WEBVTT - Buck Brief - Arynne Wexler

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.977 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:18.017 --> 0:00:21.377
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, everybody, welcome to the

0:00:21.377 --> 0:00:24.937
<v Speaker 1>Buck Brief. On this episode, Aaron Wexler joins us now.

0:00:25.097 --> 0:00:31.097
<v Speaker 1>She is a conservative commentator, a TikTok star with non

0:00:31.217 --> 0:00:35.217
<v Speaker 1>lib take, and also writes and does all kinds of

0:00:35.217 --> 0:00:37.737
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, including Man on the Street interviews. We're about

0:00:37.737 --> 0:00:39.977
<v Speaker 1>to talk to her about. Aaron, great to have you

0:00:40.137 --> 0:00:41.417
<v Speaker 1>on the program. How you doing.

0:00:42.217 --> 0:00:44.337
<v Speaker 2>I'm great, Buck, thanks for having me, and I do

0:00:44.497 --> 0:00:47.177
<v Speaker 2>just want to start by telling your audience that you

0:00:47.217 --> 0:00:50.257
<v Speaker 2>are the first big person someone I looked up to

0:00:50.297 --> 0:00:52.657
<v Speaker 2>in the space before I got involved in it, and

0:00:52.857 --> 0:00:55.097
<v Speaker 2>you're the first person who reached out to me when

0:00:55.137 --> 0:00:57.857
<v Speaker 2>I started posting on social media very early on. And

0:00:58.017 --> 0:01:00.897
<v Speaker 2>actually the credit goes less to you and more to

0:01:00.977 --> 0:01:03.657
<v Speaker 2>your wonderful wife who saw my videos and sent them

0:01:03.657 --> 0:01:04.937
<v Speaker 2>to you. So I'm very thankful for that.

0:01:05.057 --> 0:01:07.217
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was you were actually she so the former

0:01:07.257 --> 0:01:10.977
<v Speaker 1>Fox News producer is the one who really really is

0:01:11.017 --> 0:01:12.897
<v Speaker 1>the I could take a little credit for it, but

0:01:12.937 --> 0:01:15.537
<v Speaker 1>she's actually the one who was particularly on it. And

0:01:15.537 --> 0:01:17.977
<v Speaker 1>also we figured out based on your video in the

0:01:17.977 --> 0:01:21.057
<v Speaker 1>background that you lived like the next door to us.

0:01:21.057 --> 0:01:23.337
<v Speaker 1>So we were like, oh, okay, so I think I

0:01:23.377 --> 0:01:25.617
<v Speaker 1>recognized the building in the background because that's where I live.

0:01:25.897 --> 0:01:28.657
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, good to have you here. I know you're

0:01:28.737 --> 0:01:31.577
<v Speaker 1>also like me. You're a New Yorker. You went to

0:01:31.897 --> 0:01:36.417
<v Speaker 1>school in New York City growing up, and then then

0:01:36.417 --> 0:01:38.657
<v Speaker 1>you went to school in Philadelphia, a little school called

0:01:38.737 --> 0:01:42.577
<v Speaker 1>war very fancy. But you moved to Florida like I did.

0:01:42.617 --> 0:01:46.017
<v Speaker 1>But you went back to New York. And we're doing well,

0:01:46.417 --> 0:01:49.097
<v Speaker 1>Man and Woman on the Street interviews, right, we could call.

0:01:49.017 --> 0:01:50.697
<v Speaker 2>Them man on the street interviews. It's okay, I'm not

0:01:50.737 --> 0:01:52.657
<v Speaker 2>a feminazi. We could stick to man on the street.

0:01:52.777 --> 0:01:54.097
<v Speaker 1>That's a fair point. I think we're just gonna call

0:01:54.137 --> 0:01:56.617
<v Speaker 1>the man on the street dude on the street interviews.

0:01:56.857 --> 0:01:58.977
<v Speaker 1>What did you find in New York City? What questions

0:01:59.017 --> 0:02:00.697
<v Speaker 1>were you asking? Tell me a little bit about this.

0:02:01.617 --> 0:02:04.497
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I decided to walk around it was Valentine's

0:02:04.497 --> 0:02:08.417
<v Speaker 2>Week and wanted to ask people are you liberal or conservative?

0:02:08.457 --> 0:02:12.057
<v Speaker 2>And would you date? Across the political aisle, and the

0:02:12.137 --> 0:02:14.257
<v Speaker 2>answers were really a mixed bag. You had plenty of

0:02:14.257 --> 0:02:17.017
<v Speaker 2>people saying no problem. I would date across the aisle

0:02:17.057 --> 0:02:21.177
<v Speaker 2>on both sides, conservatives and liberals. The pleasant surprise was

0:02:21.217 --> 0:02:24.217
<v Speaker 2>actually the number of conservatives I ran into. I did

0:02:24.257 --> 0:02:26.817
<v Speaker 2>not tell them what I was. I just went up

0:02:26.817 --> 0:02:29.377
<v Speaker 2>to people and said, could I ask you two questions

0:02:29.417 --> 0:02:32.737
<v Speaker 2>about dating? And lots of people said yes, And then

0:02:32.737 --> 0:02:35.577
<v Speaker 2>you got the classic people you would expect, saying all

0:02:35.657 --> 0:02:38.057
<v Speaker 2>kinds of crazy things. And I think you might be

0:02:38.057 --> 0:02:41.137
<v Speaker 2>showing one of those clips soon. But it's exactly what

0:02:41.137 --> 0:02:43.377
<v Speaker 2>you'd expect for New York City, except that I would

0:02:43.417 --> 0:02:46.577
<v Speaker 2>tell New Yorkers any conservatives out there, there are a

0:02:46.577 --> 0:02:49.857
<v Speaker 2>lot more normies there than you think. That's what I discovered.

0:02:49.977 --> 0:02:52.217
<v Speaker 1>So here here's a clip from on the street, the

0:02:52.297 --> 0:02:53.697
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that she was finding out.

0:02:54.337 --> 0:02:58.057
<v Speaker 2>I hate the word liberal, but I'm definitely like political,

0:02:58.137 --> 0:03:00.697
<v Speaker 2>like revolutionary, revolutionary. What does that mean?

0:03:01.057 --> 0:03:03.217
<v Speaker 1>I'm into liberation and the revolution.

