WEBVTT - A Human Rights Activist Explains Why Bitcoin Is So Important to His Work

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Hallway. Tracy, I don't

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>want you to take this the wrong way, but you know, no,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I kind of feel like of the

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two of us, you kind of are a little have

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>try to think how to phrase this in a polite way.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You have like a little bit more like no, no,

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not that bad, but you have like a little

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>bit more like sort of crankish conspiracy theory minded sympathies

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit conspiracy. No, no, a little bit. But

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I am don't even know the problem is, I'm surrounded

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>by conspiracy theorists and I like to be fully informed,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so I listened to what they have to say. That's

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I'm I'm a depository for conspiracy theory. But

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like you kind of like are into gold and silver

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of hate the Fed a little bit,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of believe that there's bubbles everywhere, just

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I'm not saying like full on, but

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you're like sort of like you're like kind of curious,

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>like you're you're open to it. Right, this is like

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>scandalously libelous. I don't like gold or silver. I keep

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>getting given it for my birthday and I end up

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>with it. I think the FED has done a reasonably

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>good job, although I certainly have some advice for them

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on how to proceed. I do think the corporate bond

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>market is overvalued and there may be some trouble there

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in the future. There those are my opinions. So the

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>only reason I brought this up because even though I

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>do feel like you're a little more like crank curious

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>than I am, I actually think that on one topic

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a little like more skeptic goal than I am

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>within this whole like the crank role. What's that? Digital currencies? Yes,

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that. Yeah, Like I feel like

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty like deeply skeptical of them, and you're like

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of the view that they're all scams, and I'm

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like pretty skeptical of them and think they're mostly scams.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not like as entirely negative on them as

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a conceptually as you are. Wouldn't you say that's fair? Well, so,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I have some problems with digital currencies, but as a concept,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really really intriguing and what I like

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is when people basically get up and say the only

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>reason for digital currencies to exist is because of regulatory

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage purposes. Like, if we can start from that basis

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and just be honest with ourselves, then I don't necessarily

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with them, but I still think they

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>are going to face some massive, massive challenges. Okay, that's

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. Well, today, I'm actually kind of hopeful that

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in our converse station today, which obviously at this point

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone's figured out, is going to be about Bitcoin and

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>perhaps other cryptocurrencies, that actually we might be able to

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>arrive at a place where we uh see see things

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from a similar perspective. Okay, Um, I'm willing to have

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>my mind changed, so I'll be interested in this one.

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's optimistic. So you mentioned that you're kind

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of believe that maybe there's a niche for cryptocurrencies and

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of regulatory arbitrage, and I would argue that

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you could slightly accept that and broaden it a bit

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if you sort of think of cryptocurrencies as not just

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>regulatory arbitrage per se, but in allowing people to engage

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in transactions that maybe big governments or big corporations you

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want them knowing about, or maybe they wouldn't allow

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you to do. It's kind of of the same category

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>such as illegal transactions, well some of them, but even

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, illegality can be either moral or immoral, depending

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on the country, in the law and context. True, and

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this is something we did touch on with Joe Carlson

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a while back, like the idea that what's deemed illegal

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela might actually, you know, in other countries, be

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>deemed necessary for survival, and people are using bitcoin in

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>order to survive. Yes, right, So today I'm very excited

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna be talking to a guest that really

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ties these concepts together. His background, or at least's current position,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is not what you would expect from a sort of

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>typical crypto guest or sort of bitcoin believer. Our guest

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>today is Alex Gladstein. He's the chief strategy officer at

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Human Rights Foundation, and he talks a lot about

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of intrinsic connection he sees between bitcoin and

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>human rights. Al Right, well, let's bring Alex and Alex

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us. It's a pleasure

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to beyond thanks for having me so like I said,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we talked to a fair number of

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>people in the crypto world from time to time. Most

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of them are in roles that are sort of crypto specific.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they work for a VC fund, or maybe they're

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just an investor, they're a software developer. You have something

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a distinctly different perch, I would say

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>than many of the people who are interested in this

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>space talk to us. Just first of all, what do

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you do? What's the Human Rights Foundation? And when did

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your interest in uh digital currencies arise? So? The Human

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Rights Foundation is a nonprofit charity based here in New

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>York City that I started working for in two thousand seven,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>and the mission of the Human Rights Foundation is to

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>help promote freedom and human rights and closed societies. So

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we work with people who live under authoritarianism around the world,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and by our internal metrics, about of people live under

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>either a partially or fully authoritarian regime. It's about four

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>billion people. So the kind of people that I'm talking

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to all the time are struggling against various injustices in

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 1>places ranging from North Korea to China to Saudi Arabia

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to Burma to Russia to Venezuela. To Cuba, to Zimbabwe, etcetera.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of from their perspective that I learned

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>about why money not controlled by the government would be

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>really useful. Um. So my perspective is just very different

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from most people, I would say, even from the general

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>human rights community, because I have this particular focus on

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to help people who live under authoritarian societies where

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't have independent media, independent courts, They

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>can't sue their government, they don't have an e f

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>F or an a c LU to donate to, they

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>can't write not bet in the newspaper. Um. You know,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>their ability to hold their government accountable is like almost

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>non existent. So what these governments tend to do is

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>closed down the bank accounts of people they don't like,

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>or um hyper inflate the economy, or you know, just

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>basically steal or sees or confiscate funds from organizations that

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>are critical of them. So in this context, bitcoin is

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. So walk us through the exact use case then,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking about very authoritarian regimes that have almost

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>complete power over their domestic population. So I'm curious to

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what extent does bitcoin actually help those people offset the

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>power of the state. Sure, and I'll get into a

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples, but I do want to make a

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>plea to to the listeners that this matters for everybody

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking. This is what I'm about to say, is

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not a conspiracy theory. Money, the kind of money that

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you use every day, is transforming from a bearer asset

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>into a surveillance and control mechanism. That's not a conspiracy theory.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Meaning the money that I use when I use, whether

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's we chat, if I live in China, perhaps visa here, etcetera, etcetera,

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like the the way that I do transactions is becoming

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>increasingly controlled, surveilled, etcetera, moving away from a society where

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it was okay um and widely accepted to use basically

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>anonymous money in the form of cash, like in fifteen

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, no one will use paper or metal money.

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think that this transition is the core of

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the matter and is why having bitcoin uh and what

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>will be built on top of bitcoin in the future,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>which will be like basically hopefully private payments will be

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>something that can save us from essentially either like Big

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Brother or surveillance capitalism. Now that need is much more

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>cute obviously in a place like Iran, or China or Venezuela.

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'll just give you a couple examples. So, in

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Iran today, due to both American sanctions and financial controls

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Mala's, it's impossible really to send money from

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the West into Iran if you have family there to

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>help them. Right. So I know someone who's um living

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in London. She's Iranian and her partner's father is very

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sick in Tehran, right, so there's no way for them

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to send money, uh to help this person's father. However,

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they can use bitcoin, So within twenty thirty minutes, uh,

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>they have a non k y C Bitcoin account, meaning

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not connected in any meaningful way to their identity.

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>The bitcoin appears on his father's phone in Tehran, and

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>then he uses like local exchanges to turn it into

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>real and get medical assistance. So this is like a

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and I think important way to show that

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like this can be a lifeline. Obviously you heard from

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Jill on a previous episode about how some Venezuelans are

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of this as well. Some people are earning

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>money in bitcoin and circumstances where they couldn't earn money

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like if they live in Iran or Venezuela, for example.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some uptick in Palestinians using bitcoin, both in

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Gaza and the West Bank. Obviously there's quite a bit

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of uptick in places where the economy is creating, like Lebanon, Argentina.

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>There are organizations in Hong Kong which are starting to

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get their bank accounts shut down, right So, for example,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>there was an activist organization recently that that got its

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>HSBC account closed for political activities. Well, they can't stop

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>them me from donating bitcoin to them. And probably the

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>most important civil society organization in Hong Kong, or one

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of them, is the Hong Kong Free Press, right, So

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong Free Press has been accepting bitcoin donations

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for a while now. It's been very very helpful to them.

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So when you're on the front lines of freedom, I

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>believe that even today, like it's sort of infant state,

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as a technology, bitcoin can be extremely helpful. So obviously

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to explore there. I just want to

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about, as you say, you're

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing it happen on the ground, because there's a lot

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of people and this is kind of something that we

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>talked to with Jill Is. There's certainly a lot of people,

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you come across them who like to

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pontificate about how bitcoin can help people in emerging markets

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, all while sort of you know, sitting in

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>there we work space in San Francisco or whatever, without

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>actually having interactive They usually talk about why some other

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency can but sure, right right exactly, or the one

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that they're working on, the one that they're working on

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be great for right payment, cross border payment.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, there's a lot of whitewashing space. Somebody's

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>working on some new token project and they're like, oh,

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they come to me and they're like, this has happened

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>numerous times. Uh, you know, we're working on this new token.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you can help us, like find a

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>use case somewhere? And I'm like, no, this, this, this

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>is not what you know, that's not what in terms

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of like you're really seeing it, you know, it's is

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>it more than just a sort of isolated case here

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and there, Like what are you actually seeing on the

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ground in terms of how so example, for example, I

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>know a guy his name is Mo he's an entrepreneur.

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>He was born in Aleppo, Syria. Now, of course he

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lives in London, but he does some like translation and

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>creative work. His company does this stuff, and there are

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people inside Syria who still work for him. So he

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>pays them in bitcoin and they use Facebook groups to

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>turn the bitcoin into Syrian money when they need to.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, the Syrian money is like a

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>disaster from like its perspective against the dollar, for example,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so they keep it. Actually they actually use the bitcoin

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is like their checking their savings account, and then they

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>withdraw it essentially via these like peer to peer groups

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>into the local currency when they need to spend it. Now,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of course that's a fringe example. There are not that

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>many countries in the world that have uh, you know,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation that high. But it's we're talking tens of millions

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of people across different hemispheres, right from Venezuela to South

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Southern Africa to the Middle East. So it is something

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that is making a big difference I think for many,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>many people, and it won't matter as much to people

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>who live in New York or London or Tokyo in

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the near future because we have stable economies it's easy

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>for us to get credit, we can get loans, are

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial system works pretty well. So people kind of,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, gloss over the real value in bitcoin. So

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when I talk to human rights activists about this, I

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>think it's very similar to encrypted messaging in many ways.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the average person in New York City probably doesn't

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>need encrypted messaging, or maybe they do, but but generally speaking,

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they probably don't think they do same thing with bitcoin,

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and they probably don't. But the average person and maybe

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Zimbabwe or in Iran may really need encrypted messaging because

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to talk to their family or a loved

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>one who is, you know, in an opposition political party

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So I think both encrypted messaging and bitcoin

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>are our tools that are vital for people who live

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>under very difficult political environments, but whose value may not

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>be so easily understood by people who live under open societies. Okay,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>well let me pick up that thread just on the

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>point of the value. Is the value more that you

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>have payment processing that's basically done by a decentralized entity

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and allows you to get money into and out of

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a country, or is the value that bitcoin is supposed

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be anonymous and therefore untraceable. Like which one of

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>those things is more important from your perspective? Right, Well,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is pseudonymous, um, but it is much better than

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and as a payment. For example, if you're trying to

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of aida uh someone looking at you that then using

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>something that's linked directly to your identity. It's not ideal,

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of work that needs to be

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>done in bitcoin to make it more private. Um. But

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that works being done, and it's very interesting. But what

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say are the couple of main use cases.

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Number one is like sanctions breaker, I guess we could

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>call it. So you're being prevented from accessing the international

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>financial markets for some reason, probably not your fault, Like

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the average twenty three year old Iranian entrepreneur. She didn't

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>do anything to not be able to buy an iPhone.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>She didn't even vote for her leaders. It's a dictatorship,

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>so why should she be punished? Right, So, these people

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>get to access goods and services from the outside world

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because of bitcoin, because it breaks sanctions. The second one

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is more like the example I gave with Syria, is

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as like a sort of confiscation resistant parallel savings account

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Syrian government just has no clue that these

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>people have this bitcoin. They have no reasonable technical way

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of figuring that out, and they can't confiscate it. So

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for the longest time, you know, the human with more

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>violence have been has been able to just like take

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the money from someone else. Now that you can be

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like clever about it and hide your private key, either

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere on your phone or written down somewhere,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or even memorize it, we have now an asset that

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is like much much more confiscation resistant. So there's censorship

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>resistance is important. The confiscation resistance is really important, and

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>over time, the privacy aspect of it, as it becomes

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>more mature, will be very important, especially for people, you know,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in kind of advanced economies that don't want all their

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>data being like sold to the data markets. So that's

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's perfect because that's where I was going to go next.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You said at the beginning, and I agree with you

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's not a conspiracy theory to say that money

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is transforming from a a bearer assets something that I

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can just hand to you and nobody knows about it,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to a sort of tool of you know, one might

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>put its surveillance capitalism, or at a minimum, just sort

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of this series of credits that are being easily viewable

