WEBVTT - 'Downton Abbey' Masterminds See Long Future for Franchise Beyond New Sequel

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>When the new movie Downton Abbey The New Era hits

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>US theaters this week, it will mark the fifth collaboration

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>between my next guests. Julian Fellows is the Emmy winning

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>writer behind Dowton, and Gareth Name is the executive chairman

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the movie's production outfit, Carnival Films. Together they have

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>overseen a property that has crossed over from mere global

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>TV sensation to full fledged franchise. They're here to talk

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about this process. Coming up next on Strictly Business, and

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we're back with Julian Fellows and Gareth Name, the ark

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>gitext behind Dalton Abbey, which is returning to theaters this

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>week for a sequel. Thanks for coming on the podcast, gentlemen,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you ver much. Thanks so, Julian's let's start with you.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been probably about thirteen years since Dalton was first

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>conceived and began, and so I have to ask, did

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you have any inkling back then about how big this

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>would become, that this would eventually even jump over to movies.

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Um No. The short answer to that is no, But um,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a It was a different climate

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at that time when period drama was thought to have

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>died and that the audience wasn't there for it anymore.

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And Gareth didn't believe that, uh, and nor did I,

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and nor did Peter at I t V uh And

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so we were in a sense, how to prove something.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>The idea was originally Garrett's that he gone to see

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Gosford a park of film I wrote, and we were

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>having dinner actually about another project completely, but in the

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>middle of it he said, would you ever go back

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>into that territory for television? And that was really the

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the idea. Although Downtown is much warm up

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>than Gosford, it's a much cuddlier place where you know,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Gosford is all about compromises and reluctant decisions and wrong

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.519
<v Speaker 1>decisions and so on, whereas on the whole in Downtown

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>everyone is doing their best and it is essentially a

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>warm world they live in. But nevertheless, you can see

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>how the one was inspired by the other. And then

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we went forward it actually it was it was quite

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>an event less wasn't it getting it going? Because you

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>went to pet and you and that was it. Really.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we had a meeting and I was commissioned

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>right one script and I wrote it, and they commissioned

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a series and we made this Seips. It was a

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>rather trouble free journey. But of course, to answer your question, no,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>we thought we would make a successful period drama. That

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>was what we set out to do. We had a

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>jolly good cast and um, and we did it. But

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of enormous global phenomenon really started a year

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>later when it came out in America and then it

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>went all over the world and then it turned into

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a sort of magic carpet ride. Gareth, can you take

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>us back to that time where the period drama seemed dead?

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Why did it seem dead and why did you think

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it could come back to life? Well, I don't quite

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>agree with Julian in that respect. I did. I never

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>thought it was dead. Um, it's a perennial favorite. And

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>when I got to know Julian in the early two thousand's,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was not only you know, I'd watch Gosfie

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>part as a viewer and I thought, you know this,

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this was you know, it was the attention to detail,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was the knowledge. I watched that film and

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I sort of relaxed into my theater chair, thinking, this

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is the most realistic depiction that I've ever seen in

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>my life. And I think everything that came before it

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really believe and I now believe this. And

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>then I started reading sort of Julian's novels and I thought,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this is and I mean, you know, the Academy Award

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 1>that that he one for the screenplayer gossip part should

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have been enough. But you know that combined with the

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>with reading Julian's novels, I thought, this is a writer

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that has something to say right around the world, and

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it is highly commercially with my production company hat On.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I just thought, this is this is a you know,

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and as a British producer, I'm I'm always looking for

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>expressly British topics. There are certain you know, there are

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>certain subjects that are done all over the world, but

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the English country house, the class system that you know,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the British Empire and all that kind of thing is

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is a unique sort of British subject for drama. And

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this is, you know, really something that I

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>think could be highly popular both in the UK and

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world. So UM And around the same time

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that I was getting to know Julie and I watched,

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I happened to see a historic episode of Upstairs Downstairs.

