WEBVTT - The Artifact: Glass Like Dough

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Radio. Hi. My name is Joe McCormick. And this

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Artifact, a short form series from Stuff to

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind, focusing on particular objects, ideas, and moments

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>in time. Glass breaks. Apart from its transparency, the brittleness

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>of glass is its defining physical feature. And yet, since

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at least as far back as ancient Rome, there have

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>been legends of a mysterious lost technology known as the

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>vitrum flexila or vitrum malleabel, glass that can bend without breaking.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>The early medieval Spanish scholar Isadore of Seville wrote about

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this now occulted substance in a vast encyclopedic work called

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Etymologies, which he compiled towards the beginning of the

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>seventh century. According to Isadore's account, during the rain of

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Tiberius Caesar, there was an ingenious craftsman in Rome who

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>invented a formula for mixing clear glass so that it

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>was flexible and pliable at room temperature. The craftsman was

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>brought for an audience with Caesar and presented him with

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a gift of a glass drinking bowl. Caesar took the

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>bowl and threw it to the floor, but unbelievably, it

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>did not shatter. The craftsman retrieved the bowl and showed

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that instead, the impact had only left a dent, as

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you might expect from a vessel made out of a

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>metal like bronze. As if this wasn't amazing enough, the

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>craftsman then produced a hammer from his tunic and proceeded

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>to pound the dent out of the glass, restoring it

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to its original shape. From here i'll quote from the

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>translation of Isadore by Stephen a Barney quote. When he

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>had done this, Caesar said to him, does anyone else

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>know this method of making glass? After the craftsman swore

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or that no one else knew, Caesar ordered him beheaded,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>lest if this skill became known, gold would be regarded

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>as mud, and the value of all metals would be reduced.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And it is true that if glass vessels became unbreakable,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they would be better than gold and silver. Whatever you

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>might accept about the bloody logic of the Roman emperor,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>there are basic physical reasons for thinking this story is

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>probably not true. As common as it is now in

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>beer bottles and car windshields, glass is in many ways

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>an exquisite material. It's transparent, it's chemically nonreactive, it can

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>be beautiful to look at when heated in a furnace.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It can be molded into almost any shape, and it's

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>usually made primarily of silica sand, which is abundant and cheap.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But the major limitation of its usefulness has always been

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that traditional silicate glass is brittle. According to Lowther wonder Check,

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>writing for the journal Science in quote, today's glass products

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>reach only a fraction of the predicted intrinsic strength because

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of their brittleness. Wonder Check explains that the main reason

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that glass breaks instead of bending is that mechanical energy

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>delivered into glass, usually quote, accumulates in the vicinity of

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>microscopic flaws and defects. This process leads to local stress concentration,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which increases with the sharpness of the tip of the flaw. Thus,

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the locally acting stress can be much higher than the

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>externally applied one, and the material fails even when supporting

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>only a low load. It doesn't seem likely to me

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that an inventor in the ancient world would have found

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a way around this brittleness, unless the substance they were

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about was not actually glass. Aside from the brute

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>physical implausibility of this story, there's some other compelling reasons

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to think it's proudly nothing more than a misinterpreted rumor

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>or fantasy. The earliest versions of the legend crop up

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in first century CE sources like the Satiricon of Petronius,

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>where it appears in the explicit context of fiction. The

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Satiricon is a sort of absurdest comic novel, involving lots

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of crude sexual humor and vignettes about werewolves and cannibalism.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>The story of flexible glass is also told by Plenty

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Elder in his first century Encyclopedia The Natural History.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>One of Isadore's sources, Plenty rights that after the invention

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was revealed quote, the manufactory of the artist was totally destroyed,

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we are told, in order to prevent the value of copper,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>silver and gold from being depreciated. I assume the logic

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>complied in the story is that Tiberius would have been

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>concerned that if glass were just as malleable as gold

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and silver, the accumulated fortunes in those medals belonging to

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the rich people of Rome, including Tiberius him self would

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>become worthless. In other words, you could think of this

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>as an early form of science fiction, utopian or dystopian,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>depending on your perspective about how a technological change could

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have led to a revolution in the class structure of

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>an empire. But whatever the political implications, Plenty expresses skepticism

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about the story, writing that it's often repeated without much evidence.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>But despite Plenty's doubts, the idea of glass that could

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>bend without breaking had a tenacious legacy. Malleable glass would

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>become one of the enduring obsessions of the alchemists of

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Ages through the Renaissance in the early Modern period,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>though many of them never made an explicit connection to

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the story of Tiberius in the Lost Technology. In a

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>article for Renaissance quarterly called Storied Objects, Scientific Objects and

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance Experiment the Case of malleable Glass, author Vera Keller

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>writes that from around the time of the thirteenth century,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the power of making alleable glass was one of the

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>wonders attributed to the Philosopher's Stone, while on the other hand,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>straightforward recipes for softening glass appeared in several books of

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>secret knowledge between the thirteen and eighteen centuries. These recipes

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>often claimed that if followed, glass could be made soft

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like leather, cloth, or even dough. Many of the recipes

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>call for the blood of a goat, while one mentioned

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>in a footnote by Keller calls for immersing glass in

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the oil of horse hoofs. Despite the great effort poured

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>into discovering the lost secret of malleable glass, it always

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>eluded us. However, today it looks like we may becoming

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>full circle on the promise of vitrum flexila. Of course,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>since the plastics revolution of the twentieth century, we've had

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.799
<v Speaker 1>lots of polymer based consumer materials that are both flexible

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and transparent, though that material may not always have the

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>exact properties of silicate glass. And even when you're talking

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>about genuine glass, there are researchers working hard to make

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it bend without breaking, often in the context of designing

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>screens for current and upcoming models of phones that can

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>fold like a wallet without cracking their screens. These innovations

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in foldable glass are explored in a February article for

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>The Verge by Sean Hollister, who quotes m I T

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor of material Science J. J. Who and explaining

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are two main tricks to making glass that

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>can bend like plastic. One of those tricks takes us

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>back to what I mentioned already about microscopic flaws and

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>defects in the structure of the glass that allow cracks

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to propagate. Researchers are trying to prevent the formation of

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>these tiny flaws through the use of special chemical baths

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and heat treatment during the manufacturing process. But the second

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>trick is thinness. While glass the thickness of a window

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>pane will probably always shatter before it bends, glass less

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>than a under in microns thick which is about the

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>width of a human hair, can fold a surprising amount,

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and once the thickness is down to a few tens

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of microns, researchers claim that the glass can fold almost

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.559
<v Speaker 1>flat upon itself without breaking and without a large hinge gap,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what the manufacturers of these phones ultimately want.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And one of my favorite details is that some of

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the new flexible glass could be created with alternative chemical compositions,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>by making the glass not out of silica, but out

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of materials like aluminum oxide, which in its condensed crystalline

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>form is what makes a Sapphire. Tune into new editions

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Artifact every Wednesday, hosted by either Robert or myself.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>As always, you can email us at contact at stuff

0:08:52.600 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from my

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.