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>by corporations and government. And when I talked to or

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>hear from people in the West who are like extremely

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>negative on bitcoin, and there are a lot of people

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>who are and think it's just a Ponzi scheme. I

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>do think this is one area where people haven't fully

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>thought through the implications of well, what happens when literally

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>every payment they've done. And I watched the debate this

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>summer between the head of bit Max, Arthur Hayes and

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Noril Rubini and no Rubini he just at one point

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got up and he was yelling and he was like, well,

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if these people can use we Chat and

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple pay, why do they need bitcoind And we're just

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>all laughing, because because that's that's why you don't want

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>all of your payments to be controlled by a single entity.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's just a matter of financial freedom and

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty and privacy. And I say that as a person

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>who's pretty progressive politically speaking, I don't think this is

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>some radical line rand thing, like, I think that this

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is something that can actually be a great equalizer and

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>can allow hundreds of millions of people excess in a

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>permissionless way to a savings vehicle that they currently don't

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>have access to currently. If you're, let's say, in a

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of the situations I'm looking at, how do you

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>save money you buy sheet metal or cows or something

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>like that, this gives them an electronic way to have

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>something that's that's confiscation resistant and and parallel, and is

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>much more liquid in some cases. I mean, the only

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm more excited about bitcoin now than I was

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago is because the ability for you

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to exchange it into fiat is on the rise. In

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>almost every major urban city in the planet. Even in

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>cartoon you can you can sell your bitcoin for Fiat. Today,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin on its own is not very useful to people

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>because they can't buy things with it, and I think

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd be naive to think that that's going to change

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. But as a bridge between moneies and as

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to connect people, um in a very quick way,

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in a permissionless way, in a censorship resistant way. UM,

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really shining. I would say, So can I

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>pick up that threat? Because I I agree that the

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>transition to digital pay months is going to cause all

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of privacy issues and also potentially hardened financial inequality

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>because people are only going to get you know, served

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>up products and offerings based on their own transaction history

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>or browsing history or whatever. But my question is, isn't

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the company or the platform that you're

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>actually transacting with. So for instance, if I go to

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and assume that Amazon could accept bitcoin, and I

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 1>buy a book, a subversive book from Amazon, and I

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>pay in bitcoin, isn't the problem still that I'm buying

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>through Amazon versus you know that I'm using bitcoin? Correct?

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So right now, the way to get around that is

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to use the gift cards. Gift cards are very important

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>part of the world economy. A lot of people, of

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>course in America something like Americans are underbanked essentially. Um,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I was not eve enough for a lot of my

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>life to not understand when I walked into a Walgreens

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or CVS that the gift cards weren't for Christmas gifts

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>there for people who don't have bank accounts, how they

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>make electronic payments. So we have this kind of like

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a legal and moral um precedent right now that like

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>using cash to buy gift cards and buy things on

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is totally fine, and we want to hold on

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>too that We don't want to let that get taken

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>from us. We need that. So I would argue that,

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>like what I'm seeing is the birth of something that

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>may work, which would be private payments on top of bitcoin.

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>In the same way that like Visa is like a

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>layer on top of the US dollar, it's like a

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>credit system on top of the dollar. You can think

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of Lightning as a credit system on top of bitcoin.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm potentially seeing because Square is like heavily

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>invested in this and has said that it's a matter

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of when not if that they will like release this

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>into their cash app. At least Jack Dorsey said that

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe six eight months ago that you'll be able to

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>use what is basically an anonymous gift card to buy

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff at the Whole Foods and Starbucks and Amazon in

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the next year or two using this technology called Lightning.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So it'll debit from your account, the merchant will see

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the money. They won't know anything about you. They won't

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>know your last transaction, your name, your address, and it's

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>fine because they didn't need to know that stuff and

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it used to work, and you know

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that was the way things were. And I think it's

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>like an aberration historically that when you pay for something

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>today you reveal all this information about you. Do you

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's weird? How something that I think is weird anyway?

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put words in your mouth. Is

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people tech critics, many of

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>whom are tech journalists, who really sounded the alarm these days.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Is picked up over the last few years about the

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>incredible power, influence and data that Facebook, Amazon, etcetera have

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of our lives. Like every day you pick up the

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>New York Times and there's some article about how awful

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>these companies are. And yet I feel like the mainstream

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>tech critics are still like pretty dismissive of bitcoin and

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>still think it's like this like weird sort of on

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ran Silicon Valley project and not really putting two and

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 1>two together as you're putting it. I mean, look, if

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 1>someone creates something better that does what I'm describing and

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gives us essentially digital cash that allows me to pay

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for things that I need to buy in my life

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>without disclosing all this information about me, or like you know,

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>slur rendering all my liberties. I'll be all about it,

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know what this is. It is what we have.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the only way to make a digital payment

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>without a third party. This is why the coin is

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>such a revolutionary financial technology is that it allows two

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>entities you know, on the Internet to exchange value without

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a centralized payment processor. And and that was the big deal.

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, said Toshi nakamotos invention is so so revolutionary,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and and that that is what I think allows us

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>to start to think about a parallel way of doing

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>things as opposed to relying on all these third parties

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>when we do digital transactions. Why people haven't figured this

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>out yet, I'm not sure. I mean, it's quite um.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>It takes a lot of open mindedness, let's put it

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that way to like kind of look at this and

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, maybe bitcoins part of the answer. Well,

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>by the same token, you know, you mentioned that your

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>own views politically tend to be more on the progressive side.

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>What is the reaction to it among fellow human rights

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>activists in the West that you deal with at work

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or other human rights organizations? Do they do? They typically

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of the same initial reaction, that's mostly like sort of

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>like I rand, it's weird because for many years working

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in the human rights space, we didn't even think about

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>money or currency at all as as relevant. And I

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>remember this vividly. I invited a Zimbabwean opposition leader named

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Ivan Mauire to speaking an event a couple of years

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ago in San Francisco with Jill Carlson actually, and we said, hey,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>do you want to come talk about hyper inflation? We

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>just want to do an event on hyper inflation and

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of allow people to understand what it like. And

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he said sure, and he and I asked him to

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>come and prepare some remarks on what he saw as

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a Zimbabwean happened in his lifetime economically, and he's like,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>no one's ever asked me to do this before. I

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>thought that was kind of strange. But when he got

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on stage and he started talking, he took out a

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 1>necklace that he was wearing under his shirt and it

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was the nineteen eighties and Babwean dollar, and he was like,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>we all wear this, all the activists, and not all

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>of them, but a lot of them as a symbol

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of what our economy used to be. Is fascinating, and

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I just think the money and currency we use is just,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, in a different hemisphere or blocked off

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>from what we think of his human rights. So for

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>many many years I didn't even think about it. Like

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw Mark Anderson's New York Times article about bitcoin,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>which I still think is one of the better explanations

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>of what it is, and that kind of put it

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>on my radar. But it was until a couple of

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>years later that that someone I knew who worked at

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one of these UH mining companies bit Fury, was like, hey,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we should like maybe get human rights activists to learn

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>about this. That I started to really dive in and

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>then it it just sort of it went from there.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But the human rights organizations today MSTY International, Human Rights Watch,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if you just searched the word bitcoin, you won't find it.

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't gotten there yet, even even e f F

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and Wikipedia, which did receive bitcoin donations for a while

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>and then like they you know, early on, and then

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>they got rid of it, and now they're kind of

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>becoming more warmed to it. I would say even the

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 1>digital civil liberties organizations are really like UM have position

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves to be very skeptical of it, which I think

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>is uh is a mistake. I think they should be

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>open minded to it. So we're not there yet with

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with human rights organizations. They just haven't. It's not that

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they're like really against it, they just haven't really realized

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to be really key. So money

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>has always been entwined with with the notion of the

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sovereign state in many ways. So do you worry that

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in arguing that bitcoin or some new digital money technology

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 1>can successfully bypass the state and create a sort parallel

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>um payment system. Do you worry that by arguing that, uh,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll make it sort of more likely or

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>it will become inevitable that governments eventually cracked down on this.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course there will. I mean we're seeing that now.

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I think bitcoin, properly understood and manifested,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>uh will be a much greater threat to authoritarian governments

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>than democracies. I think there's ways in democracies for citizens

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to have like back and forth and negotiations with their

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>elected representatives, and we could come to agreements like, for example, hey,

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's cool that like unders dollars when you make

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>a payment digitally, it can be anonymous, that's fine. But

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to buy a house, you want to pay

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for tuition, you want to get a big loan by

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a weapon, whatever, maybe you need to provide I d

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But to me, this is like something that we could

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.719
<v Speaker 1>actually negotiate in a in a in a democracy, especially

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>when like the United States, where we have a history

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of like cash being like an important American value. In dictatorships,

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I think bitcoin is gonna be much more um of

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a problem because they won't want to give up their

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>control over money. So I mean, obviously I think bitcoin

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>separates money from state and I think that's going to

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be a really big problem for authoritarian systems because of

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the way that they kind of seize most of the

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>money in the economy and and and then do things

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that the population probably wouldn't be so hot on. And

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 1>of course this happens in America. We just saw how

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>much money did our government, or at least my government

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>spend on wars in Afghanistan in interact something absurd. I mean,

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't choose for them to do that. So, like

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>super long term, if I'm thinking utopian, I suppose I

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>would say that like an economy that's more based on

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 1>this kind of asset would hopefully prevent that kind of

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>um excessive spending that would lead to things like police

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>states and and unnecessary wars. But that's that's very far

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>into the future. So within the US or within the

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Western developed context, one of the memes that you heard

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>early on is that bitcoin is useless except for buying

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>drugs online, and maybe that's it, And some bitcoin defenders

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>had like, Oh, that's really unfair. But I still kind

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of think it's fair in the sense that the properties

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin that make it easy or possible for someone

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>in Iran to send money to their a link relative

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to get health insurance or to get healthcare, the properties

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that enable that transaction, which most people think are good,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are the same properties that allow people to engage in

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>truly illicit things in the West, like buying drugs. There

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>was also a big bust recently of a child pornography

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 1>ring and there were some bitcoin related payments. How do

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you sort of address the fact that there is a

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>neutrality in some sense to the technology such that we

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>could sit here and talk about all the great things

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that allows people to do for freedom, but also in

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>theory it makes doing very bad things also possible. Yeah,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's really similar to the debate

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>about encryption. UM law enforcement may say in Britain and

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Australia honestly, which you're turning into the biggest predators of

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>private information, which is bizarre given that their democracies. But

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they're basically trying to say, well, if you guys want

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to have like peer to peer messaging that's encrypted, we

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>want to be and we want to be in the room,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to be like the third party,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>which is which is crazy. We need that ability to

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>communicate privately and it doesn't mean we're doing bad things.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>There's some studies that have been done. So there was

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like an m I T based study that looked at

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin activity. I think it was a study that was

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>done last year and they looked at it about two

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of all the transactions they viewed as criminal pertable

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>laws of the United States. Now that's very low. UM

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen, about nine percent of the U.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>S economy is like quote unquote black market are illegal

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and the average O E C D countries like is

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen. So I think over time, the amount

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin being used for illegal stuff will probably kind

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of flow up and and even out around what. But

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the way. I don't think the medium

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>um where the type of money we use will make

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>people any less evil or good is my general gut feeling.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's again it's like we need it.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Like if we don't want to live in a society

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>where all of our behaviors and movements and transactions are

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>controlled and where we cannot criticize or descent or protest,

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>then we're gonna need the version of digital cash. The

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>example that was so vivid I saw this summer was

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that Hong Kongers were starting to use cash to buy

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like metro cards so that they could go into the

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>subway system and then exit without being spied on, because

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>if they went and used their like I D Linked

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Octopus card to do so, their employers could figure that

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>out and then fire them. And you need to be

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>able to protest to hold your government accountable. This is

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like something really important to democracy. So right now the

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kongers are able to do that because they have cash,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>But fifteen years they won't have cash, So how are

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they going to protest? Especially in an urban environments. This

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is another reason why I think digital cast is just

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so vital to democracy. I would just basically say that,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial privacy is essential, essential to a healthy democracy.

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I would ask people to show me other options. I'm

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly open to it, but like bitcoin plus second layer

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>technology that makes a private seems like the best one

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. So the trope for technology is always that

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it starts off well intentioned and then at some point

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of becomes terrible. Why would bitcoin not be the same.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I bring that up is because, like,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, we saw China outlaw bitcoin very very early on,

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and now within the past few months, China's central Bank

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has come out and said they're exploring the idea of

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>doing their own digital currency. So how would we ensure

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin or other digital payment technology doesn't become opted

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>by bad actors or used to bad ends. Yeah, that's

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a great question. Um, I think we need to separate

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the technologies here. So I would compare what you just said,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>comparing like bitcoin, which is like open source, censorship resistant,

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>decentralized money that nobody owns or no one has, you know,

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>authority over comparing that with what the Chinese are going

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to build, which is going to be highly controlled, highly survailable.

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think my personal view of what they're

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>end goal is is to replace the M zero inside

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>China with something that's trackable, get rid of paper metal

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>money entirely. I view these as like as different as

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>um signal and UH and we chat Like. Yes, they're

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>both digital currencies, but they're very very different kinds of

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies. So I think we just need to to

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>bear that in mind. But it could go wrong. Yeah,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Like my destopic view of bitcoin would be much like

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the original open Internet was perverted into like these like

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of siloed data collection mechanism like Facebook and Google, etcetera. Uh,

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and that original promise of connecting us all privately was betrayed.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what could happen with bitcoin. The what I

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>think is most reasonable as a worst case scenario is

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that all of the exchanges and places and marketplaces that

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we go to exchange bitcoin and turn it back and

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>forth into Fiat become surveillance points, and then it becomes

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not very useful. Well, I was I was going to

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>go exactly there. It seems like you could envision a

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario in which the government really does crack down on

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>making sure that every entryway into bitcoin is very heavily

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>compliant k y C, A m L. You have to

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>give over tons of information or illegal like THEE. And

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's my next question. What if one day the

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>government was like, you know what, you can't banks, Bank

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of America, Wells Fargo, Charles Schwab, you can't make transfers

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to coin base, you can't make transfers to etcetera. Whatever.

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And the industry is still not that big, so you know,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they're probably not gonna have much leverage to fight back.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry about that? And could the ecosystem still thrive?

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Could it still be as a liquid if Western market

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>regulators just said, you know, you're not allowed to deal

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with this. I mean, look, I think government's it's strange. Actually,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>once you have a full comprehension of what bitcoin kind

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of makes possible, it's bizarre that they haven't tried to

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>kill it more aggressively. That's what I think. It's really weird,

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think over time they're going to regret it

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.239
<v Speaker 1>in a big way. Lationship. But but let's just for

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a second imagine that governments have all done something they've

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>never been able to do. A plus of all agreed

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're all going to band bitcoin whatever. Okay, so

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the price really tanks, it becomes um something that's much

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>harder to get obviously, but even so, let's say I'm

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in China five years from now, and it's become completely

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to to get and I can't use there's

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>no more cash in China, so like it's very difficult

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to to buy or sell. I mean, I could still

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>invite my friend over to my house and he could

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.359
<v Speaker 1>help me with homework or something, and I could pay

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>him on we Chat for helping me with homework, and

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on the side, using two non k y C wallet's,

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he could have sent me bitcoin. Like, I

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:17.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can get rid of it. I think

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's open source software. I mean, it's it's almost

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like an idea. It's very hard to kill. So I

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think you can. You can damage the price, but ultimately,

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as the mining continues to chip away and

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>process the transactions. And what's really interesting is that Cheese

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ping, because he's so authoritarian, what we're watching is

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>some mining move out of China because it's too it's

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>too strict, and it's decentralizing and going to other places.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So as long as mining itself can be done, then

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the network will will survive um and and

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>provide this very important thing that we I think we need. Alex,

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that was a great conversation and I really appreciate you

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Super fun. Thanks. Thanks Alex, that was really

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>interest time. So Tracy, in the beginning, I sort of

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>speculated that maybe this conversation would be one where we

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of saw eye to eye and maybe it sort

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of fit within both of our views on the space.

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious if you felt the same way, because

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it felt like we kinda it felt like it kind

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of made sense. First of all, twenty or thirty minutes later,

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I still haven't forgiven you for calling me crank curious.

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But secondly, look, I'm totally on board with a conversation

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>about the privacy threat posed by new technologies and specifically

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>by digital payments. I just got back from China, where

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I had to register my I D

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>in order to get on alley pay uh, and it's

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>very very clear that every transaction on there is recorded.

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely it's a concern. I still have my doubts

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not bitcoin is the solution to it,

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and the big question I have, and this sort of

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>gets to like old theories from international relations. The big

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 1>question that I have is whether or not states are

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to allow their sovereignty or their power to be

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>undermined by this thing that is very clearly you know,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it's almost explicitly stated in the white paper and the

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>way cryptocurrency enthusiasts talk about it, something that is clearly

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>aimed at undermining or bypassing their authority. I completely agree,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and to Alex is a point at the end, if

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you think through the implications of this and actually just

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like go several steps down the road, it

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is very surprising that any government is even in the West,

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>has been as tolerant as they have. Not only have

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they not like really cracked down, like actually have like

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 1>regulated futures and stuff like that that add liquidity to it.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's really weird because if you really think it through,

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and I almost wonder whether they will, um, you know,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>come to regret it, and you sort of wonder if

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cowt they're like cowed by this idea is like, oh,

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to stifle innovation. And someone came in

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and gave a presentation about blockchain, and they got am

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really excited. But it does seem like if you're really

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like follow the thread the clashes, you

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>will you would expect them to intensify over time. So

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>here's something you'll like almost two years ago to the day.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And I hate to do this, but I'm going to

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>refer to one of my previous tweets, So I tweeted,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it's obvious regulators are going to end up regretting not

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>acting on more and sooner. On the one hand, if

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it fails miserably, there are going to be burned investors.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, if it's a wild success, their

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>authority or efficacy will be threatened. Like to me, it's

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.959
<v Speaker 1>so so clear they're going to regret this down the line.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. One other point that I thought that

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Alex made, which was really I find to be very

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>compelling and a good question to pose to people, is

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>if we can establish that there is something concerning about

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the end the fact that every one of our transactions

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>will be traceable online with the trans with the trend

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>we're going to. His point is like, Okay, maybe there's

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a better solution out there to digital cash bearer assets

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that allow me to pay you without person ce being

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>able to see or approve of the transaction. But they

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't exist yet, and no one has really put

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>forth a better, more compelling idea. Some people talk about

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>central bank digital currencies that could be designed as cash replacements.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't really seem like many central banks are enthusiastically

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>embracing that right now, but it's certainly true. As to

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>his point, it's like, Okay, well, like, if we can

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>accept that it's a problem or it should be of

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a cold certa into society, then what do you propose

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>as the better approach to enabling these kinds of transactions?

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And right now, I don't think many people have thought

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that question, or let alone come up with good answers

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. No, that's true. It feels like more people

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>should be working on it. And the other thing I

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>would just throw out is there's sort of a convenience

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>aspect to all of this, which sounds terrible because we're

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about human rights. But what I mean by that

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is there are ways to bypass the system or conceal

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>your identity currently, so Alex mentioned gift cards, of course,

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you know you have people in Syria who

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are using bitcoin and then exchanging it via a Facebook platform.

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>The problem with all of those things is that it's

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>an extra step in making the transaction and you have

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to put some effort into it. And the thing with

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the new digital payment systems like Ali pay,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like we Chat, Venmo, whatever, is there's just really easy

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to use and really convenient, and people are willing to

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>sacrifice their privacy for the sake of convenience, which you

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>know is terrible in the long run, but you could

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>see why people do it in the short run. And

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure anyone has really come up with a

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 1>response to you know, human nature. Well, I will, I

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>completely agree, And I think this is also one of

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the key things to think about, which is that people

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the difficulty of using bitcoin and they compare

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it with PayPal or Visa or Ali pay or whatever

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 1>we chat, and they're like, yeah, it's really it's really cumbersome.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult. It's difficult for even season people. But if

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you compare it not to reach at, but compared to

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>some other means for moving moving money in and out

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 1>of say a repressive regime, think, for example, of the

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>steps that people in China go to, or they like

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>pay some junk at operator to take them to Macau.

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Then they play back around for several hours, lose a

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch of money doing that, cash out their chips et cetera.

0:40:57.040 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>If you compare bitcoin to that versus we chad, suddenly

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin actually looks like the more convenient thing. So I think,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like a the convenience is a big detriment to privacy.

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>But as more people perhaps feel they must have a

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>censorship free solution or they must engage in a transaction

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that's not allowed, then you might, over time start to

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>make the convenience case for bitcoin not by compared gets

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to Ali pay, but by compared it to something way

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>more uh convoluted. Yeah, so all we need someone to

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>do is to create a reasonably convenient method of bypassing

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the existing financial system without sufficiently angering the authorities so

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that they crack down on it. Good luck. But if

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>if anyone has any better ideas, we'll have them on Yeah,

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us let us know. Alright, this has been another

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway, and I'm

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Joe Why isn'tal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart, and you should definitely follow our guest on Twitter,

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex Gladstein. He's at Gladstein. And be sure to follow

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson,

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as our substitute producer Today, our old producer

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 1>who's filling back in for the day to for Foreheads.

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>He's on Twitter at foreheads t and follow the Bloomberg

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesco Levi at Francesco Today. Check out

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all the Bloomberg podcasts under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for listening.