remember Ted Kennedy's and I'm just going to pull

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>it up, but we people can just google it. Ted

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy's nineteen eighty answer to a similar question like why

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 2>do you want to run for president?

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I do not remember that, Ryan, but I'm sure

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you do.

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Ted Kennedy himself had been he contemplated running for president

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty eight, So this is twelve years you

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 2>know after he started at least very publicly thinking he

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>was probably thinking about running for president when he was

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>five years old.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, you're a Kennedy, You're raised nineteen eighty.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>He's asked this question and he flobbed it way worse

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 2>than Harris. Yeah, but he's like, the country has a

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of natural resources, and it's it's like just people

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 2>can just people can YouTube like the interview that blindsided

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the Ted to Kennedy presidential campaign, and they can watch

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>it for themselves. At least she had an answer. But

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.559
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to like support the middle class. It feels

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>like such a layup. You could say, all right, the

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>first thing I do when I get in there, I'm

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>going to send a bill to Congress.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>That codifies Roebi Wade.

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>After that, I'm going to send a bill that cuts

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>taxes for the middle class, that expands the child tax

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>credit whatever.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, like things.

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, specific things that indicate because when we've interviewed

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidates, this is literally always our first question, because

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me the you know, this is the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>starting point, and it gets at not just what are

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the laundry list of things that you plan? What is

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>your priority? Because we all know that you're not going

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do all of the things that

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to do, so what is the like flagship

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>priority day one? And we get you know, health, the

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>middle class and by the way, Trump is bad. Now

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>she goes on, let me pull this back up. Dana

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>actually presses her like okay, but like what does that

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>actually mean? And then she goes into some of the

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>specifics that she laid out in a recent economic policy speech.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go ahead and listen to that. But you can

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of tell she's just like, yes, for whatever reason,

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was not had not really thought of what her day

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>one priority would actually be. So now she's just reaching

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>into the bag of policies she recently talked about Day one.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 6>It's going to be about one implementing my plan for

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 6>what I call an opportunity economy. I've already laid out

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 6>a number of proposals in that regard, which include what

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 6>we're going to do to bring down on the cost

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 6>of everyday goods, what we're going to do to invest

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 6>in America's small businesses, what we're going to do to

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 6>invest in families, for example, extending the Chile tax credit

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 6>to six thousand dollars for families for the first year

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 6>of their child's life, to help them buy a car seat,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 6>to help them buy baby clothes, a crib. There's the

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 6>work that we're going to do that is about investing

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 6>in the American family around affordable housing, a big issue

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 6>in our country right now.

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 5>So there are a number of things on day one.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I guess, Brian, the positive if we're looking for

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a silver lining, here is something you pointed out, which

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, being an empty vessel is the

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>negative thing in terms of if you want someone who

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>has like these core commitments, or like you're Bernie Sanders,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to fight for Medicare for all, we all

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to do it, or even you know

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, we knew healthcare was going to be a

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>major focus for him as well. The plus side is

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that this allows you an opportunity as a public to

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure her into what you want to see happen. On

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>day one, and you made a point that I thought

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>was interesting that there's almost like, in some ways a

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>healthier relationship to Kamala Harris because there isn't this cult

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of personality. It's just like, all right, this she'll do,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and we've got an agenda that we're interested in, and

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe she'll be willing, especially with the addition of Tim

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Walls here, to get some pieces of it through.

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>There is nobody on the Democratic side who thinks that

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 2>they can just sit back and let Kamala Harris lead

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 2>them to the promised land like zero people, Whereas that

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 2>was an overwhelming feeling among Democrats when it came to

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Barack Obama, oh yeah, and then they were all let

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 2>down as a result of that. Kamala Harrison is not

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 2>going to let anybody down. So it requires exactly the

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 2>public to be involved and push her and say, okay,

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you know what, you don't really have any ideas for

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to do on day one, but we do,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 2>and here's how we're going to organize and pressure you

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 2>to do those things.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It's also why the choice of Tim Walls ends up

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>being really important, because she can just okay, just do

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>his agenda, you know, like he had a plan and

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he did a thing and didn't just talk about it

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but actually was like, no, I'm going to figure out

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>how to get these things through, so just just do that.

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of why he felt so consequential, I

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think to a lot of us when he was chosen,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't just come with you know, as a

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as a person and he's a talented politician and a

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>great background in class diversity and a union member and

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. But he has a plan, had

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>an agenda and got it through. So she can just

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of grab that, or she could grab the which

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of overlap here, the pieces of build

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>back better that you know that Bernie was pushing that

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>never got pushed through. So that's the that's the hope

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and the aspiration is that that's the thing that's sort

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>of floating out there in the ether that Kamala Harris,

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>who clearly doesn't really have any thoughts of plans of

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>her own, that she can just pick up on there.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 8>But you well, I'm excited about this agenda too, as

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 8>I said, the idea of inspiring America to what can be.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 8>And I think many of these things that the Vice

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 8>president's proposing are are things that we share in values

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 8>in the child texturet is when we know that reduces

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 8>childhood property by a third. We did it in Minnesota.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 8>To have a federal partner in this unbelievable, I think,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 8>in the impact that we can make.

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there's them Walls, you know, coming in to say, hey,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we did this.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>By the way, here's it. He's like, here's an actual.

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Policy, right right, right. There was a lot made by

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the right of Tim Walls being part of this interview,

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I mean, on the one hand, I

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>understand because she hasn't done a solo interview. On the

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>other hand, of course, it is you know, traditional, I

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>guess after the conventions to do a joint interview. The

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>other thing that there's some irony to it to me,

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>because some segments of the right have thoroughly convinced themselves

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that Tim Walls was a horrific best vice presidential pick.

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 1>There was all kinds of like, oh, he's going to

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>have to drop out any day now. Meanwhile, he has

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the most the highest favorability rating of anyone you know,

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of the four presidential and vice presidential candidates by far,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and so they kind of flipped on a dime from

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>He's such a catastrophe he's going to have to drop

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>out to He's such a tremendous asset that she can't

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>even do an interview without having him by her side.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Right, it can't be both things.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 2>But I think, yeah, she made this is a a

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>problem of her own making. It doesn't look weird to

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>have them both together if she's also doing.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Lots of other interviews.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, she hasn't done an interview practically since like

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that Lester Holt, the bacle.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's true, that's true. All right, let's see

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>where we go from here.

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 4>Talked about you call it the opportunity economy. Are well

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 4>aware that right now many Americans are struggling. There's a

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 4>crisis of affordability. One of your campaign themes is We're

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 4>not going back. But I wonder what you say to

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 4>voters who do want to go back when it comes

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>to the economy, specifically because their groceries were less expensive,

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 4>housing was more affordable when Donald Trump was president.

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's start with the fact that when Joe Biden

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 6>and I came in office during the height of a pandemic,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 6>we saw over ten million jobs were lost. People I

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 6>mean literally, we were all tracking the numbers. Hundreds people

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 6>a day were dying because of COVID. The economy had

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 6>crashed in large part all of that because of mismanagement

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 6>by Donald Trump of that crisis.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 5>When we came in.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 6>Our highest priority was to do what we could to

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 6>rescue America. And today we know that we have inflation

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 6>at under three percent. A lot of our policies have

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 6>led to the reality that America recovered faster than any

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 6>wealthy nation around the world. But you are right, prices,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 6>in particular for groceries, are still too high. The American

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 6>people know what I know it, which is why my

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 6>agenda includes what we need to do to bring down

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 6>the price of groceries, for example, dealing with an issue

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 6>like price gouging. What we need to do to extend

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 6>the child tax credit to help young families be able

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 6>to take care of their children in their most formative years.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 6>What we need to do to bring down the cost

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 6>of housing. My proposal includes what would be a tax

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 6>credit of twenty five thousand dollars for first time home

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 6>buyers so they can just have enough to put a

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 6>down payment on a home, which is part of the

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 6>American dream and their aspiration, but do it in a

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 6>way that allows them to actually get on the path

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 6>to achieving that goal in that dream.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 4>So you have been vice president for three and a

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 4>half years. The steps that you're talking about, now, why

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 4>haven't you done them already?

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, we had to recover as an economy,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 6>and we have done that. I'm very proud of the

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 6>work that we have done that has brought inflation down

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 6>to less than three percent, the work that we have

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 6>done to cap the cost of insulin at thirty five

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 6>dollars a month for seniors. Donald Trump said he was

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 6>going to do a number of things, including allowing Medicare

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 6>to negotiate drug prices.

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Never happened. We did it so.

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Now and as I travel in the state of Georgia

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 6>and around our country, the number of seniors that have

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 6>benefited I've met. I was in Nevada recently, a grandmother.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 6>She showed me her receipts and before we capped the

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 6>cost of INCEALLAUINCE for seniors at thirty five dollars a month,

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 6>she was playing hundreds of dollars up to thousands of

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 6>dollars a month for her insulin. She's not doing that,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 6>and he maintained bionomics.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So that part where you know, what the answer to

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you say to people who actually are like, no, actually,

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I do want to go back to the economy under

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. The answer she gave there could have subded

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in nicely for the Day one answer. This one she

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>was clearly she was prepared for, right, She had gone

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>over whatever they wanted to say here, and I thought

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>she handled that quite well. In the same respect, it

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>shows you, you know, she's not like, like I said,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that answer could have been great for the Day one answer.

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>She's not ni enough on her feet too. If it

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't specifically in the briefing book for the answer to

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that question, she's not able to like pull it over

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in real time to insert it into the Day one question.

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that was right exactly. So if she's if

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>she has prepared for an answer, she can deliver a

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 2>good answer. And I thought she'd delivered that one quite well, right, Yes,

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 2>And she has. She's had some debate moments where she

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>clearly had like prepped like I was the kid on

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that bus or or whatever, and she hit those marks

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>quite well. So she can do that, and that is

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 2>your prosecutors are probably that's what you're trained to do,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 2>like all right, here, here are the here's the evidence

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 2>we've got against this defendant.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Here's how we're going.

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 2>To lay it, lay it out, and you deliver it well,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking on her feet and which requires you to have

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 2>some ideas, you know, about exactly what you're going to do.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 2>That's her challenge because she's kind of teaching for things.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point because it's one thing to memory

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the bullet points that someone else has given you. It

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>makes it much easier in these situations to be ex

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>temporaneous if you yourself have an agenda, a plan in mind,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>core values, things you want to articulate. And you know,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's always been the challenge for her.

