1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,320 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, thanks for listening to Breaking Points with Crystal 2 00:00:02,360 --> 00:00:04,240 Speaker 1: and Sager. We're going to be totally upfront with you. 3 00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: We took a big risk going independent to make this work. 4 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 1: We need your support to beat the corporate media CNN, Fox, MSNBC. 5 00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:15,760 Speaker 1: They are ripping this country apart. They are making millions 6 00:00:15,800 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: of dollars doing it. To help support our mission of 7 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: making all of us hate each other, less hate the 8 00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: corrupt ruling class more support the show. Become a Breaking 9 00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:26,560 Speaker 1: Points Premium member today, where you get to watch and 10 00:00:26,680 --> 00:00:29,640 Speaker 1: listen to the entire show ad free and uncut, an 11 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:32,440 Speaker 1: hour early before everyone else. You get to hear our 12 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 1: reactions to each other's monologues. You get to participate and 13 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 1: weekly ask me any things, and you don't need to 14 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:41,040 Speaker 1: hear our annoying voices pitching you like I am right now, 15 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: So what are you waiting for? Go to Breakingpoints dot 16 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,080 Speaker 1: com become a Premium member today, which is available in 17 00:00:46,120 --> 00:01:05,520 Speaker 1: the show notes. Enjoy the show, guys, Good morning, everybody, 18 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:08,120 Speaker 1: Happy Monday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 19 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:11,039 Speaker 1: What do we have, Crystal? Indeed, we do many many 20 00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:14,160 Speaker 1: big stories that are breaking this morning on the foreign 21 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:17,440 Speaker 1: policy front. We've got developments with regard to Ukraine. Actually 22 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:21,440 Speaker 1: incredible moment that we have to show you rare instance 23 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 1: of a reporter in this guy is pretty consistent though, 24 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:28,720 Speaker 1: actually pushing State Department's box asking for evidence of some 25 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,080 Speaker 1: of the claims that they're making. So we'll show you that. Also, 26 00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: some questionable claims about raid in Syria and exactly the 27 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:40,000 Speaker 1: number of civilian casualties and what happened there. We've got 28 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: some updates on the mess going on the CNN and Disarray, 29 00:01:44,760 --> 00:01:48,040 Speaker 1: I guess is how we should tree yeah, Disarray Yeah. 30 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,320 Speaker 1: And some big updates on what's going on with the 31 00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:54,440 Speaker 1: money that was raised for that Charker Convoy protest in Ottawa, Canada. 32 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:56,800 Speaker 1: I'll tell you about that. And guests, we're excited about 33 00:01:56,840 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 1: John Abramson. We've been working on Getwick on the show 34 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 1: for a while. He wrote a book called Sickening. We 35 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 1: both heard him on the Joe Rogan podcast podcast, which 36 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 1: is where we will start this morning. So there's a 37 00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 1: lot of updates here, and I just want to go 38 00:02:12,400 --> 00:02:15,680 Speaker 1: through all the pieces of what has transpired since last 39 00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 1: week spoke you guys. Remember there was a whole controversy 40 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: over to guests that Rogan had on doctor Robert Malone, 41 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: doctor Peter McCullough. There was, you know, he was accused 42 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 1: of spreading misinformation and there was a lot of concern 43 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: around his take on vaccine. So that was the initial Foray, 44 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 1: the initial tax on Rogan. He then comes out essentially apologize, says, look, 45 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:39,440 Speaker 1: I'm gonna do better. I'm gonna have people on with 46 00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:41,080 Speaker 1: a variety of views. I'm going to try to be 47 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:43,799 Speaker 1: better prepared. I hear your criticism. I'm going to try 48 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:45,760 Speaker 1: to do better. So that sort of starts to die down. 49 00:02:45,880 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: It basically is dead after he puts out the video 50 00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 1: and he has been compile thing where he goes, well, 51 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 1: this was misinformation that destroys their narrative in a single video. Yes, 52 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:58,360 Speaker 1: so then they've got to try another tactic because they've 53 00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:00,000 Speaker 1: sensed like a little bit of blood in the water 54 00:03:00,680 --> 00:03:02,959 Speaker 1: and a little bit of concern from Spotify, who of 55 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: course had decided to put labels on any of his 56 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 1: podcasts that have COVID information. So then this video compilation 57 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: emerges of Rogan over years of his podcast and these 58 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 1: all came from years in the past saying the N 59 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:20,680 Speaker 1: word and it's just him saying the word there's no 60 00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:23,040 Speaker 1: context around us. You have no idea what context and 61 00:03:23,080 --> 00:03:24,760 Speaker 1: when she said it. Of course we come to learn 62 00:03:25,240 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: this is when he's quoting other comedians. He's debating you 63 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 1: know when this person used it and what that meant. 64 00:03:31,880 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 1: So this is definitely not him like using this as 65 00:03:34,880 --> 00:03:37,240 Speaker 1: a slur at people. But you look at the video 66 00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 1: and it looks absolutely terrible. Right, So then at the 67 00:03:42,120 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: same time, let's go ahead and put this element on 68 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: the screen. People start to notice that a bunch of 69 00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:52,440 Speaker 1: his old episodes are getting pulled from Spotify. And if 70 00:03:52,480 --> 00:03:54,360 Speaker 1: you look at this list, this is a handful of 71 00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:56,560 Speaker 1: the ones that get pulled. Ultimately, now I think it's 72 00:03:56,640 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: up to over like one hundred hundred and ten different 73 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: episodees that have been pulled. You can see some of 74 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:06,240 Speaker 1: the people are those you might expect, people like Alex Jones, 75 00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:11,000 Speaker 1: and other ones you're like, wait, what, like Kyle Kolinski 76 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 1: as one example. They also pulled down the Amazing atheist 77 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:20,280 Speaker 1: Duncan Trussel, I mean, just Michael Malice across the board, right, 78 00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:23,400 Speaker 1: And so there's been this sort of narrative of, oh, 79 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 1: this must be the episodes where he said the N 80 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 1: word definitely not the case, because number one, he didn't 81 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:30,960 Speaker 1: say it nearly as many times as one hundred and 82 00:04:31,040 --> 00:04:34,400 Speaker 1: thirty episodes or whatever. And number two, I mean Kyle 83 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:38,920 Speaker 1: remembers his episode with Rogan, there were no racial slurs involved. 84 00:04:38,960 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 1: So this okay, So this is happening. The next piece 85 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 1: is that, under pressure, Rogan comes out and makes a 86 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:51,599 Speaker 1: really fulsome apology for language that he's used in the past, 87 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:55,440 Speaker 1: jokes that he's told in the past that he himself 88 00:04:55,720 --> 00:04:59,239 Speaker 1: finds to be offensive and racist. Let's take a listen 89 00:04:59,279 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 1: to a little bit of Joe's apology. Hello, friends, I'm 90 00:05:05,839 --> 00:05:10,160 Speaker 1: making this video to talk about the most regretful and 91 00:05:10,279 --> 00:05:12,560 Speaker 1: shameful thing that I've ever had to talk about publicly. 92 00:05:13,320 --> 00:05:16,120 Speaker 1: There's a video that's out that's a compilation of me 93 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:19,760 Speaker 1: saying the N word. It's a video that's made of 94 00:05:19,839 --> 00:05:23,799 Speaker 1: clips taken out of context of me of twelve years 95 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: of conversations on my podcast, and it's all smushed together, 96 00:05:27,640 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: and it looks fucking horrible even to me. Now, I 97 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:35,120 Speaker 1: know that to most people, there is no context where 98 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:38,279 Speaker 1: a white person is ever allowed to say that word, 99 00:05:38,600 --> 00:05:42,120 Speaker 1: never mind publicly on a podcast. And I agree with 100 00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:45,480 Speaker 1: that now. I haven't said it in years, but for 101 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,160 Speaker 1: a long time when I would bring that word up, 102 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:51,280 Speaker 1: like if it would come up in conversation and say, 103 00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 1: instead of saying the N word, I would just say 104 00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 1: the word. I thought, as long as it was in context, 105 00:05:57,400 --> 00:06:01,200 Speaker 1: people would understand what I was doing. And so the 106 00:06:01,360 --> 00:06:05,320 Speaker 1: very latest piece, and we can put this jump forward 107 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,960 Speaker 1: to A five, we got an email from Spotify to 108 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 1: their employees giving sort of their view of what happened here. 109 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 1: This is from the CEO, Daniel Eck. He says, and 110 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 1: this is a long letter. I won't read it all, 111 00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:21,680 Speaker 1: but I'll read a portion here. He says. There are 112 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:24,360 Speaker 1: no words I can say to adequately convey how deeply 113 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 1: sorry I am for the way the Joe Rogan experience 114 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:29,600 Speaker 1: controversy continues to impact each of you. Not only are 115 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:31,920 Speaker 1: some of Joe's comments incredibly hurtful, I want to make 116 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:34,279 Speaker 1: clear they do not represent the values of the company. 117 00:06:34,600 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: I know this situation leaves many of you feeling drained, frustrated, 118 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:40,400 Speaker 1: and unheard. This is also significant the second paragraph, So 119 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:42,640 Speaker 1: keep this up. I think it's important you're aware that 120 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:44,839 Speaker 1: we've had conversations with Joe and his team about some 121 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:46,800 Speaker 1: of the content in his show, including his history of 122 00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:50,359 Speaker 1: using some racially insensitive language. Following these discussions, in his 123 00:06:50,360 --> 00:06:53,720 Speaker 1: own reflection, he chose to remove a number of episodes 124 00:06:53,720 --> 00:06:57,640 Speaker 1: from Spotify. He also issued his own apology over the weekend. 125 00:06:57,720 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 1: Go ahead and put a six up on the screen. Now, 126 00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:03,040 Speaker 1: this is another portion of this letter. Kind of the 127 00:07:03,200 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 1: conclusion they go on to talk about, you know, we 128 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:09,880 Speaker 1: really want to make sure that we're thinking about this 129 00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,160 Speaker 1: that I've had conversations. Some have been supportive, others have 130 00:07:13,240 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 1: been incredibly hard. All of them made me think. One 131 00:07:15,560 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 1: of the things I'm thinking about is what additional steps 132 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 1: we can take to further balance creative creator expression with 133 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 1: user safety. I've asked our teams to expand the number 134 00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: of oundside experts we consult with on these efforts, and 135 00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 1: look forward to sharing more details. And the long and 136 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:30,559 Speaker 1: short of it. Kind of the headline from this letter 137 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:34,400 Speaker 1: that Daniel Ax sends to his employees there at Spotify 138 00:07:34,560 --> 00:07:37,560 Speaker 1: is that do not believe that canceling Joe Rogan is 139 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,760 Speaker 1: the solution, So sager. That kind of brings us up 140 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:44,960 Speaker 1: to date with more or less what is transpired. Let 141 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:46,280 Speaker 1: me just say a couple things that I'll hand it 142 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:48,160 Speaker 1: to you for your reaction. First of all, you know, 143 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: the elephant in the room, of course for us, is 144 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,600 Speaker 1: that we're friends with Joe. We like Joe, and not 145 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:56,120 Speaker 1: only that, but Joe has been incredibly good to us. 146 00:07:56,480 --> 00:07:58,960 Speaker 1: He helped us, you know, when not only did he 147 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:01,800 Speaker 1: have his hon his show twice, but when we were 148 00:08:01,840 --> 00:08:04,240 Speaker 1: thinking of going independence the first call, he was the 149 00:08:04,240 --> 00:08:06,960 Speaker 1: person that said to us, do it. I'll have your back. 150 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: I know you guys can make it like. We were 151 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 1: very nervous about it, and he was extraordinarily encouraging. So 152 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:16,480 Speaker 1: there's no doubt that, like we are not neutral or 153 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 1: unbiased in this. However, I also want to say that 154 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 1: I think if you look at our record of defending 155 00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:25,280 Speaker 1: people that we like and people we really really don't 156 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 1: like when it comes to free speech issues, I think 157 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,160 Speaker 1: you will see a very consistent pattern. You only have 158 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:32,480 Speaker 1: to look to last week when we were defending the 159 00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:36,440 Speaker 1: Goldberg and Dan Bongino. I think to see that. You know, 160 00:08:36,480 --> 00:08:38,880 Speaker 1: we've had a pretty consistent take on this issue. I'm 161 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:40,840 Speaker 1: glad you said that, And this is important too. Look, 162 00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:42,560 Speaker 1: I'm trying to take my emotion out of this and 163 00:08:42,559 --> 00:08:44,520 Speaker 1: look at this dispassionately, as if I had never met 164 00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, as if he ever never helped us out 165 00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 1: in the way that he did. I won't be perfect 166 00:08:48,760 --> 00:08:51,200 Speaker 1: about it, but take that obviously with the grave soul. 167 00:08:51,360 --> 00:08:54,079 Speaker 1: Understand where I'm trying to come from. When I see this, 168 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:57,760 Speaker 1: I see the boat Spotify trying to have the best 169 00:08:57,800 --> 00:09:00,880 Speaker 1: of all worlds. They want Rogan without the warts, but 170 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:03,640 Speaker 1: they also want his eleven million listeners. I saw it 171 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:08,400 Speaker 1: described as a pot from a podcast from a podcast expert, 172 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:11,840 Speaker 1: like a media person, that Joe's episodes are akin to 173 00:09:11,920 --> 00:09:15,080 Speaker 1: a Taylor Swift album per day on the platform in 174 00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:18,160 Speaker 1: terms of their economic value, just to get people to 175 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,000 Speaker 1: try and understand what that means in terms of user engagement, 176 00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 1: driving subscription and all of that. The problem that I 177 00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:27,800 Speaker 1: have with this statement is that he's like, look, canceling 178 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:33,360 Speaker 1: Joe is the wrong thing, But balancing listenership with user safety, 179 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 1: Oh man, here, you know, if you had thought labels 180 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:39,679 Speaker 1: were enough, then the experts. Anytime the experts start to 181 00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: get involved, I know that the anti racist hucksters are 182 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,120 Speaker 1: marching on in. And even worse within this is he 183 00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:48,880 Speaker 1: says that I'm going to be dedicating one hundred million 184 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:54,120 Speaker 1: dollars to historically marginalized communities and artists. What the hell 185 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,360 Speaker 1: does that mean? Once again, you are basically paying off, 186 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:00,160 Speaker 1: you know, the opposition in order to keep quiet so 187 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:02,640 Speaker 1: that they'll come onto your platform and not say anything. 188 00:10:02,679 --> 00:10:04,360 Speaker 1: And also, if you think that paying them off is 189 00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:06,680 Speaker 1: going to work, I have news for you. Go and 190 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:08,800 Speaker 1: see how it's worked out at almost every other company. 191 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:11,560 Speaker 1: That's the big problem that I have with this statement 192 00:10:11,640 --> 00:10:15,800 Speaker 1: in terms of the actual events themselves. This is all hypocrisy. 193 00:10:15,920 --> 00:10:18,360 Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Our president and I put this out there, 194 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 1: has said the N word, you know, while quoting it 195 00:10:21,800 --> 00:10:24,360 Speaker 1: in public in the year nineteen eighty five. Do I 196 00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:26,880 Speaker 1: think that that's what makes him a racist? No? But 197 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:30,480 Speaker 1: when you strip context out of everything, that's what's gonna happen. 198 00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:32,640 Speaker 1: Dave Portannoy put out a statement. I'll be talking about 199 00:10:32,640 --> 00:10:34,320 Speaker 1: some of that in my monologue. You know, people have 200 00:10:34,360 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 1: been going after him because he was, you know, singing 201 00:10:36,920 --> 00:10:39,679 Speaker 1: along to lyrics of a Jaw Rule song while introducing 202 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:42,200 Speaker 1: jaw Rule like five years ago, and they're like, this 203 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:45,440 Speaker 1: is what makes you a racist. No, that's outrageous. We 204 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,400 Speaker 1: either live in a society with context or don't should 205 00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:51,680 Speaker 1: Joe said it probably not. Okay, I'm not gonna sugarcoat it. 206 00:10:51,880 --> 00:10:54,360 Speaker 1: What do you do like? You know, obviously agrees with that. Yeah, 207 00:10:54,360 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 1: and I think he agrees with that now too. Should 208 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:58,760 Speaker 1: he have been saying this? But you know, also consider 209 00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:01,200 Speaker 1: the times. Ten years ago was a really long time 210 00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:04,440 Speaker 1: some of these jokes and other things. I remember also 211 00:11:04,600 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: that our former president Barack Obama, who Joe loves, made 212 00:11:08,480 --> 00:11:11,400 Speaker 1: big headlines when he went on Mark Baron's podcast twenty 213 00:11:11,559 --> 00:11:14,560 Speaker 1: sixteen and said, I don't want racial politics in this 214 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:17,320 Speaker 1: country to come down to whether you can say the 215 00:11:17,559 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 1: N word or not. He actually fully said the N 216 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:24,440 Speaker 1: word on the podcast. Listen to Obama. Okay. Obama is 217 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 1: the one who actually came out of and said this. 218 00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:27,920 Speaker 1: I'll be the only guy to defend Joe at quote 219 00:11:27,920 --> 00:11:30,760 Speaker 1: Obama at the same time. But I'm just trying to 220 00:11:30,760 --> 00:11:33,360 Speaker 1: put this in a societal point of view, Howard Stern. 