WEBVTT - How The AI Bubble Bursts

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>All Zone Media. Hello, and welcome to Better Offline Live

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and direct, coming at you from the middle of nowhere

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the center of everywhere, and I'm your host ed zetron.

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>What else it feels like forever since I talked directly

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to you, my dear listeners. So I'll get right to it.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And as a reminder, I'll be including links to everything

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about in the episode notes. And if you're

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>just catching up, all you really need to know here

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is that open ai makes large language models like GPT

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course the product chat GPT and throp it

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>makes claude a similar product, and that generative AI products

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have yet to really prove a use case that justifies

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>them losing money on every single transaction. Let's begin. August second,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four was Black Friday for the AI boom,

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>as a week of rough earnings from big tech led

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to what felt like the entire media industry asking one question,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is the AI bubble popping? And that's the question I'm

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going to try and answer for you today and in

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the next episode two, the Guardians sought to answer why

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the big seven tech companies had been hit with AI

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>boomed outs. CNN asked has the AI bubble burst, and

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>The Atlantic suggested several months too late that the generative

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>AI revolution may indeed be a bubble. The Financial Times

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>reported hedge fund Elliott Management told investors that Nvidia was

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a bubble, and Bloomberg reported that big tech had failed

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>to convince Wall Street that AI was paying off. It's

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>all part of a growing trend where people are suddenly

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>realizing what I've been saying for months, that this unprofitable,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>energy hungry technology that creates mediocre outputs is not actually

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the future. It's just another cloud do hickey. I had

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not a great way of putting it, I realized, but

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this is my nice way of saying. Generative AI isn't

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>completely useless, but the large language models they kind of

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are based on the costs. These articles were for the

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>most part, talking about the sudden and violent declines and

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the share prices of companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google,

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>which for the most part haven't really recovered and as

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of about August tenth, are down significantly over the past month.

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Although these articles didn't say anything particularly new or reveal

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>any individual missteps or scandals that might have prompted the slide,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they hinted to a broader awareness among Wall Street that

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the AI ambitions of these companies and by which I

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>really mean generative AI, will require these massive upfront investments

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and the payoff might not n actually be there, and

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>at least if it is, it's not going to be

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>there for a while. We're talking years, if not a decade,

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and once the narrative gets settled, is very, very very

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to move in. While a stock market isn't always rational,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>check out Tesla for more. The one day sell off

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of these stocks and the comments from analysts and industry

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>figures that followed, suggest that Wall Street is growing in

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>increasingly uncomfortable with the vast amounts of money required to

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>build and grow generative AI into whatever the fuck that's

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>meant to be. These companies, while still making over ten

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in profit, of course, referring to Microsoft, Google, Amazon,

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and the like in the last quarter alone, have also

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>spent an absolute shit ton of money on infrastructure to

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>capture the so called demand for cloud services from generative AI. However,

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one little problem, none of them seem to actually be

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>making that much money from the thing they're investing in.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>In the last fiscal year, Microsoft's capex the capital expenditures

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was about fifty five point seven billion dollars, which is

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>up seventy five percent year over year, with more than

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>one third nineteen billion dollars spent in the last quarter

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and in June thirtieth, twenty twenty four. This is reportedly

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>split fifty to fifty between infrastructure and technology, which suggests

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>an aggressive data center build out, with Chief financial officer

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for Microsoft Amyhood saying that the company expects capital expenditures

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to increase on a sequential basis, giving cloud and the

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and I quote AI demand that, as I've repeatedly said,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is not really there. And what exactly does increasing on

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a sequential basis mean in dollar terms? I have absolutely

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>no idea. It's vague and perhaps vague enough to rattle

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the markets, particularly when Microsoft will be starting from an

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>already quite high valuation. We're still, Hood added, and I

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>quote Microsoft's earnings calles that AI related spend represented nearly

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all of our total capital expenditures, with roughly half for

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure needs that will support monetization over the next fifteen

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>years and beyond ugh. In essence, Microsoft spent nineteen billion

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the last quarter on cloud and AI expenses

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and has made it clear that it's not done spending

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>more money than it's ever spent before on a technology

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that neither makes Microsoft nor the people paying them that

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>much money. It's very stupid and for context, Microsoft made

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty two point zero four billion dollars in profits in

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Q two twenty twenty five. Is this really worth sinking

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>an entire quarters worth of profits into? Let me give

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it another way to look at it. Microsoft's net profit

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>margin has dropped from thirty nine point four four percent

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in Q three twenty twenty three to thirty four point

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>four percent in Q two twenty twenty four, meaning that

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's taking home less money than it usually would because

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>they're really investing in this thing that only loses money.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's very good, it's very good that this is happening.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>This is what you love to see. The other cloud

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>providers aren't really doing much better. Google's capital expenditures are

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>forecast to be fifty billion dollars in twenty twenty four,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>and it's spent eleven billion dollars in Q four twenty

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, driven by and I quote mostly by technical

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure meaning servers and data centers, and twelve billion dollars

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was what they spent in Q one twenty twenty four.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm not breaking things out much with Google

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is because it hasn't been extremely guarded about its AI expenses,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>probably because they're really high and not making any money

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from it. Amazon's similarly guarded, with its capex last year

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>hanging somewhere around forty eight point four billion dollars. It's

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>spent thirty point five billion dollars so far in twenty

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, an absolutely ridiculous amount considering its profit for

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Q two twenty twenty four was thirteen point four to

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>eight billion. They're just sinking their profits into these things,

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's really no sign that anything changes. Every hyperscaler

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>has said that they intend to keep spending all of

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>this money on AI, and I haven't even mentioned companies

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like Oracle, which expects to spend ten billion dollars on

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>cloud infrastructure this year, with much of that new capacity

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>going to support Microsoft and Google Cloud. I don't know

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens if they don't need it anymore. Anyone think

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about anyway anyway, But no Black Friday. It was a

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>collective realization of the scale and the cost of AI

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and the first signs that the markets are starting to

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>ask those annoying little questions about whether it's actually worth it.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Yet the real chaos, and one that comparatively speaking slipped

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>under the radar, came in the form of one of

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>my pale horses. Last month, I put out an episode

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.679
<v Speaker 1>called top Culture where I suggested that the first signs

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of the AI bubbles collapse would be in the failure

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of a major AI company, though one not operating at

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the scale of say Open Ai, and I specifically picked

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>one out character dot Ai, which raised one hundred and

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars in funding, and the information had already

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>hinted might sell itself to one of the big tech companies. Now.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason I picked them is that their app which

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>allows you to talk to AI chatbots of Elon Musk

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and Staragojo from jiu Jitsu Kaizen, the anime manga which

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we all know I'm tired of waiting for. That's not

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a business, by the way, and they never really had

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a sustainable business model or really a meaningful product. And

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>there one hundred and fifty million dollar raise was the

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>first big stupid capital raise in the generative AI boom.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Early twenty twenty three, when nobody else could raise at all.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, their continued existence, other than being a

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>disgusting insult to company building and startups everywhere, was proof

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that the bubble existed, and their death or whatever form

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>this really is, is a sign that the tolerance for

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>bullshit is leaving the market, as my blunt force for

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>shadowing suggests. On Friday August second, and yes, most of

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this stuff happened. On that Friday, Google said that it

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would license Character AI's technology and hire the company's leaders,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Noam Shazia and Daniel Defritas, along with their research team

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of thirty people, to work at Google's DeepMind AI division.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The fates of the other one hundred and forty employees

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>remain uncertain. I assume they're alive, but I imagine some

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>will remain on as staff as the character dot ai

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>app remains operational. It's a strange, sad end for a

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>company that never really had any business existing, and in

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>many ways feels like a con happening in broad daylight.

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Shazir and Defritas are both former Google employees, having left

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the company in twenty twenty one to create Character dot ai.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>It's unclear whether given their previous employment, they'll be required

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to wear the new GLO propeller hat that you get

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're new to Google. I actually don't know if

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>they still do that. Email me is easy at better

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>offline dot com. That's the letter E than the letter

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Z or Z for my British and Canadian fans. If

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 1>you know about this propeller or indeed can get me one,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I would very much like one anyway. While this is

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>being framed as a typical licensing employee poaching deal where

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing acquisition adjacent has happened, it is actually an acquisition.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Google's paying two point five billion dollars to investors. Employee

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>stock options will vest, and that means when you get

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>stock in a company, it usually takes time for you

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually earn it, so that you can't just take

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it and leave it immediately, as I would, And that

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>will keep vesting until July twenty twenty six at the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>acquisition rate of eighty eight dollars a share paid for

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by the money from the licensing deal. That is not

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition from Google. But after that point your shit

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>out of luck. It's no longer guaranteed. This is a

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>terrible situation. All around for everyone other than the earliest investors.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's another great situation where the bad guys win. In

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>essence anyone who has options that aren't fully there. By

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>July twenty twenty six, maybe shit out of luck and

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>character AI's original funding valued them a billion dollars, making

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>this a situation where and Resent Horowitz aw a one

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>point five x return on their investment in a company

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that never really did anything. Employees kind of got screwed.

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they didn't, It's unclear, But what is clear is

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that as of now, character ai is effectively dead. The

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>company will shift from using their own models their literal

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>only thing that they did, to publicly available open source

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>large language models like metas Lama, and the original engineering

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>team is effectively gone. The company will likely shamble a

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>long life lessly until it curls up in the corner

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>like an old cat, Except an old cat has more

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>purpose and meaning in the universe than the bullshit chatbot company.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So why does this matter? On one level, the death

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of character dot ai is an indicator of the unsustainability

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of many of these generative AI applications and companies. Even

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>with one hundred and fifty million dollars in funding, which

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is a decent amount of money for a normal company.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Character likely couldn't keep the lights on for very long,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>which kind of made it necessary for them to be

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>absorbed or acquired before they shut down and embarrassed everyone involved.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>It's also just like a Charlatan's Olympics. It's this company sucked.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It never made money, it didn't really do anything that different,

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but they just get bailed out. These fucking start up people.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>They always go on about the meritocracy. They're always going

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>on about, Oh, it's about working hard, It's not about

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>your circumstances. These jack holes, these fucking idiots. They got

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to sell their bullshit company to Google, a company they

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>left the found it. It's just so annoying. And this

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>agreement also strongly resembles an earlier one between Inflection AI

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft, where Microsoft bought Inflections technology and team without

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>actually acquiring its equity, so the actual stock in the company.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Founded by DeepMind co founder mister Fassuliman and LinkedIn co

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>founder Reid Hoffman in twenty twenty two, Inflection was, in

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Layman's terms, intended to be a more emotion aware version

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of CHATGBT just one year after its creation, they'd raised

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>one point three billion dollars at evaluation of four billion.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>As I noted previously, I believe that Microsoft's acquisition of

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Inflection was an attempt to avoid regulatory scrutiny by structuring

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition as a transfer of tech and talent, rather

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>than buying the company where the tech and the talent live.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>And yet I'm also convinced that Inflection would struggle to

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>last out on its own, even with its smaller user

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>base and with a one point three billion dollar war chest,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and eventually it would have had to get acquired or

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>just die. Regardless, I'm beginning to see it patten AI's

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>point of failure is shifting, or more accurately centralizing. At

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one point, the burden of this entire generative AI fast

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was shouldered by a large and disparate group of startups

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and investors, and it's now moving to a few shoulders,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>those of giants like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and to

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a much lesser extent, Apple. The two most prevalent large

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>language models outside of course of Metaslama open AI's GPT

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and Anthropics claud are effectively big tech welfare recipients receiving

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in cloud credits to run their extremely

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>expensive models without having to build their own infrastructure. It's

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>also kind of a con because that's not real money,

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that's chuckie geese tokens, and how are those valued. Ten

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars goes to open Ai, mostly in cloud credits,

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and they get equity in return. That doesn't make it.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't invest in companies and air miles. Why can

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft do it? Anyway? Microsoft invested billions of dollars in

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>open Ai, and Google and Amazon are propping Upanthropic too,

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with the latter completing its four billion dollar investment in

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the ai company earlier this year. I need to be

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>clear that open Ai and Anthropic are wholly reliant on

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the mercies of a handful of trillion dollar companies who

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>are themselves at the mercy of the rot economy in

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the public markets, and especially in the case of open

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>AI's relationship with Microsoft, they're not just dependent on big

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>tech firms financial support, but also on their ability to

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>procure and build the actual infratre structure of these products.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Open Ai does not have their own service, neither does Anthropic.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps they have some a few, but the majority of

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>their actual processing is done by big tech firms that

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>paid them in Chuck e GE's tokens in cloud credits

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to run their services. Who knows how you even amortize that.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It's completely insane. It drives me insane that they're able

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to do this every time they find a horrible little

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. But me, I'm at the mercy of

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the fine products that you'll hear after this

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ad break, one that will no doubt echo my exact thoughts, feelings,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and desires. Buy their things or don't. That's up to you,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're back. As I was previously saying, Friday, August second,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four is a rough day for AI, and

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it somehow got worse. That's SAE. The Information reported that

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia has reportedly told Microsoft and another unnamed cloud customer

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that its next generation Blackwell chips, which are designed primarily

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for accelerating AI compute tasks, will be delayed by three

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>months due to an unspecified design floor identified by its

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>contract foundry TSMC. It's entirely possible that this floor takes

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more than three months to resolve. Semiconductor manufacturing

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is really, really, really really hard and issues that initially

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>see minor can rapidly spiral out of control. On top

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, you can't rush them in the same way

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you can with software. You can't just throw a bunch

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>more money. TSMC has plenty. But on top of that,

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a money problem. This is one of those

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>scientific ones that you can't just skip over. And with

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>black Whill representing a major leap forward in capabilities both

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>in the terms of power efficiency and sheer compute power,

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge blow to open ai and it's

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>many many competitors, by which I mean it's other competitor,

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>which is also bankrolled by a big tech sugar daddy.

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's also likely to delay some of open AI's grander

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>ambitions for an indeterminate amount of time, which in turn

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of dampens its appeal to potential investors. And to

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be clear, open ai basically has to raise in the

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>next six months, as the Information reported that open ai

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>could lose as much as five billion dollars this year alone.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I will get to that later, but just to be clear,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not five billion in losses plus revenue. That is,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>after you take the money out that they made. It's

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>really bad it's really really bad. Though. It's all so

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>very bad. I'm not sure why more people aren't freaking out.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm mostly chilling just because they don't really care if

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they live or die. I feel bad for the people

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>with the jobs, but I'm rambling. We'll get back to it,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is a problem that expands to Google and

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft too. In Nvidious Blackwell chips was supposed to be

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a major technological leap for generative AI, designed with both

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>influence the way that large language models generate answers in

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>training in mind, and thus providing vastly more compute parerent

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency necessary to make this shit move. But as

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of now, these chips have been delayed, with their availability

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not expected into the first quarter of twenty twenty five

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at the earliest, and the Information reports that open Ai

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>probably won't get access to them until March twenty twenty four,

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and Nvidia might be forced to do new test runs

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>with its foundry partner before scaling up to mass production.

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>One particularly worrying quote, and I kind of just hinted

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in it there, was that Microsoft managers had planned to

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>make Blackwell powered servers available to open Ai by January,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>but like I said, may need to plan for March

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>or early spring, and that was said by a person

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>with knowledge of the situation. Beautiful name the reason that's bad, Well,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not really just one. First, open ai desperately needs

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>something new. They need something that will show both investors

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and the media that open ai is building something meaningful.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And while it's possible it will be able to deliver

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>GPT five, which is their next model, in the near

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>term future, even potential customers don't believe the jump will

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be significant enough from GPT four. Second, for reasons I've

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>alluded to at the start of this episode, investors are

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>getting a touch itchy with the AI hype boom, and

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>more specifically with the giant tech companies that are bankrolling it.

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>The street needs to see results, or at the very

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>least ap plausible case for the future profitability and marketability

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of generative AI, a thing that it's genuinely bad at.

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In vidious Blackwell chips could help open ai models run

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>faster and ingest training data faster, as well as, even

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's not possible, fooling investors into believing that open

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>ai had the latest tech and thus could build the

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>average general intelligence that sam Ortmand's been lying about and

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>allow him to continue his con regardless, the article from

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Information put it very plainly open AI only gets

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>access to the latest technology as fast as Microsoft permits,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>or as fast as Microsoft is able to if I

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>did on their own, even one of these events would

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>be a deeply worrying sign of the bubble popping, and

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>together they threatened to begin a collapse that I've been

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>predicting since March, where I said that AI companies had

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>about three quarters to prove themselves and I quote savaging

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the revenues of the biggest companies in tech when things

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>don't work out. But I've realized now that it isn't

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>really super useful to attach things to time. Though I

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>stand by bud prediction, and thus I think it's more

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>illustrative to suggest what the terms of the bubble popping

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>actually are, So let's define them. What do I mean

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>when I talk about the bubble popping? For the sake

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of clarity, I'm defining it as the major cloud companies

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>reducing capital expenditures related to generative AI in a public

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and significant manner, as in an actual statement from satching

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Adelaer at Microsoft or Sun Duppishi at Google or one

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the major large language model companies Anthropic or open

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>AI collapsing in some way. No cheap thrills, no half measures.

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not calling this fucking thing until it actually pops,

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it will not pop into one or both of

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>these companies go tits up. To be clear, when I

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about Anthropic and Open Air collapsing, I don't actually

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>mean in the Enron style way. These companies are probably

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>not going to fall apart, shut down, close their doors suddenly.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>It could be that they're absorbed into another company on

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>unfavorable terms, you know, like character AI and inflection, like

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that just happened. And in that case, I

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think investors are going to take a massive loss. Open

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>AI or Anthropic might be forced to radically limit their operations,

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>either by shutting down their free chatbots or limiting access

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to enterprise customers, or by slowing down development massively, which

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, will be death's embrace. It will be over.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>We could see massive layoffs, or we could see these

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>companies pivot to a less capital intensive business model, such

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as licensing their patterns and IP to other technologies or companies,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but not really offering an actual tangible product to consumers

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or business customers, as opposed to what they're doing today,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>which is offering a tangible thing that doesn't really doom

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that much. I'm rambling again. Yeah, I can imagine all

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sorts of terminal endings for Generative AI is big two,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of them aren't even legally actionable. But I

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>believe that the collapse or absorption of these companies is

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the one critical sign to look for. Open ai began

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this hype cycle and Sam Altman is definitely the pt

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>barnum of the large language model circus, and open ai

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>has absorbed more money and attention than any other startup

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>of the last few years, and outside of Uber, I

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think they might be getting the most all time. God,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I hate it. It's symbolic of the excess in the

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>waste of the generative AI boom and it's death or

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, some alternative collapse is the sign that

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>we're done here in the same way that FTX signaled

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the cryptocurrency boom. And if open AI's

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>collapse marks the apocalypse for generative AI, I believe it

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>will be accompanied by one or several of the following

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pale horses, real tangible signs that things are falling apart,

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>things you can send to your friends, family and laugh at.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look, shall we. Number one, Any significant

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>price changes by any large language model company are a

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 1>bad sign. Desperate times require desperate measures, and any oscillation

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>in pricing is a bad sign. We could see a

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>race to the bottom, which is kind of already happening

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>with model developers releasing increasingly cheaper options to grow revenue

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and build their customer bases, which is an idea that

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>only makes sense if the underpinning technology is profitable, which

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Generative Ai is not, and it's already kind of begun

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>with open AI's reduced price GPT four oh mini in

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Google Gemini's Google Flash one point five I believe it's called,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and they just reduce that pricing to compete with GPT

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>four oh mini's cheapest option. This is totally unsustainable, which

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>means it fits right in with the rest of the

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle. Conversely, if prices start increasing, this is a

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>sign that the company is getting really, really desperate and

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>have to find a way to start recouping the massive

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>costs of the unsustainable shit show they've been participating in well.

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>This I think is probably one of the later ones.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>If they do this, if they even get to it,

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just the sign that things are falling apart. I

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>also think we're going to see stories about general discord

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in AI investment. Any articles you see about investors fleeing

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>private aideals as they did with the metaverse, or a

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sign that things are falling apart. And the things I'm hearing,

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is that this has already begun, but

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that's anecdotal. Don't take my word for it. Just watch

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the media. We might also see stories about open ai

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>having trouble raising money. Up until now, there haven't been

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>any rumors about them having trouble, despite the fact that

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they're expected to lose like I mentioned, five billion dollars

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. They need to raise billions of

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars and they have to do it soon. And if

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they can't raise, nobody can. But moving on, there's another

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>harbinger to look out for, and it would be evidence

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that Google or Microsoft is reducing the capex as discussed,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's really important to realize that venture capital and

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley really are not They're not the ones propping

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this up. They might be the year leaders, they might

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>be the ones talking about how important is But Google

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft are the ones holding this up, and Amazon

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. They're the ones who are bankrolling Anthropic and

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>open Ai. Microsoft as I will get to basically owns

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>open ai. If those companies decide they don't want this

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to continue, it will stop. Venture capital cannot afford to

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>keep open ai alive. But moving on, you should keep

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>out and beady little I for any discord within any

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of the major players in generative AI. But I'm not

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about open ai and Anthropic, talking about companies like

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Scale Ai, who are training data company that's raised over

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one on a half billion dollars and cohere, another large

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>language model company that recently raised another four hundred and

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars from Nvidia and Salesforce and Salesforce up.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>They've been talking about doing AI for like a decade.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what product they sell. I'd watch those

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>two very carefully. They're seen as stable, revenue generating yet

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as discussed, unprofitable and sillery firms that will likely need

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to raise again in the next twelve months. If we

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>hear about problems such as employees being unhappy, or trouble's

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fundraising or making money. This means that people on the

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>inside are making nasty little noises because they know things

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>are falling apart. And the same, by the way, goes

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for any discord in open Ai or Anthropic. This one's obvious.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>If we hear there are problems they're worried, or if

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>they're getting worried, if they can't raise money, if they're

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>losing people, which is kind of already happening, if they

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to make a deal work, if they're having

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble progressing their software. Anything about these companies is probably

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad sign. If I were you, I'd keep an

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>eye on the Washington Post. Natasha Tiku's done great work there,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>as the people at Shera A. V. Day and Jeffrey Fowler.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>But Natasha's done some great work. Or mister Altman, the

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Information has got some great people doing work on this

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Reuter's Tech Crunch for or film media. They're the ones

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that keep an eye out for. We've already seen a

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of this happening already. A few days ago,

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>open Ai lost two of its co founders, John Shulman,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>left for competitor anthropic and chief operating officer Greg Brockman

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>has gone on something he's calling extended leave. As on aside,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>this is objectively one of the funniest things it's anyone

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>has ever done in tech. Yeah, man, nothing big going on.

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy a vacation, mate, Not like the entire industry is

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>falling apart, not like the bubble might be popping. Enjoy

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>carbo Anyway. As things get especially bad, I think we're

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see discussions of layoffs based on people I've

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to. Generative AI companies are paying these massive salaries

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in stock and cash, and they're not run particularly efficiently

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>because they are really driven by dreamers, by which I

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>mean conn artists. If AI jobs are no longer these

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>cushy little Heidi holes for the most expensive engineers in

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the valley, things are going to sour fast because they

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>need the best to do this mediocre crab that you

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>see every day. But I'd argue the biggest and most

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>desperate of these pale horses would be some sort of big,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>stupid magic trick. As these companies get desperate, expect someone,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>especially Open AI, to try and show something new and

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy as a means of trying to turn this narrative around.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>When or if this happens, look very carefully at what

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>they say about the products availability, what it can actually do,

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or who they show it to. Is it available publicly?

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Are there limitations on it? And are there any weird

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>terms and conditions to look out for. If open ai

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>gets desperate, it may move up the public launch of

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>soro It's generative video product. Doing those really only going

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to cause more problems. There isn't a chance in hell

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that this thing is profitable, and I'm one hundred percent

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>confident that it's much much, much, much more expensive than

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the video and the text based generation tools they already have,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine its visual ginconsistencies and hallucinations would make

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for some entertaining content for YouTubers and tech reporters, which

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>will mean that they just have hundreds thousands, hundreds of thousands,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the people requesting shitty videos off of this thing,

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>burning servers quite literally in this case, losing the money.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And for what how much can they charge for this

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>thing because it's not going to be enough. The common

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>thread between all of these events is that they're all

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>expressions of desperation fear and a total lack of confidence

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the underlying company. So far, and this is Napkin maths,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd estimate that a total of two hundred billion dollars

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 1>has been spent to get Generative AI to this point

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure and funding and energy in so many different

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>meaningless ways, or to get us to the point that

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a tool that's really good at generating things

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that aren't as good as what a humor could make,

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and only sometimes are they good enough to actually use.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, we're not quite at the bubble popping yet.

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'd chose the collapse of open ai as

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the event is because it will mean that Microsoft decided

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to cut them off and that there wasn't enough banker

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or venture capital interest to prop them up further. Open

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>AI's collapse would be both financial and symbolic, the sign

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that the valley would let a company die and that

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea was not good enough for everybody to stake

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>their fetes on it. In any case, things could change,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the bubble could stay inflated. But while you're thinking about how,

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>why don't you take a breather to hear from someone

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our wonderful beautiful, precisely chosen advertisers that you

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>simply must pay money to, and we're back now. I

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give you any homework. I no, you're

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>currently holding up a convenience store or maybe trying to

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get the hub cap off of a car wheel. You

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>hear me speak enough. But a few weeks ago I

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote a newsletter called how does open ai Survive? And

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand or so word analysis of how difficult it's

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be to keep that company going at its

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>current burn rate, to simmer it down as quickly as possible.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Open ai costs about eight point five billion dollars a

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>year to run and only makes about three and a

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>half billion to four and a half billion a year

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in revenue, a number, by the way that I'm that

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>does not sound right, but it's what's being reported. Open

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>AI's costs are increasingly nearly and generative AI, as I've

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>said a few times, is deeply unprofitable and unsustainable. Making

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>open AI's models better, which doesn't necessarily mean they're more

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>valuable and more useful, also costs hundreds of millions, if

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>not billions, of dollars. As a result, open ai needs

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to raise more money than anybody has ever raised in

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the history of the valley in the next twelve to

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four months, or launch a products so significant that

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it blows chet GPT out of the water and actually

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is profitable. And these things are unlikely but possible. I

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>guess Microsoft, Google, and Amazon could somehow change the narrative,

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but doing so too would require some sort of technological

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough or a product, a very obvious product that would

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>make people money, more money than is being spent on

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the thing. And the markets are also capricious, and thus

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I really wouldn't count on there being a narrative turnaround,

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>especially with the shifting sands of a vestor sentiment. As

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned previously. On August second, Elliott Management, the hedge

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fund with over seventy billion dollars in assets under management,

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>said in a letter to clients that AI is overhyped

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Nvidia is a bubble, adding that AI had

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>not delivered value commensurate with the hype. While it's possible

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there are others that dissent against the rapidly forming consensus

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>against generative AI to prop things up, which I do

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>think is possible, as especially if you deepen the whole

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft or and Video. It's worth putting Elliott Management's

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>note in a broader context. It's only the latest voice

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in a loud or at least increasingly louder, chorus of

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>critics whose members include esteamed, analyst houses, and some of

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the largest investment banks in the world. Gold and Sax

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>put out a report in July that you've heard in

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the pop culture episode that said generative AI was too

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive and didn't solve the complex problems that would need

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to justify their expenses. At the end of July, Gartner

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>put out a report predicting that thirty percent of generative

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>AI products would be abandoned entirely after a proof of

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>concept by end of twenty twenty five, and The Washington

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Post reports that Barklay's bank thinks that and I quote

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and Lists are expecting big tech companies to

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>spend around sixty billion dollars a year on developing AI

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>models by twenty twenty six, but reap only twenty billion

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year in revenue from AI by that point.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The lastra is gone there for you. That does say revenue,

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't say profim and by the way, that's only

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars more than Microsoft's entire capital expenditures in

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter alone. Microsoft also has a storied history

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of pumping and dumping ideas for Microsoft. Augmented reality was

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I quote, an absolute breakthrough in twenty nineteen before

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it was quietly shoved in a corner with mass layoffs

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and a business line enclosures a few years later in

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, satchur Innidella, their CEO, couldn't overstate how

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>much of a breakthrough the metaverse was yet two years later,

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and big props the Preston Growler of Computer World for

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>saying this in February twenty twenty three, he laid off

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the people involved in everything on artificial intelligence

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and that everything thing that's a headline from Wired magazine.

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Very good. It's also important to remember that Microsoft effectively

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>owns open ai as part of their twenty nineteen funding round,

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which I believe was a billion dollars. Microsoft is full

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>access to all of open AI's intellectual property and research,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>which makes thorny little question why at this point would

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft give open ai any more money other than to

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>save face. That's a very real possibility that Satch in

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dela is surrounded by yes men who don't know

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about. Microsoft also has access to sell

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>open ais and I quote pre agi products, which is

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>all of their products right now, and full access to

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>all of their research, as well as and I quote

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>certain rights to open AI's intellectual property. Unless open ai

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is capable of delivering something meaningfully different, something that Dela

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>can wave in front of analysts faces and show them

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that they can automate all of these jobs away, its

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>existence is just another cost center and one that could

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>get eliminated in a tough quarter. And to be clear,

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>saturn Adella has been extremely frank about his leverage over

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>open ai and it's effective ownership of their tech or

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>be it buffeted with the usual bullshit platitudes and niceties

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that you'd expect from a shape shifting tech CEO. Monster.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>In a late twenty twenty interview with PR person Kara Swisher,

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>sach an Adella said, if open ai disappeared tomorrow, I

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want any customer of ours to be worried about it,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.240
<v Speaker 1>quite honestly, because we have all the rights to continue

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the innovation, not just to serve the product, but we

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>can go and just do what we were doing in

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>partnership ourselves. We have the people, we have the compute,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we have the data, we have everything. Mister Nadella, that

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is an insane thing to say, and the kind of

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>thing you'd only say to someone like Kara Swisher. Swisher

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>should have made that the headline that Microsoft effectively owns

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>open ai. I miss this at the time I found

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>out about this quote, like a week or two ago.

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy to me. It's crazy to me that this

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>was said, and it's not front page news. Microsoft owns

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>open ai. Who gives a shit about the nonprofit structure.

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But it actually gets better because he followed up that

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>quote with this. Microsoft's investment of thirteen billion dollars in

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>open ai gives us significant rights, as I said, and

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>also this thing, it's not hands off, right. We are

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in there, we are below them, we are above them,

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we are around them. We do the kernel optimizations. Very

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>funny if you consider the CrowdStrike thing. By the way

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>we build tools, we build the infrastructure. So that's why

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the industrial analysts are saying,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, it's really a joint project between Microsoft and

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>open ai. The reality is we are as I said,

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>very self sufficient in all of this. Well, I'm not

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>saying it's for certain. Microsoft can very clearly if they

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>so please, simply drop open AI and keep all of

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 1>their stuff. Nevertheless, as the market's sour and jennit of AI,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time for big tech to prove something.

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>It's time for them to prove that this wasn't all

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge, big, stupid, fucking waste of time and money

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to continue with their current paths. Summed up is sh

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of Google and sach and Adella of Microsoft. As the

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>loudest of the publicly traded generative AI hype men, will

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have to show everybody something remarkable. But even then they

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>will have to show how it actually makes money, and

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>if they can't, at least in the case of sach

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and Adella, they can still walk away. As well as

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in the best case scenario, these companies would either have

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to dramatically reduce their costs, something they've really shown they're

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not capable of doing and in fact have said they'll

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>do the opposite of or show ways to make generative

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>AI so significantly efficient that it somehow finally balances itself out.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>What we're really waiting for now is for somebody to blink.

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>If none of the major cloud companies change course over

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the next few months, we could potentially see this boom

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>continue for another quarter. And just to be clear, they

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>usually in lockstep. They love holding up each other's oligopolies

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and monopolies. They love being a weird cartel that sells data.

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>To continue, though, they'll have to commit billions of dollars

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>in at the very least cloud credits for open ai

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>and Anthropic, as neither of those companies can survive without

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>further cash infusions. They'll also have to find some way

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to make any of this useful and profitable, two challenges

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the generative AI has never been able to deal with,

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not even once. And I just as an aside, I've

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>had people email and saying, well, I use it for this.

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I was on a show the other days that he

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>uses it for show notes. These are all fine whatever,

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>These are like little use cases. These people need this

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a trillion dollars. Show notes aren't going to

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. Shitty translations are not going to do it.

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>A picture of Garfield with a gun is not going

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And big tech is going to have

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure out a way to support these companies in

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the face of rising disquiet among shareholders, who in the

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 1>most recent route of AI companies lost them about two

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>point six trillion dollars in market capitalization. As I pointed

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 1>out in the Shareholders Supremacy, investors don't really care about

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 1>the future or innovation. They just want profits and their

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>portfolios to get bigger. And they want to see the

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>number for profit go larger and the costs go lower,

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and absolutely nothing else matters at all, which is why

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they love generative AI at first, because if this actually

0:38:10.040 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>made a bunch of money, this is a way that

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft could just route cloud costs from themselves to themselves.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to that in a future episode about monopolies, though,

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that if generative AI becomes an albatross

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>around the next of Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, which I

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>really believe it will, these companies are going to face

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>really nasty pressure to curtail their investments and their capex.

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Investors will ask why these companies are spending a collective

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred two hundred billion dollars by the end of

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five on a technology that likely won't drive

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>much revenue growth when it could be used for things

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like stock dividends and stock buybacks, and I don't know

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thrones for the demon lords that live underneath the offices.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how Microsoft truly makes money. That's a joke,

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 1>don't email me about it. But I believe in any case,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the next month is going to be critical to the

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>future of the AI boom, and I believe this is

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a time for industry wide introspection and to really consider

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>everyone's roles and why this bubble existed in the first place.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>In the next episode, I'm going to take a closer

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>look into open Aiy's likely demise, what it looks like,

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and why the company's view avenues for salvation in fact

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>look like dead ends. And I'll get into how fucking

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous this whole bubble is and what its potential collapse

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>spells for the future of the tech industry. Thank you

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can check

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>out more of his music and audio projects at Matasowski

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com, M A T T O. S O. W

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Ski dot com. You can email me at easy at

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline dot com or visit Better Offline dot com

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter.

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I also really recommend you go to chat dot Where's

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>youoeed dot com to visit the discord, and go to

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>our slash Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media,

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 1>visit our website Coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.839
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts.