WEBVTT - Sorry Laver Cup

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody, and welcome to the Renee Stubs Tennis podcast.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>I am Renee Stubs and I am joined by the

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ever present in my life in New York, Caitlin Thompson Present.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>What's up, mate? We've lost petgo again. She's in Germany.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>She was working the.

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Labor Cup, hosting a gala.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Hosting a gala. She wrote a great substack on that,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>being nervous and all that sort of stuff. But she's

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>our girl and we are missing her, but she shall

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>be back. You asked me before we sat down and

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>started looking at things to talk about. Do we have

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the Labor Cup? I want to talk

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Labor Cup, okay, because I want to know

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you gave up a living, breathing, dead breath about

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>watching Labor Cup. No, did you watch any of the

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Labor Cup?

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Not that did I not one. I think I flipped

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>over like a couple of times when I was watching

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>something else on TV and I was like, oh, the

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Labor Cups on a one who's playing? And then I'd

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.199
<v Speaker 1>flick it over and I'd be like, I don't care.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate exhibitions. I'm not mad at exhibition matches.

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't have like a B and my bonnet about like, well,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>if it's not for points, it doesn't county. I don't

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 2>really care about that. I like uts. I think it's

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of innovative, and I like the fact that it's

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>like a little silly, you know. I love the fact

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes in the middle of no tennis we get

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>an exhibition here and there and random places preseason. But yeah,

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason, the Labor Cup has just never done

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>it for me. It just feels so contrived.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It's so.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Cheesey, like the branding is cheesy, it's so try hard

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I just like, I'm sure the

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 2>tennis is good, and I like a lot of the players,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>no disrespect whatsoever, get paid, get your bag, whatever. It's

0:01:55.360 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>just the whole thing feels like a man marketer from

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the eighties. He is trying to convince you that, like

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>this isould be.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Interested in this, and I just can't. Well, they tried

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to obviously do it, right, a cup style tennis for tennis, right,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that was the premise behind it, And the premise

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>behind it was you know, Ryder Cup is so popular.

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Which is a golf competition where half if the teams

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>are from the women.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>Just played the Solheim Cup, which got great crowds. It

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>was great fun. I watched it considerably over that the

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>weekend and the days that it was being played. I

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>know people are probably out there going lament the golf,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's like, no, it was actually really entertaining, really entertaining.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>It comes down to the wire often Ryder Cups and

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Solheim Cups, and they have like different like ways in

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the days that they play the Solheim and Ryder Club

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>where they do see I told you I was going

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to get a cough today where they do a four

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>ball best ball, And for those of you who don't

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>know golf, it's just like it's basically different ways to

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>play at the team events where they support each other. Right,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>one hits an alternate ball, so you hit the drive

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and then and then my partner hits the Yeah, exactly,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but with teammates. And then the next day it's best ball,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>meaning you both hit off, you both score the hole,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and whoever's scores the best on that hole wins the hole.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Right pick the higher scoring between the two teams. So

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 2>that's cool.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's always very like.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I like innovation in sports.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I like and that's what it is.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 2>I like team sports. I like a lot of it.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And then on the last day to finish off my

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup Soul home thing. On the last day, it's

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one on one, right, So you've gone as a team

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>back and forth for three days and then the last

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>day it's one on one.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 2>And who every side counts? Who picks like the best

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>player from each team.

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's it's a scoring system to get into the team.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you get a couple of wild card picks

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>from the captain.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>So the captain is involved the big choices big time.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>They picked the team, They picked the players, and the

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>players are desperate to be on the teams. Like I'm

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>talking desperate. It is like you talk to a golfer,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll say one of my you know, the late great

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Pain Stewart, who I was friends with because we lived

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in the same area in Orlando. And one of the

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>last conversations I had with Paine was he said, I

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>want to win one more major, Stubsy, and I love

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to make the Ryder Cup team again, Like it's so

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>important for these golfers. So we need to figure out

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a way to make something very similar in tennis and

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I did tweet out. I think I retweeted a video

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that Nelly call a quarter put out in the first

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hole where the you know, people were going crazy and

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there was music played and it was such a fun atmosphere,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Like we need this in tennis. Well, meaning not every year.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>We can't have Labor Cup. We talked about this last week,

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Labor Cup, United Cup, Hopman Cup, Blah Blah Cup, a

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Billy Olympian Cup. It's like it's too much in one year,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly during the Olympic years.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you were talking about how excited people were

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 2>to make the team, I mean that sounds like the

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Olympics to me, which is like, you know, Daniel Collins

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>famously was like, I want to make the Olympics. I'm

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>going to need to play X amount of tournament to

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>do that between March and you know whatever. The cut

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 2>off date was early summer and right, and like going

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 2>to be on the Olympic team and getting the blazer

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and doing the whole thing is cool, and so you know,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't in any way want to slag the idea

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>that we have. You know, old Guard, it was cool.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 2>I saw some of the photos from Labor Cup. It

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 2>was cool. Seeingianik Noah, who's you know, obviously one of

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 2>my favorite people, which is why I chose to put

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>him on the cover of the first issue. You know, Like,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 2>but I will say the the I don't know. I

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 2>just I can't get that excited about it for reasons

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 2>that it feels like such a simulate crom of of

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 2>a man's marketing fantasy that I just feel like I'm

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 2>being sold a product that I don't want. It feels like,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, Ron Popeel's Pocket Fishermen. It's like, who's this for?

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't want this.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, we talked about this last

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>week about and some people liked my idea, and you know,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a former Sam Stoza Playout Friend Play Eye coach

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>player applied with that said, oh, I never thought about

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like shutting the season down after the

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>US Open and maybe having some of these team events

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>where they really become important. Right, you could have a

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>mixed event after yeah, the US Open, I would I

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>would argue to say, you know, a couple of weeks later,

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a massive team event in X you know,

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a teams event where you combine

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>men and women in x whether it be South America

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or you know, places that don't South Africa, Like, let's

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>take it to places on the road that don't get

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to have the tour, you know. And if China wants

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to put a shipload of money into tennis, as they.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Do, and now they have great players with four men,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>have a huge tournament, a deep run this very week,

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 2>can you imagine.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>China against like Australia and asked in a true World

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Cup and I would argue as to say, as much

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>as you know how much we both love Billy Jean King,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have a team's tennis style way to do it and

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the excitement in that playing to six is what you're saying.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Well true the World team from the seventies, eighties and

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>nineties World Team Tennis. Yeah, I agree completely, and I think,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, in addition to these season changes, I think uh, shortening, condensing, consolidating. Yeah, like,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>let's make room for this the unique thing that tennis

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>has done uniquely for almost a century. I don't know

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>when the first mixed event was held, but like mixed

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 2>doubles where men and women play on the same field.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, World Team tennis.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, but it predated World Team Tennis.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, we have a mixed DOUBLET grant.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. Like that alone was innovation in

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 2>and of itself that other sports have only really cottoned

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>on too in the last five or so years. Now

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 2>you have an Olympic relay in swimming, you have an

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Olympic really in skiing, like everyone realizes like, oh, it's

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 2>really fun when we get everybody involved. And so yeah,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Labor Cup. I'm not trying to shut on it. It sounded

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>like the Gala. I'm sure because Andrea I hosted. It

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>was funny, it was cool to see you know, a

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of people.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but wouldn't it be great if you had Teblinka

0:07:59.720 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in that.

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Were to Well that's the album with the Labor Cups.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 2>For me, it's like, well, yeah, so just a bunch

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of dudes, also the types of dudes.

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That nobody loves Rod Labor more than me. I mean,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he's the greatest guy in the history of the world.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the nicest man you'll ever meet in your life.

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's certainly not a slide. I mean, and listen,

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I I understand why they decided to do I understand

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>why Roger thought this is you know, and teammate thought

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a Tennis Australia because those that own it,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>those are the people that I know Tennis Australia, and

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>teammate funded pretty USDA as well. So the Grand Slams

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>had a huge part in this Labor Cup. So guys,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>why not get together and have a world true World

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Cup and really get your money?

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you just said way because it involves

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone getting together.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a concept we don't understanding.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Something tennis has yet to grapple with. The if the

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 2>USTs well, that was another thing Australia. So everybody would

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 2>have to play nicely, which we are all waiting for

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>you guys to do. Imagine how great this board is

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>when we're all.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so listen. Another thing to also consider in this

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation is what are the lesser players going to do?

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Because obviously not everyone's going to make the World Cup

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>teams right for Australia, for US or for China, et cetera. Right,

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So what are you going to do with the player

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>that's ranked one hundred and fifty to two hundred in

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the world or three hundred in the world or even

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty in the world. That's not going to make their

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Czech Republic could fit seventeen players into

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like top twenty. You know, they could have two teams,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so you have the smaller tournament. Still you still have

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the one twenty five's maybe two fifties. The WTA and

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>ATP get together and try and fit the schedule around

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for the lesser players to play. I shouldn't say lesser players,

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>but lower ranked players to play. So you do need

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to have viability for those players to move up in

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>the rankings. And then you know people are going to say, well,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>then the top players that are playing these team events

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are not going to get points, right, so they can

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>move up and down the ladder. Well, you consider giving

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>bonus points for matches one or lost at these events,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>or you figure out a way that the top players

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't penalized with points and rankings. Maybe you freeze it.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but there's certainly some I just think

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's after the I don't give a shit what's

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>happening right now.

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh I care a lot. I just don't care about

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 2>the layer coat. I watched Korea okay partially because racket.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I launched a Korean footprint there, you know, but a

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of people don't know. Like we showed up hard

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>in Korea. We're going to be had to go amazing.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 2>You brought a ton of tennis newbies who have been

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>playing tennis in the basements of malls, which is how

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Korean young people play sports because spaces

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 2>at a premium and there's a lot of development in

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the city. And we brought them to a pro tennis

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 2>tournament for the first time in partnership with the WTA,

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 2>in partnership with the original beer company, which was like

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the hipster beer, and we made all of a sudden,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>like a big party happened between the grassroots tennis recreational

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 2>players and the pro game, which we want to see

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>more of. Like so obviously I watched that. I watched

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Kazakia hadad Maaya that was a great final. I watched

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Emirati Kan who have a couple of top ten or

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>top fifty wins which she hasn't.

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Had in a while and now has pulled out a Beijing.

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And now she's pulled out of Beijing because she's hurt again.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 2>But like I want to watch tennis in all places

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 2>throughout the year. I agree, the season is too long

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and somebody's got to give way, But I'm I care.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>I watched Jijiang and the young up and coming Chinese

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>player whose name is escaping me at the moment, who

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>are about to play a final I think in hung

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe like, I'm into it, and so for me, I

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>don't care necessarily where the tennis is taking place. I

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>like the fact that it's real, they care about it,

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and for a lot of these players, it's their home soil.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>It's where they get to shine, especially as the sport diversifies.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 2>So now they haven't met.

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>I haven't played that final yet, and it's Jiang and

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Chilich playing a final inhung Zho. They are in the final,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those two, so we'll know at some point.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So Juju Young just is cool. He is triple Z TRIPLESZ, TRIPLEZ.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I think. You know, we've talked about scheduling

0:11:56.360 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>at nauseum. Something's got to give. I don't think necessarily

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Asia should lose its time. It's time, just maybe not

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 2>this time on the calendar. We need to figure out

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>a way to make it a little bit more conducive

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>to you know, when people are playing, when the weather

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>is cooperated, cooperating, and when it's tough with I know,

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and when we can you know, reasonably expect these players

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to keep their bodies in one piece.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's that's another part of the issue. Right,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got players pulling out left and right, You've got

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, igaon Tech has decided that she's just shutting

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it down. By the looks of it.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Seems like a Bakina shut it down.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>A whole different story.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes, we think, but she's saying no. But she's

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>saying her back is the issue. She hasn't publicly said

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>what it is if it's not an injury. I'm not

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>saying it's not not her back, but I also, you know,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>by her own what she's.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Kind of injuries is saying listen, that she's got to

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to be a dummy not to know. There's

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more going on there for sure. And I mean,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a player that I'm written for.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 2>This girl.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>We all are, by the way. This is you know,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a player that arguably at her best, is the best

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>player in the world. Yeah, I mean, I don't know

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>if you remember her dismantling Saber Lenka at the start

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year in Brisbane, where she made Sabilenka literally

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>look like she could not play tennis on her best surface.

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Two weeks later went and won the Austraian Open. Yeah, okay,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>well three weeks later technically, but what did she do

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>after winning Brisbane? Rebeckn I mean pet Coo and I

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about this, because we're so on her about this.

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>She went and played Adelaide.

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>What in the WTF are you going to play Adelaide for?

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>What WTA?

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>What the WTF are doing going and playing Adelaide prior

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to the Austrain Open when you just won Brisbane? And

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>then she went into the Austrain Open and had a

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an injury and then lost that epic

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>tie break to Blinkover and really after that also had

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>a couple of great tournaments and then all of a

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>sudden this obviously something going on with the coach. He

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>has disappeared as well from the tour, and his word

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is that he's been banned from the tour. So there's

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>just something going on there that we clearly don't know

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>first hand knowledge of, but it's pretty bloody obvious.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>That she is obviously okay, and I hope she's being

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 2>taken care of behind the scenes and you know.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>But also with Eger, it's interesting that she's decided to

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>pull out too, so there's obviously something going on with

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>her as well.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, she's, to her great credit, she has been

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 2>putting your money where her mouth is and sort of

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>saying like, hey, this is really hard on our bodies.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>It's hard on our sleep cycles, it's hard on our

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>mental states, you know. And I really respect that about

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a player, especially one who is the number one player

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>in the world, using their platform to sort of you know,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 2>she's not complaining, she's constructively sort of saying like, hey,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>this is another way that this could be better. What

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 2>if we made the season show like you know, And

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think I respect that tremendously because I think these players,

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>especially as they get higher in the ranks and they

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>stay there and they get interviewed a and they get

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>the chance to use their platforms to make change and

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>eventually become part of the you know, player councils or

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. You know, they're they're actually using it

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 2>to advocate.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And we do have to congratulate Eager because she passed

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and became the number one in the world for a

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of weeks, where she became one of the

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to find that. I did take a screenshot

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. Yeah, she passed as passed number of week

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is spending her one hundred and twenty second career week

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at number one this week, passing Ash Barty for standalone

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>seventh most weeks at number one in the w TA

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ranking history. That's impressive. She follows Graf Navradlova, Serena Evatt, Hingus,

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and sell Us Allus. So that is a certainly a group.

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Can we just talk about Monca for a second?

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>We published in this last issue of the magazine a

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>very glowing remembrance of Monica Sellis pre worst day of

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>her life and pre the time that ended up being

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>what I think defined a lot of her life and career.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And it was such a fun story because it reminded

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>people that she was not just crushing everyone on court,

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 2>winning you know, something like seven out of eight slams

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>terror for the three year period. Right there, you were

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 2>right there. But also like she was bubbly, she was funny,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>she was into Madonna, she was on lead shows, like

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 2>she was well, she.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Was okay, time out here. I would say Monica was

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the shyest arguably maybe second to maybe No. I think

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>she more shy than Stepfi even and both of them. Sure,

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting because they were both very similar like

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>did not like the spotlight, did not like media attention.

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Monica used to wear a wig when she was younger

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to go out in public. I love that because she

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>did not want to be recognized and she was very

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>paranoid about being out in public. Well, there was a

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>versionage she did that and went on to those TV shows. Yeah,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so did. I think. I believe Steffie did as well

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in the top plays you get on those shows at

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the US Open.

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 2>My point is we saw a bubbly version of her

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 2>that was innocent, fun loving, and maybe, yes, she was

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 2>shy for most of it, but I think.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>She was always a little paranoid about stuff.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, But I guess the point that I'm trying to

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 2>make by the wooden woman who interviewed her forty times

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 2>is that let's remember that that was part of her

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 2>legacy as well. Let's remember that she was.

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen anyone else walk out under rolling girls,

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>throwing roses, love the crowd, love it. I don't think so.

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I love it was it her?

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was her. I was thinking it was Hingus. No, No,

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it was her. Hingus would never Hina was throwing a

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>racket into the crash. Can we actually, while I'm talking

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>about throwing rackets in the crowd, can we talk about

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Meddi speaking of going back, backing it up, backing it

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>up to labor cup. What the living f was he

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>doing throwing that racket that went into the It didn't

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>go into the crowd because there was like this gap

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>between the court and the actual audience, and so for

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>him to throw it in the crowd, he'd have to

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>really throw it higher or bounce it a lot harder.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>But it went near a couple of the crew and

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of people sitting around the court. I think

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that the WTA and ATP to them need to make

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a blanket rule. If you throw your racket and it

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>leaves the court, no matter what, you are defaulted, because

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>now the rule is if it doesn't hit anybody. Yeah,

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, so if I move, if I'm sitting

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in that crowd and I moved my head just a

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit to the left and it just misses me, oh,

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. The same thing happened at Wimbledon. Would sit

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the pass when he piffed a ball and it went

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>into the crowd on court one and it almost hit

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. And I don't know it hidn't

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>hit him hard enough or somebody caught. I mean I

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>remember a referee saying to me, and this is a

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>true story in Washington, DC. I think it sits a pass.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually he ripped a ball up into the crowd, and

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>usually we're trying to hit it out of the crowd,

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't quote unquote hit someone, right, because you know,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if you get it over the crowd, if it does

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hit someone, no one sees it, okay, because no one

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was watching it. A guy caught the ball, caught it

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in his hand, and the referee was sitting next to me,

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and I go ah, and this is what I'm telling you.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>He didn't even get a warning.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting.

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:12.959
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at this particular referee and I go ah,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what and he goes, well, it didn't hit anyway, he

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>caught it. I go, oh, so that's okay, Yeah, what

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>are we doing here?

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I think a very clear designation is in court out

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of court if you yeah, a good point.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and listen, I was the worst, Okay. I

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was not a patron saint of humility and happiness on

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the court. I mean, renee got a little bit ungray.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>So this is coming from somebody who did have a

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>short fuse on the tennis court. But I didn't do

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that shit, Like I just berated myself half the time

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>or an umpire or you know, lines person.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think throwing your stuff around is childish. It's

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>a bad look. It's your profession. I understand that people

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>get upset, but yeah, Like I think the easy rule

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>is anything that leaves your hand, that leaves the court,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>that's it.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Boom.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>We can add on to things like, oh, if you

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>throw your racket and it hits somebody on the court,

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>like a ball kit or something like that, But I

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>think the blanket rule is don't throw anything that is

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>leaving the field of play. Yea. Otherwise yeah, yeah, you're done.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Can you imagine it's just like, yeah, well they

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>just moved the head, so it's fine. Oh so you're

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna wape for a racket actually hit someone in the

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>middle of the forehead and like cut their skin.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the whole thing with Djokovic where everyone

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 2>was like, but it didn't hit him. It's like, but

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 2>he's been throwing no, no, no, no, not the umpire

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>who he did hit with the ball, but he chucked

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a racket and oh yes, it nearly hit the umpire

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and they were like ha ha ha, but it didn't

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 2>and it was like such a joke. It was taken

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>not seriously at all by anybody. And it's like no

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>because this one fleet footed linesman like jumped out of

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the way. Yeah, like is that going to be the standard? Yeah,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Like you've seen some of the lines of people at

0:20:57.240 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 2>these tournaments. I mean obviously lines people are generally going away,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>but like there's lots of people on the court. There's

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 2>security people, there's spall kids, there's are we all supposed

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to like make them fly, you know, watch out for

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>flying objects that could potentially hurt them. Yeah, while they're

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to do their jobs. This is a workplace.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's we need to we need to crack down

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on that stuff. I love that.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I like when we get like scolding and moralized.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, especially me, who's such a cycle on the court.

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I know that you're a little depressed

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>coming in here today because it's fall. Oh my god, see,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I know you so well. I walked out of my

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>apartment today and it was cold, and I went, oh,

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, oh, Caitlin's gonna hate. It's gonna hate today.

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to I'm trying to practice manifestation of positivity. Yeah,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to become a fall person. All right, Great

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>now because also I'm going to port a Fino in

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 2>two weeks, so I don't have to wait.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that.

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to port Afino in two weeks to

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 2>do a big project for Racket. We're going to do

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a giant.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't you have done that around the Billy Jean Kinkop

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so I could come.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>There's a chance that we made us to be doing

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a project in Spain. Let's see.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, you can let me know when we're not

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>doing this podcast.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 2>But I hopefully it'll also be warm and coastal Italy.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I know everyone wants to hit tennis stuff, but I

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>just want to update everyone on the fact that the

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>New York Liberty won. They're opening a playoff game yesterday

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and I am a huge WNBA fan. I freaking love

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>watching women's basketball, and I'll tell you why. As a

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>tennis player. Yes, I think tennis is arguably the hardest

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>sport in the world to play, just physically mentally. I

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>mean it matches out matches in Asia this last week

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>in the women's matches, they were going over four hours, brutal.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>And also it was like one hundred percent of humanity

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>and exprutal.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Sigamund just leves playing over four hours, and cats Akina

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and all these guys. But you know, I watched the

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>physicality of women's basketball basketball in general, but women's basketball.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know why they wear sleeves because they get cut

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time with their nails and people banging. Notice

0:22:58.680 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>how basketball players wear.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 2>Sleep I thought that was for like muscle.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, it's to stop them from bleeding literally because

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they get cut. Because even if you have short nails

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and you you know, your hand comes down. The bruising

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on w NBA players just look at their arms when

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>they go and play. They're bruised out the wazoo because

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they're getting beat up like hell under it. So for

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys not watching, turn on ESPN because ESPN has

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>all the playoffs and the games yesterday were great. And

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>your son and your wife Claire went to the game.

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>They did thanks to you.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Never seen Peter your son looking more excited ever. So

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just a.

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Great family experience. I love he apparently got on the

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 2>jumbo tround. I was weaving his flag.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. It was great.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Listen, I'm as somebody who doesn't like the sport of basketball.

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 2>I support good for you, all right. We got a

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Naomi Osaka is present with Patrick Moritaglu in Asia.

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of interesting comments coming on that situation.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We will see where it turns out. And oft when

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you start working with a player and you're new, they

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>do have good results early on because they're like, they

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>feel fresh, they feel like they get enthusiastic about doing stuff,

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and they get a new voice in their head. And

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it happen over the last year with some

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>players with new coaches and bang they have great results

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>and then it slowly fizzles out because you know relationships, right,

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>it's like being in a relationship having coached player. So

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>see how long it lasts. And we'll see if he

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can turn her around. But certainly in.

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Your view as a coach, what would you suggest to Naomi,

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 2>what's the solution here? Well, I mean, look, she's moving better.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 2>She started the year not moving great. She ended at

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 2>least in the last couple of tournaments moving better. Her

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 2>groundstrokes were as fearsome as ever. She just when she's

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>what do you think she's actually like it needs to

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 2>be addressed here.

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, she just needs to cut down our

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>enforced errors. Like this is a woman that can hit

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a winner from anywhere. And I think once she gets

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>into that rhythm of not missing, and when she was

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>at her very best, she could make five, six, seven

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>balls and then go bomb.

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>But can you coach somebody to be like, hey, make

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 2>less error?

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You can tell them to rather than try that.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I would like that advice, but I don't. But there's

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 2>nothing more to it than that.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, you have to practice it first of all. So

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes in the form of discipline on the practice court.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It comes in, you know, the discipline to not get

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>upset at yourself on the practice court, making sure your

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>players not getting down about stuff that they're doing that

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you want them to do. Let's just say you know,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>when you're running for a fourhander, you're running for a backhand.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>The majority of players, as you'll see, will hit it

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>back cross court. It's over the lower part of the

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>debt percent higher percentage, more room to hit the ball,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and you would then force your opponent to make a

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>choice do I go line, do I change the direction

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ball, or do I go back cross court

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. Now, most players, when you them hit a

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>ball on the run cross court, often they would just

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of stand in that area because they know, oh,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to go line, go for it. So most

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>players will go cross It's why you see these cross

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>court rallies, cross court rallies, cross cross and then finally

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>someone goes, fay, I'm going line, you know, and they

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>go for it. Right now, they might hit a great shot.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now your opponent is really moving. Now you can, you know,

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>get up to the ball hopefully don't hit to go anyway.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm telling you that is it's just simplicity, right.

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Tennis is really quite simple in a lot of ways.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>It's how many more balls can I make than you

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the court, and my depth of shot is going

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to force you to have to go cross court and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stand here and wait for my short ball,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and so it's length on ball, it's length length in

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the court. It's not going for the sideline all the time.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>She has the power to be able to hit through someone,

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>even if it's you know, three feet from the baseline,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe two feet from the base line and three feet

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>from the sideline. So I would just be practicing discipline

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with her, you know, like make every one of these balls.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And then it's sort of like how Coco played last year,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>where she didn't make an error and then she waited,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>she didn't make an err on a forehand, then she

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>waited for the back ends, and then you know, after

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>five or six shots, players get panicky and they don't

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>know where to go. Where do I go? On Coco,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how it was last year, and that's how Naomi

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>has to sort of set up her way of playing

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, Shit, where do I go? Because I know

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>if I hit anything short, She's going to crush me.

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's a matter of discipline on the practice court,

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>on the match courts, and clearly making her serve the

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>weapon that it is and not losing serve. I would

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>focus on two things with her control your service games

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and cut down your unforced eras. Go for a little

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>more percentage, but still go for it, but just bring

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the margins in a little bit. It's really simple with her.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the longer points she plays Caitlin, the more

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>fits you get, the faster she gets.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>The more confident she gets totally, and those become like virtuous.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't need it mentally to be told you can

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>win a Grand Slam. No, no, no, yeah, which is a

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>big step, right, just not everybody has that. Now has

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the belief, oh I made a final.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 2>She played well in a finale.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I can win one. So now the mental side for

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Jessica has shifted a lot. Right now, it's well, she's

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not worrying about quarters anymore or even semis that that

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is broken. She never has to think about that ever again.

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Can I Yes, she knows I can, right, So that's done.

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.959
<v Speaker 1>So that's that you know, you ticked lists right when

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you're when you're coaching a player and you say, do

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you think you can make a SENTI? Well I think

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>so what let's talk about this, right, Let's really why

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>can't you? So that's when you've got to go through

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>all the mental.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Stuff as a coach and is Patrick the going to

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 2>do this?

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Only time will tell, Caitlin, Only time work will tell.

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>One thing that we were complimented for but also ripped

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a little was that we did not talk about Brad

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 2>and oh Coco split because are coaching?

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, because it hadn't happened when we spoke.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Last episode had predated the news. It seemed pretty inevitable. Yes,

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>but also, you don't know until you know. You don't

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>know until you know, and I wonder, you know, we've

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>talked at length about what Coco should be doing. I

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 2>hope she does what she was doing last year that

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>was so effective. You know, I think pretty much everyone

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>in the sport, pretty much everyone watching the sport thinks

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the sport is better with Coco going deep, contending, playing

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 2>great and not looking.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Listen, tell my ESPN executive producers that absolutely they want

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Coco deep. For sure brings great numbers for TV.

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and she's bringing fanship and enthusiasm and people are

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, really really really excited when she's playing.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's get to these questions then, for everybody, thank

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you for writing in so yeah, this is so fun,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Yeah. Yeah, So let's start speaking of

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Yesharoff, I hope I said that right enough. I

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't Palajz. You told views exactly what Coco was doing

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong on her serve in front of Brad, which was awesome.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Why don't you become her next coach? Well, Joe,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm just.

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 2>An accident.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually hadn't read that. I mean, I'd sort of

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>breeze through them, but no, I wanted to answer them

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>alive on air because I don't make those decisions, Joe.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Those decisions with any coaching situation comes from the agent

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in her. In respect to Coco, I would imagine her agents,

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>her parents, and then Coco and the three of those

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>will talk amongst themselves. I'm sure would.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 2>You do it?

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, of course I would do it. Yeah, I mean

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say no to an opportunity working with a

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>great player. There's no way. Of course I would do it.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a decision for me to make. And

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I love Coco. I think she's an incredible kid. And

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I can say kid because she's like more than half

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>my age, a lot more than half my age. And

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I think she's an incredibly hard worker. I respect the

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>heck out of her, and she has only ever been

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>an amazing person to be around.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's a good human.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>She responds to you, she looks you in the eye.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I do see she's a lot more stressed on the

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>court over the last twelve months. I don't know the

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>answer to that. I don't know why. I think a

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of it has to do with just not having

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this success that she wanted to have immediately after winning

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the US Open. So it's a lot on her shoulders.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But look, I just hope whoever she chooses, here's a

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of experience, and you know it can work

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>on the little technical flaws. She has to have someone

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like that to work on those technical floors and not

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be afraid to work on those technical flaws, you know.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, even with my time with Carolina Plishkova, one

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the first things I did was say, your serf

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>can be way better, and everyone probably looked at me like, well,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>she's like aces, she's the ace queen. Yeah, well there

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are technical flaws still wrong with her surf, for example,

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you've got to be willing to go

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in there and say I don't need this job. But

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I want this job and I want to help you,

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And those are the two things a lot coaches don't do.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>They go and say, can you pay my rent for me?

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true? Yeah, you know?

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Next? All right? Were you oh gosh, it's just one

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>after the other. Were you surprised at Cocoa and Brad

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>parted ways? And who do you think her next coach

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>will be? Julia Eager? I don't know, and I think

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we kind of sort of answered that question. Okay, Ron buckmele,

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll like this one. Should real tennis fans care about

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Labor Cup or only when Kully toss plays it?

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean I care about Corolitos plenty too, in any context.

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess it just wasn't enough to get me to

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>watch the Laver Cup. Should real tennis flans? I think

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>real tennis fans can define themselves however they want. Real

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 2>tennis fans can watch their neighborhood, you know, Ladder, They

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 2>can what a local club, the high school team. I

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 2>think they can do whatever they want. I think for

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 2>me to take the Labor Cup seriously, I would like

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 2>for it to include women, and I would like for

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it to be a little bit more thoughtful about where

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it travels peror our conversation earlier exactly, Okay, James. Also

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the law and Order font. I just can't get over this.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a guy from Ohio who's an agent,

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>had the entire hand and doing all of this, and

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I just the taste level is so bad. I'm not

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about anyone in particular.

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Go on, Okay, good j Miller delighted with the WTA

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Tour players, a little worried about today's all court game though,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and how tennis always a gladiator sport, now daily battle

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of attrition with huge impact on players time on court injuries,

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>when everyone becomes an adule to win a point. We

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>have a problem.

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>She's talking about like counterpunching grind she.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Or a he. It's Miller, Miller o Popolis and it's

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a photo of a cat. A cat lady could be

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a cat lady, well, a cat and gentlemen, oh no,

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not a cat. It's a dog. My apologies. I

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't zooming in.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>We don't know anything about you, Miller. Ye will answer

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>your question.

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I will say I agree with you. And one of

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that I did say number of years ago

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was the next great tennis player, particularly on the men's side,

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue to say that this could be

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>also the women's side has to be better at coming

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>forward into the net and improve on the volleys and

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have a shot that's a little different. And you know,

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I got a bit of shit a couple of weeks

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>ago shocker from Shocker fans about my comments about Carlos

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 1>bringing the drop shot in right, and in my opinion,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 1>no one has used that shot more than him. Ever, Yeah,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he is in response right in tennis, particularly off the

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>forehand right. And then I got he didn't invent the

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>drop shot. I'm like, you, calm down, everybody. I know

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the drop shots. Guess what I used to play, and

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>guess what I used to hit a drop shot. I

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>know that the drop shot has existed in tennis. But

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>his forehand drop shot is a shot we've never seen.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 2>It's incredibly well disguised. He hits it from anywhere, and

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 2>he executes it flawlessly almost all the time. Yes, it's insane,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So it's truly a weapon.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It's truly a weapon. And when you guys, guys standing

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred feet behind the baseline, and some of these

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>when as well, like in egashion tech players that play

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.720
<v Speaker 1>way back. If you can implement a fourhand, particularly fourhand

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>drop shot, a lot of the women do it off

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the back end. Donnovekich hits that drop shot so well.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>On I think on Zubur brought in the drop shot

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to women's tennis a lot more. And you know, it's

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>all we could talk about. It's all people can talk about.

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's like, so my my point in telling you

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the next great player outside of the Sabalancas

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and all this, they will have an extra shot that

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 1>goes whoa finally, you know, and Mukhova, for.

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Example, is a true would talk about it.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>She's a true all court player and maybe one shot

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>she can implement is the drop shot herself. But she

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>has every shot in the book. So Fali's comes in, so.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I actually think we're in the midst of seeing this happen.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 2>I think between a curlytos between Arena Sebleka. Everyone talks

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 2>about how fast her groundstrokes are and how huge are

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>fourhand is, but she moves forward, she hits great valley.

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>She's won several slams in doubles. Like, to me, that

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 2>is so exciting because it's not just power baseline tennis.

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 2>It's really it's really varietive and creative, and I know it,

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think you're right. I'd love to see more

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 2>of it. And Mukhova being healthy and making a strong

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>showing this year I think shows a lot of people like, oh,

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 2>this is we have a style of tennis we can

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>get excited about that we haven't seen so much of.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it brings back a little bit of ash

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Barty type that we loved to watch obviously. Okay, monkey Bread,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know how much during a match are

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>players thinking, if I win this match, it's twenty five

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars more in prize money. How much do you

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>think players think about things like this?

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 2>I think it depends on player. Right.

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You've also written something else. I'm curious why the announcers

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>never mentioned maybe this stuff. I cut the end of

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that question off, but oh no, there it is. I'm

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>also curious why the announcers never mentioned prize money. Fritz

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Foux over Foe was an extra five hundred k I've

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>heard them mention, Okay, so I can tell you this. Yeah,

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we always mentioned that as announcers, the money. But you know,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to get to caught in the weeds

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with that, because honestly, is not important. I will say

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as a player, when I got a little bit older

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and I knew that my time was running out of

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>how big a check can I make as a tennis player?

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, arguably I'll never make checks like that

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ever again. You know, the potential of making a check

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for you know, a couple of hundred thousand dollars or

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>something like that. It's podcast money, Yeah, it's podcast money.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>But so I started thinking about a little bit more

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 1>at the end of my career, think is shit, if

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we won this tournaments, you know, one hundred and fifty thousand,

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like that's really great. But honestly, it's not really what

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>motivates any tennis player. I think winning and losing is

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>more important. Like winning is more important. And then you

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think about what it can bring for you ranking points wise,

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and then inevitably you're always thinking about money in a way,

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but you're not really on the court thinking, oh, this

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth another twenty thousand to me. I mean it

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>might cross your mind.

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean I feel like Sloan Stephens sort of famously

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of owns that yeah, which I kind of really

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 2>love about her. Yeah, Like I'm not sure she's thinking

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 2>about it every match, but definitely she's like chit ching

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 2>and maybe, like.

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a lot of players that come

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from very poor backgrounds.

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 2>The lines evens coming from.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>No, I think she comes from a middle class family.

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But but it's arguably you talking players from Ukraine, from

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia or from wherever they're poor.

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 2>There's absolutely if you're getting into tournaments about its getting

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 2>your teeth and there's a difference between you know, your

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 2>entire year's earnings on the line. Like sure, yeah, I

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 2>think you're right. It doesn't seem I.

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Mean when you're talking about it for a Sinner and

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Djokovic and you know, even Fritz and Foe and all

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>these guys, they're not thinking, oh god, this is worth

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>another hundred K to me. No, Okay, players Jpeg hits flat.

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a connotation for it, Jessica pol players who hit

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>super flat or with a lot of spin. I Epergula

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who hits flat? Can she easily play with more shape

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if needed? Not? Really, Yes, she can, but that's not

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>her game. The way she hits the ball and the

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>way her sort of her wrist action is and all

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. She's not about to change that now.

0:39:06.120 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Now I know that there's times that she probably has

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>put more spin on the ball, and can You can

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>put more spin on the ball as a player, but

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not really your nature to go to and it's

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not natural for you. Then it becomes a bit harder.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly something to work on because it can be

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the difference making against a certain player. You want to

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:24.720
<v Speaker 1>get the ball out of the hitting zone for example.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.280
<v Speaker 1>For example, hitting spin against jask Is is a good idea.

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>You want to try and get it above her shoulders

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't, you're in all sorts of trouble

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because she hits all so well. She's like a five

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>foot version five foot four. I don't want to make

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it shorter than she is. She's I think six or

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>five six, not five seven, maybe five six. Listen, she's

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not a sabalanca. She's not sabal ancha. I

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>was going to compare her to her way she plays

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is like a five foot six or seven version of

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Davenport.

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 2>She's flattening and hard.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like they're hitting the ball hard, but

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>my god, the ball comes flying off her racket and

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it is really hard to control. Okay, Jay Miller again,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.879
<v Speaker 1>if a second question is possible, Yeah, it is, because

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm already READI it. Still having a really hard time

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing tennis with betting outfits as major tour sponsors, slippery

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>slope players harassed by gamblers is unacceptable. Are the tours

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything on this or even give the

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 1>players a percent of sponsorship? Well, great question. I always

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's funny too, because I remember a couple of

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago they did such a big investigation into players

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>gam I know, are they throwing matches and are their

0:40:34.800 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>players out there doing Yes, of course there are players

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>doing it, but they're in the small, lower level tournaments

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>like five thousands in Brazil. Those are the players that

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are tanking matches to make money. Need the money from

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the gambling syndicates. So if you want to bet on

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a fifty thousand or five thousand tournament or ten thousand

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>k tournament in Brazil and your player doesn't win, suck

0:40:57.560 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>on it, okay, because if you want to riding them

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>on social media telling them you couldn't hold serve and

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>why would you double fault this happens all the time

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to players, it happens, they get abused non stop, and

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they're all gamblers. So but the Australian Open, I remember

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they had a sponsorship of a gambling company on their

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, sponsorship behind the court and everything, and everyone

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was up in arms. How can you do that? You're

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>doing an investigation and a gambling and tennis and you've

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>got a gambling sponsorship. I'm like, and gambling has been

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a part of every single Grand Slam forever. They just

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>don't promote it, but they're always been a part of it.

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And I have no problem with a gambling company sponsoring

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a tennis tournament or a sporting event because people gamble

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on sports. It's been happening in Australia for one hundred

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>billion years, in the UK and Europe, and finally the

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>US is finally like, oh we can make money on this.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's unbelievable to me that US has taken

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>so long to have the Draft Kings and you know, ESPN,

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Bet and all these companies, because it happens all the

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>time and it's a great It makes a lot of money. Now,

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be stupid enough to throw your

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>money down on tennis events, and you apply losers if

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you feel the need to harass them, you're a fucking loser.

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I do think what's your thought on this? Well,

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:20.799
<v Speaker 2>I sort of think of it from a platforming perspective,

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of similar to the Twitter conversation we

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 2>had the other day where people are like, oh, do

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 2>you you know Twitter? And what do you think about

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, I don't think anything about Twitter. Twitter

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter anymore. It doesn't send traffic to media people,

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't. It's not where the conversation is. It's a

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 2>bunch of Reddit virgins.

0:42:39.400 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gross.

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 2>And I think very similarly when you think about platforms,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>in no way, shape or form should any of the

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 2>players be subjected to harass, right, and so what I'm

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 2>told to die? Yeah, they're told way worse things than

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to die. So, without getting into but actually, Caroline Garcia's

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 2>podcast Tennis Insider has had a number of conversations about

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:07.359
<v Speaker 2>this where players are very candid about talking about it.

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 2>She herself, yeah, put stuff on their for a long time,

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 2>but I really applaud her for kind of taking it

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>on pretty regularly. So to me, it's a platform issue.

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:22.840
<v Speaker 2>If you are a draft Kings or a FanDuel member

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 2>or executive and you see players or your betters being

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 2>reported for harassment, kick them off the platform. Will they

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 2>create another account under another name. Maybe, But the idea

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is that it's not platforming hate speech and the sooner

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you police that. If you're a platform, then you're a publisher.

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:43.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's a distinction that almost nobody is going to

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 2>appreciate or get. But as a media person, if you're

0:43:46.880 --> 0:43:49.880
<v Speaker 2>platforming people, meaning giving them the chance to speak, you

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>are actually a publisher and you're bound by the laws

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 2>of the land, which in this case indicate hate speech.

