1 00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:06,920 Speaker 1: Well can a trillions. 2 00:00:06,920 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 2: I'm Joel Webert and I'm Eric Belchernis. 3 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 3: Eric. 4 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:15,960 Speaker 4: There's this universe that we've really never talked about on 5 00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:19,640 Speaker 4: trillions because there haven't been ETFs to really talk about. 6 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:22,959 Speaker 4: But it's called private credit. Private credit is kind of 7 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:26,840 Speaker 4: post financial crisis. It has only gotten bigger. There's a 8 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:30,159 Speaker 4: lot of non bank institutions that are big names. They 9 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:34,320 Speaker 4: have a ton of money. The growth has been really interesting, 10 00:00:34,880 --> 00:00:37,600 Speaker 4: and now it looks like they're starting to I the 11 00:00:37,640 --> 00:00:38,639 Speaker 4: ETF world. 12 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 2: Yeah, I always think of private credit and private equity, 13 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 2: which I think collectively are in the ballpark of thirteen trillion, 14 00:00:45,600 --> 00:00:48,479 Speaker 2: as sort of like the stuff only people in the 15 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 2: know can get, you know, like the party, the real party. 16 00:00:52,200 --> 00:00:54,640 Speaker 2: That's the institutional Yeah, that's in the back by the pool, 17 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 2: not the party for the plubs. And so a lot 18 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:03,200 Speaker 2: of these firms our intermediaries in this area, and the 19 00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:07,520 Speaker 2: end user is typically large institutions, acid owners who have 20 00:01:07,520 --> 00:01:11,240 Speaker 2: a ton of money, pensions, endowments, hedge funds. There's been 21 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 2: a couple news items in the past year that show 22 00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:16,399 Speaker 2: a lot of people trying to democratize this. 23 00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:18,600 Speaker 3: Whoever can bridge the. 24 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 2: Gap between all that private stuff and the retail investor 25 00:01:23,560 --> 00:01:25,320 Speaker 2: is probably going to make out big time. So the 26 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,959 Speaker 2: incentive to bridge that gap is there and enter ETFs. 27 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:33,679 Speaker 2: Everybody likes their stuff in ETFs. So there's this sort 28 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:36,920 Speaker 2: of race for the prize right now with these issuers, 29 00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 2: including black Rock, to say, how can we get this 30 00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 2: it's a paradox. How can we get this totally i 31 00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:46,720 Speaker 2: liquid thing into this vehicle that is very liquid? And 32 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:50,080 Speaker 2: this is the puzzle that the issuers are trying to solve. 33 00:01:50,200 --> 00:01:54,360 Speaker 2: And there is an interesting design put forward in the 34 00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:57,120 Speaker 2: past couple of weeks by State Street and Apollo, which 35 00:01:57,640 --> 00:02:00,040 Speaker 2: really was earth shattering. I've talked to people in the 36 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 2: and this got people buzzing. You know, we saw a 37 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 2: couple of filings right after. So there's going to be 38 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 2: this sort of race. I'll ave the bitcoin race to 39 00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 2: get there first. 40 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 1: All right. 41 00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:12,400 Speaker 4: To help us talk about that race, we're gonna be 42 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 4: joined by vil Donna Hirik, an ETF reporter with Bloomberg News, 43 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 4: this time on trillions saving private assets. 44 00:02:23,040 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 1: To Donna, welcome to trillions. 45 00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 5: Am I allowed to laugh? 46 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 1: Yes, yes you are. 47 00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 5: That was Eric's idea. 48 00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:30,560 Speaker 4: You know, first of all, we just want to say 49 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 4: first time officially on the show. We've talked about you 50 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 4: and your reporting before, so thanks for being here and 51 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:37,080 Speaker 4: looking forward to having you on. 52 00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:39,280 Speaker 2: By the way, it's not possible this is your first time. 53 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:43,600 Speaker 1: I am yeah, just after that's good. 54 00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:45,440 Speaker 2: Sort of like you know, like what is the universe 55 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:47,680 Speaker 2: expanding into? I can't get my mind around that. I 56 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 2: can't get my mind around the fact that you haven't 57 00:02:49,480 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 2: been on, Like it just doesn't make sense. 