WEBVTT - Why is There a Battle Over Net Neutrality?

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, stuff you should know is going on tour.

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Do do do do do? What are the deeds? My friend? Okay,

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So starting August eighth in Toronto, that's in Canada. We're

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at dan Fourth Music Hall. And then Chicago.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be there the next night, August nine, at

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Harris Theater at Chicago. We want to see your faces.

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Step it up, Step it Up. Vancouver or the Vote

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Theater September. That's gonna be a great show, I think,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>don't you. It's gonna be a great one. And then

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Minneapolis at the Pantageous Theater where we've been before. It's

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>lovely September. Yeah, and then we're gonna swing down to Austin.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be during Austin City Limits, although it has

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Austin City limits. Will be there

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>October ten, yes, and then we're going to Lovely Lawrence,

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas go Jayhawks. Yeah, on October eleven. Then Hey, if

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in Kansas City or anywhere in that area, this

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is your chance. Get in your car. Yeah. Uh. If

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you are anywhere near Brooklyn, well then you should go

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Bellhouse October. Will be there all three nights.

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And finally we're gonna wrap it up here in Atlanta

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at the Bucket Theater on November four for a benefit

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>show where we are donating all of the money's to

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Lifeline Animal Project of Atlanta and the National Down Syndrome Society. Yep.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So for all this information again visually and for links

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>two tickets, just go to s y s K live

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Welcome to Stuff you Should Know from House

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark, There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, Jerry's over there.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is stuff you should know the podcast. Correct.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We are not going dark, No, although that's a thing.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It is a thing for the Battle for the Net

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Action Day, Battle of the Network Stars. Nope, just net okay,

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Battle for the Net Yeah, which I would guess most

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>people have heard of, maybe not by that name necessarily,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>but um say, if you're a John Oliver fan or

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have been paying attention at all to the FCC rules

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about net neutrality, um, Battle for the Net is is

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the forefront of all that. Yeah. And

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>since our show comes out on a Tuesday, which is

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>July eleven, and that is the day that, uh, some

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>websites have elected to go dark. I think they're going

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>dark the next day. Yeah, okay, al right, well then

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel so bad, right, but we we figured

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we're actually someone wrote in suggesting this, Um, then maybe

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>instead of going dark, because you guys probably can't do that,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should just do an episode on net neutrality

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to teach all the people's about the things, which I

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thought was a pretty pretty good I suggestion. I agree,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>good suggestion. Yeah, I feel bad that we UM. I

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>can't remember who it was that road in, but thank

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you for that. Whoever it was, you know who you are,

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because you're the only one who did. Yeah, and they

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't do it for the glory. No, So what are

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we talking about, Chuck, When we're talking about net neutrality

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or network neutrality or open internet? So what that is? Um?

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Mainly what people mean when they say net neutrality is

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the Internet is an open road and

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have fast lanes or slow lanes. Uh. It

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is providing equal access to anyone who wants to build

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a website, let's say, can can throw it up there

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and have equal access to the big rollers on the

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>internet with huge sites. You're all the same as far

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>as how people can access you and whether or not

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they can access you. Yeah, and how fast they can

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>access you. Exactly right. There was this um there's a

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>great explainer in Vox about net neutrality that that we

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>used as a resource. But they gave this good example

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of net neutrality. Right, So they pointed out that when

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>um Facebook was created, Zuckerberg didn't have to go to

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Comcast or Verizon or any of the I s p s,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the Internet service providers, the companies that provide the last mile,

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the connection between your house and the public Internet. Okay,

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what an I s P is very important to

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that part. Right. He didn't have to go to

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>them and say, hey, will you carry my website on

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>your network? He just built the website, plugged it into

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, uploaded it to the Internet, and it was

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>available to any device or computer that was connected to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.559
<v Speaker 1>the Internet anywhere in the world. Right. And the fact

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't have to go to them and ask

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that to be added to their network, The fact that

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have to go to them to say, hey,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I need people to be able to download this stuff fast.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So here's a bunch of extra money. UM. The fact

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't do that. That's how it has been

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>up to this point. That is network neutrality. That's the

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>that's the basis of net neutrality, especially from the standpoint

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of UM developers and companies that create sites and applications

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on the web. Yeah, it's uh wow, that's a very

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>large spider crawling next to me. Sorry, I saw something

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>out of corn ofm eye and I'm on yeah, nope,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just a big spider. Uh, good for you. So it's

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>an It levels the playing field, and all Internet traffic

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is treated equally. Right, So not only does it level

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the playing field for people who are creating you know,

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or Netflix or what have you, it also levels

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the playing field or levels the experience for users. Right,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're a user and you are on UM the

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet through your I s P, like, you should be

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>getting whatever site you want to go to at the

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>same speed as any other site, and your Internet service

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>provider shouldn't be able to decide we don't really like

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you getting that site, we don't really like you having

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that app. We're gonna make it so that this this

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>traffic moves so slowly, you're gonna give up trying to

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>download it, or we're just gonna block it entirely. Yeah,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and why maybe because that's a competitor to us in

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>some way and we would like to serve you up

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>our product faster, right, So preventing sps from being able

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that. That's open, open internet or network neutrality. Okay,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the basis of it. That is currently how it

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>stands right now. UM, and the idea of network neutrality,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's UM, I guess about fifteen years old back

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in a two to a guy named Tim Woo who

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is a Columbia University law professor or not, I believe,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>coined the term network neutrality to basically describe a level

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 1>playing field for everybody involved, right especially at the at

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the Internet service provider level. And since then it's become

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this topic of debate like should it should this be

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 1>um something that that that we all want to adopt

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as like the basically the rules for the Internet. Should

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>network neutrality be the basis of how the Internet is

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>built and approached? Which is a big deal because we are,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>even though it seems like we're far along, we are

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>still in the infancy stage of the Internet and the

