WEBVTT - TechStuff Tidbits: Format Wars

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? Well, it's time for

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a tech stuff tidbits. This one will probably be a

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>long one, like a lot of mine. I get it.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm bad at being brief, but I thought I would

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about format wars, which I've talked

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about before, but uh, it was one of those that

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to kind of talk about to explain

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>what we mean when we say format war and what

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that can imply. And the older you are, the more

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.319
<v Speaker 1>format wars you have likely witnessed firsthand. Like I can

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think of a handful that I've seen, but of course

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty that we're way before my time. So

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what is a format war? Why can they be really bad,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>particular for consumers? And what are a few examples. That's

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what we're gonna look at today, But first let's define it.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So a format war essentially is when you've got two

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>similar technologies, so they each accomplish the same thing, or

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at least a very similar outcome. They're both meant to

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>provide for the same purpose, they might do it in

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>very different ways. In fact, frequently they do approach this

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in extremely different ways. And typically these two different or more.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's more than just two. But these different technologies

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are incompatible with one another. So they're each meant to

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>achieve a certain goal, but they can't work together because

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it in a fundamentally different way or sometimes

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a subtly different way, but a way that's different enough

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can't work together. So, in other words, if

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you buy technology A, then you aren't really able to

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>use the stuff for technology B on it. Like we

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>see this very easily and stuff like consoles, right, we

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think of the console wars where you have an Xbox

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or a PlayStation or a Nintendo. Well, you can't play

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation games on an Xbox, you can't play Xbox games

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>on a Nintendo, and so forth right, you can get

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the titles for those particular consoles, but you can't put

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an Xbox you know, disk in a PlayStation console. It

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>won't work. I mean you could do it, it just

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't work. Now. One way you could get around that

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>is if you buy all the consoles. Right, So if

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a Tech A and a Tech B. The

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one way you could get around being limited is you

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>could also buy tech B. But then you're spending way

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>more cash. And ain't all of us got that kind

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of cheddar? You know what I'm saying. I am not

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of person who can buy every format just

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>so that way I have access to everything. And you know,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we really do see this today played out in other ways,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like the different streaming services I would argue are kind

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of a format war. Um, it's more of a streaming

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>war because the format is pretty much the same. It's

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not like, you know, if you have uh one type

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>of streaming device versus another, that you're limited to specific

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>types of streaming content. But otherwise it's very similar in

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you want access to everything, you gotta subscribe

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to everything, which is pretty frustrating as a consumer. So

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason format wars tend to be bad for consumers

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is that we're faced with really tough choices. If we

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>want whatever the technology actually does, then we then have

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to decide which option do we go with. Do we

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>go with tech A or do we go with tech B.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>We do that knowing that our choice is going to

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lock us in from that point forward into that technologies

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem again unless we go crazy and buy all of them.

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So if we do that, if we're buying a specific one,

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we say, all right, I've looked at both tech A

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and tech B really for a long time. I have

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decided that Tech A is the one that I

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like more, so I'm gonna go with that. Um. But

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>we do that knowing that we're gonna miss out on

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>anything that was made explicitly and exclusively for Tech B.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And likewise, if we had made the other choice, we'd

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be facing the same situation, just in reverse. So you

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>can go with a road less traveled and it will

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 1>make all the difference. But different does not mean better.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean worse either. It means different, and you

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>might feel reluctant to get on board in the first

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>place early on in a format war, because sometimes formats

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>go obsolete. In several of the examples that will talk

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>about in this episode, one or more formats would ultimately

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>fall to a different one that would survive, and obviously

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that means that anyone who has backed a failed format

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>is left with a piece of technology that becomes increasingly

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>irrelevant and ultimately obsolete. Meanwhile, if you want to stay

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>up to speed, you have to bite the bullet and

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>buy the other format. Either that or you just you know,

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>wash your hands the whole thing and walk away from

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>technology and live out in the woods, which, trust me,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I have been tempted to do on numerous occasions. Now,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if this happens to you once or twice, where you

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>back a format and the format ultimately fails, you might

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>end up being a little gun shy around emerging formats.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You might then have a philosophy of this looks really cool.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There are two different versions of this thing, and they're

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.679
<v Speaker 1>fighting each other. I'm just gonna wait and see how

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this shakes out before I jump on board. Right you,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been bitten too many times. There are early adopters

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>who who just live for this stuff and they go

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out and they'll buy every new thing as it comes out. Um,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where they're getting their money from. It

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is not the same place where I get my money from,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>because they don't let me get that kind of money.

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, you might feel like a wait

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and see approach is better. And honestly, this is sort

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of what I typically do, although I do occasionally fall

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>victim to getting hyped because you have to suppress the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>evil feeling of fomo, you know, the fear of missing out,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly as you see other folks really enjoying their technology

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>while you just sort of sit and wait. I'm kind

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of imagining now people playing video games while writing jet

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>skis and flying over waves or something. Now, one thing

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>that can happen with format wars is that the industry

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as a whole sometimes will coalesce around a unified standard.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And it is best for the consumer anyway when this

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>happens before products ever come to market, because at that point,

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>customers have the option to buy whichever brand of the

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>technology they like, and they know it should work with

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anything else made for that specific use case. So,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in other words, like there are times where companies will

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.799
<v Speaker 1>all be developing a technology that's meant to do something similar,

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and the companies, well, then behind closed doors essentially meet

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>with one another, hash it out, make compromises, and create

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a more unified technology before they come to market. So

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>then when you go to the store, you're like, all right, well,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's brand A version of this, there's Brand B version

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of this, there's Brand C, version of this, but they

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all do the same thing, and the stuff that's made

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for them will work on the other ones. That's ideal

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>for customers. Doesn't always happen that way, but we have

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>seen that happen a few times. UH, Like the Compact Disc.

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>While it did have competitive competing formats, the Compact disc

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>was not like by itself, but the Compact Disc benefited

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>because that was it was the product of that kind

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of compromise before it came to market, and that ultimately

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>meant that consumers had fewer incompatible formats in front of

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>them in order to uh to enjoy that technology. So

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it does happen, but um often we won't see agreement

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in an industry on a particular standard until after different

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>formats have already hit the marketing. But then, of course

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it's too late. At least some portion of the consumer

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>public will be left behind if ultimately everyone then agrees

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>upon a standard. All right, Well, let's talk about a

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>few famous format wars. And there's quite a few of them.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>There have been dozens of them. I'm gonna stick with

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>some that aren't very obscure, Like I'm gonna stick with

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some well known ones just for the purposes of kind

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of explaining what was going on, and a lot of

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>them will relate to technology and various forms of media,

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>because that's one realm. Whereas consumers, we have seen format wars,

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, front and center, like those tend to be

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the most uh published or publicized format wars in our

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>era and uh And when I'm talking about media, I'm

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>really talking about any content that plays upon technology. It

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>could be media in the form of music, it could

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be shows and movies or or whatever, or it could

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>be software. So that's kind of what I mean when

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I say media. But one format that I've talked about

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a format war that I covered in past episodes. I

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>also talked about this when I I appeared as the

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Quizster on Ridiculous History. If you've never listened to Ridiculous History,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you should check it out. It's a very fun show

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and once in a rare while I'll pop on as

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous, over the top villain called the Quister. But

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there was one episode where I showed up and talked

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about rail gauges, as in railroad tracks, you know what

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>trains travel upon. In the very early days of railroads,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you had different engineers and different companies that were building

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>train engines and cars or rather like bogeis or trucks

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>as they're sometimes called. These are the wheeled frames that

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>sit on the rails and then you essentially bolt cars

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>onto these frames. Well, the were a lot of people

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>making these, and they were making them at different sizes,

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Like they had designed the tracks and the the trains

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>uh to run on a specific width of rails, and

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they weren't all the same everywhere. So this is just

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a random, like hypothetical example. You could have a region

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>within a country where one part of the region there's, uh,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a company that's laying down tracks that are a

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred centimeters apart because the wheels on their vehicles are

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred centimeters apart. But elsewhere in that same region,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you might have folks building other trains where they've settled

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>on a width that's a hundred twenty centimeters apart. And

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so you can't have a train that was built for

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>one run on the tracks of the other, right, because

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if a train were to encounter a section

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of track where suddenly there was a twenty centimeter difference

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in the width apart from the rails, the train's gonna

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>go flying off the track it you know, the wheels

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>can't expand with it. So this obviously was a limiting factor.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>So as people were building train tracks, they eventually arrived

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>at locations where other tracks were also being built at

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a different width, and that meant there was no way

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for a train to pass from one set to another,

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and if you really wanted to travel long distance, chances

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>are you would have to change trains, perhaps a few