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>The first debate back in twenty twenty, when she did

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole that little girl was me and they, I mean,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>now it's like curdled into being rather cringe, and they

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>immediately started selling like mugs and T shirts that kind

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of forced it to become immediately cringe. She was fantastic

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in that debate, and not just in that moment which

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>did land at the time, but throughout the debate. I

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>thought she was the best performer on stage. But part

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>of why is because she was fairly low in the

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>polls going into that, and she wasn't taking a lot

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of incoming, so she was able to pick her spots

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>based on where she was prepared, and she was able

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to occupy more of that sort of prosecutorial position of

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to challenge you with these things that I've

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>already prepared and already thought through. And that's when she's

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at That's certainly when she's at her strongest and when

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>she feels her greatest comfort or you know. A lot

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was made of the way she was in some of

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Senate confirmation hearings with what was it Brett Kavanaugh,

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>where she but people really liked how she performed a

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>similar deal right there. You prepare your statue and your staff,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you prepare, you know what your line and questioning is,

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can go in. So but in any case,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that the one other thing I wanted to note about

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this this answer before we keep playing it, is she

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>has a lot she She's been unburdened in a lot

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of ways by the fact that people are unhappy with

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Biden economic legacy. They don't blame her for it.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing. Actually, she is now basically tying in some

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>instances succeeding Donald Trump in terms of who would be

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>best on the economy. And I think part of the

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>reason for that is Number one, I think just the

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that she's younger and so there's more confidence she

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>could actually do some stuff, or at least communicate some stuff.

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Number Two, she genuinely was sidelined in the Biden administration,

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>so people aren't wrong to be like, oh, this lady

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to do with any of this. I think

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's actually kind of accurate. And number three, she's able

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to more comfortably make the commentary she just did, which

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is like, listen, things were challenging, we did great work,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot done, but we know people are

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in pain and there's a lot more that needs to

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>be done. That piece of being able to really empathize

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with people and where they are right now, and especially

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the concerns over pricing, is something that she is more

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>free to do than Joe Biden was. And of course

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden was not able really effectively to communicate about

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>anything at this point outside of like NATO and Aucus.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh and one quick thing on that, yeah, and our

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump supporting viewers, and we love our Trump supporting viewers

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 2>are going to pick up on her thirty five dollars

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>insulin thing.

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 2>There's become a meme that actually Trump did that, and

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 2>just the basic facts of this are Trump in mid

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty did an executive order that are basically encouraged

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical companies or who are dealing with medicare down to

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty five dollars a month. It did lower prices for

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, at least probably some millions of seniors on medicare.

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Good for Trump for doing that executive order, two thumbs

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 2>up for him. Biden did it through the Inflation Reduction

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Act and made it mandatory for everybody, not just yet,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>not just some seniors who voluntarily got a benefit from it.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 2>So that's the difference between what they're talking about here.

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to assign her any Pinocchio's or.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 3>The way she said it there?

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It was accurate.

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 3>It was actually was totally accurate.

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I just saw some polling I can't remember.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a like progressive polster but who

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>pulled all of her agenda items and lowering the cost

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of prescription drugs and specifically insulin was like the number

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one most popular thing. So no surprise that they.

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Deserve credit for that. They took on big pharma like

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>they legitimately did.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So no surprise that she that she emphasizes

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that here.

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 7>Is a success.

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 6>I maintain that when we do the work of bringing

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 6>down prescription medication for the American people, including capping the

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 6>cost of the annual cost of prescription medication for seniors

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 6>at two thousand dollars, when we do what we did

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 6>in the first year of being in office to extend

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 6>the child tax credit so that we cut child poverty

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 6>in America by over fifty percent, When we do what

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 6>we have done to invest in the American people in

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 6>bringing manufacturing back to the United States, so that we

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 6>created over eight hundred thousand new manufacturing jobs, bringing business

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 6>back to America, what we have done to improve the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 6>supply chain so we're not relying on foreign governments to

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 6>supply American families with their basic needs. I'll say that

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 6>that's good work. There's more to do, but that's good work.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I wond so, Ryan, before we go to the next question,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts on that piece you get asked about, like well,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>did you see you think the Bidenomics is good because

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bidenomics has become sort of a toxic brand

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>just because of how unpopular, frankly Joe Biden himself is.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they rolled through that stuff again like that, that's

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 2>all great stuff. Now, the flip side of having cut

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>child poverty in half is that when they let it expire,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 2>they doubled child poverty again. So you know, no credit

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>for that. But yes, that that agenda that was enacted

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one and into the twenty twenty two

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that was a old school Europeans social welfare state that

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the country would love to see, you know,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 2>brought back permanently.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you look at the approval rating actually

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of Joe Biden, he was at his most popular when

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that, you know, social democratic welfare state

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 1>type of legislation, when people had we're benefiting from you know,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID supports of a wide variety, including the child tax credit,

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's both when you know, a lot of the

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>story of the Biden administration is those things being cut

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>piece by piece by peace. You couple that with inflation

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and then another pivot point. Unfortunately, the Biden administration was

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when he did the right thing, which were from Afghanistan,

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>his approval rating takes a massive hit because of the

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, overwhelming media onslaught and punishment, punishment of him

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for doing what American people have asked him, asked presidents

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to do now for years at this point, and then

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, his decline and inability to really defend himself

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>or articulate what he's up to or what the agendas

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>or why people should believe in it, and you lead

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to you know, the abysmal approval rating, a bysmal assessment

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bidenomics, etc. That we see today.

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it's some clarity on where you stand on

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 4>some key policy issues. Energy is a big one. When

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 4>you were in Congress, you supported the Green New Deal,

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and in twenty nineteen you said, quote, there's no question

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm in favor of banning fracking. Cracking, as you know,

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 4>is a pretty big issue, particularly in your must win

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 4>state of Pennsylvania.

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 7>Do you still want to ban fracking?

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 6>And I made that clear on the debate station in

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty that I would not ban fracking. As vice president,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 6>I did not banfracking. As president, I will not banfracking.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 7>In twenty nineteen.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 4>I believe at a town hall you said you were asked,

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 4>would you commit to implementing a federal ban I'm fracking

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 4>on your first Dan office and you said, there's no question,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm in favor of banning fracking. So yes, So it

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 4>changed in that campaign in twenty twenty. I'm very clear

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>where I stand.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 6>We are in twenty twenty four, and I've not changed

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 6>that position or will I going forward.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 5>I kept my word and I will keep my word.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 4>What made you change that position at the time, Well, let's.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 5>Be clear, my values have not changed.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 6>I believe it is very important that we take seriously

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 6>what we must do to guard against what is a

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 6>clear crisis in terms of the climate. And to do that,

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 6>we can do what we have accomplished thus far, the

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 6>Inflation Reduction Act, what we have done to invest, by

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 6>my calculation, over probably a trillion dollars over the next

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 6>ten years, investing in a clean energy economy, what we've

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 6>already done creating over three hundred thousand new clean energy jobs.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 6>That tells me, from my experience as vice president, we

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 6>can do it without banning fracking.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 5>In fact, Dana Dan, excuse me.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 6>I cast the tie breaking vote that actually increased leases

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 6>for cracking as vice president.

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 5>So I'm very clear about where I stand.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 4>And was there some policy or scientific data that you

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 4>saw that you said, oh, okay, I get it.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 6>What I have seen is that we can we can grow,

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 6>and we can increase a thriving clean energy economy without

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 6>banning fracking.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. That's part one. There's three parts

0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>here that we want to get through. But what do

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you make that fracking exchange? Try? It is free, slivery

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is very slivery. It's just tough.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just tough because the honest answer is I was

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 2>pandering to the Sunrise movement and the youth vote, trying

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to win the Democratic nomination for president in a period

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>where the left was ascendant.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I failed at that, and now I'm doing a different

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 2>political thing.

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 3>So the I think, if you're not going to.

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Be honest about it, like the best approach would be,

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 2>I get you know, if you had to clearly, they

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 2>workshop like, all right, how do we answer this and

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 2>not sound like complete frauds to say, okay, look, at

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 2>the time, I thought you needed to ban fracking in

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 2>order to confront climate change. But now I think you

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>can actually confront climate change without banning fracking. Now that's

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a lie. It's blah blah blah blah blah. But like,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's the best you can come up with.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how how if you were Kamala Harris

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 2>without saying I was lying because I was pandering to

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 2>youth voters, like would you?

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess you could frame pandering in a

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>positive light of like, I'm responding to what voters what

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>votvoters won, right, and at the time, voters were saying

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we want you to ban fragging. Sorry the dog is

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>in here now she's moving everything. But U you know,

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>so you could frame pandering as like being responsive to

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the world of voters. But no, I think that saying

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>my values are the same, but you know, new information,

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I realize that we can now do this without banning bracking.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I think probably is the best that you can do.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And I mean it's fair to say that.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>There's would to win the election and that hasn't changed.

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>True, true, I mean I think she could fairly claim that, like,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, technological developments are changing what's possible blah blah blah,

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But the part that to me came off as the

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 1>most weasley is when she said something like, you know,

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, I stood on the stage and said I

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would not ban fragging or something like that, and Dana

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>meet It is like, yeah, but three minutes before that,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you were saying the polar opposite, which is kind of

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the point here. So there's no real wiggling out of this.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And she comes back because this is not the only

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>position that she's changed.

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she ran as Bernie in twenty nineteen.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for a while. And then also, you know, she

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>starts off supporting Medicare for all because she thinks that's

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Then she gets Donor push back. Then she

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>moved off of that even at the time. So so

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in any case, yeah, I.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Think her argument was I flip flopped on this four years.