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>I didn't sit down and watch it, but I was

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>flicking through the channels one day and I find I

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>found on channel three hundred and sixty eight. I found

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this nineteen seven early nineteen seventies episode of a show

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that had been popular in Britain and America called Upstairs Downstairs.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a similar sort of set up, but I

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>so I knew what the show was as soon as

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>I alighted on the channel. I knew what it was,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>but I've never watched it. And I thought at the time,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I was about forty or something, and I thought, if

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I've never watched it, because I was too young to

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>have seen it, there's two generations, you know, behind me

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that have never have never been exposed to this UM,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, you know what this is. This is

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a perennial favorite, and what Julian was doing in in

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in Gossip Park is something that would work as well

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>or or better actually an episodic television because you play

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the strengths of you know, an audience becoming familiar

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>with the characters and taking them, you know, to their

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>heart and and and becoming more more and more vested

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in in the whole thing. And so yeah, so we

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>so Julie and I met up and I said, I

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think we should do this as an episodic TV series,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how it came about. And as I said,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I never thought the genre was over it. It's the genre,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like many of these genres that that that need constantly reinventing.

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So Julian, I mean it's I was like Gareth had

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a different take on it, and I want to go

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>back to you, what at that time had you souring

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on the period drama? What needed to be reinvented? We

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just I've had a couple of things turned down. I

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>mean in my personal life, a couple of things turned

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>down because period drama. They didn't really want to get

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>into it, you know. I when this happens from time

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to time with all different companies and channels and everything,

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a big thing. But also Peter, I keep

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>forgetting his surname. What is his name? At the I

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>t V. The head of I TV them was called

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Peter Fincham Fincham. Um. He was telling me that when

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>he decided to make Dumbton, a lot of his friends said,

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>oh no, that's that's all finished, all that you you'll

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>lose your shirts on that. Dude, you shouldn't do that

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was obviously going to be very expensive. Um.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So it was just a kind of thing I picked up.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't suppose I thought it was dead forever,

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because nothing is dead forever. The question is whether instead

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>now and and that that was what he had been

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.119
<v Speaker 1>told and what I had been told. But it turned

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out that Gareth was right. It wasn't dead, and there

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>was an audience for it. I suppose looking back, there

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't at that time a period drama that was

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a particularly big hit, and so it's sort of kept

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it out of the footlights a bit. It amused. It

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>amuses me a bit that you talk about it being expensive,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because of course that first season on television in we

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>now look back on it as being extraordinarily cheap compared

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with absolutely and of course doubt and I think without

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>question reinvigorated the genre. Fast forward to today where the

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>gentlemen also have another hit here in US on HBO

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Gilded Age. Netflix has its own version with Bridgerton.

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys take credit it for the reinvigoration of

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this genre and how do you explain it's enduring appeal? Well,

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's possibly easier for me to answer than Julie.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It feels a little less personal. Um. You know, I

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>do think that Downton that there's no question in my

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>mind that it that it that it started a journey

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>not only one that that that rediscovered period drama and

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>put it front and center, but but also of course

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>globalized television production. It was Downton was the most successful

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>non American television show in the US. Um and um.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>It was the first foreign show that really delivered a

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>value globally that was equivalent to a Hollywood TV series.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So it was in that sense, absolutely groundbreaking. And it

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>also caused all of the other you know, I mean,

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>by the time we made Downtown I Company, I sold

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the company to Universal, so we were already part of

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Hollywood that the US media landscape. But it caused

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all the other competitors to send executives to London. Uh.

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. Now now it's all the studios for many

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>years now, I've had London operations and you know, Netflix

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 1>are very big in the rest of the world, headquartered

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>out of London, Apple, m Amazon. You know, it really

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>opened the door to to to the idea that that

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>a foreign show could be as successful globally and could

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>make as much money. And that was a simple fact.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you're I won't repeat all the examples that

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that that you've you've given us, that there are other shows, well,

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>actually I will. I mean, yes, Bridgeton, but I think

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to imagine um Netflix making the Crown without

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the success that Downton Abbey had globally. So I think

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it really did unlock a greatly creately and the creative

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>potential that was there anywhere and down to really began

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that journey. I think we were also though, part of

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the movement that had sort of started in America with

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the reinvention of serial television with Ian west Wing and

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Madman and you know, Good To all of these shows

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>where they had taken the multiarch storylines at the endless

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen stories happening in one episode and all the rest

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, which I'd sort of learned from all and

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>then gone on with But I think we quite deliberately

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>structure that time. It looked incredibly English and it sounded

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly English, but in fact its structure had more in

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>common with those American shows that had reinvented television than

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>indeed with sort of Jewel in the Crown or something

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of twenty or thirty years before. And it was this

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of television for people with attention deficit. It's order,

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, with sixteen things happening simultaneously. Uh. That I

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think invigorated period drama and made it seem modern and

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>very watchable and so on. And we were part of

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that rebirth really of television. Yeah, you're you're absolutely right.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We had this, remember that first dinner when we when

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we cooked up this idea. It was a strange mix.

