1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,399 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Let's go now to 2 00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:11,799 Speaker 1: the intersection of public and private markets. About two weeks ago, 3 00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:14,640 Speaker 1: State Street and Apollo launched a new kind of ETF, 4 00:00:14,920 --> 00:00:18,400 Speaker 1: granting access to private assets in the public market. Within 5 00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:21,639 Speaker 1: hours of the launch of priv the SEC sent both 6 00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:25,600 Speaker 1: firms a strongly worded letter listing multiple concerns. For more 7 00:00:25,640 --> 00:00:28,120 Speaker 1: on that, we're pleased to say. Annapaglia joins us now. 8 00:00:28,120 --> 00:00:30,840 Speaker 1: She is the executive vice president and chief business officer 9 00:00:30,880 --> 00:00:33,239 Speaker 1: at State Street Global Advisors, that is one of the 10 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: firms behind the new ETF. I'm also joined by my 11 00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:38,320 Speaker 1: ETF IQ co host, Katie Greeifeld. 12 00:00:38,440 --> 00:00:40,080 Speaker 2: Katie, great to see. 13 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 3: You both, especially not on a Thursday. Usually we talk 14 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:44,839 Speaker 3: on Mondays. So Trina also, great to see you in 15 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 3: studio with us. And I want to start with the 16 00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 3: SEC because it was really unusual to see the SEC 17 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:56,640 Speaker 3: send this letter post launch, really specifically laying out their concerns. 18 00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 3: What did your conversations look like with the SEC pre launch. 19 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 3: I think there's a lot of confusion about how this happens, 20 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:06,039 Speaker 3: and I'm just wondering if you discuss these issues with 21 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 3: the agency prior to actually trading beginning. 22 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:10,280 Speaker 2: Sure, Katie. 23 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 4: First of all, thank you for having me, and I 24 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,520 Speaker 4: know that this is the hot topic of the day 25 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:18,120 Speaker 4: or the last couple of weeks, so I'm really happy 26 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:21,160 Speaker 4: to have this conversation with you today. Let's put that 27 00:01:21,240 --> 00:01:25,200 Speaker 4: into perspective, because it is true that we get additional 28 00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:28,480 Speaker 4: comments from the SEC after we launch the fund, but 29 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:31,480 Speaker 4: I would also say that this is not a unique 30 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:34,759 Speaker 4: I mean, it happens from time to time. This fund 31 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 4: that had been in registration for five months, so if 32 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,679 Speaker 4: you compare that to a traditional fund launch that takes 33 00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:45,399 Speaker 4: usually seventy five days, that will tell you that we 34 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 4: have had a very healthy dialogue with the SEC. Four 35 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,800 Speaker 4: rounds of comments and we answered those comments. 36 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 2: And then the way. 37 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 4: Are some lingering ones without the process have concluded it 38 00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 4: had not. We got the new comments and we answered 39 00:01:59,720 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 4: those within twenty four hours. 40 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:03,960 Speaker 2: So in the last couple of weeks. 41 00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:07,360 Speaker 4: I think that's more drama than it was warranted was 42 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:11,440 Speaker 4: created in the market. And I have read so much 43 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:15,240 Speaker 4: stuff that I think it's worthwhile trying to distinguish facts 44 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:19,800 Speaker 4: from fiction. So the one thing that I've been reading is, 45 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 4: you know, this fund that may not be fully operated 46 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 4: in compliance with the forty Act. 47 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:27,280 Speaker 2: I mean that's fiction. 48 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:33,760 Speaker 4: This fund is being managed, administered, operated in full compliance. 49 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,400 Speaker 2: With the forty Act. That's a fact. 50 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 4: Interesting, then I have also read something to the effect 51 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 4: that we have not fully addressed the comments from the SEC. 52 00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:47,400 Speaker 4: There was a line around when is the next shoe 53 00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:50,440 Speaker 4: gonna drop? Now I know a thing of two about shoes, 54 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:52,840 Speaker 4: and I can tell you that that's fiction. 55 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:55,359 Speaker 2: There are no other shoes to drop. 56 00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,960 Speaker 4: And as you can see on Edgar, even the correspondence 57 00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 4: of the secs so that the stuff has no additional comments. 58 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 2: That's a fact. 59 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:05,960 Speaker 3: So given that, and given that you were having these 60 00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:08,800 Speaker 3: conversations with the SEC leading up to launch and the 61 00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 3: fund did go effective, were you surprised to see this letter? 62 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 3: Certainly from where I was sitting at my desk in 63 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:17,520 Speaker 3: the newsroom, I was surprised to see it. 64 00:03:17,600 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 4: So I was surprised and not surprised, because again, this 65 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:27,520 Speaker 4: construct is novel, and it's not the first time that 66 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:31,680 Speaker 4: the SEC gives you comments after a registration statement is effective. 67 00:03:31,840 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 4: So now it was unfortunate because it was made up 68 00:03:35,240 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 4: very public in a fund that had been you know, 69 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 4: in registration for five months, and where the flash lights 70 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:45,960 Speaker 4: were but to me, that is part of a dialogue 71 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,200 Speaker 4: with the SEC now was that ideal was not ideal, 72 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 4: But the fact that we addressed it within twenty four 73 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:55,400 Speaker 4: hours tells you the health of the conversation and the 74 00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 4: dialogue that we had with the stuff and with the 75 00:03:57,440 --> 00:03:59,480 Speaker 4: omission over the prior months. 76 00:03:59,560 --> 00:04:01,760 Speaker 1: Thank you for sharing all of that. The other thing 77 00:04:01,880 --> 00:04:03,960 Speaker 1: we can't help noticing is that this ETF was launched 78 00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: during a shift change at the SEC. Gary Ginster has gone, 79 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 1: Paul Ekins has not yet been confirmed. There's an interim chair. 80 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 1: Do you think that that impacted this whole process for you? 81 00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:16,359 Speaker 2: I wouldn't say. 82 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:20,160 Speaker 4: I wouldn't say that it is because I have been 83 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:23,680 Speaker 4: working with the SEC, with the staff for almost two 84 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 4: decades now and I have the highest respect for the staff. 85 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:30,719 Speaker 4: And even if the chairs and the leadership is changing, 86 00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:36,280 Speaker 4: there are some very incredible experts of Fortiact EXPERSUS securities 87 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:40,160 Speaker 4: experts at the SEC that are not changing with the administration. 88 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:42,560 Speaker 4: So I don't think. I don't think that the change 89 00:04:42,560 --> 00:04:45,280 Speaker 4: in administration and an impact. And whether this funder went 90 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 4: to market or. 91 00:04:46,040 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 3: Not, yeah, it's a good reminder it's not just the 92 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:49,840 Speaker 3: guy at the top. You know, there's all these teams 93 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:53,799 Speaker 3: within the agency as well. So this obviously, like you mentioned, 94 00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 3: has been a hot topic. I have a podcast with 95 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,560 Speaker 3: Matt Levine called Money Stuff, and we've been talking about 96 00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:01,479 Speaker 3: it on that podcast, and we had actually a listener 97 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:06,600 Speaker 3: right in basically asking about the relationship with Apollo. They asked, 98 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:10,200 Speaker 3: with the advent of a private credit ETF, isn't adverse 99 00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:12,280 Speaker 3: selection an inherent issues? 100 00:05:12,360 --> 00:05:13,760 Speaker 2: So I'm wondering. 101 00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:17,560 Speaker 3: Whether State Street has the expertise in house to evaluate 102 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:19,920 Speaker 3: what Apollo is putting into the ETF. 103 00:05:20,440 --> 00:05:20,720 Speaker 2: We do. 104 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:23,320 Speaker 4: We do have the expertise in house. Not only did 105 00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:27,160 Speaker 4: we have the expertise in house when thinking about the 106 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 4: h this fund and how to structure this fund, but 107 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:32,800 Speaker 4: we also made the new hire set to make sure 108 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:36,160 Speaker 4: that we had the right talent in seats. In the end, 109 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:41,480 Speaker 4: s SGA is the UH is the advisor. By design. 110 00:05:41,880 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 4: We wanted us to be in a position to make 111 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:49,159 Speaker 4: selections and have investment discretion on what task sets to 112 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 4: take or not to take from Apollo, and that type 113 00:05:51,920 --> 00:05:53,400 Speaker 4: of expertise was critical. 114 00:05:54,480 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 3: And you mentioned, you know, it was unfortunate that this 115 00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:00,160 Speaker 3: letter came after the ETF had already launched it. It's 116 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 3: out in the public like that, and I want to 117 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 3: bring that conversation to flows that have come into the ETF. 118 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 3: This is a first of its kind ETF, so there's 119 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:09,640 Speaker 3: typically a way and c sort of period. But it's 120 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:13,680 Speaker 3: only taken in two days of net inflows since it's launched. 121 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,400 Speaker 3: Told me about five million dollars in assets so far. 122 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,840 Speaker 3: Do you think that that overhang is impacting muting flows 123 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:21,520 Speaker 3: to any extent. 124 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:25,840 Speaker 4: It's funny you say that, because in this cases, success 125 00:06:26,200 --> 00:06:29,239 Speaker 4: is in the eyes of the beholder. If I look 126 00:06:29,320 --> 00:06:31,600 Speaker 4: at if I look at the treading volume, so I 127 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:35,760 Speaker 4: separate the trading volume of from flows. Treading volume for 128 00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 4: this fund that's been incredibly healthy. Let's remember it's an 129 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 4: active ETF. And if you look at all the other 130 00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:46,880 Speaker 4: active funds or even the wider ETF universe, all new 131 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:51,040 Speaker 4: funds have registered are roughly an average of four million 132 00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:54,840 Speaker 4: dollars a day of treading volume. This fund that has 133 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:57,760 Speaker 4: been an on par with the average, and at times 134 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:00,640 Speaker 4: it has even been healthier than the average. And the 135 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,719 Speaker 4: first ding, the first day it registered, the five million 136 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,840 Speaker 4: dollars of trading volume, and we got to to creates 137 00:07:06,880 --> 00:07:09,960 Speaker 4: in the first two trading days, which you know, it 138 00:07:10,000 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 4: may sound like only two, but it's very unusual for 139 00:07:14,840 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 4: a new active fund that to ever creates in the 140 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:21,640 Speaker 4: first week. I mean with active strategies. As you may appreciate, 141 00:07:21,880 --> 00:07:24,280 Speaker 4: people wait for the fund to create a little bit 142 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,600 Speaker 4: of a performance record, the trading record. 143 00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:29,040 Speaker 2: So everything we see in. 144 00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:32,560 Speaker 4: Market the first of all, is not unexpected, is actually 145 00:07:32,600 --> 00:07:35,520 Speaker 4: better than we anticipated. So we are really pleased with 146 00:07:35,600 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 4: the trading volume and the attention that we are getting 147 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:38,960 Speaker 4: from investors. 148 00:07:39,000 --> 00:07:42,520 Speaker 1: And making private assets were widely accessible to investors has 149 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:44,679 Speaker 1: long been a goal, not just for you, but for others. 150 00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: The challenge was always how to do it. At investment 151 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 1: firms like Blue Owl and Blackstone, some are choosing to 152 00:07:50,720 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: do it as interval funds, which would allow investors to 153 00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:56,080 Speaker 1: cash out during certain periods. Was that ever under consideration 154 00:07:56,320 --> 00:07:58,400 Speaker 1: for the private funds that you did launch. 155 00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:01,560 Speaker 4: It was everything was on the consideration. Everything is on 156 00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 4: the table. We like to think of ourselves as a 157 00:08:04,480 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 4: rap pagnostic firm. We always look at the best exposure. 158 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:09,400 Speaker 1: But you're the og ETF firm. 159 00:08:09,920 --> 00:08:11,520 Speaker 2: We are the OGETF forum. 160 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 4: But we do have target data funds, we have index 161 00:08:14,320 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 4: mutual funds and other mutual funds, So there are different 162 00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:21,040 Speaker 4: ways to repackage the content, and for us at democratizing 163 00:08:21,080 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 4: a private assets was paramount and this is why we 164 00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 4: said that let's let's be very creative and see if 165 00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 4: there is a way to incorporate this as a class 166 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 4: into ETFs. 167 00:08:30,320 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 3: So this launch was interesting from so many different levels. 168 00:08:33,040 --> 00:08:36,559 Speaker 3: But one of those levels was State Street's partnership strategy. 169 00:08:36,640 --> 00:08:39,240 Speaker 3: Because you have this partnership with Apollo, you have a 170 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:42,960 Speaker 3: partnership with Galaxy for example, you have a partnership with Bridgewater, 171 00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:47,160 Speaker 3: and actually you just launched this all weather ETF last week, 172 00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:50,640 Speaker 3: which was really interesting to see. So private credit is 173 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:52,559 Speaker 3: one thing, but when it comes to crypto and when 174 00:08:52,559 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 3: it comes to sort of risk parity strategies, theoretically State 175 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 3: Street could have done that in house. So talk us 176 00:08:58,760 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 3: through what the benefit of pursuing these really high profile 177 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:03,280 Speaker 3: partnerships is. 178 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 2: Oh absolutely to us. 179 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:11,640 Speaker 4: You know, brand matters because branded recognition is earned, is 180 00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:16,360 Speaker 4: not given, and the branded recognition really means that you 181 00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:19,000 Speaker 4: are an expert at something. And if we look at 182 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 4: our brand, Ssgas brand is a market leader in ETFs. 183 00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:27,960 Speaker 4: You know, we created the market with spy. We opened 184 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,240 Speaker 4: the ETF market to the masses. This is what we 185 00:09:30,280 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 4: are good at understanding the entire ecosystem. But when we 186 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:37,480 Speaker 4: want to build other strategies and bring them to clients, 187 00:09:37,520 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 4: we always look at who is the best. 188 00:09:39,840 --> 00:09:41,439 Speaker 2: In class and those strategies. 189 00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 4: Could we have done digital assets, absolutely, but we are 190 00:09:44,880 --> 00:09:48,160 Speaker 4: not a cryptonative. That's why we partnered with a crypto native. 191 00:09:48,520 --> 00:09:51,520 Speaker 4: Could we have done risk aparity, absolutely, we would have 192 00:09:51,520 --> 00:09:55,760 Speaker 4: done it, but we partnered with those who started that 193 00:09:55,880 --> 00:10:00,080 Speaker 4: business that strategy with decades of experience the goods of 194 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:05,199 Speaker 4: risk parity risk parity strategies. So for us, bringing together 195 00:10:05,360 --> 00:10:08,040 Speaker 4: what we do best with what other firms do best 196 00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:11,760 Speaker 4: allows us to bring these best in class solution to clients. 197 00:10:11,800 --> 00:10:15,640 Speaker 3: We have thirty seconds if that. When it comes to partnerships, 198 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 3: are you pursuing any others? Should we be keeping an 199 00:10:17,559 --> 00:10:17,960 Speaker 3: eye out? 200 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:19,280 Speaker 2: You should? 201 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:21,160 Speaker 4: You should be keeping an eye out of our new 202 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:25,440 Speaker 4: partnerships and more with existing partnerships, because the partnership is 203 00:10:25,440 --> 00:10:28,520 Speaker 4: not transactional. It's what we can do together the entire 204 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 4: universal possibilities. 205 00:10:30,440 --> 00:10:30,720 Speaker 2: All right. 206 00:10:30,760 --> 00:10:32,800 Speaker 1: So it's just the beginning of these partnerships. And and 207 00:10:32,960 --> 00:10:35,120 Speaker 1: I really appreciate your joining us on a paglia from 208 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:36,360 Speaker 1: Stagy Global Advisors