WEBVTT - X Risks

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You are a human being, and one day you will die.

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>But when you die, you can take comfort in the

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that you're part of something larger than yourself. You're

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a member of the human race, and as long as

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the human race continues, in some ways, you do too.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>All of us, every living thing, are individual members in

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a cycle of life and death that began four billion

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago when that first single living cell divided into two.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Two billion years after that, along came sex, and birth

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 1>led to more sex, led to more birth, And as

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>long as that cycle continues in a species, death can

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>happen in the background. It must happen. Really. It may

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sound a little cruel, but in the bigger picture, the

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>death of one thing is kind of meaningless so long

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>as the species continues. Humans tend to divide life along

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the borders between species, and for good reason. It's not

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>an arbitrary dividing line. A species is what makes the

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>difference between eating a meal and engaging and cannibalism. Across

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the animal kingdom, individuals routinely do things that risk their

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>own life to save members of their species. You almost

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>never see that kind of behavior between different species. True,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of examples of species where eating one's

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>own kind is an everyday act, and there are examples

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of adorable dogs adopting motherless lambs, But the chances are

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>better than not that an animal will show preferential treatment

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>towards a member of its species over others. Most importantly, though,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>any member of a species can combine their genes with

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>another member and come up with new and fascinating ways

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to push the species further along the evolutionary path where

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's better able to grow and flourish. Homo sapiens, the

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>species that you, me and every human alive are members of,

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>means in Latin wise human, and it's a bit of

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.639
<v Speaker 1>flattery since it is the name that we human beings

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>gave to ourselves. But here today, so far removed from

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>our ancient origins, it's easy to forget that the name

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is meant to distinguish us from other types of humans.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>As recently as fifty thousand years ago, we shared this

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>planet with no less than three other human species. In

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the same way you might walk about the Earth today

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and come upon a lion, one species of cat, and

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>tabby an entirely different species of cat. In the very

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>recent geological past, you would have been able to meet

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>with a Neanderthal in a French cave and a Denisovan

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.559
<v Speaker 1>in Siberia, and had you wandered on down to Indonesia,

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you would have been able to meet a tiny variety

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of human called Homo floresiensis, who stood four ft talls. Today,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>though there is only the one species of human us,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens. We can't say for certain, but we strongly

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>suspect that the ultimate reason why we are the only

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ones left is because of our intelligence. Perhaps the planet

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was presented with a series of tricky environmental challenges and

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>we were the only ones intelligent enough to successfully negotiate them.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was the universally devastating step in the great filter,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that's not right at all. We've only recently

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>discovered that denis Ovans and Floresiensis existed, but we've known

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>about Neanderthals for some two hundred years now, and over

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>time we've come to realize that they weren't the dim

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>wits we initially took them for. We now know that

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they used tools like us, and they may have mastered

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fire as well, and Neanderthals might have been the earliest

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>humans to bury their dead, which shows the capacity to

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think about abstractions like an afterlife. Whether or not we

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>were the only human species with the capacity for abstract thought,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>The one thing we can say for certain is that we,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens, are the only ones left on Earth. To

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder at the immense responsibility we have to simply carry

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on is the one single remaining species of our kind.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That responsibility to survive and thrive is big enough just

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>being the only human species left on Earth, but it

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>grows to overwhelming proportions when you consider the idea that

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we could be the only intelligent life and the whole

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>endless universe. The precariousness of our situation begins to sink.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>In The family paradox appears to show that the entire

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>future of intelligent life in the universe rests on the

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of us staying alive. The entire population of Homo

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>floresiensis the species of tiny humans lived on a single

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>island called Flores in modern day Indonesia. They lived there

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for almost a hundred and fifty thousand years, and then

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 1>suddenly they disappeared. One current theory for their extinction is

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that a volcano erupted and killed them all off, which

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>would have been relatively easy, since the entire species dweled

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>only on that one island. We humans alive today call

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>our island Earth, and we have to wonder what our

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>volcano will be. Right now, there are about seven and

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a half billion of us humans alive. Seven and a

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>half billion is an enormous number, to be sure, but

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a small fraction, tiny fraction of all the Homo

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sapiens who have ever lived. In the fifty thousand years

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>since we emerged as modern humans early on and continuing

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for most of our species history, we had an extremely

