WEBVTT - A Chat with the PGA Tour's Setup Czar

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball.

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>In a bright egg Friday egg, Frida Egg Friday, fridag

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.239
<v Speaker 1>bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run off of

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the course.

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Golf Podcast.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I am your host, Andy Johnson. We've got a great

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 3>show today. I'm excited about it. Actually, we had Gary Young,

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 3>he's one of the PGA Tour's chief referees, on to

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>talk all things PGA Tour set up. That's me and

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Joseph Lamania talking with Gary. It was enlightening. There was

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stuff I learned from it about how

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>they go about setting up a golf course for a

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour event. And then we talked about some of

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the hot topics TiO, pace of play, preferred lies, all

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 3>sorts of stuff. So it was really it was fun

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>chat with Gary. I appreciate him coming on and you know,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 3>answer and answering questions, answering questions that an idiot like

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 3>me has about what he does for his job. But

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>before we get to that, we got to do in

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 3>and out Joseph, what are you in on this week?

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Andy?

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>I am in on signature events with a cut. This

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>week at the Genesis Invitational, we're going to see the

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>first signature event the PGA Tour's new model with a

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>limited field and a cut. So field of about eighty players,

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to cut down to the top fifty and

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>ties after two days. I think that is a wonderful

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>recipe for the modern golf product, and I would love

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to see more of these signature events limited fields that

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have a cut implement a cut. I think it

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>adds something. It's additive. It introduces some competitiveness to the

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>event and makes it not feel like a WGC where

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>guys are climbing from T sixty one to T forty

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>eight on Sunday that really don't need to be on

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the golf course. So I think people are really gonna

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>like that cut line this week at Riviera, and it's

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>something I'm excited about. I think the signature event should

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have a cut line. So that's what I'm in on.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I almost went with this also, This was almost what

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I was in on, but I completely agree the other thing.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>The other advantage we're seeing it this week as the

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 3>waste management is barreling into the Super Bowl. As we

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 3>record this segment of this podcast, it is it is on.

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought this was gonna be over. I thought we

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 3>were going to be done with this. But you know,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 3>when you have a big field in eighty players on

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 3>a weekend is a big field. That's what they cut

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 3>to on the PGA Tour, they cut actually off into

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 3>less than eighty players. So the signature events often feature

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>more players of the weekend than a regular event. So

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>cutting it down to fifty it gives you a lot

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of flexibility. You can withstand weather delay, you can move

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 3>tea times around easier.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that makes the product way better,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and Gary touched on this is t time spacing and

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>number of players. So if you could go to Twosome's

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and space it out twelve minutes, it makes the pace

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 3>of play the product better. This is a big I

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 3>completely agree one thing I'm in on, and this is

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 3>reactive to yesterday's telecast. It's just trying new things with

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the telecasts. I thought that Kissner and Smiley on sixteen

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>were wonderful. It was just like a nice different thing,

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think the key to this is not being

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 3>locked in and can in like they're gonna look at

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>this and be like, we can do this all over

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the place. We should do this everywhere, and it's that's

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 3>not the takeaway here. The key here is that this

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 3>worked really well at this event because it fit this event,

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Like the whole atmosphere of sixteen lends itself so well

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 3>to that that little broadcast snippet like them sitting there

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 3>talking it through, talking about the atmosphere, all the things

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>that went into that, it works so well right there.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>The key to this idea is finding something like that

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 3>at every event across the board, and it's not always

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>going to be the same thing, so that that style

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 3>might work well a few other places on the PGA

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 3>tour where there's holes that have a similar atmosphere or

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 3>stakes you know, that tie to it. The other key

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 3>is finding different formats of that type of idea, like

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a different broadcast, different formats of it that fit, you know,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>another specific of at riviera. Maybe it's people sitting and

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>talking about ten or another hole. Right, just change it up,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 3>try new stuff. But I loved the initiative to try

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>something new.

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you Andy, not to be negative. I

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think there was a little sacrifice on some of the

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>shots from the players in contention, So I had a

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a problem with that on Saturday Night.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But Smiley and Kevin Kissner themselves were great, and I

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>loved that feed and seeing all those shots on sixteen,

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a balance there, like also need

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to show the shots from the players in contention, But

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, that was a great feed.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a unique situation also. I mean,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 3>like Saturday of that event's always going to be about sixteen,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>but there's also the unique situation of like the weather delays, Right,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>what are you out on?

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be an old person yelling at

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cloud take Andy, but you're not even old. I know

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what's crazy about it. But I am out on

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>celebrating drunkenness, specifically at the Waste Management Phoenix Open. These

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>videos of people like falling over drunk on the cart path.

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this year's Phoenix Open got a little out

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of control. And when you kind of the brand of

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Phoenix Open, I think they do a lot of

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>things right. So my favorite events of the year, but

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the more that the rowdiness is celebrated. I think it

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>attracts a certain type of person and things maybe got

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit out of control this year. I love

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the Phoenix Open. I've been I was drinking.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for it, but I think some of the

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like the viral clips of people peeing on themselves and stuff.

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if we cut back on some of that, we

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>won't have as many fans yelling at players and taken

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>away from some of the events. So I'm out on that.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about that?

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 3>Andy, I've thought about this a lot, and I just

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 3>think this is just in general, the natural progression of

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the way these things work, right, is that you get

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 3>an identity. Everybody finds out how cool it is, and

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>it's super fun. It's a party atmosphere. It's unique to

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>the tour, and the tour leaned into it. And I

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>don't have like a problem with them leaning into it.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>But this is the natural progression of how these things work.

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I went to the University of Illinois. It's known for

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>its unofficial Saint Patrick's Day Party. It was a big

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 3>deal when I was there. I think it's still a

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 3>big deal now, but it was like this day, it

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>was a Friday, everybody just got wasted and it you know, listen,

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I partaked, I enjoyed it. But every year you're there,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>it gets a little bit worse because you get more

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 3>and more people come from in from out of town. More.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>It becomes less and less of a homegrown type event.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's one of the things that happens here,

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 3>is like with this, with the with waste management, it's

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 3>just evolved into this and and what it is is

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>that people come in from all over the country to

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 3>party and celebrate, and it's less about like this is

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Phoenix's event, right. It's people that come in there. It's

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 3>their expectation. They treat it like a bachelor party day.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know, this is just the natural progression that's

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. And it happens with all sorts of things.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 3>It happens with golf course design, where you know, once

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>you say, oh, we're going to start, you know, narrowing

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>fairways and growing rough like one course does it, one

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 3>course does it a little bit more, one course does

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>it a little bit more. This is the way society works.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know where you go from here. If

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 3>you're the waste management, it clearly did. I had some

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 3>friends that were on site, had an awesome time, but

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 3>they they're like, you know, they cut off alcohol sales

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 3>that I talked to. One of them talked to a

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>police officer that said that like one hundred and thirty

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>people were taken out on stretchers. I don't know how

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>you rein this back in because the PGA tour has

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>leaned so far into what it is that it seems

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 3>very hard. I don't know what to do. I'm glad

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't have to decide this, but yes, this is

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 3>just what happens. The things that are deemed cool is

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that this is they get they spiral out of control.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 3>That was a long winded answer.

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>No, Look, I agree with you. I think a lot

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of things about it are great, right, like even having

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a party identity is fine. But I think it's gotten

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a little out of control, and I agree with you.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly what you do to reign it

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>back in, But all right, Andy, what are you out on?

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I you know, I so respect low scorers, I love them,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>but I just am gonna say that the number the

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>scorers in the fifties no longer has the same cachet

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>that it used to. We saw a fifty seven from

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Crystobauld Dell Solaire on the corn Ferry Tour this week.

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 3>We've just seen, you know, like this year has been

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 3>low score after low score after low scorer. Obviously Joaquin

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Neeman shot fifty nine the week before on Live Tour.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 3>You know sixties that we saw sixties from Wyndham Clark

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>at Pebble Beach. It's just not it's it's like saying,

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, I would use this to to like, these

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 3>are major League Baseball records that are being broken on

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 3>a little league field, you know. So I don't think

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 3>he had hit much more than a dgend any hole.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>The the I guess the ability for a golf course

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 3>is to defend themselves against the moundern player or at

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>an all time low you know, some equipment modifications and

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>rollbacked or coming. I don't really think it's going to

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 3>do much of anything. This might be just the new

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 3>era and I'm just out on it being a huge

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 3>deal because I just think it is. It is what

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 3>it is in today's era of golf. Your thoughts, I

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>agree with you, Andy. The Corn Ferry Tour ones were

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a special circumstance because it was a

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 3>short golf course at altitude. But a score is just

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 3>a number on a card at this point. Getting put

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 3>on fifty nine watch that used to be rare fun

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 3>and now it means basically nothing. Like I don't get

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>excited by it anymore. I think the baseball analogy's appropriate. Also,

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 3>NBA players scoring fifty, like, we've seen a huge increase

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 3>in that this year to where it's no longer as

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 3>noteworthy when somebody puts up fifty points. So yeah, scoring

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>is all relative. I don't get excited by it either.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think, especially this year, you're going to see

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of low scores, like I think we're in

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>for over the next year or two some really low

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>scores until there's a rollback. And I agree with you

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>that even once once the rollback happens, it's not going

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>to have that significant of an impact.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm with you. I'm out on that too.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's get to Gary Young, But first let's

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>talk about our friends from the USGA and the the

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>USGA Greed Section, which has been helping golf facilities provide

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 3>better playing conditions for over one hundred years. When you

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 3>schedule a course consulting visit with the USGA agronomist, you'll

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>get more than just an expert in grond me. You'll

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 3>get a trusted partner who's familiar with your region and

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>your course conditions. USGA agronomus can help you formulate a

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 3>plan to communicate to your course leadership, staff and golfers,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and they can also help you plan and prioritize your

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 3>resources more effectively. USGA consultants can provide an unbiased assessment

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 3>of your course maintenance and reservation needs, so you can

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 3>assure you're getting the trusted advice you need to make

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 3>key maintenance decisions. Book a course consulting visit by March

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>thirty first, and you'll receive five hundred dollars off your

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 3>first visit. That's not an inconsequential amount of money. So

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 3>that's five hundred dollars off your first visit. And for

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 3>more information on how to schedule a visit, go to

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 3>USGA dot org slash green section dash CCS. That's USGA

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>dot org slash green section dash CCS. All right, thanks

0:12:53.400 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 3>to the USGA, and let's get to Gary Young. All right, Gary,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 3>thank you for coming on. I would love to hear

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 3>about how someone becomes a rules official. How do you

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>become the head referee for PGA Tour event? How does

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>that even come about? How does your life take you here?

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's probably probably well, first of all, thanks for

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>having me on. It's probably the most common question that

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>we get asked by fans that are walking by and

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>see the rules official sticker on the front of the

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 2>golf cart. They're always like, how do you become one

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>of those? That sounds like something I'm interested in? I said, yeah,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>it looks like fun right now, but it has its moments.

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, everyone on our team comes from various backgrounds.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Number one, most of us have either work have either

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>been golf professionals at some point in the past, whether

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>we were PGA of America members. Couple members of our

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>team were actually members of the PGA Tour who later

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>in their career decided to pursue being rules official, which

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>is really I think that's important. It's always great to

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 2>have a player's point of view on our committee. To

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 2>someone like Mark Duce Bobbik, who does our television rules

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 2>analyst role. And Mark was actually a middle linebacker for

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the Minnesota Vikings. How about that. So, you know it's

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>something that just post football career, he really dedicated himself.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>He got involved in state and section associations, got a

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of experience in administration of golf, got educated on

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the rules, long extensive education on the rules, and eventually

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>was hired later by Mark Russell. So, you know, we

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 2>have a very very bad grounds that everyone comes from.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what makes us special.

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you guys? Is there like a test? You know,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 3>financial advisors have to take a series seven? Is a

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Is there some sort of tests that you have to

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 3>study for and then upkeep at certain times Like I'm

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 3>just that's something I've always wondered.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, yes. We all started out by having to

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>score very well on the USGA PGA of America. They

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 2>do a joint rules workshop. You intend to workshop for

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>about a week. It's a very extensive dive into the

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 2>rules of golf and how to interpret the rules of golf,

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and then you take one hundred question exam and have

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>to score exceptionally well on that to be considered so

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and then also it's just continually, like any other profession,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the continuing education and we are constantly doing a deep

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 2>dive into the rules of golf as they happen across

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 2>all the major tours. We share with one another, rulings

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that we have, we talk about them in depth so

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>that we have a better understanding of everything.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a favorite obscure rule or ruling, like,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 3>is there one that that sticks out like that?

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That's literally I was gonna ask Andy, meaning about the

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>if you have a golf ball in your pocket and

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you mark your ball, and you put it the ball

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that you just marked in your pocket and then marked

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the exact same way. Gary, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but if you're not sure which one you were using,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe that is a lost ball.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>And that was I think that comes more into play

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>when we have a ball in play right right, and

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>we hit one and we haven't marked it, and we

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 2>get out there and maybe we hit a provisional that's

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the same exact ball, same exact marking. Yeah, that would

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>be a situation where if you truly could not tell

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 2>which one was the first one in play, you know

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 2>that particular that first one is deemed to be lost.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, so it's always a good idea to mark

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 2>your golf balls differently, for sure.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Would you then have to hit a third t shot

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 3>if say you hit a provisional now.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>In that situation. I'm trying to remember the exact interpretation

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>on that one, but I believe the second the second

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 2>ball would become the ball and play.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 3>But if you can't, if you don't know one, you'd be.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Hitting your If you couldn't be hit, couldn't tell either,

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 2>or you know, you would be hitting your fourth shot

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 2>now from from the fair way.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I remember reading it within the context

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of marking your ball on the green and like putting

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it in your pocket and then you're not sure because

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>you have two balls in your pocket. And I was

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>just a crazy situation that probably doesn't come up. Do

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a personal fear obscure one?

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I really don't. I really don't. They are all they

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 2>all have their challenge is at times. So that's why

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>we have a committee. And you know, when you're out

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>there and you get in a situation like that one

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you just threw at me, I mean, you know, it's

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 2>so weird, it's so unusual for something like that to happen.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I would throw that out to the entire committee for

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone's feedback, to make sure that we get the call right.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>And as a matter of fact, I would say, okay, guys,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 2>before I close this out this ruling, is there anyone

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 2>else that's thinking differently than what we've just heard, Because

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes there's someone sitting there really thinking about it and

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 2>there's some small little thing that the committee's not thinking about.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>So we have had situations like that, and that's why

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>it's important that there are eight of us, nine of

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>us there at the course. We truly act as a

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>committee on things.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, Gary, when we resperd to PGA Tour setup, who

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>all would that entail that? That's a big question I have,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>like who all is coordinating maintenance with respect to how

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>long the grass should be green speeds? Can you can

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you explain who all within the PGA Tour orbit that

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>term would encompass.

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So when we talk about setup, we're talking about

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 2>two different things. There is the agronomic setup of the

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 2>golf course, so that would be green speeds, height of

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>cut in all of the different areas of the golf course.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the other portion of setup, which is

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 2>handled that week of the competition. And I can talk

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about both. So the first part, the

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 2>agronomic setup. That's really something that is set up by

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the chief referee and the advanced rules official for each event.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So we have a person that travels to the golf

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 2>course a week in advance and his or her job

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 2>is to prepare the golf course for competition. They work

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 2>with our ronomist and the local superintendent or director of

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 2>agronomy at a facility and they make sure that everything

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>that we have. You know, from years of experience playing

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 2>at a venue, we know what optimal conditions are for

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that particular venue. Maybe the height of cut at three

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>inches is perfect for that golf course given the grass type.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Maybe at another place it might be two inches because

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>it's bermuda grass. And you know, each type of grass

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 2>represents a different issue at different heights of cut. Same

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 2>thing with height of fairway, speed of greens, it really

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>depends upon the architecture of the golf course. You know

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>last week at Pebble Beach, that's a really challenging set

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 2>of greens to find quality whole locations. Once the greens

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>get above a certain speed, we knew we had big

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 2>wins coming in last week, so we actually backed off

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the green speeds. Our target speed was between eleven and

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a half and twelve. We actually backed it off closer

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to just below eleven, which now allows us to go

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 2>into some more slopier areas. But again, we were trying

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to get high and dry. We were trying to put

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the whole locations up where moisture wouldn't shut us down

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and we could keep playing golf. So that was the

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>bonus of being at lower green speeds. Everyone always thinks, oh,

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 2>fast green speeds, that's the challenge, not really, you know,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 2>if you want to go to some of these really

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>quality whole locations on an old golf course, we need

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>those green speeds to be lower.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that a tough conversation just you know, you hear

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 3>PGA tour players talk about when they go to the

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>say the Open Championship, and they say always talk about, oh,

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 3>the greens are slower than I'm used to. There's a period.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 3>Is it hard to have a little bit slower greens

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>when you have, like I'm thinking in my head, Sedgefield

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 3>as a great example where the greens have is an

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 3>old golf course. It's a Donald Ross design that has

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of slope and it's one of the one

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 3>of the places I feel like you see four footers

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 3>with the most break you'd see anywhere on tour. Is

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 3>it a hard thing to accomplish with players that are

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>used to act speed.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's an interesting comment because we don't try. We

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 2>are definitely not a cookie cutter tour, meaning we're not

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 2>looking to be twelve every week. We're not looking to

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>be you know, three inch height of rough. It really

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>is driven by the architecture of the golf course. You

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Sedgefield, that's a great example of a very challenging

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 2>set of greens, and we just know historically if we

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>if we have the green speeds too high, can really

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>lose quality whole locations, ones that are going to challenge

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>the player on their approach shot to the green. And

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>so almost like when we become too fast on a

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>set of greens, we tend to have to go towards

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the green with the whole locations, and

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>you don't get the variation in whole locations you're looking for. So,

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, you mentioned the Open Championship that they do

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>a great job with their golf course setup and some

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 2>of the most challenging whole locations. I'm always you know,

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>when I'm walking with a group at the Open Championship,

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm always looking at Hoss saying, wow, I mean if

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 2>we try that on the PGA Tour. But their green

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>speeds are such that they can go to those places, so,

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think that makes a lot of sense.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think your original question to players, do they

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 2>mind it? Yeah, I mean they have to make adjustments

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>to you know, that their stroke for sure. You know,

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes if it's a little on the slower side, you

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 2>have to pop it a little bit more than just

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that normal flowing stroke that they have kind of week

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 2>in and week out. So I think it's tougher to

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>use the aim point that way.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about the agronomics part of the setup, and

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>then you'd mentioned there being the other piece of the setup.

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if you can elaborate that on that And one

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>question I had is what is the PGA Tour's goal

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with setup and in your opinion, what are the ingredients

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>of a proper PGA Tour test. So maybe if you

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>want to take those questions in whatever order you see fit.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>The goal of any PGA Tour event any day is

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>to try to set up the most difficult course we

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>can yet fair, difficult yet fair. We're trying to challenge

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the best players in the world. You see some events

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>where the numbers are are high, you know, like it's

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 2>you know high meaning under par. Seems like the guys

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 2>are shooting lights out there. Well certain venues just you know,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 2>they don't have maybe the challenge of some of something

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 2>like a Tory Pines or a pebble beach or other

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>places where you can kind of ratchet things down a

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit by having tougher whole locations. So our goal

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 2>every day is difficult yet fair given the day's conditions.

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 2>So we have two setup guys each week, or we

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 2>also have women, so I shouldn't just say guys, but

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 2>we have two set up people each week, and their

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>job is to communicate with one another on how they're

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 2>setting up their nine each day. One's doing the front,

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 2>one's doing the back. They want to make sure they

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 2>have four different clubs in the player's hands on par three's.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Usually a golf course has four of them, so we're

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>looking for variety, variety in the whole location and shot shape.

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>We're also looking for variety in the yardage. So the

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.719
<v Speaker 2>goal is to have four different clubs in their hands,

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>and then throughout the golf course, just balance between right,

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>right hand, left hand, whole locations front, middle, back. You're

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 2>looking at it so that when a player looks at

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 2>a whole location sheet, they see nice balance and it

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>almost looks like one person is setting up the golf

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>course rather than two distinct ones. And that's something that

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>we work hard at is, you know, working with the staff,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 2>and they do a great job. Already. We have a

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 2>really terrific staff and they understand golf and they've been

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 2>doing it a long time, so they know how to

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 2>set up a challenging course, but really looking for that

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 2>balance so that doesn't appear that it's two distinct people

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 2>setting it up.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I could ask you a million questions on

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>pin locations alone. One that maybe a couple parts to

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this question, but something I always think about how the

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>golf course plays in the morning versus how it plays

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>when it gets a little firmer in the afternoon, and

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>how wind interacts with that. So can you maybe talk

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about some of those considerations, And for example,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are you trying to get similar difficulty on Thursday and

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Friday because you have players who play one morning one

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>afternoon and maybe how you change that over the course

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of the four days. So again a few questions that

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I just threw at you, but very interested in how

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that impacts pin locations and what you're trying to accomplish.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, those are really good questions. You know, you are

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 2>trying to keep the golf course a little more balanced.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 2>For sure, on Thursday and Friday, each player is going

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 2>to have a chance to play in the morning in

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon wave, and you hope to keep the conditions

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 2>as similar as possible. You're looking to strike that balance

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>because weather oftentimes doesn't allow that, so you're factoring that

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 2>into your decision making, and you're always setting up for

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the worst conditions that are going to be faced. So

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>what might appear to be an easy set up in

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>the morning for the guys playing in the morning, you're

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 2>really trying to keep it fair for the guys in

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon who are going to face maybe high winds

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>or a driving rain or something like that. So you're

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 2>always thinking about equity, and that's what the most important

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>function of rules committee is to keep the event as

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>equitable as possible, the competition equitable. And then again, you

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>know there's some places that are just a challenge. You know,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 2>we go to places with high altitude. I can always

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 2>remember we used to play out in Reno and the

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>golf course we played there, we had to really water

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the heck out of it overnight, and the guys would

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>always complain about how how damp it was in the morning,

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>and yet in the afternoon it was rock hard. And

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>it was like, well, if we don't get it damp

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 2>in the morning, guess what, it's gonna be dead by

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the afternoon. It's going to look like all these mountains

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 2>around us where there's no vegetation. We are in the

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>middle of an arid area where moisture is needed. So

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you're always trying to strike that balance. You don't want

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>it to be too soft for the guys in the morning,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>but you got to give it enough moisture to get

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>it through the day.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Over your time at the PGA Tour, how would you

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 3>say that setup has evolved both from the aspect of

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 3>player revolution they're hitting it further, but also from an

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>agronomic standpoint. Never is agronomy bet better. Never have we

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 3>been able to push courses to the same standard as

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 3>we can today.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you're hitting on a good point there,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 2>because distance is something that we hear about all the time,

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 2>and although I don't disagree, people are hitting it a

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 2>little bit further each year, and we see that the

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>athletes are getting bigger and stronger every year. The ability

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>for them to talk to to fine tune their equipment

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>is getting better and better with the use of track

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Man data, so they're optimizing everything about their equipment. But

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 2>going to the agronomic side, there's no doubt that our

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>agronomy team for sure has gotten better and better at

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>providing just outstanding conditions and that has an impact on

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 2>distance as well, no doubt about it. We've been mowing

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>fairways at lower tolerances for sure, constantly asking courses to

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 2>dry it down because our players want firm, fast conditions

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's what we try to provide each week. So

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>that has a big has a lot to do with

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the distance debate. Is part of it is the data

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>that's coming from our tour is being driven by just

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 2>superior conditions week in and week out. I guarantee it

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>last week that stop and wet mess we played in

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the distance was not a big factor because balls were

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 2>hitting and stopping right there, So that would be a

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 2>week that would skew the numbers severely.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 3>In terms of your stance. You were just kind of

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 3>talking about tests early on. What do you see from

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>your chair on the best way to test the modern

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 3>PGA tour player.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Probably the best way is to have a challenging set

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of greens. This is just my take on it from

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 2>watching it play out. It's all about I think architecture

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>where water is able to leave the green, it doesn't

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of shots that hit close to the green tend

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to get repelled away from the green if they're not precise,

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 2>rather than architecture that almost rewards a shot that's maybe

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 2>hit just a little more offline, hit something and ricochet's

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>back onto the green. So if I were designing a

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>course to challenge the best players right now, it would

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>all be about precision on iron shots into the green

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and then of course a nice challenging set of greens

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't have severe slopes, but just subtle, subtle features

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>that are very difficult for the player to read. And

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I noticed that our players love the older

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>courses as opposed to some of the modern courses, and

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of that has to do with

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 2>some of the most classic designs that you think of.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Probably some of your favorite courses were built in a

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>period where and most of those courses were built by hand,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 2>by horse and plow and labor, you know, manual labor

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 2>with rakes, and they get all those fine little details

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 2>that you really have to search for with your eye.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not so obvious as you know nowadays with some

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of the larger dozers and things like that that they use.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It's I think there are certain architects in the modern

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>era that that tend to be able to provide that

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 2>same type feel that I'm talking about some of the

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 2>classic courses.

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I agree, like there is a thing where when you're

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 3>not sure, it seems like it's hard. When the guys

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>struggle the most when they can't really tell which way

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 3>a putt breaks right and they think it might be

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 3>on the right edge, and then it moves just a

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 3>fraction to the right instead, and that's what kind of

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 3>flummoxes them. It gets the it gets that Pete's I quote.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 3>It gets them thinking right, you win, right, I get

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 3>them thinking from your perspective, and obviously this is all opinion.

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the older courses because of history, also

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 3>get away with a little bit more severity in features

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>because that's the way it's always been, versus when you

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.399
<v Speaker 3>go to say a newer venue or a course that's

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 3>been renovated in something news introduced that's different from what

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 3>it used to be.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you're hitting on a good one there. You know,

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>if you show up the US Open and it's being

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.800
<v Speaker 2>played at Wingfoot, where that can have some crazy features,

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>right th.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I feel like those screens wouldn't work at like TPC Scottsdale.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I think if someone showed up and someone had just

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 2>designed that golf course or that set of greens complexes,

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the players would probably be, you know, saying some nasty

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 2>things about it. But yeah, you do tend to just

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 2>accept some of the older architecture. And I think that

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 2>the guys understand that, you know, those greens were designed

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 2>when the golf ball well just wasn't rolling at the

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 2>speeds that that we have greens rolling at now. So

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 2>there is a balance there. And again, you know, I

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>think the USGA does a great job. They do a

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>great job setting up the US Open each year. I

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 2>think we enjoy, you know, the challenge they present and

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 2>they've been nice enough to have us there, uh with them,

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>just asking questions as they're as they're setting up, but

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 2>they do an outstanding job presenting a good challenge.

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, while we're here, I you know, one the the

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 3>course of what you were discussed discussing about testing the

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 3>world's best, it sounded a lot like Pinehurst number two

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>greens that repel with kind of subtle slopes in them.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 3>But while we're on the major championship setup stuff. You know,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you you attend majors, you were, you work majors. How

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 3>do you kind of look when you look at take

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a step back and look at those setups versus the

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 3>PGA Tour setups. How do you think they differ? How

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 3>do you think they're similar. I'd just be curious in

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 3>your perspective of majors versus the setups that you guys

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 3>do as your for your organization.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, first and foremost, it starts with the ability

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to nail down some of the some of the most

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 2>iconic venues. You know, and when you are bringing a

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>major championship to some of the most iconic venues in

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 2>our country, sometimes they're willing to host those events. You know,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously they're more open to it. So it starts with

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>the quality of the architecture, and that is one thing

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 2>it seems like they get right every year, and then

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 2>the ability to create a firm, fast condition. So this

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 2>year at Pinehurst, it should. You know, everything tells you

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that that place should at that time of year be paying, playing,

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 2>firm and fast and has the architectural value to really

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 2>challenge the best players in the world. Now. I think

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 2>another venue that they played recently a US Open was

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the country Club and Brookline and everyone was wondering, well,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 2>what's that going to be like, you know, and I

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 2>had no doubt in my mind it was still going

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 2>to present a serious challenge because it had some real

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.920
<v Speaker 2>strength in that those greens complexes, and I knew they

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 2>was going to challenge the guys and they were not

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 2>going to have the memory recall because not many of

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 2>them have played there, and it stood up to be

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 2>a terrific challenge. But a lot of it was they,

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the USGA did a great job setting that

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 2>place up that week, and they had us there and

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 2>they asked a lot of questions and I respect them

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 2>for that because we're with the players week in week out,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that they even asked our opinion. You know,

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 2>we're flattered by that and we're proud to be part

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 2>of our our national championship. We probably have more input

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 2>at the US Open with them than than any other major, which,

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, but I respect all of the organizations that

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:25.959
<v Speaker 2>run them, and I think they do a great job

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 2>presenting a really tough challenge. I mean, sometimes it can

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 2>have our players scratching their heads, but you know what,

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 2>it always it's fair. It's not it's not across the line.

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 2>They do a good job of keeping things in check.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 3>Now, So I imagine you kind of look at them

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 3>and think, oh, how nice it must be to be

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 3>able to like really focus in on one event for

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, for a long period of time. But on

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 3>the flip side, they look at you guys, and it's like, God,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 3>it must be nice to do this every week.

0:38:58.960 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, I don't think that we can push things

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:10.400
<v Speaker 2>sometimes as hard as they do. They're not gonna be

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna be facing the players week in and

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>week out, There's no doubt about it. But yeah, that

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.239
<v Speaker 2>is a luxury. I wish I had that luxury of

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 2>just doing it once a year, but they all do

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 2>a good job. Carrie Haig from the PGA of America

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 2>does an outstanding job every year, and you know you

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>would think that I would hear criticism, but never do.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he just does a great job.

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Gary, going back to one of your answers from a

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>couple questions ago about what an ideal test is and

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.719
<v Speaker 1>when you hit a shot that's not perfectly struck, it

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>repels away. I think you're not to put words in

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>your mouth, but kind of getting at the relationship between

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting a shot online and experiencing a consequence, and with that,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think a hot topic always on social media that

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your perspective on is t i

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I relief where there's there are infrastructural requirements of a

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour event and any professional golf event, but oftentimes

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hit a shot offline and you're able to get a

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>free drop, not experience as much of a consequence as

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe fans on social media. I'd count myself in this

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>camp I would like to see. Curious for your perspective

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>on TiO relief. Is it? Are there solutions? Do you

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's a problem on tour? I'd just love to

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>get the PGA Tour's perspective on that subject.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you you know, it's an important part

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:40.399
<v Speaker 2>of it, right, these tournaments run, they raise a lot

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 2>of money for charity, you know, and and we sell

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 2>those venues, and it's an important part of the formula

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 2>of a successful PGA Tour event. We're trying to get

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 2>people close to the action, especially sometimes on the closing

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>holes of an event. That's it's important that all those

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 2>structures are there. Not to mention that our own infrastructure

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 2>to provide data for everything right now in the sport,

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 2>whether it be gaming, whether it be our broadcasts, all

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 2>there's things popping up all over the golf course. So

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 2>when you go and play a golf course as the

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 2>average player, you don't encounter all these things. And we

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 2>certainly can't punish the players for ending up in an

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:35.399
<v Speaker 2>area where something is on their line of play, so

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 2>we do. I mentioned the advance official. The advance official

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 2>works almost year round with an event, working with the

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 2>proper placement of everything on the golf course. He's trying

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to strike a balance between the location of a structure

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 2>from an entertainment standpoint and then also from the design

0:41:56.880 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 2>of the golf course and trying to protect the design

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 2>features the golf course. You don't want to have structures

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 2>right up right up against the eighteenth green where it's

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 2>almost creating a backboard. And I think that's probably what

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you're getting at is, you know, it's a balance there.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So we're always asking more room, more room, and unfortunately

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 2>some venues don't provide enough room for all these things.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>So as upset as the home viewer may be getting,

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's within the rules of the game and

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 2>they don't have to encounter all of these things when

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 2>they play a golf course. It presents challenges, good and bad.

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, sometimes it does reward the player, and if

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 2>we've placed something wrong and it happens to player gets

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 2>rewarded for that, you know, we're making notes of that

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and we'll make darn shore next year that same thing

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't located there. But it's it's a balance. We're always

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to provide an entertainment vehicle for all of you

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>to see at home, and at the same time, you know,

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 2>we've got to have the ability to entertain people on

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 2>site and provide data for all those other folks.

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot, there's a lot to balance. I

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>know one thing I've seen at major championships in the past,

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this has happened that PGA Tour venues, is

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they'll have a designated drop area that's like a

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>bad lie. Whether it's a little bit of fescue or something.

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that something that the PGA Tour has considered, or

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>are there any counterbalancing solutions to the backboarding issue for example?

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh, We've always we have always shied away from drop

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 2>zones or drop areas because quite frankly, we just believe

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:55.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a rule in place that that keeps the ball

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 2>in a more similar area to where where struck. You know,

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 2>where it was lying. So we would rather operate off

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the TiO local rule rather than bring a player to

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 2>the nearest drop zone and have them all playing from

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:16.319
<v Speaker 2>within there and creating divots in there and everything every

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 2>other possibility. We just believe there's a rule in place,

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>and we all understand it, and we have we're very

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>comfortable operating under it. I think it's more the home

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 2>viewer that doesn't understand sometimes what we're doing. But you know,

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it's not always creating an easy up and down situation.

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it creates a worse situation than the player would

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:45.839
<v Speaker 2>have been facing if that thing wasn't there. So yeah,

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 2>this plus is and minuses. I think everyone just gets

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 2>upset when they see a player somehow get rewarded for

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 2>hitting a bad shot. And I get that.

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I get that you're referencing with a lot of the

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that's out on tour. Shot link towers, for example,

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are a big part of that. And I'm curious, does

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour what is PJ Tour setups relationship with data?

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Are you looking at certain scoring averages and hoping that

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a certain distribution of birdies and bogies on

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>particular holes based on how you've set it up? Are

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you evaluating a setup based on some of the data

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're getting back. Just curious what your relationship is

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>with data and maybe how that's changed since you've been

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the PJ Tour.

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:34.919
<v Speaker 2>We we've come a long way and we're good. It's

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:37.720
<v Speaker 2>only going to get better. We're doing a deeper dive

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>into the data all the time. And you know that's

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 2>one thing that we the PGA Tour has made a

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:49.959
<v Speaker 2>huge investment in data through shot link and shot link

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.240
<v Speaker 2>has been a huge help for us in our daily

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 2>setup of the golf course and our planning. And you know,

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 2>I talked about our setup team and their ability to

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:04.399
<v Speaker 2>take a deep dive into the data, looking at when

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the whole location is in this section of the green

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 2>in this wind direction. They can look back at the

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 2>data and they can see where the shot dispersion pattern

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 2>was off of the tee. They can make adjustments based

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 2>on all that data, thousands and thousands of shots that

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 2>are being struck. And it's almost getting to the point

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 2>where I think in the future we can actually select

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 2>a golf course and almost have the ability to predict

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>what the score is going to be just based on

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, the computer will figure out that whole location

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:47.920
<v Speaker 2>with that wind and do it for each hole and

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 2>almost predict what the average score is going to be

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>and what, you know, what the winning score might be.

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's really a neat tool in our toolbox,

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 2>and it's just just in its infancy right now. We

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 2>are come a long way, and we've got a lot

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>of great people working in the background. The PGA Tour

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 2>has not stopped with everything going on in professional golf.

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I can tell you. The folks at the

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour are hard at work trying to figure out

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>how we can be better and continue to distance ourselves

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 2>from our competition, especially in that end of the business.

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>We are getting stronger and stronger every day.

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a specific example of maybe how data

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 3>changed the way you thought about something with your job

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 3>right where you thought for years And I feel like

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 3>this happens to me all the time with golf data,

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 3>where oh I thought this, but actually this was the case.

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 3>It could be a whole location, it could be you know,

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 3>a way, it could be a variety of things.

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, I think probably where in my day to day

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes we're talking about making changes to golf holes on

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 2>certain courses, and our team now has the ability, through

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 2>all the shot linked data and through all this technology

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that they've developed, before we make the change to the

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 2>golf hole, and if we're thinking of moving a bunker

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 2>or shifting something or bringing the rough line in, they

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 2>can take all of the shot dispersion data and overlay

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that and make the changes to the hole and it

0:48:34.200 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 2>will figure out and simulate what the balls that end

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 2>up in the rough what the average score was, and

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.399
<v Speaker 2>you can see ahead of time, before you spend any

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 2>money making those changes to a golf course, are you

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 2>really going to have the impact that you're looking for? So,

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Players Championship is a great example TPC Sawgrass.

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 2>We are constantly looking at that golf course. How can

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 2>we present a better challenge to that golf course? And

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not just distance oftentimes it's shifting features, slightly changing angles,

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, constantly trying to make the player think out there.

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So before we spend money on it, we can on

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 2>CAD designs they can shift, change things and calculate is

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 2>that worth it? Is it going to change the average

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 2>score for.

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 3>The whole With regards to making changes, especially you know,

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 3>architectural changes at a place, you know with say Stagress

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 3>designed by one of the greatest architects of all time.

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 3>When you're looking at that, are you guys looking at

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 3>pure difficulty? How do we get this average up? Or

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 3>is more the goal to how do we create a

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 3>wider range of outcomes like where where we have more

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 3>low scores but also more high scores.

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well I think you hit on it. We've never

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:05.319
<v Speaker 2>We love the fact that the range of champions at

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 2>TPC Sawgrass is really wide. You know, you have players short,

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 2>short hitters, medium and long, and it's never favored any

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 2>one particular type of player. So that's why we personally

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 2>love the course and we continue to tweak the place.

0:50:24.560 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Pete Die was just an unbelievable architect who challenged you

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:33.880
<v Speaker 2>physically and mentally, and it was important to us that

0:50:34.000 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 2>if as we move forward there at TPC Sawgrass, it

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 2>was important to us that we get player feedback from

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:45.959
<v Speaker 2>people who have played it in the past, and we've

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 2>gotten a lot of feedback, especially from Davis. Davis Love,

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 2>who is now involved in making future adjustments to Pete's design.

0:50:56.040 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely was a big fan of Pete Pete's design

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:06.360
<v Speaker 2>and he's very thoughtful in his own architecture, and we

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 2>thought he was the perfect guy to bring on board.

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:13.520
<v Speaker 2>So he has been really deeply invested in future adjustments

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 2>to the golf course there and making sure that he

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 2>is being true to pete thoughts on how to play

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 2>that golf course. And also Tiger has also had some

0:51:25.680 --> 0:51:31.320
<v Speaker 2>input with Davis. They've talked extensively about how the course

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 2>used to play, and we value their opinion obviously, any

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:38.959
<v Speaker 2>any of the past champions who really want to see

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 2>that golf course be the true challenge.

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Gary, I'm really glad you brought up TPC saw grass

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>because I think one debate I've kind of had with

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:51.000
<v Speaker 1>people recently, what's the best time to play TPC saw grass.

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:54.720
<v Speaker 1>How does it play differently in May versus March. Really

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>interested in your perspective on how it plays differently in

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>March than in it's history, oracles at least where it

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>used to be in May, and what some of the

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.600
<v Speaker 1>differences are in setting up the course firmness levels. Really

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>curious for your perspective on how that moved to March

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:12.919
<v Speaker 1>has changed how TBC sawgrass plays.

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Move move back to March. Joseph might be too might

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 3>be too young to remember the March days before the

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 3>May days.

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Joe's a young one. Huh. I'll be honestly it uh.

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 2>We we had the benefit of knowing how it would

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.720
<v Speaker 2>play in March. We had been playing it in May,

0:52:34.200 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 2>and we're providing a very firm, fast golf course. It

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't quite have the color that it has. It didn't

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 2>have the appeal visually, you know, because the Bermuda was

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 2>still somewhat you know, not coming fully out of dormancy,

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:57.720
<v Speaker 2>and I think that everyone felt that the golf course

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 2>presents itself better in March. Just visually striking the rough

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 2>is certainly a challenge. Still, we have the ability to

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.920
<v Speaker 2>it's all overseed, so we have the ability to beef

0:53:11.960 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 2>the rough up and it's thick and juicy. It's just

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 2>not going to play as firm and fast. So we

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 2>know that the scoring is going to be good, and

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's it's always produced somewhere in that fourteen

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen under par region, somewhere in there, so and

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 2>we're okay with that. We think that at the end

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of a week, we want to see some scoring. It's

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 2>all about the competition itself. Was it a compelling competition.

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's not get focused on how many under par wins

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the tournament. And that's something that I don't like is

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 2>when people start placing, you know, they start saying something

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:56.800
<v Speaker 2>about a venue, they say, oh, they shoot a twenty

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:00.759
<v Speaker 2>something under par there. It's all about the competition. What

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 2>people remember in the end was the exciting finish and

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 2>was it a duel coming down the stretch? Was there

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a playoff? An exciting playoff? I don't think many people

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 2>actually remember what the winning score was, so we don't

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:16.839
<v Speaker 2>get hung up on that.

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.719
<v Speaker 3>I think the whole score things kind of silly if

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 3>you look at how many player you know, Look, when

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Tiger came out, nobody hit the ball over three hundred yards.

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 3>Now half the tour hits the ball over three hundred yards.

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the scoring competition, the scoring conversation is crazy.

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:38.400
<v Speaker 3>It's like, you know, the the quality of a golf

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:42.680
<v Speaker 3>course cannot be determined by what you know. Par is relative.

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Have you, guys ever talked about like dramatically. I know

0:54:46.960 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 3>you've done it in occasions where like TPC Craig Ranch

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 3>went down in par one shot. Have you ever talked

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 3>about going to like a par sixty eight for one

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 3>week and just seeing how what the general reaction would be.

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. We've just discovered us doing that. There

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 2>are times where we look at a par say there's

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 2>a par five, and when you look at the end

0:55:08.320 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of the week and the average for that hole is

0:55:12.200 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 2>four point zero or four point one, that's really a

0:55:16.000 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 2>par four for our players. You know on the card

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a par five. So there have been times where

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.280
<v Speaker 2>we have we've changed the par value on a hole.

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 2>But when we do that, we want to make sure

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 2>that the green is one that is receptive to a

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 2>long club being hit to it, so that we can

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 2>truly call it a par four and have the players

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 2>have it feel like it's a true par four. They

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 2>understand hitting a longer club. In where they get critical

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 2>is when it's a green that was really designed to

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:52.440
<v Speaker 2>receive a wedge and where and they're hitting you know,

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 2>long clubs to it.

0:55:54.480 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 3>I've done some research on this subject and if you

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 3>go back to when par was created in nineteen tens,

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 3>it was determined that a par five was a hole

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 3>that is reached with three shots by an expert player,

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 3>that would be the normal. And my question with that

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 3>is like, are there actually you know, we just saw

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 3>it with pebble stopping. We pebble guys hitting irons into fourteen,

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 3>which has traditionally been one of the few real three

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 3>shot par fives on tour. My question is is it,

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do par fives really even exist in the

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:29.720
<v Speaker 3>pro game today?

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 2>It's it's there's not many. There's not many that require

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 2>three shots anymore. Let's let's be honest, you know. So

0:56:39.440 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that's where sometimes our whole locations on that particular hole

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:48.080
<v Speaker 2>will be challenging, knowing that they are going to be

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 2>somewhere up there around the green flipping a wedge. Well,

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:53.279
<v Speaker 2>the balance is going to be urine and have a

0:56:53.320 --> 0:56:56.839
<v Speaker 2>really difficult up and down to achieve a birdy there.

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 2>You know that should should mean something, so but yeah,

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 2>they just it's a function of the game and how

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 2>it's evolved. And you're right, there aren't many that they

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:09.880
<v Speaker 2>don't reach into anymore.

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Gary. In terms of sports leagues, PGA Tour other sports

0:57:15.360 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 1>leagues as well, modernizing, one hot topic is always pace

0:57:19.440 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of play, speeding the game up. You know, Major League

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Baseball recently implemented a pitch clock. You are uniquely positioned

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to just discuss some of the complications in implementing a

0:57:31.800 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>shot clock in golf. It's something that gets thrown around

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Really curious for your perspective on the difficulties

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of implementing a solution like a shot clock and kind

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of how what the tour stance is on that right now.

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 2>And I'll forgive you guys for the pop shots that

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 2>you take at us once in a while about our

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 2>lack of addressing pace of play. But honestly, I so.

0:57:56.120 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 3>It takes a long It's a big commitment to watch golf.

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we hear. Don't worry. I'm being honest with you, guys.

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:11.320
<v Speaker 2>It's all about having the ability to spread the groups out. Okay,

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:16.880
<v Speaker 2>it's spreading the tea time intervals out, and clubs across

0:58:17.000 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 2>America would help the pace of their own pace of

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 2>play by creating more space. What happens is when the

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 2>fields get large, then we get one hundred and fifty

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.360
<v Speaker 2>six players in a field. We've got to have t

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 2>time intervals so close together. And then, as you just said,

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 2>par fives really are all reachable, right, so you can

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 2>almost assure yourself that every par five is going to

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 2>have a weight. So now you've got four weights occurring

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 2>throughout the golf course, and with all of them starting

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 2>so close to one another, and knowing that these weights

0:58:56.280 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 2>are occurring, how do you time anyone? You know, It's

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 2>just you kind of lose your ability, and the slower

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 2>players can tend to hide in those situations, they don't

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:11.959
<v Speaker 2>stand out as much. When we get to situations where

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 2>our fields are smaller and we can spread the tea

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:18.880
<v Speaker 2>times out, you see the results in the pace of play.

0:59:19.000 --> 0:59:22.439
<v Speaker 2>The pace of play suddenly goes from north to five

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 2>hours to suddenly now we're playing about four hours and

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 2>forty five minutes, which for professional golf and everything they're

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 2>playing for is acceptable. This is not some round of

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 2>golf that you're playing on a weekend with your buddies.

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:39.600
<v Speaker 2>These guys are playing for their lives. And we all

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 2>know that we have a system in place that I

0:59:44.480 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 2>firmly believe in through the shot Link system, and it

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:54.280
<v Speaker 2>tracks average shot time data on each player. We have

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 2>moved to that system rather than and yet we will

0:59:59.480 --> 1:00:02.000
<v Speaker 2>still t groups if they fall out of position with

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the groups ahead of them. They all have a responsibility

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 2>to stay in position with the group ahead of them,

1:00:08.040 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 2>and we will warn groups and we will time groups.

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>But the bigger thing is the slowest players on the

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour are going to end up paying fines at

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>the end of the year if they set themselves apart

1:00:24.760 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>from the rest and they and they don't. You know,

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I've always said to the slower players when when they

1:00:32.640 --> 1:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>get a what we call an ast infraction. So at

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the end of each event, there's an average time to

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>hit a shot. The slowest basically the slowest five percent

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>ends up getting an ast infraction if they get ten.

1:00:51.200 --> 1:00:54.360
<v Speaker 2>During the course of the year, fines start to kick

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in and it starts to accumulate quickly, and we don't

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:04.919
<v Speaker 2>discuss that publicly with anyone the amounts, but they're hefty amounts,

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>and what it is, it's just encouraging people to play.

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>We're looking like cars on a highway. We don't want

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.080
<v Speaker 2>people going one hundred and we want people going forty.

1:01:16.280 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>We're looking for everyone traveling right around sixty five seventy

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>miles per hour going down the highway. And if everyone's

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>spaced the same, traffic flows nicely. Things are gonna happen

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>during a round of golf. We're gonna have lost balls,

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have rulings. These are things that happen that

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>don't happen at your club each week, and the average

1:01:36.720 --> 1:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>person doesn't understand, like why is it taking them five

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 2>hours to play? Well, there's ruling calls, there's drive backs

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>to the tee. How often does someone go back to

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>the tee at your club when you're playing or you're

1:01:51.880 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>just throwing down in the field.

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:53.439
<v Speaker 1>They don't.

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>They don't have a cart. They got to run back

1:01:56.120 --> 1:02:00.120
<v Speaker 3>that's right. The junior golf days, the junior golf and

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the amateure golf days, the runback of shame. We either

1:02:03.840 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>got to compose yourself after you sprint three hundred yards

1:02:06.720 --> 1:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and hit the next teach. It's not a good feeling

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:11.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot.

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Of There's a lot of components to pace of play,

1:02:14.720 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>but the biggest component is having the ability to space

1:02:18.840 --> 1:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>groups out. And that's why we've always preached you know,

1:02:22.560 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>although we're a membership organization, we look at a maximized

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 2>starts at the same time, just understanding that smaller fields

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:34.600
<v Speaker 2>will provide us the best opportunity to improve pace of play.

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I guess you know where where I'm going to push

1:02:37.760 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 3>back because obviously I think I'm on a I have

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 3>very well documented my feelings here. But the thing that

1:02:48.960 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 3>frustrates me the most is that playing slow is rewarded

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 3>on the On the PGA tour, you hear players talk

1:02:57.440 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>about I used to play fast. We heard brooks Ka

1:03:00.760 --> 1:03:03.479
<v Speaker 3>talk about how he realized he was trying to play

1:03:03.520 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>too fast, and that's what he did at Okill. One

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.280
<v Speaker 3>of the changes he made from the Masters to o'kill

1:03:08.400 --> 1:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>was I slowed down. I just took my time I

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>went to the bathroom when I didn't need to go

1:03:12.240 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to the bathroom. When you talk about the end consumer,

1:03:15.600 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 3>that's tough to hear. But with the with regards to

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:20.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, you have this system in place, you can

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>identify who the slow players are. They're timed every SHOT's time.

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't struck wouldn't the most effective strategy be to to

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 3>dock strokes not fined because with the amount of money

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that's being played for now, these fines are completely inconsequential

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to versus Like a shot or two. I know, if

1:03:41.840 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I if I saved myself two shots when I'm playing

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>well because I play slow, I'm going to make up

1:03:48.680 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>five hundred thousand dollars and that's going to pay for

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>all my fines. No matter what the subject, it just

1:03:55.600 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem like all the the considerations are aligned here

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:03.800
<v Speaker 3>with like the most the only place to me that

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>ever is going to dissuade a PGA Tour player from

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>playing slow is saying we're taking away shots in this tournament.

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 3>That that to be like, nobody wants to be penalized

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>ever in a golf tournament, and that is the ultimate

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:21.040
<v Speaker 3>versus finds like if I play better because I play slow.

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>They're going to pay for themselves.

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>At some point, at some point they're going to hurt,

1:04:27.400 --> 1:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>hurt enough to change your mind, I promise you. And

1:04:31.680 --> 1:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>it has happened. So finds finds due work, believe it

1:04:38.480 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>or not, it bothered. Even when you're a person that

1:04:41.840 --> 1:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>makes a lot of money playing. When the finds escalate,

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it gets their attention and it has changed behavior. I

1:04:52.440 --> 1:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>can speak from experience that there are players who have

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:59.040
<v Speaker 2>changed their ways when the finds got to be a

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>certain amount. But to your other point, the strokes, there's

1:05:05.600 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 2>a huge inequity there. Okay, so you're a guy who

1:05:11.920 --> 1:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>is playing brutally slow and you miss the cut, or

1:05:17.640 --> 1:05:22.560
<v Speaker 2>you just make the cut and you get hit with

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 2>one stroke penalty. Doesn't really harm you much. You're another

1:05:27.640 --> 1:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>guy who's played at a great pace the whole tournament,

1:05:32.000 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>but now coming down the stretch, you're in contention, and

1:05:35.360 --> 1:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>something happens to you and you're on the clock, your

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>group's on the clock, and get you get a couple

1:05:40.720 --> 1:05:42.760
<v Speaker 2>bad times, and all of a sudden, we're hitting you

1:05:42.840 --> 1:05:46.080
<v Speaker 2>with a one stroke penalty. That one stroke penalty could

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars if not nowadays

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>could cost you a million dollars for that one shot

1:05:53.440 --> 1:05:56.480
<v Speaker 2>if you end up losing by one. Where's the equity

1:05:56.720 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>in that? You know? So you know that's that's kind.

1:06:01.360 --> 1:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Of why.

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:06.959
<v Speaker 2>We look, we won't hesitate to get to that one

1:06:07.000 --> 1:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>shot and we have given the one shot penalty out. Okay.

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I it's just we believe that there's a big inequity

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>there and the way the system is designed to get

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to that point, you'd have to be a fool. I

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>mean you've been your group's been warned, okay, and then

1:06:29.240 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the next step is you don't make up time and

1:06:32.240 --> 1:06:34.439
<v Speaker 2>your group gets put on the clock or you get

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:38.920
<v Speaker 2>put on the clock individually, and now you're being timed

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:41.880
<v Speaker 2>and you go over your time. Now I've got to

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>come out and tell you that I had you for

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a bad time, and I have to explain to you

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that the next time that happens, it's going to be

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a one stroke penalty. So that's like three or four

1:06:51.960 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 2>stages that we go through before that, And that's the

1:06:54.960 --> 1:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>way the system's designed by the players themselves.

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Get I guess, like where I would every other sport.

1:07:02.600 --> 1:07:06.760
<v Speaker 3>What amazes me about professional athletes in general. Is the

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:12.120
<v Speaker 3>difference between Tom Brady and someone with first round, top

1:07:12.160 --> 1:07:15.920
<v Speaker 3>five pick measurables is the way that Tom Brady is

1:07:16.000 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>able to quickly process coverages and make decisions under the

1:07:20.760 --> 1:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>gun under the highest pressure situations. To me, one of

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the things about professional golf is that when the pressure

1:07:29.880 --> 1:07:32.880
<v Speaker 3>ratchets up when it is the time to go win,

1:07:33.520 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to see players have to continue to make

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:41.200
<v Speaker 3>decisions pull the trigger when they are in uncertain times.

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Tom Brady throwing a pass before he knows the receivers

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>open in making that play is like a player not

1:07:48.920 --> 1:07:52.400
<v Speaker 3>really sure about the wind having to trust his gut

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and pull the trigger, hit the shot under a stipulated time.

1:07:56.840 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 3>To me is a more compelling product. And obviously you

1:07:59.440 --> 1:08:03.280
<v Speaker 3>can disagree here, but there's also a physical fitness aspect

1:08:03.320 --> 1:08:05.840
<v Speaker 3>of this. Right If I have to climb the eighteenth

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>hill at Riviera and I'm up and I hit the

1:08:08.480 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 3>shortest T shot and I have forty seconds to play,

1:08:11.880 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I might be breathing a little bit harder. There is

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>a there's a real like when you talk about a

1:08:17.120 --> 1:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>is golf a sport or is this really like just

1:08:19.960 --> 1:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>a you know, we can wait and we can wait

1:08:22.960 --> 1:08:25.679
<v Speaker 3>out win until it dies down to hit the shot

1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>and wait two minutes because I know I'm in the

1:08:27.760 --> 1:08:29.559
<v Speaker 3>last group and I'm not going to get popped for

1:08:29.640 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 3>this this one time. Like to me, there seems to

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>be like a little bit of a clash with pace

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:37.920
<v Speaker 3>of play and the idea of competition and playing an

1:08:37.920 --> 1:08:41.799
<v Speaker 3>outdoor sport with like with levers that are pulled against

1:08:41.880 --> 1:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>you as a competitor.

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I agree with every point you're making there. I would

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>love to see everyone again. Like I told you, our

1:08:50.400 --> 1:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>goal is to identify the slowest players, get them to

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 2>understand that the numbers don't lie, that they are a

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>slow play and that they need to change. And that's

1:09:03.560 --> 1:09:06.599
<v Speaker 2>that's a big part of our job is to get

1:09:06.600 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 2>them to understand that we're not looking to make them

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:11.680
<v Speaker 2>a fast player. I just want you to be an

1:09:11.800 --> 1:09:14.720
<v Speaker 2>average speed player. That's all I'm asking of you. We

1:09:14.760 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>want everyone playing about the same amount of time. You know,

1:09:18.840 --> 1:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think to your point there is they get

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.840
<v Speaker 2>too cerebral and you're looking for them to be more

1:09:24.880 --> 1:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>reactionary and be athletes out there make a decision and

1:09:28.840 --> 1:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>go with it. And I have the same frustrations as

1:09:32.680 --> 1:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>you at times because I love the product as well,

1:09:35.840 --> 1:09:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and that you know, I'm a fan as well as

1:09:38.800 --> 1:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>you know working out there, so I want to see

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>it go quicker. We all do. But you know, it's

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 2>it's a balance every It's like everything in life. There's

1:09:49.479 --> 1:09:52.719
<v Speaker 2>a balance there, and we've got to get these guys

1:09:52.760 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 2>to see the numbers and the numbers don't lie. And

1:09:57.240 --> 1:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>you can give all the excuses you want, but the

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 2>numbers do not lie. You're everyone's being treated the same.

1:10:04.479 --> 1:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>It's it's mechanized. Now. You can't tell me that it's

1:10:08.320 --> 1:10:11.519
<v Speaker 2>a volunteer that you had, that it was hitting the

1:10:11.640 --> 1:10:16.160
<v Speaker 2>button a little late. It's now a fully automated system

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>that is doing it. When someone hits a shot, it

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>records right away and then the clock starts on the

1:10:22.760 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>next person. And it's very well thought out system that

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:31.200
<v Speaker 2>throws out all the bad data in four or five

1:10:31.280 --> 1:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>different categories. So it's it's holding everyone to the same uh,

1:10:38.000 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>same measurements.

1:10:39.280 --> 1:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>All right, Let's let's get out of here with a

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:42.439
<v Speaker 3>few fun questions.

1:10:42.520 --> 1:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's ask some good ones here. Come on, heat

1:10:46.000 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>on me here.

1:10:46.920 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, you know, I don't want to I don't

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:51.160
<v Speaker 3>want to be like Bryson with anhill.

1:10:51.320 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, here're a couple of layups. Will you.

1:10:54.960 --> 1:10:57.799
<v Speaker 3>What's your what's your favorite golf course to go to

1:10:57.800 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 3>to set up? Like what what's the place that you

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 3>find is to be for you and your job where

1:11:04.040 --> 1:11:07.240
<v Speaker 3>you nerd out and have the most fun doing a

1:11:07.920 --> 1:11:08.960
<v Speaker 3>tournament at.

1:11:10.680 --> 1:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>We just came from it. I hate to say it.

1:11:13.120 --> 1:11:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Pebble beat You can't beat it. I mean,

1:11:16.880 --> 1:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>it's just so beautiful. It can be such a great

1:11:21.200 --> 1:11:27.120
<v Speaker 2>golf course if it's the right time and the conditions

1:11:27.120 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>are right, it can be just an outstanding golf course.

1:11:31.000 --> 1:11:33.439
<v Speaker 2>And it has been. You know, I hate to say it.

1:11:33.880 --> 1:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>People complain about where we are in the schedule. Well,

1:11:37.120 --> 1:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>that we've had like stretches of four or five years

1:11:40.360 --> 1:11:44.439
<v Speaker 2>with perfect conditions out there. It's just unfortunate. You know,

1:11:44.479 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you're going to get a couple now and then with

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:55.040
<v Speaker 2>this Pineapple Express, El Nino and.

1:11:54.640 --> 1:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>The mainstream it comes with it.

1:11:56.960 --> 1:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>You know. It's like I said, it's the price of

1:11:59.120 --> 1:12:03.559
<v Speaker 2>being imperative. It's but that's my I love being at

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Pebble Beach. I love I love working the Masters tournament.

1:12:09.680 --> 1:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, such a gorgeous place, great people, everything about

1:12:15.160 --> 1:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the event. I really cherish going to the Open Championship

1:12:20.600 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and the tradition of the Open. Yeah, it's all those

1:12:26.280 --> 1:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>iconic venues. Very very blessed to do what I do.

1:12:30.720 --> 1:12:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Is there a golf course that you think it hasn't

1:12:34.520 --> 1:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>been on the PGA Tour, but maybe you're like, wow,

1:12:36.760 --> 1:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see that be a PGA Tour

1:12:38.840 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>venue and might have the space to accommodate some of

1:12:41.000 --> 1:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure. Any in Young's dream bucket list to add

1:12:45.040 --> 1:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this to the PGA Tour rotation.

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. I don't know. I've played some

1:12:50.439 --> 1:12:54.320
<v Speaker 2>great courses over in Ireland that just I loved. I mean,

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you guys have ever played old

1:12:56.360 --> 1:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Head in kin Sale if you If you haven't, you

1:13:00.400 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>put that on your bucket list. You know there's great

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:11.560
<v Speaker 2>courses over there, Waterville, bally Bunyon. I mean, gosh, Scotland's

1:13:11.600 --> 1:13:14.439
<v Speaker 2>littered with courses. I'd love to see us play and

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:18.080
<v Speaker 2>see how the guys could do. And who knows. Who

1:13:18.080 --> 1:13:21.599
<v Speaker 2>knows what the future brings. You knows as we as

1:13:21.600 --> 1:13:24.559
<v Speaker 2>we there's a lot of talk about international play in

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the future and maybe that will give us the opportunity

1:13:29.280 --> 1:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>to go to some of these great, great iconic venues

1:13:33.160 --> 1:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and around the world. So yeah, I don't have anyone

1:13:39.400 --> 1:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that jumps out.

1:13:42.520 --> 1:13:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Is your least favorite thing to do? Preferred lies? Is

1:13:45.960 --> 1:13:48.080
<v Speaker 3>that your least favorite part of the job. When you

1:13:48.200 --> 1:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>got an institute preferred lies?

1:13:51.080 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>My least favorite part of the job is interviews. But

1:13:58.760 --> 1:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>preferred lies it's a necessary evil for professional golf. We

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:12.479
<v Speaker 2>have to have certain standards and the ability to improve

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>your lie within a club length when the golf course

1:14:16.360 --> 1:14:20.439
<v Speaker 2>reaches a point of saturation like we had last week.

1:14:20.760 --> 1:14:24.439
<v Speaker 2>It allows us to continue to play golf right, but

1:14:24.560 --> 1:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>it also can lead to some scenarios where a player

1:14:30.000 --> 1:14:35.479
<v Speaker 2>can gain a significant advantage. So I understand why. You know,

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>some of the major championships are reluctant to ever put

1:14:39.520 --> 1:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>preferred lies into play. But sometimes you've got to make

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>sure that you're going back out onto a golf course

1:14:47.600 --> 1:14:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that you can continue play on. So there's a balance there, all.

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, last question, I promise, all right, you're off a

1:14:59.400 --> 1:15:04.840
<v Speaker 3>red eye. We can't ask anymore. What is what is it?

1:15:05.040 --> 1:15:08.160
<v Speaker 3>When you think back to like one ruling, like it's

1:15:08.240 --> 1:15:11.679
<v Speaker 3>the ruling that pops in your head the most often,

1:15:11.960 --> 1:15:15.080
<v Speaker 3>what is it in the history of your career, Like,

1:15:15.600 --> 1:15:18.320
<v Speaker 3>there's got to be one that just like jumps to

1:15:18.400 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>mind every time.

1:15:20.560 --> 1:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, probably one of the most painful ones was with

1:15:24.400 --> 1:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Webb Simpson and this was that the Zurich Classic of

1:15:27.720 --> 1:15:31.559
<v Speaker 2>New Orleans, and web was I think at the time

1:15:31.600 --> 1:15:36.799
<v Speaker 2>he was leading by one shot and I got called

1:15:36.840 --> 1:15:42.759
<v Speaker 2>to the green on I want to say, his whole fifteen, yeah, fifteen,

1:15:43.640 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and he had put his putter down behind the ball

1:15:49.280 --> 1:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and the ball moved. But he had put his putter down,

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe in half an inch to an inch

1:15:57.080 --> 1:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>behind the ball, and it wasn't like you put it

1:15:59.800 --> 1:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>down firm the way he was describing it to me.

1:16:02.760 --> 1:16:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But at that time, the weight of the evidence went

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>against the player. His feet were in the position, in

1:16:10.160 --> 1:16:14.519
<v Speaker 2>the address position. Everything was saying that he was taking

1:16:14.560 --> 1:16:18.880
<v Speaker 2>his address to make the stroke, and it led to

1:16:19.000 --> 1:16:23.200
<v Speaker 2>him being penalized and he ended up losing the tournament,

1:16:23.800 --> 1:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and shortly after that the rule ended up changing. Thankfully,

1:16:28.920 --> 1:16:33.280
<v Speaker 2>when accidental movement occurs on the putting green, and thank

1:16:33.320 --> 1:16:36.600
<v Speaker 2>god that has happened, and we've avoided a lot of

1:16:36.760 --> 1:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>silly penalties through the years where I think it was

1:16:40.320 --> 1:16:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a situation where the ball just hadn't quite settled, you know.

1:16:43.720 --> 1:16:45.559
<v Speaker 2>It was maybe it was on the edge of a

1:16:45.600 --> 1:16:50.840
<v Speaker 2>spike mark or something, or a little spike imprint, and

1:16:50.920 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 2>it ended up falling and it just did it happened

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to do it while the guy's potter was behind the ball.

1:16:56.880 --> 1:17:02.519
<v Speaker 2>You hated that. That was really hard. And then I

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:06.840
<v Speaker 2>had one ruling over at the President's Cup years ago

1:17:07.080 --> 1:17:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in Korea that we ended up getting wrong as a committee.

1:17:12.479 --> 1:17:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't sure, and I put it out to the

1:17:15.840 --> 1:17:19.880
<v Speaker 2>committee and we had some of the best rules minds

1:17:19.920 --> 1:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>in the entire world there on site, and it was

1:17:23.840 --> 1:17:27.439
<v Speaker 2>one of these real obscure ones. We had the one

1:17:27.560 --> 1:17:31.599
<v Speaker 2>ball rule in effect, and Phil Mickelson had changed his

1:17:31.680 --> 1:17:37.080
<v Speaker 2>ball without announcing it to anyone, and it was four

1:17:37.160 --> 1:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>ball match play, and I told him that I believed

1:17:41.280 --> 1:17:44.640
<v Speaker 2>he was disqualified from the hole, but it didn't disqualify

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>as partner, and I put it out over the radio,

1:17:48.040 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and long story short, in the end, we ended up

1:17:51.240 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>getting it wrong and it affected the match.

1:17:55.240 --> 1:17:58.200
<v Speaker 3>And easiest guy to deal with than that, it was

1:17:58.240 --> 1:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>just it was.

1:17:59.240 --> 1:18:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Just a really weird, weird moment and to keep my

1:18:04.040 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>head straight for the rest of the match, knowing that

1:18:07.280 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>we had made this blunder and I was a big

1:18:10.040 --> 1:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>part of it. And you know, in the end, in

1:18:14.840 --> 1:18:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the end, the match ended up being tied. So thank

1:18:17.439 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 2>goodness it didn't cost anyone, you know, big.

1:18:21.120 --> 1:18:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's like I grew up caddying and

1:18:23.720 --> 1:18:26.200
<v Speaker 3>when you're caddying in a club championship match and you

1:18:26.240 --> 1:18:29.160
<v Speaker 3>give like a bad read and that's all you can

1:18:29.200 --> 1:18:32.760
<v Speaker 3>think about like the next like like you're they asked

1:18:32.760 --> 1:18:35.479
<v Speaker 3>you to read another putt and you're like like you

1:18:35.600 --> 1:18:37.880
<v Speaker 3>just like don't even want to step up and read

1:18:37.920 --> 1:18:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the putt because you just you know, you just butchered

1:18:40.320 --> 1:18:41.040
<v Speaker 3>the last read.

1:18:41.600 --> 1:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, exactly. That's a good, good analogy right there.

1:18:45.640 --> 1:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Gary, Where where will we see you next?

1:18:48.840 --> 1:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>What's uh? And uh?

1:18:50.120 --> 1:18:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you obviously for the time. Coming off of a

1:18:52.960 --> 1:18:53.720
<v Speaker 3>long week here.

1:18:54.080 --> 1:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, I'm actually headed to the Mexico Open at

1:18:57.360 --> 1:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Vedanta and then the Players Champions following that. So I've

1:19:02.760 --> 1:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>got a little bit of a break in my schedule

1:19:05.080 --> 1:19:08.360
<v Speaker 2>right now, which is good. I need a little little

1:19:08.400 --> 1:19:12.120
<v Speaker 2>time off, go do something different for a few days

1:19:12.479 --> 1:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and get away from golf.

1:19:15.120 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a good time to be in North Florida. Too,

1:19:17.280 --> 1:19:18.920
<v Speaker 3>good time of a year to have a little time.

1:19:19.800 --> 1:19:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm headed to Maine. Oh wow, I go snowmobiling up

1:19:24.040 --> 1:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>in Maine, so I just kind of get away from it.

1:19:26.120 --> 1:19:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm here in Massachusetts, so I'll look forward to a

1:19:29.680 --> 1:19:33.360
<v Speaker 2>little break for a few days, regroup, and then come

1:19:33.400 --> 1:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>back come back at it.

1:19:35.320 --> 1:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thanks so much, Gary, and look forward to

1:19:38.120 --> 1:19:41.160
<v Speaker 3>seeing you at a tournament sometime soon.

1:19:41.640 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, thanks guys, Thanks for having me on a lot

1:19:44.000 --> 1:19:44.439
<v Speaker 2>of fun.

1:19:44.600 --> 1:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Garry.

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, Thanks to Gary Young. That was he was

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:58.439
<v Speaker 3>more than generous with his time, and he was coming

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:01.920
<v Speaker 3>off of red Eye. That was a effort as he

1:20:02.479 --> 1:20:05.800
<v Speaker 3>fended off some of our questions and concerns about pace

1:20:05.840 --> 1:20:09.840
<v Speaker 3>of play. Joseph, do you have a recommendation for everybody?

1:20:10.280 --> 1:20:12.559
<v Speaker 1>I do, Andy, And I'm curious if you've watched this.

1:20:12.800 --> 1:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going the golf route actually this week. And

1:20:17.560 --> 1:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite things to do is watch old

1:20:19.640 --> 1:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>golf tournaments on YouTube. Generally I watch old editions of

1:20:23.680 --> 1:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the Masters, a lot of two thousand and five to

1:20:26.880 --> 1:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen nineteen, a lot in that range. I like

1:20:29.920 --> 1:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to go back and watch, but recently, I stumbled upon

1:20:33.280 --> 1:20:36.519
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize the twenty sixteen Open Championship at Royal

1:20:36.600 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Truon is on YouTube. Went back and watched that, the

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>epic duel between Phil Mickelson and Henrik Stenson, all time

1:20:44.680 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 1>golf tournament. It is a delightful watch. And the added

1:20:48.560 --> 1:20:50.960
<v Speaker 1>bonus is that the Open Championship this year is at

1:20:51.040 --> 1:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Royal Truon where it was in twenty sixteen, so helps

1:20:53.880 --> 1:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you get prepped for the upcoming Open Championship and you

1:20:56.400 --> 1:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>get to relive an all time, all time duel between

1:21:00.439 --> 1:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>two excellent ball strikers. So it was really fun to

1:21:03.640 --> 1:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>go back and rewatch. That would highly recommend it. Andy,

1:21:06.320 --> 1:21:08.839
<v Speaker 1>have you watched that tournament since twenty sixteen?

1:21:09.680 --> 1:21:13.400
<v Speaker 3>I have not. I remember it vividly. I remember where

1:21:13.479 --> 1:21:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I watched it. I was at I was in Los Angeles.

1:21:16.240 --> 1:21:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I remember just like I was, you know, waking up

1:21:19.439 --> 1:21:23.320
<v Speaker 3>at weird hours, West Coast and I just like vividly

1:21:23.360 --> 1:21:28.760
<v Speaker 3>remember watching that golf tournament epic shots go crazy. That

1:21:28.840 --> 1:21:30.679
<v Speaker 3>was a duel. I'm going to go back and watch that.

1:21:30.680 --> 1:21:33.879
<v Speaker 3>That's a good recommendation. I have a recommendation on YouTube

1:21:33.880 --> 1:21:39.760
<v Speaker 3>as well. All right, two YouTube recommendations I am. I

1:21:39.800 --> 1:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>would say that I'm not like a huge Bryson De

1:21:42.240 --> 1:21:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Shamba fan. That being said, I stumbled across his YouTube

1:21:47.120 --> 1:21:51.400
<v Speaker 3>page recently and I watched the Sergio Garcia Bryson De

1:21:51.479 --> 1:21:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Shambo one club nine hole match. Awesome. It was so

1:21:57.680 --> 1:22:00.880
<v Speaker 3>awesome and I think think it was just like an

1:22:00.920 --> 1:22:04.880
<v Speaker 3>amazing thing to watch Sergio do. As somebody who has

1:22:05.000 --> 1:22:09.920
<v Speaker 3>watched basically Sergio Garcia's entire career, to watch him play

1:22:10.000 --> 1:22:14.200
<v Speaker 3>nine holes with a five iron, they probably and just

1:22:15.160 --> 1:22:17.559
<v Speaker 3>but with a putter, yep, But he used a five iron.

1:22:17.840 --> 1:22:22.320
<v Speaker 3>He was just he hit some just extraordinary shots and

1:22:22.360 --> 1:22:25.400
<v Speaker 3>it makes you just like long for a little bit

1:22:25.439 --> 1:22:29.160
<v Speaker 3>tougher equipment so that you could see guys have to

1:22:29.240 --> 1:22:33.599
<v Speaker 3>hit shots again because he was amazing in this like

1:22:33.960 --> 1:22:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and I think Bryson, like by the end of it,

1:22:35.760 --> 1:22:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Bryson I think got like punched in the face right

1:22:38.320 --> 1:22:40.639
<v Speaker 3>at the start. He was This is not the type

1:22:40.640 --> 1:22:43.559
<v Speaker 3>of golf that Bryson plays. Like shot making, it's very

1:22:43.760 --> 1:22:47.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, this had blasted up there, hit a wedge,

1:22:47.479 --> 1:22:49.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, and this is a way different golf for

1:22:49.720 --> 1:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>a golf with one club. Bryson uses seven iron but

1:22:53.960 --> 1:22:56.200
<v Speaker 3>by the end of it, Bryson was hitting some really

1:22:56.200 --> 1:23:00.839
<v Speaker 3>cool shots. I thought it was an amazing YouTube video, like, honestly,

1:23:00.920 --> 1:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>like one of the best, maybe the best golf YouTube

1:23:04.080 --> 1:23:07.839
<v Speaker 3>video I've ever watched. Is this one club match between

1:23:08.120 --> 1:23:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Bryson Deshambeau and uh Sergio Garcia. Awesome golf, Awesome golf shots.

1:23:14.240 --> 1:23:16.599
<v Speaker 3>It's really like, if you're into golf, that's what you

1:23:16.720 --> 1:23:20.240
<v Speaker 3>want to see from a YouTube video.

1:23:20.600 --> 1:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I've watched it, I believe. Is it a Austin golf club, Andy.

1:23:23.600 --> 1:23:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh No, it's that it's at Spanish Oaks.

1:23:26.400 --> 1:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Okay, that's right. Yeah, I've watched it. It's pretty short.

1:23:29.439 --> 1:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, it's like an hour and a

1:23:30.600 --> 1:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>half or maybe not even that long.

1:23:32.280 --> 1:23:34.479
<v Speaker 3>Not even I think it's like forty five minutes.

1:23:34.720 --> 1:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like it's really see some cool shots. Sergio's working

1:23:38.680 --> 1:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball both ways. Bryson's like hitting a seven iron

1:23:42.120 --> 1:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>over trees from like a thing.

1:23:44.000 --> 1:23:47.240
<v Speaker 3>They flopped it flopped, it flopped a seven iron like

1:23:47.400 --> 1:23:51.160
<v Speaker 3>sixty yards over a big tree and stopped on a dime.

1:23:51.240 --> 1:23:53.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, incredible, some incredible shots.

1:23:53.920 --> 1:23:55.559
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yep, it's a good watch. I like that.

1:23:55.600 --> 1:23:58.679
<v Speaker 3>Andy, legitimately some of the best golf shots I've seen

1:23:58.760 --> 1:24:01.479
<v Speaker 3>hit in a long time from Sergio. I'm with you,

1:24:02.240 --> 1:24:05.880
<v Speaker 3>all right. That does it for this show. Big thanks

1:24:05.880 --> 1:24:09.479
<v Speaker 3>to Matt Rusis for producing and editing this podcast. As

1:24:09.520 --> 1:24:12.360
<v Speaker 3>a reminder, we got a huge week in CLUBTF. If

1:24:12.400 --> 1:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>you're not a member of CLUBTFE, maybe check it out.

1:24:16.080 --> 1:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>But it's Riviera week. I know Garrett is going to

1:24:18.800 --> 1:24:22.120
<v Speaker 3>get a Riviera profile up sometime this week. On the

1:24:22.160 --> 1:24:25.559
<v Speaker 3>golf course. I did a little one thing about every

1:24:25.560 --> 1:24:29.519
<v Speaker 3>hole at Riviera that'll be up early this week. But yeah,

1:24:29.560 --> 1:24:32.080
<v Speaker 3>if you if you don't yet sign up for CLUBTFE,

1:24:32.280 --> 1:24:34.120
<v Speaker 3>it is one hundred and twenty dollars for the year.

1:24:34.600 --> 1:24:38.360
<v Speaker 3>We also just announced our summer member guest that is

1:24:38.520 --> 1:24:42.280
<v Speaker 3>at an awesome golf course on Long Island. But yeah,

1:24:42.400 --> 1:24:45.559
<v Speaker 3>and you can get access to that if you're a member,

1:24:45.680 --> 1:24:49.720
<v Speaker 3>So big thanks. For more information on CLUBTF go to

1:24:49.880 --> 1:24:53.880
<v Speaker 3>thefridagg dot com slash membership and you can see all

1:24:53.920 --> 1:24:56.360
<v Speaker 3>the all the benefits you get there. But big thanks

1:24:56.520 --> 1:24:59.040
<v Speaker 3>to Joseph for coming on. And we will be back

1:24:59.240 --> 1:25:02.920
<v Speaker 3>later this week with a new episode of the Friday Podcast.