WEBVTT - Disney's Cost Cuts and China Tech

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation of money and power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Ludlow Amed Ludlow in San Francisco. Caroline hides off today.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology and water show we have for you.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Disney's capital spending and production costs coming in lower than

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 3>projected and saving three billion dollars for the entertainment company.

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Will bring you all the details.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Plus, President Biden imposes limits on US investments in China. Meanwhile,

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Ali Baba returns to growth across all the main divisions,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>defying China's economic turbulence.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 4>What this all means for the Chinese tech.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Sector Finally, will take a deeper look at the Supreme

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Court ruling in the epic case siding with Apple. At

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>least for now, the single day we're watching in the

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>earning story is Disney, so many stories within it, raising

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>prices for streaming basically really outperforming the loss on the

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>streaming business much narrower than forecasts five hundred and twelve million.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 4>But this is the Eiger effect.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Cost discipline and cost cutting is work. The headline spending

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 3>this year will be twenty seven billion dollars for content

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 3>principally instead of the thirty billion they normally spend.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 4>That is something the market reacted to.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 3>As lot, as well as some of the financial forecasts

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 3>they gave going forward. Let's get to our Media and

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Entertainment editor Chris Powmery, who joins us from La Chris

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Cost Discipline. Iiger the market likes it. What were some

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>of the other key takeaways from that Disney print.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, the the big headliners. Yeah, they've implemented as big

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 5>cost cutting effort. It's dovetailing with the writers and actors strike,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 5>so they're saving money on production there. And you know

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 5>the resistant general feeling on Maaster. These companies were ill

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 5>spending too much on content. The lower than expected losses

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 5>on streaming half a billion dollars, if you can call that, good,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 5>and dramatic price increases for the Disney plus and Who

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 5>Services twenty seven percent hike as they try to get

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 5>to profitability next year in streaming as they promised.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the lost half a billion dollars five hundred

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>and twelve million on the streaming business in the quarter

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a year ago it was one billion, and I think

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>the executives have guided us to seven hundred and fifty million.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.399
<v Speaker 3>We're still obsessed with subscribe account So Disney Plus subscribers

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>overall fell seven point four percent right in the course

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>had gone. But the main story there is Disney Plus

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 3>hot Star explains to what's what happened?

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, they lost the streaming rights to India Premier Cricket League,

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 5>which was a big deal, big source of subscriber growth

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 5>in India and a couple other countries, and so that

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 5>is really you know, you're seeing the impact of that

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 5>now for a few quarters, just a dramatic decrease and

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 5>subscribers locally there.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Chris, what did Igo and co say about the

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 3>writers and actors strike and how that's going to impact

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the content s late.

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 5>It was mord into the three billion dollars in content reduction,

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 5>so they didn't specify it how much was due to

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 5>the strikes as opposed to just an overall reduction in

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 5>spending that they've been implementing. But it's a significant enough

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 5>number and we've seen these similar numbers from all the.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Big media companies in recent weeks.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Billions of dollars collectively in savings as they don't have

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 5>to make new TV shows and films right now, All.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, Bloomberg's Media entertainment editor, Chris Palmery. The other big

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>piece of news is Disney raising streaming prices right there,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>it's a twenty seven percent hike for the ad free

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>version of Disney Plus it goes from fourteen to fourteen

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars a month from eleven. Really interesting, the story of

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Disney keeping up with Netflix in that sense. Let's keep

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 3>a conversation going ross Gerba, president and CEO and co

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>founder of Gerber Kawasaki, an investor in Disney. That's a

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>lot to take in, right, It's very rare you see

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>four red headlines on the Bloomberg terminal from a single

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 3>earnings report. But what was the main point for you?

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Russ?

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I think the main point is exactly what you guys

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>have been focused on, is right sizing the amount of

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 2>spending that's being done in Hollywood with the actual revenue

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 2>coming in from direct to consumer sources. So you know,

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>they started out really in a race for subscribers. I'm

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 2>very similar to online gambling. Lots of acquisition costs, and

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>now the business has matured and they have you know, well,

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 2>almost two hundred million plus subscribers, you know, and when

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you look at the business, they're very close to profitability.

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>So these are the changes that need to be made

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to make streamers profitable like Netflix. So when you look

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>at Netflix's profitability with over three and a half billion

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of free cash flow and growing, you know what the

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>potential is for Disney, even if they don't add subscribers,

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>is to see profits actually come from these streamers in

0:04:58.480 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the next year.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Russ.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Just for the benefit of our audience, I'm looking on

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal. Gerbak Kawasaki has around one hundred and

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand Disney shares as of June thirtieth, So.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 4>You've got skin in the game.