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Ago, right, Yeah, I have a long flip flopped on that.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I moved off this a long time ago. W Are

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you still talking to me about it now? I think

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>one other thing that I'll say is there is a

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of justified criticism of Kamala Harris just very clearly

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>shifting her positions depending on what she thinks is advantageous.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about Trump earlier on abortion, like he

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>does the same thing, perhaps even more shamelessly because he

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is there a position on abortion that he hasn't held

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point, right, not yet, you know, from planned

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>parenthood supporter to saying that he's so pro life that

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>women should be criminally punished if they have an abortion,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to now being you know, kind of going coming back

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to the pro choice side of things, Like he literally

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>shape shifts even sometimes within the same conversation. But he's

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just much more difficult to kind of pin down on

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>those things. So people people don't this isn't the line

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of attack that they take against Trump, that he's a

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>flip flopper for whatever reason. I'm not really sure why

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that is. But they don't think that they would be

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>able to really nail him with that charge, right.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Right, right, Yeah, nobody thinks he has convictions.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.719
<v Speaker 1>True. Yeah, they're not expected supports. Yeah, true. All right,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>let me pull up part two here, here we go. Okay, Oh,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I just want to mention I have

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this on one point two five speed just to not

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, make people think that I'm manipulating the video

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, just to get through it a little bit quicker.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 4>As vice president, you were tasked with addressing the root

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 4>causes of migration in southern countries, and not a part

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 4>of Central America, the northern part of of of Central

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 4>America that deals with that affects the southern border of

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 4>the US. During that Biden Harris administry, there were record

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 4>numbers of illegal border crossings. Why did the Biden Harris

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.719
<v Speaker 4>administration wait three and a half years to implement sweeping

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 4>asylum restrictions.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, the root causes work that I

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 6>did as Vice president, that I was asked to do

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 6>by the President has actually resulted in a number of benefits,

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 6>including historic investments by American businesses in that region. The

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 6>number of immigrants coming from that region has actually reduced

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 6>since we began that work. But I will say this

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 6>that Joe Biden and I in our administration worked with

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 6>members of the United States Congress on an immigration issue

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 6>that is very significant to the American people and for

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 6>our security, which is the border. And through bipartisan work,

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 6>including some of the most conservative members of the United

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 6>States Congress, a bill was crafted which we supported, which

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 6>I support, and Donald Trump got word of this bill

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 6>that would have contributed to securing our border, and because

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.959
<v Speaker 6>he believes that it would not have helped him politically,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 6>he told his folks in Congress, don't put it forward.

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 6>He killed a bill, a border security bill that would

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 6>have put fifteen hundred more agents on the border.

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 5>And let me tell you something.

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 6>The Border patrol endorsed the bill, and I'm sure, and

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm sure in large part because they knew they were

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 6>working around the clock and fifteen hundred more agents would

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 6>help them. That bill would have allowed us to increase

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 6>seizures of fentanyl. Ask any community in America that has

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 6>been devastated by fentanyl what passing that bill would have

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 6>done to address their concern and pain that they see?

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 7>You are so you would push that legislation again. I

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 7>just want to push it.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 5>I will make sure that it comes to my desk

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 5>and I would sign it.

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 4>There's one other question about something that you said in

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty nineteen.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I've talked to you Ryan about

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>this whole. Democrats think they were so clever with this whole.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>We're going to adopt the Trump border agenda and then,

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, try to get Republicans to pass it and

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.239
<v Speaker 1>then do this gotcha. Ah see, we did a jiu

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>jitsu move, and actually we're the real border hawks, and

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we're the ones that really want to do the fascism

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>on the border. I think that this is both immoral

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and the wrong policy. But I also think, and it's

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the critical part, is it decoupled what has long been

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the path of having comprehensive immigration reform path citizenship and

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the border sort of crackdown measures. And

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they just took out the border crackdown measures and just

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>try to pass that. They thought this was a brilliant

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>jiu jitsu move. Meanwhile, I'm sure you saw this. Paul

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Soger and I talked about it on the show. Because

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have accepted the Republican framing on immigration, and also

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>because of the reality of high number of border crossings

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, migrants being busted into blue cities, et cetera.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Higher immigration has never been more unpopular, and decreasing immigration

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has never been more popular. So basically, under Trump, actually

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>immigrants were more popular than ever before, and now under

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden they are, you know, at low in terms of

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>support for increasing levels of migration. I really owe it

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to this political philosophy, which I think is utterly foolish

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of you know, again, I think im moral wrong

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what would actually be good for the country,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera.

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>And we already have multiple experiments of this being tried

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 2>in Europe. All the center left European parties when there

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>was a migration surge over the last ten years in Europe,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 2>swung far right to try to say that they were

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>just as tough on immigrants as the right wing, but

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 2>they were going to be more humane, you know, and

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>liberal and reasonable about it, and they all were obliterated,

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Like there's basically no center left left right in Europe.

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Or you can think.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 2>About the clip of oh, I guess we didn't play

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the Trump clip, but that of Trump talking about abortion

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>rights with this Florida reporter. So now he's pro choice,

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 2>he's going to vote against the constitutional Amendment. You know,

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>he's going to vote for basically, you know, allowing abortion.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 3>In Florida all the way.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Up to liability. Yeah, it's like it's basically codifying row

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in Florida effectively.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>So, first of all, does anybody believe as a result

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of Trump saying that that Republicans are good on abortion

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and rights?

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Like nobody believes that, Yeah, and you're literally the guy

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>who put these justices on the bench.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 2>So in the same way, does anybody believe that Democrats

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 2>are the ones, like, if you really want somebody who's

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 2>going to crack down on the border, of course, is

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 2>it going to be Democrats Republicans?

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 4>Of course?

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 2>But what will Trump's capitulation on abortion rights?

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Due to the polling, There'll be some.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump supporters who are like, you know what, like you

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 2>said that that Florida amendment now will probably pass in

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 2>like massively, like with bigger numbers than it would have otherwise.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 2>And so in this and you see the flip side

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>on immigration, the numbers moving, people are like, all right, well,

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 2>if Democrats are for this and Republicans are for this,

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 2>let's do it. If you but you know, in your

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 2>debate with Zier, you guys talked about how there's a

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 2>correlation between you know, illegal crossings and people's you know,

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>anger at abortion, at immigration, and the desire to reduce

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>those those crossings. So what you could do is actually

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 2>do what Kama was talking about is a root causes.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>It's true that.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 2>In hunter Us, Guatemala and El Salvador, where you know,

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 2>she was tasked with like reducing outflow. There has been

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 2>a reduction in outflow that doesn't have a lot to

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 2>do with what the US did. A lot of bucelli

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 2>uh In Honduras you have a social democratic and shamr

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Castro come in who made things a little bit better.

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Uh So, but a lot of that migrants are coming

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 2>from Haiti, uh, Venezuela and Cuba, and they're all coming.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 3>As a result of US policies.

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 2>So we could, like, if Democrats actually want to do

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>something about it, rather than trying to act like Republicans,

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>they could actually just stop sanctioning Venezuela, stop messing with

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and destroying Haiti, and stop sanctioning and destroying Cuba, and

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 2>boom like something. Some massive portion of the migration flow Intoto,

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the border stops cold.

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>People would prefer to stay where they are.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we flatter ourselves come here. That's not right, Like

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 2>if you live in Venezuela or Cue, but you want

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to stay there.

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is we are in a different place

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>economically than we were, like when Trump was first running

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in twenty sixteen, and if you take him seriously about

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>literally deporting all twelve fifteen million. However, many undocumented immigrants

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that we have here, the level of economic catastrophe that

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>would be is basically unfathomable. I mean, we have a

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>low unemployment rate. Now, the wages aren't high enough, there's

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems in the labor market, but it's

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>actually not a high unemployment rate. There isn't a massive,

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, unemployed group of laborers out there waiting to

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick the strawberries in the field, or lay

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the roofing in the construcer, or help build the houses

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that we desperately need to build in this country. Yeah,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. I mean, if you just look at

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the instead, the most salient issue that people tell us

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>over and over again is their biggest economic concern is prices.

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>If you genuinely kicked out of the country all fifteen

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>million of those workers or whatever, the number is, the

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>amount that the prices of all of your grocery items

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.399
<v Speaker 1>and of every new house, the amount that with skyrocket

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is literally insane, not to mention, you know, the massive

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>cost to the state of and what an incredible imposition

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the deep state or the police state

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like, it's unfathomable how you would have to

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>crack down and surveil and militarize this response to round

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>all of these people up, many of whom have been

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>here for many years, etc. Like if you actually take

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it at face value from an economic perspective, it's utterly insane.

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again, no one is making that argument,

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>no one, So of course the public is like, oh, well,

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and the Republicans agree, So I guess they're right.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess we just need to do this border crackdown

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's that. And these immigrants are just bad in

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>every single way, which of course is not the reality

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the immigrant population, both legal and illegal,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that we have in this country at this point. Yeah,

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's see what we got next.

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 7>When you first ran, there was a debate.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 4>You raised your hand when asked whether or not the

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 4>border should be decriminalized.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Do you still believe that? I believe there should be consequence.

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 6>We have laws that have to be followed and enforced

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 6>that address and deal with people who cross our border illegally,

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 6>and there should be consequence. And let's be clear, in

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 6>this race, I'm the only person who has prosecuted transnational

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 6>criminal organizations who trafficking guns, drugs, and human beings. I'm

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 6>the only person in this race who actually served a

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 6>border state as attorney general to enforce our laws, and

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 6>I would enforce our laws as president going forward.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 5>I recognize the.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Problem generally speaking, how should voters look at some of

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 4>the changes that you've made that you've explained some of

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 4>here in your policy. Is it because you have more

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 4>experience now and you've learned more about the information. Is

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 4>it because you were running for president in a Democratic primary?

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 4>And should they feel comfortable and confident that what you're

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 4>saying now is going to be your policy moving forward?

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 6>Dan, I think the most important and most significant aspect

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 6>of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:10.760
<v Speaker 6>not changed.

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned the Green New Deal.

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 6>I have always believed, and I've worked on it, that

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 6>the climate crisis is real, that it is an urgent

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 6>matter to which we should apply metrics that include holding

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 6>ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with the

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Inflation Reduction Act. We have set goals for the United

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 6>States of America and by extension, the globe around when

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 6>we should meet certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 6>As an example, that value has not changed. My value

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 6>around what we need to do to secure our border.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 6>That value has not changed. I spent two terms as

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 6>the Attorney General of California prosecuting transnational criminal organization violations

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 6>of American laws regarding the passage illegal passage of guns, drugs,

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 6>and human beings across our border.

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 5>My values have not changed. So that is the reality

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 5>of it.

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 6>And four years of being vice president, I'll tell you

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 6>one of the aspects to your point is traveling the

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 6>country extensively.

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm here in Georgia.

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 6>I think somebody told me seventeen times since I've been

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 6>vice president in Georgia alone. I believe it is important

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 6>to build consensus, and it is important to find a

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 6>commonplace of understanding of where we can actually solve problems.

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>On that note, any any reflections on that part. First

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of all, her favorite phraseology at this point is transnational

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>criminal gangs. She tries to say that as much as

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the same problem that she has with all

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of the other, you know, left wing positions that she

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>took in twenty nineteen, twenty twenty.

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, it's the same.

