WEBVTT - Are robots electronic persons?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, Robot Parade,

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Robot Parade, what have the flags that the robots made?

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland and I'm Lauren Bogglebaum and today our third host,

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick, is not with us, but he will be

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>back soon. And in the meanwhile, if you couldn't tell,

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about robots again, robots from So

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a shame that Joe can't be here because

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>he actually pitched the other show will be recording and

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that will come out later this week that also has

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to do about robots. But we're going to do our

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>best to uphold the high standards of of robot integrity

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that that Joe embodies, because as we all know, Joe

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is robot. He is mostly most of that is clamp uh,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but they're delightful clamps uh and and really integrity is

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>what this episode is going to be about. Yeah, it's

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of alright. So a little backstory here. Back at

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of May, uh, there was a report that

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>came out that spurned a sparked, I should say not spurned,

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sparked a lot of conversation about robots and rites. And

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna talk about what that was and what

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was said in that report. But before we get to that,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we should also mention that this episode has a lot

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of tie ends with tons of other episodes we have

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>previously recorded, because, as it turns out, we love us

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>some robots. We we talked about robots a lot here

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on the show about the future of technology and science.

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Strangely enough, Yeah, no, okay, so so we've got we've

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>got what happens when a robot breaks the law from

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>March of Was that was that so recently? It was

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a million years? Right? Yeah? And then there's but then

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also well what steal our jobs? Which in December?

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And will robots take our jobs in May? Something tells

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>me we didn't really pay attention when we recorded the

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>second one. One of those have been a video. It

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>might have been it could be that one is a video,

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>or it could very well be that we recorded two

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>episodes with the same title. I mean to be fair,

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>this is an ongoing conversation that is getting more and

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. We also have one on universal basic income,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>which ties into those concepts as well, absolutely, because you

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>know when robots steal our jobs, that is when university

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>basic income is going to be how do I get

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>some Money's right? We also have AI Friend or Foe

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>from April two thousand fourteen, What if the President were

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>a robot? That was also a Joe suggestion that was

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>also April two and more. Yes, if we listed every

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>single episode, I mean really, just pull up our RSS

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>feed and search robot. I think I got hits to

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>be fair. That also includes all the metadata, so robot

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>shows up a lot, but thirty four hits and we

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have not been recording that show that long. I mean,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>so why are we going to talk about again? Because

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>there was a report for the European Parliament and that's

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the one that I was talking about that came out

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end of May and had proposed some provisions

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>to grant personhood to robots electronic personhood d yeah, among

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>other things. That's electronic personhood is probably the element that

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think has had the most conversation around it after

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>this report came out. Yeah, because it's kind of the

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>flashiest one and it's it's sort of the most far

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>reaching part of the report, but a lot of the

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>report is actually very grounded and down to earth and

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and I I love it, like I love a lot

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of the ideas in here. So yeah, we were really

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>excited about talking, uh with with with ourselves and to

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys. I was about to say with you guys,

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but I guess you can't practice. I mean, they can

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>talk back. We just we're not ignoring you. We just

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>literally cannot hear you. Wait was oh no, that's no,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he's eating something crunchy at any rate. So we wanted

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to really kind of boil down what was in this

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>report because there's a lot more to it than just

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the electronic personhood. Like you were saying, Lauren, that gets

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention because it almost it's like saying,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>would you give your vacuum cleaner rights. We've we've had

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>these discussions here on this show. The cool thing is

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>at the end of those discussions we always like, you know,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we really need to talk about this. Yeah, it would

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>be wonderful if elected officials would begin considering this sort

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And it's happening. It's crazy, alright. So the

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>report came out sixteen We should also say it's a

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>draft report, or at least that's how it's titled. Yeah,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a proposal. Yeah, it's called draft Report with Recommendations

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. The

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity to make even very exciting things sound very dull.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how Yeah, there's gotta be a rule somewhere

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 1>that if you are proposed something, or you've created a report,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>that the the title must be one of two things.

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It must either be excessively long and with at least

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>right and and by being excessively long, you have already

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>told somebody everything they need to know about what's in

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the report. Or it has to incorporate a stupid acronym

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that has been tortured so that it can encompass the

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>various concepts that are in the report. And if you're lucky,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you get both. Yeah. So the thing about this report,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it had some awesome stuff in it. So, first of all,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the general purpose of the proposal is to start those

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>official discussions into developing policies and guidelines in the field

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of robotics, particularly since individual member states in the European

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Union are developing their own policies over time. So the

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>fear is that you're gonna get all these different countries

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>making their individual rules, and then you're gonna have conf

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>x between the way one country legislates robotics and the

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 1>way another one does. And especially in the European Union,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>where everyone is working together very closely and literally working

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>in other countries than the one of their own origin,

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it gets really important, really quickly to have agreement in

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all of exactlyly. Yeah, if you if you got your

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.679
<v Speaker 1>training and your experience in one country in the European Union,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and you are working in the robotics field in some capacity,

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you take an opportunity in a different country

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in the European Union, which is perfectly legitimate, you might

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>find yourself struggling because these different number states have different rules.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a proposal to make more of an umbrella

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of rules so that it's kind of an even playing

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>ground throughout the entire European Union. Now, to tell you

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how cool this report is in many ways, the introduction

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>of the proposal at the very beginning section A. Under

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>introduction they reference Mary Shelley's Frankenstein the Pygmalion myth. They

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>all so I didn't put in the notes They also

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the progue golem, They mentioned catal Copex. Are you

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are or Rossum's universal Robots from where the term robot originates? Yes, Yes,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where it was coined. Ye. And it's already ten

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>times more awesome than any government proposal I've ever read,

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because you've got all these things in the introduction talking

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about throughout our our history, we have created fiction that

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>talks about our our desire to create a synthetic form

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of life, or at least intelligence. In their case, they

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>were talking about intelligent machines, although I would argue Frankenstein's

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>monster is not really a machine. It's an artificial Yeah,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess so, I mean on the same level that

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>any human is a machine. Um. Now, section B that

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>each of these sections, by the way, it's like a

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>paragraph under the introduction. But Section B of the introduction

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>posits that were on the threshold of a new industrial

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>revolution that is powered by artificial intelligence, and that part

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of society will remain unaffected by this revolution, and so

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's wise to consider the implications now again, which is

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what we say basically at the end of every single

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast that we do about robots, right, and particularly ones

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>about the idea of you know, will automation UH ultimately

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>take more jobs than it creates? How are we going

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to deal with that? That's really what that paragraph is

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>getting at, saying, look, we can't even fully anticipate the

