WEBVTT - From the Archive: Asteroid City

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break through

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the busiest time of year with the brand new Peloton

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training tread Plus

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>at one Peloton dot com.

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>On here today? You're not interested in art?

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Now we look, we're going to do this thing.

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have a conversation. Hey. Film spotters Adam

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>and Josh.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>The Film Spotting Archive has reviews of Wes Anderson films

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 3>going back to two thousand and seven's The Darjeeling Limited,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 3>plus Sacred col reviews of Rushmore and The Royal Tene Moms.

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 4>With Anderson's latest, The Phoenician Scheme, now in theaters, we're

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 4>sharing our review of his previous feature, twenty twenty three's

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Asteroid City from June twenty twenty three. Pierce that review.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 5>Junior stargazers and space cadets. Each year we celebrate Asteroid

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Day commemorating September twenty third, three thousand and seven BC,

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 5>when the Arid planes meteorite made Earth impact.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's start this discussion by doing what every character and

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 3>we meet a lot of them, is trying to do.

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 3>An asteroid City, Get our bearings. Wes Anderson's latest is

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 3>a play within a play that's also a TV show. Okay,

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 3>that probably wasn't helpful. Let's try this. Actress Scarlett Johansson

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>portrays fictional actress Midge Campbell, who comes out West Asteroid

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>City with her junior stargazing star daughter, Midge Campbell. Well,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 3>she's played by an actress from back East named Mercedes Ford. So,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>as Anderson himself has explained, you're ultimately seeing an actress

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 3>playing an actress playing an actress. Now that we've got

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>that all cleared up, truthfully, I've almost surely oversold how

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 3>confusing the mid fifties set Asteroid City is while totally

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>underselling just how dense it is post war America and

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the fractured men who return from battle, the mythic West,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 3>the space Race, Broadway, and the actor's studio and Playhouse ninety,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>not to mention direct references to the Cinema of Steven Spielberg.

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>It's as if Anderson created Asteroid City the movie and

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 3>the place to intermingle all of his greatest inspirations and influences.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Anderson said, when I started wanting to make movies, this

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>period was the center of everything. We were watching The

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Godfather and Taxi Driver and Brian de Palma, but maybe

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 3>even more Marlon Brando and James Dean, Montgomery Cliff and

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Elia Kazan the emotion of this period of movies and

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 3>their relationship to the stage. I want to get to

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 3>a question for you, Josh that may seem a little silly,

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 3>as I've just put forth why the play within a

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 3>play approach was always at the core of this project.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>And this certainly isn't new territory, as we could run

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 3>through a litany of similar framing devices and meta layers

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>in Anderson's films. But I hope that it will provoke

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>us to really consider what the director is up to

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 3>here and how successfully he achieves it. Imagine that the

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>whole movie Asteroid City is comprised only of the events

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 3>that we see take place within Asteroid City, events that

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>already comprise the majority of the movie's runtime, Johansson's Midge

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>and her flirtations and existential musings, with Jason Schwartzman's Augie Steinbeck,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>a war photographer now widower struggling to break the news

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 3>of his wife's death to his four children, Steve Carell's

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 3>industrious motel manager, Tilda Swinton's astronomer doctor Hickenlooper, Jeffrey writes,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 3>General Griff, etc. Instead of these characters stemming from the

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>mind of Edward Norton's playwright Conrad Irp, they come only

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 3>from the mind of Anderson. No TV sound stages with

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Brian Kranston playing the host, no black and white acting

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>class interactions, just all of these a little bit lost

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>souls coming together in the desert, forced to stay together

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>a little longer than planned following a close encounter of

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the third kind. And I don't mean here imagine an

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 3>alternative version of the film Asteroid City. I'm saying this

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 3>is the only version we'd ever be aware of. I

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>think there's a pretty good chance that the two of

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 3>us and many other Anderson appreciators would have been satisfied

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>with that hermetically sealed off presentation of Asteroid City. What

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 3>will we have lost?

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Though, great question, one that I was circling around as

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 4>those layers began to unfold. And I'm glad you noted

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 4>that you probably are making it sound more complicated than

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 4>it is, because that's true, and I don't want this

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 4>to scare off anyone, particularly people who thought the French

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Dispatch was a little too dense for them. This to me,

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 4>is much simpler than that in terms of its construction.

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 4>But you're not incorrect to lay out all those layers.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 4>They are there, the one you just asked me about.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll be honest, We're four or five days from seeing

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Asteroid City. That's the one I'm still immersed in. I'm

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>immersed in that eighty percent screen time set in the

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 4>title town story, the characters there, what happens there, what

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 4>that might mean. I'm going to need another viewing, or

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 4>at least a couple more days until I start digging

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 4>deeper than that. I think that's partly because to your point,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 4>I was satisfied with what I got there. I have

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>as much as I've loved his more recent films that

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 4>have added on the layers to the cake, so that

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 4>these are layer cake movies, which really started I think

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 4>in Earnest with Grand Budapest those again, have loved them all,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 4>huge fan, but I connect more strongly with the more

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>straightforward narratives that he did previously, and so that's how

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>I've responded to this one as well. I'm not trying

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to ignore those other layers. I'm going to have to

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 4>get to them a little later. And my reasoning is

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to rush through it. I want to

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.279
<v Speaker 4>enjoy what is taking place in Asteroid City, because, again,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 4>as you said, that could be a movie of its own.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 4>What movie do I think that is. We'll get to that,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 4>but I want to hear your response to that question

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 4>before we get there. I would say that, and you've

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>hinted at this, this could very much be a movie

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>entirely about the acting experience, what it means to be

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 4>an actor, the art of acting, how audiences receive acting.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 4>That may be enough for what Asteroid City is about.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's in that next layer that I've yet

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.679
<v Speaker 4>to really dig into. But I think that's why it's there.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 4>It sounds to me I'm unfamiliar with a lot of

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 4>the background information you shared. Maybe that was the genesis

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>of this project many years ago, perhaps, and I think

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of richness there. There are some fantastic

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 4>performances here, performances within performances within performances, as you said,

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 4>but just on the surface of a single character performance.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I think Schwartzman and Johansson are excellent in particular. That

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 4>may be all this movie needs to be about. That's

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 4>the layer I've yet to get to. But how are

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 4>you feeling? Is that the layer this movie needed for

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 4>you to like it as much as I'm hoping you did.

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I probably did appreciate it even more

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>because of that ambition, because of that audacity, would have

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 3>been fine, I'm sure with that more stripped down version

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>of this film. And I'm gonna say it's probably a

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>little silly to suggest that making a movie smaller would

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 3>make the movie seem smaller. Yeah, that's what would have happened,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I think, though, I think it would have been satisfying

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.559
<v Speaker 3>without being as rewarding. And look, every good movie should

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>get better with repeat viewings. Definitely the case with Anderson's films,

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 3>which are very rich. Asteroids City, though, is one that

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>almost demands I think that you go back and unpack

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>all of its references and all the ways it kind

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 3>of folds in on itself, and not just to get

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the references, though I would like to do that. I mean,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 3>we can get as minute even as the fact that

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that character I mentioned, Scarlett Johansson, one of her characters

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>in this film is named Mercedes Ford. You know, it's

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 3>as if is if this woman has probably taken a

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>stage name where she's grabbed like this more exotic foreign

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>car and they've merged it with the basic American car.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 3>For it's playing with all these myths and ideas everything,

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 3>even Hickenlooper is a reference. Of course, I don't think

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 3>there's anything in this film. Of course there's nothing by accident,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's one of those films where it really does

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>feel as if every detail matters. And watching it again

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>or multiple times after that isn't just to sort of

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>pick up on the trivia of it to get all

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>those references, but to really see how all of those

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 3>references contribute to the narrative and the ideas and yes,

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the emotions that Anderson I think is exploring here. And

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 3>there were really two moments then locked it for me,

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>and we were talking about this a little bit afterwards.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I think even the next day you said that there

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>were some lines that you really wish maybe you had

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>taken better notes on, or that you could reference. I'd

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 3>like to see if we have any overlap here. Two

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that unlocked it for me. One is a moment I

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 3>think it's Maya Hawk is a teacher who's got a

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>group of young students I don't know, maybe eight, nine,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>ten years old on a field trip. They've come to

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Astoid City to learn about space, and this is one

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 3>of her scenes where she's trying to teach them the

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>morning after this alien sighting. Now, I hadn't actually watched

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 3>the trailer for Asteroid City before seeing the movie, so

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I kind of thought. I kind of thought, you know,

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 3>even though it's not like it feels like a gigantic spoiler,

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't have expected that that was something they revealed

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 3>in the trailer. But it's right there. So it's not

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 3>like the whole movie hinges. It does kind of thematically,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 3>but it's not as if the movie, in terms of

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the plot hinges on this moment, not giving anything away.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>They have an alien sighting. It is completely by surprise.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>They have no expectation of this before this moment. They

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 3>believe they're alone in the universe, and you can see

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>how sort of upset she is. Not upset like angry,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 3>more just she's clearly been rocked. Her world has been

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>rocked by this, and now she's trying to she's trying

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to teach.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Students, well, it's changed her plan, Adam, you should know

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 4>this as a teacher. Now, I mean, there's nothing worse.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 3>And it's changed so much more than that, it's changed

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the plan for all of their lives in a way. Right,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So she says, some of our information about the Solar

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>System may no longer be completely accurate. Anyway, there's still

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 3>only nine planets in the Solar System as far as

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 3>we know. And one of the kids, Billy, raises his

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.079
<v Speaker 3>hand and Billy says, except now there's an alien. And

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you really do you sense? I love the performance. You

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 3>sense her hesitancy and the doubt that's creeping in as

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>she's saying those words, Like the way she says, as

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>far as we know, as far as we know, there's

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>still nine planets in the Solar System. And it just

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 3>raises for me this idea that I think this movie

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 3>is really exploring, among so many other ideas and questions,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>which is what do we cling to as truths, universal

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>foundational truths. How do we navigate this experience, this experience

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 3>of life with out a set of rules? Twelve hours ago,

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 3>they thought they understood the rules, They thought they understood

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>what kind of universe they lived in. Now they realize

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 3>they don't. Everything is up for grabs, and that chaos,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 3>that uncertainty is disconcerting. And I think that even ties

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 3>back Josh to the central storyline of this film, which

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 3>is surrounding grief. These Steamback kids. There's a life with

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a mother, and there's a life now without. They're just

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.079
<v Speaker 3>now coming to terms with it. They just discover it.

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>It just gets thrown thrust onto them, and they have

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 3>to reckon with it. So there's life before and after,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 3>just like there's before and after life with the alien?

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 3>What do you what are you going to be tethered to?

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Which then gets to the second moment and I can't

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 3>remember the line. Maybe you do, but I know a

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 3>character says it. I don't remember the exact context, Steve,

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and I wish I had better notes here. Someone says

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 3>something to the effect that you just have to keep

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 3>telling the story. And for all of these artists, including

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Anderson himself. The sense for me is that the only

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>way you can deal with all that chaos and uncertainty

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 3>is to just keep telling the story. Are you ever

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 3>going to find the meaning of it all? Are you

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 3>going to find the answers?

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.599
<v Speaker 3>You just keep telling the story. And that story involves characters.

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>The stories involve people. All you can do is keep

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 3>taking some comfort and solace in each other.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's one of the lines. It absolutely is. And

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 4>it's so funny because it comes at a point where

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 4>you are starting to feel overwhelmed a little bit about

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 4>what this all might mean. Not overwhelmed by the style,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, I couldn't get enough of that, the filmmaking

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 4>those sorts of things, or the performances, but starting to think, Okay,

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 4>this has been fun, but what are we doing here?