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Like say, like it's I'm just I was pandering then

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm pandering like it's there's no good answer.

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 3>You just flip through you try.

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Got it questions. Yeah, you just got to stick to

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the script and hope that the questioner moves on.

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Ultimately, you had a lot of Republican speakers at the convention.

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 4>Will you appoint the Republican to your cabinet? Yes?

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 5>I would, no one, no one in particular mine.

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 6>I got it sixty eight days to go with the selection,

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 6>so I'm not putting the car before the horse, but

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 6>I would. I think I think it's really important. I

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 6>have spent my career inviting diversity of opinion. I think

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 6>it's important to have people at the table and when

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 6>some of the most important decisions are being made that

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 6>have different views, different experiences, And I think it would

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 6>be to the benefit of the American public to have

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 6>a member of my cabinet who was a Republican.

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>What did you think of that, Ryan, Because there was

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of online commentary on the left about this comment.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Because everyone immediately is like, wait a minute, you can

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 2>have a Republican in your cabinet, but you can't even

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 2>have a palse stinting and give a two minute vetted

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 2>speech on stage at the DNC where they're supporting you.

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think that part punched a lot of people

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 2>in the face. But in general, like you know, Obama

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 2>had ray La Hood as his Transportation secretary, this like

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 2>moderate Republican, and you know he did find as a

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 2>transportation secretary.

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like, yeah, you.

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Can find a Republican who's going to There's also now

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>like so many cabinet positions. They've elevated a whole bunch

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 2>of things to quote quote unquote cabinet level positions that

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 2>you can you can harmlessly toss one of those to

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 2>a Republican if it, you know, if you think there's

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 2>some political benefit and you're gonna win over the Bill

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Crystals and other never Trump Republicans.

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean I do think like, even though

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we may discount it, there are a lot of like

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, moderate subourban, formerly Republican whatever who see that

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>hear those and like, oh, she's you know, the party

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>that's very reasonable you hear from. Yeah, exactly right. Yeah,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I sort of felt the same. I felt

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>all of those emotions because the point about like, oh,

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, all they ever do is reach out to

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and punch the left right, and and for the

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the Harris campaign, which is now all of

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like a month old, you didn't see a lot of that.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the choice of Tim Walls was the most

0:42:49.080 --> 0:42:52.319
<v Speaker 1>dramatic break from that pattern. I just assumed, like, oh,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>progressives want this guy, the left wants this guy. There's

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>no way it's going to be Tim Walls. And then

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that comes as as a major shock at the convention,

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and in this interview you get the sense that those

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>old Democratic Party patterns are taking hold. And it's almost like,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's the classic political theory of like, oh,

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>in the primary, they you know, they dance this way,

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the general election they go back the other way,

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the like primary general election two step, And I guess

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that's happening here is just in a very condensed timeline,

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>since there wasn't you know, really a prime, there wasn't

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a primary at all, and so she went from two

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks of being relatively benevolent towards the left to now

0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the normal Democratic leg general election. You know, I'm

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get a Republican in my cabinet thing. I

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>will say, some people online were floating like, hey, why

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>don't you pick like Susan Collins, for example, or like

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>another Republican senator in a state with a you know

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that a Democrat could win, or that has a democratic

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 1>governor that appoints the senator, et cetera, et cetera. So

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't on its face, I don't hate having the

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of having a modern Republican in especially if it

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of gives you cover to do something that's meaningless

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as a gesture to the right, but then have an

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>agenda that's actually like populous in the way that the

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>agenda she has announced is populist and does represent, you know,

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the better parts of the of the Biden administration.

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I want to ask you about your opponents, Donald Trump.

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 7>I was a little bit surprised.

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 4>People might be surprised to hear that you have never

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 4>interacted with him, met him face to face.

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 7>That's going to change soon.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But what I want to ask you, have you met

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump face to face?

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Ryan been in rooms? But not No, not really, so I.

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Actually I actually this was surprised. I didn't know she'd

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>never met him. I actually give you back. Okay. The

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>White House correspondents dinner after the one where Obama humiliated

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>him I was doing like a red carpet interview thing

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>for MSNBC and him and Malania Kane. And this was

0:44:45.360 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>back when he was teasing that he might run, but

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't actually been and no one was taking him seriously, right,

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, Okay, yeah, whatever, this is just

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a stunt to help you with your apprentice brand, which

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.479
<v Speaker 1>may have been true by the way, anyway, So yeah,

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I him the question. I was asked, like, hey, what

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>happened with those private investigators down in Hawaii that you

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>were sending to look at Obama's birth certificate? And he

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was like that was That's the wrong question, Crystal, That's

0:45:10.200 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the wrong question.

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I was at that dinner too. My table was actually

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.320
<v Speaker 2>really close to his. I was just watching him the

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 2>whole time, and his face was just boiling.

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So anyway, funny that she's never met him

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 1>face to face.

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 7>About is what he said last month.

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 4>He suggested that you happened to turn black recently for

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 4>political purposes, questioning a core park of your identity, any same.

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 6>Old tired playbook, Next question, please, that's it?

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great answer. Best part of the interview, in my opinion,

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like learned a lot from the failures of the Hillary

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Clinton campaign. This is exactly and so different from how

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have handled Trump the entire time, which would any

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>other moment this would have launched into some long moralizing

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>hi about it and this would have been a multi

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>weak news cycle, and instead, because of the way she

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>handled it at the time, which was also very dismissive,

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>like this, everybody just moved on and it didn't work.

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work.

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, makes them look weird and like a loser.

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, and they're just like okay, whatever, moving on. Yeah,

0:46:18.680 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly and just an overall note, Dan, I

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>think at one point we'll get to it. Asked her

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>specifically about her identity, but very different from the Hillary

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Clinton campaign. She really does have the idea the sense

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of like people can see I'm a black woman, like

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to talk about it, you know, the

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>trailblazing status or it's that's obvious and it's not what

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.240
<v Speaker 1>people care about, and sort of narcissistic to always constantly

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be leaning into like what this means for me personally

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.280
<v Speaker 1>on my journey of self discovery and you know, and ambition.

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think they've been very that's been one of

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the smarter aspects of this campaign.

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's talk about some foreign policy issues that would

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 4>be on your if you become commander in chief. President

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 4>Biden has tried unsuccessfully to end the war between Israel

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 4>and Hamas in Daza.

0:47:06.880 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 7>He's been doing it for months and months along with you.

0:47:09.480 --> 0:47:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Would you do anything differently, for example, would you withhold

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.680
<v Speaker 4>some US weapons shipments to Israel? That's what a lot

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 4>of people on the progressive left want you to do.

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:18.839
<v Speaker 5>Let me be very clear.

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 6>I am unequivocal and unwavering in my commitment Israel's defense

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 6>and its ability to defend itself, and that's not going

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 6>to change.

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 5>But let's take a step back.

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:34.879
<v Speaker 6>October seven, twelve hundred people are massacred, many young people

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 6>who are simply attending a music festival.

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Women were horribly raped.

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 6>As I said then, I say today Israel had a right,

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 6>has a right to defend itself. We would and how

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 6>it does so matters. Far too many innocent Palestinians have

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 6>been killed. And we have got to get a deal done.

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 6>We were in Doha. We have to get a deal done.

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 6>This war must and we must get a deal that

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 6>is about getting the hostages out I've met with the

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 6>families of the American hostages. Let's get the hostages out,

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Let's get the ceasefire done.

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 7>But no change of policy in terms of arms and

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 7>so forth.

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 6>No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 6>have to get a deal done. When you look at

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 6>the significance of this to the families, to the people

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 6>who are living in that region, a deal is not

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 6>only the right thing to do to end this war,

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 6>but will unlock so much of what must happen next.

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 6>I remain committed since I've been on October eighth to

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:35.839
<v Speaker 6>what we must do to work toward a two state

0:48:35.960 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 6>solution where Israel is secure and an equal measure Palestinians

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:44.480
<v Speaker 6>have security and self determination and dignity.

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts, Ryan Well, Dana said some weapons. Maybe Harris

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't even pick up on that.

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, by like completely weapons, you know.

0:48:55.960 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Self weapons.

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 2>The Biden administration has even said that they would restrict

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 2>weapons like the two thousand pound bombs used for offensive purposes.

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Like Harris.

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>People keep saying that Harris is better rhetorically and you

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 2>know more, you know, more empathetic. Where's where's the empathy there?

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Like when when you're actually not even standing by the

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 2>tiniest of concessions that the Biden administration, her administration has

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 2>has made, seems like she, you know, she very clearly

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 2>wants to just say she unequivocally, unconditionally whatever supports you know,

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Israel's right to defend itself. Whereas even Biden say, well

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>that maybe the two thousand pound bombs dropped on refugee camps,

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna we're not gonna allow that, or at

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 2>least we won't allow it for like a two week

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 2>pause period.

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's that's such a great point that she could

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have really leaned into. I mean, it's kind of bullshit

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>because they ultimately release those whatever right and have given

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Israel ultimately everything Israel could possibly want and more, But

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is enough of a fig leaf to allow her to

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 1>create some sense of separation at least from the Biden

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 1>administration by leaning into that. Listen, we did this with

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the Biden you know, with Joe Biden, we said this

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is unacceptable, and we did withhold it and I would

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>do I would I keep that option on the table,

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, so there was a way to say this

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>with you know, there's such concern on this one issue

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there's such concern about a clear break with the Biden policy.

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no concern on that and on literally any other issue.

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But she clearly feels like or you know, also maybe

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>just ideologically believes or feels that that's less likely, because

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she has ideological beliefs, but she feels

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this is where the pressure is, as she needs to

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>prove how committed to Israel she is, and she doesn't

0:50:42.520 --> 0:50:45.319
<v Speaker 1>feel as much pressure from the left for whatever reason,

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever political calculus she's doing, which by the way, I

0:50:47.400 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think is foolish when you look just look at the polls.

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, on this one issue, she feels like, oh,

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:55.959
<v Speaker 1>I have to just stay locked up with the Biden

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>administration not show any sort of you know, distance, And

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of I think that's an excuse,

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I think that's I see people making that excuse

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for I think that's kind of a bullshit excuse.

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And when Dana Bash says that this is what the

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:09.759
<v Speaker 2>progressive left wants you to do, it's true that the

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 2>progressive left wants you to do that, but so does

0:51:12.640 --> 0:51:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more than sixty percent of the country.

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's right, that's exactly.

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Great approval for Biden's Israel policy is in the twenties.

