WEBVTT - The Invention of Dog Biscuits

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 2>is Robert.

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And hey, I guess if

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 3>everything is going according to plan. This is our first

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 3>video episode publishing simultaneously to Netflix, though I think some

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of the episodes we recorded in the past few weeks

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 3>are also being uploaded there. So if you are just

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 3>listening to us in audio format right now, you can

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>now find us in video podcast format on Netflix. This

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 3>is brand new for us, so we kind of don't

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 3>know what we're doing yet. We hope it's okay.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're in three D to understand they had three dimensions.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Smell vision has also been deployed. Really, all the bells

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and whistles.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>If only we could arrange the tingler to come into

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>all of your home.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I was told the tingler option was available. Check your

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Netflix settings, I guess. But yeah, it's exciting here we

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 2>are recording from our respective abodes.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 3>This is my dank basement.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm attending to you from the limitless dark void.

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>That's where I am.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Aka the guest room.

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's a guest room. Sometimes it's a limitless dark void.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but hey, so we were trying to think what

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 3>would be the most amazingly compelling subject matter to talk

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>about for our first ever video format episode, and we

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 3>decided to talk about dog biscuits.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I originally brought the idea up as a joke

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 2>because we were like, well, can we do that's a

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>single episode? Well, we could do an invention episode. We've

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>done a lot of invention style episodes over the years,

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and we used to do an invention podcast. You can

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>find all that wherever you get your audio podcasts. And

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>so I was like, okay, we could do an invention

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, off the cuff, I was like

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 2>dog biscuits because the term is inherently funny. The actual

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>item is, of course thoroughly mundane. But then I kept

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it, and then I dug into it just

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a tiny bit and instantly became convinced, No, this is

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 2>no joke. We absolutely need to talk about dog biscuits.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 3>There is something to talk about, and hey, if you're

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 3>new to our show, I guess kind of part of

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 3>what we do is try to figure out what's interesting

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 3>about everything, and that would everything does include dog biscuits.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we may talk about black holes one week, we

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>may talk about you know, psychological concept or philosophical concept

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>another week, and then it could be dog biscuits. It

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>could be something that if you take for granted, but

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>then when you apply a little bit of scrutiny and

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 2>you dig into it, it's fascinating and is indeed mind blowing.

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>So you're not a dog owner, but you are a

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>cat owner. And what I've been curious about is are

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>there cat biscuits?

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not so much in my experience and my experience,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 2>you have the little cat treats, which they love, and

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>that's the I guess, the equivalent the dessert for cats.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>It is hard, whereas my cat's normal food is soft

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>and wet and or absolute liquid. She's old, she gets

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 2>many different types of foods at this point, but she

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>still loves the little hard treats. But they are they're

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 2>not the big like bone shaped biscuit that the big

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Scooby snack, the treat that we associate

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>with dogs. That there may be products like that on

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 2>the market for cats, and I'm just not aware of them.

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 2>But when you go through certainly when you go through

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the pet store checkout line. What I'm used to seeing

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>is that kind of cafeteria style selection of dog treats

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>where it's like all sorts of shapes, some of them

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>bone shaped and so forth, but others look like an

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>oreo cookie or some sort of you know, cookies, snacks,

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 2>some sort of human dessert treat, which can be very

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 2>confusing if you're going through there with like a toddler

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, I want some of the obvious human

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 2>foods here, and you're like, no, no, no, those are

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>just for canines.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>This is funny because I was thinking before we started

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>recording about how dog treats. I mean, I guess pet

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>treats in general, but you know, dog treats are sort

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of the big one that people think about. They're weird

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>because they're marketed as if they're designed to appeal to dogs.

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>So you see the commercial for them on TV or

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>I remember the ones when I was a kid, at least,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 3>for like, do you remember the commercials for bacon strips

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that are dogs. Don't no, it's not bacon, it's bacon,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 3>you remember, Yeah, Yeah, So the whole thing in the

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>commercial is they're showing you how much dogs want this

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 3>treat and how good they feel when they get it.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 3>But dogs can't buy treats. They don't have credit cards,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 3>they don't have money, so they can't go get treats

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 3>for themselves. Humans do all of the buying and selling

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 3>of dog treats, so dog treats are actually marketed to

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 3>appeal not to dogs, but to humans. So the seller

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>has to appeal to something you might call preference by proxy.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like advertising toys to kids, you know,

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 3>because kids don't usually have money to spend. I mean,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, things been their allowance or whatever. But usually

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're trying to sell a toy to a kid,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 3>you have to find a way to get the parents

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 3>or caregivers to buy the toy for the kid. Except

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 3>there's a difference between kids and dogs. At least with kids.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>After a certain age, they can tell adults what they want,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 3>So there is an added layer of complexity because the

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>purchase is gatelocked behind a secondary decision maker. You have

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 3>to appeal to the kid and then also get past

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>the approval of the money spender. So dogs are kind

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 3>of like that, except you kind of skip the primary

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>preference holder entirely because the commercial is not for the dog.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 3>Your appeal goes straight to the buyer, and it's like, human,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>imagine what kind of treat you would want if you

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 3>were a dog. You will almost certainly not be tasting

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>this yourself, So you're never gonna know. You know, you

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>just think, like, wow, my dog really liked that. But

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 3>in my experience, dogs like all food that you give them,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 3>So how can you really tell.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, a kid and a dog may have an

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>actual desire for something, especially something to eat that is

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of gross or rather gross sometimes in the

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 2>case of dogs, you know. But yeah, like you're saying

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>it's marketed towards the human beings, and you said that

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>humans will probably not taste it. But on the other hand,

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 2>humans will generally almost taste it because humans will smell

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the dog food. And that's a whole point. Yeah, that's

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 2>a whole important aspect of dog food design. I'm to

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>understand is that humans do have to on some level

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 2>want to eat the dog food or the cat food,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 2>or whatever the child may be. I guess it breaks

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>down a bit when you get into lizard food and

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>so forth, but with cats and dogs, it's certainly the case.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Well in the same way that the toy that is

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 3>most viscerally appealing to a child may not actually pass

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the adult buyer test because like a lot of such

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 3>toys would be extremely dangerous or detrimental to a child's

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 3>health or something, you know, like the child wants the

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>bebe gun or whatever, so like you can't do that.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>In the same I think, what is most viscerally appealing

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>to a dog may well not pass the human smell test.