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>We talked about of all of the English sort of

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the classic um English drama of merchant Ivory if you're

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>familiar with those songs from from the eighties, the sort

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the country house and the aristocracy and

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the class and the uh, you know, the sort of

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>comedy of manners, but with the pace of storytelling of

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>West Wing and the west Wing analogy. We used a

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lot because the West Wing is about an entire uh

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know workplace that is where you've got dozens of

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>people who were all doing their thing serving one man

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>who is the president. And we saw the connection with

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this new idea that we had that this was going

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to be about dozens of people who were all it

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>serve um Law, Grantham and his family, so and mostly

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in one environment. You know, it is sort of in

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one place. So yes, it was that sort of West

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Wing pace of storytelling and focus combined with the lavish

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>um you know, English charm of merchant ivory. Well, after

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>producing six seasons of television, you made the jump with

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a to the movies with a first hit two and

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight million dollars in global box office, which I

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would assume you guys realized was certainly not guaranteed. There's

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>been plenty of TV shows, successful shows that have failed

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the jump to theaters. What was it about

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Doubton that you think enabled it to succeed to the

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>point where here you are with a second one who's

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>going to answer that? I think I have an idea

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which is that, although I mean, you're quite right, this

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this was the gamble, This was the question mark was

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>would we succeed in making the transition, because plenty of

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>people haven't in the past. But I think the conception

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of that it was quite cinematic when it was on television,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was quite deliberately for that. If you remembered,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the very first shot of the very first episode was

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>an enormous traveling shot at where you went through all

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the drawing rooms and libraries, and you walked into the

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hall and you went around. It was all a continuous

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>shot that was a very filmic opening, and it was

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>rather like the famous one of us at Wells or whatever.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think always because the house was a principal character,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a sort of scale of the visuals hide

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of the show that was essentially cinematic, and all the

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>cinema would do was give us more opportunity to exploit

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the house and be able to show more of it

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and more of the scale, and that, you know, these

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>aerial shots and all the rest of it. So I

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think we act to change. I mean, normally, when

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a television show becomes a film, it's quite difficult because

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it looks different, it is differently conceived, and you don't

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>feel you're coming home whereas we didn't have that, we

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>were able legitimately to expure not to bring the house

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>onto the big screen and get even more out of it. Frankly,

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think that made it, made it easier. But

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's there's a lot of luck

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in these things. I don't think we should ever forget that.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree about the cinema, that the sort of the

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of cinema about that that there was inherent in

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the show, which is unlike a lot of television, particularly

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>television at the time. Perhaps not so much now, but

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time that there was television and film, and

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we we already filled that small screen. So

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the sense of you know, that goes back again to

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the merchant Ivory sort of them, uh

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, starting point. It had that rich full screen

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>idea too. But I think the other thing is that

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we ended the television show. You know, we quit earlier.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we this wasn't a television series

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that went on for eight seasons or nine or ten

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and the like shows. You I mean, no, no, nothing

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>does now. But but you know, ten twenty years ago,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it was about really squeezing as much as you possibly

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>could about episodic television, and we didn't do that. We

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>got out. I I think we feel we got out

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a year or two earlier than we might have done,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that really did leave the fans thinking

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't quite over. Um, so there was certainly an

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>appetite for these characters. Again, you're listening to the strictly

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bi in this podcast. Will be back in a second

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>with more with Julian Fellows and Gareth Name. We're back

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>talking with Julian Fellows and Gareth Named, the architects behind

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Downton Abbey, which is back in theaters this week with

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the sequel titled The New Era. We were just talking

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>about translating the movie, sorry, translating the intellectual property to

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the movies. The New Era movie is I think releasing

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>him to a very different climate than the last one. Uh.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>It's become a very challenged place in theaters for pretty

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>much anything that's not a Marvel superhero movie or or

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a horror film. Um. Gareth, do you have any apprehension

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about how Doubton will resonate this time around? Yes, he's

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, he's a challenging times and we were very

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>lucky with the first movie, I feel that we we

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hit the sweet spot, having been released in September twenty

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>nine and it's finished its theatrical run globally by the

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>end of twenty nine, so the timing was very fortunate. UM.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And really, you know, this second installment of downs and