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>short average life expectancy, somewhere around ten to twelve years.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that the average person died at age eleven.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>It means that if you take all the people who

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>lived into old age and all the children who died

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in infancy or at birth, so many people died young

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that the average age of death was dragged down all

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the way into the tweens. Plenty of people lived into

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what we would consider old age. It's just that many,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>many more didn't survive childhood. And this is how it

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>was for most of human history. That extremely high childhood

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>mortality rate was eventually overcome. Through the use of our

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>clever sapiens brains, we figured out things like germ theory

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and anatomy and nutrition, and all of them converged to

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>create a world that a child could be born into

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>where they had a very good chance of surviving into adulthood.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>We humans used our brains to help our species be

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>better able to survive, and as a result, our population

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>began to boom. Around two thousand years ago, there were

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>probably three hundred million people alive on Earth. About three

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty years ago, the human population had grown

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to five million. Thirty years from now we will hit

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the ten billion mark, So in just three hundred and

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty years we will have grown by nine billion, five

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred million people. All told, you can count yourself as

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the hundred and eight billion modern humans who

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have ever lived. An astronomical number, to be sure, But

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the number of humans who have ever lived, as immense

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>as it is, is a drop in the bucket of

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of humans who haven't lived yet. This is

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>philosopher Toby ord Our. Species Homo sapiens is about two

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand years old UM, so that's about two thousand

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>centuries that we've been around. If we could survive that

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>long again, uh, you know, we'd see two thousand centuries

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of civilization. That's about twenty times longer than civilization has

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>been around so far, with just wondrous things being created

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>throughout that whole time that we can barely imagine. And

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's even with relatively little in the way of fancy

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>science fiction technological progress that we might imagine. Remember back

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about the possibility that we don't see

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.119
<v Speaker 1>alien life in the universe because they opted to stay

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>home instead, Let's say that we humans have that same

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>type of home body nous in our far future, sticking

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>around on Earth rather than spreading out into the rest

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of the galaxy. So Earth remains the only planet where

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you can find a human population. And let's say that

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>over the course of a billion years our population gradually

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>lowers and stabilizes, that one billion people alive on the

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>planet at any given time, And if our lifespans stick

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>around where it is today, then by a billion years

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>from now, an additional ten to the sixteenth power humans

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>will have been born. That's ten with fifteen zeros after it,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>ten quadrillion, a million, trillion future human lives hundred and

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>eight billion doesn't seem quite so big now. That ten

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 1>quadrillion number is a low end estimate. If we do

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>nothing but continue to plot along as a species for

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the next billion years, we could expect to reach it,

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But we might also increase the number of future human

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lives dramatically if we humans in a a as a species.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways that most futurists expect we will

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>innovate is by leaving our bodies behind and entering into

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>a digital world, becoming what's called a post biological species.

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that we learned how to free the human mind

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>from its bonds to the neurons and dendrites and axons

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that make up the functioning human brain. No real reason

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that the human mind should require our selves to think

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and to experience. What if the human brain is just

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>one of many ways to produce what we call consciousness.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>What if there are other ways that could produce the

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>same thoughts, the same experiences, but with hardware instead of squishy, soft,

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>extremely fragile material we call the brain. To understand how

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we could create consciousness inside a machine rather than a

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>human brain, you should know a little bit about the

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hard problem. First, Back in The Philosopher of the Mind,

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>David chaw Mers published a paper where he divided our

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>attempts to understand consciousness into the hard problem and the

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>easy problem. The easy problem of consciousness is how it arises. How,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>for example, light can enter the eye and be carried

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>along as an electrical impulse to the brain, where it's

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>analyzed and sorted into the image of a house plant.

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>We generally understand how the various parts involved in this

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>process work. We pretty much understand how the sights and

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sounds of the external world are perceived by us. There's

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>no mystery to it. So although we haven't worked out

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>every last detail of how consciousness arises from our brains,

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in Chalmer's view, we were well enough along that we

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>basically had the easy problem licked already by the time

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he wrote his essay. The hard problem is how we

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>subjectively experienced those sights and sounds. How all of those experiences,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>moment to moment combine and create what we think of

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as the experience of being human. Why is it that

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than simply observing the house plant and deeming it

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>neither a threat nor food and simply disregard it, instead

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you might be reminded of your dear sweet mother who

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>loved house plants, and maybe you'll also think about how

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a house plant might brighten up your own apartment

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and maybe put you in a better mood because you've

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit down lately. In other words, why

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>should we experience the inner life that we think of

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>as ourselves? More to the point, where does this conscious

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>experience come from? We can point to the language processing

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the brain to show how we humans understand

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what the other person is saying when someone tells us

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they love us, But we can't point to the part

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of the brain that creates the incredibly rich experience those

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>words can arouse in us. That is the hard problem

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness. To some people, we will never figure out.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>The answer to the hard problem. Human conscious experience is

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>too ethereal to ever understand. To those on the other side,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>we've already solved the hard problem. It's the same answer

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is the easy problem. All of those neurons and dendrites

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and axons that are responsible for communicating and sorting and

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>storing the sensory input in our brains are also the

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>same parts that are responsible for creating our conscious experience.

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>We just haven't figured out how they do it quite yet.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>If that's true, and the hard problem really isn't a

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hard problem at all, there's a big implication in there.

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 1>If consciousness is just an emergent property of neural complexity,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like how tens of thousands of individual bees form a

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>high mind that is larger than the sum of its parts,

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then we should be able to simulate consciousness by simulating

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>neural complexity. Maybe not today, maybe not anytime soon, but

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the point is it would be theoretically possible, and given

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>enough time in technological development, it's a pretty safe bet

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that we will figure out how to do it. If

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there is an organizing principle of life that takes hold

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>once molecules begin to take an organic form, then perhaps

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the bio logical form. It's just one phase of evolution.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps post biology is just another stage. If or when

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we become capable of uploading human minds on the computers,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of future human lives will increase exponentially, and

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 1>those lives can be expected to be exponentially better than

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>the average life of those of us alive today. If

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>we are the only intelligent life in the universe and

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That means that should we become capable of spreading out

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>in our galaxy and then eventually throughout the rest of

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe, it will all be there for our taking.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Though farther out we look in more detail, and the

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more clearly we see there's nothing at all alive anywhere

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, then it says we are really quite special.

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Not only that we are special for having, you know,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>created cars and televisions, we are just special for being

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on a planet that has life at all. Ah and

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>the universe will remain dead until the life on our

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>planet spreads. That was great filter theorist Robin Hanson. Once

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we spread beyond Earth, we will reach one of the

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>largest milestones in the history of our species, in the

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>history of life. Really, we will no longer be earth bound.

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>We will have become a spacefaring species with an entire

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>universe to explore and use for whatever we want. All

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of the resources material and energy in the universe that

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we can reach before it inflates beyond our grasp is

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there for our use in ours alone. This is what

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>an Oxford University philosopher named Nick Bostrom calls humanity's cosmic

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>endowment and The key thing about it is that it

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's astronomically large. Every less scrap of accomplishment

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that we humans have managed to achieve in our relatively

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>short time here on Earth has been created with extremely

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>limited resources compared to what will be available to us

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>when we begin to spread out around the universe. If

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>things are the way they look that what we have

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been able to play our hands on so far is

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a period of time maybe a thousand, ten thousand years

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of human history and some hundred thousand years of prehistory.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of our species tenure so far, and we've

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>been confined to the surface of planet Earth, which is

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this little crumb floating around in a huge style of

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>material and energy and resources. So it's one planet in

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>one solar system out of a hundred billion solar systems

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in this galaxy, which is it's so one of maybe

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred building galaxies that could be reached from our

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>starting point and then used for billions of years. So

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>if you add all of those orders of magnitude together,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you find that by some very large number, it dominates

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>what exists today or has existed through human history. What

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>will we do with all that stuff? I don't know,

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>but it at least seems to me that protecting a

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>chance to do that is critically important. If, as a

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>great many philosophers throughout history have believed the point of

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>life is finding happiness, then we could use it to

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>pursue happiness on a massive scale. If you, for example,

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that happy people are our minds experiencing pleasure

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or beauty or doing interesting things have value, then that

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>could just be a lot more like a lot more

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of those in the future, a lot more like a

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>quadrillion more, and that number could grow exponentially higher if

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>or when we reach that point of post biology, like

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>any post biological civilization, we would place a pretty high

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>value on converting all of that into computing power. The

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>science fiction author Ray Bradberry once estimated that the energy

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>captured from a star could power tend to the forty

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>second computer operations per second. So Nick Bostrom took that

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>figure and he applied it to a post biological society

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with access to all of the stars that we can

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reach in the universe until they inflate forever out of

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>our grasp. If the human brain makes in the neighborhood

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of ten to the seventeenth operations per second to produce

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>our conscious experience, then it's a pretty fair bet that's

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about how many computations per second we would require to

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>experience consciousness and digital form as well. So, considering those

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers and more, Bostro included some other complex astronomical figures

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, he arrived at the low end estimate, the

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>low end of ten to the fifty second power future

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>human lives waiting to be lived expressed an American English

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that is ten sex Deicilian lives. That's a real word.

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>A number is so astoundingly large it might be tried

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to even mention that it is. And you could make

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the case that in many ways, okay, essentially every way,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>those humans in the far future will live better lives

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:02.959
<v Speaker 1>than those of us alive today, because natural selection and

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't design us to be happy, discontent other things. Being

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>equal is adaptive and fitness enhancing. And there's a transhumanist

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I very much hope that we're going to be able

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to design a civilization based on to use a slogan,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a triple ess, a civilization based on super intelligence, super happiness,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and super longevity. This is transhumanist philosopher David Pierce, who

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is among the number of people who believe that humans

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have a long and potentially bright future ahead of us.

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Humans might use all of that power to simulate amazing

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>new experiences for ourselves that we haven't considered yet and

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that would be utterly impossible in our physical reality. We

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>would be able to expand and edit our consciousness, our faculties,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>our ability to empathize with others, for capability to experience emotion.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>What we alive today might consider the high a state

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of happiness, maybe the baseline happiness for all new humans

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>born into a digital world, and so the humans of

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the future would be blissed out all the time. Here's

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>an example one sees today the effects of a drug

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like m d M A ecstasy or hug drug, in

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>which essentially people become loving, bonabo like warm, empathetic, jealousy,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>resentment evaporate UH. For evolutionary reasons, people aren't like that

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>all the time. But with the use of UH some

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>genetic tweaking, it would be possible to create people trans humans,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>post humans who who love each other in the way

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that people fleetingly do today on the m d M A.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Just how likely this scenario is. I don't know, but

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in the long run it's so be feasible because we

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>live in a world where we must compete with one

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.199
<v Speaker 1>another and other life on our planet for resources. What

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the future might be like in a world where scarcity

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist is largely inconceivable to us. Suffice it to

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.479
<v Speaker 1>say that life can be better than it is today

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>should we make it there. We can't forget the possibility

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that between us and all of those countless future lives.

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Since the Great Filter. Back in the summer of a

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>space probe launched by NASA called Viking one flew over

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Mars if photographed the planet's surface for the first time

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in human history, and prior to landing on July, Viking

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>one flew over the Sidonia region, a bumpy transition zone

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>between the planets, cratered north in the flat plains of

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the South. Within those images that it's sent back to

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>its controllers at the Jet Propulsion Lab on Earth was

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a particularly striking one. It showed what looked to be

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a massive stone face wearing a ceremonial headdress. It looked

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot like an ancient monument on the surface of Mars.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Is what it looked like It became one of the

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>more famous images in the world, the Face on Mars,

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and it stirred the imagination of earth bound humans about

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a potential Martian pass where a great civilization once lived

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and thrived. But when the Mars Global Surveyor flew over

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the site with a far better camera than the Viking

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>one had on board, it was clear the Face on

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Mars was just another mesa, shaped not by ancient Martian hands,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but by Martian wind and erosion. But what if that

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 1>image had confirmed the wildest speculations and we had mounted

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>an expedition to Mars to investigate the governments of Canada, Japan,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and the United States, the three countries leading the International

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Mars Expedition received a bundle of despat just from the

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>astronauts investigating the Mars anomaly. Today, newly discovered structures that

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>appear to be ceremonial halls and temples built from a

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>yet unidentified metal, further confirmed the one time presence of

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>an advanced civilization on the red planet. President Clinton was

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>in New York today to news like this would not

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>bode well for those of us living here on Earth.

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>As Nick Bostrom points out in an article, that ran

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in Technology Review in two thousand and eight. If we

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>were to find evidence of other intelligent life elsewhere in

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe, it would strongly suggest that the Great Filter

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>lies waiting ahead of us. News like that would tell

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>us that it's not so tough after all to get

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>past all the steps that led to us. Other life

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>managed it too. We would learn that we are not

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>special and unique, and so the likelihood would be that

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the Great Filter is not somewhere in our past, which

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>means that it must be somewhere in our future. Everything

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we've ever imagined that could go wrong is a candidate

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for a future filter. Uh. So, you know, take out

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>all of your favorite um disaster stories and fears and

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>add them all up, and it might be in there.

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It might be something we haven't imagined. If it is

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the case that the Great filters in our future, then

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason that there is no intelligent life in the

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>universe other than us is because none of those who

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>came before us were able to make it through the

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>step that lies ahead. The more you learn about the

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of risks we humans are beginning to take on,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of make up the worst of those disaster

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>scenarios Robin Hanson mentioned the more convincing the idea that

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we are now entering the great filter becomes m It's

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>probably about here that you should meet Nick Bostrom, he

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>chimed in earlier, but what I mean to say is

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that you should know more about him, as his work

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>forms a lot of the basis of this series. In Oxford, England,

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there is a university among the world's oldest, where people

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>have been teaching since at least ten nine, nearly a

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand years, and housed in a three story tan brick

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>administration building called Little gate House is the Future of

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Humanity Institute. The FHI was founded by Nick Bostrom, who,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as I said, is a philosopher, and it is a

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>center where people from a wide array of disciplines come

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>together to consider the ways that humanity could accidentally wipe

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>itself out in the near future, and also how to

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>prevent that, and also what we might do with ourselves

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>if we're able to negotiate the very tricky near future

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and actually survive into the far future. A great many

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas in this series came from those collaborations

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that arose at f HI. What Nick Bostrom mostly thinks

0:24:53.960 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about our existential risks. Existential risks are threats to life

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that have consequences so sweeping, so utterly catastrophic, that should

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them befall us, it would spell the end

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of humankind. No more humans, and if it turns out

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are the only intelligent life in the universe,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>no more intelligent life anywhere at all. What makes existential

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>threats so dangerous, in addition to the catastrophe they bring,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they are unlike any other type of risk

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>we're used to encountering. With virtually every other type of

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>threat posed to humans, we can reasonably expect that enough

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of us will be left alive to continue our species

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>should one befall us. Take a disastrous change in climate.

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>For example, imagine that a couple of decades from now,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>we humans are caught totally off guard by a sudden

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>shift in the global climate far more pronounced and abrupt

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>than the warning signs were currently experiencing. A rapid rise

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in sea levels drowns coastal towns around the world, sending

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>huge populations of people inland, which puts in a nor

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>restrain on the cities that absorb them. At the same time,

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>massive droughts and floods break out, and virtually every food

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>producing region of the world. The ecological collapse leads to

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>social collapse. Food supplies dwindle, water supplies become salty. An

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>untold number of people begin to die, more than ever

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have in human history. Even more are killed in wars

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that break out over the precious resources that remain. In

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>just a handful of decades, the entire human race is

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>reduced from ten billion to just one hundred million people

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>living in scattered settlements across the globe. As categorically awful

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>as such an experience would be, it would not spell

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of humans. Even with just one percent of

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the population left alive. We could reasonably expect that a

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred million people living across the world would be enough

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to carry the human race along and eventually to rebuild.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>To be sure, we would be set back substantially. All

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the progress that we had made as a global

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>civilization would be pushed back thousands of years, almost to

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>square one. Almost. There's a substantial difference between the perhaps

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>fateful series of events that led to the discovery of

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>something like smelting iron and carbon into steel and having

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>people who remember learning that if you add carbon to

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>iron you can make steel, or that there's such a

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing as coffee, or that you can make wine from grapes.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you spin a magnet inside a spool of

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>copper wire, you can generate an electrical current. And if

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>you pass steam through a turbine, you can use it

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to spin that magnet, so you don't have to stand

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>there and do it yourself. The memories of all the

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>ideas and discoveries that accumulated to make up the general

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>knowledge base of the average human walking around on Earth

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would remain and would provide an enormous advantage for those

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>left to rebuild compared to those who built in the

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>first place. Consider that it was perhaps only ten thousand

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago that we began organizing ourselves into complex societies

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. Those early settlements in cities like

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>cattle Hook in Turkey and Mesopotamia in Iraq that served

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as the earliest attempts at communal living, agriculture, government, law, trade,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and everything else that forms the basis of modern civilization

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>or only about ten thousand years old. So even being

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>set back to the beginning, even with humanity suddenly dead,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we could reasonably expect that people could get back to

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>roughly the point where we're at today within about ten millennia,

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like a long time, but remember we're talking

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about time on geological and cosmological scales. Ten thousand years

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is a blink. Throughout our history, we humans have survived plagues, floods, droughts,

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>supervolcano eruptions, just about anything Earth could throw at us,

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and we've always had enough of us left after a

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>catastrophe to continue on for forward momentum to slow sometimes

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but never to halt entirely, and those eons of experience

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of disaster and recovery form the basis of how we

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>learn from the world, a process you may know as

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>trial and error. Imagine that you're a chemist working on

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a new explosive. As this customary, you keep detailed notes

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>as you go along, and then one day you're in

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the lab when boom, you blow yourself up. You are

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in a great many pieces, but your notes are intact,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and so other chemists can come along, consult your notes,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>find where you went wrong, and then try again with

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different formula. This process can continue indefinitely as

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>long as it takes until we master this new explosive

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so long as there are chemists who take good notes,

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>who are willing to risk blowing themselves up, and are

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>never all in the same lab at once. This process

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of trial and error is so glaringly obvious that it

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>seems not even worth spelling out. But it is because

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the process of trial and error is how we've gain

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>virtually all of human knowledge about the world to this point,

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and understandably so, because it works. But trial and error

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work with existential risks. When it comes to other risks,

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>humanity is very good, actually at learning from trial and error,

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have some failures and we rebuild. This is

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Toby Ord, you've met him previously. He's one of Nick

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Bostrom's colleagues at the f HI, and he's literally writing

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the book on existential risks. But when it comes to

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 1>existential risks, uh, failing even once means we've lost permanently

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>our potential for the future. So we can't have any failures,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which means that we can't use our our most successful

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>way of learning, trial and error. What separates existential risks

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from all other types of risks is the outcome, the

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>potential consequences of existential risks are so catastrophic that if

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>something goes wrong with them once, that's it for humanity.

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>With these types of risk, there isn't any one percent

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of humanity to carry on. There are none of us.

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no trial and error with existential risks. It's more

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like trial and sudden nothingness. We can't go back to

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the drawing board to figure out what went wrong and

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>try again. The drawing board will have been vaporized or

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there won't be any people left to write on it.

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's very different from many kinds of risk because, um,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>first there's no redo. Um. If we accidentally trigger some

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of existential risk or are exposed to an existentially

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>destructive event, that sort of it for humanity. Um. But

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, lots of the mechanisms that we used to

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>manage risks stop working. That was Sebastian Farquhar. He too

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is a philosopher at Oxford, and he too is with

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the f HI. Another name for existential risks is low probability,

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>high consequence risks. Fortunately, the possibility of a bad outcome

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>befalling us from any of these risks is the remote. Normally,

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't give them much thought, or any thought at all.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>But these aren't normal risks. The potential bad outcome is

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>so great that even though they have an extremely tiny

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>chance of happening, they are still worth thinking about and

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to mitigate. And that is just what Nick Bostrom

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Future of Humanity does. Back in two thousand twelve,

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in a paper on existential risks, Nick Bostrom included a

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.239
<v Speaker 1>handy graph for categorizing different types of risk. Along the

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>X axis, the horizontal one. I always have trouble remembering

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that is the severity of a risk, how catastrophic its

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>outcome could be. Bostrom has ordered the severity from imperceptible

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like losing a single hair off of your head, too

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>endurable like having your car stolen, to crushing like dying

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in a car crash. All of those terrible events are

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ones that happened to a single person, which is the

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>first category along the Y axis, the upward one, which

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is the scope or how many people that the event affects.

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>This category starts with personal and moves up to local, global,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>transgenerational affecting more than one generation of people, and pan

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>generational affecting every generation. From that point on, graphs are,

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, a lot easier to take him when you

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>see them rather than to hear about them. So let's

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>just say that the upshot of all this is that

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you can take any event and plot it on the

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>graph to find if it qualifies as an existential risk.

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's do that. Take the death of a local

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>baseball mascot. We'll go with the Richmond Flying Squirrels for

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>no reason whatsoever. Let's say that the team's mascot was

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>doing his thing up at the top of the bleachers

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>when he fell over the side all the way down

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to the concrete below, dying instantly beside the ticket booth.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>This would be a very sad day, not just for

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the person who wore the flying squirrel costume, but also

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for their family and maybe even a sizeable portion of

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Richmond, Virginia area. Yeah, so we can say that

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>this would be a local event since it affects more

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>than just one person or one family, but it definitely

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't affect humanity as a whole. And since the Flying

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Squirrels family and residents of Richmond will be able to

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>carry on, then we can say that it will be

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>an endurable event. So the tragic accidental death of the

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Richmond Flying Squirrels mascot would be a local, endurable event.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's up the stakes a little, shall we. How about

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a global thermonuclear war. This would obviously be a global event,

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and it would affect in some ways everyone alive at

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the time, whether through fiery death or from radioactive fallout,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>starvation during the nuclear winter, being forced out of one's

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>home to find a safer place to live. You can

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>make a pretty good bet that a global nuclear war

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>will affect everybody on the planet, and depending on how

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 1>bad the outcome was, the after effects it has on

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>society could continue on for some time, affecting multiple generations

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of people. Perhaps it would be transgenerational in its scope,

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but it would be pretty unlikely that it killed everyone

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>alive at the time and wiped humanity out of existence.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>There would almost certainly be enough survivors to carry on, and,

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>as we saw with that climate change disaster scenario earlier,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they should eventually return back to where we were prior

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to the nuclear war, and hopefully smart enough to avoid

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>doing it all over again once we got there. So

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>for humanity as a whole, a global nuclear war would

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be a transgenerational endurable event. But if you follow the

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 1>scale this handy graph up into the right, you will

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>find the point where existential risks live pan generational crushing events.

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't make it through those, but those are exactly

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what's coming down the pike right now. We are creating

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>new technology that poses risks to humankind in a form

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we've never encountered before, a kind that dwarf global nuclear

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>war and climate change, and we are wholly unprepared for them.

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>My hope is that this series, in some small way,

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>will make us aware that we need to prepare. That

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>there is a safe path through the coming treacherousness, but

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to plan for it now. If we can

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>make it through the process of mastering the new technology

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that will define our world artificial intelligence, advances in biotechnology

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and particle physics nanotechnology, we may secure a very bright

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and very long history for humanity, reaching long into the

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 1>far future and spreading across the universe. Technology that poses

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>an existential risk to us now is the very same

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that can prevent existential risks from befollowing us once we've

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>mastered them, a point called technological maturity. We're entering the

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 1>most precarious period now the point between where those unprecedentedly

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>dangerous technologies come into existence and where we have them

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>fully under control. Any time between those two points, one

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>single slip up, one single lab accident caused by one

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>single person, one single failure to plan, one single oversight,

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>could bring about the sudden, rapid demise of humankind forever.

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Turning our back on our destiny won't help us. The

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>dye is already cast. Some self imposed return to the

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Dark Ages won't reverse our momentum. In the great filter

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that we will go through, it has become inevitable. Even

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>during the actual Dark Ages, that period of modern human

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>history where we supposedly stopped progressing intellectually, was filled with

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pockets of people and entire cultures around the world still discovering,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>still innovating. And so it would be as well if

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we all foolishly banded together to try to halt the

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>progress of science for fear of the risks that poses.

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>We are not equipped to prevent science, and we would

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not want to even if we could. It is science

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that will expose us to these risks, but it is

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>also science will free us from them forever. On the

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>other side, and It's not just us who we have

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to carry on for, it's the entire future of the

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>human race. We're carrying all of those tend to the

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>who knows what power future humans on our shoulders as

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we walk this tight rope over ruination. The way to

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>ensure our survival is not to concentrate on what's ahead,

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but instead to look down to plumb the void below.

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:30.239
<v Speaker 1>The only chance we have of navigating existential risks is

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>to understand them. On the next episode of the End

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the World with Josh Clark, the sun will basically

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fill up our entire sky. You look out the window

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>will just be a big, de seething mess of of star.

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We've lived with natural existential risks since the dawn of humanity.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 1>When bad things happen to Earth, they happen to us

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, and that will be so as long as

0:38:58.000 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we remain an earth bound species.