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>consequences of this. We know what's happening. We know that

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>robotics and artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, all of these

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>things are going to lead to a crazy amount of

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>change on par with the industrial revolution of the past.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We need to start talking about that in an official capacity,

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not just like thought experiments, but actually, like, let's lay

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>down some guidelines so that we don't mess things up

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>too much. Yeah, and and by by way of kind

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of providing proof of that, it points out that robots

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sales have been increasing exactly. Yeah, they're saying the robots

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>sales been on the rise, especially in UH areas like

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>car manufacture, automotive industry, the auto nation, in the automotive

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>industry has really been on the rise, as well as

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just an electronics in general. And also states that robots

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>will provide numerous benefits in the short to medium term,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with a potential for quote virtually unbounded prosperity end quote

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>in the long term. That's a lovely phrase. Yeah, it's

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the Star Trek belief where you know,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got like everything on demand all the time because

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of this wondrous world. It's probably not going to quite

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that extent because, as we have talked about in the past,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to that Star Trek future, we'd also have

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to find like some sort of crazy energy sources, and

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't have dilithium crystals yet, so not yet. Keep

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>keep digging, everyone, yep. So the flip side, however, because

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this isn't all about just sunshine and rose is here

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>robotic roses now, they wanted to say, like, hey, we

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>got to consider some of the possible bad things about this.

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They say that these advances quote may result in a

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>large part of the work now done by humans being

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>taken over by robots end quote, and that that would

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>affect not just employment, but also systems like social security,

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>which rely on employment taxes for funding. So, which is

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a thing that I had somehow never thought about before.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But it is yeah, clear, I mean, once it's pointed out,

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, of course, social security is a thing that

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to think about in this crazy future of robots.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Taken her jerbs. Exactly. If you if you are not

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>having enough money paid into Social Security because so many

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs have been taken over by automated systems, then social

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Security itself can no longer perform the function it's meant

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. And you start to see a pretty precipitous

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>decline in the quality of life for thousands millions of

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>people right well, based on that current system. I mean,

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously if we had some thing like basic universal income,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>then that would help. But see then you're all, how

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>are you funding that? Exactly, Like if you don't, if

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't have people working, they can't make money and

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't tax them. I mean like they're not. Yeah

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you could, but they just have even less. I mean, like,

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I have these fingernail clippings, what do you want. I've

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>got some like old newspapers and the garage I can

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>give you. I mean I was saving them for some reason.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's just it's and so again, this this

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>proposal is saying, look, we're acknowledging that these issues are

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>right on the cusp of happening today. We need to

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>start seriously talking about it, right and furthermore, on this

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of social issue, side. You know what happens when

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a robot breaks the thing, including a person. We need

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we need some legal recourse for figuring that out exactly,

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and we need to be able to assign liability in

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>those issues we need. We need to also understand how

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do robots and humans interact in a way that is

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a positive experience for humans? Uh, Sometimes that means creating

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>an experience that appears to be a positive experience for robots,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>because even though at this stage, I would argue robots

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can't appreciate a person being polite to a robot for example,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>right the robot don't care? Yeah, it doesn't. It lacks

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the capacity. We have not programmed it to love as

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of yet, but or to feel slighted. Sometimes by creating

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a system that encourages people to behave in a way

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>towards robots that they would toward another human being a

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>positive way, I would yes, that actually has a benefit

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>on the person. Right. Like, Like, we've seen some interesting

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>studies about when you create responses and robots so that

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they seem to understand when they get something right or

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>get something wrong, and they seem to have an action,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>people are feeling more receptive towards those robots and work

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more easily with those robots. And so again, while it

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>may not have a direct benefit to the robot in

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>any you know, psychological way, it has a benefit on

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>us as we interact with those robots, which is it's

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that you don't necessarily think about

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>when you start talking about policies. Uh. Also, they say, hey,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>what happens, um if robots like get super smart, like

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>like way more like more than human smart smart like

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like like not just human smart smart, but they're also

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>autonomous so that they can act on that smart smart.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't necessarily need to be conscious or self aware,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>just really really intelligent. And so essentially they're saying, we

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>need to think about the possibility of robots becoming a

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>danger to the human species. I don't let's not create

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a butt that's gonna kill us. Let's not skynet this thing,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>let's know not that. Yeah, let's do the opposite of that.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe not the opposite, but the different option at least.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So considering all of those things, the introduction concludes, the

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>European Union should really get off its stuff and start

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about these ideas and work on a strategy to

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>avoid problems in the future. So that's just the introduction. Yeah,

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just laying everything out there for you. And then

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what they do later on in the report is kind

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of laid down general principles and some guidelines that they

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>would suggest, But those guidelines are very general. We're you're

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>going to hear the same thing throughout the rest of

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this podcast where they say we need to form a

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>committee specifically to set this up. Yeah, that this entire

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>proposal is like is like one of those meetings that

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you're just sitting there and planning more meetings for the future,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>right right, and then eventually you later on down the

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>road hold a meeting to discuss how you can have

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fewer meetings and that's when everyone loses their mind and

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>run screaming from the room. But right now, where at

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a stage where they they are saying like, hey, we

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have all the answers. This this document is not

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>meant to because he's not an answer. This is just

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a suggestion for how we might come up with the

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly this isn't this isn't that that guide you would

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>find in Beetlejuice about how to uh, you know, how

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>how to work would they recently diseased I'm sorry deceased

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>jokers in the movie anyway. So the next section is

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>titled General Principles. Are at the beginning of it as

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>general Principles and the reports sites Asimov's Laws of Robotics,

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>because of course they do seek reference number like eighteen.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Again it's pretty awesome. Yeah, yeah, so if you are

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>if you are rusty on Asimov's Laws of robotics, they

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are first, a robot may not harm a human or

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>through inaction, allow a human to come to harm. Second,

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a robot must obey and the order is given by

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a human unless it would violate the first law. A

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>robot must protect itself from harm unless doing so would

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>conflict with either of the first two laws. A fourth

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and or zero with depending on how you choose, because

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it was added a little bit later, A robot may

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not harm humanity or by an action, allow humanity to

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>come to harm. Now, these are not innate laws, right

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there's These are just good ideas. These were good ideas

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>that a science fiction author came up with for the

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>purposes of creating interesting narratives that would show how even

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>these very basic ideas could sometimes have consequences. Yeah, that

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't anticipate, but we generally since then have said

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>those laws of robotics seem like a really good idea

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that lets kind of lay it out just how we

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>want it. Yeah, if you've got a big old metal

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that weighs like a half ton and it can