58 00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 5: I've known you for almost seven years now. 59 00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 3: Thanks for the So. 60 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 1: We're paying it forward. 61 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:57,799 Speaker 4: We're going to hear from you much more often now, 62 00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 4: So talk to us about this race and what it 63 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 4: looks like so far. 64 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 5: I actually really like Eric's comparison to the bitcoiny tf 65 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:09,359 Speaker 5: hrase because so we have this filing from Apollo and 66 00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 5: State Street. Everybody's trying to figure out how to make 67 00:03:13,919 --> 00:03:17,680 Speaker 5: private assets which aren't liquid, which are not liquid, so 68 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:18,880 Speaker 5: they're illequid. 69 00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:20,679 Speaker 3: Exactly. 70 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,880 Speaker 5: They do not trade as as often as the SEC 71 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:28,320 Speaker 5: would need them to be trading in order for the 72 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:31,120 Speaker 5: SEC to say that they are liquid. Because what the 73 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:35,160 Speaker 5: SEC says is something is illiquid if you cannot sell 74 00:03:35,200 --> 00:03:38,360 Speaker 5: it within seven days, and with a lot of this stuff, 75 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:40,720 Speaker 5: that would be really hard to do with the bitcoiny 76 00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:43,440 Speaker 5: tf hrase, it took years and years. It took longer 77 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,520 Speaker 5: than a decade before Blackrock came out with their filing 78 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:49,600 Speaker 5: and said, Okay, we're going to have this survey. It 79 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 5: was called the Surveillance Sharing Agreement, and everybody said, huh, okay, 80 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 5: Blackrock figured out a way to potentially make the BITCOINYTF 81 00:03:57,040 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 5: happen the same type of thing. How and here with 82 00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:03,160 Speaker 5: Apollo in State Street where they came out with their 83 00:04:03,160 --> 00:04:07,680 Speaker 5: filing and people said, Okay, potentially this is a way 84 00:04:08,160 --> 00:04:13,240 Speaker 5: to make the SEC happy when it comes to providing 85 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:17,960 Speaker 5: quote unquote ill liquid stuff to the broader public in 86 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:21,960 Speaker 5: the ETF wrapper because as Eric said, everybody wants ETFs. 87 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:26,039 Speaker 5: Everybody wants the retail share of this because retail just 88 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 5: hasn't been able to buy into this stuff. And I said, 89 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:33,600 Speaker 5: quote unquote illiquid because we can talk about how actually 90 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:38,559 Speaker 5: this filing is structured and whether or not it will 91 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 5: make the SEC happy before. 92 00:04:40,120 --> 00:04:40,640 Speaker 1: We do that. 93 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:45,480 Speaker 4: What else happened after this Apollo State Street announcement, Well, there. 94 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:48,400 Speaker 2: Was just a lot of questions on Okay, what's the 95 00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:51,159 Speaker 2: trick here, because there has been a couple like quote 96 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:53,840 Speaker 2: private ETFs. But what they tend to do is they 97 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 2: invest in closed then funds or BDCs which have connections 98 00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:01,920 Speaker 2: to private credit. But that's using that's a indirect. Then 99 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,040 Speaker 2: there's ones that say, okay, we're private dec we will 100 00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 2: invest in microcap stocks that have similar characteristics. So everything 101 00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:11,560 Speaker 2: so far has been indirect. This is the first one 102 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 2: saying we're gonna give you the real deal. And we 103 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,720 Speaker 2: know from the bitcoin race people don't want the derivative 104 00:05:16,800 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 2: or the indirect. They want it the real way. 105 00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:21,080 Speaker 1: I want what they get. 106 00:05:21,240 --> 00:05:23,839 Speaker 2: Yeah, I want the same thing, and so the apollo 107 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:27,520 Speaker 2: is the is the difference here. They're huge in this industry, 108 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:31,280 Speaker 2: their name is on the label, and they're gonna basically 109 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,600 Speaker 2: make a market in the private credit portion of the portfolio. 110 00:05:34,680 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 2: They promise to buy it back if there's a selloff. 