WEBVTT - Thursday Night preview, Week 6 projections, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess it, Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Fantasy best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. To Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:54.320 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do. Yeah, this is the Fantasy Best

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. You're on the Fantasy Sports were your network

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>alongside Frankie Sample. I am Greg Susman. What's going on Monday, Greggy?

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>The better question is what's going on with you? Going on? Yeah?

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I see that you got a headphone malfunction right now,

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>the headphones on background backward. It was also like kind

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of cleaning up the studio a bit, and uh, here

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we are, studio manager, Greg Susman. That's a lot of

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of titles. You're ready to kick off Week

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>six with Big Blue tonight. I gotta check my teams

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and I kinda be sure I don't have two hilt

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the laughing Yeah, it's fly Eagles Fly, the old

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>NFC e slabber knocker to night excited, I really mean yeah,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't have much going on in this game.

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a few shares of se Kwon Barkley, I

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have Oldell Beckham anywhere. I'm excited for zach Ertz.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable how much more I care about my my

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>two home leagues and anything else, like so much more.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, how many leaks are you in? Though? Outside

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of that does a fish bal account? I guess yeah,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a lead, right, you set your lineup rights. I

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>know you don't care about that at all. GST, we

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>should care more about that, considering it's like the highest

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>price league we play g ST GST Carton League. I

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>would spend a lot more time like looking at GSC

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>if trades were allowed. I agree, I'm a big trader.

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree GST Carton um flex a lot. Not with you, though,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like I care about my main home league more than

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I do any other league, and I too am I

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was the one I was freaking out about last week

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that I need to make it. So I have my

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>home league, my camp league, and those are both like

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>home leagues essentially, those are those are the two I

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>care more about. And I think some of it has

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to do with like flex I want to care a

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>lot about because like it's an industry league, like you're

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in it and and e wise in Florida, like all

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of changing it, Like I want to belt, I can't go,

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like my fantasy league is disgusting, is a disgusting interface,

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and I can't. I don't want to look at it.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you a website programmer? No, what I

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>know people at are Look, I'm not gonna I like

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>other websites more. I'm not going to completely bet. I

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>know it's not easy to make a fantasy website by

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>any means, but like it is like ESPN, Yahoo and CBS.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you're talking about like those are the big boys, Greg,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>but like I would obviously have sore funding and things

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that go into their fantasy webs So last night, right

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>waivers going through Wednesday nights not correct? Right? So I

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>went it was like eight o'clock. I'm on my phone,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>try to put waiter it claims in and you like

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can't on the app it's like not possible, like there's

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>no way to order it when you put the website

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on your browser because they don't like how that looks either,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you use your browser of the app?

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I usually I never put claims in on my app.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I always put it on my right because you're on

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the app. You can't even like short by anything. Literally,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, how do you have a fantasy website where

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't short by stats? If you I've never heard

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of that in my life on the computer. I just

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>said the app right, like I'm using the right How

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>could you have that? It's ridiculous. I fired up on

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a Thursday morning about my fantasy leader any any way

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>claims it because of it. I don't think we're you

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick anybody up. I wanted some people I don't

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>even know they were, like I picked up or not? Though, Man,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you want to pick up? I wanted to

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pick up Chester Chester Rogers. Oh so I just did

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>my uh. I did my rankings last night, and obviously

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about my five players I'm higher on than

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the industry, and Chester Rogers was an

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>honorable mention for me. Greggy, that's nice. The Jets are

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>allowing a decent number of fantasy points to opposing wide

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers this season, and it looks like they're gonna be

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>without Tremaine Johnson and Buster Screen this week, so that

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously lends itself to um being a good matching for

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts. Over the last two weeks, the Jets

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>are allowing the ninth most fantasy points opposing wide receivers,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't look like t Why Hilton's gonna go.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Chester Rogers has twenty two targets over his last games,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so he's just outside of my top thirty six. But

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, if you're in a pinch, especially

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in a bye week, or you're a t Y Hilton owner.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I like Chester Roger, and I thought it was first calling,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>first served. Now that it was Thursday, it should be. Well,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I'm trying to think of, Oh, that player

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>might be on waiver because they got dropped. Chester Rogers

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is owning only twelve percent of leagues. Wow, I thought

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that number would be higher. It's very frustrating. I think

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>people buy more so into Ryan Grant, so I'd like

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to look at his ownership right now. Sure, I mean

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Grant four. All right, so nobody wants anything to

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>do with the cold wide receivers. But but don't blame you.

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I can blame you because Andrew Luck throws sixty times

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a week. And do you see the stat today for

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people who are worried about Andrew Luck? He is on

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>pace to break the record, the NFL record for most

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>passing attempts in an NFL seasons? Great? Is it great?

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>The guy's arms gonna fall off? Nice? I'm just I'm

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just speaking in facts, Greggy, He've been it one on it.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I just picked up a player. Flax makes you feel

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>better on the spot, the dude, Yeah, standard league? Yeah,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>how do I see? I'd rather eat a salad and

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the I have salad for lunch today. No cross,

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>who got picked up? Who got picked up in this league?

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You look at transactions? Look at it right now. Robbie

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Anderson got picked up Breakwon Smith went for thirty two

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>dollars to Jeff Ratcliffe. He was stupid Pro Football Focus.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Anderson went for seventeen. Bob Lung had like a sex

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I like Mohammed's. I've had Courtland something like seven times

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with Michael Floorio our brethren, former best friend forever. Dollars

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>on Mohammed was not too much. I honestly would have

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>picked up Josh Reynolds. Is that too much on most

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a new Yeah? Probably like whatever you better like he's

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>better the player's I own that sair Rodgers for four dollars?

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you have been more than four dollars on chestair

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers might have been six, It might have been six.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about this? I picked up the

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins defense this week and who they got. They faced

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bears at home in Miami and they're expected to

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>get pieces back to their secondary. Interesting, the Dolphins defense

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>has been very good. I'm not buying that one week

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>sample of miss Robinski throwing four six touchdowns against a

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>depleted Tampa Bay Bucks team that just wanted to get

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to their bye week. Q question get it back to

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winson. If A players on waivers, hell, when can

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I pick them up next week? No? I mean probably

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they're probably on waivers for like a day or two.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You were played fantasy football before, not in my fantasy

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. Maybe they're on waivers until Sunday, when the

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>next uh next? I gotta make sure I'm trying to

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the most likely scenario. Alright, fine, just changing

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>some stuff around here. Do you have anything on tonight's game?

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Gre You yeah, you know tonight's game. Man Um, you

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Josh Reynolds. I do want to bring up that

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks and Cooper Cup were cleared for walkthrough. They

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>did walk through yesterday, no contact. They were really in uniform,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>no contact yet. So I don't have Brandon Cooks or

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup ranked this week yet, just because I don't

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>know that they're gonna play, So I don't have them ranked,

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just like I haven't ranked Davonte Freeman because I don't

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>know that he's gonna play either. I gotta get rid

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of players. All right, what do you

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do? You want to do? Your dude, there's

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>any football one Thursday Night or or QB and tight

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>end rankings, not ten rankings yet. I'm up to Thursday

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>night fall. No dr A origin today, am sorry, I

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>forgot to tell you that. Well, this line is moving

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy right now. It just dropped to Philly minus one.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That's this is this is not lots of money coming

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in on Big Blue, Greggy. This is basically down to

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a pick him game. This is this is not good? Why?

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Why is that not good? I don't like it. Look

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>a divisional matchup, anything can happen, especially with the Eagles

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road. The Eagles haven't scored more than twenty

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>three points in any game this season. The Giants are

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>coming off a game what is the first game that

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they scored thirty points? And how long? Great? Because I

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you used to references that all the time.

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's an over the last like two seasons plus.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So the Giants are I know you can't say it

0:08:58.440 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>because they're one and four, but they're kind of try

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>ending in the right direction. They scored thirty points last week.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>They are terrible. You are buying the Giant Giants fan.

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee if you ask the Eagles fan right now,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 1>if Chrissy Bones is around, he might say the Eagles

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>look terrible right now too. They aren't terrible though, Like

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you just watch the Giants like you watch it tonight

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>because you watch, but there are things that play in

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>their favorite They have Olivier Vernon coming back tonight. If

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are without Lane Johnson, I think this game

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is closer than people realize I actually don't disagree with

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>how this line is moving here. I am telling you right,

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>just watch, just watch this team. I'm gonna talk about

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the position players in this game. Greggy, Uh yeah, start

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on the eagle side obviously, Zach, it's you're starting. I

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>think he has a monster game tonight. I don't think

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>people realize this, but the Giants actually haven't allowed a

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to a tight end all season. Greg Through five

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the season, heading into Week six, Giants have

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to touchdown. And I believe they're allowing like

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the fourth fewest fantasy points that opposing tight end. That

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that changes tonight, Greggy Zacker is gonna have a monster game.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So I actually like that as a prop for for

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Zacker to score tonight. If you want to bet on that,

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you get at plus one seventy five on the Fandorich

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is a hilarious He is the most likely player to score.

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>According to the Well from the Eagles perspective on it,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>both um Quan and Odell Beckham are more likely to score.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>According to Fandals Player Problems, You're playing Wendel Smallwood, Corey Colment,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Which what would you rather have tonight? I have them

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 1>ranked back to back. I'm gonna go with Corey Clement Um.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Doug Peterson overall leans towards Corey Clement more

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so than Wendel Smallwood. But you know, I think it

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a close split. It could be. I mentioned

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>last week the split between j J I and Wendel

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Smallwood was of the snaps each. I don't think Darren

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Sprowles is going to go in this game tonight, so

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we're probably looking at close to a fifty fifty split.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think that Corey Clement has a little bit

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>more explosive ability. I think they might use him in

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the past game a little bit more than Moll would.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>But I do like both guys as low end r

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>B two's high end flex options. Uh. If there's any

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>way to attack the Giants, it has been with the

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>running back in the ground game. The Giants have allowed

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the seventh most Fantasy points opposing running backs this season,

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think both guys can be serviceable high end

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>flex options tonight. Yeah, I kind of agree with you.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I prefer Corey Clement Um, but I think it's going

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a split. It's gonna drive you mad, like

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing I could promise you that Corey

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Clement and when Neil small one will drive you mad.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>What it's worth? Um daily rodo They have the props

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>tool under the betting tab and they like the over

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>tonight for Corey clements total rushing yards, which multiple sports

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>books have it around forty four and a half. So

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually like that over. I wanna if you want

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to jump in on that player. I like that. I

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like that over. Although I could also see the eels

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is not running the ball and just like doing the

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>short passes as the running game like very much see

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Yeah, that's definitely a possibility. We know

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for a long time now, the Giants linebacker crew has

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>been a problem. Um so the way to attack them

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be, you know, throwing the ball to their

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>running backs and you know, without Lane Johnson, maybe that's

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>even more so true, you know, using that short pass

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>game as an extension of the running game. I will

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>mention that not very high on Alston Jeffrey tonight. I

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have him as a wide receiver three. I know he's

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>had at least eight targets in both games since he's returned.

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But the Giants have actually been very very strong against

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>opposing team's wide receiver ones this season, Greg, I think

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the most the highest yard total that we've seen out

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>of a wide receiver one was d Hop with around

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>eighties six. So overall, the Giants, I believe they are

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>allowing the fewest fantasy points in the league to opposing

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. Yes, they are the fewest, less than the Jaguars,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Giant Stevens. Pretty sneaky. They've been very good against wide

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>receiver so I'm I'm not really. I know some people

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have alson Jeffrey Ranks is like a low end wide

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver two. I think he's more of like in middling

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three, maybe even closer to a low end

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three. Not that high on him. He kind

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of got shut down by Xavier Roads last week, to

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>which if you remember we spoke about alshon Jeffrey last week,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I said could happen. Yeah, I'm with you, man,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. I also believe tonight that Aljean Jeffrey

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is a wide receiver three. On the other side, the

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.079
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants, Evan Ingram already ruled out, which means

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd is what Sterling Shepherd is going to sneak

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>right in as a low end wide receiver too. Again,

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been very bullish on the games that Evan Ingram

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>has missed. I have Sterling Shephard ranked as my wide

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver twenty. That might be a little bit too high,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but I just think this is an exploitable matchup. It

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's gonna be matched up with Jalen Mills. Obviously,

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's always the part of the field that you want

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to attack against the Eagles. We know how good they

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are against the run, and that doesn't mean that I'm

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>hesitant about se Kwon Barkley tonight, but overall, you know,

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>sa Kwan's rushing total might not be great, but he's

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch a ton of passes. The way to attack

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles defense is through the air, specifically with wide receivers.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So I do think at both Sterling Shepherd and Odell

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Beckham could get there tonight. But as we've seen, when

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham is being double teamed in the red zone,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they've already said we're not going to force feed him,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's where Sterling Shepherd comes into play. I think

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shephard scores a touchdown tonight as well. Great, Yeah,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope so. Indeed, UM, I think Sakon Barkley, who

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>has had five and secutive one hundred total yard games

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and his time for the second most NFL history to

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>start off a career. Kareem Hunt is the most. He

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>had seven in a row U last year. UM Adrian

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Peterson and s Kuon Barkley both tied at five to

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>try to pass a p tonight to make it six.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's the Giant's offense. Sagon Barkley, he is really

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>really unbelievable. I watched one of Brian Baldinger's breakdowns Baldise

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>breakdowns this week, and the line just creates nothing for

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>this guy. It's all squan. It's just very impressive. Are

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you sad that the Giants released Eric Flowers? No, but

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there was so much invested in him. Correct. You guys

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>drafted him over Todd Gurley. Doesn't that make you? Said

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it was your first round pick. You can't just give

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>up on the guy. Yeah, I'm sorry, Greggy. I have

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning ranked as my nineteenth quarterback this week. You

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's too high to h too high? So the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>players I have just Behind him are Mitch Drabinsky, Derek Carr,

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Flacco. I might want to mo ba all

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>three in front of him. Why though, I just went

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>over how I like Sertling Shepard, Nodell Beckham. You're you're

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that thing again. He's right nineteen. It's not like

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I have him as a top twelve quarterback. You're doing

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that thing again, Una, A six touchdown game doesn't matter.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You just had a bye week exactly. He's going up

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Miami Dolphins. They're going They're going back home.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Just got embarrassed this past week against the Bengals. I

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like their defense this week. I think Mitch Trobinsky is

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>still kind of suspect. I mean, he had one phenomenal

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>game against the Bucks defense. How much do you how

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>much stock do you put in that or which game?

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins game? I believe the Bears are favored by

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>three on the road. Love it? You must love the

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Dolphin game. What are you're telling me how much you

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>love the Dolphins? Actually with the hook to yeah, I

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>actually do kind of like that. Miami getting three and

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a half at home? What do you think? I think

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it could be a lower scoring close game. I wouldn't

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>touch this game personal name. But they hate the Dolphins.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I do too, I have you're talking about teams.

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't ever want to watch the Dolphins. Maybe number one.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>That's fair because they don't really utilize any one wide receiver.

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's very frustrating purposes. So you know, if you get

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the highlight that Kenyan Drake scores receiving touchdown, obviously you

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>get very excited. I get very excited because I have

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake in my home league. Um, yeah, I agree

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with you. Probably don't want to watch that, especially this week.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be an ugly game. Greg. With the

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>spread now at the Eagles minus one favorites in the

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>total at forty three and a half. Which where are

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you leaning tonight? Getting the Eagles a bias or fandom

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>getting the way of your your heart. I've learned that

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the Yankees. What do you learned the hard way?

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Your fisher pick? I will I will also take the Eagles,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'll take the over man. But I think it's close.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the totals at half, so I think

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we just get the slight over there. There you go,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Eagles in the under. Eagles in the over. We'll find

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>out tomorrow what happens when we come back. Let's dive

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>into Frank Snapple's quarterback and tight end rankings. We do

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that act. Daily Rhodo dot Com learned from the game's

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rohado dot Com optimize second minutes building,

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>optimize line up for cast games and turneys learned from

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rhodo dot com.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>M you doing that thing you do, breaking my heart

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>into a million pieces, like you always do. And we

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to be crude. Never man, you do a

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand heart aches. But I've been going through because it

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>hurts so hard just to see you girl around with

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>someone new, because I know you you're doing that thing

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you do. I'm greggy, I know all the things games

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you play. Never mom, and you I'll not say I'm done,

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I should have saying along with you that

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>thing you do with the Wonders not a real band,

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>sorry movie from that thing you do. Okay, starring Tom Hanks.

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Never seen it. It's one of my favorite movies of

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>all time. I will keep that in mind next time

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a movie night at the Sussman Household. You are

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty funk about that, sure you dum Nope? NBA

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>line of optimizer is now available. That means you can

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>use the same tools of projections of Daily rotor dot

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Com NFL Premiums subscribers are using to win each week

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for NBA DFS contest that start well next week. We

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>told you about the premium subscribers winning hundreds of dollars

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>each night using the Daily rot a lot of optimizers.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>We told you about the subscribers winning thousands and tens

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.239
<v Speaker 1>of thousands, and we told you about Colin Drew who

0:19:55.359 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>won two hundred and fifty grand this week. We've also

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>told you about the seven millionaires that Daily Rodo was created.

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You're playing DFS and you aren't using the Daily Roado

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of tools, projections and optimizers. What are you doing? You

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>know what they're wrong? You are at a disadvantage. Go

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>to Daily roader dot com, click on go Premium, enter

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the promo code f fan t S Why very special

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>discount as Daily roder dot com. Click on go Premium

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and enter the promo code F and T s why

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 1>for a special discount and start winning today. I'm being

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>informed that Tom Hanks is not the star of that movie,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and technically it is the protagonist and support that's Tom

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Everett Scott. But not only is Hanks the supporting act there,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he also produced the movie. He went and directed and

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>also it was his directorial debut. He made the movie. Scot.

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You're getting kind of called out in the YouTube, Vona.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, I feel like liv Tyler's never looked

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on her, you know what. I was literally just telling Ventra.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>She looked so cute in that movie. Was young, like

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>she was a lot younger, but like for like the

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the time period. It was in the sixties.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess it is. Well, looks like she was gorgeous.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like Armageddon time period essentially. So that was Live

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Tyler at her hottest. She still looks good though, so

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>weird now she's very deceiving. Live Tyler. This is very

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>deceiving because there are some pictures where she looks she

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>looks very good. She's greats were like, it's a little weird.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really look like the same person. She's a

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little Weird's like, don't look at the Lord of the

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Rings pure you can't look at you can't look at

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lord of the Rings pictures obviously. I mean I'm

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the right person. Right, What are the movies?

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Was this person? Do you know who her father is?

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Don't look don't look at the pictures, Tyler. You saw

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the pictures? No, I didn't, sweird. I just went back

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to all does it literally say daughter or Steven Tyler

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and Google? I mean it might somewhere I don't like, Yes,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it is Steven Tyler's daughter. You go, I got

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it right to bring that game back? Now we shouldn't

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you want to play? No, embarrassed myself to hit me

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>with the music, but like, give it to me. I

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>don't need to know live Tyler is. She doesn't play

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>football or anything. Well the stump frank music, stump the

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>frank is where we ask not but this is not

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to do there it is all right? You ready,

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Please don't ask any of a little here we go

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>gig a little bit. Well, she's in the Leftovers the show. Yes,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>she was one of the main people in the as well. Okay,

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>here we go, who is ready a ready, who's Brett Kavanaugh? Uh?

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>He is the Supreme Court justice. I also I saw

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the guy on Twitter who's like like a random guy

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter named Kavanaugh. She tweeted, this is a really

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bad time to be named. Everyone was just retweeting, Well,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I told you that when I go to get my

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 1>hair cut from my uncle who was a hair stylist. Yes, um,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a big political buff so he always has it

0:22:58.320 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>on in the background. And that's where I kind of get.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure to d just want

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you were you know of to day,

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know your stuff. Yeah, I mean this one's kind

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>of hard not to be, Okay, I just wanted to

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure. Man, I appreciate it. Though. The Strangers, that's

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>where I know her from. Did you ever see the

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>movie Terrible Movie? Never seen horror movie? You strike me

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as a guy who doesn't like horror movies because you

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>were Home is that movie. She's also in One Night

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Cools as well. Okay, who is Harvey Weinstein?

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>If you've called, if you've seen The Strangers, call in

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and give us a review of that movie. You want

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to know if anyone out there thinks it was a

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>good movie. Who is Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinstein is uh

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood guy he's I think he's a director where

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been involved in a lot of scandals

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>as one. Oh, I think he's not a director, but

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll say he's casting with casting nobly. I don't know

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>what his role is, but I know what he did. Yeah,

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, what is his technical what is his job? Tip?

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>He owned like the Weinstein company that produced all these movies.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we'll give it to you. We're giving

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it to you it gradually. Its right, next? One? More, one,

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>last one? Are you ready? I'm always ready? Okay, here

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we go. Who is m hm? Who is stumping yourself?

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to I want to make I

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>want to make it. Maybe a hard one? All right? Ready?

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Who is Warren Harding? I have no idea, no idea.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Warren Harding? Is Harding? Warren Harding? Yes, he's a twenty

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>nine president United States. There you got for me for

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a loop? Come on, man, you know I thought this

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>was a present guy. You know, I thought this guy

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>might have still been alive. But he's actually born November two,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five, very dead in Blooming Grove, Ohio, cause

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of death of heart tech. Yeah, represented the Republican Party.

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So surprised you brought his name up, Greg. Do you

0:24:52.800 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>know Joy Tylor's Joy Taylor? Uh? Actress? Nope, she's person

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that's on the TV with Colin Coward. Yeah, I don't

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>know that is she sports the American radio personality as

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>she also Jason Tylor's wife, I believe, really Yeah, like

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>former dolphin and jet for the Jets. Right, a little

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bit short stint of his career in the Redskins. All right,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what have we got? Greg? All right? Eight four four?

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>If you want to talk about the Strangers with live

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Tyler or that thing you do, would love Tyler as well?

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>All Right? She has first probably sure? Has he officially

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out right? No? No, it said it's not

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that big of a deal. Maybe it's not like a

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>long term with not a long term thing. I don't

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think he plays this week? Probably not? Which would that's

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on us? No, it's on you and Florida. No, it's

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on Yeah, it's on both of you. I didn't want

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Devonte Freeman. I wanted Kareem I wanted what do I

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>want Keena now, and that's why I wanted. I wanted

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to start Antonio Brown Keenan nowt in the PPR league

0:25:56.240 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and what have that? Actually would that have actually helped us? Yeah?

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Would have. It would happen because Keenan Allen Alex Conser

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>played every game Freeman didn't, So yeah, it would have

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>helped us, all right, So if if he doesn't go,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Freeman doesn't go. Keevin Coleman is facing the Tampa Bay Buccaneers,

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>who are allowing the sixth most fantasy place opposing running

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>backs in PPR. For what it's worth, they have not

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed over a hundred yards rushing this season at all.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>In the last game before the bye, they allowed twenty

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>five rushing attempts for seventy eight yards between Jordan Howard

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and three Cohen, So they're more so killed in the

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>past game. That's great. Obviously would favorite Tevin Coleman as well,

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so lots of like in then that would be Yeah,

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman would become in RB two and Edo Smith

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>would be like low and flex option all right, barely

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>inince top thirty six. I agree with that. I agree

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that I don't want to Smith by any means. Now,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>let's here you might this is a tough by for

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs. And I know it's only two teams on

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a buy, but you lose Camar Ingram and use carry

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>on Johnson. So to carry on Johnson we lost. I mean,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a low on RB two right now. We're talking

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>about it every day, Greg. The running back landscape is

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not good. That makes carry on Johnson at RB two

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with um you is your quarterbacks press? We usually do

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a quarterbacks press, right, so have it out? Is that

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>road raspers dot Com? Your best friends ranks? There we go.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That's great. It's a bet friends ranks last week too.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell Scott anything. I still haven't told Yeah,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stanford's Week six lineup ranks and high five, so

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't done what you wanted. And it's well, there's

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>no high five on here. It's five players that AM

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>higher on than the consensus. But I don't like see that.

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not like last usually like player player player player player,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't see that here. We have to read the

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>paragraph paragraph, just tell you who I'm high on. We

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>had Eagles running backs, so we already we gotta change

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>this Mike Davis should be changed. I'm high on Sammy Watkins,

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Hilo Lockett, Marys Thomas, and Chester Rogers. With my honorable mention, Yeah,

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not We're not doing this. Is it crazy that

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I have Jameis Winston is a top five quarterback's top

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>five is really interesting? Now. I know a lot of

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>people really really like, really really like um James Winston

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. I get it. You're facing Atlanta, UM and

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>coming off the bye he had he had in the Dome.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>He had a really good preseason with the new offensive

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>coordinators actually doing something, so I understand why you want

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it. He was also the number one quarterback

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in December of last fantasy football season, so I get it.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you know the over under for this game and

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a half? Sorry, yeah, it's really high, second to the

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Patriots in Chiefs, which are at sixty. Right. I understand it, man,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I I get it. I don't know. I can't a

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of risk involved, but they really argue with it.

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Think about this. The Falcons defense has allowed re passing

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in four straight games. Like this is unprecedented. Is

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston gonna be the guy who breaks the shriek

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't throw for three touchdowns for the fifth game

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a row against the Falcons defense. I think he does,

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>probably does like based on the weapons. It's just like

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it. The Falcons secondary as depleted as it is.

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you go out and stop Mike Evans and

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Godwin and the Seawan Jackson and Cameron Braid? And

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we should mention Cameron Brad while we're talking about tight

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ends as well. O J. Howard actually did practice yesterday

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in a limited fashion. He has a supporting a big

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>old brace on his leg. But this was a similar

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>injury to Evan Ingram, which has now forced him to

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>miss three games in a row. It would be pretty

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>miraculous if O. J. Howard just you know, he got

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the one week off from the by and now plays

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in this week. But it looks like there's a chance

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen. Greg, So do you pump the brakes

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>on Cameron Braid a little bit? So? It was really

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>really frustrating yesterday to pump the brakes al right, continue,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>It was really really um frustrating. As Cameron Brad owner,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I asked you yesterday before, who do you start? Jingan

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>reader Cameron Brad. It's really frustrating, said O. J. Howard

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was back at practice um with the knee. Rais, if

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>O J. Howard plays, I cannot start Cameron Bread. I

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can't do it like I think breat have. I had

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the choose between Brayton Howard, Brant would be the one

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that I want. But it's really really frustrating that there's

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance O J. Howard does play, and it really

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is a two week injury for him that would suck.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, even if O J. Howard plays,

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I still like Cameron Brad just because James always looks

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>his way, like when both guys are on the field.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>James has showed us that he's going to target Cameron

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Braid more than he is O J. Howard. O J.

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Howard was a, you know, a favorite of Ryan Fitzpatrick,

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and we knew that, but I do think that you

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>know what we saw it last game, Jamis came in

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>instantly inside the red zone throws a touchdown to Cameron Braid,

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So all you needed to touchdown to be a tight

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>end one with a game total this high and with

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>his best friend and Jamis Winson now quarterback in the Bucks.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Once again, I still do like Cameron Braid. I have

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>him as my tight end eight on the week. And

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that's even with assuming O. J. Howard plays. O. J.

0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Howard plays. I think he's more so in a limited fashion.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he plays, so I totally agree

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with that. Like I said, I'd rather start Break than

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Howard if they both play, I just don't feel comfortable

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>starting either of them are Fortunately that's my tight end eight.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that too high? I haven't just ahead of Jordan Read,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burton, Kyle Rudolph, David and joke. Yeah, it's gonna

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be too high. If O. J. Howard plays, well, you

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>need to touchdown. I understand that. I understand that, but

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like Reid hasn't scored a touchdown since what we won,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burton coming off a big game, it's right, you're

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna see, You're gonna see when the Bears offense gets

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>shut down this week, I'd rather start Kyle Rudolph might

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be the one I think touchdown in the past couple

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of weeks even and Joe, who also I'd rather have

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this week. Why no targets have been there. Targets have

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>been there, and targets in every game but one. Yeah,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know your guy Callaway's gonna get more snaps, right,

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>which means they played different rules. I think in the

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>offense that's that's definitely true. So that's why I think you.

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you can also be the case if O. J.

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Howard plays Austin who marking me above him too. I

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have a fantasy philosophy question for you, girls could ring

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the sirens fantasy question. Obviously, we look at fantasy points

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.719
<v Speaker 1>against a lot. Yep, that's you used that a lot

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to determine it. I feel like you should just throw

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end fantasy points against for tight ends out the

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>window because all right, so I mentioned the Giants have

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed the third fewest fantasy points to opposing tight ends.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Tight end more than any other position in fantasy. The

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of fantasy points that you give up as a

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>defense is solely dependent on the team that you play,

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they used the tight end or not.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's run through the teams that the Giants have faced.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>The Jaguars. That was with Austin Sinfarian Jenkins healthy and

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>week one, and you can argue that whether it was

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>him or Niles Paul, they should have scored a touchdown

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in week one against the Giants. In Week two they

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>faced Jallous that's you know, before they realized that Jeff

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Swain was their leading receiver. Week three, they did allow

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifteen yards to the Houston texts. Who

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like Ryan Griffin and company over there.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>In Week four it was the Saints against Ben Watson.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They allowed four receptions for eighties six, so all right,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's whatever. And then last week it was against Carolina,

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>who they're you know, they're not really targeting Ian Thomas

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>all that much with Greg Olson out. So I think

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>when you look at fantasy points against for opposing defenses

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at the tight end position, a lot of it is

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>based on what team that you have faced. I don't

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>know that this information is as valuable as it is

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.479
<v Speaker 1>running like fantasy points against running backs. So I think

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a fair point. And I hear what you're saying,

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But to me, like some of those numbers, those names

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that you gave out, Jeff swims Um, the Ben Watson's, like, again,

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not high profile guys like Ben Watson, like four six

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is really good game from tight end. You're telling me

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>my Tenan will get that awesome. I mean on that number.

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So some of those numbers that you gave out I'm

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fine with from my tight end. So you're saying I

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>have came Bray too high, and I think so, Yeah,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so. On the other side of that, right,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bucking Years the worst team, he gets tight end

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>number number one, right, not in the most fantasy points

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>per game inside ends. How could you not have Austin

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Hooper higher than Cameron Right, Well, let's look at who

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they faced again. This is this is where it comes

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>into giving me so in week two. In week one,

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>they faced New Orleans five for fifty nine. Week two

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they faced Philly, So zach Ertz obviously went off. Just

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>want to note and just want to note, no Carson

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Wentz that day either. Yes, week three, that was Pitt touchdown,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that was Vance McDonald and then it was Trey Burton

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and the everybody And that was only two receptions. That

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was a completely blown coverage. And we can get blown

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>coverages out of Tampa Baby, but Tampa Bay got she

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>lacked by it. But Austin Hooper you also have to

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>take into account the usage. Right, Like last week, he

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>had twelve targets the week before he had two. I

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>started to Yeah, So it's like, how much faith, how

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>much confidence do you have in Austin Hooper when his

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>targets are very inconsistent. Yes, it's a very good matchupent.

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't Cameron Breath. I don't have trust Cameron Bread

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to score touched on more so than I do. I

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't um Austin Hooper. I I don't many touchdowns is

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hooper have in the year, Greg, I don't think.

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if here's any Why would you why

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>would you depend on him to score one? Now? I

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>just think it's a good shot against Tampa. The touchdown

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>height ends back to back in I think this is

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a good it's a good back and forth. I agree

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>with you. I don't, but I personally I'm looking all

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>right to like the for example of Falcons, they've been

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>very good against tight ends this year, which is crazy.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's like, who have they who have they faced? They faced?

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They faced Zach Arts in week one, no tight ending

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in CAROLINEA week two, Ben Watson three six eight eight

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and Advance McDonald last week they were a good

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Steelers And it's a kind of a crapsh you know,

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not like it's type of advance. McDonald's amazing is

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely to score a touchdown with Damis Winston's quarterback

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 1>than Austin Hooper. Is this We continue the conversation when

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 1>we come back NEXTUALLYS. If you're someone that needs fantasy

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 1>sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports Radio Network has

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>you covered. When you download the n T S Y

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the top fantasy advice

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>every single day right through the weekend, and be sure

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to listen to our weekend warriors like College Football Today.

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to College Football Today Weekend Fantasy Update. The Fantasy

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Jesus in this league is never short of exciting at

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I T L and so much more. Download the Fantasy

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network GAP in the iTunes and Google play

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Store now and keep the best fantasy experts right in

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>your pocket all day long and all week long. What

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>do you take your calls here? Four three, season A

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>seven nine, Just a moment. Just use some business first, Frank,

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's tell you that. If you enjoy playing dfs

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but are sick of dealing professionals using algorithms to select

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of laughs and entries trying to proms Fielder tool

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>at my Bookie dot a G. Forget having a grand

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>multiple lineups stitched, the hassle of dealing with late line

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 1>up scratches and avoid experts winning ninety on the money

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>investional players that you want without salary caps. And if

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you sign up for a new account using the promo

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>code f n t s Y, you can receive a

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Positi bonus. No, we're dealing with late lad scratches. No

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>experts compete against you in the prop that you choose.

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Go to my Booky dot a G the promo code

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>f n T s Y pot sign up and choose

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>your matchups usual the props builder tool and that's my

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Bookie dot a G. The provoo code is f n

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>T S Why what was the name of that song

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>step by Step? Is that the by step? Yeah? You

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>kids on the Block? I think really that was that

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>step by Step? Yeah? By Step? I was probably back

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to like doing things. Did you watch that program step

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>by Step? What is that TV show? Really? Yeah? Well

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it aired like the euro was born and really blame

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>me for that one. You can watch you watch old shows.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure no new Kids on the Blox. Step by Step,

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, Greg, I know I was right. Dude. Well,

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you know you were like thirty by the time I

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was born, so obviously you know you were. You were

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>watching so true story. I'm thirty now, No, you're actually sixty,

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>doubling my age. Wait, okay, um, that's contending the tenant

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>conversation here, Frank. So I think it's really interesting thing. Um,

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I understand, and maybe I was wrong shopping the gun

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that I think Austin Hooper has a better chance to

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>catch touched on Cameron Bright. I just think so much

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>relies on O. J. Howard playing like Cameron Braid is

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in a really good position. If Howard does not play.

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>If he does play, it's it's more of a toss

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 1>up to me than anything else. When I know Austin

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Hooper is the one tight end, but don't you feel

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>like even if both play, Like with Jameis Winston back

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 1>as the quarterback, he looks Cameron Braid's way. We didn't

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of big games out of O. J.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Howard last year when Jamis Winston was the quarterback. A

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of those big games last year and this year

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>where when Ryan Fitzpatrick was the quarterback for the books.

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just think even if both guys play, it's

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>like Damis Winston just has like these these rose colored

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.479
<v Speaker 1>glasses on with and he only sees his Cameron Braid.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like he doesn't even see Oj Howard on the field.

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I got it. I'm with you. I'm totally with But

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>don't you want to give it a game to see

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that's changed? Ideally? Yeah, but the tight end position is

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a crapshoot. I agree with you with the names that

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you personally have under in your rankings. I would have

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>all above just for just for I gotta see it.

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I have to see it. It's a little bit tougher

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with a tight end because you're really just taking that

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>shot on the touchdown upside. And who has touchdown upside?

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Cameron brad with James Swinton as the quarterback has touchdown upside.

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Trey Burton, Okay, he has touched on upside, his targets

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't necessarily been there. He's facing the Dolphins, obviously, my

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins this week, which apparently I've adopted David and

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Joke Wu. While the targets have been there. You know,

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you play in a point per target league, David

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and Joke, who is great, but he hasn't done anything.

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>He's had seven at least seven targets in four to

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 1>five games. Yes, you love the usage out of David

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 1>and Joking. And I think you bring up a fair

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>point about Richard Higgins. You know he's out a couple

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. And Daven Joke, who's gonna fill that, you know,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>short to intermediate possession receiver type of role bield When

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to David and Joke, who hasn't done anything,

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't scored a touchdown this year, He hasn't really been

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>targeted in the red zone this year, which kind of

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like a mistake by Todd Haley and the Boys

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>dog Pound. So I like in Joke, I like his potential,

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I like his upside. But again, this is the standard

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>rankings for the tight end position. Who's more likely to

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdowns? In my opinion is Camera Brake fair enough?

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Eight four three eight seven nine four three six eighty

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Let's go to Devon in San Antonio. Let's

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>going on Devon. Do we have Devin? We have Devin? Devin?

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>What's up man? What's up? Um? All right? So I

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>just have two quick Star questions both of them for

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>full PPR um first one Chris Thompson or Chris Carson,

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and then second one. Um, I'm starting Dalton this week,

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.360
<v Speaker 1>but I also have Wentz and then I have Russell

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and injury luck on waivers as well. All right,

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so I would use Andy Dalton. I'm pretty bullish on him.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I might be the highest person on Andy Dalton this week,

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 1>just in that game against the Steelers. I know it's

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>an a f C North Visional matchup. Normally the narrative

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is that those games are hard hitting, they're normally low scoring.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>But this game has a fifty three and a half

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>point total over on Earth, so we're expecting points here,

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and the Steelers secondary hasn't been great this year. So

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I have Andy Dalton as my sixth rand quarterback. I

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>would use him the running back position. This is a

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tougher one to answer, because I like Chris Carson overall

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this week for his matchup against the Oakland Raiders, but

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's PPR, he doesn't catch a lot

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>of passes. Chris Thompson, we know what his upside could

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be in PPR. He can catch a ton of passes.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He can catch them, you know, in in in bunches.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He can. You know, he can easily go out there

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and have six seven, eight receptions this week. But he's

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>also now dealing with an injury. He has that rib injury.

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>On a week to week basis, you don't know if

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a p Is it going to be

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>an AP game as gonna be a Chris Thompson game.

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 1>There's just too much inconsistency. I'll take Chris Carson in

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the matchup and Andy Dalton Gregg I agree with, Actually

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Chris hard Carson, Andy Dalton as well, you're the Thompson guy.

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, you might you might fight me

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bits. Yeah, it's just for me. It is unpredictable.

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And I really thought Chris Thompson was in from this

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>massive game on Monday. Didn't happen. I think both Thompson

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and AP are banged up. When either of them are

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>banged up, I leen toword AP getting more of a workload.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Christompson's brittle man. Yeah, he definitely is. UM. It often

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>comes down the game flow and as much as as

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>much as we try to predict these games, you know,

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you never know when the Panthers are just gonna go

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out and get off to a fourteen zip lead in Washington.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You just don't know if that happens, it sets up

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a Chris Thompson game. If if it's a

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>closer game throughout, and that's what the spread tells us

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be, I think this game might be

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a pick him right now. Actually, um, yeah, Washington's favored

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>by one at home, so they expected to be a

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.399
<v Speaker 1>very close game. In games like that, we could see

0:42:53.440 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more Adrian Peterson. So it's just very hard to predict

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Washington backfield. This is one that you know you

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 1>love to have in the best all format, so the

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>decision gets made for you. But ultimately I'll take the

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>matchup with Chris Carson against the Raiders fair enough a

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four or three six eight seven nine.

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>We continue all with your telephone calls with Wesley in California.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>What's up Wesley? Hey, guys, got a couple of quick questions.

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>M Um deciding my flex three people on my flex.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I have al Sean Jeffrey uh to choose shown John

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown or Dalvin Cook. This ppruh full uh ppr. Yeah,

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not really a question for me. I really, I'm

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with John Brown. Ok, yeah, just based on

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the way that he's being used. Had fourteen targets last week.

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>He was not efficient. Um, the Titans have been a

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit inconsistent against wide receivers. They've been better recently,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but again this goes back to if you look at

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>their fantasy points against that position, it's a little bit

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>flukey because last week they faced the Bills, who don't

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of wide receivers. They don't throw the

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>ball all that much. They only allowed five receptions for

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight yards. The week before when they faced the Eagles,

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Alsan Jeffrey Nelson, Agilar and them boys fifteen receptions a

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety seven yards and two touchdowns to wide receivers.

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.319
<v Speaker 1>So they've been a little bit inconsistent, but they've been

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>prone to giving up fantasy production two wide receivers. I'll

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>take John Brown. I don't think it's very close either

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Greg so for me, and if Dalvin Cook plays, I

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like him in this matchup, but that it's a little

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>bit more risky. So I'll say this, I'm not starting

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>alshon jefferd tonight. If Dalvin Cook plays, I would play

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook if he doesn't, you have John Brown. This

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is how you felt about Cameron Braid, Like you want

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to see that proven again. It that's more how we

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>feel about Dalvin Cook, like get he's if he plays,

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be ranked inside of my top twenty. He's

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>a he's an RB two. But John Brown, the way

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's being used, I have him a Wide Receivers

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sixteen like he is a very very solid wide receiver too.

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>This week against the Tennessee Titans secondary, which has been

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent this year. Okay, eight four? You know any other

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>quite is? Why don't anyone cut you off? He said

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of questions, Yeah, yeah, yeah, Um, I also

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>try it's a trade. Uh what's the name? Uh? So

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers and Julio Jones for Cam Newton and DeAndre Hopkins.

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a wash. Which side are you on? Uh?

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I did it was because I

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>was looking at Aaron Rodgers and Julio schedule at the

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the season. Uh, during the finals

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and championships. I liked Cam Newton's and hop Hopkins schedule better.

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:36.879
<v Speaker 1>So so fine, you like, do you like him? Better?

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Go get him? Fine, it's nothing I like. I like

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that trading more so in a four point passing such

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>down league, just because Cam Newton adds more with his

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>legs six points passing, I think Aaron Rodgers just throws

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a ball more. The wide receivers are kind of a wash.

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>One thing I will say about looking forward to schedules

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the season, it's kind of hard

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to predict because one injury takes place to a secondary

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a defensive player, and that the whole

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>outlook of that team's defense can completely change. For example,

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not I don't want this to happen.

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's gonna happen. But if Jalen Ramsey

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>goes down for the Jaguars, you're looking forward and you're saying, oh,

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Week fifteen and sixteen, I'm scared of the Jaguars defense.

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>If Jalen Ramsey goes down at any point, that defense

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is not nearly as scary as it is if they

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>have Jalen Ramsey. So I'll just throw that out there.

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of hypotheticals. It's just it's very hard

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to predict what a defense is going to look like

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at that point in season. Great, Yeah, I completely understand

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying to me. It's really is a wash.

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>You like too, better go for it like it doesn't.

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>It's not that which of a difference. It's a wash.

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But I would probably lean the Rogers up if or four.

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. If we're four eight fourth three,

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Shay stage seven nine, we hit up Darren and Philly.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Darren, Let's go Eagles one one second? Darren,

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Hold hold that thought? Why why are you doing that?

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm gonna bet on them? Let's go Eagle. You

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet? Yeah, you bet you want You obviously are

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>rooting for the team that you're gonna bet on. Greg.

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, but I feel like you gotta just

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 1>like like poking the bear for no reason? Are you

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the bear in the sistance I wrote for your teams?

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't why you don't weekend? You for the Jets

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>weekend and we don't against them? Like guys, I'm a cowboy, friend, Darren, Darren,

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>we were leaving you out of this here. How about

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the cowboy? What are you doing? I'm just doing I'm

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:27.919
<v Speaker 1>doing the Fantasy executive. Fantasy executive on the Fantasy Secret,

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I hate air yards. Your man, Darren, what do you

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>got my back? All right? So I got two quid questions, Um,

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>who would you drop key Indiana receiver? Would you drop

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenney Stills for Rogers? I heard that, okay? And then

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the next question I have is my running backs is

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Zekiel Elliott, James Conner, Alex Collins and Carlos High. You

0:47:52.480 --> 0:47:54.000
<v Speaker 1>think I'm all right for the rest of the season.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're fine, um, because I look, even if

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Connor loses the job he has, he has Carlos Hide

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as his art a job he's not gonna lose his job.

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>And Alex Collins, I know he's kind of like in

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Pit of misery right now. But better days

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>are coming for Alex Collins. Once he works his good

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>graces back up, he goes a few games without fumbling,

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get back to that point where we get

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty plus touches out of Alex Collins. Maybe that's just

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>me being the ultimate optimist for him, but I do

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>think better days are coming for him as of right now.

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I do agree he's more of like a flex often

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 1>more so than the r B two. We're drafting Alex

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Collins to be Look if you could, if you could

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>trade James Connor for anything right now? I think you

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>look into it. But even even if you don't, you

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>still have Carlos Hide as your r B two. I

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think you're all right. It seems a little bit more pessimistic,

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>just a little nervous. I think it's fair to be nervous.

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Is he all right? I think he's all right. He's okay. Hey.

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>In the movie The Strangers, it sucks. I agree with you.

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a bad movie. Did you see the second part

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of it? Yeah, that one's horrible too. I'm gonna have

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to watch it. You know, it's October, gre you gotta

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>watch some Halloween movies. Get yourself in the mood, in

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the spirit. What do you greg? What do you throw

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a Halloween party? Do you have do you have whatever?

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't know whatever politically channel on in

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the background while during a Halloween or do you have

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you have a Halloween movie on? You

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have Halloween usually music on? Usually during the party? I

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 1>put sports on? What sports wanted a Halloween? Darren? And

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're still here is. I mean, Darren wants to

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be part of the show. Let me be part of

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the show. You just the want to be on because

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he was how about them cowboys, Darren? How about those cowboys?

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>There you go, let's go. Greg. Cut Darren enough. You

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 1>got it wrong. You got the damn thing wrong. You're

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fan, and you got the damn line wrong about

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>them cowboys. You should have those cowboys. Come on. It's

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable cowboy that I heard. How about them? You're way

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>too nice to these people. You give a Cowboys fan opportunity.

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Screwed it up. Thank you, We're Kee Marchino. We're done

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>with you too for the day. Thank god, getting rid

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of getting rid of this. We'll finish up the podcast,

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>especially you rate subscribe, like, leave a comment. We need

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it all. I don't really can have it's Cowboys fan whatever.

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 1>If it was a Patriots fan, I would want to

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get him off the air, too ridiculous. I have a

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit fun with the callers, Greg, Come on, I

0:50:18.080 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get happy that Darren had an opinion of the movie Strangers.

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, do you you have sports on in

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the background? Sports round, sports on the background, basketball on right, right,

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 1>then we're college football. Okay, um on on, I'm not

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to make a party. By the way,

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. My family's having their Halloween party the same night.

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:42.799
<v Speaker 1>I have an obligation. I'm sor so I usually want

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>to go baseball playoff World Series. You have all potential, look,

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and we have some music playing as well. Okay, so

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, yeah, it's fine. Do you make it? Do

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you do you really address the apartment up decorations? It

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.359
<v Speaker 1>look all spooky. Get any you get any of those

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 1>like purple lights, put the purple light bulbs in to

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>try and like, I don't make your apartment look you

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:08.360
<v Speaker 1>know more. Halloween were using cool stuff the web. You

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have the web going on. I bought my costume. I

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>can't miss my family's party all costume last night. Would

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you get I'll tell you off the air. Are you're

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna reveal it? Right? So then I won't reveal

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>my I'm assuming that we're gonna dress up here, right,

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't plan on doing that. What we did last

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>year we did was just the studio. Last year we

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.040
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to Michaels and do something. Yeah, I know,

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean? We there's no we in this, Greg, No, no, no, no, no,

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.280
<v Speaker 1>no no no. I'm I have a bunch of editing

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>priorities that I need to be doing. And you remember

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>yesterday you said you were two days you said he

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:42.000
<v Speaker 1>missed being you want to be to me? What have

0:51:42.080 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>my role? So I had to go. So if I'm

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>not editing, who's editing? Greg? Steve was here yesterday? Okay, yeah,

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 1>what a once? We have NBA stuff to do. Well,

0:51:49.960 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll hopefully tonight. If any wants to apply to an

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>editing job, people have to actually have people apply on

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter sliding those d M you know what. No contact, Frank, No,

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not in charge of this can be you

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>don't hire people, you do, but then you just pass

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>along to me anybody you like. I feel like, I

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like you want to do all these things, but

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>then you just pass on to me. Well yeah, so

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 1>not used to do with you, right? No, yeah, you're right,

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>he did. But I'm like, I don't pass things on

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to you. Everything I passed on to you. You have

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 1>your headphones on, you print it on here. You you

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>don't hear me. No, that's not true. Saying stuff to do,

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I do it I get it done. What you mean

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I said you in a meeting invite? What time was

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the call? It was that call? I was here at

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>ten am today. That's the time he was come to work.

0:52:41.120 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Every day, I'm usually here ten fifteen. It depends on

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the editing workload. God, unbelievable is the inner workings of fright.

0:52:52.120 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll get your quarterbacks ten rankings off, you're one. We

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have we have two minutes, two minutes left. You know

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get to the quarterback ranks. Now, well, I

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:01.920
<v Speaker 1>started a quarterback and he a tight ends. Quarterback rankings

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>anything interesting? Edgey luck, borderline are borderline KB twelve um

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 1>KiB one. This week we get the Shawn Watson. You're

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the lowest on the Shawn Watson. Why might move even

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 1>lower because the Bills secondary has actually been very good

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:18.440
<v Speaker 1>against quarterbacks the past couple of weeks. That's actually the

0:53:18.480 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>strength of their defense. And DeShawn Watson is dealing with

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a chess injury and his offensive line is terrible. So

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there's not a high over under total in that game.

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's a closer game. The fact that

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the spread is nine and a half points, I think

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 1>it's absurd. I don't know that the Texans have done

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>anything to earn a nine and a half point favorite.

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>What did you think this rumor yesterday that once the

0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Bills signed Derek Anderson, he's gonna like start in two weeks.

0:53:40.800 --> 0:53:43.439
<v Speaker 1>The Bills. Yeah, and they signed Derek Anderson and they're

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:45.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna prepare him to start the next couple of weeks.

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the point play, Josh Allen, do you think I

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>have Philip Rivers who lower thirteen? I just think the

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Browns defense slightly but nothing, nothing crazy, Alright, Fantasy frenzies

0:53:55.200 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 1>up next to Jim Day, Chris vanjer and the Birthday Boy,

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy executive, but Freak Naville. My name is Greg Sels.

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>We thank you so much for watching, listening to the

0:54:02.800 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy BFFs. We'll do it all again tomorrow, we hope,