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 3>You're a big EIGA fan, right, has your perception of

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 3>him and his job changed based on what you heard

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 3>last night.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 2>Not that his job has changed. He has a very

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 2>challenging job, but he's got the help that I was

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>hoping and praying he would with Kevin Mayer and Tom SAgs.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know Kevin Maher and I am always

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>impressed by his aggressiveness, his connections, his ability to get

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 2>projects done in Hollywood.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And I see, you know, Iiger.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Making a move on Candle Media and bringing these executives

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 2>back in the fold. And the big news about ESPN

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>getting into the gambling business.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>With Penn Gaming.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, they kicked port Nooy out and they added

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>ESPN and this is a huge win for ESPN, not

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>only with new revenue streams, but getting out to the

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>consumers in a meaningful way and ultimately building a standalone

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 2>sports app that could rival any app out there. So

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>there are some exciting things out there, but ultimately Eiger

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>needs to focus on content.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>They need good movies. That really is the fuel of.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Disney and that's really what I think Iigers really, you know,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>main goal is besides just cutting costs, but improving content.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>There's like two competing forces here where they're trying to

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>have cost discipline but you know, and reduce content spending.

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 4>But the content slate is impacted because of the strikes.

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>People want good stuff to watch.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 3>So how does Disney get the balance right making sure

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>they've got things that get eyeballs without overspending.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, unfortunately, the movie business is very you know, hit

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and miss and somewhat random, and there's no real formula

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>for success.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>As we've seen over the years.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Disney's had a great run over its long term in

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 2>finding tremendous talent. So what's happening now with the strike,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 2>And we're hoping that the strike ends at the end

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of summer, once everybody's done with their vacations realize they

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>need to make money again. So I do think that

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>the strike will end soon and we won't see too

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 2>much of a hiccup. But there's been so much content

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>made over the last two years. None of us have

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>seen even close to all of it. And this is

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>what I think the writers and the actors are miscalculating,

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and maybe there's a short term effect of their strike,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>but there's just so much content in the hopper.

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>There's international content.

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>They are even green lighting independent projects right now. They're

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>over one hundred productions that were green lighted by SAG

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>even during the strike, and some of them are for

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 2>big streamers like Apple TV.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>So the strike is really just posturing in the industry.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>After having just an amazingly profitable period of time, now

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>these companies need to make money. It's a bad time

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>for a strike, and they're going to cut costs into

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>what's necessary to right size their businesses. So it's a

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 2>changing time and We're seeing it in technology, and we're

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>seeing it now in entertainment.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>As we write size in the post pandemic era.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Michael Morris, an analyst at Guggenheim who covers the company,

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>asked for on the call, what are the chances of

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>a big technology company buying Disney? And I said, I'm

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>not gonna I'm not gonna comment about that, but the rumor,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the idea has been there for so long.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about that?

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>US? Well, I think if Apple had, you know, the

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't.

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think if they did, they would have bought

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Netflix in the day, they would have bought Tesla in

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the day. And they've had several attempts at Disney, and

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>they certainly should take this opportunity right now, but they're

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to. So Apple isn't that company, and they're

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>wholly focused on Vision pro. I think the one to

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 2>look at is really Amazon and Google. I do think

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the future of entertainment is very much going to be

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 2>led by tech giants, not traditional media companies.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And so as we see.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 2>This transition, you know, there's a very high likelihood that

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody might bid for all or parts of Disney. That said,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the company is fine the way it is,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and they just need to you know, fix the problems

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 2>they have, which are fixable, and the stock has tremendous

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 2>value in my mind for long term investors, despite you know,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>it's poor performance over the last two years.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the ten years.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Before it, it's been a phenomenal performer under Eiger. So

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>we've had a big step back, but I think it's

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity for investors. In my fun GK it's a

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 2>top holding for us. It's in the top fifteen holdings

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>for US. And I'm you know, a long term investor

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>in Disney and I'm not, you know, planning on changing

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that really quick.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 3>On the tech perspective, Disney was talking about how they

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>have the technology to assess password sharing and that you know,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 3>going into the next fiscal year would be more of

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>a priority. That was a factor for Netflix and its earnings.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>How do you think about password sharing in the context

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 3>of Disney plus Well.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised how successful Netflix was in getting users

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to sign up in the password sharing and having little backlash,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 2>as I thought possibly they could have some pretty severe

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>backlash and lose subscribers because of it. But in in hindsight.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>If the content's good, people will pay for it. And

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that's the bottom line, you know, sort of the debate

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 2>over you know, will people pay for X and will

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>people pay for social media platforms versus paying for entertainment

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>platforms like Netflix or Disney Plus. And what we're seeing

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>is people will pay and we have the technology to

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, hold people accountable. And I think that's you know,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 2>a win win for all involved. I think giving away

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the product, you know, at the beginning, it's served everybody,

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but now it doesn't.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, ros Gerba, President, CEO and co founder of

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Gerber Kawasaki with the Disney reaction, thank you very much.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Coming up here on Bloomberg Technology, what President Biden's executive

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 3>order means for China tech and the US tech sector.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about that and more with Joannetheny

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Advises Capital Management.

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg.

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 3>President Joe acted in executive order yesterday placing stringent restrictions

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 3>on specific US investments in China's sensitive tech sectors, for example, Chips,

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 3>quantum Tech, and select AI systems. This is part of

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>a push to restrict the company's ability to develop next

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 3>generation military and surveillance technologies that could potentially threaten US

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>national security.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 4>That is the news.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Joan Fini, partner and portfolio manager at

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Advisor's Capital Management.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 4>You know you're an investor.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 3>With a global view, but we also know you as

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 3>somebody with a long history with the chip sector. The

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>chip sector a target of this Biden initiatives. What's your

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>reaction to the executive order?

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, you.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 6>Know, this is yet another move by the US government

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 6>over the last many years, spanning administrations, to try to

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 6>limit the flow of technology to China.

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, for many years we basically gave our technology

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.599
<v Speaker 7>away by looking the other way when China was acquiring

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 7>technology through dubious means, through trade relations, through manufacturing operations

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 7>in China. And now you know with the previous administration

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 7>in this one, the professionals within those departments are trying

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 7>to curtail that and.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 8>This is yet another way so by.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 7>Restricting venture capitalist's ability to make new investments in China

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 7>and private equity ability to make new investments in China.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 7>The hope isn't so much that the deprivation of that

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 7>bit of capital, that bit of money will really slow

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 7>China innovation. It's more the stopping of those people providing

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 7>help to those companies. So it's really the technology transfer,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 7>the knowledge transfer that they want to stop. It's not

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 7>really about the money involved, because it's very little as

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 7>the whole of China investment in new technology.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 3>You make a good point that's so relevant to the

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology or audience that this is essentially a restriction

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 3>on private capital investment VC private equity. But as a

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>public market investor, does it sound were the attractiveness of

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>any of the Chinese ADRs that trade on US exchanges?

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, there are a lot of reasons to be concerned

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.199
<v Speaker 7>about specific Chinese ADRs.

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, we recognize.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 7>That the political tension between the US and China is

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 7>not likely to ease anytime soon, and that does help

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 7>to guide the sorts of investments we're willing to make

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 7>in China in other parts of Asia.

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 8>But it doesn't discourage us entirely.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, our international group is on the ground looking

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 7>for ideas there.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 8>You know, in our balance strategy, which I'm responsible for, we.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 7>Still like Taiwan semi Conductor despite the political risks that

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 7>we obviously acknowledge are out there because Taiwan Semi serves

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 7>the global demand for semiconductors, and they're at the forefront

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 7>through at the leading.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 8>Edge of advanced manufacturing, and they.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 7>Serve so many US designers of chips and they're an

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 7>integral part of that, from Nvidia.

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 8>To A and D to Broadcom and others.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, later in the show, we're going to act you

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 3>talk a little bit about Tokyo Electron, which is a

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Japanese chip gear maker equipment maker, but they're getting a

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of demand from China because at the same time,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 3>China is trying to react to this, right, So think

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>about some of the names we're interested in. In Vidia

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 3>has circumvented the other US restrictions on technic knowlogy export

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 3>by producing a lower power GPU.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 4>What is your.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Perspective on how US technology names who want to do

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>business in China can get around some of these executive orders.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so for a while, I think US companies like Nvidia, AMD,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 7>Cisco and others will continue to be able to sell

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 7>into China. But as Invidia has done, they'll have to

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 7>sell less capable chips than the leading is that they've

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 7>got to sell elsewhere in the world.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 8>And as you saw not just what.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 7>Tokyo Electron said about the continued demand for equipment are

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 7>into China, because you know, China is going to want

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 7>to build and it's going to continue to build up

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 7>its own semiconductor manufactur string capabilities, encouraged in part by

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 7>all these restrictions not just from the US but from

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Europe as well the Netherlands. And in addition, we saw

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 7>also that according to the Financial Times in videos receiving

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 7>like five billion dollars worth of orders from Chinese companies

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 7>now because they're afraid that the restrictions are only going

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 7>to get more severe. So China remains an opportunity even

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 7>if they are constrained, because they're going to want to

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 7>get as high level chips and as high level equipment

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 7>in the semiconductor industry as they possibly can.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 8>And it's pretty clear that China.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 7>Is going to be making its own investments in design capabilities,

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 7>in manufacturing capabilities, and a lot of the people they

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 7>have on staff right at Smith and at other locations

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 7>in the design world as well as manufacturing have been

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 7>trained in the US and have worked for US companies,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 7>so they have a lot of knowledge.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>To work with.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Joan All told on any metric or scale you like,

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 3>what is your assessment on the warmthful health of the

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>US China relationship.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Where do we stand?