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>That's right, But again the humans have to buy it. Yeah,

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 2>so this will all be important stuff to keep in

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>mind as we take this journey through ultimately the deep

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 2>history of dog snacks. I'd say that this was the

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>big surprise for me, not knowing anything about the history

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 2>of dog treats dog biscuits, is that I really just

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>assumed that it was a fairly recent invention. Like if

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you were to just quiz me on the street, I

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>would say like, oh, I don't know, nineteen forties, nineteen fifties,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>something like that. But ultimately the roots go far deeper.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Goes way back. Are you ready for me to talk

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a little bit about this paper I looked up about

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the science of dog snacks.

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get into it, so I dug up a.

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Paper that was published in twenty twenty four in Frontiers

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and Animal Science called the Science of Snacks a Review

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>of Dog Treats to review. The authors are Bogden, Alexandru Callencia,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Sarana Diina, and Adrian Makri. And in this paper, the

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>authors are doing kind of a general overview of research

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 3>on the market for dog treats and associated trends in

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 3>pet ownership. So they cover things like nutrition and safety

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in the treat sector, but also more relevant to me,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 3>they talk a bit about changes in dog owner's psychology

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and how that relates to the history of treat giving behavior.

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>So just to mention a few interesting things. In their

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 3>background section, they talk about how the population of companion animals,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 3>including dogs, is increasing worldwide and treats account for about

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent of the total value of the US pet

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 3>food market. The pet food market has grown in recent years,

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and the greatest sector of growth within it has been

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>snacks and treats. So pet treats are on the come

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>up and this reflects, they say, an evolving relationship between

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>humans and dogs in recent decades, where dog owners of

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:12.239
<v Speaker 3>today are more likely than dog owners of previous generations

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>to report having deep bonds and emotional relationships with their animals.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And this isn't to say that you know, nobody ever

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 3>had a deep feeling of companionship with the dog before today,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>but that more people report those kinds of feelings as

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 3>time goes on, and people also reflect differences across the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 3>span of their lives, like adults now talk about their

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>dog being a part of the family or feeling closer

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 3>to their dogs now than they remember from when they

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 3>were children. So it seems to be like an increasing

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>cultural trend to have these deeper attachments to our companion animals.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 3>And this deeper attachment manifests in feeding behavior, where dog

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 3>owners express their love by giving food and especially by

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 3>giving treats, because food, you know that might be viewed

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 3>as functional or nutritional, treats are more like a gift.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>That's how you just really show your love that the

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 3>dog's love language is, you know, bagan strips or whatever.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 3>And the authors mention one study that found that dog

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>owners tended to believe that not giving their dogs treats

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 3>was similar to not giving their children toys and believed

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 3>that dog owners believed the giving of treats to be

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a necessary part of the human's relationship with a dog. Also,

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you can just notice that dog owners describe taking care

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 3>of their dogs today in many of the same terms

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 3>that parents use to describe caring for their kids.

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Now, you'll have to speak to this more since you

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>have been a dog owner in your adult life and

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I have not. But treats are also an important part

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 2>of just the behavior of the dog, right, and training

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>to some extent the dog, right.

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think this is a shift somewhat that

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 3>treats used to be seen more as as functional rewards,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>as something that you would use to to you know,

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 3>provide a motive or incentive to the dog to pay

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>attention and you know, repeat good behaviors during training, and

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 3>probably in past you know years, they would they would

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 3>use more negative incentives as well, but more and more

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 3>all the time, it seems like treats are for bonding.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>They are a gift given out of love to show

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the bond between the human and the animal and to

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 3>make the animal happy.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 3>So the authors of this paper, they list they or

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 3>they at least cite another paper that mentioned six major

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 3>categories of dog treats. I love. Somebody's made the taxonomy here,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>so you got biscuit, bone, chew, dental meat product, and

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>raw hide. And of biscuits specifically, they had a few notes.

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 3>They say, usually made from wheat flour, baked and dried

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 3>slowly in an oven, and it creates this crunchy texture.

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 3>A lot of dog treats on the market today advertise

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>dental health benefits, you know, they say, like the crunching

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>will you know? It is of such a texture that

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>it may help clean the dog's teeth, or at least

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 3>it's advertised to do that. And as of a twenty

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>sixteen study by White at All biscuits were the most

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>popular type of treats given to dogs in the US,

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 3>accounting for seventy seven percent of all treats. So it's

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 3>biscuits by a mile, and that they actually have multiple benefits,

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>not just in what people think their dogs might want

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 3>to eat, probably also in affordability compared to some other

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 3>types of treats, but also dog biscuits tend to have

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 3>a long shelf life because of their low moisture content.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.599
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like hard tack that you'd give to

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 3>an army on the road.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Have you, in fact, ever in your life attempted to

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 2>take a little nibble off of a dog treat.

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>No, I never have, because I did as a child.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Really we did, even without a dog.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>No. No, we had a dog when I was a kid.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>But we were a kid. Okay, yeah, what is that?

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>A different era of dog ownership? You know, this is

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the dog that lived outdoors and we lived in the country.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>But I at some point just had to sort of like,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, at least stick my tongue to it and see, like,

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>is this something that a human could eat? No, they

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 2>could not, but I think you could. You can understand

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>why someone might be tempted. In part, I blame Scooby

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Doo because Shaggy would eat Scooby snacks as well for

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>some reason, right, but also.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 3>For some reason, And what was that reason.