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>times in different towns. In fact, there was one town

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania where this became a cornerstone of their local economy.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>They counted on the fact that you had different rail

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>gauges all terminating at this one town because it would

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>mean that trains would have to stop in that town,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the locals often found employment by doing stuff

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that was related to the fact people were stopped in

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the town in order to change trains. So there were

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>people who made money as as porters who were unlow

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>trains or loading other trains. You had a lot of

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are making money because they were providing food

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or lodging or both two travelers. So when you had

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>government saying, you know, it would make way more sense

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for us to settle on a standard rail gage so

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that you could travel seamlessly from point A to point

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>B without having these issues. Towns like this one in

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania really objected to that, and by objected, I mean

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like they were. They got a little rowdy, they started

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>tearing up train tracks. That's how bad this format war

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>was going. Because they saw it as their livelihood and

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>if you were too streamline things, it might be better

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for the passengers, but it wouldn't be better for this town.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So this was a format war where depending upon what

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>side you were on, like what where you were coming from,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>if you were coming from the perspective of a traveler

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or you were coming from the perspective of a townsperson

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>who is dependent upon this for their living, you had

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a very different view on what was important. Now. Ultimately,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>at least in most cases, UH standards were arrived at

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and the train gauge was set to a specific width. UH.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>There are still trains in countries even like the United

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>States that have a different rail gauge, but they tend

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to be curiosities now. They're like tourist attractions UM and

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>typically are not really used that much in industry these days.

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So you can. You can sometimes find these in interesting

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>places where you know people have maintained the tracks and

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the systems so that you can experience it. But if

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you're traveling coast to coast, then you're on standardized rail gauge.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So that was a format work that was long in

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the making and took a long time to resolve and

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't go easily. Okay, we're gonna take a quick break here,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but when we come back, we'll talk about some more

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>format wars. Okay, let's get back to it. So another

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>really big and important format war, particularly here in the

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>United States back in the day, like like late eighteen

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>hundreds into the nineteen hundreds, was alternating current versus direct current.

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So here in the US, that war was really personified

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>as Thomas Edison on the direct current side versus George

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Westinghouse on the alternating current side. Though some people will

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>substitute George Westinghouse. They'll they'll put in Nicola Tesla instead,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes Tesla versus Edison. That's not really an

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>accurate description because Edison was really more of a business

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>owner as was Westinghouse, and Tesla was more of an engineer. Um.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But we often see it Edison versus Tesla's really Edison

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>versus Westinghouse. And anyway, Westinghouson and Tesla were on the

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>alternating current side. There were numerous promotional stunts that both

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sides held in an effort to have their own standard

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>adopted for the purposes of building out infrastructure throughout the

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>United States. I mean this was like, this was representing

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a true fortune in investments right in order to build

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>out power plants and all the wiring and everything that

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>would be needed in order to transmit power to the

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>average American citizen. It is hard to put a figure

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on how big a a fortune that was a potential fortune.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So clearly the stakes were very high between d C

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and a C, and they each had their own uh

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>benefits and drawbacks, but ultimately a C would win out

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>like they were. And again there were some huge promotional battles.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>A big one was when Westinghouse managed to to land

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the contract for the World's Fair to light the World's Fair.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But and of course there's there's stories that have grown

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with the retelling, such as the the electrocution of an

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>elephant named Topsy using alternating current um, which was frequently

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>attributed to Edison in recent years, but really it was

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>more like Edison's company that did this. And the story

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>gets really complex. It's still not a good story, like

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, hearing about doing a public execution of an

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>animal in part to show how a type of electricity

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>is quote unquote more dangerous than another type. You know,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that's indefensible, really, but the story is more complicated.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll leave it at that. However, ultimately a C one out,

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>at least for the purposes of long distance electricity transmission.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And and honestly, the reason for that was largely practical

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>because it was way easier to use transformers, which work

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>with a C current but not d C current. And uh,

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it was easy to use transformers in order to step

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>up voltage for the purposes of long distance transmission, step

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>down voltage when it gets to its destination and make

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>use of it, whereas d C you would have to

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>build way more electric plants closer to the point where

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's providing the electricity. So, just from a practical standpoint,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a C ultimately one out at least back then now

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right now, as I record this episode, I'm also on

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>at work on another really big episode about the music industry,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>both the technology and the business side of the music industry,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>because the two are extremely closely tied together, Like you

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>can't really I would argue extract one without the other

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>because they inform each other. So the that I am

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hard at work, it's probably actually gonna be more than

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>one episode about the music industry and technology. So this

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>next format war I want to talk about, plays into that.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>In the early days of recorded media, like just when

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>people were learning how they could take sound and record

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that onto a physical object and then play it back,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially reversing the process. UH, you had companies like Thomas

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Edison's that were rushing to dominate the space, and there

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>were a few different formats even in the early days. Now,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one very early one was wax cylinders, and essentially recording

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>audio meant that you had a cylinder of wax mounted

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on a spindle. The spindle would rotate, UH, and you

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>would put down a stylus or needle that would carve

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>a groove into the cylinder, and if you were to

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>speak into a device would either be like a horn

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or a microphone, then it could transmit the vibrations from

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the sound ultimately to the stylus. That's carving into the

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>wax cylinder, and you're carving a physical representation of the

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sound that's being presented to this recording device. And to

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>play it back, you would take the cylinder, you'd put

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>it in a player, and you would have a different

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of stylus that would travel through the groove that

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>had already been cut through the recording process. And essentially,

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>again you were just having the same recording process but

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in reverse, and that's where you would get the sound

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>playing back. But different companies would have different ways of

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this, even as they switched from cylinders, you know,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.959
<v Speaker 1>to flat disks like the traditional format we think of

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think of like a vinyl record. Uh, they

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>weren't vinyl back in those days, but it was that

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>same shape, right, the flat disc shape. Well, even then

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>there were still major ways to cut the grooves that

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were fundamentally different. So one was that you could do

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a vertical cut grooves. So that meant that

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as the the disc rotated and you're recording to it,

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the needle you're using, the stylus you're using is varying

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in degrees of depth, so it's recording vibrations. Um Essentially

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>up and down along the groove, and when you're playing

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it back, it would mean that the playback needle would

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>be sloping up or sloping away from the surface, and uh,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>that's where the vibration would be and would be replicated

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to create the sound that you would hear. The other

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>way was lateral grooves or lateral cuts, where the groove

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>would vary in width. Right, the needle was vibrating, not

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>up and down, but left and right, and as it

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was recording, and thus when you're playing it back, same

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. But these two things were not necessarily

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>compatible with one another, which meant that if you bought

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a player that was dependent upon the vertical cut versus

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the lateral cut, then you were limited to just those records.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So this was another early format war um that was

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>tricky for consumers. Um. Another format that was around the

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>same time and of the same thing, same media, was

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>on all about rotational speed when you were recording and

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>playing back sound. So again, in order again accurate sound

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>out of a player, you need to play the record

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>back at the correct speed. If you have ever tried

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to play a forty five album, forty five refers to

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of revolutions per minute, so forty five revolutions

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>per minute. In this case, if you were to put

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a forty five album on a record player, but you

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>set the record player to its thirty three and a

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>third setting, meaning it's rotating thirty three and one third

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>times per minute, then when you listen, everything sounds rue

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>slow because the playback is slower than the recording speed,

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so it sounds much slower. By by the way, as

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>a kid, I found this endlessly entertaining, either playing forty

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>five on thirty three or finding thirty three albums and

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>playing them at forty five, so everyone sounds like, you know,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the chipmunks or whatever. I was easily entertained as a child,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, I'd still have a ready record player this today,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and uh it requires some careful uh resistance for me

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to not just indulge in that silliness even to this day.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there were so many different speed playback

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>formats in the early days. Like, it wasn't just forty

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>five and thirty three or even seventy eight, which would

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>become an early standard. There were tons of different ones,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>typically ranging between sixty all the way up to like

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty Now, that could have caused an enormous

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>problem them. Right, Like, if all record players could were

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>limited to playing back at a specific speed, that would

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be a nightmare because it would mean that if you

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>were shopping for a record, you'd have to make absolutely

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sure that the record was recorded at the same speed

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that your turntable could play back at. Otherwise it would

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just not sound right, it would sound very wrong. However,

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>most turntables, most record players that we didn't really call

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 1>them that at the time, but that's what they were.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Most of them at the time were actually capable of

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>playing back at very different speeds, Like you could set

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it to whichever speed you need to. Sometimes you have

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it manually and kind of dial it in

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so that you know, it might mean that you're taking

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a little time to get it to sound just right.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>But you had that kind of, uh, that kind of

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>flexibility for a lot of those tables. So because of that,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the format wars weren't spilling over into a negative consumer

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>experience too much. It would actually take several decades for

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the music industry to gravitate toward three and then really

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to RPM standards. So the first one, as I mentioned,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>earlier was seventy eight RPM. That was pretty close to

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of the old traditional records used. You know,

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them were somewhere between the seventy and

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty RPM, So seventy eight was kind of a well

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for multiple reasons, it was set upon as a standard.

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Of those reasons also involved the fact that when people

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>stopped using like spring loaded playback machines and they started

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>using gear devices, gear ratios ended up creating the necessity

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>to stick with certain types of of RPM. The combination

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of electric motors and gear ratios meant that there were

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>certain RPM speeds that were easy to attain, and seventy

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>eight was one of them. But later on there was

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the forty five rpm, which was the seven inch format.

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>This was primarily used for stuff that just needed a

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes of audio on each side, so it

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was ideal for things like record singles. You know, you

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>have a single song on side A and a single

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>song on side B and that's all you would have.

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Then you also had the thirty three and a third

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>rpm speed. That one became synonymous with full length record albums.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And you have to remember also that there were different

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>companies pushing these different RPM formats, right, Like, it's not

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that these were just two formats that were out there

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on records. It was that you had companies that were

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>really pushing to make that the standard and not the

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>other one. But as it turns out, both of them

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>would survive, and the reason they would survive is because

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they filled different purposes. Right. You had the forty five,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>which was great for singles. So if you were say

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>a teenager who that was the market that was really

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>into buying music, you might want to save your money

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and just buy a single song that you were like,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not interested in the full album, and so that

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was a niche that the forty five field. You might

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>be a collector and you want an entire album, and

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna spend a little bit more money, so you

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>go and get the thirty three and a third album,

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>full length album. Um, this shaped music in ways that

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>go well beyond this episode. I will touch on that

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Music Industry episodes, because again, the format itself

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>would change the way people made music. It's really fascinating

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>history when you get into it. But the important bit

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>here is just that because both of these had a use,

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they ultimately would both be adopted as standards and and

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the different companies would end up adopting the other

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>standards as well, so it stopped being something that was

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>brand specific and just became the different formats that were

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>available for record collectors. And there are a bunch of

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>others we can talk about that happened over the following decades.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, there was an infamous battle that was primarily

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>between our c A and its subsidiary NBC versus CBS

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and this was over the format

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of color television broadcast technology. Now, r c A and

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>CBS were bitter rivals in trying to establish what should

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>be the standardized color television broadcast format, and initially CBS

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>appeared to secure that format in the US UH, despite

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>our CIA really putting up a fuss about it. However,

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>before CBS could really intrench itself, the Korean War broke

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out and the United States got involved, and UH and

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>some technical challenges on top of the shortage of materials

0:27:55.160 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sidelined color broadcast television in the US. Also, at the

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>same time, our c A was determined to sand bag

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>cbs IS operations by only selling black and white sets.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>R c A would not sell color sets, and the

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>CBS color broadcast format was such that it wasn't compatible

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with the older black and white sets, so if you

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>had a black and white set, you weren't able to

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>watch those color broadcasts. So our c A had a

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>vested interest in in this because the executives wanted to

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>establish our CIAS tech as the standard. But there was

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>also a practical consideration that whatever color broadcast standard was

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>being used should be one that would be viewable even

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>if you still only had a black and white set,

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>so you'd still be able to watch the broadcast, you

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just wouldn't have color. Obviously, by the time the US

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was ready to really get back into color broadcast, CBS

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>had given up. It gave up. In fact, I think

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it gave up like a week before, or maybe even

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a day before the US announced that it was ready

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at color broadcast standards, and CBS had already

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>pulled the plug at that point, and our c A

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>was in a position to really pick it back up.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It's technology would provide the foundation for the National Television

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>System Committee, or in t SC format now with color TV.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say that our CIS actions, while motivated primarily

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>by a desire to dominate the market, would end up

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>having an enormous benefit to the average US consumer an

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>audience member, because it meant that you didn't have to

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>worry about your television only being able to receive a

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>subset of all available broadcasts. Color broadcasts could come through

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on your old black and white sets, just you wouldn't

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>see color, but you would get the broadcast, and your

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>color sets would also be able to pick up older

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>black and white transmissions. Uh. And meanwhile, broadcast stations could