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>impacts UH would be long lasting and huge moving forward.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>For from what I understand, most people agree that net

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>neutrality is at its basis, the an agreeable way to

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>frame the the Internet. That's the way it should be.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was even back in two fourteen. As we'll see,

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>we just went through this um and we're going through

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it again now. But back in two fourteen, there were

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a pair of polls that I ran across from two

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>different groups. One of them is University of Delaware. I

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>can't remember who the other one was, but it found

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that um, even among conservatives, that net neutrality is highly valued.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Something like eight of people who identify as conservative say

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that I s p s should be prevented from slowing

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or blocking traffic, right, and that Congress should actually do

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>something about it. Right. So people people buy in large

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>degree that net neutrality is the way the Internet should go.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>The division that has really kind of come out, especially recently,

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is how that good can be achieved. Do you achieve

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it by giving power to the FCC to go police

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the I s p s and find them and basically

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>make life hard for them if they don't follow the rules,

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or do you remove any teeth that the FCC might

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have in policing the I s p s and just

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>leave it up to competition. And depending on where you

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fall ideologically as far as um government regulation goes, is

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>probably where you're going to fall along the spectrum of

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality. Yeah, and it's uh, it's not a black

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and white thing like you would think. Um, Like, uh,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the end user just saying, yeah, you know, there's got

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to be net neutrality no matter what. There's a lot

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of users are like, I don't know, man, I like

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>care about is streaming my stuff as efficiently as fast

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>as possible, And if if getting rid of net neutrality

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>would increase that competition and I could get my Netflix

0:09:54.080 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>movies awesomer and faster than I'm all for it, right. Um.

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, you've got big corporate corporations that

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.599
<v Speaker 1>maybe don't feel like you think they might. Yeah, you

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>would think, you know that stuff like this usually when

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the government's involved, it's like a big guy, big corporation

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>versus little guy kind of thing. But no, there's a

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a dispute between corporations too, like you said, where

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the I s p s like Verizon and Comcast, UM

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>and A T and T are lined up against the

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>tech companies like the tech media companies like YouTube and

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and formerly Tumbler, some of the other guys, Facebook, Google, um.

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Where they're they're on opposite sides of this this issue,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>which is strange because they need each other. They have

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>very incestuous relationships that are very complicated and complex. Um.

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But as far as net neutrality goes, they are pretty

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>much divided between I s p s and tech media companies.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>One side is the against the net neutrality rules. One

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>side is strongly in favor of them. Boy, and you

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about complicated like in the future companies corporations merging

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and then I sps being a part of the same

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>company or getting into the media content game, like things

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>are getting interesting, you know, yeah, interesting but also kind

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of scary because right now, um back in well, back

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and fifteen, the FCC UM struck a

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>huge blow to the I s p s with a

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>set of new rules four page compendium, I guess you

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>would call it of rules that basically said, you guys

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>can't mess around anymore. The I s p s are

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to block or throttle or provide fast lanes. Um.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff getting real and the net really is going to

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>be neutral from now on. UM. That was under Obama

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and Trump has appointed a UM a different FCC chairman

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>who was a member of the SEC before UH, and

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he is not in favor of that at all. So, UM,

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>do you wanna do you want to talk about the

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what the two fifteen rules are and kind of how

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it is for the moment. Well, here's what I think

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>we should do. I think we should take a break. Okay,

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, we should uh go back in time when

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we come back and talk a little bit about the

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>phone companies, which will kind of set the stage for

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>what's going on today. Okay, alright, alright, we'll be right back.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why we should know, should know. But Josh Clark,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, I promised talk about phone companies because that's

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>exciting stuff. Yeah, it is. It's amazing how much telephone

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>companies have shaped UH law and policy in this country

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Yeah. Yeah, I guess it is like

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with the telephone monopolies back in the day. I mean

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that was it's all very interesting. Yeah, you used to

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have to lease your telephone from the phone company like

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>people in buy telephones you released it. Yeah, were there

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>just one telephone company wasn't it just bell Yeah, basically yeah,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they broke it up into the smaller bells,

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the baby bells. I think that's what they call them.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This is all like from my childhood, so I didn't

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>really look up much of that. Um, but we're talking

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>about the FCC. Uh here is the governing body. And

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>back in the seventies and eighties, they were sort of

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>early in on this game with the phone companies in

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the early days of computer uh networking, and they came

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>out really early on. They had a lot of foresight

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>back then and said, you know what, we need to

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>guarantee consumers with the right to use modems on their

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>phone lines. Yeah, because this is like everyone's seeing war

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>games and we all know that that's that's how the

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>future is going, Right, you gotta put your phone on

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a big box. Ye, your phone receiver on a big box.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted one of those so bad. Yeah, Like they

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>were so expensive. You literally connected your phone, right. I

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>had no idea what to do with it. I just

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thought like, well, that's that's computer plus yeah exactly. But

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the but treating the saying okay, everybody has the right

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a modem in their house and to use

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a phone line to use it. That's that's that was

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a radical idea. And the reason why

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>is because when you're talking about um telephone carriers right,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like back in the day, um A T and T right,

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mob Belt, what what you were saying is you're a

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>private corporation. You have gone and laid telephone wires all

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>throughout the United States. You guys built the US telephone infrastructure.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And yes, we the government, the taxpayers, gave you substantial

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>tax breaks and in lots of benefits to doing this.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And you guys are the ones making the money operating

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>these phone lines. But we have decided that the phone

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>lines are so important to the public good that you

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>guys aren't allowed to just be a normal corporation. That

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the government stays las fair hands off with right, you

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>guys are deemed order considered common carriers. But yeah, well

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like the people who carry people along roads, like

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>goods and people. Right, You're like an airline, You're like

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a you're like a cargo transport ship. You're like a

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>greyhound bus, but but with telephone lines. Right, So the

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>government said everyone should be able to have access to

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>telephone lines. You can charge people for that access, but