111 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:42,800 Speaker 2: That's that's I mean, that's a liquidity backstop. That's major. 112 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 2: And that's the puzzle that State Street has solved. Now 113 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 2: how much is actually private credit? This is a baby step, 114 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 2: but I think people will respond favorably this because remember, 115 00:05:52,920 --> 00:05:55,320 Speaker 2: all the advisors out there can't really get this. So 116 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 2: they can say to their clients, hey, I'm getting I'm 117 00:05:58,080 --> 00:05:59,279 Speaker 2: getting you to the real party. 118 00:05:59,440 --> 00:05:59,640 Speaker 1: Yeah. 119 00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, And then they're gonna get it through this ETF, 120 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:03,680 Speaker 2: which anybody can get, but they'll they're gonna make a 121 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:05,560 Speaker 2: show of it, and it's it's gonna work. 122 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:08,679 Speaker 1: Has anybody ever attempted anything like that backs up before? 123 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:09,600 Speaker 4: No. 124 00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,040 Speaker 2: I mean, the only thing that was somewhat similar in 125 00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 2: my view is the non transparent active structure where some 126 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:20,840 Speaker 2: of them were in like brought blind trusts and some 127 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 2: were even proxy portfolios, and market maker sort of had 128 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:26,320 Speaker 2: to figure their way out not having all the information 129 00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:29,120 Speaker 2: or having it fed to them in certain ways, and 130 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:33,839 Speaker 2: they work fine. And one other thing I'll say about 131 00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:35,600 Speaker 2: why I think this will be no big deal is that, 132 00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:38,680 Speaker 2: let's just say, even the fifteen percent that's completely a 133 00:06:38,760 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 2: liquid goes completely a liquid. The ETF still trades, and 134 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 2: in March twenty twenty, when COVID happened, there was a 135 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,240 Speaker 2: ticker called hyd which was Vanak High Yield Municipal Bond, 136 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 2: And to me, this is the canary in the coal mind. 137 00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:54,440 Speaker 2: It traded at a twenty nine percent discount to nav 138 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 2: sometimes and today it's taken in a billion dollars since then, 139 00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 2: and it trades just as much. In other words words, 140 00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:04,040 Speaker 2: I think people really have a lot of trust that 141 00:07:04,160 --> 00:07:06,520 Speaker 2: the ETF industry will not do them wrong. And then 142 00:07:06,520 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 2: if the price is a little below NAV, that is 143 00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 2: the best price I can get based on the incentive 144 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 2: to arbitrage, and possibly they'll even go the NAV probably 145 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:18,040 Speaker 2: isn't even right. Then they trust the ETF that much, 146 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:20,520 Speaker 2: and HYD to me proves it. So I think the 147 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 2: audience is certainly ready. It's the question is the SEC 148 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:26,360 Speaker 2: approves it or not. But I think it's a really 149 00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 2: good idea, and I like the idea of getting Apollo 150 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 2: into the industry, you know, to have them involved is 151 00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 2: also maybe it's a. 152 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:36,040 Speaker 4: Big Wall Street name to not be in the mix 153 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:38,800 Speaker 4: they'll done. And we should actually be pretty clear about this. 154 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:41,520 Speaker 4: We don't totally know the mechanics about how these things 155 00:07:41,560 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 4: will work. But what do we think that this Apollo 156 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 4: State Street ETF would hold. 157 00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:52,680 Speaker 5: So the perspectus says it would be eighty percent investment 158 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 5: grade stuff and twenty percent potentially high yield stuff. However, 159 00:07:57,760 --> 00:08:01,680 Speaker 5: and this is another one of those outstandings questions. State 160 00:08:01,720 --> 00:08:05,720 Speaker 5: Street it looks like is able to say XYZ is 161 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:09,360 Speaker 5: investment grade, so they are able to do that, and 162 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:12,240 Speaker 5: it's unclear whether or not you'd actually have a ratings 163 00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 5: agency involved to be able to say, okay, yes, this 164 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 5: is investment grade. So another outstanding question on that front. 