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>has filled the space ever since we started. Julie and

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I worked on the script in the first lockdown of

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>spring of twenty twenty and we got the film together

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that autumn, and then making the film in one was

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>very challenging, UM, because of all of the lockdowns and

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the COVID protocols and all of that. So all the

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>way through making this and this was a film like

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>many other films and TV shows have been made in

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this new culture. UM. So yes, we we go out

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 1>into the world in in very different times and where

0:18:55.119 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the sequencing of UM distribution is different, where where you know, films, uh,

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know come to other platforms much more quickly than

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they did even three years ago, so that there's no

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>doubt about the whole landscape is very very different to

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>what it was just three years ago. And Julian, you know,

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>it's entirely possible given how unpredictable this COVID marketplace, is

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that your film could have potentially not have released in theaters.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>It could have gone straight to streaming or something like that.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Would that have been a problem for you. You've talked

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about how Doubton is such a distinctly cinematic experience. Are

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you glad that it's going to actually be in cinemas? Oh,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm glad, yes, because, as you say quite rightly,

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>there was a real possibility at one point that it

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be an Indeed, I made another film during lockdown

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>which was hardly in cinemas and went straight onto a

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>platform because you couldn't get anyone to leave the house. So, uh,

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>there's always that side. But I mean, actually, the truth

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>is we have lived through a sort of ten or

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty period when the nature of release, of showing the

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>demonstration platforms where where ordinary terrestrial channels now seem like

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>some sort of Victorian table draping. You know, everything has changed,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think you just have to try and keep

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 1>your feet and rock and roll with what's happening. What

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think is that you know, there's a big

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>audience for this film for when it's sounds other vay

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to say that, but but for when it does hit

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a platform, because I was attacked in my hotel this

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>morning by a woman at breakfast who said, my husband

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is six and will not go into a cinema. He

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wants to know when it's going to be on a platform.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course I know nothing, you know, but I

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>think there are quite a lot of that generation who

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>will wait to see it until they feel they can

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>do so safely. So we just have to see what

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>effect that adds on us. And you know, I'm happy

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm happy that it's in cinemas in Britain already,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and and the feedback we're getting is obviously very nice.

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, that's madely from one's friends,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's what they would say, wouldn't they. But

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>nevertheless it seems quite positive. Well, and I would say,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>all you respected for that lady and the elderly husband.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we do want we do want fans

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 1>to come back to theaters. You know, um, you know,

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>America is the home of cinema and that's the you know,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the largest market, but it's the rest of

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the markets in the world all put together, and we

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>want people to come to theaters to see this because

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it is beloved titles that that like Downtown will bring

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>people back to theaters. And you know, as much as

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I have you know, huge or and utter respect for

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Marvel and all that it does, we do not want

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>movie theaters to become just about Marvel. And we want

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the fans of Downton to come and see it and

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for this to be the title that they come back

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to theaters and and enjoy, you know, in that that

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>shared experience. This is a very moving film and a

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>very funny film. I mean it's the first film was

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>very funny. And you know, in these actors, we have

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>extremely good comedic actors as well as dramatic actors. And

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Julian's writing. The great genius of it is the mix

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of drama, romance, all these things, but you know, a

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>healthy dose of comedy in the writing as well. And

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a very funny film. And I think it's

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a you know, Julian and I have seen it a

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>few times now with audiences in theaters, and it is

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a great audience experience. So with great respect to the

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>late eighties gentlemen, who's going to watch it at home?

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>And I hope you as wife, absolutely love it, and

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>many others will see it that way as well. For

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>those off later, you'll off saying that for those of

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>us who for those of us who love the movie

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going experience, you know, I really hope we'll pull the

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>stops out and come out and return to theaters like

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we used to. Gareth, you just use the M word Marvel,

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm going to use the F word franchise.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Downton as a franchise in the way

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Marvel or James Bond is considered a franchise? Because I

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 1>would think after six seasons of TV, two movies, who

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>knows how many more, is it okay to use the

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>F word? Well, I suppose it might be a kind

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>of franchise, but the comparisons that you offer up are

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so radically different that you know, I mean, not a

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>superhero in sight and all of that. Um, you know,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a different kind of franchise. If it is, it's

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly Um Julian created and the characters were realized by

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>these these fantastic act as something that um that audiences

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to let go of. And there's something about

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that world and the the you know, it's possibly one

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>of the most successful depictions of a family over a

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>long period of time ever um ever enjoyed on screen, actually,

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and people connect with that and they don't want to

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>let it go. So I think we we both feel that,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we hope there's more, and there's more to do,

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and but possibly quite a unique franchise compared to any

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>other that you could that you could reference. Yes, I

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>mean I think so. Do you think it's finished? I mean,

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, lives aren't finished until people die, and characters

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't finished until they die. There's there's there's nothing more

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to say about that. We can go on with these

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>people as long as the audience wants to go on

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing them and as long as they enjoy them, and

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we can, you know, do that in all sorts of

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>different ways. I don't know if that makes it a

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>franchise or a phenomenon, but either way, I don't see

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>any reason to call a halt. But if there's still

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>an appetite on the market, really well, to that end, Julian,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are you already thinking about, huh, what could a third movie,

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a fourth movie, spin off TV show? I mean, are

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you thinking like that? Well, I think it's impossible not

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to think like that a bit because you know that

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>these possibilities exist, and one doesn't want to just sit

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there slack Jordan glassy eyed if the topic comes up. Um,

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think we are or I am exploring what

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>might work. But you know we've seen them developed. I mean,

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the storylines of this film is that the

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>final kind of revealing of Mary as being in charge

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and as running the place, and also in her own storyline,

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>showing that she is capable of the different behaviors and

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>adjustments are required in the earlier to mid twentieth century,

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so that she's perfectly able to have a normal conversation

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>with the producer director h And you know there's that

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>moment when she's on the set and he he says, oh,

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>lady Mary, so it says just Mary at leads and

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you realize that she's making herself modern in a way

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be beyond her father. So we're already, if

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you like, taking it on into the next stage where

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>she's concerned in this film. So I don't see any

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why we can't go on, because you know, these

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>families did exist, do exist. One of them lives in

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the House where we film and High Clear and

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they're still there. And obviously getting through those years some

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of the very difficult ones meant lots of imagination and

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>getting down to it and taking different tax and I

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think there's a story of the House is survival to

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>be told. So you know, there's there's no reason that

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't go on with it. I mean, there is

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the moment if a series is about the war, there's

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a moment when the war comes to an end. But

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this war never comes to an end. So I don't

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>see why we couldn't go on. I would agree I

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>could see this, if I may call it a franchise

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>go on for decades. And Gareth, you know you're over

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Carnival Films as part of the NBC Universal family, where

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>they know franchise maintenance, big cultural difference. But I'm going

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to mention a movie Fast and Furious, And I just

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether you know, the top dogs at Comcast haven't

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>spoken to you about how do we keep this going

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty years or are you starting to speak the

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>language of franchise. But in the specialty film marketplace, you know,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the downtown is definitely in that, you know, it's it's

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the Holy Grail. It's part of that, you know.

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's in the special, it's in the VI I P Lounge, UM,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's the kind of content really that all

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>these studios look to achieve, um and you know, and

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. We didn't do that by setting out make

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge TV and movie franchise that we you know,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and nobody ever should approach it that way. Julian and

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I sat down, uh, fifteen years ago over dinner and

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>had an idea for something that we thought might you know,

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it might work, but it was something we wanted to

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>make and we thought it might be popular. And this

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is a great attraction of you knows, as you know

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>as a producer, is that you might create you know,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one sort twice, if you're lucky in a career, you

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>might create some content that is there for the for

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the for the long haul. And I agree, I echo

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what Julian says that we've got to be you know,

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>wise to the future and think of those possibilities and

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>any number of things could happen in the future. And

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that's all very exciting and we'll see. But you're you're right,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>your question is a good one, you know, we're we're

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>we're in a We're part of a company whose job

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it is to make the most of this succeptional content.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>When these companies create that content, they should make the

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>most of it because there is an a they can

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>make money from it, but audiences love it. And when

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>audiences love something, well, that's what we came into this

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>job for. Well, and I think you could end on

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>an any better note than that. I'm looking forward to

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the future of this French guys, Julian Fellows and Gareth

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Named thank you for joining me today on Strictly Business. Well,

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you scares good to see. This has been another

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>episode of Strictly Business. Tune in next week for another

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>helping of scintillating conversation with media movers and shakers, and

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>please make sure you subscribe to the podcast to hear

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>future episodes. Also leave a review in Apple Podcasts and

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>let us know how we're doing.