0:03:03.657 --> 0:03:05.937
<v Speaker 2>And what kind of revolution are you going for? Down

0:03:06.017 --> 0:03:10.817
<v Speaker 2>with the five day work week, down with capitalism, lonialism,

0:03:10.937 --> 0:03:14.457
<v Speaker 2>giving land back, being happier, not killing theirs? Well, would

0:03:14.497 --> 0:03:19.017
<v Speaker 2>you date? I guess the opposite of revolution? Never is

0:03:19.017 --> 0:03:20.457
<v Speaker 2>there anyone you'd go on a date with if you

0:03:20.497 --> 0:03:25.137
<v Speaker 2>disagreed if George Clooney asked you out, but if the

0:03:25.177 --> 0:03:26.737
<v Speaker 2>hottest woman on earth asked you out.

0:03:26.897 --> 0:03:29.457
<v Speaker 1>If you don't care about revolution, then I'm not.

0:03:29.377 --> 0:03:30.377
<v Speaker 2>Going on a date with you.

0:03:30.457 --> 0:03:34.057
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, all right, Aaron? So what did what did

0:03:34.057 --> 0:03:37.257
<v Speaker 1>this woman mean by have to be a revolutionary?

0:03:38.777 --> 0:03:41.817
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think a revolutionary is just obviously a synonym

0:03:42.017 --> 0:03:45.377
<v Speaker 2>for woke, right. I don't know if she would use

0:03:45.377 --> 0:03:47.297
<v Speaker 2>that herself. I also don't even know if she would

0:03:47.297 --> 0:03:52.257
<v Speaker 2>say that she's a she, but clearly she is clear

0:03:52.657 --> 0:03:58.857
<v Speaker 2>to me she is the stereotypical androgynoust woke zeser Jahati

0:03:58.977 --> 0:04:02.377
<v Speaker 2>Jane that is walking around Blue Cities right now, and

0:04:02.457 --> 0:04:05.937
<v Speaker 2>I think you can generally extrapolate what her beliefs are

0:04:05.977 --> 0:04:06.297
<v Speaker 2>from that.

0:04:06.737 --> 0:04:11.137
<v Speaker 1>Did you come up with the phrase low tee beta

0:04:11.177 --> 0:04:13.817
<v Speaker 1>male or is that something you've just popularized.

0:04:14.817 --> 0:04:18.577
<v Speaker 2>I came up with it. I've heard soy boy, and

0:04:18.617 --> 0:04:21.697
<v Speaker 2>I've heard low tea. And I was chatting with a

0:04:21.737 --> 0:04:24.457
<v Speaker 2>friend in the dog park almost two years ago, long

0:04:24.497 --> 0:04:27.617
<v Speaker 2>before I started this, and we were talking about dating

0:04:27.697 --> 0:04:29.697
<v Speaker 2>and also some of the guys in the dog park

0:04:29.777 --> 0:04:32.017
<v Speaker 2>that come in with the really tiny dogs. But it's

0:04:32.057 --> 0:04:35.537
<v Speaker 2>not a girlfriend's dog. It's their dog, and we decided

0:04:35.577 --> 0:04:38.057
<v Speaker 2>to call them low t soy betas. It just came

0:04:38.097 --> 0:04:39.617
<v Speaker 2>out of my mouth and it was perfect. And ever

0:04:39.657 --> 0:04:41.817
<v Speaker 2>since then, I've been using the phrase and I'm glad

0:04:41.857 --> 0:04:44.257
<v Speaker 2>people really like it, although it does get get mixed

0:04:44.297 --> 0:04:47.377
<v Speaker 2>up sometimes with low ti soy boys, so I might

0:04:47.417 --> 0:04:48.937
<v Speaker 2>need to work on the messaging a little.

0:04:48.777 --> 0:04:53.177
<v Speaker 1>Bit, hmm. And what are the ways that one finds

0:04:53.217 --> 0:04:57.257
<v Speaker 1>out what if you're on a date that you're unmarried,

0:04:57.657 --> 0:05:00.137
<v Speaker 1>so I assume you still go on dates with men,

0:05:00.577 --> 0:05:04.057
<v Speaker 1>And what are the ways that you can immediately establish

0:05:04.217 --> 0:05:07.417
<v Speaker 1>the presence of a low te soy beta in American

0:05:07.497 --> 0:05:08.337
<v Speaker 1>society today?

0:05:10.257 --> 0:05:12.057
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there could be like a video game about this,

0:05:13.097 --> 0:05:16.497
<v Speaker 2>but I always do a screen before a date. So

0:05:16.697 --> 0:05:19.017
<v Speaker 2>I don't go out with guys unless I've spoken with

0:05:19.057 --> 0:05:23.497
<v Speaker 2>them on the phone. And I do that for two reasons, yes, sir,

0:05:23.577 --> 0:05:26.337
<v Speaker 2>and I've always done this. It used to be that

0:05:26.377 --> 0:05:29.177
<v Speaker 2>I sometimes I used to text, But I used to

0:05:29.177 --> 0:05:32.057
<v Speaker 2>text because I would ask a guy a long time ago,

0:05:32.377 --> 0:05:35.017
<v Speaker 2>whom did you vote for in twenty twelve, And if

0:05:35.097 --> 0:05:37.617
<v Speaker 2>you were in that's Romney Obama for anyone who might

0:05:37.657 --> 0:05:42.177
<v Speaker 2>not remember that that that's the year Obama second term

0:05:42.217 --> 0:05:44.937
<v Speaker 2>as if as if the first term were forgivable. But

0:05:46.017 --> 0:05:49.977
<v Speaker 2>second term Barack Hussein Obama versus Romney the most at

0:05:50.017 --> 0:05:53.977
<v Speaker 2>the time was palatable moderate. Now, obviously I would consider

0:05:54.057 --> 0:05:56.737
<v Speaker 2>him a dem But if you could not vote for

0:05:56.817 --> 0:05:58.817
<v Speaker 2>Mitt Romney, then you would not be the father of

0:05:58.817 --> 0:06:01.217
<v Speaker 2>my children. So I just didn't see a point in

0:06:01.257 --> 0:06:03.017
<v Speaker 2>going on a date with someone if they had not

0:06:03.057 --> 0:06:05.177
<v Speaker 2>been able to vote for Romney. Now I do the

0:06:05.177 --> 0:06:09.857
<v Speaker 2>phone because not only are there so many libtards out there,

0:06:10.137 --> 0:06:11.937
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know if I'm allowed to say that

0:06:12.017 --> 0:06:15.497
<v Speaker 2>on the show, but perhaps I guess we'll find out. Hopefully.

0:06:15.497 --> 0:06:17.617
<v Speaker 2>I don't ding you on your YouTube rankings, but.

0:06:18.177 --> 0:06:21.417
<v Speaker 1>I have no YouTube breaking. I've been I've been blocked, suspended,

0:06:21.497 --> 0:06:24.057
<v Speaker 1>shadow band and had to restart. I think I'm on

0:06:24.097 --> 0:06:27.257
<v Speaker 1>my fifth YouTube channel now because they just keep wow.

0:06:27.297 --> 0:06:29.857
<v Speaker 1>You know, it gets going, and then I get a strike,

0:06:29.977 --> 0:06:32.097
<v Speaker 1>and then I start. There's some number you're supposed to call.

0:06:32.177 --> 0:06:35.497
<v Speaker 1>It's like customer service. Hell, you're calling someone, your right

0:06:35.497 --> 0:06:38.657
<v Speaker 1>wing pundit. You have to call someone a YouTube who

0:06:39.337 --> 0:06:41.217
<v Speaker 1>good luck even getting someone on the phone. You get

0:06:41.217 --> 0:06:43.377
<v Speaker 1>them on the phone, they have no power, they don't

0:06:43.377 --> 0:06:46.617
<v Speaker 1>care about you. As far as they're concerned. All of

0:06:46.697 --> 0:06:49.337
<v Speaker 1>right wing commentary could disappear from YouTube tomorrow and there's

0:06:49.377 --> 0:06:53.257
<v Speaker 1>still a you know, five hundred billion dollar company market cap.

0:06:53.297 --> 0:06:57.257
<v Speaker 1>Whatever they are, they could care less. So it's pretty cough. Gask.

0:06:57.337 --> 0:06:58.617
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say. Some people like, why do you still

0:06:58.617 --> 0:07:00.697
<v Speaker 1>do it? I'm like, I don't know. Fifty people watch

0:07:00.737 --> 0:07:03.057
<v Speaker 1>it on video and they enjoy that. I figure, why not.

0:07:03.177 --> 0:07:04.897
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of people listening on the audio,

0:07:05.177 --> 0:07:08.257
<v Speaker 1>still getting it going with the audio, which makes me happy.

0:07:08.337 --> 0:07:10.577
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, amazing. I'm glad I put Liftlock song for the

0:07:10.577 --> 0:07:12.337
<v Speaker 2>fifty people on YouTube. So I guess it's a drop

0:07:12.337 --> 0:07:14.417
<v Speaker 2>in the ocean. But it's all to say. I want

0:07:14.417 --> 0:07:17.377
<v Speaker 2>to screen for the libtards, but also the phone call

0:07:17.497 --> 0:07:20.177
<v Speaker 2>now is to see if they're proud to be conservative,

0:07:20.177 --> 0:07:23.057
<v Speaker 2>if they hesitate, and also to see if they sound gay,

0:07:23.217 --> 0:07:25.857
<v Speaker 2>because there are just so many low t soibetas out

0:07:25.857 --> 0:07:28.817
<v Speaker 2>there and it's good to assess if they're a real man.

0:07:30.017 --> 0:07:32.577
<v Speaker 1>So what explain this process? This is something you know,

0:07:32.617 --> 0:07:35.697
<v Speaker 1>I had a friend who recently told me that he's

0:07:35.737 --> 0:07:38.097
<v Speaker 1>actually a friend of a friend, So you know, I

0:07:38.137 --> 0:07:40.417
<v Speaker 1>can't verify this beyond but I thought it was pretty interesting.

0:07:40.937 --> 0:07:43.537
<v Speaker 1>He lives out in Hollywood, LA, so he's very sick

0:07:43.577 --> 0:07:46.297
<v Speaker 1>of Well, he's a single guy in it's like thirties,

0:07:46.817 --> 0:07:50.737
<v Speaker 1>and he says that if he comes across a woman

0:07:51.217 --> 0:07:54.537
<v Speaker 1>within Instagram that is not on private and has more

0:07:54.577 --> 0:07:56.857
<v Speaker 1>than five thousand followers, he will not go on a

0:07:56.897 --> 0:07:59.257
<v Speaker 1>date with her, which I thought was at first sounded

0:07:59.257 --> 0:08:02.577
<v Speaker 1>really harsh to me, and then I thought, actually, I

0:08:02.577 --> 0:08:06.457
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, he's pretty fair not including people

0:08:06.457 --> 0:08:08.297
<v Speaker 1>who are in the public eye, right, I mean, obviously,

0:08:08.377 --> 0:08:10.977
<v Speaker 1>if he's a date with Jessica or something like, she's

0:08:10.977 --> 0:08:13.217
<v Speaker 1>gonna have five million, But if you're just a person

0:08:13.577 --> 0:08:17.497
<v Speaker 1>and you have fifteen thousand followers on Instagram, like why

0:08:17.617 --> 0:08:19.737
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a public person, right, I think that's

0:08:19.777 --> 0:08:20.497
<v Speaker 1>a fair question.

0:08:21.457 --> 0:08:23.497
<v Speaker 2>I think it's very fair. I actually I also will

0:08:23.577 --> 0:08:25.537
<v Speaker 2>check out a guy's Instagram. And also if a guy

0:08:25.577 --> 0:08:28.497
<v Speaker 2>adds me on Instagram before the date, that's a bad

0:08:28.537 --> 0:08:31.057
<v Speaker 2>sign to me because I think people trying to do

0:08:31.177 --> 0:08:34.217
<v Speaker 2>things virtually and not in person is a really bad sign.

0:08:34.337 --> 0:08:37.857
<v Speaker 2>And giving someone a glimpse into your life before just

0:08:38.497 --> 0:08:41.777
<v Speaker 2>finding out organically, I think is very gen z And

0:08:41.937 --> 0:08:43.417
<v Speaker 2>I am thirty years old. So if you're a man

0:08:43.457 --> 0:08:45.057
<v Speaker 2>I'm going on a date with you should not be

0:08:45.137 --> 0:08:47.297
<v Speaker 2>caring about that. I do know a lot of women

0:08:47.337 --> 0:08:49.817
<v Speaker 2>also who who look for men who don't care too

0:08:49.897 --> 0:08:52.257
<v Speaker 2>much about social media. I think a man who cares

0:08:52.297 --> 0:08:55.137
<v Speaker 2>a lot about social media is also a low tweet,

0:08:55.177 --> 0:08:56.137
<v Speaker 2>low te shiite beta.

0:08:56.817 --> 0:09:00.097
<v Speaker 1>So have you ever in these in this This is

0:09:00.097 --> 0:09:03.737
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because I've lived through the I've lived through the

0:09:03.777 --> 0:09:07.457
<v Speaker 1>transition from if you were really cool, you had a beeper,

0:09:07.937 --> 0:09:09.817
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe you had a cell phone that you're

0:09:09.817 --> 0:09:12.217
<v Speaker 1>paying saying a dollar or two dollars a minute to

0:09:12.297 --> 0:09:15.137
<v Speaker 1>talk on, right, so we get really expensively fast all

0:09:15.177 --> 0:09:16.737
<v Speaker 1>the way to now where we have like all these

0:09:16.777 --> 0:09:20.097
<v Speaker 1>platforms and tik tok and instant texting and you know,

0:09:20.137 --> 0:09:25.057
<v Speaker 1>people video streaming everything. So I've lived through this whole transformation,

0:09:25.417 --> 0:09:27.817
<v Speaker 1>and I can't I just can't imagine what it's like,

0:09:28.297 --> 0:09:30.657
<v Speaker 1>you know, these days. I mean when I got out

0:09:30.657 --> 0:09:34.137
<v Speaker 1>of college, like there basically was no internet dating or Instagram,

0:09:34.217 --> 0:09:37.377
<v Speaker 1>and now everyone I know meets on either Instagram or

0:09:37.417 --> 0:09:40.417
<v Speaker 1>on on you know, some kind of a dating you know,

0:09:40.457 --> 0:09:43.937
<v Speaker 1>online dating app whatever. And I wonder though, like when

0:09:43.937 --> 0:09:47.297
<v Speaker 1>you do your pre screen. Let's say, and you find

0:09:47.337 --> 0:09:50.137
<v Speaker 1>out unfortunately it's a sad day. You're you're talking low

0:09:50.217 --> 0:09:53.257
<v Speaker 1>T soy beta situation here, right, This guy's in there,

0:09:53.297 --> 0:09:55.857
<v Speaker 1>he's he announces his pronouns when he sits, when he

0:09:56.017 --> 0:09:58.057
<v Speaker 1>when you call him, he's like, well, I'm I'm Bob,

0:09:58.097 --> 0:10:01.297
<v Speaker 1>and my pronouns are he him? Do you like play

0:10:01.337 --> 0:10:04.337
<v Speaker 1>it out and then send him a little text afterwards

0:10:04.497 --> 0:10:07.297
<v Speaker 1>or do you go and tell him right then and

0:10:07.337 --> 0:10:08.377
<v Speaker 1>there it's just not gonna fly.

0:10:09.177 --> 0:10:11.657
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't have time for drawing out the conversation.

0:10:11.897 --> 0:10:15.817
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not uncouth. Okay, I don't start a call

0:10:16.217 --> 0:10:20.137
<v Speaker 2>just immediately going into it, but I almost immediately go

0:10:20.257 --> 0:10:23.417
<v Speaker 2>into it. Well, chit chat for a little bit, and

0:10:23.417 --> 0:10:25.257
<v Speaker 2>then I say, you know, I have a couple of

0:10:25.337 --> 0:10:28.377
<v Speaker 2>big questions that I just want to get through. So

0:10:28.417 --> 0:10:30.697
<v Speaker 2>then we could talk about the small questions, right, Like

0:10:31.097 --> 0:10:32.937
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to talk about what you like to

0:10:32.977 --> 0:10:35.737
<v Speaker 2>do for fun, or like what restaurants you like. If

0:10:35.777 --> 0:10:38.977
<v Speaker 2>we just don't agree on basic values, and I'm not

0:10:39.017 --> 0:10:41.297
<v Speaker 2>looking for someone who's one hundred percent aligned with me.

0:10:41.297 --> 0:10:42.777
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know if that's possible. But that's also

0:10:42.857 --> 0:10:45.377
<v Speaker 2>not interesting. So you know, I'm hoping to find someone

0:10:45.377 --> 0:10:47.937
<v Speaker 2>who just aligns mostly or you know, to be very

0:10:48.017 --> 0:10:50.297
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris esque. You know, if we have a Venn diagram,

0:10:50.377 --> 0:10:52.777
<v Speaker 2>it's like the circle and the circle, and you overlap them,

0:10:52.777 --> 0:10:55.497
<v Speaker 2>as she likes to talk about, then that's good enough

0:10:55.497 --> 0:10:58.177
<v Speaker 2>for me. I want someone who challenges me, but I

0:10:58.217 --> 0:11:00.137
<v Speaker 2>need to make sure we're generally aligned. So I will

0:11:00.137 --> 0:11:03.617
<v Speaker 2>ask early on. And it's great to see guys reactions

0:11:03.657 --> 0:11:07.697
<v Speaker 2>because I'm obviously kind of crazy and so I need

0:11:07.737 --> 0:11:10.777
<v Speaker 2>someone who can handle that. So I just reveal it

0:11:11.057 --> 0:11:13.537
<v Speaker 2>within the first few minutes of a phone call and

0:11:13.577 --> 0:11:15.097
<v Speaker 2>it goes great. There are plenty of guys who like it,

0:11:15.217 --> 0:11:16.937
<v Speaker 2>especially when they get the correct When they have the

0:11:16.937 --> 0:11:20.097
<v Speaker 2>correct answer and they realize it's the correct answer, it

0:11:20.217 --> 0:11:21.817
<v Speaker 2>is a very exciting moment for them.

0:11:22.017 --> 0:11:23.977
<v Speaker 1>Well, I cannot be held accountable for any of our

0:11:24.017 --> 0:11:26.977
<v Speaker 1>listeners who are of the male persuasion, who are not

0:11:27.057 --> 0:11:29.497
<v Speaker 1>low to soy vetas, who might be trying to creep

0:11:29.537 --> 0:11:31.537
<v Speaker 1>into the DMS or something after this. So I'm just

0:11:31.537 --> 0:11:32.377
<v Speaker 1>saying I have no.

0:11:32.817 --> 0:11:34.417
<v Speaker 2>I don't hold you account of but I have.

0:11:34.377 --> 0:11:37.017
<v Speaker 1>No oversight on this. I have seen some of my

0:11:37.137 --> 0:11:42.697
<v Speaker 1>friends in conservative media who are very you know, attractive women,

0:11:43.057 --> 0:11:45.097
<v Speaker 1>have one or two of them have shown me what

0:11:45.177 --> 0:11:48.337
<v Speaker 1>they're just what they're random dm like Instagram dms look

0:11:48.497 --> 0:11:52.937
<v Speaker 1>like and wow, wow humanity. You start you really start

0:11:52.977 --> 0:11:57.057
<v Speaker 1>to question whether civilization is the appropriate word for us

0:11:57.057 --> 0:12:01.337
<v Speaker 1>to use the work any anyway, So we have that,

0:12:01.497 --> 0:12:04.417
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there's no It's funny. The other day Clay

0:12:04.417 --> 0:12:05.737
<v Speaker 1>did this on radio and I was like, that was

0:12:05.777 --> 0:12:08.257
<v Speaker 1>the most that was like break your neck hard turn.

0:12:08.337 --> 0:12:11.217
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was just you know, whiplash. So I'm

0:12:11.257 --> 0:12:13.137
<v Speaker 1>doing that right now. We're gonna take a big hard

0:12:13.137 --> 0:12:17.097
<v Speaker 1>turn here for a moment, because I know, I feel

0:12:17.097 --> 0:12:18.737
<v Speaker 1>like if you at least talk people through it, it

0:12:18.817 --> 0:12:21.497
<v Speaker 1>feels a little bit less. Like you know, when you're

0:12:21.497 --> 0:12:23.137
<v Speaker 1>on the plane the turbulence is so bad you feel

0:12:23.137 --> 0:12:24.697
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna hit the ceiling, but you don't. So

0:12:24.737 --> 0:12:27.737
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to I'm trying to avoid that. Are you

0:12:27.777 --> 0:12:30.977
<v Speaker 1>wondering where everyone's talking about Belize these days? Whoa boy

0:12:31.097 --> 0:12:34.857
<v Speaker 1>Belize is fantastic. It's fun. Imagine visiting a country that's

0:12:34.977 --> 0:12:38.697
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of hours from say Miami, Atlanta, Dallas, Houston,

0:12:39.217 --> 0:12:42.137
<v Speaker 1>and you can enjoy a rainforest in white sand beaches

0:12:42.217 --> 0:12:44.697
<v Speaker 1>in the same day. Belize is fun because you can

0:12:44.697 --> 0:12:47.377
<v Speaker 1>float through caves, down a jungle river, climb an ancient

0:12:47.417 --> 0:12:50.417
<v Speaker 1>Mayan ruin, swim with nurse sharks and rays, cast for

0:12:50.457 --> 0:12:53.137
<v Speaker 1>a grand Slam the Ultimate, and fly fishing on the flats,

0:12:53.417 --> 0:12:56.417
<v Speaker 1>snorkel or scuba dive the longest living reef in the world.

0:12:56.497 --> 0:12:59.737
<v Speaker 1>Or simply relax, enjoy the beach bars, playing live music

0:12:59.777 --> 0:13:02.857
<v Speaker 1>and dance under the stars before you know the sun

0:13:02.937 --> 0:13:05.257
<v Speaker 1>comes up. And also have the best lopster dinner you've

0:13:05.257 --> 0:13:07.297
<v Speaker 1>had in a very long time. Don't take my word

0:13:07.297 --> 0:13:09.697
<v Speaker 1>for it, Go visit, go check it out. Belize is

0:13:09.697 --> 0:13:13.337
<v Speaker 1>amazing for so many reasons. Download your free Belize handbook

0:13:13.377 --> 0:13:17.337
<v Speaker 1>and God go to Belize isfun dot com. That's Belize

0:13:17.737 --> 0:13:23.337
<v Speaker 1>is Fun dot com. Tell me how Biden and blink

0:13:23.417 --> 0:13:26.657
<v Speaker 1>In and the rest are doing on Israel related matters

0:13:26.737 --> 0:13:29.137
<v Speaker 1>right now in your mind, because that's something that is

0:13:29.177 --> 0:13:31.577
<v Speaker 1>even starting to show in the polls in an election year.

0:13:31.657 --> 0:13:33.897
<v Speaker 1>Could be interesting. So what do you see?

0:13:34.857 --> 0:13:36.737
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I think you're asking me about that because

0:13:36.777 --> 0:13:38.937
<v Speaker 2>I did write about this in The Federalist and The

0:13:38.977 --> 0:13:42.857
<v Speaker 2>Blaze fairly recently, So I think there are a lot

0:13:42.897 --> 0:13:45.657
<v Speaker 2>of people who are pro Israel who are holding out

0:13:45.697 --> 0:13:48.897
<v Speaker 2>false hope that Biden and Blincoln are remaining said fast

0:13:48.897 --> 0:13:51.737
<v Speaker 2>in their support for Israel. And since October eighth, I've

0:13:51.777 --> 0:13:54.817
<v Speaker 2>told people not to assume that. I said the support

0:13:54.857 --> 0:13:57.217
<v Speaker 2>would be very fleeting, and it is turning out to

0:13:57.217 --> 0:13:59.377
<v Speaker 2>be the case. We have seen it time and time

0:13:59.377 --> 0:14:02.697
<v Speaker 2>again over the last few months that as horrified as

0:14:02.697 --> 0:14:05.697
<v Speaker 2>the Biden administration can be by what happened on October seventh,

0:14:05.977 --> 0:14:10.217
<v Speaker 2>as they've made many, many statements to say that they

0:14:10.457 --> 0:14:13.617
<v Speaker 2>support Israel, but then they a will stab Israel on

0:14:13.657 --> 0:14:15.777
<v Speaker 2>the back and go to the Palestinian authority and say

0:14:15.817 --> 0:14:19.177
<v Speaker 2>they want to install them as a de facto government

0:14:19.217 --> 0:14:22.177
<v Speaker 2>for a Palestinian state. And what Biden and Blinken are

0:14:22.177 --> 0:14:25.097
<v Speaker 2>doing right now is actually telling Israel they are not

0:14:25.257 --> 0:14:28.297
<v Speaker 2>allowed to carry out their plans in eradicating Hamas, that

0:14:28.337 --> 0:14:32.097
<v Speaker 2>they have to accept living next to people who are

0:14:32.177 --> 0:14:35.377
<v Speaker 2>telling them exactly what they want and trying to ignore that.

0:14:35.417 --> 0:14:37.817
<v Speaker 2>But we know that's obviously a policy of the left

0:14:37.817 --> 0:14:40.337
<v Speaker 2>and a pattern that we've seen many times, which is

0:14:40.497 --> 0:14:43.497
<v Speaker 2>it's all about optics over outcome. So they want to

0:14:43.777 --> 0:14:45.457
<v Speaker 2>put a nice little bow on the Middle East right

0:14:45.497 --> 0:14:49.097
<v Speaker 2>now and say we've created peace, We've created a Palestinian state.

0:14:50.297 --> 0:14:52.777
<v Speaker 2>B Lincoln has said that Israel is running out of credit,

0:14:53.177 --> 0:14:55.817
<v Speaker 2>that they're running out of time in this war. He

0:14:55.897 --> 0:14:58.697
<v Speaker 2>does not say how Israel is supposed to actually maintain

0:14:58.897 --> 0:15:02.297
<v Speaker 2>security when it comes to a ceasefire. He just says

0:15:02.457 --> 0:15:05.297
<v Speaker 2>you have to stop fighting. Biden has put out a

0:15:05.337 --> 0:15:08.337
<v Speaker 2>number of statements, including one on Twitter or x as

0:15:08.377 --> 0:15:10.697
<v Speaker 2>people call it, a few months ago where he said

0:15:10.697 --> 0:15:14.417
<v Speaker 2>that Hamas is nightmare and the reason why they carried

0:15:14.417 --> 0:15:18.097
<v Speaker 2>out October seventh is because they fear nothing more than

0:15:18.377 --> 0:15:21.657
<v Speaker 2>Palestinians and Jews living side by side in peace. This

0:15:21.817 --> 0:15:24.857
<v Speaker 2>is a ridiculous statement, and that actually that tweet told

0:15:24.937 --> 0:15:27.617
<v Speaker 2>me everything I needed to know about the Biden administration

0:15:27.737 --> 0:15:31.537
<v Speaker 2>and how they're approaching this conflict. It's a lie, that's

0:15:31.577 --> 0:15:33.897
<v Speaker 2>a total lie. Hamas did not carry out this attack

0:15:33.937 --> 0:15:35.977
<v Speaker 2>because they want to live in because they know that

0:15:36.057 --> 0:15:38.657
<v Speaker 2>their civilian population wants to live in peace, side by

0:15:38.657 --> 0:15:41.217
<v Speaker 2>side with Jews in Israel. They carried out the attack

0:15:41.257 --> 0:15:43.857
<v Speaker 2>because they want the eradication of the state of Israel,

0:15:43.977 --> 0:15:47.017
<v Speaker 2>which is the eradication of Jews, and so the Biden

0:15:47.057 --> 0:15:51.777
<v Speaker 2>administration is making this about land and sovereignty. When the

0:15:51.817 --> 0:15:55.537
<v Speaker 2>Palestinians and Hamas and people even in the West Bank,

0:15:55.537 --> 0:15:58.457
<v Speaker 2>where Hamas is insanely popular in spite of the PA

0:15:58.497 --> 0:16:01.857
<v Speaker 2>being the government there, they tell us exactly what they want.

0:16:01.937 --> 0:16:04.017
<v Speaker 2>This has nothing to do with land. This has to

0:16:04.057 --> 0:16:06.417
<v Speaker 2>do with religion. It is a religious war, and they

0:16:06.417 --> 0:16:10.297
<v Speaker 2>want to see the eradication of the Jews. So in

0:16:10.337 --> 0:16:13.657
<v Speaker 2>a time where the Left has very very weak stomachs

0:16:13.697 --> 0:16:16.097
<v Speaker 2>and even we grew backbones, and they're really caving to

0:16:16.137 --> 0:16:19.937
<v Speaker 2>pressure from the general population in the US, especially certain

0:16:19.977 --> 0:16:24.337
<v Speaker 2>populations like in Michigan, very woke white populations. Jahati Jans

0:16:24.337 --> 0:16:26.057
<v Speaker 2>marching on the streets in places like New York and

0:16:26.097 --> 0:16:29.137
<v Speaker 2>California where they are calling for a ceasefire, and the

0:16:29.177 --> 0:16:31.097
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration is totally caving to that.

0:16:32.057 --> 0:16:35.257
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that there might be a real change

0:16:35.977 --> 0:16:40.817
<v Speaker 1>in the nationwide Jewish vote as it pertains to these

0:16:41.017 --> 0:16:43.857
<v Speaker 1>You know what we've seen here in the election coming

0:16:43.937 --> 0:16:48.257
<v Speaker 1>up basically Jewish Americans figuring out that the Left it's

0:16:48.297 --> 0:16:50.497
<v Speaker 1>not as friendly to them as they perhaps had thought before.

0:16:52.457 --> 0:16:58.217
<v Speaker 2>So I am cautiously optimistic but very cautiously because as

0:16:58.417 --> 0:17:00.657
<v Speaker 2>a Jew who grew up in New York, I was

0:17:00.697 --> 0:17:04.497
<v Speaker 2>the lone conservative. In May twenty twenty one, when thousands

0:17:04.497 --> 0:17:08.657
<v Speaker 2>of rockets were being sent over from Gaza into Israel

0:17:08.697 --> 0:17:11.577
<v Speaker 2>and for the first time really brought Tel Aviv, we

0:17:11.617 --> 0:17:14.017
<v Speaker 2>had a few weeks where the Jews of New York

0:17:14.057 --> 0:17:17.497
<v Speaker 2>and the liberal Jews saw things for what they were.

0:17:17.537 --> 0:17:20.777
<v Speaker 2>They felt abandoned and betrayed by organizations that they had helped,

0:17:20.977 --> 0:17:25.217
<v Speaker 2>like BLM and Stop Asian Hate and the LGBT movement

0:17:25.297 --> 0:17:27.777
<v Speaker 2>in general. And I had a lot of friends calling

0:17:27.817 --> 0:17:31.337
<v Speaker 2>me then feeling extremely betrayed. But the problem is that

0:17:31.417 --> 0:17:33.977
<v Speaker 2>Jews in America very much want to be accepted, and

0:17:34.257 --> 0:17:37.017
<v Speaker 2>I think that just as they went crawling back in

0:17:37.057 --> 0:17:39.177
<v Speaker 2>May of twenty twenty one, there's a very good chance

0:17:39.217 --> 0:17:41.577
<v Speaker 2>that they will still want to be accepted by the

0:17:41.577 --> 0:17:44.417
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party. They want to see themselves as the party

0:17:44.457 --> 0:17:47.817
<v Speaker 2>that is nice and liberal and accepting, and so I'm

0:17:47.857 --> 0:17:50.257
<v Speaker 2>not as hopeful as other people. I also think it

0:17:50.257 --> 0:17:53.257
<v Speaker 2>depends on which Jewish population you are referring to. So

0:17:53.337 --> 0:17:55.497
<v Speaker 2>I'm in the Free State of Florida. As you mentioned,

0:17:55.577 --> 0:17:57.857
<v Speaker 2>we used to be neighbors and so I think the

0:17:57.937 --> 0:18:00.057
<v Speaker 2>Jews who are here very self selecting, and they were

0:18:00.097 --> 0:18:03.177
<v Speaker 2>already pretty conservative, and I think a lot of Jews

0:18:03.177 --> 0:18:06.577
<v Speaker 2>will still have a very hard time actually changing their vote.

0:18:06.657 --> 0:18:09.137
<v Speaker 2>But I would love to be wrong about that.

0:18:10.537 --> 0:18:14.057
<v Speaker 1>And since it is the week of the President's holiday,

0:18:14.097 --> 0:18:16.377
<v Speaker 1>which I still think is kind of kids, well why

0:18:16.417 --> 0:18:18.617
<v Speaker 1>is that a holiday? But anyway, we did on the show,

0:18:18.657 --> 0:18:21.337
<v Speaker 1>So I want to give you this opportunity. Uh, three

0:18:21.417 --> 0:18:24.457
<v Speaker 1>best US presidents of all time? Three worst US presidents

0:18:24.497 --> 0:18:25.057
<v Speaker 1>of all time?

0:18:25.577 --> 0:18:30.177
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, okay, best I'm going to go with Teddy Roosevelt.

0:18:32.657 --> 0:18:34.737
<v Speaker 2>There are so many. Honestly, this is a really tough

0:18:34.817 --> 0:18:39.817
<v Speaker 2>Teddy Roosevelt's just my number one love George Washington. I

0:18:39.857 --> 0:18:41.937
<v Speaker 2>just know. I know it's a very tacky answer, but

0:18:41.937 --> 0:18:42.337
<v Speaker 2>I have to go.

0:18:42.617 --> 0:18:44.577
<v Speaker 1>He was my number one. I call him the goat I.

0:18:44.457 --> 0:18:47.697
<v Speaker 2>Have about Well, I'm sorry for calling you tacky.

0:18:47.817 --> 0:18:51.777
<v Speaker 1>Then I can take it good.

0:18:52.177 --> 0:18:58.617
<v Speaker 2>And uh, I'm gonna go with Reagan. A lot of

0:18:58.617 --> 0:18:59.697
<v Speaker 2>people won't like that one.

0:19:00.377 --> 0:19:02.177
<v Speaker 1>No, you and I were aligned on all the only

0:19:02.217 --> 0:19:06.697
<v Speaker 1>one in the Teddy Roosevelt Progressive well moose party. Eh, okay,

0:19:06.697 --> 0:19:09.097
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about it. I went, I went Calvin Coolidge,

0:19:09.097 --> 0:19:11.577
<v Speaker 1>which people are like, what I'm like, Look, guys, like,

0:19:11.617 --> 0:19:13.217
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to mess things up. I'm not here

0:19:13.257 --> 0:19:16.017
<v Speaker 1>for power. Things are going great. Let the American people

0:19:16.177 --> 0:19:18.977
<v Speaker 1>have their business be business, not gonna have bureaucracies ruining

0:19:18.977 --> 0:19:21.337
<v Speaker 1>your life. And yeah, I don't know, that's pretty sounds

0:19:21.337 --> 0:19:22.017
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome to me.

0:19:22.017 --> 0:19:24.617
<v Speaker 2>I did not see your segment on this, so very

0:19:24.697 --> 0:19:26.337
<v Speaker 2>nice to know we're aligned to Yeah.

0:19:26.217 --> 0:19:27.977
<v Speaker 1>We we were. We were two for three on that one.

0:19:28.017 --> 0:19:30.937
<v Speaker 1>All right, Now, worst presidents I know and talk radio

0:19:30.937 --> 0:19:33.057
<v Speaker 1>would have been eas issued or just been like Obama

0:19:33.137 --> 0:19:37.137
<v Speaker 1>Biden and you know, and Carter or something or Clidgon.

0:19:37.217 --> 0:19:39.337
<v Speaker 1>But you know I'm talking all time, right, so we're

0:19:39.337 --> 0:19:40.017
<v Speaker 1>talking about the guys.

0:19:40.337 --> 0:19:44.177
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that so yeah, No, I know, Okay, Well, I

0:19:44.257 --> 0:19:46.497
<v Speaker 2>wish I had been given an opportunity to think about

0:19:46.537 --> 0:19:48.737
<v Speaker 2>this before. But what I will go with is, FDR

0:19:49.377 --> 0:19:50.977
<v Speaker 2>New Deal was one of the worst things that happened

0:19:50.977 --> 0:19:51.137
<v Speaker 2>to this.

0:19:51.337 --> 0:19:57.297
<v Speaker 1>He was my honorable mention worst So well done, well done, FDR.

0:19:57.577 --> 0:20:00.497
<v Speaker 2>I have to put Barack Obama on this on this list,

0:20:00.537 --> 0:20:02.497
<v Speaker 2>I have to. He was like the beginning of I

0:20:02.497 --> 0:20:06.177
<v Speaker 2>think the most advisive period in American history. But now

0:20:06.217 --> 0:20:08.137
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to be really creative and we really don't

0:20:08.137 --> 0:20:12.457
<v Speaker 2>have time for that. So I mean.

0:20:14.097 --> 0:20:15.497
<v Speaker 1>I threw LBJ in the mix.

0:20:15.897 --> 0:20:17.017
<v Speaker 2>I'm finding Jimmy Carter.

0:20:17.697 --> 0:20:21.217
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Carter. He wasn't good, but I think he was

0:20:21.217 --> 0:20:25.657
<v Speaker 1>the worst. The popular answers I'll have yourself. The popular

0:20:25.697 --> 0:20:28.217
<v Speaker 1>answers for people on the right are from yesterday, because

0:20:28.217 --> 0:20:30.457
<v Speaker 1>we took calls. The whole thing you can in led

0:20:30.497 --> 0:20:33.537
<v Speaker 1>to the Civil War. I was a mess. James Buchanan

0:20:33.577 --> 0:20:36.097
<v Speaker 1>seems to be pretty universally considered the worst of all time.

0:20:37.497 --> 0:20:39.577
<v Speaker 1>Obviously a lot of people called and said Barack Obama.

0:20:39.657 --> 0:20:41.377
<v Speaker 1>Not many people said Biden was the worst, because I

0:20:41.377 --> 0:20:43.617
<v Speaker 1>think they really like, you know, he's bad. It's not

0:20:43.697 --> 0:20:48.097
<v Speaker 1>really it's not really bid, but a lot of people

0:20:48.097 --> 0:20:51.497
<v Speaker 1>call him with that, I said LBJ. And then just

0:20:51.817 --> 0:20:54.937
<v Speaker 1>at top to bottom, Woodrow Wilson for me, gets us

0:20:54.937 --> 0:20:59.737
<v Speaker 1>involved in the First World War. Internationalist, horrible, a true racist,

0:20:59.857 --> 0:21:03.457
<v Speaker 1>like just so many bad things. Elitist. Yeah, so Woodrow

0:21:03.497 --> 0:21:04.257
<v Speaker 1>Wilson was one for me.

0:21:04.297 --> 0:21:07.297
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, I know what the problem with this question

0:21:07.377 --> 0:21:09.457
<v Speaker 2>to you know, is that there are too many people

0:21:09.497 --> 0:21:11.497
<v Speaker 2>on this list, And so I decided to go with

0:21:11.537 --> 0:21:13.617
<v Speaker 2>the ones that just give me the most anger in

0:21:13.657 --> 0:21:16.217
<v Speaker 2>my heart. So that's why I get someone like Jimmy

0:21:16.217 --> 0:21:18.937
<v Speaker 2>Carter who's still alive versus someone who is dead a

0:21:18.937 --> 0:21:19.497
<v Speaker 2>long time ago.

0:21:20.137 --> 0:21:24.057
<v Speaker 1>Very nice with the world favoring online investing, stock markets

0:21:24.057 --> 0:21:27.697
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrencies, it almost seems archaic to some people to

0:21:27.777 --> 0:21:30.857
<v Speaker 1>look at tangible assets real things. But you want to

0:21:30.857 --> 0:21:34.297
<v Speaker 1>be ahead of the herd, not following it. Because we

0:21:34.377 --> 0:21:37.137
<v Speaker 1>barely even carry cash nowadays, So why would it be

0:21:37.137 --> 0:21:40.497
<v Speaker 1>a good idea to invest in something physical? Right, Because

0:21:41.097 --> 0:21:44.577
<v Speaker 1>look at history, look at what happens. Gold and other

0:21:44.617 --> 0:21:48.417
<v Speaker 1>precious metals have been a sound investment for banks, governments, businesses,

0:21:48.417 --> 0:21:51.937
<v Speaker 1>and individuals for decades, for centuries even there are some

0:21:52.057 --> 0:21:54.977
<v Speaker 1>very clear reasons why. Primary advantage of adding gold to

0:21:54.977 --> 0:21:58.737
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio is its stability. Gold is also a nice

0:21:58.777 --> 0:22:02.217
<v Speaker 1>hedge against inflation, meaning a good defense against your cash

0:22:02.217 --> 0:22:05.417
<v Speaker 1>getting eaten up by inflation. One popular advantage of investing

0:22:05.457 --> 0:22:07.417
<v Speaker 1>in gold is nobody knows you have it unless you

0:22:07.497 --> 0:22:10.737
<v Speaker 1>tell them, and the unlikely event of a massive financial crisis,

0:22:10.737 --> 0:22:14.417
<v Speaker 1>you can use your gold as currency. Go to Oxford gooldgroup,

0:22:14.457 --> 0:22:17.297
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash free to request your free information kit

0:22:17.737 --> 0:22:20.617
<v Speaker 1>or to make a precious metals purchase yourself. I've done it.

0:22:20.697 --> 0:22:22.937
<v Speaker 1>I've worked with Oxford Gold for years and I've gotten

0:22:22.977 --> 0:22:26.817
<v Speaker 1>my gold from them. Oxford gooldgroup dot com slash free again,

0:22:26.857 --> 0:22:31.457
<v Speaker 1>that's Oxford Goldgroup dot com slash free. Where can people

0:22:31.457 --> 0:22:33.537
<v Speaker 1>go to follow your work? Tell them so they can

0:22:33.817 --> 0:22:37.017
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the revolution that you are starting

0:22:37.057 --> 0:22:38.297
<v Speaker 1>here in conservative media.

0:22:39.377 --> 0:22:41.777
<v Speaker 2>Well? Thanks. They can find me on my Website's a

0:22:41.777 --> 0:22:43.897
<v Speaker 2>good spots. You can find all my social media from there.

0:22:43.937 --> 0:22:48.097
<v Speaker 2>It's Aaron Wexler dot com a R y n N E. Wexler.

0:22:48.937 --> 0:22:51.297
<v Speaker 2>Same handle on Twitter and on Instagram. You can search

0:22:51.297 --> 0:22:53.097
<v Speaker 2>my name, but the handle there is non.

0:22:52.977 --> 0:22:56.457
<v Speaker 1>Lab take what's with this spelling? By the way, I've

0:22:56.497 --> 0:22:58.857
<v Speaker 1>never seen my name. Yeah, of the first name, the

0:22:58.937 --> 0:23:00.577
<v Speaker 1>last name. I know, I grew up in New York.

0:23:00.617 --> 0:23:01.577
<v Speaker 1>The first name, I don't know.

0:23:03.217 --> 0:23:05.537
<v Speaker 2>I know. People love asking me, and I love when

0:23:05.537 --> 0:23:08.177
<v Speaker 2>liberals ask, by the way, because they don't just say, oh,

0:23:08.257 --> 0:23:11.017
<v Speaker 2>like what ethnicity is that, or like, but where's that from?

0:23:11.057 --> 0:23:13.377
<v Speaker 2>And they'll always ask me where are you from? And

0:23:13.417 --> 0:23:15.177
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say New York And I was like, where

0:23:15.177 --> 0:23:17.297
<v Speaker 2>are your parents from? And I say, oh, also New York,

0:23:17.337 --> 0:23:18.937
<v Speaker 2>and I just make them to keep going and going

0:23:19.017 --> 0:23:21.097
<v Speaker 2>and going. And then I'm like, oh, oh, you mean,

0:23:21.377 --> 0:23:22.977
<v Speaker 2>is it like a racial thing? Is it like a

0:23:23.017 --> 0:23:25.737
<v Speaker 2>cultural thing. The answer is my parents were just way

0:23:25.777 --> 0:23:28.817
<v Speaker 2>ahead of the celebrity baby naming trend. Not that we

0:23:28.897 --> 0:23:31.457
<v Speaker 2>are celebrities or that we that my parents are that

0:23:31.537 --> 0:23:33.977
<v Speaker 2>I was, but they just want to name me Aaron,

0:23:34.217 --> 0:23:36.937
<v Speaker 2>and aar O N is a boy's name, and e

0:23:37.137 --> 0:23:39.177
<v Speaker 2>er i n is very Catholic, and so they thought

0:23:39.297 --> 0:23:42.537
<v Speaker 2>that's confusing, and Aaron with a why is not. So

0:23:43.177 --> 0:23:45.897
<v Speaker 2>they gave me that name, and that's all there is

0:23:45.937 --> 0:23:46.297
<v Speaker 2>to it.

0:23:47.257 --> 0:23:50.017
<v Speaker 1>There we go, Aaron West. Everybody, thanks for hanging out.

0:23:50.057 --> 0:23:50.577
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you.

0:23:51.417 --> 0:23:52.217
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much. Buck