165 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:22,200 Speaker 1: Who else has expressed interest in joining the race? 166 00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:25,800 Speaker 5: So there's a couple of other filers. One is an 167 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 5: issuer named Bond Blocks. They filed for Colo ETF, which 168 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:32,600 Speaker 5: actually is a little bit different from what we were 169 00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:36,360 Speaker 5: talking about with Apollo and State Street. But I really 170 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:39,079 Speaker 5: would say the Apollo and State Street ETF is the 171 00:08:39,160 --> 00:08:41,959 Speaker 5: big one, not only because they were the first ones 172 00:08:42,160 --> 00:08:45,040 Speaker 5: to put out the filing, but also because we're talking 173 00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:49,439 Speaker 5: about two really big Wall Street names. And I want 174 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 5: to go back to what Eric was saying about the 175 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 5: fifteen percent. So the SEC requires illiquidtive investments to be 176 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:01,559 Speaker 5: capped at fifteen percent for a fund. Thinking, according to 177 00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:05,559 Speaker 5: some analysts and strategists and people who are watching this 178 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 5: race is that State Treed and Apollo might not necessarily 179 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:12,920 Speaker 5: need to be sticking to the fifteen percent cap, because 180 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:15,680 Speaker 5: if they were needing to stick to the fifteen percent cap, 181 00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:19,559 Speaker 5: they would have already filed and launched such a product 182 00:09:19,880 --> 00:09:23,119 Speaker 5: by now. And I actually want to give some analysts 183 00:09:23,200 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 5: at morning Star credit for this. The way that they 184 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:29,760 Speaker 5: were looking at the prospectus and analyzing it is that 185 00:09:29,880 --> 00:09:32,720 Speaker 5: they are thinking that really stay treat and Apollo might 186 00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:36,360 Speaker 5: not need to be sticking to that cap. Of course, 187 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 5: we just still have just the one filing so far, 188 00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:44,640 Speaker 5: so we'll probably be learning more information in due time. 189 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:47,160 Speaker 2: So this is something I missed, and I got to 190 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:52,320 Speaker 2: give Brian Moriarty and Ryan Jackson, who are morning Star. 191 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,560 Speaker 2: They wrote a great piece on this. I learned a lot, 192 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 2: to be honest, I thought the fifteen percent was all 193 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:00,840 Speaker 2: they could do, but I see your point point. If 194 00:10:00,920 --> 00:10:03,280 Speaker 2: they can say that it's liquid because Apollo's there, then 195 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 2: you can go beyond the fifteen percent. 196 00:10:04,960 --> 00:10:08,480 Speaker 3: Exactly. You have to remember that like every day, the. 197 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:13,079 Speaker 2: Japan ETF has its underlyings frozen like every single day. 198 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:16,360 Speaker 2: Then there's been cases like Egypt where the Arabs spring, 199 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:19,359 Speaker 2: the Egyptian stock market closed for three or four months. 200 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:20,839 Speaker 3: And EGPT traded on. 201 00:10:21,040 --> 00:10:23,839 Speaker 2: So even if eighty percent of it was private and 202 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,560 Speaker 2: got a little rough or even frozen again, it would 203 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:29,640 Speaker 2: trade like a cloth then fund. But if Apollo's going 204 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:31,520 Speaker 2: to step in and give a market, that wouldn't even happen. 205 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 2: So I guess it's a leap of faith. But Polo 206 00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 2: is a huge firm and oother thing. If the question is, 207 00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:40,880 Speaker 2: well they buy it back in a crisis, right? First 208 00:10:40,920 --> 00:10:43,199 Speaker 2: of all, I've known that ETF investors tend to not 209 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:47,040 Speaker 2: go they're pretty diamond handsish. They tend to not sell 210 00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:50,000 Speaker 2: a lot when the price goes down or maybe ten 211 00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:52,280 Speaker 2: percent of people, so no big deal. But let's just 212 00:10:52,280 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 2: say eighty percent ran for the door. Apollo might be 213 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:57,280 Speaker 2: smart enough to know that's when you should buy it. 214 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:00,520 Speaker 2: You know, institutions know you want to buy STUFE when it's. 215 00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:01,040 Speaker 1: In a fire sale. 216 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:04,320 Speaker 2: So they may be happy to take the private credit 217 00:11:04,360 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 2: all retail's hands after it has a downturn and buy 218 00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:07,800 Speaker 2: it on the cheap. 