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>rush to get up to speed. So that was an

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>example where again that happened behind the scenes didn't really

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>impact most consumers. There weren't very a many color televisions

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that were available before the Korean War really sidelined everything,

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So that ended up being a hiccup in technological progress

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately benefited the consumer. When we come back, we'll

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>cover a few more examples before we wrap up, but

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>first let's take this quick break. Okay, let's get back

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to music. Another big format war happened between cassette tapes,

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>which were all the rage when I was a kid man.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Mix tapes. Yeah, those are kind of back in in style,

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>largely because the guardians of the galaxy. And of course

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>people have been making things like playlists and you know,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>burn CDs and stuff forever too. But yeah, mix tapes

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is what we called them back when I was a kid.

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, there was this format war before the

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>cassette tape really established itself, where it was the cassette

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>tape versus eight tracks versus four track tapes. Now, four

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>track tapes didn't get a whole lot of love outside

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of audio file circles. Uh, they didn't really take off

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>big time in the consumer space. Eight tracks did a

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. Uh. Some car manufacturers would incorporate eight

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>track players into vehicles, so these were also cassettes of

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a type. But eight track tapes had some pretty big drawbacks.

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the major ones was that you could not

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>rewind and eight track tape. So let's say that you

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>put an eight track of an album in your in

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your jeep and starts playing and you're like, oh, no,

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I like the first song on this side, but this

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is like the third song. You'd have to end up

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>flipping it over to the second side, go all the

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>way to the end of that like either play it

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>or or whatever, and then Ultimately you can flip it

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>back over and listen to the first song on side A.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:57.719
<v Speaker 1>It was not convenient. Cassette tapes were smaller than eight tracks,

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and you could rewind them. You could also tape over them. Eventually,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>so over time they won out in the format war.

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>They had enough advantages that they became much more popular,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and essentially eight tracks kind of faded into obscurity. Now,

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>when I think the actual phrase format war, there's one

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>specific one that leads to my mind because it was

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>settling down when I was a kid. Right, I'm not

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>saying that this was the most important format war or

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. It's just the one, like, if I

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:32.239
<v Speaker 1>hear that phrase, this is what I think of, And

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the video cassette format war. Primarily, I'm talking

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about VHS, which was championed by the company j v C.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And on the other side you had Beta Max, which

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was a Sony product. Now there were other home media

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>contenders to those were not the only two, but they

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>were the two big big players in the space. You

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>had like laser disc. You also had ce D Systems

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>UM which I could go off on a rabbit trail

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on the I have one in this office. Uh, they

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>were not popular, but I still own one. I don't

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>know if it works, but I've got one. Anyway, Let's

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>get back to cassettes. So if VCR systems had only

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed for playback, If if VCR and Beta Max could

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>only play back recorded material that was sold, like you

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>would go out and buy a copy of a video

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's the only thing you could do with them,

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>then it's very possible that Beta Max could have won

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>out because Beta max quality was marginally better than VHS.

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Although both formats did evolve over time, it's not like

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they they emerged with one quality and never changed. But

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the thing that really gave v HS a big advantage

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the long run is that you could use these

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to record material from say a television onto tape so

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you can watch it again later. Uh. That was something

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that the industry was not in favor of, but it

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately happened. And this is where VHS really was superior.

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You could fit more content onto a single VHS tape

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>than you could with Beta Max, and this ultimately contributed

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>largely to VHS winning out. But it took years. It

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was not like this was an overnight thing. This this

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>took place over years and years, and it was a

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>vicious fight. Uh it wasn't a guarantee that VHS was

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>going to win, But by the early nineteen eighties, Beta

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Max was kind of treated like a punchline. It became

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the the big example of a technology

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that failed to secure relevance at least around that time period. Uh. Next,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna skip over a whole bunch of other stuff

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to get to a similar story that played

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>out in the two thousands, like mid to late two thousand's.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it was the nineteen seventies when we had

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the VHS versus Beta Max war, and three decades later

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>we would get a brand new home video format war,

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>which would pit Blu Ray versus h D DVD. You

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>all know how that turned out, because we don't talk

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>about h D DVD anymore, and we still could get

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a Blue Ray if we really want one. And some

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of you might be too young to even remember this

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>format war, but back in the mid to late two thousand's,

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this was a really big deal. Both formats were vying

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 1>to become the next big thing after the DVD, Like

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this was supposed to be the step into h D