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's he's less popular on his Israel policy

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 2>than he is on his approach to.

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Inflation and immigration.

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right exact, breaking with him would be a political benefit.

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And then she leans in to this the mass rape claim,

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 2>because she understands that there's absolutely no consequences, you know,

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 2>for saying that, despite the fact that there is not

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.720
<v Speaker 2>yet evidence of that being the case.

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 2>In fact, Israel so desperate to produce him evidence. I

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you saw this last week. Yeah, this,

0:51:51.840 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 2>this Facebook group produced a letter that we now have

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 2>confirmed is a complete hoax, making up, making up like

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 2>the most horrific things, and you know, it spent a

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:09.400
<v Speaker 2>week getting shared by prominent journalists and then the admission

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 2>that it was actually a hoax was.

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, quiet just gets buried. Yeah. And meanwhile,

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on the contrary, we have seen on camera IDF soldiers

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gang raping a Palestinian prisoner and that.

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Somehows dozens of cases like confirmed by.

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The Human Rights human rights organization, so and so, we

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>have lots of documented evidence of systematized sexual assault of

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Palestinians who are being held in this you know, prison

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>concentration camp so bad that even the Israelis felt like, oh,

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we got to at least pretend like we might might

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecute some of these guys and then come under massive,

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, pressure and huge backlash from their own citizenry.

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that that somehow never gets mentioned. So I

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 1>had a question for you specifically because you've done so

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:06.240
<v Speaker 1>much work reporting on the political incentives and shaping of

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Israel Palestine conflicting this war. Specifically, my

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:15.000
<v Speaker 1>hope for Kamala Harris was kind of the hope of like,

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this is just a political cipher, Like she doesn't believe anything.

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden is an ideological Zionist. You were not moving him

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 1>off that position, period, end of story. My hope was

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that she would look at the polling that you mentioned, like, hey,

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this isn't just the progressive left. A clear

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.800
<v Speaker 1>majority of the country, including a very clear majority of

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>independence Republicans are the only want to post to this,

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're not even they're not voting for you anyway,

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so don't worry about them. They want to ceasefire, but

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they they want to see weapons. They don't want their

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer dollars going to drop bombs and children who are

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in tents in refugee camps. They don't want that. And

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of polling at this point about

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 1>how just pure cynical electoral calculus, you stand more, you

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>have more to gain from taking the position of the

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote program have left then continuing to do this

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 1>whole Israel has a right to defend themselves no matter what,

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and yes they can do a genocide, and yes they

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can drop the bombs on the babies in the tents

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and have a polio epidemic and whatever endlessly, and I'll

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>never do anything about it. That was my hope. But

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem like she's making that calculus. It seems

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like she feels. The pressure she feels is the pressure

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats and Republicans, but Democrats in particular have felt

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from time immemorial that they can't piss off you know,

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the Israel lobby or you know, the people for whom

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a die hard commitment to the end of time.

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think part of it is that ingrained fear

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 2>of decades of that commitment to the pro Israel lobby.

0:54:41.640 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And then I think also my guess is that the

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 2>campaign is nervous about what's going to happen on college

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 2>campuses between now and the election, and they think that.

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, she's not helping things with these kind of comments.

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 2>No, right, No, that's an interesting point. Yes, she will

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:59.919
<v Speaker 2>make things worse. Like the way to end these camp

0:55:00.239 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 2>protests is to get a cease fire deal and just

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 2>force it, like a really government already put forward a

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 2>proposal that Hamas accepted.

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 3>Just implement it. Just do that like you could do that.

0:55:13.320 --> 0:55:16.560
<v Speaker 2>You're the United States of America, the most powerful empire

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 2>in world history. Not doing that is going to inflame

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 2>campus protests for the next two months, and I think

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 2>that they don't want to be at all associated with

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 2>those campus protests.

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, the longer this goes on, the more

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>likely you are to have a larger regional war. That

0:55:32.800 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>means that not only are you going to be hobbled

0:55:35.320 --> 0:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>politically in terms of getting yourself elected right now, but

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>your whole presidency is going to be handstrung by being

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>tied once again into an unpopular war in the Middle

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>East and whatever you know, thoughts you may potentially theoretically

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 1>have about a child tax credit et cetera. Like, all

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to be undercut if you are

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 1>boxed in in the way that Phoebe wants to box you. First,

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>he wants you to lose, okay, doing his best to

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>make sure that that happens. And if by some you

0:56:04.200 --> 0:56:06.439
<v Speaker 1>know chance, you were able to win in spite of

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.799
<v Speaker 1>his efforts, he wants to box you in, so you

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have no exit and it's you know, dramatically politically unpopular

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for you to leave at that point. So yeah, I

0:56:16.640 --> 0:56:19.880
<v Speaker 1>mean there they have fallen into his traps every step

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the way. And I didn't expect her to have

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:24.640
<v Speaker 1>any like worl qualms. I thought it would all be

0:56:24.680 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>ambition driven. But she seems to be engaging in the

0:56:27.560 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 1>same like outdated, foolish political calculus that leads her into

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the same, you know, foolish bear hug position of Joe Biden,

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and that is deeply, deeply disappointing. Yep, all right, I

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:42.879
<v Speaker 1>got the part three here, last piece, I go ahead

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and pull this up. Here we go.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 7>Country is just starting to get to know you.

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 4>I want to ask you a question about how you've

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 4>described your service in the National Guard. You said that

0:56:51.640 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 4>you carried weapons in war, but you have never deployed

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 4>actually in a war zone.

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 7>Beneficials said that you misspoke, did you well, First of.

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 8>All, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four years of

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 8>wearing uniform of this country. Equally proud of my service

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 8>in a public school classroom, whether it's Congress or the governor.

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:09.799
<v Speaker 8>My record speaks for itself. But I think people are

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 8>coming to get to know me. I speak like they do.

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 8>I speak candidately, I wear my emotions on my sleeves,

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:17.680
<v Speaker 8>and I speak especially passionately abo about our children being

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 8>shot in schools and around guns. So I think people

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 8>know me, they know who I am, they know where

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 8>my heart is. And again, my record has been out

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 8>there for over forty years to be for itself.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 4>And the idea that you said that you were in war,

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 4>did you mis speak as the campaign has.

0:57:31.520 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 8>Had, Yeah, I said we were talking about in this case,

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 8>this was after school shooting, the ideas of carrying these

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 8>weapons of war and my wife the English tour. My

0:57:37.720 --> 0:57:39.920
<v Speaker 8>grammar's not always correct, but again, if it's not this

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 8>it's an attack on my children for showing love for me,

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:42.560
<v Speaker 8>or it's.

0:57:42.400 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 3>An attack on my dog.

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to do that. And the one thing

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 8>I'll never do is I'll never to meet another member's

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 8>service in any way.

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I never have and I never will.

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think ran.

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:56.280
<v Speaker 2>He forgot in the first answer to contextualize it, and

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Dana kind of like helps him out and with the

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 2>follow up answer. His quote where he said he carried

0:58:02.400 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 2>weapons in war was in this congressional debate about an

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:10.280
<v Speaker 2>assault weapon ban in the wake of a school shooting,

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 2>so he was indeed talking about weapons of war. The

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.240
<v Speaker 2>way he said it was quite misleading. He said I've

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:19.200
<v Speaker 2>carried weapons in war war. He should have contextualized what

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the debate was first. I also think he should just

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:25.560
<v Speaker 2>let people know what the argument is about because so

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 2>many people are not following it.

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 3>He deployed as part of Operation Enduring Freedom to Europe.

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Where Turkey, I think it was Italy Italy, So he

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 2>deployed as part of OEF, and it is understandable he

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:42.800
<v Speaker 2>could say. It's understandable that people who are not in

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the military hear me say that I deployed as part

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of OEF, think that the deployment was either in Afghanistan

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 2>or Iraq, but it was not, and people who were

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:55.479
<v Speaker 2>in the military understand that there are lots of kinds

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of deployments that do not involve, you know, seeing combat

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 2>or being in a war. So so I don't know

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 2>what what did you make of it?

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think I agree more with your first point

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 1>than your second point. I think probably the best way

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to respond to this is to immediately shift from you know,

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 1>clearly he misspoke, whether it was intentionally misleading or you know,

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or just a true slip of the tongue. Hard to say.

0:59:22.320 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>People aren't likely to, you know, trust politicians at their

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:27.600
<v Speaker 1>word with this stuff, but to immediately shift the frame to, well,

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:30.360
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what I was talking about though, because

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was talking about our kids having to

0:59:33.320 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go to school and do lockdown drills, which our kids

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are all you know, back in school. Mine have already

0:59:37.520 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 1>done their lockdown drills.

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Those drills are not helpful.

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, my seven year old is coming home

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and asking me questions about it, and you know, sort

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of freaked down, like it's it's a horror, it's it

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is a horrible state of affairs that this is the

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>reality in America. And as a public school teacher, no

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one would be better positioned to really speak to that

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 1>horror and immediately shift the frame. So I I think

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it would be fine for him to just be like, yeah,

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I just slip at the time, I misspoke, but let

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>me tell you what the real issue is here, and

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>then move on. Because the minute you get in the

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>weeds about like, well, my rank was technically this, but

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>then I didn't fill out the paperwork, and then it's that,

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and then yes it was an operation, then you're playing

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>into their you know, what they want you to be

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about. The other thing that I would say is,

1:00:25.560 --> 1:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know when he immediately goes you know, if it

1:00:27.560 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't this, it'd be my kid being you know, expressing love.

1:00:30.280 --> 1:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It'd be the attack of my dog. I don't know

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if you guys saw this, but there was this whole

1:00:33.720 --> 1:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>like online conspiracy about how he was lying about it.

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I was insane. It was so ridiculous, and the Right

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>has given him that out because they have been they

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do have tim walls'ter arrangement syndrome, and they have attacked

1:00:46.280 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>him for some of the most ridiculous things. So if

1:00:49.320 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this you know, attack on him quote unquote misrepresenting his

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>military service, if this was going to stick, they needed

1:00:56.240 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to stay in this lane rather than now trying to

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dig up like most absurd minor. There was that story

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>about oh, he said he got an award from the

1:01:05.560 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Chamber of Commerce, but actually it was the Junior Chamber

1:01:09.440 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of Commerce, gotcha. So they kind of you know, backed

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves into a corner by having Tim Wall's arrangement syndrome

1:01:16.520 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and attacking him for his kid and his dog and

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>getting whether it was the Chamber of Commerce or the

1:01:21.040 --> 1:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Junior Chamber of Commerce wrong, or having a rally sign

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that was like, you know, didn't have all the context

1:01:26.200 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of his service and operation enduring freedom or whatever.

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I think that's right.

1:01:32.440 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 4>This one other question, because again this is all new.

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 4>This was not ever many days ago. This was not

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 4>on either of your BINGO cards, especially yours. You had

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>to clarify that you had said that you and your

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>wife used IBF, but it turned out you used a

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 4>different kind of fertility in order to have children. And

1:01:50.880 --> 1:01:52.480
<v Speaker 4>then when you ran for Congress in two thousand and six,

1:01:52.560 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>your campaign repeatedly made all statements about a nineteen ninety

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 4>five arrest for drunken reckless driving. What do you say

1:01:59.400 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 4>to voters who aren't sure whether they can take you

1:02:02.400 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 4>at your word.

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:04.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, I've been very public. I think they can see

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 8>my students come out, former folks I've served with, and

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 8>they vouch for me. I certainly own my mistakes when

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:11.680
<v Speaker 8>I make them. The one thing I'll tell you is

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 8>of I wished in this country wouldn't have to do this.

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:16.160
<v Speaker 8>I spoke about our infertility issues because it's hell and

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 8>families know this. And I spoke about the treatments that

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 8>were available to us that had those beautiful children there.

1:02:21.560 --> 1:02:23.200
<v Speaker 8>That's quite a contrast in folks that are trying to

1:02:24.280 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 8>take those rights away from us. And so I think

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:29.480
<v Speaker 8>people know who I am, they know that record, They've

1:02:29.480 --> 1:02:31.520
<v Speaker 8>seen that I've taught thousands of students. I've been out there,

1:02:31.600 --> 1:02:34.919
<v Speaker 8>and I won't apologize for peaking passionately, whether it's guns

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 8>and schools or protecting you reproductive rights. The contrast could

1:02:37.840 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 8>not be clear between what we're running against. The Vice

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 8>President's position on this has been clear, and I think

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:44.160
<v Speaker 8>most Americans get it if you've been through that. I

1:02:44.160 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 8>don't think they're cutting hairs on IVF or IUI. I

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 8>think what they're cutting hairs on as an abortion band

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:49.400
<v Speaker 8>and the ability to be able to deny familis the

1:02:49.480 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 8>chance to have a beautiful child.

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>See that I think is handled as well as you can.

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And to say, you know, I own my mistakes. But

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's the point. Let me take it back

1:02:58.360 --> 1:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the political issue.

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Because he got correct me on I don't know quite

1:03:04.600 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the details. They got some fertility treatment, but it wasn't IVF.

1:03:07.600 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't technically IVF. Yeah, so in any case, which again,

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>like I think, if I think.

1:03:16.760 --> 1:03:19.720
<v Speaker 2>His point that the the like depth of the pain

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and anxiety associated with it is equivalent, probably is what

1:03:23.920 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 2>he's saying.

1:03:24.400 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's.

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Fair exactly, And like I said, just you know, shifting

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it from him and what he said to the issue itself,

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>which is clearly a strong one for Democrats, as evidenced

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>by Donald Trump himself sort of freaking out about it.

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably the best way that you that

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk about.

1:03:40.200 --> 1:03:44.880
<v Speaker 7>That, Vice President Harris, you were a very strong.

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I also just wanted to mention, I don't know if

1:03:46.040 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you noticed Kamla's face like looking at him while he's speaking,

1:03:48.520 --> 1:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>but she loves this guy, because she clearly has a

1:03:51.240 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of affection for him. It's very clear it's like

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a proud mom looking at him while he's talking.

1:03:57.760 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Defender of President Biden's capacity to serve another four years.

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Right after the debate, you insisted that President Biden is

1:04:03.200 --> 1:04:06.200
<v Speaker 4>extraordinarily strong given where we are now, Do you have

1:04:06.240 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 4>any regrets about what you told the American people?

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:11.480
<v Speaker 5>No, not at all, not at all. I have.

1:04:13.120 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 6>Served with President Biden for almost four years now, and

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 6>I'll tell you it's one of the greatest honors of

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:18.040
<v Speaker 6>my career.

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 5>Truly.

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:22.920
<v Speaker 6>He cares so deeply about the American people. He is

1:04:23.000 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 6>so smart and loyal to the American people, and I

1:04:28.640 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 6>have spent hours upon hours with him, being in the

1:04:31.240 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 6>Oval office or the situation room. He has the intelligence,

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 6>the commitment, and the judgment and disposition that I think

1:04:39.560 --> 1:04:43.600
<v Speaker 6>the American people rightly deserve in their president. By contrast,

1:04:43.600 --> 1:04:47.240
<v Speaker 6>the former president has none of that. And so one,

1:04:48.320 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 6>I am so proud to have served as vice president

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:53.400
<v Speaker 6>to Joe Biden. And two, I'm so proud to be

1:04:53.680 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 6>running with Tim Walls for President of the United States

1:04:56.840 --> 1:05:00.640
<v Speaker 6>and to bring America what I believe the American people deserve,

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 6>which is a new way forward and turn the page

1:05:03.600 --> 1:05:06.240
<v Speaker 6>on the last decade of what I believe has been

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 6>contrary to where the spirit.

1:05:09.320 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Of our country really lies.

1:05:10.520 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But the last so she pivots there from you know,

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>do you love Joe Biden? Yes, I love Joe Biden too,

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about Donald Trump. You know, let's let

1:05:18.960 --> 1:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>me let me get off this whole Joe Biden situation

1:05:21.000 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as quick as I can and talk about this guy

1:05:22.640 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're growing up against.

1:05:23.560 --> 1:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's how the whole country feels. So it's kind

1:05:26.760 --> 1:05:27.439
<v Speaker 2>of an easy one.

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what she's betting on too, is you know, it's

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of her strengths has been the not

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>going back frame of the campaign, which I think a

1:05:37.240 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people do relate to. Of like, even though

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>she's the sitting vice president, she feels like turning a page.

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>As she said, she feels like she's kind of the

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>change candidate, even though in a lot of ways she

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is reflective of, you know, continuing the status quo of

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, and so she benefits from being in

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the vice president in the vice presidential office and people

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>being able to envision her in that role, but also

1:06:02.040 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling like just because frankly, of her identity and her

1:06:05.600 --> 1:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>relative youth, etcetera feeling like she is a turning of

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the page to a different era.

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:06:11.200 --> 1:06:13.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the polling shows people don't dislike Biden as

1:06:13.720 --> 1:06:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a person. Maybe they should, but they don't. They just

1:06:17.920 --> 1:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>didn't want him to run for re election.

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the most popular thing he's done as president. I'll say,

1:06:24.400 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, okay, we kind of like you now,

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's fine.

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So Republicans really wanted this to be because, I mean,

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it is a scandal that who knew the level of

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>his decline, Like what was going on behind the scenes

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that you all were covering up. It is a genuine scandal,

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And people Republicans really wanted this to be a problem

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for her, And people are just so relieved to not

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have Biden on the ticket that and there's such overwhelming

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>support for him making that move that I just it

1:06:54.720 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>has not landed as a political attack whatsoever.

1:06:57.520 --> 1:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because by virtue of the scandal that it was

1:07:00.000 --> 1:07:01.800
<v Speaker 2>scandal was that he was trying to run for reelection.

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>By not running for reelection, the scandal goes away.

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>True. Yeah, that's true.

1:07:07.160 --> 1:07:08.640
<v Speaker 4>This decade, of course, the last three and a half

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>years has been part of your administration.

1:07:10.560 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm talking about an era that started about a decade

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.000
<v Speaker 6>ago where.

1:07:14.840 --> 1:07:17.160
<v Speaker 5>There is some suggestion warped.

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 6>I believe it to be that the measure of the

1:07:20.760 --> 1:07:22.320
<v Speaker 6>strength of a leader is based on who you beat

1:07:22.400 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 6>down instead of where I believe most Americans are, which

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:28.160
<v Speaker 6>is to believe that the true measure of the strength

1:07:28.160 --> 1:07:29.680
<v Speaker 6>of a leader is based on who you lift up.

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 6>That's what said stake as much as any other detail

1:07:32.320 --> 1:07:33.960
<v Speaker 6>that we could discuss in this election.

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 7>Because we haven't had a chance to talk. I'm just curious.

1:07:37.800 --> 1:07:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Staying on President Biden, when he called you and said

1:07:40.520 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>he was pulling out of the race, what was that

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 4>like And did he offer to endorse you right away

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:45.560
<v Speaker 4>or did you ask for it?

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Hard heading question there, Ryan right, It's like this is

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>related a Steel herself for this one.

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>This is when you really are starting to sympathize with

1:07:54.400 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the conservative criticism of outlets like CNN, where are like, seriously, like,

1:08:02.040 --> 1:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>if you're Vanity Fair and you're doing like a magazine profile,

1:08:05.760 --> 1:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>this is interesting stuff and then you can write some

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>flowery narrative around it for a sit down interview that

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>with the presidential candidate hasn't given an interview yet. You

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>got to use your time to hit them on policy.

1:08:19.400 --> 1:08:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Well that's the thing too. You know, having done these interviews,

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you and I both with presidential candidates or other type

1:08:26.040 --> 1:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of candidates, you know, you are very aware. I've got

1:08:29.840 --> 1:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>a clock ticking from the moment we say go until

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment is over, and I have to be very

1:08:37.160 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>strategic about what I get in and what is most consequential,

1:08:41.640 --> 1:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and try to either I'm going to

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>really drill in on a couple of issues, or I'm

1:08:46.680 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a wide ranging conversation hit on as many

1:08:49.320 --> 1:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>possible things as I can. I think that's probably the

1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>approach I would take here, just because she hasn't given

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it in so we don't have her on the record,

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So I would try to get her on the record

1:08:56.960 --> 1:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on as many issues as you possibly could. So to

1:08:59.720 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>spend and you know, there's five minutes left in this interview.

1:09:03.479 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes you can get a lot accomplished, and all

1:09:06.000 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of it is just dedicated. You're about to hear Takamala

1:09:08.360 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about like cooking pancakes and her adorable, admittedly adorable

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>baby nieces wanting more bacon and whatever. When Joe Biden

1:09:15.720 --> 1:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>calls it was.

1:09:19.760 --> 1:09:22.360
<v Speaker 5>It was a Sunday. So here, I'll give you a

1:09:22.360 --> 1:09:23.200
<v Speaker 5>little too much information.