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I don't know he liked he just liked him.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know it was their incentive for solving crimes.

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 2>But I think the thing to drive home here, and

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you touched on this already talking about the composition of

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the dog treats is that they are bread. They are

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a bread product, and bread is for humans. So like

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>we can't help but think we recognize it on some

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>level as being human food, even though it is so

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 2>incredibly hard that it is not, among other reasons inadvisable

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that we attempt to consume it.

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not suited to human taste. So I have never

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>tried a dog treat or dog food. But I was

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 3>actually just talking to my wife Rachel before we recorded today,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>and it came up. We're like, did you ever try

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 3>a dog treat? And she has. She did it actually

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 3>when she was a kid. She proposed to her little sister.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 3>She said, hey, will you give me fifty cents if

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>I eat this? Actually I don't remember. She said it

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 3>was a piece of dog kibble or a dog treat.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>It was one or the other. And her sister was like, okay,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess I will. And so she started to eat it,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 3>but it was so disgusting she couldn't finish it. But

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>she ate half of it. So she made her little

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>sister pay her twenty five cents. Oh wow, it seems

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 3>only fair.

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>That one could have. Really, that could have become tied

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>up in legal proceedings there, like it technically didn't eat

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the whole treat or the whole kibble. But no, okay,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>everyone left happy.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>This is why you get everything in writing before do

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>deals like this, you know. So thinking about these changes

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 3>in dog treats and pet treats generally, it brought me

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to another thing. So I was reading more generally about

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>how there is research on growing trends in the pet

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>food market that point out this increasing trend toward anthropomorphization

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 3>in dog treats. Or maybe that's not the right word.

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 3>That might imply the dog treats are taking human form.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>But dog treats, instead of taking human form, taking the

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>form of human food. So you would have treats with

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 3>visual design, naming, and supposedly flavor. But who's going to know,

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess unless you try it yourself. You know, supposedly

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>flavor that is said to mimic human foods, so you

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 3>can think of little doggy pizza bites. I was looking

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 3>some of these up before we started. You know, it's

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be like human pizza. Instead, it's some kind

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 3>of biscuit like thing that looks like human pizza. I

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 3>found one that was advertising something called a Margurrita flavor,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and you know, little doggy tacos and little doggy hamburgers

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 3>and all that kind of stuff. And then so that's

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 3>like dog treats made out of normal dog treat stuff

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 3>shaped and made to look like human foods. And then

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you can also think about these dog friendly versions of

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 3>human treats, like dog ice cream. Obviously it's a different

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>formula here. You know, dogs do not need that much sugar.

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess humans don't either, but you know,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 3>dogs really shouldn't need that much sugar, so you know,

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't give them human ice cream. There's like a

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>special dog ice cream. And then the pop cup phenomenon.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Have you heard about this?

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 2>No, what's a pop cup?

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I think it's like I've never gotten one of these,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 3>but I've heard of them. It's like certain places do

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 3>drive throughs. I think maybe Starbucks would do this where

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>they will create it's like a whip cream type treat

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in a cup that you get for your dog that's

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 3>riding in the car with you, and you give it

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 3>to them and they lick up all the cream. And

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 3>even the best thing I came across while doing this

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:16.719
<v Speaker 3>was dog beer. All right, people don't feed your dog's

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>real beer. It's not good for dogs. They shouldn't have alcohol.

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 3>But there are fully marketed dog beers sold in cans

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 3>that look like beer cans. For example, Bush Dog Brew.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>It's not beer, there's no alcohol in it. Instead, it's

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 3>like a meat broth thing with such you know, this

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 3>is like turkey broth with sweet potatoes in it or something.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:45.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think stuff like this appeals to people because

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>it allows you to bring the dog in. You know,

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 3>these are not just like things we consume for nutrition.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 3>You're not going out for ice cream or drinking beer

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 3>for nutritional value. It's like a social ritual that you

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>do with friends or that you do with family. And

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 3>because people increasingly see their dogs as a friend or

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>as part of the family, you feel like you need

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to include them in these, you know, consume consumptive social rituals.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely. Another big one I'm to understand is if

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you have a birthday party for a dog, you want

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a dog birthday cake. Like, just a mile and a

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>half from me, there is a dedicated dog bakery. I've

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>driven past it a million times, but I had to

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>look at their website for the first time, and sure enough,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you can just straight up birthday cakes for dogs. Dog

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 2>friendly birthday cakes, as you pointed out, but still like

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 2>full blown birthday cakes. And as I was researching this episode,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 2>I was just seeing like dog biscuits and fancy dog

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>treats everywhere. Like I went into a coffee shop and

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I was like, oh, man, there are as many dog

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 2>treats in here as there are human treats. Yeah, I

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>mean I assume they were human treats. Maybe those are

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>dog treats too, Maybe I was in the wrong establishment.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 2>But my espresso did not taste of turkey broths, so

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was all right.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 3>Before our dog passed away a few years ago, you know,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 3>he was like many dogs and that he would eat

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 3>basically anything, so it was sometimes hard to distinguish, like

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 3>what the really highly desired foods are, because it's all

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 3>highly desired unless it's I remember, I guess one time

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I dropped a klipino pepper on the floor and he

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>picked it up in his mouth and took a bite

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and then just kind of dropped it. So he never

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 3>wanted that. But you eat almost anything else, I mean,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 3>whatever he found out on a walk, you know, to

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 3>discarded chicken bones, that's delicious, of course, But he really

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>loved carrots.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, Well we'll get into the really

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>fascinating history of the changing dietary habits of the domesticated dog.

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>But I guess we should again point out what is

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a biscuit a dog biscuit in the modern sense. Again,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a dry, hard, generally flower based biscuit,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and we should point out that we're, of course, when

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>we say biscuit, we're really lean more towards the the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 2>British use of the term biscuit, which is like a cookie,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to biscuits in the US and parts of Canada,

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 2>where it is like a fluffier quick bread. Though if

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>you ask dogs they'll be like, give me the fluffy

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 2>quick bread. I will also eat that. Now, as we've

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>been pointing out, the dog biscuit is generally not considered

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the primary food source. It's an extra, it's the dessert,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 2>like to your point, part of the bonding process between

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a contemporary dog person and their dog. It's not altogether necessary.

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 2>The domestic dog is a meat leaning, opportunistic omnivore. They

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 2>lean meat eater and meat scavenger. But due to their

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>long association with human beings, the human beings that domesticated them,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 2>they've acquired the genes necessary for increased starch consumption. So

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 2>in other words, they've adapted to eat human scraps, human

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>table scraps, they've come to cast off bits of vegetables,

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 2>especially things like lagoons, grains, and of course that towering

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 2>human food technology bread. A reminder here, we've talked about

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>bread plenty of times on the show before. In the

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>invention of bread, if you will, bread actually predates human agriculture.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 2>One hundred gatherers made bread in the neighborhood of like

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 2>fourteen thousand years ago. Dog domestication is even older than this,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 2>dating back depending on how you're crunching the numbers, what

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 2>twenty thousand to forty thousand years. And of course this

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>is another reason that the idea of the invention of

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the dog biscuit, or really any dedicated dog chow might

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>seem like something without anything besides twentieth century roots, right,

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>because these are creatures that have adapted over time to

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>just eat what we are eating, or eat what we

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't eat. But along the way these treats emerge for

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>different reasons. But also I think it's worth acknowledging throughout

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 2>this history you can still identify some of the same reasons,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>or you can easily imagine some version of that same

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>bond that a contemporary dog person has that you could

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can compare to someone in the ancient world.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Even yeah, even if these ancient peoples had a much

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 3>more working relationship with their dogs than most modern people

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.239
<v Speaker 3>do with companion dogs, I think you can still kind

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 3>of see the beginnings of this long road that ends

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>up with pup cups and dog beer if you look

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 3>at some of the early evidence.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, so again, domesticated dogs have had the chance

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 2>to munch down on some bread of some sort for

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>a very long time. But the question that really underlines

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 2>the topic here today is how long have humans been

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 2>making bread for dogs, perhaps exclusively for dogs. And we

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>have a few different avenues to take here. So first

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of all, what do we have in the way of

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>physical evidence of domesticated dogs that had a based diet.

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question, and of course it is important

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>to separate the question of whend were domestic dogs consuming

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 3>a grain based diet versus looking at specifically engineered dog

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>bread products, because sometimes you can't tell from the evidence

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 3>exactly what the product would have been, but you can

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 3>infer some things about it. So I was reading about

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>this in a twenty twenty one article in the Journal

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 3>of World Prehistory called Dogs that ate plants Changes in

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 3>the canine diet during the Late Bronze Age and First

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Iron Age in the Northeast Iberian Peninsula. This was by

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of authors. The lead author is Sylvia Albizouri.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 3>At least some of the authors here are affiliated with

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 3>the University of Barcelona. So this study looked at skeletal

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>remains of several dozen domestic dogs found buried at a

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 3>site in northeastern Spain called con Roquetta, which is near

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the modern city of Barcelona. The konrachetasite has been inhabited

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 3>by different human groups since prehistoric times, and by studying

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the different layers of deposition there we can learn a

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 3>lot about changes in human life in the Iberian Peninsula

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 3>over the centuries. So the bones the authors studied here

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 3>were from different time periods, ranging from the Late Bronze

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Age to the First Iron Age, and this would be

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 3>roughly the period from thirteen hundred to five point fifty BCE.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 3>And then by using isotopic analysis of the bones, the

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 3>authors were able to learn about what the dogs were

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 3>primarily eating, and then compare that data to other remains

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>found in the same strata. And this type of analysis

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 3>works because different food sources result in different concentrations of

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 3>stable isotopes in the bone, c isotopes like carbon thirteen

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 3>and nitrogen fifteen. And then so you look at that

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 3>and you find the ratios of different atomic nuclei in

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 3>the bones, and that can tell you what fed the

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>growth of the animal's body hundreds or even thousands of

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 3>years ago. So it's cool technique. So what they found was,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that dogs evolved from carnivorous predators, you know,

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>they're evolved from mostly carnivorous wolves, these dogs living alongside

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>humans from the Bronze Age to the First Iron Age,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>with a few exceptions, were already getting a large proportion

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of their dietary protein from vegetarian sources, specifically grains. So,

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 3>for example, the Bronze Age dogs were eating mostly what

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 3>are called C three cereals that include cereals like wheat

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>and barley, so they're probably eating a lot of barley.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 3>The later dogs seem to have been getting a greater

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 3>proportion of what are called seaf four grains like millet.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Now there were a few exceptions. This finding does not

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 3>mean the dogs ate zero animal protein. Later dogs tended

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 3>to show more diversity in diet than the earlier Bronze

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 3>Age dogs, which may be a result of more social

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 3>and labor based diversification within the human cultures there. So,

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>for example, there's one cluster of dogs they identified that

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 3>the authors call Group three. I think that seem to

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>have eaten significantly more meat than all of the other groups,

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 3>and the authors speculate that this could be because these

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 3>dogs were involved in different types of human labor assistance

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 3>or lifestyle. So we don't know exactly what caused this difference.