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 2>And going after players with hate speech means not only

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 2>are you liable, but also you need to be the deplatform.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And anyone who writes to a player an abusive message

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's daily, I just think you really should get

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a life.

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And you know, well, they don't have life. This is

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>their whole thing. So I would just say.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Abuse, it's so bad. It's like, what is that going

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's not going to help you later on.

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>And I hope anyone who writes an abusive tweet or

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>a text or anything to anyone's Instagram or social I

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hope you lose every bit of your money, all of it.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, they probably are good.

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's get to doctor Sook. It's a good name.

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Holgas started annoying but strong, now less annoying, but losing

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was his immature swagger, key to his game. He has

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>three questions, so we'll answer that one first. I don't know.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's matured a little bit, and I

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>think as we've noted mostly on this pod, and I

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 1>said some controversial things about whole Garuno, but I actually

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>like the kid a lot, and I think that time

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.240
<v Speaker 1>will tell. I think he's got a few technical flaws

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 1>as well. The forehands a little bit funky. But I

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be fine. He's going to mature.

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to get better with age.

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>He's a good all court player, and I think he's

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>going to mature and get older. I think he had

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure on his shoulders early on when

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he came out and had such great success.

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So well, he came up with curlyitos, and I feel

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 2>like the two of them were sort of hailed as

0:45:28.480 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a very section and when one of them takes off

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the other one doesn't to the same hates. Yeah, it

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>becomes a lot of pressure. Now. I found him really

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 2>introspective and thoughtful in his the Netflix episode about him,

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, oh, he's cocky, but in a way

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 2>that's like sort of a little self aware. Yeah, and

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 2>it made me like him a lot more. Yeah.

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think when he goes and has Twitter rants

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>with people that give him shit, I'm like, oh, I

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>feel bad because he's like obviously is very sensitive. Yeah,

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like him anyway, and I do like it.

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm written for him.

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, tiafa dump Wayne, but seems to have more problems

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bless with physical and technical game. Is he Is he

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>too muscle bound? Same? Doctor Sook said that No, he's

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>definitely not too muscle bound. He sweats a lot. He

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>ran out of gas against Taylor because arguably Taylor just

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit more firepower, particularly on the serve. Well,

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>now Francis has a great serve. I just think he

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about being very nervous. He was very close to

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>winning that match in four sets. Taylor was, you know,

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:29.399
<v Speaker 1>looking a bit down himself. But I give Taylor older

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>credit for winning that match, And no, I don't think so.

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Look, Francis is always going to have these

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>funky swings. I mean, self taught tennis player essentially, which

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is one of the greatest stories in tennis. He'll be fine,

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't worry about it. Mukhova is great. But do Checks

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 1>have mental wobble? What that is the third question from

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>doctor Zok, So enough from you, doctor Suk.

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 2>No, she doesn't think. Yeah, the answer is no.

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I think. Look, I think that she definitely could be

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>mentally a little bit stronger. I think she's starting to

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully believe in herself. But this is a woman that

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>just come back from a major, major, major risk surgery.

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 2>And has had two Grand Slam semifinals and a final year.

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the question is about the Checks. I

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:08.439
<v Speaker 2>mean I think if you want to look at the Checks,

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 2>like are the Checks the most mentally strong people in

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the history of tennis? Maybe maybe listen between Lendell and Martina, like,

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 2>come on, the tradition is strong. I think it's more

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 2>a Mukova specific back. Well, it's also like this is

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 2>how long this has been a dynasty, and they're really

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 2>responsible I think for the generations that followed, right, So

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I think when I think of check players. Even at

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the level that I play, I play with a lot

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of check players. They're tough as nails. So I think

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a Mukova thing, which is I'm coming back from

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 2>injury and I have a very high creative game, high

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 2>creativity inspired game, which I think you can get a

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit lost in the saw sometimes about that.

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 1>It was one fourhand volley away from being a set

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and three love up against Jess a few breaks. I

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think she loses that match if she makes that volley.

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, she made the valley, she didn't pay away.

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>No, no, she missed the volley.

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 2>She didn't. She hit it right back to Jess, and

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Jess hit a passenger.

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>She missed the toppy foehand into the net.

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, we'll have to go to the tap. My god,

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I was doing please please just keep going.

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I was doing the match and I said, wow,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.399
<v Speaker 1>she normally it actually went long. It went long.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 2>When I'm edicated this, it'll be really exciting for us.

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pull it up right now after the questions. Okay,

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So R. M. Jackson five like the name, and he's

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a white guy. That's great. Why is Muhova so fun

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch. Does she have compact or long strokes? Is

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:30.399
<v Speaker 1>she a mix of old school Borg Macenroe and current techniques? Well,

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a little bit of a confusing question,

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>but I do appreciate it. RM Jackson five. She is

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch. I would say her strokes are very

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>classic strokes. There's nothing about her strokes or her game

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that are really that flawed, and I think that's what

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>makes us so fun to watch. I think the most

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that I love to watch is the fact that

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>she serves and bollies. The fact that she comes into

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the net every opportunity she can, and on any short

0:48:57.160 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>forehand she plays the right shot. She hits that forehand

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>inside out, down the line and comes into the net

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and finishes it off with a volley, And I just

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:10.439
<v Speaker 1>absolutely love watching her play. Yes, so all right, let's

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>get to b hd t TL wacky WTA. I think

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>WTA should make round talking about the ball standard on

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 1>all surfaces to reduce injuries. I go one serve only

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to reduce serve boddying. Like uts, it'll make WS games

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>more watchable. What's wrong with women's tennis? I'm not even

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 1>going to answer this question. Women's game more watchable in

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, XD balls cause so many shoulder injuries. Blah

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. Okay, wacky WTA. I will say this, you

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>can't have the same ball every week because balls and

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>ball sponsors like Wilson and Penn and Technic Fiber and

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah and Babbelatt and all of them, they

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all make balls and they all want them to be

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:57.920
<v Speaker 1>used at a tournament, so they give the tournament money

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to use their balls. It's called promoting their ball. So

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of course a tournament is going to take a fifty

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars from a Wilson or one hundred thousand from

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>a Wilson to use their balls in the tournament. So

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why you don't have the same uniformity of a ball. Now,

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you did, then the w T A a TP

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 1>should get together with a Wilson or a Pan or

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:17.799
<v Speaker 1>whoever and say this is our ball all the time.

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Does seem like a opportunity.

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It does, but it's not going to happen. So there

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you go. And yes, the reason they're using regular duty

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at the US Open is because it does cause problems

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>for the player, especially the women with their wrists, with

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>their elbows and their shoulders. So that's why they went

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>back to regular duty. And that's it. And I don't

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 1>appreciate b h dtl's little slant on women's tennis. You

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>should think about men's tennis a little bit more being unwatchable,

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I know you're a fan, but that

0:50:47.760 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just bothers me. He has another question. Should Goff have

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>parted ways with Gilbert? Who do you think as coach?

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>We've already okay, right a kana, Yeah, these are all

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.719
<v Speaker 1>being answered. Why is okay, it's maybe someday who we love?

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't there a Slam for South America?

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Caitlin, thank you, agreed. Let's she wants to take

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the Australian Open and put in South America.

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So we are done with this question.

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily.

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I could have a major, not a major, tonment,

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>not a major like a Grand Slam, but that wasn't

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a big tournament down.

0:51:18.920 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I think we can well, we can do literally anything

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 2>we want. Keep in mind, one hundred years ago this

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 2>was a globe ruled by kingdoms and you know blood no.

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 2>But my point is nothing matters. The world can change.

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:36.959
<v Speaker 2>Nobody could have a Slam in October until the French

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Open did it like anything can happen. The Australian Open

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 2>wasn't really a major until it was the Open major.

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:45.640
<v Speaker 2>It has not. Was it a bigger deal than the

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Canadian Open or the Italian Open. No. Up until a

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 2>certain time it wasn't. So my point is why not

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:51.319
<v Speaker 2>at a fifth Slam?

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't always a major.

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure, But my point here is you can do whatever

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 2>we want with the calendar. What I would love to

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:00.400
<v Speaker 2>see is the tours consolidate, decide which thousands mattered most,

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 2>and then let's change the definition of a Slam so

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 2>that it becomes, you know, as prestigious because the Southern hemisphere. This, this,

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 2>by the way, is my way of appeasing you and

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 2>not taking away the Australian Open. But instead let's add

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a fit Slam. Maybe it's in Argentina, a very strong

0:52:17.320 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 2>tennis playing country.

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You cannot add another.

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 2>You can do anything, You can do anything, you just

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 2>want to South America, Argentina. Everybody does.

0:52:25.000 --> 0:52:28.839
<v Speaker 1>What can club torontosaurus flex? Who we love? What can

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>club doubles players do? More?

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Poach to win?

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Move the net more? Yeah, move the net more?

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Or if the net player is stinking it up, just

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>keep hitting it at them over and over and over again.

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Nowadays, I play a lot of club level doubles.

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 1>It's called two against one.

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 2>The difference between the college players like me and the

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 2>players who are good but did not play college doubles

0:52:50.800 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 2>is they don't poach. Yeah, poach, They just stand there.

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 2>They just stand there and wait for you. Ye.

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Look overall, we appreciate you writing us.

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, those are great. I like getting questions from the audience.

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah you do, I do?

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 2>I know you do you?

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do too. That's why I put the tweet out. Anyway,

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going into Beijing starting. My interest level is two percent.

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I shouldn't say that I will watch more

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 1>of Beijing. I did not watch any hardly anything of

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks. I didn't barely watch Labor Cup.

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I was more interested in the WNBA postseason and the

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Solheim Cup and a lot of other women's sports. But

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I will get back into the tennis now that Beijing

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is starting. But it's just I don't know, just something

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about I mean, Serena used to shut down after the

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>US Open, literally did not play after the US Open

0:53:42.400 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years, and you know she could afford

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay the fine. She didn't play the WTA finals.

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't okay with that. I wish she had done that,

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>just because it's our biggest tournament WT finals. But those

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in Jedda this year in Saudi Arabia.

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So your thoughts on that, because you might.

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Go, I'm I'm taking the Billygian King line.

0:54:04.440 --> 0:54:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Can't change it unless you're there. Yeah, and you really

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna happen? Yeah, Okay, yeah I do.

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm let's keep in mind my background is in politics. Yeah, Like,

0:54:15.160 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't believe systems are immutable, and I also think,

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, we live in a world where all of

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 2>a sudden we can decide the borders of country is

0:54:25.000 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>changing overnight. So yeah, I mean, am I incredibly optimistic

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:31.399
<v Speaker 2>as a gay person, as a lum of the Washington Post. No,

0:54:31.520 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>there's there's some reservations I have, and I'm certainly not

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 2>going to use this platform to defend. But i will say, like,

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 2>if you.

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Go to Saudi Raybe, you're not taking Claire and I

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly not.

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 2>That's said I'm gonna I'm I'm curious and I believe

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 2>in like, okay, let's do some Let's do some engagement here.

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think if the tour went back to

0:54:49.560 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>China post punk SHUEI, and it shouldn't always be on

0:54:53.160 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 2>the women, by the way to lead the charge. The

0:54:55.320 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 2>men have decided.

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the men have been going.

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 2>There forever forever. So for me, like my my general

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.719
<v Speaker 2>approach at this point is let's say, let's let's have

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 2>a conversation.

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And let's finish this pod off. You had a great

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>article in the New York Times.

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 2>What a fun article in the New York Times. Yeah,

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 2>after a tumult a transformation at rack of magazine was

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the headline. And you know, having a business for almost

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:23.120
<v Speaker 2>a decade that we've been trying to you know, illuminate

0:55:23.120 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 2>the stories, grow, do all this stuff, you know, sometimes

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 2>you need to make some changes. And I think what

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I was most excited about is the fact that in

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the New York Times we had a chance to sort

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of talk about all the amazing things that this last

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:41.360
<v Speaker 2>year has brought, especially you know, making the magazine is amazing.

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Turning it from a sort of you know, hobbyist kind

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of setup where it wasn't paying for itself to something profitable.

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 2>This year has been a tremendous effort with the best,

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.479
<v Speaker 2>most amazing writers, creators, editors, et cetera.

0:55:55.600 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I liked the last line in the article where

0:55:58.160 --> 0:55:59.879
<v Speaker 1>it's it do you remember it?

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:01.920
<v Speaker 2>I do, but I'll let you know you say it.

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It will be profitable for the first time. And I

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 2>think for me really this year, and I think for

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 2>me not coincidentally bringing on an all team of women,

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:12.080
<v Speaker 2>having the larger footprint where we get to do amazing

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 2>things with brands and with events and with collabs. You know,

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:18.840
<v Speaker 2>for me, I think this is just a very modern

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 2>way of doing media. Does it mean I'm going to

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 2>be right all the time or make a thousand percent

0:56:23.400 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 2>of my you know bets correctly? No, But I'm ambitious,

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.359
<v Speaker 2>and you know how society feels about ambitious women, which

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is I think speaks to a love of them, a

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:35.239
<v Speaker 2>little bit of the grist for the mill. So for me,

0:56:35.360 --> 0:56:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the fact that we got to talk about all the

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 2>amazing stuff we've done, including but not limited to trying

0:56:40.239 --> 0:56:42.879
<v Speaker 2>to take over our first club space here in New York,

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:44.799
<v Speaker 2>which would have us running a tennis court. Will it happen.

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Quick do I get priority on the court,

0:56:47.200 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 2>you get free membership? Right?

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay? Well on that note, this the end story is,

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.919
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do a company, just have all women.

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, thanks for joining us. See you next week.