WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Better or Worse?

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The following He's a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football clubs. Are you ready for

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break. Yeah, and so much for that.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>April first, two thousand and twenty, Season sixteen, Episode number three.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another edition of The break We are live

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>from multiple locations, all at our homes, uh and safely

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>at our homes. But we got an hour to talk

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to you guys about some Cowboys ball. Here on the

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>break Out my guy Nick, Amber Dave, and we're ready

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to go. What do you guys, How are you guys

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling today? Awesome? Derek feeling real good man, Thanks for

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>having me. That sounded really enthusiastic. Yeah, that sounded really enthusiastic. Nick.

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>After the long pause, we got a lot to talk

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about today. There have been a couple of signings since

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>our last show, and we have some other some other

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>things are gonna get into. We'll talk a little about

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the running back position today. Actually, we're gonna start a

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Position series where each day each show, we're gonna go

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>through a particular position and talk about where the Cowboys

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>are coming out of last season heading into this next season.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Understanding there are going to be free agency and h

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>and draft moves that will be made, but just talking

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>about where the Cowboys are at this point. So let's

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 1>dive right in, starting first with the signing of kicker

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg Zeroline. He signs a three year, three point five

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollars guaranteed deal. I'll ask you guys the question

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just simply, do you think this was a good move

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys. Yeah, I mean I think that you

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the kicker position, we didn't we have a

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of certainty there for the last three or four years,

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, so maybe the last couple of years. But

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Zeroline is a guy that that you know, obviously they

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>call him Greg the Leg for a reason, and he

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can kick it, you know, sixty yarders or so. But

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year that that doesn't that's you need

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>more than that. So I think it's a good move.

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm kind of always hesitant about veteran

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>kickers because I think you're a great kicker until you're not.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And then, and I've seen it firsthand, so I hope

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that he still you know, has some left in the

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>tank there and he can make the intermediate kicks. I

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's the biggest thing for him. I honestly, I

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think Derek, you actually I believe you asked this, like

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the more recent shows we did. You're like, well,

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, is resigning Kai for Bath enough? And everybody

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>said no, Like everybody in some type of competition, they

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted another kicker. I was thinking, you know, undrafted free

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>agents probably, but I'm more than happy to have a

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl or who's familiar with John Fassil or Fossil

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on the stator on the roster. He did dip last year.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He was also dealing with a foot injury. You know,

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw it firsthand. Nick's right, like, when you lose it,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>you lose it. But Dan Bailey also went on to

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>rediscover his form in Minnesota, So I'm highly optimistic this

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>guy can still kick at a high level. I'm happy

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to have him. You know, I was afraid that the

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were gonna try to bring in a kicker that

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't have much experience somewhat, you know, they like to

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>bring in those guys that no one really knows much about.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm excited that they decided to sign this guy

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and someone that's proven, that has that veteran experience, and

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to go against Kai for Bath, which was a guy

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that me personally I liked what he did last year.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I was excited. I don't think it was enough. We

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to see so much of it, but the

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>time that he did get he clearly made the best

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>out of it. He didn't miss a single kick. So

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to see this competition. We'll see what happens there,

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but two good guys. I was surprised though, that they

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>went in for a veteran guy like this. You know, yes,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>then they do have fifty five players now on the roster.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>They expanded it two spots. Now, does that mean two kickers?

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, but it wouldn't surprise me if there's some

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>team in the league that does. At some point in

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the year, we'll have a couple of kickers on the

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>roster for injury purposes or whatever. So you know, it's

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>only two spots, but I bet it comes in handy

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>at times like this, and maybe you know who knows,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe the Cowboys will have two kickers. I

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's gonna happen. But just don't forget about

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the fifty five players on the roster. Yeah, I'll mention

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>one other thing, Dave you you kind of brought up

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Jim Fossil. I think the interesting thing there is knowing

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that he was his coach last year and the fact

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that he had the foot injury suggests to me that

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at least Fossil thinks that that was the reason for

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the dip last year. You look at his numbers the

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>last several years and it actually you go back to

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, he was kicking at ninety five percent.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>He was That was a year he went to the

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl. I mean, he had a really, really great

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>year back two years ago. And so I actually am

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.799
<v Speaker 1>willing to give the benefit of the doubt there because

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I think his coach probably vouched for him here and said, yeah,

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>there was an injury concern, he played through it, he

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't kick as well. I feel like, if he's healthy,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a really good kicker, and for me, I give

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>him that benefit of the doubt. Are you guys willing

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to give that benefit of the doubt as well? Absolutely?

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. You're absolutely right.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Like his dip, his dip last year is startling compared

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to the consistency of the rest of his career, and

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>you find out that he played through an injury, it

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. What else do we know, Like NFL coach

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>love their guys, like Rod Marinelli's signing every former cowboy

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world out in Las Vegas. John Fossil gets

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to bring in the kicker that he's familiar with for

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the last eight years. I absolutely and William to give

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>him the benefit of the doubt. But the great thing

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about the kicker position is it's very easy to tell

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>how well you're doing your job. And so you know,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>he got I think he got three million or two

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half million and guarantees, which is a lot

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to give a kicker. But at the same time, you're

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to keep a guy that's not making kicks.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's very easy to determine how well

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a kicker is doing his job. So he can have

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of the doubt for the time being, but

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>training camp and preseason will ultimately determine that. You know,

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>people always say people always talk about the coaches and

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>how they know their guys, and I think this is

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those cases. But don't forget that John Fossil

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>also drafted and cut Tavon Austin, who is sitting out

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there in free agency, and you know he could they

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>need a punt returner and he knows Tavon Austin and

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not signing Tavon Austin. So sometimes familiarity can help

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a player and herd a player too. Yeah, do you

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>guys think this is going to be a competition or

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think they go into training camp with just Zerline?

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Zerolin's contract is the one that's a little bit

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>meatier than than four Bath. He only had a one

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>year deal. Do you think they take him both to camp?