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 7>Oh, well, on a scale of one to ten, one

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 7>being least healthy, I'd say we're around a three right now.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it is not a good place because of

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 8>our goals in the.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 7>US to prevent China from you know, creating military capabilities

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 7>that would be a threat to US are essentially in

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 7>conflict with China's goals and that level of tension.

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 8>You know, I'm not a military a political.

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 7>Expert, but I don't see that level of tension easy

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 7>from everything I've read, that's not going to really get

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 7>any better. Can we cooperate on fronts outside of those

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 7>sensitive areas, Yes, obviously, and we should, you know, hope

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 7>for the sake of our companies and our consumers, by

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 7>the way, who benefit from getting cheaper goods out of China,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 7>that the restrictions don't spread beyond those essential areas.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 8>Where the US finds, you know, it's needed for our security,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 8>and clearly that's the case.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, what Nvidia continues to sell, Look at what

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 7>other companies can take you to be able to sell,

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 7>whether it's Tokyo Electron or Applyed Materials or KOA or

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 7>LAMB Research.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 8>Right, there's still plenty of opportunity in China.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 7>It's just a bit narrower now, a bit lower margin

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 7>now than it was before.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 3>The US China relationship on a three out of ten

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 3>on the Juan Feeni Advisors Capital Management Scale.

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much for your time.

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Going to catch up here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 4>Time for talking tech.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Chinese chip makers are speeding up investments in mature semiconductor

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 3>equipment as the US and its allies Titan Export controls to.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 4>Cut Asia's tech edge.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Asia's biggest semiconductor gear maker is seeing extremely strong investment

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 3>in China quote and is winning new customers there. That

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>all according to the name Tokyo Electron and its CEO.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 4>And something else we're tracking is Ali.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Barber returning to growth across all its main divisions, defying

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 3>China's economic turbulence. This a first step forward to a

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 3>long or comeback after more than a year of malaise.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>China's online shopping leader reported a better than expected fourteen

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 3>percent rise in revenues during a quarter when the world's

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>number two economy struggle to gain momentum after years of

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>COVID zero restriction shares up more than five percent in

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 3>US trading today.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Those are the US listed ADRs. Let's head to Space

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 4>three two one release release release.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 3>That's the first set of private tourism passengers embarking on

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 3>the ride of a lifetime two out of space on

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Virgin Galactic's second commercial spaceflight, joining us now.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg News reporter on.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 3>All Things Space, Lauren grush Hey seventh successful launch. Finally,

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty years later, Virgin Galactic gets some tourists into space.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Give us the details.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, if you think about it, really has

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 8>been leading to this moment.

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 9>I know I probably said that during their last flight,

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 9>but this is the one that sent private pain space

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 9>tourists to space, and that is ultimately why Virgin Galactic

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 9>was founded in the first place, nearly twenty years ago.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 9>In fact, one of the passengers on today's flight, John Goodwin,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 9>has been waiting almost two decades, He's had his ticket

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 9>that long, and he finally got to make good on

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 9>that promise that Virgin Galactic made for him all.

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 8>Those years ago.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 9>So this is why it was such a big moment.

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 9>It's capping off nearly two decades of development for the company,

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 9>and from here on out it's going to be monthly

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 9>flights of these paying space tourists hereafter.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 3>So there's some things we have to clarify here. Originally

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>ticket prices were two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, right,

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>they closed them while they basically put a pause on operations.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 3>When they reopened they rose to four hundred and fifty.

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Thousand on board.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 3>We had three essentially customer tourist astronauts, but two of

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>them were.

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 4>Not paying customers.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 4>They won these tickets in a charity draw.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:58.719
<v Speaker 8>Yes, that's correct.

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 9>Only John was really the that was one of the early.

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Ticket holders, and he competed at the nineteen seventy two Olympics.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>The big question is what happens next. What do we

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 3>know about the cadence of launches now the last one

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 3>was in June one today?

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 4>How do they get going?

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 9>So the ideal goal is to do monthly launches from.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 8>Here on out.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 9>So we should see one of these flights with you know,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 9>six passengers on board, two pilots for passengers go into space.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 9>I think for the foreseeable future, Virgin Galactic wants to

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 9>have a support astronaut on board, so someone from within

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 9>the company to kind of guide the passengers along. But

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 9>you know, if on these flights we should should see

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 9>about three ticket holders, you know, get to finally fulfill

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 9>their dream of seeing space.

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 8>And that's a big deal because.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 9>As far as we're aware, the company has a backlog

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.439
<v Speaker 9>of eight hundred customers that have been holding onto tickets,

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 9>some for many years.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Space Correspondent Lauren Grush, thank you very much. Welcome

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 3>back to Bloomberg Technology. Ed Ludlow here in San Francisco.