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 3>This is just me extrapolating, but imagine you've got most

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 3>of the dogs in a culture living nearby the human

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>settlement and eating these grain based foods. I'll talk more

0:26:58.040 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 3>about that in a second. But then you have the

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 3>other subset of dogs who are involved in helping humans

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 3>with hunting or with long distance travel. So this could

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 3>be part of a sort of military class, or as

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 3>companions to people involved in trade long distance travel for

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 3>trade or for gathering materials of some kind. So these

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 3>dogs would travel around and exist more maybe on hunting

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and foraging, or maybe just they would be fed what

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the humans were eating while traveling, and humans while traveling

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 3>might be subsisting more on you know, freshly hunted game

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 3>or something. So, whatever the reason, these dogs have a

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 3>more diverse diet or they're eating more meats, whereas most

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 3>dogs at can Rokatta over the ages stay close to

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the human settlement and eat grain based foods. So this

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 3>dog you know, almost vegetarianism or semi vegetarianism appears to

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 3>be not a result of dogs foraging for human scraps

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 3>and all that's left over as grains, but instead, the

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 3>authors argue it's evidence of a deliberate feeding regime controlled

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>by humans. And as evidence of this, the authors point

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to consistency in the values of these nutritional inputs, which

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 3>they interpret to mean that humans were preparing their dog's food. So,

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>when we think about the evolution of domestic dogs from

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 3>their wild ancestors, sometimes this dietary adaptation of dogs, you

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 3>know that coming from a carnivorous evolutionary heritage and moving

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>into a more flexible omnivorous diet. Sometimes this is presented

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 3>as a pure accident of evolution that nobody planned, you know,

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 3>like proto dog. The story often goes that proto dogs

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>ate scraps leftover from human hunter gatherers, and the ones

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that were behaviorally more compatible with proximity to humans and

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 3>metabolically more coll a rent of human food, these would

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>have a survival advantage, and they began to branch off

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 3>from their wild ancestors. But at least within the prehistoric

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Bronze Age Iberian setting. Here, the exposure to an omnivorous

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 3>diet is no longer an accident. At this point. It's

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 3>not just that the dogs are eating whatever's around and

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 3>that's forcing them to adapt to a more omnivorous diet,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 3>because the dogs don't seem to be just getting leftovers

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of whatever the humans happened to be eating. The humans

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 3>seem to have been fully feeding the dogs a deliberate

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 3>grain heavy diet even when the humans were eating other things.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 3>And now that's interesting, why would they do that? While

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 3>the authors talk about how, you know, these were not pets,

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 3>obviously they were working dogs, so they'd be involved in

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of tasks like animal herding would be a

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 3>big thing, or you know, sometimes they were used for

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 3>moving loads, you know, moving loads across the ground on

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>sledges of some kind, whatever the they're doing. You don't

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 3>want your working dogs to be distracted from their work

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 3>trying to run off and forage for food because they're hungry.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 3>So it kind of makes sense to stuff them with

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>calorie dense, abundant, grain based foods so they have plenty

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>of energy and they're not tempted to stray from tasks

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 3>to go get a bite to eat.

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially if that bite to eat might be the

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>animals they're hurting.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even worse. Yeah, So I don't know. Interesting in

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 3>this context that you go back three thousand years ago

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 3>in the Iberian Peninsula and people are feeding their dogs.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not necessarily going to be milk bones, but they're

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>feeding them some kind of grain based food as a

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 3>core staple of their diet and doing so deliberately.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, really fascinating. Again, the roots here digging far

0:30:52.400 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>deeper into the past than I anticipated. Now at this point,

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 2>we're going to fast forward a bit and we're going

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to we're going to move to the ancient Romans. Generally,

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna be looking at the imperial era here. First,

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I thought we might consider this line from the Roman

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 2>poet Juvenile from his second century CE work Satire five.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I shall read it here for you is a dinner

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>worth all the insults with which you have to pay

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>for It is your hunger so importunate. That means troublesomely urgent,

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>when it might, with greater dignity be shivering where you

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 2>are and munching dirty scraps of dog's bread.

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 3>So juvenile? Is Chriswell? Am I getting that right?

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Chriswell predicts, Yeah, yeah, pretty much. Here's predicting in

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a way, right, talking about dog bread a Pannis Canarius.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 2>So what is he talking about here? Will? I had

0:31:58.160 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to dig into this a little bit more. And what

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>he's to here is at once actually bread for dogs,

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 2>but also maybe not quite bread cooked just for dogs.

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>According to Consuelo Manetta in Our Daily Bread in Italy,

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 2>it's meaning in the Roman period and today this is

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a material culture of twenty sixteen. Bread making technologies reached

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 2>a high point of production during the Roman Imperial period,

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so there were a great many different bread products, including

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 2>different breads for soldiers and sailors, such as you know,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 2>hard tack like product, high quality breads, breads with clay

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 2>added and also bread for dogs.

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I love the bread with clay added.

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I didn't. I didn't have time to follow

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 2>that tangent. But I mean, you know, things have been

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>added to bread throughout history to sort of bulk it up,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to make up for lack of ingredients and so forth.

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So the general idea, though here alluded to by Juvenal,

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 2>is that there were different types of due to where

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 2>they stood in the bread making process and then what

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 2>social classes were given to dine on them. Dog bread

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 2>was the lowest quality bread possible made as a byproduct,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, from the scraps that were left over from

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the milling process, so namely brand and husks, and was

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>generally considered suitable only for dogs and was apparently fed

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>to dogs. Like it's not just a situation where it's like, oh,

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 2>only a dog could eat that, but humans do. Like

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 2>this was also bread that was given expressly to dogs.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 3>That sounds like health food now, right, wouldn't this be

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 3>high fiber?

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, and that that is that's where we're going

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 2>with this. Yeah, really, this is where we come back

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to this idea of like working dogs deserving a working

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.479
<v Speaker 2>dog's meal. But then also it gets into very there

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>are various class attributes to it as well. So here's

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>a quote from another work. This is from Marcus Tarentius

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Varro's on Agriculture, and the author writes a lot about

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the upkeep of a farm and all the stuff that

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 2>goes into it, talks a good bit about dogs working dogs,

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and at one point writes quote, the food of dogs

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>is more like that of man than that of sheep.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 2>They eat scraps of meat and bones, not grass and leaves.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 2>But then he later says you should also feed them

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 2>barley bread, but not without soaking it in milk, for

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 2>when they have become accustomed to eating that kind of food,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>they will not soon stray from the flock.

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 3>M Okay, So you give the dog good food to eat,

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 3>yummy food, bread soaked in milk, it's not gonna run away.

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Right right, And it's not going to bite your flock

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. And the bread he's advising to be

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 2>soaked in milk would be the aforementioned dog bread. Now

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 2>another take on bread and dogs in the Roman world.

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I was reading in Around the Roman Table, Food and

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Feasting in Ancient Rome. This is by Patrick Fass. He

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 2>points out that when you were having like a fancy,

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 2>upper class theatrical Roman dinner. After the main course, like

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>before dessert, bread is passed around for guests to wipe

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>their mouths and hands, and then given to the dogs

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:15.479
<v Speaker 2>quote who were dedicated to Hecate, the goddess of night

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 2>and witchcraft. So bread here used just as like a

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 2>precursor to the napkin or a napkin substitute, and then

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 2>given to the dogs, who will gladly eat it because

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>it is bread, and it also maybe has a little

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 2>extra fun flavoring based on whatever was on your hands

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 2>and on your mouth.

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 3>This is interesting because the use of bread as napkins here,

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 3>which I don't think I was aware of this before,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 3>but it reminds me of the widespread use of bread

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 3>products as essentially plates or other you know what we

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 3>would use plates for today. You know the idea of

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 3>the trencher that you'd eat food out of a big

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 3>piece of stale bread, and then afterwards you might throw

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 3>that bread to the dogs or maybe to the poor

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in some contexts.

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And in this case especially the bread that

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 2>you're using is of course maybe not ideal for human consumption,

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 2>but the dogs are game. I was reading Bread and

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Bones Feeding Roman Dogs published in Classical World twenty twenty

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 2>one by Sarah M. Harvey, and she gets into a

0:36:14.400 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 2>good bit of this, and some of her key points

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 2>are that, first of all, providing a plan diet to

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 2>your dog, generally like a working dog, a hunting dog,

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 2>a guard dog, a sheep dog was a status symbol.

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Like here, I am an elite owner of an elite dog,

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 2>and it's an extension of my place in society that

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I give my dog what is considered a proper diet,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 2>the kind of diet that is written about. It works

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>like on agriculture, so my dog is where well cared for,

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.479
<v Speaker 2>well fed, and fed on a regular schedule. That's something

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 2>that she stresses as well. Meanwhile, that doesn't mean every

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>dog in the Roman Imperial Roman world is eating like

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this common dogs. They're going to maybe be fed more

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 2>on table scraps. But dog bread was thought to be ideal,

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 2>especially again for working dogs, dogs that need a lot

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 2>of energy to do whatever they're doing. Dogs that you

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 2>want to look very healthy and robust in the case

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 2>of a guard dog, but also but not like fat

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 2>and lazy. You want the dog to be a little

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 2>bit intimidating. I guess, so the ideal was a grain

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>heavy diet, but she points out that evidence suggests that

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 2>dog diets at the time had a high level of

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 2>animal protein, and this might have been due in part

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.479
<v Speaker 2>to availability, so you know, you would still have meat

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 2>on hand post hunt, post butchery activities, but also it

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 2>might have been just the place where experience and tradition

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 2>meet literary ideals. So there's there's what was recommended and

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 2>what was you know, the ideal dog meal. But then

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 2>in reality there's still going to be a certain amount

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of feeding the scraps to the dogs, and it's going

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 2>to be different depending on, you know, what level of society. Now,

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 2>another source that I looked at was a melting pot

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 2>of Roman dogs north of the Alps with high phenotypic

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and genetic diversity and similar diets by Granado at All.

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 2>This was in scientific reports from twenty twenty three and

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 2>it indicates that there are quote numerous archaeological, epigraphic and

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 2>literary evidence for dog food in the Roman Empire that

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 2>show a large proportion of vegetable components cereals, bread made

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 2>of barley, wheat or spelt, and a minor component of meat, bones, milk,

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 2>and whey. But they also point out it is known

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 2>that the Romans were feeding their dogs differently according to

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 2>a number of factors, including function and age, but most

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 2>likely the majority of Roman dogs were relying primarily on

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 2>table scraps. So again, there's the ideal, and there's like

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 2>sort of the high class, you know, elite diet for

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the dogs, and then there's what is maybe the reality

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 2>just throughout dog owning culture at the time in the area.

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 3>But it sounds to me like you're saying that even

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 3>in the Roman context, while we did have these prescriptions

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 3>for certain ways to prepare grain based or bread products

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 3>for dogs that were thought of as ideal, these would

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 3>not be mass produced dog biscuits like we think of today.

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 2>This would be just a byproduct of the breadmaking industry

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that was at large in the area at the time. Yeah,

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:29.919
<v Speaker 2>to really find the origin of like the modern industrial

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 2>specified dog biscuit, we have a very specific origin story,

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 2>which is always nice, especially for covering on a show,

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 2>and it's a Victorian innovation. Generally, most sources point to

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a singular Victorian innovator, and that is James Spratt. He

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 2>was a British born American inventor and entrepreneur, and generally,

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 2>from what I was reading, just a great salesman, great marketer.

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 2>And he was at the time he was traveling a

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 2>back and forth between America and England at the time,

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 2>selling his own patented lightning rods. And the story goes

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 2>that he was in he was in England, he was,

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, at the docks, and he saw some dogs

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>eating some hardtack. I guess some sailors gave them some

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of this, you know, the hard bits of bread that

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 2>are meant for rations. The dogs were loving it, and

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 2>he had this epiphany, I should make bread just for

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.320
<v Speaker 2>dogs and market it as such, And in eighteen sixty

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 2>he started doing it. The product Sprats Meat fibrine dog Cake,

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 2>with the target audience being English sporting dogs, or rather

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the owners of fine English sporting dogs. So already it's

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.399
<v Speaker 2>fascinating how that lines up with so many different things

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about here.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so appealing to the owners who think that their

0:40:55.680 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 3>dog is special and that this product will cater to

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the specialness of their animal.

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely, yeah, it is an elite, an elite and

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 2>specialized diet for special dogs. And there's prestige tied up

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>into it and everything. So I was reading an article

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 2>about this from the Hagley Museum and Library, and they

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 2>point out that that Spratt was just a masterful marketer

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 2>on this, successfully selling a product that, to be clear,

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 2>people didn't actually need, like the dogs, the dogs.

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 3>That people weren't like, what am I going to feed

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 3>my dog?

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Right? Like, yeah, we'd figured. I'm not saying that dogs

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 2>necessarily had the best diet in all cases, but a

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 2>certain equilibrium had been attained, and so the dogs at

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the time, they say, were probably eating mostly take table scraps.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It seemed to work out. But he pushed this really hard,

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 2>like he was traveling around presenting this. At the eighteen

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 2>seventy six Centennial Exhibition in the US, he presented that

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 2>he sold it to the American Kennel Club and reportedly

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>introduced the idea there were appropriate foods for different dog

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 2>life stages. Now, I think maybe the Romans had some

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 2>version of this as well, And I think in general,

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 2>if you were feeding a very old dog as opposed

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to a young dog, you might at some point realize, well,

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe they do need something different, at least structurally. But yeah,

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>the idea is that he like just really dug into this,

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and it was like, Yeah, there's a market for this,

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and then I can expand that market and I can

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>go after different sorts of clientele. Now you can look

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 2>up there's all there. You know, this is an age

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>from which we have a number of surviving advertisements. You

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 2>can find images of what these biscuits looked like. I

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 2>recommend them. I mean, I recommend checking out the advertisements. Again,

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I cannot speak for the dog cakes, the historic dog cakes,

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 2>but you can look up images of them, and they

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 2>did not look like bones. They looked more like a biscuit,

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, like an English biscuit, like some sort of

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 2>a big square cookie type thing.

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 3>I bet the dogs didn't mind.

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 2>No, no, they present Probably they love them. But more

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to the point, the humans that had the dogs loved them. Now,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the dog bone shape, like the

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 2>popularity of that that also seems to have a specific

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 2>origin story, or at least there's one that's the moment

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that's fairly popular. And I was reading about this in

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 2>an article by Michael Waters, an Atlas Obscura article titled

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 2>how an organic chemist invented the bone shaped dog treat

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.719
<v Speaker 2>from twenty seventeen and it takes us to nineteen oh

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 2>seven and organic chemist Carlton ellis an American inventor who

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 2>was also involved in the creation of both margarine and polyester.

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Two of my favorite things.

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, this one isn't I guess mentioned as much,

0:43:55.880 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 2>but like I think margarine and polyester his contributions. They

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 2>are a little more famous. But he was supposedly called

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in to help a local slaughterhouse with its waist milk

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 2>problem and came up with a dog biscuit byproduct based

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 2>on said waste. The problem dogs didn't really want to

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 2>eat them when they started producing these things prototypes presenting

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 2>them to the dogs, and the story goes that on

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 2>a whim they tried shaping them like a bone, and well,

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 2>suddenly the dogs love them. The milk bone was born

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 2>and was purchased by Nibisco in nineteen thirty one, promoted

0:44:30.320 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 2>as a dessert for dogs.

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm skeptical at several levels. Mean, the dogs didn't want them.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 3>As I've said before, in my experience, most dogs are

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 3>not very picky. I mean, they'll eat almost anything, and

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 3>so I don't know what would have to be wrong

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 3>with it for them not to want to eat it.

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 3>But then also so they didn't change the taste, they

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 3>just changed the shape, and then the dogs wanted them.

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 2>That is the story.

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, color me skeptically.

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think they're or maybe a few things

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 2>going on here. First of all, if this were an

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 2>embellishment of the origin of a particular invention, it would

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 2>not be the first. I mean, sometimes invention stories are

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 2>tweaked a little bit to give it a little more

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 2>of a story shape. Suddenly something that is just the

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, the byproduct of just trying different things, becomes

0:45:18.760 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>inspiration from a dream and so forth. So it's possible

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 2>that this is just a more fun version of what

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 2>actually happened. It's also been pointed out that it could

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 2>be the novelty factor they have. You know, who knows

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 2>how many There may be more data on this out there,

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 2>and I just didn't run across it, you know, however

0:45:38.960 --> 0:45:42.480
<v Speaker 2>many dogs we had. They're being presented with different examples

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 2>of the biscuit, and then here's one that's shaped like

0:45:44.760 --> 0:45:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a bone. It could just be that it's a novel shape.

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Dogs are curious and intelligent. They were like, what is this?

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 2>It looks different from the others, and then they were like, wow,

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 2>he loves it. He loves the dog shape. We're going

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 2>with that.

0:45:57.640 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 3>You mean the bone shape?

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sorry. Not the dogs that would be though,

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that would also make sense. That's the kind of thing

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:06.520
<v Speaker 2>that that humans would go for as well. He knew

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that it was shaped like himself, and so he ate it.

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 2>He knew it was for him that sort of thing.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 3>But because you are what you eat, it meant he

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:17.879
<v Speaker 3>wanted to become, come into himself and become the dog

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 3>he always dreamed.

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 2>He could be. Yeah, canine philosophy one on one. But

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 2>but no, I think we could all acknowledge that, like

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the true genius of this is that it appealed to

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the humans. Like the treat is shaped like a bone.

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Dogs need a bone, dogs want to bone, And this

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 2>is something that is this is an industrial product, but

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 2>then it is shaped like this natural thing. I mean,

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the same thing works on us, right, I mean there

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 2>are products where we take the mag that's an example,

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 2>or I don't know, like even things that don't make

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense, like a little you know, sort

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 2>of like cheese snack shape it like a goldfish. Suddenly

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 2>it's exciting suddenly it has this natural world component and

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>it feel like something that you would of course want

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to eat and not something that you would just like,

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, pelt other children with.

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember vividly when I was a young child getting

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 3>really excited for a super Mario shaped ice cream treat. Yeah,

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 3>like Mario head, And I think, can this be true?

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Like his nose was a gumball. I don't know, did

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 3>that come from a dream? That doesn't make any sense.

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You don't follow gum Maybe so I mean they I mean, yeah,

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean I loved there were some ice pops when

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I was a kid that were shaped like the different

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 2>They weren't like it wasn't a universal monster's official product,

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.720
<v Speaker 2>but they was like they were shaped like a mummy

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and a vampire and so forth, And of course I

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:47.360
<v Speaker 2>loved that. Now, like even today, it's like you you know,

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 2>you see a SpongeBob SquarePants ice ice cream pop. You know,

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the taste does not I'm assuming the taste profile is

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 2>not something I would dig. But you can tell my

0:47:56.680 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 2>children go crazy for it because we have taken this

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, highly processed thing and made it look like

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 2>a beloved character.

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my daughter can absolutely taste that this cracker is

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 3>shaped like mickey. Yeah, it's just mickey. Yeah.

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So so again, any way you cut it, though, I think

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to a brilliant marketing on the part

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 2>of the milk bone architects here, and it's one that's

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 2>still with us. It just, I don't know, it just

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 2>feels right. As a non dog owner, there's just I

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 2>can say that it just feels right that a dog

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:30.800
<v Speaker 2>should have a treat that is shaped like a bone.

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 2>It's almost like, on some level we realize that maybe,

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe in a way, the dog shouldn't be

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 2>eating a highly industrial bread product.

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we feel guilty about their level of domestication, the

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 3>fact that we're feeding them something that doesn't seem like

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:53.439
<v Speaker 3>part of their natural diet. They should be running down

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 3>an elk and you know process you're just chewing through

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 3>its corpse. But we can leave he ate some of

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 3>that feeling of guilt by giving them this highly processed

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 3>grain based or milk protein product that is, you know,

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 3>shaped like a like the part of a dead animal

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 3>that they really desire.

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we should lean into this more that we

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 2>should go beyond the bone. We should have it shaped

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 2>like elk skulls, you know, you know, big chunks of

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 2>rib and so forth. Someone has probably already done this.

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Guts like freets that are shaped like guts and organs.

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Three day old rotting guts, you know, something the dog

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 2>would really want to get into.

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 3>You know, really, the milk bone makes a lot more

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 3>sense than the micrib, because dogs, given the opportunity, a

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.439
<v Speaker 3>lot of dogs will eat bones. They'll crack them open,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 3>and you know they'll get the swallow pieces of them.

0:49:46.880 --> 0:49:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Humans don't usually eat bones, I think. Is so I

0:49:49.840 --> 0:49:52.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know, the mic rib is actually more mysterious.

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, now, you know, I have to have to

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge here. I am. I'm a vegetarian, so I eat

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of faux meats, and a lot of the

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 2>faux meat experience is take plant, make plant feel and

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 2>taste and look like meat. So I mean it's like

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm doing the same thing to myself.

0:50:11.040 --> 0:50:14.399
<v Speaker 3>As someone in a weird middle category who I do

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 3>actually eat meat, but I also sometimes eat you know,

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 3>imitation meats, and I find that the visual appearance actually

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:27.280
<v Speaker 3>makes a significant difference in the eating experience. Yeah, yeah,

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 3>it's you know, you hear people talk about in food

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 3>science that that that site is, you know, a really

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 3>important part of the eating experience, and sometimes you're inclined

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 3>to doubt that, but I don't know, it's it's true.

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Like sometimes it's the only way you can go after it.

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Take imitation bacon for example, Listeners, perhaps I'm wrong, Perhaps

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 2>there is a really good imitation bacon non the meat

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 2>bacon bacon option. In my experience, however, no such thing exists.

0:50:58.239 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 2>But the best we can do is we can make

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 2>it look like bacon, and we can make it kind

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 2>of like crisp like bacon in the same way, like

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 2>we can go after the tactile experience and the visual

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 2>experience of the bacon and at least try and get

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 2>that part, even if the flavor profile is not quite

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 2>there yet.

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 3>How that compares to the bacon strips unclear.

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Now, if you're just discovering stuff to blow your mind,

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 2>we just want to remind you that we've been an

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 2>audio podcast for a long time at this point, and

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 2>you can find a full archive of the episodes we've

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 2>done over the years wherever you get your podcasts. Just

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 2>look for stuff to blow your mind, and once you've

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 2>found us, whatever your favorite platform is just rate review,

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 2>subscribe all of that. It really helps us out.

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, most of all. Please obviously you know, do what

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 3>you want to do, but if you feel like subscribing,

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 3>that would be great. It would mean a lot to us.

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:54.839
<v Speaker 3>We would love it, you know, so huge, thanks as

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 3>always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If you

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 3>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 3>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 3>for the future, or just to say hello let us

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 3>know how you found out about the show, you can

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 3>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.