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>move around and whack stuff, let's try and make sure

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't whack people. Yeah, preferably so. Uh, then we

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>get the liability section talking about whacking people. This is it,

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>This is what this is about, right, Like, how do

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we determine who is or what is liable in this

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in very scenarios? And this relates very closely to that

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>podcast we did in the past about what happens if

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a robot breaks the law. So we get to a

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>point where this is where the report first suggests that

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the European Union might need to classify robots under a

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>new category, either like a category like persons, like essentially, say,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can we treat robots like people in the sense of

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>liability like legally speaking, legally speaking, or would it be

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>more like animals would be more like objects? Or do

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to create an entirely new classification for an

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligent non human entity, right right, something that can behave

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>at least semi autonomously, and something harder than a dolphin

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>less bound to the sea. Yes. So, first thing they

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point out is that AI and machine learning are transforming

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how robots interact with environments. And we wouldn't necessarily call

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>even the most advanced AI that we have operating today

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>in a thin close to being conscious or self aware,

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>but that almost doesn't really matter, right, It could still

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be active in a way that could potentially be harmful.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing more applications that allow machines to learn

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>from their environments and adapt their approaches to complete certain tasks.

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>That complicates that the whole autonomous part that makes robots useful. Yeah,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that you know, since we've been seeing

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>machine learning like go from observing a pendulum and determining

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what the laws of physics must be based upon those

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>movements up to the you know, learning what a cat

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is based upon just feeding it information, you know, and

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and then getting to a point where we can maybe

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>create an artificial intelligence, set it in a room, give

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it a task, and have it learned from its mistakes

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so that it eventually begins to do that task more

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and more efficiently. That's that's creating something very different from

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>just this machine will follow a specific set of instructions

0:18:55.320 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and repeat it exactly every time until it breaks. Right,

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And because right now, the way that robots work, take

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a take a roomba for example, nice easy, nice easy

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that you may or may not have interacted with. Uh,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>right now, if a roomba trips and trips you and

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you die, Um, you sue you see the company, You

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>see I robot? Yes, I think so, yeah, exactly believe

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it is I robot. So that would be that that's

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly the case. Because robots right now, for the most part,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>are essentially machines that do a very specific task, and

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they do it pretty much the same way every time,

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>even with something like the roombo which has some object

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>avoidance and some other little bit of learning for for

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>mapping purposes. But but it's very basic, right, It's not

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's not like the room but suddenly going to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>vacuum in a totally different way. Right, it can't. It

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lacks that capability. But at this point we would say,

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, if the if the machine were to

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>cause harm through its uh, it's normal operations, You would

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>essentially say the manufacturer, the producer of that. Maybe the

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>programmer is liable, right, But that gets more complicated as

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you get into these these devices that have machine learning

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and autonomy. Yeah. Yeah, because if it's learning how to

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>do new stuff, if if it's interacting within environment that

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the programmer didn't account for and therefore learns something harmful,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 1>then do you blame the manufacturer? They actually the report

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>actually says that the more it learns, the less you

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can really blame the creator, right that that it's behaviors

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that's learning are due to whatever environment and variables it's encountering.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>And it may very well be that if you were

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>to trace that behavior all the way back down to

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the gem, the germ of an idea, the nugget of

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>programming that eventually evolved into that behavior, it would be

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to say, well, this is clearly the fall

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of manufacturer, which means that maybe the robot itself has

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to be liable, which raise as questions like, well, how

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you deal with that? You've got to lie

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>bad robot, I mean, the robot can't think or feel.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't punish the I mean, if you punish the robot.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>It would be meaningless, right, Like, the robot can't feel

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>badly about it. It It can't learn from that experience. It

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be like, Wow, it put me in solitary and

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>now I'm I'm gonna really turn things around. Yeah, I mean,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get like a robot shoshank redemption thing going.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's really it's really shady whether or

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not humans are penitent by being put in penitentiary here.

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That is an episode I want to do, yes and

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>upsetting episode. Probably a lot of not shouting at each other,

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>but shouting just into the void. Yeah, a lot of that.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>But at any rdy getting back to the robots, so

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we they the report says, we need to perhaps come

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>up with some uh definitions so that we can figure

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>out ways to assign liability in those cases where machines

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are having this level of artificial intelligence and autonomy. Yeah,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and it furthermore proposes to to create a system of

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>registration for robots that are so advanced this could become

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Yeah. This is like almost like saying, you know,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the way you might have to register a weapon, The

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>idea that you know, at a robot there's a sufficient

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>level of intelligence also carries with it a certain amount

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of risk towards humans, and that intelligence may not necessarily

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>come in the form of physical violence. It could come

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>into form of sharing your information in a way that

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you had not anticipated, or perhaps uh spying in the

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>sense of like a video surveillance type of issue. So

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>there the draft says, maybe we need to have a

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>registration system, and once in a robot reaches a certain threshold,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a threshold in artificial intelligence or just the

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>various features in the robot, at that point, the producer

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>must register the robot so that there is a government

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>document connected with that specific entity. In the case that

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that entity goes robo berserk, or does a make some mistake,

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or operates in a way that was unintended but causes

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>harm in any of those scenarios, you've gotta have a

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>way to assign that liability. So this would again fall

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>into into that category, right, And then in order to

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of assist with that, it calls for more funding

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for research projects, particularly the ones that that are are

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>looking into these social and ethical challenges that are that

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>are raised by these kinds of advancement, right, because the

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>report recognized they said, hey, we realize this is not

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this is new. It's going to require experts and and

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to require funding. It's going to require money.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So we need to actually seriously talk about this, not

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 1>just say like, hey, let's throw ideas around, but let's

0:23:55.720 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>let's create specific entities, and those entities have the responsibility

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>of really seriously tackling these issues and coming up with

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>guidelines that are uh, that are aligned with those ideas.

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Um and that the European Union should create quote legislative

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>instruments on legal questions related to the development of robotics

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and AI end quote that looks ahead ten to fifteen years. Yeah,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>hard to do. That's nuts. We love to to speculate

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>about the future. Obviously, that's what this podcast is all about.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>That's literally what we do here. Yes, um, but I mean,

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but we also make so many jokes about forty years

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and also, wow, gosh, I keep forgetting how awesome that

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>little jingle is. Also what we say, does it become law? Right?

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And thank goodness for that, Jonathan, no joke. I mean

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>when we get that that acts of destiny swinging around,

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you want that stuff to Sometimes we're whimsical, and by

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>whimsical I also mean capricious to a level that's probably irresponsible. Anyway,

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 1>the last time I took a test, I came out

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>chaotic neutral. Yeah, that's terrifying. Chaotic neutral is the scariest

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the alignments, isn't it? Fine? I mean chaotic evil.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>At least you know that whatever they're gonna do, it's

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be bad kadock neutral. It's just like I'm gonna

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.239
<v Speaker 1>close my eyes and throw a dart. Will I hit

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a board? Maybe? Um? So. The interesting thing here though,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>again is that they want to look at creating again

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>a specific official entity that is dedicated to answering legal

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>questions and speculating about what questions will need to be

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>answered more than a decade out. So saying, let's not

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>wait until we've reached a technical, technological level of sophistication

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>where we then have to backtrack and figure out a

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>way to litigate around issues. Yeah. See, let's proactively get

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>out there and be looking for the most cutting edge,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the most ridiculous even um possibilities that could come up

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future, and let's plan just a little bit

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for those. Yeah. And it's so different from the way

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the law and technology interact in the past, Right, Typically,

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we see technological advancement leap way ahead of technology and

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>then we have this incredibly Yeah, and it tends to

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be messy and kind of embarrassing if we're being real honest. Yeah,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just look at the Internet and telecommunications here

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in the States. I mean, that's been a huge pain

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>in the butt and that has led to big arguments

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>about net neutrality. And so what this draft proposal is

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>saying is that they want to avoid having as many

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of those scenarios as possible by proactively thinking of ahead.

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just I don't know how they're gonna do it

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in a way that it may very well mean that

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they create policies that are covering a specific pathway, and

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>as we see technology take a different pathway, they'll just

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have to switch gears. Uh. It's a it's a challenging thing.

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it would be a very frustrating thing in

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>many ways, but it's also really important. Um So, the

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>draft proposal also calls for a legal solution that doesn't

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>restrict the type or extent of damage as a person

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>can seek based solely on the fact that the damage

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that was caused came from a non human agent. In

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>other words, you should never have a situation where a

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>court tells you, well, we can only award you x

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>number of dollars or euro in this case because your

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>mugger was a robot, So there shouldn't be a specific

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>limit just because of the robot being the cause. Yeah,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean also like, don't create a mugging robot, y'all.

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, let's that's going down the futurama path, which,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>while entertaining, is really not practical. No hobobots, no orphan bots,

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>come on. Just but but but joking aside, I mean,

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing a need for this, uh in cases

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>for example, like like the recent and tragic depth that

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>resulted from a Tesla car crash just a couple of

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Um, the driver had had his Tesla car

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in autopilot mode, which is not in fact autopilot but

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>rather a driver assist kind of function. Yeah, I have

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple times over the last week yelled that we maybe

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need to change the name of that feature, that it

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is inherently misleading. But but right, I mean, you know,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.959
<v Speaker 1>in this case where where it's driver was in the car,

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the car was in driver assist mode. Uh, neither the

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>driver nor the computer in the car recognized that a

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>semitruck that was crossing his path was there because of

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just glare conditions, or maybe the dude was looking away.

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Yeah, yeah, we we don't have I

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think all the details will ever be available because

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know what was happening at that moment.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But as as you're pointing out, like, this is an

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>issue where there's the question who ultimately is liable in

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this case, and without having the legislation there to kind

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of create that, it means that it means that the

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>courts have to start figuring it out on their own,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's a rough way to make legislation. Um. So,

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>moving on with the liability section. They also suggest that

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the producers of a robot are liable for damage on

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a level proportionate with the amount of instructions the producers

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>gave the robot. This is the part that I find

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. Yeah, so this this would be like the

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more simple your robot, the more liable the producers are

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>for any damage the robot creates. Yeah, if you get

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 1>crushed by a dumb robot. It's it's the manufacturer's fault, right,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because they're the ones who like, if the robot can

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:55.479
<v Speaker 1>only follow instructions that were created by the manufacturer, and

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>through the operation the robot has hurt someone, than the

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer would be considered liable, assuming that you're not having

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation where a person has flagrantly ignored warnings or

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>safety features, like in a big automation thing, there's usually

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>rails and all this other stuff separating the robot from people.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Do not walk into the clamp function of the robot

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly kind of in those cases, you would you could

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>argue that, well, the person who was hurt was at fault,

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're talking about in other in other situations where

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there was an unintended consequence in the normal operation of

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the robot. However, the more the robot acts as an

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>autonomous entity, the lower the responsibility of the producers of

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the robot. So if a robot damage is property or

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>hurts someone through an an autonomous decision that was not

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.239
<v Speaker 1>directly traced to its fundamental programming. In other words, this

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>was some sort of learned behavior that went awry, the

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>robot ends up being liable not the producers of the robot,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty radical idea. They also say that

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the longer a robot has received quote unquote education, the

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>more liable the robot's unquote teacher is for any damage

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the robot causes. So, in other words, if you have

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the robot in a lab setting and you're training it

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in the lab, and you're training it over and over

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>again with lots of different ways, and then you put

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you implement the robot somewhere and it hurts somebody, you

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could say, well, the teacher was the one training the behaviors. Yeah,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that the manufacturer didn't do it this. This person trained

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this robot to do this. So yeah, yeah, So if

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you get crushed by a dumb robot, it's the manufacturer's fault.

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>If you get crushed by a smart robot, it's either

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the robot's fault or your own faulty. And so what

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>do you do in that case? Like, all right, well

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>now we know who's fault it is. What then? Well,

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the report has some suggestions for that. They said, what

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about an obligatory insurance scheme similar to that that you

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>would have to have if you wanted to operate a car,

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>except in this case, the people making the robots are

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the ones paying the insurance, which which I'm not sure

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about. I'm I don't know. Yeah, it's

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>weird because in this case you wouldn't say, like going

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Carmen before, would be like saying, well, the

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>car manufacturer, the automaker has to pay for my car

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>insurance and an idea which I love. Now, if it

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>were an autonomous car, you might say, well, that makes

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sense because I'm not the one controlling the vehicle. If

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a car that's under my control. However,

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, well, it's the driver's behaviors, unless you're

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about a faulty vehicle, in which case there could

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be a recall or something like that. So they're saying no,

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the producers would pay out the insurance for the robots

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.719
<v Speaker 1>they create, and if the robot were to cause any damage,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then that insurance would end up paying for that damage.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Or there could be a compensation fund for the robots themselves,

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, to pay them for all of their hard work,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so they'll feel greater job satisfaction, right and be able

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to buy the good oil, right exactly. Finally, they won't

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be they won't be sledging through like the used fry

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>grease over at the fast food restaurant. They'll finally be

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>able to go in and order a pint of w

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>D forty or something. No, no, this is this is

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not to make the robots feel better about the job

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they are doing. And actually it's an interesting and practical

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>solution to this issue, saying, let's have a compensation fund

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for each individual robot, not so that the robot has

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>spending money, but so that if the robot were to

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>cause harm, then there's actually money that belongs to the

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>robot that could be paid out to the person who's

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>injured or there or whoever owns the property that was

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>damaged in the case of that sort of thing. Uh,

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And that the robot itself is paying for thee although

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it's whoever's compensating the robot. But but this is

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a way of saying like, well, you wouldn't

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>go after the business necessarily if the robot itself had

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the funds and its compensation fund, and that you would

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>even possibly invest money on behalf of the robot, which

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is so robot would hapen its own four oh one

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>K or something. It's weird, right, yeah, yeah, and and

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and that that's the point in the proposal at which

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>it says again like like really though, we're going to

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>probably need a different legal distinction for romance at this level,

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>um than just yeah. And and they also say that

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>the compensation fund is just it's a possible solution. They're

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not even saying, like we're saying, this has got to

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be the way. They first start with the idea of

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the insurance, then they move on to possible compensation fund,

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>but they admit like this is just the sort of

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>brainstorming ideas we have and something that would need to

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>go into further discussion with an actual committee. Um. And

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>then we move on to the next section, which is

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>all about ethical principles, and it calls for the design

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of an ethical framework to make certain that advances in

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>robotics are made with considerations to the impact on human safety,

0:34:54.040 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>privacy or privacy, integrity, dignity, autonomy, and data ownership. So

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>which which is a really good spread. I'm proud of

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>them for for putting privacy and data ownership and stuff

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm there too, really impressed. I was consistently

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>impressed by this report at seeing the scope that they

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>were taking, because they it was so far beyond just

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>simple ideas like they're taking our gerbs, or or robots

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>are big and scary and can smash my face in

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>or things like, you know, the stuff that we typically

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about. They went well beyond that. I mean, they

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>covered those items too, but that was kind of cool.

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They go on to say that the risk of harm

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>to a person should be no greater than that encountered

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in ordinary life. So, in other words, in the future

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's filled with robots and all sorts of roles in

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the job, social robots, care robots, whatever they may be,

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a person should encounter no more risk than they do

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>right now in an ordinary day. So it should Robots

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>should not make the world riskier in the words, um,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which is really what we're hoping for. Yes, I mean

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to decrease the risk would be awesome. I mean, but

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean at least don't make it worse. So I

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>love this. I love this idea, Like, well, like, look,

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we just we know how humans are. Can we can

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we establish a baseline of suck exactly? Like? Can we

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>make it not suck more? If we open up any

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>history book we see our propensity for making things way

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>worse early on in the development of any given technology.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We think it'd be awesome if we didn't do that

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this time. Uh So to do all of this, you know,

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they admit like this is a lot to talk about.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>They say that there must be a new European agency

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically dedicated to the field of robotics and artificial intelligence,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that it has to be funded properly. It can't

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just be an agency in name, and it needs to

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be staffed with technical experts as well as leaders in

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>coal and regulatory fields. So they're saying, like, we need

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we need smart people. Yeah, we need people who understand

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the technology, who understand the hypotheticals about the technology, and

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>also people who understand the law and understand how not

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be dicks to people exactly. Yeah, I mean this

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.439
<v Speaker 1>is this is not a small thing. This is you know, Yes,

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you need engineers, you need the people who know how

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to solve a problem, but you also need the ethical

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>experts who can say, look, just because this is the

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>most efficient way to solve the problem doesn't mean it's

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the right way, right, especially when you have a world

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that also happens to have human beings in it, which

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>which fingers crossed again, like, yeah, you know, I'd like

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the future to have I suppose, yeah, at least a couple, right,

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I need I need a couple

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of folks to watch my videos and listen to my podcast.

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise what am I going to do? Right? And then

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it and then it goes into a bunch of specific

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>sections about different different about more committees and about more

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>government and more things to think about. So and well

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll cover these in brief. So one of them is

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>about intellectual property, which they want to find a way

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to both protect and encourage innovation. So it's kind of like,

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea of patents, the idea that they

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>protect an idea, but they also allow people to see

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>what the idea is, and then once the patent expires,

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they can also use that as the jumping off point

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for new inventions that kind of stuff. Right, and not

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>only in terms of making robots, but in terms of

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>what robots make. This is the really again, something I

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have necessarily thought government report would include in it.

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they say, what about works that robots make?

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Like let's say a robot writes a song. For example.

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about this in the past about robots and

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>their role in art and what is art? And can

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.959
<v Speaker 1>a robot make art? Yeah, and so their their need

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be laws in place for what happens when that happens,

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>because it is happening right now. Yeah. Who owns the

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>copyright to the music of robot creates? Is it the manufacturer?

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it the person who owns the robot? Uh? Is

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it whomever gave Does the robot have ownership of that?

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>That art and the money it makes go back into

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that like exactly right, Like wow, our Paul McCartney bought

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>went Insane and slaughtered fourteen people. Thank goodness it wrote

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that hit song five years back. Because we can afford

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to pay off all the legal fees. We laugh or

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we cry, don't don't do that. It was the first

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>name that popped in my head. Uh. And to be fair,

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, he's he's part robot too. So uh,

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if if this in fact happens, how do we assign

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>that ownership? And again they don't have the answer for it.

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>They're just saying, this is a question that we need

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to answer. So we need to bring it up and

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>say This might seem frivolous, but it's absolutely something that

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>is happening, and so we have to come up with

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>our legal answer for it. Yeah. This next one is

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one that I'm all, I'm so excited about standardization, and

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like such a boring adult is excited about standardization.

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But we've we've covered like home automation right home automation.

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems is that if you don't want

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all your stuff to come from the same company, how

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>do you make sure that stuff can communicate with each

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>other so you actually get that automated experience that you wanted,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.439
<v Speaker 1>right or or autonomous vehicles. I think this is one

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest hurdles that we're facing right now to

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>autonomous vehicles is how do we create a system where

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>all of those vehicles from different manufacturers can talk to

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 1>each other, talk to the road, talk to the traffic signals,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Yeah, where you can have that that fully

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>integrated system where cars are fully they know where everyone is,

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they know where all the other other cars are. Not

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>only do they know where the other cars are, they

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know what the other cars are going to do before

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it starts to happen because they can communicate with one another. Well,

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>without those standards in place, you end up with a

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of proprietary systems where all the vehicles made by

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>one company can talk to each other, but that only

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>represents called shoulder to those other cars. Yeah, and there

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they represent a tiny percentage of all the vehicles on

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the road. You don't really get a very you don't

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have an integrated system in that approach. And so they're saying, well,

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to see that with this future of robotics,

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's start creating some standards that companies can follow

0:41:19.520 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>when they're designing their products so that we avoid this

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in the future and we have a more seamless integration UM.

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, they have another section on autonomous vehicles themselves,

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and they specifically call out for standards for those autonomous vehicles.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>They also mentioned care robots and medical robots. UM. They're

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically in those cases talking about a need to develop

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>robots that where you're you're specifically thinking about how are

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>these going to affect humans? Right right, and and just

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of I think it was a call for like

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like research and development into, uh, how we can create

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>robots that can help with with care of the sick,

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or the elderly, or you know whatever whatever group it is.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That and how can we create robots that are providing

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>care not just physical services, and and to make sure

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it still maintains a sense of human dignity as well,

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>like not just that they are effective in doing what

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>they do, but they are they perform their their duties

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that the person who's being cared

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for doesn't feel less less for that. Yeah, and again,

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>being someone who currently and thankfully is healthy and able bodied,

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it is a weird. It hadn't occurred to me. I'm

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not I'm so privileged in the place where I am

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in my life, it didn't even occur to me. And

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I am so thankful to see that they're smart people

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. Um. They also get into human repair

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and enhancement. Enhancement, you say, yeah, so not just like, Okay,

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>while we've developed this technology that is an artificial heart

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.880
<v Speaker 1>or an artificial kidney or an artificial liver or whatever

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:02.479
<v Speaker 1>this is getting into when we developed technology that could

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 1>actually create, yeah, an upgrade to a human being without

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>prior injury, right, like like not like this arm is defective,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I need I need a new one, but like, no,

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this arm is less cool than the robot arm. My

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>risk can't turn degree, so it's really a pain in

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the butt to put a light bulb back into a socket. Yeah,

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to have one where I can spend

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the risk in that ways and I'm done. Uh So

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, well, hey, this is gonna happen. Maybe we

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>need to start thinking about the ethics involved in this

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and actually get experts in hospitals and other healthcare institutions

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>who are thinking about these kind of issues and start

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to work on legislation for that as well, so that

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't enter into a an environment where people are

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just willy nearly getting crazy upgrades. Maybe they're putting their

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>own lives in danger as a result, maybe they're creating

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a bigger divide between the haves and have nots. They

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that, So that's what that section

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is specifically about. Oh and they also have a little

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>section about drones and that bit, but I'm not going

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to cover it because it's essentially the kind of stuff

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you would imagine, like common sense things like privacy and security,

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that sort of. So then they get into the discussion

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>about the impact on jobs and social systems. This is

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the section that got the most attention in the

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>media about the idea of personhood, and it's kind of

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>also like the most immediate impact or issue. Yeah, because

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't have robots at the level of artificial intelligence

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and autonomy in the general sphere that we have to

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about that right now. I mean, thinking about now

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is good, but it's not like they're already out there

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>right The most advanced ones are in pretty secluded environments

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>for very specific research projects. It's not like you're gonna

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>encounter one as you walk down the street unless there's

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>been a terrible miss have Paul McCartney, Bob I was

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:07.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking either that or it's Johnny five from Short Circuit. So,

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>according to one forecast that the reports cited, the EU

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>could face a shortage of as many as eight D

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thousand Information and Communications technology professionals or i

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>c T professionals. And on top of that, it predicts

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that of all jobs by will require some level of

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>digital skills. So the proposal calls for a revision of

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a digital competence framework so that they can at least

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>help young people and really people of all ages developed

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>those basic skills so that they maintain a viable place

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in the workforce. Um. They also call for designing programs

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to encourage more young women into the fields of robotics

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and the related fields, related technical fields, and they say

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that the European Union and the member states within it

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 1>should launch initiatives in order to support women in I

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>c T and to boost their E skills, which is

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. Essentially, this is a cultural shift, saying, guys,

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:12.919
<v Speaker 1>let's stop sending a message that these are fields primarily

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for dudes, right, because they weren't originally and and it's

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous that they are today. Then that there are people

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who are absolutely instrumental in the development of computer science

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>who happened to be women. Uh, I mean like you

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got a Lovelace who created the first

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>freaking computer programs, and you've got you've got the the

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>woman who does who came up with the coin computer bug. Like, uh,

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>there there contributions to computer science and to information and

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>communications technologies have been phenomenal, But in general, we've created

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a culture. And when by we, I mean like everywhere,

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not the two of us in this no, not I

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>have tried not to perpetuate, yes, but there's been a

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>culture that has discouraged women into going into those fields

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to the point where men who are in the field

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 1>may have like they may feel like what what are you?

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>What are you even here for? Like would they see

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a woman come into like an engineering class. And that

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely needs to change for multiple reasons. And uh so

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, let's get on that, let's create programs and

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>change this perception that is based on fallacy so that

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we get brilliance that were otherwise missing out on them.

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So again it goes well beyond just the idea of

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>robots in that case, also very inspiring. So they also

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>call for a system to monitor job trends to see

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>where jobs are disappearing due to robots and automation, as

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>well as where are jobs being created because of robotics.

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So essentially saying, well, we want to make sure to

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>steer people further away from these jobs that are increasingly

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>being taken by robots, but we definitely need more people

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in these other areas that that are the opportunities have

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 1>opened up because helping shape education and training. Yeah, and

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a this kind of goes in line with

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about when when we visited Georgia

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Tech and chatted about, you know, the idea of will

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>robots take our jobs? And the answer is no, there

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be other jobs. But there's the practical consideration of, well,

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>how do we how do we one identify what those

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs are and to make sure that people are getting

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the education and experience necessary to to do those jobs.

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to say, oh, well, now we've got all

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.120
<v Speaker 1>these more awesome jobs available, It's a lot harder to

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:46.399
<v Speaker 1>practically get people in the right place. Yeah, So this

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is proactively thinking about that. And here's a really big

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>one that that is the gem of the draft as

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>far as most people are concerned. Perhaps the European Union

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>should quote introduce corporate reporting requirements on the extent and

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>purport of the contribution of robotics and AI to the

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>economic results of a company for the purposes of taxation

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and social security contributions end quote. So the idea that hey,

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're a company and you have replaced your human

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>employees with robots, uh, maybe you have to pay a

0:49:21.800 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>certain amount. Yeah, maybe those robots are employees and you

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have to pay social security taxes for each of your

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>robot employees, which sounds crazy because you're thinking like, well,

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 1>robots are never going to collect on social security. But

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you get back to that question fund Yeah, exactly. If

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>if you get to a point where the Social Security

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is being defunded due to the robots taking over more

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and more jobs, you still have the need for social security,

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>but you don't have the money for social security. This

0:49:50.239 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is a kind of a temporary solution because obviously this

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>can't be supportable long term. As more and more things

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get automated, there becomes less of a need for money

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. But until that happens, right right, Yeah,

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 1>there's there's an event horizon past which none of this

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is important anymore. That's that star trek and then we're

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a minute away from it, um and and it does

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:15.919
<v Speaker 1>actually call out specifically like hey, maybe really we should

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 1>all be thinking about a basic universal income. Yeah, they

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:21.280
<v Speaker 1>say that every model state in the European Union should

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really seriously consider that that. It may not be the

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>right or it may not be the same approach for

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 1>every single nation in the European Union, but it very

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 1>well may be a conversation that should start to happen. Uh. Fortunately,

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we do have nations that are debating on using this

0:50:41.320 --> 0:50:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at least in test cases or perhaps rolling out throughout

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>an entire country where we can look and see what happens,

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and if it ends up being a massive failure, we'll say, okay,

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:52.840
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. But we still need a solution to

0:50:52.960 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this problem, perhaps some other solution. Yeah. Yeah. And then

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the last big section in the proposal is licenses. Yeah.

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Now they don't actually have like a specific you know,

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you got to go and fill out Form A three

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and get your robot license. They're laying out something

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>some basic rules guidelines they think that should be included

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for licenses. And they have two different sets, one for

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>designers for robot producers, and one for users. And I'm

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna list all of them because it's they're fairly

0:51:24.920 --> 0:51:27.879
<v Speaker 1>extensive for both. Yeah, but but some okay, Yeah, they

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of really fun and interesting ideas of

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just suggestions of how you should go about robot ing. Yeah.

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>One step one one of the ones under designers is

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.319
<v Speaker 1>let's have to kill switch on robots, like you know,

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>like a like a like just turn it off if

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it just flop. Yeah, so if it starts going Paul

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>McCartney crazy, you know, buts going and say you just

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and then like it just switches to wings mode or something,

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it turns off. Make sure your robot is going to

0:51:57.200 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 1>operate in a legal way, So don't don't make your

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>burglar bot or mugger bot. As we mentioned earlier, this

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>again for licenses for designers, be transparent in the way

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the robot is programmed, as well as the predictability of

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>robotic behavior. In other words, maybe don't call it out

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a pilot. Yeah, it might be a really good choice

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to start off with. The idea being that, you know,

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:22.879
<v Speaker 1>if you are being sincere and honest in the way

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that your robot was designed and and what it is

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:29.799
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do, you reduce the likelihood of some unintended

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>consequence for their down the road. Yeah. I think of

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this part almost like the FDA guidelines for how you

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can market food on food packaging, um, and and just

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, like like just be up and honest

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:42.959
<v Speaker 1>with people and then they'll be able to make better

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 1>decisions and right right, yeah, and you know, and and

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that way you avoid a huge class action lawsuit for

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 1>their down the line. Everyone's happy, Um, they say that

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the developers should design tracing tools during the development stages

0:52:57.920 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of robots so that when a robot behaves in aticular way,

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be traced back to the design of the

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>robot itself. So in other words, it's it's kind of

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:08.879
<v Speaker 1>like a uh, like a tracer bullet in a way,

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the pathway that you can trace back. So

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when it exhibits a specific behavior, you find out why

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it behaved that way in that situation. And this could

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be good or bad. It could be that you want

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to find out, all right, well that was interesting. We

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't anticipate that the robot was going to behave that way,

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:28.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was beneficial, So let's find out what happened.

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Out what happened. Or it could be that the robot

0:53:31.120 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 1>behaved in a way that would cause damage or harm

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to someone, and then you want to find out why

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>did it get to the root of that problem. You

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>never programmed my bot to bash someone over the head. Furthermore,

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it does also specifically say don't make humanoid robot. It

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>was not so much hid but but human like make

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it clear that they're robots. Yeah, that's the most interesting

0:53:56.840 --> 0:53:59.319
<v Speaker 1>part about the little license to developers to be too.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like, make sure your robots are easily identifiable as robots.

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't make robots that people will think are people or animals,

0:54:07.400 --> 0:54:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Or no replicants, no uh reboot, Battlestar Galactic

0:54:11.719 --> 0:54:14.279
<v Speaker 1>A cylons, none of that, I guess. I guess. Really

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it gets down to everything, like, you wouldn't want a

0:54:16.880 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>robot that's designed to look exactly like a tree, for example,

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but the tree is really a surveillance machine that's just

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>constantly recording audio and video. Because if you just see

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a tree and you can't identify as a robot, you

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know that you're being you know, watched surveilled. Now

0:54:33.960 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the UK, which not part of the

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>European Union anymore, but you know you're being under surveillance

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:44.240
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Anyway, I'm unduly upset about the idea

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of a robotic surveillance tree. Yeah, I mean it. The

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>first thing we think of is don't make robots a

0:54:51.000 --> 0:54:53.240
<v Speaker 1>little like people. But really it's saying don't make robots

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>that don't look like robots. That doesn't necessarily mean they

0:54:57.080 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the robot just has to be identifiable

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a robot. It could be in humanoid in shape, or

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it could just be like a bucket with wheels on it.

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know that it's a robot, right, it doesn't

0:55:08.000 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>look like something else. Um, I love our future of

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>bucket robots. Yes, that's actually I'm I'm referencing an actual

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>robot that's haating the streets of London right now. It

0:55:17.320 --> 0:55:20.319
<v Speaker 1>looks like a bucket with six wheels, but it has

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a lid and it's meant to deliver small packages with

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it within two or three miles. All right, I take

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.920
<v Speaker 1>back my my ribbing about bucket robots. I mean, you know,

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could call it looks kind of like

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a box with wheels. I said bucket because it's got

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>curved edges as opposed to rectangular like like part ninety

0:55:37.760 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>degree angles. But yeah, bucket bots are a thing man

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:44.840
<v Speaker 1>onto the users. So they also had several I've only

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 1>picked three of them. One of them is that uh,

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>respect human physical and emotional frailty. So don't make your

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>robot do your bullying for you. Don't set your robot

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to make someone feel badly about themselves or shake them

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 1>down for or milk money, you know, being respectful of

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>other human beings. Yeah, when you're using your robots, don't

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be mean to people, right, general rule of thumb for

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:13.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time, by the way, not just not just

0:56:13.080 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>when you're using your robots. Just don't people speaking of

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you should respect other people's privacy right not to use

0:56:19.200 --> 0:56:22.760
<v Speaker 1>robots to spy on people. Right. So this is really

0:56:22.760 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>relevant right now with drones that have high definition cameras

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:27.720
<v Speaker 1>mounted on them, the idea of you know, using a drone,

0:56:27.680 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 1>don maybe look into someone's window or something. I mean

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:33.839
<v Speaker 1>that this is specifically saying, hey, don't do that. Yeah. Well,

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and and furthermore, like even if it's a situation that

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 1>crops up where you suddenly realize that you've got a

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:42.240
<v Speaker 1>robot in a room and it's inappropriate for whatever reason

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to have that robot doing surveillance, turn off the surveillance.