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>television UH, and DVD was somewhat limited in that. So

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you had Blu Ray, which was backed by Sony, and

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Toshiba was behind h D DVD, and these two companies

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>rushed to foreign partnerships, both with other technology companies so

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there'll be other companies producing players that

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>could play Blu ray or h D DVD, but they

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>also rushed out to foreign partnerships with media companies, like

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the companies that were actually making the content, in order

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to secure exclusive deals, which meant that consumers were faced

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with this problem that, you know, the movies and shows

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they really liked, they might only be available on a

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>single format, and that meant that if you wanted those movies,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you had to buy into that format. And in the beginning,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning, it looked like h D DVD might

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>have a bit of an edge. UH. First of all,

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it came out a little bit earlier than Blu ray

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>by a few months. Secondly, early on, HD DVD attracted

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>some major studios onto its side, but Sony would turn

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>around and play some pretty brilliant strokes of its own UH.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't hurt that Blu ray also had some

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>technical advantages on top of that, a big one being

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that it could hold more information than an HD DVD

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>disc could, so you could put more onto a Blu Ray.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>For another, Blu Ray could support more advanced piracy prevention

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>technologies than HD DVD could. HDDVD had an advantage and

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that it was not quite as expensive, so that was

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a big boost. But Sony's really brilliant move was that

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they built a Blu Ray player into a PlayStation three.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That meant that you could have a games station, a

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>game's console that could also serve as a media player,

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 1>which obviously today that's pretty common thing, but back then

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty new. Plus those additional protections. That privacy

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>protection was really attractive to studios, right They were terrified

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the thought of losing out on revenue due to piracy,

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>so anything that could cut that down was a big

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>bonus for them, and one by one studios began to

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>side with Sony, until by two thousand and eight it

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was pretty clear that HD DVD was dead in the water,

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Like Warner Brothers left h D DVD, and at that

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 1>point all the major studios had had had jumped ship.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I remember attending c E S one year

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>where just a couple of weeks before the show, h

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>D DVD hold out of c E S. So there

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 1>was this big empty spot on the show floor where

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there was supposed to be an HD DVD booth, but

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing because you know, again a couple of

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks before the show happened, they decided to you know,

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have any good news to share and they

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to have to face the music at that point.

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't long after that that HD DVD was for

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>all intents and purposes dead. So Blu Ray one that

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>format war, and it meant that all those people who

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>got h D DVD players and a library of disks,

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>we're stuck with the technology that ultimately went obsolete. Um like,

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>once those players stopped working and there's not an easy

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>way to repair them. Those discs are you know, paper weights. Now,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of course we still have format wars going on today,

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>some of them have settled into different lines of products

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that can coexist. So like in the early days of

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>personal computers, we had several different styles of computers, right,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you had you know, Commodore sixty four. Uh, you would

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>have the Apple, you would have Sinclair machines, you had

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 1>all these different computer systems, and over time they mostly

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>shook out two PCs, which really was just shorthand to

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>describe any computer that was built upon architecture that IBM

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>first offered as a personal computer. And then on the

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>other side you had Apple and we continue to have

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that to this day. I mean, there are other ones

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, but those are like the two primary ones,

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and they can coexist, they serve different functions. So that

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>was a format war that ultimately kind of settled into

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two different lines of products. In other cases, however, we've

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>got ongoing format wars that can still cause trouble for consumers,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>including me. So for example, there is HDR, which is

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>high dynamic range, and this applies to displays, uh primarily

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>things like televisions, but not only television's also computer displays, tablets,

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. They can have HDR technology

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>in them. But here's the tricky thing. HDR does not

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>refer to a specific technology. You don't have just one

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that is HDR. HDR is more like a desired outcome.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>High dynamic range is a goal, not a technology unto itself,

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and the outcome is all about creating a large range

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of color intensities and brightnesses so that you can have

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>really rich, lush and accurate color representation on screen. You

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can have everything from a dim, dark purple to a bright,

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>vibrant yellow and every other color. Right that, the idea

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is that HDR gives you incredibly vibrant pictures. That's the goal.