1:09:23.320 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 7>Go for it. There's no such things a vice president.

1:09:26.160 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 6>My family was staying with us and including my baby nieces,

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:36.120
<v Speaker 6>and we had just had pancakes and you know, Auntie,

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:36.920
<v Speaker 6>can I have more bacon?

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:39.559
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I'll make you more bacon. And then we were

1:09:39.680 --> 1:09:42.560
<v Speaker 5>gonna sit We were sitting down to do a puzzle.

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 6>And the phone rang and it was Joe Biden and

1:09:47.040 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 6>he told me what he decided to do. And I

1:09:51.360 --> 1:09:55.639
<v Speaker 6>asked him, are you sure? And he said yes, And

1:09:58.160 --> 1:09:59.320
<v Speaker 6>that's how I learned about it.

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:01.439
<v Speaker 7>About the endorsement. Did you ask for it?

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:04.240
<v Speaker 5>He was very clear that he was going to support me.

1:10:04.280 --> 1:10:05.599
<v Speaker 4>So when he called to tell you, he said, I'm

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:06.759
<v Speaker 4>pulling out of the race and I'm going.

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 7>To support you.

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:08.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, my first thought was not about me, to be

1:10:08.880 --> 1:10:11.760
<v Speaker 6>honest with you, My first thought was about him, To

1:10:11.800 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 6>be honest, I think history is going to show a

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:19.679
<v Speaker 6>number of things about Joe Biden's presidency. I think history

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:22.240
<v Speaker 6>is going to show that in so many ways it

1:10:22.280 --> 1:10:26.759
<v Speaker 6>was transformative. Be it on what we have accomplished around

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:30.760
<v Speaker 6>finally investing in America's infrastructure, investing in new economies in

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:31.560
<v Speaker 6>new industries.

1:10:31.880 --> 1:10:33.760
<v Speaker 5>What we have done to bring.

1:10:33.560 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Our allies back together and have confidence in who we

1:10:36.280 --> 1:10:39.000
<v Speaker 6>are as America and grow that alliance. What we have

1:10:39.080 --> 1:10:42.479
<v Speaker 6>done to stand true to our principles, including the one

1:10:42.479 --> 1:10:44.400
<v Speaker 6>of the most important international rules and norms, which is

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:47.880
<v Speaker 6>the importance of sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I think

1:10:48.040 --> 1:10:50.479
<v Speaker 6>history is going to show not only has Joe Biden

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:56.360
<v Speaker 6>led an administration that has achieved those extraordinary successes, but

1:10:56.479 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 6>the character of the man is one that he has

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:03.719
<v Speaker 6>been in his life and career, including as a president,

1:11:03.800 --> 1:11:05.880
<v Speaker 6>quite selfless and puts American people first.

1:11:05.960 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 4>I just have to ask you both about two standout moments, aside,

1:11:09.200 --> 1:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>of course, from the addresses that you both gave, but

1:11:11.800 --> 1:11:15.280
<v Speaker 4>stand out moments that were perhaps unexpected during the convention.

1:11:15.360 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned one of them, Governor, a moment that you

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:21.799
<v Speaker 4>shared that the world shared with your son Gus.

1:11:22.080 --> 1:11:23.839
<v Speaker 7>You were speaking, the camera caught.

1:11:23.680 --> 1:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Him to another incredible softball. I did think they talked

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>about pancakes and bacon for the last five minutes, but

1:11:29.479 --> 1:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently they also you know, let Tim Wallace talk about

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>when she loves his family too. And I mean this

1:11:34.920 --> 1:11:38.759
<v Speaker 1>is look the Kamala moment. There is charming. She's charming

1:11:38.800 --> 1:11:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in that moment. It's like an in kind contribution, though, like,

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not your job. Your goal and your job and

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>these interviews isn't like to make people feel warm fuzzies

1:11:47.120 --> 1:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and do basically campaign ad for them. It's supposed to

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>be to hold power to account.

1:11:51.600 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Is there any chance that her first thought was about him?

1:11:56.000 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Any chance on her?

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Any chance whatsoever. There's a scene in Beep where Selena

1:12:03.680 --> 1:12:06.519
<v Speaker 2>Meyer gets the call that the president is not running

1:12:06.520 --> 1:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>for re election. Instead, she's gonna run. That's that's how

1:12:10.040 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>that one went down.

1:12:11.280 --> 1:12:13.639
<v Speaker 1>See, I never watched I watched like maybe two episodes

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of Deep, so I'm not familiar.

1:12:15.360 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 3>You're not prepared for this administration.

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess I got to watch it. Put that on

1:12:19.960 --> 1:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the list for me and Guyle because I don't think

1:12:22.000 --> 1:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>he's watched it. I'm not sure. Maybe he has.

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, it's it's an absolutely, it's a documentary that's.

1:12:27.720 --> 1:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Scary, scary. All right, let's finish this up.

1:12:30.840 --> 1:12:34.280
<v Speaker 4>So incredibly proud of you, so emotional saying that's my dad.

1:12:35.400 --> 1:12:37.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't know as a father, I could have

1:12:37.760 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 8>ever imagined that I'm grateful for so many reasons to

1:12:40.160 --> 1:12:42.519
<v Speaker 8>be on this ticket, but that moment to understand what

1:12:42.560 --> 1:12:45.320
<v Speaker 8>was really important to have my son feel a sense

1:12:45.360 --> 1:12:46.599
<v Speaker 8>of pride in me that I was trying to do

1:12:46.600 --> 1:12:49.080
<v Speaker 8>the right thing, and it was you you try and

1:12:49.120 --> 1:12:49.760
<v Speaker 8>protect your kids.

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 4>You don't.

1:12:50.160 --> 1:12:52.720
<v Speaker 8>It brings, it brings notoriety and things. But it was

1:12:52.760 --> 1:12:56.439
<v Speaker 8>just such a visceral emotional moment that I'm just I'm

1:12:56.439 --> 1:12:58.719
<v Speaker 8>grateful I got to experience it, and I'm so proud

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:00.080
<v Speaker 8>of him. I'm proud of him. I'm proud of all.

1:13:02.320 --> 1:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Breaking walls what it was. It was like Wall's grateful

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for visceral emotional moment with son at Dancys and breaking

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>us there.

1:13:09.560 --> 1:13:09.760
<v Speaker 5>Ryan.

1:13:09.920 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it is true that it is very rare

1:13:12.840 --> 1:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>that children, let alone take pride in their parents, but

1:13:17.000 --> 1:13:18.680
<v Speaker 2>even look at them as human beings.

1:13:19.360 --> 1:13:21.719
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I have.

1:13:21.720 --> 1:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>No doubt that was an authentically like infigurating and experience

1:13:26.280 --> 1:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>that he'll remember the rest of his life, no doubt

1:13:27.840 --> 1:13:29.960
<v Speaker 2>about it. What does that have to do with anything,

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:13:30.920 --> 1:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, to experience it, and I'm I'm so

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>proud of him.

1:13:35.160 --> 1:13:36.839
<v Speaker 8>I'm proud of him. I'm proud of hope. I'm prodiguin.

1:13:36.960 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 8>She's a wonderful mother, and these are great kids. And

1:13:39.120 --> 1:13:40.479
<v Speaker 8>I think the one thing he is talking about the

1:13:40.520 --> 1:13:42.880
<v Speaker 8>era we're in is our polittive can be better, it

1:13:42.920 --> 1:13:45.240
<v Speaker 8>can be different, We can we can show some of

1:13:45.280 --> 1:13:46.920
<v Speaker 8>these things, and we can have families involved in this.

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:49.120
<v Speaker 8>And I hope that there was a hope people felt

1:13:49.160 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 8>that out there, and I hope they hug their kids

1:13:50.439 --> 1:13:52.160
<v Speaker 8>a little tighter because you just never know and life

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:52.840
<v Speaker 8>can be kind of hard.

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>How good is he though, to immediately pivot from that

1:13:55.360 --> 1:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to like hit one of his core themes of you know,

1:13:57.840 --> 1:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we can get back to the Thanksgiving dinner table where

1:14:00.920 --> 1:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>we don't all like hate each other and dredd it

1:14:02.600 --> 1:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and whatever.

1:14:03.760 --> 1:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Pretty masterful politician.

1:14:05.640 --> 1:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he really is. I would I'd be happy to

1:14:07.880 --> 1:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just skip the Kamala harris aera and go start with

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tim Walls hair personally. Last question, have very true,

1:14:15.040 --> 1:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>very possible.

1:14:16.200 --> 1:14:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Amouna vice president. The photograph that has gone viral, you

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:21.840
<v Speaker 4>were speaking. One of your grand nieces that you were

1:14:21.880 --> 1:14:25.360
<v Speaker 4>just talking about was watching you accept the nomination. You

1:14:25.400 --> 1:14:28.519
<v Speaker 4>didn't explicitly talk about gender or race in your speech,

1:14:28.720 --> 1:14:30.559
<v Speaker 4>but obviously means a lot to a lot of people,

1:14:30.600 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 4>and that viral picture really says it.

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:36.000
<v Speaker 7>What does it mean to you?

1:14:36.000 --> 1:14:39.360
<v Speaker 6>You know, I listen, I am running because I believe

1:14:39.560 --> 1:14:41.479
<v Speaker 6>that I am the best person to do this job

1:14:41.520 --> 1:14:45.880
<v Speaker 6>at this moment for all Americans, regardless of race and gender.

1:14:46.800 --> 1:14:49.439
<v Speaker 6>But I did see that photograph and I was deeply

1:14:49.439 --> 1:14:51.400
<v Speaker 6>touched by it. And you're right, she's it's the back

1:14:51.400 --> 1:14:54.920
<v Speaker 6>of her head, her tool braids, and and then I'm

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:59.479
<v Speaker 6>in the front of the photograph obviously speaking and it's

1:14:59.560 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 6>very humble, very humblam.

1:15:01.120 --> 1:15:03.360
<v Speaker 7>Anyways, did she talking about it afterwards?

1:15:03.760 --> 1:15:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Oh, she had a lot to talk about.

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:08.960
<v Speaker 5>She listened to everything, and she listens to every.

1:15:08.800 --> 1:15:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Get of your hot takee oh yeah, definitely.

1:15:11.600 --> 1:15:13.519
<v Speaker 4>Man of Vice President, Governor Wells, thank you so much

1:15:13.520 --> 1:15:13.960
<v Speaker 4>for your time.

