1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,680
Speaker 1: President Trump has ended weeks of speculation about whether he

2
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:08,840
Speaker 1: has recordings of his conversations with former FBI director James Comey.

3
00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:12,440
Speaker 1: About five minutes ago, the President treated tweeted that he

4
00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,560
Speaker 1: had no idea whether there are tapes or recordings of

5
00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:19,800
Speaker 1: my conversations with James Comey, but quote but I did

6
00:00:19,800 --> 00:00:23,480
Speaker 1: not make and do not have any such recordings. Again,

7
00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:26,760
Speaker 1: President Trump tweeting that he has no idea if there

8
00:00:26,760 --> 00:00:30,160
Speaker 1: are Comy tapes or recordings, but he did not make any.

9
00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:32,879
Speaker 1: There's a new lawsuit against Trump over his staff not

10
00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:36,599
Speaker 1: saving other kinds of records. A watchdog group says that

11
00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:40,640
Speaker 1: Trump and his staff are using messaging applications that automatically

12
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:43,440
Speaker 1: delete the contents as soon as they're read, and the

13
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:47,320
Speaker 1: Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics or Crew want a court

14
00:00:47,320 --> 00:00:50,639
Speaker 1: to order the administration to comply with federal record retention

15
00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:53,880
Speaker 1: laws and save those joining me as Bloomberg News reporter

16
00:00:54,040 --> 00:00:58,200
Speaker 1: Andrew Harris, Andrew, what does federal law require as far

17
00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:02,040
Speaker 1: as emails and texts? So the presidents Well, this is

18
00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:05,080
Speaker 1: in part an outgrowth of Watergate. We've heard Watergate talked

19
00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,360
Speaker 1: about a lot in the context of the Trump presidency,

20
00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:10,520
Speaker 1: but one of the things that it gave birth to

21
00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:14,360
Speaker 1: is the Presidential Records Act, which requires retention to records

22
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:18,440
Speaker 1: at least as long as the president deems that they're necessary.

23
00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:20,400
Speaker 1: But before they can be the leaded, they have to

24
00:01:20,440 --> 00:01:24,520
Speaker 1: ask an archivist if they can be deleted. Um. So

25
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:28,440
Speaker 1: the use of an email app or an email like

26
00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:32,360
Speaker 1: app that automatically erases messages after they've been read, uh,

27
00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:37,319
Speaker 1: if true, would fly in the face of those rules. Now,

28
00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:43,119
Speaker 1: how does Crew know or suspect that these are being deleted? Well,

29
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,520
Speaker 1: that's a fair question, and even Crew concedes that they

30
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:49,760
Speaker 1: are going off of press reports from the Washington Post

31
00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,840
Speaker 1: and the Wall Street Journal asserting uh that sources say

32
00:01:53,880 --> 00:01:58,120
Speaker 1: that White House staffers are using these apps. Which apps

33
00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:01,760
Speaker 1: are they allegedly using? One of them is called Confide,

34
00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:05,880
Speaker 1: which apparently boasts that if you wave your finger across

35
00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:09,079
Speaker 1: the text, it magically evaporates, and another one that's more

36
00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:13,280
Speaker 1: commonly known called signal uh, for which you can set

37
00:02:13,320 --> 00:02:16,840
Speaker 1: a time after which the message will in good morning,

38
00:02:16,919 --> 00:02:21,720
Speaker 1: Mr Phelps fashion self destruct. Has a White House responded

39
00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:25,800
Speaker 1: to this not officially no, which is um? You know,

40
00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:28,280
Speaker 1: for those of us in the covering the courts in

41
00:02:28,320 --> 00:02:31,040
Speaker 1: the White House business a little bit enervating, but no,

42
00:02:31,320 --> 00:02:33,960
Speaker 1: we haven't gotten an answer yet. Now we cannot ignore

43
00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:38,440
Speaker 1: Trump's use of Twitter and crew makes claims about his

44
00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:43,160
Speaker 1: deleting posts on his personal Twitter account. Does that count

45
00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:46,880
Speaker 1: for the record retention? Well, they say it does, and

46
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,919
Speaker 1: for you know, the president, this is his preferred way

47
00:02:49,919 --> 00:02:52,680
Speaker 1: of communicating with the masses. He goes, you know, not

48
00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:56,680
Speaker 1: only over our heads, but over the heads of media generally,

49
00:02:56,800 --> 00:03:00,440
Speaker 1: and talks right to the people. But apparently on a occasion,

50
00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:05,959
Speaker 1: um cor feffi aside, he will delete one of his messages.

51
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:08,160
Speaker 1: It's things that we all do from time to time,

52
00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:10,040
Speaker 1: but we're not all subject to the same rules and

53
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:15,400
Speaker 1: regulations about presidential communicators as the president. What does the

54
00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:19,240
Speaker 1: archivists do? I mean, is the archivists taking down all

55
00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:22,200
Speaker 1: the tweets as they come in? That that that is

56
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:24,880
Speaker 1: a good question that I apologize is beyond my camp.

57
00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:28,840
Speaker 1: I don't know. So, um, let's talk a little bit

58
00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:32,840
Speaker 1: more about the kinds of recordings that are covered by

59
00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:37,520
Speaker 1: this law. Is it anything that happens in uh in

60
00:03:37,600 --> 00:03:40,720
Speaker 1: the White House? Can it possibly be all those records,

61
00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:45,840
Speaker 1: all those The notion behind this is that for future

62
00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:51,280
Speaker 1: historians and for the record, public records generally that presidential

63
00:03:52,160 --> 00:03:57,119
Speaker 1: record keeping, deliberations, certainly emails about which we have spoken

64
00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:02,280
Speaker 1: a lot over the years, UM, are evidence of presidential

65
00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:05,880
Speaker 1: decision making and policymaking, and that even though the president

66
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:10,680
Speaker 1: isn't covered by the Freedom of Information Act UH, after

67
00:04:10,720 --> 00:04:13,720
Speaker 1: a time, those records do become public records and they

68
00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:16,760
Speaker 1: are accessible, or at least they're supposed to be, but

69
00:04:16,880 --> 00:04:20,040
Speaker 1: they can't be accessed if they don't exist. Well, while

70
00:04:20,120 --> 00:04:23,640
Speaker 1: you're on, I have to ask your reaction to this

71
00:04:23,800 --> 00:04:28,200
Speaker 1: latest tweet, which is, UM, I have no idea whether

72
00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:32,719
Speaker 1: there are tapes or recordings of my conversations with James Comey,

73
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:35,520
Speaker 1: but I did not make and do not have any

74
00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:39,800
Speaker 1: such recordings. What do you make of that? I I

75
00:04:40,360 --> 00:04:43,400
Speaker 1: make of that that that is a very carefully worded

76
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,480
Speaker 1: UH thing that some people in the legal field were

77
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,880
Speaker 1: call a non denial denial. I don't know if they

78
00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:52,000
Speaker 1: are records, but if there are records, I didn't make

79
00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:55,360
Speaker 1: them and I don't have them, which certainly doesn't say

80
00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:58,599
Speaker 1: that they don't exist. I know you're a lawyer, and

81
00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:01,000
Speaker 1: you can go back to that at anytime, because you

82
00:05:01,080 --> 00:05:03,719
Speaker 1: have in Washington, d C. At least because you have

83
00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,440
Speaker 1: all the legal speak down. So what's the next step

84
00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,919
Speaker 1: on this, on this, are we going to hear a

85
00:05:10,000 --> 00:05:13,719
Speaker 1: legal uh return from the White House? Yeah, at some

86
00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:19,120
Speaker 1: point the administration's attorneys will respond to the complaint. It

87
00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:22,520
Speaker 1: was only filed earlier this morning, really really at the

88
00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:26,560
Speaker 1: very break of the business day, and the administration has

89
00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:29,760
Speaker 1: time to respond to it. Uh. That will probably be

90
00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,920
Speaker 1: in the form of emotion to dismiss the lawsuit, and

91
00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:35,480
Speaker 1: failing that they'll be compelled to file an answer or

92
00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:38,159
Speaker 1: a tweet. Andrew, you never know. Thanks so much for

93
00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:42,160
Speaker 1: joining us on Bloomberg Law. That's Bloomberg News reporter Andrew Harris,

94
00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:46,120
Speaker 1: and he has a story out on this, this latest

95
00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:48,839
Speaker 1: actually legal suit by Crew