221 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:37,200 Speaker 1: I mean, so many people in public life, many of 222 00:11:37,200 --> 00:11:39,440 Speaker 1: the people who were trying to cancel Joe themselves. Some 223 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:43,040 Speaker 1: guy Winslow I'll be talking about him tomorrow who got 224 00:11:43,080 --> 00:11:45,520 Speaker 1: the Rocks to denounce Joe Rogan and I'll also be 225 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:47,480 Speaker 1: you know, do a full thing on that. Well, he 226 00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:49,600 Speaker 1: himself he is the N word many times this books. 227 00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 1: My point is, let's not play this game. Okay, Let's 228 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 1: not try and assume you know the character and the 229 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:58,960 Speaker 1: fulsomeness of someone's soul based upon a very maliciously cut 230 00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:01,440 Speaker 1: crip from a clip from a very suspect group that 231 00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:04,880 Speaker 1: I'll also be digging into. So I think it's important 232 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: to deal with the actual statements that were made, you know, 233 00:12:08,679 --> 00:12:11,120 Speaker 1: saying N word over and over again again. I think 234 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,080 Speaker 1: the context of this really matters. That doesn't excuse it, 235 00:12:14,120 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 1: but clearly Joe was saying he hasn't done this in 236 00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:18,760 Speaker 1: a long time. He had already realized this was not 237 00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:21,040 Speaker 1: a good thing for him, as a white dude, to 238 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:25,000 Speaker 1: be saying. He comes out and apologizes, but the problem is, 239 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:29,480 Speaker 1: it's really not about the N word or the anti 240 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:32,960 Speaker 1: vax information. It's really not about that. Keep in mind, 241 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:36,120 Speaker 1: as you were pointing out, first of all, there's a 242 00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: huge amount of power and money in this. He has 243 00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:46,640 Speaker 1: is the tent pole of Spotify and their podcast outfit. 244 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,160 Speaker 1: They he is the number one podcast not just here 245 00:12:50,200 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 1: but in ninety different markets for Spotify, so they have 246 00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:59,520 Speaker 1: obviously huge vestig interest here, and their competitors have a 247 00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:03,319 Speaker 1: huge invested interest in hobbling him and in taking him 248 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: down because this has been massively significant for Spotify. So 249 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,200 Speaker 1: there's that piece. Then you have all the people, all 250 00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:13,720 Speaker 1: the circle of people who, you know, the media types, 251 00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:17,760 Speaker 1: the sort of like corporate mainstream media types who are 252 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,520 Speaker 1: jealous of Joe, who don't like the fact that they 253 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:25,000 Speaker 1: don't have control over what he says, who he has on. 254 00:13:25,559 --> 00:13:29,679 Speaker 1: He hasn't been effectively you know, subjected to shame and 255 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:33,679 Speaker 1: control and coercion in the past. You have the fact 256 00:13:33,720 --> 00:13:37,320 Speaker 1: that you know, now that he has this exclusive deal 257 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:40,679 Speaker 1: with Spotify. It sort of gave these people an opening, 258 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:43,840 Speaker 1: you know, it gave him a cudgel. That's exactly the 259 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:47,040 Speaker 1: right word, because now it's no longer Look, Joe's doing 260 00:13:47,080 --> 00:13:48,559 Speaker 1: his thing, and you know, what are you going to 261 00:13:48,640 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 1: do about it? Because he's on his own. He's independent. Yes, 262 00:13:50,960 --> 00:13:53,040 Speaker 1: at YouTube he was there, but he wasn't exclusive, he 263 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:55,240 Speaker 1: didn't have this big deal with them, He wasn't sort 264 00:13:55,240 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: of like their product. He's just using their platform. So 265 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 1: it is a different relationship. Now you have another place 266 00:14:01,480 --> 00:14:05,640 Speaker 1: where you can apply pressure through the Spotify CEO, through 267 00:14:05,679 --> 00:14:08,000 Speaker 1: their employees, who I'm sure are very distressed, and that 268 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:09,800 Speaker 1: they were sending a lot of you we know from 269 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 1: historic stress, yes, from historic events as well, that there 270 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,439 Speaker 1: is at least some group of the Spotify employees who 271 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: are very upset about all of this and how this 272 00:14:19,560 --> 00:14:25,280 Speaker 1: is all going. Then you have the anti vaxx direction, 273 00:14:25,760 --> 00:14:28,320 Speaker 1: you know, saying Malone and McCullough, who Look, I have 274 00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: my issues with those podcasts as well, which I talked 275 00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:32,200 Speaker 1: about in which we had doctor sot on to go 276 00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 1: through the claims and talk about which is the right 277 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: way to handle these things. But so that doesn't really land. 278 00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:41,320 Speaker 1: But Joe comes out and makes a statement and Spotify 279 00:14:41,320 --> 00:14:44,680 Speaker 1: puts these labels on the podcast, and there's that creates 280 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:46,320 Speaker 1: a little bit of blood in the water. Now, look, 281 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: I don't blame Joe for doing that. I thought his 282 00:14:48,840 --> 00:14:51,520 Speaker 1: comments were very gracious. I thought they were very heartfelt, 283 00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: and ultimately, when you're in these sorts of circumstances like 284 00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:57,120 Speaker 1: you have to be true to yourself and respond to 285 00:14:57,160 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 1: them in the way that is going to make you 286 00:14:58,880 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 1: feel like you handle it in the best possible way. 287 00:15:02,200 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 1: So I don't blame him for doing that. But I 288 00:15:04,600 --> 00:15:06,320 Speaker 1: do think that that put a little bit of blood 289 00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:08,480 Speaker 1: in the water and it sort of enabled this next 290 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:12,280 Speaker 1: very coordinated attack. Sager's gonna be breaking down in his 291 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:15,320 Speaker 1: monologue just how coordinated that is. But let's just say 292 00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:18,480 Speaker 1: there's a democratic super pac involved to tell you how 293 00:15:18,640 --> 00:15:22,880 Speaker 1: organic all of this outrage manufacture is. And then just 294 00:15:22,920 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 1: so you really know this has nothing to do with 295 00:15:26,360 --> 00:15:29,400 Speaker 1: him saying the N word or offensive language or whatever. 296 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 1: You know, Kyle and I were trying to rack our 297 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:34,200 Speaker 1: brains for what he said in his episode that might 298 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:37,200 Speaker 1: have gotten it hold because there certainly was no I 299 00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:39,800 Speaker 1: don't even think they talked about race wow in that 300 00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:44,320 Speaker 1: entire you know, three hour long discussion. But one thing 301 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:48,360 Speaker 1: they did talk about was Jamal Kashogi and Saudi Arabia. 302 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:55,360 Speaker 1: And also Kyle was very aggressive and very outspoken about 303 00:15:55,400 --> 00:15:58,560 Speaker 1: the war that they're prosecuting in Yemen and how they're 304 00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: causing famine. He was outspoken about some of their you know, 305 00:16:02,160 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 1: sort of barbaric practices, public beheadings and those sorts of things. 306 00:16:06,040 --> 00:16:11,200 Speaker 1: Well alone and behold, Spotify just like right now enabled 307 00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:14,560 Speaker 1: podcasts in the Saudi market. Is that the reason why 308 00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 1: it's a great cover those couldn't be could be, but 309 00:16:17,280 --> 00:16:19,800 Speaker 1: it's certainly not about sort of offensive language because there 310 00:16:19,800 --> 00:16:21,960 Speaker 1: was nothing in that podcast that would that would fall 311 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:24,240 Speaker 1: in that category. They're also that I think they talked 312 00:16:24,280 --> 00:16:26,600 Speaker 1: about Epstein as well, which was another thing that we're like, 313 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:31,000 Speaker 1: interesting maybe, But there was also a moment in there 314 00:16:31,040 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 1: that was kind of a little bit prophetic where they 315 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 1: talked about the problem was censoring all of these independent 316 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 1: media outlets. And look, I know Joe has a big 317 00:16:40,840 --> 00:16:44,560 Speaker 1: contract for Spotify, so he's technically technically corporate media. But 318 00:16:44,640 --> 00:16:47,080 Speaker 1: the whole fight over this is about the fact that 319 00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:49,680 Speaker 1: corporate media has not been able to control him and 320 00:16:49,720 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: has not been able to rain him in, has not 321 00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:53,760 Speaker 1: been able to dictate who he has on and what 322 00:16:53,800 --> 00:16:56,320 Speaker 1: he says and what sort of topics he covers. So 323 00:16:56,360 --> 00:16:59,200 Speaker 1: that's why I make the distinction. But take a listen. 324 00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:01,800 Speaker 1: This is a four control room. Take a listen to 325 00:17:01,840 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 1: some of what they had to say on that now 326 00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:06,919 Speaker 1: banned podcast. Speaking of social media, have you seen all 327 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:09,560 Speaker 1: these purges recently? There's a new round of it that 328 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:12,640 Speaker 1: just happened. No who get purged, They're all almost all 329 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:16,640 Speaker 1: alternative media accounts, so it is a scary time because 330 00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:19,879 Speaker 1: you see that this can impact you know, really anybody 331 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:22,440 Speaker 1: who's not towing the line, if you will. The Internet 332 00:17:22,600 --> 00:17:25,200 Speaker 1: went through a phase of like just totally free and open, 333 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: wild wild West type thing, and now it looks like 334 00:17:28,600 --> 00:17:31,280 Speaker 1: they're trying to reel it back in. And it's like, 335 00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:33,840 Speaker 1: that's the viewed as the public square. It's supposed to 336 00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:36,320 Speaker 1: be that these social media outlets, which are so gigantic 337 00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:39,120 Speaker 1: and so powerful, that this is now the public square. 338 00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:41,919 Speaker 1: So to be able to censor people in these in 339 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 1: these forums should be considered unconstitutional. Yeah, kind of ironic 340 00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:49,040 Speaker 1: that that's the sort of conversation they were having on 341 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:51,880 Speaker 1: a podcast that you now cannot find anyway. I gotta 342 00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:54,120 Speaker 1: be honest, I'm kind of offended that we didn't get 343 00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:57,320 Speaker 1: taken off neither episodes. I guess I wasn't hardcore enough. 344 00:17:57,359 --> 00:17:59,239 Speaker 1: If we're happy, if we're lucky enough to be back on, 345 00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:02,359 Speaker 1: I'll bring the five. Here's what I really have to say, 346 00:18:02,600 --> 00:18:04,840 Speaker 1: especially about this. How are we supposed to check what 347 00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:06,840 Speaker 1: he said when they took it down? This is part 348 00:18:06,880 --> 00:18:08,800 Speaker 1: of the problem. Kyle's got to rely on his memory. 349 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,280 Speaker 1: I hear that there's some guy online who's got all 350 00:18:11,280 --> 00:18:13,520 Speaker 1: of the episodes downloaded. You have to contact him and 351 00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,040 Speaker 1: he'll send you one. By the way, whoever you are, 352 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:17,479 Speaker 1: please send them to me. I've been trying to get 353 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:20,560 Speaker 1: in touch. But all of this is important whenever it 354 00:18:20,600 --> 00:18:23,480 Speaker 1: comes to the delineation of language, because I see these 355 00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:27,240 Speaker 1: dishonest morons online saying Joe is corporate media. You know 356 00:18:27,280 --> 00:18:29,960 Speaker 1: he works for a corporation. Okay, you really want to 357 00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:33,000 Speaker 1: play this game establishment media. It's very clear here is 358 00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: the thing. The Joe Rogan experience will probably never ever 359 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:38,880 Speaker 1: be allowed to happen again because it slipped through the cracks. 360 00:18:39,040 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 1: It was never supposed to be this way. He will 361 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:43,439 Speaker 1: be the first person to tell you that. And so 362 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:45,760 Speaker 1: because they never had a hand in molding it, in 363 00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:49,000 Speaker 1: booking it, and shaping it, in promoting it, any of that. 364 00:18:49,080 --> 00:18:52,720 Speaker 1: He never did any pr ADS interviews. That makes it 365 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:54,960 Speaker 1: so that when it becomes so much bigger than them, 366 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:57,439 Speaker 1: it is a direct threat to their authority. And that 367 00:18:57,600 --> 00:18:59,640 Speaker 1: is what it is all about. That's what that clip 368 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:02,440 Speaker 1: was of. That's what the censorship, as you pointed out 369 00:19:02,920 --> 00:19:05,320 Speaker 1: over the weekend of the right and the left. Guess, 370 00:19:05,359 --> 00:19:08,920 Speaker 1: it's about power, and it's about control and the dishonest 371 00:19:09,160 --> 00:19:12,359 Speaker 1: actors out there pretending to care about this clip of 372 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:15,040 Speaker 1: Joe saying the N word. They are the most biggest 373 00:19:15,160 --> 00:19:17,919 Speaker 1: hypocrites on the planet. Apply the same standard then to 374 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:20,320 Speaker 1: Joe Biden, and to Howard Stern and to so many 375 00:19:20,359 --> 00:19:23,240 Speaker 1: of the people in American public life. Obama, like I 376 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,919 Speaker 1: said previously, right, context doesn't matter, Okay, I mean this 377 00:19:27,040 --> 00:19:29,199 Speaker 1: is part of the thing whenever we come down to 378 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,239 Speaker 1: litigating this without any context, without any good faith, and 379 00:19:33,359 --> 00:19:36,840 Speaker 1: especially whenever we try to make it all about using 380 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:39,800 Speaker 1: race in particular as a cudgel, and to make it 381 00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 1: so that these words lose meaning. And by the way, 382 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 1: if you care about race and race relations in this country, 383 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:47,639 Speaker 1: you don't want that. You want these to have the 384 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:51,520 Speaker 1: real palpability that they originally had to maintain the power 385 00:19:51,560 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 1: of the attack and the label in the first place, 386 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:56,400 Speaker 1: because they have erased it from all of our discourse. 387 00:19:56,480 --> 00:19:59,280 Speaker 1: Millions of people out there, they see through this, they 388 00:19:59,320 --> 00:20:02,000 Speaker 1: know exactly what that's happening. And so, like I said, 389 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:04,280 Speaker 1: I would be saying all this and this defense if 390 00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:06,199 Speaker 1: I never met Joe Rogan. I've been a fan of 391 00:20:06,200 --> 00:20:08,560 Speaker 1: his from a long time. When I was a young 392 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:11,640 Speaker 1: guy riding the metro. The funniest thing is, I told 393 00:20:11,680 --> 00:20:13,760 Speaker 1: you the most controversial things that he believes are that 394 00:20:13,800 --> 00:20:17,600 Speaker 1: the Sphinx is like ten thousand years old. So I mean, personally, 395 00:20:17,640 --> 00:20:20,080 Speaker 1: big archaeology should be the people who Yeah, I mean, 396 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:22,199 Speaker 1: there's a lot to be said about that, and I 397 00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:24,560 Speaker 1: get this is the other thing that upsets me about 398 00:20:24,600 --> 00:20:27,840 Speaker 1: this is if you're a kind of normy person like 399 00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:31,880 Speaker 1: this is this has penetrated to the point that, like 400 00:20:32,200 --> 00:20:34,520 Speaker 1: my mom's talking to me about it, My girlfriend's sisters 401 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:36,320 Speaker 1: are like, what's going on with the only hot And 402 00:20:36,359 --> 00:20:38,359 Speaker 1: my mom just figured out how to listen to my 403 00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 1: podcast Okay seriously, like in the last month, So it 404 00:20:43,119 --> 00:20:46,479 Speaker 1: has broken through to the entire world. I told you 405 00:20:46,520 --> 00:20:48,760 Speaker 1: before when we were talking about this, my friend who 406 00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:51,399 Speaker 1: was in Brazil back home visiting our family, was like, 407 00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:54,840 Speaker 1: what's going on with Brogan? All the Brazilian mediolscenario apparently 408 00:20:54,960 --> 00:20:59,800 Speaker 1: is defending Like Okay, thanks, but you know, to get 409 00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 1: back to your point about race, and just to use 410 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,600 Speaker 1: Joe Biden as an example here, think of the harm 411 00:21:06,640 --> 00:21:08,520 Speaker 1: that Joe Biden has done to black people in this 412 00:21:08,560 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 1: country through his career. Think about the crime bell and 413 00:21:11,840 --> 00:21:17,320 Speaker 1: mass incarceration, and the drug laws and his involvement in 414 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:22,400 Speaker 1: creating the crack cocaine mass disparity. I mean, you want 415 00:21:22,440 --> 00:21:24,680 Speaker 1: to talk about people who have really harmed black people 416 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:29,880 Speaker 1: in this country, please saying this word in context and 417 00:21:29,920 --> 00:21:33,800 Speaker 1: as part of quoting people. This pales in comparison. And 418 00:21:33,840 --> 00:21:36,280 Speaker 1: the only reason I say this is and this is 419 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,080 Speaker 1: something I'll talk about a little bit more in my 420 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:41,560 Speaker 1: monologue to point out what a silly distraction all of 421 00:21:41,600 --> 00:21:44,199 Speaker 1: this is from the real work of making this country 422 00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:47,040 Speaker 1: in this world a better place. You know, it comes 423 00:21:47,119 --> 00:21:50,560 Speaker 1: down to do you trust the people in this country 424 00:21:50,600 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 1: to be grown up, adult Americans to be able to 425 00:21:52,840 --> 00:21:54,840 Speaker 1: listen to a podcast that may have things that are 426 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:58,679 Speaker 1: a little edgy or even sometimes blatantly offensive and not 427 00:21:58,720 --> 00:22:02,159 Speaker 1: be able to turn into the Do you actually trust 428 00:22:02,240 --> 00:22:06,080 Speaker 1: your fellow human beings here to participate in a democracy, 429 00:22:06,119 --> 00:22:09,080 Speaker 1: because that's what this comes down to. And if the 430 00:22:09,160 --> 00:22:12,879 Speaker 1: answer is no, then we're in a really bad place. 431 00:22:13,320 --> 00:22:15,399 Speaker 1: I do want to say, even though this feels like 432 00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:19,320 Speaker 1: this title wave of like mass public outrage, I do 433 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:22,840 Speaker 1: think that it's relatively This is like a relatively elite 434 00:22:23,280 --> 00:22:27,840 Speaker 1: online conversation where the voices are extremely loud, but most 435 00:22:27,880 --> 00:22:30,960 Speaker 1: people that I think are going about their normal days 436 00:22:31,040 --> 00:22:33,520 Speaker 1: have a lot deeper concern than what Joe Rogan said 437 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:37,560 Speaker 1: on a podcast in twenty eleven. However, that doesn't mean 438 00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:39,760 Speaker 1: that the fight doesn't matter, because these are the people 439 00:22:39,800 --> 00:22:44,440 Speaker 1: who number one, have disproportionate power, and number two, it's 440 00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:47,439 Speaker 1: really sad because they're also oftentimes the people who, in 441 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:52,160 Speaker 1: another era, their activist impulses would have been part of 442 00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:56,320 Speaker 1: an effort for real collective change rather than just like 443 00:22:56,760 --> 00:23:02,320 Speaker 1: policing people's language and desperately urging tech oligarchs to cling 444 00:23:02,440 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 1: even more power. And so that really undercuts our ability 445 00:23:06,760 --> 00:23:09,840 Speaker 1: to have a democracy in this country when number one, 446 00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 1: you don't trust your fellow human beings to engage in 447 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:14,399 Speaker 1: that democracy and not be like so thrown off course 448 00:23:14,440 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 1: by a podcast that we can't coexist, and number two, 449 00:23:18,560 --> 00:23:23,280 Speaker 1: where our greatest activist impulses are channeled towards helping the 450 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:27,159 Speaker 1: powerful become even more powerful. So that's one of the 451 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:29,639 Speaker 1: things that is really troubling about this and why I 452 00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:31,960 Speaker 1: think we've focused so much time on it, because it 453 00:23:32,080 --> 00:23:35,159 Speaker 1: is part of this really larger fight of what kind 454 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 1: of a country are we going to live in. Is 455 00:23:36,640 --> 00:23:38,199 Speaker 1: it going to be democracy? Is it going to be 456 00:23:38,400 --> 00:23:40,320 Speaker 1: a police state? What are we going to spend our 457 00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:42,840 Speaker 1: time in collective energies doing? Are we going to be 458 00:23:42,880 --> 00:23:45,520 Speaker 1: policing podcasts from twenty eleven? Are we actually going to 459 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:48,399 Speaker 1: try to do something for the collective good? And I 460 00:23:48,440 --> 00:23:51,480 Speaker 1: just want people to know that, you know, I don't 461 00:23:51,520 --> 00:23:55,120 Speaker 1: begrudge anyone who like listens to these words or these 462 00:23:55,160 --> 00:23:57,639 Speaker 1: old jokes or whatever and feels like this was really 463 00:23:57,640 --> 00:23:59,800 Speaker 1: offensive and this wasn't okay, But I want you to 464 00:24:00,160 --> 00:24:03,920 Speaker 1: stand that this was not some organic, like mass outrage. 465 00:24:04,200 --> 00:24:07,240 Speaker 1: This was orchestrated. It is a hatchet job, and at bottom, 466 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:10,560 Speaker 1: it's about power and money and who has control. Yeah, power, 467 00:24:10,640 --> 00:24:13,119 Speaker 1: money and control, and you know, in a way, to 468 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: your monologue's point, they're gaslighting all of us into trying 469 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:18,840 Speaker 1: to make us focus. And luckily we have this show 470 00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:20,760 Speaker 1: so that we can talk about Rogan and we can 471 00:24:20,760 --> 00:24:23,040 Speaker 1: talk about all the stuff that also matters. So let's 472 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:25,680 Speaker 1: move on to another story, the GoFundMe story, which is 473 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 1: also about power, control, tech and money. Let's go ahead 474 00:24:29,560 --> 00:24:31,480 Speaker 1: and put this up there on the screen, a really 475 00:24:31,520 --> 00:24:36,080 Speaker 1: stunning display go fund me after raising tens of millions 476 00:24:36,080 --> 00:24:39,199 Speaker 1: of dollars, not the organization itself, but a petition on 477 00:24:39,280 --> 00:24:43,639 Speaker 1: the platform for the Canadian Trucker Convoy says that no 478 00:24:43,800 --> 00:24:47,159 Speaker 1: further for their funds would be distributed directly to the 479 00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:53,119 Speaker 1: organizers of the Freedom Convoy protests, and they firm specifically said, quote, 480 00:24:53,160 --> 00:24:57,160 Speaker 1: we now have evidence from law enforcement that the previously 481 00:24:57,240 --> 00:25:01,639 Speaker 1: peaceful demonstration has become an occupation. So this is a 482 00:25:01,760 --> 00:25:05,360 Speaker 1: very important point, Crystal. The Freedom Convoy of the truckers 483 00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:08,960 Speaker 1: who are originally protesting vaccine mandates, but really more it's 484 00:25:08,960 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 1: become a catch all for all restrictions in Canada. On 485 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:16,320 Speaker 1: top of vaccine mandates and restrictions, lockdowns, masks, et cetera. 486 00:25:16,600 --> 00:25:20,440 Speaker 1: Has become a force where they've occupied, not even even occupied, 487 00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:22,159 Speaker 1: I don't even want to use their language. They have 488 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:24,840 Speaker 1: taken up, you know, certain parts of the city in Ottawa. 489 00:25:24,880 --> 00:25:27,720 Speaker 1: They're honking their horns. They're getting a lot of community 490 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:30,400 Speaker 1: support both out in the United States but also within 491 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:34,119 Speaker 1: Canada as well, and it's turned into a real grassroots movement. 492 00:25:34,320 --> 00:25:37,720 Speaker 1: Now as some grassroots movements, it has raised tens of 493 00:25:37,720 --> 00:25:41,159 Speaker 1: millions of dollars online, but the Ottawa police and the 494 00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:45,920 Speaker 1: Canadian government have taken an incredibly hard line against these truckers. 495 00:25:45,960 --> 00:25:48,520 Speaker 1: Now there has not been use of force yet, although 496 00:25:48,560 --> 00:25:50,800 Speaker 1: apparently that you know, remains in the cards and it 497 00:25:50,880 --> 00:25:53,560 Speaker 1: is possible. But they've been denounced by the Prime Minister, 498 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:56,480 Speaker 1: they've been denounced by the police, they've been accused of, 499 00:25:56,520 --> 00:25:58,679 Speaker 1: you know, all sorts of things as usual. You know, 500 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:01,119 Speaker 1: the truckers are now racist because one guy had a 501 00:26:01,119 --> 00:26:04,040 Speaker 1: Confederate flag in the convoy of like, by the way, 502 00:26:04,080 --> 00:26:05,879 Speaker 1: we also don't even know yet how big this thing is. 503 00:26:06,080 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 1: Some said fifty thousand, some said a thousand. Who knows, 504 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:13,119 Speaker 1: it's not fifty thousand, it's more like a thousand. I 505 00:26:13,119 --> 00:26:15,240 Speaker 1: didn't you take a look at the the numbers in 506 00:26:15,320 --> 00:26:17,359 Speaker 1: terms of participants at the biggest rallies, it was like 507 00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:19,720 Speaker 1: eight thousands. In terms of number of trucks, it was 508 00:26:19,720 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 1: in the hundreds to maybe. So all of this is 509 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:26,440 Speaker 1: really important. But the problem is that this has become now. 510 00:26:26,720 --> 00:26:30,159 Speaker 1: Go fund me is the cudgel through which people who 511 00:26:30,200 --> 00:26:32,320 Speaker 1: are trying to raise money for a cause believe in, 512 00:26:32,560 --> 00:26:34,359 Speaker 1: and go fund Me is supposed to be the platform, 513 00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:38,280 Speaker 1: is now acquiescing to the demands of law enforcement that 514 00:26:38,400 --> 00:26:40,800 Speaker 1: is a terrible standard. Let's put this up there, which 515 00:26:40,840 --> 00:26:43,399 Speaker 1: is Ottawa Police puts out a statement. We want to 516 00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:45,879 Speaker 1: thank go fund me for listening to our concerns as 517 00:26:45,880 --> 00:26:48,359 Speaker 1: a city and a police service. The decision to withhold 518 00:26:48,400 --> 00:26:52,359 Speaker 1: funding for these unlawful demonstrations is an important step and 519 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:56,359 Speaker 1: we call on all crowdfunding sites to follow. Now, what 520 00:26:56,440 --> 00:26:58,520 Speaker 1: did we just talk about in our rogan block Crystal, 521 00:26:58,680 --> 00:26:59,960 Speaker 1: which is where you can live in a free soil, 522 00:27:00,600 --> 00:27:02,879 Speaker 1: or we can live in a police state. The definition 523 00:27:02,920 --> 00:27:05,679 Speaker 1: of a police state is when the police get to 524 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:09,280 Speaker 1: decide what cause is worthy and what is not. Now, 525 00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:11,879 Speaker 1: look Canada, you know it's not America. They don't have 526 00:27:11,880 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 1: the Bill of Rights. Ostensibly free, but a lot more 527 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:18,560 Speaker 1: like the Europeans. This is still, though, an American company 528 00:27:18,760 --> 00:27:23,119 Speaker 1: which masquerades itself domestically as oh well, we don't take sides, 529 00:27:23,160 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 1: even though they have in the past. This is the 530 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:29,399 Speaker 1: most absolute demonstration that they will listen to people in 531 00:27:29,440 --> 00:27:31,919 Speaker 1: authority when it's a cause that they don't like, and 532 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:34,320 Speaker 1: that they will then use their platform and to deny 533 00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:38,520 Speaker 1: a key part of the online fundraising system towards people 534 00:27:38,640 --> 00:27:42,200 Speaker 1: just because they disagree with their aims and their justification 535 00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:45,200 Speaker 1: here could have obviously been used against BLM. It obviously 536 00:27:45,320 --> 00:27:47,520 Speaker 1: wasn't right. You know, those people have raised are tens 537 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:48,920 Speaker 1: of millions of dollars and there's a lot of questions 538 00:27:48,960 --> 00:27:51,440 Speaker 1: about where that money has gone. But the point is 539 00:27:51,480 --> 00:27:53,840 Speaker 1: that they shouldn't have pulled it from BLM either. They 540 00:27:53,840 --> 00:27:56,320 Speaker 1: shouldn't pull it from anybody. Anybody should be allowed to 541 00:27:56,400 --> 00:27:59,280 Speaker 1: raise money here unless it's explicitly violating the whole like 542 00:27:59,520 --> 00:28:04,040 Speaker 1: docs in you know, the violence, the actual cardinal rules 543 00:28:04,080 --> 00:28:06,119 Speaker 1: of the Internet for when things should get taken down 544 00:28:06,200 --> 00:28:10,159 Speaker 1: apps in that these truckers they're protesting, okay, protests, they 545 00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:14,240 Speaker 1: get to raise money, especially on an American platform like GoFundMe. 546 00:28:14,280 --> 00:28:16,640 Speaker 1: Who's doing this at the behest of the Ottawa police. 547 00:28:16,840 --> 00:28:18,880 Speaker 1: I spent a lot of time looking into this one 548 00:28:18,960 --> 00:28:21,760 Speaker 1: because I think it's this type of story. First of all, 549 00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:24,320 Speaker 1: we're not there, right and we don't. It's not a country, 550 00:28:24,320 --> 00:28:26,639 Speaker 1: it's not our country, We're not there, and so I 551 00:28:26,720 --> 00:28:29,080 Speaker 1: really wanted to spend a lot of time doing research 552 00:28:29,119 --> 00:28:32,240 Speaker 1: about what is really going on, how's the meeting media 553 00:28:32,280 --> 00:28:36,080 Speaker 1: portraying it, what are the participants themselves saying? I listen 554 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:39,200 Speaker 1: to a lot of audio of people who are involved 555 00:28:39,200 --> 00:28:41,880 Speaker 1: in it themselves talking about what it's about and how 556 00:28:41,880 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 1: they feel about it, And I think there's a few 557 00:28:45,120 --> 00:28:47,040 Speaker 1: things that are important to say here. First of all, 558 00:28:47,120 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 1: I don't doubt that if you live in Ottawa, this 559 00:28:49,520 --> 00:28:52,000 Speaker 1: is a tremendous pain in the ass, sure right, it's 560 00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:55,360 Speaker 1: I feel total sympathy for you. They're honking their horns 561 00:28:55,360 --> 00:28:58,480 Speaker 1: all night, it's extraordinarily loud, You're having trouble getting around 562 00:28:58,520 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 1: your city, and just like living normal life. I get it. 563 00:29:01,840 --> 00:29:03,880 Speaker 1: And by the way, I think we can relate to 564 00:29:03,920 --> 00:29:08,160 Speaker 1: it having been living here a couple of summers ago, 565 00:29:08,280 --> 00:29:10,960 Speaker 1: during the George Floyd protests, when and during the inauguration, 566 00:29:11,160 --> 00:29:14,160 Speaker 1: and during the inauguration and after January sixth, I mean, 567 00:29:14,200 --> 00:29:16,720 Speaker 1: it just was like one thing after another where but 568 00:29:16,760 --> 00:29:19,120 Speaker 1: there were times when I mean this city was under 569 00:29:19,160 --> 00:29:25,600 Speaker 1: a military lockdown, helicopter circling overhead, every street barricaded with 570 00:29:25,720 --> 00:29:29,680 Speaker 1: massive military vehicles and hum v's and armed, you know, 571 00:29:29,840 --> 00:29:36,000 Speaker 1: openly armed soldiers. So I definitely get the frustration of 572 00:29:36,080 --> 00:29:41,520 Speaker 1: having your normal life disrupted. However, there have been only 573 00:29:41,560 --> 00:29:47,040 Speaker 1: three arrusts from this protest. They were for relatively minor 574 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:52,520 Speaker 1: infractions as my understanding, things like property destruction. And I 575 00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:55,960 Speaker 1: do think that there has been an effort because the 576 00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:59,719 Speaker 1: cause is broadly unpopular in Canadian society, but I think 577 00:29:59,760 --> 00:30:01,840 Speaker 1: there's been an effort to use the actions in the 578 00:30:01,880 --> 00:30:04,960 Speaker 1: language of a few to broadly tar the whole movement. 579 00:30:05,000 --> 00:30:07,200 Speaker 1: The one Confederate flag is a good example. The one 580 00:30:07,240 --> 00:30:08,920 Speaker 1: dude who said this is going to be our January 581 00:30:08,920 --> 00:30:13,959 Speaker 1: sixth is another good example. And from listening to the 582 00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:18,240 Speaker 1: comments of the people who are involved themselves, which were 583 00:30:18,240 --> 00:30:21,720 Speaker 1: broadcast by CBC, which has not been very charitable to 584 00:30:21,800 --> 00:30:26,360 Speaker 1: that they have been trying to really police their own people. 585 00:30:26,480 --> 00:30:32,640 Speaker 1: So there were instances of people using Nazi iconography, swastikas, 586 00:30:32,800 --> 00:30:35,440 Speaker 1: yellow stars and the like. Now they say, we're saying 587 00:30:35,480 --> 00:30:37,880 Speaker 1: that they're the Nazis, not that we're in support of Nazis. 588 00:30:37,920 --> 00:30:40,040 Speaker 1: I have no idea. I do know that that sort 589 00:30:40,040 --> 00:30:43,680 Speaker 1: of imagery and like symbology can be very offensive and 590 00:30:43,680 --> 00:30:46,240 Speaker 1: it's not helpful to their cause whatsoever. They seem to 591 00:30:46,280 --> 00:30:48,040 Speaker 1: know that as well and are trying to crack down 592 00:30:48,040 --> 00:30:50,320 Speaker 1: on that sort of direction. So I don't want to 593 00:30:50,360 --> 00:30:53,400 Speaker 1: sanitize and say these are like all just salt of 594 00:30:53,400 --> 00:30:56,560 Speaker 1: the earth people. There's no extremist elements or anything like that. 595 00:30:56,880 --> 00:31:00,600 Speaker 1: But the important thing is that they're the root of 596 00:31:00,680 --> 00:31:05,320 Speaker 1: their protest is a legitimate line of debate, which is 597 00:31:05,360 --> 00:31:08,440 Speaker 1: about whether you agree with them or not. Should we 598 00:31:08,520 --> 00:31:12,120 Speaker 1: have these vaccine requirements, should we have these lockdowns, should 599 00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:15,200 Speaker 1: we have these mask mandates. We disagree with this, and 600 00:31:15,240 --> 00:31:17,479 Speaker 1: we want to make our voices heard, And frankly, I 601 00:31:17,480 --> 00:31:20,040 Speaker 1: think that their approach to it has been very creative 602 00:31:20,480 --> 00:31:23,600 Speaker 1: and has been very effective, certainly in getting people's attention 603 00:31:24,080 --> 00:31:27,560 Speaker 1: and inspiring people in Canada, but also obviously this has 604 00:31:27,600 --> 00:31:29,880 Speaker 1: been a big story here as well. The reason it's 605 00:31:29,920 --> 00:31:32,760 Speaker 1: relevant to us is because of the GoFundMe piece, because 606 00:31:32,760 --> 00:31:36,960 Speaker 1: this is an American company that is incredibly significant in 607 00:31:37,040 --> 00:31:40,360 Speaker 1: terms of a fundraising platform, and for them to be 608 00:31:40,440 --> 00:31:43,960 Speaker 1: able to have the say over who's able to actually 609 00:31:44,080 --> 00:31:48,360 Speaker 1: raise funds for their cause and who's not, that's where 610 00:31:48,400 --> 00:31:51,320 Speaker 1: things start to get very uncomfortable, because again, you're just 611 00:31:51,520 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 1: your cand and over control of society to few tech oligarchs, 612 00:31:56,120 --> 00:31:59,720 Speaker 1: letting them say who can have a podcast, who can 613 00:31:59,760 --> 00:32:04,080 Speaker 1: be on YouTube, who can raise money at funds? Who 614 00:32:04,160 --> 00:32:07,640 Speaker 1: can host on you on the cloud, who can exist 615 00:32:07,680 --> 00:32:11,480 Speaker 1: on the app store. You really are closing off avenues 616 00:32:11,520 --> 00:32:14,680 Speaker 1: and making it so that there are these incredibly powerful gatekeepers. 617 00:32:14,680 --> 00:32:16,719 Speaker 1: And once again, if you think this is just going 618 00:32:16,760 --> 00:32:19,920 Speaker 1: to stay with the right, go ask all the leftists 619 00:32:19,960 --> 00:32:22,280 Speaker 1: who have been canceled and who have been deep latform 620 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:24,440 Speaker 1: and who've had their podcast taken down about how that 621 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:26,959 Speaker 1: ultimately all works out. I honestly think it's worse than 622 00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:29,800 Speaker 1: the tech piece because they didn't take responsibility. They gave 623 00:32:29,840 --> 00:32:31,600 Speaker 1: it to the cops. They were like, no, the cops 624 00:32:31,640 --> 00:32:34,600 Speaker 1: say it's bad. You're like, well, okay, so that's the standard. 625 00:32:34,840 --> 00:32:38,880 Speaker 1: I mean, let's take the logical extrapolation of that in 626 00:32:38,960 --> 00:32:42,200 Speaker 1: terms of tech people listening. Then to the law enforcement agencies. 627 00:32:42,360 --> 00:32:44,280 Speaker 1: You think the FBI doesn't have an interest in taking 628 00:32:44,320 --> 00:32:47,200 Speaker 1: down this podcast after all the January sixth coverage that 629 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:49,880 Speaker 1: we've made here, or the Capitol Police talking about their 630 00:32:49,880 --> 00:32:53,800 Speaker 1: spying abilities, or the Department of Homeland Security. Luckily we 631 00:32:53,880 --> 00:32:56,360 Speaker 1: have the First Amendment. We can say whatever we want, 632 00:32:56,400 --> 00:32:58,280 Speaker 1: but we don't have a right to be on YouTube. 633 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:01,000 Speaker 1: We don't have a right to be on Spotify or whatever. 634 00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:03,920 Speaker 1: Any of those people could then go ahead and platform 635 00:33:04,040 --> 00:33:06,440 Speaker 1: or partner with the platform on the cops. If they 636 00:33:06,480 --> 00:33:08,960 Speaker 1: made the request, I'll take it at one step further 637 00:33:09,120 --> 00:33:11,520 Speaker 1: up the tech stack, if you will. Let's say gofund 638 00:33:11,600 --> 00:33:14,640 Speaker 1: me didn't do this. What if Visa and MasterCard and 639 00:33:14,680 --> 00:33:17,120 Speaker 1: other credit card processors there's only like three or four 640 00:33:17,480 --> 00:33:20,240 Speaker 1: in the entire country decided they would no longer process 641 00:33:20,280 --> 00:33:24,640 Speaker 1: transactions at the behest of law enforcement towards the Autawa truckers. Well, 642 00:33:24,960 --> 00:33:28,920 Speaker 1: that's pretty scary, and actually that's already happened in several instances. 643 00:33:29,080 --> 00:33:32,280 Speaker 1: Now that was against white nationalists. But the standard has 644 00:33:32,320 --> 00:33:35,280 Speaker 1: been set, and especially if they use it and listen 645 00:33:35,320 --> 00:33:38,680 Speaker 1: to the cops, especially in a time of turmoil and 646 00:33:38,920 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 1: protest and occupation, you know, whatever you want to call 647 00:33:41,800 --> 00:33:44,120 Speaker 1: it about what's happening. So the point is is that 648 00:33:45,040 --> 00:33:48,640 Speaker 1: these co American tech companies are setting the standard of 649 00:33:48,760 --> 00:33:52,840 Speaker 1: listening to foreign law enforcement. Okay, go fund me, Hong Kong, 650 00:33:53,000 --> 00:33:56,920 Speaker 1: what's going to happen. Go fund me Saudi Arabia. Let's uh, women, 651 00:33:57,080 --> 00:33:58,720 Speaker 1: go ahead and try and start to go fund me 652 00:33:58,760 --> 00:34:03,360 Speaker 1: in Saudi Boom, Go fund me, Iran, Go fund me, Russia, 653 00:34:03,400 --> 00:34:06,640 Speaker 1: Go fund me, Ukraine, Go fund me, Germany, even you know, 654 00:34:07,000 --> 00:34:10,840 Speaker 1: all of these places have outrageous anti free speech laws. 655 00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:14,000 Speaker 1: The standard that they're setting is that the locals get 656 00:34:14,040 --> 00:34:18,400 Speaker 1: to decide what is cool and what is not. Now, okay, 657 00:34:18,400 --> 00:34:21,080 Speaker 1: that's fine from a democratic sense, but not from an 658 00:34:21,120 --> 00:34:24,160 Speaker 1: American tech company sense, and especially if they're going to 659 00:34:24,200 --> 00:34:27,200 Speaker 1: import that standard here to the US. So that's my 660 00:34:27,239 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 1: biggest concern on all this. I listened as part of 661 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:34,759 Speaker 1: my research for this. I listened to Canadian Broadcasting Corporation 662 00:34:35,440 --> 00:34:38,960 Speaker 1: podcast that was truly insane. They brought on this woman 663 00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:43,759 Speaker 1: who is an expert in like terrorism financing, and then 664 00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:47,840 Speaker 1: she was using all of this language that was plucked 665 00:34:47,920 --> 00:34:51,839 Speaker 1: straight from Russia Gate, talking about we don't know where 666 00:34:51,840 --> 00:34:55,839 Speaker 1: these funds are coming from, this is foreign influence in 667 00:34:55,880 --> 00:34:59,480 Speaker 1: our country. And she wasn't actually, she wasn't talking abou Russia, 668 00:34:59,480 --> 00:35:03,400 Speaker 1: was actually talking about the United States. But it was 669 00:35:03,440 --> 00:35:07,920 Speaker 1: all meant to be very nefarious, very sketchy. I mean, 670 00:35:08,000 --> 00:35:11,600 Speaker 1: first of all, it was just completely invented because she 671 00:35:11,719 --> 00:35:14,160 Speaker 1: had no idea who gave the money, where the money 672 00:35:14,160 --> 00:35:17,319 Speaker 1: came from, and so that enabled her to concoct this 673 00:35:17,440 --> 00:35:20,680 Speaker 1: whole sort of like idea of a nefarious cabal that 674 00:35:20,760 --> 00:35:23,920 Speaker 1: was supporting this because it was interesting her language too, 675 00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:27,480 Speaker 1: because the reason she first decided to investigate it was 676 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:30,840 Speaker 1: because it struck her that it was not likely that 677 00:35:30,920 --> 00:35:34,600 Speaker 1: they organically raised that much money, which speaks probably to 678 00:35:34,640 --> 00:35:36,800 Speaker 1: her own bubble of the people that she lives around 679 00:35:36,840 --> 00:35:38,920 Speaker 1: and the views that they hold, and that they wouldn't 680 00:35:38,920 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 1: need the type that would give to a cause like this. 681 00:35:41,520 --> 00:35:45,520 Speaker 1: But that's the type of misinformation that's being used, and 682 00:35:45,560 --> 00:35:47,600 Speaker 1: it's to the point that they're actually going to have 683 00:35:47,719 --> 00:35:51,640 Speaker 1: like a government hearing an inquiry into the source of 684 00:35:51,680 --> 00:35:54,799 Speaker 1: the funds and all of this. So that's some of 685 00:35:54,840 --> 00:35:58,520 Speaker 1: the heat that has been created around this money and 686 00:35:58,560 --> 00:36:01,279 Speaker 1: where did it come for from and what is it 687 00:36:01,320 --> 00:36:03,600 Speaker 1: going to. So originally GoFundMe was like, we're going to 688 00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,239 Speaker 1: give it to charities. Now they are refunding it to 689 00:36:06,239 --> 00:36:08,960 Speaker 1: the people involved. But you know, those people who gave 690 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:11,920 Speaker 1: that money, they want to support this cause and they 691 00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:14,120 Speaker 1: have every right to, whether you like the cause or not. 692 00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:16,760 Speaker 1: I personally have issues with, you know, the stances they're taking. 693 00:36:16,800 --> 00:36:18,959 Speaker 1: I have no doubt that they're like, you know, a 694 00:36:19,000 --> 00:36:21,760 Speaker 1: widespread anti vac sentiments within the group, But who cares. 695 00:36:21,800 --> 00:36:26,560 Speaker 1: It's about believing in democracy, even when it's uncomfortable, even 696 00:36:26,560 --> 00:36:28,840 Speaker 1: when it's messy, believing that people have a right to 697 00:36:28,920 --> 00:36:31,719 Speaker 1: raise their voice in protest, and that in that give 698 00:36:31,760 --> 00:36:33,320 Speaker 1: and take you're going to come to some sort of 699 00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:36,000 Speaker 1: consensus about what your society is going to look like. 700 00:36:36,120 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 1: And you know, it's just a sad state of affairs 701 00:36:38,360 --> 00:36:40,600 Speaker 1: that you have so many people who, again, in another time, 702 00:36:41,040 --> 00:36:45,359 Speaker 1: would be very energized. I would have activist impulses dedicated to, hey, 703 00:36:45,400 --> 00:36:48,120 Speaker 1: how do we how do we forge a better collective good? 704 00:36:48,280 --> 00:36:50,399 Speaker 1: How do we stand up against the man? And now 705 00:36:50,440 --> 00:36:53,200 Speaker 1: what are they spending their energy doing? Like begging tech 706 00:36:53,239 --> 00:36:55,920 Speaker 1: all of these the man to have more to take 707 00:36:56,000 --> 00:37:00,920 Speaker 1: more control over society. Yeah, I think that's well said. 708 00:37:01,960 --> 00:37:03,960 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and move on to Ukraine. This is 709 00:37:04,040 --> 00:37:07,200 Speaker 1: an important story, one of the most stunning displays that 710 00:37:07,239 --> 00:37:09,800 Speaker 1: I've seen from the American press in a long time. 711 00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:12,080 Speaker 1: That being said the journalists who were about to show 712 00:37:12,120 --> 00:37:14,200 Speaker 1: you Matt Lee. I actually was in the State Department 713 00:37:14,200 --> 00:37:15,880 Speaker 1: Press Corps for a very short period of time. I 714 00:37:15,920 --> 00:37:18,560 Speaker 1: got to see him in action. He is somebody deeply 715 00:37:18,560 --> 00:37:22,040 Speaker 1: skeptical of all administrations, lived through a lot of lies, 716 00:37:22,080 --> 00:37:23,919 Speaker 1: and it very much shows on his kind of weather 717 00:37:23,960 --> 00:37:28,040 Speaker 1: beaten face and in his language. But this exchange over 718 00:37:28,120 --> 00:37:31,560 Speaker 1: a recent claim from the US government is truly incredible. 719 00:37:31,560 --> 00:37:33,200 Speaker 1: So we'll set it up a bit, which is that 720 00:37:33,239 --> 00:37:36,279 Speaker 1: the US government had come out over the weekend or sorry, 721 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:39,480 Speaker 1: on Friday, and they said, we have evidence that the 722 00:37:39,640 --> 00:37:42,759 Speaker 1: Russians are planning a video which is going to be 723 00:37:42,840 --> 00:37:47,200 Speaker 1: some false flag attack with crisis actors, which then is 724 00:37:47,239 --> 00:37:49,680 Speaker 1: going to be a pretext for the invasion. That's all 725 00:37:49,680 --> 00:37:53,200 Speaker 1: they said, and a lot of us said, Okay, show 726 00:37:53,280 --> 00:37:57,400 Speaker 1: us the evidence. What's the evidence, And their claim is 727 00:37:57,400 --> 00:38:01,120 Speaker 1: that simply uttering that claim the Russians are doing this 728 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:04,799 Speaker 1: is evidence that that declassification of being able to say 729 00:38:04,800 --> 00:38:07,440 Speaker 1: it is enough for all of us. And it was 730 00:38:07,520 --> 00:38:11,520 Speaker 1: crystallized in this moment with Matt Lee pressing him and saying, 731 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:16,160 Speaker 1: show me the actual evidence and watch this former CIA 732 00:38:16,480 --> 00:38:22,120 Speaker 1: Google squirm under real questioning from the press, offering up 733 00:38:22,400 --> 00:38:25,279 Speaker 1: nothing and showing us that, yeah, they don't have a 734 00:38:25,320 --> 00:38:27,759 Speaker 1: whole lot to back up what they're saying. Let's take 735 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:33,839 Speaker 1: a listen. Nice Okay, well that's quite a mouthful there. 736 00:38:34,760 --> 00:38:39,560 Speaker 1: So you said, actions such as these suggest otherwise suggest 737 00:38:39,960 --> 00:38:42,799 Speaker 1: meaning they suggest they're not interested in talks, and they're 738 00:38:42,840 --> 00:38:44,839 Speaker 1: going to go ahead with some kind of a What 739 00:38:44,920 --> 00:38:48,840 Speaker 1: action are you talking about? One the actions I've disappointed 740 00:38:48,880 --> 00:38:52,640 Speaker 1: to you? The fact action the fact that Russia continues 741 00:38:52,680 --> 00:38:57,759 Speaker 1: to engage in disinformation. He made an allegation that they 742 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:02,080 Speaker 1: might do that. Have they actually what we know, Matt, 743 00:39:02,160 --> 00:39:04,080 Speaker 1: is what we what I have just said that they 744 00:39:04,120 --> 00:39:08,120 Speaker 1: have engaged in this activity, in this planning activity. But 745 00:39:08,320 --> 00:39:11,480 Speaker 1: let me let me because obviously this is not this 746 00:39:11,560 --> 00:39:15,680 Speaker 1: is not the first time we've made these reports public. 747 00:39:15,880 --> 00:39:19,200 Speaker 1: You'll remember that just a few weeks ago, sorry, you 748 00:39:19,239 --> 00:39:22,160 Speaker 1: made what report public? If you'll let me finish, I 749 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:24,920 Speaker 1: will tell you what report we made public. We told 750 00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:28,040 Speaker 1: you a few weeks ago that we have information indicating 751 00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:31,160 Speaker 1: Russia also has already prepositioned a group of operatives to 752 00:39:31,200 --> 00:39:34,919 Speaker 1: conduct a false lag operation in eastern Ukraine. So that, Matt, 753 00:39:35,000 --> 00:39:37,960 Speaker 1: to your question, is an action that Russia has already taken. 754 00:39:38,000 --> 00:39:40,560 Speaker 1: It's an action that you say that they have taken, 755 00:39:40,840 --> 00:39:45,279 Speaker 1: but you have shown no evidence to confirm that. And 756 00:39:45,360 --> 00:39:47,319 Speaker 1: I'm going to get to the next question here, which 757 00:39:47,360 --> 00:39:49,920 Speaker 1: is what is the evidence that they I mean, this 758 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:53,280 Speaker 1: is like crisis actors. Really this is like Alex Jones 759 00:39:53,400 --> 00:39:57,399 Speaker 1: territory you're getting into. Now, what evidence do you have 760 00:39:57,600 --> 00:40:00,440 Speaker 1: to support the idea that there is some proper aganda 761 00:40:00,480 --> 00:40:04,280 Speaker 1: film in the in the making. Now, this is derived 762 00:40:04,719 --> 00:40:08,160 Speaker 1: from information known to the US government, intelligence information that 763 00:40:08,200 --> 00:40:11,320 Speaker 1: we have declassified. I think you okay, Well, where where 764 00:40:11,360 --> 00:40:14,279 Speaker 1: is it? Where? Where is this information? It is intelligence 765 00:40:14,280 --> 00:40:16,600 Speaker 1: information that we have declassified. Well where is it? Where 766 00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:21,360 Speaker 1: is the declassified information? I just delivered it. No, you 767 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:24,279 Speaker 1: made a series of allegations. Would you would you like 768 00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:25,920 Speaker 1: us to print out the top art because you will 769 00:40:25,920 --> 00:40:28,000 Speaker 1: see a transcript of this briefing that you can print 770 00:40:28,000 --> 00:40:30,719 Speaker 1: out for yourself. Not evidence, Ned, that's you saying it. 771 00:40:30,800 --> 00:40:36,080 Speaker 1: That's not evidence. I'm sorry. What would you like, Matt? 772 00:40:36,280 --> 00:40:38,759 Speaker 1: I would like to see some proof that you that 773 00:40:38,760 --> 00:40:43,439 Speaker 1: that that that that you can show that that Matt, 774 00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:46,080 Speaker 1: you have been that that shows that that that shows 775 00:40:46,080 --> 00:40:47,920 Speaker 1: that the Russians are doing it. Ned, I've been doing this. 776 00:40:48,280 --> 00:40:50,880 Speaker 1: I know that was my you have. You have been 777 00:40:50,920 --> 00:40:52,520 Speaker 1: doing this for quite a while. You know that when 778 00:40:52,520 --> 00:40:56,239 Speaker 1: we declassify intelligence information, and we do so in a means, 779 00:40:56,760 --> 00:41:03,200 Speaker 1: we do so, we do so to protects. I remember 780 00:41:03,200 --> 00:41:06,600 Speaker 1: a lot of things. So, where is the declassified information, 781 00:41:06,680 --> 00:41:10,399 Speaker 1: other than you coming out here and saying, Matt, I'm 782 00:41:10,400 --> 00:41:12,400 Speaker 1: sorry you don't like the format, but we have a 783 00:41:12,600 --> 00:41:15,560 Speaker 1: class format. It's the content. I'm sorry you don't like 784 00:41:15,600 --> 00:41:18,640 Speaker 1: the content. I'm sorry. I'm sorry you are doubting the 785 00:41:18,640 --> 00:41:20,880 Speaker 1: information that is in the possession of the US government. 786 00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:23,839 Speaker 1: What I'm telling you is that this is information that's 787 00:41:23,840 --> 00:41:26,000 Speaker 1: available to us. We are making it available to you 788 00:41:26,719 --> 00:41:29,600 Speaker 1: in order for a couple of reasons. One is to 789 00:41:29,640 --> 00:41:33,120 Speaker 1: attempt to deter the Russians from going ahead with this activity. Two, 790 00:41:33,480 --> 00:41:35,480 Speaker 1: in the event we're not able to do that, in 791 00:41:35,520 --> 00:41:37,680 Speaker 1: the event the Russians do go ahead with us, to 792 00:41:37,760 --> 00:41:40,560 Speaker 1: make it clear as day, to lay bare the fact 793 00:41:40,600 --> 00:41:42,839 Speaker 1: that this has always been an attempt on the part 794 00:41:42,840 --> 00:41:46,880 Speaker 1: of the Russian Federation to fabricate a pretext. Yeah, but 795 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:51,120 Speaker 1: you don't have any any evidence to back it up 796 00:41:51,120 --> 00:41:54,520 Speaker 1: other than what you're saying. It's like you're saying, we 797 00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:58,640 Speaker 1: think we have information in the Russians may do this, 798 00:41:59,360 --> 00:42:01,880 Speaker 1: but you won't tell us what the information. And then 799 00:42:01,920 --> 00:42:04,640 Speaker 1: when when you're that is the idea behind the terrence, 800 00:42:04,719 --> 00:42:06,960 Speaker 1: when that is the idea behind a turrence and it 801 00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:09,400 Speaker 1: is all hope that the Russians don't go forward with 802 00:42:09,520 --> 00:42:12,160 Speaker 1: this is you say, I just gave it to you. 803 00:42:12,719 --> 00:42:15,480 Speaker 1: But that's not what you You seem not to understand. 804 00:42:15,600 --> 00:42:19,719 Speaker 1: You seem not to understand the idea of we are 805 00:42:20,080 --> 00:42:22,840 Speaker 1: the Russians from moving forward with this type of activity. 806 00:42:23,040 --> 00:42:25,319 Speaker 1: That is why we're making a public today. If the 807 00:42:25,360 --> 00:42:28,319 Speaker 1: Russians don't go forward with this, that is not it's 808 00:42:28,400 --> 00:42:30,719 Speaker 1: so facto an indication that they never had plans to 809 00:42:30,760 --> 00:42:34,920 Speaker 1: do so. Uh. But then it's unprovable. My god, what 810 00:42:35,040 --> 00:42:37,200 Speaker 1: is the evidence that you have that suggests that that 811 00:42:37,320 --> 00:42:40,160 Speaker 1: that the Russians are even planning this? That is the 812 00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:42,879 Speaker 1: perfect way to handle that. You have to scorn them 813 00:42:43,120 --> 00:42:45,919 Speaker 1: exactly to their faces and show them that what they're 814 00:42:45,960 --> 00:42:49,520 Speaker 1: saying is outrageous. We have evidence, I just gave it 815 00:42:49,560 --> 00:42:52,120 Speaker 1: to you. That's not evidence, that's you speaking. That doesn't 816 00:42:52,160 --> 00:42:55,799 Speaker 1: mean any And you say in some stuff, we continue 817 00:42:55,840 --> 00:43:01,520 Speaker 1: to find that Washington makes these outlandish crew claims, which 818 00:43:01,640 --> 00:43:05,239 Speaker 1: leads them to have the hottest rhetoric in the ongoing 819 00:43:05,280 --> 00:43:09,200 Speaker 1: dispute between Ukraine and Russia. And if you do want 820 00:43:09,200 --> 00:43:11,680 Speaker 1: to broaden it out, you can say the Europeans and 821 00:43:11,760 --> 00:43:15,040 Speaker 1: Russia put this up there on the screen. US assessments 822 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:18,879 Speaker 1: continue to find Russia could seize Kievan days cause some 823 00:43:19,000 --> 00:43:23,560 Speaker 1: fifty thousand civilian casualties in Ukraine. I mean, what year 824 00:43:23,640 --> 00:43:27,320 Speaker 1: is it, you know, nineteen thirty nine. What's happening here, crystal, 825 00:43:27,480 --> 00:43:30,719 Speaker 1: which is that the rhetoric used from Washington does not 826 00:43:30,920 --> 00:43:33,960 Speaker 1: match the rhetoric or the actions that are being pursued 827 00:43:34,000 --> 00:43:38,560 Speaker 1: on the continent right now. Macron is practicing shuttle diplomacy 828 00:43:38,640 --> 00:43:42,040 Speaker 1: between Europe and Russia, trying to hammer out some diplomatic 829 00:43:42,120 --> 00:43:45,880 Speaker 1: or agreement, and the US, as Matt Lee says, is 830 00:43:45,920 --> 00:43:49,560 Speaker 1: putting out some Alex Jones level insanity in terms of 831 00:43:49,600 --> 00:43:52,360 Speaker 1: its claims about what exactly is gonna happen. That's a 832 00:43:52,400 --> 00:43:55,600 Speaker 1: crazy claim. If you have evidence, publish it. I'd love 833 00:43:55,600 --> 00:43:58,719 Speaker 1: to see it. This would be like ADLEI Stevenson at 834 00:43:58,719 --> 00:44:02,799 Speaker 1: the Cuban missile crisis. We have evidence that the Russians 835 00:44:02,840 --> 00:44:06,880 Speaker 1: put missiles in Cuba, and everybody's like, okay, where is it. 836 00:44:07,120 --> 00:44:10,280 Speaker 1: At least we brought pictures that time. I mean, this time, 837 00:44:10,360 --> 00:44:12,640 Speaker 1: they won't even give us that what's happening here? I 838 00:44:12,680 --> 00:44:15,240 Speaker 1: think it also says a lot about what they expect 839 00:44:15,239 --> 00:44:17,279 Speaker 1: from the press. Corps that they think they could just 840 00:44:17,400 --> 00:44:21,520 Speaker 1: assert something that is a look, well it did work, actually, 841 00:44:21,520 --> 00:44:24,399 Speaker 1: Crystal Yeah on CNN they parodied it. They go right 842 00:44:24,400 --> 00:44:26,440 Speaker 1: along with it. Yeah, that you could put on something 843 00:44:26,480 --> 00:44:31,080 Speaker 1: that is quite a pretty wild claim. Look, I don't 844 00:44:31,080 --> 00:44:33,520 Speaker 1: put anything past around. I don't trust them, eybe, but 845 00:44:34,400 --> 00:44:36,440 Speaker 1: this is sound there. I mean, he says, it sounds 846 00:44:36,480 --> 00:44:39,040 Speaker 1: like some Alex Jones, like crisis actors and all of this, 847 00:44:39,239 --> 00:44:42,600 Speaker 1: and this is like plot number three that they've claimed 848 00:44:42,960 --> 00:44:46,480 Speaker 1: the Russians are planning here and uncovered us, and you know, 849 00:44:46,560 --> 00:44:49,480 Speaker 1: the Brits are partnering with us to sort of distract 850 00:44:49,480 --> 00:44:52,960 Speaker 1: from their own problems at home. But so listen, I 851 00:44:52,960 --> 00:44:55,160 Speaker 1: think it says everything that they think that the press 852 00:44:55,200 --> 00:44:59,600 Speaker 1: will just take this their assertion backed by nothing, as 853 00:44:59,640 --> 00:45:02,600 Speaker 1: complete fact. And the other thing that we've seen with 854 00:45:02,680 --> 00:45:07,000 Speaker 1: this really consistently is the language around. If you are 855 00:45:07,560 --> 00:45:12,320 Speaker 1: willing to dissent from their narrative, you are immediately tarred 856 00:45:12,480 --> 00:45:19,000 Speaker 1: as creator propaganda's Russians. All of that stuff there was actually, 857 00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:21,280 Speaker 1: I mean, this was kind of funny too. David from 858 00:45:21,560 --> 00:45:24,200 Speaker 1: don't normally check out his Twitter feed that often, but 859 00:45:24,600 --> 00:45:27,360 Speaker 1: Ben and Jerry's put out this statement that just said, 860 00:45:27,960 --> 00:45:31,160 Speaker 1: you cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war. We call 861 00:45:31,200 --> 00:45:33,880 Speaker 1: on President Biden to de escalate tensions and work for 862 00:45:33,960 --> 00:45:37,160 Speaker 1: peace rather than prepare for war. Sending thousands more US 863 00:45:37,239 --> 00:45:39,560 Speaker 1: troops to Europe and response to Russia's threats against Ukraine 864 00:45:39,600 --> 00:45:43,080 Speaker 1: only fans the flame of war. Incredibly reasonable sentiment, very 865 00:45:43,080 --> 00:45:49,040 Speaker 1: consistent with their historic pro peace orientation. And David from 866 00:45:49,120 --> 00:45:52,239 Speaker 1: quote teats that and says congratulations to Tucker Carlson on 867 00:45:52,320 --> 00:45:55,480 Speaker 1: his appointment as CEO of BEN and Jerry's like, just 868 00:45:55,600 --> 00:45:59,440 Speaker 1: the language and the rhetoric around this is so ridiculous. 869 00:46:00,160 --> 00:46:04,320 Speaker 1: Allowed to say, hey, here's what's going on from Russia's perspective, 870 00:46:04,360 --> 00:46:07,239 Speaker 1: here's why they're looking at it this way, here's what 871 00:46:07,320 --> 00:46:09,920 Speaker 1: some of their motivations are, which, again in the New 872 00:46:10,000 --> 00:46:12,520 Speaker 1: York Times this morning, they're laying out what Macron is 873 00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:16,120 Speaker 1: trying to do and is trying to assert the European 874 00:46:16,520 --> 00:46:20,080 Speaker 1: position because they have a lot more directly at stake 875 00:46:20,160 --> 00:46:23,600 Speaker 1: in this in terms of their energy prices than we do. 876 00:46:24,520 --> 00:46:26,319 Speaker 1: And one of the things that The New York Times 877 00:46:26,360 --> 00:46:29,120 Speaker 1: says is that they're trying to figure out how to 878 00:46:29,840 --> 00:46:33,000 Speaker 1: acknowledge that Russia has a little bit of a point 879 00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:36,680 Speaker 1: when it comes to NATO expansion without backing off of 880 00:46:37,400 --> 00:46:40,880 Speaker 1: the promises that have already been made and the statements 881 00:46:40,920 --> 00:46:43,400 Speaker 1: that have already been made by the West with regards 882 00:46:43,400 --> 00:46:46,960 Speaker 1: to that NATO expansion. So this is not crazy stuff 883 00:46:47,040 --> 00:46:49,520 Speaker 1: to talk about. But they've just gotten away with so 884 00:46:49,719 --> 00:46:54,759 Speaker 1: long having reliable stenographers from the press that will just 885 00:46:54,880 --> 00:46:58,080 Speaker 1: write down whatever they say is fact, no evidence needed, 886 00:46:58,400 --> 00:47:00,160 Speaker 1: that they feel like they can do this and they 887 00:47:00,160 --> 00:47:02,360 Speaker 1: can get away with it, and they largely can. No, 888 00:47:02,440 --> 00:47:04,280 Speaker 1: you're right, And there was a moment on the exact 889 00:47:04,320 --> 00:47:06,680 Speaker 1: same day that we want to show you about Syria. 890 00:47:06,840 --> 00:47:08,920 Speaker 1: So let's go ahead and move on to that. What 891 00:47:09,000 --> 00:47:11,640 Speaker 1: happened for so, yeah, so you guys probably saw this 892 00:47:11,800 --> 00:47:15,200 Speaker 1: news that there was a big raid in Syria that 893 00:47:15,280 --> 00:47:18,360 Speaker 1: took out an ISIS leader. I'm going to totally butcher 894 00:47:18,400 --> 00:47:20,800 Speaker 1: his name. I'm sorry, but his name is Abu Ibrahim 895 00:47:20,840 --> 00:47:26,040 Speaker 1: al Hashimi al Karashi. Karashi Tarishi was killed Wednesday, I'm 896 00:47:26,040 --> 00:47:28,640 Speaker 1: reading from CNN right now during the US counter terrorism 897 00:47:28,719 --> 00:47:31,880 Speaker 1: raid in northwest Syria. Biden announced that on Thursday morning, 898 00:47:32,200 --> 00:47:35,040 Speaker 1: biggest US raid in that country since the twenty nine 899 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:39,640 Speaker 1: nineteen operation that killed the last ISIS leader, Abu Baker 900 00:47:39,719 --> 00:47:44,160 Speaker 1: al Bagdati. So what the US says, what they claim 901 00:47:44,600 --> 00:47:47,680 Speaker 1: without evidence at this point is that he blew himself 902 00:47:47,800 --> 00:47:53,040 Speaker 1: up as US forces approached his compound, and that self 903 00:47:53,080 --> 00:48:00,560 Speaker 1: immolation or suicide bombing resulted in multiple civilian casualties. However, 904 00:48:01,239 --> 00:48:03,239 Speaker 1: there's a lot of facts that don't add up here. 905 00:48:03,840 --> 00:48:07,360 Speaker 1: The number of civilian casualties that the US is claiming 906 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:12,080 Speaker 1: does not match what independent organizations on the ground are 907 00:48:12,160 --> 00:48:15,360 Speaker 1: saying the number of civilians that were killed during this operation. 908 00:48:15,880 --> 00:48:18,440 Speaker 1: And so, once again, on the very same day that 909 00:48:18,480 --> 00:48:22,000 Speaker 1: we were having pushed back over the whole Ukraine situation, 910 00:48:22,520 --> 00:48:26,400 Speaker 1: we also had some pushback from reporters about the narrative 911 00:48:26,480 --> 00:48:28,680 Speaker 1: that the White House was laying out with regards to 912 00:48:28,719 --> 00:48:31,080 Speaker 1: how this raid exactly went down. Let's go ahead and 913 00:48:31,120 --> 00:48:34,200 Speaker 1: put this tweet up on the screen. A board Air Force. 914 00:48:34,239 --> 00:48:37,920 Speaker 1: One reporter asked White House pro Secretary Jensaki for evidence 915 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:42,320 Speaker 1: to back up the claim that Karashi detonated a suicide bomb. 916 00:48:42,960 --> 00:48:46,719 Speaker 1: Saki responds by asking whether skeptics think the US military 917 00:48:46,880 --> 00:48:52,440 Speaker 1: is not providing accurate information and ISIS is providing accurate information? 918 00:48:52,520 --> 00:48:54,840 Speaker 1: Let's go to the next tweet. The reporter did not 919 00:48:54,920 --> 00:48:58,920 Speaker 1: back down. That reporter said, I mean the US has 920 00:48:59,000 --> 00:49:02,680 Speaker 1: not always been st right forward about what happens with civilians, 921 00:49:02,920 --> 00:49:06,520 Speaker 1: and I mean that is a fact. Great points there. 922 00:49:06,600 --> 00:49:08,279 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and put the next piece up on 923 00:49:08,320 --> 00:49:11,000 Speaker 1: the screen. So this shows the discrepancy. The Syrian civil 924 00:49:11,040 --> 00:49:14,200 Speaker 1: defense group, the White Helmets, says that thirteen people were 925 00:49:14,280 --> 00:49:17,760 Speaker 1: killed in the raid. Meanwhile, the Pentagon spokesman John Kirby 926 00:49:17,880 --> 00:49:20,360 Speaker 1: says that four civilians and five combatants that would be 927 00:49:20,360 --> 00:49:23,440 Speaker 1: a total of nine people died during the operation. So 928 00:49:23,480 --> 00:49:27,120 Speaker 1: there's a discrepancy already from the jump about how many 929 00:49:27,160 --> 00:49:30,680 Speaker 1: civilians were actually killed, not to mention, no actual evidence 930 00:49:30,719 --> 00:49:35,040 Speaker 1: provided that the civilians who were killed were actually killed 931 00:49:35,040 --> 00:49:39,280 Speaker 1: by Karashi and his suicide bomb. So it's another instance 932 00:49:39,320 --> 00:49:43,240 Speaker 1: where typically for years and years, everyone in the press 933 00:49:43,680 --> 00:49:48,760 Speaker 1: would just parrot whatever the official line was, no evidence needed, 934 00:49:49,360 --> 00:49:52,920 Speaker 1: yae go USA, and they would move on. This is 935 00:49:52,920 --> 00:49:55,960 Speaker 1: a very rare instance of a reporter who's saying, listen, 936 00:49:55,960 --> 00:49:57,719 Speaker 1: I hear your narrative, but I would like to see 937 00:49:57,719 --> 00:50:00,640 Speaker 1: some evidence here. And of course we know for and 938 00:50:00,680 --> 00:50:04,480 Speaker 1: what this reporter alluded to. We know from lots of 939 00:50:04,560 --> 00:50:08,279 Speaker 1: reporting from the intercepts over many years, recently from the 940 00:50:08,280 --> 00:50:12,239 Speaker 1: New York Times, that the number of civilian casualties is 941 00:50:12,320 --> 00:50:14,880 Speaker 1: dramatically higher than they've ever acknowledged, that there are a 942 00:50:14,920 --> 00:50:18,160 Speaker 1: few precautions put in place to avoid civilian casualties, that 943 00:50:18,200 --> 00:50:20,319 Speaker 1: they're covered up after they happen. And of course we 944 00:50:20,360 --> 00:50:23,720 Speaker 1: saw that horrific, horrific case in point of what happened 945 00:50:23,719 --> 00:50:26,200 Speaker 1: with that drone strike in Afghanistan. I mean, look, if 946 00:50:26,239 --> 00:50:28,920 Speaker 1: you have evidence, you have to release it. And you 947 00:50:28,920 --> 00:50:32,000 Speaker 1: know the reporter is correct. I have no sympathy for 948 00:50:32,120 --> 00:50:35,200 Speaker 1: Abu whatever all Kuahi. I have also, don't put it 949 00:50:35,200 --> 00:50:37,560 Speaker 1: past them to blow up a bunch of kids. But 950 00:50:38,160 --> 00:50:39,960 Speaker 1: the White Helmets, and this is the other problem. White 951 00:50:39,960 --> 00:50:41,960 Speaker 1: Helmets a state department funded thing. You know, a lot 952 00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:45,160 Speaker 1: of people call them, you know, propagandists themselves in the past, 953 00:50:45,200 --> 00:50:47,480 Speaker 1: so it's hard to believe. But you know, in general 954 00:50:47,520 --> 00:50:49,600 Speaker 1: they try to save civilians, and they put out a 955 00:50:49,600 --> 00:50:52,640 Speaker 1: lot of videos during the civils Syrian Civil War, even 956 00:50:52,680 --> 00:50:56,200 Speaker 1: they are saying, right, there's a lot more casualties. Okay, 957 00:50:56,360 --> 00:50:58,880 Speaker 1: I mean maybe is has killed them. You have to 958 00:50:58,920 --> 00:51:01,839 Speaker 1: tell us. And I don't believe them? Should you? How 959 00:51:01,840 --> 00:51:04,799 Speaker 1: many stories we've done here on the show, blowing up 960 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:09,120 Speaker 1: that dam in Syria, lying about it? Obviously the isis 961 00:51:09,400 --> 00:51:13,160 Speaker 1: drone strike, lying about it, botching it, covering it up, 962 00:51:13,440 --> 00:51:18,480 Speaker 1: not punishing anyone. Look, maybe they killed some civilians. Admit it. 963 00:51:18,600 --> 00:51:21,000 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's the fog of war. It 964 00:51:21,080 --> 00:51:23,879 Speaker 1: maybe even be understandable. But you have to admit to it. 965 00:51:24,080 --> 00:51:26,840 Speaker 1: Why don't you say anything? And what was the planning 966 00:51:26,880 --> 00:51:28,880 Speaker 1: behind this operation? That was the other problem is that 967 00:51:28,920 --> 00:51:31,400 Speaker 1: Biden was trying to turn this into some oslov and 968 00:51:31,480 --> 00:51:34,960 Speaker 1: laden moment. Trump did the same thing with Bagdaddy. It's like, look, 969 00:51:35,040 --> 00:51:37,200 Speaker 1: neither of these guys even compare Sosama, Like it's not 970 00:51:37,280 --> 00:51:40,239 Speaker 1: even close in terms of the direct relationship. You know, 971 00:51:40,320 --> 00:51:42,799 Speaker 1: the way Americans feel about it, all of that, and 972 00:51:42,840 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 1: they try to use it as some like chest beating 973 00:51:45,040 --> 00:51:47,680 Speaker 1: moment to gin up their own popular support, which I 974 00:51:47,680 --> 00:51:50,400 Speaker 1: personally found very gross. I do think the timing of 975 00:51:50,440 --> 00:51:53,279 Speaker 1: it is noteworthy here because obviously Biden under a lot 976 00:51:53,280 --> 00:51:56,160 Speaker 1: of pressure here, not things you know, not going down 977 00:51:56,160 --> 00:51:58,600 Speaker 1: well with Ukraine, things not going well with COVID, things 978 00:51:58,600 --> 00:52:01,600 Speaker 1: not going well with the economy, and so yeah, this 979 00:52:01,760 --> 00:52:03,399 Speaker 1: was a nice way to try to put a feather 980 00:52:03,440 --> 00:52:05,720 Speaker 1: at his cap of we got the bad guys. Meanwhile, 981 00:52:05,719 --> 00:52:07,640 Speaker 1: you also killed a bunch of Do you remember the 982 00:52:07,640 --> 00:52:11,600 Speaker 1: twenty twelve Joe Biden's speech at the Democratic Convention bin 983 00:52:11,680 --> 00:52:14,239 Speaker 1: Laden is dead and GM is alive. He said it 984 00:52:14,280 --> 00:52:17,200 Speaker 1: over and over again. This was a huge political benefit 985 00:52:17,480 --> 00:52:20,120 Speaker 1: to Obama at the time when he was running for reelection. 986 00:52:20,160 --> 00:52:22,480 Speaker 1: It's kind of hard to remember, but that was Biden's 987 00:52:22,480 --> 00:52:24,520 Speaker 1: whole thing. He was like, we killed Osami. He said 988 00:52:24,520 --> 00:52:26,600 Speaker 1: it over and over and over again in his speech. 989 00:52:26,680 --> 00:52:28,399 Speaker 1: You know, you should go and watch it, if not, 990 00:52:28,520 --> 00:52:30,880 Speaker 1: just to see how different he's was at the time. 991 00:52:31,320 --> 00:52:34,200 Speaker 1: The reason why all this matters is that it's fuzzy 992 00:52:34,400 --> 00:52:37,280 Speaker 1: and we shouldn't trust these people whenever they make claims. 993 00:52:37,440 --> 00:52:39,440 Speaker 1: I do want to say though, and this just bothers me. 994 00:52:39,960 --> 00:52:43,960 Speaker 1: It took the war in Afghanistan and like the collapse 995 00:52:44,000 --> 00:52:46,920 Speaker 1: of Kabble before everyone's eyes, in the military's lives over 996 00:52:46,920 --> 00:52:49,120 Speaker 1: the last twenty years for these people to wake up 997 00:52:49,120 --> 00:52:50,680 Speaker 1: and be like, Okay, hold on a second, maybe we 998 00:52:50,680 --> 00:52:53,440 Speaker 1: should ask that. It's like, yeah, we should ask Okay, 999 00:52:53,600 --> 00:52:56,200 Speaker 1: Like you know, I shouldn't cry tears that it's coming now. 1000 00:52:56,280 --> 00:52:58,520 Speaker 1: But it's like, hey, you know, we could have saved 1001 00:52:58,560 --> 00:53:01,600 Speaker 1: a lot of people if this happened in the past. 1002 00:53:02,080 --> 00:53:04,920 Speaker 1: I will say this, it shows you how weak they 1003 00:53:05,040 --> 00:53:08,760 Speaker 1: ultimately are. They don't. Nobody believes him anymore, and you shouldn't. 1004 00:53:08,840 --> 00:53:13,040 Speaker 1: They've lied to our faces over and over and over again. Also, 1005 00:53:13,200 --> 00:53:14,920 Speaker 1: what are all these troops doing in Syria in the 1006 00:53:14,920 --> 00:53:18,680 Speaker 1: first place. I don't remember having a conversation around that one, 1007 00:53:18,760 --> 00:53:21,080 Speaker 1: because you know, they didn't just come in from Iraq 1008 00:53:21,200 --> 00:53:23,800 Speaker 1: or wherever. There's a base of like a couple hundred 1009 00:53:23,800 --> 00:53:27,080 Speaker 1: guys who are just sitting in Syria. It's twenty twenty two. 1010 00:53:27,360 --> 00:53:30,600 Speaker 1: We killed Bagdaddy in twenty nineteen, the caliphate collapse in 1011 00:53:30,600 --> 00:53:32,879 Speaker 1: what twenty eighteen? Are we just now going to sit 1012 00:53:32,920 --> 00:53:35,200 Speaker 1: in Syria forever? By the way, the Syrian government doesn't 1013 00:53:35,200 --> 00:53:37,279 Speaker 1: want us there. I'm not saying I like us od 1014 00:53:37,560 --> 00:53:41,280 Speaker 1: or whatever. It's his country. He won the civil war. Okay, fine, 1015 00:53:41,520 --> 00:53:43,439 Speaker 1: so listen to them. This is the thing I don't 1016 00:53:43,440 --> 00:53:46,640 Speaker 1: really seem to understand. Congress is supposed to authorize these 1017 00:53:46,680 --> 00:53:50,319 Speaker 1: types of occupations and invasion of a foreign nation. I mean, 1018 00:53:50,560 --> 00:53:52,840 Speaker 1: you know, we should have a conversation around that, and 1019 00:53:52,840 --> 00:53:55,279 Speaker 1: then they just do these little operations here and there, 1020 00:53:55,320 --> 00:53:56,840 Speaker 1: and they hope that we don't hear about it. And 1021 00:53:56,840 --> 00:53:58,879 Speaker 1: when we do hear about it, everybody's supposed to chest beat. 1022 00:53:59,000 --> 00:54:01,120 Speaker 1: But every once in a while, a little bit of information, 1023 00:54:01,239 --> 00:54:04,120 Speaker 1: thanks to the Internet, starts to squeak out, and you know, 1024 00:54:04,160 --> 00:54:06,600 Speaker 1: we learn about Niger. You're like, hey, what happened in Niger? 1025 00:54:06,680 --> 00:54:08,440 Speaker 1: What was all that going on there? How do these 1026 00:54:08,480 --> 00:54:10,280 Speaker 1: four guys end up in the middle of the desert 1027 00:54:10,440 --> 00:54:12,800 Speaker 1: and one of them get shot with no air support 1028 00:54:13,000 --> 00:54:16,120 Speaker 1: on some crackpot mission. Also wire troops in Niger, in 1029 00:54:16,160 --> 00:54:20,360 Speaker 1: the first Somalia, Yemen, the very first week of Trump's presidency, 1030 00:54:20,560 --> 00:54:22,839 Speaker 1: Navy seal gets shot in the chest in Yemen on 1031 00:54:22,920 --> 00:54:27,120 Speaker 1: some crazy kill capture mission against al Qaeda. We're also 1032 00:54:27,160 --> 00:54:30,120 Speaker 1: a bunch of kids were killed, no questions, I mean, 1033 00:54:30,160 --> 00:54:32,480 Speaker 1: these are all this has been happening for a long time. 1034 00:54:32,520 --> 00:54:34,759 Speaker 1: I would just put it in that context. Yeah, these reporters, 1035 00:54:34,880 --> 00:54:36,920 Speaker 1: they've let a lot of this slide. Oh when I 1036 00:54:37,000 --> 00:54:39,279 Speaker 1: was there, Well, and let's not over sell this is 1037 00:54:39,360 --> 00:54:41,279 Speaker 1: one person. Yeah right, It's like, hey, I want to 1038 00:54:41,280 --> 00:54:45,920 Speaker 1: see the evidence. There's but it says a lot about 1039 00:54:46,080 --> 00:54:49,719 Speaker 1: how much they've been exposed. That you even have a 1040 00:54:49,840 --> 00:54:53,760 Speaker 1: single reporter who's willing to say, you know, your narrative 1041 00:54:53,760 --> 00:54:56,560 Speaker 1: about the suicide bomb, maybe it's true, but don't I 1042 00:54:56,560 --> 00:54:58,840 Speaker 1: don't put it past them. Yeah, we don't put it 1043 00:54:58,920 --> 00:55:02,799 Speaker 1: past them. But that there's even just a question of like, well, okay, 1044 00:55:02,840 --> 00:55:05,719 Speaker 1: let's see the evidence, because you people will tell us 1045 00:55:05,760 --> 00:55:09,360 Speaker 1: whatever is most convenient for your storyline. The Niger example 1046 00:55:09,400 --> 00:55:11,440 Speaker 1: is a great one because there's been even more information 1047 00:55:11,480 --> 00:55:14,040 Speaker 1: to come out about you know, they tried to blame 1048 00:55:14,360 --> 00:55:18,239 Speaker 1: the dead bodily. Yeah it was a role mission, and 1049 00:55:18,280 --> 00:55:20,520 Speaker 1: they come to find out no, it wasn't, No, it wasn't. 1050 00:55:20,600 --> 00:55:22,560 Speaker 1: This was authorized from the top. You all just don't 1051 00:55:22,560 --> 00:55:25,160 Speaker 1: want to have your hands dirty on something that went 1052 00:55:25,320 --> 00:55:30,279 Speaker 1: so horrifically wrong. So tiny little bit of skepticism here 1053 00:55:30,400 --> 00:55:33,080 Speaker 1: is nice to see. Yeah, that's right. All right, all right, 1054 00:55:33,160 --> 00:55:36,239 Speaker 1: got some lighter news here from CNN. CNN and disarray. 1055 00:55:36,920 --> 00:55:38,520 Speaker 1: Let's put this first piece up on the screen. So, 1056 00:55:38,520 --> 00:55:43,560 Speaker 1: of course we've been tracking Andrew Cuomo. Chris Cuomo gets fired. 1057 00:55:43,840 --> 00:55:46,920 Speaker 1: Jeff Sucker gets taken out as part of that, because 1058 00:55:46,960 --> 00:55:49,080 Speaker 1: apparently he was having a long time affair which apparently 1059 00:55:49,080 --> 00:55:52,799 Speaker 1: everybody knew about and was totally consensual. But the person 1060 00:55:52,800 --> 00:55:54,560 Speaker 1: who was a woman he was having affair with was 1061 00:55:54,560 --> 00:55:57,399 Speaker 1: a former Andrew Cuomo aid, and sure looks like Chris 1062 00:55:57,480 --> 00:56:02,240 Speaker 1: Cloma's kind of getting his revenge here by basically threatened 1063 00:56:02,239 --> 00:56:04,080 Speaker 1: to expose the whole thing, and that there was a 1064 00:56:04,200 --> 00:56:09,120 Speaker 1: lot more going on with regards to Zucker and his brother. 1065 00:56:09,239 --> 00:56:12,360 Speaker 1: Andrew then ultimately meets the eye because of course, you know, 1066 00:56:12,480 --> 00:56:14,520 Speaker 1: Zucker's line is, oh, Chris was totally doing this on 1067 00:56:14,520 --> 00:56:16,200 Speaker 1: his own. I had nothing to do with it, and 1068 00:56:16,239 --> 00:56:18,040 Speaker 1: so we have to fire him. We you know, killed 1069 00:56:18,040 --> 00:56:21,680 Speaker 1: the bad apple. So so now we're getting some details 1070 00:56:21,719 --> 00:56:24,560 Speaker 1: of how much money is at stake here and how 1071 00:56:24,600 --> 00:56:27,319 Speaker 1: much money Chris Cuomo may be able to extract from 1072 00:56:27,400 --> 00:56:31,040 Speaker 1: CNN with some of the apparently successful tactics he's been using. 1073 00:56:31,360 --> 00:56:34,280 Speaker 1: Daily Mail said in that tear sheet fired CNN anchor 1074 00:56:34,400 --> 00:56:37,839 Speaker 1: Chris Cuomo was hoping to secure an eighteen million dollar 1075 00:56:37,960 --> 00:56:40,480 Speaker 1: lump sum payout following his departure last year. I think 1076 00:56:40,520 --> 00:56:42,600 Speaker 1: that was the entirety of the rest of his contract. 1077 00:56:42,880 --> 00:56:44,560 Speaker 1: But he's been told to set his size lower, with 1078 00:56:44,640 --> 00:56:47,360 Speaker 1: him unlikely to receive anything more than a round, just 1079 00:56:47,400 --> 00:56:51,480 Speaker 1: a mere nine million dollars. Sager that he's looking like 1080 00:56:51,680 --> 00:56:54,799 Speaker 1: he's got house in the Hamptons out of this. That's right, 1081 00:56:54,880 --> 00:56:58,239 Speaker 1: I mean, it's not cheap. They're living that life. There. 1082 00:56:58,239 --> 00:57:01,600 Speaker 1: Apparently AT and T CNN's companies said to be negotiations 1083 00:57:01,640 --> 00:57:03,800 Speaker 1: to reach a deal that would see the fired anchor 1084 00:57:03,840 --> 00:57:07,080 Speaker 1: receive half of the eighteen million dollars he had been 1085 00:57:07,600 --> 00:57:11,759 Speaker 1: vying for. So looks like CNN AT and T a 1086 00:57:11,880 --> 00:57:14,160 Speaker 1: poise to offer Chris Cuomo a little bit of hush 1087 00:57:14,239 --> 00:57:18,600 Speaker 1: money to keep some of the uglier, dirtier details of 1088 00:57:18,640 --> 00:57:22,880 Speaker 1: how this all went down under wraps. So that's one piece. 1089 00:57:22,960 --> 00:57:24,600 Speaker 1: The other pie. The next piece that we can put 1090 00:57:24,680 --> 00:57:29,280 Speaker 1: up on the screen here is the staffers. The anchors 1091 00:57:29,320 --> 00:57:33,840 Speaker 1: at CNN are not happy because they see how exactly 1092 00:57:33,920 --> 00:57:37,720 Speaker 1: happening this went down, and they are totally freaked down 1093 00:57:37,880 --> 00:57:39,400 Speaker 1: about what this is going to mean for them and 1094 00:57:39,440 --> 00:57:42,960 Speaker 1: their next and their jobs going forward. Jake Tapper kind 1095 00:57:42,960 --> 00:57:46,000 Speaker 1: of led the charge here. This was in a meeting 1096 00:57:46,480 --> 00:57:52,160 Speaker 1: with the WarnerMedia CEO Jason Kyler. Tapper says, I'll just 1097 00:57:52,200 --> 00:57:54,800 Speaker 1: reduce relatively long quote, but you can see the direction 1098 00:57:54,880 --> 00:57:58,000 Speaker 1: of where they go, if you could address the perception, 1099 00:57:58,280 --> 00:57:59,800 Speaker 1: because we're all going to be asked about this, the 1100 00:57:59,800 --> 00:58:03,400 Speaker 1: perception that Chris Cuomo gets fired by CNN, Chris Clomo 1101 00:58:03,480 --> 00:58:06,320 Speaker 1: hires a higher powered lawyer who has a scorch Durth policy, 1102 00:58:06,640 --> 00:58:08,600 Speaker 1: who then makes it very clear to the world that 1103 00:58:08,760 --> 00:58:12,680 Speaker 1: unless Jeff gives Cuomo his money, they're going to blow 1104 00:58:12,800 --> 00:58:16,080 Speaker 1: the place up. Stuff starts getting leaked to gossip websites 1105 00:58:16,080 --> 00:58:20,040 Speaker 1: about Jeff and Allison. Then weeks later, Jeff comes forward, 1106 00:58:20,080 --> 00:58:25,200 Speaker 1: discloses this and resigns, not willingly. An outside observer might say, well, 1107 00:58:25,440 --> 00:58:29,320 Speaker 1: looks like Chris Cuomo succeeded. He threatened. Jeff said, we 1108 00:58:29,360 --> 00:58:31,960 Speaker 1: don't negotiate with terrorists, and Chris blew the place up. 1109 00:58:32,320 --> 00:58:34,680 Speaker 1: How do we get past that perception that this is 1110 00:58:34,760 --> 00:58:37,840 Speaker 1: the bad guy winning now? I would strenuously object to 1111 00:58:37,880 --> 00:58:41,680 Speaker 1: the idea that Jeff Zucker is the good guy and 1112 00:58:41,800 --> 00:58:44,480 Speaker 1: Chris Coohma is the bad guy, when in reality what 1113 00:58:44,640 --> 00:58:47,240 Speaker 1: was about to happen was going to be exposed that 1114 00:58:47,320 --> 00:58:50,760 Speaker 1: Jeff Zucker also was the bad guy. What I love 1115 00:58:50,920 --> 00:58:54,680 Speaker 1: about all these guys, Tapper and Jim Acosta and the 1116 00:58:54,680 --> 00:58:58,480 Speaker 1: rest of them, They are freaking out because Zucker protected 1117 00:58:58,480 --> 00:59:01,600 Speaker 1: them at all costs. To the higher up executives. People 1118 00:59:01,680 --> 00:59:04,320 Speaker 1: need to know this at and t did not like CNN. 1119 00:59:04,440 --> 00:59:07,320 Speaker 1: That's why they're selling it basically to Discovery as part 1120 00:59:07,320 --> 00:59:09,920 Speaker 1: of some big major deal down in Dallas. They had 1121 00:59:09,960 --> 00:59:12,880 Speaker 1: been wanting to cap CNN and cut costs for a 1122 00:59:12,960 --> 00:59:16,400 Speaker 1: long time. Zucker was the person who pushed back against 1123 00:59:16,440 --> 00:59:18,200 Speaker 1: all of that. And part of the reason that it 1124 00:59:18,240 --> 00:59:20,400 Speaker 1: was sold and given to Discovery in the first place 1125 00:59:20,640 --> 00:59:22,960 Speaker 1: is because Discovery also wanted to take things in a 1126 00:59:22,960 --> 00:59:26,280 Speaker 1: different direction, but was perhaps willing to spend more cash. 1127 00:59:26,440 --> 00:59:30,000 Speaker 1: Now Acosta, Tapper, and the rest of the clowns, their 1128 00:59:30,200 --> 00:59:34,200 Speaker 1: worst behavior was not only protected, but encouraged by Zucker. 1129 00:59:34,400 --> 00:59:37,000 Speaker 1: That's why they loved Zucker. In fact, it has come 1130 00:59:37,040 --> 00:59:42,600 Speaker 1: out that Jake Tapper held a shiva of like solemnness 1131 00:59:42,920 --> 00:59:45,600 Speaker 1: on Friday night when they all found out the news 1132 00:59:45,640 --> 00:59:49,200 Speaker 1: for all the morning CNN staffers. That's how much they 1133 00:59:49,240 --> 00:59:53,360 Speaker 1: loved this guy. Okay, And the reason why is because 1134 00:59:53,680 --> 00:59:58,000 Speaker 1: he was, at his core the developer and the protector 1135 00:59:58,400 --> 01:00:01,840 Speaker 1: of the clownish behavior over the last five years. I 1136 01:00:01,880 --> 01:00:05,120 Speaker 1: can't underscore this enough. It was his idea he believed 1137 01:00:05,160 --> 01:00:07,480 Speaker 1: not only was good for business, but he believed that 1138 01:00:07,560 --> 01:00:09,960 Speaker 1: it was the best possible thing that you could do 1139 01:00:10,080 --> 01:00:12,080 Speaker 1: for the country. Kind of found himself as you know, 1140 01:00:12,200 --> 01:00:14,680 Speaker 1: this anti Trump person, even though he himself was a 1141 01:00:14,720 --> 01:00:17,440 Speaker 1: guy who created Trump over on the Apprentice. And what 1142 01:00:17,560 --> 01:00:21,400 Speaker 1: I find especially hilarious is that the CNN talent are 1143 01:00:21,400 --> 01:00:25,000 Speaker 1: telling on themselves because they're protecting Zucker. They see, no, 1144 01:00:25,200 --> 01:00:27,880 Speaker 1: they have no ethical qualms here with the fact that 1145 01:00:27,920 --> 01:00:30,480 Speaker 1: the boss was banging one of his subordinates, and that 1146 01:00:30,600 --> 01:00:33,520 Speaker 1: at that time him and that subordinate re coordinating with 1147 01:00:33,600 --> 01:00:37,040 Speaker 1: Andrew Cuomo, her former boss, both talking points that has 1148 01:00:37,080 --> 01:00:39,840 Speaker 1: now come out, and in terms of encouraging him to 1149 01:00:39,880 --> 01:00:42,600 Speaker 1: go on Chris Cuomo's show for higher ratings in the 1150 01:00:42,640 --> 01:00:46,120 Speaker 1: first place, they have no problem with that. Not only 1151 01:00:46,160 --> 01:00:49,480 Speaker 1: no problem, they are outwardly talking about how Zucker is 1152 01:00:49,520 --> 01:00:52,000 Speaker 1: the best person in media. Now, look, you say what 1153 01:00:52,080 --> 01:00:54,760 Speaker 1: you will about Fox and all that. I didn't see 1154 01:00:54,760 --> 01:00:57,560 Speaker 1: a lot of people being after Roger Ayles was canned 1155 01:00:57,760 --> 01:01:01,800 Speaker 1: saying oh, but Roger, you know, he was the best boss. 1156 01:01:01,880 --> 01:01:05,520 Speaker 1: He's like No, Everyone's like, okay, Roger, Roger was nice. Yeah, 1157 01:01:05,560 --> 01:01:07,920 Speaker 1: It's like he was not a nice okay, sure, but 1158 01:01:08,040 --> 01:01:11,200 Speaker 1: like you know, arguably more successful than Zucker and more 1159 01:01:11,240 --> 01:01:13,560 Speaker 1: would I say when I point to that is that 1160 01:01:13,920 --> 01:01:16,160 Speaker 1: they're saying the quiet part out loud, which is that 1161 01:01:16,240 --> 01:01:19,520 Speaker 1: they value his loyalty to them in defense of their 1162 01:01:19,520 --> 01:01:23,400 Speaker 1: shenanigans in idiocy more than actual journalistic integrity. And I 1163 01:01:23,400 --> 01:01:25,640 Speaker 1: think that that is pathetic and disgusting from him. I mean, 1164 01:01:26,200 --> 01:01:30,160 Speaker 1: Zucker created a real full service economy there at CNN 1165 01:01:30,280 --> 01:01:34,040 Speaker 1: because he was definitely a part of elevating Trump. I mean, 1166 01:01:34,080 --> 01:01:37,600 Speaker 1: first of all the Apprentice, but during Trump's campaign, you know, 1167 01:01:37,640 --> 01:01:42,040 Speaker 1: they were infamous for how much they were showing his rallies. 1168 01:01:42,160 --> 01:01:46,480 Speaker 1: They'd show his empty podium rather than Hillary Clinton's siege Rael, 1169 01:01:46,760 --> 01:01:49,600 Speaker 1: probably more entertaining. I'm sure it was more right, I mean, 1170 01:01:49,760 --> 01:01:53,600 Speaker 1: And so they they're a business. They care about the ratings, 1171 01:01:53,600 --> 01:01:56,360 Speaker 1: they care about the money, and Jeff was leading the 1172 01:01:56,440 --> 01:01:58,600 Speaker 1: charge on all of that. And then once Trump gets 1173 01:01:58,600 --> 01:02:02,560 Speaker 1: into office, they they decide to completely orient themselves in 1174 01:02:02,600 --> 01:02:06,880 Speaker 1: opposition to Trump, and people like Jim Acosta become big stars. 1175 01:02:07,080 --> 01:02:09,840 Speaker 1: As you know, he's got his own show now watches it. 1176 01:02:10,120 --> 01:02:11,880 Speaker 1: And so it's great for Trump because he's got this 1177 01:02:11,960 --> 01:02:14,240 Speaker 1: great villain that he can point to and he can 1178 01:02:14,280 --> 01:02:16,360 Speaker 1: you know, fake news and all that stuff. It's great 1179 01:02:16,400 --> 01:02:19,120 Speaker 1: for them. They get book contracts, they get great ratings, 1180 01:02:19,120 --> 01:02:21,720 Speaker 1: they get to, you know, be the opposition in the 1181 01:02:21,760 --> 01:02:25,040 Speaker 1: Trump Show. So none of this was about like, let's 1182 01:02:25,040 --> 01:02:26,840 Speaker 1: do what's right for the country. It was great, it 1183 01:02:26,960 --> 01:02:29,440 Speaker 1: was great for their business, and now that that business 1184 01:02:29,560 --> 01:02:32,360 Speaker 1: model is dead, at least for the moment, they've also 1185 01:02:32,440 --> 01:02:36,080 Speaker 1: been really, really, really struggling. So that's sort of the 1186 01:02:36,400 --> 01:02:39,520 Speaker 1: back context here. But it is incredible that there doesn't 1187 01:02:39,560 --> 01:02:44,200 Speaker 1: seem to be any concern from the talent whatsoever about 1188 01:02:44,200 --> 01:02:47,360 Speaker 1: the fact that it also came out there's at least reported, 1189 01:02:48,200 --> 01:02:51,840 Speaker 1: you know, allegations that he was helping Andrew Cuomo on 1190 01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:56,360 Speaker 1: his coronavirus freefing, you know, being serving as much of 1191 01:02:56,400 --> 01:02:59,880 Speaker 1: an advisor to Andrew Cuomo as apparently Chris Cuomo was. 1192 01:03:00,280 --> 01:03:02,600 Speaker 1: So then when he turns around that that also gives 1193 01:03:02,600 --> 01:03:05,680 Speaker 1: you insight into why Chris Cuomo was able to hang 1194 01:03:05,720 --> 01:03:08,920 Speaker 1: around for so long, because this was a very uncomfortable 1195 01:03:08,960 --> 01:03:12,480 Speaker 1: situation for Zucker that, you know, if it all comes 1196 01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:15,520 Speaker 1: out that not only is Cuomo advising and his brother, 1197 01:03:15,680 --> 01:03:19,640 Speaker 1: but you're advising his brother and you're you know, you're, 1198 01:03:20,520 --> 01:03:22,680 Speaker 1: you're whoever, what do we want to call her? Your? 1199 01:03:22,840 --> 01:03:27,000 Speaker 1: Your lady is also advising Cuomo, this is not going 1200 01:03:27,040 --> 01:03:29,120 Speaker 1: to look good for you. The funny this is we 1201 01:03:29,200 --> 01:03:31,880 Speaker 1: have to play some of this. Brian Stelter has been 1202 01:03:32,040 --> 01:03:36,600 Speaker 1: a very consistent lackey for the higher ups at CNN. 1203 01:03:37,360 --> 01:03:40,120 Speaker 1: That's how someone who's so profoundly untalented can end up 1204 01:03:40,160 --> 01:03:41,920 Speaker 1: with a big job at a network. Is you're good 1205 01:03:41,920 --> 01:03:44,080 Speaker 1: at You're good at playing the inside game, which clearly 1206 01:03:44,120 --> 01:03:47,360 Speaker 1: he was during the whole Chris Cuomo fallout, Remember You, 1207 01:03:47,400 --> 01:03:50,400 Speaker 1: famously was like, this is such a strange Who could 1208 01:03:50,440 --> 01:03:53,000 Speaker 1: ever anticipate this situation? How could you figure out what 1209 01:03:53,040 --> 01:03:55,440 Speaker 1: to do when it's very obvious this conflict of interest 1210 01:03:55,560 --> 01:03:57,120 Speaker 1: and that you know, the way they had handled it 1211 01:03:57,160 --> 01:04:00,400 Speaker 1: was totally unacceptable. So here's the sort of of like 1212 01:04:00,720 --> 01:04:05,520 Speaker 1: absurdly fawning language that Stelter has been using to talk 1213 01:04:05,520 --> 01:04:10,720 Speaker 1: about Jeff Zucker is why why did this happen? This 1214 01:04:10,800 --> 01:04:13,240 Speaker 1: is the ugliest shake up at CNN since the day 1215 01:04:13,320 --> 01:04:16,400 Speaker 1: is Ted Turner was still walking the halls. Zucker was 1216 01:04:16,400 --> 01:04:18,440 Speaker 1: in charge one minute and he was gone the next. 1217 01:04:18,480 --> 01:04:22,040 Speaker 1: So why even employees who didn't like him, are mad 1218 01:04:22,760 --> 01:04:25,560 Speaker 1: because this made CNN look bad, so they want to 1219 01:04:25,600 --> 01:04:28,320 Speaker 1: know why. They want to know what happened. But most 1220 01:04:28,320 --> 01:04:33,640 Speaker 1: staffers did like him, Many loved him. Many felt Zucker 1221 01:04:33,680 --> 01:04:36,680 Speaker 1: was the best boss they'd ever worked for. They would 1222 01:04:36,720 --> 01:04:39,320 Speaker 1: walk into war zones for him, and sometimes they did, 1223 01:04:40,040 --> 01:04:43,520 Speaker 1: and in return, Zucker protected them, defended them, cheered for them. 1224 01:04:44,080 --> 01:04:46,600 Speaker 1: He was like a heat shield. That's the best way 1225 01:04:46,680 --> 01:04:49,600 Speaker 1: I can explain it. He shielded his staff from all 1226 01:04:49,640 --> 01:04:54,280 Speaker 1: sorts of heat. Look they were using hagiographic language, but 1227 01:04:54,320 --> 01:04:56,240 Speaker 1: he's just telling you what I just told you. He 1228 01:04:56,320 --> 01:04:58,320 Speaker 1: was the heat shield, all right, And look, some of 1229 01:04:58,320 --> 01:05:01,520 Speaker 1: that heat probably should have come. I am truly relishing 1230 01:05:01,560 --> 01:05:05,000 Speaker 1: Crystal to see what happens behind the scenes. This website, 1231 01:05:05,120 --> 01:05:09,200 Speaker 1: Radar Online, which actually had the Coomo story originally, has 1232 01:05:09,240 --> 01:05:12,040 Speaker 1: a new piece which I find personally hilarious. Let's put 1233 01:05:12,040 --> 01:05:14,160 Speaker 1: this up there on the screen. It turns out that 1234 01:05:14,280 --> 01:05:18,680 Speaker 1: Chris Wallace is having a quote meltdown over the Zucker 1235 01:05:18,720 --> 01:05:21,680 Speaker 1: Alison Gallis scandal and is said to be at war 1236 01:05:21,760 --> 01:05:25,480 Speaker 1: in the DC Bureau with Jake Tapper. Wallace is apparently 1237 01:05:25,480 --> 01:05:30,760 Speaker 1: getting paid eight to ten million dollars a year hilarious. 1238 01:05:30,960 --> 01:05:33,480 Speaker 1: Just think about that eight to ten million to anchor 1239 01:05:33,880 --> 01:05:36,840 Speaker 1: CNN plus, which nobody is going to watch. This thing 1240 01:05:36,880 --> 01:05:39,320 Speaker 1: is going to be the one hundred million dollar boondoggle. 1241 01:05:39,560 --> 01:05:41,760 Speaker 1: I'm also looking forward to that story. But what they 1242 01:05:41,760 --> 01:05:43,480 Speaker 1: point to is that Wallace thought he was going to 1243 01:05:43,480 --> 01:05:46,080 Speaker 1: be coming over to work for Zucker, and now Zucker 1244 01:05:46,160 --> 01:05:49,479 Speaker 1: himself is out. He apparently is at war with Jake 1245 01:05:49,560 --> 01:05:53,200 Speaker 1: Tapper over journalistic disagreements and all that, which I find 1246 01:05:53,520 --> 01:05:55,600 Speaker 1: very funny. I think this place is going to implode. 1247 01:05:55,640 --> 01:05:58,240 Speaker 1: And I'll tell you why, which is that Discovery CEO, 1248 01:05:58,440 --> 01:06:01,200 Speaker 1: by all accounts, does not love of any of this nonsense. 1249 01:06:01,480 --> 01:06:04,400 Speaker 1: We played that clip here on the show several months 1250 01:06:04,440 --> 01:06:08,520 Speaker 1: ago of a huge investor in Discovery, an original founder 1251 01:06:08,600 --> 01:06:11,040 Speaker 1: of CNN, who was like, I think CNN needs to 1252 01:06:11,080 --> 01:06:13,840 Speaker 1: go back to its news roots. This is terrible. Jason 1253 01:06:14,680 --> 01:06:18,840 Speaker 1: Kyler hated Jeff Zucker by all accounts, because he was 1254 01:06:18,880 --> 01:06:20,760 Speaker 1: a tech guide. He thought Zucker and all these DC 1255 01:06:21,040 --> 01:06:24,280 Speaker 1: New York people were clowns. Correct, Jason, you know, clean 1256 01:06:24,360 --> 01:06:26,000 Speaker 1: house while you have the chance. Well that's the other 1257 01:06:26,040 --> 01:06:27,480 Speaker 1: part is this looks a little bit a little bit 1258 01:06:27,560 --> 01:06:30,120 Speaker 1: like you know, his revenge. Yeah, well, I mean, listen, 1259 01:06:30,240 --> 01:06:33,080 Speaker 1: take it okay, I think it's fine. I what I 1260 01:06:33,120 --> 01:06:36,800 Speaker 1: see very much is an opportunity where you can actually 1261 01:06:36,840 --> 01:06:39,160 Speaker 1: clean house over at that network. I mean, I'm not 1262 01:06:39,200 --> 01:06:41,320 Speaker 1: saying you could ever turn around CNN Plus after some 1263 01:06:41,360 --> 01:06:43,480 Speaker 1: of the hiring decisions that have made, but I don't know, 1264 01:06:43,560 --> 01:06:46,360 Speaker 1: maybe you can do something different. But there are a 1265 01:06:46,400 --> 01:06:49,120 Speaker 1: lot of people in the executive chair who have hated 1266 01:06:49,160 --> 01:06:52,360 Speaker 1: this show and or have hated this network for a 1267 01:06:52,400 --> 01:06:54,440 Speaker 1: long time in the direction it went under Jeff Sucker, 1268 01:06:54,600 --> 01:06:56,800 Speaker 1: and they're in charge now. And if you're Jim Acosta, 1269 01:06:57,200 --> 01:06:59,240 Speaker 1: you know it's not gonna be a good time for you, buddy, 1270 01:06:59,400 --> 01:07:02,960 Speaker 1: because his ratings are We would be living under a 1271 01:07:02,960 --> 01:07:07,600 Speaker 1: bridge if that few people watched our show we were independent. 1272 01:07:07,880 --> 01:07:11,200 Speaker 1: Just put it in context, Don Lemon is the same thing. 1273 01:07:11,600 --> 01:07:13,880 Speaker 1: These people are really going to suffer. These people are 1274 01:07:14,000 --> 01:07:17,360 Speaker 1: getting tastes crazy to anchor these streaming shows. I mean, 1275 01:07:17,480 --> 01:07:20,120 Speaker 1: I could just tell you the economics does not yea 1276 01:07:21,000 --> 01:07:23,920 Speaker 1: that way for Chris Wallace. He there is like not 1277 01:07:24,280 --> 01:07:27,360 Speaker 1: one person in the country who is going to subscribe 1278 01:07:27,400 --> 01:07:29,200 Speaker 1: to see an unplus to see Chris Waller. I agree, 1279 01:07:29,240 --> 01:07:32,200 Speaker 1: And that's what these that's what these salaries ultimately should 1280 01:07:32,240 --> 01:07:34,240 Speaker 1: be used to justify. I mean, Rogan is a perfect 1281 01:07:34,320 --> 01:07:37,640 Speaker 1: example of yeah, he got a big deal, but actually 1282 01:07:37,720 --> 01:07:42,080 Speaker 1: he's mad because of the number of people that he 1283 01:07:42,160 --> 01:07:45,320 Speaker 1: actually brings in is converted to premium subscribers. I mean, 1284 01:07:45,360 --> 01:07:48,000 Speaker 1: this is a huge money maker for Spotify. Why because 1285 01:07:48,000 --> 01:07:51,120 Speaker 1: he actually has an audience that cares about what he 1286 01:07:51,120 --> 01:07:53,040 Speaker 1: has to say and is going to show up for him. 1287 01:07:53,440 --> 01:07:57,560 Speaker 1: These people they're hiring, no one cares what these people 1288 01:07:57,640 --> 01:08:00,320 Speaker 1: have to say, and so it's ridiculous. I will say, 1289 01:08:00,320 --> 01:08:02,560 Speaker 1: the one thing that I don't think there's any saving 1290 01:08:02,640 --> 01:08:06,080 Speaker 1: CNN plus that's that's a dune deal. But the one 1291 01:08:06,080 --> 01:08:08,760 Speaker 1: thing that we'll rescue CNN is Trump. And it reminds me, 1292 01:08:08,880 --> 01:08:12,920 Speaker 1: if you know, it reminds me very much of an MSNBC. 1293 01:08:13,760 --> 01:08:16,400 Speaker 1: You know, during the Obama years when I was at 1294 01:08:16,400 --> 01:08:18,759 Speaker 1: the end of when I was there, ratings are way down. 1295 01:08:19,360 --> 01:08:21,920 Speaker 1: They did the same thing, We've gone too far left, 1296 01:08:21,960 --> 01:08:25,160 Speaker 1: it's too progressive. Imagine saying that. No, but anyway, that 1297 01:08:25,280 --> 01:08:26,880 Speaker 1: was the thinking. It's like, we got to get back 1298 01:08:26,920 --> 01:08:28,640 Speaker 1: to the same thing. We got to get back to 1299 01:08:28,680 --> 01:08:31,400 Speaker 1: our roots a NBC News. We're gonna plug Brian Williams 1300 01:08:31,439 --> 01:08:33,120 Speaker 1: in he's going to do breaking news. We're going to 1301 01:08:33,240 --> 01:08:35,280 Speaker 1: use like these people like Kate Snow and all these 1302 01:08:35,560 --> 01:08:38,720 Speaker 1: NBC news journals are going to be given shows. We're 1303 01:08:38,720 --> 01:08:41,760 Speaker 1: going to get the opinion down a here, and then 1304 01:08:41,800 --> 01:08:44,400 Speaker 1: Trump shows up and of course saves the whole thing. 1305 01:08:44,600 --> 01:08:46,800 Speaker 1: The shows that are doing the best are the ones 1306 01:08:46,840 --> 01:08:50,360 Speaker 1: that are willing to be the most insane and deranged 1307 01:08:50,479 --> 01:08:53,400 Speaker 1: when it comes to Trump and especially the Russia conspiracies, 1308 01:08:53,760 --> 01:08:56,559 Speaker 1: and so you know, MSNBC looking at the bottom line 1309 01:08:56,560 --> 01:08:58,720 Speaker 1: makes a total incomplete shift. It's gonna be the same 1310 01:08:58,720 --> 01:09:00,559 Speaker 1: thing with CNN. They're going to try to pivot back 1311 01:09:00,600 --> 01:09:04,040 Speaker 1: to where the straight news journals a minute Trump comes 1312 01:09:04,080 --> 01:09:06,760 Speaker 1: back on the scene. It's gonna shift around right again, 1313 01:09:06,800 --> 01:09:09,479 Speaker 1: because that's you know, that's the only thing that has 1314 01:09:09,520 --> 01:09:12,320 Speaker 1: worked for them over these past number of years. Otherwise 1315 01:09:12,320 --> 01:09:13,720 Speaker 1: they were dead in the water. Yeah, so I might 1316 01:09:13,760 --> 01:09:16,559 Speaker 1: as well gouge my eyes out live on you pretty 1317 01:09:16,640 --> 01:09:21,479 Speaker 1: much all right, Zacher ready looking at it. Well, there 1318 01:09:21,520 --> 01:09:23,920 Speaker 1: is always more to the story than it seems. I've 1319 01:09:23,920 --> 01:09:26,240 Speaker 1: watched with great dismay as the tide is turned against 1320 01:09:26,280 --> 01:09:29,000 Speaker 1: Joe Rogan and one of the most transparent witch hunts 1321 01:09:29,000 --> 01:09:31,320 Speaker 1: that I've ever seen in my lifetime. First he was 1322 01:09:31,320 --> 01:09:34,720 Speaker 1: the purveyor of vaccine misinformation. Then he destroyed them with 1323 01:09:34,760 --> 01:09:37,640 Speaker 1: his response, Oh okay, now he's a racist. When this 1324 01:09:37,680 --> 01:09:41,080 Speaker 1: one dies down, he'll be a transphobe, a misogynist. They 1325 01:09:41,080 --> 01:09:44,519 Speaker 1: are pulling out all the stops. I, along with many others, 1326 01:09:44,560 --> 01:09:48,080 Speaker 1: are resolved to fight back against them. But therein lies 1327 01:09:48,120 --> 01:09:51,559 Speaker 1: the question who is them? It's a great question one 1328 01:09:51,640 --> 01:09:53,920 Speaker 1: I have spent hours trying to get to the bottom of. 1329 01:09:54,200 --> 01:09:56,600 Speaker 1: So come along with this journey with me. I have 1330 01:09:56,680 --> 01:09:59,679 Speaker 1: previously laid out the various music interests at play behind 1331 01:09:59,720 --> 01:10:03,080 Speaker 1: Neil Young and the original boycott campaign from Blackstone and 1332 01:10:03,120 --> 01:10:06,200 Speaker 1: the Hedge Funds to Amazon Music, but the recent effort 1333 01:10:06,240 --> 01:10:09,760 Speaker 1: against Rogan has inspired deeper investigation, and I have found 1334 01:10:09,800 --> 01:10:12,920 Speaker 1: that this is even bigger than I originally thought. Something 1335 01:10:12,920 --> 01:10:16,320 Speaker 1: I took notice of Thursday is that this entire manufactured 1336 01:10:16,360 --> 01:10:20,280 Speaker 1: controversy began right before Spotify earning season. The reason that 1337 01:10:20,320 --> 01:10:23,320 Speaker 1: matters is that the controversy caused a big headache for 1338 01:10:23,360 --> 01:10:26,600 Speaker 1: the CEO, Daniel Eck, and it coincided with a not 1339 01:10:26,800 --> 01:10:30,640 Speaker 1: so great earnings report for Spotify. The company meaning that 1340 01:10:30,720 --> 01:10:34,600 Speaker 1: whomever is striking against Rogan had maximum leverage as a 1341 01:10:34,640 --> 01:10:38,200 Speaker 1: stock plunged by twenty percent. It's in the downtimes that 1342 01:10:38,240 --> 01:10:41,839 Speaker 1: these companies are the most vulnerable. Now I'm not claiming 1343 01:10:41,880 --> 01:10:44,120 Speaker 1: Rogan is the only reason that stock went down, but 1344 01:10:44,200 --> 01:10:46,320 Speaker 1: let's say organically it would have gone down to like 1345 01:10:46,400 --> 01:10:49,680 Speaker 1: eighteen and now it's down twenty. That two percent is 1346 01:10:49,760 --> 01:10:54,040 Speaker 1: literally hundreds of millions of dollars in value. Every tiny 1347 01:10:54,080 --> 01:10:56,640 Speaker 1: tenth of a percentage point matters at this level that 1348 01:10:56,640 --> 01:10:59,240 Speaker 1: we're talking about, And if you think that sounds far fetched, 1349 01:10:59,400 --> 01:11:02,559 Speaker 1: it's not literally right now, Business Insider just dropped its 1350 01:11:02,560 --> 01:11:06,320 Speaker 1: second ridiculous hit piece on barstool founder Dave Portnoy, right 1351 01:11:06,360 --> 01:11:09,720 Speaker 1: before his company, Penn Gaming had its earnings calls. The 1352 01:11:09,800 --> 01:11:12,320 Speaker 1: best part They did it twice in a row, a 1353 01:11:12,400 --> 01:11:15,559 Speaker 1: transparent effort to destroy his net worth. They do this 1354 01:11:15,720 --> 01:11:18,080 Speaker 1: all the time. It's a piece of the playbook. But 1355 01:11:18,200 --> 01:11:21,200 Speaker 1: again that they question, well, it could be a lot 1356 01:11:21,280 --> 01:11:23,720 Speaker 1: of people, per my friend, unusual Wales. Here are the 1357 01:11:23,720 --> 01:11:27,920 Speaker 1: companies that are short Spotify, Big Time, RBBN Fund, Calamos 1358 01:11:28,000 --> 01:11:33,040 Speaker 1: Investment Trust run by a billionaire, Luthold Funds Inc. Guidestone, Funds, 1359 01:11:33,360 --> 01:11:38,000 Speaker 1: morning Star Alternative Funds, Northern Lights Fund Trust three. It's 1360 01:11:38,000 --> 01:11:40,880 Speaker 1: difficult to dig into who exactly owns these and controls them, 1361 01:11:41,000 --> 01:11:42,439 Speaker 1: but I'm putting them out there in the world for 1362 01:11:42,479 --> 01:11:44,400 Speaker 1: all of you to see, perhaps for others to take 1363 01:11:44,439 --> 01:11:47,240 Speaker 1: on the mantle. The other question to always look into 1364 01:11:47,520 --> 01:11:51,240 Speaker 1: is the Latin phrase qui bono? Who benefits? On this one? 1365 01:11:51,360 --> 01:11:54,400 Speaker 1: We all know the answer. No single person has benefited 1366 01:11:54,400 --> 01:11:57,800 Speaker 1: more from this fracas than Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. As 1367 01:11:57,840 --> 01:12:01,479 Speaker 1: I previously reported, Neil Young, of course, is immediately starting 1368 01:12:01,479 --> 01:12:04,160 Speaker 1: giving people a four month free deal on Amazon Music 1369 01:12:04,400 --> 01:12:07,479 Speaker 1: after leaving Spotify, and the company put both Young and 1370 01:12:07,560 --> 01:12:11,960 Speaker 1: Mitchell write smack dab on its homepage, using the controversy 1371 01:12:12,000 --> 01:12:14,839 Speaker 1: to try to get sign ups and generate even more revenue. 1372 01:12:15,120 --> 01:12:18,040 Speaker 1: But the craziest thing I saw was this true hit 1373 01:12:18,120 --> 01:12:21,400 Speaker 1: job was a helpful guide from the Washington Post, who 1374 01:12:21,400 --> 01:12:24,920 Speaker 1: wrote an entire article titled how to Quit Spotify without 1375 01:12:24,960 --> 01:12:28,320 Speaker 1: losing your music? Just a helpful lifestyle tedbit, of course, 1376 01:12:28,640 --> 01:12:32,840 Speaker 1: except who owns the Washington Post. Oh that's right, Jeff Bezos. 1377 01:12:33,640 --> 01:12:36,800 Speaker 1: Article just so happens to include handy little instructions about 1378 01:12:36,840 --> 01:12:39,400 Speaker 1: how to port all your music off of the platform 1379 01:12:39,479 --> 01:12:42,599 Speaker 1: if you just so happen to turn over to Amazon Music. Now, 1380 01:12:42,640 --> 01:12:44,559 Speaker 1: one of the reasons I knew bigger forces were at 1381 01:12:44,600 --> 01:12:48,080 Speaker 1: play is because this is an old school Washington play. 1382 01:12:48,439 --> 01:12:52,160 Speaker 1: Almost nothing you see is organic or authentic, and that 1383 01:12:52,200 --> 01:12:55,160 Speaker 1: even includes the Joe Rogan racial controversy. So while the 1384 01:12:55,160 --> 01:12:56,840 Speaker 1: clip of him saying the N word over and over 1385 01:12:56,880 --> 01:12:59,200 Speaker 1: again is one, this existed for years. There's a group 1386 01:12:59,240 --> 01:13:02,080 Speaker 1: on Twitter that was most responsible for disseminating it to 1387 01:13:02,120 --> 01:13:05,840 Speaker 1: black artists and urging cancelation. It's called Patriot Takes. Now 1388 01:13:05,880 --> 01:13:08,360 Speaker 1: here's a statement from Patriot Takes taking credit for this. 1389 01:13:08,680 --> 01:13:10,439 Speaker 1: They say they're going to keep going. It's out in 1390 01:13:10,479 --> 01:13:13,800 Speaker 1: the open. So who the hell are these people? Let's investigate. 1391 01:13:13,840 --> 01:13:16,720 Speaker 1: Per their website, Patriot Takes is a group dedicated to 1392 01:13:16,840 --> 01:13:20,920 Speaker 1: exposing right wing misinformation. Oh okay, nothing shady about that. 1393 01:13:21,200 --> 01:13:24,160 Speaker 1: Who funds them? They are partnered with an organization called 1394 01:13:24,280 --> 01:13:27,839 Speaker 1: Midas Touch. Now. Midas Touch describes itself as a quote 1395 01:13:27,960 --> 01:13:31,519 Speaker 1: producing the best pro democracy political videos and content and 1396 01:13:31,560 --> 01:13:34,840 Speaker 1: include a political action committee that's interesting, a super pack. 1397 01:13:35,120 --> 01:13:37,120 Speaker 1: So this is a world I know a lot about 1398 01:13:37,400 --> 01:13:40,320 Speaker 1: who exactly has donated to this Political Action Committee. Well, 1399 01:13:40,439 --> 01:13:43,000 Speaker 1: per my research, one of the biggest donors to Midas 1400 01:13:43,040 --> 01:13:46,439 Speaker 1: Touch pack is none other than Bette Midler, the washed 1401 01:13:46,520 --> 01:13:49,479 Speaker 1: up actress who most recently said West Virginia is full 1402 01:13:49,520 --> 01:13:52,920 Speaker 1: of quote poor, illiterate and strung out people in reference 1403 01:13:52,920 --> 01:13:56,400 Speaker 1: to Joe Manchin, they're not sending their best in other words, 1404 01:13:56,439 --> 01:13:59,280 Speaker 1: is what she said. But who else? Of course, also 1405 01:13:59,320 --> 01:14:02,719 Speaker 1: on the list Reid Hoffman. Hoffman is probably the single 1406 01:14:02,840 --> 01:14:06,960 Speaker 1: largest donor in democratic politics today, next to George Soros. 1407 01:14:07,080 --> 01:14:10,639 Speaker 1: He has donated some four hundred million dollars to these 1408 01:14:10,680 --> 01:14:14,080 Speaker 1: types of groups and all sorts of shady efforts, including 1409 01:14:14,160 --> 01:14:17,960 Speaker 1: funding a literal fake news publication in Alabama to try 1410 01:14:18,000 --> 01:14:20,559 Speaker 1: and swing the Senate election down there. So here we 1411 01:14:20,600 --> 01:14:23,599 Speaker 1: have a shady democratic media group who is finding these clips, 1412 01:14:23,720 --> 01:14:27,200 Speaker 1: funded by Silicon Valley billionaire and Hollywood actress, as well 1413 01:14:27,200 --> 01:14:29,040 Speaker 1: as a lot of other types. Now, as for the 1414 01:14:29,080 --> 01:14:32,599 Speaker 1: operation itself, let's look deeper. Midas Touch group is run 1415 01:14:32,640 --> 01:14:35,360 Speaker 1: by three brothers, one of whom was once a social 1416 01:14:35,400 --> 01:14:38,840 Speaker 1: media manager for Ellen DeGeneres. Now, the group was a 1417 01:14:38,880 --> 01:14:43,439 Speaker 1: resistance media operation which generated cringe clicks during the twenty 1418 01:14:43,520 --> 01:14:47,479 Speaker 1: twenty election, but by twenty twenty one, even Rolling Stone 1419 01:14:47,720 --> 01:14:51,559 Speaker 1: magazine unveiled the effort as one that took millions of 1420 01:14:51,600 --> 01:14:54,839 Speaker 1: dollars from big donors and anti Trump liberals and appears 1421 01:14:54,880 --> 01:14:59,200 Speaker 1: to have dramatically oversold its influence. It's basically a Blue 1422 01:14:59,240 --> 01:15:02,200 Speaker 1: Lincoln project. So do you guys get the big picture? Now? 1423 01:15:02,560 --> 01:15:06,919 Speaker 1: Wall Street, Jeff Bezos, big Democratic donors, resistance media operation. 1424 01:15:07,200 --> 01:15:09,599 Speaker 1: This is a political hatch's job. I know quite well. 1425 01:15:09,840 --> 01:15:12,320 Speaker 1: I recognize at the moment I saw move on dot 1426 01:15:12,400 --> 01:15:15,240 Speaker 1: org and ultrabiolt get involved last week, and I'll continue 1427 01:15:15,280 --> 01:15:17,040 Speaker 1: to stand up for Rogan in the only way that 1428 01:15:17,160 --> 01:15:20,599 Speaker 1: I think I uniquely can. Following the money, uncovering the 1429 01:15:20,600 --> 01:15:22,800 Speaker 1: corridors of power. We're never going to give up here 1430 01:15:22,840 --> 01:15:24,760 Speaker 1: on this show. That's the thing, Crystal. I mean, you 1431 01:15:24,760 --> 01:15:28,120 Speaker 1: look at this group, Midas touched, Superpack, Ben and if 1432 01:15:28,120 --> 01:15:30,960 Speaker 1: you want to hear my reaction to Sager's monologue, become 1433 01:15:30,960 --> 01:15:36,640 Speaker 1: a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot Com. Let's go 1434 01:15:36,680 --> 01:15:38,320 Speaker 1: ahead and get your monologue Crystal, because I know you've 1435 01:15:38,360 --> 01:15:41,160 Speaker 1: got a great point about anti politics here. Well, guys, 1436 01:15:41,160 --> 01:15:43,800 Speaker 1: there are in one sense, about a billion things going 1437 01:15:43,800 --> 01:15:45,759 Speaker 1: on in the world more important than the current efforts 1438 01:15:45,800 --> 01:15:50,240 Speaker 1: to James smear and censor one single podcaster. You've got hunger, poverty, 1439 01:15:50,400 --> 01:15:53,320 Speaker 1: war to spare, climate collapse. Just take your pick. We're 1440 01:15:53,320 --> 01:15:55,400 Speaker 1: in the midst of a new Cold War style conflict 1441 01:15:55,400 --> 01:15:58,760 Speaker 1: between the two nuclear powers centered around Ukraine. The FED 1442 01:15:58,920 --> 01:16:02,080 Speaker 1: is making economic life or death decisions right now as 1443 01:16:02,080 --> 01:16:05,400 Speaker 1: we speak. Inequality has soared during the pandemic to world 1444 01:16:05,520 --> 01:16:08,960 Speaker 1: historic levels, leading to a dystopian split screen, like Jeff 1445 01:16:08,960 --> 01:16:12,280 Speaker 1: Bezos commanding the deconstruction of a historic bridge in order 1446 01:16:12,360 --> 01:16:15,920 Speaker 1: to accommodate his massive yacht, while on the other hand, 1447 01:16:15,920 --> 01:16:19,200 Speaker 1: you've got his former workers like de Quan Smith, forced 1448 01:16:19,200 --> 01:16:22,479 Speaker 1: into homelessness for the crime of advocating for a union. 1449 01:16:23,080 --> 01:16:25,640 Speaker 1: In a certain sense, any of these topics would be 1450 01:16:25,640 --> 01:16:27,799 Speaker 1: a better use of our time than Joe Rogan versus 1451 01:16:27,800 --> 01:16:31,040 Speaker 1: the Libs. Yet, ironically, the very fact that the nation 1452 01:16:31,160 --> 01:16:34,160 Speaker 1: has become so consumed with whatever bad words Rogan is 1453 01:16:34,200 --> 01:16:37,719 Speaker 1: said over his multi decade career, instead of a serious 1454 01:16:37,720 --> 01:16:40,640 Speaker 1: inquiry into any of the problems I just mentioned that 1455 01:16:40,760 --> 01:16:44,040 Speaker 1: is in and of itself actually a gigantic issue. I 1456 01:16:44,040 --> 01:16:46,920 Speaker 1: don't want to be dramatic here, but the personal moral 1457 01:16:46,960 --> 01:16:50,920 Speaker 1: purity way of doing politics is truly a cancer, and 1458 01:16:50,960 --> 01:16:54,519 Speaker 1: it's eating away at our pseudo democracy. In other words, 1459 01:16:54,720 --> 01:16:57,280 Speaker 1: part of why we can never address any of those 1460 01:16:57,360 --> 01:17:01,080 Speaker 1: real problems is because the public is content, ginuinely distracted 1461 01:17:01,160 --> 01:17:05,160 Speaker 1: and tenilated by these fake, personalized problems. But it's actually 1462 01:17:05,160 --> 01:17:07,640 Speaker 1: so much worse than that, because they are not just 1463 01:17:07,680 --> 01:17:11,240 Speaker 1: a distraction, their centrality in our public discourse makes any 1464 01:17:11,280 --> 01:17:15,160 Speaker 1: sort of collective action virtually impossible. It reminds me of 1465 01:17:15,240 --> 01:17:18,439 Speaker 1: this infamous nineteen forty four CIA manual on how to 1466 01:17:18,479 --> 01:17:21,479 Speaker 1: destroy the productivity of an organization. It's called the Simple 1467 01:17:21,520 --> 01:17:25,559 Speaker 1: Sabotage Field Manual, and it contains the following advice. Take 1468 01:17:25,560 --> 01:17:29,559 Speaker 1: a look at this, bring up irrelevant issues as frequently 1469 01:17:29,600 --> 01:17:34,960 Speaker 1: as possible, haggle over precise wordings of communications, minutes and resolutions, 1470 01:17:35,280 --> 01:17:38,240 Speaker 1: refer back to matters decided upon at the last meeting, 1471 01:17:38,240 --> 01:17:41,040 Speaker 1: and attempt to reopen the question of the advisability of 1472 01:17:41,080 --> 01:17:44,679 Speaker 1: that decision. Now, these precepts seem to have been implied 1473 01:17:44,840 --> 01:17:48,960 Speaker 1: to our entire society in fact, debating the personal character 1474 01:17:49,040 --> 01:17:52,479 Speaker 1: of Joe Rogan and similar obsessions, they are a potent 1475 01:17:52,600 --> 01:17:56,640 Speaker 1: form of anti politics. It feels like you're engaging in 1476 01:17:56,680 --> 01:17:59,439 Speaker 1: politics like you're adding your voice to a cacophonist and 1477 01:17:59,560 --> 01:18:04,040 Speaker 1: vibrant democracy, but you're not. You're stuck wandering endlessly around 1478 01:18:04,040 --> 01:18:07,280 Speaker 1: a fake Potempkin village of democracy, while leads with an 1479 01:18:07,280 --> 01:18:09,680 Speaker 1: interest in maintaining the status quo are left free to 1480 01:18:09,720 --> 01:18:14,080 Speaker 1: make the real political decisions. You are relitigating the context 1481 01:18:14,160 --> 01:18:16,960 Speaker 1: within which Joe Rogan said the N word in twenty thirteen. 1482 01:18:17,360 --> 01:18:19,759 Speaker 1: While the FED decides whether or not to vote fork 1483 01:18:19,800 --> 01:18:22,479 Speaker 1: over a few more trillions to Wall Street, and private 1484 01:18:22,479 --> 01:18:25,320 Speaker 1: equity giants decide whether young people will ever be able 1485 01:18:25,360 --> 01:18:27,640 Speaker 1: to buy a home or start a family, and the 1486 01:18:27,680 --> 01:18:30,960 Speaker 1: oil and gas industry buys off politicians to continue forcing 1487 01:18:31,000 --> 01:18:34,000 Speaker 1: the planet off a climate cliff. Now Neil Young, he 1488 01:18:34,040 --> 01:18:36,200 Speaker 1: was the first artist to pull his music from Spotify, 1489 01:18:36,240 --> 01:18:38,240 Speaker 1: and actually his arc over the course of his life 1490 01:18:38,280 --> 01:18:41,559 Speaker 1: is really illuminating. His original forays into activism. They were 1491 01:18:41,600 --> 01:18:45,439 Speaker 1: about bolstering a mass struggle against war, protesting the killings 1492 01:18:45,439 --> 01:18:47,599 Speaker 1: of young students at Kent State who were gunned down 1493 01:18:47,600 --> 01:18:50,720 Speaker 1: for their activism against the state under George W. Bush. 1494 01:18:50,760 --> 01:18:53,200 Speaker 1: He was part of a free speech toward decrying the 1495 01:18:53,240 --> 01:18:57,320 Speaker 1: reactionary censorship of anti war voices. But in our modern 1496 01:18:57,320 --> 01:19:01,519 Speaker 1: climate of democracy sabotage. He's flipped now his IR is 1497 01:19:01,560 --> 01:19:05,960 Speaker 1: directed at Spotify for allowing too much free speech. He's 1498 01:19:06,000 --> 01:19:10,640 Speaker 1: the same guy, same activists impulses, yet now his activism 1499 01:19:10,680 --> 01:19:14,040 Speaker 1: is dedicated to bolstering power rather than fighting it, and 1500 01:19:14,080 --> 01:19:16,439 Speaker 1: his remedy is too perfect as well. He's pushing his 1501 01:19:16,520 --> 01:19:18,800 Speaker 1: fans their dollars to one of the most powerful and 1502 01:19:18,880 --> 01:19:23,360 Speaker 1: nefarious companies on the planet, Amazon, Rogan's thought crimes are 1503 01:19:23,400 --> 01:19:27,920 Speaker 1: given higher moral priority than Amazon's mass exploitation, monopoly rigging, 1504 01:19:27,960 --> 01:19:31,880 Speaker 1: and modern day indentured servitude. But Neil Young is emblematic 1505 01:19:31,960 --> 01:19:34,720 Speaker 1: of an influential activist population that has been tricked into 1506 01:19:34,720 --> 01:19:37,200 Speaker 1: thinking that they are fighting for democracy when they are 1507 01:19:37,240 --> 01:19:40,280 Speaker 1: actually fighting for tech oligarchs and media barons to have 1508 01:19:40,360 --> 01:19:44,200 Speaker 1: more power in an ingenious sleight of hand. Good and 1509 01:19:44,280 --> 01:19:47,599 Speaker 1: well intentioned people who in a previous era would have fought, 1510 01:19:47,640 --> 01:19:50,880 Speaker 1: like Neil Young for real democratic change in action, have 1511 01:19:51,000 --> 01:19:54,640 Speaker 1: instead been persuaded that handing over as much control of 1512 01:19:54,680 --> 01:19:57,680 Speaker 1: the public square as possible to our modern day aristocracy 1513 01:19:57,760 --> 01:20:01,080 Speaker 1: is somehow sticking it to the man. They believe that 1514 01:20:01,120 --> 01:20:03,360 Speaker 1: the most powerful people on the planet are the ones 1515 01:20:03,360 --> 01:20:06,439 Speaker 1: to be trusted and that their own powerless relatives and 1516 01:20:06,439 --> 01:20:08,720 Speaker 1: neighbors are the ones to be held in contempt and 1517 01:20:08,800 --> 01:20:12,200 Speaker 1: held to account, because that's what the instinct towards censorship, 1518 01:20:12,240 --> 01:20:14,040 Speaker 1: that's what it is about at its core. It's not 1519 01:20:14,080 --> 01:20:17,919 Speaker 1: really about Joe Rogan. It's about adult Americans not trusting 1520 01:20:17,960 --> 01:20:20,640 Speaker 1: their fellow adult Americans to be able to listen to 1521 01:20:20,680 --> 01:20:24,240 Speaker 1: a podcast or read a Facebook post without becoming murderous, 1522 01:20:24,360 --> 01:20:28,200 Speaker 1: raving lunatics. And that makes these constant moral purity debates 1523 01:20:28,320 --> 01:20:32,759 Speaker 1: active democracy sabotage instead of just a simple bread circuses distraction. 1524 01:20:33,400 --> 01:20:37,519 Speaker 1: How are you ever going to engage in collective struggle 1525 01:20:37,560 --> 01:20:39,280 Speaker 1: for change with the sort that led to victory for 1526 01:20:39,320 --> 01:20:42,160 Speaker 1: the abolitionists and the suffragists and the civil rights movement 1527 01:20:42,439 --> 01:20:45,639 Speaker 1: when the collective has been deemed too evil and too 1528 01:20:45,680 --> 01:20:49,120 Speaker 1: deplorable for a decent person to engage with at all. 1529 01:20:49,680 --> 01:20:52,519 Speaker 1: Why would you even want to institute universal programs when 1530 01:20:52,560 --> 01:20:55,080 Speaker 1: they would benefit these evil and nasty people who can't 1531 01:20:55,120 --> 01:20:58,120 Speaker 1: even trusted to listen to a podcast without basically becoming 1532 01:20:58,160 --> 01:21:02,679 Speaker 1: the KKK. Will you challenge corporate friendly media at scale 1533 01:21:03,040 --> 01:21:06,840 Speaker 1: when every channel that challenges conventional orthodoxy is tarred as 1534 01:21:06,880 --> 01:21:10,400 Speaker 1: a racist grift. After all, if you trust your fellow 1535 01:21:10,400 --> 01:21:12,640 Speaker 1: Americans to behave like grown ups in a democracy with 1536 01:21:12,680 --> 01:21:16,559 Speaker 1: its necessary messy swirl of information, then whatever Rogan says, 1537 01:21:16,640 --> 01:21:19,559 Speaker 1: whatever Guessie has on, they're really no big deal. Matt 1538 01:21:19,560 --> 01:21:22,639 Speaker 1: Tybee's essential book hatingc tracks how such a large number 1539 01:21:22,640 --> 01:21:25,600 Speaker 1: of Americans were persuaded to trust tech oligarchs drunk on 1540 01:21:25,720 --> 01:21:28,600 Speaker 1: power more than their neighbors and relatives who happen to 1541 01:21:28,600 --> 01:21:32,040 Speaker 1: have different political views. The constant stream of propaganda from 1542 01:21:32,040 --> 01:21:35,679 Speaker 1: Fox News and CNN and MSNBC, it is all aimed 1543 01:21:35,720 --> 01:21:39,440 Speaker 1: at terrifying the people about their fellow citizens. Your struggles 1544 01:21:39,479 --> 01:21:42,240 Speaker 1: aren't because of a system rigged by plutocrats to deliver 1545 01:21:42,360 --> 01:21:46,719 Speaker 1: riches for themselves and desperation for you. No, the real 1546 01:21:46,800 --> 01:21:49,759 Speaker 1: threat to your well being is your cute, curious aunt 1547 01:21:50,120 --> 01:21:53,519 Speaker 1: or the college kids posting their pronouns to TikTok. That's 1548 01:21:53,520 --> 01:21:56,560 Speaker 1: how you end up with the GOP literally poised to 1549 01:21:56,680 --> 01:22:00,840 Speaker 1: run on no platform and probably win historic talk. They 1550 01:22:00,880 --> 01:22:03,400 Speaker 1: don't have to promise that they'll deliver on anything in particular, 1551 01:22:03,840 --> 01:22:05,479 Speaker 1: just that they will serve as a check on the 1552 01:22:05,479 --> 01:22:07,760 Speaker 1: half of the country that their voters believe to be 1553 01:22:07,840 --> 01:22:10,720 Speaker 1: the problem. Democrats have their list of dangerous people and 1554 01:22:10,760 --> 01:22:12,760 Speaker 1: ideas they want to see ban that they believe the 1555 01:22:12,760 --> 01:22:15,640 Speaker 1: American people can't be trusted with, and Republicans have their 1556 01:22:15,680 --> 01:22:18,080 Speaker 1: own list of dangerous people and ideas they believe the 1557 01:22:18,120 --> 01:22:21,479 Speaker 1: American people can't be trusted with. That's what the CRT, panic, 1558 01:22:21,520 --> 01:22:24,839 Speaker 1: anti protest laws, and book banning movements are really all about. 1559 01:22:25,240 --> 01:22:27,799 Speaker 1: Democrats think you can't listen to a three hour discussion 1560 01:22:27,840 --> 01:22:32,120 Speaker 1: with Robert Malone without deciding vaccines or implanting microchips. Republicans 1561 01:22:32,200 --> 01:22:35,080 Speaker 1: think you can't raid Ibramex Kendy without wanting to lock 1562 01:22:35,120 --> 01:22:39,839 Speaker 1: white people into prison camps. I reject this corrosive, anti 1563 01:22:39,880 --> 01:22:43,000 Speaker 1: populus view that seeks to place power in a few 1564 01:22:43,200 --> 01:22:47,800 Speaker 1: concentrated hands, where the only pseudo political struggles are whether 1565 01:22:47,880 --> 01:22:50,240 Speaker 1: or not our elected reps will signal that they're on 1566 01:22:50,320 --> 01:22:53,639 Speaker 1: our side in that culture war. In fact, a belief 1567 01:22:53,640 --> 01:22:58,000 Speaker 1: in actual democracy, obnoxious and frustrating as it can sometimes be, 1568 01:22:58,479 --> 01:23:00,519 Speaker 1: is actually at the very core of why I do 1569 01:23:00,600 --> 01:23:03,000 Speaker 1: this show at all, and why I'm so proud of 1570 01:23:03,040 --> 01:23:06,439 Speaker 1: its large and ideologically diverse audience, and why I call 1571 01:23:06,520 --> 01:23:09,559 Speaker 1: myself a populist. I know it can sound really hokey, 1572 01:23:09,840 --> 01:23:12,760 Speaker 1: but I really wanted to demonstrate that it's okay in 1573 01:23:12,800 --> 01:23:15,200 Speaker 1: a democracy to deal with people who might have different 1574 01:23:15,280 --> 01:23:19,040 Speaker 1: views than you. In fact, it is essential, even that 1575 01:23:19,120 --> 01:23:21,240 Speaker 1: you might agree with them in some areas, that you 1576 01:23:21,320 --> 01:23:24,439 Speaker 1: might even find them to be loyal friends, trusted colleagues, 1577 01:23:24,680 --> 01:23:27,360 Speaker 1: that they can serve as partners in a democratic project, 1578 01:23:27,400 --> 01:23:30,439 Speaker 1: even though yes, sometimes they might drive you nuts. Look, 1579 01:23:30,800 --> 01:23:33,479 Speaker 1: there are only two paths from where we are now. 1580 01:23:34,000 --> 01:23:37,200 Speaker 1: One is towards an authoritarian police state, and the other 1581 01:23:37,479 --> 01:23:41,120 Speaker 1: is towards a real democracy. The less that we trust 1582 01:23:41,160 --> 01:23:43,400 Speaker 1: our fellow adults to be able to handle bad or 1583 01:23:43,400 --> 01:23:47,599 Speaker 1: wrong or dangerous information, or information that just doesn't accord 1584 01:23:47,640 --> 01:23:50,840 Speaker 1: with our own political sensibilities, the harder we will fight 1585 01:23:51,040 --> 01:23:53,840 Speaker 1: for the police state and demand an end to our 1586 01:23:53,920 --> 01:23:58,519 Speaker 1: own democratic rights. Look, we act like our democracy is 1587 01:23:58,560 --> 01:24:00,600 Speaker 1: most in danger of being stolen by a cabal of 1588 01:24:00,760 --> 01:24:04,000 Speaker 1: nefarious wrongdoers, when the much more likely scenario is that 1589 01:24:04,040 --> 01:24:07,000 Speaker 1: we will willingly hand it over in exchange for censoring 1590 01:24:07,120 --> 01:24:09,920 Speaker 1: and banning the people we think are bad. So the 1591 01:24:10,000 --> 01:24:12,320 Speaker 1: cancer at the core of the fight over Joe Rogan 1592 01:24:12,439 --> 01:24:15,439 Speaker 1: right now, it is both a distraction from real problems, 1593 01:24:15,479 --> 01:24:17,559 Speaker 1: and it is a symptom of how much the nation 1594 01:24:17,800 --> 01:24:21,960 Speaker 1: has been poisoned against itself. And this cancer, mark my words, 1595 01:24:22,200 --> 01:24:26,120 Speaker 1: if allowed to metastasize, will destroy whatever good is left 1596 01:24:26,200 --> 01:24:28,880 Speaker 1: in the American ideal. And so on the one hand, 1597 01:24:28,920 --> 01:24:31,000 Speaker 1: Shager it's silly, you can say it's bread circuses. I 1598 01:24:31,000 --> 01:24:33,200 Speaker 1: see people deserve. And if you want to hear my 1599 01:24:33,360 --> 01:24:36,680 Speaker 1: reaction to Crystal's monologue, become a premium subscriber today at 1600 01:24:36,760 --> 01:24:42,559 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot Com. Really excited to be joined by our 1601 01:24:42,600 --> 01:24:46,280 Speaker 1: next guest, doctor John Abramson. He's written a book Sickening, 1602 01:24:46,360 --> 01:24:50,040 Speaker 1: How Big Pharma broke American healthcare and how we can 1603 01:24:50,080 --> 01:24:52,400 Speaker 1: fix it. This is something where he appeared on The 1604 01:24:52,439 --> 01:24:55,519 Speaker 1: Joe Rogan Experience and Crystal and I were absolutely stunned 1605 01:24:55,720 --> 01:24:57,959 Speaker 1: by how good of an episode. It was really excited 1606 01:24:58,160 --> 01:25:00,200 Speaker 1: to read the book. Haven't had that chance yet. We 1607 01:25:00,240 --> 01:25:02,600 Speaker 1: have doctor Abramson here in order to break some of 1608 01:25:02,640 --> 01:25:04,280 Speaker 1: this down. Thank you so much for joining us, sir. 1609 01:25:04,280 --> 01:25:06,760 Speaker 1: We really appreciate it. Well, thank you for having me. 1610 01:25:06,800 --> 01:25:09,960 Speaker 1: I appreciate it absolutely. So let's go a little bit 1611 01:25:10,000 --> 01:25:12,840 Speaker 1: into the book. What are some of the top line 1612 01:25:12,880 --> 01:25:15,960 Speaker 1: ways of which you were able to expose the way 1613 01:25:16,000 --> 01:25:19,919 Speaker 1: that big pharma has rigged and destroyed the American healthcare system. 1614 01:25:20,120 --> 01:25:23,080 Speaker 1: And this is absent of the vaccine conversation, although we 1615 01:25:23,160 --> 01:25:26,320 Speaker 1: will get into that as well. Right So, I spent 1616 01:25:26,360 --> 01:25:29,120 Speaker 1: about ten after my first book came out Overdose to America, 1617 01:25:30,080 --> 01:25:33,040 Speaker 1: lawyers started to call me to serve as an expert 1618 01:25:33,240 --> 01:25:39,240 Speaker 1: in litigation against the drug companies plane of slawyers and 1619 01:25:39,600 --> 01:25:44,320 Speaker 1: I spent about ten years inside the corporate computers. We 1620 01:25:44,320 --> 01:25:46,559 Speaker 1: would get the corporate hard drives that would be up 1621 01:25:46,560 --> 01:25:50,880 Speaker 1: to twenty million documents in each case. And over those 1622 01:25:50,920 --> 01:25:54,000 Speaker 1: ten years, I learned what the drug companies are doing. 1623 01:25:54,160 --> 01:25:59,080 Speaker 1: I know what's going on that. I know how they've 1624 01:25:59,120 --> 01:26:04,440 Speaker 1: taken over the knowledge that is created and delivered to doctors, 1625 01:26:05,080 --> 01:26:12,320 Speaker 1: and how they encourage, how they create the impression that 1626 01:26:12,479 --> 01:26:16,200 Speaker 1: doctors are practicing the best medicine for their patients by 1627 01:26:16,240 --> 01:26:20,400 Speaker 1: prescribing new and expensive drugs and consuming resources that would 1628 01:26:20,439 --> 01:26:24,679 Speaker 1: be better spent on social determinants of health and other 1629 01:26:24,760 --> 01:26:28,719 Speaker 1: approaches than giving expensive new drugs. I know how that happened. 1630 01:26:29,760 --> 01:26:33,160 Speaker 1: Some of it I can tell, and some of it 1631 01:26:33,280 --> 01:26:37,240 Speaker 1: remain sealed. But the bottom line is that American healthcare 1632 01:26:37,360 --> 01:26:43,800 Speaker 1: is performing horribly. American's healthy life expectancy, the number of 1633 01:26:43,880 --> 01:26:46,760 Speaker 1: years they live in good health now ranks sixty eighth 1634 01:26:46,840 --> 01:26:49,519 Speaker 1: in the world. It's gone down from thirty eighth to 1635 01:26:49,640 --> 01:26:54,799 Speaker 1: sixty eighth between nineteen between two thousand and twenty nineteen. 1636 01:26:55,320 --> 01:26:59,760 Speaker 1: And for that awful health, we're spending an extra one 1637 01:26:59,800 --> 01:27:03,519 Speaker 1: point five trillion dollars a year on our healthcare. This 1638 01:27:04,240 --> 01:27:06,760 Speaker 1: ought to be the biggest story. This is bigger than 1639 01:27:06,880 --> 01:27:11,320 Speaker 1: nine to eleven. There are more people. The excess death 1640 01:27:11,400 --> 01:27:13,840 Speaker 1: rate in the United States is like, we're having a 1641 01:27:13,920 --> 01:27:17,559 Speaker 1: nine to eleven every two and a quarter days, every 1642 01:27:17,600 --> 01:27:20,040 Speaker 1: single two and a quarter days. Three jumbo jets going 1643 01:27:20,120 --> 01:27:24,840 Speaker 1: down every day, and this story is not covered. So 1644 01:27:25,120 --> 01:27:28,920 Speaker 1: what are the roots of that issue? Because yeah, I 1645 01:27:28,960 --> 01:27:31,120 Speaker 1: mean you look around the rest of the developed world, 1646 01:27:31,240 --> 01:27:35,240 Speaker 1: they're not seeing these spiking rates of diabetes, deaths, of 1647 01:27:35,680 --> 01:27:39,479 Speaker 1: overdose deaks, these excess deaths that that you're tracking closely. 1648 01:27:39,640 --> 01:27:42,800 Speaker 1: So what is the root cause of these issues? Yeah? 1649 01:27:42,840 --> 01:27:46,040 Speaker 1: I think there are two caused, Crystal. I think one 1650 01:27:46,120 --> 01:27:50,439 Speaker 1: is that the production and dissemination of what doctors take 1651 01:27:50,720 --> 01:27:55,520 Speaker 1: as medical knowledge has been turned over to the commercial interests. 1652 01:27:55,760 --> 01:28:01,120 Speaker 1: So the essentially the research agenda is set by commercial interests. 1653 01:28:01,160 --> 01:28:06,679 Speaker 1: They control the studies, they control the data, own the data, 1654 01:28:07,120 --> 01:28:14,000 Speaker 1: do the analysis, mostly prepare the manuscripts for publication. The 1655 01:28:14,120 --> 01:28:19,719 Speaker 1: peer reviewers were taught we physicians are taught to trust 1656 01:28:20,160 --> 01:28:23,479 Speaker 1: that peer reviewed articles in medical journals are the gold 1657 01:28:23,560 --> 01:28:29,000 Speaker 1: standard and we should determine our medical practice according to 1658 01:28:29,080 --> 01:28:32,400 Speaker 1: the pure reviewed studies. What we're not taught is that 1659 01:28:32,439 --> 01:28:34,640 Speaker 1: the peer reviewers don't even get to look at the 1660 01:28:34,720 --> 01:28:38,799 Speaker 1: data for themselves. They have to accept what the drug 1661 01:28:38,880 --> 01:28:45,000 Speaker 1: companies have largely drug companies have sent them. So on 1662 01:28:45,040 --> 01:28:49,799 Speaker 1: the one hand, we've got the control of medical knowledge 1663 01:28:50,120 --> 01:28:54,599 Speaker 1: having been given over to the commercial interests without adequate oversight, 1664 01:28:55,320 --> 01:28:58,519 Speaker 1: And on the other hand, we have the dissemination to 1665 01:28:58,600 --> 01:29:02,679 Speaker 1: the public of that information, largely influenced by the drug 1666 01:29:02,720 --> 01:29:07,120 Speaker 1: companies because the enormous amount of advertising that they do. Right. Yeah, 1667 01:29:07,160 --> 01:29:09,599 Speaker 1: this was the part that I was really stunned by 1668 01:29:09,720 --> 01:29:13,000 Speaker 1: during your episode, was about the specific data. So the 1669 01:29:13,280 --> 01:29:17,120 Speaker 1: list is where we can involve the vaccine conversation. Doctor, 1670 01:29:17,439 --> 01:29:20,799 Speaker 1: how have you found it difficult to balance two things? 1671 01:29:20,960 --> 01:29:24,200 Speaker 1: Number one, the drug companies have rigged trials in the past, 1672 01:29:24,280 --> 01:29:27,080 Speaker 1: have not been honest so much so that they've had 1673 01:29:27,080 --> 01:29:30,360 Speaker 1: to pay multi billion dollar fines and the actual efficacy 1674 01:29:30,720 --> 01:29:35,160 Speaker 1: of a medicine. How do we, as you know, as layman, 1675 01:29:35,640 --> 01:29:39,280 Speaker 1: how are we supposed to balance our mistrust rightfully with 1676 01:29:39,439 --> 01:29:42,920 Speaker 1: actual information? How do you look at that problem? It's 1677 01:29:42,960 --> 01:29:46,519 Speaker 1: a huge problem, segar, And what we need to do 1678 01:29:47,080 --> 01:29:50,480 Speaker 1: is look at all the data and make our own decisions. 1679 01:29:51,439 --> 01:29:57,960 Speaker 1: In the case of the vaccinations, Pfizer is fighting with 1680 01:29:58,120 --> 01:30:03,960 Speaker 1: the FDA as a partner to slow walk the release 1681 01:30:04,040 --> 01:30:09,600 Speaker 1: of the data from its original large study of efficacy 1682 01:30:09,600 --> 01:30:13,439 Speaker 1: and safety of vaccines, and the FDA is making the 1683 01:30:13,479 --> 01:30:16,639 Speaker 1: claim that they should get seventy five years to release 1684 01:30:16,720 --> 01:30:21,360 Speaker 1: the data from that study. It's craziness. It's craziness that 1685 01:30:21,439 --> 01:30:26,360 Speaker 1: the public doesn't get access to that data. Now, that 1686 01:30:26,520 --> 01:30:30,320 Speaker 1: would seem to support an anti vaccine position that we 1687 01:30:30,320 --> 01:30:33,880 Speaker 1: don't have the data, and if the data weren't hiding something, 1688 01:30:33,960 --> 01:30:37,400 Speaker 1: FIZA would probably be more likely to volunteer it. On 1689 01:30:37,439 --> 01:30:40,599 Speaker 1: the other hand, there's real world data and we know 1690 01:30:40,880 --> 01:30:44,760 Speaker 1: that people who are unvaccinated have about twenty times the 1691 01:30:44,880 --> 01:30:48,559 Speaker 1: risk of dying of COVID and there's no question that 1692 01:30:48,680 --> 01:30:53,320 Speaker 1: these vaccines are effective, and I would urge everybody to 1693 01:30:53,320 --> 01:30:56,920 Speaker 1: get vaccinated and get boosted when it's recommended. But we 1694 01:30:57,040 --> 01:31:01,080 Speaker 1: need to liberate the data. And it's just another example 1695 01:31:01,200 --> 01:31:06,439 Speaker 1: of how the pharmaceutical industry is controlling this game. I mean, 1696 01:31:06,479 --> 01:31:10,040 Speaker 1: what kind of market could you have when the consumers, 1697 01:31:10,080 --> 01:31:14,120 Speaker 1: the purchasers, the users aren't allowed to see the data 1698 01:31:14,520 --> 01:31:17,960 Speaker 1: upon which the claims that their product is useful and 1699 01:31:18,080 --> 01:31:22,840 Speaker 1: safe are being made. It makes no sense. Could you 1700 01:31:22,960 --> 01:31:25,680 Speaker 1: just so people can make this really concrete walk through 1701 01:31:25,720 --> 01:31:30,080 Speaker 1: an example of, you know, from the development of a drug, 1702 01:31:30,360 --> 01:31:33,759 Speaker 1: to the trials that are performed, to how it's presented 1703 01:31:33,800 --> 01:31:36,839 Speaker 1: to the FDA, to how it's ultimately presented to doctors, 1704 01:31:36,920 --> 01:31:40,799 Speaker 1: and then how it's prescribed to patients. How this all works, 1705 01:31:40,960 --> 01:31:44,320 Speaker 1: and the way that that process has been corrupted. I 1706 01:31:44,360 --> 01:31:46,960 Speaker 1: know you have some really specific examples in the book 1707 01:31:47,040 --> 01:31:51,320 Speaker 1: of how this has all gone down. Yeah, So what 1708 01:31:51,479 --> 01:31:55,680 Speaker 1: happens is drug companies fund about eighty six percent of 1709 01:31:55,760 --> 01:32:00,240 Speaker 1: clinical trials now, and almost all clinical trials are about 1710 01:32:00,280 --> 01:32:03,840 Speaker 1: drugs and devices. They're not about how to improve Americans 1711 01:32:03,840 --> 01:32:08,360 Speaker 1: health in a more general way. So the drug companies 1712 01:32:09,560 --> 01:32:15,759 Speaker 1: fund the trials and they hire companies called contract research 1713 01:32:15,960 --> 01:32:20,880 Speaker 1: organizations to do the research. Now, in nineteen ninety one, 1714 01:32:21,560 --> 01:32:24,920 Speaker 1: academic medical centers did eighty percent of the research, and 1715 01:32:24,960 --> 01:32:27,839 Speaker 1: the academics could play a role in designing the studies 1716 01:32:27,880 --> 01:32:30,760 Speaker 1: and picking the outcomes and the doses and the populations 1717 01:32:30,800 --> 01:32:33,519 Speaker 1: that were in the study, and analyzing the data and 1718 01:32:33,560 --> 01:32:36,880 Speaker 1: writing it up. In nineteen ninety one eighty percent. That 1719 01:32:37,000 --> 01:32:39,800 Speaker 1: dropped to twenty six percent by two thousand and four. 1720 01:32:40,439 --> 01:32:44,960 Speaker 1: So what happened is the drug companies took control of 1721 01:32:46,479 --> 01:32:51,360 Speaker 1: almost of three quarters of the research, and because they 1722 01:32:51,400 --> 01:32:54,760 Speaker 1: could pull the rest of the research, they exerted influence 1723 01:32:54,880 --> 01:32:57,840 Speaker 1: over the academic medical centers for the twenty six percent 1724 01:32:57,840 --> 01:33:01,120 Speaker 1: of the research they were getting. They own the data, 1725 01:33:02,080 --> 01:33:06,719 Speaker 1: they do the analyses, they send in the manuscript. Generally 1726 01:33:06,800 --> 01:33:10,280 Speaker 1: they play a role in writing the manuscript that get 1727 01:33:10,320 --> 01:33:14,280 Speaker 1: sent to the journal for peer review. The peer reviewers 1728 01:33:14,320 --> 01:33:17,400 Speaker 1: look at it. They look for obvious mistakes, but they 1729 01:33:17,400 --> 01:33:21,479 Speaker 1: don't have the data. So it's assumed that when the 1730 01:33:21,600 --> 01:33:26,519 Speaker 1: article is peer reviewed, the peer reviewers have thoroughly have 1731 01:33:27,120 --> 01:33:30,680 Speaker 1: reanalyzed the data and make sure that the study is 1732 01:33:31,560 --> 01:33:35,960 Speaker 1: saying what the manuscript says. That doesn't happen, So the 1733 01:33:36,080 --> 01:33:40,599 Speaker 1: doctors read the peer reviewed article in the medical journal 1734 01:33:40,680 --> 01:33:44,800 Speaker 1: thinking that they're doing what they're supposed to do, but 1735 01:33:44,880 --> 01:33:48,080 Speaker 1: it's not vetted, and they accept that as fact and 1736 01:33:48,120 --> 01:33:51,360 Speaker 1: they start prescribing drugs based on that, and then those 1737 01:33:51,479 --> 01:33:56,360 Speaker 1: articles get collected up into clinical practice guidelines. But the 1738 01:33:56,479 --> 01:33:59,760 Speaker 1: experts who write the clinical practice guidelines that set the 1739 01:33:59,760 --> 01:34:03,920 Speaker 1: states for medical care, they too don't get the data. 1740 01:34:04,000 --> 01:34:07,560 Speaker 1: They have to rely on the commercial analysis of the 1741 01:34:07,640 --> 01:34:11,760 Speaker 1: data that's published in the medical journals. So that information 1742 01:34:12,560 --> 01:34:16,400 Speaker 1: is what forms the basis of what's called evidence based 1743 01:34:16,439 --> 01:34:20,880 Speaker 1: medicine that all doctors are supposed to practice to provide 1744 01:34:20,920 --> 01:34:24,880 Speaker 1: the best care to their patients. The doctors don't understand 1745 01:34:24,920 --> 01:34:29,519 Speaker 1: that that information has not been verified, so that's how 1746 01:34:29,560 --> 01:34:35,160 Speaker 1: the standard is set, and that's we've got a tail 1747 01:34:35,240 --> 01:34:40,680 Speaker 1: wags dog situation. The pharmaceuticals spend about seventeen percent of 1748 01:34:40,720 --> 01:34:45,400 Speaker 1: our total medical budget, so they're not spending all the money, 1749 01:34:45,960 --> 01:34:49,920 Speaker 1: but what they're doing is in teaching doctors how that 1750 01:34:50,000 --> 01:34:53,360 Speaker 1: money should be spent, and it should be spent on 1751 01:34:53,479 --> 01:34:57,040 Speaker 1: the products that they've decided to invest in as a 1752 01:34:57,080 --> 01:35:01,320 Speaker 1: research in their research agenda, because not because they'll produce 1753 01:35:01,360 --> 01:35:05,000 Speaker 1: the most health, but because they will produce the greatest 1754 01:35:05,400 --> 01:35:11,080 Speaker 1: financial return on investment. So that's our system. It's close 1755 01:35:11,120 --> 01:35:14,720 Speaker 1: to the system in other countries. The difference in the 1756 01:35:14,800 --> 01:35:19,080 Speaker 1: United States is we don't have guardrails that exist in 1757 01:35:19,120 --> 01:35:23,120 Speaker 1: other countries. So we don't have independent health technology assessment. 1758 01:35:23,760 --> 01:35:26,760 Speaker 1: We don't have an organization that looks at all the 1759 01:35:26,840 --> 01:35:32,120 Speaker 1: data and determines which therapies are most effective for patients. 1760 01:35:32,479 --> 01:35:36,200 Speaker 1: The FDA tells us which drugs we can prescribe, but 1761 01:35:36,280 --> 01:35:39,800 Speaker 1: the FDA does not tell us which drugs we should prescribe. 1762 01:35:40,200 --> 01:35:45,559 Speaker 1: And almost all the other countries have that we don't have. Yeah, 1763 01:35:46,160 --> 01:35:48,280 Speaker 1: and it would be easy. We were the first country 1764 01:35:48,280 --> 01:35:52,360 Speaker 1: to have Health Technology assessment and it got scuttled with 1765 01:35:52,520 --> 01:35:56,280 Speaker 1: Newt Gingrich's contract with America in nineteen ninety five. So 1766 01:35:56,320 --> 01:35:59,000 Speaker 1: now we were the first to have it, and now 1767 01:35:59,200 --> 01:36:02,480 Speaker 1: we're practic the only country not to have it. Fascinating. 1768 01:36:02,479 --> 01:36:07,439 Speaker 1: And similarly, we don't allow cost effectiveness cost effectiveness studies 1769 01:36:07,479 --> 01:36:11,000 Speaker 1: to be funded by federal money. We don't allow the 1770 01:36:11,040 --> 01:36:16,240 Speaker 1: cost of drugs to be included in the recommendations of 1771 01:36:16,360 --> 01:36:22,839 Speaker 1: therapy made by government sponsored organizations. So what we've got 1772 01:36:23,400 --> 01:36:28,080 Speaker 1: in broad brushstrokes is the drug companies are controlling what 1773 01:36:28,200 --> 01:36:31,720 Speaker 1: doctors think they know about the best way to practice medicine. 1774 01:36:31,840 --> 01:36:34,439 Speaker 1: And we don't have the guardrails that other countries have. 1775 01:36:35,000 --> 01:36:36,880 Speaker 1: So let's get into how we can fix it part. 1776 01:36:36,920 --> 01:36:40,760 Speaker 1: Then you have exhaustive lists, but give us some of 1777 01:36:40,800 --> 01:36:42,920 Speaker 1: the top line ways. What are some of the best 1778 01:36:42,920 --> 01:36:46,479 Speaker 1: ways we can fix our health care system? Well? Number 1779 01:36:46,520 --> 01:36:50,560 Speaker 1: one is peer review has to be real. This is ridiculous. 1780 01:36:50,600 --> 01:36:55,400 Speaker 1: We were now operating on scientific standards that predate the Enlightenment. 1781 01:36:55,800 --> 01:37:00,519 Speaker 1: You know, we're back in the sixteen hundreds year. Peer 1782 01:37:00,520 --> 01:37:04,320 Speaker 1: reviewers have to have the data if they're going to 1783 01:37:05,080 --> 01:37:10,000 Speaker 1: verify allow their analysis to be used as saying that 1784 01:37:10,040 --> 01:37:13,839 Speaker 1: the study, the results of the study that are presented 1785 01:37:13,880 --> 01:37:17,160 Speaker 1: are actually true. So we've got to fix pure review. 1786 01:37:18,479 --> 01:37:23,240 Speaker 1: We need a national mechanism of Health Technology assessment, an 1787 01:37:23,280 --> 01:37:30,080 Speaker 1: independent agency or organization that gets all the data and 1788 01:37:30,120 --> 01:37:34,360 Speaker 1: that makes recommendations about which drugs are most effective. And 1789 01:37:34,439 --> 01:37:38,160 Speaker 1: I know you're interested in insulin. That's a big example. 1790 01:37:38,240 --> 01:37:41,840 Speaker 1: We are spending an extra twenty billion dollars a year 1791 01:37:42,000 --> 01:37:47,519 Speaker 1: on insulin analogs, the latest iteration of bioengineered insulin for 1792 01:37:48,120 --> 01:37:51,439 Speaker 1: people with type two diabetes, and it's no better. We 1793 01:37:51,520 --> 01:37:55,479 Speaker 1: can reinvest that twenty billion dollars in helping people at 1794 01:37:55,560 --> 01:37:59,720 Speaker 1: risk of diabetes to participate in active lifestyle counseling and 1795 01:38:00,560 --> 01:38:04,479 Speaker 1: healthy lifestyle activities in their communities, and we get a 1796 01:38:04,479 --> 01:38:08,040 Speaker 1: lot more health out of it than that. We need 1797 01:38:08,080 --> 01:38:11,320 Speaker 1: to control the price of drugs, not just because the 1798 01:38:11,400 --> 01:38:14,120 Speaker 1: drugs are too expensive. They are. We spend three and 1799 01:38:14,120 --> 01:38:17,479 Speaker 1: a half times more. The price of brand name drugs 1800 01:38:17,520 --> 01:38:19,360 Speaker 1: in the United States is three and a half times 1801 01:38:19,360 --> 01:38:22,800 Speaker 1: more than it is in other OECD countries. But that 1802 01:38:22,920 --> 01:38:29,280 Speaker 1: price funds the distortion of our healthcare. So the profit 1803 01:38:30,200 --> 01:38:34,559 Speaker 1: in the United States two thirds to three quarters excuse me, 1804 01:38:34,840 --> 01:38:39,320 Speaker 1: two thirds to three quarters of global pharmaceutical profits come 1805 01:38:39,360 --> 01:38:45,040 Speaker 1: from the United States. All that money creates this huge 1806 01:38:45,080 --> 01:38:50,200 Speaker 1: machine that can lobby that can hire pr that pays 1807 01:38:50,840 --> 01:38:56,719 Speaker 1: doctors to be key opinion leaders, and that money itself 1808 01:38:57,520 --> 01:39:02,880 Speaker 1: distorts our healthcare system. Just doing those few things, having 1809 01:39:02,960 --> 01:39:08,080 Speaker 1: health technology assessment, having cost effectiveness research, controlling the price 1810 01:39:08,080 --> 01:39:12,639 Speaker 1: of drugs, and rebalancing our research agenda so that it 1811 01:39:12,680 --> 01:39:15,960 Speaker 1: reflects the health needs of the American people and not 1812 01:39:16,080 --> 01:39:20,160 Speaker 1: the financial wishes of the pharmaceutical industry. That would go 1813 01:39:20,200 --> 01:39:23,000 Speaker 1: a long way and One other thing would help, which 1814 01:39:23,040 --> 01:39:29,439 Speaker 1: is when drug companies are found guilty of wrongdoing, they 1815 01:39:29,479 --> 01:39:34,240 Speaker 1: ought to be subjected to penalties that are commensurate with 1816 01:39:34,280 --> 01:39:44,600 Speaker 1: the crime, so that when people misrepresent science and reprofits 1817 01:39:44,600 --> 01:39:48,400 Speaker 1: in the billions of dollars range that are ill gotten 1818 01:39:48,520 --> 01:39:53,320 Speaker 1: because their data hasn't been adequately represented. That's stealing a 1819 01:39:53,320 --> 01:39:57,040 Speaker 1: billion dollars. And somebody steals twenty dollars, they get in trouble. 1820 01:39:57,080 --> 01:40:04,120 Speaker 1: But if you steal a billion dollars, okay. Those simple 1821 01:40:04,200 --> 01:40:08,520 Speaker 1: measures would go a long way towards bringing American healthcare 1822 01:40:09,320 --> 01:40:13,120 Speaker 1: back towards the function of the other wealthy countries. Last 1823 01:40:13,160 --> 01:40:15,599 Speaker 1: question for you, John, The media has tended to talk 1824 01:40:15,640 --> 01:40:21,439 Speaker 1: about vaccine hesitancy solely is like a personal responsibility story, 1825 01:40:21,680 --> 01:40:25,240 Speaker 1: like these bad people or maybe listening to the wrong 1826 01:40:25,320 --> 01:40:28,479 Speaker 1: podcast or whatever, and so they're not protecting themselves and 1827 01:40:28,479 --> 01:40:31,479 Speaker 1: they're not protecting their communities by doing the right thing 1828 01:40:31,640 --> 01:40:34,760 Speaker 1: and getting the vaccine. What have you thought about those 1829 01:40:34,840 --> 01:40:37,920 Speaker 1: narratives and how do you think that your research about 1830 01:40:37,960 --> 01:40:43,880 Speaker 1: the genuinely malign influence of big pharma has impacted the 1831 01:40:43,960 --> 01:40:47,880 Speaker 1: level of vaccine hesitancy that we have in this country. Crystal, 1832 01:40:47,920 --> 01:40:52,639 Speaker 1: that's really an important issue. And in fact, Robert Kennedy's book, 1833 01:40:52,800 --> 01:40:56,439 Speaker 1: which I wouldn't endorse, I'm not giving it a shout out. 1834 01:40:56,920 --> 01:40:59,400 Speaker 1: He starts his book and the introduction of his book 1835 01:40:59,439 --> 01:41:03,160 Speaker 1: starts with a quote from me about drug company information. 1836 01:41:04,400 --> 01:41:09,439 Speaker 1: I am not an anti vaccer, but the question that 1837 01:41:09,479 --> 01:41:13,599 Speaker 1: you ask is a really important one because people are 1838 01:41:13,680 --> 01:41:16,599 Speaker 1: aware that they're not getting the real data, and now 1839 01:41:17,200 --> 01:41:21,599 Speaker 1: Pfizer and the FDA joining arms to prevent the release 1840 01:41:21,640 --> 01:41:25,880 Speaker 1: of the data from Pfizer's big study that fuels anti 1841 01:41:25,960 --> 01:41:28,479 Speaker 1: vax sentiments. It's like, how can you expect us to 1842 01:41:28,520 --> 01:41:30,720 Speaker 1: take a drug when we can't see the data? And 1843 01:41:30,760 --> 01:41:35,400 Speaker 1: that's a very legitimate point. And I want to make 1844 01:41:35,439 --> 01:41:41,360 Speaker 1: sure that your listeners understand that they deserve the data 1845 01:41:41,439 --> 01:41:46,519 Speaker 1: and that the anti vax folks who use that as 1846 01:41:46,720 --> 01:41:51,559 Speaker 1: to support their argument are not wrong. But the real 1847 01:41:51,800 --> 01:41:56,120 Speaker 1: world data shows that these drugs do the vaccines do 1848 01:41:56,360 --> 01:42:01,240 Speaker 1: way more benefit than harm. Would say that the drug 1849 01:42:01,320 --> 01:42:05,800 Speaker 1: companies not being forthright about their data does way more 1850 01:42:05,920 --> 01:42:11,599 Speaker 1: harm than benefit. And this ought to create a public 1851 01:42:11,680 --> 01:42:16,160 Speaker 1: outcry to liberate that vaccine data so people know what 1852 01:42:16,160 --> 01:42:18,960 Speaker 1: they're getting. Yeah, I think that's really well said. Doc. 1853 01:42:19,120 --> 01:42:21,160 Speaker 1: The last thing is is that we were all talking 1854 01:42:21,160 --> 01:42:23,920 Speaker 1: about this before the segment, but you, like we said, 1855 01:42:23,960 --> 01:42:27,000 Speaker 1: we heard you on the Joe Rogan experience. Has it 1856 01:42:27,040 --> 01:42:29,840 Speaker 1: been frustrating that, you know, for all the talk and 1857 01:42:29,880 --> 01:42:33,360 Speaker 1: the media of doctor Robert Malone and doctor Robert McCollough. 1858 01:42:33,560 --> 01:42:37,439 Speaker 1: I distinctly remember during your episode of not only handling 1859 01:42:37,479 --> 01:42:41,479 Speaker 1: these issues with Grace talking about big pharma and the 1860 01:42:41,560 --> 01:42:44,559 Speaker 1: rot of the healthcare system, but also pushing back yourself 1861 01:42:44,800 --> 01:42:48,920 Speaker 1: on what on brown booster shots around vaccination myocarditis. Could 1862 01:42:48,920 --> 01:42:51,639 Speaker 1: you speak to that element of censorship in our modern 1863 01:42:51,640 --> 01:42:56,240 Speaker 1: discourse if you feel comfortable. Yeah. Absolutely. Joe was a 1864 01:42:56,280 --> 01:42:59,240 Speaker 1: perfect gentleman with me. I didn't temper, I didn't say 1865 01:42:59,240 --> 01:43:01,960 Speaker 1: anything with him that I'm not saying with you. And 1866 01:43:02,040 --> 01:43:04,320 Speaker 1: perhaps I went further out on a limb in terms 1867 01:43:04,360 --> 01:43:09,280 Speaker 1: of being critical of the pharmaceutical industry that's not getting press, 1868 01:43:09,920 --> 01:43:14,479 Speaker 1: and I think it's not fair to Joe. Now that said, 1869 01:43:14,800 --> 01:43:18,040 Speaker 1: we do have a problem, as we're now in a 1870 01:43:18,240 --> 01:43:22,439 Speaker 1: real age of rapid transition about how people get their information, 1871 01:43:23,160 --> 01:43:27,920 Speaker 1: and for reasons that I don't completely understand, this anti 1872 01:43:28,000 --> 01:43:33,840 Speaker 1: vax sentiment is primal almost so that when people come 1873 01:43:33,920 --> 01:43:39,519 Speaker 1: on to the media and they make an anti vax argument. 1874 01:43:39,680 --> 01:43:45,000 Speaker 1: For some reason, it has credence that it ought not 1875 01:43:45,080 --> 01:43:49,720 Speaker 1: to have. The information has not been verified, and we 1876 01:43:49,840 --> 01:43:52,599 Speaker 1: do need to come up with some way to have 1877 01:43:53,680 --> 01:43:56,479 Speaker 1: guardrails on the quality of information that gets out on 1878 01:43:56,520 --> 01:44:01,760 Speaker 1: the Internet without censoring that information. We haven't worked that out, 1879 01:44:01,920 --> 01:44:04,880 Speaker 1: and I think Joe is kind of at the forefront 1880 01:44:05,160 --> 01:44:13,360 Speaker 1: of raising the question of how we deliver a wide 1881 01:44:13,439 --> 01:44:17,880 Speaker 1: spectrum of information and at the same time ensure that 1882 01:44:17,880 --> 01:44:21,600 Speaker 1: that information is responsible, that it that both sides of 1883 01:44:21,640 --> 01:44:25,120 Speaker 1: the argument are presented. And I think what Joe wrote, 1884 01:44:25,160 --> 01:44:28,720 Speaker 1: maybe there are excesses. Maybe he's used language that it 1885 01:44:28,760 --> 01:44:31,360 Speaker 1: should never be used. You know, I don't defend that, 1886 01:44:31,800 --> 01:44:35,360 Speaker 1: but he surely allowed me and many other people to 1887 01:44:35,400 --> 01:44:39,880 Speaker 1: tell their story that is opposite to the Malones and mcculloughs. Right. 1888 01:44:40,800 --> 01:44:50,560 Speaker 1: So how we oversee the public responsibility of bringing information 1889 01:44:50,600 --> 01:44:54,679 Speaker 1: to people is unclear. But I think Rogan's not getting 1890 01:44:54,800 --> 01:44:58,679 Speaker 1: quite the fair deal that he should get. He's brought 1891 01:44:58,720 --> 01:45:01,760 Speaker 1: a lot of good information to Thank you, sir. Very 1892 01:45:01,800 --> 01:45:03,960 Speaker 1: caricature is view of him out there right now. Thank 1893 01:45:03,960 --> 01:45:05,720 Speaker 1: you so much, doctor. Great to have your insight, really 1894 01:45:05,760 --> 01:45:10,680 Speaker 1: appreciate it. Thank you both. Thank you guys so much 1895 01:45:10,680 --> 01:45:13,280 Speaker 1: for watching. I mean, I can't appreciate you all more. 1896 01:45:13,439 --> 01:45:16,040 Speaker 1: You know, we were consumed by all of this this weekend, 1897 01:45:16,120 --> 01:45:18,559 Speaker 1: and every time I was just like, thank God. The 1898 01:45:18,600 --> 01:45:21,479 Speaker 1: business is the way it is because you know, people, 1899 01:45:21,640 --> 01:45:24,840 Speaker 1: both of us, our public stance of defending Rogan I see, 1900 01:45:24,880 --> 01:45:27,719 Speaker 1: you know, all sorts of accusations crawling out of the woodwork, 1901 01:45:27,960 --> 01:45:30,680 Speaker 1: and you know, look, guys, you enable us to have 1902 01:45:30,760 --> 01:45:33,880 Speaker 1: the wherewithal to not care about any of that because 1903 01:45:33,920 --> 01:45:36,559 Speaker 1: we rely only upon you for our business, the core 1904 01:45:36,600 --> 01:45:39,280 Speaker 1: of it. We've expanded now. We added the Matt Stolar 1905 01:45:39,320 --> 01:45:42,120 Speaker 1: collaboration that dropped off the weekend. I was stunned by 1906 01:45:42,120 --> 01:45:44,680 Speaker 1: how many of you watched it. I love that. I mean, 1907 01:45:44,720 --> 01:45:47,800 Speaker 1: we're continuing to find people like him. We're going to 1908 01:45:47,840 --> 01:45:50,680 Speaker 1: be continued to grow. We've branched out. You know, our 1909 01:45:50,680 --> 01:45:53,280 Speaker 1: clips are now on Instagram, on TikTok, to my own chagrin, 1910 01:45:53,960 --> 01:45:56,360 Speaker 1: but you know, you have to exist in the society 1911 01:45:56,400 --> 01:45:59,160 Speaker 1: as we design. Yes, I critique society and I exist 1912 01:45:59,200 --> 01:46:01,559 Speaker 1: in society. What are we supposed to do for our 1913 01:46:01,600 --> 01:46:03,240 Speaker 1: gen Z fan base? You can go and follow us 1914 01:46:03,280 --> 01:46:06,519 Speaker 1: there Instagram, tech talk, YouTube, all of that, but you guys, 1915 01:46:06,600 --> 01:46:08,240 Speaker 1: premium subscriptions at the end of the day are the 1916 01:46:08,240 --> 01:46:11,000 Speaker 1: people who fund us, who enable us to bring you 1917 01:46:11,040 --> 01:46:13,479 Speaker 1: both the Stolers of the world, the Abramsons, and to 1918 01:46:13,640 --> 01:46:17,120 Speaker 1: just take the stands that we feel genuinely one. You 1919 01:46:17,120 --> 01:46:19,040 Speaker 1: will always know that that's where we're coming from, not 1920 01:46:19,120 --> 01:46:21,320 Speaker 1: from any other influence. So thank you all, and we 1921 01:46:21,400 --> 01:46:23,800 Speaker 1: really appreciate you, love you guys so much, and we 1922 01:46:23,800 --> 01:46:25,720 Speaker 1: will see you back here tomorrow.