219 00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 1: You know. 220 00:11:09,559 --> 00:11:12,319 Speaker 2: So there's a couple we don't know they're thinking here. 221 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:14,760 Speaker 2: The question morning Star Rose, and I don't know the 222 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:17,319 Speaker 2: answer totally is what does Apollo get out of this? 223 00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:19,239 Speaker 2: Do they get a cut of the expense ratio. 224 00:11:19,840 --> 00:11:22,120 Speaker 1: As some people the restrant? I mean, they're taking a 225 00:11:22,240 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 1: ton of risk here. 226 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:26,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, so maybe, but do they really need that money? 227 00:11:26,280 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 2: You know the private business that they're all yeah, you know, 228 00:11:28,880 --> 00:11:29,840 Speaker 2: millionaires and billionaires. 229 00:11:29,880 --> 00:11:30,719 Speaker 3: Do they really need this? 230 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:34,720 Speaker 2: Somebody theorized that Apollo was doing this so they could 231 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:38,120 Speaker 2: dump the less desirable stuff onto retail, sort of like 232 00:11:38,240 --> 00:11:41,760 Speaker 2: exit liquidity. But I would hope that State Street being 233 00:11:41,800 --> 00:11:43,960 Speaker 2: a fiduciary and being part of this, and their name 234 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:46,760 Speaker 2: comes first. By the way, would you know, make sure 235 00:11:46,840 --> 00:11:50,040 Speaker 2: that they're a check and balance on that. This is 236 00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:53,559 Speaker 2: again a question that has no answer yet because you 237 00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:55,560 Speaker 2: can't get these people to talk about their filings until 238 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:56,600 Speaker 2: the ATF comes out. 239 00:11:57,440 --> 00:11:59,880 Speaker 5: Yeah, so there's those questions plus a bunch of other ones, 240 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:02,560 Speaker 5: and we have critics sort of pointing to a bunch 241 00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:06,079 Speaker 5: of the gaps in knowledge in terms of what we 242 00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 5: know how this ETF would potentially work, and we're likely 243 00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:14,280 Speaker 5: to find out more information as time goes on. What 244 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:17,439 Speaker 5: we do know is just looking at the prospectus, is 245 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 5: Apollo would be originating and pricing the stuff, It would 246 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 5: be selling it to Stage Street, and then it would 247 00:12:24,240 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 5: also be buying it back if Stage Treat asks it to. 248 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:30,959 Speaker 5: And then the filing also mentions a daily limit in 249 00:12:31,040 --> 00:12:33,599 Speaker 5: terms of what Apollo would be buying back, and we 250 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:37,000 Speaker 5: actually just don't know what that amount would be, whether 251 00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:41,400 Speaker 5: or not it would be a dollar amount or a percentage. So, 252 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 5: for instance, if they're buying back a million dollars worth 253 00:12:44,920 --> 00:12:47,719 Speaker 5: of stuff or ten million dollars worth of stuff, what 254 00:12:47,960 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 5: happens if the fund grows to a billion dollars in 255 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:56,880 Speaker 5: assets and then Apollo is buying back just one million. Still, 256 00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,679 Speaker 5: So those are some of the outstanding questions, And again 257 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:03,800 Speaker 5: I want to give credit to morning Star for pointing 258 00:13:03,840 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 5: this one out as well as they did in one 259 00:13:05,920 --> 00:13:07,760 Speaker 5: of their analysis pieces recently. 260 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: To be clear, here, they've filed, Now how long are 261 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:20,520 Speaker 1: we waiting? How long was bitcoin? The Bitcoin raise? 262 00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:24,320 Speaker 3: Well, this is different because it's not a thirty three act, 263 00:13:25,480 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 3: it's a. 264 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:29,360 Speaker 1: General Well we're just saying worst case scenario. 265 00:13:29,559 --> 00:13:32,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, best case scenario seventy five days minus ten, 266 00:13:32,679 --> 00:13:34,680 Speaker 2: which we already went through, so like sixty five days 267 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:38,280 Speaker 2: that would be if it gets approved. When you file something, 268 00:13:38,559 --> 00:13:42,920 Speaker 2: the SEC either says something and you have to rejigger 269 00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:45,560 Speaker 2: the filing or they say nothing and it just goes. 270 00:13:45,800 --> 00:13:48,199 Speaker 3: It goes through. So my guess is the SEC will 271 00:13:48,360 --> 00:13:50,199 Speaker 3: call them and work something out. Maybe they'll have to 272 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:51,480 Speaker 3: tweak stuff, but. 273 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:53,679 Speaker 2: If the SEC is fine as is, it will just 274 00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:56,800 Speaker 2: launch in sixty five days or so, and there we go. 275 00:13:57,120 --> 00:13:59,680 Speaker 4: So when this happens, we will be talking about it again. 276 00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 4: I'm very curious about how they answer some of these 277 00:14:02,280 --> 00:14:03,120 Speaker 4: technical questions. 278 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:05,640 Speaker 2: One thing that should be pointed out is that up 279 00:14:05,760 --> 00:14:08,439 Speaker 2: until now, when people had this idea of private credit 280 00:14:08,520 --> 00:14:11,360 Speaker 2: or private equity, they've gone to these interval funds, which 281 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 2: are like mutual funds, but you can only get in 282 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:16,520 Speaker 2: and out like quarterly or every half year, and they thought, Okay, 283 00:14:16,559 --> 00:14:18,360 Speaker 2: this is the better vehicle for this type of ill 284 00:14:18,360 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 2: liquid investment. 285 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 3: The problem is nobody wants this. 286 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:26,280 Speaker 2: It's like putting music in an eight track cassette tape, like, yeah, 287 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:27,920 Speaker 2: it could be the best song, but like, no one's 288 00:14:27,960 --> 00:14:30,560 Speaker 2: gonna go just the vehicle to deliver it is so bad. 289 00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 2: Interval funds the average fee is like one point five percent. 290 00:14:33,800 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 2: The fees are so high in these things. The returns 291 00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:37,400 Speaker 2: aren't great. 292 00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:39,240 Speaker 3: I'm, you know, not to say what. 293 00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:41,240 Speaker 2: They should benchmarked against, but I just sorted through them, 294 00:14:41,280 --> 00:14:43,560 Speaker 2: and I'm like, I can sort of see why people 295 00:14:43,600 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 2: don't want interval funds. Kathy Wood has one for ARC 296 00:14:46,640 --> 00:14:49,600 Speaker 2: that she does private equity investing in that's an interval fund, 297 00:14:49,640 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 2: and nobody really cares. And this came out around the 298 00:14:52,520 --> 00:14:55,800 Speaker 2: arc hype. So I think when people say, well, this 299 00:14:55,880 --> 00:14:57,640 Speaker 2: should be in a different fund, I'm like, I don't know. 300 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 2: ETFs are where it's at. So I do see the 301 00:15:02,240 --> 00:15:04,640 Speaker 2: need to get it in here. And again, what people 302 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 2: won't mention, and it has not been mentioned even in 303 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:12,240 Speaker 2: the Morning's article, is trust. You know, people underrate how 304 00:15:12,360 --> 00:15:16,040 Speaker 2: much investors trust the ETF world because take out some 305 00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 2: of these senior loan ETFs like BKLN. Some of these 306 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:21,880 Speaker 2: things don't settle for like a month, and in the 307 00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 2: high yield HyG is so super popular, most of those 308 00:15:24,760 --> 00:15:26,920 Speaker 2: bonds don't trade every day. So we have a lot 309 00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:29,520 Speaker 2: of experience putting in liquid stuff into an ETF and 310 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:33,160 Speaker 2: everybody seems fine with it in order. And when I 311 00:15:33,280 --> 00:15:37,440 Speaker 2: say fine, they trust arbitrage to do its thing and 312 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 2: deliver them a price that's about fair minus. 313 00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:43,200 Speaker 3: What the arb person needs to make a little money 314 00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 3: for themselves. 315 00:15:45,480 --> 00:15:47,200 Speaker 4: But one of the things that's providing trust here is 316 00:15:47,240 --> 00:15:50,360 Speaker 4: the name State Street, which is a name that everybody knows. 317 00:15:50,560 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 4: In ETF world. We often talk about, you know, is 318 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 4: there a zone here that vanguard or the black rocks 319 00:15:56,720 --> 00:15:59,360 Speaker 4: of the world can't touch if if State Street and 320 00:15:59,360 --> 00:16:01,960 Speaker 4: Apollo show so that you can do this, how protected 321 00:16:02,080 --> 00:16:03,760 Speaker 4: is this space? Is there going to be a feeding 322 00:16:03,800 --> 00:16:05,920 Speaker 4: frenzy and you're going to see the Vanguards and the 323 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:07,880 Speaker 4: black Rocks come in and try and find partners. 324 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:11,560 Speaker 2: It's interesting Vanguard did partner with the private equity firm 325 00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:15,520 Speaker 2: because they Vanguard's also an advisor, but they didn't put 326 00:16:15,600 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 2: a fund out that was private equity. But Vanguard has 327 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 2: tiptoed in this area for sure. I don't see them 328 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:24,160 Speaker 2: doing anything like this. They don't need this, you know, 329 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,360 Speaker 2: the fisher jumping in the boat. They're not structured the 330 00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:30,560 Speaker 2: same as everybody else. Blackrock is like always. 331 00:16:30,200 --> 00:16:32,040 Speaker 3: On the hunt for new revenue streams. I mean they 332 00:16:32,080 --> 00:16:34,120 Speaker 3: are relentless. They die for every loose ball. 333 00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 2: I bet there are whiteboard meetings at Blackrock as we 334 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:40,360 Speaker 2: speak trying to figure this out. Blackrock recently brought Prequin, 335 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:43,120 Speaker 2: which a lot of people thought was to get into 336 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 2: this business, and I think was it Larry Fink or 337 00:16:45,320 --> 00:16:48,800 Speaker 2: somebody at Blackrock said we want to democratize private markets. 338 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:52,720 Speaker 5: The other interesting thing is that it is State Street 339 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 5: and they have a new head of ETFs Anapaglia, and 340 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 5: it seems like they're taking a bit of a shift 341 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:04,400 Speaker 5: towards the type of stuff that they're willing to put out. 342 00:17:04,840 --> 00:17:07,840 Speaker 5: So since she's joined the firm, they actually have put 343 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:11,520 Speaker 5: out filings or even put out crypto ETFs, so it 344 00:17:11,560 --> 00:17:13,919 Speaker 5: looks like they're looking to do more with that. They 345 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:18,480 Speaker 5: also partnered with Galaxy, a crypto firm that used to 346 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:22,520 Speaker 5: work with in Vesco where she came from, and now 347 00:17:22,600 --> 00:17:25,399 Speaker 5: we have this filing as well, So it seems like 348 00:17:26,080 --> 00:17:30,880 Speaker 5: they are looking to like Eric mentioned with Blackrock, they're 349 00:17:30,920 --> 00:17:34,520 Speaker 5: going after revenue. Potentially We're seeing sort of changes at 350 00:17:34,640 --> 00:17:38,040 Speaker 5: State Street as well, like State treat is known for spy, right, 351 00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:41,320 Speaker 5: so there's sort of new innovative stuff that they're looking 352 00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:41,520 Speaker 5: to do. 353 00:17:41,760 --> 00:17:45,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, and Pagalley is a great point because she is 354 00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:50,399 Speaker 2: a a go getter, she's an ETF person, and if 355 00:17:50,440 --> 00:17:52,320 Speaker 2: they're giving her the keys to run the business, I 356 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:54,480 Speaker 2: could see I get why they did this. I could 357 00:17:54,520 --> 00:17:56,680 Speaker 2: see more of this kind of stuff coming down the line. 358 00:17:57,040 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 2: You know that matters because we've seen companies where in 359 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 2: ETF person with that kind of verve is driving the 360 00:18:03,280 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 2: boat versus when they leave and then they put somebody 361 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,040 Speaker 2: from like another department or the mutual fun area. It 362 00:18:09,119 --> 00:18:12,600 Speaker 2: all just slows down and it's all prevent defense again. 363 00:18:13,280 --> 00:18:17,159 Speaker 2: But an it to me is aggressively an offensive minded 364 00:18:17,240 --> 00:18:19,159 Speaker 2: persons industry. 365 00:18:19,280 --> 00:18:22,160 Speaker 4: There's there's new blood at Vanguard too, so this whole 366 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:24,120 Speaker 4: space will be an interesting one to watch. 367 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:26,600 Speaker 2: To me, it's just different because you've got this major 368 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:31,240 Speaker 2: player in the space providing liquidity backstop in Apollo that 369 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:34,479 Speaker 2: is huge. And State Street, by the way, has had 370 00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:37,520 Speaker 2: success in the past. They did this State Street Double 371 00:18:37,560 --> 00:18:40,600 Speaker 2: Line ETF with Jeff Gunlock and that was successful. Gunlock 372 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:43,280 Speaker 2: now launches Double Line on his own, but that was, 373 00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:47,040 Speaker 2: you know, his first foray. So State Street has done 374 00:18:47,080 --> 00:18:52,400 Speaker 2: this in the past teaming up with somebody. So I'm excited, Joel. 375 00:18:52,440 --> 00:18:54,520 Speaker 2: You know, I I just spent a long time on 376 00:18:54,600 --> 00:19:00,199 Speaker 2: the planet Crypto and ready to move. Yeah, or new 377 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:02,680 Speaker 2: planet was a new universe because I got out before 378 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:03,119 Speaker 2: they got me. 379 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, they almost got me. They almost got me. 380 00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:07,960 Speaker 5: You're gonna get Twitter hate for them. 381 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:10,959 Speaker 2: Sometimes when I when I've gained so many these crypto 382 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:13,600 Speaker 2: followers that when I tweet about like fixed income or 383 00:19:13,640 --> 00:19:14,520 Speaker 2: something like, yo, what's this? 384 00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:15,600 Speaker 3: Do you know? 385 00:19:15,680 --> 00:19:18,400 Speaker 5: What they would call you in crypto land tourists. 386 00:19:18,640 --> 00:19:22,399 Speaker 2: Yeah, they called me they called me in James, the 387 00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,560 Speaker 2: Bloomberg boys. Ois, they call me a suit they call 388 00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:29,240 Speaker 2: me a boomer. I've heard it all trad five bro. 389 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:30,320 Speaker 2: All those are true? 390 00:19:30,400 --> 00:19:31,320 Speaker 5: And how much of it is true? 391 00:19:31,400 --> 00:19:35,080 Speaker 3: Yeah? Wall Street The other guy called me elite Wall 392 00:19:35,160 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 3: Street guy. 393 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:36,360 Speaker 1: Yeah. 394 00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:38,040 Speaker 3: I'm like, all right, I like that. 395 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:40,320 Speaker 5: All right, So you're giving you're giving up the crypto 396 00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:41,520 Speaker 5: space is the headline. 397 00:19:41,720 --> 00:19:44,680 Speaker 2: No, I told people it would be percentage of it 398 00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:46,200 Speaker 2: would be a ten percent of my life. 399 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 3: It went it was like ninety. But it was always 400 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:53,480 Speaker 3: going to diversify away credit. It's hard to leave it 401 00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:55,320 Speaker 3: alone because they're still growing assets. 402 00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:57,920 Speaker 1: You've changed bild. 403 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:00,359 Speaker 4: I got one more question for you, which is that 404 00:20:00,400 --> 00:20:03,000 Speaker 4: we often ask I guess on trillions, what is your 405 00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:03,960 Speaker 4: favorite ETF ticker? 406 00:20:04,920 --> 00:20:08,160 Speaker 5: Oh? My god, I love tickers. Do I have a favorite. 407 00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:13,120 Speaker 5: I'm obsessed with tickers because I think that there really 408 00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:16,560 Speaker 5: are people who sit at issuers, who sit around and 409 00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 5: think about what is going to be the best ticker 410 00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:22,560 Speaker 5: to attract retail or whoever else. And then you have 411 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:24,960 Speaker 5: some like really serious players and they'll come out with 412 00:20:25,240 --> 00:20:29,959 Speaker 5: a really good catchy ticker. I know what Eric's is. Tok, right, 413 00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 5: that's your favorite ticker. No, you've tweeted about it before. 414 00:20:35,040 --> 00:20:38,480 Speaker 1: It is. It is a great top tier tier one ticker. 415 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:40,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a good one. 416 00:20:40,600 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 5: So you you really have me on the spot. But 417 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:45,159 Speaker 5: so for example, b. 418 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:49,120 Speaker 1: R r r burr, Yeah, money printer goes burr money printer. 419 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:50,680 Speaker 5: That's a really good one. That's for one of the 420 00:20:50,840 --> 00:20:54,560 Speaker 5: bitcoiny tfs. But then you had black Rock recently come 421 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:58,280 Speaker 5: out with like an infrastructure fund and the ticker is 422 00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 5: made m A D E made And you know. 423 00:21:02,040 --> 00:21:07,320 Speaker 4: It's so simple though, it's like so good's good. 424 00:21:07,320 --> 00:21:08,920 Speaker 2: Well they have Jay Jacobs who is a global x 425 00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:10,199 Speaker 2: and they are tickers specialists. 426 00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:12,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, they I just I love tickers. 427 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 3: Can I think about it, I'll get I'm back with another. 428 00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:17,840 Speaker 5: This is me assuring that I'm coming back. 429 00:21:18,320 --> 00:21:20,720 Speaker 1: You've paid it forward. Yeah, exactly, So, don and thanks 430 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:21,919 Speaker 1: so much for joining us on trillions. 431 00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:25,480 Speaker 5: Don't have to say anything. Oh, thanks for having me. 432 00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:37,560 Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to trillions until next time. You can 433 00:21:37,600 --> 00:21:43,159 Speaker 4: find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or. 434 00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 1: Wherever else you'd like. 435 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:44,440 Speaker 5: To listen. 436 00:21:45,040 --> 00:21:47,600 Speaker 1: We'd love to hear from you. We're on Twitter. I'm 437 00:21:47,840 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 1: at Joel Webber Show. He's at Eric Baltren's. 438 00:21:52,200 --> 00:21:56,120 Speaker 4: This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson Bye 439 00:22:00,640 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 5: Fo