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And finally, don't weaponize your robot. I just don't do it.

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't don't strap knives to your robots hands and just

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>tell it to go wind melling around or you know,

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Paul McCartney needs no excuses to right, you just keep

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that robot under wraps. No, seriously, though, it's that that's

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the rules that they had keep in mind

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 1>when I say rules, these are all proposals. Even if

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this were to be adopted, it would still just be

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a set of proposal. Yeah, it's not. It's not like

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a legally binding document um. So that gets to

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the reaction to the proposal. Some critics are

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that setting up guidelines this early, particularly for stuff

0:57:24.800 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like the concept of electronic personhood, when we don't even

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have robots that are closed to being conscious, is more

0:57:32.200 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 1>premature than not, and really that that being this premature

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 1>could stifle development right in other in other words, like

0:57:40.720 --> 0:57:43.080
<v Speaker 1>if you were to set up rules and regulations that

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>say X is off limits, someone who is trying to innovate,

0:57:47.240 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 1>may end up not pursuing a path of innovation because

0:57:52.000 --> 0:57:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they're afraid it's going to overlap on that restriction. And

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 1>then the what the critics are saying is that means

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we get a much slower rate of progression when it

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to we get no Paul McCartney bought at all, Right,

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and think of the songs that we're going to miss

0:58:08.080 --> 0:58:10.680
<v Speaker 1>out on from Paul McCartney bought that's going to be

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:13.600
<v Speaker 1>copyrighted in some way that we haven't determined. Yet they

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 1>also point out that this proposal again is not legally

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>binding legislation. So some people are saying, hey, what's the

0:58:19.240 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>point of this anyway. It's not like if if the

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>European Parliament said this is a great idea, that anything

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>would happen. That's not the point I would argue. I

0:58:26.880 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>would argue that the draft report is meant to say,

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>let's start the ball rolling and actually officially get some

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>committees in place to start forming what will be legislation. Yeah,

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I get I get the argument, and in that it's saying, like,

0:58:41.480 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 1>stop making meetings to make more meetings. But but in

0:58:45.040 --> 0:58:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this case it's necessary, especially since like we advocate all

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the time that we need to talk about this, and

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then we say, hey, why are you talking about that?

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy? But uh, finally we have that social security

0:58:58.600 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 1>section that has people scratching their heads because on the

0:59:00.720 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>face of it, it sounds like crazy talk to say,

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a robot is not a person. Why would you have

0:59:05.440 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a robot pay into social security? A robot is never

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>going to collect on social security. But when you look

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at that larger picture that we've mentioned a couple of

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>times now, the idea of a social system that starts

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to fold in on itself through lack of funding, it

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:20.400
<v Speaker 1>starts to make a little more sense at least that

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to find a solution to that problem. Maybe

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:26.919
<v Speaker 1>having the robots essentially the owners of the robots paying

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.280
<v Speaker 1>into social security on behalf of the robots. Maybe that

0:59:29.400 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ultimately doesn't make sense, but we definitely have to think

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>about of a solution that does make sense because that

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:40.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is going to be there either way. So uh so, yeah,

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm I was so pleased to get to

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:47.200
<v Speaker 1>dig into this document and uh and so pleased again,

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like I feel like I've said this

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.640
<v Speaker 1>like nine times already, but like, just good job you guys,

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>y EU for getting this done. Yeah. I hope that

0:59:56.600 --> 1:00:00.959
<v Speaker 1>this leads to more official action. Yeah. Uh, it would

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>be great to see someone take the lead in this

1:00:03.840 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>space and say, I don't care if you guys think

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this is silly. We have to prepare or else we're

1:00:10.480 --> 1:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be caught with our our digital pants down exactly.

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to come up with what adjective do

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to use for pants? Digital? Was perfect? Um,

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so we don't want that to happen. Let's let's get

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead of it. And I think that this is a

1:00:25.360 --> 1:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>really interesting start, and I'm hopeful that it will continue

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and that despite the jokes and the pranks and the

1:00:33.720 --> 1:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the good natured like not so good natured

1:00:37.080 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>jabs on Twitter, that we see progress because it's it's

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>something that has to happen sooner or later, and that

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>or other it happens sooner. Yeah, it will happen whether

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we like it or not. So let's let's be prepared.

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious to hear what you guys think. You know,

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>give it, give it a read if you like it.

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.919
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty two pages long. Uh that includes the first

1:00:57.920 --> 1:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>two pages that have just like the little contents of

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff stuff, and then once you get into that, it's

1:01:02.800 --> 1:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a super fast read. I promise you. You can even

1:01:05.640 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>start skimming it in certain sections because they're reiterating stuff

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they've said, so you can really breathe through it in

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like a half hour easy. And that's if you're taking

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>time to make notes. I know because I've done it. Uh,

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So check it out. It's available online. You can actually

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>get the PDF and read through the whole thing. And

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear what you guys have to think

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>about that, like, do you have your own reaction to this?

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Are there certain things that you think are great ideas?

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Are you things that you feel are completely off off base,

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>off track? Is there anything that you think that they

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>missed entirely? Yeah? And uh. Also, obviously, if you have

1:01:41.000 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes of forward thinking, you can send

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>those to us as well. Our email address is FW

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or you can

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Twitter or Facebook at Twitter

1:01:53.200 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>where FW thinking. If you go to Facebook and you

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>search FW thinking in that little search bar, our profile

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:00.439
<v Speaker 1>should pop up and you can leave us on sit there.

1:02:00.840 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We'd like to hear from you, guys, and we will

1:02:03.080 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. For more on this

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:14.439
<v Speaker 1>topic and the future of technology, visit forward Thinking dot

1:02:14.480 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Com Problem brought to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,