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Apple is a key name that we're watching in the markets.

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>We're actually basically treading water now completely flat on the

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>stock it did fall twenty four hours ago. And you'll

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 3>remember the headline broke during Bloomberg Technology that in the

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 3>context of Apple, the US Supreme Court is allowing the

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 3>iPhone maker to keep its app store payment rules in

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>place for the time being. This is dismissing a request

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>from Epic Games that would have let developers direct iPhone

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>users to other lower priced alternative stores online.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Remember the context here.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 3>The ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals had sided with

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Epic and said that Apple's app store rules contravened California

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 3>competition law. What the Supreme Court is doing simply here

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>is intervening, saying for the time being, Epic's request, which

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 3>was to immediately allow users to be redirected other stores,

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>has been rejected.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 4>Apple is expected.

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>To appeal the original decision later in the year, but

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 3>if the judges won't hear it, then then it's size

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 3>of Epic. Anyway, We've got to discuss what this means

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 3>for epics prospects of enforcing the original rule. And bring

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 3>in Sarah o'lamb. She's a senior fellow at the Tech

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Policy Institute.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 4>That was a lot.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 3>It's a difficult one to explain, Sarah. But at a

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 3>high level, what does the Supreme Court intervention mean at

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 3>this stage?

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 10>So, Justice Kagan denied an application by Epic to overturn

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 10>the Ninth Circuit stay on the District Court's order, pending

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 10>Apple's petition for Sercchi orri to the Supreme Court this fall.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 10>As you said, so, basically, the Federal Appellate Court said

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 10>that Apple doesn't need to lift yet it's anti steering provisions. Basically,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 10>the buttons, external leans or other calls to action that

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 10>direct customers to alternative purchasing mechanisms in their app store.

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 10>They don't need to lift that restriction. Yet Epic charges developers'

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 10>lower fees on their own app store, and so they

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 10>want a way to tell folks that, oh, you can

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 10>click this button to go to our store. So that's

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 10>what's that issue here.

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 3>So just to remind our audience, the Appeals Court has

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>put its decision on hold so that Apple has time

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 3>to file a Supreme Court appeal later in the year.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 4>But the ruling only.

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Kicks in if the Justices refuse to hear the case.

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 4>So it's complicated.

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 3>What is the Tech Policy Institute's kind of big picture

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 3>stance on this battle and the idea at the heart

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, what's interesting is that it's about this state law,

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 10>California's unfair competition law, and it's focused only on the

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 10>anti steering provisions. Basically, can other app stores put links

0:23:56.200 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 10>and buttons in Apple's app store to say, user, you

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 10>can click this link to go to another store to

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 10>buyer in app purchases. That's what we're talking about here.

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 10>There are other items that are in Actually another trial

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 10>with Epic versus Google coming up this fall, and so

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 10>that'll be interesting to watch as well. What's interesting to

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 10>me also is looking at Epic and Fortnite. So Epic

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 10>it has three different lines of business itself. It's a

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 10>multi billion dollar company that is a game developer but

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 10>also an app store and also a distributor. And so

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 10>what's really interesting is to see how these two app

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 10>stores are competing in the courts.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 3>The technology story here is about developers and the app store.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you see any merit in kind of Apple's argument,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 3>which in summary essentially is that it is a relief

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 3>to developers. You know, Apple feel like they're giving a

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of business and visibility opportunity with the rules such

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 3>as they are.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 10>Yes, well, I think, I mean personally, I think it

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 10>makes sense that Apple would say on their own app

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 10>store that we don't want links to other app stores

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 10>that are competing with us, and so on that point,

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 10>it makes sense that a store wouldn't want to be

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 10>able to promote other stores in their own store. So

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 10>that's what it is that issue here. There are other

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 10>claims in other lawsuits, and actually there are the two

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 10>other claims that Epic made at trial were denied were failed.

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 10>So what's really at issue here is that disclosure rule,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 10>the anti steering rule, and California's unfair competition law. And

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 10>so you know, there was a sixteen day bench trial.

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 10>There were dozens of witnesses, nine hundred exhibits in September

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty one, and so they thoroughly went through all

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 10>the different claims. The only one that survived, which is

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 10>that issue here is are those buttons or the links

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 10>to other stores? And that seems you know, that's a

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 10>very contained question. What's interesting as well is the appeal

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 10>that Apple might file or will file with the Supreme

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 10>Court raises some interesting federalism issues, and so that'll be

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 10>good to watch.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what I want to ask you next. You know,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>we love having you on the show, Sarah. You have

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>such a deep knowledge in the area. But I appreciate

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 3>you don't have a crystal ball, right, But what do

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 3>you think will be the outcome if the Justices choose

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 3>not to hear the Supreme appeal? What are the other

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 3>avenues that either party can go down?

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, so it's sounded like we'll have to wait and

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 10>see what Apple files in their serciari appeal, But it

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 10>sounded like they they will raise questions about, you know,

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 10>ken a ruling on a state law effect by a

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 10>federal court affect broadly parties outside of the lawsuit. So

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 10>that'll be an interesting question to ask when it comes

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 10>to the ecosystem of game gaming. I think there are

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 10>a lot of questions about antitrust theory and about competition

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 10>in the marketplace that are unanswered and that are good

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 10>to go through discovery and litigation to actually look at

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 10>the numbers the market shares. So we'll we'll be watching

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 10>the Epic versus Google trial as well to see, you know,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 10>how much competition is there in this marketplace. And yeah,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 10>it makes sense for gaming platforms to have have rules.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Sarah, this is epics response to the Supreme decision twenty

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 3>four hours ago. The result will be to inge not

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 3>only Epic, but innumerable consumers and other app developers for

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 3>a significant period of time. Just very quickly, in the

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 3>thirty seconds we have left. What do your response I

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>suppose to Epic's position on this, Well.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 10>My question for them would be, you know, how can

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 10>you measure injury? And so they have to prove losses

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 10>and that's a counterfactual.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 8>It's not clear to.

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 10>Me that there would be a lot of losses. I mean,

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 10>people know that they can go outside of different stores

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 10>to reach Fortnite and Epic content. They can go to

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 10>Epics app store themselves, and so it's a matter of

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 10>discovering what that number is, having experts weigh in, and

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 10>doing some economic analysis.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Olam, Senior fellow at the Tech Policy Institute, thank

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you for coming here on Bloomberg Technology, reacting what's been

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>a big story in the last twenty four hours. Alright,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 3>coming up here on Bloomberg Technology. Is it a good

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 3>time to expand your investments outside of the US. That

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 3>has been the question of this program. We're going to

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 3>talk all things from the venture capital perspective in the domestic,

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>US and abroad with Christine Zi, CEO of five hundred Global.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 4>That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, amid the flood of big tech layoffs, it's

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>becoming harder than ever to try and enter y Combinator,

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 3>the famous Silicon Valley startup accelerator where Airbnb, Coinbase, and

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Reddit all got their start. Bloomberg Original's host and executive

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>producer Emily Chang sat down with y Combinator CEO Gary

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 3>tan to talk about the state of tech markets and

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 3>venture capital have listened.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing tens of thousands of people getting laid off

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 11>from tech companies.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 4>How does this play out?

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 12>I think a lot of large companies started treating their

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 12>employee base almost as a place to park resources and

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 12>almost as a competitive moat versus the other giants. And

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 12>when I think about the amount of talent that was

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 12>sort of locked up in cushy jobs that you could

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 12>have been actually out there in the market making new technology,

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 12>pushing things forward. I'm hoping a lot of them actually

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 12>come over to startups and they realize, oh, this is

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 12>what it's like to run fast again.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 11>What's your advice for these workers who are getting laid off.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 11>It does sound a little trite to just say it's

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 11>time to build, right it Sure it does.

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 12>I mean I think some of it is like a

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 12>take stock right, Like getting much more connected to the

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 12>problems out there, I think will lead to just a

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 12>lot more direct access to I mean, building equity, building

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 12>businesses that really matter.

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 11>Well, speaking of equity, for years, tech workers have been

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 11>paid in stock and that was sort of you know,

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 11>the ticket, You're taking a risk on this company. It

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 11>could be worth ero or it could you know, be

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 11>worth millions. Right, we're seeing kind of the dark side

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 11>of RSUs are getting paid in stock.

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 11>Do you think that's still the way it should work.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 4>In Silicon Valley?

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 12>I mean that's some of the magic of startups. I

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 12>think this is about labor being able to access actual capital,

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.239
<v Speaker 12>and this is like one of the most direct and

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 12>most awesome versions of it. Some of the bad behavior

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 12>we saw from startup founders was trying to reach for

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 12>that billion dollar valuation because they wanted the headline out

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 12>there saying that they're a unicorn now. But that comes

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 12>at a cost, right, the focus on valuation and getting

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 12>that next notch of valuation above all else. That comes

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 12>at both a great personal cost to the founders themselves

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 12>but also to the employees.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 11>So what do you think needs to change?

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 12>I think some of it is already happening, right. You know,

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 12>the revaluation of startups right now is starting and it

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 12>will continue. People are going to be a lot more

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 12>mindful about do I really need to do that fifty

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 12>to two hundred million dollar rays.

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>That was why Combinator CEO Gary Tam watch more of

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>the circuit with Emily Chang tonight ten pm Eastern Time

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Television, or if you're a modern day person,

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 3>stream it at eight pm Eastern on Bloomberg Originals. Let's

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 3>stick with the venture capital story now, and for today's

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 3>VC Spotlight, let's bring in Christine's side. She's the founding

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 3>partner and CEO of five hundred Global, a multi stage

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 3>venture capital firm two point five billion dollars in assets

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 3>under management. The big story of the show has been

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 3>President Biden's executive order on limiting US investment privately VC

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 3>or PE into mainland China. Now I don't think five

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred Global does invest into mainland China, But what is

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 3>your reaction to that executive order?

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 13>Well, thanks so much Ed for having me, and it

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 13>really makes me reflect back to the early days of

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 13>five hundred. We just celebrated our thirteenth anniversary a couple

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 13>of weeks ago, so go back to twenty ten, very

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 13>different era in Silicon Valley and technology and venture capital.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 13>What has really evolved over the last thirteen years that

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 13>five hundred has been investing globally is certainly huge growth

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 13>in venture funding tech penetration worldwide, but also and particularly

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 13>in the US this intersection between tech, venture and policy,

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 13>so I think this will only increase. As you mentioned

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 13>five hundred global we aren't active in China.

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 4>Our focus has.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 13>Largely been investing US and globally, and for US that

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 13>really means what we've actually referred to as the rise economies,

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 13>So twenty five of what we see as the largest

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 13>fastest growing economies in markets like Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Mexico,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 13>and so forth, and we've seen great opportunities there.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 3>At the heart of the Biden story, though, is the

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 3>merits and benefits of investing in US tech versus international markets.

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>So some of those countries you listed, what is it

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>about them that makes them as attractive as a venture back,

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 3>investment into a founder or even a largest startups you're

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 3>at multi stage right, yes.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 13>Well, early on we began investing both in the US

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 13>Silicon Valley but outside of the US. Since twenty ten

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 13>and today our portfolio is more than twenty eight hundred companies,

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 13>about half of that portfolio is non US, specifically in

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 13>those rise economies that I mentioned, like in Indonesia or

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 13>Mexico or Turkey or so forth. What we have seen

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 13>early on is that these are very large economies, fast

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 13>growing from both population growth as well as GDB growth.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 13>And we took a bet very early on that because

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 13>of the many trends that we were seeing in technology.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 13>If you remember twenty ten, costs to start a company

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 13>were coming down dramatically online platforms like a Google Meta previously, Facebook, Twitter,

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 13>Mobile was really taking off in terms of Apple and Android,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 13>that all of this would make it just much more

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 13>cost effective and the barrier to start a company would down.

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 13>So as a result, we would start seeing a lot

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 13>of big opportunities from founders building all around the world.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 13>And so that is really our belief. It continues to

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 13>hold true and for us, I think we're going to

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 13>just continue to deepen that exposure.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Christine, you sound very busy, I mean, and I mean

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 3>that kindly. Here on VC Spotlight, you know, we have

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 3>a number of vcs that are sort of narrowly focused

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 3>on early stage or growth stage, or the firm might

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 3>have one early stage fund, one growth stage fund, but

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 3>within geographic narrow focus twenty eight hundred portfolio companies, eighty countries,

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 3>multi stage just from an industry respective, how do you

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 3>manage that as a firm well.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 13>You know, from the early days, a lot of that

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 13>vision was really to find great opportunities great founders in

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 13>all corners of the world. Because of that bet we took,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 13>and our roots are certainly in early stage, and that

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 13>continues to be an area we're very active in. However,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 13>a lot of the opportunity we saw was that a

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 13>lot of these markets that we took a bet on

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 13>early coming online have now generated a number of big

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 13>outcomes either regional or global category leaders, and we've had

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 13>a great opportunity because of the early relationships we've established

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.959
<v Speaker 13>with founders from you know, early on as either one

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 13>of or the first institutional backer to really follow the

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 13>founder's journey and help back them from pre seed to

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 13>pre IPO. So for us, it's really in line with

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 13>our certainly the original vision and thesis. But you know,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 13>we're excited to keep supporting the founders in all corners

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 13>of the world where they may actually need it more

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 13>In terms of the development of venture the venture ecosystem, we.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Showed some of your port photo companies a moment Ago, Canva,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 3>get Lab, Credit, Calm, and the names that jump out.

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>The story of twenty twenty three, though, has been ours

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 3>ficial intelligence. Are you focused on AI native companies or

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 3>more AI adjacent startups that kind of want to jump

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 3>in and gain benefit from the tool of generative AI

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 3>or a large language model.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 13>It's definitely not never a dull moment, especially as it

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 13>relates to AI and against the stark backdrop of the

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 13>macro markets and valuations falling and funding dropping. But for us,

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 13>because we have our roots in investing in a larger

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 13>number of companies across a number of sectors, one of

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 13>the big benefits of that, and really an advantage for us,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 13>is to be able to spot what we see our

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 13>emerging innovation not just in the US, but in all

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 13>corners of the world. So as it relates specifically to AI,

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 13>we have been investing in companies in the AI space

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 13>for a number of years, and I think as we

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 13>see the uptick in terms of companies building either like

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 13>you said, they're going after the AI tech stack itself

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 13>or kind of AI adjacent or really going after existing

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 13>sectors from kind of an AI perspective, we definitely are

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 13>leaning in and looking at all of those opportunities and

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 13>then writing investments. And I think what's quite unique again

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 13>from our perspective is that this is not just a Silicon.

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.359
<v Speaker 8>Valley story or just a US story.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 4>It's really a global story.

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 13>Oftentimes, what we've seen in the early days is that

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 13>certain business models will start in the US and then

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 13>we see them happen in other parts of the world.

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 13>But for AI, it really is happening in parallel in

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 13>many different markets.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Christine si Founding Partners, CEO of five hundred global twenty

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 3>eight hundred portfolio companies in eighty countries. That is global

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 3>reach here on VC Spotlight. So look, online dating can

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 3>be just as tough as dating in person, from ghosting

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 3>and harassment to chats that don't lead to dates. Now

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 3>AI chatbots could help solve that issue, at least that's

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 3>what a number of these startups are saying.

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 3>To unpack more is Bloomberg's ear Nakano and you've been

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 3>reporting on this and specific apps that are tool to

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 3>help in dating, But what's the big picture story here?

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 3>What are the apps purporting to be able to do?

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so my colleague Kiln Punder and I we downloaded

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 14>three relatively new apps that are marketed to be AI driven.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 14>So this is beyond the machine learning that you see

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 14>in traditional dating apps like Tinder and Hinge, and these

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 14>apps are marketed to rid the inefficiencies that you see

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 14>in the dating world. These are things like ghosting and ghosting,

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 14>which is when your matches ignore you, and inefficient matches

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 14>that are just.

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Not they're not good.

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I actually met my wife on a dating app,

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>but it was me doing the work the conversation.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Some of the functionality of the technology is to mimic

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:29.240
<v Speaker 3>you or to do things on your behalf. Just explain

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 3>how it works and you actually tested it out.

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, absolutely so. Teaser AI, which is the app that

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 14>gets rid of the small talk, essentially jumps to the

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 14>part where your chatbot talks to your match, so they

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 14>have full license over your conversations and they will break

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 14>the ice with quirky conversations. But to our extent, we

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 14>found out that a lot of them were false facts

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 14>about ourselves.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>One debate for the industry broadly is the cost of

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 3>dating apps. You know, it was the one that I

0:39:55.280 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 3>used was free, but there's a premium element as well.

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Do these AI driven apps cost What are the fees involved?

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so they're free for the most part, but like

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 14>other traditional dating apps, there's a free subscription and the

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 14>premium subscription, and the premium features include things like better matches,

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 14>more matches, or finding out why people didn't like you,

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 14>which is a mystery to a lot of people. And

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.280
<v Speaker 14>these range from four to sixty dollars a month.

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 3>I think that the bit that we got hung up

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 3>on is the mimicking and flirting bit.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 4>Is it realistic?

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 3>The experience that the AI generated content does it come

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 3>across as a human.

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 14>So we found that they were very very awkward. Sometimes

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 14>the a I would send pictures avatar pictures of themselves

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.359
<v Speaker 14>which are very awkwardly posed, so I wouldn't think that

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 14>they were you know, there was a human behind it.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 14>But some people seem to really like it. And there's

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 14>also a breakup Buddy app which will help you guide

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 14>through your heel and self journey when a robot breaks

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 14>your heart.

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bloomberg's Area and Nikano, this is AI irl

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 4>right here.

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 3>On Bloomberg Technology. Unfortunately, that does it for this edition

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 3>of Bloombog Technology.

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Tune in Friday tomorrow.

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be joined by Kyle Vott, the CEO

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 3>of driverless car company Cruise. A lot of news coming

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 3>out in the self driving space in recent weeks new markets.

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 3>We're still kind of waiting for the real deal, something

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about here on this program. It has been

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a mega week. We're just four days in. Earnings have

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 3>been a big part of the story, so don't forget that.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 3>You can recap everything we've talked about on the show,

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 3>a big emphasis on Biden's executive order when it comes

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 3>to investment in China. Check out the podcast wherever you

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 3>get your podcasts. We're on Apple, we're on Spotify, and

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 3>we're on iHeart, and of course the podcast also on

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg platforms. Four days in, Guys, one day to

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 3>go from San Francisco.

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology