WEBVTT - Ray Dalio Discusses Major Financial Crises (Podcast)

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Dear Lord, I have an extra special guest. His name

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is Ray Dalio. I could have sat and chat with

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Ray for hours and hours. His newest book is Principles

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for Navigating Big Debt Crisis, and it is a masterful

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>three volume set on what the debt crises around the

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>world look like throughout history. He does detailed case stories

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>about three of the biggest ones, the Great Financial Crisis

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of oid O nine, the Great Depression, and then what

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>took place in Germany. And then there are forty eight

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>case studies or forty six case studies about other debt crises.

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>He really provides an education for central banks going forward

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>as to what they need to do to avoid these

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of problems in the future, and when they happen,

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>how to make them less painful. It's a master work

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and I expect it's gonna be on central bank bookshelves

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for decades and decades to come. This is would also

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>be a good time to mention we have coming up

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business Live with Ray Dalio. Uh and keep

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>your ears open for that. We're gonna do a live

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>broadcast going over the book. You could get the PDF

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the book for free. The Kindle version is fifteen

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars in this behemoth is about fifty bucks, So free pdf.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to argue with that. With no further ado,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>my conversation with Ray Dalio. My extra special guest this

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>week is Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates out of

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>his apartment over forty years ago. He is presently co

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>chairman and co c i O of the firm, which

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>manages a hundred and sixty billion dollars in assets. Bridgewater

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps has made more money for clients than any other

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund in history. Rather than waste a lot of

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>time with the introduction, I just want to say, Ray Dalio,

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.919
<v Speaker 1>welcome back to Bloomberg. Thanks for having me back. Before

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>we get to the new book. Last year, you were

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>here right after Principles came out, and knowing how you

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>look at the world as a giant experimental learning opportunity.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>What did you learn on the tour to promote the book?

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I was I was surprised at how curious and interactive

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>people were. Um, I went on social media and that's

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a place that I thought I'd never go on. And

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>uh and I thought probably was a snarky place and

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a little um hasn't been for me. You know, there

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of curious people out there were eager

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn, and I'm good people. I'm having great conversations

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>with them back and forth. Uh take a little bit

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of time to do it. And uh so I was

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>most surprised about those things you embrace as part of

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>your process, both radical transparency and a pure meritocracy. If

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>someone has a good idea, it doesn't matter where it

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from. Well, the markets teach you humility. You know,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you're never a dent, you're being right in any way.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that what that taught me is that I

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>love to have my views challenged and so to learn

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the art of thoughtful disagreement. That's not a fight, it's

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a curiosity experience. That's a great phrase, the art of

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful disagreement. So now you write a second book, I

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you go sixty years without ever writing

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a book, and then you put out to really, this

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is a really substantive book in three years. What what

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is the hurry? What's the rush to get all this

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>writing done so quickly? Well, like my other book, a

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of the principles that I had in this book

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>were written over a long period of time, a lot

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of the research, and then I was asked by a

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>number of policy makers on others UH to write this

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>book on for the tenth anniversary of the financial crisis,

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>because um, they said that there's no book that you

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can go to that really gives the lesson that happen

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Now other words, we're going to

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>focus a lot on the two thousand and eight financial crisis,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's good, but um, it's like looking at one

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>case of a disease. If you really want to understand

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that how the disease transpires, you have to see pretty

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>much them all and then understand how they work on

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>average and how they deviate. And that was the purpose

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of the book. So the timing was the big thing,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and then a shove from other people. You don't want

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to get too lost in the weeds on any one

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>particular financial disaster. What we're trying to find is the

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent thread, the best ways to respond to them, the

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>best ways to manage them, and even heaven forbid, possibly

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>avoiding them in the future. Statement. Yeah, well, let me

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>give you an example in this particular financial crisis, a

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>lot hinged on bank capital. No other words, how he

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>rectified bank capital, liquidity and how much well capital capital.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Liquidity is different from capital, but so in other words, basically,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>capital is on your income statement, what your balance sheet

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>look like. Okay, are you out of money? Then you

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get shut down. Liquidity is the money that comes in.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You can have no bank capital and plenty of liquidity

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and be fine if they don't have marked the market accounting.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>So like by going through the crisis, which by most

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>measures was of severe or comparable severity in terms of that,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the big differences was they didn't have marked

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the market accounting. So because they didn't have marked the

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>market accounting, the solvency issue wasn't as big a deal

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't account for it as being insolved where

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity issue was. So my point is that when

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you go from one to the other, you start to

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>understand what levers and what patches. So the whole notion

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is look at the one on average, what's the typical one,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and then look at the deviations and see what causes them,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you understand how these things work. And that's

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>what the books about. So when we look at the

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>oh you don't crisis. We see most of the banks

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of capital, but they also had a

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of assets leveraged on top of the capital. How

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>significant is that leverage ratio of of capital to additional

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>leveraged assets. Well, it tells you how much of a

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>downward movement in the assets you can take. Right. If

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's if it's a bank is leverage ten to one

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and the average assets go down ten percent, you're out

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of money. Right, that's the counting. And and if you

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>don't account for that like that period of time, you

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>don't count for that exactly that way, you treat them differently,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>then you're really dealing with a liquidity case. But these

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>things happen over and over again. The same basic structure

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>happens over and over again. And I thought it was

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really really important to have a book that shows what

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that classic diseases, like, how it works one thing leads

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>to another in a certain way, and then to show

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>all of the cases. So it shows all forty eight

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>cases of bad debt crisis is over the last hundred years,

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can go into them see them one by one,

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and then it takes you through three classic ones in

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>detail takes you through them pretty much almost day by day,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can viscerally feel what they were like, and

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you could almost imagine what you would do on that day.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Um it starts with the it does it in the

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sequential order. So in the nineteen twenties the inflationary depression

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>um of Germany's Weimar Republic. And the reason I put

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that in is because depressions can be inflationary or deflationary,

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and in order to understand what makes the difference, what

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>makes them inflationary versus deflationary, wanted to put that in.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But the sequence is similar. Then then we go that's

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the end of World War One and the period in

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>between that's interesting, and then we go to the after

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>World More one. We had the twenties, and with that

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we had the set up for the ninet thirties Great Depression.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I love the way you structured this three segments. One

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is the archetypical debt cycle. The next is some detailed

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>case studies. And you look at the Great Depression, you

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the Weinmar public, you look at a way

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>A nine, and then you come up with forty eight

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>additional case studies. Each of these are a different volume

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in what effectively is a three volume set, tell us

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the thinking about this, and and tell us about the

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.599
<v Speaker 1>feedback you've gotten from people who had to manage the

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>oh eight or nine crisis. Well, I believe the same

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>things happened over and over again. And it's like a disease.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>If you don't watch all the cases you want to

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>understand them. That's kind of like doctors in emergency room.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>They do a twenty four hour shift just so they

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>can see the disease run its full course over and

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>over again, over and over again, right, and then you

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>make the connections. You know how these things work because

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>they're classic. They all happen basically in the same way.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's what I did. That's why I put

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>all of those case studies in there as a backdrop,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and then I put the template the templates. Just sixty pages.

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>You read it, you get the template. Um, yeah, no, no,

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the people, Ben Bernankee said, Ray Dali's book is the

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>most read uh as I must read for anyone who

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>aspires to prevent or manage the next financial crisis. Larry

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Summers said, a terrific piece of work by one of

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the world's top investors who has devoted his life to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>understanding the markets and demonstrating that understanding by navigating the

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight financial crisis. Um Tim Geitner said, it's

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding history of the financial crisis, including the devastating

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>crisis of two thousand eight. That's an amazing list of

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>people who were actually actually there and and running this.

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And Hank Poulson is another person who had some comments

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>in any way they I think it's um. I think

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>it's accur it. And the most important thing isn't the book.

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The most important thing that I'm really trying to get

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>at is the mechanics of the disease has described here.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Because if we can just understand and agree on the

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of these things, we make a giant leap forward.

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the mechanics are not agreed to, and

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not studied. They don't look at cases. For example,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time, there was a lot of argument that

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>printing money would bring back right, but which which showed

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental misunderstanding of what showed a fundamental misunderstanding because

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>when when more money comes into the system at the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>same time as credit is contracting, the actual amount of

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>purchasing power is not rising, and so what causes inflation

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is when more money is spent than goods and services

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are produced. Okay, And what's happening at these times is

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that money creation is making up for the contraction and credit.

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're jumping ahead to the beautiful deleveraging. Let's

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>go through the six steps as you outlined in the book,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and just a quick overview the early part of the cycle,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the bubble, the top, the depression, the beautiful deleveraging, the

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>pushing on a string, and then normalization is did I

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>get that more or less right? That's right and um,

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And basically most cycles work the same way, but there's

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when you hit a zero interest rate, then you have

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the big one. Okay. So what happens is in the

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>early part of a cycle, uh, the amount of lending

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that takes place produces a cash flow which is greater

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.119
<v Speaker 1>than the debt service payments on that that's a virtuous

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lending because credit gives buying power and depending on how

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you're using that buying power for using it to create

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>income that's greater than the debt service payments. Is a

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>self reinforcing positive cycle that normally happens in the early

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the cycle. Then it pushes asset prices up.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And what happens is that people start to extrapolate those

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>things going forward, so as the debts continue to rise,

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and they believe this is going to go higher and higher.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the belief in um, the miracle of

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the new thing, and maybe the miracle of the the

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>new Amazon or the new Tesla, or it's the nifty

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty in other years, in other words, that of the world,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and that there's not careful calculation in terms of what

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>could be paid back. We start to get into the

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bubble stage. The bubble stage is also um accompanied by

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a shadow The development of shadow banking is that consistent

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>always always. We saw shadow banking very much in O eight,

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>o nine. I was not aware until I plowed through

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this that there was a shadow banking system. Uh in

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression. There was a shadow banking system repeatedly

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, repeatedly throughout history. The way it works is

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the banks are regulated and they're controlled, and they're safe

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're overseen. But there are innovations that come outside

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of the banking system. For there's a shadow banking system.

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Now you know, in other words, private lending that takes

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>place out of the side of the banking system in

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>various ways, and it's not regulated, and there's an incentive

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to go outside the banking system because the banking system

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>being regulated and being controlled can't make as much money

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as going outside the banking system. Safer but capped right,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>watched over um. But you know, not necessarily totally say,

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but you always have the going out to that, and

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you always have the development of new vehicles, always new vehicles,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and they grow in a very fast way. Doesn't mean

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not healthy, but they grow in a very fast way.

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And you see a growth in that in lending that

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes an unsustainable growth rate that feeds on itself because

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the middlemen make money on making these kinds of loads. Um,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>those who are buying them have them go up in value,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and everybody is happy at that point. What we always

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>try to do is do the pro form of financial statements,

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in other words, how much cash is going to come

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in and come and you don't have uh, you have

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And there's the lending of seeds, the ability

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to services that's right. And in addition, you come to

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the late part of the cycle. You know, when there's

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>not much capacity to grow as fast, but the markets

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to discount a fast growth rate. The funny thing

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about markets is that they discount what they've experienced more

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>than what's likely. Like you would imagine when an economy

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.119
<v Speaker 1>is really depressed that buying large that they would discount

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that it would be pick up because it's at the

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>low part of the cycle, or when when you run

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>into the late part of the cycle, they would say

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it can't sustain that particular growth rate. And they certainly

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can't sustain that growth rate on a lot of debt,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But yet the their price to discount that, And so

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the the irony is asset prices are higher. There's much

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more leverage in the mark in the system. And so

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>why would asset prices be higher or credit spreads be

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lower when there's a lot more leverage in the price

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of everything is higher. Doesn't make sense, But that's where

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the bubble is. These are the good times, these are

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the great times, it seems right. So so then you

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>get the top and then bang, the next stop is depression. Well,

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>most typically then the top. The top usually comes through

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a combination of a tightening of monetary policy because you're

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>later in the cycle. Are the central bankers historically always

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>late to the party. Is there anything they could do

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to sort of slow it down in real time or

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>has history shown own they always are are at a

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>step History is shown that they're pretty much always allowing

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the rate of growth to be rate faster than the

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>rate of capacity to produce. And so we see a

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>shrinking labor force. We excess labor, we see as shrinking

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>utilization of excess utilization of capacity. You see those types

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of things that to put on the brakes enough ahead

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the capacity limitations. Um, you know, hardly ever takes place.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>They can't, they don't get it right, and and that's

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>partially related to this economy, but it's also partially related

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to the asset prices. The asset prices go first before

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy goes, so private equity competes with public equity

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and everything, and so you like in this cycle, you've

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>seen those asset prices go down and projected returns of

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all those assets prices go lower. You see the duration

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the assets length and duration means also price sensitive.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>A lacing um longer bo more sensitive than the product

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to the movement of interest rates. So the interest rate UM,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>so as it's become more sensitive, and then what happens

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is classically you have enough of a tightening um to

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>create the crack that usually also happens when they cash

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>flow is not in um, not positioned because there's too

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>much debt relative to the cash flow, and it starts

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the periphery of the credit markets, and then it

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>works itself down through that. So sorry, you're suggesting it

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>starts in the shadow banking market and then works its

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>way into the mainstream, so you get colts. So what

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw, no, you know, nine these non bank lenders,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the model was uh underwrite mortgages to sell to securitizers.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>They started going belly up in pretty big numbers in

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>oh six, oh seven, long before you saw any problems

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>with with the big banks. That that's typical of all

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>these cycles because at the periphery there's more aggressive lending.

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It's unregulated the leverage, right, I think about the investment

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>banks being more leveraged than the traditional banks. By way

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of example, traditional banks are all part of the party.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's the same thing now, every everybody

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is in the same hot up together. All of these cycles,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the upward cycle is self reinforcing. So let's let's get

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to the I want to jump to the beautiful deleveraging,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>which is your phrase, which I've always found to be

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a romantic phrase about something that's a fairly

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>dry economic process. Tell us about the beautiful deleveraging post

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>O eight o nine And in previous cycles, well, um,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in a normal cycle, when you have the downward move

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to get it reef moving on the positive side, they

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>get the good cycle going. You lower interest rates enough

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so that the present value discount rate for asset prices

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>goes up. You may a um it cheaper to have

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>new borrow because the monthly payments are less because of

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate is less. You and you make everybody richer.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how the cycle goes. And that seems to have

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>happened posted eight o nine. Yes, it happens in all

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these cycles. That's the normal way to happen. But what's

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>different about the eight oh nine, which is the same

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as the nine team to thirty two period, is interest rates.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's zero. When interest rates it's zero, the game changes, okay,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>because monetary policy cannot operate that way. And so two

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>times that century, that happened. And that's when century or

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>or century, that's the that's the time it happened. And

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>then what that means is the game changes. And the

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>game then has to be that you print money and

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>you buy financial asset central banks you got to do

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>that ZERP and KWI. Yeah, and that they do that

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the world. And in that since then, they built, uh,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they brought about sixteen trillion dollars. Central banks have bought

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>about sixteen trillion dollars, put about sixteen trillion dollars of

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>liquidity out in the system in financial markets, and that

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>causes financial markets to go up and produces plenty of

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>liquidity in the um. In that crisis, they also guaranteed

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of all of the debt in the

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. And that's that's just an astonishing figure. You've

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been using nineteen thirty seven as the parallel for today.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Nineteen thirty seven was kind of a scary time in history.

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It was before the rise of Nazism, was before World

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>War two. A lot of bad things were going on

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen thirty seven. Why do you draw that that parallel, Well,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I think things happening. There's a list of things happening

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen thirty two, nine nine, nineteen thirty two as

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight to two thousand nine UM,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a debt crisis and that UM where an

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates at zero and central banks had to print

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to buy a lot of financial assets,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which produced UM big rallies in the stock market and

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a big pickup in economic activity. And in seven the

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>federal reserves started to tighten monetary policy of law, and

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>there was an interest rate sensitivity associated with that. Was

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it premature UM, It's not so much premature as much

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as highly impactful in my opinion, maybe a bit of both, UM.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But the point at that time is that in doing that,

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that contributed to the wealth gap, because financial assets are

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>owned by people who have financials and poor people don't

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>have that, and to produced a wealth gap in which UM,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like now, the top intent of one percent of the

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>population's net woralth is equal to the bottom combined. So

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>so there was a there was a giant wealth gap.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And at that time there's tension between the left and

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the right, and this is true in all countries around

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the world, and so we have the emergence of populism

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>now four countries decided to go from democracies to dictatorships.

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>That happened in Italy, feet and then it happened in Germany,

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it happened in Japan, it happened in Spain, and that

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that tension produced tension inside the country and tension outside

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the country, and it produced a certain type of leader,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>which was a populist leader. So we have populism in

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>other words, of gap there that I think is very

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>important to understand. Politics now is more important than at

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>any time in my lifetime. And I've been doing this

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for fifty years. So what are we seeing in today's

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>today's um worlds of politics between the rise of Trump

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is m and what we've seen in the Philippines and

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and Britain and Brexit. Are you saying, hey, your world

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>post crisis is now dealing with a very similar ninety

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>seven UH form of popularism and leading to dictatorship. Populism

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is um when a strong individual is brought in by

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>a segment disenfranchised segment of the population, partially because of

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the economics, partially because of a sense that their culture

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>is being threatened and that there are it's anti elites,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and it is nationalistic it is protectionistic and is military istic,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and the populist has a fighter mentality. So that's that's

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>what populace. That's every financial crisis, it's the same thing.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Well in the big ones. In the big ones, you

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to get that polarity. So we have a situation

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that's like that. I think everybody would agree that the

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>nature of the situation is like that. It's producing more

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:09.479
<v Speaker 1>domestic conflict around that UM the the right becomes more

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>right and the left becomes more right left, and then

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>also more international conflict. Another key element here in the

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>thirties which were not used to is that you have

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a rise of a country to of existing power, to

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>have challenged the exist the existing power rise of a

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>new country. That was that was Japan versus the Europeans,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or Japan versus the US, and the Japan versus the

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>European powers that had colonies in the Pacific area. A

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of them had colonies that and the United States

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>UM had interest there where they were competing for natural resources.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And so when UM Japan, then UM had its economic

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>problems and wanted to grow. It needed resources to beyond

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Japan because Japan has very limited resources, so it goes

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>into takes over man Choria, northern China. There is that competition.

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>So now we're worried about resources and we start to

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>put in you know, blockades and things. And then when

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>World War two begins to break out, really nine, so

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the same phenomenon happening in Europe, where the

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>rising power was Germany. It was hobbled at the end

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of World War One, hobbled and humiliated, and as a

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>result of that, it became stronger, and it became strong

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>relative to the existing powers, and that was particularly the

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>UK and France. And as a result, we had UM

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that conflict, that that type of conflict, and over the

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>period of time, it first started economically, like in Japan,

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they UM, we would put sanctions in place, and eventually

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>when it got um more serious, then Japan took advantage

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of that because they couldn't those colonies couldn't defend themselves

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Asia, and so they invaded those areas and so

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>expanding to also get materials, rubbers and things like that.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And then UM we had then embargo their assets and

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>then eventually we embargo their oil and that led UM

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to Pearl Harbor. So thirty nine was war in Europe

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and forty one was um Pearl Harbor, and in the

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>beginning of that, I'm not saying we're going down that

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>path along those lines, but I'm saying, let's say key points. Okay, first,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're later in a short term debt cycles. So

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>there are two debt cycles. I'm referring to. One is

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the short term debt cycle. I think we're acquainted with that.

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a business cycle. You have recessions, economy gross because

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of stimulations, you run out of capacity, central bank titan

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, markets start to decline, then the economy declines,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a session and you do that

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. Those things are usually you know,

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe ten years in that facility, a little less. Then

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a long term debt cycle. And the long

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>term debt cycle is um the accumulation of those short

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>term debt cycle, but it kind of reaches its end

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when first interest rates at zero because you can't puff

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>things up with interest rate declines anymore. And then you

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>have QUI, which is then the purchase of those assets

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to cause those prices to rise a lot. And with

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>those asset prices rising a lot, you can't From that

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>point have the same impact. I want to emphasize, UM,

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the pushing on the string. That's the pushing that's

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>that's the pushing on a string phase, which is a

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>wonderful metaphor. You try and do something and nothing happens.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>You push on it, it doesn't go into the system.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And so UM, just let's take a moment here and realize, UM,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have a system in which demand is produced

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:17.479
<v Speaker 1>by credit and that UM most people are long in

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>other words, and their leverage law. UM. So the balance

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking for a healthy economy to obtain is

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>sufficient credit consumption so that consumers are out buying, businesses

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are expanding, but not such reckless issuance of credit that

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>things go haywire and you get the bubble and then

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>debt cycle that leads to a giant collapse. How do

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you get that balance? Can? Um? Is debt rising faster

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>than the income to service it, that's a bad sign.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>There maybe a lead lad but at the end of

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the day, it has to rise there UM, So that

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you have UM debt being that service payments growing faster

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>than the actual excuse me, the income growing faster than

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the debt service payments. So you're gonna need that growing

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>faster than you could service stuff. That's that's good. That's

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a good economy. That's the way the capital markets

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>should work. So when you have debt growing faster than

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the debt service payments, that's unsustainable. And at some point

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that stops and you lose that demand. So that's point one.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Point two is what is the power of the central

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>bank to keep that thing going to in other words,

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>repair that situation by lowering interest rates or buying assets

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to produce liquidity in the system, to build it up,

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>because a debt is a promise to deliver cash, and

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>when they put money into the system, it makes it

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>easier to service that debt. It lowers interest rates, causes

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>set prices. So what is the capacity of the central

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>bank when we get into serious problems, really serious problems.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>We have a situation in which we can't service that debt,

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're in a situation where the central bank policies

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.239
<v Speaker 1>aren't are not as powerful because either interest rates are

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>close to zero or the power of quantitative easing has

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>largely been used up because that balloon has been expanded,

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and also what you can buy is limited. So that's

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're at more at the end of the longer

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>term debt cycle, I wanna I want to ask you

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about the current circumstances. Can you stick around a little bit.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>We are tumbl questions we've been speaking with Ray Dalio.

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, be sure and check out

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the podcast extras, where we keep the tape rolling and

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>continue discussing all things debt crisis. You can find that

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at Apple iTunes, Bloomberg dot com, Stitcher, overcast, wherever your

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>finer podcasts are sold. We love your comments, feedback and

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Check out my daily column at Bloomberg dot

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>com slash Opinion. You could follow me on Twitter at

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>rit Holts. You could follow Ray on Twitter at Ray Dalio.

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Ritolts. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast, Ray, Thank you so

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>much for doing this. I've been looking forward to following

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up with you since our last conversation, and I have

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so many questions we did not get to before we

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>move away from big debt crises. I just have to

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you here it is. It's has anybody learned anything

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about financial crisis? Do you think we're better prepared next time?

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Or are we gonna get tenue to make the exact

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>same mistakes over and over again. We've learned some things,

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but not enough things. I think that I think people

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>more cautious, cash is higher, the lending is different. Um,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the banks have more capital. Uh, those things

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are good. I think we also, I think may put

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>some regulations in place that limit the policy makers flexibilities

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to deal with things. I think every

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>crisis is a bit different, and you can't write the

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>rules so precisely that you can deal with it anyway.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've materially changed those things. If I'm

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>looking forward, I would say when we do our financial

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers pro forma, generally speaking, there's much less of a

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>bubble around. Back in two thousand seven, when we did

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>those numbers, we could see that a lot of debt

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>problems and a debt crisis was going to come. So

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you contextualize something like the student debt crisis

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which is at all time highs or is that not

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the sort of bubble that leads to a systemic issue. Well,

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what we do is we look at each of the

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>different types. There are parts here that look like bubbles

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to us, and the question is what is how big

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are they and what are the contagious and so um

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you're so methodical, you really you bring an engineer's approach

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to this. It's the economic machine, which you've described previously.

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But even when looking at a specific type of debt,

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to know exactly how problematic it is and

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is it something that's contained within its own silo or

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>does it have the ability to infect the whole system?

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Where you need to do that and not just the

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to be granular as well as

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a big picture. So yeah, that's what we do. And

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so when we go that, I think the biggest risks

0:33:56.720 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that we see are the corporate market has increased a lot.

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of funding to um private equity

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>firms and so on. Um is that a good thing

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or a bad thing? Well, funding is good. It depends

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>on whether that debt is producing the cash flows and

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and and so on. If you have a decline in earnings,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>which will come from the next recession, fair much fair

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>amount of that debt um will be stress tested and

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.919
<v Speaker 1>they'll be issues pertaining to that. And then the other

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>UM particular imbalance that we see is the amount of

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sales that the U. S. Treasury is going to have

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to make. And so when we look about what those

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>numbers will be, particularly after the stimulus starts to taper off,

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we have we've had a big one time stimulus, particularly

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts and particularly the corporate tax cuts, and that

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>will have a fading impact at the same time as

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the budget deficits. Hence the sales of bonds will increase

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as the balance sheet is being contracted.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>When I do the calculations of who are the buyers

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of that and one of their quantities, I see an

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>imbalance in that. And so UM, that is a form

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of problems that existing. So three types of debt. You

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have household, You've corporate, you have government. Where's the biggest problem? Um? Government?

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And UM, the government debt and the corporate debt are

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problems. So let me push back on you

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and that and UM please do But UM, and what

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is not in total, okay, but government by

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and large in total. But UM, corporates, not in total,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>but in existing in certain pockets. It's going to be

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the pushback because there seems to be a whole lot

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of corporate debt, some of which seems to be with

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>good companies with good care flows and a strong ability

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>to service that debt a rated and then I don't know,

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 1>it's call at the bottom who are issuing a lot

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of debt that's a kind of junkie and of dubious

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>serviceability in the future, Or am I just being too

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>nat I think you're pretty you're pretty accurate on that.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you did triple B or double

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>by debt, and if you looked at UM leverage loans

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and which has become huge the past five years, that's right,

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and UM to finance also acquisitions a lot of private

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 1>equity acquisitions and and so on, and you looked at

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the collateralized loan obligation mark CLO market UM in terms

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of those things, there are some there are vulnerabilities that

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>exist there in terms of if incomes go down and

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're fairly covenant like, they're they're very convenent lie UM

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and so and the big growth in debt in this

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>psycho has been the corporate debt too, because when interest

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>rates were lowered to a level that was below the

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>return on equity it paid to have buy backs or

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to make acquisitions or um, and to go out there

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and have a private equity because I get a higher

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>return on the equity. So it's a great financial That's

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what you do with free money. You take it and

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you put it to where it's going to generate the

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>highest return. That's right, and so UM a lot of

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>that UM that's where the big growth is. Two things

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about that is that can't continue. First of all at

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 1>that pace, okay, so um that that problem under the

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>market will be disappearing. And then because you get leveraged

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>up to a certain point, you can't extrapolate that. But

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>then in addition to that, you know through experiences that

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there are some that you could see are going to

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>be problems when earnings get hurt. And then there are

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>some that you can't see because you haven't stress tested

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 1>whether that was done well with good asset liability matches.

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:07.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, for example, number of multinational companies bought companies

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>in other countries and they financed that with dollar denominated debt,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and when the dollar goes up and the incomes that

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they're receiving is in local currency, you have an asset

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>liability mismatch. So there are a lot of asset liability

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>mismatches that are out there that we sort of worry about.

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Those are the particular spots I would say that look vulnerable,

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not nothing like it looked to us in two thousand seven.

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But then if you go a little bit longer and

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you take the movement. Um, we also have nonfunded, non

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>debt liabilities in the form of pension liabilities and healthcare liabilities,

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>both of which widnded, that are going to come. I mean,

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to a lot of promises, promises either be

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>paid back in the form of debt or promises to

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you have money to pay pensions and all and negati

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>here that that all becomes limited and not all that produces,

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a greater squeeze, So it doesn't look as big,

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like a big bang type of thing. My concern has

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fact that it is coming at

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the same time as there's populism and the political because um,

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>we're really right now at each other's throats, the left,

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the right, the UM. I want to I want to

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>push back on that also, But before I do that,

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I just have to come back to the corporate debt.

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>What you're describing is sort of an echo boom following

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the original bubble and crash. Is that echo boom historically consistent?

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Does that always seem to happen after a debt crisis

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and collapse? Do you always get hey, things start to

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 1>repair and here we go again, or is this kind

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of unique to well? You always you always go through

0:39:55.719 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. And so when you're uh, when we we

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>are in a position where we're nine years into the

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>expansion and central banks have brought fifteen sixteen trillion dollars

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>worth of assets and made that cheap, you then mechanistically

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>have what you're calling an echo boom. You have that

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>big boom that has taken place. Happens, and that that

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>always happens. That's why you always have cycles, you know,

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you come back to seven between the politics,

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>it's ten years after that's twin years, almost ten years.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We're late in the short term cycle, relatively late, although

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say we've got probably the seventh inning of

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the short term cycle this business cycle. We're late in

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the long we're late in the long term cycle. Meeting

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the amount of ammunition is less. These are facts in

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 1>other words, the interest rate, the quei thing um. And

0:40:56.440 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we do have um a lot of populism and uh

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and clashes about wealth and culture and those things internally

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>much more than we did. And we're at the top

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>or right near the top of the cycle and the

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>markets and so on, so you can't imagine that things

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would turn down. And when things turned down, UM, my

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>big worry about that following these cycles is that political conflict,

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>social conflict worsen's because at times get worse for everybody.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's and that's that's an issue. So how do

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the politics play out? How how were we with each other?

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Can we can we approach that together or not? And

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then of course then there's the power of the central

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 1>bank to be helping us, which is less. So so

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>let me do the little bit of pushback. And you know,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we kind of all exist in a media world, in

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a social network world. But when we see these studies

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that talk to Americans about a lot of hot button issues,

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 1>once you get away from the crazy rhetoric and the divisiveness,

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>we kind of all more or less have you know,

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>six agreement on some big issues. We all agree that

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there should be less abortions if there's a way to

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>make that happen. We could disagree about whether or not

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>it should be mandatory, but there's some agreement there. There's

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>some agreement about some pretty common sense gun control laws.

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>There's some agreement about pollution and climate change. There's a

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>small group of people who don't believe it's man made,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's a small group of people who don't believe

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in small pox vaccination. But by and large, most of

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 1>America things it's a bad idea to spew chemical exhaust

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>into the into the atmosphere that we all have to

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>um breathe. So, taking what you've learned, when you've put

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:02.839
<v Speaker 1>these principles of of dead crisis together, how can we

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:07.680
<v Speaker 1>get people outside of Twitter and Facebook to focus on

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>what we have in common? Hey, we're all Americans. We

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>all share a certain common belief system. How come we

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>don't focus on what brings us together as opposed to

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>what divides us. Well, first of all, I would disagree

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with us um. I think we have a higher level

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of conflict that created a conflict gauge. The conflict gauge

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>consists of a lot of different measures of conflicts alone

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 1>go over that. I was kind of leaning in that direction. Okay,

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>but it would be UM. The polarity within the two

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>political systems, the percentage of UM those who are adamantly

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>in favor of their candidate versus adamantly opposed to the

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>other candidate. That it would be. There's a whole bunch

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of political things like uh, compromises in the bills that

0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:03.839
<v Speaker 1>are there, UM, A whole bunch of those types of

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>political things. UM. There are social value measures UM. In

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>other words, UM lots of indicators of what the parties

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think of the other side, which is um uh antagonistic

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>almost to the point of being violent in terms of

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>measuring what one side is listening to the other side.

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Any if you if you use UM, if you google

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the word google, count the word war as this thing

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>from the word peace or compromise, and so on, all

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of those measures. I could rattle on a lot. Big

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>differences in beliefs, Okay, big difference Uh. One of the

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 1>things that used to bind us more together was UM

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>certain religious produced certain UM common beliefs of Judeo Christian,

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of relief system, the appreciation for the immigrant UM. These

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>were things, in other words, where diversity was really the

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:13.200
<v Speaker 1>main sort of thanks anyway I could rattle off those.

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We so we created an index, and the Index of Conflict,

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>which is just these measures biled up UM shows that

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the conflict gauge is both within the country and within

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>most countries, is greater than it was since the thirties,

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and also between countries. So is it just the nature

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the debt cycle? Can we blame? Can you blame

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, social media, Fox News, Nancy Pelosi, Donald Trump?

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Who gets the blame for that? Or is this just

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you have a big debt crisis. Um. Yeah,

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it happens over and over again because of

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that disenfranchise and also I don't think they have much contact.

0:45:57.160 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's totally understandable. I think in the sense

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that UM, capitalism right now is not working for the

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:09.360
<v Speaker 1>majority of Americans. And I'm a hardcore capitalist. I wish

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I could. But if you take the bottom six I

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>did a study of carving out what is it like

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom I want to look at the majority. Those

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>conditions are are bad. Another hasn't been income growth theory

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>on a real basis. That's right, there's rising debt um Uh,

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>there's rising death rates to rid death rates from opiates

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>death rates, but from suicides and so on. In those

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>those conditions, less economic mobility, there's a whole ga. We

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>used to have a middle class that was on the

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>assembly line and it kind of worked. So we have

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a greater economic polarity you have. UM, so there's a

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchised group out there. That's important. UM, we're also we

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.439
<v Speaker 1>don't have that same sort of contact with each other.

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I live in Greenwich, Connecticut, in Greenwich, so

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so exemplifies this. And my um we live

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in Fairfield County, Greenwich, Connecticut. Um, it's I think still

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the wealthiest state in the United States anyway, right up there. Um,

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in that state there is one county that's rich and

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the count state pretty much as poor,

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's going in terrible situation. My wife, she does

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to work with the disengaged kids, the students who basically

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>they're just kind of coasting through school and not in

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>doing anything. Yeah, thank you for remembering. Yeah, it's um,

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 1>there's disengaged and there's disconnected. And the disengaged are the

0:47:39.680 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>kid who attends school but he doesn't study, doesn't take tests,

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>or he fails and that county is just so to

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>getting through, and then there's disconnected, which means they don't

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>know where they are. They're no longer coming to the

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>school district. Twenty two percent of the high school students

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>are one of those. Those kids are going to be

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty Those kids are going to be on the street.

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be there's a uselessness. They have to share

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>books literally, I mean in some cases sharing pencils, they literally.

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Can you do to change that? Sounds like a broken system,

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>both on the educational level and the family level. How

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:21.839
<v Speaker 1>can you possibly fix that? Well, these are um I'm

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>still answering the last question on the division right and

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that division and most people don't even have contact with it,

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I wouldn't have contact if it wasn't for my

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>wife taking me there and they in their twenty five

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.320
<v Speaker 1>miles up the road. You know, you're in Grant, Connectic

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>kit and then and there, and you go to Bridgeport

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>or you go to Hartford, and you look at what

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the daily shootings are killings in this place. Hartford, Connecticut

0:48:46.400 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>used to be the yeah, and and uh, you know,

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 1>a very fine place to be. So there is this

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>polarity we're talking about the reasons for the polarity. There's

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of reasons. I think to answer your question,

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what you need is to recognize that that that that's

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a national emergency, in other words, that capitalism has got

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to work for the majority of the people. First of all,

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 1>let's recognize that. Let's and let's establish what that polar

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>metrics around that. You you have always been such a

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>private individual most of your career. You're not a big

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past. When the books came out, you started

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>doing a little more media. This sounds like politics. I

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine any interest in running for for office or

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>you the I can't imagine it. Now, some guy who

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sits about forty feet from where we're having a conversation

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>has been talking about running in Do you think the

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:49.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of technocratic approach, the engineered approach that Bridgewater uses,

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or Mike Bloomberg, who is the owner of Bloomberg LP

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>where we're sitting right now, do you think that approach

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can help solve some of these issues. And I was

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>not planning on making a political commercial. I'm I'm sincerely

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>asking a question. These have been very, very challenging problems

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>for generations. Nobody seems to have figured out how to

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.439
<v Speaker 1>fix that. Well, I think a big I think big

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 1>progress can be made. First, UM, let's acknowledge it, let's

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>measure it, put the statistics, let's use those measurements as metrics,

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:28.960
<v Speaker 1>in other words, to own it, so that now you say,

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>if I change that number, I'm doing a good job,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or if I'm not changing that number. And then let's

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>bring about the various peoples and parties. UM various parties

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>people most importantly, who are experts who deal in those

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:47.359
<v Speaker 1>communities and understand them and make changes. Because I think

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of things that can be done

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 1>in my philanthropic efforts, and I think probably in Mike's

0:50:52.840 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>philanthropic You guys just did something with the ocean X

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollar investment to help uh folk us

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>on keeping the oceans cleaner and resolving submission. That's right,

0:51:03.400 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think people, I think we're also dealing with

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that population and a we see all the time great

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>return on investment type of things that could be done,

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and you just cannot imagine how the payoff can't be

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.399
<v Speaker 1>great on those types of things. I think you could

0:51:21.440 --> 0:51:25.359
<v Speaker 1>put together public private partnerships and that that could be

0:51:25.719 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>corporations or philanthropists together with the government to do high

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 1>return on investment. I could rattle off a bunch of

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.239
<v Speaker 1>these types of things that would help to eliminate, in

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>other words, things that pay for themselves. And think about,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cost of getting not getting through high

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>school and getting not getting a job in an individual's lifetime.

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna, it's gonna be forever. It's a it's about

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars per per per person. The that means

0:51:56.040 --> 0:52:01.000
<v Speaker 1>everything from police to courts to jails and beyond incarceration

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>is between eighty thousand dollars a year is what happens.

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And people if you don't have jobs and you're in

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a community that way, and like I support micro finance,

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and for every dollar that I give to micro finance,

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve dollars is lent out to people in the first

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:22.960
<v Speaker 1>five years and it keeps ongoing because they get paid

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>back and so on. If you look at um um

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that I could go on and on and on a

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>listening and those things, but somebody's got to take it

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 1>on right in other words, and then the other thing

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is um I think the important, the most important thing

0:52:42.080 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is to believe that we're there's a country that we

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:49.319
<v Speaker 1>are in it together, Okay, that we need to um,

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>not fight about things, but to debate, argue and then

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 1>move on to compromises and to run the country for

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole. We need to have thoughtful disagreement and principles

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>for dealing with it. Yeah, so you got me on

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>a hot street, Ray, you got my vote. So I'll

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>tell you that much I wish. I know, I have to.

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to head out. Promise me you'll come back.

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a thousand more questions for you. I can

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 1>talk to you for hours and hours. Um, this has

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely delightful. Thank you for being so generous with

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your time. Thank you for having me. It's always a

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 1>delight Um. We have been speaking with Ray Dalio, co

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bridgewater Associates. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be sure to look up and entered down an inch

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, iTunes, Overcast, Stitcher, uh, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com,

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>wherever your finer podcasts are sold. I would be remiss

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank the correct staff that puts

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this together each week. Medina Patwana is my audio engineer

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and producer extraordinaire h A Tico Valberon is our project manager.

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Riggs is our booker, slash producer producer. Michael bat

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Nick is my head of Reese Urch. I'm Barry Retolts.

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>m