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 4>And what happens? This is in the TV documentary you mentioned,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 4>which is chronicling the production of the play that is

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the story proper and Schwartzman, who is the actor at

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 4>this point, not the father in Asteroid City, but the

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>actor playing him, asks Adrian Brody, as the play's director,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 4>doesn't even ask him, he just kind of says, an exasperation,

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 4>I still don't understand the play, and it just hit

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 4>me because I was right there with him. It was

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 4>like exactly where I was. And then Brody's director is

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 4>the one who says, you had it, just keep telling

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 4>the story. That was his direction. I love your reading.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 4>I love this idea of you know, being disconcerted by

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 4>events and wondering what truths can we cling to. I

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 4>think that absolutely fits. I had a little different response

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 4>to the alien encounter, I think, and then a reading

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 4>that worked backwards for the film. I almost found that

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 4>for the characters to be it's the end epiphany, right,

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 4>And we've gotten these in almost every one of his

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 4>movies where a character suddenly it's Max Fisher flying the kite,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 4>it's Steve Zizou underwater encountering the jaguar shark. I think

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna lose my cred if I got that wrong.

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 4>You know, these epiphanies, they often come in the you know,

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 4>the final twenty minutes of his films. What's so interesting here?

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 4>And why you're right that it's not necessarily a spoiler

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 4>though I did not know it going in. As well,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 4>the alien appearance, it's about the midway point. It feels

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 4>like and so it is an epiphany that turns a

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 4>little differently than previous ones for me. And I'm going

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 4>to back all the way up and then say that

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 4>I found asteroid City. My takeaway was this is maybe

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 4>his darkest film, maybe his bleakest film, And I think

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 4>it's capturing a feeling right now that for me at least,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 4>is very appropriate this movie, Adam. I think maybe because

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 4>of the atomic setting, it had me thinking about the

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 4>doomsday clock. And this is not something I really think

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 4>about very much, but I actually thought, I'm gonna go

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 4>see what's the doomsday clock saying right now? And this

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 4>is that, you know, it's kind of a pseudoscientific thing

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 4>that's supposed to measure how close we are to destroy ourselves.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Right It's at its worst right now. And I thought

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 4>that fits. That makes sense to me, just how kind

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 4>of I've been feeling when you talk to like younger people,

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>how they talk about their future. It's like, yeah, this

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 4>tracks that the doomsday clock is saying things are pretty dire.

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 4>And then I'm thinking about this movie, which is set

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 4>decades later but sort of a similar time. Right, we've

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 4>had a pandemic, We've had American insurrection. Those are unique,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 4>but Russian aggression environmental degradation that we have now. But

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 4>you think also about the atomic testing element and what

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 4>that meant when it was first dawning upon humanity's consciousness

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 4>in the fifties. The extreme existential angst of nineteen fifty five,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 4>I have to imagine, was similar to what we are

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 4>experiencing now, as the doomsday clock attests. And so I

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>think this movie is wrestling with all of that and

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 4>making it personal to your point, not only in the

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Schwartzman character's family wrestling with the mother and wife's death,

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 4>but Midge's character is performing. She's rehearsing this suicidal scene

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 4>in her next movie, and she is giving it such

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 4>pathos that you really worry for her as a character,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>not as an actress playing that part, but as a character.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 4>This is also a common theme in Anderson's films, considering suicide,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 4>and it's darker for me because it just feels both

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 4>personal and bigger. It really does feel as if the

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 4>world is on the verge of crumbling. There's another line

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 4>that I wrote down, We're doomed or something like that,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and someone says in a response, maybe we are wondering

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 4>it feels like we're doomed? Is something like that, Maybe

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 4>we are? And I think there's stylistic touches that support

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 4>this reading. Think about that highway ramp in the middle

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 4>of town that goes to nowhere. It's just like, very

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 4>funny but also kind of an unsettling joke. The atomic

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 4>testing constantly going on in the background. How about the

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 4>police chase that interrupts every favorite guest. It's so funny

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 4>in the film, right, It's like police car chasing a

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 4>hot rod down main street, screaming. They're shooting at each other.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 4>It's funny, it's another one of the Roadrunner cartoon elements,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 4>but it's also deeply distressing in a way, like your

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 4>life is going to be interrupted by this any moment.

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 4>There's nothing you can do. You're in the gunfire. Why

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 4>do so many characters carry guns with no explanation in

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 4>this movie? Adam Tom Hanks's father in law, he doesn't

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 4>need a gun, Steve Carrell's hotel keeper, he doesn't need

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 4>a gun. And they're just kind of in their holes

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 4>in their belts. This is a movie that's deeply disquieting

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 4>to me, constantly reminding of me of that, and then

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the Alien comes, and for me, it was almost as

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 4>if it opened things up for these characters. You know

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 4>what I thought about. We've talked many times about how

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Tarkowsky's Mirror has affected our viewing of every movie since

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 4>The Alien for me was a little bit like the

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 4>wind in Mirror, where inexplainable, disturbing in a way, unsettling,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 4>yet somehow also maybe a little bit comforting that, Okay,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 4>things feel out of our control, but maybe that's because

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 4>we're not in control and there's something else out there

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 4>we don't understand, and there's something comforting about that. And

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 4>the reason I turned to that is because there are

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 4>very subtle changes for some of these characters after that

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 4>point that I won't get into now because I've talked

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 4>long enough, but did find the movie for me moving

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 4>a little bit away from that despair and unease that

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 4>it otherwise was really steeped in for me, almost more

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 4>than any of his other films.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we saw the film the same way.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 3>We're thinking about it, very much the same way. Some

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 3>of our word choices might be slightly different. You mentioned

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>bleak and that it might be his bleakest or his darkest. Yes,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>those elements are there. That's what's grounding everything and what

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the film is riffing on and responding to.

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 3>But as I said, really following up that mantra of

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 3>just keep telling the story, it feels to me his

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 3>most hopeful in some ways. And just to mention about

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Hank's real quick I like that character touch because it

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 3>seemed to me one where because of the way he

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 3>carried himself, and he has a very kind of stern demeanor,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>and that gun obviously was an indicator as well. It

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>made me think this guy has to be a military guy.

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 3>He's someone who probably comes from that world, the military world.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Now he's trying to domesticate back into regular life, and

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 3>that's one of those barriers that he can't quite break.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 3>That's just now who he is. And I think this

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 3>movie is filled with those kinds of dichotomies, including the

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 3>types of dichotomies that surround what you're expressing or this

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>conflict of the film, the hopefulness versus the bleakness, the

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 3>sort of fatalism of it, it's all there. I think

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that is what he's really exploring, and it does feel

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to me that that time You're right that time in

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 3>the fifties that he's tapping into it must have felt

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 3>like that every day for people, for a lot of Americans,

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 3>but especially people maybe living in some of these these

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>towns around places like the you know, real asteroid cities

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 3>where bombs are being tested. But even then on the

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 3>East Coast, that's another dichotomy at play here, the East

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Coast and the actors and it's all very cerebral and

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to get inside these characters and understand them.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 3>But then we've got the West, and everything about the

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 3>mythicness of that is in opposition to what we think

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 3>of as the East. This movie is those things, and

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 3>then we get the dichotomies in terms of the color

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 3>and black and white, yep, the aspect ratios that switch

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 3>here in this film. And I'll come back to that

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more, but that, for me is really

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 3>why you can't separate or I don't think you get

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>a quote unquote better film if you separated out all

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 3>the asteroid city story stuff, because it's so tied to

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>all the other stories that we get and all the

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 3>other storytellers we see. Without the dichotomies of the movie

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 3>simply isn't as rich. So that actor's studio stuff. For example,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>I really feel like, Josh, if you if you know

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 3>anything about that group at all and what some of

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 3>those actors, and that includes people like Marilyn Monroe even right,

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>it's part of the actor's studio, lots of other famous

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>people whose films that Anderson grew up on and that

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, we're all familiar with. There was a sense

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>by doing this work, the work of being an actor,

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 3>and this is just my sense of it too from

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>what I've gleaned from movies and reading, is that they

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 3>were they were unlocking the mysteries of the universe too.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 3>They were, or at least the mysteries of humanity, trying

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 3>to deeply understand what makes us all tick and then

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 3>translate that to the screen, to put that in a

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>box and make people see themselves reflected in that and

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 3>better understand where they stand in the universe by living

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>through it through these characters. Now we can sit here

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>and say, well, that's maybe way too grandiose a notion,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 3>but that's what those students were in those classrooms hoping

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to learn. They were trying to unlock those things. And

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 3>I imagine that someone from the outside, someone in Middle

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 3>America hearing about the actors and the actor's studio and

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>picking up these little things. They even had a sense

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 3>that I don't understand what's going on in those classrooms. Sure,

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what they think they're doing, but that's

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 3>not that different than the astronomers trying to make sense

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>of the universe. Like there was this time where all

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 3>of these things were converging. You're starting to be able

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 3>to access the universe through technology and actually going out

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 3>into space. That's making you think about your world differently.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 3>And now people are taking things like acting and they're

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 3>exploring the mind in a way that is ostensibly deeper

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.400
<v Speaker 3>than what had ever been done before. Again, it comes

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 3>back to this idea of mysteries too. And so when

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>you look at Asteroid City, when you think about all that,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and then you look at Asteroid City the movie, but

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>also the place, just the place itself within the movie,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 3>it it for me takes on another layer of poignancy.

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to use a word here in a

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 3>moment that you already said, and you don't just appreciate

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 3>the visual aesthetics of it, which I'm with you, I

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 3>could have just watched I could have just watched people

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 3>move about.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 4>Sound for the production design as well. Is it's just incredible.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, But these locations, when you think about Anderson and

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 3>his work, You've already referenced some of these films, those

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>spaces always have so much meaning to Anderson's characters, right Rushmore,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the school, the Tenenbaum House, the boat in the Life Aquatic,

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the Grand Budapest Hotel. But these places exist within the world.

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 3>They can't actually be completely sealed off from the world,

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 3>as much as the characters maybe want them to be.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 3>The outside world always encroaches. And the difference here, I think,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>or one difference I thought of, is that Asteroid City

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 3>is what it is only because of the outside world encroaching.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Like it's not actually really a town undo itself. Almost

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 3>nobody actually lives there. The only people we meet, for

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the most part, we meet all the people who who

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 3>come there for some other reason. And every edifice we

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 3>see in Asteroid City is artifice. The whole thing is

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>and I know this again will sound a little silly,

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 3>but this is where the movie folds in on itself.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>The whole thing is like a movie set. Yeah, not

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 3>one piece of construction or writing on the walls or

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>on a sign or a set of stairs or whatever.

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Not one of those things wasn't something that was created

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 3>by a maker, created by Wes Anderson.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 4>Even the Mesa's in the background, which are delightfully pink

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 4>like those are clearly clearly fake.

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Exactly so when I talk about poignancy, and I talk

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 3>about what I imagine to be personal, even though I'm

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 3>not suggesting I know anything about Wes Anderson's own life

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 3>or things he might be dealing with right now in

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.239
<v Speaker 3>his life, but I got the sense watching it that

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 3>one of the things he wanted to explore on screen

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 3>and deal with is the idea that the more uncertain

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 3>we are, the more life seems to unravel or be

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 3>unraveling around us or control, we naturally try to exert

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 3>over it and reassert ourselves. And so this movie is

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not just about that push pull like it embodies it.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>It embodies it literally in every frame where we have

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 3>a filmmaker. They always say that about Anderson. His detractors

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 3>say it to a fault, that it's all too controlled,

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 3>it's all too intricately manicured. Whatever. This is one of

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 3>those films where it both seems to me he's taken

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>it to yet another level of being that orchestrated and designed,

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 3>because as I said, there literally isn't a thing you

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 3>see that not only do you know Wes Anderson, imagine,

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I almost figure he's the one who wrote those things.

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 3>He probably got out the paintbrush and actually wrote the

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 3>things like oil change and you know, pancakes whatever for

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 3>for a dollar, whatever it is. That's the sense you

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 3>get watching it. It's as if he himself, like the

0:26:55.560 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 3>characters are trying to exert that that control have have

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 3>complete dominance and dominion over this space.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 4>And then the alien comes in and takes all that

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 4>control away, which is and I'm pretty sure I won't

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 4>describe it in detail because I want people to experience

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 4>it and be surprised. I think stop motion animation is involved.

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Let's just say I'd like was one hundred and twenty

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 4>percent in when I saw how they handled the alien.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 4>It's just wonderful. I love what you said about the

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 4>actors studio and the seriousness of the project at work

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 4>there in terms of trying to wrestle with this anxiety

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 4>and angst and unease and using it not just to

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 4>put on a performance, but to understand more about the

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 4>human psyche. I think that's absolutely right. It helps me

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 4>to connect it with the you know, the story proper

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 4>that we see, and it's also gives us a chance

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 4>to talk more about these performances, which everyone here is wonderful.

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I think every small bit part is absolutely precisely doing

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 4>what it needs to be using that particular actor's persona

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 4>and talents. But I really think Schwartzman and Johansson are

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 4>holding this thing together on an emotional level. Hers is

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 4>almost a supporting turn. I don't even know if you

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 4>would consider his a lead turn, but she definitely gets

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 4>less screen time, but I think she's kind of the

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 4>central focus. And the way she that vacant stare she holds,

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 4>which suggests someone very lost. And this is whether she's

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 4>looking at a character or looking directly at the camera,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 4>someone who's incredibly lost in the ways we've described, possibly despair,

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 4>but also it just pierces right through you.

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 2>He took a picture of me, whow, I'm a photographer.

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>You didn't ask permission. I never ask permission?

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 5>Why not?

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Because I work in trench's battlefields and combat zones, really.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean you're a war photographer.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Mostly sometimes I cover sporting events. My name is Augue Steinbeck.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 4>What are you going to do with that?

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 5>That picture? Hm?

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, if it's any good, I guess I'll try to

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>sell it to a magazine now that you mentioned it.

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Midge Campbell eating.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 4>A waffle Schwartzman, you know she's minimalist, and so is

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 4>he as Augie I should say, not is the actor

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Plane Augie, but as Augie almost like speaking without separating

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 4>his teeth in many ways. And there's a great joke

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 4>about that, which I won't spoil. I think it's in

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 4>the trailer too, though, unfortunately. And he I don't think

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 4>he's one of the best lines. It's so good, and

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't think i've seen him. I haven't seen everything

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 4>he's done, but something as clenched as this is, and

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 4>I love that different side of him. And he's also

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 4>good as the insecure actor Plane Augie as well, as

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 4>we've already touched on, gets another one in great lines

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 4>in that part. So they're both they're both just, you know,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 4>top of their games here.

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 3>I think, yeah, I think they are both very good

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 3>and I have always appreciated Schwartzman, especially in in Anderson's films.

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I will only say that you're right. They're giving performances

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>that are in a very similar register and show similar restraint,

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and are similarly kind of vacant at times or a

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 3>little bit detached. And I would I would say that

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Schwartzman's performance is incredible if it wasn't for the fact

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 3>that he was playing off Johansson. And I think that

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Johansson just exhibits something with that character. For all the

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 3>ways they're very similar, there is something, to use your word,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 3>more more piercing, a little bit more haunting for sure,

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a bit more mysterious. There's there is a a well

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 3>of mystery to her character that Schwartzman's character doesn't quite

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 3>put off. And I don't know if that's because of

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the way they're written. I don't know if it's because

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of the direction and what Anderson wanted, or it's something

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that's lacking in Schwartzman's performance, or it's just something that's

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>so there in Johanson's performance, because I think she's incredible.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's fair. I mean, if I had

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 4>to rank them, she's she's giving a richer performance, even

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 4>though it's a character with a little less screen time.

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do want to mention, as we're talking about

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the layers and storytelling and following that idea of telling

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 3>the story, things like all of these devices, sometimes literal

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>or physical devices, like the camera. I mean, Aggie's a

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 3>war photographer, so you see him always bringing the camera

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 3>up to his eye. It's almost like it's his protection.

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 3>You know that he has his art, he has this

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 3>this camera that allows him to get a little bit

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 3>of space and see the world the way that he

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 3>wants to see it. But we also get these frames

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:08.719
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of different ways. It's not just the

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 3>frame of the camera, and that frame is sometimes the

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.239
<v Speaker 3>personium of a stage or a television, or it's the

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 3>movie the widescreen that we're seeing all of those things there.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 3>But Josh even the way he shoots Scarlett Johanson and

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Jason Schwartzman as they spend a good chunk of the

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 3>movie talking to each other from their little bungalows, Yeah,

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 3>a window, and they have some space in between them,

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 3>and when you look directly at them, when the camera

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 3>shows them head on, it's like they're within another frame

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 3>of course they are a window, and that window is

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>almost like the aspect ratio. It's the squarer right, classic

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>style aspect ratio which we sometimes get in other universes

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 3>within this movie. But then when Anderson shoots the desert

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>space between them so that you see them on each

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>side of the frame, it creates a new wide screen

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>frame like their faces and their windows create yet another

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>screen within the screen. I started to almost feel like,

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 3>am I going crazy? I'm seeing I'm seeing rectangles and

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 3>squares everywhere I look. But that's that's to me to

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the film's credit. Yes, that that I started to experience

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:23.479
<v Speaker 3>all that.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's it's emphasizing their separation, them feeling

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 4>boxed in by their own individual identity or individual angst

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 4>and anxieties that are there are shared anxieties in this movie,

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 4>and there are very individual anxieties, and it makes space

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 4>for both. It frames both appropriately, as when we see,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, the chain link fence around the government facility

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 4>that that kind of is oddly designed, so it's just

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>going straight deep into the screen then back all the

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 4>way showing how wide it is. And there's also I

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 4>think and Anderson formal first I would have to go

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 4>again frame by frame through all his films to make

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>sure I think we get at a swishpan within a

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 4>split frame. So it's when two characters are ones on

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 4>each side right of the screen, separated, they're not just

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 4>standing next to each other. And then that police chase

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 4>goes by, and I forget which character, and one of

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 4>them turns to look at the police car, and the

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 4>camera pans quickly with them. I mean, he's gonna drive

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 4>himself insane at some point if he keeps layering things

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 4>like this. I just hope, I just hope I can

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 4>keep up with them.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what put me in the headspace, and

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 3>we'll go out on this. I'm gonna invoke your beloved

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 3>life aquatic. The opening of this film is a shot.

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 3>I may not be getting it exactly right, but as

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 3>I recall it, it's a shot of it's Brian Cranston

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 3>talking as the host of the TV show, and the

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 3>first image we see is him but through the glass

0:34:58.800 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 3>of the TV booth.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 4>Hmm.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 3>So there's there's people working on the TV show who

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 3>are in the very foreground the glass that they're looking through,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 3>and then Cranston on the stage. So again we've got

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 3>we've got all these layers here, we've got the stage

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 3>itself that he's on, we've got the studio glass. But

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 3>it made me think immediately of the submarine shot from

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Steve Zizou that that even that shot, Josh, when you

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 3>think about it, the way he frames that, that moment

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 3>with the jaguar shark, that group of people sitting in

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>those seats in the submarine looking out through that wide screen,

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 3>it's like they're at a movie theater. It's like they're

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 3>it's like they're watching this this all unfold in front

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 3>of them. And it works for me on the level

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 3>that it's almost as if Anderson can only see the

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>world through through frames, through these types of boxes, and

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so so he layers his film with his characters doing

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the same.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.839
<v Speaker 4>One of the best shots in his filmography that one

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 4>from Zazoo, for sure.

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>That's im class.

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Access to the full Film Spotting archive going back to

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and five, it's like over twelve hundred episodes

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 3>with all the bonus shows is one of the benefits

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 3>of joining the Film Spotting family. Plus those bonus shows,

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 3>a weekly newsletter, early access to events, and more. More

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 3>information is available at Film spotting family dot com.

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Fine film spotting is listeners supported. Join the film Spotting

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Family at film spotting family dot com and get access

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 3>to ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and the first time all in one place, the entire

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.959
<v Speaker 3>film spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 3>That's a film spotting Family dot com Panicbly