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't mess with their access. We're not letting you.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And in the seventies one of the things, or the eighties,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things the government said was, Hey,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know how we're kind of the bosses of you guys,

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>even though your private corporations, Well, we're gonna boss you

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>around right now and say, any business that wants to

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>come along and use your phone lines to provide dial

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>up modem service to their customers, you have to let

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>them do it. And that was it was for the

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>public good. And by doing that, the dial up Internet

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>UM industry was able to blossom unfettered with government protection. Right,

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the government got in between that blossoming industry that was

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in competition with the telephone companies, and the telephone companies

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that could have strangled it in the cradle. And that

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>was that was the first big thing that the SEC

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>did as far as the Internet goes. Yeah, and very

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>important UH distinction was drawn with basically Congress drawing up

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to category stories. And this you'll see plays out kind

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of over and over and will continue to in the future.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>UM two different things, telecommunication services and information services. So

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>telecom services, UH we're talking about the phone lines. That

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about here, And um, as far

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>as the law is concerned, there are a lot of

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>like you were talking about, legal obligations on these services,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and the FCC has a lot of um oversight and

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>regulation over them. Yeah. Uh. Information services on the other hand, Um,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>they said, like like Facebook, that's an information service. YouTube

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is an information service. They were less or well basically

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>exempt for most of the FCC regulations. So dividing those

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>things in two was a very, very big deal. And

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>during the Clinton years what most people would consider what

0:17:55.240 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a JITPI, which we he is Trump's um pick to

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>chair the FCC. He called the Clinton era and basically

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>up through two thousand fifteen a light touch regulation, which

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is what he is in favor of and what we'll

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get to him a little bit more in a minute. Um,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's that Clinton era fec uh regulations that basically

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>did what you're talking about and said, you know what

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>we want DSL that's the newest thing forget dial up.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>We want to send faster speeds over the Internet, and

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>you all have to play along. So they did it

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>again to the phone companies. They went to and said,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>remember dial up modems. No one wants that any longer.

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants DSL. So now you guys have to let

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>any DSL provider use your phone lines, and that let

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the DSL, the beginning of the high speed Internet industry flourish. Right.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>So there's this pattern of the SEC coming in and

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>being like, you guys are huge, You guys who provide

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that last mile. You common carriers, who are the gatekeepers

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>between the public at large and the public Internet. You

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>guys stand in between them, and we're saying you can

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>do this, you can't do that. You can do this,

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. And for a while, the I

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>s p s were classified as telecommunication services, which meant

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that they fell under way more oversight and scrutiny, like

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, than say, like YouTube. And the reason the

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>government did this was to let the Internet start to boom, right, Yes,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure why, I guess because it was

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Bush era, and the Bush FCC chair said we shouldn't

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>be classifying I s p s as telecommunications companies anymore,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>but we have to. It's the law. He went to

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>court and the court said no, Actually, you guys are

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the f CC. If you want to start classifying Internet

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>service providers as information services, which are not as heavily regulated.

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>You guys go ahead and do that. So the Bush

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>era FEC said, okay, well, we here by decree that

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Internet service providers are not the akin to the Bell

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.120
<v Speaker 1>telephone switchboard operators of your They're much more akin to YouTube.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>They're part of the Internet, which, if you really stop

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and think about it, doesn't make much sense. But that

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that was that that was a huge sea change in

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>what the government could say or do to I s

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>p s. That gave them way more freedom to do

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more stuff after they were classified as information services. Yeah.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And then, uh, in two thousand and ten, the chair

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC at the time, Julius Ganikowski, said, you

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>know what, we've got some new regulations on the books.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna prohibit I s p s from blocking content online.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna prohibit what we call unreasonable discrimination, and they're

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all gonna have to be a little more transparent about

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. And this is in the era of

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>broadband now, right. Uh. And then Verizon stepped up and said,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we don't like the sounds of this.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>This is you guys are stepping way over your your

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>congressional power here. Yeah, they said, well, don't forget you

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>guys classified us as information services. You can't tell us

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to to do or not do this stuff. We're not

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>telecoms anymore, suckers. Yeah, pretty much. Uh, And the d

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>C Circuit Cord of Appeals agreed with Verizon and this

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is just inten so just a few years ago then

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>said those rules have got to go. As long as

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you're classified that way, Uh, then you're gonna have to

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>play by these rules. Right. But that changed again in

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen when Tom Wheeler came along as

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the chair of the FCC and he kind of flip flopped.

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>He came out initially and proposed some rules that people said, no,

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that's like, that's way too weak, bra Right, Well he was.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>They got leaked and there was a huge backlash in

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>public outcry against it. And but I don't think anyone

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was surprised because Tom Wheeler was a longstanding UM lobbyist

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>for the cable and wireless industries, right, so he was

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>an industry insider who was supposed to be regulating that

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that industry that he was already friends within, where his

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>background was, so nobody was really surprised when the FCC

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>came out with these really weakened rules on I s

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>p s. But there was a huge backlash. Yeah, that

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was the first battle for the net. And then Wheeler

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>went whooa, whoa, whoa, I was just kidding, Um, here's

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>here's my real document. He didn't really say that, but

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>he came up with a new document with with bigger,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>sharper teeth, and that was what you referenced earlier four

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>page document called the two thousand fifteen Open Internet Order,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which was a really big deal. And that was a

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise because Wheeler, again who was a lobbyist for the

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>these very industries, um not only reversed course from these

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>toothless weak law rules to much stronger rules that were

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in step with the what the net neutrality advocates were

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>asking for. He actually went even further and made even stronger,

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tighter net neutrality rules and then took the time to

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>write something like three hundred pages of rules explaining the

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>logic and the thought behind all this, which could pose

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem as we'll talk about later for a jeep

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Pie and the Trump FCC to get past. But the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the it was a huge, huge surprise that came out

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere in an enormous victory for net neutrality advocates

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and for Obama and his administration. It became one of

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the signature um acts I guess or watershed moments for

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration because he campaigned as a net neutrality supporter.

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, you know, one year, the last year

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 1>of his presidency, his FCC just dropped the mic on

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality and said it is it is done. Yeah,

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and within that Open Internet Order one of the first

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it did a couple of big things, but

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the big big thing it did was it said, hey,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>remember way back in nine the Communications Act, we think

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we can actually reclassify broadband as what we're gonna call

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a title to telecommunication service. So remember earlier when we

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>said they split it up in the two buckets. Uh,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this all changed a couple of years ago when they

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>can now classify you know, Verizon, our Comcast as a

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>telecom service, which again means it's a common carrier and

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>much more heavily regulated. Yeah. So the SEC was like, oh,

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we can't tell you what to do if you're classified

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>as an information service, Well you're no longer classified. Is

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're classify as a telecommunications service now and we

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are up your rectum. It's so interesting that this like

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the birth of this industry that like is

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>being figured out in full view. Well maybe not always

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>full view, right you know what I'm saying though, Yeah,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's still it's still being molded right now. You know.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting. So that was that was the first

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that the two thousand and fifteen Open Internet Order did, right,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It reclassified the I s p s back to telecommunication status.

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It really it took them out of the same league

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>as YouTube and Netflix and um all of these these

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>um content providers on the web and said, you guys

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>actually handle the nuts and bolts of it. You you

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>don't handle the actual content, So you're telecom now. Then

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>it did a second part two, which was basically saying

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we're the net is now neutral. We're instilling net neutrality

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>values onto the Internet as the FCC. Yeah, and we'll

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do so in three main ways. No blocking. You can't

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>block lawful content, can't block services, You can't block applications.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>As long as it's lawful and legal content, you can't

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>block it. You can't throttle it. To me, throttling is

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>a weird word. It seems counterintuitive because through throttling, I

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>would think means you speed something up, but in this case,

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>it means you can't slow something down. Yeah, basically I

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>would say breaking, not throttling. Playing on, Yeah, but throttling

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>basically means, as a I s P. You can't come

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in like we're talking about earlier and saying, uh, you

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>know what your competition Netflix to our Comcast services, So

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to make sure no one can stream anything

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>very well, right, so we're gonna slow you down. And

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then the final one was no paid prioritization, so yeah,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they can't. You can't pay someone to juice up your site,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>right so that you can get an edge over the competition,

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Which I mean like if Netflix is doing that to

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime, nobody's really shedding a tear. Like Amazon Primer

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>big kids, and they can handle themselves. But if you are,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, developing the next streaming video app and you

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have the money to to compete against Netflix, you're

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a huge disadvantage and and it has been

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>pointed out as a potentially stifling to to new technology.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So um one of the things that the FCCS two

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen rules said, we're that I sps have to

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>behave in a quote just and reasonable manner. I think

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>you said that, right, No, I didn't. Okay, Well they do.

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That's part of it. And they also said, hey, everybody

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from YouTube to YouTube, uh, you guys, if you see

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>an I s P behaving in an unjust and unreasonable manner,

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>let us know, even if it's if it's not illegal,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>if you think it's unjust and unreasonable, let us know,

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and we will look into to it. And the I

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>s p s went, Oh, the f c C So

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that was a really big thing. We'll we'll talk about

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a little a little bit more about why it is

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>such a big thing in a in a minute. UM.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But then one of the other things that it did

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>too was it said this also applies to wireless providers

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 1>before in two ten, when the FEC introduced some the

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>some net neutrality rules that were challenged by Verizon and

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>court and were overturned by the court in two thousand fourteen. UM,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that they did was it exempted

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>wireless carriers wireless I s p s from these laws.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Again because they wanted to promote UM. They wanted to

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>promote growth in that industry. They're like, no one's ever

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>going to use their phone to stream content. I think

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>they were hoping that people would and that regulation might

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>hamper that. Right, So that kind of brings us up

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to speed on where we are today. Uh enter uh

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>adject pie who was UM. He was a former lawyer

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for Verizon and is the head of the SEC under Trump,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and he, like I said before, he favors what he

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>calls a light touch regulation, which is basically pre title

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to reclassification. Right that basically, if you are if you

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.479
<v Speaker 1>are an I s P, you are going to be

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>subject to the laws of competition of capitalism and those

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>will keep you in line. And the SEC doesn't need

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to be involved. And the more of that secs involved,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the more stifling these regulations will be. And um, basically

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole Internet will break if the SEC is involved. Yeah,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and his theory. Watched a couple of interviews with him

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and his theory. Very smart guy. His theory is that

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if we deregulate and kind of make it wide open,

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then people in uh I guess more rural areas of

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the kind tree will benefit because if we have all

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 1>these regulations, it might stifle their internet, and we want

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone to have like good fast internet, and he believes

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that the way forward is through uh not regulating this stuff,

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and he thinks that would lead to rural areas getting

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like faster speeds. I don't see how that's I don't,

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't see how it's possible. Like, I

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that just just by definition, fewer customers out there

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>means it's more expensive to lay that cable out to

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>those people. Well, I think his his argument is that uh,

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>investments in this infrastructure would would dry up because of

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>these rules, which in turn would like the first people

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to lose out on that would probably be people in

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>rural areas. Like we're not gonna bother putting infrastructure in

0:30:56.160 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>these rural areas because it's not worth our time and effort. Uh,

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that's what he's saying. So there's a there's

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>actually another thing that addresses that that's from the old

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>telephone days. I can't remember what it's called. It's like

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a universal fund, but it's basically where everybody who has

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a telephone line or gets service from an I s

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>p um paid like paid a little tax. Like if

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>you looked at your phone bill back in the day,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 1>there would be a line item that said, like the

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>universal something fun and it was three cents or seven

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>cents or something like that, something you just couldn't care

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>less about. But put together in a pot for with

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the seven cents from all the other phone users households

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that had phones, you had a pretty decent amount of money.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And that money was was taken to goo to to

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>create infrastructure out to rural areas so that people out

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in the sticks had telephones. There's a there's a bill

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>right now or a proposal in the FCC that was

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.959
<v Speaker 1>proposed by the Wheeler FEC about creating that or continuing

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that same thing, not broad with broadband, right, So, I

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>mean that's there's a solution right there. It's everybody paying

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>an extra few cents so that people out in rural

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>areas can get that kind of infrastructure, and it's the

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>taxpayers paying the I s p s to go lay

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that cable for people in rural areas. Yeah, he also

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>says because one of the one of the things a

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talk about are the harm that can

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be caused by this deregulation and there are examples even

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which will go here in a minute, but he called

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>those he calls those hypothesized harms and even UH said,

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a solution that wouldn't work. Title two is a solution

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't work for a problem that didn't exist. So

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>when in this interview I saw an NPR when they

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>sat down and gave him examples of what can happen,

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, this has happened. I'm not saying it

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened, he said, but these are are single examples.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And he said to me, it would have to be

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that would have to be widespread evidence of this kind

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of problem, uh, in order for this kind of regulation

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to be enacted. Right, I got um, which you know

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Maybe it would be more widespread if there

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>was no regulation. So, well, that's the fear. That's another hypothesis.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess that that's the fear that that once you

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, take the take take the bridle off of

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the I s p s who you know, they're gonna

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>run rampant. And again, these are multinational companies that are

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>providing most of the access to the public Internet in

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>America and you know the Western world. So you it's

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not foolish to think that they're going to very

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly consolidate as much power as they can with the

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>new less restricted freedom, uh to do so that would

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>be given if you rolled back the two thousand fifteen rules.

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of people point out too that if

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at the period from five, while the I

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>s p s were classified as telecoms, the Internet still

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>boomed and flourished. We had a bubble, an internet um

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>stock bubble happened even pretty early on, and the Internet

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as we know it today developed during that time. Uh

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that it's stifling or would stifle that

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>growth classifying eyes pieces telecoms doesn't seem to hold much water. Well.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you talk about investment infrastructure, it kind of

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>depends on which studies you've looked at. Some have said

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that it uh it has already. Um Like Pie pointed

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to twelve. I think over the two year period since

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the Title two went into effect, the twelve major carriers

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>have had five percent reduction and infrastructure spending. Um. And

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>then you can cheery pick another study that might say, well, yeah,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but these companies actually put in more money and invested

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>more money. So I think in either case, it's probably

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a correlation and causation argument. You know, maybe you can't

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>necessarily say it's because of the the different classification, right,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and so the numbers we have are not so great

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's this lobbying group called um U s Telecom,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and their numbers show that the infrastructure investing this is

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>new fiber cable or upgrades to existing cable being laid

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, the broadband infrastructure that the spending

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>by the big twelve I s p s went down

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>by a billion dollars between two thousand and fourteen and

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen, and the idea is that's because of reclassification.

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>The US Census Bureau said, actually, no, our numbers show

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that between two thousand fourteen and two thousand and fifteen,

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the spending on infrastructure went up by six hundred million.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that not that much, but it was an actual increase.

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And this is really really important, Chuck, because if you

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 1>are looking at net neutrality in the battle over it

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from a legal standpoint, infrastructure is going to be the

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>crux of the argument. Because there was a law passed

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>back in I can't remember what it's called, but it

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>basically bans federal agencies from making capricious rule changes, which

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>is basically like, for if exactly the situation that we're

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in right now, you have one administration making one set

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>of rules and then a year or two later a

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>philosophically different in administration coming in and completely changing those rules. Well,

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that that the new administration's regulators have to

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>prove why it's a it's a good idea to change

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>these rules. They can't just be capricious, right And so

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 1>observers of this whole battle that's going on right now

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>are saying, probably Pie is going to be using the

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure um the drop and infrastructure investing as his reason why.

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>He's going to point to it and say, look, man,

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this title to classification led to a billion dollar, five

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars whatever billion dollar dropped in infrastructure investment. It

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>was a bad idea. We're going to reverse the rules.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And if he can do that, then the rules probably

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>will be changed and net neutrality will be rolled back.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But the figures aren't in yet for two thousand and sixteen,

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:33.919
<v Speaker 1>so no one actually knows if overall spending on infrastructure

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>declined or increased or stayed the same, but that's probably

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be the crux of the legal argument about

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>changing the rules back. You want to take a break, Sure, alright,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take a break, and hopefully we'll get to

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 1>hear Josh say lay the cable at least two more times.

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why has that you should know? That's a should knows.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But Clark, all right, so we're back. Um, you're still

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>laughing at that. Huha. So before we move on, we

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>should say that this um uh, like we were saying

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>about websites going dark, the title two is up for

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 1>grabs again, essentially coming up soon and UH people are

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>being asked if you care about this one way or

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the other. UM. You can leave your comments on restoring

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Internet Freedom by going to FCC dot gov and you

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>click on file a Public comment, UM, and then you

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>click on preceding seventeen Dash one oh eight Restoring Internet Freedom,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you can tell them what you think about it. Yea,

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>And the comment in and of themselves have gotten a

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of traction and pop popular culture. UM. Back in

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fourteen, John Oliver UH did a piece on UM,

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>what's this show called this week tonight? Uh? Last week

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>tonight that's right, thank you. Um and he uh he

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very famously called the battle over net neutrality cable comp

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>company Smurfrey, right and um he basically he said, everybody

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.439
<v Speaker 1>go leave your comments about net neutrality, and the next

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>day the FCC's website broke under. It buckled under the strain. Uh.

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately the FCC got something like three point seven

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>million public comments about the the the two thousand fifteen rules,

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most of them in favor of them. Right. So, um,

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the this time around, John Oliver has done another thing.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The internet broke again, but they think this time it

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>was actually a d E O S attack. It was

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 1>an attack, and there's also been evidence that uh, spam

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>bots are leaving um comments as well. Yeah. Wasn't there

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like uh five million identical comments on the half a million?

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh half a million? Yeah, there's been about five million total,

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but they found like half a million from a spam box, right,

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>which were identical comments, uh with I mean, I think

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>they use real names and addresses, but including all the same. Yeah.

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the persons whose name was stolen and used

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>by the spambot was a jeep pie himself. Yeah, and

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this is what it said. It said, Um, the unprecedented

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>regulatory power by the Obama administration imposed on the Internet

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is smothering innovation, damaging the American economy, and obstructing job creation.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The plan currently under consideration at the FCC to repeal

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Obama's title to power grab is a positive step forward

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and will help to promote a truly free and open

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>internet for everyone. Yeah. So it's it's just so interesting

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to me that both sides want the same thing and

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>they just have two very different ideas on how to

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>go about it, and someone's right and wrong. Right, Well,

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you know what's bizarre about this one. There's

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>there's three sides to it. There's two sides that are

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>opposed philosophically over the role of government and regulation, and

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>then there's a third side. The I s p s

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were like, everybody, shut up, stop telling us what to do.

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>We want to just go make some money, and uh,

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we want the FCC out of our butts. Yes, you know. Yeah,

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's we've kind of hit on some of them,

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but let's talk about what some of the arguments in

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>favor of net neutrality are, and then we'll talk about

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the arguments against. Well, um, I guess the

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>first thing that we should point out is that it

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>actually will prevent censorship. Yeah, when that is what it

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is feared, it won't happen. Yeah, there's we didn't say that.

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>The The name that a jeep pie and his f

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>CC came up with for their new rules is um

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Restoring Internet Freedom Rules, which has kind of been accused

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of being news speaker double speak because it it's it's

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, like, you know, the FEC being involved in

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this is was a power grab by the Obama administration,

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and that by getting the FEC out of this whole thing, Um,

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>then we're actually protecting against censorship. That it was a

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>government grab of the Internet to try to start to

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>censor it, right, which is not the case. Well, I mean,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on how you feel about government regulation.

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the saying that the two thousand and fifteen

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>rules allowed government censorship is patently wrong, That's what I meant.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And if anything, it prevents censorship by the I s

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>p s by preventing blocking and throttling. Yeah. Another thing

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that um, some people, Uh it's weird. The arguments and

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>counter arguments all like use each other. Um, they'll say

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that like, no, we we need the regulations so we

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>can promote uh, growth in this industry, not stifle it.

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But when you have net neutrality in place, it keeps

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that low barrier to just getting a website going. And

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like like you said before, Um, we're at an age

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>now where anyone can design the next Facebook. Uh. And

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if if let's say you needed half a million dollars,

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:43.399
<v Speaker 1>like you've designed it and everything's great, but you need

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to pay an I s P five grand to get

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it going at a reasonable speed, then that'll that'll kill innovation, right.

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends on whose innovation you're stifling. If

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the I s p s as part

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, Um, well, then having the Internet thrive

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and having new new, huge, massive traffic driving companies like

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook that get a lot of people to the Internet

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to use it in the first place, that's an inherent good. Um.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>But really what you're talking about is is keeping that

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:22.320
<v Speaker 1>unregulated and regulating the I s P s. Um, So

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are you stifling? And the argument is

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're stifling infrastructure investment, so like high speed cable

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 1>being laid by not by me. Uh. And then um,

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting cable out to rural areas, that kind

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing. Um, the I think when you when you

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>hear both sides using the same point to prove their case,

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>it means that BS is a foot somewhere. Another thing

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that we touched on a little bit is like when

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we said, hey, maybe Comcast as a cable company would

0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>want to slow down or throttle Netflix. Uh, so you know,

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it would not unleveled the playing field. The same can

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be said of like a telephone company not wanting Skype

0:45:07.560 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to become a thing or Internet phone to become a thing. Uh.

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And so that is a genuine fear that behind the scenes, um,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.879
<v Speaker 1>that will be throttling going on. Yeah, and that's a

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>real legitimate fear for two reasons, Chuck. One that um,

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the I s p s are starting to branch

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out and getting into like you said earlier, um, the

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>content game. Yeah, the content game. Right. So so that's

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's rule one, or that's that's problem one. Like for

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>for for instance, Verizon just bought Yahoo and Yahoo owns

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>flicker and Tumbler, and Tumbler, by the way, used to

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:52.759
<v Speaker 1>be at the at the forefront the tip of the

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>spear for net neutrality, um advocacy like they were loud

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and proud man and then Verizon bought them and all

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, Tumbler silent on the subject, right um.

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>But more to the point, since Verizon bought Yahoo, which

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>owns Flicker and Tumbler, it told all of its Tumbler

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and Flicker users that have a Bell South associate or

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a a T and T associated email address that they

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't gonna be able to access their Flicker or Tumbler

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>accounts anymore until they created a new user I d

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with a using a Yahoo email address. So that's fairly

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive, you can make a case. And so that's

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>going on right now as I sps are starting to

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>get into the media game. But it's also happened in

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the past plenty of times too. It's already happened. It's

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>been documented that when the I s p s are

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>free to to to be anti competitive, they take you

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:53.320
<v Speaker 1>up on the offer. And Pie has responded to those

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>uh incidents, has isolated examples and not enough of a

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to regular Yeah. His feeling is it has to

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be a widespread problem for it to be a real issue. Yeah,

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that's a position for sure, that's

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a position. Yeah. Yeah, uh what about the case against

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality? So again there's there's there's that whole investment

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thing in infrastructure, which is that's big, that's legitimate, you know.

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean like if if the I s p s say, dude,

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just we're not making enough money, we're not we're

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>really unhappy about this regulation. We're gonna stop putting money

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>into the American broadband infrastructure, then America will suffer as

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a result. We want the highest, fastest speed infrastructure we

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 1>can get, and we rely on the I s p

0:47:56.400 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>s to build those and then charge us money for

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>access using those high speed routes. Right, That's what I

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.760
<v Speaker 1>don't buy though, because they want they want the fastest internet,

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because they want your business. They totally do. Right, Okay,

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, Like everybody when they're talking about this

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>seems to kind of dance around this. But yeah, dude,

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the I s p s can make a lot of

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.720
<v Speaker 1>money charging access. They make plenty of money, plenty of revenue.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But they're also again they're the gatekeepers. They they're the

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ones who built this infratructure. They're the ones who have

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this the access to this these networks built and these

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>these customer bases built, and if they are unhappy and

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>they want to be sour pusses about it, they can

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>stop investing in America's infrastructure and America will suffer as

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a result. And again, these aren't necessarily companies that have

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 1>an office on Main Street in Kansas, in Topeka. They're

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>multinational companies and if they move their favor elsewhere, then

0:48:55.600 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>America could suffer. Right. It's we're somewhat hostages to their

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>their whims to an extent, but at the end of

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the day, America is also one of the best markets

0:49:08.120 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for broadband access and they want the money of American users,

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so they are going to keep investing in infrastructure, I think.

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:19.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's a gamble. And if you're if you're opposed

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to federal regulation and principle, you're going to say that

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>gamble is not worth it. Like, I don't want to

0:49:25.560 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>put federal regulation on these guys if it's going to

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>make them unhappy because I don't like federal regulation. They

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>don't like federal regulation, and it could take them off

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>enough that America's infrastructure could start to sag. Here's the thing, though,

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know much. I'm not an expert in this,

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but my feeling is, wouldn't they have to all collude

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and none of them do that, because as soon as

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>one of them starts, uh, one of them starts laying

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the cable, like Josh Clark, then they'll have the advantage

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and the other ones be like, we gotta start laying

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the cable because they're getting a and getting faster. Well, yeah,

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>like they would all have to be in cahoots and say, well, hey,

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>let's all just sort of make a ton of money

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and just say this is how fast the internet is now.

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So here you just dug up another issue. It's totally

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.279
<v Speaker 1>true if you have a lot of different I s

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>p s who have large, massive networks, if you have

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:27.919
<v Speaker 1>those large I s p s suddenly starting to consolidate,

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:30.920
<v Speaker 1>which they are, and you have fewer and fewer but

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger I sps they control larger parts of

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the market, to where if you've got basically two major

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I s p s competing against one another, they could

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:44.359
<v Speaker 1>conceivably do that, and it would be tough for one

0:50:44.400 --> 0:50:46.399
<v Speaker 1>to just be like, no, I'm not doing that, I'm

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm laying all the cable. Um, I'm gonna take all

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your your market share. It's possible that they could do that,

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but it could also be likely that they would collude, um,

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily in an illegal fashion, but just saying, you

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>know what, we both kind of agree America's the pits

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, will wait until the winds change. Let's go

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>over to Ireland and invest in their infrastructure because they

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>got some cash and they don't feel like, um, like

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>regulating today. So it's not like, you know, I think

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think like, well, you know, this

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is Trump's FCC, so they're just you know, automatically evil

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and have no real point there. There are they They

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do represent a viewpoint of anti regulation sentiment, right, but

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a there's another aspect to all of this

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:43.839
<v Speaker 1>chuck that has kind of blown my mind. Um that

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that it's just not talked about all that much. One

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the well, two of the things that that people

0:51:51.280 --> 0:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who are in the net neutrality debate are are talking

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>about and worried about are don't really actually exist any longer.

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>To major things. Yeah, so internet censorship and a equal

0:52:04.040 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>access to broadband networks that that's not around anymore. Neither

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of those are around or an internet free from censorship,

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say yeah, And I mean I don't know

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:18.480
<v Speaker 1>censorship is the right word because that implies you have

0:52:18.560 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>no access at all. Um, but what search engines do,

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and what apps do, and what Facebook and Google and

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and everyone does in that game as they serve

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>things up to the public that are very much curated

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.800
<v Speaker 1>according to their needs. I was gonna say whims, but

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not whims. There their their needs as a company. Um,

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like they're censoring things, but they certainly aren't. Uh,

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean like that you can still find the things

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet. They're not like deleting things and censoring things.

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But they're definitely serving up uh like search engines, aren't

0:52:59.840 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know that they're definitely all just they're serving up

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what they want to serve up because that serves their

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:10.359
<v Speaker 1>company best. Whether yeah, whether it's like, um, you know,

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 1>content that's more likely to lead to data that they

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 1>can use to better target you for ads, or there

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:22.640
<v Speaker 1>are some instances of very like actual censorship where Twitter

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter can take your tweet down if it's deemed defensive

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that censorship. This book can do the same thing with

0:53:29.640 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 1>your posts that censorship. So there's a whole group of

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>stakeholders in this whole debate that, like the media companies

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that do have the legal and technical ability to censor

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, right, but giving the I s p s

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the ability to censor the Internet doesn't make anything any

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>fairer or more even. It just makes things worse. Right,

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's the idea that, well, these guys can alregue

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of the Internet, so why shouldn't the I s

0:53:56.000 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>p s be able to? That's a terrible argument. Uh.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And one of the other big things that's already happening

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is when we were talking about paying extra money to

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>get your content faster, that's already going on, right, So

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they're already fast lanes essentially exactly. And that's not supposed

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to be um, but but it's been going on for

0:54:20.080 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a while. Yeah. And so Google and Netflix, um, among

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:28.240
<v Speaker 1>other companies that basically have paid extra money to connect,

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they've almost created like a side Internet by connecting their

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>routers and servers directly to the I s p S

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>network servers. Instead of saying, well, we'll just be routing

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>our traffic along with the rest of the Internet, they

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they have essentially paid to have their own special fast

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>lane right exactly. And again, this has been going on

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>for years, and Google started it and we basically everybody

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has yet and the rub there was a very famous

0:54:57.480 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>UM dispute about it that that made this whole concept,

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it's called peering, made a public between Comcast and Verizon

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and Netflix Netflix as users. And I remember this Netflix

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was their Their transmission was degrading fast and Netflix had

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to go to Verizon and Comcast and say I need

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to peer network setup. I need to be able to

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>plug in directly. Here's a bunch of money. I hate

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>you guys, and they publicly accused at least Comcast, I

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think of purposefully letting their traffic back up and not

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:33.799
<v Speaker 1>rerouting it UM to make it go faster so that

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Comcast would have to come and and and get give

0:55:37.239 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>them money. And now Verizon and UM Comcasts viewpoint is, well,

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys are sending tons of traffic that you're charging

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:53.359
<v Speaker 1>for our way without paying anything extra. Why should we

0:55:53.480 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>have to add, you know, an extra router server or

0:55:57.160 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>whatever to to accommodate this traffic when you guys are

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones generating from generating it and profiting from it,

0:56:06.080 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 1>and so that's just kind of been like, uh that,

0:56:08.480 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's that's the part that part of

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that philosophical divide too with net net neutrality, who's who

0:56:16.200 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>should be paying for the the increase in traffic? Well,

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and not only that, but these these uh deals are

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:28.320
<v Speaker 1>worked out between the companies and if the FCC sticks

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>their nose in it, then all of a sudden, they

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are inserting their self in that process. Uh. And and

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 1>companies aren't liking the sounds of that either. Well, yeah,

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like the the the market for this has been unregulated

0:56:43.160 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and for the most part, companies have been okay with

0:56:45.280 --> 0:56:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it and fine with it. And the sps are happy

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>because their users are getting faster traffic. And Netflix or

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>say Amazon Prime is happy because their users are getting

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to watch Game of Thrones faster. Right, But the fccs

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen rules say, well, we're involved than this now.

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:03.719
<v Speaker 1>And remember we said that I s p s have

0:57:03.800 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to act in a justin reasonable manner. So Netflix, now

0:57:07.840 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 1>under these two fifteen rules, if they try this again,

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you can come and tell us that they're acting unreasonably

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get involved. Which is another thing that a

0:57:17.120 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>jeepie wants to roll back because he doesn't think the

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>SEC has any any business getting involved in these transactions. Yeah,

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's um man, It's really a slippery slope on all

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>sides if you ask me for sure. But to me,

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing boils down to do we do we

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>want to give I, s P S the the ability

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to block traffic. I think I think of

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>them as the switchboard operators. I think conceiving of them

0:57:47.600 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as common carriers as is absolutely right. And I think

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I think giving them the ability to to censor, block,

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or throttle traffic, I just think it's a bad move. Well.

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing that has kind of been true

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>over and over throughout our history is that greed has

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>typically wins out when it's completely unregulated, and it has

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>led to bad things for the end user what whatever

0:58:15.520 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>industry that might be. Yeah, yeah, the companies might went out,

0:58:20.480 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and but kind of greed, greed kind of doesn't lead

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 1>down the good path for average Joe sitting at his laptop.

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true, man, And that is what it

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>boils down to, do we trust Do we trust them?

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Do we trust them? There? You go to act fairly, Yeah,

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:42.880
<v Speaker 1>let's leave it at that man, Well well done. Uh,

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know more about net neutrality while

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you can get involved, and then you can also head

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on over to FCC dot gov. And they also allow

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.480
<v Speaker 1>comments from international people too. You don't have to be

0:58:53.480 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>an American, but you should check a box that says

0:58:56.000 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you're international. You just put your name and address on

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there and leave your comment and you can comment. Remember,

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you can do that till July what Chuck, Yeah, I

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>think and then there's comments on the comments that runs

0:59:11.800 --> 0:59:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to August six, So go go let them know how

0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel one way or the other. And since I

0:59:18.560 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>said feel, it's time for a listener mail, Yeah, click

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>on the international box so it will go right into

0:59:27.960 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the abyss of the Internet. I'm just kidding. I'm gonna

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 1>call this just a very concise stone Wall reaction. We've

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of good feedback on our Remembering Stonewall episode,

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think both of us feel pretty good about

0:59:46.240 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that one. Great. Um. Hey, guys, I've listened to and

0:59:49.880 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>loved your podcast for years, but your recent Remembering Stonewall

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 1>episode compelled me to write you guys. As a gay man,

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, how can these two straight guys do justice

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to my community's history a prejudice. I subsequently, I am

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>not proud of because you handled the subject so eloquently,

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>so understandingly. Very impressed on how well you tackled the subject, guys,

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>which shouldn't have surprised me since you handle every episode

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so expertly, but since this subject hits so close to

1:00:18.960 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>home for me, was so very happy and proud with

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the reverence that you gave it. Thank you, thank you,

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you nice three, thank you, yeah three, thank yous.

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that's the magic number, and that is from Craig. Craig,

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot for that. We appreciate it. We do

1:00:37.080 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about that. Echo is interesting and good

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and stirring and all that jazz. So hats off to

1:00:43.840 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you right back. If you want to get in touch

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with this, like Craig did, you can tweet to us

1:00:48.920 --> 1:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at Josh I'm Clark or s Y s K Podcast.

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You can join us on Facebook at Facebook dot com,

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>slash stuff you Should Know or slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

1:00:57.800 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcast at

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot com and has always joined us

1:01:02.240 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>at our home on the web, Stuff you Should Know

1:01:04.240 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Is it how stuff Works? Dot com, m