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Though I would have to assume they do. Kai four

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Bath he only got one hundred and thirty thousand and guarantees, Like,

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not this crazy contract you need. I mean you

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>need multiple kickers in training camp anyway, And again like

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>why not just let him kick? And if Zerline is

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not good, it's not enough money that you would keep

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>him if he's not good, I don't know why you

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't bring him both to camp? They actually have three

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>kickers on the roster right now. So this Guyana, Tristan Biscayana,

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't know. Oh that's right, I forgot

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about him. I mean, and you can dismiss him, but like,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>if he's punted at all, then he's the guy that

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to take a camp so they can you know,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he could do some kickoff, do some punts. You know.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the third kicker punter that they always typically take

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to camp. So I don't I don't know. I don't

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>care how much experience someone has at this point at

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the kicking position. At the kicker position, I expect all

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, well, these two main guys, though the

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>other guy, the third guy that Nick mentioned, I really

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.239
<v Speaker 1>have forgotten about him, honestly. But these two main guys,

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I expect them to go out to the preseason games

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and have them both kicking at different times of the

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>games and none of that like, oh, this guy has

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>more experience, we need to kind of preserve him more,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>none of that crap. I want both of them out.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They're kicking as much as possible and hopefully picking out

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the right guy. I don't know, I just now I'm

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>just hesitating. I'm tired of getting kind of excited about

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>these kickers and then they always come up with some crap.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Ever since then Bailey left, then Bailey broke my heart,

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and then since then, I just I can't be at

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>peace with the kick in positions. So you got to

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>watch the most accurate kicker in NFL history for three years,

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and now you just can't settle for anything else. Absolutely not. Yes,

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hard to be excited about a kicker

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>just because the only time you think about a kicker

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really is when they're not doing their job. If they're

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>doing their job, you just kind of take it for

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>granted after a while, right, That's I guess that's kind

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>of my point is like ag started following the Cowboys

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.319
<v Speaker 1>at like the height of their kicking ability, and like,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate, I hate to be a downer Amber, but

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's probably never gonna be that good again. It's just

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it just is what it is. You're about to say something, Nick,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>where you gonna throwing Well, just the fact that I mean, Derek,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>you remember, I mean we sat here and we were

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>excited that Cowboys signed the great most accurate kicker of

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>all time. He was the leader in accuracy Mike Vanderjack

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>and he was terrible with the Cowboys. I mean, he

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't even make it through the season. Parcels had to

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>cut him and was so bad. And so he was

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the most accurate kicker of all time. I think Dan

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Bailey at one time was as well. That's why I'm

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of hesitant, because you know, I remember there's

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>time for David Akers was never gonna miss for the Eagles,

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>or that guy Read was never gonna miss for the Steelers,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they do and then they fall off, you know.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>But like Dave said, Bailey did kind of come back.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Vinitarians come back, and you know, and maybe Zerline will

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>do the same. And I don't think he's had a

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>huge drop off by the way too. I mean it's

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's not he wasn't as automatic as he was.

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is gonna be a good move

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. Yeah, he was last year. I think he

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>was second worse than the NFL, behind Maha, of course,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean ahead of mahar But if you look at

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the last two years before that, he kicked at eighty

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>seven percent in two eighteen, ninety five percent in two

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seventeen eighty six percent in two thousand and sixteen.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So you look at his record like he's been a

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good kicker throughout most of his career. He's had

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple down seasons. He had another season where he's

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>right at ninety three percent. So again I think that

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a kicker again, you're gonna have your

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ups and downs. And one thing we know about kickers,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>there are ebbs and flows. There are only a few

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>really great ones that are always consistently great. Most of

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>them kind of have their ebbs and flows, and you

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>hope you catch them on on an upswing and keep

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>them for as long as they're on an up swing,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and then whenever they take that down swing, then you

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>may have to move on to someone else. All right,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and talk a little bit about don

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Terry Poems deal him about time not you Derren Fount,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>time that they got the damn thing right, Yeah, I

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>mean negociating with this guy for six freaking days right

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>last week We actually mentioned it on the show because

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>at that time they were having conversations. But if the

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>deal's finally done, do you guys know the terms at

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this point? What was the deal, how much they pay

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>him end up paying him, and for how long. I

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>believe it was two years, ten and a half mil so, right,

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean right now? A bad deal? No, it's it's

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>right around their sweet spot for deals they like to do,

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like right around the five or six per year range.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not as many years as Gerald McCoy got, but

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a similar salary. So, I mean, you know, very

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>typical Cowboys signing, a little not quite scrape in the

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the barrel, but definitely bargain hunting. Yeah, And

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked last week about how much of a value

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy like that can bring to a defensive line,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>especially one that had some issues stopping the run last year.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a big guy, I think six three, three hundred

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>forty pounds big guy. But with the signing of Poe

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and the signing of McCoy together, do you think that

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>changes how the Cowboys look at the draft when it

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to the defensive tackle position. Well, I think it

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just changed. It just shows that they change what kind

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of tackle that they're valuing. They you know, the guy

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that's a little bit under size that can play inside

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is not what they're looking for right now. So I

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think it would change what they do in the

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>draft if there's somebody there that fits that mold. But

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>because you remember Poe and McCoy, you know they're at

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the downside of their career. You know this, they're just

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a little bit of resurgence there. But

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it changes what they're gonna do if

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>there's if there's somebody that fits, I just I don't

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a strong priority to now go into

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that you get a defensive tackle. But

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if like kin Law or somebody is sitting there, I

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know why you would pass on him just because

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you've signed these two veterans. I'm really I'm curious about this.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're good signings, McCoy and and Poe both.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>It fits what McCarthy said they wanted to do. They

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>can be a little multiple, you can do four three

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and three four stuff with them. I feel good about it.

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's the narrative that's going around, and it's totally fair.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>The Carolina Panthers, I believe we're fourth worst in the

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>league in rush defense last year, and that was with

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 1>Luke Keakley and Shack Thompson playing linebacker, so like, these

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't Scrubs playing linebacker behind him. And it is curious

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to me that they were so bad against the run

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with these two guys. Um, I haven't gone back and watched.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I will slash should I want to go get a

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>better feel for how these guys played. But that is curious,

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>um that that they weren't better. Um. I do like

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>these signings, but in line with that, it wouldn't stop

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>me from doing anything in the draft. Um, Well, they're

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>primarily playing, primarily playing a four man front. I don't

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know if you even know that at this point or front.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>They played way more four than three, Like McCoy did

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>play some three four end and Poe played some nose tackle,

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>but it was a four man front way more often

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than a three man front. Um, So I don't think

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it should stop him. I never really believe that they

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would take a d tackle seventeenth anyway, just because I

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>think Derek Brown and Javon ken Law will be long

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>gone by then. Um, but there's there, there's value to

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be had there. Ross Blacklock out of TCU is a

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>name that comes to mind. Jordan Elliott out of Missouri,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>justin Matt a week from Texas A and m is

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that they've been linked to. Any of those

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>guys second third round, it wouldn't stop me from doing

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>anything because I don't think this is like a long term,

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, fixer upper situation. I think they still need

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to look at that position in the draft. What do

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys, Whatever they do, I was gonna say, whatever

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>they do with this draft, whatever position they decide to

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>go with, they just need to get someone that is

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>able to contribute right away. In my opinion, last year's

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>draft to me is honestly quite forgettable except for Tony Pollard.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to really think, like sit down and think, Okay,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>who were the guys that they drafted last year? And

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>then out of that the only one that always comes

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to mind is Tony Pollard. But whoever they go with,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I just hope that it's someone that really can start

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>contributing this year rather than sitting around for a whole

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>year and starting to, you know, thinking about the future

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff. None of that crap. Okay. So

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, do you guys think that based

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on anything you saw from Tristan Hill, whether that was

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what you saw in training, camp in during the season.

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Was there any moment or any particular spark that you

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>saw from him that suggests that this year he could

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be better, especially if he has these veteran guys that

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they can help him out a little bit and

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>get in there. Do you see anything as far as

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what you expect from him this year going into the season.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest thing for him was the hiring

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of Jim Tomsula. I mean, he is just a veteran

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive line coach that he has worked with a lot

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of players and made them better. And that's I think

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the best thing that can happen for Tristan Hill. And

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that's nothing against Rod Marinelli. I mean, it's just that

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he can have some different coaching in here.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he's gonna have to be coachable. I mean,

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that he wasn't, but he had some

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>maturity issues that he needed to deal with and I

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>and you know, most players make a big league from

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one to two, whether it be their body, whether it

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>be their mind, experience, whatever, he's got to he's got

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that. I mean, they drafted

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>him to be a you know, a contributor, and they

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>went and signed Michael Bennett because he couldn't get on

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the field, so they have to he has to kind

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of want it to make that that stuff. Hopefully he will. Hopefully,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully Gerald McCoy will be part of that too, because

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in addition to being a great player over

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, you know, he's he's achieved really noteworthy

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>status for what a high character leader type of guy

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he is. He did an interview a few days ago

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>with one of the serious NFL shows about, you know,

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how you know he's going to be a

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>leader on this team and they're looking toward veteran leadership.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say Don Tory Poe couldn't be that guy,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't know his much About Don Taripoe,

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I do know Gerald McCoy is pretty famous for having

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>high football and off field character. So that seems like

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a guy that could have a positive impact on Tristan

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hill for sure. All right, let's go ahead and take

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>our first break. When we come back, we're going to

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the running back and fullback positions.

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into some topics around that. Some most

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>positive things out of twenty nineteen and s Mary's weather

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to get a little bit better. We'll talk

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about that when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. I'm Jay Novachik, former tight end

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day, I was

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy who always got the tough yards, and that's

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>why I run with John Deer today. In fact, I

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>have a John Dear three zero twenty five E tractor

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Dear

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas COWBOYSLA is a proud sponsor

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, helping fans seemore and do more

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with our best vision solutions. Our lens technologies reveal a

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>world more beautiful than you can imagine. For a limited time,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>get the slur next Gen Offer, where you buy the

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>latest generation of Transitions lenses with select Esselore lenses, you

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>can choose a second pair of clear lenses for free

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>with qualifying frame purchases restrictions apply. Find a participating eyecare

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>professional by visiting esseloor USA dot com, selor seemore. Do

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>more want to use what the pros use? How about

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter, a

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The starter includes four Jack Clack

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorite plus a full sized and tense therapy lip bomb.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys the Jack Black Starter ten bucks,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>free shipping your new apartments. Big Such a great deal,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, just okay? What's not right above the subway? Well,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I bet you don't even notice it after that's my neighbor.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>A deal that's just okay, It's not okay. Get a

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>great deal with America's best network. Come into an AT

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and T store to find out how to get one

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of our popular smartphones for zero dollars down based on

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>GWS one score. September twenty nineteen. Back to the break

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>here at the Cowboys. We can't wait to get back

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field, and we know you can't wait to

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>pack at and T Stadium to cheer us on when

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the time comes. SeatGeek is the place to get all

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>your Cowboys tickets, plus tickets to hundreds of games, concerts,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>rodeos and other live events will be able to enjoy

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>again soon. Every SeatGeek purchase is protected by buyer guarantee,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which means you'll get your money back if the event

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is canceled. Guaranteed Seek Geek. Let's go all right, let's

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>jump back into this thing, guys. Let's talk about the

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>running back and fullback position. To day, we're gonna start

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>up our player our position series. We're gonna talk about

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a different position every day. Running back and fullback is

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>where we'll kick it off. This is probably one of

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the easiest positions to talk about because you have a

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>starter in Zeke Elliott who's gonna be here for a

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>presumably long time after signing his new deal last year.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You got Tony Pollard who looked the part of a

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>break back up last year from the draft class. And

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>then where it gets a little bit shaky, as the

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>fullback position, whether it's a matter of how much they

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>use him or matter of what his particular skills are.

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But Jamazel the walle they did pick up his one

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>year option. So let's start first by you guys, give

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>me your idea of what do you think from the

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>standpoint if you have to pinpoint one thing is the

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>most positive thing about the running back fullback position in

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the twenty nineteenth season. What would it be. Let's start

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with you, Dave. For me, it would probably be just

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that I really thought Zeke rounded into his best form

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last like six weeks of the season. Let

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>me see if I can get his stats in front

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of me while I say it. But you know, I

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>remember last September, last October, we talked about it on

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the show. We fielded questions about it. Has Zeke lost

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a step as he had a shape and for a

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>while it really looked true like you didn't see long runs,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't see game changing plays. You know, I think

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>he went like a month without having a run of

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>longer than twelve yards. But I really felt like that

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>changed around Thanksgiving and yeah, I'm looking at it right now.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he has seventy one yards and along of

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty against the Bulls eighty yards, two touchdowns and along

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of thirty one against the Bears. I know it was

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a BS game, but he had a really nice day

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the season finale against Washington. He just looked like

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen twenty seventeen. Zeke a lot more. Obviously didn't

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>have a training camp in twenty nineteen because the contract

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>hold out. I think he spent a lot of the season,

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, overcoming that, and I'm encouraged that with his

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>contract situation taken care of, he can be that back

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>more often moving forward. Amber Honestly, I'm feeling pretty good

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about the running back position, not just with Zeke, but

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>also with what we got to see from Tony Pollard.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, he despite him being a rookie, I think

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he took great advantage of the opportunities that was given

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to him and he made the most out of it.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>He has shown to have the ability that you need,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>not just in a backup, like he could be that

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>guy that could step in in case something was to

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to Ezekiel Elliot. He's a guy that you know,

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to me a huge well, I'm not

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna say a huge drop off because obviously ze Zek

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and he can only do what he does. But at

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's not like one of these other

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>backs that we've had in the past where there was

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a huge drop off between those two. So the combination

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of the two guys not just him being a guy

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that can give Zeke some rest off the field, but

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>also a guy that can be on the field at

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the same time. I'm excited to see what kind of

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>place they can build for these two guys to maybe

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have them both on the field at the same time.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be really good for the offense.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm excited about that. Nick, I think they said

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it best. I mean, you've got a capable backup in

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard, who can you know, jump in there if

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you needed. I think he's going to make a big

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>jump in his second year transition. And then of course

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is still one of the best running backs, if

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not the best, in the NFL. And you know, we're

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing that two or three years ago there was a

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>debate on maybe who was the best, and there was

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>three guys, and two of those guys are on different

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>teams now, so um, you know, I think that it

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>just goes to show that it's hard to stay at

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of the mountain when you're talking about good

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>running backs great running backs, and I think Zeke is

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>going to do so this year, especially with if if

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he can have you know, a full off season or

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>training camp, and who knows what that's going to be like,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.679
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know, if he can you know, get

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>into training camp and get ready for the season, I

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be even better this year. All right,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So what would you guys say is the biggest area

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of concern or a place where you see it or

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a desire for change when it comes to

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the running back position. I'm interested to see about the

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fullback spot, just to see what happens there. Um with

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Mike McCarthy's offenses and win Green Bay,

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw a lot of fullbacks play there and not

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 1>not like the finesse fullback like old A Wally, but

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>more of a smashed mouth blocker guy. So, um, I

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.959
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Olda Wally can do that, and that's

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of offense that they're going to have. But

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm anxious to see what happens with the fullback spot

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>because I do think you'll see a little bit more

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional run blocking there. That's why Jason Witten I don't

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>think was as needed, just that complete tight end type blocker,

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>even though he had dropped off as a blocker for sure,

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that that's what they wanted from

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position, Like they've always had the way

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the nose type of guy. They don't want that from.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>They wanted more from the fullback. So I'm anxious to

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>see if they're going to actually get a fullback type

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or use Ola Walley that way, Yamber, you know, with

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position still being kind of in question

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. As to me, I don't really know what

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to expect out of that. As far as productivity, I

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think I would like the Cowboys to start using the

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs more in the in the passing game, just

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>having more plays. They've both shown the capability of being

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>able to catch the ball and run with it, so

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see them just incorporate that a

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>little more with these running backs. Dave. I mean, I

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you could see Todd Gurley get cut

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and shipped off to Atlanta and not be concerned about

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the long term. When you talk about zeke I mean,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys gave him an absurdly long deal by any

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL standard, even crazier when you consider that it's running back,

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the position that gets bashed on every single down. So

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys need three healthy seasons out of Zeke before

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they could potentially move on and not have it hurt him.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they can get that. Like Zeke is remarkably durable.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not super duper worried about it in the long term,

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>but if something were to go wrong in one of

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the next three seasons, that's not great, and you know

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's how you wind up in salary cap troubles. So

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just watching what's happened with running back over the last

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>twelve months around the league, it's definitely concerning. But I

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think Zeke is more of the exception than the rule.

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>But isn't that kind of why they got Tony? It is,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, and I have all the faith. I really

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>love Tony Poller. I think he's a capable backup. I'm

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.879
<v Speaker 1>excited to see what he can do. But if Zeke

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is unable to play over the next three seasons at

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the money that he's making full capacity, Yeah,

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're just you're going to be in trouble when it

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to managing your roster, like it's going to hurt

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>your ability to feel a competent team. So I just

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>need Zeke to be healthy until like twenty twenty two

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 1>or three, which I think, like I said, I think

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he can do that. Well, this question is Dave, You've

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>already said it, But for Nick and Hamber, how concerned

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are you after seeing what happened with Todd Gurley? How

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>concerned are you that the Cowboys have a long term

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with a second contract, long term deal with a

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>running back. I think that you have to see warning signs,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and you saw it with Gurley had warning signs when

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted. You know, he was already had been

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>injured and he was dynamic, but he has injury prone

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and he stayed that way as well. With leban Bell,

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he showed you that the contract was going

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue there and then and then it

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was and he set out and they ended up getting

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>rid of him. So um, I just feel like that

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen those warning signs yet from Zeke. He's

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>got the contract, he's he's one of the highest you know,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>paid offensive players in football. I mean or for a

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>skill player and so, and he hasn't really missed any

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>games so that the Cowboys you know, on his own.

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just feel like he's he's probably you know,

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.479
<v Speaker 1>going to play those three or four years like that,

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and if he could play at a high level, I

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mean that's even better. But he hasn't shown those warning

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>signs yet. Yeah, That's what I was about to say too,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is like he hasn't had any injury through this time.

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>The only time that we saw him kind of slowing

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>down or like limping a little bit was in twenty

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>eighteen when the Cowboys were just giving everything to him,

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and poor guy, they exhausted him. So last year with

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the drafting of Tony Potler and using him in the game,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I've feel like they were able to balance that out

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better where Zeke wasn't just being fully

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>exhausted by every single play. But as far as injury

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and longevity, I think as of right now, he seems

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like the guy I can definitely endure several years more

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>without having to lower his productivity on the field. I

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think part of that too. You gotta remember, like you

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about second contracts, and I mean, Gurley is right

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there to compare to and I get that. But to

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick's point, he had a degenerative knee issue coming out

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of college, like injuries who were a problem with him

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia. But when you talk about giving a running

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 1>back a second contract, you're usually talking about twenty six

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven year old players, and Zeke is not even

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five yet he was remarkably young when he came

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>into the league. So I set this on Twitter recently,

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is like, I understand the concern about paying running backs

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in general. I don't think it's a great idea, but

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna pay one, Zeke is about as perfect

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>a case as there is, and so I get people's

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>concerns with it, But in this particular instance, it doesn't.

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't bother me a whole lot, all right. In

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>most instances, when we're doing these these position analysis, we're

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna end it with the question of what is the

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest reason for optimism with this group? I think I

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>can answer that for all of us, that the reason

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're optimistic about this group is because you've got Zeke, Elliott,

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and Tony Pollard. There really isn't much else you have

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to say about it. You feel pretty good about where

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>those guys are. Anybody disagree with that? Nope? No, all right, good,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>let's go to break. We're gonna take our second and

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>final break. When we come back. Amber is going to

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>uh Amber is going to play a little game. We

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>got a little game, just like we did last week.

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get our pins in our paper ready, and

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys want us so we'll be fun. We'll do

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Radio since eighteen sixty five. Stets and Hats

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are American maid with pride right here in Texas, and

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Stetson is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and Team pride too? You

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson heads the official crown of all self

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Stadium pro Shop or at Stetson dot Com.

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Your new apartment's big, such a great deal, that's okay,

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just okay? What's not right above the subway? Well, I

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bet you don't even notice it after, that's my neighbor.

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Hang it the deal. That's just okay, It's not okay.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Get a great deal with America's best network. Come into

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>an AT and T store to find out how to

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>get one of our popular smartphones for zero dollars down

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>based on GWS one s cour September twenty nineteen. Tesselor

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is a proud sponsor of the Dallas Cowboys, helping fans

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>see more and do more. Our best vision solutions, our

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>lens technologies reveal a world more beautiful than you can imagine.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>For a limited time, get the Slur next Gen offer,

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>where you buy the latest generation of Transitions lenses with

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>select Slur lenses, you can choose a second pair of

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>clear lenses for free with qualifying frame purchases. Restrictions apply.

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Find a participating eyecare professional by visiting SLOR USA dot com.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Slor See More, Do More. So you're shopping, and that's

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>when you see it. I old twenty three Doctor Pepper

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>stack from top to bottom as far as the eye

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>can see, the phrase two going to be true comes

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to mind. Yet there it is a rich, delicious Doctor

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Pepper Paradise. Wait did did that can of doctor Pepper,

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just open itself for you. They all are as if

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, so nice to treat you. And even though

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it feels weird to talk to we, can you pick

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one up and say, it's so nice to be treated

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper, so nice to treat you. Back to the Break.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the final segment of the Break. We

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are live. We're not at the s WBC mortgage studios.

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We are at our own individual homes doing shows as

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>most people are doing right now, and trying to give

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>you guys a little bit of fun here while you're

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>working from home. Amber's got a game for us. Amber,

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you have? Well, basically the same thing as

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, with the exception that we will not make

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it confusing. We're gonna write our answers on the piece

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>of papers, show it, and then we'll address the answers

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as needed. Okay, so let's just keep it simple and

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>have fun with it. First question, will the Cowboys miss

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Jason Witten on the field? M do we have to

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>write this down? Sorry? I know we just said we

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to confuse it. No, you don't need to.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we can answer this when just outright I

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>would say no, and that is I think they may

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>miss miss him off the field. I think they him

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and missus leadership. I think it may be a little

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>weird if they should happen to match up in well

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason doesn't really matter, but it would have

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to be in the playoffs. But if they should happen

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to match up with the Raiders, I think it may

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>feel a little weird to Cowboys fans and maybe even

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to his former teammates. But I think just from a

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of the play, honestly, I think that last year

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>what we saw from Jason was a couple of really

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>really nice plays. I think about that touchdown player, that

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>play that was kind of back shoulder phenomenal played by him.

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, I think his play was average,

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be honest about it. And so

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't think they're necessarily going to

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>miss him on the field. I think there will be

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>other guys that should be able to step up. I

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>love the signing of Blake Bell. From the standpoint of

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a blocking tight end, I think they're going to get

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>more from him than they've probably gotten as a block.

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>As a blocker from any tight end, they've had over

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the last several years, so I don't think they'll necessarily

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>miss him. I think there are ways to answer everything

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that he would have done for them this year. Yeah,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll miss him. You just said he was average,

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have an average tight ends right now

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on the roster, or they don't have anything above average

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on the roster. So until I see somebody above average

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on the roster, then I would say that, yeah, they

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>will miss him. From a standpoint of one to three

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on the tight ends, that the three tight ends that

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:23.439
<v Speaker 1>will roll out there, I don't think they're better right now.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, maybe they draft someone. Maybe maybe those

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>guys will show that they that they are. But as

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of right now, I don't think that the three tight

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ends that they have or are better than the three

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tight ends they had last year. You want to break

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the tie, Yeah, I don't. I don't know. I mean,

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Derek, I don't. I don't think they'll really

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>miss him that much. I can't say that Blake Jarwin

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is definitively better than Jason Witten right now, but I

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>will gladly roll the dice on the upside because you

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about athleticism, downfield, playmaking ability, run after catch. You know,

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this, you know last time when when

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about them resigning him. He has the

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>potential to grow into a playmaker. And you know, Jason

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Witten's going to the Hall of Fame. He was a

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>great player. But he's not going to get better than

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>what we saw, Like he's only going to continue to

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>decline as he gets older. I'll gladly roll with the upside.

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll be just fine. All right, all right,

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>next question, which team or player do you hate playing

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>against the most? Any player or team that you hate

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>seeing the Cowboys playing against the most? I mean, how

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>could it not be Aaron Rodgers? Right, No, I'm serious.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean he just with the with the lone exception

0:37:55.560 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty sixteen regular season, he just breaks their

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>heart every freaking time they play. And he doesn't even

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't even always have to have a great game,

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>like in twenty fifteen it was James Starks and Eddie

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Lacey just ran all over him. But like Rogers record

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Cowboys is ridiculous, and you throw in two

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>playoff losses and that's all she wrote. He's the current

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>version of Randy Moss even though yeah, the Cowboys, well yeah,

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys did have two chances to draft him actually

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and didn't, So I don't I don't know if they

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, he ever you know used that against them,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the Cowboys could have drafted him, I guess

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five. But Randy Moss uh never

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>lost to the Cowboys, and Aaron Rodgers is only, like

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Day said, only lost the one game, maybe two games.

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think he's seven and two. I

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>think it's or eight and two. It's definitely a lot

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>too a little right, I'll say this, I'll throw in

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this one. I think Aaron Rodgers is definitely the answer.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to have a second choice, it

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the Saints in New Orleans. Like, I absolutely

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>hate going to New Orleans to play the Saints. That's

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that seems like it's never fun, Like it's just there

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>have been a couple of games that the Cowboys come

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>out victorious, but I just I hate I hate going

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to that place to play just because it's just bad things.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>When you start hearing that song that they play, you

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>know it's not going good for your team. So I

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just I'm out on the on the New Orleans trip

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 1>took place. You know, they're actually gonna play at a

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>place this year that they've never won in Baltimore. I mean,

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a lot of games there. Yeah, but

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a good team too. Yeah, yeah, they have not Yeah,

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>they have not won there at that stadium. So I

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>believe owen three. Um, so that'll be that'll be one

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of the road trips this year on the AFC. I

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>guess Cincinnati being the other one, which you know, that'll

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>be interesting too if they if they you know, have

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the number one pick with Joe Burrow. I hear he's

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I mean I've been it's all right, it's

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 1>what I've been told. That's what I've been told, Dave.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know if you're gonna run him

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>down in his locker room and just to talk to

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>him or something. I don't know. I know people, can

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>you sign my tattoo? Can you sign my tattoo? I'm

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna shart choice this thing and make him side your

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>glove or something like that. I am a professional in

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>every sense of I would never do that. Okay, okay,

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>on that note, all right, yea with all the changes

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and the unknown. On a scale one to ten, ten

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>being the highest, how good do you project this oh

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>line to be in twenty twenty mm so ten being

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the highest? How good do you project this offensive line

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to be this year? M I'm gonna say seven. I

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.280
<v Speaker 1>think seven is a yeah. Seven is a really good answer.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe sixty, yeah, because I think they'll be above average.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Five is average, right, I think they're gonna be a

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit above average, but all up in nine or ten?

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Have they ever been ten? I mean have they Have

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you ever called them at ten? I mean I don't

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think at ten. A nine maybe and fourteen sixteen, maybe

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not at ten, but they were pretty damn close. Okay, Yeah,

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that being said, I would say seven with

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the chance to get to eight. You know, these guys

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are older. They and they show that they're older. I mean,

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Martin's missing in practice because of a back injury,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyran Smith. You know, it looks like Derek sometimes with

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>his elbow. I mean, like I just think that my

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>elbow is fine. Yeah. I just feel like that they

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have gotten a little bit younger, sound like they're completely older.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They're getting younger, and when they keep drafting. You know,

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these guards and McGovern and Connor Williams and

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know this guys can step up. You know they

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have a chance of maybe eight, but I would say

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>seven probably. Sorry, So let's let's say that with the

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>inexperience of the younger guys, plus maybe some injuries that

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>could happen to these veteran guys. How much do you

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think that any kind of change right there could really

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:29.600
<v Speaker 1>affect Dak Prescott in his game? I think I think

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Dak has kind of evolved into that kind of player too,

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>where maybe he can start holding his own a little

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Yeah, I think that the biggest thing that's

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>going to affect BAC would be the center position. And

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, he did have his best season last year

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of stats when Travis Frederick came back. I

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's a coincidence or not, but but

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that Frederick's awareness was was a

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>big factor and that that helps. I mean, when you

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>have the anchor of your line making the calls, that's

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>going to take some of the pressure off of Dak.

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So whoever the center is, if it's Joe Looney, whoever

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it is, that you know that he's got big shoes

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to fill, and I think that's the one position that

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.879
<v Speaker 1>will affect Dak Prescott. And then also if the left

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>tackle doesn't play, that affects them too, because we saw

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a game in Atlanta a couple of years

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ago when Tyran Swift didn't play, and I think Dak's

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>back felt it the next probably the next rescue games

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Yeah, you know, Nick, I'll say this though.

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that Dak and Joe Looney have

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 1>been through this before two years ago when when Zack,

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>when Travis was out, they had to go through this,

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I think they should be better prepared. If

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Looney is the guy that actually steps up into this position,

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be better prepared this time going

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>around and should be better than they were then because

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they've had that experience of doing that and they have

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>been able to grow from it. So yeah, I know

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that it's it wasn't and I shouldn't say it because

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>it certainly wasn't bad. I don't think two years ago.

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think that it wasn't as good as what

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you were seeing with Travis Frederick. I think that at

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this point my expectation at least is they should be

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>able to step up and be much better than they

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>were back then, because it's this is their second go

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a round. I want to throw this out there. In

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen with Joe Looney in the lineup, Joe Looney

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>played great, They were fine. They gave up fifty six sacks,

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 1>which was second in the league. Just an impossibly high number.

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Can't sustain winning football giving up that many sacks, which

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is ironically they made the playoffs whatever. They dropped all

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the way to twenty three last year. And you can't

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>convince me that a post guion bare syndrome Travis Frederick

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>was the difference in thirty four sacks. There's just no way,

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:46.800
<v Speaker 1>my point, because by the way, he didn't play his

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>best football last year. No, that's my point, Like, this

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't this isn't all pro Travis Frederick. This was above

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>average Travis Frederick. Like, there's no way that that's the

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 1>difference in thirty plus sex And my point, some of

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be on Dak And I think he got

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot better last year. I think John Kitten that

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>helped him with his decision making, being more asserted in

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the pocket. Hopefully that keeps up with Doug nus Meyer

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>as the quarterback coach. Kelly Moore is still there, so

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I expect it will be. But I think a lot

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of that's gonna be on Dak to help the offensive lineout,

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's gotten better at that, as evidenced

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 1>by the dramatic drop last year. Okay, real quick, what

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is your favorite jersey number? Okay, so, I mean my

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>favorite number is just a yeah. I mean I would

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say fourteen is my favorite number. But like, you can't

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>beat like, you can't beat eighty eight on a wide

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver in football. It's just so badass. And I like

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not even Cowboys bias. It just looks awesome in general.

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Nick, you said too, I like to I

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this times back to Deon Sanders. I. You know, I

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>just when Dion was wearing number two in college, I

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thought that was the coolest thing. And you know, a

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people like to wear number one, but I

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>think two is cool, especially like in football, but yeah,

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess even in basketball too. I just think it's

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a cool number. So yeah, I've always, honestly,

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I've always been partial to number one on a jersey.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks really cool. And watching Warren moon

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.439
<v Speaker 1>for years with the Oilers as number one that kind

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of jaded me a bit. Even when I played football

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in high school, I war number one just because of

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>war moon Wards, so I thought, I think number one school.

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I love number one all right. Now, in a percentage scale,

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>one are the real chances of the Cowboys drafting and

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:52.839
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the first round. So what we want

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>or what we think, what you think the Cowboys will do,

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>not what we want all right? Percentage wise, realistically, I

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>would put it at like a twenty to twenty five

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>percent chance, because I really do think it could be

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where the best receiver available is a lot better.

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you want a ready made starter at

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>receiver or a guy that's kind of a project anywhere else?

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what gives me pause. But all things

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>like if it's even close, if it's even remotely close,

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the front office wants a defender. So I

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that realistic, but I think there is

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance. Yeah, I agree with that thought process, but

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I put the percentage around fifteen percent because I think

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 1>they will convince themselves that that defender is on par

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with that receiver. But I do agree with you. I

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>think I think there's a possibility you might be able

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to get the top receiver, depending on what flavor of

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver you like the most. I think you may be

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.760
<v Speaker 1>able to get one of those top guys at seventeen.

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And to me, the value of that is is better

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>then say, you know, one of the other guys at

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those defensive positions that may be a good player,

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.839
<v Speaker 1>but isn't as as great a player as maybe one

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of those top receivers. Yeah, I think it's closer to

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:17.879
<v Speaker 1>forty actually, because that's so that's what you guys just said. Though,

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it's because of the value. I think that's where you're

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>going to get your value. And then and if some

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of these defenders are off the board, you know, if

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if the value is there of a seeding Lamb or

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Jerry Judy will go that low, but

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>he might. I mean, you know who knows. Um, you know,

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they do have a spot. I mean, three receivers is

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>important in any offense. That's just the way it's gone now.

0:48:39.960 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>And they only have two that they can really count on.

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Right now. So, um, I think it's started with that

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:49.759
<v Speaker 1>being said. While you're saying, Nick, regardless, you're saying there

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is a forty percent chance, regardless of what they have

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>already invested at the wide receiver position, with Amari Cooper

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>resigning him and then having what you have with my

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>called Gallop and his development. Yeah, but I mean Gallop

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>two years for two more years for Gallop, three years

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>for Cooper. I mean, I still think and the fact

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that that your third receiver is going to play lit

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it just comes down to value. And I think because

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's so heavy of receivers this year, I think that

0:49:19.160 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>when they sit there at seventeen and they look at

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>their board and they go who's there, they're like, dang,

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these three receivers are are really really good. I think

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna either they trade back because of those great

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 1>receivers or they take one, which keep it keep in mind,

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a g name the next best receiver on the team

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>after Gallup, Like that's an awesome starting too. Let's see.

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously, name the next one, because it's no

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's it. This reminds me a little bit of what

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta did. I think a couple of years ago when

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>they had Julio Jones, they had snow and then they

0:49:52.640 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't really you know, you didn't really have to draft

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Calvin Ridley, but he was there. And now I'm sure

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that they're glad that they did, you know, because they

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily need him, but they but they picked him.

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So I could see that happening. Hey, Dave, Yes, I

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>got one for you. Okay. Des Bryant. A lot of

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 1>people keep asking about him coming back to the Cowboys.

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I thought I thought we did this back

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Combine. I just I don't see it. I

0:50:22.200 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like he doesn't he doesn't feel the role that

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>they need, Like they need more of a slot guy.

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, like he's done that, but it's not his

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>forete by any stretch. He's thirty two coming off in Achilles.

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Does he have the explosiveness you want from a starting receiver.

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>That's and I think for the most part, people that

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>want Dez back are talking about, like let him come

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in as the fourth guy and play in the red

0:50:45.160 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>zone and you know, maybe he gets fifteen snaps a game. Fine,

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Like for I still don't see that happening. But like

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a guy that can play starting snaps,

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, sixty five seventy five percent of the snaps

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 1>every week. I just don't don't think I buyed it.

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Des is that guy? Yeah, I mean either. But here's

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>another question for you guys, this one you're gonna enjoy.

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:15.879
<v Speaker 1>If you have to root for another college team, who

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>would you root for? Who would we root for? It

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can't be anybody in the SEC. That was easy for me. Actually,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 1>now I think about it, It's New Mexico because my

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:37.320
<v Speaker 1>nephew plays there, So yeah, i'd be New Mexico. You

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.279
<v Speaker 1>root for them anyways, I know. But we're saying I

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>assume she's saying other than your school, right, right? School?

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:47.840
<v Speaker 1>What's another die hard? I mean I talk about invested

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>because in three or four years you probably won't root

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 1>for them as much. So who is your die hard?

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Who are you gonna wear a sweatshirt with four on

0:51:55.200 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Friday afternoon? Like? What other school? No? One? Oh? I

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>mean you got like five schools, Nick, So it's a

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>little different for you. I've got five schools you root for.

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I got two. I've got two that I root for.

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, yeah, okay, and that's how many games both

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of them won last year, so you know, I would

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>say Notre Dame. Huh, that's I mean, I've always liked

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You're playing next year, That's that's really interesting. I would

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like to I would like to be there if that

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>has happened. You're gonna wear the split jersey? No, no,

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not like that. I mean, I liked Rudy. That

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was it, you know. I mean, you know, but I'm

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna split the jersey. You know. But I'm just

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>saying I could, I could, you know, root for that.

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate them, you know, like a lot of people,

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like love or hate. I don't really hate them.

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 1>That would be a team I guess I could could

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 1>pull for it. I'd probably say I'd probably say Wisconsin.

0:52:50.160 --> 0:52:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I got a lot of family up there, so I

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people that root for them anyway.

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, great, you know, they they win, They've gone

0:52:57.280 --> 0:52:58.919
<v Speaker 1>to the Rose Bowl a bunch of times the last

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. Great running backs, Russell Wilson, Camp Randall's an

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>awesome stadium. Yeah, I could root for Wisconsin. Get another

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tat two on the other arm, Yeah, I get that

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>w I get the w over here my tiger, all right,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.320
<v Speaker 1>last question. This one's kind of easy. Um, what position

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:24.319
<v Speaker 1>do you feel that has been upgraded the most during

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this free agency upgrade? I think it has to be

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the defensive tackle position, right, I mean, that's where they

0:53:32.840 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>spent most of their resources at this point. Yeah, yeah,

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you sure it's an upgrade? I mean,

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I think what they have right now is

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>better than what they had last year. Now, whether how

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>high you want to think that goes, I don't know.

0:53:48.719 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that may speak to the quality or

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the level that they were at last year, but I

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're better off this year than they were last

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>year at that position, at those two positions defensive tackle,

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I think, I agree. I mean, but I like, I don't,

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about how they were bad against the

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>run in Carolina last year. Like, I don't think it's

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this crazy improvement, but I just think it speaks to

0:54:11.080 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>like right now, I just I don't feel that optimistic

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that this team is better than it was last year.

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So if I had to pick a spot, i'd probably play, say,

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle. Yeah, I don't. I think you're right, Dave,

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because you've got two positions that they have not upgraded.

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've actually downgraded at cornerback and defensive end,

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so you can make the argument for defensive tackle. I

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:37.160
<v Speaker 1>mean probably, so safety is probably a wash kicker. It's

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:39.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to say that right now because I mean, four

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Bat didn't miss when he was here, so it's hard

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that he's going to be completely better tight end.

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't know, receiver. They actually lost the third receiver

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, so that's it. I don't think this is

0:54:51.400 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a better football team than it was last year right now.

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys honestly think that, you guys honestly

0:54:56.920 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>think that Antoine Woods and Malie Collins are better than

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Poe and McCoy. No, I just don't think that. I

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know that it's like that dramatic of an upgrade.

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Carlins is probably a better player.

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's a better player like across the board

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL than maybe those two. I don't know

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about from a scheme fit standpoint, But well, what gives

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you that impress I mean we've only seen him in

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 1>this scheme, so is that just kind of your your

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on what you think he can be in another scheme?

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Because he's going to the same scheme now going to

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 1>open with Rod. So what you know, what I don't

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>know is I don't know his money. I don't. I

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:39.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really remember. It was kind of it took a

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 1>long time for that money to come out. So what

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they pay, Yeah, Malik got a one year like five

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:47.040
<v Speaker 1>four or five million, He got a proven deal. He

0:55:47.080 --> 0:55:51.719
<v Speaker 1>really didn't get a whole lot. M I just think then, no,

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Yeah, I don't think the league

0:55:54.040 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 1>values him very much by seeing by what happened in

0:55:57.080 --> 0:55:59.760
<v Speaker 1>free agency. I think it's I think it's his injury,

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>his stree. Honestly, he's you know, he's had foot injuries

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:07.560
<v Speaker 1>for the vast majority of his career. I agree with you,

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Derek that the defensive tackle the starting two is better

0:56:11.840 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>than it was, But I don't think it is by

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this like astronomical margin, Like I mean, you know, don

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Tari Poe, like these are these are guys that are

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.240
<v Speaker 1>closer to the end of their career than the beginning.

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I like, you know, this isn't twenty twelve Gerald McCoy.

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I still think he can be effective, don't get me wrong,

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but I just I'm not convinced that this is a drastic,

0:56:38.239 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>drastic upgrade. Yeah, and I agree with that. Honestly, I

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think time will tell how much of an upgrade it is.

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an upgrade. I just don't know how much.

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think it also depends on what these coaches

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can get out of those two players. That's going to

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you how much it is. So that's what we

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>can't tell. But I think if you're just looking at

0:56:56.520 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just the raw talent of the player, I think, to me,

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's even a question that they have

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.840
<v Speaker 1>better caliber players at those two defensive tackle positions than

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they had last year. The only reason I'm drawn more

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to that position, defensive tackle, is just because they've gone

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in two bodies out of this free agency. Other than that,

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>there's if it was just one guy. Honestly, I don't

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like that gives me much excitement for the position.

0:57:23.720 --> 0:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that at least they signed two bodies

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to add to the roster, that's the only reason I

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 1>would lean more towards that being an upgrade at this point. Yeah,

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and quite frankly, I still think the defensive line is

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>worse off. I know that sounds like I'm talking out

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of both sides. Of my mouth. But the fact that

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they lost Robert Quinn to me, is bigger than the

0:57:44.640 --> 0:57:47.280
<v Speaker 1>addition of those two guys relative to the defensive tackles

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that were that were there before. So for me, this

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>all hinges on what are they going to do with

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive end, either in the draft or in the remainder

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of free agency. That's going to replace the production that

0:57:57.280 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert Quinn gave them. So if they don't do that,

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't replace that, and they're expecting that one of

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the guys on the current roster is going to be

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that guy, then I think they'll go into next year

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with the worst defensive line than they had last year.

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee there are people watching this right now screaming saying,

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>how can you not say safety because they firmly believe that. Haha.

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Dix is a better player than Jeff Heath. But

0:58:19.520 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we know that yet. Yeah, I was

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I don't know if I that's one of

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the areas we're talking about how Dave looked at defensive tackle.

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of how I look at safety. I think

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he might be better. Yeah, Honestly, there have been suggestions

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>from things I've seen that suggests he might not be

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>He might be the same guy. Like he may just

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>frustrate you in different ways than Jeff Heath would frustrate you. Right, So,

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's a better player. Maybe it is,

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it isn't, don't Yeah, I think a jury is

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:50.160
<v Speaker 1>still out there. Yeah, all right, we appreciate you guys

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 1>join us. Thanks for that. But that was a fun game.

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Got some good round conversation about some different things involving

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this team. We're gonna be back next week, next Wednesday,

0:58:57.920 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back at the normal time eleven o'clock. Will

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be here at our homes, not at the SWBC Mortgage studios,

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but at our homes. And you got some more content,

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some stuff to talk about. Make sure you check out

0:59:08.280 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all the content we're putting out on Dallas Cowboys dot com.

0:59:10.720 --> 0:59:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We're also putting out a Dock of the day. If

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you haven't had a chance to see some of the

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Deep Blue documentaries. Every day we're going to highlight a

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>different one. It's a good opportunity for you to catch

0:59:19.440 --> 0:59:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up on those again. Try to catch up with them

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on your connected TV device. Is a good opportunity. Since

0:59:23.600 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at home. To be able to watch some of

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>our content on your television, just download The Cowboys Now

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at It's on Amazon, Fire, Roku, and Apple tv until

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:36.320
<v Speaker 1>next week. For Nick Eatman, Dave Hellman, Amber Garcia, I'm

0:59:36.360 --> 0:59:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleson. This has been The Break live on Dallas

0:59:39.040 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production of

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.