1:15:14.280 --> 1:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. But that last answer very emblematic

1:15:18.400 --> 1:15:21.479
<v Speaker 1>of how she has. She's really adopted more of an

1:15:21.479 --> 1:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Obama approach to the quote unquote historic nature of her candidacy.

1:15:25.760 --> 1:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>She lets it speak for herself. She really wants to

1:15:28.320 --> 1:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>give comfort to everyone that listen, I'm not going to

1:15:31.120 --> 1:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about like all this black stuff. I'm just I'm

1:15:32.960 --> 1:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a president for everybody. And if it

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>means something to you, that's great, but that's not what

1:15:37.040 --> 1:15:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm That's not the reason I'm here. And I think

1:15:39.520 --> 1:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's sad that that's what she has to do. But

1:15:41.560 --> 1:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the right approach. I mean. But on

1:15:43.200 --> 1:15:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, like, obviously, representation matters and it does

1:15:46.520 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>speak for itself, but more important is Okay, what are

1:15:48.880 --> 1:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you going to do on Roe versus way that is

1:15:50.960 --> 1:15:53.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be much more impactful to all women versus

1:15:54.000 --> 1:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you yourself Kamala Harris transcending to this position of power.

1:15:58.360 --> 1:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but yeah, again, if you're a conservative watching that,

1:16:02.520 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>you're like.

1:16:02.920 --> 1:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>How is this a how? How is this a Is

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>this a journalist?

1:16:08.240 --> 1:16:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Like?

1:16:08.320 --> 1:16:09.160
<v Speaker 3>What's going on here?

1:16:09.479 --> 1:16:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1:16:10.000 --> 1:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>And it's fine, Like it is a cool picture.

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:15.120
<v Speaker 2>And for the public to end Democrats in particular to

1:16:15.240 --> 1:16:17.120
<v Speaker 2>like love the picture, that's great.

1:16:18.160 --> 1:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>But for the.

1:16:19.160 --> 1:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Media like to take the opportunity of this interview to

1:16:22.960 --> 1:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>just elevate that and give her an opportunity to sell

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>it more, it's just I mean, Cana's gonna do what

1:16:29.200 --> 1:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna do.

1:16:29.760 --> 1:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, yeah, they can't.

1:16:31.439 --> 1:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>They can't complain then when people see them as Democratic

1:16:34.880 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Party apparatriics.

1:16:36.040 --> 1:16:41.479
<v Speaker 1>That's it's that's exactly right overall, t LDR. What what

1:16:41.520 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>grade do you give her? Do you think this is

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be consequential in any way? Are there any

1:16:46.040 --> 1:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>moments from this that sort of survived the weekend?

1:16:48.640 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>She she did fine enough.

1:16:50.680 --> 1:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, it was much better than her

1:16:55.400 --> 1:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>previous interviews. It was it was pretty easy interview, Like

1:17:00.360 --> 1:17:02.960
<v Speaker 2>there were no really tough questions. The only reason that

1:17:03.080 --> 1:17:05.240
<v Speaker 2>questions were tough is because there were some obvious ones,

1:17:05.280 --> 1:17:07.519
<v Speaker 2>like you used to say the complete opposite of what

1:17:07.560 --> 1:17:11.400
<v Speaker 2>you say now, why right? Like, but you know, she

1:17:12.000 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 2>didn't do the word salad that she's famous for for

1:17:14.600 --> 1:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the most part, And so I think, like, like we

1:17:18.000 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 2>were saying earlier, unlike Obama, who people really vested all

1:17:22.600 --> 1:17:25.760
<v Speaker 2>of their hopes and dreams into and were willing to

1:17:25.840 --> 1:17:29.200
<v Speaker 2>let them lead them wherever, That's not how people feel

1:17:29.200 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 2>about Harris. They just want her to not fall over,

1:17:33.160 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and they will, like the crowd will like carry her

1:17:35.280 --> 1:17:36.600
<v Speaker 2>on their shoulders across.

1:17:36.320 --> 1:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>The finish line.

1:17:37.600 --> 1:17:40.759
<v Speaker 2>They're like, just just be alive, just be better than Biden.

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and she's doing that.

1:17:43.439 --> 1:17:43.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's also the case that the bar has been it

1:17:47.840 --> 1:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is fair to say the bar has been said exceptionally

1:17:49.720 --> 1:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>low because of Biden, but also because all we've really

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>seen of her for the Biden administration has been like

1:17:58.840 --> 1:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>whatever words ouid clip have been cut and shared viraly.

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a caricature of her number one and

1:18:07.120 --> 1:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>number two that forgets some of the moments where she

1:18:09.479 --> 1:18:12.479
<v Speaker 1>has been strong and capable, and she's obviously you know,

1:18:12.560 --> 1:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>she's I think she also has an added confidence and

1:18:16.360 --> 1:18:18.519
<v Speaker 1>swagger in this moment she didn't previously have. And I

1:18:18.520 --> 1:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>also think she probably grew on the job as vice president.

1:18:21.240 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, even though we weren't seeing everything she was doing,

1:18:23.160 --> 1:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>she was doing some stuff and having to get reps

1:18:26.320 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>in and hone some of her skills and get better.

1:18:29.080 --> 1:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think she I think Republicans will be

1:18:33.240 --> 1:18:36.719
<v Speaker 1>disappointed that she isn't actually the caricature that they had

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in their mind where she's just totally incapable of answering

1:18:41.840 --> 1:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>any question without a script right in front of her

1:18:44.320 --> 1:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or someone holding her hand, et cetera.

1:18:47.120 --> 1:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that she had a month to prepare

1:18:49.000 --> 1:18:51.920
<v Speaker 2>for it. Yeah, and so she did some prep. There

1:18:52.000 --> 1:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>was the previously the concern among her departed staff was

1:18:55.320 --> 1:18:58.559
<v Speaker 2>that she refused to prepare for interviews and flubbed you know,

1:18:58.640 --> 1:19:01.759
<v Speaker 2>easy questions questions. Yeah, she did that at the start

1:19:01.760 --> 1:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>of this one, the day one, but was prepared for

1:19:04.920 --> 1:19:09.400
<v Speaker 2>other ones. And so yeah, it's like she should do

1:19:09.439 --> 1:19:12.000
<v Speaker 2>more of these and not make it like a national event.

1:19:13.560 --> 1:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We have to do an hour and twenty minute response

1:19:18.040 --> 1:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>parsing every single answer, because this is all we have.

1:19:21.280 --> 1:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>This is all we have at this point of you know,

1:19:23.400 --> 1:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what she's given us in terms of interview sit down.

1:19:27.720 --> 1:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this you know, what do you

1:19:29.720 --> 1:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think is the next time? Do you think now she'll

1:19:32.040 --> 1:19:33.519
<v Speaker 1>feel like, Okay, maybe I can do a few of

1:19:33.520 --> 1:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>these and I can survive it. Or do you think

1:19:35.040 --> 1:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>she'll feel like, all right, check to that box. I'm

1:19:37.920 --> 1:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to have to do another one of these

1:19:39.439 --> 1:19:40.559
<v Speaker 1>for another month and a half.

1:19:40.960 --> 1:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe she'll do one a little sooner, yeah, or maybe

1:19:45.200 --> 1:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>she'll maybe she'll just punt like because what they did,

1:19:47.720 --> 1:19:49.640
<v Speaker 2>they punted it to the end of the month, and

1:19:49.640 --> 1:19:52.160
<v Speaker 2>then they did it right before Labor Day, so they'll

1:19:52.160 --> 1:19:55.400
<v Speaker 2>skip Labor Day week next week, then they'll be under

1:19:55.439 --> 1:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>then then they got the debate like so that that'll

1:19:59.240 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 2>buy them some time. Sure, maybe not until a couple

1:20:02.040 --> 1:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>of weeks after the debate, and then there's the Walls debate,

1:20:07.600 --> 1:20:10.200
<v Speaker 2>so you know, they.

1:20:10.160 --> 1:20:12.439
<v Speaker 3>Might punt it. They'll punt it for as long as

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:14.160
<v Speaker 3>the media in the public lets them get away with it.

1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I actually think the media and the public

1:20:17.960 --> 1:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are pretty much gonna let her get away with it.

1:20:20.560 --> 1:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I don't I don't see

1:20:22.720 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that there was like a huge real back I you know,

1:20:26.120 --> 1:20:28.559
<v Speaker 1>think she probably could have. They felt pressure and the

1:20:28.600 --> 1:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>media was getting, you know, pissier and testier. There's the

1:20:32.280 --> 1:20:34.479
<v Speaker 1>other danger with this is they stop liking you and

1:20:34.520 --> 1:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they start being more aggressive with.

1:20:36.000 --> 1:20:37.559
<v Speaker 3>You, start doing tougher stories.

1:20:37.880 --> 1:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, So I think they were starting to feel

1:20:40.080 --> 1:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>some of that build. But I have a I have

1:20:42.880 --> 1:20:44.599
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that you're right, that she's going to feel

1:20:44.600 --> 1:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like I checked the box. I don't have to do

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this again for a while.

1:20:47.240 --> 1:20:47.439
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

1:20:47.880 --> 1:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So enjoy it, guys, All right, Ryan, thanks for doing

1:20:52.160 --> 1:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this with me this morning. Enjoy Yeah, enjoy the long weekend, guys,

1:20:56.360 --> 1:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy Labor Day, and we will see you back for

1:20:58.479 --> 1:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>a full breaking point show.

1:21:00.120 --> 1:21:03.639
<v Speaker 3>Got the Friday Show? Actually, Oh that's right. Yeah, later today.

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you guys had a rf K junior well RFK

1:21:07.240 --> 1:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>junior debate. That was Michael Tracy and then a field

1:21:11.080 --> 1:21:13.599
<v Speaker 1>staff who.

1:21:12.520 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Was a national previous national field director for RFK kind

1:21:16.160 --> 1:21:18.439
<v Speaker 2>of defending his decision to endorse Trump.

1:21:19.560 --> 1:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't checked that one out yet, so I'm like

1:21:21.080 --> 1:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Forwared of saying that I know Michael Tracy has been

1:21:23.160 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>going hard on the paint as he is as he

1:21:25.400 --> 1:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is wont to do so. All right, y'all enjoy that,

1:21:29.479 --> 1:21:31.519
<v Speaker 1>check out drive site News, and I will see you

1:21:31.560 --> 1:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>guys back here on Tuesday. By y'all,