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The problem is there are different ways to get to

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that goal. There's not just one technological pathway to lead

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to h d R, and there are actually several different

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>formats that all aim to do this. The big ones

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>are h lg UH, there's Dolby Vision, there's HDR ten

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the most common of the formats, and there's HDR

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ten plus. So Dolbie Vision has really incredible capabilities, like

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it is technically one of the most advanced of the

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>HDR formats. However, Dolbi Vision is also a proprietary Now

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that means that anyone who wants to make use of

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Dolby Vision, whether it's a television manufacturer right it's a

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it's someone that's creating televisions that are capable of showing

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Dolby Vision, or it's a format like a like a UH.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Someone who's creating media and they want the media to

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be in Dolbie Vision. No matter what, if you want

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to make use of Dolbie Vision, you have to pay.

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>You have to pay a licensing fee, and um companies

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>typically don't like having to pay a license fees. If

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they can find a way around it, like if they've

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 1>got a free option, they would much prefer to do

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that because they keep more of the money themselves. So

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>HDR ten is an open standard. That's why it's the

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>most common because you can use it for free. Like

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you can make use of that open standard, but it's

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not as advanced as doy'll be Vision. So you get

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>your HDR output, but it's not as good as if

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you were to use Dolby Vision. Now, all of this

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>is on the back end, right, like you have all

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>these companies that are making deals about whether or not

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to pay a licensing fee and use something

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like they'll be Vision, or they're going to go with

0:42:35.760 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an open standard, or maybe they will support multiple ones.

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>But on the consumer side, it gets really messy and

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really confusing because not all HDR television's support all HDR formats.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what I find really frustrating about format wars like

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this because You can go out and buy an HDR

0:42:56.080 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>capable TV, but if it only supports say HDR ten,

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>then it doesn't necessarily support something like Dolby Vision. And

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you might think, Oh, I'm gonna watch this it's an HDR,

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But if it's an HDR and it uses Dolbi Vision,

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you won't be able to experience the HDR. So this

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is really upsetting to me because it means that you

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>actually have to do a lot more homework before you

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>go out and buy something. Right. You can't just oh,

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>this TV is on sale, I need a new TV.

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna buy it, and then I can watch all

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>this stuff maybe or at least maybe with the HDR,

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but you might not be able to if the television

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't support the formats that are available on the media

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you have. By the way, this gets even more complicated

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when you start talking about things you connect to your TV.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Because let's say that you have like a streaming device.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's say the television is not its own smart TV,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have native access to streaming apps, and you

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>have it connected to a streaming device. Well, the streaming

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>device also needs to have those same compatibilities. So anywhere

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>in a chain. If you are lacking a compatibility, then

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you miss out on that that particular feature. And this

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is really the downside for me for format wars. It's

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>why I think standardization is so important because it removes

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that confusion and ambiguity and it improves the customer experience.

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily mean we get the absolute best version

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of whatever that technology is. We might make some compromises.

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But what it does mean is that when you buy

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>technology A, you know it can play everything that was

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>made for technology A right or whatever. The play is

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>too limiting because this goes well beyond media, but that

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is that's the argument for standardization is that doesn't mean

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>that you get the absolute best version of everything, but

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can be confident that the version you do

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>get is something you can use. That's the big benefit

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of standardization. Now, maybe you one day, you and me

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and everybody else listening to this will all be like

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:09.439
<v Speaker 1>super wealthy and we won't care, Like we won't care

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if if one format is not compatible with the other,

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>because we'll just buy all of them. But I don't

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>know about y'all. I do not appear to be on

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that track anytime soon. So for the meantime, I'm going

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue being my grouchy old man self and argue

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>for standardization. I hope you enjoyed what was going to

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be a Tech Stuff tidbits, but I'm looking at the

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:31.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at my recording right now, and it's as

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:35.879
<v Speaker 1>long as a normal episode, very typical. Go ahead, get

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>your licks in now. I deserve them. If you want

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to chi to be on Twitter for being a chatty Cathy,

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the handle is tech Stuff hs W. Also reach out

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>if you have any suggestions for topics you would love

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for me to cover in future episodes of Tech Stuff,

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a technology, a trend in tech, a company, uh,

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>an important person in tech, any of those things, let

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 1>me know. Or if there's like a guest you would

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>love for me to have on the show. I've really

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed having guests on recently. It's um it's always a

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge to schedule those kind of things, but I think

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they bring a lot of value to the show, and

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you folks really appreciate getting to listen to

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>someone besides just me. So if there's anyone out there

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that you think would be an excellent guest for whatever purpose,

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>as long as you know technology related, let me know.

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Send me that message tech stuff hsw on Twitter and

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.