WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 7 NFL Game (Ep. 362)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It's me Joey p Joe Pie Zapia and

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it's Monday. You know what that means. It's time to

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>look ahead to Week seven in the NFL. And maybe

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing for a lot of teams that

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>were overlooking their opponents. In Week six, we had some

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>massive upsets. The Cleveland Brown's upset, the San Francisco forty

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers, the New York Jets, and Zach Wilson. That's right,

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that Zach Wilson beat the Philadelphia Eagles. So it's a crazy,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy week that we are trying to recover from. Lucky

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, despite the fact my favorite thing all week,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Derek Brown, was the the four and a half we

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>locked in early on this show last week on the

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers. I felt so good about that until

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I started watching that game and watching the forty nine

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ers slowly implode upon themselves, then the injuries take their toll.

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I bet the Browns hard at plus four point fifty

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>live and I stuck with it. I was offered a

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>cash out debro and I said, no, I'm gonna see

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this rookie kicker all the way through the end. I

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>told my dad. I was like, look, we're gonna rerooting

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Brown's ear. We watch it all the way

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to the end. He missed the kick. It saved my

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>entire day. Thank you, Cleveland Browns. And here's to live betting.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>What a beautiful thing, Derek Brown, Sam hop and joining

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>us to look ahead, deebro it was a crazy week six.

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to turn the page.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about you, very very happy. And to

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>turn the page, I need Monday night to go pretty well,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to end up above fifty percent for bets. So just

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>a bloodbath on bets. And I was watching the same game, Joe,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and because of where I'm at, I wasn't able to

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.400
<v Speaker 2>live Bett and Hedge. I would that is the sharpest

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>all get out call. But I'm watching it with my kids,

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and my kids go, hey, Dad, who we want to win?

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, we really want the forty nine

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 2>ers to win right now?

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then we want them to win.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, okay, all I need is for

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>them to drive the distance of the field and then

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>we get the cover for the four and a half.

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>So I need it and we didn't. We didn't know

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>any that did not happen.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam. I was texting with Derek during this game, saying, Oh,

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just so good for the Browns. Every time something

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.639
<v Speaker 1>good happened for them. I kept texted in BJ Walker,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>PJ Walker. Sam, you mentioned to me before the show started,

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you're not sure if any team is good in the NFL.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Who's the best team in the NFL right now? If

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I had to ask.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>You, it's probably the Chiefs.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like at this point, you got to give

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 3>them the benefit of the doubt. With Patrick Mahomes. Their

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 3>defense we'll talk about later. I think is a top

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 3>five defense right now, and they have Andy Reid. I mean,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>it's it's them, or it's still probably the forty nine

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 3>ers I think up top. I think again, going against

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 3>one of the best defenses, if not now the best

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>defense in the league, there was just a sort of

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 3>a tail outcome for them on offense.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So all right, well, we're going to try to pick

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>up the pieces from week six, move on to week

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>seven before we do a little bit of housekeeping. You know,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we like to give away free things here, so it's

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>time to give away that. Odell Beckham jersey again the

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Ravens own thanks to Betting Pros. So the big winner

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Ravens jersey is you, Casey Phillips. Congratulations, Casey Phillips.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with us over at Mailbag at Bettingpros

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com with your mailing address, proof of your subscription

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to Betting Pros YouTube channel, and we'll get that jersey

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>shipped out to you again. Casey Phillips, hit us up

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at Mailbag at Bettingpros dot com and with one giveaway gone,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>another one begins. So it's time to throw in your

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>hat for this one. Brace yourselves if you want a

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>chance to win this. Robert Tuny in Chicago bears jersey

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>courtesy of Bettingpros dot com. That's right, This is all

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do. Subscribe to Betting Pros YouTube channel. Drop

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>your comments below, ring that bell to lit goos ding.

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean you just want to talk about rare jerseys.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>A signed Robert tanyan jersey took time out of his

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>busy schedule to sign it for you. So there you

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>have it. Everybody, go win that jersey again. Subscribe to

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube channel, drop a comment below. Heck, if you win,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you can give it to fat Pat Fitzmorris as a

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gag gift for all I care. It's hilarious. Go get

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it right now. All right, let's start at Thursday night

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>football uncertainty of the Jaguars because one of the many

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>injuries is Trevor Lawrence. We're dealing with that right now.

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So New Orleans at plus one and a half underdogs

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at home minus one fifteen over at bet MGM minus

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>point five. Right now you can get Jacksonville points. Bet

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the numbers forty one and a half. The money line

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is minus money basically right there around one hundred one

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>h two to one ten, depending on where you look.

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Sam Hoppin, do you see any early value in this game?

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>You want to jump on this maybe before you get

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>clarity with the injury to Lawrence, if it goes in

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the right direction, and maybe get some value.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't. This is a real tricky one. Obviously you

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>mentioned Trevor Lawrence dealing with some injury issues that the

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.799
<v Speaker 3>market right now I think is pessimistic on Lawrence playing

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 3>this game. I think in an out of conference game

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night, short week, they maybe exercise some caution with Lawrence.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 3>They also lost Tyson Campbell their top cornerback and Brandon

0:04:56.320 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Shurf their top lineman against the cold this past week.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So they're dealing with a number of injuries, not just

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>to Trevor Lawrence. And so this is one that just

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I think screams under for me right now. It's Alwaukee

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Thursday Night football. Both defenses, I think are our top

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>ten in the league. The Saints offense has sputtered quite

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 3>a bit in recent games, so I think with the

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville run defense being very strong against a Saints tief

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 3>team that wants to run the ball, it won't lead

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>to many points on Thursday Night football.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, coming off a tough loss there in Houston,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that New Orleans takes advantage of this

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>home field that they have in a Jacksonville Jags team

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a little banged upty? Or what do you see here?

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Or you're just looking for the under Like Sam said.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the unders in play, but give me I'll

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>look for the Saints to cover in this one, and

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 2>I want the Saints money line not only playing at home.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>This game is another one we get more news on

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Lawrence, Like if he misses this game, spread's gonna tilt,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna go in New Orleans favor. I want to

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 2>be ahead of that. And yeah, I mean I think

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the Saints win this game. So if I'm I think

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 2>this money again, if any Lawrence news drops, I think

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 2>this moves more in the Saints favor And I like

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the Saints at home. There's so many different parts of

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>pieces the Saints offense. Also, this last week against the

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Texans showed a few more signs of getting right, and

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville has been a massive pass funnel this year. I

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>think Derek Carr can walk away with another good game.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Next up is the Giants at home, coming off another loss.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There now one in five, maybe that call should have

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>gone their way. We can argue that all day. They

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>are two point underdogs at home to Washington minus one

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and a half, and get that number over on fandle

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, the number is anywhere from forty to forty

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and a half right now, if you like the Giants

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to pull out this in division win at home plus

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one ten. Now, they did get Saquon back last week,

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday really last week, but still the same thing.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>But Derek, you know, the Giants continue to struggle to

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>get w year, Sam Howe, and Washington coming off a

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>big road wind. You seeing the early value on this

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>line here between the Commanders and the Giants.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Give me the Giants money line. And I know I'm

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 2>talking about a one in five team, but we just

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>saw them go toe to toe with the Buffalo Bills.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Tyrod actually moving this offense going against the Commanders and

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>they get them at home if that defense can stack

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 2>another good week. And Washington's offensive line has been abysmal.

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>The Giants pass rush is nothing. To sit here and

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 2>snub your nose at so they can get pressure after

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Sam Howe, who I gotta go look at it. I

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 2>still think he is the most sacked quarterback in the NFL.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I will happily take the Giants money line A plus

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>money right now.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a sucker for those eighties throwbacks that Giants were

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing last night. They looked so good. It looks so good.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It's so good, and look they left it all out

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there in the field. They gave it everything against the

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills. In your opinion, Sam, do you see any

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>value early on in this New York Washington game?

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not really. I originally made this line Washington by

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. I'd really don't think whether it's

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Jones or Tyrod Taylor, that the line changes all

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 3>that much. You know, you think about the randomness of

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the NFL, like if that end of half scenario goes

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>differently for the Giants and then they are in field

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>goal range to potentially win that game. Like, I don't

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>know if we're talking about them that differently, but it

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>does talk to the randomness a bit. The Giants do

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 3>blitz a ton on defense, and Sam however, versus the

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>blitz has been terribly as a fifty three zero point

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>five PFF grade, which is twenty eighth among qualifying quarterbacks.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Giants might be to play here,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>but it's it's an indivision game that I just I

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I'd rather not.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I can understand that, And look, I think the

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 1>only difference was if they had won that game last night.

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You build a little momentum of confidence, like, hey, we

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>got saque back, we got a huge road victory. We're

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna come home in division game and get back on track.

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Now you're gonna see what Brian Dabole Coach of the

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Year is worth because now You're gonna know how he

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>motivates these guys. Are they are you one and five

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in your quitting or are you one in five? Are

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're fighting next week? So this is gonna be an

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting game, but again one to bet on. That's the

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>tricky part. Buffalo, the aforementioned is gonna head to New England.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Boy do they stink? I keep making money against the

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Patriots every single week. I'm a Patriots fan who's at

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus years of glory and now I'm making money

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>off the downside. So I mean, it's it's just nothing

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but winning. It feels like, uh, this is I thought

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this number would be ten right now it's at nine

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half over at bet MGM you can

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get this one. Of course, New England is underdogs at home.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo usually blows the doors off New England most of

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>these games lately. Anyway, Forty two and a half is

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the number. If you like New England for the upset,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't, it's plus three thirty over a points bet.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I think this number of the nine. Look, I don't

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>want to take too much out of last night, Sam

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the Buffalo offense, especially after you had

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that moment with Damian Harris, you know, getting hurt. I

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think the shades of that moment reminding everybody of last

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>year with Hamlin. I think that was a lot for

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that team mentally. So I think they just go in here,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>beat the crap out of the New England Patriots, and

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this nine is safe to you.

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, really a tough situation with Damian and Harris.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Hope he's okay, but absolutely, I think the Bills can

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 3>cover here. Their four man rush on defense is so lethal.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean they have the sixth highest pressure rate but

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 3>only the twenty ninth highest blitzer rate, so they are

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 3>getting after the quarterback with just four guys. The Bill's

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>defense is a little bit boom or bust for this reason.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 3>When the pass pass protection can hold up on the

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 3>other side, the team can you know, give up some

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>bigger plays. But New England has nothing on offense that's explosive.

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it just looks really bad. They had gone

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I think like twenty seven straight drives without scoring a point,

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, a bajillion drives without even getting into the

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 3>red zone, like it was. It's not been good for them,

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.559
<v Speaker 3>and I think the Bills can cover this one pretty easily.

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I do too. In fact, I want to lock it

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in now because I think it's only going to grow

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>as time goes. I think people are gonna bet the

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Bills hard early on. I think this is gonna go

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to double digits easily. And I might even tease this

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>one too, Like, I just feel like that, uh de bro,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>your take on New England Buffalo offense not good for

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots defense not much better?

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that the Patriots are just an isore

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>right now. It's really bad. I don't disagree that. I

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 2>think that Buffalo can cover this. The only thing that

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I think could could drag this to where Buffalo doesn't

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 2>cover is the Bills have a really bad run defense.

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>This is a perfect spot New England at home inter

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 2>division game for them to slow things down. Feed mare

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>feed zeke, drag this game to the under and to

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 2>be honest, like I maybe the under is the only

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>way that I want to attack this. But outside of that,

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying away from the spread and everything else.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The mac Jones turnovers too. I mean that first interception

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he three yesterday was so bad. It was such a

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bad bad desis It's just broken there like and the

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills are gonna have turnovers in this game. I'm

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>staying away from the over under. I'm just going straight

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Bills. That's all I'm doing here. Let's go

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>straight to Tampa Bay. It's much warmer there. Let's go

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to Tampa. They are three and two. They are minus

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. You're at home. The Atlanta Falcons

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>come in at plus three over a points. Bet the

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. You can get a fan

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>duel forty is this number on DK thirty nine and

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a half over if you like that one over at

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM and then plus one thirty for the Falcons

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to win outright. So the Falcons got their first home

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>loss in a while, for the first home loss of

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Desmuner's career. Can the Falcons get back on track here?

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>De bro or do you think that Tampa kind of

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>recovers from Sunday's butt kicking by the Detroit Lions and

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and actually win this football game?

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I like the Falcons in this one. Give me their lot,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>their bunny line. I think the total and the spread

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>are pretty spot on. But I do think the Falcons

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 2>can go into Tampa and win this game. Defense still

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>playing good. There's still pressure in the quarterback. Well, we

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>know that break Baker Mayfield can fall apart, and he's

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>been surprisingly good versus pressure this year. But I think

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 2>that you're looking at the outside doo of these corners.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>We still haven't seen a just monster blow up game

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>from Bijon Robinson. So it's coming one of these weeks.

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to rule it out that it's against Tampa.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, This line is basically choose your own adventures.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>So how do you want to choose it?

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 3>First of all, I think Atlanta struggles on early downs defensively,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>but Tampa Bay struggles on early downs offensively. So I

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 3>think that I don't know, it's just one. I don't

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>We have so many question marks in these games in

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 3>this slate that I just none of it really weren't

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 3>much opportunity.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it doesn't.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't work much opportunity, then it sounds like

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about unders when it comes to this forty'.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, forty points is a lot for these teams.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Tampa Bay is a pass final defense. But

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Desmond Rider has struggled. He had the one good game

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 3>last week, but I think he just needs to get

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>the ball in the hands of his playmakers, whether it's

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Bijon Drake London, John new Smith, any of those three guys. Really,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they can move the ball and potentially get

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the upset here.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's see if I can tempt you with

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Baltimore game instead. This one's going to be

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore. It's minus two and a half here for

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore Ravens. You're getting the plus two and a

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>half at minus one oh five overrun DraftKings forty four

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is the number one fandal forty four and a half

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on DK if you like Detroit to win plus one

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. Very interesting case to be made. Some injuries though,

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about David Montgomery questionable here. We'll see how

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that unfolds this week. I'm on Ross Brown, still working

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>his way back from injury, but did have the touchdown.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And Sam Laporta also a little banged up. So Detroit's

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of the walking wounded Baltimore coming back from travel.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>How do you see this? One's the early value in

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this game.

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>This is another one that I don't see a ton

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>of value, And actually I think I think Detroit is

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the play here. You know, we have a lot of

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 3>strength on strength matchups in this game. You have the

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Detroit passing offense versus the Baltimore passing defense. But if

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>you look at the quarterbacks that Baltimore has played so

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>far this year, it was CJ. Stroud in his very

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>first game and injured Joe Burrow, Gardner, Minshew, Dorian Thompson, Robinson,

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Pickett, and Ryan Tannehill. Like, none of those really scream.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, we're shutting down some explosive offenses. So I

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 3>think Detroit can get it done. The Baltimore rushing offense

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 3>versus Detroit's rushing defense, which is top five in rushing

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>EPA for play and success rate, I think could make

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 3>the difference here. The Baltimore passing offense still looks a

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 3>little out of sorts. They just haven't clicked at all

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 3>together yet. So I like Detroit to go in and

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 3>bite some knee gaps and take home a road w Yeah.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, I've had a hard time trusting the Baltimore Ravens

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all year, and that's why I'm kind of leaning towards

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the money line here with Detroit. I'd like to get

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>some good reports on some players. But that being said,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>D is that where you're kind of leaning at this

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>early stage as well?

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm gonna take the opposite side of this

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>game here.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>The argument I want to hear it.

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>So Baltimore is not pressure on the quarterback, but they

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 2>are an extremely good pass defense. I know who they've

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 2>played has not been very good. But what are we

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>talking about with the Lions here? If they are without

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 2>David Montgomery, If Jamir Gibbs doesn't play in this game,

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Sam Laporte is banged up, what if he misses this game?

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>You have Amarro, Sam Brown maybe, I mean Jamo's are

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>not even running double digit routes right now, so you

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>cannot go into Baltimore. If they decide they're going to

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>make Detroit one dimensional enough to pass, Yeah, Detroit's been

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty good at that, but I still want to take

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens at home. If we get more word about

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>David Montgomery out in this game, what happens to this spread?

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Does it lean more towards Baltimore? I think so? So

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 2>right now, before that spread moves at all, I think

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to take Baltimore to cover. And I mean

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the money line's fine, you can bet that as well,

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 2>But for me, it's mostly looking at the Ravens to

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 2>cover this two and a half because I think it

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 2>could get up to four if we get news that

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>David Montgomery is definitively out, and if on top of

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 2>that late week news that Jamier Gibbs misses this game.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, we do have some huge marquee matchups here in

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Week six, some really exciting football games. This next one

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is not one of them. The Chicago Bears at one

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in five hosting the Las Vegas Raiders at three and three. Again,

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a choose yard adventure. The numbers three for

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Vegas Raiders on the road against Chicago. I think

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely we see justin Fields again, We're still waiting

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>MRIs and imaging and all these things. Forty and a

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>half is the number plus one thirty five, Derek, Look,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I know this sounds easy to me. I think I

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>just take the Vegas with the three right now, before

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we officially get the rule. Actually, this is one of

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the more intriguing lines jokes aside of early betting. Lock

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Raiders at the three and when the Fields

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>news comes out, I think this number goes to four

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts, Yeah, I think go to four and a

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.239
<v Speaker 2>half or five, just depending on how how you know

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>how much money comes in on that. I think the

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>bets are for this game are pretty straightforward. I think

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 2>it's the Raiders to cover lock in the minus three

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and I will happily take the under for this game

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>as well. I mean we're not even talking about like

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe we don't get Jimmy Garoppolo. Maybe it's Aidan to O'Connell.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 2>It's it's Aim O'Connell versus Trace and Pagent in this game.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>That's true, This line.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Is gonna go right, Like, I'm kind of surprised it's

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>even open.

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So many injuries, Derek, I can't even I can't. We

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>just did the Waiver podcast, Joe, I know, I know,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally forgot about the Garppolo one in my head.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And Sam, I mean back in but still, like I'm

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at the deficits of the Bears without justin fields,

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and like the first thing I'm thinking of is, well,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>what's the Max Crosby sack prop Like that's the first

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>thing in my head. I want to go for that one.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's the best bet you can make in

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>this game, but it's too early to make it down.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Look, if if you had told me that in week

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>seven we were gonna get a potential Brian Hoyer versus

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Tyson Badger matchup, I mean, put it in the calendar

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>book market like this is.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Man like he's gonna he's gonna DVR this, like you

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 2>have like a seal of this.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 3>On a serious note, so I do think it is

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna be Brian Hoyer. Jimmy Garoppolo can't play, and I

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 3>think Hoyer is competent enough to get the ball in

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 3>day Adams, Jakobe Myers, Josh Jacob's hands. Like these guys

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 3>are their entire offense and they're moving the ball pretty well. Uh,

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, to your point, Max Crosby has been incredible

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 3>this year once again, can wreck this Chicago Bears offensive line.

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I like the Raiders with the points here.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, it's crazy days out there with all these injuries.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of injuries, we'll see if PJ. Walker makes his

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>second start. I mean why not? I mean, heck, it

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>was fun right. Indianapolis Colts are gonna host the Cleveland

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Browns here in this contest. The Cleveland Browns are one

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites Overrip at MGM. You can

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>get Indianapolis at plus two and a half at minus

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>one fifteen at FanDuel. The number for this game is

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine and a half on fandle forty points bet

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis one plus one ten. Excuse me on the money line, Sam,

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland coming off a huge victory, Indianapolis coming off

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>another disappointing loss. Man, the Jaguars just have their number

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for the last couple of seasons. It feels like they

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>just keep sticking it to them over and over and

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>over again. Is this a trap game? That's my number

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>one question here? All that goodwill? Does it all go

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>away when you go on the road here and Indy

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>gets back at home and wins this football game? Because

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what the NFL feels like to me in Week

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>seven right now.

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, you asked me about a trap game last week,

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>and I profusely push that down, and.

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You did previously push that down. What what game was that? Again?

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Was the Brown I raise my hand.

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 3>I did if you had told me that I was

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 3>going to get six points of closingline value, I'm making

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that bet one hundred times out of one hundred. Okay,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>it was a tail out come. But in any case,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>I bet.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The minus four and a half on Sanford. It was

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>the right process was However, However, the right pivot is

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're watching these games live, you have this opportunity

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to to redeem yourself and look at some of these

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>things and and I think that's one of the great

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>things about live betting. And again, if you haven't already

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>downloaded the betting pros, app get the best lines, you

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can set the game notifications, do all the right things,

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you're doing that, you know you can make

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>a good educated investment and then see what's happening and

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>developing in a game, and see the injuries and see

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the play and feel what's going on and make hedges

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>that are really smart at times or profits in this

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>case and this instance. But continue with Sam, keep telling

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>me the story. I want to hear it.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think I was sort of waiting

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 3>for Cleveland's defense to show something against a top offense,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and they did exactly that. Again San Francisco. Obviously we

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>know San Francisco dealing with the injuries on offense to

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Trent Williams, Christian McCaffrey and Debs Samuel, But even with

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 3>them in the game, like they were just crushing them

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 3>And I don't see how, you know, as fun as

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Garner Minshew is, they just don't even have the same

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 3>level of playmakers as the forty nine ers. So I

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>think Cleveland can cover this. I made this Cleveland by

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>three to start, and if we get some positive news

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 3>on Deshaun Watson again kind of a weird situation, then

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that move is excuse me, that line is going to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>move even more in favor of the Browns.

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on the Cleveland side too. Defense travels at

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. We just talked about the

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>defense on the Way We Wire podcast on Fantasy Bros. Derek,

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know they were only thirty percent rostered still

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's because they were coming off a bye and

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>then people started dropping them because they are forty nine ers.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Is gonna be ugly? Well it wasn't. I mean there,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's ugly, just a game ugly for a brock perty

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of times. But all jokes aside, Cleveland feels like the

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>right side of this game to be on, and I

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think now is a really interesting time to jump on

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it before like Sam said, if you get more positive

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland injury news, a Kareem Hunt look good running the football,

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>drum Ford has moments at the end of the game,

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Cooper made an amazing catch. They're like there were there

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of things to take away positively in

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>this momentum. But again, it's like momentum stops every week

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>when you get these crazy things and you go up. Well,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for that momentum of Cleveland. I feel like

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a trap game, so I'm being very careful

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. This is like a one unit bet, but

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that unit is on Cleveland right now.

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts, I'm with Sam. If this game would have

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>been in Cleveland, this line would have opened at like

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>minus three and a half probably for the Browns. So

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>even though they're on the road, I'm totally fine betting

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the Browns one to cover. You want to attack their

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 2>money line, that's fine too. I think this defense is

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna go into Indian slap the mustache off of Minshew's face.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I like that. Los Angeles Rams are going to

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>host the Pittsburgh Steelers, coming off there by minus three

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Rams at home, you get plus three and

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a half on the Pittsburgh Steelers at minus one fifteen

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>at bet MGM, the three is at DK forty two

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and a half is a DK and if bandle as well,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>plus one forty six for the Steelers on the money line. Derek, Look,

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the Rams big question now is the injuries

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to that Backfieldkyen Williams, Ronnie Rivers both hurts, and now

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like Zach Evans. Now, I don't know if that

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>matters so much because I feel like they're gonna throw

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball no matter what they want to do anyway.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>So that being said, your confidence tells me, Hey, let's

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get in on the Rams here, or do you want

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to wait and maybe people start betting the Pittsburgh side

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>of this game and anticipating, oh no, so many injuries

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams.

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know how much that line's gonna move

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>just based off of Kien Williams, Like if you had

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.479
<v Speaker 2>bigger news like it was Hooker, Cooper, Stafford somebody like that.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I can't see the line moving that much for the Rams.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean as far as in the Pittsburgh side. So really,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>I want to lock this in early. Give me the

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Rams to cover minus three. I don't want to do

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 2>anything with the total because I just don't know how

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>much pushback the Steelers are going to offer the Rams,

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and I mean their offense, their defense, pick whatever, pick

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 2>whatever you pick your poison, their defense. This entire team

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 2>has been a surprise this year, like the if the

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>ball drops any other different directions, like, we could be

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>talking about a four or five win team right now.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think that they're going to easily take care

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>of the Steelers.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Sam, do you agree with Derek that this line probably

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is not going to move much all week long?

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think so. I think this line is

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 3>actually like spot on right now. And you mentioned the

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 3>backfield injuries for the Rams. On the Pittsburgh side of

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 3>the ball, it sounds like they're going to get Pat

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Friar Muth back. They could get Deontay Johnson back on

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 3>offense as well. Larry Ogunjobi and TJ. Watt did go

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 3>into their bye week with some injuries at the end

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 3>of their pre bye week games.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>He already popped his faver back in the place. He's good.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it doesn't sound like they're going to miss any time,

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.120
<v Speaker 3>so that's good. But it is something too to monitor.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>We've seen that this Pittsburgh passing defense can be exploited,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 3>and the passing attack of the Rams is the best

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 3>unit on that team. So I think that this line

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>is spot on. I'm staying away right now, but I

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 3>think this is going to be a really good matchup.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Arizona at Seattle. Seattle seven and a half point favorites

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>against Arizona. You can get Arizona plus eight and a

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>half over on DK on the betting pros app right now.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Forty five and a half is that number? Forty six

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half of the under on DK plus three

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ten for the Cardinals. Cardos are one and five. Look,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know they got a lot of moxie. They hang

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in there. Seattle defense not great sam But at the

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>same time, do you think that the seven and a

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>half is a little too big of a number.

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, you could tell that the Seahawks

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 3>offensive line was struggling against Cincinnati, but Arizona is not

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>nearly as a as ferocious of a d line. They

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>have the worst pressure rate in the league. I think

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Kenneth Wager should be able to run all over this

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Arizona defense. You know you said the Seattle defense has

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 3>been bad. Their run defense has been sneaky excellent this year.

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Their fifth in rushing EPA for play, first in success rate.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>In your opinion, are those excellent because everybody just wants

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball on them? Or are they excellent

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>on their own just out of curiosity? Because I think

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the plan of attack for Seattle is throw against them,

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>So those numbers deflated because people want to attack them

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary.

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that's part of it too, but they I

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I just think they're they're performing even if

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 3>they are throwing against Seattle a ton like when they

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 3>are running the ball, they're struggling to do so. So

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Arizona is going to be able to

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 3>pass the ball super effectively against them. The Josh Dobbs

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 3>hype has has sort of worn off a little bit

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 3>in recent weeks.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll double down with Sam here. I think it's because

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Seattle's run defense is actually really freaking good.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, I want to ask the question because I

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's we talked about a lot, like Derek

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>when we do the Betting Pro Show. I mean, you

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>see the DFS show on the Betting Pro Channel on Fridays,

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we always talk about like up Seattle, let's throw the

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>ball against Seattle, you know, so I just wonder, you know,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes there's that you know, apples and our statistics sometimes

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>where ye know, well are they really good at this?

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Or a people just not challenging.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>The gout, I mean the other part. And I wanted

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to double check this real fast. But you've got four

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>five guys for Seattle grading out with seventy five or

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 2>higher run defensive grades for the Seattle Seahawks. And one

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>of those guys we haven't seen a whole lot of

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 2>with Jamal Adams, so if he comes back, he's a

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>full time guy. I think that their run defense actually

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 2>goes up another here.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go to Los Angeles and Kansas City. The

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs are five and one, they're at home. They're five

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites against the Chargers. We'll see

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what the Chargers do tonight. Fifty one is the number

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on the total here plus two a five for the

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers to win. These are typically pretty competitive games.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Herbert really kind of show his best against

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, which is fun to me, I'm just gonna

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>write for that fifty one. I know it's tough for

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City lately. They seem like there's still a work

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>in progress. They don't know who their favorite is. But

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you like the other side of this, You're going underneath.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm going under. I'm going big down under on

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 2>this game. The Kansas City defense has been elite. Lugerius

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Sneed is playing out of his freaking mind man like

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>he is shadowed. I'm curious when I pull up the

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 2>metrics this week. He's shadowed in almost every single game,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 2>and the laundry list of guys he is shut down

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 2>has been awesome. So I'm looking at this game. This

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 2>game screams the under. The only reason this the only

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 2>reason this game has the to total that it has,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 2>is these two teams and their names and the name

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 2>sexiness attached to them. Outside of that, if you look

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 2>at what these two offenses have done, much as the

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City defense, there's so many routes and paths to

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the under in this game. That is the big, big

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>play for me in this game.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, your thoughts? Are you also in on

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the under in this one?

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I am?

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean again, the name value, with the quarterbacks Justin

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Herbert and Patrick Mahomes obviously driving this total up. But

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 3>like I mentioned earlier in the show, I think Kansas

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 3>City has a top five defense. They're top eight in

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 3>EPA per play, success rate EPA per drive. Their passing

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 3>defense is third in EPA per play and second in

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>success rate, so they've been able to slow down some

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 3>of these passing attacks. Their rushing defenses is still a

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 3>big concern. They're twenty ninth and rushing EPA per play.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>But if the Chiefs defense can hold this Chargers offense,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 3>and then on the flip side again, we've talked about

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the Kansas City offense struggling like they didn't do much

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 3>against a terrible Broncos defense on Thursday night. Now Andy

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Reid with the extra time to prepare and maybe realizing

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 3>you shouldn't be playing with his food as much as

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 3>he did on Thursday night changes things. But I like

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City to cover this spread. I think their defense,

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 3>combined with their offense getting a little bit of extra time,

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 3>will help them cover.

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Playing with bringing Bo that was nice.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>We're going to jokes today.

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>I like that, man, I'm here for it, Sam, I

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>got a quick question, man, if before we get to

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>this next one, if you just took the name Cache

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>out of these quarterbacks and these offenses and just look

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>at what they were doing this season, doesn't this feel

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 2>like a game that should be like forty seven and

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>a half ish, if not maybe a little bit lower

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>based off all what these teams have actually done this year.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you're sort of I think the lines are

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the line for the total is possibly baking in. Okay,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe this is the week for the Chiefs.

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>To have a click.

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 3>But again, yeah, they're offering hasn't been great.

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been Look, that is absolutely accurate. It hasn't

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been great. They are working progress. However, Look, I think

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't just say if you take the quarterbacks away,

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because this is a quarterback league and those two quarterbacks

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are capable of putting on a show. And that's why

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if this number was fifty three and a half, I'd

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>probably be more where you are, because last year they

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>were a fifty four and fifty one for the two

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>games they played against each other. Fifty one is just

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>right for me, And I'm like, Okay, I'm comfortable with

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the over at fifty one. If you started to push

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it to fifty three and a half or somewhere like that. Okay,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where I'm out on that one. It's a razor

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>thin margin. Speaking of razor thin margins for error, the

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos are at one in five. They're gonna host

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the Green Bay Packers. The Packers you get minus one

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>at points bet for Denver you get plus two over

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>on DK. Forty four and a half is the number

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on bet MGM forty five at FanDuel. If you like

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Denver to get another victory, a plus one ten a DK,

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you can go bet that. Sam, what are your thoughts

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on this one? You're a Packer guy, Jordan Love not

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>coming off a really good performance, so your thoughts.

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 3>The Packers need Aaron Jones back. I mean, I don't

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 3>want to put a ton of value into a single

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 3>running back, but AJ Dillon has played not well this year,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and they just need some explosiveness back in that offense.

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 3>As of this morning, Jones was practicing, so that's good

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.200
<v Speaker 3>to see. I believe Darnell Savage was practicing and kway

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Walker was doing some stuff off to the side. But

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I like the under here. The Broncos defense hasn't been

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 3>very good, but need it just these offenses are sort

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of sputtering at times this year. The Packers got off

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 3>to a hot start but have quickly regressed past the

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 3>mean to be honest, and I think even though Denver

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 3>can't get much pressure on the quarterback, they'll be enough

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 3>to keep this one under.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Derek, your thoughts on this one before you

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the two games that everybody really is excited about.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Sam brought it up a point that I

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>wanted to hit on this. With Denver having a bottoms,

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I won't say that there's sixth worst in pressure rate

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 2>this year, and that's been the Achilles Hill for Jordan Love.

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 2>He just melts under pressure. And at Denver their pass

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>rush can't get home. I like the Packers to win

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>this game. I do lean towards the under just because

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of how both of these teams have played. But the

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Jones news I think could swing a little bit.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about with Kyron Williams a little bit.

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 2>So if you wanted to take the Packers to cover

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 2>and win this game outright, I don't hate the money

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>liner to them covering the spread.

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go to Miami at Philadelphia. This is

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a good one here, Sunday Night football. Let's go. The

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are minus two and a half point favorites of

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this one over on DK at minus won ten. Fifty

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a half is the number on FanDuel fifty

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>three over on DK. If you like the under, you

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>get my aami a plus one twenty five. So, look,

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Miami's had some injuries here with the backfield. We know

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that Tyreek Hill had that cramp issue. But look, this

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>is a historically good offense for the Miami Dolphins, like

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about all time great is what we've seen

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so far. Derek Brown, is that going to travel to

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia in your opinion? And if so, do we just

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>take Miami on the money line and plus one twenty

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>five or do we see the Eagles after a bad

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>loss get right here against Miami.

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I could see either one of these teams pulling this

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>win out. And I'm kind of surprised, Like I think

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>this spread should be a little bit closer than what

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>it is. I just want to take that. I want

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 2>to hit the over for this game. And because you're

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>telling me Philly is going to force the Dolphins to

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 2>be more pass heavy because they are a pass funnel. Yeah, okay,

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 2>fine two is gonna take to the ear Tyreek Waddle,

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 2>let's go and Philly can CounterPunch. Philly can push this

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 2>off sh of course again, so I'm all on, look,

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I understand this is at fifty two and a half.

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't give a crap man, Like both these teams

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>could put up a ton of points. I want to

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 2>hit the over and I want to stay away from

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the spread and the money lines on this one.

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>How about you, Sam? How do you see this one?

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Because this is the marquee matchup, is the standalone game?

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Is gonna be a lot of betting on it. Do

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to go ahead and be on the Miami side,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>the Philly side, or just the side of the over?

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm on the Miami side here. Philadelphia is struggling with

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 3>some injuries in the secondary. Reblankenship left early, Bradley Roby

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 3>left the game earlier. Dale Darius Slay did not play

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 3>like who is going to cover Tyreek Hill and Jalen

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Waddle Like it doesn't matter no, Like Ladon Johnson left

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the game early as well, which is a huge potential

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 3>loss for a Philadelphia offensive line that is potentially the

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 3>best in the league. The Philadelphia pass rush has not

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 3>been phenomenal. They are fifteenth in pressure rate this year.

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 3>So I like the Dolphins money line.

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>All right. Last one here, San Francisco forty nine Ers,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>another team coming off their loss. Man the Eagles had

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just beaten the Jets, they would be right at the

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>top of that NFC where looking down at everybody. They

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>did not handle their business either did the forty nine Ers.

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna go play the Minnesota Vikings. They are now

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>two and four. Look, the Vikings are not great, so

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>one would imagine here that San France should go in

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>there and take care of Minnesota and maybe take out

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>their aggression. But Sam, the numbers a good size. It's

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seven here, Christian McCaffrey questionable for this game as of

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>recording this. Forty four and a half is the number

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for this contest. Minnesota plus two sixty is a big

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>number on the money line. So I guess at the

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, this is just a question of

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the San fran in your opinion, just bounce

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>right back. I mean, they did have losses on the

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>offensive line side to a lot going on here. For

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:50.680
<v Speaker 1>San fran Do you think that really affects Party on

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the road against Minnesota two consecutive ro games.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Too, Yeah, I think it could. I mean the discourse

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 3>with Rock Party this week, who be interesting to follow, but.

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Take all the toys away all of a sudden, He's

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 1>not Tom Brady too anymore. He's not Tom Brady two

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>point maybe, so I do think, go on.

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 2>Geez, he did.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think something under discussed is obviously the Trent

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Williams entry. He apparently was seen wearing a walking boot

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 3>out of the game. Now that's not a death sentence

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 3>by any means, but this man Minnesota defense hasn't been

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 3>as terrible as expected, at least going into the season.

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 3>They're obviously not the Browns defense by any stretch of

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the matter. But this is what I'm staying away from

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 3>for right now. Potentially could use it in a teaser leg,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 3>teasing San Francisco down to a point and a half

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 3>or something, depending on on the line. I don't really know. Again,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm having some trust issues with the forty nine ers

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 3>right now, as you can possibly probably tell. But it

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:01.919
<v Speaker 3>also is Kirk Cousins in prime time, and he has

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 3>struggled in those situations. So I'm staying away for right now.

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 3>I do think this is a really interesting matchup, though.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an interesting one from a prop standpoint.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.319
<v Speaker 1>The game itself. That's the one where I struggle here,

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it's not that I don't have faith

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the forty nine ers, it's just it's a weird

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>scenario now with the injuries on top of it, and

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the walking boat's never a good thing. I mean, walking

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>boat typically means you ain't playing this week at the

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>very least. So Derek, your thoughts on this one as

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we close out Week seven look ahead?

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I all these lines are really good. They're really a

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>spot on the spread of the totals. I want to

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 2>stay away from those. I do. I don't want to

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 2>sound like I'm insane here, but I do see a

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>scenario where the Vikings could win this game if you

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 2>look at how their defense stacks up against this. If

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 2>no Trent Williams this week, we don't get debo, he

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have CMC, and the Vikings are blitzing at the

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:58.959
<v Speaker 2>highest rate in the league. If that pressure gets home

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>and their pressure rates are going up, you're talking about

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a defense that started the year bottom three in pressure rate.

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Now they're up to middle in the road. Like this

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 2>defense is finding itself a little bit and I think

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 2>at home as well. If this game was in San Francisco,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 2>I feel a little bit better about this. But there

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 2>are avenues for the Vikings defense to take this home

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for them, especially as banged up as the forty nine

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 2>ers are, because the Vikings run defense has been top

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 2>ten this year. So if you can make them one dimensional,

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you can blitz brock perty And we saw what happened

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 2>last week and the only toys that he has to

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 2>play with is Brandon Aiyuk and George Kittle. I'm not

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna tell you that I'm betting the Minnesota Vikings money

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 2>line right now, but it is really freaking intriguing, all right.

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear what everybody else is in on,

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you drop your comments below in the

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel, and don't forget to also make your picks count.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Go to bettingpros dot com, Slash and fl contest join

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it today. The winner on the year gets a JSN

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>autograph Jersey Jackson Smith and Jigba. But we're also doing

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>weekly prize as monthly prizes you don't have to make bets,

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just make picks as easy as that. Download the Betting

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Pros app again click that community tab, join the NFL contest,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or just go to betting Pros dot com slast NFL

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>contest to go win and remember when you drop your

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>comments below in our chat here in the YouTube, you

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>might win that Robert Tunyan jersey. That's right, I want

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you to win that. I'm talking to you. You know

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>who I'm talking to. You know you want that jersey.

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it. Everybody that'll do it for us,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for Derek

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Sam Hoppin. I'm Joey P. We'll see you

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>next time. Kids. Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Follow us on x and TikTok at betting Pros and

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros